ACTIONS INVOLVING TITLES
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
532 SCRA 642, Sepe!"e# $$, 2007 INVOLVING INVOLVING TITLES RODRIG%E& ' RODRIG%E&
ACTIONS
No collateral attack on title A Torrens certifcate o title is indeeasible. indeeasible. The power to pass upon the validity o such certifcate o title at frst instance belongs to the Regional Trial Court in a direct proceeding or the cancellation o title. The alleged invalidity o a Torrens certifcate o title may not be raised by way o a deense in an ejectment case where the uestion o ownership may be provisionally ruled upon only or the sole purpose o determining who who is entitled to possession possession de acto.
(ACTS) Juanito Rodriguez owned a fve-door apartment. On October 27, 1983, e e!ecuted e!ecuted a "#u$ing #abi$in at %e&tamento' giving petitioner (re&enciana %ubo Rodriguez, i& $ive-i $ive-in n partne partner, r, apartm apartment ent& & ) and * and i& ci$d ci$dre ren n +enam +enamin in Rodrigu odriguez ez te te decea&e u&band o re&pondent *vange$ine Rodriguez/, apartment 0, re&pondent +uenaventura Rodriguez, Rodriguez, apartment +, and re&pondent +e$en Rodriguez, Rodriguez, apartment (. #owever, on June 1, 198, Juanito e!ecuted a )eed o 0b&o$ute a$e over te propert in avor o petitioner.
4etitioner f$ed a comp$aint or un$awu$ detainer again&t te re&pondent&, a$$eging tat &e wa& te $awu$ and regi&tered owner o te propert and &e on$ a$$owed te re&pondent& *vange$in, *vange$in, +uenaventura and +e$en, out o 5indne&& and to$erance, to occup occup unit& unit& 0, + and ), re&pecti re&pective$ ve$.. #owever, #owever, witout witout er 5now$edge 5now$edge and con&ent, re&pondent& &eparate$ $ea&ed te unit& to $e&&ee&, wo de&pite repeated demand&, ai$ed and reu&ed to vacate te premi&e& and to pa renta$&. Re&pondent&, on te oter and, c$aimed owner&ip over te &ubect propert b &ucce&&ion &ucce&&ion and a$$eged tat te petitioner i& not te $awu$ owner becau&e te )eed o 0b&o$ute 0b&o$ute a$e wa& &imu$ated &imu$ated and void. 0$&o, 0$&o, te maintained maintained tat petitioner petitioner e!erted undue in6uence over teir ater, wo at tat time wa& &eriou&$ i$$, to agree to te &a$e o te propert or on$ 42,. ater 5nowing tat on$ two apartment& were given to er in te #u$ing #abi$in at %e&tamento. orover, te a$$eged tat petitioner a& no cau&e o action again&t tem or being a part to te4 te4artiti artition on 0greem 0greement ent were werein in te te reco recogni gnized zed eac eac oter oter a& co-own co-owner& er& and partit partition ioned ed te prope propert rt in accor accordan dance ce wit wit te provi provi&io &ion n o te te $a&t $a&t wi$$ wi$$ and te&tament. %( rendered a udgment on avor o te re&pondent& and e$d tat te )eed o a$e a$e wa& &imu &imu$at $ated. ed. %e R%( rever rever&ed &ed te deci&i deci&ion on o te %( %( and e$d tat tat petitioner& certifcate o tit$e i& a conc$u&ive evidence o owner&ip o te &ubect propert. 0$&o, it wa& e$d b te R%( tat %( erred wen it re$ied eavi$ on te "#u$ing "#u$ing #abi$in at %e&tamento,' wic wa& not probated probated ence a& no e:ect and no rigt can be c$aimed terein. terein. %e 4artition 4artition 0greement wic wic wa& a$$eged$ entered into pur&uant to te #u$ing #abi$in at %e&tamento &ou$d not a$&o be con&idered. (0 rever&ed te deci&ion o te R%( urter e$d tat e #u$ing #abi$in at %e&tamento tran&mitted owner&ip o te &pecifc apartment& not on$ to te re&pondent& but a$&o to te petitioner petitioner;; and pur&uant pur&uant tereto, tereto, te partie& partie& e!ecuted e!ecuted te 4artit 4artition ion 0greement in accordance wit te wi&e& o te te&tator. ISS%E) <eter te re&pondent& ave rigt o po&&e&&ion over te &ubect propert in te ab&ence o probate o te wi$$. *ELD)
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
=O. Re&pondent& ai$ed to prove teir rigt o po&&e&&ion, a& te #u$ing #abi$in at %e&tamento %e&tamento and te 4artition 4artition 0greement 0greement ave no $ega$ e:ect &ince te wi$$ a& not been probated. probated. +eore an an wi$$ can can ave orce orce or va$idit it mu&t be probated. probated. %i& cannot be di&pen&ed wit wit and i& a matter o pub$ic po$ic. po$ic. 0rtic$e 838 o te (ivi$ (ode mandate& tat ">n?o wi$$ &a$$ pa&& eiter rea$ or per&ona$ propert propert un$e&& it i& proved proved and a$$owed a$$owed in accordanc accordance e wit te Ru$e& Ru$e& o (ourt.' 0& te wi$$ wa& not probated, te 4artition 0greement wic wa& e!ecuted pur&uant tereto cannot be given e:ect. %u&, te act tat tat petitioner wa& a part part to &aid agreement agreement become& immateria$ in te determination o te i&&ue o po&&e&&ion. G+R+ N+ $6-454+ De.e!"e# 27, 2007 INVOLVING INVOLVING TITLES *e/# 1 Ma#.e/n D#n/ '+ *#+ 1 (#na D#n/
ACTIONS
The rules on uieting o title e!pressly provide that any declaration in a suit to uiet title shall not prejudice persons who are not parties to the action.
(ACTS pou&e& imeon )oronio and (orne$ia @ante decea&ed,were te regi&tered owner& o a parce$ o $and $ocated. arce$ino )oronio and Aortunato )oronio, decea&ed, were te ci$dren o te &pou&e& and te partie& in ti& ca&e areteir eir&. 4etitioner& are te eir& o arce$ino )oronio, wi$e re&pondent& are te eir& o Aortunato )oronio. *ager *ager to obtain obtain te entir entire e prope propert rt,, te te eir& eir& o arc arce$i e$ino no )oroni )oronio o and Beroni eronica ca 4ico 4ico f$ed f$ed beor beore e te R%( inCrd inCrdane aneta, ta, 4anga& anga&ina inana na petiti petition on DAor DAor te Regi&tration o a 4rivate )eed o )onationDdoc5eted a& 4etition (a&e =o. C-92. =o re&pondent& were named in te &aid petition a$toug notice& o earing were were po&te po&ted d on te bu$$e bu$$etin tin board board& & o +arang +aranga a (aba$i (aba$itaa taan, n, unici unicipa$ pa$iti itie& e& o 0&ingan and Eingaen. )uring te earing&, no one interpo&ed an obection tote petition. 0ter te te R%( orde orderred a gene genera ra$$ dea deau$ u$t, t, te te peti petiti tion on wa& wa& even eventu tua$ a$$ $ gran grante ted d on eptember 22, 1993. %i& $ed to te regi&tration regi&tration o te deed o donation, cance$$ation o O(% =o. 3F2 and i&&uance o anew %ran&er(ertifcate o %it$e %(%/ =o. 81 in te name& o arce$ino )oronio and Beronica 4ico. %u&, te entire propert wa& tit$ed in te name& o petitioner& predece&&or&. On 0pri$ 28, 199,te eir& o Aortunato Aortunato )oronio )oronio f$ed a p$eading beore te R%( in te orm o a petition in te &ame4etition (a&e =o. C-92. %e petition wa& or te recon&ideration o te deci&ion o te R%( tat ordered teregi&tration o te &ubect deed o donation. Gt wa& praed in te petition tat an order be i&&ued dec$aring nu$$ andvoid te regi&tration o te private deed o donation and tat %(% =o. 81 be cance$$ed. #owever, te petition wa&di&mi&&ed wa&di&mi&&ed on te ground tat te deci&ion in 4etition (a&e =o. C-92 ad a$read become fna$ a& it wa& not appea$ed. ISS%E) (an re&pondent& be bound b te deci&ion in 4etition (a&e =o. C-92 even i te were not made partie& in te &aid ca&eH *ELD) 4etitioner& cannot u&e te fna$it o te R%( deci&ion in 4etition (a&e =o. C-92 a& a &ie$d again&t te verifcation o te va$idit o te deed o donation. 0ccording to petitioner&, te &aid fna$ deci&ion i& one or Iuieting o tit$e. Gn oter word&, it i& a ca&e or dec$arator re$ie under Ru$e now Ru$e 3/ o te Ru$e& o (ourt. uit& to Iuie Iuiett tit$ tit$e e are are not not tec tecni nica ca$$ $$ &uit &uit& & in rem nor nor are are te te,, &tri &trict ct$ $ &pea &pea5i 5ing ng,, in per&onam, but being again&t te per&on in re&pect o te re&, te&e proceeding& are caracterized a& Iua&i in rem. %e udgment in &uc proceeding& i& conc$u&ive on$ between te partie&. %u&, re&pondent& are not bound b te deci&ion in 4etition (a&e =o. C-92 a& te were not made partie& in te &aid ca&e.%e ru$e& on Iuieting
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
o tit$e tit$e e!pr e!pre&& e&&$ $ provi provide de tat tat an dec$ar dec$arati ation on in a &uit &uit to Iuiet Iuiet tit$e tit$e &a$$ &a$$ not not preu preudi dice ce per&o per&on& n& wo are are not partie partie& & to te action action.. %at %at re&po re&ponde ndent& nt& f$ed f$ed a &ub&eIuent p$eading in te &ame 4etition (a&e =o. C-92 ater te deci&ion tere ad become fna$ did not cange te act tat &aid deci&ion became fna$ witout teir being imp$eaded in te ca&e. aid &ub&eIuent p$eading wa&di&mi&&ed onte ground o fna$it o te deci&ion.
G+R+ N+ $5-666+ De.e!"e# 4, 2007 INVOLVING INVOLVING TITLES ed#an '+ *#+ ened/. ed#an
ACTIONS
No prescription where no title issued An action or the reconveyance o a parcel o land based on implied or constructive trust" as we have already e!plained in this case" prescribes in #$ years" the point o reerence being the date o registration o the deed or the date o the issuance o the certifcate o title o the property% however" where no &CT has yet been issued desp despit ite e an orde orderr rom rom the the cour courtt to titl title e the the lots lots"" the the date date rom rom when whence ce the the prescriptive prescriptive period could be reckoned is unknown and it could not be determined i indeed the period had already lapsed or not. Thus" we agree with the CA that prescription prescription has not yet set set in.
(ACTS) Eot =o. 1 wa& previou&$ owned b )r. G&idro #n&on wo &o$d it on arc 1F,19 1F,19F F to Romana omana onte ontea$ a$ 4edra 4edrano, no, or 44 31F.2 31F.2.. Romana omana wa& marrie married d to +enedicto +enedicto4ed 4edrano rano wo pa&&ed pa&&ed awa on 0ugu&t 0ugu&t 19, 197. 197. Aourte Aourteen en ear& ear& $ater, $ater, petitioner *u$ogio .4edrano, .4edrano, a &on o Romana, Romana, a$$eged tat e ad bougt te $and im&e$ or 44 3,rom Romana, paab$e on or beore )ecember 31, 1982 a& &own &own in te )eed o a$eda a$edated ted )ecember )ecember 22, 1981. 1981. ince ince Eot Eot =o. =o. 1 1 an and d anoter $ot, Eot =o. 9, were etuntit$ed, te&e became &ubect o (ada&tra$ (a&e =o. =-, ER( (ad. Rec. =o. =-, ortit$ing.0$$eging tat petitioner ad not paid te 44 3, con&ideration or Eot =o. 1 unti$te )ecember 31, 1982 dead$ine, a& &tipu$ated in te )ecember 22, 1981 )eed o a$e,re&pondent& f$ed a ca&e a&5ing or te annu$ment o te )ecember 22, 1981 )eed o a$e,and te recover o te po&&e&&ion and owner&ip o Eot =o. 1, wit praer or a writ o pre$iminar inunction and re&training order and damage&.0ccording to re&pondent&, Romana inormed petitioner tat te ormer wa& cance$ing te&a$e and petitioner &ou$d ave )r. #n&on& name in te tit$e rep$aced wit er name.Re&pondent& added tat de&pite te cance$$ation o te deed o &a$e, Romana a$$owedpetitioner to occup te ou&e on Eot =o. 1. Aurter, re&pondent& averred te wereunaware tat peti petiti tion oner er in&t in&tit itut uted ed a cada cada&t &tra ra$$ ca&e ca&e to a ave ve te te $and $and tit$ tit$ed ed to im& im&e$ e$. %edi&covered %edi&covered i& macination& macination& on$ in 199. %u&, re&pondent& re&pondent& in&tituted te in&t in&tan antt ca&e ca&e toa toave ve te te )ece )ecemb mber er 22, 22, 1981 1981 )eed )eed o a$e a$e void voided ed or or want want o con&ideration and or raud. %e %ria$ (ourt ru$ed tat pre&cription o te cau&e o acti action on to an annu nu$$ te te Iue& Iue&ti tion oned ed )eed )eedo o 0b&o 0b&o$u $ute te a$e a$e a a& & a$r a$read ead &et &et in, in, te te comp$aint in te above-entit$ed ca&e i& ordereddi&mi&&ed. ordereddi&mi&&ed. %e R%( &aid tat it cou$d no $onger annu$ te &a$e rea&oning tat 0rtic$e11>? o te (ivi$ (ode provided or 1 ear& witin wic to bring action rom te timete rigt o action accrue& upon a written contract. #ence, it conc$uded tat &ince te deedo &a$e wa& e!ecuted on )ecember 22, 1981, and te in&tant action wa& f$ed on$ oneptember F, 199, ater more tan 1 ear&, pre&cription pre&cription ad &et in. %e (0 rever&ed te ru$ing o R%( R%( and &tated tat 0rt. 11 o te (ivi$ (ode wa&erroneou&$ app$ied b te R%(. %e
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
(0 e!p$ained tat te in&tant ca&e invo$ve& an imp$iedtru&t, and tat 0rt. 1F o te (ivi$ (ode wa& te app$icab$e $aw. ISS%E) <eter or not a pre&cription ad &et in. *ELD) 0n action or te reconveance o a parce$ o $and ba&ed on imp$ied or con&tructive con&tructive tru&t, a& we ave a$read e!p$ained in ti& ca&e, pre&cribe& pre&cribe& in 1 ear&, te point o reerence being te date o regi&tration o te deed or te date o te i&&uance o te certifcate o tit$e o te propert; owever, were no O(% a& et been i&&ued de&pite anorder rom te court to tit$e te $ot&, te date rom wence te pre&criptive period cou$d berec5oned i& un5nown and it cou$d not be determined i indeed te period ad a$read $ap&ed or not. %u&, we agree wit te (0 tat pre&cription a& not et &et in
G+R+ N+ $6-$2- Ma#. 2, 2007 INVOLVING INVOLVING TITLES SANTOS '+ L%MAO
ACTIONS
Reconveyance is imprescriptible where plainti' is in possession An action or annulment o title(reconveyance title(reconveyance based on raud is imprescriptible imprescriptible where the plainti' is in possession o the property subject o the acts.
