Stress is a part of day to day living of every individual. The students may experience stress in meeting the academic demands, people on the job and business men may suffer stress to reach office in time and to complete the projects on time and even
“A study of Job Stress among employees Of Public Sector Banks and Private Sector In – A case study of State Bank of India (SBI) & Development Credit Bank (DCB) of Mumbai”
Dasar-dasr pengukuran tanah untuk wilayah tambangFull description
Bab pendahuluanDeskripsi lengkap
Defenisi stress dan stress akademik
Full description
Makalah
Full description
MakalahDeskripsi lengkap
stress recoveryDescrição completa
Failure analysis, fractography, microstructure
stress managementFull description
Kuesioner stress
Manajemen StressFull description
Atividade Stress
Academic StressFull description
Job Stress Survey Score Report by Charles D. Spielberger, PhD and Peter R. Vagg, PhD
Employee Information
Name:
Sample Client
Gender:
Female
Age:
29
ID#:
123-45-6789
Test Date:
08/07/1999
Norms Used:
Clerical females
Organization/Group: Kane Data Management Co. Job Title:
Data Entry Clerk
Prepared for:
Examiner
Use of this score report requires a complete understanding of the Job Stress Survey (JSS) and its interpretation and applications as as presented in the JSS manual. This report contains raw and standardized scores from the JSS and does not provide interpretation of the scores. Users should refer to the JSS Professional Manual for procedures and guidelines for the interpretation of this score report and psychometric characteristics of the JSS.
Use of the JSS Score Report The summary information presented in this report is based on the individual’s responses to the JSS. The T scores for each of the JSS scales are standardized scores that have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Percentiles indicate the percentage of individuals in the norm sample who fall below a given raw score. The JSS is scaled so that higher T scores and percentiles indicate greater levels of stress. The T scores and percentiles are based on the occupational group listed in the Information section and on the respondent’s gender. The following steps are recommended for interpreting JSS scores.
Steps in the Interpretive Process 1. Check report for general accuracy. 2. Examination of Job Stress Index (JS-X), Severity (JS-S), and Frequency (JS-F) scale scores. 3. Examination of Job Pressure Index (JP-X), Severity (JP-S), and Frequency (JP-F) subscale scores. 4. Examination of Lack of Organizational Support Index (LS-X), Severity (LS-S), and Frequency (LS-F) subscale scores. 5. Examination of Item Index scores.
Lack of Organizational Support subscales Lack of Support Index ( LS-X ) Lack of Support Severity ( LS-S ) Lack of Support Frequency ( LS-F )
22.00 5.00 3.90
52 48 54
65 40 75
T score
Note. Asterisk (*) denotes a scale with too many unanswered items to be considered valid.
Percentile
Client: Sample Client ID#: 123-45-6789
Test Date: 08/07/1999 Page 3
Profile of JSS Scores ≥
99
≥
95
95
90
90
85
85
80
80
75
•
70
75
70
65
•
65
60
55
99
60
•
55
50
•
50
45
45
40
•
40
35
35
30
•
30
•
25
25
20
•
20
•
15
15
10
10
5
5
<1 Scale %ile Raw
<1 JS-X 55 19.57
JS-S 30 4.40
JS-F 50 3.20
JP-X 30 11.90
JP-S 20 3.30
JP-F 20 1.80
LS-X 65 22.00
LS-S 40 5.00
LS-F 75 3.90
Scale %ile Raw
Client: Sample Client ID#: 123-45-6789
Test Date: 08/07/1999 Page 4
Item Ratings and Item Index Summary Table Severity Rating
Frequency Rating
5 7 8 1 8 4 2 7 2 7
5 8 6 0 4 2 0 6 0 4
25 56 † 48 † 0 32 8 0 42 † 0 28
JP
11. 12. LS 13. LS 14. 15. JP 16. 17. LS 18. 19. 20.
1 1 2 3 7 1 2 2 9 7
0 1 2 3 5 1 2 4 8 4
0 1 4 9 35 1 4 8 72 † 28
LS 21. 22. JP 23. JP 24. JP 25. JP 26. JP 27. 28. LS 29. 30.
2 1 2 3 6 8 7 6 7 4
3 1 0 0 6 5 6 3 5 2
6 1 0 0 36 40 42 † 18 35 8
Item Text
LS JP LS LS JP LS JP LS
†
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
[Item text removed from this report]
Item Index
This Item Index score is among the five highest index scores. Check the Severity and Frequency ratings for this item to determine the extent to which the perceived severity and/or frequency of occurrence of the stressor event contributed to the elevated I tem Index score.
