A generic evaluation form. I'm also in the process of submitting this as a Google Form template.Full description
Full description
Descrição completa
Single-case Research Designs - Alan E. KazdinDescripción completa
Full description
EvaluationFull description
JournalFull description
Full description
Descripción: This is a document that allows a quick description of the 4 stages in the Cambridge speaking assessment, regarding parts 1 to 4 of the FCE test.
NAUI Medical Evaluation and Physician Approval From
Full description
UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH DESIGNS EVALUATION FORM Presenters
A B
Sectio Sect io n Date
Presentation Assi As si gnmen gn mentt
□
Type
indicate title of research paper for critical analysis
CRITERIA
Exceeds expectations (5 points)
Content of the Discussion
Clarity of Explanations 1
Comprehension1
Preparedness
Time Management
□
DESCRIPTORS Barely hitting the Doing fairly well mark (4 points)
Oral Report of a Research Design Critical Analysis of a Research Paper
Needs improvement
(3 points)
(2 points)
The scope of the report lacks (or fails to explain in detail) two key components required.
The scope of the report lacks (or fails to explain in detail) three key components required.
The reporter struggles to explain key points in the discussion.
The reporter did not make an effort to explain key points in the discussion.
The reporter is able to accurately answer most of the questions posed about the topic.
The reporter is able to accurately answer a few questions posed about the topic.
The reporter is not able to accurately answer any of the questions posed about the topic.
Reporters seem to have prepared but struggles transitioning from one part of the discussion to the next.
There are instances in the discussion when the reporters manifested uncertainty.
The report was unorganized.
The report took more than the allotted time to finish.
The report was finished in less than 10 minutes.
The scope of the report includes and explains in detail all key components required. The reporter is consistently able to provide a clear and concise discussion of the ideas raised.
The scope of the report lacks (or fails to explain in detail) one key component required. Although ideas are clear, the reporter is not able to express them directly to the point.
The reporter is able to accurately answer almost all questions posed about the topic. Reporters are completely prepared and has obviously planned for the discussion. Reporters are able to maximize the time given to them (within 14-16 minutes of discussion)
A
B
TOTAL INDIVIDUAL SCORE
1
Reporters to be evaluated individually.
UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH DESIGNS EVALUATION FORM Presenters
A B
Sectio Sect io n Date
Presentation Assi As si gnmen gn mentt
□
Type
indicate title of research paper for critical analysis
CRITERIA
Exceeds expectations (5 points)
Content of the Discussion
Clarity of Explanations 1
Comprehension1
Preparedness
Time Management 1
DESCRIPTORS Barely hitting the Doing fairly well mark (4 points)
Needs improvement
(3 points)
(2 points)
The scope of the report lacks (or fails to explain in detail) two key components required.
The scope of the report lacks (or fails to explain in detail) three key components required.
The reporter struggles to explain key points in the discussion.
The reporter did not make an effort to explain key points in the discussion.
The reporter is able to accurately answer most of the questions posed about the topic.
The reporter is able to accurately answer a few questions posed about the topic.
The reporter is not able to accurately answer any of the questions posed about the topic.
Reporters seem to have prepared but struggles transitioning from one part of the discussion to the next.
There are instances in the discussion when the reporters manifested uncertainty.
The report was unorganized.
The report took more than the allotted time to finish.
The report was finished in less than 10 minutes.
The scope of the report includes and explains in detail all key components required. The reporter is consistently able to provide a clear and concise discussion of the ideas raised.
The scope of the report lacks (or fails to explain in detail) one key component required. Although ideas are clear, the reporter is not able to express them directly to the point.
The reporter is able to accurately answer almost all questions posed about the topic. Reporters are completely prepared and has obviously planned for the discussion. Reporters are able to maximize the time given to them (within 14-16 minutes of discussion)
Reporters to be evaluated individually.
□
Oral Report of a Research Design Critical Analysis of a Research Paper
