DEWS
Management and Therapy
Management and Therapy o Dry Eye Disease: Report of the Management and Therapy Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007) ABSTRACT
I. InTRODuCTIOn
Te members members o te Maagemet Maagemet ad Terap Terap
Sbcommittee assessed crret dr ee terapies. Eac member wrote a sccict evidece-based review o a assiged aspect o te topic, ad te a report was writte ater review b ad wit cosess o a sbcommittee members ad te etire Dr Ee WorkSop membersip. I additio to its ow review o te iteratre, te Sbcommittee reviewed
hisreportsummarizesthemanagementandtherapeuticoptionsortreatingdr peuticoptionsor treatingdreedisease.The eedisease.Thelevel level oevidenceorsupportingdata oevidence orsupportingdataromthe romtheliterature literature isevaluatedaccordingtothemodiedAmericanAcadem oOphthalmologPreerredPracticesguidelines(Table1).
T
te Dr Ee Preerred Practice Patters o te America Academ o Optamoog ad te Iteratioa Task Force
II. GOAlS OF ThE MAnAGEMEnT AnD ThERAPy SuBCOMMITTEE
(ITF) Depi Pae o Dr Ee. Te Sbcommittee avored te approac take b te ITF, wose recommeded treatmets were based o eve o disease severit. Te recommedarecommeda tios o te Sbcommittee are based o a modicatio o
Goalsothiscommitteeweretoidentiappropriate therapeuticmethodsorthe therapeuticmethods orthemanagemento managementodree dreedisease disease andrecommendasequenceorstrategortheirapplication, basedonevidence-basedreviewotheliterature. Thequalitotheevidenceintheliteraturewasgraded accordingtoamodicationotheschemeusedinthe AmericanAcademoOphthalmologPreerredPractice Patternsseries.Whenpossible,peer-reviewedullpublications,notabstract tions ,notabstracts,wereused.Therep s,wereused.Thereportwasrevie ortwasreviewed wed
te ITF severit gradig sceme, ad sggested treatmets were cose rom a me o terapies or wic evidece o terapetic eect ad bee preseted. KEyWORDS
DEWS, dr ee disease, Dr Ee WorkSop, WorkSop,
maagemet, terap
Tabe 1. Evidence grading scheme Ciica Stdies
AcceptedorpublicationJanuar2007. ManagementandTherapSubcommitteemembers: Stephen C. Pfugelder, MD (Chair);GerdGeerling, (Chair);GerdGeerling,MD;Shigero MD;ShigeroKinoshita,MD;Michael Kinoshita,MD;MichaelA.Lemp, A.Lemp, MD;JamesMcCulle,MD;DanielNelson,MD;GarN.Novack,PhD;Jun Shimazaki,MD;CliveWilson,PhD. ProprietarinterestsoSubcommitteemembersaredisclosedonpages202 and204. Reprintsarenotavailable.Articlescanbeaccessedat:www.tearlm.org. CorrespondenceinregardtothethischaptershouldbeaddressedtoStephen C.PfugelderMD,Ophthalmolog-O C.PfugelderMD,Ophthalmol og-OcularSurCtr,CullenEeInstitute, cularSurCtr,CullenEeInstitute, 6565FanninStreetNC205,Houston,TX77030.Tel:713-798-4732.Fax: 713-798-1457.Email:
[email protected]
leve 1. Evidence obtained rom at least one properly conducted, well-designed, randomized, controlled trial, or evidence rom well-designed studies applying rigorous statistical approaches. leve 2. Evidence obtained rom one o the ollowing: a well-designed controlled trial without randomization, a well-designed cohort or case-control analytic study, preerably rom one or more center, or a well-designed study accessible to more rigorous statistical analysis. leve 3. Evidence obtained rom one o the ollowing: descriptive studies, case reports, reports o expert committees, expert opinion. Basic Sciece Stdies leve 1. Well-perormed studies conrming a hypothesis with adequate controls published in a high-impact journal. leve 2. Preliminary or limited published study.
©2007 Ethis Communications, Inc. The Ocular Surface ISSN: 15420124. (No authors listed). Management and therapy o dry eye disease: report o the Management and Therapy Subcommittee Subcommittee o the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). 2007;5(2):163-178.
leve 3. Meeting abstracts or unpublished presentations. This evidence grading scheme is based on that used in the American Academy o Ophthalmology Preerred Practice Pattern series.
The Ocular Ocular Surace Surace / april 2007, VOl. 5, NO. 2 / www.tos.om
163
DEWSMANAGEMENTANDTHERAPy III. ASSESSMEnT OF CuRREnT DRy EyE ThERAPIES
OuTlInE
A. Tear Sppemetatio: lbricats
I. Introduction II. Goals o the Management and Therapy Subcommittee III. Assessment o current dr y eye therapies A. Tear supplementation: lubricants 1. General characteristics and eects 2. Preservatives 3. Electrolyte composition 4. Osmolarity 5. Viscosity agents 6. Summary B. Tear Retention 1. Punctal occlusion a. Rationale b. Types c. Clinical studies d. Indications and contraindications e. Complications . Summary 2. Moisture chamber spectacles 3. Contact lenses C. Tear stimulation: secretagogues D. Biological tear substitutes 1. Serum 2. Salivary gland autotransplantation E. Anti-infammatory therapy 1. Cyclosporine 2. Corticosteroids a. Clinical studies b. Basic research 3. Tetracyclines a. Proper ties o tetracyclines and their derivatives 1) Antibacterial properties 2) Anti-infammatory 3) Anti-angiogenic properties b. Clinical applications o tetracycline 1) Acne Rosacea 2) Chronic posterior blepharitis: meibomianitis, meibomian gland dysunction 3) Dosage and saety F. Essential atty acids G. Environmental strategies IV. Treatment recommendations V. Unanswered questions and uture directions
ballsubcommitteemembersandbtheentireDrEe WorkShopmembership.Commentsandsuggestedrevisionswerediscussedbthesubcommitteemembersand incorporatedintothe report where deemed appropriate bconsensus. 164
1. General Characteristics and Eects Theterm“articialtears”isamisnomerormostproductsthatidentithemselvesassuch,becausethedonot mimicthecompositionohumantears.Mostunctionas lubricants,althoughsomemorerecentormulationsmimic theelectroltecompositionohumantears(TheraTears ® [AdvancedVisionResearch,Woburn,MA]). 1,2Theocular lubricantspresentlavailableintheUnitedStatesareapprovedbasedontheUSFoodandDrugAdministration (FDA)monographonover-the-counter( OTC)products (21CFR349)andarenotbasedonclinicalecac.The monographspeciespermittedactiveingredients(eg, demulcents,emulsiers,suractants,andviscositagents) andconcentrations,butgivesonllimitedguidanceon inactiveadditivesandsolutionparameters.Certaininactiveingredientsthatareusedinarticialtearssoldinthe US(eg,castoroilinEndura ™[Allergan,Inc.,Irvine,CA] andguarinSstane ®[Alcon,FtWorth,TX])arenotlisted inthemonograph. Itisdiculttoprovethataningredientinanocular lubricantactsasanactiveagent.Ithereisanactiveingredient,itisthepolmericbaseorviscositagent,but thishasproveddiculttodemonstrate.Thisiseither becauseitisnotpossibletodetecttheeectsordierences inclinicaltrialswithpresentlavailableclinicaltestsor becausethecurrentlavailable agentsdo nothavean discernableclinicalactivitbeondalubricationeect. Althoughcertainarticialtearshavedemonstratedmore successthanothersin reducingsmptoms oirritation ordecreasingocularsuracedestaininginhead-to-head comparisons,therehavebeennolargescale,masked, comparativeclinicaltrialstoevaluatethewidevarieto ocularlubricants. Whatistheclinicaleectoocularlubricantsorarticial tears?Dothelubricate,replacemissingtearconstituents, reduceelevatedtearlmosmolarit,diluteorwashout infammatororinfammation-inducingagents?Dothe, insomeinstances,actuallwashoutessentialsubstances oundinnormalhumantears?Thesequestionsremainto beansweredasmoresensitiveclinicaltestsbecomeavailabletodetectchangesintheocularsurace. Theoremostobjectivesincaringorpatientswithdr eediseasearetoimprovethepatient’socularcomortand qualitolie,andtoreturntheocularsuraceandtearlm tothenormalhomeostaticstate.Althoughsmptomscan rarelbeeliminated,thecanotenbeimproved,leading toanimprovementinthequalitolie.Itismoredicult todemonstratethattopicallubricantsimprovetheocular suraceandthetearlmabnormalitiesassociatedwithdr ee.Mostclinicalstudiesailtodemonstratesignicant correlation between smptomsand clinical test values orbetweentheclinicaltestvaluesthemselves. 3-5Itisnot unusualoradreewithonlmildsmptomstoshow signicantrosebengalstaining.Untilagentsaredeveloped thatcanrestoretheocularsuraceandtearlmtotheir
The Ocular Surace / april 2007, VOl. 5, NO. 2 / www.tos.om
DEWSMANAGEMENTANDTHERAPy
normalhomeostaticstate,thesmptomsandsignsodr eediseasewillcontinue. Ocularlubricantsarecharacterizedbhpotonicor isotonicbueredsolutionscontainingelectroltes,suractants,andvarioustpesoviscositagents.Intheor,the idealarticiallubricantshouldbepreservative-ree,contain potassium,bicarbonate,andotherelectroltesandhavea polmericsstemtoincreaseitsretentiontime. 1,6-8Phsical propertiesshouldincludeaneutraltoslightlalkalinepH. Osmolaritiesoarticialtearshavebeenmeasuredtorange romabout181to354mOsm/L.9Themainvariablesinthe ormulationoocularlubricantsregardtheconcentration oandchoiceoelectroltes,theosmolaritandthetpe oviscosit/polmericsstem,thepresenceorabsenceo preservative,and,ipresent,thetpeopreservative. 2. Preservatives Thesinglemostcriticaladvanceinthetreatmentodr eecamewiththeeliminationopreservatives,suchasbenzalkoniumchloride(BAK ),romOTClubricants.Because otheriskocontaminationomultidoseproducts,most eithercontainapreservativeoremplosomemechanism orminimizingcontamination.TheFDAhasrequiredthat multidosearticialtearscontainpreservativestoprevent microbialgrowth.10Preservativesarenotrequiredinunit dosevialsthatarediscardedaterasingleuse.Thewidespreadavailabilitononpreservedpreparationsallows patientstoadministerlubricantsmorerequentlwithout concernaboutthetoxiceectsopreservatives.Forpatients withmoderate-to-severedreedisease,theabsenceo preservativesisomorecriticalimportancethantheparticularpolmericagentusedinocularlubricants.Theocular suraceinfammationassociatedwithdreeisexacerbated bpreservedlubricants;however,nonpreservedsolutions areinadequateinthemselvestoimprovethesuraceinfammationandepithelialpathologseenindreedisease.11 Benzalkonium chloride is themost requentlused preservativeintopicalophthalmicpreparations,aswellas intopicallubricants.Itsepithelialtoxiceectshavebeen wellestablished. 12-17ThetoxicitoBAKisrelatedtoits concentration,therequencodosing,theleveloramount otearsecretion, and the severito the ocular surace disease.Inthepatientwithmilddree,BAK-preserved dropsareusuallwelltoleratedwhenused4-6timesada orless.Inpatientswithmoderate-to-severedree,the potentialorBAKtoxicitishigh,duetodecreasedtear secretionanddecreasedturnover. 17Somepatientsmabe usingothertopicalpreparations(eg,glaucomamedications) thatcontainBAK,increasingtheirexposuretothetoxic eectsoBAK.Also,thepotentialortoxicitexistswith patientabuseootherOTCproductsthatcontainBAK, suchasvasoconstrictors. BAKcandamagethecornealandconjunctivalepithelium,aectingcell-to-celljunctionsandcellshapeand microvilli,eventuallleadingtocellnecrosiswithsloughing o1-2laersoepithelialcells. 17Preservative-reeormulationsareabsolutelnecessarorpatientswithseveredr