(ACTS) Rita &o$d to re&pondent& pou&e& Eumbao denominated a& "+i$ian ng Eupa' te &ubect propert wic i& a part o er &are in te e&tate o er decea&ed moter aria. aria. 0ter 0ter acIuirin acIuiring g te &ubect &ubect proper propert, t, re&pond re&pondent& ent& pou&e& pou&e& Eumbao Eumbao too5 actua actua$$ po&&e& po&&e&&i &ion on tere tereo o and erect erected ed tere tereon on a ou&e ou&e wic wic te te ave ave been been occuping a& e!c$u&ive owner& up to te pre&ent. 0& te e!c$u&ive owner& o te &ubect propert, re&pondent& re&pondent& pou&e& Eumbao made &evera$ verba$ demand& upon Rita, during er $ietime, and tereater upon erein petitioner&, or tem to e!ecute te nece&&ar document& to e:ect te i&&uance o a &eparate tit$e in avor o re&pondent& pou&e& Eumbao in&oar a& te &ubect propert i& concerned.
Re&pon e&ponden dent& t& pou&e pou&e& & Eumb Eumbao ao a$$eg a$$eged ed tat tat prior prior to e err deat deat,, Rita Rita inor inormed med re&pondent re&pondent 4ro&erfna 4ro&erfna Eumbao &e cou$d not de$iver te tit$e to te &ubect propert becau&e te entire propert inerited b er and er co-eir& rom aria ad not et been partitioned. pou&e& Eumbao c$aimed tat petitioner&, acting raudu$ent$ and in con&pirac wit one anoter, e!ecuted a )eed o *!traudicia$ ett$ement, adudicating and partitioning among tem&e$ve& and te oter eir&, te e&tate $et b aria, wic inc$uded te &ubect propert a$read &o$d to re&pondent& pou&e& Eumbao. Re&pondent& pou&e& Eumbao, troug coun&e$, &ent a orma$ demand $etter to petitioner& but de&pite receipt o &uc demand $etter, petitioner& &ti$$ ai$ed and reu&ed to reconve te &ubect propert to te re&pondent& pou&e& Eumbao. (on&eIuent$, te $atter f$ed a (omp$aint or Reconveance wit )amage& beore te R%( o 4a&ig (it. 4etitioner& f$ed teir 0n&wer dening te a$$egation& tat te &ubect propert ad been &o$dto te re&pondent& pou&e& Eumbao. 4etitioner& 4etitioner& f$ed teir 0n&wer dening te a$$egation& tat te &ubect propert ad been &o$d to te re&pondent& pou&e& Eumbao. %e $i5ewi&e denied tat te )eed o *!traudicia$ ett$ement ad been raudu$ent$ e!ecuted becau&e te &ame wa& du$ pub$i&ed a& reIui reIuire red d b $aw. $aw. %e %e R%( rende rendere red d a deci& deci&ion ion in avor avor o te te petiti petitione oner& r&..
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
0ggrieved, re&pondent& pou&e& Eumbao appea$ed to te (ourt o 0ppea$&. <ic rever&ed te ru$ing o te tria$ court and ordered te reconveance o te propert to te re&pondent&. %e petitioner& Iue&tioned te deci&ion, ence ti& petition. ISS%E) <eter or not a co-owner can a$ienate, mortgage mortgage or a&&ign i& a$iIuot or undivided &are in te propert. *ELD) Gt i& notewort tat at te time o te e!ecution o te document& denominated a& D+i$ian ng Eupa,D te entire propert owned b aria, te moter o Rita, wa& not et divided among er and er co-eir& and &o te de&cription o te entire e&tate i& te on$ de&cription becau&e te e!act mete& and bound& o te &ubect propert &o$d to re&pondent& pou&e& Eumbao cou$d not be po&&ib$ determined determined at tat time. =eve =evert rte e$e $e&& &&,, tat tat doe& doe& not not ma5 ma5e te te cont contra ract ct o &a$e &a$e betw betwee een n Rita Rita an and d re&pondent& pou&e& Eumbao inva$id becau&e bot te $aw and uri&prudence ave categorica$$ e$d tat even wi$e an e&tate remain& undivided, co-owner& ave eac eac u$$ u$$ owner owner& &ip ip o teir teir re&pe re&pect ctive ive a$iIu a$iIuot& ot& or undivi undivided ded &ar &are& e& and ma tereore a$ienate, a&&ign or mortgage tem. %e co-owner, owever, a& no rigt to &e$$ or a$ienate a &pecifc or determinate part o te ting owned in common, becau&e &uc rigt over te ting i& repre&ented b an a$iIuot or idea$ portion witout an p&ica$ divi&ion. Gn an ca&e, te mere act tat te deed purport& to tran&er a concrete portion doe& not per &e render te &a$e void. %e &a$e i& va$id, but on$ wit re&pect to te a$iIuot &are o te &e$$ing co-owner. Aurtermore, te &a$e &a$e i& &ube &ubect ct to te te re&u re&u$t& $t& o te partiti partition on upon upon te termina terminatio tion n o te coowner&ip.
Gn te ca&e at bar, wen te e&tate $et b aria ad been partitioned on 2 a 198 b virtue o a )eed o *!traudicia$ ett$ement, te 17- &Iuare meter $ot &o$d b te te mote moterr o te petiti petition oner& er& to re&p re&pond ondent ent& & pou&e pou&e& & Eumba Eumbao o &ou$ &ou$d d be deducted rom te tota$ $ot, inerited b tem in repre&entation o teir decea&ed moter, wic in ti& ca&e mea&ure& 7 &Iuare meter&. %e 17-&Iuare meter $ot a$read &o$d to re&pondent& pou&e& Eumbao can no $onger be inerited b te petitioner& becau&e te &ame wa& no $onger part o teir ineritance a& it wa& a$read &o$d during te $ietime o teir moter
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
LAC*ES
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
G+R+ G+R+ N+ $6 $666$ 66$ O." O."e# e# 26, 26, 2007 2007 LAC*ES ESTATE O( T*E LATE JES%S S+ Y%J%ICO '+ Rep"/. An action to recover lands o the public domain is imprescriptible. imprescriptible. )uch right howeve howeverr can be barred barred by laches laches(es (estop toppel pel under under )ec. )ec. *+ o ,.-. #+/ #+/ which which recogni0es the rights o innocent purchasers or value above the interests o the government.
(ACTS) Gn 1973, Aermina (a&tro f$ed an app$ication or te regi&tration and confrmation o er tit$e over a parce$ o $and wit anarea o 17,33 &Iuare meter& covered b p$an ER(/ 4&u-9 $ocated in 4araKaIue (it, in te 4a&ig-Riza$ (ourt o Air&t Gn&tance (AG/.%e app$ication wa& oppo&ed b te OLce o te o$icitor @enera$ O@/ on bea$ o te )irector o Eand&, and b ercede& )izon, a private part. %ria$ court ru$ed in avor o (a&tro.2. %e )irector o Eand& and ercede& )izon did not appea$ rom te adver&e deci&ion o te 4a&ig-Riza$ (AG. %u&, te order or te i&&uance o a decr decree ee o regi& egi&tr trat atio ion n beca became me fn fna$ a$,, an and d a )ecr )ecree ee wa& wa& i&&u i&&ued ed b te te Eand Eand Regi&trat egi&tration ion (ommi&&i (ommi&&ion on ER(/.0n ER(/.0n Origina$ Origina$ (ertifca (ertifcate te o %it$e %it$e wa& i&&ued i&&ued in te name o Aermina (a&tro b te Regi&ter o )eed&.
Eand wa& ten &o$d to Je&u& Muuico. %e O(% o (a&tro wa& cance$$ed and a %(% wa& i&&ued in Muuico& name over Eot1 wi$e anoter %(% wa& i&&ued in avor o erein co-petitioner 0ugu&to (arpio. eanwi$e, 4) no. 18F wa& i&&ued and a&&ert& tat Eand Eand rec$a rec$aim imed ed in te ore& ore&or ore e and o:&ore o:&ore area& area& o ani$ ani$a a +a becam became e te proper propertie& tie& o te 4ub$ic 4ub$ic *&tate& *&tate& 0utorit 0utorit 4*0/, 4*0/, a governmen governmentt corporat corporation ion tat undertoo5 te rec$amation o $and& or te acIui&ition o rec$aimed $and&. %u&, an O(% wa& i&&ued in avor o 4*0. %e 4*0 a$&o acIuired owner&ip o oter parce$& o $and a$ong te ani$a +a coa&t wic were &ub&eIuent$ &o$d to te ani$a +a )eve$o )eve$opm pment ent (orpor (orporati ation on +)( +)(/. /. %e 4*0 undert undertoo5 oo5 te con&t con&tru ructi ction on o te ani$a (oa&ta$ Road. 0& ti& wa& being p$anned, Muuico Muuico and (arpio di&covered tat a verifcation &urve te commi&&ioned &owed tat te road direct$ over$apped teir propert, and tat te owned a portion o te $and &o$d b te 4*0 to te +)(.. Muuico and (arpio f$ed beore te 4araKaIue (it Regiona$ %ria$ (ourt R%(/, a comp$aint or te Remova$ o ($oud and 0nnu$ment o %it$e wit )amage&.7. Re&pondent Repub$ic argued tat, fr&t, &ince te &ubect $and wa& &ti$$ underwater, it cou$ cou$d d not not be regi& egi&te terred in te te na name me o Aermi ermina na (a&t (a&trro. eco econd nd,, te te $and $and regi&tration court did not ave uri&diction to adudicate ina$ienab$e $and&, tu& te deci&ion adudicating te &ubect parce$ o $and to Aermina (a&tro wa& void. 0nd tird, te tit$e& o Muuico and (arpio, being derived rom a void tit$e, were $i5ewi&e void.8. %ria$ (ourt ru$ed in avor o te petitioner and &tate& tat ater 28 ear& witout being conte&ted, te ca&e ad a$read become fna$ and e!ecutor. %e tria$ cour courtt a$&o a$&o oun ound d tat tat te te O@ O@ a ad d part partic icip ipat ated ed in te te ER( ER( ca&e ca&e,, an and d cou$ cou$d d aveIue&tioned te va$idit o te deci&ion but did not.9. On appea$, rever&ed te deci&ion o te $ower court a&&erting tat &ore& are propertie& propertie& o te pub$ic domain intend intended ed or pub$i pub$ic c u&e u&e and, and, tere tereor ore, e, not regi& regi&tra trab$e b$e and teir teir inc$u& inc$u&ion ion in a certifcate o tit$e doe& not convert te &ame into propertie& o private owner&ip or cone conerr tit$e tit$e upon upon te regi& regi&tra trant. nt. Aurter urter,, accor accordin ding g to te appe$$ appe$$ate ate court court re& re& udicata doe& not app$ to $and& o pub$ic domain, nor doe& po&&e&&ion o te $and automatica$$ dive&t te $and o it& pub$ic caracter. ISS%E)
<eter (0& deci&ion wa& correct.
