SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT (SAR) For Accreditation of UG Engineerin Programm Department of Civil Engineering
Submitted to
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION b
SREE SASTHA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, CHENNAI Chennai – Bangalore Highway Chembarambakkam, Chennai – 600 123 (A.M. Kanniappa Mudaliar & A.M.K. Jambulinga Mudaliar Educational Trust)
SAR CONTENTS Serial Code & Link to the item PARTA
It e m
PagNeo.
1
InstitutionalInformation
PARTB
CriteriaSummary Program Level Criteria
1 2
Vision,Mission an d Program Educational Objectives Program Curriculum and Teaching – Learning Processes
6 16
3
CourseOutcomesandProgramOutcomes
42
4
Students’ Performance
85
5
FacultyInformationandContributions
100
6 7
FacilitiesandTechnicalSupport ContinuousImprovement
116 122
Institute Level Criteria
8
First Year Academics
9
StudentSupportSystems
10
Governance, Institutional Supportand Financial Resources
PA RT C
DeclarationbytheInstitution
Program Outcomes(POs) & ProgramSpecific Annexure-I Outcom es (PSOs) Annexure-II
FacultyInformation`
142 166 200
224 227
PART A: Institutional Information 1. Name and Address of the Institution:
Sree Sastha Institute of Engineering and Technology Sree Sastha Nagar, Chennai-Bangalore Highway Chembarambakkam, Chennai-600 123 Phone: 044-26810114, 26810115, 26810117 Web: www.sreesasthainstitutions.edu.in E-mail:
[email protected] 2. Name and Ad dress of the A ffiliating Un iversity: Anna University Sardar Patel Road, Guindy Chennai 600025 Tamilnadu 3. Year of es tablishment of the Institution:
1999 4. Type of the Institution:
University Deemed University Government Aided Autonomous Affiliated
¸
5. Ownership Status:
Central Government State Government Government Aided Self financing
¸
Trust Society 1
Section 25 Company Any Other (Please specify) Provide Details: 6. Other Academic Institutions of the Trust/Society/Company etc., if any: Name of the Institution(s)
Year of Establishment
Programs of Study
Location
B.E.-Computer Science Engineering Sree Sastha College of Engineering
2009
Sree Sastha College of Nursing
2009
Sree Sastha College of Education
2005
AMK Technological Polytechnic College (Started as C.M. Kothari Polytechnic in 1973)
2003
B.E.-Electronics and communications Engineering B.E.-Electronics and Electricals Engineering B.E.-Mechanical Engineering M.E.- Applied Electronics Engineering B.Sc.-N ursing
B.Ed.-Tamil B.Ed. - English B.Ed.- Mathematics B.Ed. - Physical Science B.Ed. – Biological Science B.Ed. – History M.Ed. – Education Diploma in Mechanical Engineering (Machine tool Maintenace & repair) Diploma in Mechanical Engineering (Foundry) Diploma in Mechanical Engineering (Refrigeration & Air conditioning) (SF) Diploma in Mechanical Engineering (Regular) (SF) Diploma in Civil Engineering Diploma in Electrical & Electronics Engineering Diploma in Automobile Engineering (SF) Diploma in Civil Engineering Diploma in Electronics and Communication Engineering Post Diploma of Advanced technological Course in Refrigeration & Air 2
Sree Sastha Nagar, Chembarambakkam Chennai – 600 123
SreeSasthaNagar, Chembarambakkam Chennai – 600 123
Sree Sastha Nagar, Chembarambakkam Chennai – 600 123
Sree Sastha Nagar, Chembarambakkam Chennai – 600 123
conditioning M.B.A
Sree Sastha Institute of Management & Computer Studies
2001
SreeSasthaNagar, Chembarambakkam Chennai – 600 123
MCA
7. Details of all the programs being offered by the institution under consideration: Increase Year Year of AICTE Visit Period/ in Accreditatio S.No Program Name Of Intake increase Approval Accreditation intake, n Status* Start Period if any B.E.-Computer th th Not 28 to 30 1. Science 1999 60 120 2005 1999 accredited August 2015 Engineering B.E.-Electricals th th Not 28 to 30 2. and Electronics 1999 60 90 2007 1999 accredited August 2015 Engineering B.E.-Electronics th th and Not 28 to 30 3. 1999 40 120 2004 1999 communication accredited August 2015 Engineering B.Tech.Eligible but 4. Information 1999 60 120 2007 1999 not applied Technology Granted B.E. – Civil 5. 2002 60 180 2011 2002 accreditation 2009-2012 Engineering for 3 years
Eligible but not applied Granted accreditation for 3 years
6.
M.B.A
2002
60
120
2011
2002
7.
B.Tech.- Bio Technology
2003
30
120
2006
2003
2005
18
0
2005
Eligible but not applied
2005
18
0
2005
Eligible but not applied
2005
18
0
2005
2006
60
180
2007
18
0
2007
2007
18
0
2007
Eligible but not applied
2009
60
0
2009
Applying first time
8.
9. 10. 11. 12. 13.
14.
M.E. – Computer Science Engineering M.E. – Power Electronic andDrivers M.E. – VLSI Design B.E.-Mechanical Engineering M.E. – Communication M.E. – Construction Engineering and Management B.E.-Automobile Engineering
2014
3
2006
Eligible but not applied Not accredited Eligible but not applied
2009-2012
th
th
28 to 30 August 2015
15.
M.E. – Structural 2011 Engineering
18
0
2011
16.
B.E. –Aeronautical 2014 Engineering
60
0
2014
17.
M.E. – Thermal Engineering
2014
18
0
2014
18.
M.Tech –Bio Technology
2014
18
0
2014
Eligible but not applied Not eligible for accreditation Not eligible for accreditation Not eligible for accreditation
8. Programs to be considered for Accreditation vide this application: S.No
Level
Discipline
ProgramName
1.
Under Graduate
Engineering & Technology
B.E. – Automobile Engineering
2.
Under Graduate
Engineering & Technology
B.E. – Civil Engineering
3.
Under Graduate
Engineering & Technology
B.TECH. - Biotehnology
9. Total number of employees in the institution : A. Regular* Employees (Faculty and Staff): 2015-2016 Min Max
Items
2014-2015 Min Max
2013-2014 Min Max
M 145 145 147 147 148 F 105 105 103 103 104 M 24 24 21 21 21 Faculty in Maths, Science & Humanities F 37 37 41 41 41 M 29 29 30 30 30 Non-teaching Staff F 13 13 12 12 12 B. Contractual Staff Employees (Faculty and Staff): (Not covered in Table A): Faculty in Engineering
Items
2015-2016 Min Max M 0 0 Faculty in Engineering F 0 0 M 0 0 Faculty in Maths, Science & Humanities F 0 0 M 0 0 Non-teaching Staff F 0 0 10. Total number of Engineering Students:
2014-2015 Min Max 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2013-2014 Min Max 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Engineering and T echnology – UG Shift -I Item TotalNo.of Boys TotalNo.ofGirls TotalNo.ofStudents
2015-2016 1554 723 2277
4
148 104 21 41 30 12
2014-2015 2013-2014 1762 1936 837 956 2599 2892
Engineering and T echnology – PG Shift -I Item TotalNo.ofBoys TotalNo.ofGirls TotalNo.ofStudents
2015-2016 35 40 75
2014-2015 2013-2014 51 64 60 62 111 126
Item TotalNo.ofBoys TotalNo.ofGirls TotalNo.ofStudents
2015-2016 19 17 36
2014-2015 2013-2014 68 102 45 52 113 154
MBA – Shift -I
11. Vision of the Institution: Sree Sastha Institute of Engineering and Technology has a vision to realize, a vision of
"developing into a multidisciplinary, multi campus technological institution of excellence in this part of the globe, providing the right ambience and environment to create engineers and technocrats who serve the needs and demands of society". 12. Mission of the Institution:
The Management of Sree Sastha Institute of Engineering and Technology (SSIET) has taken on the mission to v Provide the necessary infrastructure to support an institute of excellence; v Foster and grow an academic team to cater to the ever increasing demands of the
student community; v Motivate the students, the faculty and the stakeholders to utilize the facilities provided; v Augment all available avenues to deve lop students for the changi ng needs of the
society, and v Finally to develop SSIET into international institute of excellence.
13. Contact Information of the Head of the Institution and NBA coordinator, if designated:
i.
Name: Dr. V. R. Sampath Designation: Principal Mobile No: 7299905145 Email id:
[email protected]
ii.
NBA coordinator, if designated : -
5
CRITERION 1
Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives
60
1. VISION, MISSION AND PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES (60) 1.1. State the Vision and Mission of the Department and Institute (5) Vision of the Institute
Sree Sastha Institute of Engineering and Technology has a vision to realize. A vision of “developing into a multi-disciplinary, multi-campus technological institution of excellence in this part of the globe, providing the right ambience and environment to create engineers and technocrats who serve the needs and demands of society”. Mission of the Institute The Management of SSIET has taken the mission to v Provide the necessary infrastructure to support an institute of excellence; v Foster and grow an academic team to cater to the ever increasing demands of the student
community; v Motivate the students, the faculty members and the stakeholders to utilize the facilities
provided; v Augment all available avenues to develop students for the changing needs of the society;
and v Finally to develop SSIET into an international institute of excellence.
Vision of the Department
To impart knowledge and excellence in Civil Engineering with global perspectives to make our students, ethically strong engineers to construct our nation and to fulfill the demands of Civil Engineering in society by playing responsible role with the sense of self-discipline, social responsibility and co-operative work attitude. Mission of the Department v To develop the students with a broad and complete education in fundamentals,
applications, design and execution that equip them with necessary skills to become successful professionals engineers v To create congenial environment for interaction amongst students, faculty and technical
staff to facilitate open thinking and learning process.
v To produce wholesome civil engineers to provide service for the wealth improvement of
our nation v To provide advanced skills and knowledge in the research field and design areas of civil
engineering with the state of the art technologies. 6
1.2 State the Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) (5)
Program Educational Objectives of Civil Engineering Program are listed below. Our graduates will, PEO1:
Become competent and engaged engineering professionals by applying their
technical and managerial skills. PEO2:
Adapt to any environment and succeed in higher positions in engineering practice
or research. PEO3:
Update the breadth of knowledge and engage themselves in the life-long learning
process to meet challenges of globalization. PEO4:
Make ethical decisions and demonstrate a commitment to serve the profession and
society by establishing their own organization. 1.3 Indicate where the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published and disseminated among stakeholders (10)
Table 1.1 shows the publication and dissemination of Civil Engineering Program Vision, Mission and PEO. Table 1.1. Adequacy in respect of publication & Dissem ination Disseminating Tool
College Website
Detail
Disseminatedto
http://www.sreesasthainstitutions.e
Public
du.in/dept/civil-engineering/ Brochure
FDP, Workshop and Placement Brochure, Admission Campaign
Display
Notice boards, HOD room, Faculty room, class rooms, Laboratories, Newsletter and AV hall.
Students, Parents, Visitors and Alumni
Meetings
Orientation Pocket card
Orientation Program for Students at the beginning of every semester Card containing year calendar and vision, Mission and PEO 7
Year around display
Researchers, Industries, Recruiters, Academicians and Parents
Communication to all stakeholders during respective meetings like parents-teachers meeting, Alumni Meeting, Stake holders meeting.
Frequency
All Stakeholders
Students Students
During the event
Year around display 1. Parents Teacher – Once in the semester. 2. Alumni Meeting – Once in a Year 3. Stakeholder meeting - Once in a Year. Once in a semester Onceinayear
Process to ensure awareness of Vision/Mission/PEO
Figure 1.1 shows the process to ensure awareness of Vision, Mission and PEO of the program.
Identification of Stakeholders to whom awareness of Vision/Mission/PEOs to be created in Department Advisory Board Meeting
Deciding the tools of Communication to reach various stakeholders in Department Advisory Board Meeting
Publishing in Website, Brochures, Pamphlets, Pocket Cards
Display in Class Rooms, Laboratory, HOD Room, Notice Board
Dissemination in Parents Teachers Meet and Alumni Meet
Conducting orientation Program for Students by the Program Coordinator at the beginning of every semester
Feedback on Awareness of Vision, Mission and PEO through Survey
Fig 1.1 Process to ensure awareness of Vision/Missio n/PEO
1.4 State the process for defi ning the Vision and Mission of th e department, an d PEOs of the program (25) Process of formulation of Vision and Mission
The Vision and Mission of the department is established in line with Vision and Mission of the Institute, considering the new outcome based approach to education.
8
Initially a series of review meeting of the faculty were conducted to draft the Vision and Mission statement of the department. The process of defining the vision and mission is given in fig. 1.2.
External Stakeholder
Internal stakeholders
Institute Vision and Mission
Governing Council
Department Review Meeting
Formulation of Department Vision and Mission
Review & modify
Discussing the Vision and Mission in the Stakeholder meeting
Finalizing the Vision and Mission of the Department
Fig 1.2 Process of Formu lation of Vision /Mission Process of formulation of Program Educational Objective (PEO)
PEOs of the program will be finalized in the department advisory board. The process of defining PEO is shown in fig.1.3.
9
Department Vision and Mission
Institute Vision and Mission
Program Outcomes
Receiving suggestions on Program Educational Objectives in Stakeholders Meeting
Discussion in Program Assessment Committee Meeting
Finalizing the PEOs in the Department Advisory Board Meeting
Periodical Review of PEOs & Redefining PEO, if Required
Table.1.2. Decision Authorities Involved in defining PEO of the program Committee/Board
Stakeholders Committee
Program Assessment committee
Department Advisory Board
Members
Management Representative Principal HOD(Program Coordinator) Academician Senior Faculty Industry Representatives Alumni Parent Student Representatives HOD(Program Coordinator) All Faculty Principal HOD(Program Coordinator) Senior Faculty Management Representatives Industry Representatives Student Representatives Parent Representatives 10
Frequency of Meeting
Once in an Year (May-June)
Twice in an Year (June, August)
Once in an Year (June)
Table 1.3 List of Stakeh olders of the program mes Stakeholders
RoleoftheStakeholders
Interacts and maintains liaison with key stakeholders, students, faculty Program coordinator (HOD)
and employer. Interacting with course coordinators towards attainment of POs and PSOs and review/update the changed required for curriculum gap. Conducts and interprets various surveys required to assess POs and PSOs. Students are the important constituents due to the fact that the major
Students
investment (money and time) is envisaged in them. Student’s evaluation and opinion are obtained in the stakeholders meeting and exit survey. The corporate input from industry representatives is considered
Industry
essential in assessing student’s performance. The feedback from the employers is another milestone for the vision achievement. The faculty is the backbone in providing an excellent teaching-learning experience and the ultimate facilitator for engineering education. As a
Faculty
real facilitator, the faculty has an excellent opportunity to evaluate student deliverables. Evaluations of student performance in classes are used as assessment tools. Alumni of the programme represent a much broader spectrum of individuals with a wide range of experience in their lives and careers. It
Alumni
is very important to include alumni and their feedback (through alumni surveys), to evaluate POs and PSOs and formulate the PEOs. Parents are the most important stakeholders for the academic
Parents
programme. The parent constituency contributes valuable suggestions and feedback. The role of academicians is important to enhance the quality of education. The qualities which are essential for a teacher is to create an
Academician
everlasting impact in the minds of the student. All academic and subject related activities are undertaken. Assess the content and scope of the project to ensure it meets the subject's objectives.
1.5. Establish consistency of PEOs with Mission of the Department (15)
The following table 1.5 represents how program Educa tional Objectives are consiste nt with Mission of the department. For example the PEO1 is consistent with Mission of our 11
department M1, M3 and M4. Table 1.4 PEO and Mission of the Dep artment PEO
PEOSTATEMENT
M
Become competent and engaged PEO1
engineering applying
professionals their
technical
by and
complete M1
PEO2 succeed in higher positions in
To M2
engineering practice or research.
and engage themselves in the lifelong learning process to meet
a
with
necessary
skills
to
become
decisions
M3
congenial
environment
for
interaction amongst students, faculty and technical staff to facilitate open thinking and
To provide advanced skills and knowledge in
to
PEO4 serve the profession and society by establishing their own
provide service for the wealth improvement of our nation.
and
commitment
create
To produce wholesome civil engineers to
challenges of globalization. ethical
fundamentals,
learning process.
Update the breadth of knowledge
demonstrate
in
successful professional’s engineers.
Adapt to any environment and
Make
education
applications, design and execution that equips them
managerial skills.
PEO3
MISSIONSTATEMENT
To develop the students with a broad and
the research field and design areas of civil M4
engineering
with
the
state
of
the
art
technologies.
organization.
Table 1.5 Mapping of PEO with Mission of the Dep artment PESOtatements
M1
M2
M3
M4
1
PEO
2
-
3
1
2
PEO
2
2
-
3
PEO 3 4
PEO
1 -
3 1
Note: Correlation details are 1: Slight (Low)
1 3
2: Moderate (Medium)
For no correlation “-”
12
2 2 3: Substantial (High) 4:
Table 1.6 Justification of PEO with Mission of the Department PEO Stateme nts
Mission Stateme nt
Mapping
Justification The Mapping Strength is “Moderate”
The Graduates become competent and successful in their M1
2
profession by applying various skills
provided by the
department. However, to become a complete engineering professional, the focus should be laid on managerial skills. The Mapping Strength is “No-correlation”
To become a compete nt civil engineer ing profession a graduate M2
-
is expected to widen his professional ambience in order to keep pace with diverse opportunities in their discipline concerned.
PEO 1
The Mapping Strength is “Substantial”
The students become competent civil engineering professionals M3
3
upholding the values of social resp onsibilities to be reflected upon the productive development of the nation. The Mapping Strength is “Low”
Besides applying the technical and managerial skills acquired M4
1
through seminars, symposium, technical quizzes, projects and competitions, more practising platforms would strongly enhance their research quests in their discipline concerned. The Mapping Strength is “Moderate”
The success of the graduates relies upon not only with the M1
2
fundamentals but also their adoptability with their professional front. The Mapping Strength is “Moderate”
PEO 2
The congenial environment facilitates students to acquire M2
2
essential inter-personal communication skills. However, the success relies upon the appropriate applications of the individual concerned.
13
The Mapping Strength is “No-correlation”
To become a full-pledged engineer, it is almost important to M3
-
keep abreast of all latest technologies and its appropriate applications to prove their abilities. The Mapping Strength is “Substantial”
The graduates become adept at practising innovative technical M4
3
ideas into research to obtain desired results which would ultimately get reflected on his/her professional hierarchy in any given environment. The Mapping Strength is “Low”
The graduates are equipped with fundamentals. However, they M1
1
have to develop their interest in latest advancements in order to face the challenges of global needs. The Mapping Strength is “Substantial”
The congenial environment enables a graduate to acquire M2
3
essential inter personal skills in order to meet the challenges globally.
PEO 3
The Mapping Strength is “Low”
M3
1
It is almost important for graduates to keep abreast of all latest technologies and its appropriate applications in order to establish themselves as full-pledg ed engineers. The Mapping Strength is “Moderate”
The knowledge obtained in the area of research and design M4
2
would engage the graduates with lifelong learning process. However, the challenges of globalisation can be met only with appropriate technical skills. The Mapping Strength is “No-correlation”
Graduates can establish themselves as perspec tive engineers by PEO 4
M1
-
their ethical decisions, but their commitment towards the welfare of the soc iety solely rests upon them.
14
The Mapping Strength is “No-correlation”
A graduate with all hi s core fundamental knowledge can establish an organisation but the success of the organisation is M2
1
determined by various factors such as hands-on experience and wide knowledge of latest technologies which would ultimately get reflected upon the society and his profession as well. The Mapping Strength is “Substantial”
M3
3
A full pledged civil engineer carries his commitment towards profession and society as well. The Mapping Strength is “Moderate”
The knowledge obtained from research and design areas would M4
2
possibly pave a way for a graduate to become an entrepreneur. However, the productive impact of the same on society rests upon the entrepreneur himself.
15
CRITERION 2
Program Curriculum and Teaching – Learning Processes
120
2. PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING - LEARNING PROCESSES (120) 2.1. Program Curriculum (20) 2.1.1. State the process used to identif y extent of compliance of the University curr iculum for attaining the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes as mentioned in Annexure I. Also mention the identified curricular gaps, if any (10) v The institute is affiliated to Anna University. v The program follows the curriculum provided by Anna University. v The curriculum contains a good balance of mathematics, general and engineering
science related to technical and professional aspects, general educational, social and environmental studies. The following process is used to identify the compliance and curriculum gap Blooms Taxonomy
Anna University Curriculum
Faculty Writes Course Outcome, Identifies Knowledge Level and performs CO-PO Mapping
Consolidation of Mapping by the Department and report to the Program Coordinator
Program Coordinator Identifies the Curriculum Gap – Weakly supported Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes
Discuss and receive opinions from stakeholders in Stakeholders Meeting
Propose additional Course/ New course that bridges the Gap
Discussing and Finalizing the conduct of additional course/new course in the Department Advisory Board Meeting
Figure 2.1 Process to identify Compliance of Curriculum and Curriculum Gap
16
The list of GAP is given below Table 2.1 List of curricular gaps YEAR OF STUDENTS
S.NO
SUBJECT
GAPIDENTIFIED
DURATION
1
Bridge courseMathematics, Physics, Chemistry, Computer fundamentals,& Communication skill
Bridging school to college level
5days
2
Construction Materials
Advancement in Concrete technology
1 day
2nd year students
3
SurveyingII
1 day
2 year students
4
Structural analysis II
5
Soil mechanics and Foundation Engineering
6
Environmental Engineering II
7
Softskills
nd
Total Station and GPS Analysis by stiffness & flexibility method
rd
1 day
Soil stabilization and soil Reinforcement. Waste Water Treatment Technicaltraining
1styear
3 year students rd
1 day
3 year students rd
1 day Weekly4hours
3 year students For all years students
v In Anna university curriculum, certain gaps are identified and necessary actions are taken
to bridge the gaps. v Students will enrich their knowledge and improve their skills to get better placements and
lifelong learning. v Letter was sent to the board of studies, Anna University stating the curricular gaps
identified from the syllabus 2.1.2. State the delivery det ails of the conten t beyond th e syllabu s for the attainme nt of POs and PSOs (10) Course Delivery Methods used in our department: v Lectures v Presentation (PPTs & Video) v Experimental & Laboratory Work v Group tasks (Projects)
17
Table 2.2 Curricul ar gaps in the attainment of POs/PSO s CAY 2015-16
S.No.
1
Gap
Actiontaken
3
4
5 6 7 8
9
10
Resource Person with designation
Ms. Devi,AP,-Maths Dr.Gnanam,APPhysics Bridging 04.08.15 Mr. Ekambaram.C, AP school level to Bridge course – - English college level
2
DateMonthYear
Construction material
% of students
Relevance to POs, PSOs
100
POs-1,2,3,10 PSOs-1
11.08.15 Mr.Ashok kumar,APChemistry SSIET Industrial Visit
01.09.16
Mr.Natrajan
Dr.Shahul Hammed.M Professor & Dean Guest Lecture 04.09.15 NPR College Of Engineering And Technology Ms.R.J.Devi,APMaths Soft skills, 22.06.15 Mr.Venkatesh,AP Aptitude and Soft Skill Ms.Sherbanu,AP Communicatio Training 23.09.15 Mr.M.Sugan,AP n skills Structural analysis-I
Mr.Nagamanickam,AP Ms.Jinsa fathima AP Basic Civil and Mr.Gopinath Mechanical (AP)-Civil Engineering Concrete Mr.Krishnakumar Technology (AP) -Civil Renewable 18.06.15 Mr.Ganansekaran source of Audit course (AP) -Civil energy 27.10.15 Green building Mr.Aravindan system (AP) -Civil Infrastructure planning, Mrs.Mekala management (AP) -Civil and evaluation Guest Lecture Environmental on “Waste Grundfos Pumps India 21.07.15 Engineering II Water Pvt.Ltd Treatment”
18
100
POs -1,2 PSOs- 1
100
POs – 1,2 PSOs- 1
100
POs - 9,10 PSOs- 3
100
POs - 1 PSOs- 1
100
POs – 1,2 PSOs- 1,2
100
POs – 1,2,6,7 PSOs- 1,2
100
POs – 1,6,7 PSOs- 1,2
100
POs – 1,2,11 PSOs- 1
100
POs-1,2,6,7 PSOs-1,3
CAY m1 2014-15 S.No.
1.
Gap
Bridging school level to college level
Action Taken
Bridge course
DateMonthYear
% Of Resource Person with Relevance To Studen Designation POs, PSO ts Mrs.Devi, AP- Maths Dr. S. Suresh, AP- Physics 04.08.14 POs-1,2,3,10 Mr. Bobby, AP - English 100 -13.08.14 PSOs-1 Dr. Dulcy Evangelin, APChemistry
Soft skills (Technical skills, 2
3
4
5
APT resources, Trainer Technical 23.06.14 TIME institute, Trainer Aptitude and Training -18.10.14 Manya education, Communication Trainer skills) Training Program Value 22.07.14 SKIFI LAB On Hand Held added -27.10.14 Bangalore GPS course 16.06.14 T.I.M.E (Triumphant Inst Campus Placement Of Management Residential Training 22.06.14 Edu.Pvt.Ltd) Programme
100
POs - 9,10 PSOs- 3
100
PO s-5,1 PSO -2
100
POs-1,9,10 PSOs-1,3
Kuttimarks M S-AP Civil
100
POs-1,2,7 PSOs-1
Chinnasamy M-AP Civil
100
POs-1,2,7 PSOs-1,2
-18.10.14 Aiswaryadevi S-AP Civil
100
POs-1,6,7 PSOs-1,2
100
POs-1,2,6,7 PSOs-1,2
Risk And Reliability Analysis of Civil Infrastructure Heavy
6
Construction Methods And Machines
7
Green Building Systems
8
Renewable Energy
Gnanasegaran R-AP Civil
9
Building Services
Vidya M-AP Civil
100
POs-1,2,6 PSOs-1,2
10
Basics Of Remote Sensing And GIS
B Kannadasan-AP Civil
100
POs-1,6 PSOs-1,2
Training 17.06.14program CADD Centre, Chennai 19.06.14 on REVIT
100
POs-1,5 PSOs-1,2
100
POs-2,6,7 PSOs-1
Audit course
23.06.14
Summer 11
Analysis and design software learning
12
Environmental Awareness
Guest lecture
20.12.14
19
Dr. Shaukat Mirza, Chairman,
CAY m2- 2013-14 S.No.
1.
DateResource Person with % of Relevance to Actiontaken Monthdesignation students POs, PSOs Year Mr. Kulothunga Prasad AP- Maths Dr. S. Suresh, APBridging 29.07.13 POs-1,2,3,10 Physics school level to Bridge course 100 PSOs-1 Mr. Bobby, AP college level 07.08.13 English Dr. Dulcy Evangelin, Gap
AP- Chemistry
2.
Soft skills (Technical skills, Aptitude and Communicatio n skills)
3
Training Analysis and 17.06.13 Program on E design software CADD Centre, Chennai Tabs learning 22.06.13
4
5
Technical Training
08.07.13 29.10.13
Manya Education, Trainer
Guest Lecture Modern on “Modern Dr.R.V.Ranganath, concrete – the Concrete-The 16.11.13 BMS College of changing Changing Engineering, Bangalore paradigm Paradigm” Campus 10.06.13 Placement TVS Training & Service Residential Training Ltd. Program me 15.06.13
100
POs - 9,10 PSOs- 3
100
POs-2,3, 5 PSOs-2
100
POs -1,6,7 PSOs-1
100
POs-1,9,10 PSOs-1,3
2.2. Teach ing - Learning Process es (100) 2.2.1. Describe Processes followed to improve quality of Teaching & Learning (25) Adherence to Academic Calendar v The academic calendar contains the events plan according to Anna university calendar
and academic schedule is prepared and circulated to students every year on the reopening day of odd semester
20
College Exam Cell
Opinion from HODs /Class In charges
Anna University Calendar and Academic Schedule
Drafting Academic Calendar for One Year by the Calendar Coordinator
IQAC Opinion on Department Plans
Modification if necessary, in the Calendar
Approval by the Principal and Academic Advisory Board
Circular of Schedule
Circulate the academic calend ar to Students and Staff reopening day of odd semester Figure 2.2 Processes for Academic Calend ar Decision Authorities Involved Table 2.3 Decision authority Committee/Board
Members
Academic Advisory Board
Principal, HOD Representatives , Academician Industry Representatives, Alumni, Parent, Student Representatives
21
FrequencyofMeeting
Once in an Year (May-June)
Management Representative, Administrative & Technical Staff, Faculty Representatives, Community Representatives, Industry Representative, Student Representative, Alumni
IQAC
Two times an Year ( Once in a Semester)
Table 2.4 Adherence to academic calen dar Year/Sem
Academic calendar
As per University
College reopen
01-02-16
1 assessment period
10-03-1617-03-16
st
2 assessment period
Last working day College reopen st
1 assessment period 2 assessment period
Reasons (if noncompliance)
Yes
-
04-01-16 09-01-16 19-01-16 27-01-16 11-02-16 17-02-16 26-02-16 04-03-16 21-03-1626-03-16 12-04-16 21-04-16
08-02-1613-02-16 22-02-1627-02-16 07-03-1612-03-16 21-03-1626-03-16 04-04-1609-04-16 30-04-1606-05-16
07-05-16
07-05-16
07-05-16
No
30-01-16
16-12-16
09-12-16
Yes
-
18-01-16 & 19-01-16
Yes
-
19-02-16
Yes
-
19-03-16
Yes
18-04-16
Yes
04-04-1611-04-16
30-04-1605-05-16
05-03-1609-03-16
nd
2015-16 VIII
Status of adherence
01-02-16
rd
3 assessment period
Actual Dates
16-12-15
nd
2015-16 II,IV,VI
As per Academic calendar
28-03-1631-03-16
rd
3 assessment period
13-04-1618-04-16
Last day working
18-04-16
04-01-16 09-01-16 19-01-16 27-01-16 11-02-16 17-02-16 26-02-16 04-03-16 21-03-1626-03-16 12-04-16 21-04-16 18-04-16
22
No
No
No
Due to inclement weather conditions, academic schedule was not been adhered
-
Process for course delivery v Flow chart indicates the outline of methodology for delivery of courses v Content of course delivery will be evaluated by HOD and Principal
Institutional Head
Academic schedule
Dept head + Timetable / Program coordinator
Common courses
Course committee Faculty meeting
∑
Lecture
∑
PPT
∑
Video Lectures
∑
Library
∑
Guest lecture
∑
Demonstration
∑ ∑
Teaching Learning Methodologies
CO PO PEO
Faculty
Syllabus T.L. Process uniformity in delivery
Tutorial Feedback
Evaluation T.L. activities planning Documentation
Figure 2.3 Processes f or course delivery Table 2.5– Generalized mappin g of Course deliv ery methods to the Pos. Modes of Delivery Lectures
1
2
¸
¸
3
¸
PROGRAMME OUTCOMES 4 5 6 7 8
9
Group Discussion
¸ ¸
¸
¸
10
11
¸
¸
¸
¸
Tutorial hours Project Based ¸¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ Training ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ E-Leaning Practical Class ¸ ¸ ¸¸ ¸ Mini Projects ¸ ¸¸¸ ¸ ¸¸¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ Seminar Class Industrial Based ¸ ¸¸ ¸
23
¸
12
Training ¸
Video Lectures
¸
¸
Methodology to Support Students
The student performance and overall development is regularly monitored by the mentor. The students are classified into bright and weak students based on academic performance. The process included in encouraging bright students and supporting weak students is given below. Mentor
Classification of bright students and weak students based on Academic and Overall Performance
General Strategies Formulated By the Principal and Academic Advisory Board
Applying Strategies for each classification
Encouraging Bright Students ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑
∑
Supporting Weak Students
Merit scholarship Rewarding in College Day Encouraging for Higher Studies Placement in Tier – I companies Internship in industries Participation in co-curricular activities Participation in exchange programme
∑ ∑ ∑ ∑
Effective Mentoring Coaching Classes Simplified learning materials Peer learning
Figure 2.4 Processes for Student Improvement Table 2.6 Impact of student improvement process S.No. 1.
