SEG Mock Up Verses SEG Prototype - Stages of R&D

If you download (for free of course), make sure to check back for revisions. This is a learning process. I’m constantly adding diagrams, editing & elaborating. Last updated - 08/21/15 @ 12:22 pm

Of what significance is the SEG Mock Up? Have to go and look at John's claims. Then isolate each claim and prove it out. There are lots of concepts the Mock Up proves. Look at it from an electric engineering point of view.

Claim #1: The SEG is a valid Motor/Generator Design. What do you need in a motor/generator? You need relative motion. That means 1 part needs to be stationary (stator) and another part has to move around (rotor/ magnetic rollers) There are things called "vectors". 3 of them in this case. Magnetic, Electric and Motion. All of the vectors occur at 90 degrees to one another. (3 finger rule - for Transverse Waves)

The Magnetic in this case is aligned axially (Top to Bottom).

That means the Electric must be Radial. (Planar) From the center out, or, from the outer rim to the core

Therefore, the Motion must be to the Right (or Left)

What does that translate to? As a radial electric current moves to Or from the stator, the magnetic rollers must move 90 degrees to the side. That means, as a ring shaped electric current moves from the rim to the core, or the core to the rim, the magnets around the machine must orbit around and move to the side. And indeed they do move to the side. That function is inherent in the SEG design. Claim #1 proved true. The SEG is indeed a valid design.

Claim #2: John says the rollers will spin as they orbit the stator. As we can see in the mock up, that is also true. The rollers spin on their centripetal axis as they orbit the stator. In the past, scientists told John that the rollers must spin the opposite direction to the direction they travel. Or that every other roller would spin CW, CCW, CW, CCW. But simple observation proves that's not the case. Claim #2 is proved to be true. The Rollers indeed spin together as they orbit and in the same direction as travel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2YRy_Og6ME Claim #3: The rollers will have no sound, won't touch and will float as they spin around the stator. It’s obvious that the rollers will spin as they orbit the stator as seen in the previous link. But how could they spin around if they are pushed away from the stator from eddy currents? To demonstrate this, it required building an entirely different set-up (which took thousands of dollars in itself and a couple months work.)

(Original – just copper ring spinning)

Normally, the stator is stationary and the rollers move around. But to isolate the frictionless bearing effect, we inversed the rolls of the parts. Rather than have the stator be positioned horizontally as seen here…

we flipped the stator’s orientation 90 degrees:

(Remade w/ magnets under left ring to simulate the equalizing of attraction/ repulsion between roller and stator)

And rather than having the stator stationary and the rollers spin, we have the roller stationary and the stator spin. That mimics the same relative motion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbpEwRsMj4w With just a copper ring, we can see that as the roller makes its way around the stator, it’s lifted up by the eddy currents. The roller is prevented from touching the surface of the plate (stator) just as John said. Claim #3 proved to be true. That after sufficient RPM, the magnets won't touch, won't vibrate, no friction, no sound, etc. That makes for a device with moving parts that don’t touch. A machine like that wouldn’t need the same maintenance as a conventional motor or generator with oil, bearings, shafts, etc. Claim #4: John says the rollers will Spin AND levitate. Normally you can get a magnet to Spin OR levitate. Take a Diametrical Magnet or Axial Magnet and put it next to a spinning copper ring. You will feel a repulsion preventing the magnet from touching the ring. (Much like how all atoms of matter repel at 10^-8 centimeters. Nothing actually “touches” on the quantum scale)

If you were to sit that magnet on top of the spinning copper ring, the magnet would hover, but not spin. If you change the magnet’s orientation 90 degrees, the magnet will spin but not hover. How to make it hover and spin? A Bloch Wall is normally a “flat line/ 2D plane” separating N from S.

Actually, it’s more like a Ring. Like a DVD.

Or, like the common wall shared between 2 bubbles.

Visualize the Bloch Wall acting as “a wave” rather than a "flat plane". So, by simulating a wave on the Bloch Wall, it makes the cylinder levitate And spin.

Lenz Law Experiments SEG: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjB562_ZxZ4 Claim #4 is proven. Indeed the rollers will spin And levitate as they orbit the stator. (But only with an added and/or simulated wave)

Claim #5: The rollers will remain equidistant, self align and stay on track. This claim is self-evident. The rollers self organize from the magnetic repulsion interactions, stay level around the stator, etc.

http://www.searlsolution.com/RotatingWire-Ver2.wmv

Claim #6: Magnetic waves can be imprinted onto ferrous materials: Fernando Morris built other units to isolate this claim. He also built his own magnetizer from scratch powered with many car batteries in series. Over 1000 amps @ about 70 volts. Yikes! O_o

Fernando proved that indeed waveforms, glitches and variations can be imprinted onto magnetic materials. The material seems to “remember” the glitches. The magnet is made in a uniform fashion which SHOULD result in a uniform field… but the field Is Not uniform. There is not much literature in the scientific world to explain why this happens. It shouldn’t happen, but it does. And we can plainly see the results on the scopes. Fernando built a unit to test it out as seen here:

The magnetic ring is made to turn. There are 2 compasses on either side of the uniquely magnetized axial ring. There is an analog gauss meter probe on the ring connected to a digital oscilloscope. the scope reads out the waveform on the ring as it turns. A normal Bloch wall would reap a flat line. And the compasses on either side of the ring fluctuate as it spins showing a variation in waveform and polarities. As seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_qWEAMAh3s

That right there is VERY different from other magnets. (Not to mention the ring hops forward as you push it on a ferrous surface) As seen here at the 6 minute mark to 8 minute mark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JrC5hXqZpA And here: http://www.searlsolution.com/WHmagneticroll.wmv

Take note that we are way beyond coincidence now from an electrical engineering point of view. There is enough reasonable assumption to move forward in engineering a full scale prototype. All of John's claims have proved out so far by isolating them 1 by 1 and showing them in the Mock Up. The prototype combines all the phenomenon into 1 unit. But to do that requires full funding and at least 18 months full time work. Prof. John R.R. Searl proved to the media and officials attending his lectures that magnets act in waves and not just poles. Scientists have always maintained that the only method of magnetization possible occurs with clear and discrete poles of North and South. The industry has produced multiple poles on a magnet, but always with discrete North/South polarity. On May 9, 2005, at The Victory Hall, Aboyne, Scotland, Professor John Roy Robert Searl demonstrated a magnetic wave pattern on a Ferro-magnetic metal material, thus proving conventional scientist wrong. This demonstration was witnessed by officials from the Scottish Government as well as a member of the press. The entire lecture was videotaped by a reputable production company from Los Angeles California. The tests demonstrated a magnetic ring rotated on test set with constant rate and measurement taken with a gauss meter. The readings steadily increased and decreased in an even and fluid manner. Further tests were videotaped using an oscilloscope to show the complete repeating wave form. This leaves no doubt that the field that Professor Searl describes can be created and duplicated. The secret to making this wave pattern on a magnetic material is a technical and proprietary process. This magnetic wave pattern is used to create the Searl Effect Generator (SEG) and it is a cornerstone of a new era in clean and sustainable energy. We are now closer to replicating the Searl Effect with a working prototype of the SEG. With the anticipated support, this technology will reach the entire World and bring about an exciting new energy age.

Page 429 from Prof. Searl's book "SEG Concept Review".

What is the S.E.G.? The Searl Effect Generator (SEG) is a self-contained, electrical power generator, able to produce clean and sustainable energy. It is a magnetic prime mover that operates without friction and can supply electrical power to suit both home and industry. The core technology behind the SEG is referred to as the "Searl Effect" which enables natural ambient sources of energy to be converted into useful electrical power. The SEG is based on magnetic fields that generates a continual motion of magnetized rollers around magnetized rings that in turn produces electrical currents and under certain conditions, a unique gravito-magnetic force is also generated. Electricity can be produced as pulsed DC or AC and hence, the SEG can be utilized to supply power to existing electrical grids or supply it on a decentralized bases, drive electric motors for cars or ships. During normal operation the SEG generates very high electrical potentials that ionizes the air and incidentally kills airborne bacteria and viruses. One function of the SEG is the emissions of negative ions to its surrounding environment. This causes loosely attached contaminants to be removed from the air by making them to drop to the ground while the unit produces useful energy. This is the health benefit of the SEG that can be utilized to purify and cool the air. Rendering it as refreshing as spring water; ideally suited for hospitals but can be used just as well for homes and work places. The SEG is a converter of nature's ambient sources of unlimited energy and it does so without the use of fuels as it is commonly known.

The SEG consists of three fixed stator rings that are uniquely magnetized with patterns setup to generate continual motion of similarly magnetized cylindrical rotors. The magnetic rotors or rollers consist of eight segmented components made of the same four layers of concentric materials that make up the stators. The rollers have both freedom of spin and rotation around the stator which generates both mechanical and electrical power. The SEG is an 'open system' of energy conversion that is in accordance with known thermodynamic laws; particularly as it may apply at the quantum level. The open energy cycle of the SEG enables it to function both as a prime mover of mechanical rotors, but more so as an electrical generator that continuously interacts and processes energy from the natural environment. Incidental effects includes a halo of negative air ionization or plasma, vacuum by extreme electrical charge, cooling temperatures of both device and the local environment; also gravitational and inertial anomalies under specific conditions.

Energy conversion while operating involves the processing of random quantum fluctuations and kinetic energy within the atomic lattice into coherent currents of electron pairs. These “Cooper Pairs” form between 2-dimensional boundaries of different type materials.

Therein between surface boundaries, the Quantum Hall Effect of a strong pulsing magnetic field facilitates electron transformations (compression) that dramatically decreases the device’s temperature with increasing mean free paths (conductivity). This occurs due to the increase in fermion pair formations (bosons) tunneling through all of the concentric material layers of the Searl Effect Generator. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Hall_effect Energy out of the environment is typically chaotic (incoherent) but pervasive at the quantum level, and we all feel it in part as ambient temperatures. But this is just one source of ambient energy within the electromagnetic spectrum which is in a random state. This naturally occurring randomized energy is readily utilized by the SEG. It is in effect, an unbiased solid state magnetic diode that can effectively turn ambient energy into asymmetrical electron motion out of randomness into a uniform state of coherent currents, consisting of high velocity tunneling electron pairs with photon-like characteristics.

The Searl Effect Generator (SEG) functions along the principles of a linear induction motor (LIM), but designed around a circular track for continuous motion of movable rotors. It is a magnetic prime mover of electromagnetic multi-phased cylindrical rollers over fixed stator rings and free of any mechanical wear or friction. The SEG’s stators and rollers are magnetic components uniquely magnetized or imprinted with matching magnetic pole patterns. The neodymium layer serves as a source or reservoir of electron charges that are drawn out by electromagnetic induction. These radial currents though the rollers make for mechanical motion at right angles to both the electric and magnetic fields. The SEG configuration of rollers in motion, cuts through the magnetic flux with a unique cycloid pattern that is superimposed over an orbit around the circumference of the stator. In this manner, each roller can also induce eddy currents of mutual induction between the copper surfaces to form a frictionless ‘magnetic bearing’ as it generates radial electrical potentials. Frictionless bearings enable the SEG to operate without physical wear and thus it operates with a service expectancy of a lifetime. The generator consists of three stator rings (called Plates) that are composed of four distinctively different materials concentrically layered to each other and fixed to a non-conductive base.

Surrounding each of the Plates are rotors (called rollers) constructed with the same materials but are free to rotate around the Plates.

The inner most Plate typically has 12 rollers. There are 22 rollers on the second stage and 32 on the final Plate. Surrounding the outer most rollers are conventional electromagnets, which by way of magnetic induction, taps energy out of the rapid passing of magnetized rollers. These inductive pickup coils are connected in various configurations to supply AC power at a variety of desired voltage and current levels to suit residential or industrial applications. The SEG is defined as a device constructed of 2,124 component parts that make up 3 plates and 66 roller sets. 12 of the 2,124 components make the 3 plates that act as reaction components. 2,112 components are employed to create 66 roller sets that also act as active components. Each roller set consists of 8 segments constructed from 32 components. Each segment cannot be less than 34 grams in weight, as the Law of Squares mathematical matrix defines the value of 34 as the lowest suitable for the reasonable generation of electricity. Therefore the smallest roller set must weigh 272 grams, making a grand total of 2,244 grams per roller set for the smallest surface bound SEG. The SEG is a step up rotary transformer. In fact it’s a 'three rotary transformer' operational system, within the whole unit. The inner transformer output is fed in to the input of the second plate which increases the output of the second unit additively. The output of the second unit, in turn, feeds as an input to the final unit, thereby increasing the final output to a very high voltage. The electromagnet pick-up windings can be designed to step down the output to a standard 240 volts at the rate of about 15 Kilowatts for a home unit. From 1946 to 1968, and in John’s early newsletters, The Searl Effect was referred to as ‘magnetic bubbles in motion’. In 1968, it became clear that these ‘magnetic bubbles’ contained particles in a set manner, and that there was a set pattern to how many bubbles were present in the material. Because of this finding, Searl dropped the term ‘magnetic bubbles’ and replaced it with the term ‘magnetic quantum material’.

Professor Searl then released these details in a newsletter which has since been reproduced in one of his books a few years ago. A laboratory examination also agrees that somehow the material “changes its state” when produced in this manner. When the rollers are brought into close proximity to the SEG plate, the Searl Effect resonant magnetic field causes electrons to be drawn in to and accelerated through the machine. This process is assisted by the highly electron-attracting or capturing effect of the neodymium layer. The unique mechanical and material arrangement of the SEG pulses the neodymium to continually release and replace the surplus electrons that provides both mechanical and electrical power.

I take the “magnetic waves” imprinted on the SEG as being similar to the physical ridges of a butterfly wing. (This is just my own opinion) It at least serves as an analogy to know the importance of absorption and reflection as it applies to Light, Darkness and Color.

Look into how a butterfly wing (ridges) interacts with light (photons) and entertain the notion that a “magnetic standing wave” (ridges) and electricity (electrons) might interact in a similar way. In the regard that "electron" behavior of varying wavelengths around normal generators can be compared the random motion of photons from an incandescent white light; Whereas, the behavior of "electrons" in the SEG act more like the photons in a specifically colored laser beam. But these laser-like paths of bosons (coherent currents) are only generated within the atomic lattice of the mass making up the unit. Planar. And in the case of the SEG, radial. The SEG is an absorber. Just as a butterfly wing absorbs all wavelengths of light but only reflects the one its structure is made of. Also look into the term "coherence" in relation to physics The electric fields of the SEG are "coherent".

NASA explains coherence: http://www.spaceplace.nasa.gov/laser/en

coherence A property holding for two or more waves or fields when each individual wave or field is in phase with every other one. Lasers, for example, emit almost perfectly coherent light; all the photons emitted by a laser have the same frequency and are in phase. Since quantum states can be described by a wave equation, coherence can hold for quantum states in general, though only among bosons. Coherence is generally possible in physical systems that may undergo superposition. See also Bose-Einstein condensate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose–Einstein_condensate Cooper Pairs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooper_pair

"Photons, Phonons, Electrons, Plasmons": http://www.phys.org/news/2014-04-quantum-photon-propertiesrevealed-particlethe.html Standing Waves (ridges) and Interference Patterns: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_wave Wave Propagation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interference_(wave_propagation)

Butterfly Wings, Nanoscopic Ridges and Light: http://benthebutterflyguy.blogspot.com/2011/02/what-makes-bluemorpho-butterfly-wings.html Optics of Butterfly Wings: http://www.livescience.com/92-advanced-optics-butterflywings.html How a Laser works: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUEbMjtWc-A \

Claim #7: The SEG "looses weight" after a certain energy draw. Technically, the unit doesn't actually loose weight or loose mass. The Earth's magnetic field competes with the superconducting electrostatic field generated by the SEG; therefore, there is an upward repulsion effect. (But only in specific cases) The unit still "weighs" the same regardless, but electrostatic forces prevent it from touching the ground once in an overloaded/ superconductive state. You’ll have to listen to Paul Murad’s interview and see their technical data in their paper linked below. Does a magnet levitating above a cooled superconductor “loose weight/ mass?” Or is the magnetic field just pushing upward? (There is 0 loss or gain of mass of either superconductor or magnet) Meissner Effect: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect Meissner Effect vs. Flux Pinning: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyN8cSB7BWs

The “reduction of weight” claim is confirmed by Paul Murad and Morningstar Energy Box as well as the Russians Roschin and Godin. It cost Murad et all over $500,000 to achieve his results over the course of about 6 years. Paul Murad: http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/paul-murads-searleffect-generator.html Murad Technical Data: http://www.americanantigravity.com/files/documents/Paul-MuradSEG-Replication.pdf

John says the coherent electric fields of the SEG are “laser like” and the SEG “compress electrons" (transforms). The kinetic energy of “electrons” is harnessed, cycled and recycled by the SEG much like how the kinetic energy of water is cycled and recycled through a hydroelectric dam. We can compare water to electricity in a number of analogies, but major work has to be done to change the current perception of what is thought to take place on the quantum scale. Coherent electricity deals with bosons (pairs of electrons “traveling”/propagating as One in 1 direction); whereas, incoherent electricity deals with fermions (single and traveling in varying directions. Clashing with turbulence and loosing internal kinetic energy.) Bosons only occur at low temperatures and in coherent states. Also only occur in a planar field. (ordered/ uniform/ in phase on 1 plane. “2D”.) “Particles” in phase can’t interfere with each other and don’t loose internal kinetic energy. I liken the process of Cooper Pairs & Phonon resonance to a bolus during paristalsis. A radial and symmetrical propagation in a wavelike manner. What mainstream tries to do is force coherence of quantum “particles” by cooling a conductor until it becomes a superconductor. By lowering existing incoherence to a tolerable low. Then you have a simulated state of coherence between “particles” which leads to the Meissner Effect (the lifting). If force cooling causes coherence of a magnetic field and atomic lattice, and for every action there is an equal and opposite… the inverse would be that the cold is a biproduct of the superconductivity. Rather than the superconductivity being a bi-product of the cold. Mainstream superconductive research force freezes materials to simulate the effect of coherence. which costs a lot of money and energy to maintain at a constant. John Searl discovered a process to actually magnetize a material to reap the effect at a constant as a biproduct of producing electricity. Seems to be a mirror image of the current processes by mainstream attempts at the oxy-moron called “room temperature superconductivity.” Force Freezing a material to simulate particles in phase and actually being in phase are 2 different things. Imagine how much it would cost and how much energy would be wasted from futilely trying to

organize incandescent photons to a coherent wavelength using a giant Tokamak-like setup. Might be able to achieve it for a few nanoseconds. Like the oxy-moron of “room temperature superconductivity.” For a few pico seconds. Big whoop. That's the difference between incoherent people using a standardized magnetization process (the hard way) verses a coherent John Searl doing it the smart way. One saying I learned which rings true is to “work smart, not hard.” Here's a video of an "anomalous spin" effect by a magnet levitating over a ring shaped superconductor. Most experiments I’ve seen dealing with Meissner Effects are with pucks of YCBO and not rings. ‪https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRby1Wilv-Q The gentleman in that last video found that a NdFeB magnet hovering over a ring shaped superconductor will start to mysteriously spin. http://phys.org/news/2011-03-high-temperature-superconductorsecret-phase.html#jCp 'In all known superconductors electrons join in pairs (Cooper pairs) to move in correlated fashion through the material. It takes a certain amount of energy to break Cooper pairs apart; in ordinary superconductors, the absence of single-electron states below this energy constitutes a superconducting gap, which vanishes when the temperature rises above Tc. Once in the normal state the electrons revert to unpaired, uncorrelated behavior.'