eewithocularsuracediseaseandimpairmentolacrimal gland secretion, or orpatients on multiple, preserved topicalmedicationsorchroniceedisease.Patientswith severedree,greatlreducedtearsecretion,andpunctal occlusionareatparticularriskorpreservativetoxicit.In suchpatients,theinstilledagentcannotbewashedout;i thisriskhasnotbeenappreciatedbtheclinician,preserved dropsmightbeusedathighrequenc. AnotheradditiveusedinOTCormulationsisdisodium (EDTA).ItaugmentsthepreservativeecacoBAKand otherpreservatives,but,bitsel,itisnotasucientpreservative.Usedinsomenonpreservedsolutions,itma help limit microbial growthin opened unit-dose vials. AlthoughuseoEDTAmaallowalowerconcentrationo preservative,EDTAmaitselbetoxictotheocularsurace epithelium.Astudcomparingtwopreservative-reesolutions,HpotearsPF ®(NovartisOphthalmics,EastHanover, NJ)containingEDTAandReresh ®(Allergan,Inc.,Irvine, CA)withoutEDTA,showedthatbothormulationshad identicalsaetprolesandwerecompletelnontoxicto therabbitcornealepithelium. 18Otherstudiesoundthat EDTA-containingpreparationsincreasedcornealepithelial permeabilit. 19,20Thepotentialexiststhatpatientswith severedreewillndthatEDTA-containingpreparations increaseirritation. Nonpreserved, single unit-dose tearsubstitutes are more costl orthe manuacturerto produce, more costlorthepatientstopurchase,andlessconvenient tousethanbottledocularlubricants.Forthesereasons, reclosableunitdosevials(eg,RereshFree[AllerganInc., Irvine,CA];TearsNaturalFree® [Alcon,Fort Worth, TX])wereintroduced.Lesstoxicpreservatives,suchas polquad(polquaternium-1),sodiumchlorite(Purite®), andsodiumperborateweredevelopedtoallowtheuse omultidosebottledlubricantsandtoavoidtheknown toxicitoBAK-containingsolutions.21,22The“vanishing” preservativesweresodiumperborateandsodiumchlorite (TheraTears®[AdvancedVisionResearch,Woburn,MA], Genteal®[Novartis,EastHanover,NJ],andRereshTears ® [AllerganInc.,Irvine,CA]). Sodiumchloritedegradestochlorideionsandwater uponexposuretoUVlightaterinstillation.Sodiumperborateisconvertedtowaterandoxgenoncontactwiththe tearlm.Forpatientswithseveredree,evenvanishing preservativesmanottotalldegrade,duetoadecreasein tearvolume,andmabeirritating.Patientspreerbottled preparationsorreasonsobothcostandeaseouse.The ideallubricantwouldcomeinamultidose,eas-to-use bottlethatcontainsapreservativethatcompleteldissipates beorereachingthetearlm,oriscompletelnontoxicand nonirritatingandmaintainsabsolutesterilitwithrequent use.Onesuchmulti-use,preservative-reeproducthas beenintroducedtothemarket(VisinePure-Tears ®[Pzer, Inc,NJ]). Ocularointmentsandgelsarealsousedintreatmento dreedisease.Ointmentsareormulatedwithaspecic mixtureomineraloilandpetrolatum.Somecontainlanolin,
The Ocular Surace / april 2007, VOl. 5, NO. 2 / www.tos.om
165
DEWSMANAGEMENTANDTHERAPy
whichcanbeirritatingtotheeeanddelacornealwound healing.23Individualswithsensitivittowoolmaalsobe sensitivetolanolin. 23Someointmentscontainparabensas preservatives,andtheseointmentsarenotwelltolerated bpatientswithseveredree.Ingeneral,ointmentsdo notsupportbacterialgrowthand,thereore,donotrequire preservatives.Gelscontaininghighmolecularweightcrosslinkedpolmersoacrlicacid(carbomers)havelonger retentiontimesthanarticialtearsolutions,buthaveless visualblurringeectthanpetrolatumointments. 3. Electrolyte Composition Solutionscontainingelectroltesandorionshavebeen showntobebenecialintreatingocularsuracedamage duetodree.1,6,20,24,25 Todate,potassiumandbicarbonateseemtobethemostcritical.Potassiumisimportantto maintaincornealthickness. 7Inadr-eerabbitmodel,a hpotonictear-matchedelectroltesolution(TheraTears ® [AdvancedVisionResearch,Woburn,MA])increasedcon junctivalgobletcelldensitandcornealglcogencontent, andreducedtearosmolaritandrosebengalstainingater2 weeksotreatment.25Therestorationoconjunctivalgoblet cellsseeninthedr-eerabbitmodelhasbeencorroborated inpatientswithdreeaterLASIK.26 Bicarbonate-containingsolutionspromotetherecover oepithelialbarrierunctionindamagedcornealepithelium andaid in maintaining normal epithelialultrastructure. Themaalsobeimportantormaintainingthemucinlaer othetearlm.6Ocularlubricantsareavailablethatmimic theelectroltecompositionohumantears,eg,TheraTears ® (AdvancedVisionResearch,Woburn,MA)andBIONTears ® (Alcon,FortWorth,TX). 1,2Thesealsocontainbicarbonate, whichiscriticalorormingandmaintainingtheprotectivemucingelinthestomach.27Bicarbonatemaplaa similarroleorgel-ormingmucinsontheocularsurace. Becausebicarbonateisconvertedtocarbondioxidewhen incontactwithairandcandiusethroughtheplasticunit dosevials,oilpackagingotheplasticvialsisrequiredto maintainstabilit. 4. Osmolarity Tearsopatientswithdreehaveahighertearlm osmolarit(crstalloidosmolarit)thandothoseonormal patients.28,29Elevatedtearlmosmolaritcausesmorphologicalandbiochemicalchangestothecornealand conjunctivalepithelium18,30andispro-infammator.31This knowledgeinfuencedthedevelopmentohpo-osmotic articialtearssuchasHpotears ®(230mOsm/L[Novartis Ophthalmics,EastHanover,NJ])andsubsequentlTheraTears®(181mOsm/L[AdvanceVisionResearch,Woburn, MA]).32 Colloidal osmolalit is anotheractor that varies in articial tearormulations. Whilecrstalloid osmolarit isrelatedtothepresenceoions,colloidalosmolalitis dependentlargelon macromoleculecontent.Colloidal osmolarit,alsoknownasoncotic pressure,isinvolvedinthe controlowatertransportintissues.Dierencesincolloidal 166
osmolalitaectthenetwaterfowacrossmembranes,and waterfowiseliminatedbapplinghdrostaticpressure tothedownsideothewaterfow.Themagnitudeothis osmoticpressureisdeterminedbosmolalitdierences onthetwosidesothemembrane.Epithelialcellsswell due todamageto theircellular membranes ordueto a dsunctioninthepumpingmechanism.Followingthe additionoafuidwithahighcolloidalosmolalittothe damagedcellsurace,deturgescenceoccurs,leadingtoa returnonormalcellphsiolog.Theoreticall,anarticial tearormulationwithahighcolloidalosmolalitmabeo value.HollandEsquivelevaluatedmandierentarticial tearormulationsandshowedthatHpotears ®(Novartis Ophthalmics,EastHanover,NJ)hadthehighestcolloidal osmolalitoallotheormulationstested. 33Formulations withhighercolloidalosmolalithavesincebeenmarketed (Dwelle®[DrEeCompan,Silverdale,WA]). Protectionagainsttheadverseeectsoincreasedosmolarit(osmoprotection)hasledtodevelopmentoOTC dropsincorporatingcompatiblesolutes(suchasglcerin, erthritol,andlevocarnitine(Optive®[AllerganInc.,Irvine, CA]).Itisthoughtthatthecompatiblesolutesdistributebetweenthetearsandtheintracellularfuidstoprotectagainst potentialcellulardamageromhperosmolartears. 34 5. Viscosity Agents Thestabilitothetearlmdependsonthechemicalphsicalcharacteristicsothatlminteractingwiththe conjunctivalandcornealepitheliumviathemembranespanningmucins(ie,MUC-16andMUC-4).Intheclassical three-laeredtearlmmodel,themucinlaerisusuall thoughtoasasuractantorwettingagent,actingtolower thesuracetensionotherelativel hdrophobic ocular surace,renderingthecornealandconjunctivalcells“wet table.”33Currentl,thetearlmisprobablbestdescribed asa hdrated, mucin gel whose mucin concentration decreaseswithdistanceromtheepithelialcellsurace.It mahaveaprotectiverolesimilartothatomucininthe stomach.35Itmaalsoserveasa“sink”orstoragevehicle orsubstancessecretedbthemainandaccessorlacrimal glandsandtheocularsuracecells.Thismaexplainwh mostotheavailablewater-containinglubricantsareonl minimalleective in restoringthe normal homeostasis othe ocular surace.In additionto washing awa and dilutingoutirritatingortoxicsubstancesinthetearlm, articiallubricantshdrategel-ormingmucin.Whilesome patientswithdreehavedecreasedaqueouslacrimalgland secretion,alterationsordecienciesinvolvingmucinalso causedree. Macromolecularcomplexesaddedtoarticiallubricants actasviscositagents.Theadditionoaviscositagentincreasesresidencetime,providingalongerintervalopatient comort.Forexample,whenaviscous,anioniccharged carboxmethl-cellulose(CMC,100,000mw)solutionwas comparedwithaneutralhdroxmethlcellulose(HPMC) solution,CMCwasshowntohaveasignicantlslowerrate oclearanceromtheee. 36Viscousagentsinactivedrug
The Ocular Surace / april 2007, VOl. 5, NO. 2 / www.tos.om
DEWSMANAGEMENTANDTHERAPy