BrightStudents Methodology Rewarding in
WeakStudents Impact
Methodology
Students are motivated to 24
Effective
Impact Students difficulties were
College Day
receive prizes for university rank holders and class toppers Implementation: Giving special advice and materials for preparing competitive exam and higher studies to achieve their goal of studying abroad and going for higher studies Impact: Enabled a few students to get through the competitive
2.
Encouraging for Higher Studies
3.
exam. Implementation: Trainers from reputed training institutes appointed for giving placement training along with academic Placement T raining schedule facilitates students. Impact: To enhance and excel their abilities at times of placement.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Inplant training
These trainings will create awareness on complicated theoretical aspects in Civil Engineering
Sending students to renowned industries and R&D centers for Internship in internship programs assist them industries practical knowledge about real time projects. Students were guided to participate in various technical Participation in coand non technical events curricular activities conducted by universities and affiliated colleges Students with good marks were encouraged by providing merit Merit scholarship scholarship for their tuition Participation in enhanced engineering knowledge programme
fees Students are allowed to participate in various training programmes organized by IIT.
25
Mentoring
identified and counseled to focus on studies
Coaching Classes
Coaching classes were conducted and the academic performance was gradually increased
Peer learning
Allowing students to interact with other students and faculties through online course NPTEL to attain educational goals
Simplified learning material
The simplified learning materials helped the candidate to understand the difficult topic clearly and to score better marks
Laboratory Experiments Developing List of experiments as approved by Anna university curriculum
Preparing experiments procedure
Preparing manual for conducting experiments
Instruction to students and safety measures in lab
Conducting experiments
Recording the results in Observation Note by student
Evaluation of the results by the Course Faculty
Recording the results in Record Note
Evaluation of the Record and experimentation by students in internal and external exams
Figure 2.5 Processes for lab experiments Impact: ∑
It will be useful to implement theoretical concept in practical experiments.
∑
It is a lifelong learning process
Continuous Assessment in Lab Experiment
Continuous assessment system is also implemented for assessment of laboratory work. The assessment is done on the basis of submission of laboratory records, understanding of the experiment through oral viva voce questions and participation in performing the experiment.
26
Table 2.7 Continuous Assessment in Lab Course Aim and apparatus (10)
Procedure (25)
TabulationObservation (20)
Calculation (15)
Result (10)
Viva (10)
Record (10)
Total (100)
Feed back Student feedback for teaching learning process and actions taken: v The feedback will be taken after
Unit-I completion and end of the semester, all the
students are required to fill a feedback-form appraising the faculty using a scale of 1 (low) through 5 (high). v Counseling and motivation are given by respective HOD for those faculty members who
have secured low scores and negative comments, if any, in the feedback. This motivates them to improve their skills and abilities. v If required, training - orientation programmes are conducted by professional experts to
master the skills of the faculty members in the nuances of teaching, thus improving the efficiency of teaching-learning process. TEACHING EVALUATION FORM Table 2.8 Feedback of Teaching Learning Process
Name of the Teacher taking the class, ________________________________________ Designation _________________________ Subject handled - Topic: _______________ Branch, Class __________________________________________________________
NSo..
Attributes
1
1.
Introduction given, Topic of lecture announced - written on the Board
2.
Objectives stated - Teaching Points written on the Board.
3.
Subject matter knowledge
4.
Voice (is it clear, and audible?)
5.
Writing on the Board, Figures - Diagrams. (Size, Legibility, Methodical)
6.
Any Teaching Aid used
7.
Posture
8.
Eye contact with students 27
2
3
4
5
9.
Confidence level exhibited
10.
Monitoring Process (Checking whether students have understood the points covered)
11.
Making students comfortable in class Encouraged Students to ask Questions.
12.
Is the lecture interesting or not?
13.
Communication (Language and Fluency)
14.
Was there any element of creativity (by way of certain examples) (What’s new?)
15.
Class room management
16.
Conclusion - summarization made; or lecture abruptly ended?
Feedback analysis Table 2.9 Feedback analysis S.No.
1
Feedbackcategory
Teaching and learning
Frequency
Twice a semester
Analysis
Actiontaken
If faculty members
If required, training -
secured low scores and
orientation programmes are
negative comments, then
conducted by professional
counseling will be given by the respective HOD
experts to improve the skills of the faculty members
2.2.2. Quality of internal semester Question papers, Assignments and Evaluation (20) Question Paper Setting v The internal assessment question paper covering specified course outcomes are set
by the course faculty. v Question paper audit is conducted to ensure the quality of question paper. v The assignments are given to the students and are evaluated by the course faculty
The process of the setting question paper is given in the following table:
28
Subject handling faculty
Anna University question paper format and instruction
Based on Unit coverage
Setting of Question Papers with mapping of questions with Course Outcomes by the Course Faculty
Submit the question paper one week before the test/Exam Set A& Set B
Submission of the Question Papers to the Department Exam Cell Coordinator
Question Paper Audit by HOD and Department Exam cell coordinator
Acceptance of the Question Paper/ Recommending Modification, if required
Figure 2.6 Processes for Question paper setting -
-
Question paper validation ∑
Two sets of internal exam question papers were prepared by the subject handling faculty and it was validated by department exam cell coordinator
∑
The department head ensures that the question paper prepared by the subject handling faculty was attaining course outcomes and it has learning level of the student.
∑
Among the two sets, one was selected by the HOD for internal examination.
29
Model answer-evaluation and its compliance
After each test, the faculty concerned for individual subject prepares answer key for the question papers, which in turn get counte rsigned by the respect ive HOD for initiating the evaluation process. Mark obtained by individual student is entered in the exam cell once the evaluation is carried out . Table 2.10 Format for CO Coverage
S . No
S u b je c t
Course outcomes
Allocated marks Unit
Cycle
Test-1 Test - 1
Unit
Cycle
Unit
Test-2
Te st - 2
Test-3
CO1 CO2 CO3
1
CO4 CO5 CO6
Result analysis procedure
The Exam cell Coordinator consolidates the mark statement by individual faculty concerned for each subject and ana lysis the report for substantially an d justifying the reasons stated by them. Following that the final report submitted to the Exam Cell .
30
Assignments and Evaluation
The assignments were given periodically after the completion of the units and it is evaluated. Course Outcomes
Course Curriculum
Course Faculty identifies the topics for assignments which promotes self learning
Brief orientation to students about assignment writing and the sources of information such as (E-book, NPTEL) by the Course Faculty
Preparation of assignment and submission by the student within the stipulated time
Evaluation of the Assignment by the Course Faculty and Recording the Performance
Figure 2.7 Processes for Assignments and Evaluation Table 2.11 Format for CO Coveraged
S.No.
Subjects
e rs u o C
s e m o c t u o
Allocatedmarks .1 n g sis A
CO1
1
CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5 CO6 31
.2 n g sis A
References .3 n g sis A
Book & page No.
2.2.3. Quality of student projects (25)
As a part of final year, and in partial fulfillment of graduation requirements, undergraduate students in the Civil Department do a Final Year Project (FYP). v Purpose
To define the procedure for student project identification, allocation & evaluation v Scope
To review the students project work progress and timely completion.
Figure 2.8 Process for students Project
Projects are evaluated through presentations periodically and suitable comments are given by the project co-coordinator and the faculty members during every review to improve students’ knowledge on their project. Suggestions are also given on modules (if necessary) to make the project noteworthy. The supervisor verify whether the students have taken corrective actions for the comments given below and then sign in the review form given for each batch.
32
SREE SASTHA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY CHEMBARAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600123 DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING EVALUATION FORM PROJECT REVIEW I YEAR-SEMESTER: S.N O
Batch No
Reg No
YEAR-SEMESTER: S.N O
Batch No
Reg No
YEAR-SEMESTER: S.N O
Batch No
Reg No
BATCH: Name of the Students
Aim & Objective (10)
Literature Review (10)
DATE: Work plan (10)
SREE SASTHA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY CHEMBARAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600123 DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING EVALUATION FORM PROJECT REVIEW II BATCH: DATE: Work Name of the Methodology Presentation progress Students (10) (10) (10)
SREE SASTHA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY CHEMBARAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600123 DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING EVALUATION FORM PROJECT REVIEW III BATCH: DATE: Methodology Results & Name of the Presentatio & Execution Discussio Students n (10) (10) n (10)
33
TITLE LITERATURE REVIEW METHODOLOGY
TECHNICAL CONTENT
PRESENTATION
SREE SASTHA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY CHEMBARAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600123 DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING POOR GOOD VERYGOOD EXCELLENT Not matching In accordance Clear selection Innovative and with course with the course of topic research oriented objective and novel idea Not relevant to Moderate to Highly relevant to to topic topic topic topic Not yet Approaching Fully meeting Exceeding meeting the expectations expectations expectations expectations Students have Students Students are at Students do limited demonstrate ease and answer not appear to understanding comprehensive most questions understand of the subject, knowledge and with subject, can't and have answer all explanations answer difficult questions with and some questions answering explanations and elaboration questions elaboration Student present Students lack Student’s Students are with easy confidence, do voices are low confident, speak confidence, speak not speak and unclear, well and are very well and clearly, and difficult to keep engaged with clearly, maintain not engaged engagement with audience with audience. their audience excellent engagement.
BEST PROJECT Table 2.12 Denoting the Best three Projects by students (2015-16) SNo.
StudentName
1.
Raj Kumar.P Saranya.N Swetha.K Zeba Jalal
2.
Magesh S Nandhakumar B Lakshan.Rs Prakash.U
3.
Girishchandar.G Kikrokul Kikhi Sodhungen Limboo Yogesh Limboo
ProjectTitle
Self healing bio concrete
GuideName
Gnanasegaran.R
POs1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1 0,11,12 PSOs- 1,2,3
Kuttimarks.M.S
POs1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1 0,11,12 PSOs- 1,2,3
Ajith.J
POs1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1 0,11,12 PSOs- 1,2,3
Flexural Behaviour Of Cold Formed Stainless Steel Member An Experimental investigation on concrete with Nano silica 34
Relevance To Pos &Psos
Implementation
A project coordinator is appointed by the Head of the department who is responsible for planning, scheduling and execution of all the activities related to the student project work. Impact analysis v The students develop innovative ideas of the project work v
The skills or abilities of students are improved.
v
The knowledge on various aspects of project is widened.
v
Confidence level of the students is boosted
v
Improved teamwork spirit is found among the students
v
Implementation and deployment of the project for social benefits reveals social responsibilities as students
v Students gain knowledge in document preparation and presentation.
2.2.4. Initiatives related to industry interaction (15)
The industry interactions were conducted by industry personnel and the project work done by students outside & inside the campus are shown in the below tables. Table 2.13: Industry Attached Laboratory SN .o
1
2
Laboratory
Organization CAY (2015-16)
Title
Siva Constructions And Builders
Testing of soil samples, concrete cubes and aggregate at Velacherry site, Medavakkam site and Tambaram site for Siva Constructions
Soil Mechanics, Concrete Siva Constructions And Builders Lab
Testing and analysis of soil and concrete samples for residential buildings at Adayar site, Nandambakkam site, Thiruverkadu site and Chrompet site for Siva Constructions and builders
Soil Mechanics Lab
CAYm1 (2014-2015)
1
2
Soil Mechanics, Concrete SS Constructions Lab
Testing of soil samples, concrete cubes and aggregate at Porur site, Valasaravakkam site and Mangadu site for SS Constructions.
Soil Mechanics, Concrete VASS Constructions Lab
Testing and analysis of soil and concrete samples for residential buildings at Pammal site, Anagaputhur site, Thirunermalai site and Chrompet site for VASS Constructions
35
CAYm2 (2013-2014)
3
Soil Mechanics, Concrete CC Builders Lab
4
Strength Of Materials Lab
Testing and analysis of soil and concrete samples for construction of Residential building at Pallavaram site for CC Builders.
VASS Constructions
Testing of steel rods for Pammal construction site for VAAS Constructions.
CAYm3 (2012-2013)
5 6
Testing of steel rods for Pallavaram
Strength Of Materials Lab
CC Builder
Strength Of Materials Lab
SS Constructions
construction site for CC Builders. Testing of steel rods for Porur construction site for SS Constructions.
Table 2.14: Details of project done by Stude nts in research labor atories N So
Title
Developed. Organized By
Coordinator
Benefited Students
Vinoth Kumar S
Surya prakash K Joy aditiyan C Vichu S Vignesh V
CAY (2014-15)
1
Study on usage of dismantled brick masonry and concrete aggregate in precast products using bottom ash as fine aggregate in place of river sand
2
Replacement of River sand with bottom ash in concrete
NLC
Sivaprakasan S
3
GlowingRoads
Highway Research Station
Thilakar Y C
NLC
Raja Kumar S Kasiraja T Anandh Raj S Arul Pandiyan. P Gowtham. B Joshi G Karupasamy
CAYm1 (2013-14)
1
Study on internal curing of concrete using admixtures
Highway Research Station
Murugan M
2
Study on road junction improvement Integral Coach Factory
Highway Research Station
Dr.Thenmozhi S
36
Monica M Sareetha S Sivaranjani A Subhashini V R Naresh V Sangamita Nag Sowndara Pandian A Vijayalakshmi R
3
Experimental study on corrosion resistance using coated rebars in an effluent treatment plant
ONGC
Dr.Thenmozhi S
Naveenkumar N Rajeshwar C G Sudharson K Visalan V
4
De-Centralized Waste Water Treatment
IITM Research Park
Aiswarya Devi S
Murali J Srinivas S Sugadev S
5
Utilization of Biopolymer in Bituminous mix
Highway Research Station
Thilakar Y C
Rajiv B Veeramani R Sudharsan S Vijay Palani P
Table 2.15 Guest lecture by Industrial experts S NO
Title
Resource person/Industry
Co-ordinator
Benefited students
Chinnasamy M
Final Year students
CAY (2015-16)
1
Waste Water Treatment
2
Structural analysis-I
Senthil Kumar Design Engineer L&T Construction
Kuttymarks M S
Third Year students
3
Soil Mechanics
Bhavana chandar dass Regional Manager OC TEC
Kannadasan B
Second year students
Grundfos Pumps India Pvt.Ltd
CAYm1 (2014-15)
1
2
3
4
5
Construction Management Techniques" Construction of Highways & Bridges" Recent trends on High Rise Buildings Estimation using BEST Software Introduction to Construction Planning
L &T Construction Chennai
Chinnasamy M
BSCPL Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd
Dinesh Babu ES
Guntur HUSCON Engineers Pvt. Ltd,
Kuttymarks M S
CISTSOMAG
MSK group, Hyderabad CAY m2 (2013-2014)
37
ChinnasamyM
Kannadasan B
Third year students (Batch2012-16) Third year students (Batch2012-16) Final year students (Batch2011-2015) Final year students (Batch2011-2015) Final year students (Batch2011-2015)
1
Fracture Mechanics
2
Special Concrete & Case Studies
Dr. A.R.C.Murthy Senior Scientist, Project Leader Sri. A.C.Santosh Sales Manager Construction System BASF
Nagaraj.S
Final year students (Batch2010-2014)
Krishnakumar. M
Third year students (Batch2011-2015)
Table: 2.16 Short term courses
S. No
Module Description
1.
Technical Training On Civil Engineering
Any other contributory Inst. . Industry
Developed. Organized by
Duration
Resource Persons
Target Audience
10.02.16 26.03.16
Trainers From Face TRG
Third Year Students
CAY (2015-16)
Face TRG
Department Of Civil Engineering
CAYm1 (2014-2015)
1.
Transportation Engineering
2.
Building Services
3.
Application of GIS And Seismic Design Of Buildings
4.
Building Construction Management
Trainers From Skifi Lab Bangalore Trainers From Skifi Lab Bangalore
Skifi Lab Bangalore
Department Of Civil Engineering
10.09.2014 - 09.12.2014
Skifi Lab Bangalore
Department Of Civil Engineering
12.01.2015 17.01.2015
Skifi Lab Bangalore
Department Of Civil Engineering
30.07.2014 03.09.2014
Trainers From Skifi Lab Bangalore
Third Year Students
SNL Civil Wing
Department Of Civil Engineering
02.03.2015 05.03.2015
Trainers From Skifi Lab Bangalore
Third Year Students
CAY m2 (2013-2014)
5.
GIS
Skifi Lab Bangalore
6.
Transportation
Skifi Lab Bangalore
Third Year Students
Final Year Students
Department Of Civil Engineering
30.01.2014 03.03.2014
Trainers From Skifi Lab Bangalore
Third Year Students
Department Of Civil
10.02.1409.03.14
Trainers From Skifi
Third Year Students
38
Engineering
Foundation Analysis
7.
Skifi Lab Bangalore
Department Of Civil Engineering
20.01.14 -27.01.14
Lab Bangalore Trainers From Skifi Lab Bangalore
Third Year Students
Impact Analysis The department organizes special short term course for improving student’s technical
interest in their respective core areas to enable them to perform better in their academics, professional as well. 2.2.5. Initiatives related to industry internship. Summer training (15) In Plant Training v Students are encouraged to undergo In Plant Training as it provides hands-on industrial
experience to them. It also equipments students with necessary technical knowledge even before they enter the job scenario. v The following table shows the list of internship training visits for the academic years 2015-
16, 2014-2015 and 2013-2014. Table2.17: In Plant Training undertaken by the students. S. No.
NameoftheCompany
Field
Duration
No. of students
CAY 2015-16
1 2 3 4 5 6
M/S Green Star Fertilizers (Spic) M/SSalemSteelPlant M/S High-tech Concrete Solutions Pvt Ltd M/SSalemSteelPlant M/S High-tech Concrete Solutions Pvt Ltd M/S High-tech Concrete Solutions Pvt Ltd
Site Execution SiteExecution Material Testing ExecutionWork
25.04.16 - 9.05.16 & 20.06.16 15.07.16 28.03.16 02.04.16 29.03.16 -02.04.16 21.03.16 26.03.16
3 5 5 3
Design Mix Work
16.03.16- 21.03.16
5
Design M ix Work
02.03.16 -07.03.16
4
Site Execution 7
M/S Preetha Constructions
8
M/S Harinee Constructions
Site Execution
9
M/SAptsorbh
Site Execution
10
I 5 Housing And Properties
Site Execution
39
16.03.16 20.03.16 15.03.16 20.03.16 29.02.16 05.03.16
5
10.02.16 -16.02.16
1
4 4
11
ChennaiPortTrust
1
6 7
Larsen&Toubro Port Of Chennai,(Port Par – Excellence) Pentagons Engineering Contractors Dawn Engineers And Contractors Pentagons Engineering Contractors L&T ChennaiPortTrust
8
Andaman&NicobarPWD
2 3 4 5
25.07.16 30.07.16
Site Execution CAY m1 (2014-2015) SiteExecution Design Of RCC Structures
6
18.06.14-23.06.14
1
02.01.15-08.01.15
4
Site Execution
20.12.14-2 4.12.14
4
Design
21.06.14-26.06.14
4
Site Execution
20.12.14 -24.12.14
SiteExecution SiteExecution
14.12.14-24.12.14 15.12.14- 24.12.14 07.12.1430.12.14& 15.12.14 -25.12.14
Design
5 1 6 2
CAY m2 (2013-2014)
1
East Coast Constructions & Industries Ltd
Estimation Work
04.06.13-05.06.13
3
2
ShakthiConstructions
Construction
07.06.13-11.06.13
3
Geo Foundations & Structures Pvt Ltd Dawn Engineers And Contractors UniqueInfra
3 4 5
Construction
19.06.13-20.06.13
4
Design
21.06.13-26.06.13
3
Construction
23.06.13-25.06.13
6
Impact Analysis of industrial training v The students Gain knowledge about the Work Experience. v The internship has transitioned into a job for few students. v Students Gain Confidence. v The students get exposure from the industries.
Industrial Visits
The following table shows the list of industrial visits for the academic years 2015-16, 20142015, 2013-2014, and. 2012-2013. Table 2.18 Details of Indu strial Visits by Stu dents. S. No.
1 2 3 4 5
Name of the Company
Chennai Trade Centre “Build Expo” Dakshina Chitra MattupettyDam DreamLandConstruction Ultratech RMC plant
No. of days Duration CAY (2015-16)
1 1 4 4 1 40
18.07.2015 02.09.2015 09.09.15-13.09.15 09.09.15-13.09.15 01.09.16
No. of students
132 132 63 67 130
6
SERC
1 2 3 4 5
Munnar- CochinPort ChennaiHarbour Poondi Reservoir Poondi Reservoir Poondi Reservoir P&C Construction(RMC Plant) P&C Construction(RMC Plant) P&C Construction(RMC Plant)
6 7 8
1 25.09.15 CAY m1 (2014-2015) 5 24.09.14- 28.09.14 3 16.09.14- 18.09.14 1 04.03.15 1 05.03.15 1 06.03.15
12 44 159 49 67 43
1
11.08.14
39
1
13.08.14
37
1
14.08.14
71
CAY m2 (2013-2014) 1 CochinPortTrust,Kerala 1 30.09.2013 50 Impact Analysis v Industrial visits are arranged for students to provide more input for technical
seminar study, project work and practical oriented subjects. v Students also get awareness about the corporate culture and the working
atmosphere of the industries. v The visits motivate students to come out with more innovations and involve in
R&D work etc.
Feedback Report Table 2.19 Feedback Analysis S.No
1
2
Feedback category
Industrial visit
Inplant training
Frequency
Analysis
Actiontaken
After visiting the industry students will give feed back
Analysis based on Industrial visit report given by students
Based on the positive report given by the students, the industrial personals are contacted for signing of MOU, training programme and campus recruitment drive.
Every semester
The collected reports were analyzed and choose the better training center.
The finalized training centersR&D labs are contacted for sending of next set of students.
41
CRITERION 3
COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES
120
3.1 Establish the correlation between the courses and the Program Outcomes (POs) and Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs) (20)
Program Outcomes as mentioned in Annexure I and Program Specific Outcomes as defined by the Program PROGRAM OUTCOMES: 1. Engineering knowledge : Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering
fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems. 2. Problem analysis : Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex
engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences. 3. Design/development of solutions : Design solutions for complex engineering problems
and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations. 4. Conduct inve stigations of co mplex problems : Use research-based knowledge and
research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions. 5.
Modern tool usage : Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and
modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations. 6. The engineer and society : Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to
assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice. 7. Environment and sustainability : Understand the impact of the professional engineering
solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development. 8. Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and
norms of the engineering practice. 9. Individual and team work : Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or
leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
42
10. Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the
engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions. 11. Project m anagement and finance : Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments. 12. Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage
in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change. PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES: PSO 1: Attain proficiency in mathematics, physical science and also excel in problem solving,
design and interpretation of experiments by operating as a team to find solution of various issues in the core areas of civil engineering. PSO 2: Operate effectively in a professional environment by executing quality construction work
applying modern tools and techniques. PSO 3: Achieve excellence, managerial expertise, outstanding leadership to succeed in position in
civil engineering profession and passion for lifelong learning and research in advanced areas & related field. 3.1.1
Course Outcomes(COs)(SAR should include course outcomes of one course from each semester of study, however, should be prepared for all courses and made available as evidence, if asked) (5) Note: Number of Outcomes for a Course is expected to be around 6. Table 3.1.1 Course Outcomes Course Name: C202 (GE2021 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING) Year of Study: 2013-14
C202.1
Define the scope and importance of environment ecosystem and biodiversity
C202.2
Explain about the causes and effects of environmental pollution
C202.3
Describeaboutthepropertiesofnaturalsources
C202.4
Illustratethesocialissuesandenvironmentproblems
K2
C202.5
State about human population and variation among nations
K1
C202.6
Explaintheimportanceofenvironmentandits impacts
K2
43
K1 K2 K2
Course Name: C211 (CE2251- SOIL MECHANICS)
Year of Study: 2013-14
C211.1
Classifythesoilbasedonindexproperties
C211.2
Compute the permeability characteristics of soil
K3
C211.3
Explain about various methods of compaction and consolidation of soil
K2
C211.4
Calculate shear strength of various types of soil.
K3
C211.5
Analyze the stability of slopes using different methods.
K3
C211.6
Determine the properties of soil
K3
Course Name: C302(CE2302-STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS I)
K2
Year of Study: 2014-15
C302.1
Determine the forces in the members of the statically indeterminate structures.
K3
C302.2
Demonstrate the effect of moving loads and to construct influence line diagram for determinate beams
K3
C302.3
Analyze suspension cables, two hinged and three hinged arches
C302.4
Analyze statically indeterminate structures by using slope deflection methods.
K3
C302.5
Analyze statically indeterminate structures by using moment distribution methods.
K3
C302.6
Apply various classical methods in the analysis of structural elements.
K3
K3
Course Name: C312 (CE23 52- DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTU RES) Year of Study : 2014-15
C312.1
Enumerate the Design of steel connection using rivet, bolt and welding
k2
C312.2
Prepare the design of tension member
k3
C312.3
Prepare the design of compression member
k3
C312.4
Prepare the design of laterally supported and unsupported beams
k3
C312.5
Prepare the design of truss component members
C312.6
Apply the Codal provisions in the design of various steel structures.
Course Name: C402(CE2402 ESTIMATION AND QUANTITY SURVEYING)
44
k3 k3
Year of Study: 2015-16
C402.1
Estimate the Quantity of various items of works involved in buildings.
