COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR) D. LORIA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION PROPONENT’S NAME MONITORING PERIOD COVERED: January to June 2! I. "ASIC PROJECT IN#ORMATION AND $PDATES $PDATES ECC Control No/Reference Code No.: ECC%R&A%!'%'% *ate* January '+ 2! Project Title: ",o%Et-ano Pant Project Type: D,/t,at,on D,/t,at,on an* #er0entat,on Location: S,t,o Ma,/an+ "aran1ay Tuu-an+ Na/u1u+ "atan1a/ O Project Coordinates: '&O'’ '’2!3 2!3 to '& O'’4.!3 Nort- at,tu*e at ,tu*e an* '2 5'’&.3 to O '2 5'’5'.3 Ea/t on1,tu*e
Project Stage/Phase: (i.e. construction; commissioning, etc.) O6erat,on P-a/e Contact Person: M/. D,1na Lor,a Contact Numers: (&) 57%77 E!P "ppro#al: $ 8 % &uring ECC "pplication Stage $ 8 % 'pdated after ECC (ssuance) appro#ed on May + 2! Changes in Project &esign *if any+: In9rea/e ,n 6ro*u9t,on 9a6a9,ty an* In/taat,on o
A**,t,ona Ma9-,ner,e/ an* E;u,60ent
II. E
Tae II%'. Su00ary o Ma>or #,n*,n1/ or t-e Mon,tor,n1 Per,o* Con*,t,on?Re;u,re0ent? Co00,t0ent Compliance ith ECC Compliance ith E!P
Co06,an9e Statu/ @ Su00ary o A9t,on/ Taen Co06,e* A,r Pout,on: Pout,on: Du/t 9oe9tor 9oe9tor a/ ,n/tae* an* 0a,nta,ne* ater Pout,on: a/teater Treat0ent Treat0ent #a9,,ty a/ a/ ,n/tae* an* 0a,nta,ne*
Re9o00en*at,on?Co00,t0ent or t-e NeBt Re6ort,n1 Cont,nuou/ 0on,tor,n1 on 9o06,an9e to ECC 9on*,t,on/ Cont,nuou/ 0on,tor,n1 an* 9o06,an9e to t-e 6ro,/,on/ o RA !4&+ RA 245+ RA an* RA 77 an* t-e,r re/6e9t,e IRR
So,* a/te: a/te: Pro,/,on o 1ara1e ,n/ ,n /trate1,9 o9at,on/ o t-e 6ant. I06e0entat,on o 6ro6er Se1re1at,on+ Re9y9,n1+ Reu/e an* D,/6o/a. Co00,//,one* a99re*,te* -auer/
(mplementation of appropriate and effecti#e en#ironmental impact remedial actions in case of e-ceedances
Faar*ou/ a/te: a/te: a toB,9 an* -aar*ou/ a/te/ are 6ro6ery /tore* ,n t-e *e/,1nate* 9-e0,9a a/te roo0 6r,or to *,/6o/a y an a99re*,te* treater T-e 6ant ,/ o6erat,n1 at ,t/ o6t,0u0 e,9,en9y ee o !H an* no re9or*/ o eB9ee*an9e/ t-at , 9ontr,ute to en,ron0enta 6out,on. T-e Cont,n1en9y Pan an* E0er1en9y Re/6on/e Pro1ra0 /-a e /tr,9ty ,06e0ente* ,n
Cont,nuou/ 0on,tor,n1 an* 9o06,an9e to t-e 6ro,/,on/ o RA !4&+ RA 245+ RA an* RA 77 an* t-e,r re/6e9t,e IRR
Complaints management
Realistic and sufficient udget for conducting the en#ironmental monitoring and audit acti#ities
"ccountaility 0 1ualified personnel are charged ith the routine monitoring of the project acti#ities in terms of education training 2noledge and e-perience of the en#ironmental team 3thers44
9a/e o eB9ee*an9e/ to DENR /tan*ar*/ T-e 9o06any ,/ an a9t,e 0e0er o an en,ron0enta,/t 1rou6 -ere 9o06a,nt/ are e,n1 re/oe*. No 9o06a,nt/ ere re9e,e* y t-e 9o06any ro0 /tae-o*er/ /,n9e t-e 9o06any ,/ a a%a,*,n1 9,t,en T-e 9o06any ao9ate* P5+. or t-e 6er,o*,9 /a06,n1 anay/e/ an* *e/,1nate* t-e En,ron0enta O,9er?PCO to -an*e 9o06,an9e to DENR Stan*ar*/ T-e 9o06any 9reate* an en,ron0enta un,t an* *e/,1nate* M/. C-ery Duya a/ ,t/ En,ron0enta O,9er?PCO to ea* an* -an*e 9o06,an9e to DENR Stan*ar*/