ormulationsmaalsoprolongocularsuracecontact,increasingthedurationoactionandpenetrationothedrug. Viscousagentsmaalsoprotecttheocularsurace epithelium.Itisknownthatrosebengalstainsabnormal cornealandconjunctivalepithelialcellsexpressinganalteredmucinglcocalx. 37Agentssuchashdroxmethcellulose(HMC),whichdecreaserosebengalstainingindr eesubjects, 38maeither“coatandprotect”thesurace epitheliumorhelprestoretheprotectiveeectomucins. IntheUS,carboxmethlcelluloseisthemostcommonlusedpolmeric viscositagent(IRIMarket Share Data,Chicago,IL),tpicallinconcentrationsrom0.25% to1%,withdierencesinmolecularweightalsocontributingtonalproductviscosit.Carboxmethlcellulose hasbeenoundtobindtoandberetainedbhumanepithelialcells.39OtherviscositagentsincludedintheFDA monograph(invariousconcentrations)includepolvinl alcohol,polethleneglcol,glcol400,propleneglcol hdroxmethlcelluloseandhdroxproplcellulose. Theblurringovisionandestheticdisadvantagesocakinganddringoneelashesaredrawbacksohighlviscous agentsthatpatientswithmildtomoderatedreewill nottolerate.Lowermolecular-weightviscousagentshelp tominimizetheseproblems.Becausepatientcompliance, comort,andconvenienceareimportantconsiderations,a rangeotearsubstituteormulationswithvaringviscositiesareneeded. Hdroxpropl-guar(HP-guar)hasbeenusedasagellingagentinasolutioncontainingglcol400andpropleneglcol(Sstane®,Alcon,FortWorth,TX).Ithasbeen suggestedthatHP-guarpreerentiallbindstothemore hdrophobic,desiccatedordamagedareasothesurace epithelialcells,providingtemporarprotectionorthese cells. 40,41Severalcommercialpreparationscontainingoilin theormocastoroil(Endura™[AllerganInc.,Irvine,CA]) ormineraloil(Soothe ®[Bausch&Lomb,Rochester,Ny]) arepurportedtoaidinrestoringorincreasingthelipidlaer othetearlm.42,43Haluronicacidisaviscositagentthat hasbeeninvestigatedorearsas an“active”compound addedtotearsubstituteormulationsorthetreatmento dree.Haluronicacid(0.2%)hassignicantllonger ocularsuraceresidence times than 0.3percentHPMC or1.4percentpolvinlalcohol.44Someclinicalstudies reportedimprovementin 44-48dreeinpatientstreated withsodiumhaluronate-containingsolutionscompared tootherlubricantsolutions,whereasothersdidnot. 48 AlthoughlubricantpreparationscontainingsodiumhaluronatehavenotbeenapprovedoruseintheUS,theare requentlusedinsomecountries. 6. Summary Althoughmantopicallubricants,withvariousviscos itagents,maimprovesmptomsandobjectivendings, thereisnoevidencethatanagentissuperiortoanother. Mostclinicaltrialsinvolvingtopicallubricantpreparations willdocumentsomeimprovement(butnotresolution)o subjectivesmptomsandimprovementinsomeobjective
parameters.4However,theimprovementsnotedarenot necessarilanbetterthanthoseseenwiththevehicleor other nonpreservedarticiallubricants. Theelimination opreservativesandthedevelopmentonewer,lesstoxic preservativeshavemadeocularlubricantsbettertolerated bdreepatients.However,ocularlubricants,which havebeenshowntoprovidesomeprotectionotheocular suraceepitheliumandsomeimprovementinpatientsmptomsandobjectivendings,havenotbeendemonstrated incontrolledclinicaltrialstobe sucienttoresolve the ocularsuracedisorderandinfammationseeninmostdr eesuerers. B. Tear Retetio
1. Punctal Occlusion a. Rationale Whiletheconceptopermanentloccludingthelacrimalpunctawithcautertotreatdreeextendsback70 ears,49and,althoughtherstdissolvableimplantswere used45earsago,50themoderneraopunctalpluguse beganin1975withthereportbFreeman. 51Freemandescribedtheuseoadumbbell-shapedsiliconeplug,which restsontheopeningothepunctumandextendsintothe canaliculus.Hisreportestablishedaconceptopunctalocclusion,whichopenedtheeldordevelopmentoavariet oremovable,long-lastingplugstoretardtearclearance inanattempttotreattheocularsuraceo patientswith decientaqueoustearproduction.TheFreemanstleplug remainstheprototpeormoststlesopunctalplugs. b. Types Punctalplugsaredividedintotwomaintpes:absorbableandnonabsorbable.Theormeraremadeocollagen orpolmersandlastorvariableperiodsotime(3das to6months).Thelatternonabsorbable“permanent”plugs includetheFreemanstle,whichconsistsoasuracecollar restingonthepunctalopening,aneck,andawiderbase.In contrast,theHerrickplug(Lacrimedics[Eastsound,WA]) isshapedlikeagolteeandisdesignedtoresidewithin thecanaliculus.Itisblueorvisualization;othervariations areradiopaque.AnewldesignedclindricalSmartplug ™ (MedenniumInc [Irvine,CA])expandsandincreasesin diameterinsituollowinginsertionintothecanaliculus duetothermodnamicpropertiesoitshdrophilicacrlic composition. c. ClinicalStudies Avariet oclinicalstudiesevaluatingtheecaco punctalplugshavebeenreported. 52-56Theseseriesgenerall allintoLevelIIevidence.Theirusehasbeenassociated with objective andsubjective improvementin patients withbothSjogrenandnon-Sjogrenaqueousteardecient dree, lamentar keratitis, contactlens intolerance, Stevens-Johnson disease, severe trachoma, neurotrophic keratopath,post-penetratingkeratoplast,diabetickeratopath,andpost-photoreractivekeratectomorlaserin situkeratomileusis.Severalstudieshavebeenperormed
The Ocular Surace / april 2007, VOl. 5, NO. 2 / www.tos.om
167
DEWSMANAGEMENTANDTHERAPy
toevaluatetheeectsopunctalplugsontheecaco glaucomamedications in reducingintraocular pressure, andthesestudies have reported confictingresults. 57,58 Benecialoutcomeindreesmptomshasbeenreported in74-86%opatientstreatedwithpunctalplugs.Objective indicesoimprovementreportedwiththeuseopunctal plugsincludeimprovedcornealstaining,prolongedtear lmbreakuptime( TFBUT),decreaseintearosmolarit, andincreaseingobletcelldensit.Overall,theclinicalutilitopunctalplugsinthemanagementodreedisease hasbeenwelldocumented. d. IndicationsandContraindications Inarecentreviewonpunctalplugs,itwasreported thatinamajoreeclinic,punctalplugsareconsidered indicatedinpatientswhoaresmptomaticodrees, haveaSchirmertest(withanesthesia)resultlessthan5 mmat 5 minutes,and show evidenceo ocular surace destaining.56 Contraindicationstotheuseopunctalplugsinclude allergtothematerialsusedintheplugstobeimplanted, punctalectropion,andpre-existingnasolacrimalductobstruction,whichwould,presumabl,negatetheneedor punctalocclusion.Ithasbeensuggestedthatplugsma becontraindicatedindreepatientswithclinicalocular suraceinfammation,becauseocclusionotearoutfow wouldprolongcontactotheabnormaltearscontainingproinfammatorctokineswiththeocularsurace. Treatmentotheocularsuraceinfammationpriorto pluginsertionhasbeenrecommended.Acuteorchronic inectionothelacrimalcanaliculusorlacrimalsacisalso acontraindicationtouseoaplug. e. Complications Themostcommoncomplicationopunctalplugsis spontaneousplugextrusion,whichisparticularlcommon withtheFreeman-stleplugs.Overtime,anextrusionrate o50%hasbeenreported,butmanotheseextrusions tookplaceaterextensiveperiodsoplugresidence.Most extrusions are osmall consequence, exceptor inconvenienceand expense.More troublesomecomplications includeinternalmigrationoaplug,biolmormationand inection,59andpogenicgranulomaormation.Removalo migratedcanalicularplugscanbedicultandmarequire surgertothenasolacrimalductsstem.60,61 f. Summary Theextensiveliteratureontheuseopunctalplugsin themanagementodreediseasehasdocumentedtheir utilit. Severalrecentreports, however, have suggested thatabsorptionotearsbthenasolacrimalductsintosurroundingtissuesandbloodvesselsmaprovideaeedback mechanismtothelacrimalglandregulatingtearproduction.62Inonestud,placementopunctalplugsinpatients withnormaltearproductioncausedasignicantdecrease intearproductionorupto2weeksaterpluginsertion. 63 Thiscautionarnoteshouldbeconsideredwhendeciding 168
whethertoincorporatepunctalocclusionintoadree diseasemanagementplan. 2. Moisture Chamber Spectacles Thewearingomoisture-conservingspectacleshasor manearsbeenadvocatedtoalleviateoculardiscomort associatedwithdree.However,theleveloevidencesupportingitsecacordreetreatmenthasbeenrelativel limited.Tsubota etal, using asensitivemoisturesensor, reportedanincreaseinperiocularhumiditinsubjects wearingsuchspectacles. 64Additionosidepanelstothe spectacleswasshowntourtherincreasethehumidit. 65 Theclinicalecacomoisturechamberspectacleshas beenreportedincasereports.66,67Kurihashiproposeda relatedtreatmentordreepatients,intheormoawet gauzeeemask.68Conversel,Nicholsetalrecentlreportedintheirepidemiologicstudthatspectaclewearerswere twiceaslikelasemmetropestoreportdreedisease. 69 Thereasonorthisobservationwasnotexplained. Therehavebeenseveralreportswithrelativelhigh level oevidence describing therelationship between environmentalhumiditanddree.Korbetalreported thatincreasesinperiocularhumiditcausedasignicant increaseinthicknessothetearlmlipidlaer.70Dree subjectswearingspectaclesshowedsignicantllonger interblinkintervalsthanthosewhodidnotwearspectacles, and duration oblink (blinking time) wassignicantl longerinthelattersubjects.70Instillationoarticialtears causedasignicantincreaseintheinterblinkintervaland adecreaseintheblinkrate.71Maruamaetalreportedthat dreesmptomsworsenedinsotcontactlenswearers whenenvironmentalhumiditdecreased.72 3. Contact Lenses Contact lenses ma help toprotect and hdrate the cornealsuraceinseveredreeconditions.Severaldierentcontactlensmaterialsanddesignshavebeenevaluated, includingsiliconerubberlensesandgaspermeablescleralbearinghardcontactlenseswithorwithoutenestration. 73-77 Improvedvisualacuitandcomort,decreasedcorneal epitheliopath,andhealingopersistentcornealepithelial deectshavebeenreported. 73-77Highloxgen-permeable materialsenableovernightwearinappropriatecircumstances.75Thereisasmallriskocornealvascularization andpossiblecornealinectionassociatedwiththeuseo contactlensesbdreepatients. C. Tear Stimatio: Secretogoges
Severalpotentialtopicalpharmacologic agents ma stimulateaqueous secretion, mucoussecretion, orboth. Theagentscurrentlunderinvestigationbpharmaceuticalcompaniesarediquaosol(oneotheP2y2receptor agonists),rebamipide,gearnate,ecabetsodium(mucous secretionstimulants),and15(S)-HETE(MUC1stimulant). Amongthem,adiquaosoleedrophasbeenavorabl evaluatedinclinicaltrials.2%diquaosol(INS365,DE-089 [Santen,Osaka,Japan];Inspire[Durham,NC])provedto
The Ocular Surace / april 2007, VOl. 5, NO. 2 / www.tos.om
DEWSMANAGEMENTANDTHERAPy
