APPENDIX B:LETTER OF PERMISSION
November28, 2010
Hononorable Nenita Polines Barangay Captain of Naslo Barangay Naslo, Pototan, Iloilo
Dear Madam: We the students of Central Philippine University College of Nursing will conduct a study entitled: “Knowledge, Attitude and Family Planning Practices of Couples in Barangay Naslo, Pototan, Iloilo December 2010”. In partial fulfilment fulfilment of the requirements in N-410. In this connection, we would like to ask permission from your good office to have our pre-test on November 29, 2010 and conduct our study to the 122 randomly selected couples aging 15-49 years old, residents of your Barangay on December 18, 2010. We are hoping for your kind consideration. Thank you and Godbless.
Respectfully yours, Geron Agravante Team Leader Noted By:_____________________ Dr.Betty Polido (Adviser)
Approved By:__________________ Nenita Polines (Brgy.Captain, Naslo,Pototan)
APPENDIX C:Letter to the Respondents CENTRAL PHILIPINE UNIVERSITY College of Nursing Jaro.Iloilo City
November 28,2010 Dear Sir/Madam: We the students of Central Philippine University College of Nursing will conduct a study entitled: “Knowledge, Attitude and Family Planning Practices of Couples in Barangay Naslo, Pototan, Iloilo December 2010”. This study will give us a ppropriate information about your level of knowledge, attitude and family planning practices. Kami ngamgastudyante sang Central Philippine University College of Nursing ( Kami magahiwat sang amonnga research parte samga “Nabal-an, DisposisyonkagmgaPama-agi sang mga Mag-asawasa family planning sang Barangay Naslo, Pototan, Iloilo Disyembre 2010”. Ang research najamagataukanamonkamgainsaktongaimpormasyonparamaintindihannamonanglebel sang inyonabal-an, disposiyonkagpama-agi sang mag asawahanungodsa family planning.) In this regard we request to ask your consent to be one of our respondents in the study. The information that you will provide will be treated w ith privacy and will not be used outside the scope of our study. (paagisasulatnaini kami. Gapangayokmi sang inyongakonsehongamaging is aka amonrespondents sainingapagtuon. Angmgaimpormasyonngainyo gin hatagamoamonikabignaisakasekretokagindiinipagamitonlabawsasakop sang iningapagtuon) We deeply appreciate your participation. Thank you and God bless. (Dakugidngasalamatsainyobuligparasaamonngapagtuon.) Respectfully Yours, GeronAgravante Veegie Mae Alarcon Karla Mae Alba Jazer Anthony Alcagno EdcelClentAmedo Charmane Joy Andrino Francis Antonio Anna Denise Aquino Kim Louise Areño Charmane Lynn Balasa
APPENDIX D: INFORMED CONSENT
Central Philippine University College of Nursing
I, the undersigned, a resident of Barangay Naslo, Pototan, Iloilo, willingly agree to be included as a respondent in the study entitled “Knowledge, Attitude and Practices among Couples in Barangay Naslo, Pototan, Iloilo, December 2010” conducted by the Central Philippine University Senior Nursing Students. I am extending my full participation in providing true and valid information needed.
I am aware of the objectives and purpose of the study being conducted. I am aware that confidentiality of information is highly considered.
___________________________________
__________________
Signature over Printed Name of the Respondent
Date
______________________________________
____________________
Signature over Printed Name of the Researcher
Date
APPENDIX E:INSTRUMENT
Instrument KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE,AND FAMILY PLANNING PRACTICES OF COUPLES IN BARANGGAY NASLO, POTOTAN, ILOILO Respondent’s Number: _________ _________ Name of respondent (optional): _____________________________________ I. Respondent’s characteristics A. a. Age (As of last birthday): _____ B. a. Educational attainment : ___ 1 Elementary ___ 2 High School ___ 3 College C. Family Income:________ pesos per month D. Number of children: _____
Date:
Instructions: Please check the box of your chosen answer.
I.
Knowledge:
Questions 1. If condom will slip off during sexual intercourse, it will get lost inside the woman’s body? Kung mahukas ang condom, madula bala ini sa sulod ka lawas ka isa ka babaye? 2. There is a high risk of condoms breaking or tearing during sexual intercourse? Hangod bala ang tsansa na ma gisi ang condom kada pakipaghilawas? 3. I will only take a pill when I have a sexual intercourse with my partner? Mainom lang ako ka pills kada pakipaghilawas ko? 4. Pill causes abnormal or deformed babies? Makatuga ang pills sang abnormal na bata? 5. Taking pills is like having an abortion? Ang pagtumar sang pills pareho lang na bala nga nag pa abort ka? 6. The thread of the IUD can trap the penis during intercourse? Makibon bala sang hilo sang IUD ang kinatawo sang lalaki kada pakipaghilawas nyo? 7. A woman who has IUD cannot do heavy work? Ang babaye nga may IUD indi pwede ka pamug at ubra? 8. The IUD rots in the uterus after prolonged use? Sa madugay na paggamit sang IUD madunot ini sa bahaybata? 9. Injectable contraceptives cause cancer? Maka-tuga sang cancer ang pag.gamit sang injectables? 10. Injectable causes nausea? Nagalinhgin ang ulo sa paggamit sang injectable?