*ELD) 4*%G%GO= @R0=%*). <i$e it ma be true tat e&toppe$ doe& not operate again&t te &tate or it& agent&, owever, *Iuitab$e e&toppe$ mabe invo5ed again&t pub$ic autoritie& wen a& in ti& ti& ca&e, ca&e, te $ot wa& a$read a$read a$iena a$ienated ted to inn innoce ocent nt buer& buer& or va$ue va$ue an and d te
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
governmen governmentt did not underta5 underta5e e an act to conte&t te tit$e or an unr unrea&o ea&onab$ nab$e e $engt o time. ection 32 provide&N *(. 32. Review o decree o regi&tration; Gnnocent purca&er or va$ue. %e decree o regi&tration regi&tration &a$$ not be reopened or revi&ed b rea&on rea&on o ab&ence, minorit, or oter di&abi$it o an per&on adver&e$ a:ected tereb, nor b an proceeding in an court or rever&ing udgment&, &ubect, owever, to te rigt o an per&on, inc$uding te government and te brance& tereo, deprived o $and or o an e&tate e&tate or inter intere&t e&t ter terein ein b &uc &uc adud adudic icati ation on or confr confrma matio tion n o tit$e tit$e obtained b actua$ raud, to f$e in te proper (ourt o Air&t Gn&tance a petition or reopening and review o te decree o regi&tration not $ater tan one ear rom and ater te date o te entr o &uc decree o regi&tration, but in no ca&e &a$$ &uc petition be entertained b te court were an innocent purca&er or va$ue a& acIuired te $and or an intere&t terein, wo&e rigt& ma be preudiced. <enever te pra&e "innocent purca&er purca&er or va$ue' or an eIuiva$ent pra&e occur& in ti& )ecree, it &a$$ be deemed to inc$ude an innocent $e&&ee, mortgagee, or oter encumbrance& or va$ue. Gn ti& petition, te ER0, ER0, i&&ued )ecree =o. =-1F912 in avor o Aermina (a&tro (a&tro and O(% =o. 121F wa& i&&ued b te Riza$ Regi&trar Regi&trar o )eed&. O(% =o. 121F doe& not &ow an annotation, $ien, or encumbrance on it& ace. Re$ing on te c$ean tit$e, Muuico Muuico bougt te &ame in good ait and or va$ue rom er. er. %ere i& no a$$egation tat Muuico wa& a buer in bad ait, nor did e acIuire te $and raudu$ent$. #e tu& ad te protection o te %orr %orren& en& &tem tat ever &ub&eIuent purca&er purca&er o regi&tered $and ta5ing a certifcate o tit$e or va$ue and in good ait &a$$ o$d te &ame ree rom a$$ encumbran e ncumbrance& ce& e!cept to&e noted on te certifcate and an o te encumbrance& wic ma be &ub&i&ting. %e &ame $ega$ &ie$d redound& to i& &ucce&&or&-in-intere&t, &ucce&&or&-in-intere&t, te Muuico& and (arpio, more particu$ar$ te $atter &ince (arpio (arpio bougt bougt te $ot rom rom Je&u& Je&u& M. Muuico uuico or va$ue and in good ait. Ei5ewi& Ei5ewi&e e protected are te rigt& o innocent mortgagee& or va$ue, te 4GO, (itiban5, =.0., 4)(, R(+(, 4(G+, and )+4. *ven i te mortgagor& tit$e wa& proved raudu$ent and te tit$e dec$ared nu$$ and void, &uc dec$aration cannot nu$$i te mortgage rigt& o a mortgagee in good ait. 0noter contention o te re&pondent Repub$icN %e p$ain import o unicipa$it unicipa$it o 0ntipo$o v& Papanta i& tat a $and regi&tration regi&tration court court,, te R%( at pre&e pre&ent, nt, a a& & no uri& uri&dic dictio tion n over over te &ubec &ubectt matte matterr o te app$ication wic re&pondent Repub$ic c$aim& i& pub$ic $and. Airm$ entrenced i& te te prin princi cip$ p$e e tat tat uri uri&d &dic icti tion on over over te te &ub &ubec ectt matt matter er i& con coner errred b $aw $aw. (on&eIuent$, te proper (AG now te R%(/ under ection 1 o 4) 1F29 4ropert Regi&trat egi&tration ion )ecree/ )ecree/ a& uri&dic uri&diction tion over app$icat app$ication& ion& or regi&tr regi&tratio ation n o tit$e tit$e to $and. %e app$icant in a $and regi&tration regi&tration ca&e u&ua$$ c$aim& te $and &ubect matter o te app$ication a& i&Qer private propert, a& in te ca&e o te app$ication o (a&tro. %u&, te conc$u&ion o te (0 tat te 4a&ig-Riza$ (AG a& no uri&diction over te &ubect matter o te app$ication o (a&tro (a&tro a& no $ega$ mooring. %e $and regi&tration regi&tration court initia$$ a& uri&diction uri&diction over te $and app$ied or at te time o te f$ing o te app$ication. 0ter tria$, te court, in te e!erci&e o it& uri&diction, uri&diction, can determine weter te tit$e to te $and app$ied or i& regi&trab$e regi&trab$e and can be confrmed. Gn te event tat te &ubect matter o te app$ication turn& out to be ina$ienab$e pub$ic $and, ten it a& no uri&diction to order te regi&tration o te $and and perorce mu&t di&mi&& te app$ication.
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
AR 8%ESTIONS TOIC) RESCRITION AND LAC*ES
G Eouie, beore $eaving te countr to train a& a ce in a fve- &tar ote$ in =ew Mor5, C0, entru&te entru&ted d to i& fr&t-deg fr&t-degree ree cou&in )ewe )ewe an app$icat app$ication ion or regi&tr regi&tration ation,, under te Eand Regi&tration 0ct, o a parce$ o $and $ocated in +aco$od (it. 0 ear $ater, Eouie returned to te 4i$ippine& and di&covered tat )ewe regi&tered te $and and obtained an Origina$ (ertifcate o %it$e over te propert in i& )ewe&/ name na me.. (omp (ompou ound ndin ing g te te matt matter er,, )ewe )ewe &o$d &o$d te te $and $and to #u #ue e,, an inno innoce cent nt purca&er purca&er or va$ue. Eouie prompt$ f$ed an action or reconveance o te parce$ o $and again&t aga in&t #ue #ue . 0. G& te te act actio ion n pur pur&u &ued ed b Eouie ouie te te pr proper oper remed emedH H +. 0&&u 0&&umi ming ng tat tat rec recon onve vea anc nce e i& te te prop proper er rem remed ed, , wi$$ wi$$ te te actio action n pro& pro&pe perr i te ca&e wa& f$ed beond one ear, but witin ten ear&, rom te entr o te decree o regi&trationH 0=<*RN 0. 0n act actio ion n or rec recon onve vea anc nce e again again&t &t #ue #ue i& not not te te pr proper oper rem remed ed, , bec becau au&e &e #ue i& an innocent purca&er purca&er or va$ue. %e proper recour&e recour&e i& or Eouie to go ater )ewe or damage& b rea&on o te raudu$ent regi&tration and &ub&eIuent &a$e o te $and. G )ewe i& in&o$vent, Eouie ma f$e a c$aim again&t te 0&&urance Aund #eir& o 4edro Eopez v&. )e (a&tro 32 (R0 F91 >2? citing p&. *duarte v&. (0, 323 4i$ 2 >199?/. +. Me&, te remed wi$$ pro&per becau&e te action pre&cribe& in ten 1/ ear&, not witin one 1/ ear wen a petition or te reopening o te regi&tration decree ma be f$ed. %e action or reconveance i& di&tinct rom te petition to reopen te decree o regi&tration @re 0$ba v&. )e$a (ruz, 17 4i$ 9 >191?/. %ere i& no need to reopen te regi&tration proceeding&, but te propert &ou$d u&t be reconveed to te rea$ owner. %e action or reconveance reconveance i& ba&ed on imp$ied or con&tructive con&tructive tru&t, wic pre&cribe& in ten 1/ ear& rom te date o i&&uance o te origina$ certifcate o tit$e. %i& ru$e a&&ume& tat te deendant i& in po&&e&&ion o te $and. <ere it i& te p$ainti: wo i& in po&&e&&ion o te $and, te action or reconveance wou$d be in te nature o a &uit or Iuieting o tit$e wic action i& impre&criptib$e )avid v&. a$a, 318 (R0 711 >1999?/. GG Gn 19, an unregi&tered parce$ o $and wa& mortgaged b owner O to , a ami$ riend, a& co$$atera$ or a $oan. O acted troug i& attorne in act, &on, , wo wa& du$ autorized b wa o a &pecia$ power o attorne, werein O dec$ared tat e wa& te ab&o$ute owner o te $and, tat te ta! dec$aration&Qreceipt& were a$$ i&&u i&&ued ed in i& i& na name me,, an and d tat tat e a a& & been been in open open,, cont contin inuo uou& u& an and d adve adver& r&e e po&&e&&ion in te concept o owner. 0& O wa& unab$e to pa bac5 te $oan p$u& inte interre&t e&t or or te te pa&t pa&t fve fve F/ F/ ear ear&, &, a ad d to or orec$o ec$o&e &e te te mort mortga gage ge.. 0t te te orec$o&ure &a$e, wa& te ige&t bidder. Cpon i&&uance o te &eri:& fna$ deed o &a$e and regi&tration in Januar, 19, te mortgage propert wa& turned over to & po&&e&&ion and contro$. a& &ince ten deve$oped te &aid propert. Gn 197, O died, &urvived b &on& and 4. Gn 1977, ater te tent 1t/ deat anniver&ar anniver&ar o i& ater O, &on 4 f$ed a &uit to annu$ te mortgage deed and &ub&eIuent &a$e o te propert, etc., on te ground o raud. #e a&&erted tat te propert in Iue&tion wa& conuga$ in nature actua$$ be$onging, at te time o te mortgage, to O and i& wie, <, wo&e conuga$ &are went to teir &on& and 4/ and to O.
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
0. G& te te &ui &uitt f$ed f$ed b b 4 barr barred ed b b pre& pre&cr crip ipti tion onH H *!p$ *!p$ai ain n our our an& an&we werr. +. 0ter te te i&& i&&uan ance ce o te te &e erri:& :& fna$ deed deed o &a$e &a$e in 19 19 in ti ti& ca&e, a&e, a&&uming tat app$ied or regi&tration under te %orren& &tem and wa& i&&ued a %orren %orren& & %it$e to te &aid propert in Iue&tion, wou$d tat added act ave an &ignifcant e:ect on our conc$u&ionH tate our rea&on. 199/ 0=<*RN 0. Cnde Cnderr 0rt. 0rt. 173, 173, ((, ((, te te acti action on i& bar barrred b pr pre&cr e&crip ipti tion on bec becau au&e &e te te wie wie ad ad on$ ten 1/ ear& rom te tran&action and during te marriage to f$e a &uit or te annu$ment o te mortgage deed. +. G ad ad &ecu &ecurred a %or %orrren en& & %it$ %it$e e to te te $and, $and, a$$ a$$ te te mor more e an and d 4 cou$ cou$d d not not recover becau&e i at a$$ teir remedie& wou$d beN 1. 0 4et 4etit itio ion n to Rev Revie iew w te te )ecr )ecree ee o reg regi& i&tr trat atio ion. n. %i& %i& can can be be avai avai$e $ed d o wit witi in n one 1/ ear rom te entr tereo, but on$ upon te ba&i& o "actua$ raud.' %ere i& no &owing tat committed actua$ raud in &ecuring i& tit$e to te $and; or 2. 0n act actio ion n in per& per&on onam am aga again in&t &t or or te te reco reconv nve ean ance ce o o te tit$ tit$e e in tei teirr avor. 0gain, ti& remed i& avai$ab$e witin our / ear& rom te date o te di&cover o te raud but not $ater tan ten 1/ ear& rom te date o regi&tration o te tit$e in te name o . 0E%*R=0%GB* 0=<*RN 0. %e %e mort mortga gage ge cont contra ract ct e!ec e!ecut uted ed b O, i at at a$$, a$$, i& on$ on$ a voida voidab$ b$e e cont contra ract ct &ince &ince it invo$ve& invo$ve& a conuga$ conuga$ partner&ip partner&ip propert propert.. %e action to annu annu$$ te &ame in&tituted in 1977, or e$even ear& ater te e!ecution o te &eri:& fna$ &a$e, a& obviou&$ pre&cribed becau&eN 1. 0n act actio ion n to ann annu$ u$ a con contr trac actt on te te gr ground ound o o rau raud d mu&t mu&t be be brou broug gtt wit witin in our / ear& rom te date o di&cover o te raud. ince ti& i& in e&&ence an action to recover owner&ip, it mu&t be rec5oned rom te date o e!ecution o te contract or rom te regi&tration o te a$$eged raudu$ent
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
MISCELLANEO%S
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
G+R+ N+ $500-$
Ap#/ 2, 2007 MISCELLANEO%S AL(ONSO '+ O((ICE O( T*E RESIDENT
%e e&&ence o o due proce&& proce&& i& te opportunit to e!p$ain one& one& &ide. -uty o Register o -eeds To Reuire )ubmission o Approved )ubdivision ,lan" Technical -escription 1 &wner2s -uplicate Certifcate o Title 3eore 4ssuing New Titles
(ACTS) 4etitioner Mo$anda O. 0$on&o 0$on&o/, ten te regi&ter o deed& o (a$oocan (it, wa& ound admini&trative$ $iab$e or a$$eged$ acIuie&cingS to te cange o te date o te regi&tration o O(% =o. 99 rom a 3, 1917 to 0pri$ 19, 1917, and or ma5in ma5ing g it appear appear tat tere tere were were two O(% =o&. =o&. 99. 99. (on&eI (on&eIuen uent$ t$,, &e wa& di&mi&&ed rom government &ervice or grave mi&conduct and di&one&t.
0$on&o wa& inve&tigated b te Eand Regi&tration 0utorit ER0/ upon te reIue&t o 4i$-Bi$$e )eve$opment (orporation 4i$-Bi$$e/ wo purca&ed &ome part& o te $and. 4i$-Bi$$eT& $etter-comp$aint $ed to te conduct o an inIuir b te enate (ommittee& on Ju&tice and #uman Rigt&, and on Crban 4$anning, #ou&ing and Re&ett$ement wic fnd& tat 0$on&o acted ma$iciou&$, raudu$ent$ and in bad ait ait recom ecomme mend ndin ing g te te f$in f$ing g o admi admini ni&t &tra rati tive ve ca&e ca&e& & agai again& n&tt e err an and d e err con&pira con&pirator& tor&.. On te oter and, and, ER0 ER0 fnd& fnd& er gui$t o @rave @rave i&cond i&conduct uct and recommended er di&mi&&a$. %e OLce o te 4re&ident &ub&eIuent$ di&mi&&ed 0$on&o. %e (ourt o 0ppea$& aLrmed te di&mi&&a$ o 0$on&o. #ence, ti& petition contending tat er rigt to due proce&& wa& vio$ated. ISS%E) <eter or not te (ourt o 0ppea$& erred in upo$ding deci&ion o te OLce o te 4re&ident becau&e 0$on&oT& rigt to due proce&& wa& vio$ated. *ed) Gn te $andmar5 ca&e o 0ng %iba v. (ourt o Gndu&tria$ Re$ation&, ti& (ourt $aid down down te te car cardina dina$$ prim primar ar reIui eIuirremen ement& t& o due due proc proce& e&& & in admi admini ni&t &tra rati tive ve proceeding&. Aoremo&t o te&e reIui&ite& i& te rigt to a earing, inc$uding te rigt to pre&ent oneT& ca&e and &ubmit evidence in &upport tereo. %e e&&ence o due proce&& in admini&trative proceeding& i& te opportunit to e!p$ain oneT& &ide or to &ee5 a recon&ideration o te action or ru$ing comp$ained o.
0& apt$ ob&erved b te (0, 0$on&o wa& given ever opportunit to e!p$ain er &ide and to pre&ent evidence in er deen&e during te admini&trative inve&tigation condu conducte cted d b te ER0. ER0. Record ecord& & &uLcie &uLcient$ nt$ &ow &ow tat tat in comp$i comp$ianc ance e wit wit te &o &oww-ca cau& u&eS eS $ett $etter er o te te ER0 ER0 0dmi 0dmini ni&t &tra rato tor, r, &e &e &ubm &ubmit itte ted d e err writ writte ten n e!p$anation, and tat during te pre-tria$ conerence&, &e pre&ented documentar evidence. Ei5ewi&e, te Iuantum o proo reIuired in an admini&trative proceeding i& on$ &ub&tantia$ evidence or tat amount o re$evant evidence tat a rea&onab$e mind migt accept a& adeIuate to &upport a conc$u&ion. %e &tandard o &ub&tantia$ evidence i& &ati&fed wen tere i& rea&onab$e ground to be$ieve tat te per&on indicted wa& re&pon&ib$e or te a$$eged wrongdoing or mi&conduct. Gn te ca&e at bar, 0$on&o &tood carged not or canging te date o regi&tration o O(% =o. 99 but rater, &e wa& indicted or acIuie&cing to te cange b 1/ i&&uing con6icting certifcation on te date o i&&uance o O(% =o. 99; and 2/ or ma5ing it appear tat tere were two O(% =o&. 99. %u&, er prote&tation& tat &e ad no and in te a$teration are unavai$ing.
