Rhode Island TSA School: ________________________________ _________________________________________________ __________________________________ _________________________ ________ Date: ___________ Score: ________
Computer Aided Design and Drafting Drawing and Blueprint Rubric Project Name: _________________________________________
Criteria
Below Expectations
Needs Work
Meets Expectations
Exceeds Expectations
1
2
3
4
•
Accuracy
•
Less than 85% of the assigned objects/structures are drawn and/or labeled accurately.
•
Drawing is sloppy; drawing has countless smudges, erasure marks and/or ghost lines which make the information hard to read accurately.
94–85% of the assigned objects/structures are drawn accurately and are recognizable.
•
94–85% of the assigned objects/structures are labeled accurately.
•
Drawing is fairly neat but has many smudges, erasure marks and/or ghost lines. Title block is filled
94–85% of the assigned objects objects/structures are drawn accurately and are recognizable.
•
•
All assigned objects/structures are labeled accurately.
•
All assigned objects/structures are labeled accurately.
•
Drawing is neat and somewhat free of smudges, erasure marks and/or ghost lines.
•
Drawing is exceptionally neat and free of smudges, erasure marks and/or ghost lines.
Title block is completely filled out.
No items are missing in the Drawing Name, designer Name, school name and address, Date, Scale, or sheet numbers indicated.
•
Title Block
Drawing General
Title block is not filled out properly.
Two items are missing in the Drawing Name, Designer Name, School name and address, Date, Scale, or sheet numbers indicated.
Title block is filled
out.
out.
One item is missing in the Drawing Name, Designer Name, School name and address, Date, Scale, or sheet numbers indicated.
95% or more of the assigned objects/structures are drawn accurately and are recognizable.
Overall, the quality of the drawing is poor. poor.
Overall, the quality of the drawing is fair .
Overall, the drawing is good. good.
Overall, the drawing is excellent. excellent.
Major improvements are needed to be able to build from prints.
Drawing is laid out correctly, utilizing the practices covered in class and/or text.
A large amount of critical information is missing.
However, the appearance can be enhanced by a few minimal improvements. improvements.
There are several minor improvements needed to make it acceptable to build from prints.
Some critical information is missing
All critical information is present.
All critical information is present with extra reference information.
CADD Drawing Project Rubric
Total 75 Self Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation
_x 3_
_x 3_
_x 4_
_x 4_
Page 1
Rhode Island TSA School: ________________________________ _________________________________________________ __________________________________ _________________________ ________ Date: ___________ Score: ________
Dimensions
View Placement
Printed Scale
Object /structure drawn would easily be built from prints.
74% or less of the items are properly dimensioned.
75% or more of the items are properly dimensioned.
Over 85% of the items are dimensioned dimensioned properly.
•
74% or less of the object’s or structure‘s views are used and placed properly.
•
75% of the object’s or structure’s views are used and placed properly.
•
85% of the object’s or structure’s views are used and placed properly.
74% or less of the drawing views are scaled properly.
•
More than 70% of the drawing views are scaled properly.
•
•
More than 80% of the drawing views are scaled properly.
Object /structure drawn would easily be built from prints.
All items are dimensioned dimensioned properly.
_x 2_
_x 2_
•
All of the object’s or structure’s views are used and placed properly.
_x 3_
_x 3_
•
All drawing and detail views are printed properly to scale.
_x 2_
_x 2_
Total Scoring Chart
100
97
94
92
89
85
82
80
78
75
72
69
65
62
57
56
Grade Equivalency
60
58
56
55
53
51
49
48
46
45
43
41
39
37
34
33
Total points
Judge's Comments:
CADD Drawing Project Rubric
Page 2