In 9a/e o any 9o06a,nt/ re9e,e*+ t-e 9o06any /-a /u0,t t-e re/ut/ o t-e /ette0ent or re/out,on un*ertaen y t-e 9o06any Co/t /u00ary o u*1etary re;u,re0ent/ an* 6ro1re// re6ort /-a e /u0,tte*
T-e En,ron0enta O,9er?PCO /-a 9oor*,nate ,t- t-e EM" re1ar*,n1 u6*ate/ on 9o06,an9e to DENR Stan*ar*/
N/"
III. RES$LTS AND DISC$SSIONS A. Co06,an9e Mon,tor,n1 The status of compliance to the ECC conditionalities and the attainment of E!P commitments should e elaorated in this section. Reasons for noncompliance or unmet commitment should e e-plained and solutions and measures to attain full compliance of ECC terms and conditions as ell as satisfactory attainment of E!P commitments should e discussed as reneed efforts for the ne-t monitoring period. Tae ' may e used to summari5e the status of compliance.
Tae '. Su00ary Statu/ o ECC @ EMP Co06,an9e ECC?EMP Reeant ECC Con*,t,on/ Statu/ o Con*,t,on?Re;u,re0ent Co06,an9e Re;u,re0ent? Cate1or,at,on (8 , 9o06y,n1) De/9r,6t,on 6 Project Co#erage/ T-e 0aB,0u0 annua 9a6a9,ty ,/ 5+ 0etr,9 ton/ Limits 8
7
Components
8
3ther sectoral re1uirements mandated y other agencies to e complied ith
7
9
E!P and updates as deemed re1uired
6 7 8 9 ; <
D,/t,at,on De6art0ent+ #er0entat,on De6art0ent+ "o,,n1 Fou/e De6art0ent+ Poer Pant+ T#+ Du/t Coe9tor Sy/te0+ Stora1e Area or ra 0ater,a/ an* ,n,/-e* 6ro*u9t/ Per0,t/?Cearan9e/ ere /e9ure* ro0 FL$R"+ NR"+ LG$/+ DOE+ DOLE+ DTI+ DOF+ et9.
8
Str,9t ,06e0entat,on o t-e a66roe* EMP
8
8
Re0ar/ #ro0 January to May 2!+ t-e 6ant -a/ area*y 6ro*u9e* aout 2+ 0etr,9 ton/. In9rea/e ,n 9a6a9,ty a/ a66roe* on January '+ 2! ,t- ,n/taat,on o a**,t,ona 0a9-,nery an* e;u,60ent
Co6,e/ o 6er0,t/? 9earan9e/ /-a e ,n9u*e* ,n t-e neBt /u0,//,on o CMR or /ee AnneB or Atta9-0ent T-e u6*ate* EMP /-a e /u0,tte* ,n t-e neBt /u0,//,on o CMR or /ee
Conduct of aseline compliance and impact self= monitoring
; >
A,r an* ater Kua,ty /a06,n1 anay/e/ ere 9on*u9te*
8
;
!ulti=sectoral monitoring *as may e re1uired+
6>
MOA or t-e 9reat,on o MMT a/ a66roe* on A6r, + 2!
8
>
Regular reporting
<
Re1uar /u0,//,on o t-e /e0,%annua CMR an* ;uartery SMR
8
<
(nstitutional arrangements necessary for implementation of en#ironmental management measures Standard &ENR re1uirements on transfer of onership Standard &ENR re1uirements on aandonment (mpact !itigation Plan or Construction/ ContractorAs En#ironmental Program
6 9
Coor*,nat,on ,t- LG$+ 1oern0ent a1en9,e/ 9on9erne* on t-e ,06e0entat,on o EMP
8
67
Social &e#elopment Plan
68
(EC Plan
69
Contingency/ Emergency Response Plan or e1ui#alent Ris2 !anagement Plan
?