C402.2
Estimate the Quantity of various items of works involved in roads, retaining walls , culverts ,water supply and sanitary works
C402.3
Prepare specification ,tenders, contract document and rate analysis
C402.4
Estimatevaluationofbuildings
C402.5
Prepare report on estimate of various civil engineering works
C402.6
Estimate the quantities of works involved in various civil engineering works
K2 K2 K3 K2 K3
Course Name: C413 (CE2453 FINAL PROJECT)
K2
Year of Study: 2015-16
C413.1
Identifytherealworldproblems
K2
C413.1
Developdesignmethodologies&itsimplementation
C413.1
Utilizeadvancedsoftwaretechniques/skills
C413.1
Use various techniques, engineering knowledge and skill, and modern engineering tools
C413.1
Prepare Technical reports
C413.1
Solve specific a problem
K3 K3 K3 K6 K6
3.1.2 A CO-PO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1(Six matrices to be mentioned; one per semester f rom 3rd to 8th sem ester) (5) Note : correlation level s1, 2 or 3 as defined below : 1 : Slight(Low) 2 : Moderate(Medium) 3 : Substantial(High) If there is no correlation, put Course Name: C202 (GE2021 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING) Year of Study: 2013-14 CO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C202.1
1
0
-
-
-
0
1
- - - - -
C202.2
2
1
-
-
-
0
2
- - - - -
C202.3 C202.4
2 2
1 1
-
-
-
0 0
2 2
- - - - - - - - -
C202.5
1
0
-
-
-
0
1
- - - - -
C202.6
2
1
-
-
-
0
2
- - - - -
AVERAGE
1.7
0 .7
-
-
-
0.0
1 .7
Course Name: C211 (CE2251- SOIL MECHANICS) 45
-----
Year of Study: 2013-14
CO
PO1
PO2
PO3
C211.1
2
1
- - - - -
PO4
PO5
PO6
- - - - -
PO7
C211.2
3
2
- - - - -
- - - - -
C211.3
3
2
- - - - -
- - - - -
C211.4
3
2
- - - - -
- - - - -
C211.5
3
3
- - - - -
- - - - -
C211.6
3
2
- - - - -
- - - - -
AVERAGE
2.8
2 .0
PO8
PO9
PO10
PO11
PO12
----------
Course Name: C302 (CE2302-STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS I) CO
PO1
PO2
PO3
C302.1 C302.2
3 3
2 2
- - - - - - - - -
PO4
PO5
PO6
- - - - - - - - -
C302.3
3
2
- - - - -
- - - - -
C302.4
3
2
- - - - -
- - - - -
C302.5
3
2
- - - - -
- - - - -
C302.6
3
2
- - - - -
- - - - -
AVERAGE
3.0
2 .0
Year of Study: 2014-15
PO7
PO8
PO9
PO10
PO11
PO12
----------
Course Name: C312 (CE2352-DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURES) Year of Study: 2014-15 CO
PO1
PO2
PO3
C312.1
2
1
0
- - -
PO4
PO5 -
PO6
PO7
PO8 2
-
-
-
-
C312.2
3
2
1
- - -
-
3
-
-
-
-
C312.3
3
2
1
- - -
-
3
-
-
-
-
C312.4
3
2
1
- - -
-
3
-
-
-
-
C312.5
3
2
1
- - -
-
3
-
-
-
-
C312.6
3
2
1
- - -
-
3
-
-
-
-
AVERAGE
2 .8
1 .8
0 .8
----
PO9
PO10
PO11
PO12
----
3.0
Course Name: C402 (CE2402 ESTIMATION AND QUANTITY SURVEYING) Year of Study: 2015-16
CO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 C402.1 2 1 0 - - - - C402.2 2 1 0 - - - - C402.3 3 2 1 - - - - C402.4 2 1 0 - - - - C402.5 3 2 1 - - - - C402.6 2 1 0 - - - - AVERAGE 2.3 1.3 0.33 Course Name: C413 (CE2453 FINAL PROJECT)
PO7
PO8
PO9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
PO10 PO11 PO12
-Year of Study: 2015-16
CO
PO1
PO2
PO3
PO4
PO5
PO6
PO7
PO8
PO9
PO10
PO11
PO12
C413.1
2
1
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
C413.2
3
2
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
0
0
0
C413.3
3
2
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
0
0
0
C413.4
3
2
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
0
0
0
C413.5
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
C413.6
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
AVERAGE
2.8
2 .2
1 .5
1.5
1 .5
1.5
2.8
2 .8
1.5
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
46
3.1.2 B CO-PSO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1(Six matrices to be mentioned; one per semester from 3rd to 8th semester) (5) Table 3.1-2 CO – PO Matrices Course Name: C202 (GE2021 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING) Year of Study: 2013-14 CO
PSO1
PSO2
PSO3
C202.1
0
-
-
C202.2
1
-
-
-
-
C202.3 C202.4
1 1
-
-
C202.5
0
-
-
C202.6
1
-
-
AVERAGE
0.7
-
-
Course Name: C211 (CE2251- SOIL MECHANICS) CO C211.1 C211.2 C211.3 C211.4 C211.5 C211.6 AVERAGE
PSO 1 1 2 2 2 3 2 2.0
Year of Study: 2013-14
PSO 2
PSO 3 -
0 1 1 1 2 1 1.0
-
-
Course Name: C302 (CE2302-STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS I) CO
PSO1
PSO2
PSO3
C302.1
2
-
-
C302.2
2
-
-
C302.3
2
-
-
C302.4
2
-
-
C302.5
2
-
-
C302.6
2
-
-
AVERAGE
2.0
-
-
Year of Study: 2014-15
Course Name: C312 (CE2352-DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURES) Year of Study: 2014-15 CO
PSO1
PSO2
PSO3
C312.1
1
-
0
C312.2
2
-
1
C312.3
2
-
1
C312.4
2
-
1
C312.5
2
-
1
C312.6
2
-
1
AVERAGE
1.8
-
0.8
Course Name: C402 (CE2402 ESTIMATION AND QUANTITY SURVEYING) Year of Study: 2015-16
47
CO
PSO 1
PSO 2
PSO 3
C402.1
1
2
0
C402.2
1
2
0
C402.3
2
3
1
C402.4
1
2
0
C402.5
2
3
1
C402.6
1
2
0
AVERAGE
1.3
2.3
0.33
Course Name: C413 (CE2453 FINAL PROJECT) CO
PSO 1
Year of Study: 2015-16 PSO 2
PSO 3
C413.1 C413.2
1 2
2 3
0 0
C413.3
2
3
0
C413.4
2
3
0
C413.5
3
3
3
C413.6
3
3
3
AVERAGE
2.2
2.8
1 .0
3.1.3 - A Program level Course-PO matrix of all courses INCLUDING first year courses (10) Table 3.1-3 CO – PSO Matrices
Note : correlation levels 1, 2 or 3 as defined below : 1 : Slight(Low) 2 : Moderate(Medium) 3 : Substantial(High) If there is no correlation, put – COURSENAM E
PO 1
PO2
PO3
PO 4
PO 5
PO 6
PO7
PO8
PO 9
PO 1 0
PO11
PO 1 2
C101
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.0
1.5
1.5
-
C102
2.7
1.8
0.8
0.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C103
2.2
1.2
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C104
2.31
.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C105
3.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C106
2.8
-
0.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C107
3.0
-
-
-
3.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C108
3.0
2.2
-
-
3.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C109
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.2
2.0
2.0
-
C110
2.271
.67
0.7
0.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C111
2.2
1.3
0.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C112
1.80
.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C113
2.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C114
2.3
1.3
0.3
0.3
2.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C115 C116
3.0 2.0
3.0
-
1.0
1.0 1.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C117
2.2
-
-
-
0.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C201
2.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C202
1.7
0.7
-
-
-
-
1.7
-
-
-
-
-
C203
2.01
.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C204
2.71
.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
48
SUM
C205
2.21
.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C206
2.3
-
0.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C207
2.51
.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C208
3.0
2.0
1.0
-
1.0
-
-
-
1.0
-
-
-
C209
2.8
1.8
0.8
-
2.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C210
3.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C211
2.82
.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C212
2.71
.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C213
2.3
1.7
0.7
-
-
0.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
C214
2.21
.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C215
2.3
1.3
0.3
-
-
0.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
C216 C217
3.0 3.0
2.2 2.7
1.3 1.7
-
3.0 1.7
-
-
-
1.3 1.7
0.3 0.7
-
-
C218
3.0
2.2
1.3
-
1.3
-
-
-
1.3
-
-
-
C301
2.8
1.8
0.8
-
-
0.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
C302
3.02
.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C303
2.0
1.0
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C304
2.0
1.2
-
-
-
0.3
2.0
-
-
-
-
-
C305
2.8
1.8
0.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C306
3.0
2.3
1.3
-
-
-
-
3.0
-
-
-
-
C307
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.0
1.5
1.5
-
C308
3.0
2.2
1.2
-
3.0
-
-
-
1.2
0.2
-
-
C309
2.8
1.8
0.8
-
2.8
-
-
-
0.8
-
-
-
C310
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.5
-
0.0
-
C311
2.71
.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C312
2.8
1.8
0.8
-
-
-
-
3.0
-
-
-
-
C313
2.8
1.8
-
-
-
0.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
C314
2.3
1.3
-
-
-
0.3
2.3
-
-
-
-
-
C315
2.5
-
-
-
-
0.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
C316
2.5
1.5
-
-
-
0.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
C317
3.0
3.0
3.0
-
3.0
-
3.0
-
-
-
-
-
C318
3.0
2.5
1.8
-
1.8
-
3.0
-
-
-
-
-
C319
2.8
1.8
-
-
2.8
-
-
-
0.8
-
-
-
C401
3.0
2.0
1.0
-
-
-
3.0
-
-
-
-
-
C402
2.3
1.3
0.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C403
2.7
1.7
0.7
-
-
-
-
3.0
-
-
-
-
C404
2.3
1.3
0.3
-
-
-
2.0
-
-
-
-
C405
2.7
1.7
0.7
-
-
0.7
2.7
-
-
-
-
-
C406
2.5
-
0.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C407
2.0
1.0
-
-
-
-
2.0
-
-
-
-
-
C408 C409
3.0 2.8
3.0 2.2
2.0 1.5
1.5
2.0 1.5
1.5
2.8
2.8
1.5
1.0
1.0
-
C410
2.3
-
0.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C411
2.31
.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C412
2.5
1.5
-
-
-
0.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
C413
2.8
2.2
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
2.8
2.8
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
162
91
32
7
39
8
25
16.6
16
9
6
2
49
No of Courses
63
53
35
8
19
12
10
6
13
8
5
1
PO TARGET
2.6
1 .7
0 .9
0 .9
2.1
0.7
2 .5
2.76
1 .3
1.2
1 .4
1 .0
3.1.3 B Program level Course-PSO matrix of all courses INCLUDING first year courses (10) Table 3.1-5 Program Level CO with PSO matrices COURSENAME C101 C102
PSO1 2.5 1.5
PSO2 -
PSO3 2.0 -
C103 C104 C105 C106 C107 C108 C109 C110 C111 C112 C113 C114 C115 C116 C117 C201 C202 C203
1.2 1.3 2.0 1.8 1.8 2.2 3.0 1.7 1.3 0.8 1.5 1.3 3.0 2.0 1.5 0.7 1.0
-3.0 3.0 -
-0.3 1.0 -
C204 C205 C206 C207 C208 C209 C210 C211 C212 C213 C214 C215 C216 C217 C218 C301 C302 C303 C304 C305 C306 C307 C308 C309 C310 C311
1.7 1.2 1.5 2.0 1.8 2.0 2.0 1.7 1.7 1.2 1.3 2.2 3.0 2.2 2.0 2.0 1.2 1.8 2.3 3.0 2.2 1.8 2.5 1.7
2.3 3.0 2.8 2.3 3.0 2.0 3.0 -
2.3 1.0 0.7 1.0 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 0.8 0.7
50
C312 C313 C314 C315 C316 C317 C318 C319 C401 C402 C403 C404 C405
1.8 1.8 1.3 1.5 1.5 3.0 2.3 1.8 2.0 1.3 1.7 1.3 1.7
2.8 2.5 2.8
C406 C407 C408 C409 C410 C411 C412 C413 SUM No of Courses PSOTARGET
1.5 1.0 2.2 1.3 1.3 1.5 2.2 112.13 63 1.78
2.5 3.0 3.0 2.5 2.8 51.5 19 2.71
2.3
0.8 0.8 0.3 0.8 1.0 0.3 0.0
2.7 3.0 0.5 2.3 1.0 26.63 24 1.11
3.2 Attainment of Course Outcomes (50)
3.2.1 Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of Course Outcome is based (10). In the Outcome Based Education (OBE), assessment is done through one or more than one processes, carried out by the institution, that identify, collect, and prepare data to evaluate the achievement of course outcomes (CO’s).
CO Assessment Processes:
Assessment tools are categorized into two methods to assess the course outcomes as:
Direct Methods: Direct methods display the student’s knowledge and skills from their
performance in the continuous internal assessment tests, semester examinations, and laboratory Examination. These methods provide a sampling of what students know and/or can do and provide strong evidence of student learning.
51
Table 3.2-1 Direct Method Direct assessment Methods Sl.no
DirectAssessment
MethodDescription
The Internal Assessment marks in a theory paper shall be based on six tests generally conducted as per schedule. It is a 1.
Internal
Assessment metric to continuously assess the attainment of course
outcomes with respect to course objectives. The best marks
Test
obtained from first two tests shall be the first Internal Assessment Marks for the relevant subject. 2.
3.
In case of Practical, the Internal Assessment marks shall be
LabModelExam University
based on the laboratory records and one practical test. theory
Semester examination (theory or practical) are the metric to assess whether all the course outcomes are attained or not
Examination
framed by the course owner. Semester Examination is more 4.
5.
University
Practical
Examination
Project Work Viva-voce
focused on attainment of course outcomes and uses a descriptive exam. Viva-voce examination of project work shall be conducted for each Student.
52
Data collection-Direct Attainment
Conducting CIA test by the Department
Evaluation by the Faculty within two days of the Exam
Data Feeding in TCS ION within a Week of the Exam
Consolidation of Marks by the Department Exam Cell Coordinator in Excel Sheets
Uploading the Data in University Web Portal
Receiving the University Results from Exam Cell
Storing of Data for further processing by the Department Exam Cell Coordinator
Fig.3.2.1.1. Process of collection of data for direct assessment
53
3.2.2 Record the attainment of Course Outcome of all courses with respect to set attainment levels
Program shall have set Course Outcome attainment levels for all courses. MEASURING CO ATTAINMENT THROUGH INTERNAL ASSESSMENTS: Table 3.2.2.1.1 Evaluation of CO Attainment through Internal Assessment
54
55
56
MEASURING CO ATTAINMENT THROUGH EXTERNAL ASSESSMENTS
Table 3.2.2.1.2 Evaluation of CO Attainment through External Assessment
57
58
Attainment of Course Outcome for the Batch 2012-16
CO attainment has been calculated for the set attainment level as 50% of pass percentage of the Internal Assessment. Attainment Level 1: 50% students scoring more than 50% pass percentage of the University examinations. Attainment Level 2: 60% students scoring more than 50% pass percentage of the University examinations. Attainment Level 3: 70% students scoring more than 50% pass percentage of the University examinations. 59
CO Attainment through Internal Assessment Table 3.2.2.1.3 CO Attainment through Internal Assessment COURSECODE
CO1
CO2
CO3
CO4
CO5
CO6
C101
3
3
3
3
3
3
C102
3
3
3
3
3
3
C103
3
3
3
3
3
3
C104
3
3
3
3
3
3
C105
3
3
3
3
3
3
C106
3
3
3
3
3
3
C107
3
3
3
3
3
3
C108
3
3
3
3
3
3
C109
3
3
3
3
3
3
C110
3
3
3
3
3
3
C111
3
3
3
3
3
3
C112
3
3
3
3
3
3
C113
3
3
3
3
3
3
C114
3
3
3
3
3
3
C115
3
3
3
3
3
3
C116
3
3
3
3
3
3
C117
3
3
3
3
3
3
C201
3
3
3
3
3
3
C202
3
3
3
3
3
3
C203
3
3
3
3
3
3
C204
3
3
3
3
3
3
C205
3
3
3
3
3
3
C206
3
3
3
3
3
3
C207
3
3
3
3
3
3
C208
3
3
3
3
3
3
C209
3
3
3
3
3
3
C210
3
3
3
3
3
3
C211
3
3
3
3
3
3
C212
3
3
3
3
3
3
C213
3
3
3
3
3
3
C214
3
3
3
3
3
3
C215
3
3
3
3
3
3
C216
3
3
3
3
3
3
C217
3
3
3
3
3
3
C218 C301
3 2
3 2
3 2
3 2
3 3
3 3
C302
2
2
3
3
3
3
60
C303
3
3
2
2
3
3
C304
3
3
1
1
3
3
C305
2
2
0
0
3
3
C306
1
1
3
3
3
3
C307
3
3
3
3
3
3
C308
3
3
3
3
3
3
C309
3
3
3
3
3
3
C310
3
3
3
3
3
3
C311
3
3
3
3
3
3
C312
3
3
3
3
3
3
C313
3
3
3
3
3
3
C314 C315
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
C316
3
3
3
3
3
3
C316
3
3
3
3
3
3
C317
3
3
3
3
3
3
C318
3
3
3
3
3
3
C401
2
2
3
3
3
3
C402
3
3
3
3
3
3
C403
3
3
3
3
3
3
C404
2
2
3
3
3
3
C405
2
2
3
3
3
3
C406
2
2
3
3
3
3
C407
3
3
2
2
3
3
C408
3
3
3
3
3
3
C409 C410
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
C411
3
33333
C412
3
3
3
3
3
3
C413
3
3
3
3
3
3
CO Attainment through University Exam: Table 3.2.2.1.4 CO Attainment through University Exam COURSE CODE C101 C102 C103 C104 C105 C106 C107
CO1
CO5
CO6
22 33 33 22
CO2
CO3
22 33 33 22
2 3 3 2
2 3 3 2
33 33 33
33 33 33
3 3 3
3 3 3
61
CO4
C108
33
33
3
3
C109
33
33
3
3
C110
22
22
2
2
C111
33
33
3
3
C112
33
33
3
3
C113
22
22
2
2
C114
33
33
3
3
C115
33
33
3
3
C116
33
33
3
3
C117
33
33
3
3
C201
22 11 00 22 22 00 11 33 33 33 33 33
22 11 00 22 22 00 11 33 33 33 33 33
2 1 0 2 2 0 1 3 3 3 3 3
2 1 0 2 2 0 1 3 3 3 3 3
33 33 22 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 11 22 33 33
33 33 22 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 11 22 33 33
3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 2 3 3
3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 2 3 3
33 33 22
33 33 22
3 3 2
3 3 2
C202 C203 C204 C205 C206 C207 C208 C209 C210 C211 C212 C213 C214 C215 C216 C217 C218 C301 C302 C303 C304 C305 C306 C307 C308 C309 C310 C311
62
C312 C313 C314 C315 C316 C317 C318 C319
C401 C402 C403 C404 C405 C406 C407 C408 C409 C410 C411 C412 C413
11 33 33 00 00 33 33 33 00 11 11
11 33 33 00 00 33 33 33 00 11 11
1 3 3 0 0 3 3 3 0 1 1
1 3 3 0 0 3 3 3 0 1 1
00 00 33 11 33 33 33 33 33 33
00 00 33 11 33 33 33 33 33 33
0 0 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3
0 0 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3
CO Attainment for the batch 2012-16: CO attainment = 80% of Co attainment through university exam + 20% CO attainment through Internal Assessment Table 3.2.2.1.5 CO Attainment for batch 2012-16
COURSE CODE C101
CO1
CO2
CO3
CO4
CO5
CO6
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
C102
3
3
3
3
3
3
C103
3
3
3
3
3
3
C104
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
C105
3
3
3
3
3
3
C106
3
3
3
3
3
3
C107
3
3
3
3
3
3
C108
3
3
3
3
3
3
C109
3
3
3
3
3
3
C110 C111
2.2 3
2.2 3
2.2 3
2.2 3
2.2 3
2.2 3
C112
3
3
3
3
3
3
63
C113 C114
2.2 3
2.2 3
2.2 3
2.2 3
2.2 3
2.2 3
C115
3
3
3
3
3
3
C116
3
3
3
3
3
3
C117
3
3
3
3
3
3
C201
3
3
3
3
3
3
C202
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
0.6
0.6
0.6
C203
0.6
0.6
0.6
C204
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
C205
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
C206 C207
0.6.6 1.4
0.6 1.4
0.6 1.4
0.6 1.4
0.6 1.4
0.6 1.4
C208 C209
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
C210
3
3
3
3
3
3
C211
3
3
3
3
3
3
C212
3
3
3
3
3
3
C213
3
3
3
3
3
3
C214
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
C215
3
3
3
3
3
3
C216
3
3
3
3
3
3
C217
3
3
3
3
3
3
C218
3
3
3
3
3
3
C301
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
3
3
C302 C303
2.8 3
2.8 3
3 2.8
3 2.8
3 3
3 3
C304
3
3
2.6
2.6
3
3
C305
1.2
1.2
0.8
0.8
1.4
1.4
C306
1.8
1.8
2.2
2.2
2.2
1.4
C307
3
3
3
3
3
3
C308
3
3
3
3
3
3
C309
3
3
3
3
3
3
C310
3
3
3
3
3
3
C311
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
C312
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
C313
3
3
3
3
3
3
C314
3
3
3
3
3
3
0.6 0.6
0.6 0.6
0.6 0.6
0.6 0.6
0.6 0.6
0.6 0.6
C315 C316
64
C317 C318 C319
33 33
3 3
33
3 3
3 3
3 3
3
3
3
3
C401
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
C402
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
C403
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
C404
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
C405
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
C406
2.8
2.8
3
3
3
3
C407
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.4
C408 C409
33 33
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
C410 C411
33 33
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
C412
33
3
3
3
3
C413
33
3
3
3
3
3.3 Attainment of Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes (50) 3.3.1 Describe the assessment tools and pro cesses used for measuring the attainment of each of the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes (10)
(Describe the assessment tools and processes used together the data upon which the evaluation of each of the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes is based indicating the frequency with which these processes are carried out. Describe the assessment processes that demonstrate the degree to which the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes are attained and document the attainment levels)
65
DATA COLLECTION PROCESS FOR PO EVALUATION
66
Consolidated University Marks
Consolidated Internal Marks
Internal Assessment: Level 1 = 50% of the students scoring above 50% Level 2= 60% of the students scoring above 50%
Developing an Excel Sheet for calculating CO Attainment
Level 3=70% of the students scoring above 50%
University Assessment: Level 1 = 50% of the students scoring above 50% Level 2 = 60% of the students scoring above 50% Level3 = 70% of the students scoring above 50%
Finding the weighted average of attainment of internal and University exam
Weighted Average: University Exam: 80% Internal Exam : 20%
Course outcome attainment levels carried forward to PO attainment based on Mapping
Survey Results (Indirect Attainment)
Calculating PO Attainment using Excel
Finding the weighted average of attainment through direct and indirect attainment
Match the attainment with target level fixed in the Department Advisory Board Meeting
PO-CO ATTAINMENT MEASUREMENT
67
Weighted Average: Direct Attainment: 80% Indirect Attainment: 20%
3.3.2. Provide results of evaluation of each PO & PSO (40) The expected level of attainment for each of the Program Outcomes;
The program outcomes are assessed with the help of course outcomes of the relevant Courses through direct and indirect methods.
Direct Assessment Method:
Direct measures are provided through direct examinations or observations of student knowledge or skills against measureable course outcomes. The knowledge and skills described by the course outcomes are mapped to specific problems on internal exams/home assignment/group task. Throughout the semester the faculty records the performance of each student on each course outcome. At the end of the semester students receive grades from external exams.
Indirect Assessment Method:
Indirect assessment strategies are implemented by embedding them in the Exit survey, Employer survey and Alumni Survey. Finally, program outcomes are assessed with above mentioned data and Program Assessment Committee concludes the Po attainment level. The evaluation POs is carried out with respect to student performance and surveys in both the terms of direct and indirect assessment methods. ∑
Direct method of assessment is based on assessment of PO on the achievements in the contributing courses for that particular PO.
∑
Indirect method of assessment is based on Exit survey.
∑
The evaluation PSOs is carried out with respect to student performance and surveys in both the terms of direct and indirect assessment methods for the contributing courses mapped to the PSO. Programme Outcome assessment Tools
Programme Outcome 1: Engineering
knowledge:
Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering
fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
SUBJECTS
Method Of Assessment
Source Target For When For Data Data Is Performance Collection Collected
68
C102 C103 C104 C105 C106 C107 C108 C109 C110 C111
Internal/Extern Evaluation al Evaluation Data
80
End theof Semester
C112 C113 C114 C115 C116 C117 C201 C202 C203 C204 C205 C206
&
&
&
C207
&
C208 C209 C210 C211 C212 C213 20 C214 C215
Exit Survey
Survey
69
End of
C216 C217 C218
Program Exit Survey Alumni Survey
Report
C301 C302 C303 C304 C305 C306 C308 C309 C311 C312 C313 C314 C315 C316 C317 C318 C319 C401 C402 C403 C404 C405 C406 C407 C408 C409 C410 C411 70
theYear
C412 C413
Program Outcome 2: Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex
engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
SUBJECTS
Method Of Assessment
Source When Target For For Data Data Is Performance Collection Collected
C102 C103 C104 C108 C109 C110 C111 C112 C114 C116
Internal/Extern Evaluation al Evaluation Data
C201 C202 C203 C204 C205 C207 C208 C209 C210 C211 71
80
End of the Semester
C212 C213
&
&
&
C214
&
C215 C216 C217 C218 C301 C302 C303 C304 C305 C306 C308
20 Exit Survey Program Exit Survey Alumni Survey
Survey Report
C309 C311 C312 C313 C314 C316 C317 C318 C319 C401 C402 C403 C404 C405 C407 C408 C409 72
End of the Year
C411 C412 C413
Program Outcome 3: Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and
design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
SUBJECTS
Method Of Assessment
Source When Target For For Data Data Is Performance Collection Collected
C102 C103 C106 C109 C110 C111 C114 C201 C206 C208
Internal/Extern Evaluation al Evaluation Data
C209 C210 C213 C215 C216 C217 C218 C301 73
80
End of the Semester
C303 C305 C306 C308
&
&
& &
C309 C312 C317 C318 C401 C402 C403 C404 C405 C406 C408 C409
Exit Survey Program Exit Survey Alumni Survey
Survey Report
20
End of the Year
C410 C413
Program Outcome 4: Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research
methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions. SUBJECTS
C102 C110 C114 C116 C201 C210 C409 C413
Method Of Assessment
Source For Data Collection
Internal/External Evaluation & Exit Survey Program Exit Survey Survey Report Alumni Survey
74
Target For Performance
80
20
When Data Is Collected
End of the Semester End of the Year
Program Outcome 5: Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern
engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
SUBJECTS
Method Of Assessment
Source When Target For For Data Data Is Performance Collection Collected
C107 C108 C114 C115 C116 C117 C208
Internal/Extern al Evaluation &
C209
Evaluation Data
80
&
&
Survey Report
20
C216 C217 C218 C308 C309 C317
Exit Survey Program Exit Survey Alumni Survey
End of the Semester &
End of the Year
C318 C319 C408 C409 C413
Program Outcome 6: The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess
societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice. 75
SUBJETS
Method Of Assessment
Source For Data Collection
Target For Performance
When Data Is Collected
C213 C215 C301 C304
Internal/Extern al Evaluation &
Evaluation Data
80
C313 C314 C315 C316 C405 C409
End of the Semester &
Exit Survey Program Exit Survey Alumni Survey
&
&
Survey Report
20
End of the Year
C413
Program Outcome 7: Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering
solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
SUBJECTS
Method Of Assessment
Source When Target For For Data Data Is Performance Collection Collected
C202 C304 C314 C317
Internal/Extern al Evaluation &
C404 C405 C407
80 &
C318 C401
Evaluation Data
Exit Survey Program Exit Survey Alumni
&
End of the Semester &
20 Survey Report
76
End of the Year
C409
Survey
C413
Program Outcome 8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms
of the engineering practice.
