Law Enforcement Conduct Commission - NSW Justice defeated

TO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT ENFORCEMENT CONDUCT COMMISSION – the imprimatur to this complaint is within the email attachments from the Ombudsman NB THIS EMAIL SUBMISSION HAS NOT BEEN SENT TO ANYONE ELSE – IS PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

My name is Charles H. Norville of 21 Crosby Crescent, Killarney Vale, NSW 2261 and I have a complaint against the NSW Police Investigation Investigation E67840074 and the neglect of the Ombudsman’s Office. 1. The Police E67840074 –“ E67840074 –“CH CH Norville Police Statement Stat Dec 150218 ” attached (conducted Feb- Mar 2018) investigation which also encompasses fault by other watchdog and legal bodies. The crux of the complaint of a crime is that after many years of complaining to the Ombudsman and others finally there was an overwhelming number of criminal assaults and 2010 Task Force SIME investigated many such assaults as mine; 2. The point is that my Workers Comp lawyers in 1995 knew of the probability of the crime and did not not report it to Police. It appears that the the Police consider now that I should have reported to Police the crime in 1981 (instead of 1995 and 2010) – 2010) – The The number of Fire Brigades assaults investigated investigated were around 50. In short if it was a crime in 2010 why is it not a crime in 1995 when those in power that could be believed as the media and whistleblowers were believed in 2010? a. My initial singular complaint to the Police in 2010 was rebuked (RE Ombudsman 2010) so in all likelihood my single complaints as currently now above 2018 would have received the same dispatch in 1981; 3. At least 3 lawyers present in 1995 and one other who had better access to Police reporting procedure procedure to be believed. But these lawyers who know what a crime looks like decide otherwise to carry on with Workers Comp litigation that would have been unnecessary, because without doubt the Fire Brigades would have been required to support me; 4. The scenario of the non-reporting of the crime by Officers of the Supreme Court ie the total compliment of Workers Comp Lawyers, conspired with the criminally complicit Fire Brigades to retire me for the term of my natural life – the – the process then become one of civil litigation under 1916 Superannuation Act S48-52 .; .; 5. So Police consider that I should have reported the crime in 1981 even when it took until 2010 to investigate at the behest of the media and myself and 50 other firefighters serving and non-serving under Task Force SIME to investigate decades of ritualistic atrocities that would have also harmed the family members of firefighters; 6. If I had reported the crime in 1981 to Police, I would have lost my job and in fact I would have walked away and gone back to the metal trades – which – which in hindsight I should done;

The world's largest digital library

Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.







7. However when I reported reported the crime in 1995 I lost lost my job. I have had to pay for a crime committed by others when Workers Comp solicitors clearly could have cut their costs and reported what was a highly highly suspected crime to Police. Instead I was retired in lieu of dismissal thus with Lawyers deceiving the Workers Comp Jurisdiction; 8. What is particularly despicable is that if Workers Comp lawyers by reporting their concerns to Police would have initiated a more proximitous investigation thereby saving the ritual atrocities against firefighters and their families between 1995 and 2010; 9. I have attempted numerous civil litigations in my own shoes for what now has been expressed as a form form of persona non grata grata by the legal industry. industry. This is because lawyer fraternity cannot be involved in what would clearly reveal the wrong doing by the 1995 lawyers; 10. NB At around the same time of the E67840074 19 Feb 2018 submission to Police an award for Victims Compensation is made to me for the 1981 assault which is received on Mar 12 2018. I consider the 2 nd reassessment a denovo from Victims Services (VS) Compensation (VC); 11. Victims Victims Services Services offers a quick quick compensatory compensatory solution for for victims and a cost benefit solution to to criminal justice system system that is being overwhelmed. overwhelmed. Never the less it is a legislative relief for victims, to which I am glad to attest to; 12. On 24 Feb 2018 I received a phone call from DSC Matt Attenborough dismissing dismissing my complaint E67840074; E67840074; I pursued this with the the Ombudsman and other other matters, via Ombudsman Officer Howard as well as the Ombudsman’s own negligence of account at least two decades; 13. The Ombudsman Office also must have also known what a crime looked like and believing in the continuous white washing of their responsibilities together with numerous other NSW Government Departments Departments decide it is a civil matter for me to vainly pursue as has been the case re para 9. I have attached various documentation documentation which includes: *“CH Norville Police Statement Stat Dec 150218 ” re -Police E67840074 – E67840074 – this this nd declaration given to Police 19 Feb 2018 references non-compliance 2 VS/DoJ review “reassessment” dated 5 th Mar 2018 which was subsequently received 12 th Mar 2018. However the “reassessment” does not change the inference of criminal activity stated in the declaration. *“FW: *“FW: Your complaint to the NSW Ombudsman [DLM=For-Official-Use- Only]” Only]” re – re – is is the forwarding of Ombudsman Email to Victims Services account to return by registered mail a cheque that DoJ accounts had lost and then mysteriously found. The email has the attached response from Ombudsman, Ombudsman, email dated 7 June 2018; *” Ombudsman Ombudsman non formalising of sexual assault 221001 re 221001 re Ombudsman: C/2001/7725 &7727 Re Mr Y Piga 22 Oct 2001; R/01/234; –