6@
66
AnneB or Atta9-0ent Re/ut/ o aoratory /a06,n1 anay/e/ /-a e /u0,tte* ,n t-e neBt /u0,//,on o CMR or /ee AnneB or Atta9-0ent Co6y o t-e MOA /-a e /u0,tte* ,n t-e neBt /u0,//,on o CMR or /ee AnneB or Atta9-0ent Co6y o t-e CMR an* SMR /-a e /u0,tte* ,n t-e neBt /u0,//,on o CMR or /ee AnneB or Atta9-0ent ,t- MOA Re1uar au*,t y au*,tor/
ISO '& 9ert,,e* 8
No tran/er o oner/-,6
8
T-e 9o06any /-a ,nor0 EM" on t-,/ 0atter
<
No aan*on0ent or tran/er o o9at,on
8
Str,9t ,06e0entat,on o t-e a66roe* IMP
8
9 E!P
Se9ure* e06oy0ent+ tra,n,n1/?/e0,nar/ or e06oyee/+ /9-oar/-,6+ /aary oan/+ 0e*,9a 9on/utat,on or e06oyee/ an* ene,9,ar,e/
8
8 E!P
Re1uar 9on/utat,on ,t- t-e e06oyee/ an* -o/t 9o00un,ty aout t-e /ae o6erat,on o t-e 9o06any
8
T-e 9o06any -a/ a Cont,n1en9y? E0er1en9y Re/6on/e Pan -,9- a/ ,n9or6orate* ,n t-e ECC a66,9at,on *o9u0ent/
8
T-e 9o06any /-a ,nor0 EM" on t-,/ 0atter T-e u6*ate* IMP /-a e /u0,tte* ,n t-e neBt /u0,//,on o CMR or /ee AnneB or Atta9-0ent Co6y o t-e SDP /-a e /u0,tte* ,n t-e neBt /u0,//,on o CMR or /ee AnneB or Atta9-0ent Co6y o t-e IEC Pan /-a e /u0,tte* ,n t-e neBt /u0,//,on o CMR or /ee AnneB or Atta9-0ent Co6y o t-e Cont,n1en9y? E0er1en9y Re/6on/e Pan /-a e /u0,tte* ,n t-e neBt /u0,//,on o CMR or /ee
6 7 8 9 ; < E!P
7
6
"andonment Plan *hen applicale+
6;
En#ironmental !onitoring Plan *E!oP+
6>
3thers4444
<
E!oP
At 6re/ent+ no ore9a/t o aan*on,n1 t-e 6ro>e9t
8
In9or6orate* ,n t-e ECC a66,9at,on *o9u0ent/
8
AnneB or Atta9-0ent T-e Aan*on0ent Pan /-a e /u0,tte* 2 0ont-/ 6r,or to aan*on0ent a9t,,t,e/. T-e u6*ate* EMoP /-a e /u0,tte* ,n t-e neBt /u0,//,on o CMR or /ee AnneB or Atta9-0ent
N/"
". I06a9t Mon,tor,n1 This section shall contain rele#ant graphical presentation of 1uantitati#e and semi=1uantitati#e impact monitoring results shoing trends comparing past monitoring results ith the current. Rele#ant monitoring results in the other S!R modules shall e referred to. The latest monitoring findings and conclusion should e discussed in te-t form. Bualitati#e impact monitoring results may e presented in te-t form or in terms of pictorial co#erage if applicale. E-amples of 1ualitati#e impacts are those relating to 1uality of life degree of happiness and sense of en#ironmental cleanliness.
Pro>e9t A9t,,t,e/
Pre*,9te* I06a9t: De/9r,6t,on 6er Para0eter
M,t,1at,on? En-an9e0ent
A9tua?Re/,*ua I06a9t
Pro6o/e* C-an1e/ to t-e M,t,1at,on? En-an9e0ent Pan
Pre-Construction
Construction
Operation
Abandonment
i. Summary of Previous Monitoring The 2ey findings recommendations and action plan from the pre#ious monitoring and outstanding issues from earlier monitoring periods *if applicale+ should e highlighted in this section. *Provide discussion and results of laboratory sampling analyses ii. Current Monitoring Results and Findings The data collected and related e-penses from the #arious sampling and measurement e#ents done under the En#ironmental !onitoring Plan *E!oP+ or a Sampling and !easurement Plan *S"!P+ for the current monitoring period shall e summari5ed in a taular form preferaly using the prescried format in Tae/ 2 an* elo and discussed under this section. 3nly processed and summari5ed data must e presented here. The current monitoring results must e related to the historical trend for each parameter. "ny de#iation from this trend must e e-plained. !ore importantly the discussion must focus on point=y=point comparison of the gathered #alues ith En#ironmental Buality Performance
Le#els *EBPLs+ if EBPLs ha#e een committed y the Proponent or estalished ith the !ulti=partite !onitoring Team. The monitoring results could also e used to determine the action and limit le#els for the specific project. These should all e presented here in detail and summari5ed in the conclusions and recommendations section. Compliances non=compliances and e-ceedances must all e thoroughly e-plained. (n cases of compliances success factors must e cited. ,or non=compliances and e-ceedances the proponentAs response should e e-plained. !oreo#er causati#e factors must e identified and additional solutions and mitigation measures proposed if needed. (t should also cite the eather conditions and other factors hich may affect the results of the sampling acti#ities. The status of compliance to recommendations from pre#ious monitoring and measures included in the action plan should e descried and any unmet commitment must e rationali5ed and alternati#e if needed presented.