SUBJECTS
Method Of Assessment
Source For Data
Target For Performance
Collection
When Data Is Collected
C306 C312 C401 C403 C404 C409 C413
Internal/Extern al Evaluation & Evaluation Exit Data Survey & Survey Program Exit Report Survey Alumni Survey
80 & 20
End of the Semester & End of the Year
Program Outcome 9: Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in
diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
SUBJECTS
C101 C109 C208 C216 C217 C218 C307
Method Of Assessment
Source When Target For For Data Data Is Performance Collection Collected
Internal/Extern al Evaluation Evaluation Data & & Exit Survey Survey Program Exit Report Survey Alumni
77
80 & 20
End of the Semester
& End of the Year
C308
Survey
C309 C310 C319 C409 C413
Program Outcome 10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write
effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
SUBJECTS
C101 C102 C216 C217 C308 C409 C413
Method Of Assessment
Source When Target For For Data Data Is Performance Collection Collected
Internal/Extern al Evaluation & Evaluation Exit Data & Survey Survey Program Exit Report Survey Alumni Survey
80 & 20
End of the Semester & End of the Year
Program Outcome11: Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering
and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
SUBJECTS
C101
Method Of Assessment
Source When Target For For Data Data Is Performance Collection Collected
Internal/Extern Evaluation 78
80&
Endof
al Evaluation & Exit Survey Program Exit Survey Alumni Survey
C109 C310 C405 C409 C410 C413
Data & Survey Report
20
the Semester & End of the Year
Program Outcome 12: Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change
SUBJECTS
Method Of Assessment
Source When Target For For Data Data Is Performance Collection Collected
Internal/Extern al Evaluation & Evaluation Exit Data & Survey Survey Program Exit Report Survey Alumni Survey
C413
End of the Semester & End of the Year
80 & 20
PO ATTAINMENT:
PO attainment = PO target* Percentage of CO attainment
Table 3.3.1 PO attainment COURSENAM E
PO1
PO2
PO3
PO4
PO5
PO6
PO7
PO8
PO9
PO10
PO11
PO12
C101
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.6
1.5
1.5
-
C102
2.7
1.8
0.8
0.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C103
2.2
1.2
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
79
C104
1.71
.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C105
3.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C106
2.8
-
0.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C107
3.0
-
-
-
3.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C108
3.0
2.2
-
-
3.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C109
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.2
2.0
2.0
-
C110
1.7
1.2
0.5
0.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C111
2.2
1.3
0.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C112
1.80
.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C113
1.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.3
0.3
0.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3.0
-
1.0
1 1.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C114
2.3
C115 C116
3 2.0
C117
2.2
-
-
-
0.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C201
2.5
1.50
.5
0.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C202
0.8
0.3
-
-
-
-
0.8
-
-
-
-
-
C203
0.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C204
1.91
.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.2
C205
1.6
0.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C206
0.5
-
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
1
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
C207 C208
1.0 3
C209
2.8
1.8
0.8
-
2.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C210
3.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C211
2.82
.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C212
2.71
.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C213 C214
2.3 2.21
1.7 .0
0.7 -
-
-
0.7 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
C215
1.7
0.9
0.2
-
-
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
C216
3.0
2.2
1.3
-
3.0
-
-
-
1.3
0.3
-
-
C217
3.0
2.7
1.7
-
1.7
-
-
-
1.7
0.7
-
-
C218
3.0
2.2
1.3
-
1.3
-
-
-
1.3
-
-
-
C301
2.7
1.7
0.8
-
-
0.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
C302
2.11
.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C303
1.9
1.0
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C304
1.4
0.8
-
-
-
0.2
1.4
-
-
-
-
-
C305
0.3
0.2
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C306
1.3
1.0
0.5
-
-
-
-
1.3
-
-
-
-
C307
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.0
1.5
1.5
-
C308
3.0
2.2
1.2
-
3.0
-
-
-
1.2
0.2
-
-
C309
2.8
1.8
0.8
-
2.8
-
-
-
0.8
-
-
-
C310 C311
2.21
.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.5 -
-
0.0 -
-
C312
1.3
0.8
0.4
-
-
-
-
1.4
-
-
-
-
80
C313
2.8
1.8
-
-
-
0.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
C314
0.5
0.3
-
-
-
0.1
0.5
-
-
-
-
-
C315
0.2
-
-
-
-
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
C316
0.5
0.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C317
3.0
3.0
3.0
-
3.0
-
3.0
-
-
-
-
-
C318
3.0
2.5
1.8
-
1.8
-
3.0
-
-
-
-
-
C319
2.1
1.3
-
-
2.1
-
-
-
0.6
-
-
-
C401
0.5
0.3
0.17
-
-
-
0.51
-
-
-
-
-
C402
1.8
0.61
0.14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C403
1.26
0.8
0.33
-
-
-
-
1.41
-
-
-
-
C404
0.4
0.23
0.1
-
-
-
0.0
0.36
-
-
-
-
C405 C406
0.5 2.4
0.3 -
0.1 0.5
-
-
0.1 -
0.5 -
-
-
-
-
-
C407
0.90
.45
-
-
-
-
0.9
-
-
-
-
-
C408
3.0
3.0
2.0
-
2.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C409
2.8
2.2
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
2.8
2.8
1.5
1.0
1.0
-
C410
2.3
-
0.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C411
2.31
.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C412
2.5
1.5
-
-
-
0.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
C413
2.8
2.2
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
2.8
2.8
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
SUM
132
76
28
7
36
7
18
11.8
15
8
7
1
No of Courses
63
53
35
8
19
12
10
6
13
8
5
1
Direct Attainment
2.0
1.3
0.8
0.8
1.9
0.6
1.8
1.96
1.2
1.0
1.4
1.0
Indirect Attainment 80% of Direct Attainment 20% of
2.2
1.8
1.1
1.2
2.1
0.9
2.0
1.2
1.5
0.8
1.0
0.8
1.6
1.1
0.6
0.7
1.5
0.4
1.4
1.56
0.9
0.8
1.1
0.8
Indirect Attainment PO ATTAINMENT
0.4 2.05
0.4 1.54
0.2 0.89
0.2 0.90
0.4 1.97
0.2 0.62
0.4 1.80
0.24 1.80
0.3 1.24
0.2 0.98
0.2 1.32
0.2 0.96
0.1
PSO attainment: Table 3.3.2 PSO attainment
SUBJECTCODE C101 C102 C103 C104 C105 C106 C107 C108 C109 C110
PSO1 1.83 1.50 1.20 0.95 2.00 1.83 1.83 2.17 3.00 1.25 81
PSO2 3.00 -
PSO3 1.47 -
C111 C112 C113 C114 C115 C116 C117 C201 C202 C203 C204 C205 C206 C207 C208 C209 C210 C211 C212 C213 C214 C215 C216 C217 C218
1.30 0.83 1.15 1.33 3.00 2.00 1.5 0.3 0.2 1.22 0.86 0.7 2.00 1.83 2.00 2.00 1.67 1.67 1.17 0.98 2.17 3.00 2.17
3.00 0.47 3.00 2.83 1.57 3.00
0.33 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.67 1.00 0.67 1.33 1.33
C301 C302 C303 C304 C305 C306 C307 C308 C309 C310 C311 C312 C313 C314
1.91 1.96 1.17 0.68 1.48 3.00 2.17 1.83 2.50 1.22 0.86 1.83 1.33
1.96 3.00 2.83 -
0.84 1.17 0.83 0.49 0.39 0.33 0.07
C315 C316 C317
0.30 0.3 3.00
0.50 -
-
82
C318 C319 C401 C402 C403 C404 C405 C406 C407 C408 C409 C410 C411 C412 C413 SUM No of Courses Direct Attainment IndirectAttainment 80% of Direct Attainment 20% of Direct Attainment PSO ATTAINMENT
2.33 1.83 0.36 0.62 0.78 0.24 0.30 1.47 0.44 2.17
2.83 1.09 0.47 2.44 3.00 3.00
0.83 0.18 0.15 3.0 0.50
1.30 1.33 2.33 1.50 2.50 2.17 2.83 1.00 90.07333 37.71111 18.95926 63 19 24 1.429735 2.125 0.922 1.5 2.1 1 1.14
1.70
0.74
0.30
0.42
0.20
1.44
2.12
0.94
PO TARGET vs. PO ATTAINMENT
83
3.0
2.5
2.0
PO TARGET
1.5
PO ATTAINMENT 1.0
0.5
0.0 PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
PSO TARGET vs PSO ATTAINMENT 3.0
2.5
2.0
PSO TARGET
1.5
PSOATTAINM ENT 1.0
0.5
0.0 PSO1
PSO2
PSO3
84
CRITERION 4
150
Students’ Performance
4. Students Performance (150) ITEM
CAY
CAYm 1
CAYm2
CAYm3
(201516)
(201415)
(201314)
(201213)
(201112)
(201011)
180
180
180
180
180
120
43
134
140
131
161
119
4
2
7
33
26
15
Separate division (N3)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total number of students admitted in the Program (N1 + N2 + N3)
47
136
147
164
187
134
(Information to be provided cumulatively for all the shifts with explicit headings, wherever applicable) Sanctioned intake of the program (N)
CAYm 4 CAYm 5
Total number of students admitted in first year minus number of students migrated to other programs/institutions plus no. of students migrated to this program (N1) Number of students admitted in 2nd year in the same batch via lateral entry (N2)
Number of students who have successfully graduated without backlogs in any semester/year of study
N1
+ N2 + N3
Year of entry
CAY (2015-16) CAYm1 (2014-15)
Number of students who have successfully graduated without backlogs in any semester/year of study
(As defined above)
IYear
47(43+4)
2
IIYear
IIIYear
IVYear
136(134+2)
40
27
CAYm2 (2013-14)
147(140+7)
34
16
CAYm3 (LYG) 2012-13
164(131+33)
33
15
5
2
CAYm4 (LYGm1) 2011-12
187(161+26)
35
20
12
12
CAYm5 (LYGm2) 2010-11
134(119+15)
20
4
3
3
CAYm6(LYGm3)
133(107+26)
19
6
5
5
85
(2009-10) Number of students who have successfully graduated (Students with backlog in stipulated period of study)
N1
Year of entry
CAY (2015-16) CAYm1 (2014-15)
+ N2 + N3
(As defined above) 47(43+4)
136(134+2)
Number of students who have successfully graduated (Students with backlog in stipulated period of study) I Year II Year III Year IV Year 5 44 49
CAYm2 (2013-14)
147(140+7)
46
34
CAYm3 (LYG) 2012-13 CAYm4 (LYGm1) 2011-12 CAYm5 (LYGm2) 2010-11 CAYm6(LYGm3) (2009-10)
164(131+33) 187(161+26) 134(119+15)
52 42 39
66 48 34
24 66 45
101 91 83
133(107+26)
24
15
25
92
4.1 Enrolment Ratio (20)
Enrolment Ratio= N1/N Year N 2015-2016 180 2014-2015 180 2013-2014 180 2012-2013 180 Average [(ER1+ER2+ER3) /3]: 75
N1 43 134 140 131
EnrolmenR t atio=(N1/N)*100 23.89 74.44 77.78 72.78
Assessment: 16 4.2. Success Rate in the stipulated period of the program (40) 4.2.1. Success rate without backlogs in any semester/year of study (25)
SI= (Number of students who have graduated from the program without backlog)/(Number of students admitted in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable) Average SI = Mean of Success Index (SI) for past three batches Success rate without backlogs in any year of study = 25 × Average SI
86
Latest Year of Latest Year of Graduation Graduation minus 1, CAYm3(LYG CAYm4(LYGm2) m1) 2010-11 2011-12
Item
Latest Year of Graduation (LYG) 2012-13
Number of students admitted in the corresponding First Year + admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate division, if
164
187
134
133
applicable Number of students who have graduated without backlogs in the stipulated period
2
12
3
5
0.01219512
0.064171
0.022388
0.037594
Success Index (SI)
Average Success Index Average Success 0.032918102 Index Average SI [(SI1+SI2+SI3)/3]: 0.0414
Latest Year of Graduation minus 2, CAYm5(LYGm3) 2009-10
0.041384389
Assessment [25* Average SI]: 1.035 4.2.2. Success rate with backlog in stipulated period of study (15)
SI= (Number of students who graduated from the program in the stipulated period of course duration)/ (Number of students admitted in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable) Average SI = mean of Success Index (SI) for past three batches Success rate = 15 × Average SI
Item
Number of students admitted in the corresponding First Year + admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate
Latest Year of Graduation (LYG) 2015-16
Latest Year of Graduation CAYm3 (LYGm1) 2011-12
164
187
Latest Year of Graduation minus 1, CAYm4(LYGm2) 2010-11
134
87
Latest Year of Graduation minus 2, CAYm5 (LYGm3) 2009-10
133
division, if applicable Number of students who have graduated with backlogs in the stipulated period Success Index (SI)
101
91
83
92
0.61585366
0.486631
0.619403
0.691729
0.599254441
Average SI Average SI
0.573962553
Average SI [(SI1+SI2+SI3)/3]: 0.6 Assessment [15* Average SI]: 9 4.3. Academic Performance in Third Year (15)
Academic Performance Level = 1.5 * Average API (Academic Performance Index) API = ((Mean of 3rd Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or (Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students in Third Year/10)) x (number of successful students/number of students appeared in the examination) Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the Final year. Academic Performance
CAY 2015-2016 2012-16
Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of 5.35 all successful students (X) Totalno.ofsuccessfulstudents(Y) 159 Total no. of students appeared in the 159 examination (Z) API X* =(Y/Z) 5.35 AverageAPI=(AP1+AP2+AP3)/3
CAYm1 2014-2015 2011-15
CAYm2 2013-2014 2010-14
5.88 173
5.81 127
173 5.88
CAYm3 2012-2013 2009-13
6.35 124
127 5.81 6.01
124 6.35
Average API [(AP1 + AP2 +AP3)/3]:6.01 Assessmen t [1.5*Average API]:
9.02
4.4. Academic Performance in Second Year (15)
Academic Performance Level = 1.5 * Average API (Academic Performance Index) API = ((Mean of 2nd Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or (Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students in Second Year/10)) x (number of
88
successful students/number of students appeared in the examination) Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the Third year. Academic Performance
CAY 2015-2016 2013-17
Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of all successful students (X) Total no. of successful students (Y) Total no. of students appeared in the examination (Z) API = X* (Y/Z)
CAYm1 2014-2015 2012-16
CAYm2 2013-2014 2011-15
CAYm3 2012-2013 2010-14
5.43
5.57
6.30
173
127
5.28
147
159
147 5.28
173
159 5.43
127
5.57
6.30 5.76
Average API = (AP1 + AP2 +AP3)/3 Average API [(AP1 + AP2 +AP3)/3]
5.43
:5.76
Assessment [1.5*Average API]
:8.65
4.5. Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship (40)
Assessment Points = 40 × average placement ITEM Total No. of Final Year Students(N)
No. of students placed in the companies or government sector (X) No. of students admitted to higher studies with valid qualifying scores (GATE or equivalent State or National Level Tests, GRE, GMAT etc.)(Y) No. of students turned entrepreneur in engineering technology(Z) Placement Index[(X+Y+Z)]/N
2015-2016
2014-2015
2013-2014
2012-2013
159
173
127
124
110
153
86
98
3
4
2
2
-
3
1
3
0.711
0.925
0.701
0.831
Average Placement[(P1+P2+P3)/3] Average Placement[(P1+P2+P3)/3]
0.8188 0.7788 89
Average placement= (P1 + P2 +P3)/3=0.8188 Assessment Points = 40 × 0.8188 = 32.751 4.6 Professi onal Activities (20) 4.6.1. Professional societies/chapters and organizing engineering events (5)
The Department of Civil Engineering has two students Chapter – BAI Institute chapter, and Sree Sastha Civil Engineering Association (SSCEA).The following are the various events organized through these chapters and association CAY (2015-16) S. No
1 2 3 4
Name of the Professional society SSCEA
SSCEA SSCEA SSCEA
5
SSCEA
6
SSCEA
7
SSCEA
Name of the Events
GuestLectureonWasteWaterTreatment GuestLectureonMechanicsoffluids GuestLecture onRemotesensingand GIS NationalLevelTechnicalSymposium GuestLectureonStructuralanalysis-I Workshop on ”Emerging trends in Construction Industry” GuestLectureonSoilMechanics
Date of Programme
21.07.2015 29.07.2015 04.08.2015 09.08.2015 04.09.2015 27.11.2015 21.01.2016
CAY m1 (2014-15)
1
SSCEA
2
SSCEA
3
SSCEA
4
SSCEA
5
SSCEA
6
SSCEA
7
SSCEA
8
SSCEA
9 10
SSCEA SSCEA
Guest Lecture on Introduction to Construction Planning Guest Lecture on Construction of Highways & Bridges NationalLevelTechnicalSymposium Guest Lecture on Recent trends on high rise buildings Workshop on “Modern Construction Materials” Guest Lecture on Environmental Awareness Guest Lecture on Estimation Using BEST Software Guest Lecture on Introduction to Construction Planning Guest Lecture on Construction Management Techniques National Conference on Advancements in 90
25.07.2014 04.08.2014 09.08.2014 04.09.2014 29.09.2014 20.12.2014 07.01.2015 11.02.2015
23.04.2015 29.04.2015
Civil Engineering (CACE’15) CAY m2 (2013-14)
1
SSCEA
2
Student Chapter
4
ISTE Student Chapter SSCEA
5
SSCEA
6
SSCEA
7
SSCEA
8
SSCEA
9
Student Chapter
10
SSCEA
11
SSCEA
12
SSCEA
13 14 15
3
NationalLevelTechnicalSymposium Group Discussion 15 teams participated and the three teams were awarded certificates Indra College ISTE Technical Competition “Best Engineer” GuestLectureon“GreenBuilding” Workshop on “Modern Construction Materials”
10.08.2013 24.08.2013 30.08.2013 04.09.2013 19.09.2013
SSCEA
GuestLectureon“FractureMechanics” Guest Lecture on Modern Concrete-The Changing Paradigm Workshop on ”Emerging Trends in Construction Industry” Quiz Completion 13 teams Participated and the three teams were awarded certificates National Conference on Advancements in Civil Engineering (CACE’14) Guest Lecture on Special Concrete & Case Studies Guest Lecture on Construction Planning and scheduling GuestLectureonHydrology
12.10.2013
04.03.2014
SSCEA SSCEA
GuestLectureonSurveying-II GuestLectureonSoilMechanics
20.03.2014 29.03.2014
16.11.2013 28.11.2013 11.01.2014 29.04.2014 20.02.2014 15.03.2014
CAY m3 (2012-13)
1
ISTE Student Chapter
2
SSCEA
3
SSCEA
4
Student Chapter
5
Student Chapter
6
SSCEA
7
SSCEA
8
SSCEA
9
SSCEA
Indra College ISTE Technical Competition “Best Engineer” Guest Lecture on “GIS Application in civil Engineering” Personalitydevelopmentprogramme. Quiz Completion 13 teams Participated and the three teams were awarded certi ficates Group Discussion 15 teams participated and the three teams were awarded certificates NationalLevelTechnicalSymposium Guest Lecture on “How to Choose the Final year Project ” Workshop on “Computer Application in construction Engineering” Workshop on “Modern trends in Civil 91
14.07.2012 28.07.2012 04.08.2012 11.08.2012 01.09.2012 20.09.2012 06.10.2012 02.02.2013 09.02.2013
10
SSCEA
1
ISTE Student Chapter
2
SSCEA
3 4 5
SSCEA SSCEA SSCEA
6
SSCEA
7
Student Chapter
8
Student Chapter
9
SSCEA
10
SSCEA
engineering” National Conference on Advancements in Civil Engineering (CACE’13) CAY m4 (2011-12)
29.04.2013
Indra College ISTE Technical Competition “Value engineering” Workshop on “Emerging Trends in Civil engineering” Guest Lecture on “Remote Sensing” Guest Lecture on “Town Planning” National Level Technical Symposium Workshop on “CADD Software and its uses” Treasure and Completion 10 teams participated and the three teams were awarded certificates the CADD drawing Completion 13 teams Participated and the three teams were awarded certificates Workshop on ”Emerging Trends in Construction Industry” National Conference on Advancements in Civil Engineering (CACE’12)
09.07.2011 31.08.2011 10.09.2011 15.09.2011 06.10.2011 15.10.2011 29.10.2011
17.11.2011 28.01.2012 13.04.2012
4.6.2 Publication of technical magazines, newsletters, etc. (5)
(The Department shall list the publications mentioned earlier along with the names of the editors, publishers, etc.) The Department has taken an opportunity to publish newsletters that summarize events, technical innovations and activities conducted and participated technical magazines stimulates creativeness in students and faculty and helps for their profession development. A. Department Newsletters and Souvenirs Org anization of paper contest , design content, etc . and achievements Civil department students organize various events through symposium the details are as follows. S.No
Name of the magazine
Month and Issue
Publishers
Name of the e ditors
Efforts & achievements
CAY (2015-2016)
1
COGNIZANCE
10/2015 Issue 1
Department of Civil Engineering 92
Dr.S.Thenmozhi (HOD)-CE Lavanya (IVCE)
Students prize winning and technical contribution
COGNIZANCE
4/2016 Issue 2
1
COGNIZANCE
10/2014 Issue 1
2
COGNIZANCE
3/2015 Issue 2
1.
COGNIZANCE
08/2013 Issue 1
2.
COGNIZANCE
10/2013 Issue 2
3.
COGNIZANCE
03/2013 Issue 3
4
COGNIZANCE
2
11/2013 Issue 5
Department of Civil Engineering
Dr.S.Thenmozhi (HOD)-CE Lavanya (IV CE)
CAY m1 (2014-2015) Department Dr.S.Thenmozhi of Civil (HOD)-CE Engineering Manisha (III CE) Department Dr.S.Thenmozhi of Civil (HOD)-CE Engineering Lalith (II CE) CAY m2 (2013-14)
Department Dr.S.Thenmozhi of Civil (HOD CE) Engineering Genga Chithra V (II CE) Dr.S.Thenmozhi Department (HOD CE) of Civil Keerthiga .K (IV CE) Engineering Madhumitha (IV CE) Rajeshwar. C.G (III CE) Dr.S.Thenmozhi Department (HOD CE) of Civil Keerthiga .K (IV CE) Engineering Madhumitha (IV CE) Rajeshwar. C.G (III CE) Dr.S.Thenmozhi Department (HOD CE) of Civil Madhumitha (IV CE) Engineering Rajeshwar. C.G (IV CE) Gopinath.R (AP/CE)
Students participated in extracurricular activities Students contributed recent news in civil Engineering Students contributed technical news and drawings Students contributed drawings using technical Software’s. Students contributed technical articles
Students contributed Poems and Literature
Students contributed conventional ideas in civil Engineering
CAY m3 (2012-13)
COGNIZANCE
07/2012 Issue 1
Department of Civil Engineering
2
COGNIZANCE
09/2012 Issue 3
Department of Civil Engineering
3
COGNIZANCE
10/2012 Issue 4
Department of Civil Engineering
COGNIZANCE
11/2012 Issue 5
Department of Civil Engineering
1
4
93
Dr.B.Hemalatha (HOD CE) Naveen Raj. R (II CE) Dr.B.Hemalatha (HOD CE) Keerthiga .K (III CE) Madhumitha (IIICE) Dr.B.Hemalatha (HOD CE) Rajeshwar. C.G (IV CE)Kavitha .R ( AP/CE) Dr.B.Hemalatha (HOD CE) Rajeshwar. C.G (III CE)
Students contributed drawings using technical Software’s. Students contributed drawings Students contributed conventional ideas in civil Engineering Students contributed recent news in the civil Engineering
Shamla.D.S(AP/CE)
field
CAY m4 (2011-2012)
1
COGNIZANCE
07/2011 Issue 1
Department of Civil Engineering
2
COGNIZANCE
08/2011 Issue 2
Department of Civil Engineering
3
COGNIZANCE
09/2011 Issue 3
Department of Civil Engineering
4
COGNIZANCE
10/2011 Issue 4
Department of Civil Engineering
Dr.B.Hemalatha (HOD CE) B.Arun (II CE)
Students contributed drawings using technical Software’s.
Dr.B.Hemalatha (HOD CE) Karthiga (II CE) Madhumitha (II CE) Genga Chithra (IV CE) Dr.B.Hemalatha (HOD CE) Karthiga (II CE) Madhumitha (II CE) Genga Chithra (IV CE) Dr.B.Hemalatha (HOD CE) Karthiga (II CE) Madhumitha (II CE) Genga Chithra (IV CE)
Students contributed technical articles
Students contributed drawings
Students contributed poems and literatures
4.6.3 Participation in inter-institute events by students of the program of study (10)
(The Department shall provide a table indicating those publications, which received awards in the events/conferences organized by other institutes.)
Item
Symposium Workshop National conference International conference
CAY 201516 Participation 125 Prizes-15 15 -
-
Participation110 Prizes-1 5 20
CAYm1 201314 Participation100 Prizes-3 7 25
CAYm2 201213 Participation120 Prizes-3 0 22
CAYm1 201112 Participation140 Prizes-2 8 19
-
1
-
-
-
2
-
-
CAY 2014-15
a. Paper publications in International and National Journals have helped students to share their innovative ideas to the outside world. The detailed list is:
94
Sl.No
Name of the student
Title of the Paper
Journal Name
International Journal of Emerging Engineering Research and Technology International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology
1
R.Shruthi
Experimental Studies on Replacement fine aggregate with glass and fly ash
2
A.Sivaranjani, M.Monica, V.R. Subhashini, S.Sareetha
Study on internal curing of concrete using Admixtures
Month and Year
May-14
Jan-14
b. Details of prize winners and participants of various events in Inter – college symposiums during the past 3 years
SYMPOSIUM- PRIZE WINNING CAY ( 201 5- 2016) Title College “Artifex 2k15” Technical quiz Sri Venkateswara College Of Engineering, Chennai “Artifex 2k15” Caddquiz Sri Venkateswara College Of Engineering, Chennai “Artifex 2k15” Modelmaking Sri Venkateswara College Of Engineering, Chennai
S.no
Name
1
M.S.Mani Manjari
2
Jeyanthi.K
3
Lavanya.V
4
PrakashRaj.A
5
Arul Prakash K.
Code cracking
6
Pravena.S.R
Technicalquiz
7
SivaneshC
Modelmaking
8
Anugraha.R
Civil
9
Manisha.M
Poster presentation
10
Subash.C.A
Caddquiz
11
Bhagya Lakshmi .R
Cadd modeling
12
Padmavathi.S
Builders choice
Autocad modeling
“Zaarvia 2k15” United Institute Of Technology, Coimbatore “Aptaz 2k15” T.J Institute Of Technology, Chennai “Wafes 2k16” , Meenakshi Sundararajan Engineering College “Wafes 2k16” , Meenakshi Sundararajan Engineering College “Eptis 2k15” Dhanalakshmi Engineering College, Chennai “Eptis 2k15” Dhanalakshmi Engineering College, Chennai “Civis 2k16” A.C.T College Of Engineering & Technology, Chennai “Civilian 2k16” B.S.Abdur Rahman University. Chennai “Civiclan 2k16” B.S.Abdur Rahman University. Chennai 95
Prize
1st
2nd
1st 3rd 3rd 3rd 1st 1st 2nd 3rd 1st 2nd
13
Swetha.S
14
Vishnu Shankar .B
15
Subashree.R
“Civiclan 2k16” B.S.Abdur Rahman University. Chennai “Civiclan 2k16” Model making B.S.Abdur Rahman University. Chennai “Civiclan 2k16” Cadddrawing B.S.Abdur Rahman University. Chennai CAYm1 ( 2014 - 2015)
Technicalquiz
3rd 3rd 1st
Xhenios’14 (Paper Presentation) Xhenios’14 (Paper Presentation)
Peri Institute Of Technology & 15 th Sep
1st Prize
Peri Institute Of Technology & 15 th Sep
1st Prize
Safrinsiahan M.R
Xhenios’14 (Code Cracking)
Peri Institute Of Technology & 15 th Sep
1st Prize
4.
T.Nivetha N.Vinodha
6.
S.Vaanmathy
7.
R.Gomathyi
Saveetha Engineering College & 14,15 th And 16 Sep Saveetha Engineering College & 14,15 th And 16 Sep Saveetha Engineering College & 14,15 And 16t H Sep Saveetha Engineering College & 14,15 And 16t H Sep
1st Prize
5.
8.
S.Natesan
Peri Institute Of Technology & 15 th Sep
1st Prize
9.
S.Natesan
Peri Institute Of Technology & 15 th Sep
1st Prize
10.
A.Sunil Kumar
Drestein’14(Poster Presentation) Drestein’14(Poster Presentation) Drestein’14(Poster Presentation) Drestein’14(Poster Presentation) Xhenios’14 (Paper Presentation) Xhenios’14 (Cadd Contest) Xhenios’14 (Cadd
11.
Safrinsiahanm.R
12.
S.Abirami
13.
S.Abirami
14.
S.Abirami
1.
A.Prakashraj
2.
J.Manibharathi
3.
1
N.Prabu
2
N.NaveenRaj
3
G.Vijayakumar
th
Peri Institute Of Technology & 15 Sep
Contest) Xhenios’14 (Cadd th Peri Institute Of Technology & 15 Sep Contest) Xhenios’14 (Paper th Peri Institute Of Technology & 15 Sep Presentation) Drestein’14(Poster th Peri Institute Of Technology & 15 Sep Presentation) Xhenios’14 (Cadd th Peri Institute Of Technology & 15 Sep Contest) CAYm2 ( 2013-2014 ) Ziggurat 2k13 (Paper Presentation) Ziggurat 2k13 (Paper Presentation) Kraciva’13 Paper Presentation
Magna College Of Engineering & th 10 Sep. Magna College Of Engineering & 10 Sep.
1st Prize 1st Prize
st
1 Prize st
1 Prize st
1 Prize st
1 Prize 2
nd
Prize
1st Prize th
Ssn College Of Engineering & 11th Sep 96
1st Prize
1st Prize 1stPrize
Kraciva’13 Poster Presentation Kraciva’13 (Cadd Contest) Ascent’13 (Quiz & Model Making) Ascent’13 (Quiz & Model Making) Ascent’13 (Quiz & Model Making) Ascent’13 (Tech. Quiz)
4
G.Vijayakumar
5
G.Vijayakumar
6
K.Swetha
7
A.Vijila Merlin Rose
8
M.Sathishkumar
9
G.Vijaya Kumar
10
S.Mahesh
11
D.Karthi
12
M.Poongundran
Ascent’13( Quiz)
13
A.Vijayakumar
Ascent’13 (Quiz)
14
Ganeshsanat Kumar
15
P.Archana
16
B.Monisha
17
P.Dinesh
18
P.Dinesh
19
P.Dinesh
Ascent’13 (Cadd Contest) Karigaala’2k13 (Paper Presentation) Karigaala’2k13 (Paper Presentation) Karigaala’2k13 (Paper Presentation) Karigaala’2k13 (Paper Presentation) Karigaala’2k13 (Paper Presentation)
20
P.Dinesh
21
R.Aravind Kumar
22
G.V.Vinoth Kumar
23
K.Swetha
Ssn College Of Engineering &11
Karigaala’2k13 (Paper Presentation) Karigaala’2k13 (Quiz) Karigaala’2k13 (Quiz)
Sep
Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of Technology& 12th Sep Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of th Technology& 12 Sep Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of th Technology& 12 Sep Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of th Technology& 12 Sep Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of th Technology& 12 Sep
Ascent’13 (Poster Presentation) Ascent’13 (Poster Presentation)
(CodeCracking)
th
1stPrize 1st Prize 1st Prize 1st Prize 1st Prize 1st Prize
Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of th Technology& 12 Sep Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of Technology& 12th Sep Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of Technology& 12th Sep Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of Technology& 12th Sep Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of Technology& 12th Sep
1st Prize 1st Prize 1st Prize 1st Prize 1st Prize th
Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19 Sep
1st Prize
th
Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19 Sep
1st Prize
th
Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19 Sep
1st Prize
Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19th Sep
1st Prize
Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19th Sep
1st Prize
Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19th Sep
1st Prize
th
Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19 Sep
1st Prize
th
Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19 Sep Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19th Sep 97
1st Prize 1st Prize
24
Mr.Hari Vijay
25
R.Aravindh
26
C. Joyadithyan
27
R.Kalaiselvan
28
B.Parsith Kumar
29
A.Jiaur Rahuman
30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
1 2 3 4 5
Karigaala’2k13 (Cadd Quiz) Wafes V2.0 (Surveying) Wafes V2.0 (Surveying) Generix’13 Xiphias 2k13(Paper Presentation) Xiphias
Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19th Sep Meenakshi Sundararajan Engineering College & 12th Aug Meenakshi Sundararajan Engineering th College & 12 Aug R.M.D Engineering College & 11t Aug
th
Dmi College Of Engineering, 28 Aug
2nd 2nd Prize 2nd Prize 1st Prize 1stPrize
th
2k13(Paper Dmi College Of Engineering, 28 Aug Presentation) Xiphias S.Magesh 2k13(Poster Dmi College Of Engineering, 28 th Aug. Presentation) Aakriti’13 (Paper Dr.M.G.R. Educational & Research B.Parsith Kumar th th Presentation) Intitute University,8 & 9 Sep. A.Jiaur Aakriti’13 (Paper Dr.M.G.R. Educational & Research th th Rahuman Presentation) Intitute University, 8 & 9 Sep. Aakriti’13 (Paper Dr.M.G.R. Educational & Research A.Ananadhavel Presentation) Intitute University, 8th & 9th Sep. Aakriti’13 (Paper Dr.M.G.R. Educational & Research M.Saravanan Presentation) Intitute University, 8th & 9th Sep. A.Vettri Aakriti’13 (Paper Dr.M.G.R. Educational & Research Vigneshwaran Presentation) Intitute University, 8th & 9th Sep. Confluencia’14 M.S.Mani (Paper Sakthi Mariamman Engineering College, Manjari 27th March Presentation) M.S.Mani Confluencia’14 Sakthi Mariamman Engineering College, th Manjari (Quiz) 27 March Jetinfratec 2k14 M.S.Mani Mamallan Institute Of Technology& 14 th (Paper Manjari Mar Presentation/Quiz) CAYm3 ( 2012-2013 ) Sparkgallo’12 University College Of Engineering, V.Naresh (Paper Presentation) Panruti & 11th Sep. Sparkgallo’12 University College Of Engineering, V.Naresh (Posterpresentation) Panruti & 11th Sep. Instruofete’13 Panimalar Engineering College & N.Vinitha (Code Cracking) 25th Jan Instruofete’13 Panimalar Engineering College & S.Abirami (Code Cracking) 25th Jan Instruofete’13 Panimalar Engineering College & S.Swathi (Code Cracking) 25th Jan 98
1stPrize 2nd Prize 2nd Prize 2nd Prize 2nd Prize 2nd Prize 2nd Prize 2nd Prize 2nd Prize 2nd Prize
2nd Prize 1st Prize 2nd Prize 1st Prize 1st Prize
6
R.Naveen
7
C.Santhdeep Kumar
8
G.Vijayakumar
9
A.Vijayakumar
10
C.Joyadithyan
Formaquest 2013 (Model Making) Formaquest 2013 (Model Making) Symplix’12 (Super Surveyor) Symplix’12 (Super Surveyor) Symplix’12 (Super Surveyor)
Shree Motilal Kanchaiyalal Forma Institute Of Technology &23,25th Jan Shree Motilal Kanchaiyalal Forma Institute Of Technology &23,25th Jan Misrimal Navajee Munoth Jain th Engineering College & 28 Sep Misrimal Navajee Munoth Jain th Engineering College & 28 Sep Misrimal Navajee Munoth Jain th Engineering College & 28 Sep
99
1st Prize 1st Prize 1st Prize 1st Prize 2nd Prize
CRITERION 5
FACULTY INFORMATION & CONTRIBUTIONS
200
5. FACULTY INFORMATION & CONTRIBUTIONS (200) 5.1. Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR) (20)
S.F ratio = N/F; N = Number of Students= 3x where x is (approved intake + 20% lateral entry intake+ separate division, if any) F = No. of faculty = (a + b – c) for every assessment year a:
Total number of full-time regular Faculty serving fully to 2nd, 3rd and 4th year of the this
program b:
Total number of full-time equivalent regular Faculty(considering fractional load) serving
this program from other Progr am (s) c:
Total number of full time equivalent regular Faculty(considering fractional load) of this
program serving other program (s) Regular Faculty means:
•
Full time on roll with prescribed pay scale. An employee on contract for a period of not
less than two years AND drawing consolidated salary not less than applicable gross salary shall only be counted as a regular employee. •
Prescribed pay scales means pay scales notified by the AICTE/Central Government and
implementation as prescribed by the State Government. In case State Government prescribes lesser consolidated salary for a particular cadre then same will be considered as reference while counting faculty as a regular faculty. The following table shows the Student faculty ratio
Year
x
N
F
SFR=N/F
2015-1016
216
648
46
14.09
2014-2015
216
648
46
14.09
2013-2014
144+(216*2)
576
41
14.05
Average SFR for three assessment years
14.08
Marks to be given proportionally from a maximum of 20 to a minimum of 10 for average SFR between 15:1 to 20:1, and zero for average SFR higher than 20:1. 100
5.2. Faculty Cadre Proportion
(25)
The reference Faculty cadre proportion is 1(F1):2(F2):6(F3) F1: Number of Professors required = 1/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 15:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1 F2: Number of Associate Professors required = 2/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 15:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1 F3: Number of Assistant Professors required = 6/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 15:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1 The following table shows the faculty cadre proportion for CAY,CAYm1,CAYm2
Professor Year
Associate Professor
Assistant Professor
Required F1
Available
Required F2
Available
Required F3
Available
5 5 5 RF1=5
5 5 5 AF1=5
10 10 10 RF2=10
0 0 0 AF2=0
29 29 24 RF3=27.33
40 40 35 AF3=38
2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 Average Numbers
È È AF ˘ È AF ˘˘ ˘ È AF 1 ˙ + Í 2 * 0.6˙ + Í 3 * 0.4˙ ˙ *12.5 Í Í RF ˙ Í RF ˙˚ ÍÎ RF3 ˙˚ ˙ ÎÎ 1 ˚ Î 2 ˚
Cadre Ratio Marks Í Í
•
If AF1 = AF2= 0 then zero marks
•
Maximum marks to be limited if it exceeds 25
Assessment = 19.29
Example: Student No. = 180; Required number of Faculty: 12; RF1= 1, RF2=2 and RF3=9 Case 1: AF1/RF1= 1; AF2/RF2 = 1; AF3/RF3 = 1; Cadre proportion marks = (1+0.6+0.4) x12.5 = 25 Case 2: AF1/RF1= 1; AF2/RF2 = 3/2; AF3/RF3 = 8/9; Cadre proportion marks = (1+0.9+0.3) x12.5 = limited to 25 Case 3:AF1/RF1=0; AF2/RF2=1/2; AF3/RF3=11/9; Cadre proportion marks = (0+0.3+0.49) x12.5 = 9.87
101
5.3. Faculty Qualification
(25)
FQ =2.5 x [(10X +6Y)/F)] where x is no. of regular faculty with Ph.D., Y is no. of regular faculty wit h M.Tech. F is no. of regular faculty requ ired to comply 1:15 Facul ty Student ratio (no. of faculty and no. of students required are to be calculated as per 5.1)
The following table shows the Faculty Qualification for CAY, CAYm1, CAYm2 Y ea r
X
Y
F
FQ=2.[x5(10X +6Y)/F)]
2015-2016
5
40
44
16.47
2014-2015
5
40
44
16.47
2013-2014
5
35
39
16.67
AverageAssessment
5.4. Faculty Retention
1 6 .5 3
( 25)
No. of regular faculty members in, 2013-2014 = 39
2014-2015 = 44
2015-2016 = 44
The following table shows the Faculty retention for CAY, CAYm1, CAYm2. Item >=90% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm2 as base year >=75% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm2 as base year >=60% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm2 as base year >=50% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm2 as base year <50% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm2 as base year 27 Faculty members are working from academic year 2013-14 to 2015-16.