*” Reports Reports by Charles H Norville to Australian Training Ministers Attorneys General 26 Sept 2016 ” ” - https://www.scribd.com/document/336801798/Reports-by-Charles-H-Norville-







https://www.scribd.com/document/365735319/updated-NSW-JusticeDepartment-Review-ofEconomic-Losses-28112017

DISCUSSION on The Rule Of Law: 1. I am inspired by Rule Of Law reference by The Hon JJ Spigelman AC Chief Justice of NSW: The Rule of Law Institute of Australia – Judicial Judicial Reflections on the Rule of Law 13 May 2011,– 2011, – interview interview by Malcolm Stewart Vice Chair RLIA: “The Rule of Law to me serves two principle purposes. Firstly it requires a society which places a high value on individual autonomy and it also requires a society which has a high level of social order to which it in turn contributes both in terms of preserving autonomy and contributing (to) the social order”; 2. So I understand that accountabilities are essential in a society of high social order in upholding the rights of individuals – the – the Common Law considers a balance of personal rights with social duties; 3. I understand that the NSW Police are overwhelmed by the amount of substantive criminal activity that is subject of prescribed technology interventions. Individual criminal criminal events that have numerous numerous perpetrators perpetrators compromises the the legal process simply simply by cost cost benefit analysis. analysis. Police are under resourced and are forced to seek the jurisdiction of the Coroners Court to solve murders Re Joseph Tainter The Collapse Of Complex Societies reveals reveals that complex societies create inefficiencies that are not beneficial to social order and progress. THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN The basis of my complaint against the Ombudsman is their maladministration of the above events as I have described (amongst other things) but to also avoidance of culpability under their jurisdiction. EPISODE A: report A: report by Ombudsman Officer Howard re C/2018/2087 attachment: QUOTE “ QUOTE “ Your previous complaint to the NSW Ombudsman Ombudsman” ” “On 24 May 2018 you made made reference to a previous complaint complaint with this office. office. You wrote: …It appears that same procedure by Ombudsman for you to contact. I have attached the refuting by Bruce Barbour the NSW Ombudsman 7 Nov 2001 that there was ever a crime committed against me the follow up of the VS established a crime I then report a further crime to.” (this is in reference to Bruce Barbour’s support s upport of Ombudsman Officer Mr Y Piga 22 Oct 2001). “This matter is considerably dated as such I will not comment on Mr Barbour’s previous correspondence.” correspondence.” END QUOTE EPISODE B: The B: The matter which I consider is relevantly dated Ombudsman: C/2013/6251 Investigation Officer Patrick Trieu 5 Sept 2013. “ 2013. “Reports Reports by Charles H Norville to Australian Training Ministers & Attorney Generals 26 Sept 2016 ” 2016 ” https://www.scribd.com/document/336801798/Reports-by-Charles-H-Norville-toAustralian-







Barbour, Ombudsman 7 Oct 2001. 54.Mr Barbour states inter alia: “I have read My Piga’s decision and other material on file” This refers to the “26 page Chronology” and the retirement which the Ombudsman see nothing wrong with. Senior Investigation Officer Piga states “…except in those rare cases where the opinion is clearly so unreasonable that no reasonable person would have given it. I do not believe this office is in a position to make that decision in this instance …” so that the Ombudsman has no problem with the criminal assault either. Ombudsman: C/2013/6251 Investigation Investigation Officer Patrick Trieu 5 Sept 2013 55.In 2013 the process of dealing with the VRC via Napier Keen the Police having done their investigation 2010, I send once more to the Ombudsman – Ombudsman – but but prior to the official outcome decision by VRC viz 11 Aug 2014, once again the “ 26 page Chronology ” and following email detail sent 22 Aug 2013: 56.The following attachments in the email The following attachments 26 page chronology ref Bastardisation @ page 19 “...in order of responsibility”; responsibility”; o @ page 22 ~ 9.9.87; 2.10.87 re reporting bastardisation to Chief Officer Bill Reay; Personnel Office Alan Grunsell; Union Secretary John Slade; Treating psychiatrist Dr Mark Howard – Howard – ref 26 page ‘summary’ @ para 4; Treating psychologist Dr Marlowe – Marlowe – ref ref Bastardisation @ para 2; GIO psychiatrist Milton re bastardisation @ 11; Ombudsman 221001 (C/2001/7725 & 7727) re 26 page chronology @ para 2nd page 57.The response by the Ombudsman Investigation Investigation Officer 5 Sept 2013 2 013 Ref C/2013/6251 officer Patrick Trieu states inter alia “While I note your allegations about being victimised, harassed or discriminated discriminated against, I cannot find any clear evidence of wrong administrative conduct on the part of a NSW government agency that warrants any action by this office.” 58.INTERIM 58.INTERIM CONCLUSION: Quite apart from the specific bias, these people deal with the law they must know what a crime looks like. Lawyers steer clear of litigants of this nature, like myself, knowing that the of Coventry has displaced the Rule Of Law. …….END …….END QUOTE 