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
0$on&o i& tu& admini&trative$ $iab$e or &eriou& mi&conduct eriou& mi&conduct, a& a va$id cau&e or te di&mi&&a$ o an emp$oee, i& improper or wrong conduct; te tran&gre&&ion o &ome e&tab$i&ed and defnite ru$e o action; a orbidden act or dere$iction o dut, wic i& wi$$u$ and intentiona$ neg$ect and not mere error in udgment. Gt mu&t be grave and aggravated in caracter and not mere$ trivia$ or unimp un import ortant ant.. .. Gn additi addition, on, it mu&t mu&t be direct direct$ $ re$at re$ated ed andQor andQor conne connecte cted d to te te perormance o oLcia$ dutie&.
ATENTS9GOVERNMENT A:ARD
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
G+R+ N+ $54654 Sepe!"e# $4, 2007 ATENTS9GOVERNMENT A:ARD TAG%INOD VS CO%RT O( AEALS The rights o a homestead patentee are superior to that o a tenant under the Agrarian Reorm Reorm 5aw. 5aw.
(ACTS) 4re&ident Aerdinand *. arco& promu$gated 4) 27 or te emancipation o tenantarmer& rom private agricu$tura$ $and& te ti$$ tat are primari$ devoted to rice and corn. )0R $aunced Operation Eand %ran&er OE%/ to imp$ement te $aw. <en OE% wa& $aunced, a$ud 0$varez 0gui$a wa& te regi&tered owner o te di&puted $ot&. %e %(%& over te two $ot& were i&&ued ba&ed on ome&tead patent&. %e fr&t %(% %(% wa& tran&erred tran&erred to Bic 0gui$a wo wa& ten 1 r& o$d/, and te &econd %(% wa& tran&erred to Jo&epine %aguinod. +ot $ot& were p$aced under coverage o OE%. a$ud 0gui$a, on bea$ o Bic 0gui$a, f$ed a notice or retention. <en Bic 0gui$a became o age, e f$ed a notice or e!emption. %aguinod a$&of$ed a notice or e!emption.
eanwi$e, te two &ubect $ot& were &urveed and a &ubdivi&ion p$an o te $ot& parce$ed to te armer-benefciarie& wa& prepared and approved. %e )0R unicipa$ 0grarian Reorm OLcer 0RO/ recommended to te 4rovincia$ 0grarian Reorm OLcer 40RO/ te approva$ o te app$ication& o a$ud 0. 0gui$aQBic 0. 0gui$a and Jo&epine 0. %aguinod or retention retention o rigt&. %e 40RO granted te app$ication app$ication or retention rigt&. Re&pondent&-armer Re&pondent&-armer-benefciarie& -benefciarie& oppo&ed te deci&ion. %e R) aLrmed te 40RO& deci&ion but &tated tat te tran&er made b a$ud 0gui$a to petitioner& i& nu$$ and void, but tat a$ud 0gui$a &ou$d be granted te retention rigt&. rigt&. 4rivate 4rivate re&pond re&pondent& ent& oppo&ed oppo&ed ti& deci&ion deci&ion.. %aguinod aguinod a$&o f$ed a motion motion contending tat 0gui$a wa& not te rea$ owner o te $and a& &uc wa& b %aguinod rom er bio$ogica$ moter and tat te &ame wa& on$ mortgaged to 0gui$a wic propert &e ad a$read redeemed. %e )0R ecretar aLrmed te deci&ion o te R) and denied denied %aguino aguinod& d& motio motion. n. Cpon Cpon motio motion n or recon recon&id &idera eratio tion, n, te te )0R )0R ecretar ru$ed tat a$ud 0gui$a wa& di&Iua$ifed in retention rigt& becau&e &e owned &evera$ oter propertie&. 4etitioner& appea$ed to te OLce o te 4re&ident. %e O4 ru$ed tat te &aid $ot&, aving &temmed rom ome&tead patent&, are e!empt rom te coverage o 4) 27. On appea$, te (0 ru$ed in avour o private re&po e&pond nden ent& t&.. %e %e (0 owe oweve verr agr agreed eed wit wit te te O4 tat tat te te rigt igt& & o te te ome&teader and i&Qer eir& to own and cu$tivate per&ona$$ teir $and acIuired under under te te Dome& Dome&tea tead d $aw&D $aw&D are are &uper &uperior ior over over to&e to&e o tenant tenant& & invo5i invo5ing ng te Dagrarian reorm $aw&'. #owever, it ound tat petitioner& %aguinod and 0gui$a ai$ed to di&carge te burden o adducing evidence to prove te identitie& o te origina$ ome&tead patentee& and tat te are te direct compu$&or eir& o te origina$ patentee&. ISS%E) <eter or not te &ubect $and& are e!empted rom coverage o 4) 27 *ELD) %e petition i& beret beret o merit. ett$ed in ti& uri&diction uri&diction i& te ru$e ru$e tat te rigt& o a o$d o$der er o a ome ome&t &tea ead d pate patent nt are are &upe &uperi rior or over over te te rig rigt& t& o te te tena tenant nt& & guaranteed b te 0grarian Reorm Eaw.
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
%u&, D%e #ome&tead 0ct a& been enacted or te we$are we$are and protection protection o te poor. %e $aw give& a need citizen a piece o $and were e ma bui$d a mode&t ou&e or im&e$ and ami$ and p$ant wat i& nece&&ar or &ub&i&tence and or te &ati&action &ati&action o $ie& oter need&. %e rigt o te citizen& to teir ome& and to te ting& nece&&ar or teir &ub&i&tence i& a& vita$ a& te rigt to $ie it&e$. %e ave a rigt to $ive wit a certain degree o comort a& ! ! ! uman being&, and te tate wic $oo5& ater te we$are o te peop$e& appine&& i& under a dut to &aeguard te &ati&action o ti& vita$ rigt.D Gt i& tereore incumbent upon petitioner& to identi &ub&tantia$ evidence on record to &upport te O4& fnding tat teir $ot& are e!c$uded rom te cover coverage age o (ompr (ompree een& n&ive ive 0grar 0grarian ian Reorm eorm 4rog 4rogram ram.. Gn act, act, a& apt$ apt$ put b private re&pondent&, petitioner& never averred beore te )0R and O4 tat a$ud 0gui$a wa& te origina$ ome&tead patentee or a direct compu$&or eir o te ome&t ome&tead ead patent patentee. ee.
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
G+R+ N+ $4$$$
Ma#. 5, 2007 ATENTS9GOVERNMENT A:ARD J%STALERO J%STALERO ' SAN AG%STIN GON&ALES GON&ALES 6here there is no showing that the deceased 7ree ,atent Applicant availed himsel o a legal remedy to assail an adverse decision" his successors8in8interes successors8in8interestt are bound by the same.
(ACTS) =oemi an 0gu&tin and Penaida an 0gu&tin @onz$e&, togeter wit teir oter &ib$ing&, entered into a ubdivi&ion 0greement werein te parted te e&tate o teir decea&ed parent&. ub&eIuent$, a %ran&er (ertifcate %it$e& were i&&ued to =oemi and Penaida.
0ter nine ear&, @i$ Ju&ta$ero and te eir& o i& decea&ed broter, Je&u& Ju&ta$ero Je&u& Je&u&// f$ed f$ed a comp$a comp$aint int again& again&tt Penaid Penaida a an and d =oemi =oemi or Iuiet Iuieting ing o tit$e tit$e and recon econve vea anc nce e wit wit dama damage ge& & beo beorre te te Regio egiona na$$ %ria$ ria$ (our (ourtt R% R%(/ o G$oi G$oi$o $o contending tat te $ot& &ubect o te petition were a$&e$ c$aimed b Penaida and =oemi. @i$ added tat Je&u& in act f$ed an app$ication or Aree 4atent over te &ubect $ot. Aor teir part, Penaida and =oemi aver tat te $ot& were covered b an Origina$ (ertifcate o %it$e O(%/, wic were owned b teir decea&ed parent. %e R%( ru$ed in avor o Penaida and =oemi. @i$ and te eir& appea$ed to (ourt o 0ppea$& wic aLrmed te R%( deci&ion. ISS%E) <eter or not te &ubect $ot wic i& c$aimed b @i$ and te eir& i& embraced in te tran&er certifcate tit$e& o =oemi and Penaida *ELD) %e ba&i& o te i&&uance o =oemiT& tit$e i& te (on&o$idation and ubdivi&ion 4$an, 4c&--3 wic bear& a note on te $ower portion tereo reading >t?i& &urve i& covered b Origina$ (ertifcate o %it$e =o. 3898, 32 and 32F a$$ in te name o Bicente an 0gu&tin and Ro&ario abe$$a. %e &ame p$an wa& certifed a& correct b +ernan (erteza, @eodetic *ngineer, and recommended or approva$ b %eodoro %eodoro impa&, (ie, urve& )ivi&ion. %e )irector )irector o Eand& troug troug Regiona$ Regiona$ )irector anue$ Eaguni$$a a$&o approved te &ame. Aurtermore, te (ourt o Air&t Gn&tance o G$oi$o a$&o approved te &aid ubdivi&ion 4$an b Order o a 22, 1979 in Gn reN 4etition or 0pprova$ o (on&o$idation and ubdivi&ion 4$an in accordance wit ection o 0ct 9 and 0ct . +ett . Bi$$anueva, 4etitioner.
oreover, a$mo&t two ear& beore te f$ing o Ju&ta$ero and te eir&Tcomp$aint, te +ureau o Eand&, G$oi$o (it rendered a )eci&ion in te above-&tated Aree 4atent app$ication f$ed b Je&u& J. Ju&ta$ero, dec$aring tat te &ubect $ot, (ada&tra$ Eot =o. 2F9, i& identica$ to Eot 8, 4c&--3 wic i& now tit$ed in te name o =oemi. %ere i& no &owing tat @i$ Ju&ta$ero&Tpred Ju&ta$ero&Tpredece&&or ece&&or-in-inter -in-intere&t, e&t, Je&u& Ju&ta$ero Ju&ta$ero a& Aree 4atent app$icant avai$ed im&e$ o an $ega$ remed to a&&ai$ te &aid deci&ion wic wa& adver&e to im. #ence, i& &ucce&&or&-in-intere&t-erein - Ju&ta$ero and te eir& are bound b te deci&ion.
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
REGISTRATION O( DEEDS
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
G+R+ N+ $66-$3 O."e# 5, 2007 REGISTRATION O( DEEDS SO%SES TANGLAO '+ SO%SES AR%NGAO 9N&65:-;: 3< 74R)T 3=<:R The act o registration by the second buyer must be coupled with good aith and no knowledge o any deect or lack o title o the vendor or that he is not aware o acts which which should should put him upon upon inuir inuiry y and invest investiga igatio tion n as must must be necess necessary ary to acuaint him with deects in the title.
(ACTS) pou&e& 4arungao, purca&ed rom pring #ome& 7 ubdivi&ion Eot& in Eaguna. Re&pon e&ponden dent& t& made made a down down pame pament, nt, $eavin $eaving g a ba$anc ba$ance e e!c$u e!c$u&iv &ive e o inter intere&t e&t.. Re&po e&pond nden ent& t& intr introd oduc uced ed impr improv ovem emen ent& t& on te te $ot& $ot&.. Cnde Cnderr te te ter term& o te te (ontract& to e$$ &igned b re&pondent& and pring #ome&, te ba$ance o wa& to be paid b tem witin one ear rom it& e!ecution. Re&pondent& ai$ed to pa te in&ta$$ment&.
Eater, Eater, pring pring #ome& e!ecuted e!ecuted two &eparate &eparate )eed& o 0b&o$ute 0b&o$ute a$e in avor o &pou&e& %ang$ao, petitioner&, werein te ormer &o$d to te $atter two $ot&. Gt turned out tat te $ot& &o$d to tem were among te $ot& previou&$ &o$d to te &pou&e& 4arungao. Gn a $etter, re&pondent& re&pondent& demanded tat pring #ome& de$iver to tem te corrected corrected (ontract& to &e$$, a& we$$ a& te %(%& covering te $ot& te purca&ed. eanwi$e, petitioner& too5 po&&e&&ion o te two $ot& te bougt. %e orcib$ open opened ed te te &tee &tee$$ gate gate a& we$$ we$$ a& te te door door& & o te te bui$ bui$di ding ng& & an and d en ente terred te te premi&e&. <en inormed o te&e event&, re&pondent& re&pondent& demanded an e!p$anation e!p$anation rom pring #ome&; it apo$ogized and promi&ed &e wou$d &ett$e te matter wit petitioner&. #owever, te controver& wa& not &ett$ed. Re&ponden e&pondentt pou&e& pou&e& 4arung 4arungao ao f$ed wit te #ou&ing #ou&ing and Eand C&e Regu$ator egu$ator +oar +oard d #E #ECR+/ CR+/,, a comp comp$a $ain intt or or an annu nu$m $men entt o deed deed o &a$e &a$e an andQ dQor or retur eturn n o inve&tment or te &even 7/ $ot& and co&t& o improvement&, p$u& intere&t and damage&. Gmp$eaded a& re&pondent& were pring #ome& and petitioner&. )e&pite notice, pring #ome& did not appear during te earing&. %e #ECR+ #ECR+ 0rbiter rendered rendered a )eci&ion ordering ordering re&pondent re&pondent pring #ome& to pa comp$ainant& b wa o reund o pament& and damage&. )i&&ati&fed wit te ru$ing, re&pondent& f$ed a petition or review wit te #ECR+ +oard o (ommi&&ioner&. %e #ECR+ +oard o (ommi&&ioner& rever&ed te 0rbiter& )eci )eci&i &ion on an and d gran grante ted d te te peti petiti tion on or or revie eview w. 4etit etitio ione ner& r& f$ed f$ed a moti motion on or or reco recon&i n&ider derati ation, on, but ti& ti& wa& wa& denied denied b te #ECR #ECR+ + +oard +oard o (ommi (ommi&& &&ion ioner& er&.. 4etitioner& ten f$ed an appea$ wit te OLce o te 4re&ident, wic di&mi&&ed teir teir appea$ appea$ and aLrm aLrmed ed te )eci&i )eci&ion on o te #ECR+ #ECR+ +oard +oard o (ommi& (ommi&&io &ioner ner&. &. 4etitioner& R wa& a$&o denied b te &aid OLce. *ventua$$, petitioner& f$ed wit te (0 a petition or review.%e (0 rendered it& )eci&ion di&mi&&ing te petition, ence ti& petition or Review on (ertiorari ISS%E) <o between te petitioner& and re&pondent& ave te rigt o owner&ip over te two $ot& in controver&.
