Rethinking Piano Performance - Cristine MacKieDescripción completa
Full description
Full description
Grading rubric for intro Scratch programming unit; design your first game.
Finally my secret rubric for gauging a woman's level of investment into a relationship.
rubricFull description
Rubric for evaluating translations for a college-level translation course. Based on ATA guidelines.Full description
Full description
Rubric Sa Pag-uulat
mathFull description
Rubric for +Maths ProjectDescripción completa
Students are going to make an original game using Scratch and they are going to assess each other using this rubric guide
giving grades to a freehand drawing with shading and applying the light and shadow effects.Full description
dance rubric
Score/Grade:
PWHS Music Department – Piano Performance Rubric Name____________________________________________________________________ Date________________________ Piano 1 2 Class Period_______ Selection Title______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (Include any other information to clearly identify the piece, such as composer, book, page number, publisher, or edition) The teacher considers the performer’s ability, experience, and length of study/preparation time when marking this rubric. The checked boxes indicate the areas being assessed during this performance. Teacher Signature:
Pitch
Rhythm
Tempo
Fingering
Performance Presence
All Pitches were played correctly.
All rhythms were played correctly.
All prescribed (score/teacher) dyn/art/exp marks were performed correctly.
Played in appropriate and/or consistent tempo.
Performed with confidence and without hesitation.
Almost all pitches were played correctly, but with a few errors Many pitches played correctly, but with several errors.
Almost all rhythms were played correctly. Few errors.
Almost all prescribed (score/teacher) dyn/art/exp marks were played correctly A few of the marks were not clearly performed.
Played in a generally appropriate and/or consistent tempo.
All prescribed fingering (score/teacher) was played correctly. Almost all prescribed fingering was played correctly.
Many rhythms were played correctly, but with several errors.
Many prescribed (score/teacher) dyn/art/exp marks were played correctly, but with several inconsistencies.
Played in a minimally acceptable tempo but demonstrated some inconsistencies.
Poor (60-69)
Some pitches played correctly, but with many errors.
Some rhythms were played correctly, but with many errors.
Some prescribed (score/teacher) dyn/art/exp marks were played correctly. Many or key marks were not followed. Showed a lack of understanding of the meaning of the marks.
Played in a tempo that was not prescribed (score/teacher).
Some of the fingering was correct, but the overall impression was inconsistent. Prescribed fingering (score/ teacher) was not followed.
Unacceptable (below 60)
Did not know the pitches.
Did not know the rhythms.
None of the prescribed (score/teacher) dyn/art/exp marks were followed.
Demonstrated a lack of understanding of tempo in music.
Performed with several moments of hesitation, but was able to complete selection. Performed with many moments of hesitation and was unable to complete selection. Demonstrated a lack of any preparation.
Excellent (90-100)
Good (80-89)
Fair (70-79)
Dynamics, Articulation, Expression D A E
Demonstrated a lack of understanding of appropriate fingering.
Performed with confidence but with a little hesitation.