Tae 2. Su00ary Statu/ o En,ron0enta I06a9t Mana1e0ent an* Mon,tor,n1 Pan I06e0entat,on !onitoring 3jecti#e
En#ironmental "spect
Compliance to "ir emission R" <>9? *"ir from genset Buality+ oiler *e1uipment that use fuel+
En#ironmental (mpact "ir pollution Noise pollution health ha5ards
Compliance to R" ?7> *Gater Buality+
&ischarge of asteater and effluent
Gater pollution land contamination health ha5ards
Compliance to R" ;?;? *Da5aste !gt.+
Ieneration of to-ic and ha5ardous astes
Gater pollution land contamination health ha5ards
Compliance to R" ?@@8
Ieneration of solid aste
Gater pollution land contamination health ha5ards
!onitoring Parameter TSP S3- N3- C3- P!6@ P 38 D7S 3C
H3& C3& pD TSS Temp. T&S coliform E.Coli 3il Irease metals FTCLP Fmetals FThose classified in Tale 6=6 of (RR PCL olume of solid astes generated
Sampling !easurement Results Stn/ Pre#ious Current Loc (dentifi FPro#ide FPro#ide ed results of results of station sampling sampling s analyses analyses
Standard/ E(S Prediction
En#tAl !gt. !easures
Complian ce to &ENR Emission Standards
Pro#ision and maintenan ce of CE!S FSet limits/ stac2s arning uffer 5one tree planting Pro#ision FNo EBPL/Not maintenan applicale ce of GTP FSet limits/ arning
(dentifi ed station s outfall
FPro#ide results of sampling analyses
FPro#ide results of sampling analyses
Complian ce to &ENR Effluent Gasteat er Standards
Storag e area
FPro#ide results of sampling analyses
FPro#ide results of sampling analyses
Complian ce to R" ;?;? Standards
Githin the site !R,
FPro#ide #olume generated
FPro#ide #olume generated
Complian ce to R" ?@@8 (RR
Remar2s *EBPL commitme nt if any+ FNo EBPL/Not applicale
Pro#ision FNo EBPL/Not maintenan applicale ce of storage FSet limits/ area arning Pro#ision FNo EBPL/Not maintenan applicale ce of ins !R, FSet limits/ arning
EKPL%En,ron0enta Kua,ty Peror0an9e Lee o "lert or Red ,lag = early arning o "ction Le#el=point here management measures must e employed so as not to reach the regulated threshold or limit le#el or to reduce deterioration of affected en#ironmental component to pre=impact or optimum en#ironmental 1uality o Limit Le#el=regulated threshold of pollutant *standard that must not e e-ceeded+) point here emergency response measures must e employed to reduce pollutants to loer than standard limit. o NOTE: Section on EBPLs may e filled out as a ProponentAs draft commitment or after these ha#e een estalished and mutually agreed upon among Proponent E!H and other !!T memers. 3therise only the L(!(T Le#el shall e the reference for regulatory compliance. This means that en#ironmental management measures are formulated at the J"CT(3N le#elK so as not to e-ceed this regulated threshold.