beeectiveinthetreatmentodreeinarandomized, double-maskedtrialinhumansto reduceocular surace staining.78Asimilarstuddemonstratedtheocularsaet andtolerabilitodiquaosolinadouble-masked,placebocontrolled,randomizedstud.79Thisagentiscapableo stimulatingbothaqueousandmucoussecretioninanimals andhumans.80-83Benecialeectsoncornealepithelial barrierunction,aswellasincreasedtearsecretion,has beendemonstratedintheratdreemodel.84Diquaosol alsohasbeenshowntostimulatemucinreleaseromgoblet cellsinarabbitdreemodel.85,86 Theeectsorebamipide(OPC-12759[Otsuka,Rockville,MD];Novartis[Basel,Switzerland])havebeenevaluatedinhumanclinicaltrials.Inanimalstudies,rebamipide increasedthemucin-likesubstancesontheocularsurace oN-acetlcsteine-treatedrabbitees. 87ItalsohadhdroxlradicalscavengingeectsonUVB-inducedcorneal damageinmice.88 Ecabetsodium(Senju[Osaka,Japan];ISTA[Irvine, CA])isbeingevaluatedinclinicaltrialsinternationall, butonllimitedresultshaveetbeenpublished.Asingle instillationoecabetsodiumophthalmicsolutionelicited astatisticallsignicantincreaseintearmucinindree patients.89 Gearnate (Santen[Osaka,Japan]) hasbeen evaluated inanimal studies.Gearnate promoted mucin productionaterconjunctivalinjurinmonkes.90GearnateincreasedPAS-positivecelldensitinrabbitconjunctivaand stimulated mucin-like glcoproteinstimulation romratculturedcornealepithelium. 91,92Aninvivorabbit experimentshowedasimilarresult.93,94 The agent15(S)-HETE,a uniquemolecule,can stimulateMUC1 mucin expression on ocular surace epithelium.9515(S)-HETEprotectedthecorneainarabbit modelodesiccation-inducedinjur,probablbecauseo mucinsecretion. 96 Ithasbeen showntohavebenecial eectsonsecretionomucin-likeglcoproteinbtherabbitcornealepithelium.97Otherlaboratorstudiesconrm thestimulatoreecto15(S)-HETE. 98-101Someothese agentsmabecomeuseulclinicaltherapeuticmodalities inthenearuture. Twooralladministeredcholinergicagonists,pilocarpineandcevilemine,havebeenevaluatedinclinicaltrials ortreatmentoSjogrensndromeassociatedkeratocon junctivitissicca(KCS).Patientswhoweretreatedwithpilocarpineatadoseo5mgQIDexperiencedasignicantl greateroverallimprovementthanplacebo-treatedpatients in“ocularproblems”intheirabilittoocustheireesduringreading,andinsmptomsoblurredvisioncompared with placebo-treated patients. 102Themostcommonl reportedsideeectromthismedicationwasexcessive sweating,whichoccurredinover40%opatients.Two percentothepatientstakingpilocarpinewithdrewrom thestudbecauseodrug-relatedsideeects.Otherstudieshavereportedecaco pilocarpineorocularsigns andsmptomsoSjogrensndromeKCS,103-105 including anincreaseinconjunctivalgobletcelldensitater1and 2monthsotherap. 106
Cevilemineisanotheroralcholinergicagonistthat wasoundtosignicantlimprovesmptomsodrness andaqueoustearproductionandocularsuracedisease comparedtoplacebowhentakenindoseso15or30mg TID.107,108Thisagentmahaveeweradversesstemicside eectsthanoralpilocarpine. D. Bioogica Tear Sbstittes
Naturalloccurringbiological,ie,nonpharmaceutical fuids,canbeusedtosubstituteornaturaltears.Theuse oserumorsalivaorthispurposehasbeenreportedin humans.Theareusuallunpreserved.Whenoautologous origin,thelackantigenicitandcontainvariousepitheliotrophicactors,suchasgrowthactors,neurotrophins, vitamins, immunoglobulins,and extracellular matrix proteinsinvolvedinocularsuracemaintenance.Biologicaltearsubstitutesmaintainthemorphologandsupport theprolierationoprimarhumancornealepithelialcells better than pharmaceutical tear substitutes. 109However, despite biomechanical andbiochemicalsimilarities, relevantcompositionaldierencescomparedwithnormal tears exist and are oclinical relevance. 110Additional practicalproblemsconcernsterilitandstabilit,anda labor-intensiveproductionprocessorasurgicalprocedure (saliva)isrequiredtoprovidethenaturaltearsubstituteto theocularsurace. 1. Serum Serumisthefuidcomponentoullbloodthatremains aterclotting.Itstopicaluseorocularsuracediseasewas much stimulated b Tsubota’s prolic work in thelate 1990s.111Thepracticalitiesandpublishedevidenceo autologousserumapplicationwererecentlreviewed. 112 Theuseobloodanditscomponentsasapharmaceuticalpreparationinmancountriesisrestrictedbspecic nationallaws.Toproduceserumeedropsandtouse themoroutpatients,alicensebanappropriatenational bodmaberequiredincertaincountries.Theprotocol usedortheproductionoserumeedropsdetermines theircompositionandecac.Anoptimizedprotocolor theproductionwasrecentlpublished.113Concentrations between20%and100%oserumhavebeenused.The ecacseemstobedose-dependent. Becauseosignicantvariationsinpatientpopulations, productionandstorageregimens,andtreatmentprotocols, theecacoserumeedropsindreeshasvariedsub stantiallbetweenstudies.113Threepublishedprospective randomizedstudieswithsimilarpatientpopulations(predominantlimmunediseaseassociateddree,ie,Sjogren sndrome)areavailable.Whencomparing20%serumwith 0.9%salineapplied6timesperda,Tananuvatetal ound onlatrendtowardimprovementosmptomsandsigns odrees, 114whereasKojimaetalreportedsignicant improvementosmptomscores,fuorescein-breakuptime (FBUT),andfuoresceinandrosebengalstaining.115 Aprospectiveclinicalcross-overtrialcompared50% serumeedropsagainstthecommerciallubricantpreviousl
The Ocular Surace / april 2007, VOl. 5, NO. 2 / www.tos.om
169
DEWSMANAGEMENTANDTHERAPy
usedbeachpatient.Smptomsimprovedin10out16 patients,andimpressionctologicalndingsimprovedin 12outo25ees. 116Noda-Tsuruaandcolleaguesound that20%autologousserumsignicantlimprovedTFBUT anddecreasedconjunctivalrosebengalandcorneafuoresceinstaining1-3monthspostoperativel,comparedto treatmentwitharticialtears,whichdidnotchangethese parameters.117Additionalreportsosuccessultreatment o persistent epithelial deects—where successis more clearldenedas“healingothedeect”—withautologous serumsubstantiatetheimpressionthatthisis avaluable therapeuticoptionorocularsuracedisease.118 2. Salivary Gland Autotransplantation Salivarsubmandibularglandtransplantationiscapable oreplacingdecientmucinandtheaqueoustearlm phase.Thisprocedurerequirescollaborationbetweenan ophthalmologistandamaxilloacialsurgeon.Withappropriatemicrovascularanastomosis,80%o gratssurvive. Inpatientswithabsoluteaqueous teardecienc,viable submandibular gland grats, in the long-term, provide signicantimprovementoSchirmertestFBUT,androse bengalstaining,aswellasreductionodiscomortandthe needorpharmaceuticaltearsubstitutes.Duetothehpoosmolaritosaliva,comparedtotears,excessivesalivar tearingcaninduceamicrocsticcornealedema,whichis temporar,butcanleadtoepithelialdeects. 110Hence,this operationisindicatedonlinend-stagedreediseasewith anabsoluteaqueousteardecienc(Schirmer-testwetting o1mmorless),aconjunctivalizedsuraceepithelium,and persistentseverepaindespitepunctalocclusionandatleast hourlapplicationounpreservedtearsubstitutes.Forthis groupopatients,suchsurgeriscapableosubstantiall reducingdiscomort,butotenhasnoeectonvision. 119,120 E. Ati-Ifammator Terap
Diseaseordsunctionothetearsecretorglandsleads tochangesintearcomposition,suchashperosmolarit, thatstimulatetheproductionoinfammatormediatorson theocularsurace. 31,121Infammationma,inturn,cause dsunctionordisappearanceocellsresponsibleortear secretionorretention.122Infammationcanalsobeinitiated bchronicirritativestress(eg,contactlenses)andsstemic infammator/autoimmunedisease(eg,rheumatoidarthritis).Regardless otheinitiatingcause,aviciouscircle o infammationcandevelopontheocularsuraceindree thatleadstoocularsuracedisease.Basedontheconcept thatinfammationisakecomponentothepathogenesis odree,theecacoanumberoanti-infammator agentsortreatmentodreediseasehasbeenevaluated inclinicaltrialsandanimalmodels. 1. Cyclosporine Thepotentialocclosporine-A(CsA)ortreatingdr eediseasewasinitiallrecognizedindogsthatdevelop spontaneousKCS. 123ThetherapeuticecacoCsAor humanKCSwasthendocumentedinseveralsmall,single170
center, randomized,double-maskedclinical trials.124,125 CsAemulsionortreatmentoKCSwassubsequentl evaluatedinseverallargemulticenter,randomized,doublemaskedclinicaltrials. InaPhase2clinicaltrial,ourconcentrationsoCsA (0.05%,0.1%,0.2%,or0.4%)administeredtwicedail tobotheeso129patientsor12weekswascompared tovehicletreatmento33patients.126CsAwasoundto signicantldecreaseconjunctivalrosebengalstaining, supercialpunctatekeratitis,andocularirritationsmptoms(sandorgritteeling,drness,anditching)ina subseto90patientswithmoderate-to-severeKCS.There wasnocleardoseresponse;CsA0.1%producedthemost consistentimprovementinobjectiveendpoints,whereas CsA0.05%gavethemostconsistentimprovementinpatientsmptoms(LevelI). TwoindependentPhase3clinicaltrialscompared twice-dailtreatmentwith0.05%or0.1%CsAorvehicle in877patientswithmoderate-to-severedreedisease. 127 WhentheresultsothetwoPhase3trialswerecombined orstatisticalanalsis,patientstreatedwithCsA,0.05%or 0.1%,showedsignicantl(P<0.05)greaterimprovement intwoobjectivesignsodreedisease(cornealfuorescein stainingandanesthetizedSchirmertestvalues)comparedto thosetreatedwithvehicle.AnincreasedSchirmertestscore wasobservedin59%opatientstreatedwithCsA,with 15%opatientshavinganincreaseo10mmormore.In contrast,onl4%ovehicle-treatedpatientshadthismagnitudeochangeintheirSchirmertestscores(P<0.0001). CsA0.05%treatmentalsoproducedsignicantlgreater improvements(P<0.05)inthreesubjectivemeasuresodr eedisease(blurredvisionsmptoms,needorconcomitant articialtears,andtheglobalresponsetotreatment).No dose-responseeectwasnoted.BothdosesoCSAexhibitedanexcellentsaetprolewithnosignicantsstemic orocularadverseevents,exceptortransientburning smptomsaterinstillationin17%opatients.Burningwas reportedin7%opatientsreceivingthevehicle.NoCsAwas detectedinthebloodopatientstreatedwithtopicalCsA or12months.ClinicalimprovementromCsAthatwas observedinthesetrialswasaccompaniedbimprovement inotherdiseaseparameters.Treatedeeshadanapproximatel200%increaseinconjunctivalgobletcelldensit. 128 Furthermore,therewasdecreasedexpressionoimmune activationmarkers(ie,HLA-DR),apoptosismarkers(ie, Fas),andtheinfammatorctokineIL-6btheconjunctivalepithelialcells. 129,130ThenumbersoCD3-,CD4-,and CD8-positiveTlmphoctesintheconjunctivadecreased incclosporine-treatedees,whereasvehicle-treatedees showed an increased number o cells expressing these markers. 131Atertreatmentwith0.05%cclosporine,there wasasignicantdecreaseinthenumberocellsexpressing thelmphocteactivationmarkersCD11aandHLA-DR, indicatinglessactivationolmphoctescomparedwith vehicle-treatedees. Twoadditionalimmunophilins,pimecrolimusandtacrolimus,havebeenevaluatedinclinicaltrialsoKCS.