Faculty Retention
27 *100 44
Ma r k s
25 20
15 10 0
61.36%.
Assessment = 15. 5.5. Innovations by the Faculty in T eaching and Learning
(20)
Innovations by the Faculty in teaching and learning shall be summarized as per the following description. Contributions to teaching and learning are activities that contribute to the improvement of student learning. These activities may include innovations not limited to, use of ICT, instruction delivery, 102
instructional methods, assessment, evaluation and inclusive class rooms that lead to effective and efficient interaction between students and faculty. Any contributions to teaching and learning should satisfy the following criteria: v
The work must be made available on Institute website
v
The work must be available for peer review and critique
v
The work must be reproducible and developed further by other scholars
The department/institution may set up appropriate processes for making the contributions available to the public, getting them reviewed and for rewarding. These may typically include statement of clear goals, adequate preparation, use of appropriate methods, and significance of results, effective presentation and reflective critique Course Faculty creates learning resource such as videos
Evaluation of the learning resource by program Assessment Committee
Providing Opportunity to present a topic in Teachers day Celebrations conducted every year
Publishing /uploading the content in the public domain
Awarding Best presentation after peer evaluation
Receiving Comments and Reviews
Fig .1.Process of Dissemination of Faculty Innovations
Table Innovations by Faculty in Teaching Learning Process N So
Method
CoursNeame
Semester
1.Surveying
1
Experimental Teaching Methodology
3
2.Design of reinforced concrete elements
5
3.EnvironmentalEngineering
5
4.Soil Mechanics 5.Construction Planning And Management 6.Railway ,Airport ,Harbor Engineering 103
4
6 6
Steps in Experimental Teaching Methodology
Step 1: Students team were formed, (Shuffling Advanced, Average and Slow learners) Step 2: Teaching the syllabus content.(Board/PPT) Step 3: After covering the important topics, it has been assigned to a team. Step 4: The team has to prepare chart based on the topic with reference to the lecture given. Step 5: Faculty along with Advanced learners help the slow learners in preparing chart and presentation Step 6: Slow learners were motivated to do presentation. Best performing team gets appreciation. Step 7: Charts were pasted in class rooms for a week and the same will be used as a material for revision during semester exams. Salient Features of this Teaching Methodology v
Interactive learning
v
Visual, Auditory and Kinesthetic learners all together benefitted
v
Deep knowledge about the course content
v
Promotes team work
v
Enhances students communication skills
v
Improves leadership skills
5.6.
Faculty as participants in Faculty development/training activities/STTPs
(15)
A faculty scores maximum five points for participation Participation in 2 to 5 days faculty development program: 3 Points Participation > 5 days faculty development program: 5 points. The following table shows the list of Faculty participation in Faculty development programs. S .N o
Name of the faculty
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Dr.B.Hemalatha Dr.T.Muralikrishna Dr.K. Saravanan Dr .R.Elangovan Dr.Arumugam. P Kannadasan.B Sathishkumar.K Dasarath Kayalvizhi.I
10 11 12
N.S.Divia Vidhya.M Aishwarya Devi.S
CAY (20152016) 5 -
CAYm1 (20142015) 5 3 3 3
CAYm2 (20132014) 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3
5
3 -
3 -
104
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Sivaprakasan.S Dr.S.Thenmozhi Dr.Nandhni Devi.G Mr.M.Chinnasamy Mr. M.Murugan Mrs. B.Lavanya Mr.S.Nagaraj Mr.S.Vinoth kumar Mr.S.C.Jayakumar Mr.M.S.Kutti marks Mr.R.Lenin Mrs.T.Diana j oslin
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
Mr.Y.C.Thilakar Mr.E.S.Dinesh babu N.S.Divia Mr.T.Kannan Mr.S.Ramesh Mr.D.Karthik Mrs.S.Archana Kiruthigaa Aishwarya.J.U Dr.Saravanan Dr.Arunkumar Mr.S.C.Jayakumar Mrs.Sathya Mr.K.Manikandan Saranya.R Devi Priyadarshini.K
5 5 3 5 3 5 3 -
3 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 -
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55
Sivakumar.B Devarajan.V Meenalakshmi.D Sudha.V Kayalvizhi.I Panchasaram.K Lavanya.B Rajesh.S Mathu Latha.O Premkumar.K Jenisha.T Arumugam.M Uma Magheswari Megala S.Sangeetha D.S.Shamla
-3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 -
--
56 57 58
Sastha Arumugapandi S.Aravindan S.Natarajan
3 5 5 105
-
-
59 60 61
Ajith Arunthathi Silambarasan SUM RF= Number of the faculty required to comply with 15:1 Student- Faculty ratio as per 5.1 Assessment=3×(Sum/0.5RF) (Marks limited to 15) Average assessment not over three years 5.7. Research and Develo pment (30)
3 5 5 77
134
104
44
44
39
10.5
18.27
15.53
14.90
5.7.1. Academic Research (10)
Academic research includes research paper publications, Ph.D. guidance, and faculty receiving Ph.D. during the assessment period. 1. Number of quality publications in refereed/SCI Journals, citations, Books/Book Chapters etc. (6) {3*2=6} BOOK PUBLISHED S .N o
FacultyName
1 2 3 4 5
Mr.M.Chinnasamy
BookPublished ISBNNumber Construction Techniques, Equipment 978-81-8472-221-5 and Practices
Estimation&QuantitySurveying RepairandRehabilitationofStructures Surveying I ConstructionMaterials
978-81-8472-243-7 978-81-8472-286-4 978-81-8472-268-0 978-81-8472-276-5
RESEARCH PAPER PUBLICATIONS S .N o . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Name of the Faculty Dr.S.Thenmozhi Dr.G.NandiniDevi Mr.M.Chinnasamy Mr.E.S.Dinesh Babu Ms.S.Aiswarya Devi Mr.Y.C.Thilakar Mr.T.Kannan Mr.M.S.Kuttimarks Mr.S.Natarajan Mr.Kannadasan Mr.N.Silambarasan
No. of p apers P ublished 4 2 1 0 0 1 4 1 -
106
No. of C onferences a ttended 13 1 7 1 1 1 2 1 0 1 1
CAY (2015-2016) N S.o
Title
Authors
J o u rn a l
1
Study on behavior of cold formed steel built-up stiffener compression member” International
Dr.Thenmozhi.S, Mr.R.Krishnan,
Journal of Applied Engineering Research, ISS973-4562 Vol 10 No.38.
2
Performance study of bacterial concrete
Dr.S.Thenmozhi., Dr.N.Unnamalai, Kishore
ICCREST, June/2016 3(2349-7610)
Dr.Thenmozhi, Yogalakshmi.P
International conference June /2016 3(2349-7610) IJREST.
S.Natarajan, Shahul Mohammed
International conference June/2016,, IJREST 3/issue62349-7610
Experimental Study On 3
Reinforced Concrete Beams Strengthened With Near Surface Mounted (NSM) Fibre Reinforced Polypropylene
Experimental study on flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with glass fibre reinforced polymer. CAYm1 (2014-2015) 4
N S.o
Title
A u t h or s
1
Performance of Quaternary Blended Cement Concrete With GGBS, MK and RHA
2
An Experimental investigation artificial aggregate using recycle plasticson and broken bricks
M. Chinnasamy A.Syed Ali Fathima
3
“Change Detection and Health Assessment Modeling of Pichavaram Mangroves” By the Application Of Remote Sensing And Gis."Icccim-14
T.Kannan
4
Experimental Studies on Replacement of Fine aggregate with Glass & Fly Ash
5
Experimental Studies on Replacement of Fine aggregate with Glass & Fly Ash
M. Chinnasamy J Annie Mary
Mr.M.S.Kutti Mark R.Shruthi Mr.M.S.Kutti Marks A.Shivaranjani M.Monica
107
J o u rn a l
Journal Of Science And Innovation Engineering And Technology Journal Of Science And Innovation Engineering And Technology International Journal of Emerging Technology & Advanced Engineering"4, Spl 4 S.R.M.University. May 2014 Vol 2, Issue 2, pp 205 -208 IJEERT International Level 1.22 Journals. May 2014 Vol-3 , ISSUE-4 IJEEERD International Level 3.2294 Journal
6
Experimental Studies on Replacement of Fine aggregate with Glass & Fly Ash
Mr.M.S.Kutti Marks
May 2014 Vol 2, Issue 2, pp 205 -208 IJEERT International Level 1.22 Journal
5.7.2. Sponsored Research (5)
Funded research: (Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration) Funding amount (Cumulative during assessment years): Amount > 20 Lacs – 5 Marks Amount >= 16 Lacs and <= 20 lacs – 4 Marks Amount >= 12 Lacs and < 16 l acs – 3 Marks Amount >= 8 Lacs and < 12 lacs – 2 Marks Amount >= 4 Lacs and < 8 lacs – 1 Mark Amount < 4 Lacs – 0 Mark NIL 5.7.3 Development activities (10)
The following products are developed by the students’ Civil engineering under the guidance of faculty members. A. Product dev elopment CAY (2 015- 2016)
Most of the projects done by the students are based on product development of which few are listed below. S .N o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Product(Model/Miniature) Natural sand by M sand in high performance concrete with Nano Silica Pervious concrete using flyash brick aggregate Carbon footprint mapping and analysis using GIS Green building technologies Coconut shell as aggregate replacement in concrete Strengthening of RC flexural element using hybrid FRPC Self healing bio concrete Cement concrete with rice husk ash Ultrathin bituminous pavement Plastic material for improving permeability of soil Saline water stabilized s oil
CAY m 1 (2014 - 2015)
Most of the projects done by the students are based on product development of which few are listed below. 108
S .N o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Product(Model/Miniature) Foam concrete in UPVC cubes Sustainable concrete Cold foam build up stiffeners Pervious concrete Polypropylene fibre in concrete Reinforced gypsum with hollow slab Prefabricated brick panel roofing Alkali – resistant concrete Bamboo reinforced concrete GGBFS (Ground granulated blast furnace slag)
11 Self compacting concrete CAY m 2 (2013 - 2014) Most of the projects done by the students are based on product development of which few are listed below. S .N o
Product(Model/Miniature)
1
Exposed acid in FRP concrete
2
Stabilization of soil
3
Litracon light transmitting concrete
4
Conplast Admixture with concrete
5
M-sand in concrete
6
Granite powder waste in concrete
7
Micro silica high performance concrete
8 9
Greenconcrete GFRP - Glass Fibre Reinforced polymer concrete
10
Bio-polymer in bituminous mix
11
Industrial waste in marines clay
B. Instructional materials S.No.
Name of the Faculty
1
Dr.T.Muralikrishna
Civil Engineering
2
Dr.K. Saravanan
Civil Engineering
3
Dr .R.Elangovan
4
Dr.S.Thenmozhi
Specialization
Course Developments
Environmental Engineering Geo Technical Engineering
Polymer Modified Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete Application of Intensification Approaches On Recycled Aggregate Compressive Strength Of Recycled Concrete Soil Stabilization
109
5
Dr.B.Hemalatha
6
Dr.G.Nandini Devi
7
Mr.Gnanasekaran
8
Mr.Kannadasan.B
9
Mr.M.Chinnasamy
10
Ms.S.Aiswarya Devi
Environmental Engineering Structural Engineering Environmental Engineering Geo Informatics Construction Engineering Management Engineering Environmental
Hazardous Waste Management Mechanical Property of Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Ferrocement Advanced Earthquake Resistant Design Green Concrete Geo Polymeric Building Materials Utilization of Industrial Waste Self-Compacting Concrete Made With Recycled Aggregate
5.7.4 Consultancy (from Industry) (5)
(Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration) Funding amount (Cumulative during assessment years): Amount > 10 Lacs – 5 Marks, Amount >= 8 Lacs and <= 10 lacs – 4 Marks, Amount >= 6 Lacs and < 8 lacs – 3 Marks, Amount >= 4 Lacs and < 6 lacs – 2 Marks Amount >= 2 Lacs and < 4 lacs – 1 Mark..Amount < 2 Lacs – 0 Mark The following tables shows the consultancy to be carried out in our department SN .o
Y e ar
Faculty
Organization
Title
F un d
Testing and analysis of soil and concrete samples for construction of 1
Dr.S.Thenmozhi
CCB uilders
Dr.B.Hemalatha
Vass Constructions
Testing of steel rods for pammal construction site for VAAS Constructions.
12000
SS Constructions
Testing of soil samples, concrete cubes and aggregate at porur site, valasaravakkam site and mangadu site for SS Constructions.
46000
2013-14
Dr.S.Thenmozhi
2
2014-15 Mr.Chinnasamy
Vass Constructions
residential building at pallavaram site for CC Builders.
Testing and analysis of soil and concrete samples for residential buildings at pammal site,anagaputhursite,thirunermalai site and chrompet site for VASS
110
30000
62000
Constructions
Dr.S.Thenmozhi
3
Siva Constructions And Builders
2015-16 Mr.Kannadasan
Siva Constructions And Builders
. Testing of soil samples, concrete cubes and aggregate at velacherry site, medavakkam site and tambaram site for siva Constructions Testing and analysis of soil and concrete samples for residential buildings at adayar site, nandambakkamsite,thiruverkadu site
40000
36000
and chrompet site for siva Constructions and builders T ot al
22 6000
5.8. Faculty Performance Appraisal and Development System (FPADS) (30)
Faculty appraisal is conducted as a means to enhance the job performance of each individual faculty member and as route to improvement of the organizational effectiveness and overall operation of the college; the appraisal is also used as a basis for reward and corrective action. Features of the faculty appraisal system:
1. The faculty appraisal system is the clearly communicated to all the faculty and also briefed by the HOD 2. The feedback is obtained periodically which will be later consolidated by the HOD 3. The appraisal system consists of various elements viz academic activities, professional development, research activities and administrative activities The following table shows Elements of faculty appraisal system. Appraisal Criteria Student Feedback
% of Evaluator Marks
2
HodFeedback
12.5
HOD
3
TestResult
10
HOD
4
ExamResults
10
HOD
5
Professional Development
S.No
1
12.5
20
Students
HOD
Time of Evolution At the End Of Semester At the end of year At the end of semester At the End Of
Semester At the end of Academic Year 111
Basics Of Evaluation
Feedback Is Consolidated Feedback given based on the observation by HOD Results for all courses is consolidated Data obtained from faculty by HOD Department research activity data is consolidated
Research Activities Administrative Activities
6 7
27.5
HOD
7.5
HOD
At the end of academic year At the end of academic year
No of roles assumed by the faculty
Performance Metrics
The Appraisal forms are submitted to the Principal. The Principal recommends for actions to Management based on the Performance Metrics. Appraisal criteria
Metrics
Recommendation bytheprincipal
Academic activities
Minimum 60%
Tenure of faculty extended/continued
Overallappraisal
60%-69%
Recommendedforoneincrement
Overallappraisal
70%-79% >80% & years of experience
Recommendedfortwoincrement
Overall appraisal
Recommended for promotion
SREE SASTHA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY ACADEMIC YEAR 2015-2016 Faculty Appraisal NAME OF THE FACULTY: DEPARTMENT : YEAR :2015-2016 Academic Activities Max Teaching Effectiveness Marks Obtained Marks Student Feedback Punctuality of Faculty Member in Teaching1 5 Learning Sessions 2 Dress Code and Mannerism of Faculty Member 5 3 WellPreparednessofSubjectContent 5 Encourages Student Participation in Learning 4 5 Activities Provides Learning Rationale, Learning Objectives, 5 5 Learning Plan and Learning activities I 6 Encourages Student Participation in Assessments 5 Solves answers for problems asked in Internal 7 5 Tests & Previous year question papers Provides Answer Paper Evaluation Pattern before 8 5 Tests & Exams Demonstrates experiments before asking students 9 5 to perform 10 Proves to be a 'Role-Model' to follow for students 5 TOTAL 50 HOD Feedback
II
1 2
Preparation of Course Rationale, Course Plan, Model Question Papers, Evaluation Pattern etc., Student Course Learning Material, Teacher Course
112
5 5
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Teaching Materials, Models Class Conduction Methodology followed as per policy Test Question papers as per policy for QP Setting Assignments / Tutorials / Seminar as per policy of Conduction Field data collection / case studies as per policy of Collection No. of hours of learning conducted and assessment of learning Extra technical care fors tudents/department Indirect feedback from students through Tutor Ward Meeting and Class Committee Meeting etc., Extent of syllabus completion (based on class notes of students) / standard of Question paper (Auditor / HOD Report) TOTAL Test Result
III
1 2
Cumulative Weighted Average of Test Marks (Target >XY %) Average Percentage of Students Securing less than 50% in the test (Target
IV
1 2
Pass Percentage of Number of Students (Target >XY %) Overall Average Marks in Exam (Target >XY %) TOTAL Professional Development
1 2 3 4 V
5 6 7 8
VI
1 2 3
International Conference/s approved in policy list Industrial Training Books– InternationalPublisher Books– NationalPublisher STTP / FDP / Workshop / Seminar / Symposium per session Papers– InternationalConference Papers – Refereed National Journals as per policy list Papers – International Journals as per policy list TOTAL Research Activities Fund Generation: a) Proposal submitted to funding agencies b) Proposal sanctioned c) International Conferences organized (Organizing Secretary / Coordinators) [whenever more than one faculty is
113
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 50 Max Marks
Marks Obtained
20 20 40 MAX MARKS
MARKS OBTAINED
20 20 40 MAX MARKS 10 10 10 10
MARKS OBTAINED
10 10 10 10 80 Max Marks 15 25 10
Marks Obtained
1 2 1 2
1
involved the credits will be shared equally by all concerned] Consultancy and Testing Testing Activities Consultancy Work Product Development Activities/course module Existing Product Improvement / Modification NewProductDevelopment Successful Guidance ME/M.Phil/MS/Phd Professional Society Activities ActivitiesinProfessionalBodies TOTAL
10 10 10 10 10 10 110
Administrative Activities Max Marks Roles & Responsibilities Assigned to Faculty Member 1 Discipline Work Assigned to Faculty Member 10 2 Association Incharge 10 3 Time table In-charge 10 4 Quality Standards Maintenance(NBA Incharge) 10 5 InternalExam In-charge 10 6 TCS ION incharge 10 7 Training and placement 10 VII 8 Industrial Training 10 9 Class incharge 10 10 Lab Center / In-charge 10 11 STTP FDP / Organized 10 Placement / Competitive Exam Preparation 12 10 Support TOTAL 30 MAX MIN CONSOLIDATED MARKS MARKS 1 Academic Activities 180 2 ProfessionalDevelopment 80 3 Research Activities 110 4 AdministrativeActivities 30 TOTAL 400 HOD CR :
Marks Obtained
Any Three Roles
MARKS OBTAINED
SIGNATURE PRINCIPAL REMARKS :
SIGNATURE
114
5.9. Visiting/Adjunct/Emeritus Faculty etc. (10)
Adjunct faculty also includes Industry experts. Provide details of participation and contributions in teaching and learning and /or research by visiting/adjunct/Emeritus faculty etc. for all the assessment years: v
Provision of inviting/having visiting/adjunct/emeritus faculty (1)
v
Minimum 50 hours per year interaction with adjunct faculty from industry/retired professors etc.
(Minimum 50 hours interaction in a year will result in 3 marks for that year; 3 marks x 3 years = 9 marks) Course Name
Soil Mechanics
Course/Training Resource
Name of the Visiting faculty
Anna university
Duration
90 Hrs Dr.Rajaraman
FoundationEngineering
Annauniversity
FluidMechanics
Annauniversity
Engineering Geology
Anna university
90Hrs Dr.Karmegam
90Hrs 90 Hrs
Prof.K.R.Dhandapani
Applied Hydraulic Engineering
Annauniversity
Surveying-II
Annauniversity
Water Resources And Irrigation Engineering
Anna university
90Hrs Prof.Kandasamy Prof .Kandasamy
115
90Hrs 90 Hrs
Academic Year
2013-14 II Yr/III Sem 2013-14 II Yr/IV Sem 2014-15 II Yr/ III Sem 2014 – 15 II Yr/III Sem 2014 – 15 II Yr/IV Sem 2015– 16 II Yr/IV Sem 2015– 16 Sem IV Yr/VII
CRITERION6
FacilitiesandTechnicalSupport
80
6. FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT (80) 6.1. Adequate and well equipped laboratories and technical manpower (30) ∑
The Department has required number of laboratories for all the semester subjects according to the curriculum.
∑
The courses which have practical hours are provided with laboratory sessions every week.
∑
Laboratories are equipped with necessary equipment, hardware and licensed software to run experiments specified in the curriculum and beyond them.
∑
S r. N o.
Laboratories are assisted with well trained technical supporting staff.
Name of the Laborator y
Name of the Lab Course
Survey Practical I (CE6311) 1
3
60
Survey lab Survey Camp (CE6512)
2
No of stude nts per setup (Batc h size)
Computer lab
Soil Mechanics Laboratory
Computer Aided Building Drawing (CE6312) Computer Aided Design and Drafting Laboratory (CE2405)
Soil Mechanics Laboratory (CE6511)
60
60
60
30
Name of the Important equipment
Weekly utilization status ( all the courses for which lab is utilized)
Name of technical staff
Designati on
Qualifica tion
8/48
Mr.S.Sathish
Lab Assistant
DCE
Semester Summer Vacation (70 hours )
Mr.S.Sathish
Lab Assistant
DCE
8/48
Mr.B.Rajesh
Lab Assistant
ITI
12/48
Mr.B.Rajesh
Lab Assistant
ITI
18/48
Ms.M.Nagala kshmi
Odd Semester 1. Plane Table, 2. Dumpy Level 3. Prismatic
Compass 1. Dumpy Level 2.Theodolites 3.Total Station 1. Computer system of Pentium IV 2. AUTOCADD 1. Computers Pentium IV, 2. AUTOCADD, 3. STADD PRO Softwares 1. Direct Shear Apparatus 2. Triaxial Shear Apparatus 3. Consolidation Apparatus 116
Technical Manpower Support
Lab Assistant
B.E. (Civil)
4
Communic ation Skills Laboratory
Communicatio n Skills Laboratory (GE6563)
30
Computer with good configuration ( HP DX7380)
18/48
Mr.G.Prabhu
System Admin
DCA (BE)
8/48
Mr.S.Sathish
Lab Assistant
DCE
4/48
Mr.B.Rajesh
Lab Assistant
ITI
18/48
Mr.G.Sekar
Lab Superviso r
B.Tech, _______ M.E
18/48
Mr.S.Sathish
Lab Assistant
DCE
18/48
Mr.B.Mohan
Lab Technicia n
DME
18/48
Ms.M.Nagala kshmi
Lab Assistant
B.E (Civil)
Even Semester
1
Survey lab
2
Computer lab
Survey Practical II (CE6413) Computer Aided Drafting & Modeling
60
60
Lab (CE6261)
3
4
Strength of Materials Laboratory
Concrete and Highway Engineerin g
Strength of Materials Laboratory (CE6411)
30
Concrete and Highway Engineering Laboratory (CE6612)
30
1. Theodolite 2. Total Station 3. Dumpy Level 1. Computer System of Pentium IV 2. AUTOCADD 1.Universal Testing Machine of 1000KN capacity 2. Torsion Testing Machine for Steel Rods 3. Hardness Testing Machine 1.Compression Testing Machine 2. Aggregate Impact Testing Machine 3. Los - Angeles
Laboratory
Abrasion Testing Machine 1.Pumps Hydraulic Hydraulic 2.Turbines Engineerin Engineering 5 30 3. Pipe Fittings g Laboratory 4.Venturimeter Laboratory (CE6412) 5. Orifice Meter 1. Oxygen Environme Environmental Analyzer ntal Engineering 2. 6 Engineerin 30 Laboratory Spectrophotometer g (CE6611) 3. Ion Selective Laboratory Electrode Note:- Total working hour for a week is 48 hours
117
6.2. Additional facilities created for improving the quality of learning experience in laboratories (25)
Sr .N o.
Location Facility Name
Details
Reason(S) for Creating facility
Utilizati on
Opened througho ut the Semester for Utilizatio n
Areas in which students are expected to have enhanced learning
Effective ness
Relev ance To POs/P SOs
Final
1
Loading Frame
Structural Engineerin g Lab
2.
Ultrasonic pulse velocity
Advanced Concrete Engineerin g Lab
3.
Rebound hammer
V- Funnel 4.
Loading Frame 50 T
To determine the strength of reinforced concrete elements
Ultra sound couplant, two 3m cable transducer2nos
To test quality of existing RC structure
Advanced Constructi on Engineerin g Lab
Concrete test hammer normal pundit with reference bar
To test compressive strength of existing RC structure
Advanced Constructi on
V- Funnel MS 1.6 mm
To test flow ability of the self compacting
Engineerin g Lab
thick
concrete
118
18/48
18/48
18/48
Structural Testing
NDT Hardened concrete behavior
NDT Hardened concrete behavior
Flow of concrete
year students used lab for Projects effectivel y Third year Students used Concrete & Highway Lab effectivel y Third year Students used Concrete & Highway Lab effectivel y Third year Students used Concrete & Highway Lab
PO1,3,4,5 ,7 PSO1,2
PO1,3,4,5 ,7 PSO1,2
PO1,3,4,5 ,7 PSO1,2
PO1,3,4,5 ,7 PSO1,2
5
6
U- Flow tube
L- Box
Advanced Constructi on Engineerin g Lab
Advanced Constructi on Engineerin g Lab
U- Flow tube MS 1.6 mm thick
L- Box MS 2 mm thick
Room 309 7
Audio/Vid eo Room
Main Block
To test confined flow ability and the capacity of SCC concrete to flow within confined space
To test flow rate and passing ability of SCC in confined space
To give video LCD Projector
lecture to students
18/48
18/48
Opened througho ut the Semester for Utilizatio n
Flow of concrete
Flow of concrete.
To learn in depth in all Civil Engineering subjects
effectivel y Third year Students used Concrete & Highway Lab effectivel y Third year Students used Concrete & Highway Lab effectivel y All the Years Students used the Audio \ Video Room
6.3. Laboratories: Maintenance and overall ambiance (10) Maintenance of Laboratory Equipments
1. All the labs are serviced before the commencement of the semester in addition to the periodic maintenance done for all the machines. 2. Maintenance register is maintained in the laboratories. 3. As per the requirement minor repairs are carried out by the lab technical staff. 4. Immovable equipment is fixed with concrete bases. 5. Major repairs are outsourced by following the procedure of the institute. 6. Internal and external auditing will be conducted at regular interval. 7. Maintenance sheet for Equipment is maintained in the laboratories. 119
PO1,3,4,5 ,7 PSO1,2
PO1,3,4,5 ,7 PSO1,2
8. Sufficient consumables are kept in stock always. 9. Usage of consumable is monitored regularly 10. Stock register is maintained regularly. Overall Ambiance
1. Department has enough labs that are used for all the years on timetable basis to meet curriculum requirement. 2. Number of experiments to be conducted is listed in the display board. 3. Safety arrangements are provided in all the laboratories. 4. Lab instructors are instructed to wear their lab coats while demonstrating experiments. 5. Students are instructed to wear lab uniform and shoes, and observe other necessary safeguards. 6. Sufficient laboratory manual are distributed to students. 7. After completing each experiment, the equipment cleaning is done immediately. 8. Chemicals are kept in their respective racks for safety purposes. 9. All the laboratories are well equipped to meet the project needs of the fi nal year students. 10. According to the size of the movable equipment, it’s kept in the safety box. 11. Experience and qualified Lab Assistants are recruited for laboratories. 12. First aid facilities are available in all the laboratories. 13. Drinking water facilities are available in all the laboratories. 14. Uninterrupted power supply is ensured for all labs. 15. Good ventilation and lighting facilities are ensured with all labs. 16. As per the curriculum all the labs are fully furnished and equipped with necessary instruments. 6.4 Project laboratory (5) S.No.
1
2
Name of equipment
Loading Frame
V-F unnel
UtilizationofEquipment
To determine the strength of reinforced concrete elements To test flow ability of the self compacting concrete
ProjectTitle
Strengthening of RC flexural elements using hybrid frpc
Usage
Final year students used for Project Work
Self compacting concrete using ground granulated furnace slag
120
Final students foryear Project Workused
3
U- Flow tube
4
L- Box
To test confined flow ability and the capacity of SCC concrete to flow within confined space
Self compacting concrete using ground granulated furnace slag
Final year students used for Project Work
To test flow rate and passing ability of SCC in confined space
Self compacting concrete using ground granulated furnace slag
Final year students used for Project Work
6.5 Safety measures in Laboratory (10)
The Code of conduct is displayed in all Laboratories - Survey Lab, Computer Lab, Strength of Materials Lab, Concrete and Highway Engineering Laboratory, Hydraulic Engineering Laboratory, Soil Mechanics Laboratory & Environmental Engineering Laboratory. S r .N o . 1
2 3 4 5 6
SafetM y easures Displaying general rules of Conduct in laboratories . Displaying specific Safety Rules for students. Appointing well trained technical supporting staff. Avoiding the usage of damaged equipment and providing needful equipment and components. Maintaining First aid box and Fire Extinguisher are kept in the Laboratory. Ensuring appropriate storage areas.
121
CRITERION7
CONTINUOUSIMPROVEMENT
50
7.1. Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the POs & PSOs (20) POs & PSOs Attainme nt Levels and Actions for impr ovement – Batch (2012-1 6)
P os
T a r g et L ev el
Attainment
Observations
Level
PO1: Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C201, C202, C203, C204, C205, C208, C304, C305, C308, C311, C313, C405 PO1
2.6
2.05
1. Lateral entry Students are not exposed to basics of engineering mathematics. 2. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems.
Action: 1. Additional classes to be conducted to expose the students to basics of mathematics. 2. Additional assignments are to be given to introduce basics of civil engineering. PO2: Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C201, C202, C203, C204, C205, C208, C214, C304, C305, C311, C313, C314, C405 PO2
1.7
1.44
1. Basic knowledge of analysis is difficult for students to understand. 2. Subject involves both analysis and design which is complex.
Actions 1. More tutorial classes are to be conducted for analytical papers. 2. More problems will be given for practice. 122
PO3: Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C201, C206, C208, C303, C305, C312, C401, C405 PO3
0.9
0.84
1. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems 2. Solving design problems found to be difficult.
Actions 1. More examples on design to be practiced by students in extra classes. 2. Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. PO4: Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C201, C210 1. Lateral entry Students are not exposed to basics of PO4
0.9
0.89
engineering mathematics. 2.
Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems.
Actions 1. Additional classes to be conducted to expose the students to basics of mathematics. 2. Additional assignments are to be given to introduce basics of civil engineering. PO5: Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C208, C409 PO5
2.1
1.94
It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and resources are necessary to meet the industry standards and research.