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
*ELD) 4OC* 40RC=@0O, te fr&t buer.
4*%G%GO= )*=G*). %e )eci&ion o te (0 i& 0AAGR*) in toto. %e owner&ip o immovab$e propert propert &o$d to two di:erent per&on& at di:erent time& i& governed b 0rtic$e 1F o te (ivi$ (ode,2 wic provide&N 0rt. 0rt. 1F. 1F. G te &ame ting ting &ou$d &ou$d ave been been &o$d &o$d to di:er di:erent ent vende vendee&, e&, te te owner owner&i &ip p &a$$ &a$$ be tran& tran&er erre red d to te per&o per&on n wo ma ma ave ave ta5en ta5en po&&e& po&&e&&i &ion on tereo in good ait, i it &ou$d be movab$e propert. ou ou$d $d it be immo immova vab$ b$e e prop proper ert t,, te te owne owner& r&i ip p &a$ &a$$$ be$o be$ong ng to te te per& per&on on acIuiring it wo, in good ait, fr&t recorded it in te Regi&tr o 4ropert. ou$d tere be no in&cription, te owner&ip &a$$ pertain to te per&on wo in good ait wa& fr&t in po&&e&&ion and, in te ab&ence tereo, to te per&on wo pre&ent& te o$de&t tit$e, provided tere i& good ait. Gn a$$ a$$ o te& te&e e ca&e ca&e&, &, good good ait ait i& e&&e e&&ent ntia ia$, $, bein being g te te ba&i ba&ic c prem premi& i&e e o te te preerentia$ rigt& granted to te per&on c$aiming owner&ip o te immovab$e. Gn OcceKa v. *&poni$$a,F ti& (ourt, &pea5ing troug ten 0&&ociate Ju&tice now (ie Ju&tice/ Renato . 4uno, $aid down te o$$owing ru$e& in te app$ication o 0rtic$e 1FN 1/ Unow$edge b te fr&t buer o te &econd &a$e cannot deeat te fr&t buer& rigt& e!cept wen te &econd buer fr&t regi&ter& in good ait te &econd &a$e; and 2/ Unow$edge gained b te &econd buer o te fr&t &a$e deeat& i& rigt& even i e i& fr&t to regi&ter, &ince &uc 5now$edge taint& i& regi&tration wit bad ait. )i:erent$ put, te act o regi&tration b te &econd buer mu&t be coup$ed wit good ait, meaning, te regi&trant regi&trant mu&t ave no 5now$edge o te deect or $ac5 o tit$e o i& vendor or mu&t not ave been aware o act& wic &ou$d put im upon &uc inIuir and inve&tigation a& migt be nece&&ar to acIuaint im wit te deect& in te tit$e o i& vendor. 0t te time o te &econd &a$e to petitioner& b pring #ome&, tere were a$read occupant& and improvement& on te two $ot& in Iue&tion. %e&e act& &ou$d ave put petitioner& on teir guard. ett$ed i& te ru$e tat a buer o rea$ propert in po&&e&&ion po&&e&&ion o per&on& oter tan te &e$$er mu&t be war and &ou$d inve&tigate te rigt& o to&e in po&&e&&ion, or witout &uc inIuir te buer can ard$ be regarded a& a buer in good ait and cannot ave an rigt over te propert. 0& te petitioner& cannot be con&idered buer& in good ait, te cannot re$ upon te te inde indee ea& a&ib ibi$ i$it it o tei teirr %(%& in view view o te te doct doctri rine ne tat tat te te dee deen& n&e e o inde indeea& ea&ibi ibi$it $it o a %orre orren& n& tit$e tit$e doe& doe& not e!ten e!tend d to tran& tran&er eree& ee& wo wo ta5e ta5e te te certifcate o tit$e in bad ait. (on&idering tat re&pondent& wo, in good ait, were fr&t in po&&e&&ion o te &ubect $ot&, we ru$e tat te owner&ip tereo pertain& to tem.
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
G+R+ N+ $70$72 N'e!"e# 23, 2007 REGISTRATION O( DEEDS INEDA VS ARCALAS A levy on e!ecution registered takes preerence over a prior unregistered sale > a regist registere ered d lien lien is entitl entitled ed to pree preeren rentia tiall consid considera eratio tion. n. An e!cept e!ception ion to the preerence given to a registered lien is the case where a party has actual knowledge o the claimant2s actual" open" continuous and notorious possession o the disputed property at the time the levy or attachment is registered.
(ACTS) %e &ubect propert propert con&i&t& o tree parce$& parce$& o $and regi&tered regi&tered in te name o &pou& &pou&e& e& Eateo Eateo.. 0 certai certain n Bicto Bictoria ria %o$ent o$entino ino boug bougtt te &aid &aid prope propert rt rom rom te pou&e& Eateo. ometime $ater, a civi$ ca&e or um o one, wa& in&tituted b 0rca$ 0rca$a& a& again& again&tt Bicto Bictoria ria %o$enti o$entino no.. %i& %i& ca&e ca&e &temm &temmed ed rom rom an indeb indebted tedne& ne&& & evidenced b a promi&&or promi&&or note and our po&t-dated cec5& $ater di&onored, di&onored, wic Bictoria %o$entino owed 0rca$a&. %e Vuezon (it R%( rendered udgment in avor o 0rca$a&. eanwi$e, 4ineda bougt te &ubect propert rom Bictoria E. %o$entino. 4ineda a$$eged tat upon pament o te purca&e purca&e price, &e too5 po&&e&&ion o te &ubect propert but ai$ed to regi&ter te &ubect propert under er name. %o e!ecute te udgment, te Vuezon (it R%( $evied upon te &ubect propert and te =otice o Eev on 0$ia& 4G=*)0? OA %#* F #*(%0R* #*(%0R* 4OR%GO= 4OR%GO= OA EO% 372 G 0ER*0)M*VCGB 0ER*0)M*VCGB0E*=% 0E*=% %O 0 %G%E* )*4G%* %#* 0+*=(* OA R*@G%R0%GO= *ELD) %i& petition mu&t be di&mi&&ed. di&mi&&ed. 4ineda aver& tat &e i& not a part to civi$ ca&e and tat te $ev on te a$ia& writ o e!ecution i&&ued cannot a:ect er purca&e o &ubect propert. uc po&ition run& contrar to $aw and uri&prudence. ection& F1 and an d F2 o 4re& 4re&id iden enti tia$ a$ )ecr )ecree ee =o. =o. 1F29 1F29,, ote oterw rwi& i&e e 5n 5now own n a& te te 4rop 4roper ert t Regi&tration )ecree, provide tatN
ection F1. (onveance and oter dea$ing& b regi&tered owner. 0n owner o regi&tered $and ma conve, mortgage, $ea&e, carge or oterwi&e dea$ wit te &ame in accordance wit e!i&ting $aw&. #e ma u&e &uc orm& o
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
deed&, mortgage&, $ea&e& or oter vo$untar in&trument& a& are &uLcient in $aw. +ut no deed, mortgage, $ea&e, or oter vo$untar in&trument, e!cept a wi$$ purporting purporting to conve or a:ect regi&tered $and &a$$ ta5e e:ect a& a conveance or bind te $and, but but &a$ &a$$$ oper operat ate e on$ on$ a& a cont contra ract ct betw betwee een n te te part partie ie& & an and d a& evid eviden ence ce o autorit to te Regi&ter Regi&ter o )eed& to ma5e regi&tration. regi&tration. %e act o regi&tration regi&tration &a$$ be te operative act to conve or a:ect te $and in&oar a& tird per&on& are concerned, and in a$$ ca&e& under ti& )ecree, te regi&tration &a$$ be made in te oLce o te Regi&ter o )eed& or te province or te cit were te $and $ie&. *mpa&i& provided./ ection F2. (on&tructive notice upon regi&tration. *ve * ver r conv conve ean ance ce,, mort mortga gage ge,, $ea& $ea&e, e, $ien $ien,, atta attac cme ment nt,, orde order, r, udg udgme ment nt,, in&trument or entr a:ecting regi&tered $and &a$$, i regi&tered, f$ed or entered in te oLce o te Regi&ter Regi&ter o )eed& or te province province or cit were te $and to wic it re$ate& $ie&, be con&tructive notice to a$$ per&on& rom te time o &uc regi&tering, f$ing or entering. Gt i& c$ear rom te&e provi&ion& tat beore a purca&er o $and cau&e& te regi&tration o te tran&er o te &ubect propert in er avor, tird per&on&, &uc a& 0rca$a&, cannot be bound tereb. Gn&oar a& tird per&on& are concerned, wat va$id$ tran&er& or conve& a per&on& intere&t in rea$ propert i& te regi&tration regi&tration o te deed. 0& te deed o &a$e wa& unrecorded, unrecorded, it operate& mere$ mere$ a& a contract between te partie&, name$ Bictoria Bictoria %o$entino %o$entino a& &e$$er and 4ineda a& buer, wic ma be enorceab$e again&t Bictoria %o$entino troug a &eparate and independent action. On te oter and, 0rca$a&& 0rca$a&& $ien wa& regi&tered regi&tered and annotated at te bac5 o te tit$e o te &ubect propert and according$ amounted to a con&tructive notice tereo to a$$ per&on&. %e doctrine i& we$$ &ett$ed tat a $ev on e!ecu e!ecutio tion n du$ du$ regi& regi&ter tered ed ta5e& ta5e& pree preere renc nce e over over a prior prior unr unregi egi&te &tere red d &a$e. &a$e. 0 regi& regi&ter tered ed $ien $ien i& en entit tit$ed $ed to pree preere renti ntia$ a$ con&i con&ider derati ation. on. %e %e (ourt (ourt e$d e$d tat tat a regi&tered regi&tered writ o attacment wa& a &uperior $ien over tat on an unregi&tered unregi&tered deed o &a$e becau&e an attacment i& a proceeding in rem.
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
SALE O( REAL ESTATE
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
G+R+ N+ $6--0 Ma#. $2, 2007 ESTATE ESG%ERRA ' TRINIDAD
SALE
O(
REAL
=nit ,rice Contract vs. 5ump )um 4n a unit price contract" the statement o area o immovable is not conclusive and the price may be reduced or increased depending on the area actually delivered. 4 the vendor delivers less than the area agreed upon" the vendee may oblige the vend vendor or to deli delive verr all all that that may may be stat stated ed in the the cont contra ract ct or dema demand nd or or the the proportionate proportionate reduction o the purchase price i delivery is not possible. 4 the vendor delivers more than the area stated in the contract" the vendee has the opti option on to acce accept pt only only the the amou amount nt agre agreed ed upon upon or to acce accept pt the the whol whole e area area"" provided he pays pays or the additional additional area at the contract contract rate. 4n the sale o real estate" made or a lump sum and not at the rate o a certain sum or a unit o measure or number" number" there shall be no increase or decrease o the price" alth althou ough gh ther there e be a grea greate terr or less less area areas s or numb number er than than that that stat stated ed in the the contract. 4n a contract o sale o land in a mass" it is well established that the specifc boundaries stated in the contract must control over any statement with respect to the area contained within its boundaries. 4t is not o vital conseuence that a deed or contract o sale o land should disclose disclose the area with mathematical accuracy. accuracy. 4t is su?cient i its e!tent is objectively indicated with su?cient precision to enable one to identiy it. An error as to the superfcial superfcial area is immaterial. Thus" the obligation o the vendor is to deliver everything within the boundaries" inasmuch as it is the entirety thereo that distinguishes the determinate object. FACTS: Felipe
Esguerra and Praxedes de Vera (Esguerra spouses) owned several parcels of land half of whic which h they sold to their grandchildren grandchildren Feliciano, Feliciano, Canut Canuto, o, Justa Justa,, Ang Angel, el, Fide Fidela, la, Clar Clara a and Pedr Pedro, o, all surna surnaed ed Esguerra! Esguerra! "he spouses sold half the reai reaining ning land were sold their other grandchildr grandchildren, en, the #rothers Eulalio and Julian "rinidad! $u#se%uentlly, the Esguerra spouses executed the necessary &eeds of $ale #efore a notary pu#lic! "hey also executed a deed of partitioning of the lots, all were a#out ', s%uare eteres each! Eulalio "rinidad ("rinidad) later sold his share of the land to his daughters! &uring a cadastral survey conducted in the late *+s, it was discovered that the ',s%uare eter portion of Esguerra-s parcel of land sold to "rinidad actually easured +,.+/ s%uare eters! Feliciano Esguerra (Feliciano), who inha#its the lot #ordering "rinidad, su#se%uently filed a otion for nullification of sale #etween the Esguerra spouses and "rinidad on the ground that they were procured through fraud or isrepresentation! isrepresentation! Feliciano contended that the stipulations stipulations in the deed of sale was that "rinid "r inidad ad was sold a ', ', s%uar s%uare e eter lot! "he #oundaries #oundaries stipulated stipulated in the contr contract act of sale which extend the lot-s area! 0oth cases were consolidated and tried #efore the 1"C which, after trial, disissed the cases! 2n appeal, the appellate court also disissed the cases3 and su#se%uently, the otion for reconsideration was also denied! 4hether or not the Appellate Court erred in holding that the description and #oundaries of the lot override the stated area of the lot in the deed of sale ISSUES:
4here #oth the area and the #oundaries of the iova#le are declared, the area covered within the #oundaries of the iova#le prevails over the stated area! 5n cases of conflict #etween areas and #oundaries, it is the latter which should prevail! HELD:
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
4hat really defines a piece of ground is not the area, calculated with ore or less certainty, entioned in its description, #ut the #oundaries therein laid down, as enclosing the land and indicating its liits! 5n a contract of sale of land in a ass, it is well esta#lished that the specific #oundaries stated in the contract ust control over any stateent with respect to the area contained within its #oundaries! 5t is not of vital conse%uence that a deed or contract of sale of land should disclose the area with atheatical accuracy! 5t is sufficient if its extent is o#6ectively indicated with sufficient precision to ena#le one to identify it! An error as to the superficial area is iaterial! "hus, the o#ligation of the vendor is to deliver everything within the #oundaries, inasuch as it is the entirety thereof that distinguishes the deterinate o#6ect!