The Ocular Surace / april 2007, VOl. 5, NO. 2 / www.tos.om
DEWSMANAGEMENTANDTHERAPy
2. Corticosteroids a. ClinicalStudies Corticosteroids arean eectiveanti-inlammator therapindreedisease.LevelIevidenceispublished oranumberocorticosteroidormulations.Ina4-week, double-masked, randomized stud in 64 patients with KCS and delaed tear clearance, loteprednol etabonate 0.5%ophthalmicsuspension(Lotemax[BauschandLomb, Rochester,Ny]),q.i.d.,wasoundtobemoreeectivethan itsvehicleinimprovingsomesignsandsmptoms.132 Ina4-week,open-label,randomizedstudin32patientswithKCS,patientsreceivingfuorometholoneplus articialtearsubstitutes( ATS)experiencedlowersmptom severitscoresandlowerfuoresceinandrosebengalstainingthanpatientsreceivingeitherATSaloneorATSplus furbiproen. 133 Aprospective,randomizedclinicaltrialcomparedthe severitoocularirritationsmptomsandcornealfuoresceinstainingintwogroupso patients,onetreatedwith topicalnonpreserved methlprednisolone or2 weeks, ollowedbpunctalocclusion(Group1),withagroup thatreceivedpunctalocclusionalone(Group2). 134Ater2 months,80%opatientsinGroup1and33%opatientsin Group2hadcompleterelieoocularirritationsmptoms. Cornealfuoresceinstainingwasnegativein80%oeesin Group1and60%oeesinGroup2ater2months.No steroid-relatedcomplicationswereobservedinthisstud. LevelIIIevidenceisalsoavailabletosupporttheecac ocorticosteroids.Inanopen-label,non-comparativetrial, extemporaneouslormulatednonpreservedmethlprednisolone1%ophthalmicsuspensionwasoundtobeclinicalleectivein21patientswithSjogrensndromeKCS. 135 Inareview,itwasstatedthat“…clinicalimprovemento KCShasbeenobservedatertherapwithanti-infammatoragents,includingcorticosteroids.”136 IntheUSFederalRegulations,ocularcorticosteroids receiving“classlabeling”areindicatedorthetreatment “…osteroidresponsiveinfammatorconditionsothe palpebral andbulbar conjunctiva, cornea andanterior segmentotheglobesuchasallergicconjunctivitis,acne rosacea,supercialpunctatekeratitis,herpeszosterkeratitis,iritis,cclitis,selectedinectiveconjunctivitides,when theinherenthazardosteroiduseisacceptedtoobtainan advisablediminutioninedemaandinfammation.”WeinterpretthatKCSisincludedinthislistosteroid-responsive infammatorconditions.137-140 b. BasicResearch Corticosteroids arethe standard anti-infammator agentornumerousbasicresearchstudiesoinfammation,includingthetpesthatareinvolvedinKCS.The corticosteroidmethlprednisolonewasnotedtopreserve cornealepithelialsmoothnessandbarrierunction inan experimentalmurine model odr ee. 141Thiswasattributedtoitsabilittomaintaintheintegritocorneal epithelialtightjunctionsanddecreasedesquamationo apicalcornealepithelialcells. 142Aconcurrentstudshowed
thatmethlprednislonepreventedanincreaseinMMP-9 protein inthe corneal epithelium, aswell as gelatinase activitinthecornealepitheliumandtearsinresponseto experimentaldree.141 Preparationsotopicallappliedandrogenandestrogensteroid hormones arecurrentl being evaluated inrandomizedclinicaltrials.Atrialotopicallapplied 0.03%testosteronewasreportedtoincreasethepercentageopatientsthathadmeibomianglandsecretionswith normalviscositandtorelievediscomortsmptomsater 6monthsotreatmentcomparedtovehicle. 143TFBUTand lipidlaerthicknesswereobservedtoincreaseinapatient with KCS who was treated with topical androgen or 3 months. 144Tearproductionandocularirritationsmptoms werereportedtoincreaseollowingtreatmentwithtopical 17beta-oestradiolsolutionor4months.145 3. Tetracyclines a. PropertiesofTetracyclinesandTheirDerivatives 1) Antibacterial Properties Theantimicrobialeectooraltetracclinetreatment analogues(eg,minoccline,doxcline)haspreviouslbeen discussedbShineetal,146Doughertetal,147andTaet al.148Itishpothesizedthatadecreaseinbacterialforaproducinglipolticexoenzmes146,148andinhibitionolipase production 147withresultantdecreaseinmeibomianlipid breakdownproducts 146macontributetoimprovementin clinicalparametersindree-associateddiseases. 2) Anti-Infammatory Properties The tetracclines have anti-infammator as wellas antibacterial properties that mamakethem useul or themanagementochronicinfammatordiseases.These agentsdecreasetheactivitocollagenase,phospholipase A2,andseveralmatrixmetalloproteinases,andthedecreasethe productiono interleukin( IL)-1andtumor necrosisactor(TNF)-alphainawiderangeotissues, includingthecornealepithelium. 149-151Athighconcentrations,tetracclinesinhibitstaphlococcalexotoxin-induced ctokinesandchemokines.152,153 3) Anti-angiogenic Properties Angiogenesis,theormationonewbloodvessels,occursinmandiseases.Theseincludebenignconditions(eg, rosacea)andmalignantprocesses(eg,cancer).Minoccline anddoxcclineinhibitangiogenesisinducedbimplanted tumorsinrabbitcornea.154Theanti-angiogeniceecto tetracclinemahavetherapeuticimplicationsininfammatorprocessesaccompaniedbnewbloodvesselormation. Well-controlledstudiesmustbeperormed,atboththe laboratorandclinicallevels,toinvestigatethispotential. 155 b. ClinicalApplicationsofTetracycline 1) Acne Rosacea Rosacea,includingitsocularmaniestations,isaninfammatordisorder,occurringmainlinadults,withpeak severitinthethirdandourthdecades.Currentrecom-
The Ocular Surace / april 2007, VOl. 5, NO. 2 / www.tos.om
171
DEWSMANAGEMENTANDTHERAPy
mendationsaretotreatrosaceawithlong-termdoxccline, minoccline,tetraccline,orerthromcin. 156Theserecommendationsmabetemperedbcertainrecentreportsthat inwomen,theriskodevelopingbreastcancerandobreast cancermorbiditincreasescumulativelwithdurationo antibioticuse,includingtetracclines.157,158 Anotherlarge studdidnotsubstantiatethesendings.159 Tetracclinesand their analoguesareeective inthe treatmentoocularrosacea,160,161orwhichasingledail doseodoxcclinemabeeective. 162Inadditiontothe anti-infammatoreects otetracclines,their abilitto inhibitangiogenesismacontributetotheireectivenessin rosacea-relateddisorders.Factorsthatpromoteangiogenesisincludeprotease-triggeredreleaseoangiogenicactors storedintheextracellularmatrix,inactivationoendothelial growthactorinhibitors,andreleaseoangiogenicactors romactivatedmacrophages.155,163 Tetracclinesarealsoknowntoinhibitmatrixmetalloproteinaseexpression,suggestingarationaleortheiruse inocularrosacea.164Althoughtetracclineshavebeenused ormanagementothisdisease,norandomized,placebocontrolled,clinicaltrialshavebeenperormedtoassess theirecac.153 2) Chronic Posterior Blepharitis: Meibomianitis, Meibomian Gland Dysunction Chronicblepharitisistpicallcharacterizedbinfammationotheeelids.Therearemultipleormsochronic blepharitis,includingstaphlococcal, seborrheic(alone, mixedseborrheic/staphlococcal, seborrheicwithmeibomian seborrhea, seborrheic with secondarmeibomitis), primarmeibomitis,andothers,likeatopic,psoriatic,and ungalinections.165Meibomianglanddsunction(MGD) hasbeenassociatedwithapparentaqueous-decientdr ee.Useotetracclineinpatientswithmeibomianitishas beenshowntodecreaselipaseproductionbtetracclinesensitiveaswellasresistantstrainsostaphlococci.This decreaseinlipaseproductionwasassociatedwithclinical improvement.147Similarl,minocclinehasbeenshownto decreasetheproductionodiglceridesandreeattacidsin meibomiansecretions.Thismabeduetolipaseinhibition btheantibioticoradirecteectontheocularfora. 146One randomized,controlledclinicaltrialotetracclineinocular rosaceacomparedsmptomimprovementin24patients treatedwitheithertetracclineordoxccline. 166Allbutone patientreportedanimprovementinsmptomsater6weeks otherap.Noplacebogroupwasincludedinthistrial. A prospective,randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled,partialcrossovertrialcomparedtheeecto oxtetracclinetoprovidesmptomaticrelieoblepharitis withorwithoutrosacea.Onl25%othepatientswith blepharitis without rosacearesponded to theantibiotic, whereas50%respondedwhenbothdiseaseswerepresent.167Inanothertrialo10patientswithbothacnerosaceaandconcomitantmeibomianitis,acnerosaceawithout concomitantocularinvolvement,orseborrheicblepharitis, minoccline50mgdailor2weeksollowedb100mg 172
dailoratotalo3monthssignicantldecreasedbacterialfora(P=0.0013).Clinicalimprovementwasseenin allpatientswithmeibomianitis.148 Becauseotheimprovementobservedinsmallclinical trialsopatientswithmeibomianitis,theAmericanAcademoOphthalmologrecommendsthechronicuseo eitherdoxcclineortetracclineorthemanagemento meibomianitis.165 Larger randomized placebo-controlled trialsassessingsmptomimprovementratherthansurrogatemarkersareneededtoclaritheroleothisantibiotic inblepharitistreatment. 153Tetracclinederivatives(eg, minoccline, doxccline)have been recommended as treatmentoptionsorchronicblepharitisbecauseotheir highconcentrationintissues,lowrenalclearance,longhallie,highlevelobindingtoserumproteins,anddecreased riskophotosensitization.168 Severalstudieshavedescribedthebenecialeectso minocclineandothertetracclinederivatives(eg,doxccline)inthetreatmentochronicblepharitis. 146,147,168,169 Studieshaveshownsignicantchangesintheaqueoustear parameters,suchastearvolumeandtearfow,ollowing treatmentwithtetracclinederivatives(eg,minoccline). Onestudalsodemonstratedadecreaseinaqueoustearproductionthatoccurredalongwithclinicalimprovement. 170 A recentlpublished randomized, prospectivestud byooSeetal compareddierentdoxcclinedosesin 150patients(300ees)whohadchronicmeibomiangland dsunctionandwhodidnotrespondtolidhgieneand topicaltherapormorethan2months. 171Alltopical therapwasstoppedoratleast2weekspriortobeginningthestud.AterdeterminingtheTFBUTandSchirmer testscores,patientsweredividedintothreegroups:ahigh dosegroup(doxccline,200mg,twiceada),alowdose group(doxccline,20mg,twiceada)andacontrolgroup (placebo).Ateronemonth,TFBUT,Schirmerscores,and smptomsimproved.Boththehigh-andlow-dosegroups hadstatisticall signicant improvementin TFBUTater treatment. Thisimpliesthat low-dose doxccline (20 mgtwiceada)therapmabeeectiveinpatientswith chronicmeibomianglanddsunction. 3) Dosage and Saety Sstemicadministrationotetracclinesiswidelrecog nizedortheabilittosuppressinfammationandimprove smptomsomeibomianitis. 172,173 Theoptimaldosing schedulehasnotbeenestablished;however,a varieto doseregimenshavebeenproposedincluding50or100mg doxcclineonceada,174oraninitialdoseo50mgada ortherst2weeksollowedb100mgadaoraperiod o2.5months,inanintermittentashion.146-148,170 Others haveproposeduseoalowdoseodoxccline(20mg) ortreatmentochronicblepharitisonalong-termbasis. 171 Thesaetissuesassociatedwithlong-termoraltetraccline therap,includingminoccline,arewellknown.Man managementapproacheshavebeensuggestedortheuseo tetracclineanditsderivatives;however,asaebutadequate optioninmanagementneedstobeconsideredbecauseo