Actions 1.Modern labs like total station , STADD pro etc will be more utilized to fulfill the requirement in
123
engineering applications in new industrial era. PO6: The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C301, C304, PO6
0.7
0.62
C313, C314, C405 It is observed that the students knowledge on assessing the societal concerns is comparatively low.
Actions 1. Industrial Visits will be arranged to students to gain knowledge on societal concerns. 2.Webinars will be arranged for students to create more awareness on societal issues. PO7: Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C314, C404, PO7
2.5
1.80
C405 The issues of global and environmental awareness among the student should be improved.
Action 1. Students are encouraged to indulge in projects, in which global and environmental issues are improved, with respect to consumption of energy and utilization of renewable energy resources. Action 2: Guest lecture from experienced staffs of the practical issues being faced in the life are brought visible to the students PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C306, C312 PO8
2.76
1.8
The students are doing better in improving the overall expertise in field of engineering but lack in ethical moral knowledge.
Actions 1. Corporate lectures and motivational talks will be arranged to overcome the above observations. PO9: Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in
124
diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C208, C309, PO9
1.3
1.24
C310, C319 The students are not able to work as individual as well as in team.
Action 1. Institute has initiated Program which provides a platform to work in indiv idual as well as a group in the fields of Engineering helps the students to groom the skills like leadership, effective team member. 2. The students will be motivated to work as a team in the programs conducted by the college. PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C216, C217, PO10
1
0.98
C308, C409 The communication, presentation and report writing skills are to be further improved among the students.
Actions: 1.Soft skills training will be imparted to students to enhance various aspects of communication/technical talks by group discussions, presentations and new learning outcomes. 2. The communication lab provides students a place to learn language by reading, hearing and speaking in English for a better communication. The students will be made to utlise communication lab. PO11: Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C409, C413 Few courses of curriculum give knowledge of Management PO11
1.4
1.32
principle and applying managerial principles to his/her work including financial implications and to manage the project in multidisciplinary environments.
Actions: 125
1. The awareness is to be created among the student regarding the management principles and managing projects. 2. The importance of Finance is to be taught to gain knowledge on the crucial role of money in finishing the target without wastage through guest lectures. PO12: Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C216, C217, C308, C409 PO12
1
0.96
The pre final year and final year courses of the program are demonstrating the resource for contemporary issues and lifelong learning.
Action 1: Students will be encouraged to use MOOCs and motivated to register for NPTEL. Action 2.Making students updated with information’s through net (e-learning), books & journals. PSOs
T a rg et L ev e l
Attainment
Observations
Level
PSO1 : Attain proficiency in mathematics, physical science and also excel in problem solving, design and interpretation of experiments by operating as a team to find solution of various issues in the core areas of civil engineering.
The courses of the program are demonstrating the resource PSO1
1.78
1.44
fullness for contemporary issues. The project titles of the final year and pre-final year students are addressing the real life problems.
Action 1: Students are motivated to take up the real life problems during their project work so that they can design, analyze and find solution which gives exposure to latest technologies. PSO2: Operate effectively in a professional environment by executing quality construction work applying modern tools and techniques.
PSO2
2.71
2.12
It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and resources are necessary to meet the industry standards and research.
Action 1: Academic workshops and conferences are coming into picture to apply more knowledge in terms of 126
conduction of experiments and analysis the as required level. PSO3: Achieve excellence, managerial expertise, outstanding leadership to succeed in position in civil engineering profession and passion for lifelong learning and research in advanced areas & related field.
PSO3
1.11
0.94
To inculcate ethics, good interpersonal relationships, ability to communicate, leadership and project management.
Actions 1. Career readiness program and corporate lectures are arranged to meet required expertise in field of engineering.
POs & PSOs Attainme nt Levels and Actions for impr ovement – Batch (2011-1 5)
P os
T a rg e t L ev el
Attainment
Observations
Level
PO1 : Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C201, C204, C205, C305, C311, C313, C314, C405 Civil engineering curriculum requires the strong PO1
2.6
2.01
foundation of theoretical and practical knowledge of science and mathematics, which the students study in their first year, but student’s lags in correlating the theoretical concepts with applications.
Action: 1. Tutorials based on real application inclusion of simulation software in teaching learning process. 2. Students are encouraged to participate in technical events, other events where their basic knowledge should convert to application matching with defined level of their standards. PO2: Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
PO2
1.7
1.51
Attainmenti slowinthefollowingsubjects: 127
C201, C202, C203, C204, C205, C305, C311, C313, C314, C405 The students lack in problem solving and analyzing skills gained through first and second year courses and ability to apply in real time application. Actions 1. More tutorial classes are to be conducted for analytical papers. 2. More problems will be given for practice. 3.Coaching classes will be conducted. PO3: Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C201, C206, C208, C303, C305, C312, C401, C405, C406, PO3
0.9
0.89
C410 1. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems. 2. Students feel vague in theoretical subjects.
Actions 1. More examples on design are to be practiced by students i n extra classes. 2. Theory subjects are to be made interesting with PPT, Videos and practical visits. PO4: Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C201, C210 1. Lateral entry Students are not exposed to basics PO4
0.9
0.71
of engineering mathematics. 2.
Students
find
it
difficult
to
solve
engineering problems. Actions1. Basic problems are given as assignments to make students feel easy and interested with problems. 128
the
Action 2: University exam question papers are made to be solved regularly. PO5: Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C208, PO5
2.1
1.96
C218, C408 It is observed that Up-gradations of tools is mandatory for students to learn the measurement techniques.
Actions 1. Off campus survey is done for students to learn surveying in different topographical conditions. 2. The importance of design in construction is indulged in students by discussing the recent design failures that caused massive fatal accidents. PO6: The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C213, C215, C301, C304, C314, C315 PO6
0.7
0.631
The courses of civil Engineering are addressing the needs of, health, safety and social concerns regarding engineering practices in real life.
Actions 1. To understand the safety concerns and social aspects, students visited industry to expand their practical knowledge with the effect of improved practices in engineering. 2. Industrial visits are taken to make students know the various processes in real time concerning need and safety. PO7: Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C202, C304 PO7
2.5
2.04
The issues of global and environmental awareness among the student should be improved. 129
Actions 1.Environmental aspects are to be shown in videos of real time to create curiosity in students. 2. Students are encouraged to indulge in proje cts, in which global and envir onmental issues are impr oved, with respect to consumption of energy and utilization of renewable energy resources. PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C306 PO8
2.76
1.96
The students are doing better in improving the overall expertise in field of engineering but due to lack of knowledge in using code books efficiently
Actions 1. Special classes are arranged to overcome the above observations 2. Use of code book efficiently is taught by staffs and the students are made to use them regularly. PO9: Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C208, PO9
1.3
1.26
C307, C308, C309, C310, C318, C408 The students are not able to work as individual as well as in team.
Actions 1. Institute has initiated Program which provides a platform to work in individual as well as a group in the fields of Engineering helps the students to groom the skills like leadership, effective team member. 2.Group assignments are given to work as a team. PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C216, PO10
1.02
1
C217, C308, C408 The importance of lab is not understood by the students.
Actions: 130
1.Soft skills training is imparted to students to enhance various aspects of communication/technical talks by group discussions, presentations and new learning outcomes. PO11: Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C307, C408 Few PO11
1.4
1.28
courses
Management
of
curriculum
principle
principles to his/her implications and to
and
give
knowledge
applying
of
managerial
work including financial manage the project in
multidisciplinary environments. Actions1: The awareness created among the student regarding the management principles and managing projects. PO12: Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C208, C307, C308, C309, C310, C318, C408 PO12
1
0.96
The pre final year and final year courses of the program are demonstrating the resource for contemporary issues and lifelong learning.
Action 1: The Subjects that are meant as lifelong learning are repeated several times through lectures, presentations and videos. Action 2.Making students updated with information through net (e- learning ), books & journals.
PSOs
Target
Attainment
Level
Level
Observations
PSO1 : Attain proficiency in mathematics, physical science and also excel in problem solving, design and interpretation of experiments by operating as a team to find solution of various issues in the core areas of civil engineering.
131
The courses of the program are demonstrating the resource PSO1
1.78
1.36
fullness for contemporary issues. The project titles of the final year and pre-final year students are addressing the real life problems.
Action 1: Students are motivated to take up the real life problems during their project work so that they can design, analyze and find solution which gives exposure to latest technologies. PSO2: Operate effectively in a professional environment by executing quality construction work applying modern tools and techniques.
PSO2
2.71
2.17
It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and resources are necessary to meet the industry standards and research.
Action 1: Academic workshops and conferences are coming into picture to apply more knowledge in terms of conduction of experiments and analysis the as required level. PSO3: Achieve excellence, managerial expertise, outstanding leadership to succeed in position in civil engineering profession and passion for lifelong learning and research in advanced areas & related field.
PSO3
1.11
0.95
To inculcate ethics, good interpersonal relationships, ability to communicate, leadership and project management.
Actions 1. Career readiness program and corporate lectures are arranged to meet required expertise in field of engineering.
POs & PSOs Attainme nt Levels and Action s for improvement – Batch (2010-1 4)
Pos
Target
Attainment
Level
Level
Observations
PO1 : Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
PO1
2.6
2.279
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C201, C204, C205, C305, C311, C313, C314, C405 132
1. Lateral entry Students are not exposed to basic of engineering mathematics 2. Students find it difficult to solve design subjects Action: 1. Special classes to be conducted improve the mathematical fundamental basics. 2. Additional classes to be conducted to introduce civil engineering fundamental basics. PO2: Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
Attainment is low in the following subjects C201, C202, PO2
1.7
1.612
C203, C204, C205, C305, C311, C313, C314, C405 1. Basic knowledge of analysis is not well understood 2. Subject involves both analysis and design which confuses
Actions 1. Tutorial classes for repeated analysis of problem learning 2. More problems will be given for practice. PO3: Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
Attainment is low in the following subjects C201, C206, C208, C303, C305, C312, C401, C405, C406, PO3
0.9
0.88
C410 1. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems 2. Solving design problems found to be lengthy
Actions 1. More examples on design to be practiced by students in extra classes 2. More design classes to be taught in tutorial classes PO4: Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
133
Attainment is low in the following subjects C201, C210 PO4
0.9
0.823
It is observed that most of the project abstract and literature survey are addressing the research based approach but does not end with valid conclusions.
Actions1. We inspire students to participate in technical events, other events where their basic knowledge should convert to application matching with defined level of their standards. PO5: Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
Attainment is low in the following subjects C208, C218, PO5
2.1
1.926
C408. It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and resources are necessary to meet the industry standards and research.
Actions 1.Modern labs are developed to demonstrate the use of Modern tools like total station, stadd pro etc. to specify fulfillment of requirement in engineering applications in new industrial era. PO6: The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.
Attainment is low in the following subjects; C2013, C215, C301, C304, C314, C315 PO6
0.7
0.676
The courses of civil Engineering are addressing the needs of, health, safety and social concerns regarding engineering practices in real life.
Actions 1. To understand the safety concerns and social aspects, students visited industry to expand their practical knowledge with the effect of improved practices in engineering. PO7: Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
PO7
2.5
1.83
Attainment is lowinthefollowing subjects: C202,C304 134
The issues of global and environmental awareness among the student should be improved. Action 1. Students are encouraged to indulge in projects, in which global and environmental issues are improved, with respect to consumption of energy and uti lization of renewable ene rgy resources. Action 2: guest lecture from experienced staffs of the practical issues being faced in the life are brought visible to the students PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C306 The students are doing better in improving the overall PO8
2.76
1.96
expertise in field of engineering but due to lack of communications and other ethical moral knowledge, some are lagging in real life situations.
Actions 1. . Corporate lectures and motivational talks are arranged to overcome the above observations. PO9: Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
Attainment is low in the following subjects C208, C307, PO9
1.3
1.26
C308, C309, C310, C318, C408 The students are not able to work as individual as well as in team.
Action 1. Institute has initiated Program which provides a platform to work in individual as well as a group in the fields of Engineering helps the students to groom the skills like leadership, effective team member. 2. The students work as a team in the programme conducted by the college. PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
Attainment is low in the following subjects C216, C217, PO10
1.02
0.998
C308, C408 The communication, presentation and report writing skills are to be further improved among the students. 135
Actions: 1.Soft skills training is imparted to students to enhance various aspects of communication/technical talks by group
discussions,
presentations
and
new
learning
outcomes.
2. The communication lab provides students a place to learn language by reading, hearing and speaking in English for a better communication PO11: Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
Attainment is low in the following subjects C307, C408 Few courses of curriculum give knowledge of Management PO11
1.4
1.22
principle and applying managerial principles to his/her work including financial implications and to manage the project in multidisciplinary environments.
Actions: 1. The awareness created among the student regarding the management principles and managing projects. 2. The importance of Finance are taught to know the crucial role of money in finishing the target without wastage. PO12: Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.
Attainment is low in the following subjects C208, C307, C308, C309, C310, C318, C408 PO12
1
0.96
The pre final year and final year courses of the program are demonstrating the resource for contemporary issues and lifelong learning.
Action 1: The importance of the Subjects that are meant as life long learning are repeated several times through lectures, presentations and videos. Action 2.Making students updated with information through net (e-learning), books & journals. PSOs
Target
Attainment
Level
Level
Observations
PSO1 : Attain proficiency in mathematics, physical science and also excel in problem solving, design and interpretation of experiments by operating as a team to find solution of various issues in the core
136
areas of civil engineering.
The courses of the program are demonstrating the resource PSO1
1.78
1.416
fullness for contemporary issues. The project titles of the final year and pre-final year students are addressing the real life problems.
Action 1: Students are motivated to take up the real life problems during their project work so that they can design, analyze and find solution which gives exposure to latest technologies. PSO2: Operate effectively in a professional environment by executing quality construction work applying modern tools and techniques.
PSO2
2.71
2.12
It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and resources are necessary to meet the industry standards and research.
Action 1: Academic workshops and conferences are coming into picture to apply more knowledge in terms of conduction of experiments and analysis the as required level. PSO3: Achieve excellence, managerial expertise, outstanding leadership to succeed in position in civil engineering profession and passion for lifelong learning and research in advanced areas & related field.
PSO3
1.11
0.94
To inculcate ethics, good interpersonal relationships, ability to communicate, leadership and project management.
Actions1. Career readiness program and corporate lectures are arranged to meet required expertise in field of engineering.
7.2 Academic Audit and Actions Taken thereof during The Period of Assessment 7.2.1 Academic Audit System
The Academic Audit plan is prepared by the Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) every year before the commencement of the semester classes. An Internal Auditing committee is formed to carry out the various audits as per the scheduled plan .The process of Academic Audit is explained in the chart below.
137
Preparation of Academic Audit Plan by
Formulation of Internal Audit Committees
Audit carried out by the Internal Audit Committee as scheduled
Class Committee Course File Audit Log Book Audit Question Paper Audit Answer Script Audit Lab Experiment Audit Lab Equipment and
Submitting the Audit Reports and actions recommended to IQAC
Actions taken by IQAC
7.2.2 Implementation of Academic Audit System The various Audits planned by Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) are presented here. The Assessment criteria and the process involved in each audit are explained in the following table. The nature of Actions taken and implementation of the audits are also described briefly here.
S.No
1.
Audit & Assessment Criteria
Class Committee Meeting Assessment Criteria: a. Quality of Teaching b. Syllabus completion c. Quality of Facilities
Frequency Of Audit
Two per Semester
The Chairperson nominated by IQAC with all subject staffs of class is present for the meeting. 5 students from the respective class are present. Feedback received from students and direct discussion between faculty and student is enabled.
Action Taken & Implementation The action to be taken is decided based on the report which includes: 1.Advising the teacher to change method of teaching 2.Completion of syllabus by faculty 3. Improvement in facilities by getting
Minutes will be prepared and filed. The report of the audit
approval from management.
Process
138
is submitted to IQAC.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Course File Audit Assessment Criteria: a. Contents b. Arrangement
Log Book Audit Assessment Criteria: a. Attendance b. Syllabus completion c. Assessment Entry d. Content beyond syllabus e. No.of Hours taken
Question Paper Audit a. Quality b. Unit Coverage c.CO mapping
Answer Script Audit
Laboratory Experiment Audit a. Experiment Completion as per Anna University b. Observation Notes
Beginning and end of every semester
Equipment Stock Auditand a. Stock Verification
The action to be taken is decided based on the audit includes: 1. An Opportunity to include the contents 2.Creating strong awareness on importance of Course file The action to be taken is
Three times per semester
Before every assessment
After every assessment
Twice in a semester
Laboratory 7.
The Head of the department evaluates every course file in the beginning of the on-going semester. At the end of every semester, re-audit is carried out to ensure the course file is updated.
Periodic entry of assessment and assignment marks are monitored. The report of the audit is submitted to IQAC.
The Head of the Department audits every question paper before it is submitted to exam cell. The quality and syllabus coverage is verified
The action to be taken is decided based on the report 1.The question paper should be reframed if it does not meet the standards
Senior Faculty along with the Department Exam Cell Co-ordinator verifies the evaluated answer scripts.
If deviation is found , Reevaluation will be conducted
The Lab Co-ordinator inspect the conduct of experiments The number of experiments completed, or scheduled for completion in accordance with the University syllabus
Special Classes will be conducted for completing the experiments
The Lab Co-ordinator along Once a Year
decided based on the report 1.Seeking Explanation letter 2. If explanation is not satisfactory, Time will be given for completing it.
with theassess team of faculty thesenior instrument condition and perform stock 139
If there is any malfunction found in any of the equipment in the laboratory, it will be
b. Equipment Maintenance
8.
Laboratory Practical Record Audit a. Record Completion
verification
taken for service immediately.
The completion of record note by the student and Record correction by the faculty will be verified by the Head of the Department. The total number of experiment completed and its relevancy to University syllabus is also examined by the Head of the Department.
Every semester before University Practical Exam
Counselling will be done for completion by the lab co-ordinator along with the team of senior faculties.
7.3 Improvement in Placement, Higher Studies and Entreprenuership
Assessment is based on improvement in Placement: number, quality placement, core industry, pay packages etc. 7.3.1 Placement Details v
Higher studies: performance in GATE, GRE, GMAT, CAT etc., and admissions in premier institutions
v
Entrepreneurs
S.No
1 2 3 4 5
ITEM No. of Students
Eligible No of Students placed Quality Placement Core Industry Pay packages / annum
2015-2016
2 014- 2015
2013-2014
2012-2013
159
173
127
124
110
153
86
98
40 36
30 123
300000
240000
18 68
14 84
180000
144000
7.3.2 Higher Studies S .N o
1 2
ITEM No. of Students appeared in GATE/TANCET Admitted in Premier Institutions
2 015- 2016
2014-2015
2013-2014
2012-2013
15
15
32
18
3
4
2
2
140
7.3.3
Entrepreneurs
S.No
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
ACADEMIC YEAR
GRADUATE NAME
C O MP A N Y N A ME
M.Anand R.Naveenraj JiaurRahmanA R.VishnuPriya Goutham.R ChristopherShyam.F B.Lakshmipathy
2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013
G.M.A.Foundations. R.NaveenrajSAssocaitesPvtLtd. PuduvaiTilesPvtLtd JananiConstructionPvtLtd. R K.C. Builders Pvt Ltd. FR.KAssociatesPvtLtd. D.L.SInteriorsPvtLtd.
7.4 Improvement in The Quality of Students Admitted to the Program
Assessment is based on improvement in terms of ranks/ score in qualifying state level/ national level entrances tests, percentage marks in Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics in 12th Standard and percentage marks of the lateral entry students S.NO
1
2
3
4
ITEM
National Level Entrance Examination State/ University/ Level Entrance Examination/ Others
20152016
20142015
20132014
20122013
-
-
-
-
No of Students admitted OpeningScore/Rank
-
-
-
-
ClosingScore/Rank
-
-
-
-
No of Students admitted
----
Opening Score/Rank
-
-
-
-
Closing Score/Rank
-
-
-
-
No of Students Entrance admitted Examination for Lateral Entry or OpeningScore/Rank Lateral entry ClosingScore/Rank details Average CBSE/Any other board result of admitted Students (Physics, Chemistry & Maths)
141
2
7
33
26
73
88
89
91
67
65
60
61
127
137
143
138
CRITERION8
FIRSTYEARACADEMICS
50
8.1 First Year Student-Faculty Ratio (FYSFR) (5)
Faculty Ratio (FYSFR) (5) Assessment = (5×15)/Average FYSFR (Limited to Max.5) Data for first year courses to calculate the FYSFR
Year
Number Of Students (approved intake strength) N
Number of Faculty members(considering fractional load)F
FYSFR (N/F)
2013-2014
930
64
15
2014-2015
1050
71
15
2015-2016
990
67
15
Average FYSFR: 15.00 Assessment [(5 * 15) / Average FYSFR]: 5.00 8.2 Qualification of Faculty Teaching First Year Common Courses (5)
Assessment of qualification = (5x + 3y)/RF x = Number of Regular Faculty with PhD, y = Number of Regular Faculty with Post-graduate qualification RF = Number of faculty members required as per SFR of 15:1, Faculty definition as defined in 5.1
Year
x (Number Of Regular Faculty with PhD)
y (Number Of Regular Faculty with Post graduate Qualification)
RF (Number Of Faculty Members required as per SFR of 15:1)
Assessment Of Faculty Qualification [ (5x + 3y) / RF]
2013-14
6
31
49
2.51
2014-15
8
34
54
2.63
2015-16
8
33
50
2.78
Average Assessment: 2.64
142
8.3. First Year Academic Performance (10)
Academic Performance = ((Mean of 1st Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or (Mean of the percentage of marks in First Year of all successful students/10)) x (number of successful students/number of students appeared in the examination) Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the second year.
Academic Performance
Mean CGPA or mean percentage of all successful students(X) TotalnumberofSuccessfulstudents(Y) Total number of students appeared in the examination(Z) API[X*(Y/Z)] Average API [(AP1+AP2+AP3)/3]:4.94
2015201420132016 2015 2014 4.705 5.29 4.83 402 507 635
402 4.705
507 5.29
Assessment = Average API: 4.94
2015-2016 Department Wise CGPA 7
5.75
5.6
6
5.43
5 4
4.49
4.63
4.47
EEE
IT
MECH
3.74
3.53
3 2 1 0
AUTO
BT
CIVIL
CSE
ECE
2014-2015 Department Wise CGPA 7
6.26
6
5.84
5.83
5.13
5 4
3.9
3.65
Aero
Auto
5.66 4.65
5.08
3 2 1 0
Biotech
Civil
CSE
143
ECE
EEE
IT
Mech
635 4.83
2013-2014 Department Wise CGPA 7 6 5 4
5.75
5.23 4.62
5.29
4.69 4.02
3.84
4.47
3 2 1 0 Auto
Biotech
Civil
CSE
ECE
EEE
IT
Mech
8.4. Attainment of Course Outcomes of first year courses (10) 8.4.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of Course Outcomes of first year is done (5)
(Examples of data collection processes may include, but are not limited to, specific exam questions, laboratory tests, internally developed assessment exams, oral exams assignments, presentations, tutorial sheets etc.) Table 8.1 List of Assessment Tools TO O L
RELEVANCE
Internal Exam
Specific Course Outcomes
Test-I
Test-I (Co1 And Co2)
Test-II
Test-Ii(Co3 And Co4)
Test-III
Test-Iii(Co5 And Co6)
Laboratory Internal Exam
Outcomes Of Courses
University Assessment For All Courses
All First Year Courses(Equal Weightage)
FREQUENCY
Three Times Per Semester
Laboratory
144
One Time Per Semester One Time At The End Of The Semester
Conducting Internal Assessment Test
Evaluation by the Faculty within two days of the Exam
Data Feeding in TCS ION within a Week of the Exam
Consolidation of Marks by the Department Exam Cell Coordinator in Excel Sheets
Uploading the Data in University Web Portal
Receiving the University Results from Exam Cell
Storing of Data for computing PO Attainment
Fig 8.1: Data Collection Process For CO Evalu ation
145
Consolidated Internal Marks
Consolidated University Marks
Deciding the attainment levels for CO
Internal Assessment: Level 1 = 60% of the students scoring above 50% Level 2= 70% of the students scoring above 50% Level 3=80% of the
Computing the average of course outcome attainment level for Internal and University Assessment
University Assessment: Level 1 = 60% of the students scoring above 50% Level 2= 70% of the students scoring above 50% Level3=80% of the students scoring above 50%
Finding the weighted average of Course attainment based on internal and University assessment
Weighted Average: University Exam: 80% Internal Exam: 20%
Fig 8.2: CO Attainment Measurement
students scoring above 50%
8.4.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all first year courses (5)
Program shall have set attainment levels for all first year courses. The attainment levels shall be set considering average performance levels in the university examination or any higher value set as target for the assessment years. Attainment level is to be measured in terms of student performance in internal assessments with respect the COs of a subject plus the performance in the University examination Refer to 3.2.2 for further details CO Attainment through Internal Assessment (2012-2016) COURSECODE C101
CO1 3
CO2 3
CO3 3
146
CO4 3
CO5 3
CO6 3
C102 C103 C104 C105 C106 C107 C108 C109 C110 C111 C112
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
C113 C114 C115 C116 C117
3 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3
CO Attainment through University Exam COURSECODE
CO1
CO2
CO3
CO4
CO5
CO6
C101
2
2
2
2
2
2
C102
3
3
3
3
3
3
C103
3
3
3
3
3
3
C104
2
2
2
2
2
2
C105
3
3
3
3
3
3
C106
3
3
3
3
3
3
C107
3
3
3
3
3
3
C108
3
3
3
3
3
3
C109
3
3
3
3
3
3
C110
3
3
3
3
3
3
C111
3
3
3
3
3
3
C112
3
3
3
3
3
3
C113
3
3
3
3
3
3
C114
1
1
1
1
1
1
C115
1
1
1
1
1
1
C116
3
3
3
3
3
3
C117
2
2
2
2
2
2
CO Attainment for the batch 2012-16 COURSECODE C101 C102
CO1 2.2 3
CO2 2.2
CO3 2.2
3
3
147
CO4 2.2 3
CO5 2.2 3
CO6 2.2 3
C103
3
3
3
3
3
3
C104
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
C105
3
3
3
3
3
3
C106
3
3
3
3
3
3
C107
3
3
3
3
3
3
C108
3
3
3
3
3
3
C109
3
3
3
3
3
3
C110
3
3
3
3
3
3
C111
3
3
3
3
3
3
C112
3
3
3
3
3
3
C113
3
3
3
3
3
3
C114
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
C115
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
C116
3
3
3
3
3
3
C117
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
8.5. Attainment of Program Outcomes from first year courses (20) 8.5.1. Indicate results of evaluation of each relevant PO and/or PSO, if applicable (15)
The relevant program outcomes that are to be addressed at first year need to be identified by the institution. Program Outcome attainment levels shall be set for all relevant POs and/or PSOs through first year courses. (Describe the assessment processes that demonstrate the degree to which the Program Outcomes are attained through first year courses and document the attainment levels. Also include information on assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of each Program Outcome is based indicating the frequency with which these processes are carried out) Table 8.2: List of Assessment Tools TOOL
RELEVANCE
Internal Exam
Specific Course Outcomes
Test-I
Test-I (Co1 And Co2)
Test-II
Test-Ii(Co3 And Co4)
Test-III
Test-Iii(Co5 And Co6)
Laboratory Internal Exam
Outcomes Of
Laboratory
Courses
FREQUENCY
Three Times Per Semester
One Time Per Semester
University Assessment For
All First Year Courses(Equal
One Time At The End Of The
All Courses
Weightage)
Semester 148
Consolidated University Marks
Consolidated Internal Marks
Internal Assessment: Level 1 = 50% of the
University Assessment: Level 1 = 50% of the
Deciding the attainment level for CO students scoring above 50% Level 2= 60% of the students scoring above 50% Level 3=70% of the students scoring above 50%
students scoring above 50% Level 2= 60% of the students scoring above 50% Level 3=70% of the students scoring above 50%
Computing the average of course outcome attainment level for Internal and University Assessment
Finding the weighted average of Course attainment based on internal and University assessment
Weighted Average: University Exam: 80%
Mapping the Course Outcomes with Program Outcomes
Carry forward the attainment levels of Cos to PO mapping matrices and compute the average of Course Outcome attainment level for each Fig 8.3: PO Attainment Measurement PO ATTAINMENT (2012-2016): COURSE NAME
PO 1
PO 2
PO 3
PO 4
PO 5
PO 6
PO 7
PO 8
PO 9
PO1 0
PO1 1
PO1 2
C101
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.6
1.5
1.5
-
C102
2.7
1.8
0.8
0.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
149
C103
2.2
C104
1.71
1.2
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C105
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C106 C107
2.8
-
0.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C108
32
.2
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C109
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.2
2
2
-
C110
2.3
1.67
0.7
0.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C111
2.2
1.3
0.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C112
1.8
0.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C113
2.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C114
1.1
0.6
0.2
0.2
1.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C115
1.4
-
-
-
0.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C116
2
3
-
1
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C117
2.2
-
-
-
0.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SUM
34
143
3
9
-
-
-
4
3
3
-
No of Courses PO ATTAINMENT
15
11
6
4
6
2
2
2
-
2.2
1.2
0.5
0.7
1.5
2
1.5
1.5
0
0
0
0
PSO Attainment SUBJECTCODE
PSO1
PSO2
PSO3
C101 C102
1.83 1.5
-
1.47 -
C103
0.67
-
-
C104
0.57
-
-
C105
-
-
-
C106
1.83
-
-
C107
1.83
-
-
C108
2.17
3
-
C109
3
-
2
C110
1.97
-
-
C111
1
-
-
C112 C113
0.83 1.5
-
-
C114
0.62
-
0.16
C115 C116
3
-
0.47 -
C117
1.47
2.2
-
150
SUM No of Courses PSOATTAINMENT
23.79 15 1.58
5.2 3 1.73
4.1 5 0.82
8.5.2. Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of relevant POs (5)
(The attainment levels by direct (student performance) are to be presented through Program level Course-PO matrix as indicated) PO Attainm ent Levels and Act ions for impro vement - CAY – Mention for relevant Pos
POs
Target
Attainment
Level
Level
Observations
PO1: 1. Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
2.54
PO1
2.266
Attainment is low in the following subjects C101,C110
Action 1: Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. Students are to be made, to read English books
to improve their technical English skills. Action 2: Tamil Medium students feel the subject is difficult, extra classes for them are to be provided. PO2:2.Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
Lateral entry Students are not exposed to basic of engineering PO2
1.622
1.272
mathematics ,Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems
Action 1: Additional classes to be conducted to introduce Mechanical Engineering fundamental Action 2: More problems will be given as part of assignment and the same will be monitored on a
regular basis PO3:3. Design/development of solutions: Design soluti ons for complex engineerin g problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
Attainment achieved nearly, improvement actions will make us PO3
0.516
0.5
achieve the target 151
Action 1:Ways to improve further are being analyzed Action 2: Modern techniques and practices are to be updated and known to the students with the
consideration of environment. PO4: Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions. PO4
0.7
0.7
AttainmentAchieved
Action 1: Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. Action 2: Conduction of Science Fest and motivating students to prepare/built prototype models. PO5: Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of PO5
1.883
1.5
the limitations.
It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and resources are necessary to meet the industry standards and research.