Russian Validations http://www.rexresearch.com/roschin/roschin.htm The Russians proved a proportional temperature drop more so than Morningstar Energy Box has been able to achieve so far. To isolate that claim would require a lot more funding; As well as, the magnetic repulsion (lift effect) with increased load/ RPM. There is more than enough validations and curiosity to justify funding John Searl to rebuild a fully working 3 ringed prototype. (But why fund some 3rd party without the info attempting to COPY John Searl when you can support the man John Searl directly?) Claim #8: The rollers speed up as an electric current is drawn. What happens to a motor as you draw more current? It speeds up. And indeed that's the case with the SEG. As more load is drawn, more current flows. But the SEG is a motor AND generator. (Though, it doesn't become active as a generator until the unique waves are imprinted onto the materials.) The SEG Prototype inverses the roll of the Mock Up. The Mock up delivers power to the coils from an isolated power source from the outside in. The prototype guides “electrons” in laser-like paths radially through the layers of the unit. Quantum Tunneling http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunnelling The electric current goes from the center outward with Collimated energy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collimated Regardless of direction of radial current, the fact is that the rollers move faster around the stator with increased load. The next stage and claim to prove is that the SEG generates "electron emissions." But to test that means we need to make a large stator ring, magnetize it to the specs, make the smaller components to the specs and then have them move in relation to each other. Only then will the SEG produce more measurable and impressive phenomenon. To achieve that.... requires almost 2 years full time work, being full funded with 3 to 6 million dollars and hiring a small team of professional engineers. (That’s really nothing compared to other scientific research projects.)

Mock Up vs. Prototype: MOCK UP feeds power TO the magnets. The coils in the MOCK UP send a charge FROM the Rim TO the Center.

The PROTOTYPE inverses the role of the coils and magnets. The PROTOTYPE receives power FROM the magnets and the charge travels radially FROM the center To the rim. (The Magnets don’t carry the energy like a battery but rather they direct the flow of energy more focused and coherent.)

The EM coils in the PROTOTYPE are present only to COLLECT the energy delivered from the moving magnets.

Magnets imprinted with variations do not behave the same. We can plainly see the difference between White Light and Blue Light. We can plainly see the difference between an incandescent light and a laser beam. But we cannot see the difference between magnetized materials Nor can we directly observe the difference between incoherent and coherent electric currents.

INCOHERENT

|

COHERENT

Also look into the brilliant work of Johann Goethe, who 100 years after Newton, discovered more detailed properties of prisms, light and dark spectrums. Visit these sites: http://www.rainengineering.com/ether/Light&Electricity/light_and_elec tricity.html Goethe vs Newton: http://aetherforce.com/the-tao-of-colours-by-doug-marsh Light Dark & Color: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ID0BSlfZyHU

There’s no way to tell what frequencies were used to make a given magnet just by looking at the metal. You could stare at magnets and blanks side by side all day and never be able to discern. You might be able to see the difference between various colored butterfly wings, but you won’t be able to see the difference between electric or magnetic imprints. All known magnets are made the same ordinary way. It works and you get a magnet, but that’s all the industry knows and practices. We want to finesse the magnets and fine tune it.

Modulating specific frequencies during a magnetization process will result in a uniquely magnetized material, specific to that frequency. It will function and resonate like a tuning fork at that frequency, but in a magnetic and electric sense. Resonating with the very atoms composing the SEG (their electrons) and make them behave coherently as photons do in a laser beam. (When combined with the other components of the right proportions and densities) So far, my view is that the waves imprinted are fixed like ridges on wings. But perfectly spaced unlike deviations on a wing or elytra. Therefore, the magnets would be different than conventional ones.

“Random Electron drift” behaves wildly and unpredictably through a conventional system with normal magnets. Directed drift in the SEG. “Electron” motion in a normal generator can be compared to the random motion of photons from an incandescent light bulb. The Brownian Motion is chaotic and random. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownian_motion

Or the motion of “quantum particles” can be compared to the random motion of water molecules in a mist cloud. Or even a raging rapid. Same premise. There’s no order or uniformity to the individual components of the media. Though the total volume of water or electric current is being moved, there is still chaos and turbulence amongst the collective “particles” making up a given medium. Unless there’s coherence. But normal magnets in conventionally made systems Do Not generate coherent electric currents. Because fermions do not tunnel through an atomic lattice. Just as an incandescent bulb doesn’t produce a laser beam. Compare the motion of water molecules in an industrial water jet (beam) to the motion of molecules in a cloud of mist. The jet has compression and the kinetic energy has focus and direction. The cloud does not. Or compare the turbulent wind in the open atmosphere to a jet stream or column of air. The difference in motion of the particles is equal to the difference between energy harnessed by John Searl’s SEG verses conventional systems. In a beam of jet stream, there is more focus of kinetic energy. That’s pretty much it. Same energy, but one system has more focus because of pressure and other variables. Just as a laser beam is the same light as a bulb, just a focused and coherent wavelength. coherence a fixed relationship between the phase of waves in a beam of radiation of a single frequency. Two beams of light are coherent when the phase difference between their waves is constant; they are incoherent if there is a random or changing phase relationship. Stable interference patterns are formed only by radiation emitted by coherent sources, ordinarily produced by splitting a single beam into two or more beams. A laser, unlike an incandescent source, produces a beam in which all the components bear a fixed relationship to each other.

What is the Power Source for the SEG? One aspect to better understand is the proportional temperature drop in relation to electric output. (Lots of work to be done mathematically.) John encourages people to think outside the box and not necessarily look at heat as a flow. From my understanding, heat is the product of “electrons” losing/ transferring internal kinetic energy resulting from incoherent quantum turbulence. To feel temperature/heat means "electrons" are loosing energy from constantly bumping around at random from any & all directions. That Natural state of randomness is also known as Brownian Motion. The more "electrons" “bump” around, the more kinetic energy they impart, the more photons they eject, and the more heat is generated. That's what heat is. A bi-product of "electrons" “bumping” around. The more room “electrons” have to bump around, the more kinetic energy they build up. And when they “collide”, it means the loss of that built up energy generates more heat. In a conventional system, “electrons” are stripped from an isolated power source and are not replenished at all. So the electrons that are left have progressively more and more room to bump around. Thus, why heat is generated, resistance increases, etc. The motion of “quantum particles” throughout Nature is in a state of Brownian Motion, or, Incoherent chaos. The motion of “quantum particles” throughout the totality of man’s conventional batteries and machinery is incoherent and random. I don’t know how to mathematically describe a scenario dealing with the electrons themselves interacting in a state of coherence on a quantum level. There are 2 energy sources for the SEG. The internal energy source of the cores and the sustaining energy source from the surrounding environment. The internal energy source is the kinetic energy of valence electrons in the atoms making up the rare-earth cores which are constantly recycled on demand in proportion to load.

More load = more positive charge of the core, which in turn, proportionally draws in more negatively charged electrons from the surrounding environment. The attracted free electrons fill the outer shell of each atom that lost its valence. Those newly replaced electrons only remain for an “instant” before leaving their position in the outer shell and making their way through the system. One leaves and another fills its place. And at a constant rate (in proportion to load.) Like people lining up single file and walking in step. The SEG harnesses kinetic energy of “electrons” on the quantum level much like how the kinetic energy of water molecules is harnessed by a hydroelectric dam on our scale.

The SEG’s energy cycle is illustrated with this diagram as an open system of energy conversion. Whereas the dam harnesses kinetic energy with a liquid media, the SEG harnesses kinetic energy of the electron media within the Neodymium metal reservoir. However, both systems complete their energy cycles via the atmosphere and thus harnessing unlimited ambient energy as open systems.

Searl Effect Technology effectively utilizes quantum kinetic energy which involves the "electron’s" inherent ability to absorb and emit energy at the quantum level with an energy cycle that can could compared and explained in layman terms to the hydroelectric dam in principle since both are driven directly or indirectly by entropy of the sun's radiant energy. A dam builds up potential and kinetic energy by way of cloud condensation that forms rain and fills reservoirs, but does so only after it has achieved a higher energy level by way of evaporation from ground levels; whereas, the SEG utilizes its layer of neodymium as a reservoir of "electrons". The Teflon layer is analogous to the dam itself. The Magnetic layer acts as the power plant making useful work of the currents. (Magnets are not batteries though) And finally, the copper layer compares to the water outlets seen jetting out the bottom of a dam. Similarly, the SEG ram-jets electrons out into the atmosphere. At this point, energy levels of the water jets, or in the case of "electrons", are kinetically reduced existing the system. Be mindful that these discharges go Back to the environment to recharge!

Therein, ambient energy restores their energy levels up by way of evaporation of water or as with the SEG, the uniform emission of electrons to the outside air exposes them to atmosphere’s ambient sources of energy or temperature which raises the electron’s quantum energy levels back up to natural ambient levels. Thereafter, the external sources of electrons attracted back to the relative positive potential of the electron depleted neodymium layer (reservoir). The energy cycle continuously repeats. It’s a process that effectively strips kinetic energy out the of electrons before they’re emitted. No different in principle to the energy cycle of a hydroelectric dam where the kinetics of the water flow are harnessed. In this manner, both ways gather ambient sources of energy that can be processed and made useful for electrical applications.

This animation illustrates the pathways of electric charges in and out of the SEG. The electron capture effect of the Neodymium layer with its positive charge, attracts the electrons from the surrounding atmosphere. These charges are kinetically energized at the level of the ambient temperature outside the SEG. Once these charges enter the SEG layers, they are paired and directed radially towards the rollers. These are laser-like beams of electron pairs (Cooper Pairs/ bosons) propagating through the rollers which in turn drive them to orbit around the stator rings.

This process strips kinetic energy from the electrons before they exit the atomic lattice making up the SEG. In principle, it is the same as a hydroelectric dam, yet energy was harnessed into mechanical motion by passing the current flow. Like water in and out of the dam, the electrons move in and out of the SEG. Both systems utilize the ambient energy currents as part of an open energy cycle. Both systems tap onto sustainable energy sources from the outside environment cleanly and effectively. However, the Searl Effect Generator operates at the quantum level, making it far more effective and not dependant on location nor weather conditions.

There’s an energy cycle in the atmosphere with water as an open system. Just as there’s an energy cycle in the SEG with “electrons” as an open system. Rain fills a reservoir like electrons fill the rareearth core.

The reservoir in the case of the SEG is the outer shell of each neodymium atom making up the core. The valence “electrons” fill the shell like water fills a basin.

The reservoir is dammed up to create pressure and potential. There is weight and pressure from water on the wall of a dam. Just as there is pressure from electrons on the dielectric Teflon layer. (2nd concentric stator ring)

Dielectric materials and insulators act as a dam for electricity like the water analogy.

Water from a dam is shot through holes/ slits/ pipes. The pressure sends the water in jet streams. There’s coherent kinetic energy of all water molecules forced to channel through the holes.

Analogous to how “electrons” tunnel through the lattice of the atoms making up the dielectric layer. Fermions cannot pass through insulators, but Bosons can. (Cooper Pairs tunnel through insulators as photons tunnel through glass.) Water vapor in mist form cannot “tunnel” through a penstock. Each molecule making up the mist would cohere to the tunnel itself and loose kinetic energy. But condensed (compressed) and pressurized water (liquid) can tunnel. Pressurize a mist enough and it will condense to form a stream. (Realize that this is an analogy to get you to Think about open systems and the REcycling of energy)

The hole in a dam forces the water out in a coherent flow which focuses the kinetic energy of the water in a beam to turn a turbine.

The turbines generate electricity. The holes/ slits in the case of the SEG are the spaces between atoms making up the dielectric layer. The pressure compresses the electrons and they tunnel through as a Bose-Einstein Condensate. (They are also additionally accelerated by the impelling force from the magnetic fields permeating through the mass of the other materials.) The premise is like someone grabbing the front of your shirt and pulling you forward at the same time someone else pushes your forward from behind. Lots of kinetic energy there from the simultaneous impelling on the front side & positive pressure pushing on the back of “electrons” migrating radially through the system.

The water molecules floating about in the natural environment are in a state of incoherence. Because of that incoherence, the kinetic energy is distributed in a cloud-like state rather than focused in a jetstream. The flow of water molecules shooting out of a hole in a pressurized dam is coherent. Which is like simulating a beam of kinetic energy through a lattice. That same potential is all around us. But it has to be dammed up first to create the needed pressure. The mass of the unit will dictate ultimate output. Rule of thumb is 90 watts per pound. So a 15kW SEG would weigh about 168 pounds without the housing or pick-up coils. After the electrons tunnel through the dielectric layer, they're accelerated radially outward in a planar manner by the uniquely imprinted magnetic fields. The fields rapidly pulse as the rollers move in a cyclonic fashion around the stator. The electrons are then emitted by the copper layer out at the equator of the unit from both top half and bottom half in a double torus formation.

The turbines in the case of the SEG are the orbiting rollers.

The kinetic energy of the electrons shoots out in streams horizontally. (From every pore and space between atoms making up the dielectric layer) But radially, from the center out.

Magnets move 90 degrees to an electric current which is why the rollers orbit the stator in the first place.

What happens to water after it turns a turbine in a hydroelectric dam?

It eventually evaporates and becomes part of the incoherent environment again. Which then precipitates back into the reservoir completing the cycle. As an open system.

Likewise, the “electrons” in the SEG are emitted back out into the atmosphere where they recharge and migrate back to the reservoir. A complete cycle. Openly.

Water evaporates much like how the bosons emitted by the SEG decouple after being harnessed in the pickup coils. The single fermions quickly charge up in the incoherent environment (outside the boundary of mass making up the unit) and are then attracted to the positively charged neodymium core once again. Then the cycle repeats in a dual toroidal circuit. Radial emissions outward at the equator and converging vortices at the poles. Nothing created or destroyed. Only already existing energy cycled and recycled.

Compare to Walter Russell’s diagrams from 1926.

7

There is moisture in every blade of grass, every leaf of every tree, and pretty much everything in the scenario in the above diagram contains water. Just as there is “electricity” in every bit of every atom making up pretty much everything in the universe. As everything decays, it gives the water back to Earth’s cycle. Same with all matter in the universe in regards to emitting electrons as it oxidizes and decays. Electrons are effortlessly drawn in by the field generated by the interacting waveforms. The harnessed energy isn't "free" per say. Meaning, the energy isn't just manifested from "nothing". It's a cyclical conversion process. The Sun and other stars bombard the Earth with light and heat and incoherent fermions. 100% hits, but 70% is reflected. And other energy is emitted by matter. The SEG recycles that wasted energy called “heat”. Anything above absolute zero is “heat”. Heat by definition is the collective loss of internal kinetic energy of incoherent fermions resulting from Brownian Motion, random drift and quantum turbulence. How can a unit that operates with coherence generate “heat” which is the definition of incoherence? It simply cannot. Order is Order. Disorder is Disorder. The 2 don’t mesh.

If you had your own hydroelectric dam to power your home, you wouldn't have to pay for the energy it reaped once it was set up. In that regard, the energy would be free, and perpetually sustained by the natural environment. Imagine the source of water in the next four images below coming from a giant dam. How would this break the 2nd Law of thermodynamics? As long as there is water pressure, you could spin the generator. How would you possibly halt the totality of pressure exerted on a dam wall short of breaking the dam itself?

Now image that hose directly connected to a dam. You couldn't use more water than what is in the reservoir even if you opened the spill ways and powered your house at peak all day. The rate at which the Natural environment replenishes the reservoir with rain is faster than what you can deplete in the totality of what is dammed up to generate a few kilowatts.

"There is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment." -Nikola Tesla

“Does the machine produce more electricity than it takes to run it?” No. No 'Overunity" or magic needed. There is a proportional temperature drop to electric output. I'm not fond of the concept of a closed system producing "more out than in". Or the concept of Any system "creating energy from nothing". The SEG is an Open System though.

Just as a hydroelectric dam doesn't produce “more energy than required to run it". What is the "input power" to a hydroelectric dam? The already existing water is dammed up. No magic there. The pressure is used to turn turbines. You get an equal amount of force to turn the turbine as you have pressure built up. In this case, the amount of “electron pressure” is proportional to the amount of mass. There is no "input power" in an open system scenario like measuring a volt meter with an isolated battery. Nor does the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics apply to the totality of the cycle of an open system.

Just as rain replenishes the water level in a reservoir for a dam, if you used energy in the SEG, the environment naturally replenishes the valence of neodymium atoms making up the cores. You are using energy which is being depleted, but AS you use energy, it’s generating another field that attracts more energy to influx the system at the same time. You don't say that the dam provides "more energy than required to run it". The density of the rare-earth used as the core will determine how much is in the reservoir. (Like increasing the depth of a basin) So you know the total output of a given unit by its density and mass.

Coherently made magnets in a coherently made system do not generate the same incoherent fermions we're used to. And that requires massive study. (which requires adequate funding.) It’s the difference between the lack of kinetic energy of water vapor in the atmosphere verses the kinetic energy of water coming out of a fire hose. Big difference. All known closed electric systems harness incoherent fermions. It’s not the magnets alone that initiate a cycle and recycling of energy. Nor is it the magnets alone that generate the pressure needed to generate bosons. It’s the Entire system working together as 1 cycle. Each component plays its role. Without it, there would be no loop. The density of the Neodymium must be enough to maintain a large enough reservoir of electrons for peak output. If the density is off, it would to like trying to turn a turbine with the force of water coming out of a hole in the side of a bucket. Rather than with the force of water coming out of a hole in a large dam.

If the density of the Teflon isn't right, then it would be like having a paper thin wall for a large dam. The wall of the dam will break and the system will be compromised and flood with too much energy. If the wall of a dam is too thick, the water will loose kinetic energy by the time is makes its way out the hole. If there’s just a trickle of water, it won’t have enough force to spin a turbine. The kinetic energy from the "electron streams" turns the rollers with so much force, the amount of resistance caused by drawing a load is

negligible in comparison. The amount of energy you can draw from a given unit, (regardless of how large) wouldn’t deplete the total supply of available energy in the grand scheme of things. That cycle will sure last longer than Your lifetime! Think of the grander cycle of energy. Think outside the box. And have an open mind. The longest lasting energy systems are an open cycle rather than closed/ isolated systems. The “electrons” that power the SEG are the same "electrons" you feel right now as temperature. Just as the water that powers a hydroelectric dam is the same water you feel right now as “humidity” in vapor form. There is a focused flow to turn the rollers. Without that focused jet stream of “electrons”, the SEG would not function. The SEG harnesses the kinetic energy of “electrons.” Just like a hydroelectric dam harnesses the kinetic energy of water. Doesn’t matter the charge per “electron”. Just as it doesn’t matter the size of a water drop in a dam full of water. The water has kinetic energy that turns turbines. Period. The “electrons” have kinetic energy that turn the rollers. Period. That kinetic energy is cycled through the SEG with “laser-like” precision and force. Electrons are depleted, recharge, migrates back and cycle again. Just like the cycle of water in the atmosphere, then through a hydroelectric dam, then back out to the atmosphere again. Water Jet (Straight H20 Beam) Photon Jet (Straight Laser Beam)

Radial Electron Emissions

The magnetic fields imprinted on the SEG are what make it active as a generator. It’s also what creates spin And lift when the eddy current effects take place. (If the waves were not imprinted, you couldn’t draw any energy. The magnets would hover but not spin.) You need relative motion to generate electricity. If the magnets didn’t hover, there would be major friction. The speed of the relative motion between roller/ stator would be severely restricted and the system would break.

The unique field lines also serve as a route for “electrons” to tangentially swirl as they’re attracted to the core. (Like water down a drain. But from both top down and bottom up.)

The imprinted waves also serve to create pulses of current which lead to the Quantum Hall Effect. A full blast and then nothing. Open/ Close. On/ Off. 1/ 0. Like constructive/destructive interference fringes. http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/11/4/043030/fulltext

Again, it will take one top grade engineer with top grade software to map the complex interaction of magnetic and dielectric fields. Without the proper densities, the system will do nothing at all. Or it’ll immediately overflow with energy and be compromised with any load. Without the imprinted magnetic waves, the unit would just be a very expensive paperweight. Or a very expensive homopolar motor that needed a conventional battery or power source to make it spin. If you connected pick-up coils to a conventional homopolar motor, it would meet so much resistance as you tapped energy that it would stop.

