STAAD-Pro Analysis Input For Frame – 3 .........................................................................101
6.4.3
Support Reactions For Frame – 3 ............................................................................. ...................................................................................... ......... 110
STAAD-Pro Analysis Input For Frame – 4 .........................................................................123
6.5.3
Support Reactions For Frame – 4 .............................................................................. ...................................................................................... ........ 131
STAAD-Pro Analysis Input For Frame – 5 .........................................................................142
6.6.3
Support Reactions For Frame – 5 .............................................................................. ...................................................................................... ........ 146
7 ANA LYSIS FOR COUNTERFORTS COUNTERFORTS ........................................................................................ .................................................................................................... ............ 147 7.1 CF – 8.......................................................................... 8................................................................................................................................................ ........................................................................... ..... 147
BGR Energy Energy Syst ems Ltd . Project
KHAPARKHEDA TPS 1X500MW Expansion Project
Title
WAGON TIPPLER – Design of Foundation
Doc. No.
GID-091-CV-CAL-3481C
Page 3 of
Rev
B
292
7.6.2
STAAD-Pro Analysis Input For CF - 13..............................................................................181 13 ..............................................................................181
7.6.3
Support Reactions For CF – 13.......................................................................................... 182
8 ANA LYSIS OF BA SE RAFT ...................................................................................... ................................................................................................................183 ..........................183 8.1 STAA D SKETCHES .......................................................................... ..............................................................................................................................183 ....................................................183 8.2 STAA D-Pro ANA LYSIS INPUT ................................................................................. ............................................................................................................186 ...........................186 9 ANA LYSIS RESULTS – PRESSURE ON SOIL: .................................................................................232 10 DESIGN OF BA SE RAFT ............................................................................ ....................................................................................................................234 ........................................234 10.1
CHECK FOR PUNCHING SHEAR ................................................................................ ............................................................................................. ............. 237
11 DESIGN OF COUNTERFORTS COUNTERFORTS .................................................................................. ...........................................................................................................239 .........................239 11.1
DESIGN OF CF8.........................................................................................................................239
11.2
DESIGN OF CF9.........................................................................................................................245
11.3
DESIGN OF CF11.......................................................................................................................253
11.4
DESIGN OF CF12.......................................................................................................................258
11.5
DESIGN OF CF13.......................................................................................................................263
12 DESIGN OF WALLS WAL LS .......................................................................... ............................................................................................................................268 ..................................................268 13 CHECK FOR BUOYANCY BUOYA NCY IN BUILDING PORTION PORTION ..........................................................................271
BGR Energy Syst ems Ltd .
1
Project
KHAPARKHEDA TPS 1X500MW Expansion Project
Title
WAGON TIPPLER – Design of Foundation
Doc. No.
GID-091-CV-CAL-3481C
Page 4 of
Rev
B
292
GENERAL
1.1
SCOPE
This document covers the design of Base Raft, Columns, Walls & Counterforts for Wagon tippler complex for 1x500 MW Expansion project for Khaparkheda TPS.
1.2
UNITS OF MEASUREMENTS
Units of measurements used in analysis shall be of SI Units.
1.3
CODES AND REFERENCES
The following codes and standards have been referred: Project Reference Drawings / Documents 1 2 3
Density Characteristic Strength Modulus of Elasticity
25
N/ Sq mm
Reinforcing Steel
1.5
5 of Rev
MATERIAL PROPERTIES Material
Density Characteristic Strength Modulus of Elasticity
PLA NT SITE INFORMATION
25000
N/ sq mm
78.5
kN/ cum
500
N/ sq mm
200000
N/ sq mm
Page
Remarks IS : 875 Part - 1 IS-456 (2000) IS-456 (2000)
B
292
BGR Energy Syst ems Ltd .
2
Project
KHAPARKHEDA TPS 1X500MW Expansion Project
Title
WAGON TIPPLER – Design of Foundation
Doc. No.
GID-091-CV-CAL-3481C
Page 6 of
Rev
B
292
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE & GEOMETRY
The geometry is considered as per ELECON drawings Ref [3] to [9]. Wagon Tippler complex Comprises of an Underground RCC portion and a structural steel shed with sheeting. The Underground portion ( Coal Hopper and machinery Hatches) consists of RCC frames spaced at 3.5m c/c with RCC wall panels on the sides and RCC raft at the bottom fixed to the frames. The counterfort columns along the sides and the raft beam forms a closed continuous structural frame placed at the stated intervals. The intermediate space is filled by RCC panels all around except at the top. The coal hopper arrangement can be seen from the GA drawing as below Basic geometric dimensions assumed for counterforts, coulmns and beams are furnished in the figures shown below. :
BGR Energy Syst ems Ltd . Project
KHAPARKHEDA TPS 1X500MW Expansion Project
Title
WAGON TIPPLER – Design of Foundation
Doc. No.