7nder the "orrens $yste, an 2C" en6oys a presuption of validity, which correlatively carries a strong presuption that the provisions of the law governing the registration of land which led to its issuance have #een duly foll followed! owed! Fraud #eing a seri serious ous charge, it ust #e suppor supported ted #y clear and convincing convincing proof! Petitioners failed to discharge the #urden of p roof, however! "he sae rule shall #e applied when two or ore iova#le are sold for a single price3 #ut if, #esides entioning the #oundaries, which is indispensa#le in every conveyance of real estate, its area or nu nu#er #er should should #e desi designa gnated ted in the con contra tract, ct, the ven vendor dor sha shall ll #e #ou #ound nd to del deliv iver er all that is included within said #oundaries, even when it exceeds the area or nu#er specified in the contract3 and, should he not #e a#le to do so, he shall suffer a reduction in the price, in proportion to what is lac8ing in the area or nu#er, unless the contract is rescinded #ecause the vendee does not accede to the failure to deliver what has #een stipulated! 5n fine, under Article '9., what is controlling is the entire land included within the #oundaries, regardless of whether the real area should #e greater or saller than that recited in the deed! "his is particularly true since the area of the land in 2C" :o! +9*/ was descri#ed in the deed as ;huigit 8uulang,; that is, ore or less! A caveat is in order, however! "he use of ;ore or less; or siilar words in designating %uantity covers only a reasona#le excess or deficiency! A vendee of land sold in gross or with the description ;ore or less; with reference to its area does not there#y ipso facto ta8e all ris8 of %uantity in the land!
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
TORRENS CERTI(ICATE O( TITLE
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
G+R+ N+ $33$$0 Ma. 2, 2007 O( TITLE ARSTO:E *ILS VS RE%LIC
TORRENS CERTI(ICATE
The Republic may not go ater innocent purchasers o lots o a subdivision owner @who is guilty o securing titles raudulently who looked into TCTs TCTs o developer and ound nothing to raise doubts as to their validity and authenticity.
(ACTS) %i& ca&e invo$ve& te con6icting tit$e& to te &ame parce$& o $and &ubect $ot&/ o petitioner +ar&towe 4i$ippine& (orporation +4(/ and te re&pondent Repub$ic o te 4i$ippine& Repub$ic/. )ue to te fre tat gutted te OLce o te Vuezon (it Regi&ter o )eed& on 11 June 1988 and de&troed man certifcate& o tit$e 5ept terein, 0ntonio &ougt te admini&trative recon&titution o te origina$ copie& and owner owner& & dup$i dup$icat cate e copie copie& & o 2 %(%&. (%&. %e Repub$i epub$ic c app$ie app$ied d or admini admini&tr &trati ative ve recon&titution recon&titution o te &ame wit te ER0. Gt wa& ten tat te Repub$ic Repub$ic came to 5now tat anoter part ad app$ied or recon&titution wic a$&o covered te &ame $ot&. %e R%( rendered rendered udgment dec$aring bot +4( and Repub$ic Repub$ic a& buer& in good ait. +ut it upe$d +4(& rigt& over te repub$ic &ince it wa& regi&tered regi&tered ear$ier. ear$ier. %e (a ru$ed or te Repub$ic. ISS%E) <o between +4( and te Repub$ic a& a better tit$e over te &ubect $ot&H *ELD) C$timate$, ti& (ourt i& ca$$ed upon to determine wic part now a& &uperior tit$e to te &ubect $ot&N te Repub$ic, +4(, te intervenor& 0be&ami&, =ico$a&-0gbu$o&, and &pou&e& antiago, or ervando& eir&H
+4(, te intervenor& 0be&ami&, =ico$a&-0gbu$o&, &pou&e& antiago, and ervando& eir& derived teir tit$e to te &ubect $ot& rom ervando& %(%& =o. 229 and 23. %i& (ourt ten i& compe$$ed to $oo5 into te va$idit, autenticit, and e!i&tence o te&e te &e two %(%&. #owever, tere i& an ab&o$ute deart o inormation and proo a& to ow ervando acIuired owner&ip and came into po&&e&&ion o te &ubect $ot&. Re$ing on te fnding& o te ER0, it wa& e&tab$i&ed tat %(%& =o. 229 and 23 were orged and &puriou&, teir recon&titution wa& a$&o attended wit grave irregu$aritie&. +4( wa& unab$e to attac5 te autenticit and va$idit o te tit$e& o te Repub$ic to te &ubect $ot&, and cou$d on$ interpo&e te deen&e tat it wa& a buer in good ait. Gt point& out tat it purca&ed te &ubect $ot& rom ervando and regi&tered te &ame, wa beore te tit$e& o ervando were dec$ared nu$$ b te R%(. Cnder ection FF o te Eand Regi&tration 0ct, a& amended b ection F3 o 4re&identia$ )ecree =o. 1F29, an origina$ owner o regi&tered $and ma &ee5 te annu$ment o a tran&er tereo on te ground o raud. #owever, &uc a remed i& witout preudice to te rigt& o an innocent o$der or va$ue wit a certifcate o tit$e. 0 purca&er in good ait and or va$ue i& one wo bu& te propert o anoter, witout notice tat &ome oter per&on a& a rigt to or intere&t in &uc propert, and pa& a u$$ and air price or te &ame at te time o &uc purca&e purca&e or beore e a& notice o te c$aim or intere&t o &ome oter per&on in te propert. Gt a& been con&i&tent$ ru$ed tat a orged deed can $ega$$ be te root o a va$id tit$e wen an innocent purca&er or va$ue intervene&. 0 deed o &a$e e!ecuted b an impo&tor witout te autorit o te owner o te $and &o$d i& a nu$$it, and
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
regi&tration wi$$ not va$idate wat oterwi&e i& an inva$id document. #owever, were te certifcate o tit$e wa& a$read tran&erred rom te name o te true owner to te orger and, wi$e it remained tat wa, te $and wa& &ub&eIuent$ &o$d to an innocent purca&er, te vendee ad te rigt to re$ upon wat appeared in te certif certifcat cate e and, and, in te ab&enc ab&ence e o ant anting ing to e!cit e!cite e &u&p &u&pici icion, on, wa& wa& under under no ob$igation to $oo5 beond te certifcate and inve&tigate te tit$e o te vendor appearing on te ace o &aid certifcate. =ow te Iue&tion i& weter +4( Iua$ife& a& an innocent purca&er purca&er or va$ue wic acIui acIuire red d va$id va$id tit$e& tit$e& to te &ubect &ubect $ot&, $ot&, de&pit de&pite e te act tat tat te tit$e& tit$e& o it& predece&&or-in-intere&t were ound to be orged and &puriou&. %i& (ourt fnd& in te negative. +4( cannot rea$$ c$aim tat it wa& a purca&er in good ait wic re$ied upon te ace o ervando& tit$e&. Gt &ou$d be reca$$ed tat te Vuezon (it Regi&ter o )eed& caugt fre on 11 June 1988. 4re&umab$, te origina$ copie& o %(%& were burnt in te &aid fre. ervando& eir& &ougt te admini&trative recon&titution o te %(%&. G +4( bougt te &ubect $ot& ater %(%& were de&troed wen te Vuezon (it (it Regi& egi&te terr o )eed )eed& & burn burned ed down down,, but but beo beorre te te &aid &aid cert certif ifca cate te& & wer were recon&tituted, ten on te ace o wat tit$e& did +4( re$ on beore deciding to proceed wit te purca&e o te &ubect $ot&H %ere wa& no &owing tat tere were &urviving owner& dup$icate copie& o %(%&.
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
!!!! ignifcant$, te oter private re&pondent& X pou&e& anto&, pou&e& (a$aguian, )e$a Auente and adaa X bougt &uc De!pandedD $ot& in good ait, re$ing on te c$ean certifcate& o t. Jude, wic ad no notice o an 6aw in tem eiter. Gt i& on$ on$ air air and rea& rea&ona onab$e b$e to app$ app$ te eIuit eIuitab$ ab$e e princ princip ip$e $e o e&topp e&toppe$ e$ b $ace& $ace& again&t te government to avoid an inu&tice to te innocent purca&er& or va$ue.
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
AR 8%ESTIONS) TOIC) TORRENS SYSTEM ;$--0, $--$, $--4, $--, 200$< G ection 7 o 4) 1F29, concerning adver&e c$aim& on regi&tered $and, provide& a 3-da period o e:ectivit o an adver&e c$aim, counted rom te date o it& regi&tration. uppo&e a notice o adver&e c$aim ba&ed upon a contract to &e$$ wa& regi&tered on arc 1, 1997 at te in&tance o te +CM*R, but on June 1, 1997, or ater te $ap&e o te 3-da period, a notice o $ev on e!ecution e!ecution in avor o a JC)@*=% JC)@*=% (R*)G%OR wa& a$&o regi&tere regi&tered d to enorce a fna$ udgment or mone mone again&t again&t te regi&t regi&ter ered ed owner owner.. %en, %en, on Jun June e 1F, 1F, 1997 1997 tere tere aving been been no orma$ orma$ cance$$ation o i& notice o adver&e c$aim, te +CM*R pa& to te &e$$er-owner te agreed purca&e price in u$$ and regi&ter& te corre&ponding deed o &a$e. +ecau&e te annotation o te notice o $ev i& carried over to te new tit$e in i& name, te +CM*R bring& an action again&t te JC)@*=% (R*)G%OR to cance$ &uc annotation, but te $atter c$aim& tat i& $ien i& &uperior becau&e becau&e it wa& annotated annotated ater ater te adver& adver&e e c$aim c$aim o te +CM*R +CM*R ad ipso act acto o cea&ed to be e:ective.
GG Gn 19, an unregi&tered parce$ o $and wa& mortgaged b owner O to , a ami$ riend, a& co$$atera$ or a $oan. O acted troug i& attorne in act, &on, , wo wa& du$ autorized b wa o a &pecia$ power o attorne, werein O dec$ared tat e wa& te ab&o$ute owner o te $and, tat te ta! dec$aration&Qreceipt& were a$$ i&&ued in i& name, and tat ea& been in open,
continuou& and adver&e po&&e&&ion in te concept o owner. 0& O wa& unab$e to pa bac5 te $oan p$u& intere&t or te pa&t fve F/ ear&, ad to orec$o&e te mortgage. 0t te orec$o&ure &a$e, wa& te ige&t bidder. Cpon i&&uance o te &eri:& fna$ deed o &a$e and regi&tration in Januar, 19, te mortgage propert wa& turned over to & po&&e&&ion and contro$. a& &ince ten deve$oped te &aid propert. propert. Gn 197, O died, &urvived b &on& and 4. Gn 1977, ater te tent 1 t/ deat anniver&ar o i& ater O, &on 4 f$ed a &uit to annu$ te mortgage deed and &ub&eIuent &a$e o te propert, etc., on te ground o raud. #e a&&erted tat te propert in Iue&tion wa& conuga$ in nature actua$$ be$onging, at te time o te mortgage, to O and i& wie, <, wo&e conuga$ &are went to teir &on& and 4/ and to O. (. G& te te &ui &uitt f$e f$ed d b b 4 bar barre red d b pre& pre&cr crip ipti tion onH H *!p$ *!p$ai ain n our our an& an&we werr. ). 0ter ter te i&& i&&uan uance o te te &eri eri: :& & fna$ fna$ deed deed o &a$e &a$e in 19 19 in ti ti& ca& ca&e, a&&uming tat app$ied or regi&tration under te %orren& &tem and wa& i&&ued a %orren& %orren& %it$e to te &aid propert in Iue&tion, wou$d tat added act ave an &ignifcant e:ect on our conc$u&ionH tate our rea&on. 199/ ANS:ERS) 0. Cnde Cnderr 0rt. 0rt. 173 173,, ((, ((, te te acti action on i& i& barr barred ed b b pre& pre&cr crip ipti tion on bec becau au&e &e te te wi wie e ad ad on$ ten 1/ ear& rom te tran&action and during te marriage to f$e a &uit or te annu$ment o te mortgage deed.