The electricity output from such a setup would reap incoherent electric currents. The electric output from ANY system using conventional magnets made using strictly DC will be incoherent and heat up. Why? Because all known electrical generators result in Brownian flow of “electrons”. And all known electrical systems are closed/ isolated systems where the power source isn’t replenished on demand in proportion to load. (or not replenished at all). In addition, there are no coherent currents through the atomic lattice of the mass making up conventional generators. Conventional currents are incoherent. More load = more incoherence. Definition of heat is quantum incoherence. Rhetorical Questions: How does one expect magnets to contribute in generating coherent electricity if the magnets generating the electricity are made with an incoherent current? How does one expect for a system to “regenerate itself” (or rather, have the surrounding environment regenerate it) if it’s an isolated or closed system? How has Hoover dam been able to constantly provide energy for 80 years? And why doesn’t that violate the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics? How has “Karpen’s Pile” been able to run continuously for over 60 years in a Romanian museum without any visible diminishing of the energy supply? And lastly, how many Open System electric generators have been developed over the last 100 years? Have an incoherent person make an incoherent magnet in a conventionally made system and you’ll reap incoherent electricity. The force and efficiency of that conventional electricity is like comparing the kinetic energy of water vapor in mist form to a jetstream of liquid water. The difference in quantum kinetic energy harnessed is just like the difference between a light bulb and a laser beam.

ALL known magnets are made with the same sloppy process of hammering a metal with DC and high capacitive discharge. The Only man known to ever imprint a waveform on a magnetic material is Professor John Searl. Just as all known electric generators don’t account for the density of the materials making up the unit. And certainly don’t account for the density of a system in relation to the amount of output. Can Man create something that doesn't exist in Nature? Yes! Laser Beams do Not occur in Nature. It takes the conscious action of Man putting together components and utilizing Scientific Rules to create a scenario Nature itself cannot generate. Combining a hydroelectric dam with an industrial atmospheric water generator and tapping the natural energy cycle of water to harness electricity doesn’t exist in nature either. 100 years ago, a laser pointer was “impossible.” All people knew was the randomness of incandescent light. (Incoherence) 10 years ago, a beam of sound was “impossible”, or never conceived. All people knew was the randomness of acoustic waves. Most people have still never heard of Woody Norris and his Hypersonic Sound Laser Panel. People know of his LRAD system. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HF9G9M0cR0E Today, coherent electricity or magnetism is "impossible." All people know are the conventional electric currents reaped by all commonly made magnets. The magnetization process imprints a material with a modulated and tuned wave which manifests as a type of interference pattern. When you spin it (in relation to another like magnet of equal imprint), more interactions manifest. Just as a music box won't manifest the song until it's spun. All the info on it means nothing until motion is added relative to something else. Are there different equations for the motion of "particles" emitted from an incandescent source verses a laser beam? Yes.

Are there equations for the motion of "electrons" generated from magnets? Of course. But most of those equations apply to FermiDirac rather than Bose-Einstein. To suggest it’s Impossible for man to achieve such a feat is pseudoskeptical. Ad antiquitam. To suggest John Searl's technology isn't valid is like saying there's no such thing as a laser beam or that a hydroelectric dam violates the laws of thermodynamics/ COE. etc The field lines of standard magnets are incoherently zapped “onto” a material during the magnetization process. That results in no spin and lift in the presence of eddy currents. How to get the field lines of a magnet to exhibit a swirl? Like water down a drain or the phi spiral your hair makes on the back of your head. When those magnets are spinning relative to another, there are unique and complex interactions of forces at play. To manufacture a system like that requires a different process and tighter tolerances than what the current industry practices. How expensive was it for scientists to figure out how to make the world's first laser in comparison to the price of a light bulb you could buy off the shelf? How expensive will it be it to imprint the needed waveforms onto a material of suitable composition and density, in comparison to the price of a regular magnet you can buy off the shelf? About 3 million dollars verses $10. If the scientific community didn't "believe" lasers were possible, what technologies would we be without today? If the scientific community doubted Nikola Tesla’s idea of hydroelectric power and refused to pursue it, we might have that many more nuclear stations (and fall outs as a result.) So many scientists in the mainstream community aren’t aware of these concepts or the many parties attempting to advance the understanding. Some of those scientists are aware but refuse to participate in advancing the studies of controversial perspectives. Because of the widespread lack of willingness, lack of education and lack of open mindedness… what are we missing out on today?

It's the difference between Order and Chaos. Coherence and Incoherence. Uniform and Random. Taking the time, money and effort to do it right verses doing it quickly, cheaply and brutally wrong. Ad antiquitam. "Electrons" flow in a circular orbit around magnetic field lines. All known magnets are made the same way with sloppy DC. Zap the metal with a high capacitive discharge and you get a magnet. Brute force and it works. But we want to finesse the process. Tune it, modulate the current and imprint waves like interference patterns. Create ridges and trenches. Tracks and dots of poles in waves. Points of magnetism and points of no magnetism on the same material.

Like helical gears made out of “magnetic waves.”

All known magnets are made the same sloppy way, not accounting for the resistance of the current in the magnet and a lot more. All known magnets have fields that are always “on.” Even binary code, the most basic premise, requires On and Off. 1 and 0. A magnet’s strength goes to zero as it approaches the Bloch Wall. Then if flips. What if you can have full power and then off… Full power and then off? The intensity of the field wont drop off the same if you account for the modulation and pulses at specific frequencies.

Quantum Mechanical Coherence: (Notice the expensive equipment needed for this research) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Js4KptOXnng Coherence Lecture UC Berkeley: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTkNSa-Ay5g John Searl's magnets in combination with the specific densities of materials reap different electricity than regular magnets in “a housing” like a conventional system. The difference in quantum kinetic energy harnessed is just like the difference between a laser beam and a light bulb. In a laser beam there is coherence and focus in 1 particular direction. Lack of Brownian Motion. More order. No bumping around of photons. In a kinetic beam of electrons, there’s collectively much more energy to impart. And without the waste heat and turbulence associated with conventional “electron drift”. But a general drift ≠ coherence. Just like the water molecules making up a constantly flowing river are not coherent. But if you dam up the river and create pressure… then the water molecules shooting out of the hole will be coherent. Even if a uniquely made magnet is spinning in front of a coil, you can’t expect to generate bosons or coherent electrons. You need pressure. You can regulate the spin of your motor, the gauss of your magnets, the composition and dimensions all you want. But you will not solve the randomness of the energy harnessed by the system you threw together in a, cheap, quick and sloppy conventional way. The Only way for the SEG to achieve an output of coherent electricity is by manufacturing the components to the right densities and by imprinting specific waveforms onto the magnets. Otherwise, it's a paperweight. Energy is not created or destroyed by the SEG. Energy is harnessed as an Open System. Not a Closed System.

People need to look into the difference between an Open System and Closed (Isolated) System and when the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics actually applies. The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics applies to Closed/ Isolated Systems. Not Open Systems. Just as superposition doesn’t apply to non-linear systems. It even plainly states in the very Wikipedia link naysayers used to post in a blindly bias attempt to invalidate the physics. But it’s They who didn’t read their own links! And the info indeed Does validate it. 2nd Law Definition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_law_of_thermodynamics The 2nd law of thermodynamics states that the entropy of an isolated system never decreases, because isolated systems always evolve toward thermodynamic equilibrium, a state with maximum entropy. (this is all dealing with INCOHERENT WAVES) Closed System: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_System Isolated System: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isolated_system Open System (in Same wiki link as 2nd Law) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_system_(thermodynamics)#Open_s ystem Open System (Systems Theory) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_system_(systems_theory) Syntropy (Negentropy): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntropy From BlazeLabs.com http://www.blazelabs.com/n-perpetual.asp

The Zeroth Law states: If two thermodynamic systems are in thermal equilibrium with a third, they are also in thermal equilibrium with each other. This law has been introduced recently in the 20th century, much later than the other three laws. It basically states that when two systems are put in contact with each other, there will be a net exchange of energy between them unless or until they are in thermal equilibrium. The first law states: In any process, the total energy of the universe remains constant. It simply means that the amount of energy lost in a steady state process cannot be greater than the amount of energy gained. This is the only thermodynamic law that is not statistical, and thus is considered the only secure law of present science. In physics, this is known as the law of conservation of energy of isolated systems. (Notice the hidden postulates: isolated system, and a closed finite universe.) Nöether's Theorem, states that if a system has a particular symmetry, there is a quantity associated with that symmetry that is conserved. By this theorem, the principle of conservation of energy is a consequence of invariance under time translations, that is symmetry in time. The conservation of energy law does not apply to systems which are not symmetrical upon time translation or reversal, nor does it apply if the system is not isolated or if the universe is not finite. The second law states: There is no process that, operating in a cycle, produces no other effect than the subtraction of a positive amount of heat from a reservoir and the production of an equal amount of work. This means that energy systems have a tendency to increase their entropy rather than decrease it. It is known however that a microscopic system may exhibit fluctuations of entropy opposite to that dictated by the 2nd Law, and so, this law is only valid for macroscopic systems or long durations. Quoting Maxwell (who was also a thermodynamicist): 'The truth of the second law is a statistical, not a mathematical, truth, for it depends on the fact that the bodies we deal with consist of millions of molecules. Hence the second law of thermodynamics is continually being violated, and that to a considerable extent, in any sufficiently small group of molecules belonging to a real body.' (J. C. Maxwell, Tait's Thermodynamics II, Nature 17, 278-280 [7 February 1878]).

The third law states: As temperature approaches absolute zero, the entropy of a system approaches a constant, equal to null. It is not usually stressed enough, the fact that there is a very fundamental assumption in these laws, even in the first most 'secure' law of thermodynamics, or what we usually refer to as COE (conservation of energy). They ASSUME a closed system, and are born out of pure mathematics or statistical work, unprovable in the real world. Unprovable, because no one has yet been able to isolate a closed system. We are not even sure that the universe as a whole can be regarded as a closed system, which is a strict requirement for the conservation of energy law! In fact principles such as uncertainty, and entanglement, would seem to indicate that either it is impossible for a truly closed system to exist, or that our idea of a closed system is not taking into account other phenomena or energy exchanges which cannot be easily or possibly isolated from our systems. For example, one might consider a mechanical engine as a closed system, and finds out that it's impossible to get two similar efficiency readings. This could for example be due to changes in external ambient temperatures which were not taken into account in the first place. So, in such a case, ambient heat must be taken into account as part of the system. But, still, we find that even at absolute zero Kelvin, the ground state energy does not go to zero, and this means that other yet unknown energy sources must be taken account, or at least have their existence accepted by mainstream science, which is currently not the case. And that's why the list of anomalous effects in science is getting longer year after year.

On the quantum scale, all electrons and atoms and parts are in a perpetual state of transition motion. Some people say perpetual motion doesn’t exist. But they are referring to relative motion between 2 bodies. Not necessarily the motion of 1 body in space by itself. But that 1 body is made up of a bunch of other “bodies”. And the smaller you zoom in, the more Brownian motion you get. Like the white noise (static snow) on a TV. Anything in nature above Absolute Zero (0 Kelvin) is in chaotic motion. And there’s no where in the universe at 0 Kelvin. The coldest part and deepest parts of space are calculated to be about 4 Kelvin because of the influence from cosmic radiation and other forces. So in that regard, all “things” made of atoms are constantly moving regardless where its location is in the universe. And that motion is random and chaotic like the static on a TV. Constant resistance, turbulence, loss of energy and generating heat.

The point is that “electrons” and “quantum particles” are in a constant state of motion and constantly “violating” our macro laws of thermodynamics. Even in “a vacuum” (state of less pressure). Study the perspectives of Nikola Tesla, Dayton Miller & Paul Dirac. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_sea

SEG -Theory of Operation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJX17LgBYaQ Have to briefly explain about static electricity too . Positive and Negative Charges. Static electricity is just as interesting as magnetism. A physical Magnet always has Positive AND Negative. Duality. Both. In normal magnets, the North and South is Uniform. John Searl’s magnets are Not uniform. But an electrically charged object like static electricity has Positive OR Negative. Look into an “Electrophorus” and have some fun. Or a Van DeGraff Generator (with supervision). Awesome. (I’m not fond of mainstream terminology like “electrons”, etc. Which is why I’m always putting it in quotes. I lean more towards the models and perspectives of Nikola Tesla, Walter Russell, Ed Leedskalnin, Dewey B Larson, Pier Luigi Ighina, etc.) For sake of conversation… we have to entertain the mainstream terminology. I’d like to eventually translate this pdf to Russellian terminology, Leedskalnin’s perspectives, compare to Ighina, Keely, Rodin etc. For now, let’s continue with the “accepted” terms.) Please watch this video about static electricity to get a basic understanding. SIA Static: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7XAWxaQvdk Assuming you watched that and have context, we can continue talking about charges of the SEG components and a bit on how those charges interact. You need to be able to visualize it all in your mind. If something makes sense, it’s pretty easy to visualize. No context to make sense and you won’t be able to visualize it. People won’t entertain a thought that doesn’t make sense. One by one, make sense of every step along the way. Then the whole picture will make more sense. If people can make sense of an idea, they are more likely to support it.

Let’s compare the circuit of energy in the SEG to a hydroelectric dam. A hydroelectric dam is an Open System. Rain from the open environment fills a reservoir. Man dams up the reservoir to create pressure and potential. The water is shot through holes which spin turbines. The turbines generate electricity. The water shoots past the turbines, evaporates back into the atmosphere which then rains down and fills the reservoir again. No water was created or destroyed. Only what was already present is harnessed in a Natural cycle. There are 4 materials in the SEG.

\

The function of the Neodymium acts like the reservoir in the hydroelectric dam analogy. But instead of water, the Lanthanide (rare-earth) Neodymium is a reservoir for “electrons”.

To explain this, we have to use the conventional model of the atom used by Bohr. (I’m more partial to Walter Russell’s Table of Elements), but let’s zoom in on Neodymium.

The outer most “electrons” on the outer most “shell” are called “Valence electrons”. The valence of atoms is how they react with other atoms, and those “electrons” are sometimes easily stripped off.

There are extra “electrons” in the Neodymium’s valence. Neodymium has a tendency to give up “electrons”. You can tell because of the rate it oxidizes. Leave it out in the open air and it turns to dust really quickly. Compared to iron. Leave it exposed to the air and it won’t rust right away. Neodymium can oxidize so quickly, it’ll leave a coating of powder within 24 hours. For some reason, those “electrons” easily come off when excited by an electric current. During operation in the SEG, when those valence “electrons” are stripped off, ones to replace it are already lined up waiting to immediately take their place (as an OPEN SYSTEM). Let’s briefly go over the circuit of energy in the SEG again. (It will really take a top grade engineer with state of the art software to map the advanced interacttions during the SEG’s operation.) AFTER the SEG is made according to the needed specs, and AFTER it’s magnetized with the unique waveforms, what will happen? Nothing will happen unless you put the pieces together and initiate movement. When the rollers and stator are moving relative to each other, THEN we get the chain-reactions, “electron emissions”, boson formations, cooling effects, and “The Searl Effect.” By giving the rollers a push, it will generate current. Once a current is initiated, it starts a chain reaction that generates a dual toroidal cycle of energy. That field attracts incoherent fermions and free electrons back to the core. The rollers accelerate with monstrous force to an idle speed. Much like opening the penstock to a dam for the first time to allow the pressure through. What is there to stop a turbine in a hydroelectric dam once the water is allowed through? A given size fan blade will turn a given idle speed with a given amount of incoming kinetic force. As you draw more load, it’s like allowing more water through, which then spins the turbine faster in proportion. As the waveforms are initiated, the magnets begin to generate coherent currents. The valence “electrons” are stripped from the neodymium atom.

Relatively speaking, the inner core is positive. (when in operation)

(Obviously need more help with diagrams and animations) The neodymium core becomes positively charged. At the same time, the neodymium is extracting free “electrons” from around it to replenish the ones it looses. We are literally in a “sea of energy”. The neodymium core becomes positive relative to outside the copper ring. The extra “electrons” added to the air, ionize the air. Negatively. Negative seeks positive. The negatively charged “particles” (fermions) around the unit are drawn to the positively charged core. They meet with the “electrons” from the neodymium. The result is no longer thermionic. They tunnel through the dielectric layer. (Normally fermions are blocked/ reflected by insulators and dielectric materials. But cooper pairs tunnel through insulators like photons through glass) The bosons are able to launch through the dielectric layer. Like the water coming out of the hole in a dam. There is a jet stream. The “electrons” line up single file, in phase, in a “2D sheet”, uniform and ordered. Planar and radial. Focused, unlike like incandescence.

After they shoot through the dielectric layer, they are accelerated by the coherently imprinted flux lines of the rotating rollers. Then blasted to the copper layer where they are emitted to the atmosphere. (And/or coils which tap the energy at the periphery.)

After that, they encounter the incoherent environment. The boson splits from natural chaos and disorder. They get charged up by the atmosphere and as fermions, seek the positively charged core again. That completes the toroidal circuit (dual) (I know this is a really lame and crude attempt to diagram and explain, but I’m working with what I’ve got so far. Just trying to give you guys some context to understand and visualize. If I had better tools to work with, I could present the information more effectively.) Just so people are aware, the image on the next page is a prototype version but without the uniquely magnetized layer.