1 YES
2 NO
II.
Attitude
Questions 1. I agree that family planning will help proper spacing and number of children? Gapati ako nga ang family planning nagabulig sa paglimita kag sa pag-agwat sang pagbata? 2. I agree that family planning is considered as the welfare of the family and community? Gapati ako nga ang family planning isa ka pamaagi para sa kaayuhan sang pamilya kag komunidad? 3. I support the use of family planning? Ginasuportahan mo bala ang paggamit sang family planning? 4. I am willing to undergo surgical procedure for a family planning method? Gusto ko magpa-opera para sa family planning? 5. I agree that family planning gives you contentment in your sexual intercourse? Kontento ako sa pagpakipaghilawas gamit ang family planning? 6. I am willing to join a seminar regarding family planning? Gusto ko mag intra sa seminar sang family planning? 7. I agree that it is a must to use family planning method now a days? Nagapati ka bala na kinahanglan gid mag gamit sa tulad nga tini-on sang family planning? 8. I agree that couple should limit their children? Nagapati ako na dapat limitahan sang mag asawa ang ila mga bata? 9. I am willing to promote family planning in your area? Nagasugot ako na palapnagon ang family planning sa inyo lugar? 10. Is it significant for me to use family planning?
1 Yes
2 No
Importante sa akon ang paggamit sang family planning ?
III.
Practice
a. Are you practicing a family planning method?
___1 Yes
___2 No
b. If yes what kind of family planning method is/are you using?
_1 Withdrawal _2 Lactation Amenorrhea Method _3 Basal Body Temperature _4 Calendar Method _5 Cervical Mucus Method _6 Condom _7 Intra Urine Device _8 Injectable _9 Vasectomy _10 Tubal Ligation _11 Pills _12 Others (pls specify):______________
APPENDIX F: SUPPLEMENTAL TABLES age of respondents Cumulative Frequency Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
25 and below (young adult)
14
12.1
12.1
12.1
26 - 35 (middle adult)
47
40.5
40.5
52.6
36 and above (old adult)
55
47.4
47.4
100.0
116
100.0
100.0
Total
income of respondenst Cumulative Frequency Valid
P10,000 and below (Low
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
106
91.4
91.4
91.4
2
1.7
1.7
93.1
8
6.9
6.9
100.0
116
100.0
100.0
Income) P10,001 - P15000 (Average Income) P15001 and aboev (High Income) Total
educational attainment of respondents Cumulative Frequency Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
Elementary
13
11.2
11.2
11.2
High School
64
55.2
55.2
66.4
College
39
33.6
33.6
100.0
116
100.0
100.0
Total
Descriptive Statistics N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
income of respondents
116
500.00
40000.00
6353.4483
6005.43856
knowledge of respondents
116
2.00
10.00
5.7672
1.69068
116
.00
10.00
8.1638
2.13029
age of respondents
116
17
49
35.49
8.161
Valid N (listwise)
116
about family planning methods attitude of respondents towards family planning method
number of children of respondents Cumulative Frequency Valid
No child
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
3
2.6
2.6
2.6
1 - 3 (Small Size)
69
59.5
59.5
62.1
4 - 6 (Average Size)
38
32.8
32.8
94.8
7 or More (Big Size)
6
5.2
5.2
100.0
116
100.0
100.0
Total
knowledge of respondents about family planning Cumulative Frequency Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
4 and below (poor)
26
22.4
22.4
22.4
5 - 7 (average)
75
64.7
64.7
87.1
8 and above (high)
15
12.9
12.9
100.0
116
100.0
100.0
Total
attitude of respondents Cumulative Frequency Valid
Negative (5 and below)
Percent
Valid Percent
9
7.8
7.8
7.8
Positive (6 and below)
107
92.2
92.2
100.0
Total
116
100.0
100.0
family planning practices of respondents Cumulative Frequency Valid
Percent
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
yes
84
72.4
72.4
72.4
no
32
27.6
27.6
100.0
116
100.0
100.0
Total
Correlations knowledge of respondents
age of respondents
age of
income of
children of
about family
respondents
respondents
respondents
planning
.211*
.390**
-.064
.023
.000
.493
116
116
116
116
Pearson Correlation
.211*
1
.043
-.020
Sig. (2-tailed)
.023
.651
.832
N
116
116
116
116
.390**
.043
1
.046
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
.651
N
116
116
116
116
-.064
-.020
.046
1
Pearson Correlation
1
Sig. (2-tailed) N income of respondents
children of respondents
Pearson Correlation
.623
knowledge of respondents
Pearson Correlation
about family planning
Sig. (2-tailed)
.493
.832
.623
N
116
116
116
116
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
educational attainment of respondents Elementary knowledge of
4 and below (poor)
respondents about family planning
5 - 7 (average)
8 and above (high)
Total
High School
College
Total
6
12
8
26
46.2%
18.8%
20.5%
22.4%
6
44
25
75
46.2%
68.8%
64.1%
64.7%
1
8
6
15
7.7%
12.5%
15.4%
12.9%
13
64
39
116
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
5.038a
4
.283
Likelihood Ratio
4.399
4
.355
Linear-by-Linear Association
1.862
1
.172
Pearson Chi-Square
N of Valid Cases
116
a. 2 cells (22.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.68.