Action 1: Software’s that are of recent trends used in the civil field are to be taught Action N: Students should be given individual Systems to work on software’s PO6: The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice. PO6
0
0
NIL
Action 1: To understand the safety concerns and social aspects, students visited industry to expand their
practical knowledge with the effect of improved practices in engineering. Action 2: Exposure to the site of construction for the students to learn and analyze in & around for a
smooth construction.(Industrial visits, In plant trainings are to be arranged) PO7: Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development. PO7
0
0
NIL
Action 1: The issues of global and environmental awareness among the student should be improved. Action 2: Projects based on sustainability are encouraged PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and
152
norms of the engineering practice.
0
PO8
0
NIL
Action 1: The students are doing better in improving the overall expertise in field of engineering but
due to lack of communications and other ethical moral knowledge, some are lagging in real life situations. Action 2: Practical issues should be discussed and ethics, its role & importance should be taught. PO9: Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
2.2
PO9
2
The students are not able to work as individual as well as in team.
Action 1: workshops, symposiums are conducted by the students as teams Action 2: Institute has initiated Program which provides a platform to work in individual as well as a
group in the fields of Engineering helps the students to groom the skills like leadership, effective team member. PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
The communication, presentation and report writing skills are to PO10
2.00
1.5
be further improved among the students.
Action 1: Soft skills training is imparted to students to enhance various aspects of
communication/technical talks by group discussions, presentations and new learning outcomes. Action 2:The communication language lab gives students an opportunity to improve their skills in
presentations, GD etc. PO11: Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
The PO11
2.00
1.5
knowledge
of
Management
principle
and
applying
managerial principles to his/her to manage a work as a team to
achieve the target on time. Action 1: Group assignments are to be given 153
Action 2:Real time projects are to be studied and presented as a group report (In plant trainings) PO12: Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change. PO12
0
0
NIL
Action 1: Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. Action 2:Communication & problem solving skills are to be learnt for a life time to be an independent
PSOs
Target
Attainment
Observations Level Level PSO1: Student will able to use techniques, skills and modern engineering tools for civil engineering day to day practice PSO1
1.726
1.586
Attainment is low in the few subjects.
Action 1: Additional classes to be conducted to introduce design subjects Action 2: Practical approach of teaching design to be adapted. PSO2: Students will able to participate in critical thinking and problem solving of civil engineering field that require analytical and design knowledge
Lateral entry Students are not exposed to basic of engineering PSO2
2
1.733
Mathematics,
Students
find
it
difficult
to
solve
the
engineering problems, Basic knowledge of design is not well understood Action 1: More practical problems will be given for practice Action 2: Exposing students to participate in off campus programmes and in plant training PSO3: Students will be able to pursue of lifelong learning and professional development to face the challenging emerging needs of our society PSO3
1.11
0.82
Practical problem solving skills
Action 1:Giving students group assignments and programmes to conduct Action 2:Ethical learning for a sustainable development
PO ATTAINMENT (2011-2015):
154
COURSE NAME
PO1
PO2
PO3
PO4
PO5
PO 6
PO 7
PO 8
PO9
PO1 0
PO1 1
PO1 2
C101
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.1
1.9
1.9
-
C102
2.0
1.3
0.6
0.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C103
2.1
1.1
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C104
0.4
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C105
0.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C106
0.4
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C107
3.0
3.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C108
3.0
2.2
3.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C109 C110
1.7
1.2
0.5
0.5
-
-
-
-
2.2 -
2.0 -
2.0 -
-
C111
2.2
1.3
0.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C112
1.8
0.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C113
1.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C114
1.7
1.0
0.2
0.2
1.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C115
3.0
-
-
0.0
1.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C116
2.0
3.0
-
1.0
1.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C117
3.0
-
-
0.0
1.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
27.8
12.2
2.0
2.3
10.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.2
3.9
3.9
0.0
15
11
6
3
6
2
2
2
0
1.85 7
1.10 8
0.32 8
0.78 2
1.78 5
2.11 9
1.95 6
1.95 6
-
SUM No of Courses PO ATTAINMEN T
POs
Target Level
Attainment Level
-
-
-
Observations
PO1: Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems. PO1
2.54
1.857
Attainment is low in the following subjects C101,C110
Action 1: Special classes are conducted at evening for the students who are lacking behind Action 2: Proper Motivation for the lateral entry and dull students are done to bring interest in problem solving techniques. PO2: Problem analysis: Identify, formul ate, review research literat ure, and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of
155
mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
PO2
1.622
1.108
Lateral entry Students are not exposed to basic of engineering mathematics ,Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems
Action 1: Additional classes to be conducted from resource person to impart exposure to dimensional science learning. Action 2: More problems will be given as part of assignment and the same will be monitored on a regular basis PO3: Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design system c omponents or processes that meet the specifi ed needs with appropr iate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations. PO3
0.516
0.328
Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems, Basic knowledge of design is not well understood.
Action 1:Ways to improve further are being analyzed (example the mentor system is being analyzed to be implemented) Action 2: Modern techniques and practices are to be updated and known to the students with the consideration of environment. PO4: Conduct i nvestigations of com plex problems: Use resea rch-based know ledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
PO4
0.7
0.782
It is observed that most of the project abstract and literature survey are addressing the research based approach but does not end with valid conclusions.
Action 1: Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. Action 2: Conduction of Science Fest and motivating students to prepare/built prototype models. PO5: Moder n tool usage : Create , select, an d apply app ropri ate tech niques , resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations. PO5
1.883
1.785
It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and resources are necessary to meet the industry standards and research.
156
Action 1: Software’s that are of recent trends used in the civil field are to be taught Action N: Students should be given individual Systems to work on software’s PO6: The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice. PO6
0
0
NIL
Action 1: To understand the safety concerns and social aspects, students visited industry to expand
their practical knowledge with the effect of improved practices in engineering. Action 2: Exposure to the site of construction for the students to learn and analyze in & around for a smooth construction.(Industrial visits, In plant trainings are to be arranged) PO7: Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development. PO7
0
0
NIL
Action 1: The issues of global and environmental awareness among the student should be improved. Action 2: Projects based on sustainability are encouraged PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice. PO8
0
0
NIL
Action 1: The students are doing better in improving the overall expertise in field of engineering but due to lack of communications and other ethical moral knowledge, some are lagging in real life situations. Action 2: Practical issues should be discussed and ethics, its role & importance should be taught. PO9: Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
2.2 PO9
2.119
The students are not able to work as individual as well as in team.
157
Action 1: workshops, symposiums are conducted by the students as teams Action 2: Institute has initiated Program which provides a platform to work in individual as well as a group in the fields of Engineering helps the students to groom the skills like leadership, effective team member. PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and de sign documentation, make effective presentations, and give and r eceive clear instructions.
PO10
2.00
1.956
The communication, presentation and report writing skills are to be further improved among the students.
Action 1: Soft skills training is imparted to students to enhance various aspects of communication/technical talks by group discussions, presentations and new learning outcomes. Action 2:The communication language lab gives students an opportunity to improve their skills in presentations, GD etc. PO11: Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
PO11
2.00
1.956
The knowledge of Management principle and applying managerial principles to his/her to manage a work as a team to achieve the target on time.
Action 1: Group assignments are to be given Action 2:Real time projects are to be studied and presented as a group report (In plant trainings) PO12: Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change. PO12
0
0
NIL
Action 1: Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. Action 2:Communication & problem solving skills are to be learnt for a life time to be an independent
PSO Attainment (2011-2015) SUBJECTCODE
P SO 1
158
P SO 2
P SO 3
PSOs
C101
2.39
-
1.91
C102
1.10
-
-
C103
0.64
-
-
C104
0.14
-
-
C105
-
-
-
C106
0.29
-
-
C107
1.83
-
-
C108
2.17
3.00
-
C109
3.00
-
2.00
C110
1.08
-
-
C111
1.00
-
-
C112
0.83
-
-
C113
0.70
-
-
C114
0.98
-
0.24
C115
-
-
1.00
C116
3.00
-
-
C117
2.00
3.00
-
SUM
21.14
6.00
5.16
No of Courses PSO ATTAINMENT
15
3
5
1.409342
2
1.031111
Target Level
Attainme nt Level
Observations
PSO1:Student will able to use techniques, skills and modern engineering tools for civil engineering day to day practice PSO1
1.726
1.409
Attainmentislowinveryfewsubjects.
Action 1: Additional classes to be conducted to introduce design subjects Action 2: Practical approach of teaching design to be adapted using softwares (STADD) PSO2: Students will able to participate in critical thinking and problem solving of civil engineering field that require analytical and design knowledge PSO2
2
2
Attainment achieved
Action 1: More practical problems will be given for practice
159
Action 2: Exposing students to participate in out college programmes and in plant training PSO3: Students will be able to pursue of lifelong learning and professional development to face the challenging emerging needs of our society 1.11 1.031 PSO3 Practical problem solving skills Action 1: Giving students group assignments and programmes to make them conduct as a team. Action 2:Ethical learning for a sustainable development
PO ATTAINMENT (2010-2014): COURSE NAME C101
PO1
PO2
PO3
PO4
PO5
PO6
PO7
PO8
PO9
PO10
PO11
PO12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.2
2.0
2.0
-
C102
2.7
1.8
0.8
0.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C103
2.2
1.2
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C104
2.3
1.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C105
3.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C106
2.8
0.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C107
3.0
3.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C108
3.0
2.2
3.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C109
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.2
2.0
2.0
-
C110
2.3
1.7
0.7
0.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C111
1.6
1.0
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C112
1.8
0.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C113
2.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C114
1.7
1.0
0.2
0.2
1.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C115
3.0
-
-
1.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C116
2.0
3.0
-
1.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C117
3.0
-
-
1.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
37
14
3
11
0
0
0
4
4
4
0
2
2
2
0
-
-
-
2.167
2.000
2.000
-
SUM
1.0 3
No of Courses
15
9
6
4
6
Po attainment
2.460
1.545
0.500
0.687
1.785
POs
Target
Attainment
Level
Level
Observations
PO1: 1. Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fun damentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems. 2.54 2.460 Attainment is low in the following subjects C101,C110 PO1
160
Action 1: Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. Students are to be made, to read English books to improve
their technical English skills. Action 2: Tamil Medium students feel the subject is difficult, extra classes for them are to be provided. PO2:2.Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
Attainment lacks in C102,C105,C110,C116 PO2
1.622
1.545
Lateral entry Students are not exposed to basic of engineering mathematics ,Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems
Action 1: Additional classes to be conducted to introduce Mechanical Engineering fundamental Action 2: More problems will be given as part of assignment and the same will be monitored on a regular basis PO3:3. Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations. PO3
0.516
0.500
Subject involves both analysis and design, Solving design problems found to be lengthy
Action 1: Coaching class for the dull & lateral entry students Action 2: Modern techniques and practices are to be updated and known to the students with the consideration of
environment. PO4: Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
It is observed that most of the project abstract and literature survey PO4
0.7
0.687
are addressing the research based approach but does not end with valid conclusions.
Action 1: Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. Action 2: Conduction of Science Fest and motivating students to prepare/built prototype models. PO5: Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations. PO5
1.883
1.785
It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and resources are necessary to meet the industry standards and research.
Action 1: Software’s that are of recent trends usedin the civil field are tobe taught
161
Action N: Students should be given individual Systems to work on software’s PO6: The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice. PO6
0
0
NIL
Action 1: To understand the safety concerns and social aspects, students visited industry to expand their practical
knowledge with the effect of improved practices in engineering. Action 2: Exposure to the site of construction for the students to learn and analyze in & around for a smooth
construction.(Industrial visits, In plant trainings are to be arranged) PO7: Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of theprofessional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development. PO7
0
0
NIL
Action 1: The issues of global and environmental awareness among the student should be improved. Action 2: Projects based on sustainability are encouraged PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commi t to professional ethics and responsibilities nd a norms of the engineering practice. PO8
0
0
NIL
Action 1: The students are doing better in improving the overall expertise in field of engineering but due to lack of
communications and other ethical moral knowledge, some are lagging in real life situations. Action 2: Practical issues should be discussed and ethics, its role & importance should be taught. PO9: Individual and team work: Function effectively sa an individual, and as amember or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings. PO9
2.2
2.167
The students are not able to work as individual as well as in team.
Action 1: workshops, symposiums are conducted by the students as teams Action 2: Institute has initiated Program which provides a platform to work in individual as well as a group in the
fields of Engineering helps the students to groom the skills like leadership, effective team member. PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions. PO10
2.00
2.00
Attainmentachieved
Action 1: Soft skills training is imparted to students to enhance various aspects of communication/technical talks
by group discussions, presentations and new learning outcomes. Action 2:The communication language lab gives students an opportunity to improve their skills in presentations,
GD etc.
162
PO11: Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments. PO11
2.00
2.00
Attainmentachieved
Action 1: Group assignments are to be given Action 2:Real time projects are to be studied and presented as a group report (In plant trainings) PO12: Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change. PO12
0
0
NIL
Action 1: Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. Action 2:Communication & problemsolving skills are to belearnt for a life time to be an independent
Program level Course-PSO matrix-Target
SUBJECT CODE C101
PSO1
PSO2
PSO3
2.5
-
2
C102
1.5
-
-
C103
0.7
-
-
C104
0.8
-
-
C105
-
-
-
C106
1.8
-
-
C107 C108
1.8 2.2
3
-
C109
3
-
-
C110
2
-
-
C111
1
-
-
C112
0.8
-
-
C113
1.5
-
-
C114
1.3
-
0.3
C115
-
-
1
C116
3
-
-
C117
2
3
-
AVERAGE
1.726667
3
1.1
163
PSO Attainment (2010-2014)
SUBJECTCODE C101 C102 C103 C104 C105 C106 C107 C108 C109 C110 C111 C112 C113 C114 C115 C116 C117 SUM No of Courses PSO ATTAINMENT PSOs
Target
PSO1 2.5 1.5 0.7 0.8 0 1.8 1.8 2.2 3 1.5 0.7 0.8 1.5 1 3 2 24.8 15 1.653333
PSO2 3 3 6 2
PSO3 2 0.2 1 5.2 4
3
Attainme
1.1
Observations
Level nt PSO1: Student will able to use techniques, skills and modern engineering tools for civil engineering day to day practice PSO1
1.726
1.653
Attainment is low in very few subjects. With the following actions the target can be achieved.
Action 1: Additional classes to be conducted to introduce design subjects Action 2: Practical approach of teaching design to be adapted. PSO2: Students wil l able to partici pate in critic al thinking and problem so lving of civil engineering field that require analytical and design knowledge
Lateral entry Students are not exposed to basic of engineering PSO2
3
2.12 Mathematics, Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems, Basic knowledge of design is not well understood 164
Action 1: More practical problems will be given for practice Action 2: Exposing students to participate in out college programmes and in plant training PSO3: Students will be able to pursue of lifelong learning and professional development to face the challenging emerging needs of our society PSO3
1.11
1.1
Practical problem solving skills
Action 1: Giving students group assignments and programmes to make them conduct as a team. Action 2:Ethical learning for a sustainable development
165
CRITERION9
StudentSupportSystems
50
9. STUDENT SUPPORT SYSTEMS (50) 9.1 Mentoring system to help at individual level (5)
Type
of
mentoring:
Professional
guidance/career
advancement/course
work
specific/laboratory specific/all-round development. Number of faculty mentors: Number of students per mentor: Frequency of meeting: (The institution may report the details of the mentoring system that has been developed for the students for various purposes and also state the efficacy of such system)
MentoringSystem Type of mentoring Number of students per mentor Frequency of meeting
:Yes : Professional guidance/career advancement/course work specific/laboratory specific/all-round development : 20 : Every Tuesday
Mentoring Process
Each Faculty is assigned for a batch of 15 to 20 students in a class. The Mentor Student Meeting is conducted every week regularly in their respective venue (lab or classroom) after the college working hours on every Tuesday between 3.30 p.m. to 4.30 p.m. The outcomes of the mentoring process help students to develop their academic and career pursuits positively. The flowchart of the mentoring process is shown as follows:
166
History Card
A history card is maintained for each student. It contains the following data v
Personal Information
v
Previous Record
v
Academic Performance
v
Competitive Examination Details
v
Details of Internship and Industrial Trainings
v v
Scholarships record Co-Curricular and Extra-Curricular activities 167
Monitoring and Counseling the students
The mentors: v
Make sure that the students understand not only the personal reflections of their commitment to their studies, but also the value of the professional community and general public as well.
v
Keep track of students’ progress and achievements, setting milestones and acknowledging their accomplishments.
v
Observe students’ different cultural and ethnic background and find productive methods to
v
balance the level of students. Encourage students’ inquisitive quest for new techniques and discuss the concepts for prospective outcomes.
v
Provide support and encouragement at times of appreciation, accomplishments emotional and physical distress.
v
Categorize the students
based on their
academics, attendance, discipline and
extracurricular activities. Efficiency of the mentoring system ∑
Overall pass percentage of the institute has increased with effectiveness of the system.
∑
The absenteeism among the students is reduced considerably.
∑
The overall personality of the students is enhanced by imbibing positive attitude in them.
9.2. Feedback analysis and reward /co rrective mea sures taken, if any (10)
Feedback collected for all courses: YES/NO; Specify the feedback collection process; Average Percentage of students who participate; Specify the feedback analysis process; Basis of reward/ corrective measures, if any; Indices used for measuring quality of teaching & learning and summary of the index values for all courses/teachers; Number of corrective actions taken.
Feedback collected for all courses: Yes Feedback collection process: v
Regular class committee meetings are conducted. Class committee consists of a chair person who is a senior faculty but not handling that class, faculties of that class and students representatives. The main aim of this is to improve the teaching process. The 168
performance of the students is analyzed and if necessary they are counseled for their improvement. v
Besides the class committee meetings, a well-designed feedback form is given to the students to assess the academic performance of the faculty who handled the subject at the end of each semester. These online feedbacks will speak on the Faculty qualities – punctuality in coming to the class, sincerity in teaching, communication ability, honesty in completing the portion, prompt in valuing, encouraging & motivating the students etc.
169
Execution of Feedback process: v
A centralized Intranet feedback system used for collecting feedback from the students.
v
The Schedule for the course feedback is sent to the departments and students should record their feedback during the scheduled time in the central computing centre.
v
The entire feedback process is monitored by Course feedback coordinator.
Indices (Grading) used for measuring quality of teaching and learning v
In online feedback, questionnaire contains 7 parameters rated using 5 point scale to
v
measure faculty performance. The weighted average of the students response is calculated and consolidated
v
The performance based on feedback is categorized in to ∑
Category I (above 90%) – Excellent
∑
Category II (70% - 90%) – Good
∑
Category III (Below 70%) – Suggestion for Improvement.
Basis of reward / corrective measures C a t eg o r y
Indices
R em a rk s
I
Above 90%
Appreciation
II
70% -9 0%
Recommended for FDP, Workshop, Conference
II
Below 70%
Faculty has panel discussion with Principal/ HOD
9.3. Feedback on facilities (5) Assessment is based on student feedback collection, analysis and corrective action taken. v
Institute collects the Facility feedback from students for each semester.
v
Facility feedback collected from student through class committee meeting
v
IQAC consolidate the report and submit to the Principal/Management for corrective measure.
170
Feedback Analysis, Corrective and Preventive Actions v
Consolidated statement prepared by IQAC Coordinator based on Teaching Learning and facilities is taken note of them by the Principal and HOD.
v
Where serious complaints are received from the students regarding general facilities like Library, Hostel, Canteen, etc, then Management takes appropriate corrective
measures
immediately and the same is promptly recorded.
9.4. Self-Learning (5)
(The institution needs to specify the facilities, materials and scope for self-learning / learning beyond syllabus, Webinars, Podcast, MOOCs etc. and evaluate their effectiveness)
Scope for self-learning
The institution helps students in many ways to inculcate and develop problem solving ability, self-reliance, and initiat ive, spirit of inquiry, learni ng by observation and discussion and developing lifelong learning skills by providing facilities like, 171
v
Common Computing Centre with internet
v
General Library
v
Department Library
v
Digital library
v
Wi-Fi Connection
v
Course Materials uploaded in TCS Ion.
v
E-Books
All the above mentioned facilities are available even after working hours. The institution provides an excellent academic environment with access on self-learning. v The institution helps students to inculcate self-learning, one is by providing main library with required study materials like reference books, text books and books related to competitive exams like GRE, TOEFL, IELTS, GATE etc. v
Digital Library with DELNET data base, NPTEL video lectures, book CD’s are available where students can prepare their own Study material. Research journals are available.
v
Wi-Fi Connectivity is available for student benefit.
v
Study materials & question banks have been uploaded for individual subjects through internal server in the Departments concerned where they can be easily accessed.
NPTEL: v
The institution has a NPTEL Local Chapter.
v
NPTEL contents are being used by our institution as part of the teaching-learning process.
v
Faculty members are using these contents as part of their lesson plan to teach university curriculum.
v
Students are using NPTEL to prepare for technical jobs and competitive exams, and also for constant learning and updating knowledge.
v
Many students of our institution have taken-up the NPTEL online certification courses and achieved certificates.
172
Implementation Process:
A faculty member is identified as Single Point Contact (SPOC)
SPOC disseminates all NPTEL initiatives among the students
SPOC encourages students to enroll in courses
Students attend the courses, submit the assignments and finally take-up the tests
Students get certificates from NPTEL
NPTEL Loca l Chapter Star ted on: – 25-07-2015 Course Status report for the Academic Year (2015 – 2016)
S .N o
Particular
July – September
January – May
2015
2016
1
No. of Subjects Registered
12
24
2
No. of Students Registered
318
218
3
No.ofStudentsReceivedScholarship
4
5
225
No. of Students Received Participant
156 14
Certificates No.ofStudentsReceivedMeritCertificates
173
01
52
16
iON DIGITAL LEARNING
The institution is powered by iON Digital Learning , which is a collaborative learning platform on the cloud that provides an interactive environment for improved learning outcomes. Powered by a best-in-class Learning Management System (LMS), it offers a collaborative pedagogical model to enrich participatory learning by enabling course delivery, assessment and other learning opportunities in a community setting.
• INSTRUCTOR
•LEARNER •Collaborate with peers •Access study material •Get feedback
• Create courses • Conduct tests • Give assignments
• INSTITUTION • Create learning communities • Aggregate content • Connect with industry
TCS ion S t u d en t s C o r n er
Parents Corner
Coordinator
Faculty Corner
Responsibility
∑
Login
∑
Login
∑
Login
∑
Timetable Upload
∑
Timetable
∑
Timetable
∑
Subject Notes
∑
Enroll Students
∑
Class Notes
∑
Attendance
∑
Attendance
∑
Faculty Allocation
∑
Attendance
∑
Internal
∑
Subject Allocation
∑
Internal Marks
Internal Mark
∑
Notes Upload
∑
Events
Entry
∑
SMS facilities
∑
Feedback
∑
Activity/ Event
Entry
marks
∑
Digital Learning
v
Students’ can access the study material at any time using their login.
v
Study material has available to download in the format of Docx, PPT & PDF. 174
v
Content beyond the syllabus, quiz methodology for self-practices and solved university papers are also available on website for enhancing the students’ knowledge.
WEBINARS
The Institution is hosting many webinars to enrich the knowledge of faculty members on current technologies. v
“Balancing work and family as a career woman”, organized by department of ECE
MOOCs- Student Orie ntation Progra mme:
MOOCs provide interactive user forums to support community interactions among students and Professors. MOOCs is an online course aimed at unlimited participation and open access via the web. By using MOOC s source, faculty and stude nts are benefited with Filmed lectures, readings, and problem sets etc.
v
MOOCs Orientation programme was conducted to faculty and students in the month of August 2015.
v
MOOCs Coordinator gave orientation to the students of all the departments
v
The students were oriented towards the benefits of using free online course wares such as edx, udacity, urserc.
9.5. Career Gui dance, Tra ining, Pl acement (10 )
(The institution may specify the facility, its management and its effectiveness for career guidance including counseling for higher studies, campus placement support, industry interaction for training/internship/placement, etc.)
Sree Sastha Institute of Engineering & Technology holds an annual seminar on "Employment Opportunities, Recruitment Dynamics and Employability Challenges" as part of its Comprehensive Employability Enhancement Program for its final and pre-final students. Institute invite leaders from core and non-core industries, to share their thoughts and vision with regard to opportunities in their respective industries, recruitment best practices and employability challenges that students need to address for their successful placement and subsequent career advancement. Institution provides facilities like reference books, internet connection, etc., for campus drive preparation. 175
Training and Placement v
Separate cells exist for Training and Placement activities.
v
Campus drive starts in the month of June and continues up to early March and ends with the Mega Job fair at the end of every year.
Institutions Infra Structure Facilities: v
Infra-Str ucture Faci lities – TPO S .N o
v
Particulars
Quantity
1 2
Room Size VisitorsWaitingSofa
15 X40 3
3
Chair
8
4
Monitor
1
5
TableBig ( Size)
6
ComputerTable
7
CPU
8
Key Board
9
Mouse
10
Steel Bureau
2
11
SteelLockerCabinet
1
12
Printer
13
LCD Projector
1
14
White Board
1
15
InternetFacility
1 1 1 1 1
1
45Mbps
Infra-Str ucture Facili ties – For Conductin g Campus Drives
S .N o
Particulars
Quantity
1.
Auditorium
1 ( 300 Seat Capacity)
2.
Seminar Hall
2 ( 300 Seat Capacity)
3.
Control Room HR
1
4.
Training Hall ( AV Hall)
8
5. HallGD
3 176
6.
Interview Panel Rooms
10
7.
VIP Visitors Hall
8.
1100 Client PC: Intel Core 2 Duo / I3
1
processors, 2GB Ram, XP, Office 2007 9.
OpticalFiberCampusConnectivity
10.
Internet Facility
1 45 Mbps
Placement Training
The Training and Placement office organizes several training programs for the students of all semesters with the help of in-house experts and experts drawn from professional agencies. The activities are proved exceptionally useful in shaping the career of the student. The Staff members of the placement work together as a team in shaping the students to the requirements of various industries. Several Career guidance program, reasoning tests, aptitude tests, Puzzle Solving, Group Discussions, Mock Interviews, Brain Storming Sessions, Core Discussion, Pick and Speak, Communication Skills and sharing their experiences etc., are organized on regular basis in order to motivate and develop the personality of the students.
Training Module Module
Areo aT f raining
Module I
Communication Skill Enhancement
Module II
Effective Placement Training (includes Personality Development Program)
Module III
Model Aptitude Tests
Module IV
Group Discussions
Module V
Mock Interviews
177
Process Framework for Placement
178
Process Framework for Training and Career Guidance
179
Outsourced Training Vendors
S .N o
TITLTE / HEME
C O MP A N Y
1.
JAVA(GreenFoot)
2.
MATLAB
3.
MotorWinding
4.
Design and Study of Ball Bearing
TVS Training and Services Ltd.
5.
RivetArchitecture
KSMCADAcademy
6.
Fluorescent Staining, Acid-Fast Staining, and Grading Techniques
7.
Cloud Computing
8.
EmbeddedSystems
TVSTrainingandServicesLtd.
9.
PLC (Programmable Logic Controller)
TVS Training and Services Ltd.
10.
Design and Analysis of CAM
TVS Training and Services Ltd.
11.
EssentialsofETABS
KSMCADAcademy
12.
BioInformatics
Armats Biotek
13.
FeduciaInfoTech TVSTrainingandServicesLtd. TVSTrainingandServicesLtd.
EMC
Fluorescent Staining, Acid-Fast Staining, and Grading Techniques
14.
JAVA .NET /
15.
EmbeddedSystems
NIRT in association with ICMR 2
in association with ICTACT
NIRT in association with ICMR
NIIT RSRTechnologies’
16. NET .
NIIT
17.
Power Construction And Engineering
18.
BIOPROCESS
Sri Ganga Paduka Engineering Consultancy PVT LTD., Armats Biotek
Campus Residential Programme
With a highly competitive and fast changing business environment, thinning of profit margins and increased cost of hiring, Industry is left with no option but to be very selective with recruitments in their organizations. Students have the best chances for being selected by an employer when they are in the college. Once outside the college they need to compete with 7 Lac 180
other students. To be successful in job market, they need to perform well not only in their chosen academic field but also need to succeed in the on/ off campus interviews. In a short window of opportunity of 10 to 15 minutes they need to leave a lasting impression on the interviewer to be selected in that company.
Success can be achieved only through a thorough preparation to face this challenge. SSIET is arranging an intensive Campus Residential Placement Training Program for this purpose to train students to industries’ expectations. In addition, guest lecturers are also being arranged by experts from industries. The training program is free of charge which includes boarding and lodging in the hostel complex except for the Yoga mat which is essential for the program which will be purchased from the Vendor who will be teaching the Yoga Classes.
CAMPUS RESIDENTIAL TRAINING PROGRAM JUNE 2014
Beneficiary: Third Year Students Duration: (16-06-2014 to 22-06-2014 ) – 7 days CAMPUS RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMME SCHEDULE DATE
8.40-10.10 A .M 1.30Hrs
Day 1
Inauguration Function
Day 2
Verbal Ability
Day 3
Verbal Ability
Day 4
Verbal Ability
Day 5
Verbal Ability
10.3020 Mts
12.00 P.M 1.30Hrs
1.0060 2 .3 0 P .M Mts 1.30Hrs
Quantitative Aptitude
T E A
Quantitative Aptitude Quantitative Aptitude Quantitative Aptitude
2.50–
15 4.20P.M 6.00 P.M Mts 1.30Hrs 1.30Hrs
SWOT Analysis / Industry Analysis
Reasoning Ability
L U N C H
Quantitative Aptitude
Reasoning Ability Reasoning Ability Reasoning Ability
Reasoning Ability 181
4.30 –
T E A
Resume/ Writing
Extempore
Day 6
Verbal Ability
Quantitative Aptitude
Day 7
Assertiveness/ Psychometric Analysis
Wisdom Zone / Prof. Etiquette
ÿ
Resume Correction / Email Etiquette
Interview Skills (GD)
Personal Interview (HR Tips)
Personal Interview (HR Mock up)
Yoga / Medication in Morning / Art of Living Course in Evening
SYLLABUS FOR THIRD Y EAR STUDE NTS S .N o
SUBJECT
DURATION
1.
Quantitative Aptitude
Hrs 9
2.
Reasoning Ability
3.
English– VerbalAbility
4.
ResumeWriting/EmailR esumeCorrection
5.
Extempore
6.
SWOTAnalysis&IndustryAnalysis
7.
Assertiveness/PsychometricAnalysis
8.
WisdomZone/Prof.Etiquette
1Hrs30Mts
9.
Interviewskills(GD)/MockUp(GD)
1Hrs30Mts
10.