(But how can you machine the other layers unless you know the density of the magnetic material?) You can do it for practice. So you know the steps to take when you Do get the final densities. Can’t just jump into manufacturing an SEG on the first try. You’ve got to do your homework on how to go about handling the needed tolerances regardless of what they are. And practice on materials before doing the real thing. Notice the magnetic ring is in 12 sections though. It SHOULD be a solid ring. But alas… no one in the entire world of manufacturing makes solid rings of magnetic materials that large. And this is the Smallest inner most stator for the smallest possible version of the SEG (using these materials). Can’t farm out this kind of work or outsource it. Have to do it inhouse. Would be a logistical and communications nightmare to try and have others manufacture these parts at this point. It’s not reasonable to impose the level of tolerances we need on other shops. Just imagine trying to press a solid magnetic ring for a unit 6 feet in diameter. Or 60 feet. Or 600 feet. Or 6000 feet. It can be scaled up as long as you have the capability of machining it. The larger units would obviously have to be in sections

Some more context regarding Open System Dynamics: http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-03/09/230-percentefficient-leds

You Cannot generate the phenomenon of the SEG, “electron emissions”, and the more fantastic claims relating to coherence without magnetizing the materials to the needed specs! AND making the other materials with the proper densities/ proportions. No easy way to go about that. No cheap or quick route. All focus has to sync

Took John Searl about 8 months of full time work WITH unlimited resources, megawatts of power and access to a multi-million dollar infrastructure for free. He was provided with teams of machinists and factory workers at his availability each time he developed an SEG. He didn’t have to pay rent, labor, utilities, medical benefits, insurance, legal fees, materials, shipping, etc. etc. Working with very limited resources today with 4 people on a shoe string budget and not even a fraction of what John had originally… it’s going to take a lot longer. If it took John about 8 months with unlimited resources and all the help he needed before… what will it take to purchase everything with modern prices while going against the grain? It’s been like this for quite a while. People have some silly misconception that John has been working on the SEG non-stop for 60 years. He was only able to work on it when the funding allowed. If people have more questions, they can go through the links below: FAQs: http://searlsolution.com/contact2.html Searl Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLF9EBB4FBBA29759B Pdf of Lecture on John Searl: https://www.scribd.com/doc/134608782/John-Searl-and-the-SEGPresentation Professor John Searl Album (Facebook): https://www.facebook.com/verbelli/media_set?set=a.409237198301.1 84888.683583301&type=3 John Searl album (Photobucket): http://108.photobucket.com/user/Therealverbz/library/John%20Searl Paul Murad & Morningstar Energy Box Audio Interview: http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/paul-murads-searleffect-generator.html

Paul Murad Technical Data (which cost about $500,000): http://www.americanantigravity.com/files/documents/Paul-MuradSEG-Replication.pdf Russian Validations (which cost a couple million dollars) http://www.rexresearch.com/roschin/roschin.htm SEG Background: http://www.rexresearch.com/searl4/searl4.htm Official Searl Sites With Lots of Info: http://www.SearlMagnetics.com http://www.SearlSolution.com/members/technology5.html http://www.SwallowCommand.com/index-4.html http://www.SearlAerospace.com 3rd Party Sites: http://www.JohnSearlStory.com http://www.SearlEffect.com/free/allaccess/allaccess.html

To give the SEG more mainstream context: Ultra Efficient LED Tested by MIT http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-03/09/230-percentefficient-leds Cooper Pairs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooper_pair Quantum Hall Effect: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Hall_effect Meissner Effect: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect Flux Pinning: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flux_pinning

Meissner Effect vs. Flux Pinning: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyN8cSB7BWs Brownian Motion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownian_motion "Photons, Phonons, Electrons, Plasmons": http://phys.org/news/2014-04-quantum-photon-properties-revealedparticlethe.html Geometrically Coded Magnets Behave Differently: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6WC9hO_8wg Curved Paths: http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/02/bend-it-like-schrodingerbeams-of-electrons-curve-around-barriers/ Butterfly Wings, Nanoscopic ridges and Light: http://www.webexhibits.org/causesofcolor/15A.html http://www.livescience.com/92-advanced-optics-butterfly-wings.html Spin Transfer: http://physics.aps.org/articles/v2/11 coherence A property holding for two or more waves or fields when each individual wave or field is in phase with every other one. Lasers, for example, emit almost perfectly coherent light; all the photons emitted by a laser have the same frequency and are in phase. Coherence can hold for quantum states in general, though only among bosons. Coherence is generally possible in physical systems that may undergo superposition. See also Bose-Einstein condensate. Geometrically Coded Magnets Behave Differently: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6WC9hO_8wg Correlated Magnetics Research: http://www.CorrelatedMagnetics.com http://www.maglatch.com http://www.polymagnet.com

CMR YouTube Channel: http://www.YouTube.com/user/correlatedmagnetics1 Single Wire Transmission: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcvSXQHvFLg Tesla Transmission: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJimMDrmwrM

Gyroscopes: Fran McCabe: http://www.franmccabe.com/#!gyroscopics McCabe Compilation (Read Description): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xYhrFgcyWQ A 2.5 in lb 12/24 V rated DC motor spinning a1.5 lb, 6" D. Gyro wheel can systemically output 31.5 in lb thru gyroscopic natural and powered precession. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c74C2iTSIzI Centripetal Force: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GC5ZiJNZssk Eric Laithwaite on Gyroscopes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpCEJxO6V9g Laithwaite on Gyroscopic Propulsion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt9wTAL5KoU Sandy Kidd: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt9wTAL5KoU Gyro Says "No" to Newton: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTEVC22qAZg Gyro Experiments Galore: http://relmachine.blogspot.com/

Self Rotation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYK2-7kdtcY The behavior of a single spinning wheel in gimbals is a welldocumented subject; however, the interaction between multiple spinning wheels is less fully explored. Some researchers have hypothesized that spinning wheels could be mathematically modeled after electrical inductors, suggesting that the interaction between multiple spinning wheels might mirror that of multiple inductors in proximity with each other. The goal of the current set of experiments was to examine the interaction between two gimbaled spinning wheels with six degrees of freedom embedded in one scaffolding and observe their behavioral similarity to electrical inductors. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=camtPxBL-YM Working Together: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IPtlYipB4w Levers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdM2jWg2uEE Pulleys: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMx7nIIH9ik Inclined Planes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_ErI0QjNos Wheels and Axles: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7xu9O0miEc

What Does it Take to Make an SEG?

In addition to the ridiculously elaborate magnetization process, each component of the SEG needs to be made according to Density. Not length, width and height. Or Diameter, Thickness and Height. If the total tolerance of the 2124 parts are off on weight by 3 grams, the whole unit won't function and you have a useless paperweight. That means the tolerance for each part is plus or minus .05 grams! If you build all the components to precision but don't have the magnetization down, you still have a useless paperweight.

To make just the inner most neodymium stator ring will cost about $15,000. (conservatively) $10,000 in materials for solid steel to make the mold, then the labor for a week’s work to make a 3D CAD for the mold on SolidWorks, then CNC the mold. And any alterations later, etc. All so the metal powders can be smashed into the needed size rings. But no telling the mold will be right the first try, or won't crack under the pressure of the 100 ton press. Then it would require another 2 weeks full time work to make another mold and another $15,000. Machinists don't work for free. Costs about $45 an hour. Plus machine and floor time, tool changes, utilities, oil, maintenance, etc. Realistically looking at about $85+ an hour. 10 full work days. 8 hours a day. That's just for labor for 1 mold. Might need 2 molds for Each stator set. And 2 molds for the smaller components. That's 8 molds. Each one bigger than the next. Need a mold for each neodymium ring and a mold for each magnetic ring. 3 stator sets. Then the actual materials to mix and smash into solid rings. Both big and small. (This is for pressing powders. Pouring molten ingots into molds is an entirely different process which is equally difficult and expensive. Yet slightly more dangerous because of the volatility of rare earth materials) No telling you’ll get the right density with a given proportion of powders. No telling you’ll use the right binder so it won’t crumble apart. No telling that even if you hit the right density and it doesn’t crumble or crack that it will retain the needed gauss. If the gauss is off, you need to change the percentages of proportions which might alter the size of the mold. Which means you’d need to make another mold until you get all the numbers you want.

And remember, it has to be repeatable so that all 2124 parts are exactly the same. For that, you need a production environment. Yes… to make even just 1 SEG since all the parts are the same. There’s just a lot of them. 528 exact parts. Of Each 4 components. 528 x 4 = 2112. Then the 3 stator rings with 4 materials each. Takes a couple months to go through trial and error until you achieve a ring that can have all the numbers you want. Then you know the dimensions of the ring after experimenting with the densities, gauss, pressures, binders, etc. Then you can build the rest of parts of the SEG around that. But you have to be prepared for unaccounted for hurdles, expenses and have enough funding for about 2 years full time work. Could be more, could be less depending on the hurdles encountered. And should be able to work not having to worry about running low on neodymium, magnetic powders, copper, rent, labor, insurance of all kinds, argon, tooling, utilities, handling legal and corporate fees, shipping fees, taxes, accounting fees, etc etc etc. Will cost about 3 million dollars at this point unless a cheaper alternative is explored. But even to explore other options requires funding. And the longer we wait, the more the economy gets more expensive. So, for those with the eyes to see and ears to hear... Those with the electrical engineering experience to be able to realize the design and function of the SEG... For those who have worked on similar projects and who want to try something different without repeating actions expecting different results... The SEG is ready to be funded. The ONLY hurdle is funding! The technology, theory of operation, supporting validations, scientific articles, cooborating journals, and known models all validate the SEG. From start to finish.

What is “Proof” and what are our priorities? "Proof" isn't just an end result you buy off the shelf. "Proof" is all the information and processes that make an end result possible. For the people who can see "proof" in the process, we can use your help, be partners, and make a team effort to bring this to the world! For the people who only see "proof" as a final product you can exploit... they will all be customers in the future. So if CERN can justify hundreds of billions of dollars over the course of decades to futilely search for proof of "god particles"... (that will never power a house let alone an LED light) Or if NASA can justify hundreds of billions of dollars over the course of decades to continually search for "earth-like planets" or chipping away at rocks the Martian terrain... Or if the Federal Reserve can justify printing trillions of dollars to bail out CEOs, creating fiat currency from nothing... Then why not (with all the validations, interest and growing evidence) shouldn't John Searl's project get adequate funding for 2 years of work? To prove himself right in a fraction of the time and for a fraction of the price as NASA or CERN has come through on any of their decades of claims. John Searl and Fernando Morris have shown more tangible proof of the SEG’s function and design through the Mock Up than CERN has shown for higgs bozos, dark matter, black holes, etc. You can actually feel the magnets with your hands in the mock up. Witness the equidistant magnets spinning as they orbit. See the eddy current levitation effects. Feel the attraction And repulsion of the roller to the stator. You can see and measure the waves on a ring using the probe and oscilloscope. The Russians and Morningstar Energy Box have provided their proofs too. With all of that combined, and more, I’d say that’s a lot more tangible proof in the mock up than what you can touch and feel from CERN’s trillion dollar projects.

Blueprints to an SEG and Reality of Costs: Nonsensical question. “What are the dimensions of an SEG?” Nonsensical response: “What is the size of a composite that weighs 100 pounds?” An object’s dimensions (size) are determined by its composition, density and shape. A block of uranium weighing 100 pounds will have significantly smaller dimensions than a block of aluminum weighing 100 pounds. The dimensions of a composite block of uranium combined with aluminum would be dependent upon the percentages of the 2 materials. To ask for the dimensions of “an SEG” isn’t a legitimate question because there aren’t enough variables. Depends on what the SEG is made of. Can be a number of combinations. If you asked, “What are the dimensions of an SEG made of A, B, C and D… that would be more logical. But then you have to make sure A is a material that tends to have a positive charge, B is a dielectric, C is a magnetic material and D a conductive material. How many different materials qualify for ABCD? The outer dimensions are determined by the density of the material, composition and shape. We know the shape is a ring, so that narrows it down. “Give me blueprints to the SEG.” “I want to build my own SEG, what are the schematics?” Most standard blueprints and schematics deal with outer dimensions like Length, Width and Height. Or Diameter, Thickness and Height. If you want to build a speaker box for your trunk, the box must have a certain amount of internal volume regardless of what the box is made of or what shape it is. Nonsensical question: “What is the shape of an enclosure that has 100 cubic feet of volume in it?” Nonsensical question: “How big is an SEG that weighs 100 pounds?” Depends on the materials. An SEG is built according to density.

The outer dimensions will be determined by the materials used. The size can vary just as much as the difference in size between a pound of styrofoam and a pound of gold. You can build a cube shaped speaker box out of wood with 100 internal cubic feet of volume, or you can make a box out of acrylic, or steel, or gold, or a combination of materials, etc. The internal volume will be 100 cubic feet regardless of the materials used or outer shape. But depending on what materials you use will determine how heavy the box is. A 100 cubic foot box made of gold is much more dense than a box made of plywood even though the internal volume might be the same. And both will have significantly different costs. Regardless what materials qualify for A, B, C, and D… when you put them together, they need to equal a certain density. And depending on what you use will determine the overall dimensions. 3 out of 4 most cost effective, available and “easiest” materials to machine on the market to build an SEG are Neodymium, Teflon, and Copper. The density of a gram of neodymium, Teflon and copper are all known and relatively “easy” to calculate. But if made in a composite, the only way to test it is to make it, weigh it, measure the volume and calculate the density with math. That takes trial and error and/ or one heck of a software programmer. (which takes funding) If you wanted an SEG to weigh Exactly 100 pounds, you’d have to know how much of each material to use. And the amount of the material will dictate the dimensions.

The more you mix percentages of materials in a given A, B, C or D component will make it that much more difficult to calculate. If you used Aluminum rather than copper for D, then the diameter of the SEG would be significantly bigger since the weight and density of the SEG must always remain the same no matter what materials you use. Just like the internal volume of a speaker box must always be a specific amount regardless of the shape or materials used. So if you substitute aluminum for copper, you might need to change the size of all the other components too. Change 1 thing means to change all other 2123 parts equally. And if you use a lighter material, you have to make sure that your CNC lathe can handle the diameters, or your equipment is capable of handling the large rings. Just because you have access to a machine shop doesn’t mean you have the capability to make an SEG. And if you do have the capability in 1 area, you probably won’t in another, since it takes a multi-million dollar infrastructure (as John originally had) Knowing the density of a magnetic material is difficult. The magnetic material in the SEG is made of a unique mix of metal powders. Depending on what materials used and in what proportions will determine the magnet. (and size and density) Can’t use standard epoxy or standard industrial binders. Have to stay true to the materials and Law of Squares. (That’s another discussion altogether) You want to build an SEG huh? What binder are you going to use? What is the density of that binder? And how much will that affect the overall density, gauss or size of the final result? That can only be determined through trial and error. Research and development. (which takes funding) You might use 20% Alnico, 60% Ferrite and 20% binder. Might be 22% NeFeB, 40% Ferrite, 5% Alnico, and 33% binder. Could be 80% Ferrite, 5% binder, 15% Alnico. How many combinations can YOU think of?!?

Could be whatever magnetic materials you choose as long as the ring doesn’t crumble apart and can retain the needed gauss. But you must know the density of the ring once it’s done because that’s what you’re aiming for first and foremost. And before that, you need to decide on whether you ultimately want a unit that is really tall and skinny, or really wide and short? Or somewhere in between. The same density SEG can be a number of different sizes. What metal powders are you going to use? Will your final result hold enough gauss? Will it be too brittle? Will your molds crack under pressure of the press? All that can only be figured out through trial and error. Research and Development. (which, again, takes Funding) You could spend 3 weeks making a mold specific for a certain proportion of powders. (at about $45 an hour labor *per machinist with about $35/hr tooling changes, oil maintenance and utilities to run the equipment. Not to mention the liability insurance, rent, and medical benefits for the machinist or machinists plural). But if you change the %, you might have to change the size of the mold to account for the change in the ring. Then go back to making another mold 2 thousands of an inch wider or shallower, etc. Once you find the right magnetic materials to use and discover what proportions work best… THEN you can know the dimensions of the final result. And you must know the density you want to hit in your final result before you try making it. If you’re .05 grams off in weight for ANY of the 2,124 components.. it’s back to the drawing board, or back to the CNC lathe, or back to compacting another ring in the press. (and hope your mold doesn’t crack under the pressure, otherwise it’s going to be another week or 2 to make another mold. And that’s working full time. And not many machinists work for free to repeatedly make molds.) And you have to pay labor and utilities and rent, etc for every hour of every day at the facility. That’s the reality of running a lab environment.

The density and composition of the magnetic rings will determine their diameter, thickness and height. THEN you can start to build A, B and D rings AROUND the magnetic rings. You can’t even start to CNC the other components because you won’t know the dimensions until After doing months of research on the magnetic rings. The magnetic rings are the heart of the SEG. And that’s the most difficult part to tackle. (that and the actual adjusting of frequencies, power and monitoring to magnetize the rings – That’s another conversation) Once you know the dimensions of the magnetic rings, you can build around that. But how much time, money and effort would that take for an average engineer or person working in their garage to achieve? Might take you $100,000 - $200,000 over the course of 3 to 6 months Just In Labor alone with unaccounted for errors!! More realistically, it might take $750,000 over the course of 6 – 8 months with all the monthly overheads. (Might take.. could be double, could be less) Have to pay for the industrial equipment and the power to run them. And then retrofitting the building to handle the power, in addition to a programmer and machinist to run the equipment, pay their labor, liability insurance medical/dental, rent for the facility, utilities, legal, accounting, kits of drill bits and tooling, materials, and costs that don’t cease once you start R&D. So you’d better have enough funds in the bank to cover a potential year or 2 of full time work in a lab/ machine shop environment with unforeseen delays, hurdles and overheads. Can’t “just give blueprints or schematics” like average people would like. Most of the above mentioned was just talking about the small ring segments! Not even getting to the large stator rings, which require A Lot more work, much larger molds, etc. Need 6 different molds. Each progressively bigger than the next for the stator sets.

And then you need a CNC lathe that can handle the diameters of the larger pieces to machine them into molds! Do You, the reader, have the capability of pressing a 30 inch diameter solid ring from ferrous metal powders? I doubt it. Or the capability of smelting a solid 30 inch neodymium ring in an argon environment? Most of you will not. Not even major Chinese manufacturers can press the large rings. They can only do many small segments put together to make 1 ring. And they only deal with ordinary epoxies with ordinary metal powders in ordinary proportions. Their magnets are made with ordinary DC. “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.” And sometimes acquiring extraordinary proof requires extraordinary funding. Especially if you’re using extraordinary methods with extraordinary precision. Nothing is ordinary about the SEG and its construction. Even Nikola Tesla was provided with the means to make his discoveries. His methods were extraordinary compared to Edisons’. Without the means to experiment through trial and error… how would an experimenter acquire the info? (How much has CERN spent to date? And how close are they to powering your home, car or LED?) The point of this section of diatribe is to give people some perspective on reality. Reality of what it takes to manufacture an SEG part by part and the machining hurdles and costs to do so. The reality that you can’t just “give blueprints or schematics” because building something according to density doesn’t have the same “schematics” as building a box… or Anything using only outer dimensions. You can 3D print any object you want as long as the 3D CAD has the algorithm or outer dimensions right? It takes time, money and effort to develop the CAD first of all. But what if you told the 3D programmer to add the dimension of DENSITY to the CAD? And better use a process that doesn’t alter the chemical structure to much. And now the 3D printer has to have the capability to print the same size object in different weights. Not just shapes and size.

How much more circuitry and capability would that require? A Lot. To add another dimension of density to any building process takes additional time, money and effort. 3D printers aren’t capable yet. Then adding magnetics to the process is even more technical!

Aren’t the densities already worked out? No, the densities and dimensions are Not worked out. All that information of pressure ratios, proportions, percentages, etc were never written down at the time when John first made the SEG. The teams of machinists and factory workers went through trial and error until they got it right. If we want to rebuild the SEG, we have to start from scratch again. (Which Fernando Morris has done since 2003 with the Mock Up and what we have collectively done since 2010 to establish the research and development facility in San Diego, CA.) And even if you knew the proper proportions, you'd have to try and regulate the particle size. You could take 2 scoops of metal powder from the same bag and make 2 "identical" rings, but they might not be the same size for the same density. Why? Because varying particles sizes affect overall density and volume. So even if you got it right in the past, it will still take you just as much work to do it again. Even if you know all the numbers. In this case, the numbers were never written down. And the info that was written has since been burned. All that remains is what is throughout the volumes of Law of Squares books, but exact measurements and dimensions aren't given. The original info is gone. Have to deal with it, move forward and do whatever it takes to acquire the same information in a new setting. John originally had the help of factory workers and machinists. But they just did as John said until they achieved the result John wanted. Today, we want to do the same thing, but in a professional environment, document every step and make the process repeatable for mass production.

Still need a mass production environment just to make 1 SEG. There are 2124 parts to the SEG. 528 of the Same neodymium cores. 528 of the Same copper rings. 528 of the Same magnetic rings. 528 of the Same Teflon rings. That's 2112 parts right there. So you'd better have a repeatable process to make sure All of the parts are the exact same proportions, densities, weights and volumes. If Any of the 2124 parts are off by .05 grams, the entire unit won't function. If the rings chip, crack, crumble or break, you need to try making more. And you can only make so many at once. (If we had production facility and millions of dollars, we can make 528 at once and hope all of them turn out in the first batch) Getting 100 good rings out of 528 tries would be more realistic. People say "Just make 1 SEG before you try mass producing them." But it takes a mass production environment to even make the 1! Plus the 12 stator rings. Just because you make 1 ring to perfection... doesn't mean the other 2123 will come out the same. Might get 1 or 2 good rings out of a batch of 20. Even if you know the numbers you want to hit, it's still trial and error until you hit it. And then hit it another 2123 times. And THEN magnetize 528 perfected rings. But you only get 1 shot to magnetize a ring correctly. At this point, we only have the equipment capable of making the smallest inner stator set. To CNC the larger stators would require a larger CNC. Which costs a lot of money. So... you could make all the magnetic materials to precision...but then you have to magnetize them to precision! It's not like a VHS tape you can just record or magnetize over. So if you spend money multiple times to make the right size stator ring (just for the inner most stator set), there's no guarantee that you'll magnetize it correctly the first try. So you'll need a few rings to test. IF we were to make all the molds right the first try and get Everything right the first try... it would still take months of R&D. But in reality and machine shop, you don't get things right the first try more often than not. You go through trials and you have errors until you learn how to make it a success. Which requires adequate funding and support. Time, money and effort.