The Ocular Surace / april 2007, VOl. 5, NO. 2 / www.tos.om
DEWSMANAGEMENTANDTHERAPy
Tabe 2. Dry eye severity grading scheme Dr Ee Severit leve
1
2
3
4*
Discomort, severity & requency
Mild and/or episodic occurs under environ stress
Moderate episodic or chronic, stress or no stress
Severe requent or constant without stress
Severe and/or disabling and constant
Visual symptoms
None or episodic mild atigue
Annoying and/or activity limiting episodic
Annoying, chronic and/ or constant limiting activity
Constant and/or possibly disabling
Conjunctival injection
None to mild
None to mild
+/–
+/++
Conjunctival staining
None to mild
Variable
Moderate to marked
Marked
Corneal staining (severity/location)
None to mild
Variable
Marked central
Severe punctate erosions
Corneal/tear signs
None to mild
Mild debris, ↓ meniscus
Filamentary keratitis, mucus clumping, ↑ tear debris
Filamentary keratitis, mucus clumping, ↑ tear debris, ulceration
Lid/meibomian glands
MGD variably present
MGD variably present
Frequent
Trichiasis, keratinization, symblepharon
TFBUT (sec)
Variable
≤ 10
≤5
Immediate
Schirmer score (mm/5 min)
Variable
≤ 10
≤5
≤2
*Must have signs AND symptoms. TBUT: fuorescein tear break-up time. MGD: meibomian gland disease Reprinted with permission rom Behrens A, Doyle JJ, Stern L, et al. Dysunctional tear syndrome. A Delphi approach to treatment recommendations. Cornea 2006;25:90-7
thenewinormationregardingthepotentiallhazardous eectsoprolongeduseooralantibiotics.Arecentstud suggestedthata3-monthcourseo100mgominoccline mightbesucienttobringsignicantmeibomianitisunder control,ascontinuedcontrolwasmaintainedoratleast3 monthsatercessationotherap. 170 Inanexperimentalmurinemodelodree,topicall applieddoxcclinewasoundtopreservecornealepithelialsmoothnessandbarrierunction. 141Italsopreserved theintegritocornealepithelialtightjunctionsindrees, leadingtoamarkeddecreaseinapicalcornealepithelialcell desquamation. 142ThiscorrespondedtoadecreaseinMMP9proteininthecornealepitheliumandreducedgelatinase activitinthecornealepitheliumandtears.141 F. Essetia Fatt Acids
Essentialattacidsarenecessarorcompletehealth. Thecannotbesnthesizedbvertebratesandmustbe obtainedromdietarsources.Amongtheessentialatt acidsare18carbonomega-6andomega-3attacids.In thetpicalwesterndiet,20-25timesmoreomega-6than omega-3attacidsareconsumed.Omega-6attacidsare precursorsorarachidonicacidandcertainproinfammatorlipidmediators(PGE2andLTB4).Incontrast,certain omega-3attacids(eg,EPAoundinshoil)inhibitthe snthesisotheselipidmediatorsandblockproductiono IL-1andTNF-alpha.175,176 Abenecialclinicaleectoshoilomega-3attacidsonrheumatoidarthritishasbeenobservedinseveral
double-masked,placebo-controlledclinicaltrials.177,178Ina prospective,placebo-controlledclinicaltrialotheessential attacids,linoleicacidandgamma-linolenicacidadministeredoralltwicedailproducedsignicantimprovement inocularirritationsmptomsandocularsuracelissamine greenstaining.179DecreasedconjunctivalHLA-DRstaining alsowasobserved. G. Evirometa Strategies
Factorsthatmadecreasetearproductionorincrease tearevaporation,suchastheuseosstemicanticholinergicmedications(eg,antihistaminesandantidepressants) anddesiccatingenvironmentalstresses(eg,lowhumiditand airconditioning drats)should be minimized oreliminated. 180-182Videodisplaterminalsshouldbe loweredbeloweeleveltodecreasetheinterpalpebral aperture,andpatientsshouldbeencouragedtotakeperiodicbreakswitheeclosurewhenreadingorworking onacomputer. 183Ahumidiedenvironmentisrecommendedtoreducetearevaporation.Thisisparticularl benecialindrclimatesandhighaltitudes.Nocturnal lagophthalmoscanbetreatedbwearingswimgoggles, tapingtheeelidclosed,ortarsorrhap. IV. TREATMEnT RECOMMEnDATIOnS
Inadditiontomaterialpresentedabove,thesubcommitteemembersreviewedtheDrEePreerredPractice PatternsotheAmericanAcademoOphthalmologand theInternationalTaskForce(ITF)DelphiPanelondr
The Ocular Surace / april 2007, VOl. 5, NO. 2 / www.tos.om
173
DEWSMANAGEMENTANDTHERAPy
Tabe 3. Dry eye menu o treatments Articial tears substitutes Gels/Ointments Moisture chamber spectacles Anti-infammatory agents (topical CsA and corticosteroids, omega-3 atty acids)
leve 1: Education and environmental/dietary modications Elimination o oending systemic medications Articial tear substitutes, gels/ointments Eye lid therapy leve 2: If Level 1 treatments are inadequate, add: Anti-infammatories Tetracyclines (or meibomianitis, rosacea) Punctal plugs Secretogogues Moisture chamber spectacles
Tetracyclines Plugs Secretogogues Serum Contact lenses Systemic immunosuppressives Surgery (AMT, lid surgery. tarsorrhaphy, MM & SG transplant) AMT = amniotic membrane transplantation; MM = mucous membrane; SG = salivary gland
eetreatmentpriortoormulatingtheirtreatmentguidelines.184,185 Thegroupavoredtheapproachtakenbthe ITF,which basedtreatmentrecommendationson disease severit.AmodicationotheITFseveritgradingscheme thatcontains4levelsodiseaseseveritbasedonsignsand smptomswas ormulated (Table2). Thesubcommittee memberschosetreatmentsoreachseveritlevelroma menuotherapiesorwhichevidenceotherapeuticeect hasbeenpresented(Table3).ThetreatmentrecommendationsbseveritlevelarepresentedinTable4.Itshould benotedthattheserecommendationsmabemodied bpractitionersbasedonindividualpatientprolesand clinicalexperience.Thetherapeuticrecommendationsor level4severitdiseaseincludesurgicalmodalitiestotreat orpreventsight-threateningcornealcomplications.Discussionothesetherapiesisbeondthescopeothisreport. V. unAnSWERED QuESTIOnS AnD FuTuRE DIRECTIOnS
Therehavebeentremendous advances inthe treatmentodreeandocularsuracediseaseinthelasttwo decades,includingFDAapprovalocclosporinemulsion asthersttherapeuticagentortreatmentoKCSinthe UnitedStates.Therehasbeenacommensurateincreasein knowledgeregardingthepathophsiologodree.This hasledtoaparadigmshitindreemanagementrom simpllubricatingandhdratingtheocularsuracewith articialtearstostrategiesthatstimulatenaturalproductionotearconstituents,maintainocularsuraceepithelial healthandbarrierunction,andinhibittheinfammator actorsthatadverselimpacttheabilitoocularsurace andglandularepitheliatoproducetears.Preliminarexperienceusingthisnewtherapeuticapproachsuggeststhat qualitoliecanbeimprovedormanpatientswithdr eeandthatinitiatingthesestrategiesearlinthecourseo thediseasemapreventpotentiallblindingcomplications odree.Itislikelthatuturetherapieswillocuson 174
Tabe 4. Treatment recommendations by severity level
leve 3: If Level 2 treatments are inadequate, add: Serum Contact lenses Permanent punctal occlusion leve 4: If Level 3 treatments are inadequate, add: Systemic anti-infammatory agents Surgery (lid surgery, tarsorrhaphy; mucus membrane, salivary gland, amniotic membrane transplantation) Modied rom: International Task Force Guidelines or Dr y Eye 185
replacingspecictearactorsthathaveanessentialrolein maintainingocularsuracehomeostasisorinhibitingke infammatormediatorsthat causedeathor dsunction otearsecretingcells.Thiswillrequireadditionalresearch toidentithesekeactorsandbetterdiagnosticteststo accuratelmeasuretheirconcentrationsinminutetear fuidsamples.Furthermore,certaindiseaseparameters mabeidentiedthatwillidentiwhetherapatienthas ahigh probabilito respondingto aparticulartherap. Basedontheprogressthathasbeenmadeandthenumber otherapiesinthepipeline,theutureodreetherap seemsbright. REFEREnCES (Parenthetical codes following references indicate level of evidence, as described in Table 1. CS = Clinical Study; BS = Basic Science.) 1. Gbd Jp, ross Sr, hyd KG. Otm sotons, t o s, nd nq tt t t omton. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;107:348-55 (BS1) 2. Gbd Jp. hmn t m toyt onnttons n t nd dyy dss. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1994;34:27-36 (CS2) 3. Sn O, Ts J, Mnoz B, t . rton btwn sgns nd symtoms o dy y n t dy. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1395-1400 (CS2) 4. Nson JD, Godon J. To bontn n t ttmnt o ktoon jntvts s. con Ktoonjntvts S Stdy Go. Am J Ophthalmol 1992;114:441-7 (CS2) 5. Nson JD. imsson ytoogy. Cornea 1988;7:71-81 (BS1) 6. ubs J, Mctny M, lntz W, t . ets o svtv- t t sotons on on t stt nd nton. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:371-8 (BS1) 7. Gn K, MKn Dl, Sg T, cks l. T otssm ontbts to mntnn o on tknss. Ophthalmic Res 1992;24:99-102 (BS1)
The Ocular Surace / april 2007, VOl. 5, NO. 2 / www.tos.om
DEWSMANAGEMENTANDTHERAPy 8. hoy , lm M. S msty o t t m: imtons o dy y syndoms, ontt nss, nd otm oyms. Contact Lens Soc Am J 1971;5:12-9 (BS2) 9. pgn DM, Mogn a, Qnto S, t . comson o osmoty vs o std o bnts. arVO 2004 ost ssson 449 10. Kmn B, Novk GD. comn sss n mntng o dgs. Ocul Surf 2003;1:80-5 11. abtz J, B a. T onjntv tm n dy y sbtys: et o svd nd nonsvd to ttmnts. Curr Eye Res 2001;22:8-18 (CS2) 12. Gsst ar, is Y, Kmn h, M T. cytotoxty o otm svtvs. Am J Ophthalmol 1974;78:98-105 (BS1) 13. Wson . advs xtn ts o to otm mdtons.Surv Ophthalmol 1979;24:57-88 (CS3) 14. Bstn N. con ytotoxty o toy d dgs, vs nd svtvs. Surv Ophthalmol 1980;25:15-30 (CS3) 15. Bstn N. T ts o to dgs nd svtvs on t ts nd on tm n dy y. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1985;104:402-9 (CS3) 16. Bbk r, Mln J. uss o t foootomt n gom s. Ophthalmology 1985;92:884-90 (BS1) 17. Smt l, Gog M, Bdy G, abson M. comtv ts o svtv t sbsttts on t bbt on: snnng ton moso vton ( ARVObstt). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32 (S):733 (BS1) 18. Gbd Jp, s rl, Sntm J 2nd. Osmoty o t movoms n ktoonjntvts s. Arch Ophthalmol 1978;96:677-81 (BS2) 19. loz Bn D, ubs Jl. Qntttv vton o t on t b: t o t ts nd svtvs.Curr Eye Res 1991;10:64556 (BS1) 20. Bn Dl, ubs Jl. at t omoston nd omoton o ovy o t dmgd on tm. Cornea 1993;12:115-20 (BS1) 21. Nok r: ets o ommon otm svtvs on o t. Adv Ther 2001;18:205-15 (CS1) 22. Tt BJ, Tt rc, Ko Sp: cytotoxty o otm svtvs on mn on tm. Lens Eye Toxicity Res 1992;9:361-75 (BS1) 23. hm J, dnwd J. rtdton o wond ng n t on tm by non. Am J Ophthalmol 1950;33:1421 (CS3) 24. Nson J, Dk M, Bw J, Ty M. evton o ysoog t sbsttt n tnts wt ktoonjntvts s. Adv Exp Med Biol 1994;350:453-7 (CS2) 25. Gbd Jp, ross Sr. an toyt-bsd soton tt nss on gyogn nd onjntv gobt- dnsty n bbt mod o ktoonjntvts s. Ophthalmology 1992;99:600-4 (BS1) 26. lnton lM, abtz JM: et o mos-bsd t ts on t o s n ys t s n st ktomss. J Refract Surg 1999;15(2 S):S227-S231 (CS2) 27. Somny Bl, Somny a. ro o ms n gst mos otton. J Physiol Pharmacol 1991; 42:147-61 (BS1) 28. Gbd Jp. T m osmoty nd ktoonjntvts s. CLAO J 1985;11:243-50 (CS1) 29. Gbd J. T m osmoty nd ktoonjntvts s. lbbok TX,Dy ey insttt, 1986 (CS3) 30. Gbd J, ct J, Sng D, t . Mooog t o yosmoty on bbt on tm. Ophthalmology 1984;91:1205-12 (BS1) 31. lo l, l D, cos r, pfgd S. hyosmo sn s onfmmtoy stss on t mos o s. Eye Contact Lens 2005;31:18693 (BS1) 32. Gbd Jp, Knyon Kr. T dnts n t ttmnt o ktoonjntvts s. Ophthalmology 1985;92:646-50 (CS2) 33. hoy , esqv e. cood osmot ss o t ts. J Ocul Pharmacol 1985;1:327-36 (BS1) 34. Yny ph: Ogn osmoyts s omtb, mtbo nd onttng yoottnts n g osmoty nd ot stsss .J Exp Biol 2005;208:2819-30 (BS2) 35. hoy , lm M. Wttbty nd wttng o on tm. Exp Eye Res 1971;11:239-50 (BS1) 36. hw a, Smt T, Dgns G. a qntttv omson o t t n ts n mns sng gmm sntgy (arVO bstt). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31 (S):517 (BS1) 37. agso p, Tsd a, S-Md S, t . Mn tsts o mn on-mb t s tt xd t os bng non dy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:113-9 (BS1) 38. Vs p, Mto M, St , t . Dy y bo nd t ty