   

CONCLUSION (OF ALL MATERIAL DOCUMENTS): DOCUMENTS): A: Police task Force SIME 2010 was was inspired by media and and whistleblowers, whistleblowers, and the Police were informed and conducted their investigations. investigations. The report (E67840074) (E67840074) & included links shows that at the time of discovery in 1995 there were at least three lawyers and another legally trained individual that observed my 1981 account, I consider this to be ample to inspire affidavits to Police by lawyers and a pulling back from the Workers Comp Jurisdiction, an adversarial gravy train an honest







dated” . 2. Acting with proscribed proscribed maladministration maladministration of their duty function function with the available relevantly relevantly dated correspondences correspondences at hand. The evidence shows that that the NSW Ombudsman Office has used adversarial avoidance to find reasons not to seek the truth. C: The Ombudsman and a host of other Government departments could have provided an easy solution within the framework of their statutory duty and obligations under for instance the 1916 Superannuation Act S48-52 . The legal fraternity quite often seems sociopathic sociopathic in its lying adversarial approach – the – the legal fraternity consider sour appraisal of my situation, as there is simply no gravy train of proforma law for them to easily fill in, and some in their conceit have actually stated, in pathetic honesty they cannot sue other lawyers, yet this is not my intention. D: The system of Westminster Law is used in a prescribed adversarial methodology, methodology, which includes the contesting by serial lying lawyers that undermines the Rule Of Law of an individual’s right to fairness and equity – Victims Services Legislation partially compensates compensates but cannot restore restore a victims access to to a lost livelihood. On this point age and past history vetting by a multi-billion dollar employment industry endorsed by Government, manifests unequal access to employment and regardless of my civil litigation I was sentenced to be retired for the term of my natural life for crimes committed by others and denied re-employment under the 1916 Superannuation Act S48-52 . I have no equal equal employment access despite the costly skill base I obtained from tax payer subsidised TAFE. E: My retirement in lieu of dismissal 1995 was an induced ambush against a good and loyal statutory informant who acted with duty function to protect life and property eg submission to Emergency Services Minister, Ombudsman, ICAC, Coroner’s Court, OPM on the vocational corruption of the NSW Fire Brigades 1991 & 1995. F: By using the duplicity of Superannuation Act 1916 and and Workers Comp Law which which has sole jurisdiction over injured workers – workers – my my retirement maintained somewhat allusive rights to civil litigation and the restored function re Superannuation Act 1916 S48-52 was was eliminated. The Ombudsman Office and and now Police, (who now are are forced to seek the jurisdiction of the Coroners Court to solve murders) know full well that the legal industry industry would continue continue with their illicit fraternity. fraternity. Lawyers protect the the guilty on an insalubrious gravy train, with the help of over complex courts systems . Re Evan Whitton on Westminster system and adversarial law . law . G: This is, I consider conside r my last ‘port of call’ within the NSW Government and Judicial encumbrances. If there are any anomalies anomalies please inform me so as I can can rectify issues in order to sanction this exit ASAP. This concludes my submission faithfully. Signed



























WRONG AND THE ABOVE STATE MP KNOWS IT – THE EXPOSURE OF THIS TO THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM CONFIRMS A JUSTICE OF CRIMINALS A SEEDY UNDERWORLD OF HIT HIT & MISS & OCCASIONED PROSECUTIONS. PROSECUTIONS. THE SYSTEM WON’T ALLOW SCRUTINY AND THAT’S HOW IT IS.