Searl vs. CERN

This note could also be appropriately titled: Academia vs. Quackademia Science vs. Psyence or

Education vs. Indoctrination Occam’s Razor vs. Nonsense

One of Professor John Searl's diagrams in print over 10 years ago compared to latest "discoveries" by CERN and the so called "Higgs Field".

Weʼre going to go over the Higgs Model and why the explanation as itʼs presented is absurd and backwards. Phenomenon is real, but the terminology and diagrams are sorely lacking. In the Higgs diagram below, they show massive particles being generated at the bottom by a massless particle on top. The arrow starts at the top of the hill indicating that a massless particle somehow creates a hill by curving space and then magically gains mass as it travels a straight path down the hill following the vertical line.

So theyʼre saying that nothing becomes something. No mass creates mass. Right off the bat, thereʼs already major problems that violate common sense as well as their own conservation laws. That ball on the top of the hill really should be red. To symbolize the nose of Bozon the Clown.

In Searl's diagram, it shows the inverse. The rollers orbiting the stator IS the mass at the bottom in the trough. But the trough of what? Certainly not some non-existent curvature of space. The blue lines in Searlʼs diagram (which are cut off at the equator in the Higgs diagram) are representative of magnetic field lines. Something real, accepted, measurable, observable by anyone with iron shavings, compasses, ferrofluid, etc.

There are satellite magnets orbiting a stator ring like planetary gears. With unique magnetization resulting in high frequency waveforms. That when in rotation at critical speeds generate a spiraling flux cone (frustum) for the path of "electrons" 90 degrees to the tangential field lines propagating Up the cone. Which causes them to converge and condense, accumulating negative energy. (compressed “electrons”) Part of the problem here is the model for the electron. Itʼs commonly taught that an “electron” has mass. And a negative charge. So, if a bunch of mass is converging and condensing, it should form a solid ball. But for every positive thereʼs a negative. So, if thereʼs positive mass, then there must be negative mass. If positive mass is said to curve space and make a well…. then an accumulation of “electrons” should make a well. Not a hill. Therefore, the model of the electron is backward. (at the very least) It should be thought of as negative mass with a negative charge. (The math for a negative mass and positive charge works out the same as a positive mass with a negative charge.) Look it up.

Hey… the concept of no mass generating mass… is stranger than uniquely magnetized positive mass rotating to accumulate and condense negative mass (electrons). That can be visualized and makes sense logically. Rather than “virtual particles popping into existence because of a curvature of space resulting from no mass.” (which contradicts their own logic since their own model requires mass to curve space in the first place) In their model, the massless particle bends space into a hill FIRST… and THEN a massive particle is generated as a result. Does that make Any sense? You donʼt need a PhD to know thatʼs absurd. Any PhD who believes that and tries to justify that with erroneous equations must have Permanent Head Damage.

http://www.diracwasright.com

And where is the spin in the Higgs Model? Itʼs static. I think the rings in their grid are supposed to be B fields (which are oriented incorrectly 90 degrees). I think the lines in their grid are supposed to be E fields. They do not propagate out into space forever in straight lines or flat planes.

First a well with straight lines… and now a "hill" with straight lines on 1 plane that aren't even connected to anything. Magnetic field lines loop around in 3 dimensions. The erroneous grid in the Higgs diagram represents nothing in reality. Nature is all about Spirals:

Animated Gif Static: http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n29/Therealverbz/John%20Searl/Toru sFlowMed_zpsk0kmsxyi.gif

Animated Gif Dynamic: http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n29/Therealverbz/John%20Searl/ETor usFlowMed_zpsidm5zxcy.giforiginal.gif

"All direction is curved, and all motion is spiral." -- Walter Russell

Where is the spin in Einstein's curvature of space model? Itʼs static. They just show a straight well in a non-existent "fabric of space". To show a spin in Einyʼs curvature model equates to Frame Dragging. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame-dragging#Frame_dragging_effects (which, in reality, is a lag in a rotating magnetic field)

Both the concept of Space curvature and empty space is a joke. Casimir Effect proves that. Watch from 36:20 to 36:33 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SiuTk2ZiyU#t=36m20s Make sure to watch that entire link which elaborates on the signifiance of magnetic waves and how they generate a BEC while in orbit around the stator.

Quick question... Why is the curvature of space always shown at Antarctica? Why never at the North Pole, or 90 degrees to the Equator? How would they account for the multiple planes of Pluto's eccentric orbit with their graphs? It's all using straight lined graphs and talking about curvatures of space and fabrics of time and dark matter and empty space and black holes and Things That Do Not Exist!!! Rotating superconductors exist. Plasma exists. Magnets Exist. Waveforms Exist. Casimir Force exists, Coherence exists. Which reaps the physical manifestations of the mathematical interpretations they want to achieve. Is there a dense object in the center of the SEG? No.. It's Hollow! But there's mass in a ring AROUND what they would consider the "dense ball". O_o Where is the mass to generate the magnetic fields for their space curvature? A "massless particle?" Lol That sure makes sense.. O_o

If positive mass generates a well, then why would zero mass generate a hill? Wouldn't "negative mass" generate the opposite of positive mass? If a proton is positive, aren't "electrons" supposed to be negative? Wouldn't zero mass just be "flat" according to their own model? Once you get to zero, that's it according to them. No negative inertia. No negative mass. So why then isn't the rest of their graphs just a bunch of gopher hills randomly placed? Hey, there's no mass over there... let's arbitrarily put a hill! Does that make Any sense people?! O_o Wait... let's look at that model for space curvature again...

Why is it flat away from Earth and the Sun? BECAUSE THERE'S NO MASS ACCORDING TO THEIR MODEL! So why not just have arbitrary hills everywhere else if no mass makes hills? O_o

How come the graph (with what's supposed to represent the magnetic field lines) just stops at the lip around the hill? Where does it go? How can the graph represent space curving if they say space is empty? O_o

Look at the Cartesian coordinate graph.

Did they forget elementary algebra? Draw a plus sign. + The intersection is (0,0) Above the horizontal line is Positive... Below the horizontal line is Negative... A “Massless particle” would be ON THE ZERO LINE at (0,0). Not in any quadrant nor on any part of the X or Y axis other than (0,0). Hey CERN... that means the ball below the horizontal line is a NEGATIVE NUMBER. NOT ZERO.

Shall we go back to 1st Day of Pre-Algebra? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartesian_coordinate_system

uummm… Donʼt the points on CERNʼs graph fall BELOW the 0 line of the X axis? Thatʼs negative territory. If No Mass means (0,0)… then what would (5,-2) be? According to their own diagram, that means Negative Mass.

Open Letter to Professor Michio Kaku: "You Could Be Sued for Millions and Ridiculed for Centuries" May 15, 2009 Dear Dr. Kaku: This open letter relates to your disparagement of energy-producing devices which at this juncture in time are demonstrably critical to our nation's survival. And I write this letter as a Ph.D. experimental nuclear physicist with qualifications that I believe allow me to speak to the subject in question, namely production of energy using nonconventional means. I ask that you read this letter carefully and ask that you not dismiss it out of hand in the manner of many of our country's physicists. Recently, on the popular late-night radio program, "Coast to Coast AM," which reportedly has a listening audience of millions, you indicated that investors call you up daily and ask whether certain inventions will work. Characterizing those devices as "perpetual motion machines" you said they were impossible to make. But that can be proven to be a false statement. Such devices can exist if negative mass electrons can be introduced into electronic circuits and possibly certain machines. They can also exist if other forms of negative energy can be created, and apparently they can. Finally, it appears to be the case that gauge transformations could allow such devices to work. This would not involve a violation of one of the most important laws of physics, namely energy conservation, either, Dr. Kaku. I believe you assume that such devices do violate the laws of physics, which is also an assumption that appears to be made by others. Dr. Kaku: You appear to believe that the universe has 11 dimensions, many of which are supposed to be hidden. Why would that be true while creation of energy using negative mass electrons or using gauge transformations would be impossible? Could you be wrong, sir? Undoubtedly you think you are not wrong, but could you be wrong, sir?

You might say to me that negative mass electrons have never been seen. But those many dimensions you believe in have never been seen either. And is it not true that we physicists for decades have used negative mass electrons in our theories in order to reach agreement with experiment? And wasn't the positron discovered because Dirac invoked the existence of negative mass electrons -approximately 80 years ago? Perhaps it is true that we physicists have not yet observed negative mass electrons, but does that mean they do not exist? Now let me ask you this: Have you ever examined even one of the devices that you tell investors cannot work? I suspect you haven't. There are in fact inventions that produce energy without having any kind of conventional fuel. You may see one work in a web page of mine linked to below. But perhaps you think you don't even need to look. Could that be the case, Dr. Kaku? Perhaps you simply "know" these devices can't work. Might you not also have said many years ago that airplanes could never fly? Before the Wright brothers were flying airplanes, renowned scientists said it was impossible. So, I ask that you examine the video linked to below and I ask that you examine other such videos. http://www.doctorkoontz.com/Scalar_Physics/Steven%20Mark/Step hen_Mark_video2.mp4 (Please give the video time to load -- as the file is large. The small black device shown in the video is producing the power. Then a larger unit is shown.) Here is the link to another web page of mine that has links to more such TPU videos. I can assure you the TPU device works, sir. For the sake of our nation and the world, I ask that you take the small amount of time needed to examine these videos. http://www.doctorkoontz.com/Scalar_Physics/Steven%20Mark/Steve n_Mark.htm Please don't say that the above demonstrations were faked, Dr. Kaku. There are many engineers who examined the device. And some demonstrations were made outdoors, far from any possible sources of energy.

The TPU units shown in the videos apparently use gauge transformations. Those would be the same kind of gauge transformations that, for decades, you theorists have been telling us allow for electromagnetic energy non-conservation, but then say don't have any practical applications. And we know that theoretical physicists are never wrong, don't we? So the device cannot work, can it? So why then does it work? Could it be that gauge transformations do have practical applications? Could it thus be that theoretical physicists could be wrong about the impracticality of using gauge transformations to make energy? I think so. Do not gauge transformations lead to electromagnetic energy nonconservation? And is it not true that in your analysis of free energy devices you assume that electromagnetic energy is conserved? That is a grave inconsistency, sir. And arguing that gauge transformations lead to no change in the electric and magnetic fields is not at all convincing as the question relates to energy, not electric and magnetic fields. Would you say that gauge waves cannot exist? And if you do allow that they can exist, would they not carry energy, possibly in both positive and negative forms? Where then am I wrong, Dr. Kaku? Or could I be right -- along with many other Ph.D. physicists and engineers who are regularly dismissed as crackpots? You have said that you greatly respect the work of Nikola Tesla, and surely you have studied his inventions and his life. If so, then you might be aware that Nikola Tesla was planning to transmit power all over the world in a way that you would surely say is impossible. But you must know that Nikola Tesla was a very careful experimenter who tested every idea before employing it. What then is the answer to the implied dilemma? So, Nikola Tesla was just a wild man, right? A nut. While Michio Kaku and his 11 dimensions make wonderful sense. Or could you and others be wrong about what Nikola Tesla was doing? Could it

even be the case that Tesla was using electromagnetic theory that included the very gauge transformations that physicists of this era do not include? Is that not possible, sir, and if not, why not? Therefore, if I may speak freely, I would say that while millions or even billions of people live in desperate poverty, and while millions of Americans lose their jobs because we don't have this kind of technology -- you tell people that such technology is impossible, when it isn't. Is everyone who disagrees with you and other leading theorists a crackpot, Dr. Kaku? Was Nikola Tesla a crackpot? I would strongly suggest that he wasn't at all a crackpot but was one of the greatest inventors in the history of the world -- and I believe you have also said as much. So why then would you dismiss Tesla's ideas about free energy? I must say that I have seen many smirks in association with production of free energy -- Smirks -- while millions of Americans lose their jobs and the United States falls into a terrible economic decline. Smirks. Is that appropriate, sir? I would say not. But the matter does not end with the above TPU units. There is also the work of Thomas Henry Moray who was able to produce an estimated 50 kilowatts of power from a tabletop unit that my analysis indicates involved employment of negative mass electrons which Dr. Moray apparently captured in very special circuits he built -- many, many decades ago. Here is a link to what I have written about Dr. Moray's work. There are many more links on the Internet: Please do take the time to investigate. A world desperate for energy waits. http://www.doctorkoontz.com/Scalar_Physics/Energy/index.htm Robert W. Koontz, Ph.D.Experimental Nuclear Physicist The URL of my web site is given below. There is a link on the main page to my bio: http://www.DoctorKoontz.com/

What is in between Casimir plates?

Is there matter so dense that it pulls the plates together? No, there's nothing between the plates. The plates are PUSHED together from the outside. According to Einstein's model of gravity, (which he said isn't a force) The Casimir effect would generate infinite curvature of space which requires infinite mass at which point the entire universe instantly falls in the well and is destroyed... Fail! Casimir Force doesn't destroy the universe, nor does it generate infinite mass or ANY curvature of space, nor is there dark matter in between the plates pulling them together. It's not that you generate a massless particle which then bends space which generates massive particles... Lol You spin massive particles with uniquely imprinted waveforms to generate helical magnetic flux lines. And in rotation the "electrons" converge and condense. Creating the PHYSICAL MANIFESTATION OF THE MATHEMATICAL EQUIVALENT to "dark matter". Only way to generate those flux lines I know of is through rotating uniquely imprinted waveforms. In Searl's system, that generates cooper pairs. (bosons) There is no Higgs Boson... Because a massless particle can't make a hill out of space first of all. Misconception. It's an accumulation of negative energy. The tip to the Higgs Field Diagram shows a Compounded Spherical and Rounded Cone. Like how they think a “black hole” forms a well with a closed tip.

But thereʼs a major difference between a very tight conical frustum and a closed cone. ABSOLUTE FAILURE!!!! Why call it a black “hole” and then give a diagram for a closed “well” as if bending the meniscus of water?

The magnetic field lines converge tangentially. As an open frustum. Like the Iris of a camera. Is there a ball of invisible dark matter at the center of an iris getting more compact? Thatʼs how absurd the model is.

Thatʼs like saying the Pupil of your eye is compacted dark matter that generates the iris and scalera and holds the rest of your eye together… FAIL!

Someone needs to wake up the people at CERN! Siesta is over. Time to circumcise the sombrero homes.

An open frustum cone is not a closed well. Sort of defeats the entire notion of a “singularity”/ infinite densities/ dark matter/ curved space/ empty space, etc. Should look more like a bundt cake mold.

STATIC “HIGGS FIELD”

DYNAMIC SEARL FIELD

Hereʼs another thing thatʼs absurd about CERNʼs model. To me… it looks like the math works either way if you turn the diagram upside down. (Or look at it in the inverse) How do you know that the so called fabric of space isnʼt really being bent by massless particles into a hill from the other side of the meniscus? The model for positive matter again shows Earth in a closed well.

And they say the well is generated by the mass of the Earth… But they just said a hill is generated by a massless particle… 2 sides of the same meniscus... Why isnʼt the Mass of the Earth generated by Massless particles by pulling the fabric of space from the other side then? Massless particles bend space now.. so why not state that all matter is just the result of massless particles combining on the other side of the meniscus of nonexistent curved space? See how laughable this is?! If 1 side of space sinks, then the other side must raise by my simple mind. Sorta the whole idea behind looking at a parabolic dish from both sides. 1 side is convex, the other side is concave. 2 sides… same bowl. If you state 1 thing… you have to account for the scenario in the inverse.

Canʼt just have a well on 1 side of a meniscus without making a hill on the other side by default. Is there only 1 side to a coin now too CERN?! Only 1 side to the bundt cake mold? Only 1 side to a sombrero? If you make a divot on 1 side of a coin…. Then whatʼs on the other side of the coin? A HILL… If you have a divot on 1 side of a bundt cake mold… whatʼs on the other side? A HILL… So, by Einsteinʼs logic, there should be 2 worlds. 1 on either side of his non-existent meniscus of the fabic of space. AS matter makes a divot on this side, then simultaneously a massless particle would be making a hill from the other side. Ok… by that logic, which one generates the other? Neither.. Why? Because the entire model is bullshit. This is such a joke! Massless particles pulling the fabric of space into a hill collecting matter NOT ONLY IN THE TROUGH OF THE SOMBRERO… BUT ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE MENISCUS… Absolutely Ridiculous. CERN is trying to smash together 2 incoherent fermions in hopes of coupling them together to make a coherent boson. (which they donʼt even label in their erroneous diagram.) O_o Are they insane!?! (They must be since they're repeating their actions expecting different results. It's like a pathetic gambler who needs just 1 more loan. They have the formula to win this year right? What a joke.) Analogy: That's like pointing 2 flashlights with white bulbs at each other in hopes that it will someone isolate a particular bandwidth and make a laser beam. So they spend more and more money on brighter white bulbs. Expecting that by intensifying current failures with a more expensive set up will somehow reap their results. O_o If the square peg isn't fitting through the round hole.... you don't continue to push harder. You try something else... (I learned that all by myself when I was less than a year old!)

In order to even generate their “higgs field”, you need to have something in an orbit first. Then it generates the frustum out of magnetic field lines which then tighten like an iris. Might be so tight that you THINK itʼs a closed convex or concave shell, but thereʼs a “HOLE.” Not that thereʼs a stationary massless ball particle that magically pulls space to a hill to make a sombrero (while simultaneously mass is pushing a well on the other side to fill the hat). And then 1 ball particle of mass is generated in the trough of the sombrero. Even in their diagram they show TWO divots but only 1 stationary ball…

Which means that 1 ball would need to orbit on the Z axis around the Y Axis while maintaining the same plane on the X axis at ( , -2). But always staying 5 points away from the fulcrum/ shaft of the Y axis according to this graph to make a circular orbit on 1 plane. Canʼt have a stationary single ball make 2 divots in 2 points of space at the same time. Nonsense! At least grow a pair and have 2 balls for your 2D diagram cross section. Whatʼs the cross section of a torus look like?

At least have 2 stationary balls for the 2D diagram. Or accurately show a dynamic orbit motion of at least 1 ball (cylinder) orbiting around the cone (frustum) of the circumcised sombrero. (that means you need fermions/ “electrons” to spin around in a ring at high frequencies) Funny CERNʼs own facility is an open Ring yet they canʼt recognize a cross section of their own model…. and conclude a closed well. Must be all that “dark matter” in the center of the 17 mile facility. Or their skulls for that matter. Lol Here's a small list of costs for CERN..... JUST FOR THE YEAR 2008.... $21.5 Million for Extra Computing demands $146.5 Million for Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider Operations $79.2 Million for the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator $158 Million for Tevatron Operations at Fermilab for Collider and other neutrino physics programs $62 Million for US CERN Scientists Single year 2008 Expenditure TOTAL from the US Dept of Energy in its ongoing investment in CERN & related activity = $467 Million Dollars Numbers drawn from page 69 of CERNs 2008 budget form.

..... meanwhile.... Professor John Searl's claims require 3 million dollars, 18 months full time work and a team of less than a dozen personnel. If my taxes go to pay for Cern's crap... is there a way I can opt out please? Just put that money toward Professor John Searl instead please. Occam's Razor... It'll cut the cost.

That 1 diagram is from page 115 from just ONE of Searl's books. Here's a picture of 25 of his books. The other 60 or so were on the shelves. Couldn't fit them on the table... or the others in boxes...

Higgs Field? More like THE SEARL EFFECT

Watch some leading University or CERN itself publish a new diagram soon showing a "dynamic higgs field" with a swirling grid up the cone instead of a "static higgs field" like in their current diagrams and understanding. They'll probably try to attribute it to rotational frame-dragging and/or Lense–Thirring Effect or a rotating Kerr "hill". http://albert51.tripod.com/bhole.htm. They would have to claim it's the result of a spinning massless particle. Which is so laughable it's pathetic. At least call it negative mass.... or more specifically, a rotation of an accumulation of "electrons". Condensed from converging at the conical and tangential flux lines up the FRUSTUM. (See why Iʼm so “frustrated!”) If they make a new sombrero model with a twist and claim credit, just look back on this note and diagram and push to get Searl the support he needs. Invest a fraction of the funding into Professor John Searl so we can actually have a unit to Display these effects. Not just get a new diagram with a twist and a claim they discovered it to justify their last billion dollar budget. LOTS more to discuss and share and show in context. Lots.