wt ydoxyoymtyos. Ophthalmologica 1989;198:152-62 (CS3) 39. Smmons pa, Gtt Q, X S, t . intton o boxymtyos wt mn on s. arVO2006, e-abstt 2759 (BS1) 40. cstnsn M, con S, rnt J,t . cn vton o n hpg gb bnt y do o t o dynss o t y. Curr Eye Res 2004;28:55-62 (CS2) 41. D ps Ma, Goto e, Tsng Sc. Sqnt ngs o d t m t t nstton o sng do o nw mson y do n dy y tnts. Ophthalmology 2004;111:783-91 (CS2) 42. Kob Dr, Sd rc, Gn JV, t . T t o two nov bnt y dos on t m d y tknss n sbjts wt dy y symtoms. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:594-601 (CS2) 43. Snbson Gr, Gvs Jl, So ND, t . pon sdn tms o sodm yont sotons stdd by qntttv gmm sntgy. Eye 1990;4:594-602 (CS3) 44. pok , MN M. T ttmnt o dy ys wt Na yont (hon). Cornea 1982;1:1333 (CS3) 45. Stt Jc, lnn JG. Dt sodm yont (hon) n t ttmnt o o s dsods. Ann Ophthalmol 1985;17:190-2 (CS3) 46. Dls V, ptson W. T s o to hon ts n t mngmnt o toy dy-y syndom. Ann Ophthalmol 1984;16:823-4 (CS3) 47. Snd B, Mn K, Non M. Sodm yont n t ttmnt o ktoonjtvts s. Acta Ophthalmol 1989; 67:181-3 (CS3) 48. Nson JD, s rl. Sodm yont nd oyvny oo t t tons omson n tnts wt ktoonjntvts s. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:484-7 (CS2) 49. Btm Wp. mnty ktts. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1936:33:41335 (CS1) 50. ods WS. intn gtn mnts n t ttmnt o ktoonjntvts s. Br J Ophthalmol 1961:45:625-7 (CS2) 51. mn JM. T ntm g: vton o nw ttmnt o t dy y. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1975:79:Op874-9 (CS2) 52. Tbv aW, dk Wr, Wood TO. pnt oson n t dny syndoms. Ophthalmology 1982;89:1170-2 (CS2) 53. Ws rM, obg r, Km Jh, t . T ttmnt o qos-dnt dy y wt movb nt gs. a n nd mssonytoog stdy. Ophthalmology 1987;94:514-8 (CS2) 54. Gbd Jp, ross Sr, az DT, Gy Kl. et o nt oson by mn son g nston on t osmoty n dy y dsods. CLAO J 1989;15:216-8 (CS2) 55. Bm M, Smbg Da, Dn Mr. ey nd tobty otoms t nt oson wt son gs n dy y syndom. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;131:30-6 (CS1) 56. Bxt Sa, lbson pr. pnt gs n t mngmnt o dy ysOcul Surf 2004;2:255-65 (CS3) 57. Bttt JD, Bon K, coss D, Gdd iB. ey o son nt gs s djnts to to moty o gom-- ot stdy. pnt pgs n Gom Stdy Go. J Am Optom Assoc 1996;67:664-8 (CS2) 58. hng Tc, l Da. pnt oson nd to mdtons o gom. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;107:151-5 (CS2) 59. Sgt J, Yoko N, wood NJ, t . T dtton o bt nd bt boms n nt g os. Cornea 2001;20: 362-5 (CS3) 60. Gdng h, Ks J, Bss h. Symtomt tz oson o n t nston o hk m gs. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:926-8 (CS3) 61. l J, ngn Jc. comtons ssotd wt son ntn gs. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;17:465-9 (CS3) 62. psn . T mn m gnds. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 2003;170:iii-Xi,1-106 (BS1) 63. Yn MT, pfgd Sc, WJ. T t o nt oson on t odton, t n, nd o s snston n nom sbjts. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;131:314-23 (CS2) 64. Tsbot K. T t o wng sts on t mdty o t y. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;15;108:92-3 (BS2) 65. Tsbot K, Ymd M, uym K. St sd ns nd most nsts o t ttmnt o dy-y tnts. Cornea 1994;13:197-201 (BS1) 66. Gsst J, Smont p, Godon D. combnton o sd sd wt n o most mb. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1984;61:610-2 (CS3) 67. Sv De. a nw o to o most mbs. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1978;15:51-3 (CS3) 68. Ks K. Most d dng s o t ttmnt o dy y: wt gz y msk. Ophthalmologica 1994;208:216-9 (CS3) 69. Nos JJ, Zg c, Mt Gl, Nos KK. S-otd dy y ds-
The Ocular Surace / april 2007, VOl. 5, NO. 2 / www.tos.om
175
DEWSMANAGEMENTANDTHERAPy s oss tv modts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:1911-4 (CS2) 70. Kob Dr, Gn JV, Gonk T, t . et o o mdty on t t m d y. Cornea 1996;15:129-34 (BS2) 71. Tsbot K, ht S, Oksw Y, t . Qntttv vdog nyss o bnkng n nom sbjts nd tnts wt dy y. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:715-20 (BS1) 72. Mym K, Yoko N, Tkmt a, Knost S. et o nvonmnt ondtons on t dynms n sot ontt ns ws.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:2563-8 (BS1) 73. Bon aS, astn c, Dt JK. Son bb ontt nss o t omomsd on. Cornea 1994;13:422-8 (CS3) 74. pm KW, Wtng Ma, Bky rJ. S ontt nss: t xndng o. Cornea 2005;24:269-77 (CS3) 75. Tn MJ, pm KW, Bky rJ. S ontt nss o ovngt w n t mngmnt o o s dsods. Eye 2001;15(pt 2):168-72 (CS3) 76. romo-rng T, Stvo p, cott J, t . Gs-mb s ontt ns ty n o s dss. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:25-32 (CS3) 77. rosnt p, cott JM, Bm J. Ttmnt o sstnt on t dt wt xtndd w o fd-vnttd gs-mb s ontt ns. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:33-41 (CS3) 78. Tb J, Dvtt W, Bokosky Je, t . Dob-mskd, bo-ontod sty nd y t o dqoso ttsodm (iNS365) otm soton o t ttmnt o dy y. Cornea 2004;23:784-92 (CS1) 79. Mndsd MV, Novk GD, agood Ve, t . O sty o iNS365 otm soton: p2Y(2) gonst n ty sbjts. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2001;17:173-9 (CS1) 80. Mkm T, j T, hob Y, Nkm M. Dqoso ts nss n nt c- tnsot tog p2Y2 to stmton n bbt onjntv. Ophthalmic Res 2004;36:89-93 (BS1) 81. l DQ, loksw Bl, Soomon a, t . rgton o MMp-9 n mn on t s. Exp Eye Res 2001;73:449-59 (BS1) 82. Mkm T, jt h, j T, t . Nov nonnvsv snstv dtmnton o t vom ngs n nom ts. Ophthalmic Res 2002;34:371-4 (BS1) 83. Yx Br, Mndsd M, Syvst rN, t . O sty o iNS365 otm soton, p2Y2 gonst, n tnts wt md to modt dy y dss. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002;506(pt B):1251-7 (BS2) 84. j T, Mkm T, jt h, t . imovmnt o on b nton by t p2Y(2) gonst iNS365 n t dy y mod. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:96-100 (BS1) 85. j T, Mkm T, Ngno T, t . iNS365 ssss oss o on t ntgty by ston o mn-k gyootn n bbt sot-tm dy y mod. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2002;18:363-70 (BS1) 86. Yx Br, Dogss JG, en pp, t . potny nd dton o ton o syntt p2Y2 to gonsts on Sm sos n bbts Adv Exp Med Biol 2002;506(pt a):261-5 (BS2) 87. usm h, Okmoto T, Tkj Y, t . rbmd nss t mont o mn-k sbstns on t onjntv nd on n t N-tyystn-ttd n vvo mod. Cornea 2004;23:613-9 (BS1) 88. Tnto M, Tkns T, Kdz S, t . cytoottv ts o bmd nd too ydood gnst tvot B-ndd on dmg n m. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44:2980-5 (BS3) 89. Msd K, Toksg h, Ogw T, t . et o to bt sodm on mn vs n t t fd o tnts wt dy y. Seri-arVO2003. 90. Tosd h, Nkt K, hmno T, t . et o gnt on t o s n sq monkys Cornea 2002;21:292-9 (BS3) 91. Nkm M, endo K, Nkt K, hmno T. Gnt nss paS ostv dnsty n bbt onjntv. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:1320-3 (BS3) 92. Nkm M, endo K, Nkt K, hmno T. Gnt stmts ston o mn-k gyootns by on tm n vto nd otts on tm om dston n vvo.Exp Eye Res 1997;65:569-74 (BS3) 93. Tosd h, Nkt K, hmno T, t . Gnt stmts gobt oton oowng n xmnt wond to t ts onjntv n t dy y bbt. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002;506(pt a):353-7 (BS 3) 94. hmno T. Dy y ttmnt wt y dos tt stmt mn odton. Adv Exp Med Biol 1998;438:965-8 (CS3) 95. Jmbtt Je, cnnngm l, Jmbtt MM. ets o 15(S)-heTe on mn onjntv mn ston. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002;506(pt a):323-7 (BS1) 176
96. Gm Da, W ZY, Wm lK, t . con otton by t o mn stgog 15(S)-heTe n bbt mod o dston-ndd on dt. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2002;18:349-61 (BS2) 97. Jkson rS 2nd, Vn Dykn SJ, Mctny MD, ubs Jl. T osnod, 15-(S)-heTe, stmts ston o mn-k gyootn by t on tm Cornea 2001;20:516-21 (BS2) 98. az rG, eds h. evton o t ts o 15(S)-heTe on on t s: n toysoog nd ytom stdy. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002; 506(pt a):329-33 (BS3) 99. ubs Jl, a MD, Jkson rS 2nd, t . Toy d 15-(S)heTe stmts mn odton by on tm. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002;506(pt a):317-21 (BS2) 100. Gm Da, W ZY, Wm lK, t . psvton o on ntgty by t mn stgog 15(S)-heTe n bbt mod o dstonndd dy y. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002;506(pt a):335-40 (BS2) 101. Jmbtt Je, cnnngm lT, l Y, Jmbtt MM. ctzton o mn o mn ston mdtd by 15(S)-heTe. Cornea 2002;21:818-24 (BS3) 102. Vvno B, a-hsm i, Kn K, t . pon tbts o t ttmnt o dy mot nd dy y symtoms n tnts wt Sjogn’s syndom. Arch Intern Med 1999;159:174-81 (CS1) 103. Tky M, ikw Y, Ymd c, t . Ttmnt wt on ydood o s symtoms n Sjogn’s syndom. Ryumachi 1997;37:453-7 (CS2) 104. Tstk N, Ktsos G, psds ca, t . O on o t ttmnt o o symtoms n tnts wt Sjogn’s syndom: ndomsd 12-wk ontod stdy. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:1204-7 (CS2) 105. ps aS, S YS, cny M, t . Sss ttmnt o dy mot nd dy y symtoms n Sjogn’s syndom tnts wt o on: a ndomzd, bo-ontod, dos-djstmnt stdy.J Clin Rheumatol 2004;4:169-77 (CS1) 106. agon p, D pto r, Sn r, Mob M. conjntv tm movmnt t systm on n tnts wt Sjogn’s syndom. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:166-70 (CS2) 107. pton D, condm JJ, r, t . Dob-bnd ndomzd boontod stdy o vmn n Sjogn’s syndom tnts wt xostom nd ktoonjntvts s. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:748-54 (CS1) 108. Ono M, Tkm e, Snozk K, t . Tt t o vmn on dy y n tnts wt Sjogn’s syndom: ndomzd, dobbnd n stdy. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:6-17 (CS1) 109. Gng G, Dns JT, Dt JK, t . Toxty o nt t sbsttts n y dnd t mod o mn on t s.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42948-56 (BS1) 110. Gng G, honnk K, Sod c, t . Qty o svy ts oowng toogos sbmndb gnd tnsntton o sv dy y. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;238:45-52 (BS1) 111. Tsbot K, Goto e, jt h, t . Ttmnt o dy y by toogos sm ton n Sjogn’s syndom. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:390-5 (CS2) 112. Gng G, htwg D. atoogos sm ydos o o s dsods, n rnd T, lkn (ds). con nd xtn y dss. Bn, hdbg, Sng, 2005, 2-19 113. l l, htwg D, ho S, t . an otmsd otoo o t odton o toogos sm ydos. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005;243:706-14 (BS1) 114. Tnnvt, N, Dn M, Svn lJ, t . contod stdy o t s o toogos sm n dy y tnts. Cornea 2001;20:802-6 (CS1) 115. Kojm T, isd r, Dog M, t . T t o toogos sm ydos n t ttmnt o sv dy y dss: ostv ndomzd s-onto stdy. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:242-6 (CS1) 116. Nob Ba, lo rS, Mlnnn S, t . comson o toogos sm y dos wt onvnton ty n ndomsd ontod ossov t o o s dss. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:647-52 (CS1) 117. Nod-Tsy T, asno-Kto N, Tod i, Tsbot K. atoogos sm y dos o dy y t laSiK. J Refract Surg 2006;22:61-6 (CS1) 118. Sz SD, Skndo W,Ko p.atoogos sm o t ttmnt o on t bsons n dbt tnts ndgong vttomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:207-11(BS1) 119. Gng G, Sg p, Bstn GO, lq h. Tnsntton o t toogos sbmndb gnd o most sv ss o ktoonjntvts s. Ophthalmology 1998;105:327-35 (CS2) 120. Sod, Sg p, mm c, t . [Tnsntton o t sbmndb gnd n bsot dy ys. et on t o s]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2002;219:494-501 (CS2) 121. lo l, l DQ, Dos a, t . exmnt dy y stmts odton
The Ocular Surace / april 2007, VOl. 5, NO. 2 / www.tos.om
DEWSMANAGEMENTANDTHERAPy o nfmmtoy ytokns nd MMp-9 nd tvts MapK sgnng twys on t o s. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:4293301 (BS1) 122. Ndkon JY, Stn Me, pfgd Sc, t . Dstng stss nds T -mdtd Sjogn‘s syndom-k m ktoonjntvts.J Immunol 2006;176:3950-7 (BS1) 123. Kswn rl, Ssby Ma, Wd Da. Sontnos nn ktoonjntvts s. a s mod o mn ktoonjntvts s: ttmnt wt yoson y dos. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:1210-16 (BS2) 124. Gndz K, Ozdm O. To yoson ttmnt o ktoonjntvts s n sondy Sjogn’s syndom. Acta Ophthalmol 1994;72:3842 (CS2) 125. lbovtz ra, So S, andno J. pot t o yoson 1% otm ontmnt n t ttmnt o ktoonjntvts s. Cornea 1993;12:315-23 (CS1) 126. Stvnson D, Tb J, rs Bl. ey nd sty o yoson a otm mson n t ttmnt o modt-to-sv dy y dss. a dos-ngng, ndomzd t. Ophthalmology 2000;107:967-74(CS1) 127. S K, Stvnson OD, Mndo TK, rs Bl. Two mtnt, ndomzd stds o t y nd sty o yoson otm mson n modt to sv dy y dss. Ophthalmology 2000;107:631-9 (CS1) 128. Knt KS, Tsd aS, Gson iK. Gobt nmbs nd t oton n t onjntv o tnts wt dy y syndom ttd wt yoson. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:330-7 (BS1) 129. Bgno , ps pJ, D Snt Jn M, t . ow ytomt nyss o nfmmtoy mks n KcS: 6-mont ttmnt wt to yoson a. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:90-5 (BS1) 130. Tn K, pfgd Sc, J Z, t . intkn-6 vs n t onjntv tm o tnts wt dy y dss ttd wt yoson otm mson. Cornea 2000;19:492-6 (BS1) 131. Knt KS, Tsd aS, Stn Me, Smt Ja. anyss o to yoson ttmnt o tnts wt dy y syndom: t on onjntv ymoyts. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:1489-96 (BS1) 132. pfgd Sc, Mskn Sl, andson B, t . a ndomzd, dobmskd, bo-ontod, mtnt omson o otdno tbont otm ssnson, 0.5%, nd bo o ttmnt o ktoonjntvts s n tnts wt dyd t n. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:444-57 (CS1) 133. avndk aM, avndk Mc, Vn eD, Kmn he. T omson o s o to otostods nd nonstod ntnfmmtoy dos on dy y tnts: a n nd mmnoytom stdy. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:593-602 (CS1) 134. Snz d Mz S SM, Smon cstv c, Kbbn O. Nonsvd to stods nd nt oson o sv ktoonjntvts s. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2000;75:751-56 (CS1) 135. Ms p, pfgd Sc. To nonsvd mtydnsoon ty o ktoonjntvts s n Sjogn syndom.Ophthalmology 1999;106:811-6 (CS3) 136. pfgd Sc. antnfmmtoy ty o dy y. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137:337-42 (CS3) 137. anonymos. ctn otm ntbot ombnton dgs o mn s; Dg y stdy mmntton. Fed Reg 1982;47:21296 138. anonymos. ctn stod tons o otm nd/o ot s. Fed Reg 1980;45:57776-80 139. anonymos. ctn otm ntbot ombnton dgs o mn s; Dg y stdy mmntton. Fed Reg 1980b;45:57780-3 140. anonymos. ctn stod tons o otm o ot s.Fed Reg 1976;41:34340-2 141. D pv cS, cos rM, V al, t . a on b dston n xmnt mn dy y s bogtd by mtydnsoon nd doxyyn. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:2847-56 (RS1) 142. D pv cS, cos rM, V al, t . cotostod nd doxyyn sss MMp-9 nd nfmmtoy ytokn xsson, MapK tvton n t on tm n xmnt dy y.Exp Eye Res 2006;83:526-35 (RS1) 143. Smn rM, Bdod r, Bnn B, t . a mtnt, dob-mskd, ndomzd, v-ontod, -go stdy to vt t sty nd y o tstoston otm soton n tnts wt mbomn gnd dysnton. arVO 2006, e-abstt 5608 (CS3) 144. Wod c, N J, hb Jc, Sto MO. Ttmnt o ktoonjntvts s wt to ndogn. Maturitas 2001;37:209-12 (CS3) 145. Sto MO, Jo ea, Goszwsk T, t . Ttmnt o mnos ktoonjntvts s wt to ostdo. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:100-2 (CS2)
146. Sn We, Mcy Jp, pndy aG. Mnoyn t on mbomn gnd ds n mbomnts tnts. Exp Eye Res 2003;76:417–20 (CS2) 147. Dogty JM, Mcy Jp, Svny re, t . T o o ttyn n on bts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:2970–5 (CS2) 148. T cN, Sn We, Mcy Jp, t . ets o mnoyn on t o fo o tnts wt n os o sbo bts. Cornea 2003;22:545–8 (CS2) 149. Soomon a, rosnbtt M, l DQ, t . Doxyyn nbton o ntkn-1 n t on tm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:2544-57 (CS2) 150. l Y, Kng K, Yx B, t . rbbt onjntv tm tnsots fd, nd p2Y2(2) to gonsts stmt c(-) nd fd ston. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2001;281:c595-602(BS1) 151. l DQ, lo l, cn Z, t . JNK nd erK Map knss mdt ndton o il-1bt, TN- nd il-8 oowng yosmo stss n mn mb t s. Exp Eye Res 2006;82:588-96. eb 2005 Ot 3 (BS1) 152. Kk T, Bky M. Doxyyn s nt-nfmmtoy nd nbts styoo xotoxn-ndd ytokns nd mokns. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003;47:3630-3 (BS1) 153. Vos Sa, evns Me, ln MT, t . us o mods nd ttyns o on nfmmtoy dsss. Ann Pharmacother 2005;39:86-94 (CS3) 154. Tmgo rJ, Bok ra, Bm h. angognss nbton by mnoyn. Cancer Res 1991;51:672-5 (BS1) 155. Sdn aN, smj r. Ttyns: Nonntbot ots nd t n mtons J Am Acad Dermatol 2006;54:258-65 (CS3) 156. hb Tp. cn dmtoogy, 4t d. St los:Mosby-Y Book, 2004, 162-89 (CS3) 157. V cM, hkbt Sr, lm JW, t . antbot s n ton to t sk o bst n. JAMA 2004;291:827–35 158. V cM, hkbt Sr, rtt c, t . assoton btwn ntbot s o to bst n dgnoss nd bst tmo tsts (untd Stts). Cancer Causes Control (Netherlands) 2006;17:307-13 159. Gı rodıgz la , Gonzz-pz a. us o ntbots nd sk o bst n. Am J Epidemiology 2005;161:616-9 160. Mdond a, w M. po dmtts: toogy nd ttmnt wt ttyn. Br J Dermatol 1972;87:315-9 (CS3) 161. Jnsn T, pwg G. ros: sston nd ttmnt. J R Soc Med 1997;90:144-50 (CS3) 162. t-py J, cyt aS, dmn ST, t . T t o doxyyn on o os. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;107:434-5 (CS2) 163. Wkn JK. ros. toysoogy nd ttmnt. Arch Dermatol 1994;130:359-62 (BS1) 164. Ston Du, codos J. O ttyns o o os: n vdnbsd vw o t tt. Cornea 2004;23:106-9 (CS1) 165. Mcy Jp, Dogty JM, Dn DG. csston o on bts. Ophthalmology 1982;89:1173-80 (CS2) 166. t-py J, Sg e, hmo i, ev-hdn p. ey o doxyyn nd ttyn n o os. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;116:88-92 (CS1) 167. S DV, Wgt p, pk l, t . pbo ontod t o sd d g nd oxyttyn o nt bts nd os.Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:42-5 (CS1) 168. ho pD, Ws DM. enty o o ttyns nto sv nd ts. Antimicob Agents Chemother 1974;3:330–6 (BS1) 169. Gbnkn a, Mys J, s D. hmst fnk ogn ydos nd s tvty. J Invest Dermatol 1980;75:289–92 (BS1) 170. aonowz JD, Sn We, O D, t . Sot tm o mnoyn ttmnt o mbomnts. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:856-60 (CS2) 171. Yoo Se, l Dc, cng Mh. T t o ow-dos doxyyn ty n on mbomn gnd dysnton. Korean J Ophthalmol 2005;19:25863 (CS2) 172. Bownng DJ, po aD. O os. Surv Ophthalmol 1986;31:145– 58 (CS3) 173. esty NB, Konsky JS, y Nl, t . Nto motxs n tnts wt n vng o ttyn ty. Arch Dermatol 1984;120:1308-13 (BS1) 174. Gbd Jp. T snt ontxt nd bss o t moog mngmnt o dy ys. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2005;18:475-84,v (CS3) 175. Jms MJ, Gbson ra, cnd lG. Dty oynsttd tty ds nd nfmmtoy mdto odton. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71(1 S):343S-8S (BS2) 176. ends S, Gobn r, Ky Ve, t . T t o dty smntton wt n-3 oynsttd tty ds on t syntss o ntkn-1 nd tmo noss to by monon s. N Engl J Med
The Ocular Surace / april 2007, VOl. 5, NO. 2 / www.tos.om
177
DEWSMANAGEMENTANDTHERAPy 1989;320:265-71 (BS1) 177. Jms MJ, cnd lG. Dty n-3 tty ds nd ty o mtod tts. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1997;27:85-97 (CS3) 178. Km JM. n-3 tty d smnts n mtod tts. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71(1 S):349S-51S (CS1) 179. Bbno S, rondo M, cmon p, t . Systm no nd gmmnon d ty n dy y syndom wt n nfmmtoy omonnt. Cornea 2003;22:97-101 (CS2) 180. Sdo Ja, lmbts D, Bgmnn rB, py hD. mnty ktts ssotd wt dnydmn ydood (Bndy). Am J Ophthalmol 1986;101:376-7 (CS3)
178
181. Moss Se, Kn r, Kn Be. pvn o nd sk tos o dy y syndom. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:1264-68 182. Md Th, Sttng rD. Ktoonjntvts s sd by dnoxyt ydood wt ton st (lomot). Am J Ophthalmol 1991;111:377-8 (CS2) 183. Tsbot K, Nkmo K. Dy ys nd vdo dsy tmns. N Engl J Med 1993;25;328:584(CS2) 184. Mtob aY, hs DJ, Mk DB, t . Dy y syndom, amn admy o Otmoogy, 2003 185. Bns a, Doy JJ, Stn l, t . Dysnton t syndom: a D o to ttmnt ommndtons.Cornea 2006;25:900-7
The Ocular Surace / april 2007, VOl. 5, NO. 2 / www.tos.om