GID-091-CV-CAL-3481C
Page 7 of
Rev
B
292
Soil Support Below Foundation :
The soil support is modeled as spring supports and details of spring stiffness used in the analysis are as below. The foundation for the structure has been modeled as a raft on elastic soil. The soil spring value for the frame spaced at 3.5 m c/c and support placed at 0.9965 m c/c has been calculated as follows As the soil investigation repo rt allowable bearing pressure at 10 m below FGL is 300 kN/m2 corresponds to 25 mm settlement. In the Hopper portion As the soil investigation repo rt allowable bearing pressure at 20 m below FGL is 400 kN/m2 corresponds to 25 mm settlement in the Tunnel portion For Frame 1 & Frame 1a spring constants are calculated as follows The soil spring constants are estimated using cross hole shear test results furnished by client. From test results, Shear modulus of soil below the foundation, G
= 1.11E+6 KN/m2
Poissons ratio of soil
= 0.33
BGR Energy Syst ems Ltd . Project
KHAPARKHEDA TPS 1X500MW Expansion Project
Title
WAGON TIPPLER – Design of Foundation
Doc. No.
GID-091-CV-CAL-3481C
Page 8 of
Rev
B
292
For Base Raft spring constants are calculated as follows
The soil spring constants are estimated using cross hole shear test results furnished by client. From test results, Shear modulus of soil below the foundation, G
= 1.095E+6 KN/m2
Poissons ratio of soil
= 0.3386
Depth of embedment below ground level
= 17.6m
Total area of the raft
= 353.187 m2
Average horizontal dimension perpendicular to rocking axis(L)
= Raft area/length = 353.187/22.86 = 15.45m
Raft dimension parallel to rocking
= 22.86m
From fig. 4.12 of “Hand Book of Machine Foundations by Sri P. Srinivasulu and C.V Vaidyanathan” 2.1
BGR Energy Syst ems Ltd .
3
Project
KHAPARKHEDA TPS 1X500MW Expansion Project
Title
WAGON TIPPLER – Design of Foundation
Doc. No.
GID-091-CV-CAL-3481C
Page 9 of
Rev
B
292
ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL SHED
Loading on Portal Roof Spacing of Portal Spacing of Purlins
= =
1.00m
14.75m
1.00m
14.75m
7.0 m 1.3 m
1.00m
13.15m 16.15m
Y Z
X
Load 1
LOAD COMPUTATION a) DEAD LOAD 1) Selfweight of Sheeting + Fixtures 2) Selfweight of Purlin (MC150) 3) D L d
= =
2
0.060 kN / m 2 0.168 kN / m 2 0 2 0 kN /
BGR Energy Syst ems Ltd . Project
KHAPARKHEDA TPS 1X500MW Expansion Project
Page
Title
WAGON TIPPLER – Design of Foundation
10 of
Doc. No.
GID-091-CV-CAL-3481C
Rev
B
292
b) LIVE LOAD 2
1) Live load = 0.59 KN/m
=
0.59 kN / m
2
LOAD DISTRIBUTION AT NODES AT NODE 101 TO 120 O
0.59 X 7.0 X ( 1.3/2 + 1.3/2 ) X COS 18 = 5.132 KN AT NODE 99 100
O
0.59 X 7.0 X ( 1.05/2 + 1.3/2 ) X COS 18 = 4.638 KN AT NODE 96, 97, 121, 122 O
0.59 X 7.0 X ( 1.31/2 ) X COS 18 = 2.585 KN AT NODE 95, 98 O
0.59 X 7.0 X ( 1.05/2 ) X COS 18 = 2.062 KN
C) WIND LOADS k1 = k2 = k3 = Vb = Vz =
1.07 1.06 1 44 49.905
wind pressure on first span(a) wind pressure on next span(b)
External pressure coeff (cpe) a b c d -0.78 -0.60 -0.3 -0.48
(for category II & class B structure) m/sec m/sec Design pressure Pd = 1.49 (-0.78+-0.7) = 1.49 (-0 6+-0 7)