Law Enforcement Conduct Commission Act 2016 As at 24 May 2018 See also: Government Sector Finance Legislation (Repeal and Amendment) Bill 2018 Long Title An Act to constitute the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission and to define its functions; to repeal the Police Integrity Commission Act 1996 and and amend Part 8A of the Police Act 1990 and the Ombudsman Act 1974; and for other purposes.

The Newspaper article below Daily Telegraph 31 August 2018 – bottom of second column ….the ….the Minister (of (of Police Tony Grant) told him (the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission (LECC) Commissioner) not to hire staff from the former Police Integrity Integrity Commission















https://www.scribd.com/doc/50667440/NSW-Fire-Brigades https://www.scribd.com/doc/506 67440/NSW-Fire-Brigades-Training-ST-DD -Training-ST-DD-1991-19911995 The above link report NSW NSW Fire Brigades Training Training ST-DD 1991 - sent to FB & Police Minister Pickering, ICAC, ICAC, Ombudsman, Ombudsman, Coroner, OPM the below article within on page 66….. THERE ARE MANY REPORTS LISTED IN SCRIBD ON FIRE BRIGADES CORRUPTION AND NEGLIGENCE







LETTERS I HAVE ATTACHED No 3 LETTER TO REPORT 29TH AUG 2018, A BREACH IN THE COURT RULES AFTER WHICH THE JURY WAS DISMISSED BEFORE CONCLUSION CONCLUSION OF THE TRIAL







NOTE …………………………………….. …………………………………….. Juror 828 8 28-20A -20A

DATE: 29 Aug 2018

1. Your Honour I am Jury member 828-20A and I have valued your instructions instructions and directions throughout this trial re NOTE 24 Aug 2018 & NOTE 28 Aug 2018 as indeed all members of the Jury, bar one member. 2. The NOTES that I have given to His Honour have been carefully understood by all member of our Jury, Jury, bar one member. This one member had made up his mind last week without consideration to any evidence presented by either the Crown nor the Defence stated that the accused was “innocent” and that there should have never been a prosecution of the accused and blaming the Police. P olice. 3. This recalcitrant member’s incoherent ramblings stated “prima facie” evidence were needed to be superior superior evidence. I can only deduce this as him meaning “forensic” – hence – hence some curious outlier questions on Tue 28 Aug 2018 on “forensic” evidence evidence that only His Honour Honour was lawfully able to instruct instruct on. 4. This recalcitrant Jury member on two occasions did not take his evidence clip board to the Court Room, previously stating in the morning that by the end of the week we would all see things things his way. There were other intimidations intimidations to members. 5. The NOTES were submitted with genuine interest to understand Court and Law procedures. I felt the recalcitrant recalcitrant Jury member was beyond all reason of of







NO ACTION WAS TAKEN AGAINST THE OFFENDING JUROR (ABOVE) WHICH MAKES A MOCKERY OF THE SYSTEM BECAUSE THIS JUROR, A MALE, WOULD RECEIVE THE SAME LETTER BELOW TO SERVE AGAIN – THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IS A CHARADE.







ON THE 31 AUG 2018 2 DAYS AFTER THE JURY WAS DISMISSED A NEW LAW IS PASSED TO PREVENT THE ALLEGED OLDER PERPETRATOR FROM ANY LENIENCY OUTCOME OF GUILTY – THIS IM SURE WOULD GIVE SOME CONFIDENCE BACK TO THE VICTIMS THAT WOULD HAVE TO REPEAT THEIR EVIDENCE IN THE RETRIAL

THIS CONCLUDES THIS SUBMISSION – PEOPLE WILL NOT AGREE THAT I SHOULD STILL ATTEMPT TO ACCESS EMPLOYMENT IN ELECTROTECHNOLOGY AS WAS MY BIRTHRIGHT – COMMON LAW STATES OTHERWISE. EMPLOYMENT IN AUSTRALIA IS A GRAVY TRAIN AFFAIR OF MULTI BILLION DOLLAR EMPLOYMENT AGENCY INDUSTRY. REPORTED IN THE FEDERAL SENATE BY ONE NATION IS THAT THERE THERE ARE 1.4 MILLION VISA HOLDERS THAT ARE INTERTWINED INTO AUSTRALIA’S EMPLOYMENT. IT IS NOW NECESSARY TO IMPLICATE CERTAIN INSTITUTIONS INTO THIS DEBACLE, THE NEED FOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND BS RESPONSE IS TOTALLY FUTILE GIVEN THAT THE POSTAL RECEIPTS BARE WITNESS TO THESE NEGLIGENT INSTITUTIONS.

Law Enforcement Conduct Commission - NSW Justice defeated

Recommend Documents