This next image is the one that did it for me finally.

The Poincare Conjecture

Apples fall on your head. But Halos surround your head. Same mass equivalent can be present in the form of negative energy (gravitational mass), but will manifest in the form of a ring. Not a dense ball like positive mass. (Inertial mass) http://www.dirac-was-right.com/negative-energy.php Things to think about that will screw up your day. Positive Mass with a Positive Charge (Proton)/ Positive Inertia Positive Mass with a Negative Charge (Anti-Proton)/ Negative Inertia Negative Mass with a Positive Charge (Positron)/ Positive Gravity Negative Mass with a Negative Charge (Electron)/ Negative Gravity Positive Mass compact to spheres. Negative Mass condense into a torus. "Electrons" Have a negative charge. But are they really positive mass? You can change the sign of mass, but it won't change the charge.

http://phys.org/news/2015-01-magic-quantum-revealed-coldatoms.html

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100412084525.htm

The same math for a positive mass with a negative charge is transitory to a negative mass with a positive charge. Thought of something with the orbital electron theory to explain it in terms of this comparison photo. Mass equivalence from multiple spheres to 1 torus. If there are 2 alleged electrons orbiting in the inner shell, to me, that means the negative mass equivalent of 2 electron balls but in the form of 1 ring. So the mass of 2 ball electrons is there, but equally distributed in a torus instead of 2 spheres. The torus becomes twice as energy dense. If there are 8 electrons in a shell... that means the negative mass equivalent of 8 ball electrons is evenly distributed in a ring. More energy dense, but still 1 ring. 1 ring per "shell". As for the double slit experiment. That would be a 90 degree version of what you see in the Walter Russell image. Russell's image is showing an aeriel view. Parallel to the meniscus of water compared to the double slit experiment which is perpendicular to the meniscus.

But if you were to see it head on, it would look like ripples in a pond. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100412084525.htm That's why it's so confusing for people. Because they ASSUME they are shooting ball particles, when really they are sending expanding rings which look like waves from head on. Because electrons have mass (negative). But mainstream says all mass is positive. So they assume a ball particle and see a wave, then make up a fantasy about how the ball becomes a wave as soon as you look. So you're not shooting 1 electron from a gun in the form of a ball. You're shooting an electron at a specific energy density at which will form ripples regardless. But the amplitude of the ripple will change depending on how energy dense. In the Poincare Conjecture, it's ASSUMED the ring shrinks down to a "point." NOPE A ring cannot become a point. But at the Planck scale... when it WOULD become a point... you get a "gravitational collapse" because the energy is converging at the center of an iris. Has no where to go, then MUST do something else. (phase transition) Negative mass CANNOT form a sphere or point. So it collapses like a cavitation bubble to form another ring. But like how an "electron" jumps to a higher or lower energy state and "jumps electron shells". What happens is that the large ring become a more energy dense smaller ring. Folds in on itself after reaching a critical compression (condensation) Or the inverse is a smaller ring expands to become a less energy dense larger ring.

I need help to make my a version of the periodic chart showing "electron orbitals" as concentric circles of varying thickness. (almost like layers of saturnʼs rings) More electrons per shell = a thicker more energy dense torus per concentric ring. Instead of using multiple balls per shell on an imaginary ring of equal thickness per shell... you have to use the same mass equivalent but distributed in actual torus. I think this helps explain the 1/2 spin BS in quantum theory. You can't have a solid ball with 1/2 spin. Doesn't work. a ball can spin 1 way OR the other. But a torus can fold in on itself like a smoke ring. On 1 side of the torus will be folding in CW "1/2 of the spin" and the other side will be folding in CCW. The other half? A ball cannot have ½ spin. Absurd.

There are six shells for neodymium. Six concentric rings of varying energy density. 2, 8, 18, 22, 8, 2 Not that there is actually 2 balls orbiting the nucleus in the inner shell, 8 balls orbiting in the second shell, 18 balls orbiting in the third shell, 22 balls orbiting in the fourth Shell, 8 balls orbiting in the fifth Shell, 2 balls orbiting in the valence sixth shell. To me, it's more like the inner shell has the negative energy density equivalent to two ball electrons but evenly distributed in one ring. The 2nd shell has a negative energy density equivalent to eight ball electrons but evenly distributed in 1 ring. The 3rd shell has a negative energy density equivalent to 18 ball electrons but evenly distributed in one ring. The 4th shell has a negative energy density equivalent to 22 ball electrons that are evenly distributed in one ring. The 5th shell has a negative energy density equivalent to 8 ball electrons that are evenly distributed in one ring. The 6th shell has a negative energy density equivalent to 2 ball electrons that are evenly distributed in one ring. Not that ball electrons randomly pop into existence where ever you happen to look. Lol

Still have to show ‪Dan Winter's donut with the colored spiral. Which is actually representative of what mainstream would call "frame dragging". Which is a lag in a rotating magnetic field. Which causes an inverse centripetal spin of negative mass UP and AROUND the outside of a frustum cone that forms in the center of the donut like an iris. (Not down the inside of a cone like ball particles in a water vortex) Then the energy converges and condenses around the ever decreasing radii of the iris field which then collapses like a cavitation bubble through the donut to form a toroid shape itself again. But because of the tangential field lines converging, the collapse manifests as a swirling donut. (dynamic) Like a "Kerr Black Hole" (which is NOT a well resulting from a positive mass sphere) More like the iris of a camera. You cannot shrink a sphere of positive mass to make a ring. Nor can you cannot form a sphere out of a negative mass ring. They are 2 different shapes and states. Einstein called that the equivalence principle which is why he thought gravity and inertia were the same. That's like saying a sphere and a ring are the same. FAIL! Relativity is for linear moving Spheres and positive mass. Absolutivity is for non-linear spinning Rings and negative mass. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_time_and_space

Pink Line on the square grid in the upper left corner represents E Field. Red Line in that grid Represents B field. You can transpose a Square grid into a torus where we see the correct orientation of electric to magnetic. The 3rd Vector is rotation. The Pink Line and Red Line are 90 degrees to each other. Just as magnetic and electric forces act on each other. How to get them to interact? What is half of 90 degrees? 45 degrees. So you take the 45 degree angle of the square grid and when you transpose it onto a torus, you get a swirl or wave if you trace the path. Which means a dynamic motion of both electric and magnetic forces. Moving in the SAME direction, which accelerates the system. The numbers correlate with weights/ densities needed to make the unit. Cannot deviate from certain numbers or the unit won't function. Like how a tuning fork won't hit a desired pitch unless it's precise.

Since it's a torus, it's representative of negative mass. Which normally behaves the opposite of positive mass. (spheres) The negative mass (electrons/ ring) move in epicycles in the SAME direction as the positive mass (orbiting rollers) in the SEG. The coherent grid in green shows randomness converted to order. Like the incoherence of energy all around us in ambient energy form. But in this system, it's in a controlled imbalanced state. Which means the energy is conserved, represented by the 34 at a constant. Regardless which way you add the numbers, always the same. Regardless which way you move the energy, it's always one. Always a Bose-Einstein condensate. As opposed to the other state which is resistive and subject to Fermi-Dirac. The waveform as imprinted on the rollers and stator interact to form another wave which acts as a gear and impels the rollers around the stator. As a cascading energy conversion takes place. Making random into order. Dropping the temperature and generating an electric current as an open system. Apparently, random electricity is heat and inertia while organized electricity is cold and gravity. Understanding the SEG - Reality of Costs/ "Blueprints" - Mock Up vs Prototype - Coherence vs Chaos - History of John Searl - Current Status of Project & Context: http://www.scribd.com/doc/217826903/Understanding-John-Searl-s-SEG FAQs: http://searlsolution.com/contact2.html Searl Playlist: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL648B9EAD08EF537F Searl Sites: http://www.SearlMagnetics.com/ http://www.SearlSolution.com/members/technology5.html http://www.SwallowCommand.com/index-4.html http://www.SearlAerospace.com/ 3rd Party sites: http://www.SearlEffect.com/free/allaccess/allaccess.html http://www.JohnSearlStory.com/

Pdf of Lecture on John Searl: http://www.scribd.com/doc/134608782/John-Searl-and-the-SEGPresentation Professor John Searl Album (Facebook): https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.409237198301.184888.68358 3301&type=3 Professor John Searl Photobucket Album: http://s108.photobucket.com/user/Therealverbz/library/John%20Searl There are many people trying to COPY Professor John Searlʼs work. If PhD holding professionals are spending millions of dollars to investigate Searlʼs claims…. With success achieving anomalous results… Then thereʼs obviously justification for funding THE ACTUAL INVENTOR HIMSELF WHO IS STILL ALIVE AND LIVING IN SAN DIEGO, CA. So many people would love to talk to Nikola Tesla or would get him full funding if he were alive today. Well John Searl is here and NOW. And others are spending lots of time, money and effort to reap just a fraction of what the Searl Effect Generator is capable of.

Paul Murad & Morningstar Energy Box Audio Interview: http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/paul-murads-searl-effectgenerator.html Murad Technical Data (which cost about $500,000): http://www.americanantigravity.com/files/documents/Paul-Murad-SEGReplication.pdf

Russian Validations (which cost a couple million dollars) http://www.rexresearch.com/roschin/roschin.htm Picture of Russian Prototype:

Short video of Russian Prototype with translation: "Russian physicist/ scientist Sergei Godin & Vladimier Roschin have observed that when the rotor turned clockwise it's weight reduced, and when spun the other way it gained weight. Such effects can only be obtained when a device affects the gravitation and inertia of the body. Experiments continue." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1_xtwsr3Go Dr. Tom Valone Speaks on Electrogravitics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unMr8l1j2Do Welton Meyers Account: http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Welton_Myers#Searl_Effect_Gener ator Arthur Manelas' Magnets: "The first technology that Arthur demonstrated on my visit was a magnet that had been poled in a specific way. When you observed the magnetic field rather than the usual long sweeping waves between north and south, this had small micro domains. It looked like for a lack of a better explanation Egyptian hieroglyphics." -- Mark Dansie http://revolution-green.com/memory-arthur-manelas Dr. Paul Brown Attempted Magnetization 1986: http://www.scribd.com/doc/127455220/SEG-Experiment-by-Dr-PaulBrown-1986 SEG Background: http://www.rexresearch.com/searl4/searl4.htm Design: http://www.rexresearch.com/searl/searl.htm Ultra Efficient LED (for context) http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-03/09/230-percent-efficient-leds

Podkletnov: http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0108005 Dr. Podkletnov describes his “force beam generator” experiment and his improvements to increase the experimental gravity-beam. The force beam is generated by passing a high-voltage discharge from a Marx-generator through a YBCO emitter suspended in a magnetic field. He described it as being powerful enough to knock over objects in the lab as well as capable to punch holes in solid materials. After careful testing, Podkletnov found the speed of the impulse to be approx. 64 times the speed of light (64c), which he indicates doesn't conflict with interpretations of Relativity. http://nextbigfuture.com/2014/05/update-on-podkletnov-gravity.html "Podkletnov claims the gravitational beam is generated by a 3 to 5 megavolt drop onto a 4-inch diameter superconductor, which is enclosed in a wrapped-solenoid to create a magnetic field around the apparatus." http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/eugene-podkletnov-ongravity-shielding.html "The beam doesn't disappear rapidly with distance -- in fact, its been measured at distances of up to 5 kilometers and seems to penetrate all materials without a decrease in force." http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/eugene-podkletnov-onantigravity.html "Someone in the laboratory was smoking and the smoke rose in a column above the superconducting disc. We placed a ball-shaped magnet above the disc. We found that any object above the disc lost some weight, and we found that if we rotated the disc, the effect increased."

Boeing and Podkletnov: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2157975.stm

NASA and Podkletnov (Look into Dr. Ning Li)

Propagation of Gravity based on Lorentz 1 min. 50 second audio: http://wri27.com/mp3/gravity.mp3 Gravity as 2nd Order Function http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0505194 Dr. Eugene Podkletnov Interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgyAFElQZcU

Please Watch this for Context:

Where else can we find these little Higgs Field shapes in nature?

More of Nature’s Coherent Order:

A microscopic image of the underside of the Elytra (wing casing)

Compare the natural array on the underside of a scarab’s Elytra to a man-made nanostructure on a “revolutionary solar panel” http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/06/new-nanocone-solarpanels-will-revolutionize-the-energy-industry-2242003.html

Underside of Elytra of Scarab Beetle - Hydrophilus Triangularus:

http://www.dailytech.com/Scientists+Solve+Greatest+Superconductor +Puzzle+Yet/article12800.htm

'The property is exhibited primarily by cuprates, brittle ceramic materials composed of two-dimensional sheets of copper and oxygen separated by more complicated layers of atoms. When cuprates are cooled below a certain temperature, electrons in the copper-oxygen sheets suddenly overcome their mutual repulsion and pair up. With their powers combined, they behave like a different type of particle altogether, a boson, which has the unique ability to join with other bosons into a coherent swarm that moves as one. This bosonic swarm perfectly conducts electricity. A current flowing through a loop of cuprate wire will persist forever — or as long as the liquid-nitrogen fridge stays on.' http://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20140430-decoding-thesecrets-of-superconductivity

Again, look at all that expensive equipment needed for this kind of research. If that particular team working on researching they would be able to explore what they are currently exploring?

Electrons Not the Cause of Charged Grains: http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/58

Electrons are Not Enough: Cuprates Defy Convention http://phys.org/news/2013-03-electrons-cuprate-superconductorsdefy-convention.html

Science that Stumped Einy: http://phys.org/news/2014-07-science-stumped-einstein.html#jCp

A Counterintuitive Phenomenon: http://phys.org/news/2014-06-counterintuitive-phenomenoncoexistence-superconductivity-dissipation.html

Law of Squares – The Basics

Professor John Searl understands patterns. He sees a seemingly chaotic state (Brownian Motion) and is able to see how it can be transformed into an ordered state and/or coherent flow (laser-like focus). This has to do with everything from transduction, to DNA, to calculating densities, to calculating electric outputs and a lot more. John Searl has written about 100 Books on this subject in sets. Volumes of material. http://www.searleffect.com/free/store/store.html In the picture above are only 25 books. There were about 40 more on the shelves that I couldn't fit on the table. And there are more still in boxes. "All that the Law of the Squares does is to give you a route in which, if you've got your sum right, gives you the option to achieve your objective. Whether you're designing a building or what ever it is... it gives you a route to follow. Which 99.9% of the time will be perfect. No adjustments needed." -- John Searl

I kept wondering how the HELL John could fill in the squares so quickly. I gave him 1 number in 1 box, and in 30 seconds, he would fill in the rest. All the numbers will add to the same sum no matter which way you add. There was obviously a pattern that I couldn't see. "Because the squares have structure, it's got DNA.! That means every square has a mathematical value to connect to the next one. And so on. As long as you know the DNA, then it's child's play." -John Searl The Law of Squares is a numbered matrix. Like Sudoku. It's also called "Magic Squares". Many people throughout history have understood the same laws and patterns. One man most known for the squares was named Lo Shu. In this note, I'm only going to show the basic patterns I've learned, and the relationships between the numbers. We have years of research to do in order to find how all this relates to Walter Russell's "Cubic Wave Field", Marko Rodin's "Vortex Based Math", Eric Dollard's work regarding "counter-space", the function of DNA, and a lot more. At age 6, John Searl started having reoccurring dreams of Squares and Hop Scotch.

When John Searl was working for the electric company as a 14 year old, he saw a piece of paper with a little 2 next to a big 2.

He asked the foreman what it meant and the man answered it was "2 squared". John asked, "What is 2 squared?" The man said, "You know, 2 squares on top of 2 squares. Equals 4 squares. 2^2 = 4. 2 x 2. Two by Two"

John asked, "But what is the value of the squares?" (meaning what do the blank spots represent?)

The man said, "They don't represent anything, it's just a formula we use to get the answer. Count the number of squares and you get the answer." John Searl knew something was missing. How can you have empty squares? They have to have Some value in reality. He thought back to his 6 years of reoccurring dreams and started coming up with volumes of material to explain what the Value is of the squares represents and more. He would develop his own unique way of using an ancient concept of "Magic Squares" as a calculator. This has huge implications. John was looking at it literally.

2^2 = 4. "Four what?" - J.S. "Four Squares." -Boss But you can't just have "a square" in reality. Those 4 squares are the face of a cube. "What is the value?" - J.S. "Value" is the unit of measurement you assign. Whether it be grams per cubic centimeter (g/cm^3), or grams per cubic meter (g/m^3), or pounds per cubic meter (lbs/m^3), pounds per cubic foot (lbs/ft^3), tons per cubic foot (ton/ft^3), etc etc etc., So, "Four what?" - J.S. "Four Squares." - Boss But in reality those squares represent 1 side of a cube. Cube of what? What is the weight and volume of the cubes? Both individually and as a whole. Keep asking, "What is the value?" until you assign the desired units and actually describe something in reality. Even though each number represent blocks within a larger cube (small composites in a total volume), we are only paying attention to 1 side of the cube. 1 face.

Just make sure you stick with any 1 given side and stick with the same units when assigning each square a number. Those numbers represent units whether grams, pounds, etc. Because it's part of a cube, you know to assign a cubic measurement whether it be cm, meters, inches, feet, miles, light years, etc. Thus, the /__^3. Fill the space by assigning a unit. The squares already tell you the equations in the right format. Just need to assign what you're calculating by using Real examples. So, let's assign some numbers. We'll get to adding the sums up in a bit. First we'll understand more about the mass and volume (space) part.

Let's pick the diagonal numbers, 3, 5 and 7. Assign them a value (unit) Let's use grams. 3g, 5g and 7g. But you can't just have "weight" in reality. With weight comes volume. If an object "weighs" something, it will have volume and take up space. (Weight is only measured relative to 2 or more bodies. All objects are inherently "weightless" unto themselves)

Look at this image again, but in a literal sense:

The numbers are over a cube. What does that mean mathematically if you were to write it out? 3/__^3, or 5/__^3, or 7/__^3 But you can't just have an exponent (the cube) by itself in reality. "What is the value?" What unit of measurement are you going to assign for the __? cm, meters? feet? And remember the numbers over the cube represent quantities in reality. Assign the unit: 3 grams/cm^3, or 5 grams/cm^3, or 7 grams/cm^3. And again, "What is the value?" 3 grams, 5 grams and 7 grams of What? Depends on what you're measuring. Assign a material to it or compound or alloy. Let's say copper. 3 grams of copper/cm^3. What does that mean in reality? That means there is 3 grams of copper per every cubic centimeter of space.

That right there tells you the equation to find the density. D = m/v. Density equals mass divided by volume. Mass is the weight. Volume is the amount of space or length x width x height. If you know the weight of copper per a given amount of space (1 cubic centimeter)... what is 1 centimeter x 1 centimeter x 1 centimeter? 1 x 1 x 1 = 1. So the volume is 1 in this case. The mass is the weight which is 3 grams. m/v = D 3 divided by 1 = 3. So the Law of Squares tells you how to calculate the density as well as gives you the equations by translating the position of numbers in a literal sense. And translating the ambiguous numbers on a 2D square into a 3D reality using real materials You assign and knowing their weights and volumes (by measuring). All of that and more in John Searl's head as a child. In an instantaneous avalanche of questions and logic. From seeing this:

O_o Interesting phenomenon take place when coils are in resonance. What phenomenon would take place from having the density of mass in resonance between materials in a solid state system or system of any kind? How many electrical systems account for the DENSITY of materials used in that system? How many people account for Density when making a part? Most only need outer dimensions. Ask how much more difficult 3D printing would be if the printer had to account for density to make a part. Add that to the CAD maker's program. He'll love that.