Tae . Re6ort on Statu/ o En,ron0enta "u*1et Ao9at,on/ an* EB6en/e/ "u*1et A9tua EB6en/e/ EB6en/e Ite0 D,re9t ro0 "u*1et or D,re9t MMT Co06any MMT Co06any EB6en/e/ EB6en/e A. I06e0entat,on o Mana1e0ent Pan/ @ Pro1ra0/ 6+ En#ironmental (mpact !itigation Plan
P8@@@@@
FPro#ide the
P8@@@@@
7+ Social &e#elopment Plan
P@@@@
8+ (EC Plan
P@@@
9+ Enhancement Programs *if any+
N/"
appro#ed G,P FPro#ide the appro#ed G,P FPro#ide the appro#ed G,P FPro#ide the appro#ed G,P
P@@@@ P@@@ N/"
". ,06e0entat,on o Mon,tor,n1 Pan/ 6+ Self=!onitoring
P6@@@@@
7+ En#ironmental !onitoring ,und *ith !!T+
FPro#ide the appro#ed G,P FPro#ide the appro#ed G,P
P6@@@@@
FPro#ide the appro#ed G,P 8+ En#ironmental Iuarantee ,und FPro#ide the FPro#ide the appro#ed appro#ed G,P G,P T3T"LS P9@@@ P9@@@ F,or mining projects e1ui#alent cost items shall e adopted e.g. S&!P in lieu of S&P.
IV. CONCL$SIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This section should present the conclusions and recommendations of the current S!R ased on the results and discussion of the pre#ious sections. (t should also e-plain if the pre#ious monitoring recommendations should continue *if implemented+. 3n the other hand if arranted the recommendation may e the cessation of specific or all monitoring acti#ities. The conclusions and recommendations should preferaly e in a ulleted format and as much as possile grouped according to coherent themes such as the folloing headings.
A. Co06,an9e Statu/ 3nly the 2ey conclusions aout the status of compliance to ECC and E!P are included in this section. The status of non=compliances should e particularly trac2ed throughout all S!Rs e#en if compliance has een already attained. Recommended additional measures or amendments to the E!P should e presented here. *ased on t!e presented environmental data and results of actual monitoring activities" t!e company is compliant to t!e conditions stipulated in t!e #CC *ased on t!e actual monitoring activities" t!e company complied to $#%R Standards e&cept e&ceedance to ''''''''''''''''(parameter)due to '''''''''''''''''.
". En,ron0enta Kua,ty Statu/ (a66,9ae ony , EKPL/ -ae een /et y t-e Pro6onent a/ ,t/ 9o00,t0ent or , o6te* to e 0utuay a1ree* u6on y Pro6onent ,t- t-e EM" an* ot-er 0e0er/ o t-e MMT) 3nly the 2ey conclusions on meeting the set EBPLs are included in this section. *ased on t!e actual monitoring activities" results of sampling analysis for air and ater +uality are it!in t!e limit set fort! in t!e $#%R Standards. *ased on t!e actual monitoring activities" t!e company complied to $#%R Standards e&cept e&ceedance to ''''''''''''''''(parameter)due to '''''''''''''''''.
C. En,ron0enta Mana1e0ent Pan Statu/ 3nly the 2ey conclusions aout the status of E!P implementation and recommended additional measures or amendments should e presented here.
Pro,*e 0atr,B o t-e a66roe* EMP?IMP?EMS%a/e* EMP
D. ENVIRONMENTAL RIS CATEGORIATION
The proponent should fill=up or update the projectAs en#ironmental ris2 categori5ation 1uestionnaire *presented in "nne- 7=>d of the Re#ised Procedural !anual of &"3 7@@8=8@+ 0 applicale on the Second Semi=annual ECC Compliance !onitoring Report.
PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND A$DIT PRIORITIATION SCFEME (PEMAPS) K$ESTIONNAIRE Pro>e9t Na0e Pro>e9t Lo9at,on ECC Reeren9e No/. Pro6onent Pout,on Contro O,9er Te. No. : #aB No. E%0a, Pro>e9t Ty6e Pro>e9t Statu/ I.