+. G ad ad &ecu &ecurred a %or %orrren& en& %it$ %it$e e to te te $and $and,, a$$ a$$ te te mor more and 4 cou$ cou$d d not not recover becau&e i at a$$ teir remedie& wou$d beN 3. 0 4eti 4etiti tion on to Rev Revie iew w te )ecr )ecree ee o reg regi& i&tr trat atio ion. n. %i& %i& can can be avai avai$e $ed d o wit witin in one one 1/ ear rom te entr tereo, but on$ upon te ba&i& o "actua$ raud.' %ere i& no &owing tat committed actua$ raud in &ecuring i& tit$e to te $and; or
. 0n actio action n in personam again&t or te reconveance o te tit$e in teir avor avor.. 0gain 0gain,, ti& ti& remed remed i& avai$a avai$ab$e b$e witin witin our our / ear& ear& rom rom te date o te di&cover o te raud but not $ater tan ten 1/ ear& rom te date o regi&tration
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
o te tit$e in te name o . ALTERNATIVE ANS:ER) 0. %e mortgage contract e!ecuted b O, i at a$$, i& on$ a voidab$e contract &ince it invo$ve& a conuga$ partner&ip propert. %e action to annu$ te &ame in&tituted in 1977, or e$even ear& ater te e!ecution e!ecution o te &eri:& fna$ &a$e, a& obviou&$ pre&cribed pre&cribed becau&eN
3. 0n action to annu$ a contract on te ground o raud mu&t be brougt witin our / ear& rom te date o di&cover o te raud. ince ti& i& in e&&ence an action to recover owner&ip, it mu&t be rec5oned rom te date o e!ecution o te contract or rom te regi&tration o te a$$eged raudu$ent document wit te a&&e&&or& oLce or te purpo&e o tran&erring te ta! dec$aration, ti& being unregi&tered $and 3ael vs. 4AC" @R =o. E- 723 Januar 3, 1989, 19 19 (R0 17/. 17/. . G te action i& to be treated a& an action to recover owner&ip o $and, it wou$d ave pre&cribed u&t te &ame becau&e more tan ten 1/ ear& ave a$read e$ap&ed &ince te date o te e!ecution o te &a$e. ANOT*ER ALTERNATIVE ANS:ER) 0. %e action to recover a& been barred b acIui&itive pre&cription pre&cription in avor o con&idering tat a& po&&e&&ed te $and under a c$aim o owner&ip or ten 1/ ear& wit a u&t tit$e. 8%ESTION 8%ESTION N+$) An=e >ed a pe//n pe//n 1# #e=/#a/ #e=/#a/n n 1 a pa#.e pa#.e 1 and n Jne 22, $--4 .a/!/n= a e a "een /n a.a, pen, .n/n and n#/ pe/n, /n e .n.ep 1 an ?ne# 'e# e a!e+ I appea# a e /@e?/e >ed a 1#e#e eae app/.a/n 'e# e a!e and /n $-77+ D#/n= e #/a, e .# #de#ed e LRA and e CENRO >e ?/ / a #ep# n e a 1 e "e. and+ Te .# e#ea1e# #ende#ed a de.//n n MaB 3 $--5 =#an/n= e pe// pe//n+ n+ Te a/d a/d de.// de.//n n "e.a!e "e.a!e >na >na and ee.#B ee.#B++ Te O.e O.e 1 e S/ S /./ ./ # # =ene =ene#a #a " "e ee en nB B >ed >ed a pe/ pe// /n n 1# 1# ann ann! !en en 1 e e a"' a"'e e d=!en n e =#nd a "aed n e #ep# 1 e LRA ?/. ?a #e.e/'ed "B / n Jne 22, $--5, e and app/ed 1# / 1#e#e and+ a< "<
:a :a / e e na na# #e e and and .a .a/ />. >.a a/ /n n 1 1 1# 1#e e #e #e and andF F :/ :/ e e a. a./ /n n 1 1 e e Re Rep p" "/. /. # #= = e e OS OSG G p# p#p pe# e#F F
ANS:ERS) a/ NO+ Aore&ore $and i& tat &trip o $and tat $ie& between te ig and $ow water mar5& and i& a$ternative$ wet and dr to te 6ow o te tide. Gt i& tat part o te $and adacent to te &ea, wic i& a$ternative$ covered and $et dr b te ordinar 6ow o tide&. Gt i& part o te a$ienab$e $and o te pub$ic domain and ma be di&po&ed o on$ b $ea&e and not oterwi&e. Aore&ore Aore&ore $and remain& part o te pub$ic domain and i& out&ide te commerce o man. Gt i& not capab$e o private appropriation.
b/ YES+ *ven i te deci&ion o te R%( a& become fna$ and e!ecutor, te action or annu$ment o udgment &ou$d be &u&tained &ince it i& impre&&ed wit pub$ic intere&t. %e tate a& to protect it& intere&t& and cannot be bound b, or e&topped rom, te mi&ta5e& or neg$ neg$ig igen entt act& act& o it& it& oLci oLcia$ a$& & or agen agent& t&,, mu& mu& more more,, nonnon-&u &uit ited ed a& a re&u re&u$t $t ter tereo eo. Aurtermore, 0nge$ ad in act f$ed a ore&ore $ea&e app$ication in 1977 and paid te corre&ponding ee& tereon. %ere i& tereore doubt to 0nge$& c$aim tat e ad been in actua$, open, notoriou&, and continuou& po&&e&&ion in te concept o an owner. owner. @Republic vs Court o Appeals" ;R No. #+B*#B" une +" +$$D
8%ESTION N+2) On De.e!"e# 27, $-76, (#an./. >ed a pe//n 1# #e=/#a/n 1 e #ee pa#.e 1 and+ *e ae=ed e#e/n a e#e ?e#e a#dB anB "/= #ee /n e "e. p#pe#B and a e and / p#ede.e#/n/ne#e e'en paned "anana, .aa'a, ..n #ee and .a!e n e a!e+ *e 1#e# ae=ed a e ad "een /n a.a, pen, n#/ and .n/n pe/n 1 e p#pe#B /n e .n.ep 1 ?ne#+ ?ne#+ Te app/.a/n ?a pped "B e D/#e.# 1 Land n e =#nd a e "e. p#pe#B ?a 1#e and and ?a nB #e.a/>ed a a/ena"e and d/pa"e nB n Ap#/ $6, $-73+ a< S Sd d e e pe pe/ // /n n 1# 1# #e=/ #e=/ #a #a/ /n n "e =#an =#ane edF dF "< I e e a" a"en en.e .e 1 1 "/= "/= #ee #ee .n. .n. /' /'e e a #e= #e=a# a#d d e e .a .a/ />. >.a a/ /n n 1 a pa#.e 1 and a n "en=/n= 1#e andF ANS:ERS) a/
Cnder ecti ection on o (ommo (ommonwe nwea$ a$t t 0ct 0ct =o.1 =o.11 1,, te c$a&&ifcation c$a&&ifcation and NO+ Cnder
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
rec$a&&ifcation o pub$ic $and& into a$ienab$e or di&po&ab$e, minera$ or ore&t $and i& te prerogative prerogative o te *!ecutive )epartment. )epartment. %e ru$e on te confrmation confrmation o imperect imperect tit$e doe& not app$ un$e&& and unti$ te $and c$a&&ifed a& ore&t $and i& re$ea&ed in an oLcia$ proc$amation to tat e:ect &o tat it ma orm part o te di&po&ab$e agricu$tura$ $and& o te pub$ic pub$ic domain domain.. Aranci&c ranci&co o ai$ed ai$ed to adduce adduce in eviden evidence ce an certif certifcati cation on rom rom te +ureau o Eand& or te +ureau o Aore&tr to te e:ect tat te propert i& a$ienab$e or di&po&ab$e. di&po&ab$e. Aurter Aurtermore more,, &ince te propert propert wa& rec$a&&ifed rec$a&&ifed a& a$ienab$e a$ienab$e and di&po&ab$e on$ on 0pri$ 1, 1973 1973 and Aranci&co f$ed i& app$ication on$ on )ecember 27, 197, e irreragab$ ai$ed to prove i& po&&e&&ion o te propert or te reIui&ite tirt 3/-ear period. b/ NO+ 0 ore&ted area c$a&&ifed a& ore&t $and o te pub$ic domain doe& not $o&e &uc c$a&&ifcation &imp$ becau&e $ogger& or &ett$er& ma ave &tripped it o it& ore&t cover. 4arce$& o $and c$a&&ifed a& ore&t $and ma actua$$ be covered wit gra&& or p$anted to crop& b 9aingin cu$tivator& or oter armer&. "Aore&t Eand&' do not ave to be in te mountain& or in out o te wa p$ace&. wamp area& covered b mangrove tree&,
nipa pa$m& and oter tree& growing in brac5i& or &ea water ma a$&o be c$a&&ifed a& ore&t $and. %e c$a&&ifcation i& de&criptive o it& $ega$ nature or &tatu& and doe& not ave to be de&cripti de&criptive ve o wat te $and actua$$ actua$$ $oo5& $i5e. $i5e. @Earate vs -irector o 5ands" ;R No. #*#$#" uly #D" uly #D" +$$D 8%ESTION N+3) Te pe &ea "a/ned 1#! GSIS 'a#/ an e.#ed "B #ea eae !#=a=e 'e# pa#.e 1 and+ Te pe &ea 1a/ed paB e/# an ?/. p#!ped GSIS 1#e.e e #ea eae !#=a=e+ D#/n= e a./n ae, !e 1 e !#=a=ed p#pe#/e ?e#e a?a#ded GSIS+ *?e'e#, !e ?/. ?e#e .'e#ed "B e !#=a=ed !#=a=ed /e ?e#e ep#eB e.ded 1#! e a./n /n.e e a ?e#e d ?e#e ./en paB 1# a e !#=a=e de"+ T/ n?/and/n= n?/and/n= GSIS /n.ded e e.ded ?en / ee.ed n N'e!"e# 25, 25, $-75 $-75 an Ada Ada'/ '/ 1 Cn Cn /d /da a/ /n n 1 O? O?ne ne# #/ /p p n e e "a/ "a/ 1 ?/. ?/., , .e#/> .e#/>.a .ae e 1 /e /e 'e# 'e# e a!e ?e#e ?e#e /ed /ed /n e na!e 1 GSIS+ GSIS+ &e &ea a e#ea1e# #an1e##ed / #/= 'e# e e.ded Eda#d /n $-- ? .neenB de!anded 1#! GSIS e #e#n 1 e a/d e.ded + Eda#d en >ed n MaB 7, $--0 a .!pa/n 1# #e.n'eBan.e 1 #ea eae a=a/n e GSIS+
"<
a< Can Can GSIS GSIS e=a e=aB B .a/ .a/! ! ?ne ?ne# #/ /p p 'e 'e# # e e e. e. de ded d p#p p#pe# e#/ /e e n n e e "a/ 1 e .e#/>.ae 1 /e 'e# e a!e ?/. ?e#e /ed /n / na!eF *a *a e e a./ a./n n 1# 1# #e. #e.n n'e 'eBa Ban. n.e e p#e p#e. .#/ #/"e "edF dF
ANS:ERS) a/ NO+ *ven i tit$e& over te $ot& ad been i&&ued in te name o te @G, &ti$$ it cou$d not $ega$$ c$aim c$aim owner& owner&ip ip and ab&o$ut ab&o$ute e dominio dominion n over over tem becau&e indeea&ib indeea&ibi$it i$it o tit$e tit$e under under te %orren& %orren& &&tem doe& not attac to tit$e& &ecured b raud or mi&repre&entation. %e raud committed b @G in te orm o concea$ment o te e!i&tence o &aid $ot& and ai$ure to return te &ame to te rea$ owner& ater teir e!c$u&ion rom te orec$o&ure &a$e made @G o$der& in bad ait. Gt i& we$$ &ett$ed tat a o$der in bad ait o a certifcate o tit$e i& not entit$ed to te protection o te $aw or te $aw cannot be u&ed a& a &ie$d or raud. b/ NO+ 0rtic$e 1F o te (ivi$ (ode provide&N G te propert i& acIuired troug mi&ta5e or raud, te per&on obtaining it i&, b orce o $aw, con&idered a tru&tee o an imp$ied tru&t or te beneft o te per&on rom wom te propert come&. 0n action or reconveance ba&ed on imp$ied or con&tructive tru&t pre&cribe& in ten ear& rom te a$$eged raudu$ent regi&tration or date o i&&uance o te certifcate o tit$e over te propert. %e genera$ ru$e tat te di&cover o rau raud d i& deem deemed ed to ave ave ta5 ta5en p$ace p$ace upon upon te regi regi&tr &trati ation on o rea$ rea$ prope propert rt beca becau&e u&e it i& "con&idered a con&tructive notice to a$$ per&on&' doe& not app$ in ti& ca&e. %e ca&e in point i& )amonte )amonte vs Court o Appeals were te upreme (ourt rec5oned te pre&criptive period or te f$ing o te action ba&ed on imp$ied tru&t rom te actua$ di&cover o te raud. antiago came 5now o @G raudu$ent act& on$ in 1989 and te comp$aint wa& f$ed in 199. Ao$$owing te (ourt& (ourt& pronounceme pronouncement nt in )amonte, te in&titution in&titution o te action or reconveance reconveance wa& tu& we$$ witin te pre&criptive period. @;)4) vs )antiago" ;R No. #+$B" &ctober +F" +$$* 8%ESTION N+ 4) In A= $-50, e Rep"/. 1 e //pp/ne >ed an app/.a/n ?/ e .ada#a .ada#a .# .a/!/n= ?ne#/p 'e# .e#a/n p#pe#/e ?/. .'e#ed L 432-+ G/e#! >ed an an?e# .a/!/n= e#e/n a #/= 'e# L 432-+ G/e#! d/ed d#/ d#/n= n= e e pend penden en.B .B 1 e e .ae .ae++ G#e= G#e=# #/ /,, ? ? .a/ .a/!e !ed d "e e e nB nB n n 1
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
G/e#!, "/ed e ae#, and /!, L 432- ?a add/.aed "B e .#+ Te de.//n "e.a!e >na and ee.#B+ ee.#B+ On JB , $-5, OCT N+ 06,$5$ ?a /ed / ed /n e na!e 1 G#e=#/+ S!e/!e e#ea1e#, e "#e# and /e# 1 G/e#! G/e#! >ed a .!pa/n .!pa/n 1# #e.'e#B 1 pe/n pe/n ?/ da!a=e da!a=e a=a/n a=a/n G#e=#/, ae=/n= a G/e#! d/ed /n=e and ?/ /e and a G#e=#/ "a/ned /e e p#pe#B #= 1#ad de.e/ and =# !/#ep#eena/n+ TeB p#aBed a G#e=#/H /e "e .an.eed and e p#pe#B "e #e.n'eBed e!+ A1e# e #/a, e .# de.a#ed a G#e=#/ a n ./enB p#'ed a e / e n 1 G/e#! " #ed a e a e #/= 1 pe/n 1 e d/p d/p ed ed p#p p#pe# e#B B++ I G#e= G#e=# #/ / en/ en/e ed d e e p pe e/ /n n 1 e e d/p d/p ed ed p#pe#BF ANS:ER) ANS:ER) YES+ @regorio wa& ab$e to obtain a tit$e in i& name over te Iue&tioned propert ater ater te cada&tra$ proceeding& proceeding& in&tituted in&tituted b te Repub$ic. Repub$ic. %i& %orr %orren& en& tit$e i& now a conc$u&ive conc$u&ive evidence o i& owner&ip o te &ubect $and. 0ter te e!piration o te one-ear period rom te i&&uance o te decree o regi&tration, te &aid certifcate o tit$e became incontrovertib$e. Gn fne, weter or not i& tit$e wa& obtained raudu$ent$ i& beond te competence o te upreme (ourt (ourt to determ determine. ine. %e i&&ue i&&ue &ou$d &ou$d ave ave been been rai&ed rai&ed during during te proceedi proceeding ng beor beore e te cada&tra$ court. 0 %orren& tit$e cannot be co$$atera$$ attac5ed, te i&&ue on te va$idit o tit$e, i.e. weter or not it wa& raudu$ent$ raudu$ent$ i&&ued can on$ be rai&ed in an action e!pre&&$ e!pre&&$ in&tituted or tat purpo&e. %e praer or te cance$$ation o @regorio& tit$e and te reconveance o te &ame to broter& and &i&ter& o @ui$$ermo i& $ega$$ impo&&ib$e. %o &u&tain te &aid action wou$d be incon&i&tent wit te ru$e tat te act o regi&tration i& te operative act tat conve& a parce$ o $and to it& regi&tered owner under te %orren& &&tem. <at we are empa&izing i& tat, a$toug @regorio a& not &uLcient$ proved i& f$iation to te $ate @ui$$ermo, te act tat e a& a $ega$ tit$e over te &ubect $and entit$e& im to po&&e&&ion tereo, pending te fna$ determination o te va$idit o te tit$e i&&ued to im in an appropriate proceeding.