The SEG is made according to Density. Everything is built around that. The output of the SEG is dictated by its density. The Law of squares is a calculator. For a lot of things. Let's use it for digits Start simple at first with a 3 by 3 square:

The point is to add each row up horizontally, vertically and diagonally. When all the numbers are in regular order, you get different sums:

How can you arrange the numbers so that they all add to the same sum no matter which way you calculate?

TAKE NOTE OF THE PLACEMENT OF THE 9 NUMBERS. THIS TELLS YOU HOW TO SOLVE ANY 3 BY 3 SQUARE! Let's try bumping it up by one digit. Instead of 1 through 9, let's use 2 through 10.

((I'm keeping the 1 - 9 in the square so you know how to place ANY consecutive numbers in the squares))

Now let's add up add the large digits:

Notice how they all add up to 18 now. If we use 3 through 11, we follow the same rules. But the sum will equal 21. If we use 4 through 12, we follow the same rules. But the sum will equal 24. If we use 5 through 13, we follow the same rules. But the sum will equal 27. We're on a 3 by 3 square. And every time you bump up the sequence by 1 digit, the sum will increase by 3.

Now let's move to a 4 by 4 square. The rules are the same no matter what the matrix/ grid/ square. You just need to know the initial order. Then that will give you the route to take for ANY consecutive numbers.

TAKE NOTE OF THE PLACEMENT OF THE 16 NUMBERS. THIS TELLS YOU HOW TO SOLVE ANY 4 BY 4 SQUARE.

Now let's try starting with the number 17 in Square 1 and follow the rules:

Add up each row and you'll get 98.

Now start with the number 18 in Square 1 and follow the rules:

Add up each row and you'll get 102 Now start with number 19 in Square 1 and follow the rules:

Add up each row and you'll get 106.

When you bump up the digit by one in a 4 by 4... the sum will go up by 4. Just like the sum goes up by 3 in a 3 by 3 square! The same will go for a 5 by 5 to infinity. So I drew a line from square 1 to square 2 to square 3, etc. This is the image I got. Perfectly symmetrical!

And if you draw a line through each column that adds up.. you get this image:

Here are a few examples from John Searl:

The relationship between the purple sets are 5, 7 and 15. Top purple example skips every 5th number starting with 3. 3, 8, 13, 18, 23, etc 3 goes in square 1. 8 goes in square 2. 13 goes in square 3. 18 goes in square 4. etc. Second example skips every 7th number starting with 7. 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, etc. 7 goes in square 1. 14 goes in square 2. 21 goes in square 3. 28 goes in square 4. etc. Third example skips every 15th number starting with 13. 13, 28, 43, 58, 73, etc. 13 goes in square 28 goes in square 43 goes in square 58 goes in square 73 goes in square Etc

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Here are some switching methods to get from the regular order that doesn't add up, to the "random" order that adds up to the same sum.

Magic Square Physics BY IVARS PETERSON 3:57PM, JUNE 30, 2006

The study of magic squares has a long, long history. In ancient Babylonian times, these array of numbers were held to have magical powers. Over the years, they have also served as protective charms and religious symbols. At the recreational level, they're fun for all ages, says Peter Loly of the University of Manitoba. Loly himself has investigated the "physical" properties of magic squares—treating the numbers of each such square as physical quantities. A magic square is a square matrix drawn as a grid filled with numbers. It consists of a set of integers arranged in the form of square so that the numbers in each row, column, and diagonal all add up to the same total. If the integers are consecutive numbers from 1 to n2, the square is said to be of nth order. The magic sum itself is given by n(n2 + 1)/2. Suppose, for example, you interpret the numbers as masses. You can then determine a magic square's moment of inertia about a given axis of rotation. For any specific case, you obtain the moment of inertia, In, of a magic square of order n about an axis at right angles to its center by summing mr2 for each cell, where m is the number centered in a cell and r is the distance of the center of that cell from the center of the square measured in units of the nearest neighbor distance. You find that the moment of inertia, Iz, about the square's center (an axis at right angles to the square) is twice the moment of inertia about an axis of rotation along the center row or column. In general, you can show that, for order n, Iz = [n2 + (n4 – 1)]/12. So, for n = 3, Iz = 60; for n = 4, Iz = 340. "This is the only property of magic squares, aside from the line sums, which is solely dependent on the order of the square, n," Loly and

Adam Rogers note in a paper published in 2004 in the Canadian Undergraduate Physics Journal. The same formula applies to semi-magic squares, which don't meet the standard requirement that diagonals also sum to the magic number. Such an analysis can be extended to magic cubes. A magic cube consists of n3 numbers, arranged so that each row, column, and main diagonal give the same sum. In the case, the magic constant is n(n3 + 1)/2. Here's one example. 2

13

27

16

21

5

24

8

10

22

9

11

3

14

25

17

19

6

18

20

4

23

7

12

1

15

26

The three layers (above) of a 3-by-3 magic cube. Loly and Rogers show that the moment of inertia of a magic cube is n3(n3 + 1)(n2 – 1)/12. In effect, they demonstrate that magic cubes have the same inertial form as a spherical top. It's also possible to consider the numbers of magic squares to be electric charges and to extend such analyses to higher dimensions. Loly has even calculated the so-called Eigen values of magic squares, which are related to their "fundamental frequencies" if you were to set these squares ringing like a bell. "When treated as mass distributions, magic squares give clear and accessible examples of the properties of the moment of inertia," Loly says. "When treated as matrices, magic squares also serve as exceptional examples of some advanced linear algebra theorems." Check out Ivars Peterson's MathTrek blog at http://blog.sciencenews.org/.

Some other seemingly related diagrams from Walter Russell (1926)

Abstract ~ In the present paper the results of the experimental research of Magnetic-Gravity Effects are presented. The abnormal magnetic and thermal changes in the radius of 15 meters from the researched device were measured as well. PACS: 41.20.-q; 44.60.+k; 76.50.+q Introduction ~ There has been a great interest in examining nonlinear effects in the system of rotating magnetic fields. Such effects have been observed in the device called Searl's generator or SEG (SEG, Searl Effect Generator) [1-4]. An SEG consists of a series of three rings and rollers that go around those rings. All parts of SEG are based on the Law of the Squares. The rollers revolve around the plates that form the rings, but they do not touch them. There's a primary north and south pole on the rollers and a primary north and south pole on the plates. Obviously you will have the north pole of the roller attracted to the south pole of the plate. The plate and the rollers have layered structure. The external layer - Titan, then Iron, Nylon and last internal

layer was made from Neodymium. John R.R. Searl has supposed that the electrons are given off from the central element (which is neodymium), and they travel out through other elements. If nylon had not been put there, the SEG would act like a laser and one pulse would go out and it would stop, build up, and another pulse would go out. But, with the nylon being, nylon acts as a control gate, and that control gate gives you an even flow of electrons throughout the SEG [4]. In [4] it was shown that in the process of magnetization of the plate and rollers, the combination of constant and variable magnetic fields for creating a special wave (sine wave) pattern on a plate surface and rollers surface was used. The basic effects are the rollers self-running around a ring plate and reduction of weight up to occurrence of propulsion and flying up of all magnetic system. These effects come about because of a special geometry of experimental setup. It was shown that the work of the device in critical regime is accompanied by biological and real physical phenomena. Unfortunately except for the listed references we could not find other information where similar effects are be mentioned. In this paper we present the experimental device the results we have obtained. The Description of the Experimental Installation ~ The basic difficulty is in a choosing the materials and maintaining the necessary pattern imprinting on the plate and rollers surfaces. To simplify the technology we decided to use a one-ring design with onering plate (stator) and one-ring of rollers (rotor). It is obvious, that it was necessary to strengthen the rollers on a rotor by the bearings and balance the rollers well. In the suggested design the air bearings were used which provided the minimum losses due to friction. From the available description [1-4] it was not clear how it is possible to make and magnetize the stator with a diameter of about one meter. In order to make the stator from separate magnetized segments executed on the basis of rare earth magnets with the residual induction 1T; the segments were magnetized in a usual way by discharging capacitor battery through the coil. Afterwards the segments were assembled and glued together in a special iron armature, which reduced magnetic energy. To manufacture the stator 110 KGs of rare earth magnets were used, and to manufacture the rotor 115 KGs of that material was used. High-frequency field under magnetization was not applied. It was decided to replace an

imprinting technology described in [1-4] with cross-magnetic inserts having a flux vector directed at 90 degrees to a vector of basic magnetization of a stator and rollers of a rotor. For these cross inserts the modified rare earth magnets with a residual magnetization of 1,2 T and coercive force a little bit greater than in a base material was used. In Figure 1 and Figure 2 the joint arrangement of stator 1, elements of a rotor - rollers 2 and a way of their mutual gearing by means of cross magnetic inserts 19, are shown. Between the stator and roller surfaces the air gap d of 1 mm is left. No layered structure was used except a continuous copper foil of 0.8 mm thickness which wrapped up the stator and rollers. This foil has the direct electrical contact to magnets of a stator and rollers. Distance between inserts in the rollers is equal to distance between inserts on the stator. Figure 1: Variant of One-Ring Converter ~ The ratio of parameters of the stator 1 and the rotor 2 in Figure 2 is chosen so that the relation of stator diameter D and roller diameter d is an integer equal to or greater then 12. Choosing such a ratio allows us to achieve a magnetic spin wave resonant mode between elements of a working body of the device.

Figure 2: Organization of Magnetic Gearing Stator & Rollers ~ The elements of magnetic system were assembled in a uniform design on the aluminum platform. In Figure 3 the general view of the platform with one-ring converter is displayed. This platform was supplied with springs, amortizators and had a possibility of moving vertical on three supports. The value of displacement was measured by the induction meter of displacement 14; thus the change of the platform weight at once has been defined during the experiment in real time. Gross weight of the platform with magnetic system in the initial condition was 350 KGs.

Figure 3: General View of the Platform with One-Ring Converter ~

The stator 1 was mounted motionlessly, and the rollers 2 were assembled on a mobile common separator 3, connected with the basic shaft 4 of the device. Through this shaft the rotary moment was transferred. The basic shaft by the means of friction muff 5 was connected to the electrodynamics generator 7 and starting engine 6, which accelerated the converter up to a mode of self-sustained rotation. Along a rotor the electromagnetic inductors 8 with open cores 9 were located. The magnetic rollers 2 crossed the open cores of inductors and closed the magnetic flux through electromagnetic inductors 8, and induced emf in them, which acted directly on an active load 10 (a set of incandescent lamps with total power 1 kW). The electromagnetic inductors 8 were equipped with an electrical drive 11 and had an opportunity to smoothly move on supports 12. To study the influence of the external high voltage on the characteristics of the converter the system of radial electrical polarization was mounted. On periphery of the rotor ring electrodes 13 were set between the electromagnetic inductors 8 having with the rollers 2 air gap of 10 mm. The electrodes are connected to a high-voltage source; the positive potential was connected to the stator, and the negative to the polarization electrodes. The voltage was adjusted in a range of 0-20 kV. In experiments the constant value of 20 kV was used. In case of emergency braking, friction disk from the ordinary car braking system was mounted on a basic shaft of the rotor. The electrodynamics generator 7 was connected to active load through a set of switches ensuring step connection of the load from 1 kW to 10 kW. The converter under going testing had in its inner structure the oil friction generator of thermal energy 15, intended for taping a superfluous power (more than 10 kW) into the thermo-exchange contour. But since the real output power of the converter in experiment has not exceeded 7 kW, the oil friction thermal generator was not used. The complete stabilization of revolutions of the rotor was carried out by electromagnetic inductors connected to an additional load, which was set of incandescent lamps with total power 1 kW.

Experimental Results ~ The magnetic-gravity converter was built in a laboratory room on three concrete supports at a ground level. The ceiling height the lab room was 3 meters. Besides the presence of the iron-concrete ceiling, in immediate proximity from the magnetic system there was a generator and electric motor, which contained some tens KGs of iron and could potentially deform the field's pattern. The device was started by the electric motor, which accelerated the rotation of the rotor. The revolutions were smoothly increased up to the moment the ammeter included in a circuit of the electric motor started to show zero or lower value of a consumed current or even a presence of the back current. The presence of the back current is detected at approx. 550 rpm. The magnetic moving sensor 14 starts to detect the change in weight of the whole installation at 200 rpm. Afterwards the electric motor is completely disconnected by the electromagnetic muff and the ordinary electrodynamics generator is connected to the basic shaft of the device through the same muff. The rotor of the converter continues to self-accelerate and with the approach to the critical mode of 550 rpm, the weight of the device quickly changes. In addition to the change speed of rotation the weight depend of the power, removed into active load, (the set of ten ordinary electrical water heaters of 1 kW was used) and of the applied polarizing voltage, as well. At the maximum output power equal to 6-7 kW the change of weight G of the whole platform (total weight is about 350 KGs), reaches 35 % of the weight in an initial condition G?. A load of more than 7 kW results in a gradual decrease of revolutions and exit from the mode of self-generation with the subsequent complete stop of the rotor. The weight of a platform can be controlled by applying of a high voltage to cellular ring electrodes located at a distance of 10 mm from external surfaces of the rollers. Under the high 20 kV voltage (electrodes negative pole) the increase of taped power in circuit of the basic generator more than 6 kW does not influence G while the revolutions per min is not decreased to 400 rpm. "Tightening" of this effect is observed as well as the effect of hysteresis on G (a kind of "residual induction"). The experimental diagrams given on Fig.4 illustrate the modes of the converter operations.

Figure 4: Modes of Operation of the Magnet-Gravity Converter ~ The effect of a local change of the platform weight is convertible relative to the direction of rotor turning, and has the same hysteresis. At clockwise rotation the critical mode comes in the area of 550 rpm and the propulsion force against the direction of gravitation vector is created, by analogy, at counter-clockwise rotation the critical mode comes the in area of 600 rpm and the propulsion on the direction of gravitation vector is created. The difference in approach to a critical mode of 50-60 rpm was observed. It is necessary to mention that the most interesting region lies above the critical area of 550 rpm, but due to of a number of circumstances the implementation of such research was not possible. Other interesting effects include the work of the converter in the dark room when corona discharges are observed around the converter's rotor as a blue-pink glowing luminescence and a characteristic ozone smell. The cloud of ionization covers the area of a stator and a rotor and has accordingly toroidal form. On the background of luminescence glowing on rollers' surfaces we distinguished wave picture. A number of more vigorous strips of discharges around the rollers were observed. These discharges were of the white - yellow color is, but the characteristic for the arc discharges sound was not audible. One more effect previously not mentioned was observed i.e. the vertical magnetic "walls" around the installation. We noticed and measured the abnormal permanent magnetic field around the converter in the radius of 15 meters. The zones of an increased intensity of a magnetic flux 0,05T located concentrically from the centre of the installation were detected. The direction of magnetic field vector in these walls coincided with the direction of rollers' field vector. The structure of these zones reminded circles on water from the thrown stone. Between these zones a portable magnetometer, which used the Hall's sensor as a sensitive element, did not register abnormal magnetic fields. The layers of an increased intensity are distributed practically without losses up to a distance of about 15 meters from the centre of the converter and quickly decrease at the border of this zone. The thickness of each layer is about 5 - 8 cm. The border of each layer has sharp shape, the distance between layers is about 50 - 60 cm and it slightly accrues when moving from the centre of the converter. The steady picture of this field was observed as well at a height of 6 m above the installation (on the second floor above the

lab.). Above the second floor the measurements were not carried out. The abnormal fall of the temperature in direct affinity from the converter was also found. While the common temperature background in laboratory was + 22? (2?) the fall of temperature equal to 6-8? was noticed. The same phenomenon was observed in vertical magnetic walls as well as. The measurements of temperature inside the magnetic walls were carried out by the ordinary alcohol thermometer with inertia of indication about 1,5 min. In the magnetic walls the temperature changes can be distinctly observed even by hand. The hand when placed into this magnetic wall feels real cold at once. The similar picture was observed at the height above installation, i.e. on the second floor of the laboratory as well as despite the ferro-concrete blocking of ceiling. Discussion ~ All the results we obtained are extremely unusual and require some theoretical explanation. Unfortunately the interpretation of results within the framework of the conventional physical theory cannot explain all the observed phenomena and first of all the change of weight. The change of weight is possible to interpret as a local change of gravity force or as an occurrence of propulsion force by repelling from its own field. Direct experiment, confirming a presence of draft force was not performed, but in any case both interpretations of the weight change do not correspond to the modern physical paradigm and demand reconsideration of the standard theory of gravitation or criticism of the second law of Newton, both of which are only possible if we take into consideration the now-advert physical media ether as understood by Faraday-Maxwell-Mie. From the modern physics position electrilization and luminescence of the converter's magnetic system in the near zone is not completely clear. The phenomenon of the magnetic and thermal "walls" may be connected with Alphen's magnetic-sound waves raised in near zone in magnetized plasma induced by a variable magnetic field of a rotating rotor [5]. At the present time we can not give an exact description of the interactions mechanism with environment and transformation of energy, but it is completely obvious, that without the use of the

concept of physical media --- the ether in a sense of FaradayMaxwell-Mie we are completely unable to give physically substantial theory of these phenomena. In conclusion, we emphasize that the issues of the biological influence effects and especially of the variations of real time stream effects, which must be taking place in an operative zone of the converter, were not considered at all. These issues are extremely important and absolutely unexplored; though there are some mentions of J.R.R.Searl about healing action of the SEG's radiation. Our own experience allows to make only cautious assumption that the short-term stay (dozen minutes) in a working zone of the converter with the fixed output power of 6 kW remains for the people without observed consequences. The present paper is only a beginning. References ~ 1. Herbert Schneider, Dr. J.B. Koeppl, Hans-Joachim Ehlers: "Begegnung mit John R.R. Searl"; Raum und Zeit, #39 (1989), pp. 75-80. 2. S. Gunnar Sandberg: "Was ist Dran am Searl-Effect; Raum und Zeit, #40 (1989), pp. 67-75. 3. Herbert Schneider & Harry Watt: "Dem Searl-Effect auf der Spur"; Raum und Zeit, # 42 (1989), pp.7581; #43, pp.73-77. 4. John A. Thomas, Jr.: "Anti-Gravity: The Dream Made Reality"; Extraordinary Science, VI (2) 1994. 5. L.D.Landau, E.M.Lifshits: Electrodynamics of Continuous Media; Moscow, Nauka, 1982. (in Russian)

Technical Physics Letters 26 (12): 1105-1107 (2000) "An Experimental Investigation of the Physical Effects in a Dynamic Magnetic System" V.V. Roschin & S.M. Godin Inst. of High Temperatures, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia Abstract ~ It is demonstrated that a magnetic system based on rare-earth magnets is capable of converting various forms of the energy, provided that a certain critical operating regime is set up. As the critical regime is attained, the experimental setup becomes energetically fully autonomous. This is accompanied by local variations in the total structure weight, a decrease in the surrounding air temperature, and the formation of concentric "magnetic walls" at a distance of up to 15 meters from the experimental setup. Introduction ~ We have experimentally studied the physical effects in a system based on rotating permanent magnets (1). Below we describe the technology of manufacture, assembly, and the results of testing this experimental setup, which is referred to as the converter. Technological Description ~ The converter comprises an immobile stator and a rotor moving around the stator and carrying fixed magnetic rollers. The magnetic system of the working body of the converter has a diameter of about 1 meter. The stator and magnetic rollers were manufactured from separate magnetized segments made of rare-earth magnets (REMs) with a residual magnetization of 0.85 T, a coercive force of [Hc] ~ 600 kA/m, and a specific magnetic energy of [W] ~ 150 K/m3. The segments were magnetized by a conventional method based on a discharge of a capacitor bank through an inductor coil. Then the magnetized segments were assembled and glued together in a special mounting stage, which provided for the necessary tolerance in positioning the segments and for the removal of magnetic energy.