",o%Et-ano Pant S,t,o Ma,/an+ "aran1ay Tuu-an+ Na/u1u+ "atan1a/ ECC%R&A%!'%'% *ate* January '+ 2! D. Lor,a Internat,ona Cor6orat,on En1r. C-ery Duya
: : :
*or,aya-oo.9o0 J % #oo* an* Reate* In*u/tr,e/ J Q D,/t,at,on @ #er0entat,on O6erat,on
(&) 57%77 : (&) 57%77
PROJECT CONSIDERATIONS 6.6
Si5e and Type 6.6.6 Si5e ased on numer of employees Numer of Employees 0 ;@ 6.6.6 Type Non=ECP and Non=EC"
6.7
Gaste Ieneration and !anagement 6.7.6 Gaste Type and Buantity of Gastes Ienerated
Cate1ory
a/te
"ir Gater Solid
6.8
Particulate !atter Process Gasteater !ud ca2e ,ly ash Hagasse
a/te Ty6e Non=Da5ardous Non=Da5ardous Non=Da5ardous Non=Da5ardous Non=Da5ardous
Kuant,ty !T/year Cuic meter/year !T/year !T/year !T/year
Pollution Control System *PCS+ 6.8.6 PCS or Gaste !anagement !ethod 'sed
Cate1ory "ir
Gater
Solid
II.
: : : :
PCS?a/te Mana1e0ent Met-o* $/e* Get Scruer Emissions
Re0ar/
for
Hoiler Complemented y settling asin for solid aste collection Primary Treatment 0 Settling Gater recycling practiced Hasins hence discharge is minimal Secondary Treatment 0 Hiological Tertiary Treatment = Hiological Composting ,acility /!R, Coordination ith LI' haulers
PATFA=S 7.6 7.7
7.8 7.9 7.
Pre#ailing ind toards arrio No Rainfall *impacts surface and groundater pathays+ 7.7.6 "#erage annual net rainfall = 7@@ mm 7.7.7 !a-imum 79=hr rainfall = 67@ mm Terrain ,lat (s the facility located in a flood prone area No Iroundater &epth of groundater *m+ Ireater than 6@
III. RECEIVING MEDIA?RECEPTORS 8.6 8.7
"ir *&istance to nearest community+ Recei#ing surface ater ody 8.7.6 &istance to recei#ing surface ater
@. to 6 2m @. to 6 2m
8.7.7
Si5e of population using recei#ing surface ater ,resh ater 8.7.8.6 Classification of fresh ater 8.7.8.7 Si5e of fresh ater ody 8.7.8.8 Economic #alue of ater use
8.7.8
Class C 6< s1. 2m. drainage area (ndustrial "gricultural Salt ater *Estuarine ater 0 2m tidally affected ri#er segment+ 8.7.9.6 Classification of salt ater Class S& 8.7.9.7 Economic #alue of ater use (ndustrial
8.7.9
8.8
8.9
8. 8.;
Iroundater 8.8.6 &istance to nearest recharge area 8.8.7 &istance to nearest ell used 8.8.8 Iroundater use for nearest ell Land 8.9.6
7@ DD
Ireater than 6 2m Ireater than 6 2m (ndustrial
(ndicate current/actual land uses ithin @. 2m radius (ndustrial "gricultural Residential
8.9.7
Potential/proposed land uses ithin @. 2m radius (ndustrial
8.9.8
Numer of affected En#ironmentally Critical "rea ithin 6 2m Radius None
8.9.9
&istance to nearest EC"
Ireater than 6 2m
Compliance *to e chec2ed ith E("& and PC& files+ Numer of #alid complaints
Compliant
8.;.6 8.;.7
None None
Citi5en and NI3 3thers
IV ENVIRONMENTAL PER#ORMANCE (#OR E
9? R" ?7> R" ;?;? R" 6<;
FNone
R" 7@@8
FNone
FNone FNone FNone FMes
FE-pansion ithout ECC
*To be filled up by EMB personnel)
RECOMMENDATIONS: "ssessed Hy: Noted Hy:
E. OR PLAN #OR NE
The specific actions for the ne-t monitoring period including carry=o#ers from pre#ious monitoring periods should e detailed in this section.
% A/ re;u,re* y 9on*,t,on/ /t,6uate* ,n t-e ECC % V. ATTACFMENTS Please ha#e the folloing documents attached: a+ Laoratory Results of "nalysis from &ENR=E!H recogni5ed laoratory) + "ppro#ed (mpact !itigation Plan in the E(S/other E(S 'pdate &ocuments) and c+ "ppro#ed En#ironmental !onitoring Plan in the E(S/other E(S 'pdate &ocuments d+ Related data
PREPARED "=:
NOTED "=:
CFER=L D$=A . Pout,on Contro O,9er D. Lor,a Internat,ona Cor6orat,on Date
DIGNA LORIA . Genera Mana1er D. Lor,a Internat,ona Cor6orat,on Date
%ame $esignation Company $ate