LAND REGISTRATION
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
G+R+ N+ $6665 Ma#. 2, 2007 REGISTRATION ena'en#a '+ Rep"/.
LAND
(ACTS) 4etitioner& 0nge$ita and 4recio&a are te app$icant& or regi&tration o tit$e over te &ubect propert. %e are te eir& o &pou&e& 0mado +uenaventura and Grene A$ore& &pou&e& +uenaventura/ rom wom te acIuired te &ubect propert. %e &ube &ubect ct prope propert rt wa& acIui acIuire red d b te &pou& &pou&e& e& +uenav +uenavent entura ura rom rom te #eir& #eir& o Eazaro de Eeon, beore
0n 0pp$ication or Regi&tration o %it$e on F June 2 were f$ed beore te R%( o 4aranaIue werein petitioner& pre&ented witne&&e& in order to e&tab$i& te act tat petitioner& and teir predece&&or& ave acIuired ve&ted rigt over te &ubect propert in te manner and or te period reIuired b $aw; $i5ewi&e, to prove te a$ienab$e and di&po&ab$e caracter o te propert &ince 3 Januar 198 a& certifed b te )*=R. )*=R. R%( R%( granted te petition. Repub$ic appea$ed to te (ourt o 0ppea$& a$$eging tat petitioner& ai$ed to prove continuo continuou&, u&, open, open, e!c$u&i e!c$u&ive ve and notoriou notoriou& & po&&e&&i po&&e&&ion on b teir teir predece predece&&o &&or&-i r&-innintere&t and b tem&e$ve&. %e (0 rever&ed te tria$ court& deci&ion and dec$ared te &ubect propert a pub$ic $and. ISS%ES) G. <eter or not te (ourt o 0ppea$& erred in nu$$iing te )eci&ion o te tria$ court confrming petitioner& tit$e over te &ubect propert or not being a$$eged$ &upported b &ub&tantia$ evidence a& reIuired b $aw. M*/
GG. <et <eter er or not te (ourt (ourt o 0ppea 0ppea$& $& grave grave$ $ erre erred d in dec$a dec$arin ring g te te &ube &ubect ct prop proper ert t a& pub$ pub$ic ic $and $and an and d igno ignori ring ng peti petiti tion oner er& & evid eviden ence ce o over over 3 ear ear po&&e&&ion in te concept o an owner and comp$ete$ unmo$e&ted b an adver&e c$aim. M*/ *ELD) 4etitioner& o:ered in evidence a certifcation rom te )epartment o *nvironment and =atura =atura$$ Re&our e&ource& ce&,, to prove prove tat tat te te &ube &ubect ct prope propert rt wa& wa& a$ien a$ienab$ ab$e e and di&po&ab$e $and o te pub$ic domain. uc certifcation i& &uLcient, in te ab&ence o contrar evidence, to prove te caracter o te $and.
Aurtermore, petitioner& were ab$e to prove &uLcient$ troug teir witne&&e&/ tat te ave been in po&&e&&ion o te &ubect propert or more tan 3 ear&, wic po&&e&&ion i& caracterized a& open, continuou&, e!c$u&ive, and notoriou&, in te concept o an owner. + ti&, te &ubect a$ienab$e and di&po&ab$e pub$ic $and ad been e:ective$ converted into private propert over wic petitioner& ave acIuired owner&ip troug pre&cription to wic te are entit$ed to ave tit$e troug regi&tration proceeding&. 4etitioner& rigt to ave teir tit$e to te &ubect prop proper ert t regi& egi&te terred cann cannot ot be dee deeat ated ed &imp &imp$ $ beca becau& u&e e te te po&& po&&e& e&&i &ion on o peti petiti tion oner er& & comm commen ence ced d on a date date $ate $aterr tan tan 12 Ju June ne 19F 19F,, or or te te $aw $aw an and d &upp$eme &upp$ementin nting g uri&pru uri&prudenc dence e amp$, amp$, u&t$ u&t$ and rigtu rigtu$$ $$ provide& provide& te nece&&a nece&&ar r remed to wat wou$d oterwi&e re&u$t in an unu&t and unwarranted &ituation. Gt wou$d be te eigt o inu&tice i petitioner& regi&tration o tit$e over te &aid propert wi$$ be denied &o$e$ on tat ground.
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
G+R+ N+ $70724 Jana#B 2-, 2007 REGISTRATION Rep"/. ' San L#en
LAND
)ection DF @b o Commonwealth Act No. #D#" as amended @,ublic 5and Act" and )ectio )ection n #D @# o ,resid ,resident ential ial -ecree -ecree #+/" #+/" otherw otherwis ise e known known as the the ,roper ,roperty ty Regist Registra ratio tion n -ecree -ecree"" reui reuire re that that the applic applican ants ts must must prove prove that that the the land land is alienable and disposable public land% and that they or through their predecessors in interest" have been in open" continuous" e!clusive" and notorious possession and occupation o the alienable and disposable land o the public domain" under a bona fde claim o acuisition or ownership" since une #+" #/D
(ACTS) an Eore Eorenzo nzo )eve$o )eve$opm pment ent (orpor (orporati ation on f$ed f$ed wit wit te te %(( %(( o )anao )anao (it (it an app$ication or regi&tration o tit$e to a parce$ o $and. %i& wa& oppo&ed b te Repub$ic. %e date or te initia$ earing wa& re&et or man time&. %e ca&e ca$$ed a$oud in open court to determine weter tere were oter oppo&itor& a&ide rom te Repub$i epub$ic. c. %ere %ere being being none, none, te court court i&&ue i&&ued d an Order Order o @enera @enera$$ )eau$ )eau$t. t. Re&pondent (orporation pre&ented &evera$ document& and witne&&e& a& evidence. %(( rendered deci&ion granting re&pondent& app$ication.
Gt i& important to ta5e note o te o$$owing date&N a 1F, 1988 X %e tria$ court i&&ued an order June , 1988 X %e %e notice o initia$ initia$ earing earing wa& i&&ued i&&ued eptember 23, 1988 X %e earing wa& actua$$ e$d On appea$, petitioner Repub$ic maintain& tat te (%( never acIuired uri&diction over te ca&e on account o it& ai$ure to conduct te initia$ earing tereo witin te period f!ed in ection 23 o 4.). =o. 1F29 wic mandate& tat te date and our o initia$ earing &a$$ not be ear$ier tan F da& nor $ater tan 9 da& rom te date o te Order. Gn &uc ca&e, te initia$ earing &ou$d ave been &et =O% ear$ier tan June 29, 1988 F da& rom a 1F, 1998/ and =O% $ater tan 0ugu&t 13, 1998 wic i& 9 da& rom a 1F, 1998/. (0 di&mi&&ed Repub$ic& appea$. ISS%E) <eter or not te deective notice o pub$ication o initia$ earing ve&ted te tria$ court wit uri&diction *ELDN M*. Re&pondent Re&pondent (orporation &ou$d =O% +* A0CE%*) 0CE%*) i te initia$ earing wa& conducted on eptember 23, 199F wa& out&ide te 9-da period &et ort under ect ectio ion n 23 o 4re& 4re&id iden enti tia$ a$ )ecr )ecree ee =o. =o. 1F29 1F29.. Re&po e&pond nden entt (orp (orpor orat atio ion n a a& & &ub&tantia$$ comp$ied wit te reIuirement& under te regi&tration o te $and.
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
0 part cannot intervene in matter& witin te e!c$u&ive power o te tria$ court. =o au$t i& attributab$e to &uc part i te tria$ court err& on matter& witin it& &o$e power. Gt i& unair to puni& an app$icant or an act or omi&&ion over wic te app$ic app$icant ant a a& & neit neiter er re&po re&pon&i n&ibi$ bi$it it nor contr contro$, o$, e&peci e&pecia$$ a$$ i te app$ic app$icant ant a a& & comp$ied wit a$$ te reIuirement& o te $aw. 0& e$d in Repub$ic v& anna 4ropertie&, %e dut and te power to &et te earing date $ie wit te $and regi&tration court. 0ter an app$icant a& f$ed i& app$ication, te $aw reIuire& te i&&uance o a court order &etting te initia$ earing date. %e notice o initia$ earing i& a court document. %e notice o initia$ earing i& &igned b te udge and cop o te notice i& mai$ed b te c$er5 o court to te ER0 >Eand Regi&tr egi&trati ation on 0utor 0utorit it?. ?. %i& %i& invo$v invo$ve& e& a proc proce&& e&& to wic wic te te part part app$i app$ica cant nt ab&o$ute$ a& no participation. participation. #owever, te upreme upreme (ourt ound tat te re&pondent re&pondent corporation can on$ prove po&&e&&ion po&&e&&ion becau&e o te ta! dec$aration& dec$aration& it pre&ented or te ear 198, 193 and 19. %i& doe& =O% con&titute te evidence nece&&ar to acIuire te tit$e troug adver&e occupation under (0 11. 0$$ tat te (*=RO certifcate evidence& i& te a$ienabi$it o te $and invo$ved, not te open, continuou&, e!c$u&ive and notoriou& po&&e&&ion po&&e&&ion and occupation tereo b te re&pondent or it& predece&&or&-in-inter predece&&or&-in-intere&t e&t or te period pre&cribed b $aw. #ence, ( ru$ed in avor o Repub$ic.
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
CERTI(ICATE O( ALIENAILITY
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
53 SCRA 705, 23 N'e!"e# 2007 CERTI(ICATE O( ALIENAILITY RE%LIC O( T*E *ILIINES '+ MARIA ISAEL LA%REL ARANDIARAN The person applying or the registration o the land has the burden o proo to overcome the presumption o the )tate2s ownership over lands o public domain by incontrovertible incontrovertible evidence.
(ACTS) Re&pondent aria G&abe$ Eaure$ +arandiaran +arandiaran/ f$ed an app$ication or regi&tration o a parce$ o $and Eand/ beore te unicipa$ %ria$ (ourt o %anauan, +atanga& %(/. On$ petitioner Repub$ic o te 4i$ippine& R4/ oppo&ed te &aid app$ication on te ground tat te $and be$ong& to tem, it being a portion o te pub$ic domain and tat +arandiaran +arandiaran or er predece&&or&-in-intere& predece&&or&-in-intere&tt ad not been in open, continuou&, e!c$u&ive and notoriou& po&&e&&ion or occupation tereo.
+arandiaran te&tifed tat &e and er &ib$ing& became intere&ted in te $and and upon a&5ing rom te peop$e witin te vicinit o te $and and rom te 0&&e&&orT& OLce o %anauan, te ound out tat te $and wa& regi&tered in te name o a certain G&adora @onza$e& @onza$e&/. +arandiaran and er &ib$ing& bougt te $and rom rom te te e eir ir& & o @onz @onza$ a$e& e& an and d te te $and $and wa& wa& &ub& &ub&eI eIue uent nt$ $ dec$ dec$ar ared ed un unde derr +arandiaranT& +arandiaranT& name or ta!ation purpo&e&. %( %( dec$ared tat te $and i& regi&trab$e regi&trab$e unde un derr +ara +arand ndia iara ranT nT& & na name me.. %e %e (our (ourtt o 0ppe 0ppea$ a$& & aLrm aLrmed ed te te $owe $owerr cour courtT tT& & deci&ion. #ence, ti& petition. ISS%E) <et <eter er or not owner& owner&ip ip o te prope propert rt a& been been &uLcie &uLcient$ nt$ e&tab$ e&tab$i& i&ed ed b +arandiaran *ELD) %e burden o proo proo to overcome overcome te pre&umption o &tate &tate owner&ip o $and& o te pub$ pub$ic ic doma domain in $ie& $ie& on te te per& per&on on app$ app$i ing ng or or regi& egi&tr trat atio ion. n. %e %e evid eviden ence ce to overcome te pre&umption mu&t be we$$-nig incontrovertib$e. %e )ec$aration o Rea$ 4ropert in @onza$e& Tname, doe& not prove owner&ip o te $and. Gt i& &ett$ed tat tat ta! ta! recei eceipt pt& & an and d dec$ dec$ar arat atio ion& n& o owne owner& r&i ip p or or ta! ta! purp purpo& o&e& e& are are n not ot incontrovertib$e evidence o owner&ip; te on$ become evidence o owner&ip acIuired b pre&cription wen accompanied b proo o actua$ po&&e&&ion o te propert. =o &uc proo o actua$ po&&e&&ion o te propert wa& pre&ented.
0& or te notation on te &ubdivi&ion p$an o te $ot &tating tat te &urve i& in&ide a$ienab$e and di&po&ab$e area, te &ame doe& not con&titute proo tat te $ot i& a$ienab$e and di&po&ab$e. o Repub$ic v. %ri-4$u& (orporation in&truct&N %o prove tat te $and &ubect o an app$ication or regi&tration i& a$ienab$e, an app$icant mu&t mu&t e&ta e&tab$ b$i& i& te te e!i& e!i&te tenc nce e o a po&i po&iti tive ve act act o te te gove goverrnmen nmentt &uc &uc a& a pre& pre&id iden enti tia$ a$ proc proc$a $ama mati tion on or an e!ec e!ecut utiv ive e orde order, r, an admi admini ni&t &tra rati tive ve acti action on,, inve&t inve&tiga igatio tion n repor report& t& o +ureau +ureau o Eand& Eand& inve& inve&tig tigato ator& r&,, and a $egi&$ $egi&$ati ative ve act or &tatute.
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS
2007 CASE DIGESTS ON LAND TITLES AND DEEDS JOSE RAY RAY MACOTE and ROXANNE DE LAS VERLAS