Correlations attitude of respondents
age of respondents
age of
income of
children of
towards family
respondents
respondents
respondents
planning method
.211*
.390**
-.238*
.023
.000
.010
116
116
116
116
Pearson Correlation
.211*
1
.043
-.014
Sig. (2-tailed)
.023
.651
.881
N
116
116
116
116
.390**
.043
1
-.054
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
.651
N
116
116
116
116
-.238*
-.014
-.054
1
Pearson Correlation
1
Sig. (2-tailed) N income of respondents
children of respondents
Pearson Correlation
.562
attitude of respondents
Pearson Correlation
towards family planning
Sig. (2-tailed)
.010
.881
.562
N
116
116
116
method
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
116
attitude of respondents * educational attainment of respondents Crosstabulation educational attainment of respondents Elementary attitude of Negative (5 and
6
9
.0%
4.7%
15.4%
7.8%
13
61
33
107
100.0%
95.3%
84.6%
92.2%
13
64
39
116
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Total
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
5.106a
2
.078
Likelihood Ratio
5.592
2
.061
Linear-by-Linear Association
4.759
1
.029
Pearson Chi-Square
N of Valid Cases
116
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.01.
Total
3
Positive (6 and below)
College
0
respondent below) s
High School
Crosstab family planning practices of respondents yes age of respondents
25 and below (young adult)
no 12
2
14
85.7%
14.3%
100.0%
35
12
47
74.5%
25.5%
100.0%
37
18
55
67.3%
32.7%
100.0%
84
32
116
72.4%
27.6%
100.0%
26 - 35 (middle adult)
36 and above (old adult)
Total
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
2.067a
2
.356
Likelihood Ratio
2.218
2
.330
Linear-by-Linear Association
2.002
1
.157
Pearson Chi-Square
N of Valid Cases
116
a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.86.
Total
Crosstab family planning practices of respondents yes income of P10,000 and below (Low responde Income) nst
P10,001 - P15000 (Average Income) P15001 and aboev (High Income)
Total
no
Total
74
32
106
69.8%
30.2%
100.0%
2
0
2
100.0%
.0%
100.0%
8
0
8
100.0%
.0%
100.0%
84
32
116
72.4%
27.6%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
4.169a
2
.124
Likelihood Ratio
6.808
2
.033
Linear-by-Linear Association
3.921
1
.048
Pearson Chi-Square
N of Valid Cases
116
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .55. Crosstab family planning practices of respondents yes educational attainment of
Elementary
respondents
no 9
4
13
69.2%
30.8%
100.0%
44
20
64
68.8%
31.3%
100.0%
31
8
39
79.5%
20.5%
100.0%
84
32
116
72.4%
27.6%
100.0%
High School
College
Total
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
1.473a
2
.479
Likelihood Ratio
1.522
2
.467
Linear-by-Linear Association
1.082
1
.298
Pearson Chi-Square
N of Valid Cases
116
a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.59.
Total
Crosstab family planning practices of respondents yes number of children of No child respondents 1 - 3 (Small Size) 4 - 6 (Average Size) 7 or More (Big Size) Total
no 0
3
3
.0%
100.0%
100.0%
51
18
69
73.9%
26.1%
100.0%
31
7
38
81.6%
18.4%
100.0%
2
4
6
33.3%
66.7%
100.0%
84
32
116
72.4%
27.6%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
14.138a
3
.003
13.497
3
.004
Linear-by-Linear Association
.101
1
.751
N of Valid Cases
116
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .83.
Total
Crosstab family planning practices of respondents
Correlations yes knowledge of
4 and below (poor)
respondents about family planning
knowledge of 20 respondents
no
76.9% about family
knowledge of respondents Pearson Correlation 8 and above (high) about family planning Sig. (2-tailed) methods N Total attitude of respondents Pearson Correlation towards family planning method
towards 23.1% family 100.0%
planning 53 methods 70.7%
5 - 7 (average)
11
planning 22 method 75 29.3% 1
73.3% 84 72.4%
Sig. (2-tailed)
Total attitude of 6 26 respondents
4 26.7%
116 .102
32 27.6%
.274
N
116
116
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
.386a
2
.825
Likelihood Ratio
.394
2
.821
Linear-by-Linear Association
.133
1
.715
N of Valid Cases
116
Pearson Chi-Square
a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.14.
100.0% .102 15 .274 100.0% 116 116 1 100.0%
Crosstab
family planning practices of respondents yes attitude of respondents Negative (5 and
no
Total
3
6
9
33.3%
66.7%
100.0%
81
26
107
75.7%
24.3%
100.0%
84
32
116
72.4%
27.6%
100.0%
below)
Positive (6 and below)
Total
]
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
sided)
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
7.460a
1
.006
Continuity Correctionb
5.490
1
.019
Likelihood Ratio
6.528
1
.011
Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
.013 7.395
1
.007
116
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.48. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.013