Using this mounting stage, it was possible to glue the elements into the common unit. The stable incorporated REMs with a total weight of 110 kg and the rollers contained 115 kg of the same REM material. The magnetic system elements were assembled into a single structure on a special platform made of non-magnetic structural alloys. The platform construction was provided with springs and shock absorbers and allowed the converter setup to move in the vertical direction on three sides. The motion was monitored by an inductive transducer. Which allowed changes ion the platform weight to be determined in the course of the experiment. The total weight of the platform with the magnetic system in the initial state was 350 kg. Description of the Observed Effects ~ The converter was installed in a 2.5-meter high laboratory room using three concrete supports on a ground level. In addition to the ordinary steel-reinforced concrete ceiling blocks, the converter equipment featured a usual electrodynamic generator and an electric motor, with a total iron weight of several tens of kilograms (only these parts could, in principle, introduce distortions into the electromagnetic field pattern observed). The converter was set to operate by over-speeding the rotor with the aid of the electric motor. The motor speed was gradually increased until the ammeter connected in the motor circuit showed zero consumed current and the current direction reversal. This state corresponded to a rotor speed of approximately 550 rpm, but the motion transducer began to indicate a change in the platform weight already at 200 rpm. Then the electric motor was disconnected using an electromagnetic overrunning clutch, and a usual electrodynamic generator was connected instead to the main shaft of the converter via another electromagnetic clutch. On attaining the critical regime (~550 rpm), the rotor exhibited a sharp increase in the rotation speed; this was accompanied by a slow-down in the rate of the current weight reduction.

At this instant, the first 1 kW load was connected to the system. Immediately upon this connection, the rotation speed began to decrease, while the Delta G value kept increasing, and so on as depicted in the figure.

A diagram illustrating various operation regimes of the magnetogravitational converter showing (I) load power (kW) and system weight variation; (II) 7-kW load (high voltage off); (III) 7-kW load (high voltage on); (IV) supercritical regime; (V) subcritical regime (1, high voltage off; 2, high voltage on). The system weight variation depend both on the power consumed by the active load (the load consisted of 10 ordinary 1-kW heating elements) and on the polarization voltage applied. For a maximum consumed power (7 kW), a change in the total platform weight reached 35% of the initial value in the immobile state (350 kg), which corresponded to 50% of the pure weight of the working body of the converter. An increase in the load power above 7 kW led to a gradual decrease in the rotor speed and, eventually, to the system going out of the self-generation regime and the rotor speed decreasing until the

full stop. The platform weight could be controlled by applying a highvoltage signal to the cellular ring electrodes situated 10 mm above the external roller surface. Upon applying a 20 kV signal (negative polarity on the electrodes), an increase in the load power consumption above 6 kW did not affect the Delta G value even when the rotor speed decreased down to 400 rpm. This was equivalent to "prolongation" of the effect and was accompanied by phenomena of the remnant induction" type with respect to Delta G. The converter operation in various experimental regimes is illustrated in the figure. The effect of the system weight variation is reversible with respect to the direction of rotor motion and exhibits certain hysteresis. For the clockwise rotation, the critical regime is observed in the region of 550 rpm and is accompanied by development of the force acting against the gravity vector. For the counter-clockwise rotation, the onset of the critical regime is observed at approximately 600 rpm and the extra force coincides in direction with the gravity vector. The onset of the critical regime exhibited a scatter within 50-60 rpm. It should be noted that, probably, some other critical resonance regimes may exist, which correspond to higher rotor speeds and markedly greater useful load levels. Proceeding from the general theoretical consideration, the output mechanical energy must nonlinearly depend on the internal parameters of the converter magnetic system and the rotor speed, so that the observed effects are likely to be far from optimum. Establishing of the maximum output power maximum weight variation, and the converter energy resource is of considerable theoretical and practical interest. Besides the phenomena described above, a number of other interesting effects were observed in the system studied. In particular, the converter operation in the dark is accompanied by a corona discharge with a pink-blue light emission and by the production of ozone. The ionization cloud is formed around the stator and rotor, acquiring a toroidal shape. The general corona discharge background is superimposed with a wavy pattern corresponding to the surface of the rollers: the zones of increased emission intensity are distributed along the roller height in a manner similar to that observed for the high-voltage microwave induction energy storage in the prebreakdown state.

These zones appeared yellowish-white, but the emission was not accompanied by sounds characteristic of the arc discharge. Nor did we observe any visible erosive damage on the stator and rotor surfaces. One more effect, which was never reported previously, is the appearance of vertical "magnetic walls" surrounding the setup. We have detected and measured an anomalous constant magnetic field around the converter. The measurements revealed zones of increased magnetic strength on the order of 0.05 T arranged coaxially relative to the system center. The direction of the magnetic field vector on the "walls" coincides with that in the rollers. The structure of these magnetic zones resembles the pattern of circular waves on the water surface. No anomalous field is detected by a mobile magnetometer, employing the Hall effect transducer, in the area between zones. The layers of increased magnetic field strength are propagating with virtually no attenuation to a distance of 15 meters from the converter center and then rapidly decayed at the boundary of this 15-meter area. Each layer zone is 5-8 cm thick and exhibits sharp boundaries. The layers are spaced by 50-60 cm, the spacing slightly increasing with the distance from the converter center. A stable pattern was also observed at a height of 5 meters above the setup (the measurements were conducted in a 2nd floor room above the laboratory; no tests were conducted on a still higher level). Another interesting phenomenon consists in an anomalous temperature drop in the immediate vicinity of the converter. At a general room temperature level in the laboratory (+22 +-2 C), the temperature at the converter surface was 6-8 C lower. Similar temperature variations were detected in the vertical magnetic "walls". The temperature changes in the walls were detected by an ordinary alcohol thermometer with a reading set time of 1.5 minutes. The temperature variations in the magnetic "walls" can even be sensed by the human body: a hand placed inside the "wall" immediately feels cold. The same pattern was observed at a height of 5 meters above the setup in a 2nd floor room above the laboratory (despite the steelreinforced concrete blocks separating the rooms).

Discussion of Results ~ All the experimental results described above are very unusual and need some theoretical rationalization. Unfortunately, attempts at interpreting the obtained results within the framework of the existing physical theories showed that no one of these models can explain the whole set of experimental data. Recently, Dyatlov (2) attempted to combine the concepts of electricity and gravity by introducing the so-called electronavigation and magnetic-spin coefficients into the Heaviside gravity equations and the Maxwell field equations. This provides for a relationship between the gravitational and electrical components, as well as between the magnetic and rotational components in a given medium. The assumptions are built around a special model of inhomogenous physical vacuum, called the vacuum domain model (2). It is suggested that the extra relationships are absent outside the vacuum domain. Although it is difficult to imagine a long-living vacuum domain, the proposed model provides for a satisfactory explanation (at least on a qualitative phenomenological level) for the appearance of emission, the system weight variations, and the conversion of energy taken from the surrounding medium into the rotational mechanical moment of the rollers. Unfortunately, the theory cannot provide a physical pattern of the observed phenomena. Conclusion ~ At present, the work on a developed variant of the converter are in progress at the Glushko "NPE Energomash" company (Moscow). This setup would allow a deeper insight into the physics of observed phenomena. Another aim is the creation of commercial samples for various practical applications. References ~ (1) Thomas, J.A.: Anti-Gravity: The Dream Made Reality ~ The Story of John R.R. Searl; Direct International Science Consortium, London, 1994), Vol. 1, Issue 2. (2) Dyatlov, V.L.: Polarization Model Heterogenous Physical Vacuum (Inst. Mat., Novosibirsk, 1998); Translated by P. Pozdeev.

M. Pitkanen: About Strange Effects Related to Rotating Magnetic Systems An explanation of the Roschin-Godin experiment in terms of Topological Geometro-Dynamics (TGD). [PDF]

Russian Patent # 2,155,435Mechanical Energy

Generating Device & Process

[ PDF ] Publication date: 2000-08-27 Application Number: RU19990122275 19991027 ~ Priority Number(s): RU19990122275 19991027 IPC Classification: H02N11/00; F03H5/00 Abstract ~ Power engineering and transport; miscellaneous industries. UBSTANCE: Single-row power module has stator and rotor with rollers combined by common separator. Stator and rotor are made of permanent magnets or electromagnets based on composite laminated magnetic, conducting, and insulating materials. Main shaft of device is coupled via free-wheel clutches with starting motor that brings device to automatic speed-maintaining mode of operation and device loading system which is, essentially, electrodynamic generator mechanically coupled with main shaft of device. Electromagnetic transducers are radially arranged on device periphery. Propulsion control is effected by adjusting mechanical energy taken off the device and by producing radial electric polarization on its periphery by means of annular electrodes separated from rotor rollers by air gap. Electrodes are connected to high-voltage power supply. Generating process includes electric power supply to starting gear, acceleration of rotor shaft to working speed, take-off of generated energy, and adjustment of mentioned energy and propulsion by varying rotor and stator speed through varying load of generator connected to device as well as by adjusting high voltage applied from external power supply. EFFECT: Reduced energy consumption. 9 cl, 17 dwg.

New Energy Technologies, Vol. 10 (1), Jan.-Feb. 2003, p. 47 [ Excerpted from www.sisrc.com ] Background The Searl Effect Generator (SEG) technology, as applied to the commercial market, had been previously developed to the point where a few prototype SEG generators were made, and used for electricity generation and motion. Commercial interest at that time focused on the SEG’s transport potential and, under commercial pressure to deliver a fully functional system, the original generators were used and lost in a series of vehicular propulsion experiments and demonstrations. Funding was insufficient to continue with the manufacture of the required larger-scale pressurized cabin machines --- resulting in the termination of the project at that time. Although all the operating principles, precise proportions and weights of the required materials are known for three of the four required operating materials, the precise data of the original magnetic layer is uncertain. The objective of the current R&D program is to re-establish the original magnetic layer using modern and more efficient materials. Originally, the layered materials were constructed and magnetized by the now-defunct Midlands Electricity board under the direction of John Searl. Modern magnetic materials have advanced considerably, and old ones discontinued, so a series of tests need to be conducted to establish the optimum materials and processes, These tests need to comply with the working criteria required and must lead to a costeffective manufacturing process. In recent times SISRC has been re-establishing the original research. Due to the very limited funding that has been available, only a partially functioning demonstration prototype of the SEG principles has been possible. This prototype consists of the innermost of the three composite tings required and several rollers…

Technical Description Physically the Searl Effect Generator (SEG) consists of three concentric rings each made of a composite of four different materials which are also concentrically attached to each other. The three rings are fixed to rotate around them, are rollers --- typically 10 on the first ring, 25 on the next, and 35 on the outer ring. Surrounding the rollers on the outer ring are coils which are connected in various configurations to supply either AC or DC current at a variety of voltages. Multiple magnetic poles are imprinted on the rings and rollers to form frictionless magnetic bearings. These also arrange the static charge into opposing charge clusters which cause the rollers to rotate around the circumference of the ring (as shown in Figure 2)

Some expressions currently in use to describe the source of the energy for the SEG are the Space Fabric, Quantum Energy Field of Space, or Zero Point Energy. This is an unlimited and constant source of energy which can be made to flow when the correctly proportioned masses concerned are stimulated by the correct frequencies creating an ‘open system’. The idea of utilizing this source of energy is currently the subject to

various devices and experiments such as the ‘Lamb Shift’, ‘Casimir Effect’, and the work of the Russian Nobel Prize winner Ilya Prigogine. However, these devices and experiments tend only to prove the existence of energy and not a method to create a coherent, ordered flow to produce useful power. In contrast, John Searl has discovered that, in order to create a steady and stable flow, all the masses of the device (and the stimulating frequencies) must conform to precise values determined mathematically by the ‘Law of the Squares’. A machine constructed to these principles produces a stable and useful power output. Definition of a Surface-Operating SEG A linear motor operating on a magnetic bearing with the characteristics of an auto-transformer. The SEG is defined as a device, which is constructed from 2,124 component parts, which make up 3 plates and 66 roller sets. 12 of the 2,124 components create the 3 plates, which act as reaction components. 2,112 components are employed to create 66 roller sets, which act as active components. Each roller set consists of 8 segments constructed from 32 components. Each segment cannot be less than 34 grams in weight, as the law of squares defines that value as the lowest value suitable for the reasonable generation of electricity. Therefore the smallest roller set must weigh 272 grams, making a grand total of 2,244 grams per roller set for the smallest surfacebound SEG. Tolerance should be about 0.05 gram per roller set. The larger the error the greater is the loss of power within the unit. Therefore the total tolerance for the smallest SEG roller set must not be greater than 3.30 grams --- above this factor the SEG will not function. For the best results, the tolerance across the total 66 roller sets should not exceed 0.05 grams! The SEG is a step-up rotary transformer. In fact it’s a ‘three rotary transformers’ operational system, within a unit. The inner transformer output is fed in to the input of the second plate which increases the output of the second unit, thereby increasing its final output to a very high voltage. Therefore the SEG is just a prime mover for the

production of clean electrical energy. The output windings must be designed to step down this output to 240 volts at 15 kW. When the SEG rollers are brought into close proximity to the SEG Ring, the Searl Effect resonant magnetic field causes negative ions and electrons to be drawn into and accelerated through the machine. This process is assisted by the highly electron-attracting rare earth metal Neodymium. The unique mechanical and material arrangement of the SEG pulses the neodymium to continually release and replace the surplus electrons to provide electrical or mechanical power, or both.

Development Prior to the production of complete 15 KW SEGs, a minimum of two demonstration Ring and Roller prototypes are to be produced. The ‘Ring’ is typical of the innermost of the three rings required to make a complete SEG. The 69-roller sets in a complete 3-ring SEG are identical. Six roller sets will be made for the prototype inner rings so that the Searl Effect can be demonstrated. The production of a self-running Ring and Roller prototype will establish the precise sequence and parameters of electrical, magnetizing and material processes required for the SEG and will demonstrate electrical power generation. An operating single inner ring with 1-8 rollers will also determine if a particular material will function correctly and at what level of power output… Open Source Energy network http://www.opensourceenergy.org Video Link: http://www.opensourceenergy.org/_layouts/apps/vplayer2.asp?v ID=24 ( IFNE Conference, Denver CO, 1994 ) www.searleffect.com NOTES "The Searl Effect Generator (SEG) is a magnetic diode, and what one may consider one of the original "Free Energy" Devices. The inventor of the technology is Professor John Robert Roy Searl of England. The SEG in essence is a composite ring made of an electron reservoir (a rare earth like Neodymium), a magnetized accelerator stage (Iron or Nickel), an electron flow regulator stage (Nylon 66 or Teflon), and finally, a paramagnetic layer (Aluminum or Copper). The design of the SEG is both beautifully simple and infuriatingly complex at the same time..." "Inside each of these IGVs there is a powerful 3-ring SEG which provides levity to the craft through a combination of magnetic, electrostatic and flywheel effects, many of which I freely admit are beyond my comprehension.

"The iron element in the SEG "plate" (the big ring) is magnetized with a combined DC and AC magnetizing sequence which causes many poles to form all over the surface of the iron, in a wave like pattern corresponding to the AC frequency used. The iron element is then combined with the others (which are NOT involved in the magnetizing process) in a process called sintering - pushing them together under pressure. The same is done for the smaller magnets, or "rollers", except that each roller consists of eight stacked segments held together by the magnetic field. When you have twelve roller stacks and a correctly magnetized plate, and place the rollers on the plate as below, something truly amazing happens.

"There are only ten rollers in the picture for safety reasons, as in a full set, the rollers will accelerate to 250km/h around the plate! This incredible feat is due to the instability of having an AC sine imprint on the plate and a cosine print on the rollers - instability created as the fields conflict causes the rollers to orbit the plate. They are held down by the magnetic field and thrown out by the centrifugal forces, so the rollers do not actually touch the plate when in motion. Thus, friction is virtually non-existent, and the high electrostatic charge accumulated by the SEG soon ionizes all the nearby air and pushes it totally away from the SEG, enveloping it in an intense vacuum. High voltage flashover thus becomes impossible, and the potentials created by the generator can reach monstrous levels.

"Unlike any other form of electrical technology, the presence of electron flow throughout the generator actually cools it, reducing the resistance. This is due to free electrons being pulled out of the air and the resulting energy deficit causing the air to cool. As one places a greater and greater load on the SEG's induction coils (fitted so that the rollers pass through them to produce high-frequency AC), the rollers accelerate to accommodate the added energy drain, more power is pulled from the air, and the temperature lowers even further. A critical point is eventually reached. At 4 degrees Kelvin, the SEG becomes superconductive and totally loses electrical resistance. At this point, it levitates, completely enveloped in a perfect vacuum. Without control, it will accelerate up away from the Earth and disappear off into space, never to be seen again. To control it, a powerful radio frequency emitted nearby is required. If the same RF is transmitted as the AC frequency used to magnetize the rollers, they will completely stop. This acts as an ideal control gate, preventing the loss of costly generators.

——————————————————————————————

Take Note that there Indeed are volumes of scientific literature corroborating John Searl’s claims and the dynamics of the SEG, open systems, electronic and magnetic coherence, etc. You just have to be prepared to take the time and search, READ, compare, experiment and have on-going conversations. I’ll probably include more articles that seemingly relate or validate the science of the SEG.

Boeing and Podletnov: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2157975.stm

Dr. Eugene Podkletnov: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgyAFElQZcU Podkletnov: http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0108005 Dr. Podkletnov describes his “force beam generator” experiment and his improvements to increase the experimental gravity-beam. The force beam is generated by passing a high-voltage discharge from a Marx-generator through a YBCO emitter suspended in a magnetic field. He described it as being powerful enough to knock over objects in the lab as well as capable to punch holes in solid materials. After careful testing, Podkletnov found the speed of the impulse to be approx. 64 times the speed of light (64c), which he indicates doesn't conflict with interpretations of Relativity. http://nextbigfuture.com/2014/05/update-on-podkletnov-gravity.html "Podkletnov claims the gravitational beam is generated by a 3 to 5 megavolt drop onto a 4-inch diameter superconductor, which is enclosed in a wrapped-solenoid to create a magnetic field around the apparatus." http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/eugene-podkletnov-ongravity-shielding.html

"Someone in the laboratory was smoking and the smoke rose in a column above the superconducting disc. We placed a ball-shaped magnet above the disc attached to a balance. The balance behaved strangely. We substituted silicon and still the balance was very strange. We found that any object above the disc lost some weight, and we found that if we rotated the disc, the effect increased." “Pulses are powerful enough to punch through brick, concrete, and deform light-metals "like hitting it with a sledgehammer". "The beam doesn't disappear rapidly with distance -- in fact, its been measured at distances of up to 5 kilometers and seems to penetrate all materials without a decrease in force." http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/eugene-podkletnov-onantigravity.html

Article: http://www.nano.org.uk/news/965

http://phys.org/news/2011-03-space-chessboard.html

http://gizmodo.com/pouring-saltwater-over-graphene-generateselectricity-1563379860

Funny quotes to look back on from “experts” of their day. ''The Bomb will never go off; I speak as an expert in explosives." - - Admiral William Leahy , US Atomic Bomb Project "There is no likelihood man can ever tap the power of the atom." -- Robert Millikan, Nobel Prize in Physics, 1923 "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." -- Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895 "Airplanes are interesting toys but of no military value." -- Marechal Ferdinand Foch, Professor of Strategy, in France. "Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons." -- Popular Mechanics, forecasting the march of science, 1949 "There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home." -- Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977 "The super computer is technologically impossible. It would take all of the water that flows over Niagara Falls to cool the heat generated by the number of vacuum tubes required." -- Professor of Electrical Engineering, New York University "But what is it good for?" -- Engineer at the Advanced Computing Systems Division of IBM, 1968, commenting on the microchip. This 'telephone' has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered a means of communication. The device has inherently no value to us." -- Western Union internal memo, 1876. "The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who would pay for a message sent to nobody in particular?" -- David Sarnoff's associates in response to his urgings for investment in the radio in the 1920s. "If I had thought about it, I wouldn't have done the experiment. The literature was full of examples that said you can't do this." - - Spencer Silver on his adhesives for 3-M "Post-It" Notepads.