PersonalInterview(HR)/MockUpHR
Hrs 7 30 Mts 7Hrs30Mts 3Hrs Hrs 1 30 Mts 1Hrs30Mts 1Hrs30Mts
3Hrs TO TA L
182
37Hrs30Mts
Beneficiary: Second Year Students Duration: (9-06-201 4 to 15-06-2014) – 7 days CAMPUS RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMME SCHEDULE 8.40 -10.10 A.M
DATE
20 Min
1.30Hrs Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Day 4
Day 5
Day 6
ÿ
12.00 P.M
60 Min
1.30Hrs
1.00-
2.50 –
15
2.30 P.M 1.30Hrs
4.30 – 6.00
4.20 P.M Min
1.30Hrs
P.M 1.30Hrs
Inauguration
Quantitative
Reasoning
Public
Function
Aptitude
Ability
Speaking
Quantitative
Reasoning
Time
Aptitude Quantitative
Ability Reasoning
Management
Verbal Ability
Verbal Ability
Verbal Ability
Verbal Ability
Aptitude
L
Ability
T
Quantitative
U
Reasoning
E
Aptitude
N
Ability
E
A
Quantitative
C
Reasoning
A
Aptitude
H
Ability
Extempore
T
Creativity
Quantitative
Reasoning
Aptitude
Ability
Attitude
Presentation
Personal
Personal
Building &
Techniques /
counseling
counseling &
Leadership
Practice
& Feedback
Feedback
Verbal Ability
Day 7
10.30-
Thinking & Innovation
Yoga / Medication in Morning / Art of Living Course in Evening
SYLLABUS FOR SECOND YEAR STUDENTS S.No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
SUBJECT Quantitative Aptitude Reasoning Ability English – Verbal Ability Public Speaking Extempore / Time Management CreativityThinking&Innovation AttitudeBuildingLeadership / PresentationTechniques/Practice Personalcounseling&Feedback TOTAL
DURATION Hrs 9 Hrs 9 7 Hrs 30 Min Hrs 3 Hr 30 1Min 1Hr 30Min 1Hr 30Min 1Hr 30Min 3Hrs 3 H73 M r0sin
183
CAMPUS RESIDENTI AL TRAINING PROG RAM – JUNE 2015 Beneficiary: Final Year Student s Duration: (8-06-201 5 to 13-06-2015) – 6 days CAMPUS RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMME SCHEDULE 6.00 DATE
7.30 A.M 1.30 Hrs
Day 1
Yoga
Day 2
Yoga
8.40 -
10.30-
10.10 A.M
20
1.00-
12.00 P.M
Min 1.30Hrs
60
2.30 P.M
Min 1.30Hrs
2.50– 4.20P.M
15
4.30 – 6.00 P.M
Min 1.30Hrs
Inauguration Function
Quantitative Aptitude
Reasoning Ability
Verbal
Quantitative
Reasoning
Ability
Aptitude
Ability
1.30Hrs Public Speaking Public Speaking / Extempore
1.30Hrs Guest Lecture (E commerce) Guest Lecture (Art of Living)
Resume
Day 3
Yoga
Verbal Ability
Quantitative T
Aptitude
Day 4
Yoga
Day 5
Yoga
Day 6
ÿ
Yoga
Verbal
U
Reasoning Ability
N
E A
L
E
C Quantitative
T
Guest Lecture (Core Engg)
/ Email Etiquette Group
Guest Lecture
Ability
Aptitude
Ability
Discussion
(Entrepreneurship)
Verbal
Quantitative
Reasoning
Mock Up
Guest Lecture
Ability
Aptitude
Ability
GD
(Software)
Verbal
Quantitative
Ability
Aptitude
H
Reasoning
A
writing Correction
Personal Interview (HR Tips)
Personal Interview (HR Mock up)
Valedictory / Certificate Distribution
Yoga / Medication in Morning / Art of Living Course in Evening
SYLLABUS FOR FINAL YEAR STUDENTS S .N o
S U B JE C T
DURATION
1
Quantitative Aptitude
2
Reasoning Ability
Hrs 7 30 Min
3
English– VerbalAbility
7Hrs30Min
4
PublicSpeaking/ Extempore 184
Hrs 9
3Hrs
5
ResumeWriting/EmailResumeCorrection
1Hr3 0Min
6
GroupDiscussionMock / Up(GD)
3Hrs
7
PersonalInterview(HR)/MockUpHR
3Hrs
8
GuestLecture(Ecommerce)
9
GuestLecture(ArtofLiving)
1Hr 30Min
10
GuestLecture(CoreEngg)
1Hr 30Min
11
1Hr 30Min
GuestLecture(Entrepreneurship)
12
1Hr 30Min
GuestLecture(Software)
1Hr 30Min
Inauguration Function / Valedictory / Certificate Distribution
13
3 Hrs
TO TA L
H4r5s
CAMPUS RESIDENTIAL TRAIN ING PROGRAM ME – JUNE 2015 Beneficiary: Third Year Students Duration: (2-06-201 5 to 7-06-2015) – 6 days
CAMPUS RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMMME SCHEDULE 6.00 DATE
7.30 A.M 1.30 Hrs
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Yoga
Yoga
Day 4
Yoga
Day5
Yoga
8.40 -10.10
10.30-
A.M
12.00 P.M
20 Min
1.30Hrs
1.30Hrs
60 Min
1.00-
2.50 –
4.30 – 6.00
2.30 P.M
4.20 P.M
P.M
15 Min
1.30Hrs
1.30Hrs
Inauguration
Quantitative
Reasoning
Public
Function
Aptitude
Ability
Speaking
Verbal
Quantitative
Ability
Aptitude
Verbal
Quantitative
Ability
Verbal Ability Verbal
T
E
A
L
U
Aptitude
Quantitative
N
Aptitude Quantitative
H
185
1.30Hrs
Extempore
Reasoning
Time
Guest
Ability
Management
Lecture
Attitude
Reasoning
T
Ability
Leadership
Reasoning
E
Ability Reasoning
Building &
A
Self Motivation / Peer Group Learning
Creativity
Presentation
Thinking &
Techniques /
Innovation Personal
Practice Guest
Ability
Aptitude
Ability
counseling&
Lecture
Feedback
Day 6
ÿ
Yoga
Verbal
Quantitative
Reasoning
Ability
Aptitude
Ability
Personal
Valedictory /
counseling &
Certificate
Feedback
Distribution
Yoga / Medication in Morning / Art of Living Course in Evening
Syllabus for Third Year Students S.No
SUBJECT
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.
DURATION
Quantitative Aptitude Reasoning Ability English – Verbal Ability Public Speaking Extempore / Time Management AttitudeBuildingLeadership / SelfMotivation/PeerGroupLearning CreativityThinking&Innovation PresentationTechniques/Practice Personalcounseling& Feedback Guest Lecture Inauguration Function / Valedictory / Certificate Distribution TOTAL
Hrs 9 Hrs 9 7 Hrs 30 Min Hrs 3 Hr 30 1Min 1Hr 30Min 1Hr 30Min 1Hr 30Min 1Hr 30Min 3Hrs Hrs 3 3 Hrs H4r5s
PLACEMENT RECORD Department
No. of Students No. of students Admitted for the placed based on Programme Admitted 2013 – 2014
Placement Percentage
Automobile
65
48
74%
Biotechnology
86
43
50%
Computer Science
83
65
78%
Civil
127
86
68%
ECE
77
38
49%
EEE
58
18
31%
IT
78
49
63%
Mechanical
90
58
64%
186
2014-2105 Automobile
59
36
61%
Biotechnology
36
19
52%
Computer Science
81
59
73%
Civil
173
153
88%
ECE
68
27
40%
EEE
30
10
33%
IT
69
23
33%
Mechanical
96
51
53%
Automobile
54
35
64.%
Biotechnology
61
40
65%
Computer Science
65
64
98%
Civil
159
110
69%
ECE
68
53
78%
EEE
17
14
82%
IT
51
35
69%
Mechanical
61
45
74%
2015-2016
Internship Training ∑
Internship training is helpful to the students to gain practical knowledge.
∑
The training cell arranges training to the students based on the skills of the students.
∑
Institute has signed MOU with companies for Internship training
∑
Students Internship training report maintained by the Institute Training Head Internship/IPT for the Academic Year 2015-2016
S .N o
Department
ye ar
No. of Students Attended Internship
eligible students
No. of companies
Repeated Companies
1
ECE
III
57
57
8
2
2
CSE
III
36
36
8
0
3
IT
III
17
17
6
1
4
MECH
III
71
61
17
1
187
5
EEE
6
AUTO
7
BIO TECH
8C
∑
III
61
III
27
III
IVIL
31 48
26 III
8
0
8
82
8
0 7
39
62
5
1
334
394
68
12
Career Guidance Career Guidance for Higher Education
S.No
Academic Y ear
Date
Name of the Event
No. of Beneficiary
1.
2014-2015
12.02.2015
GATECoachingSeminar
373
2.
2013-2014
02.04.2014
Career Guidance programme –2 014
309
9.6. Entrepreneurshi p Cell (5)
(The institution may describe the facility, its management and its effectiveness in encouraging entrepreneurship and incubation) (Success stories for each of the assessment years are to be mentioned) v
Entrepreneurship cell established in the year 2007.
v
Entrepreneurship cell is a separate entity to produce a budding entrepreneur.
v
Entrepreneurship cell motivates guides and encourages the students to prepare a business plan.
v
Entrepreneurship cell supports the students both in terms of financial and non-financial requirements.
Infra-Structure Facilities S .N o
Particulars
Quantity
1.
RoomSize
10 X 30Sq.Feet
2.
Table
2
3.
Chair
5
4.
Monitor
5. 6.
CPU Key Board
1 1 1 188
7.
Mouse
1
8.
SteelLockerCabinet
9.
Printer
10.
LCD Projector
1
11.
White Board
1
12.
InternetFacility
1 1
45Mbps
Enterpreneurship Cell Process Flow
CommitteeM embers
Frequencyo fM eeting
Principal, EDC Head, and
Committee members meet once in every
EDC Coordinators
quarter to review the plan of action.
189
Entrepreneurship Programmes Academic year
Date of Program
1.
2015-2016
23.04.16 KeyAccountsManagement
62
2.
2015-2016
30.04.16 TimeManagement
68
3.
2015-2016
14.07.15 association with Securities and Exchange Board
SI.No.
No of Student Benefited
Name of Program
Financial Planning for young investors (In 59
of India) 4.
2015-2016
5.
2015-2016
11.09.15
Professionalism and positive work culture to enhance business
31.07.15 - Training in Innovative Health Care Pvt Ltd.,
61
01.08.15
6.
2014-2015
19.03.15 CareerGuidanceProgramme
7.
2013-2014
02.03.14
8.
2013-2014
∑
65
36
Employment Opportunity, Recruitment
75
Dynamics and Employability Challenges
10.10.13 Entrepreneurship Awareness
86
&12.10.13 Camp
Entrepreneurship members were benefited and turn out as a Successful entrepreneur details is given below: AcademicYear 20 15- 2016 No. of Entrepreneur
2014-2015
1
4
2013- 2014
3
INNOVATION CELL ∑
Innovation cell is a part of Entrepreneurship Development Cell.
∑
Innovation cell encourages and guides the students for developing the new concepts
∑
Innovation cell financially supports the students for developing the new concepts
∑
Innovation cell rewards the achievers in terms of appreciation.
190
LIST OF ACTIVITIES S.No
Academic Year & Month
1.
2015-16 (August)
Name of the Students
S.SivaPriyan
2015-15 Sudharsan.A (September)
2.
Department
CSE
Biotechnology
2015-16 (January)
1. Dinesh.M 2. LokeshKumar.G 3. Prabhu Dinesh .J.S 4. Ranjithkumar.R
4.
2015-16 (January)
1. Ashokraj.A 2. Ganesh.K 3. Lokesh.G
Automobile
5.
2015-16 (January)
1. Zabeer Khan .A 2. Mr.Saravanan
CSE & IT
6.
2014-15 (April)
1. Praveen Kumar Mishra 2. R.Yogesh Kumar 3. R.RamPrasath
3.
Automobile
Mechanical
Innovative project Title
Award/ Remarks
DARVENERG
Cash Award of Rs 5,000
Cardiovascular Risk Calculator for Indians Design and Analysis of Strapless helmet. Super charging A Naturally aspirated Two Wheeler SI Engine. Poster Design Competition Anti-Lag System (ALS) in Turbo Charger on Single Cylinder Engine
-
-
-
1st Place nd 2 Place
Cash Award of Rs 10,000
9.7 Co-curricular and Extra-curricular Activities (10)
(The institution may specify the co-curricular and extra-curricular activities ) (Quantify activities such as NCC, NSS etc.)
Annual Students Activities ∑
∑
Annual Students activities are a part of career development for the students. Institution has more responsibility to encourages the students to participate in all the activity to gain knowledge and experience. 191
Annual Students Activities in 2015-2016 S .N o
Date
Name of the Activities
Remarks
Campus residential programme as a part of
1.
June & July 2015
Campus
placement & training activities, external
Residential
trainer
gave
Programme
advancement
lecture and
special
about
career
yoga
classes
conducted to the students. Orientation about the courses and the 2.
8th August 2015
Induction Day
facilities of the college to the budding engineers.
th
3.
15 September 2015
Teachers’ Day
th
4.
15 September 2015
Engineers’ Day
Motivates the faculty members for the betterment of students as well as institution. Institution
had
competition
for
conducted faculty
special
members
on
“Effective teaching learning methodology” and cash award was given for first three positions. Organized Blood Donation camp and 25 tree
29th January 5.
2016
Founder’s Day
saplings were planted inside the college campus. Mrs.Madhumitha
Rajaprakash
,
GM-
HR&IR JBM Auto System Pvt Ltd as 6.
th
8 March 2016
Women’s Day
special guest and gave a special note on the importance of employment for women in all levels. 65 companies recruited our students through
7.
th
8 April 2016
Placement Day
on campus and pooled hiring. 605 students placed in the year is celebrated.
Alumni Induction 8.
8th
April 2016
Alumni
Induction
Day
supports
the
institution in terms of Industrial interaction
Day
and student welfare. 192
Best Outgoing 9.
8th April 2016
Best
Students
outgoing
students
honored
with
certificates and medal on the placement day
Programme
celebration itself. Alumni Association day conducted every
10.
th
9 April 2016
year for maintain good relationship with
Alumni
alumni and consider the area of development
Association Day
for the present students to shine in the modern business world. Awarded graduation certificate to 809 students, of them 725 are UG and 84 PG. 12
11.
th
11 April 2016
Graduation Day
university Rank holders and 20 department toppers were awarded with medals and certificates. Distributed appreciation certificates and cash rewards for the outstanding students
12.
th
12 April 2016
Annual Day
from each class and for the faculty members who produced more than 90% results in Anna University Examination. Students who won prizes in zonal, district
13.
12th April 2016
and state level sports and athletic events
Sports Day
were honored with certificates and cash awards.
14.
th
13 April 2016
Hostel Day
Special cultural programmeon hostel day.
Co- curricular Activities
The students are encouraged to attend seminars, symposia, workshops, present papers to gain additional exposure for his/her career advancement. Students Achievement in 2015-2016 S.No
1.
Department
Biotechnology
Name of the
No. of Event participation
No. of Students
Award/Remarks
Event Conference
in a year 2
Participated 6
SpecialPrize,
193
First and Second prize. 2
4
Symposium
2
5
Second Prize
Journal
1
4
Participation
6
23
Participation
2
10
Participation
National 2.
ECE
First and Second
Bio-Quiz
Conference International Conference
prize.
EXTRA- CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES Games and sports
Sports ground for athletics, Football, cricket and courts for volleyball and ball badminton are available in the institute and students can avail these facilities after college hours any day of the week. A qualified sports instructor is available to facilitate these activities. Physical Education aims not only on the physical development but is also concerned with education of whole person through physical activities. Sports Facilities
1.
Indoor and Outdoor games Football Field
2.
KabaddiCourt
3. 4.
VolleyballCourt Badminton/Shuttle
5. 6.
Cricket Chess
Length-100 mts minimum 110 mts maximum Width-64 mts minimum 75 mts maximum Length-13mts Width-10mts Length-18mts W idth-9mts Singles Length-13.40mts Width-5.18mts Doubles Length-13.40mts Width-6.10mts Boundary59.43mtsto64.00mts Available
7.
Carom
Available
S.No
Remarks
194
LIST OF ACHIEVEMENTS
S.No
Academicyear
1.
2013-14
2.
2014-15
Event
Prize
Participant
Chess
IIIPlace
Thavapriya
Chess
IIIPlace
Preethi
Chess
IIIPlace
Kavibharathi
Chess
IIIPlace
Sruthi
200Min
IIIPlace
4x400 MinR elay
III Place
S.TamilMani S.Tamil Mani
Academic Year 2015-2016 Students’ Achievements in University Level Sports Competition S. No
1
2
3
Dept/Y
No.of.
ear
Days
Civil / IV Civil / II AUTO/ I
2
2
2
AUTO/ 4
IV
2
5
BT/III
2
6
Civil / II
1
7
BT/III
1
8
ECE
1
9
CSE
2
Venue/ Games/
E v en t
Events
Anna University/
4X100
4X100 Relay
Relay
Anna University/
4X100
4X100 Relay
Relay
Anna University/
4X100
4X100 Relay
Relay
Anna University/
4X100
4X100 Relay
Relay
Anna
100
University/100Mts
Mts
Anna
Badmi
University/Badminton
nton
Anna
Badmi
University/Badminton
nton
Anna
Badmi
University/Badminton
nton
Anna
Hamm
University/Hammer Throw
er Throw
195
Positi
No of
on
Student
Name of student
S.Tamizh
First
1
First
1
First
1
First
1
Suhail
Third
1
B.Manaswini
Third
1
P.Pavithra
Third
1
P.Vidya
Third
1
R.Praneetha
1
K.Akash
Mani J.Kingslin Godwin G.Charan M.Mohammed
Seco nd
Students’ Achievements in Institution Level Sports Competition S .N o
E v en t
1.
4X100Relay
2.
4X200 Mts Relay
3.
100Mts
4.
200Mts
5.
400Mts
6.
1500Mts
Department
Noo . fStudents
Automobile, Civil, CSE,
16
Mechanical Civil,Mechanical
8
Automobile, Biotech, Civil,
5
CSE, Biotech,Civil,Mechanical
14
CSE, Mechanical Civil,Mechanical
Badminton
8.
FootBall
9.
Volleyball
Civil,Mechanical
10.
ThrowBall
Biotech,Civil
11.
Chess
12.
DiscThrow
13.
JavelinThrow
14.
Shot Put
15.
Kabaddi
Civil,Mechanical
30
19
Mechanical,Civil
Civil, CSE
196
First, Second, & Third Place
Winner&Runner
Third Place
3
First, Second & Third Place First, Second & Third Place First, Second & Third
5
Civil,Mechanical
Third Place
First, Second, &
6
Mechanical
First, Second, &
Winner&Runner
10
Biotech, Civil, CSE,
Place
Winner&Runner
20
Civil, Auto
First, Second, &Third
Third Place 16
CSE,ECE, Mechanical
First&SecondPlace
First, Second, &
3
Automobile, Biotech, Civil,
7.
First&ThirdPlace
First, Second, & Third Place
6
Automobile, Biotech, Civil,
Prize
Place 20
Winner&Runner
NSS
The NSS programme aims to inculcate social welfare in students, and to provide service to society without bias. NSS volunteers work to ensure that everyone who is needy gets help to enhance their standard of living and lead a life of dignity. In doing so, volunteers learn from people in villages how to lead a good life despite a scarcity of resources. Camps are held annually, and are usually located in a rural village or a city suburb. Volunteers may be involved in such activities as: ∑
∑
∑
Cleaning Afforestation Stage shows or a procession creating awareness of such issues as social problems, education and cleanliness.
∑
Inviting doctors for health camps
There are no predefined tasks; it is left up to the volunteers to provide service in any way that is feasible. Camps typically last between a week and 10 days, although camps for shorter periods are also conducted. LIST OF ACTIVITIES Academic Year
No. of days (camp)
Nature of Activity ∑
∑
2013-14
5 ∑
Blood Donation Camp Awareness on usage of traditional food products and food crops Kaddapah slab and green board donation for school children&
2014-15
2015-2016
7
∑
Health awareness programme .
∑
Health awareness programme,
∑
Global Hand washing day,
∑
7 day special camp at Nemam etc.,
1
Blood Donation camp
1
International Yoga Day (21/06/2016)
1
Blood Donation Camp
1
Youth Renaissance Day (Tree Plantation) 197
1
Founder’s Day (Blood Donation Camp and Tree Plantation)
7
NSS Special Camp at Kuthampakkam Village
YRC
Youth Red Cross was started on 20th March 2004, to serve the needy people with number of student volunteers. Youth Red Cross In our college one unit is functioning with 100 volunteers who are really interested, enthusiastic and services minded who initiates and organize programmes.
The programme focuses on the following areas: v
Promote life and health through training and education on safety, primary care and health care and healthy living.
v
Encourage community service through training and education.
v
Disseminate the seven fundamental principles of Red Crescent movement through activities that encourage the Red Cross ideals.
v
Promote international friendships with that cultivate a humanitarian spirit.
Technical support in the development of youth programmes, fund raising, identification material and resource.
List of Activities S.N o.
1
D at e
18/04/2015
Activities
Natureofactivities
Youth Tamil
i)Tamil Competition(TamizhoduVilayadu)
Motivational
ii)Special Speech (TamizhinVanappumValamum)
Programme
iii)Prize Distribution for winners i)To highlight the glory and greatness of India
Youth 2
3
8/8/2015
7/4/2015
ii) To remind the sacrifices of unknown young freedom
Motivation
fighters
Programme
iii) To instill values and patriotism in faith
Blood Donation
iv) To identify the role of youth in nation building 400 units of blood were collected. The event was 198
Camp
organized byNSS Unit, YRC Unit of SSIET, Indian Bank &Madras Voluntary Blood Bureau.
4
21/06/2015
International Yoga Day
Training was given by Asana Andiyappan College of Yoga and Research Centre, Anna Nagar, Chennai. 180 hostel students got benefitted. 407 units of blood were collected. The event was
5
6
23/09/2015
29/10/2015
Blood Donation Camp
Tree plantation programme
Organisedby NSS Unit, YRC Unit of SSIET, NSS Unit of SSCE, IndianBank& Madras Voluntary Blood Bureau 30 saplings were planted. It was Jointly organized by NSSUnit& Department of Biotechnology, SSIET
Founder’s Day – Blood Donation 7
29/01/2016
Camp & Tree Plantation
50 units of blood were collected, 25 saplings were planted which was Organized byNSS Unit & Indian Bank
Programme 8
23/02/2016
NSS One Day Orientation
Attended by NSS Volunteers. It was organized by NSS Cell,Anna University, Chennai.
199
CRITERION 10
Governance, Institutional Support a nd Financial R esources
120
10. GOVERNANCE, INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES (120) 10.1. Organization, Governance and Transparency (40) 10.1.1. State the Vision and Mission of the Institute (5) Vision of the Institute
Sree Sastha Institute of Engineering and Technology has a vision to realize. A vision of “developing into a multi-disciplinary, multi-campus technological institution of excellence in this part of the globe, providing the right ambience and environment to create engineers and technocrats who serve the needs and demands of society”. Mission of the Institute The Management of SSIET has taken the mission to v
Provide the necessary infrastructure to support an institute of excellence;
v
Foster and grow an academic team to cater to the ever increasing demands of the student community;
v
Motivate the students, the faculty members and the stakeholders to utilize the facilities provided;
v
Augment all available avenues to develop students for the changing needs of the society; and
v
Finally to develop SSIET into an international institute of excellence.
Availability of the Vision & Mission statements of the Institute Availability of Vision & Mission
∑ ∑ ∑ ∑
∑
Availability of Vision & Mission In Institute College website College Academic calendar Service rule Common facilities centre like Canteen, Library , Seminar hall College brochure
Availability of Vision & Mission in Department Course plan Course Log book Identity Card Packet card Laboratory Record and Observation Note
∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑
200
Appropriateness/Relevance of the Statements v
The Vision and mission of the institute is described through opinion and feedback from stakeholders namely Student, Parent, Alumni, Employer and Governing council.
v
Moreover vision and mission statement is derived to aspire the young engineers and technocrats. It relates current scenario and augment all avenue of the needs of society.
v
The department vision and mission is formulated based on the Institute vision and mission
10.1.2. Governing body, administrative setup, functions of various bodies, service rules, procedures, recruitment and promotional policies (10)
The Institution has the following Academic and Administrative Bodies 1. Governing council 2. Institute development monitoring committee 3. Internal quality assurance 4. Academic Advisory Board 5. Anti Ragging Committee 6. Grievance Redressal Cell
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF GOVERNING COUNCIL
1. Determine the Organization's Mission and Purpose and Strategic Direction 2. Ensure Effective Organizational Planning 3. Ensure Adequate Resources 4. Monitor the Organization's Programs and Services 5. Enhance the Organization's Public Image 6. Develop Policies 7. Acts as an Appeal Panel 8. Grievance Resolution 9. Assess Its Own Performance Academic and Administrative Bodies
201
Governing Body Composition S .N o
N am e
Position
PresentDesignation
Chairman
Chairman of the trust
1
Prof. J. Karthikeyan
2
Dr.A.B.Mandal
3
Dr. D.P. Kothari
Member Secretary
4
Dr.Kincha
Member
Chairman/Professor
5
Dr.R.Natarajan
Member
Former Chairman, AICTE
6
Dr.S.Mohan
Member
Nominee From Southern Regional Office, AICTE Nominee From Commissioner Of Tech. Education
7
8
Action Director, CLRI
Member
Director
DirectorNITTTR
Member
Director
Member
Commissioner
9
Dr.R.Salivahanan,
10
Dr.V.Ganesan
Member Member
Emeritus Professor
Principal
11
Ms.K.Nithyalakshmi
Member
Member-Trust
MemberPrincipal, Secretary *Frequency of Meeting - Every year in the mon th of May 12
Dr.V.R. Sampath ,
Residential Address & Phone number 122, Gengu Reddy Road, Egmore, Chennai-8. 044-26810111 CLRI, Adayar, Chennai.20 044-24910846 IIT-New Delhi.
Department of EEE, IISc Bangalore. 52/7, 13th cross road, Maleeswaram, Bangalore. Director, NITTTR, Chennai. 044-22541982 26, Haddows road, Chennai-6. DOTE, Guindy, Chennai-25. SSN College of Engineering Chennai IIT-Chennai 122, Gengu Reddy Road, Egmore, Chennai-8. 044-26810111 SSIET, Chennai04426810122
Institute development monitoring committee Roles and Responsi bilities of Institution Developm ent and Monitori ng Committee : ∑
The board meets once in 6 months to discuss on progress of academic courses and starting of new courses, selection and appointment of teaching and non-teaching staff in developing infrastructural and laboratory facilities according to requirement focusing on financial requirement and admission strategy
202
Institution Developmen t and Monitorin g Committee - composition S No.
Name
Position (Chairman/ Member)
1
Dr.V.R.Sampath
Chairman
2
Dr.T.Sasilatha
Member
3
Dr.Baskar
Member
4
Mr.J.Natarajan
Member
5
Mr.N.Saravanan
Member
6
Mr.Oskar
Member
Category
Present professional position/ Occupation
Principal of the college Vice-Principal of the college Senior faculty member from University/other college Industrial expert in the field of engineering and technology Industrial expert in the field of engineering and technology Architect/Civil Engineer
Principal Vice Principal HOD
Address& E-mail
SSIET, principal@ sasthaenggcollege.com SSIET, viceprincipal@ sasthaenggcollege.com SVECE, SRIP
21, 13th East Cross Road, 2nd East Main Road, Industrialist Gamdjo Magar, Katpadi, Vellore-6 21, 13th East Cross Road, 2nd East Main Road, Industrialist Gamdjo Magar, Katpadi, Vellore-6 26, Haddows Road, Industrialist Nungambakkam, Chennai-6
Senior faculty SSIET,civilhod@sasthae member of the HOD – Civil nggcollege.com College *Frequency of Meeting - Every year in the mon th of May 7
Dr.S.Thenmozhi
Member
Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) Roles and R esponsibilities of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) ∑
Facilitating the creation of a learner-centric environment conducive to quality education and faculty maturation to adopt the required knowledge and technology for participatory teaching and learning process
∑
Arrangement for feedback response from students, parents and other stakeholders on quality-related institutional processes
∑
Documentation of the various programmes/activities leading to quality improvement.
∑
Acting as a nodal agency of the Institution for coordinating quality-related activities, including adoption and dissemination of best practices.
∑
Development of Quality Culture in the institution. 203
∑
Preparation of the Annual Quality Assurance Report (AQAR) as per guidelines and parameters of NAAC, to be submitted to NAAC
IQAC Composition
S. No.
Name
Position (Chairman/ Member) IQAC Chair person
Category
Present professional position/
Principal of the college Senior Faculty Member
1
Dr.V.R. Sampath
2.
Mr.S.Hariharan
IQAC Coordinator
3.
Mr.Ganesan
Administrative/ Technical staff Department Coordinators
Senior Faculty Member
Student Member
Student Member
Student
Alumnimember
Alumnimember
Alumni
4 5 6 7. 8 9
Department Coordinators Nominee from Student representative Nominee from alumni association Nominee from Management Nominee from Employers/ Industrialists Nominee from External Experts
Management Representative Employers/ Industrialists External Experts
Principal Faculty
Principal AO
Principal AO Faculty
Mgmt. Representative
Mgmt. Representative
Employers/ Industrialists
Employers/ Industrialists
External Experts
Stakeholder and community Community community representative Representative representatives *Frequency of Meeting - Every year in the mon th of may and Decembe r 10
External Experts Community Representative
Academic Advisory Board Roles and Responsibilities of Academic Advisory Board
The Academic Advisory Board identify the difficulty in the exiti ng Academic System and the industry Expectation by getting Feedback and Suggestion from industry Experts ,Academic experts.
204
Academic Advisory Board Composition S. No.
1 2. 3. 4
Name
Position (Chairman/ Member)
Stake holder committee Chair person Nominee from Internal HOD and Senior Academic experts Faculty members Nominee from External Professor from IIT Academic experts and Anna university Dr.V.R. Sampath
Nominee from Industry Program specific Experts Expert
Category
Present professional position/
Principal of the college
Principal
HOD and Senior Faculty members External Academic experts HR, Program specific Expert
Faculty Professor HR, Program specific Expert
∑
Nominee from current Student Member Student Member Student Student representative Nominee from alumni Alumni member Alumni member Alumni /passed out student Nominee from Parent Parent Parent Parent All the above Academic bodies meet as per schedule and minutes recorded.
∑
During meeting all the action taken reports are analyzed and committee will take suitable
5 6 7.
decision. Service rul e (Year of publica tion - 2011) ∑
Institute Service rule is uploaded in the institute website.
∑
Institute Service rule is given to faculty as a booklet at the time of appointment and getting the declaration- acknowledgment.
10.1.3. Decentralization in working and grievance redressal mechanism (10) Decentralization in working ∑
The Principal heads all administrative activities .
∑
The Administration is decentralized by principal , to enhance the quality of education as follows
∑
The HODs are delegated and authorized to carry out the activities such as academic,
co-curricular,extra curricular, conduct of university examination and various other function for efficient and effective execution ∑
In turn, workload allotment, monitoring and supervising ,conduct of class effectively ,evaluation of students , organizing seminar ,
symposium etc., are taken care of by the
Head of the department with the help of faculty members for effective implementation 205
∑
Librarian ,Physical Director and Training and Placement Officer are all delegated
with responsibilities by the principal for rendering effective service to students ∑
The officers delegated with various responsibilities for the current academic year 20152016 are given below
The details of the officers delegated with various responsibilities are given below N S.O
1
PositioN n am e Principal , IQAC Chair person& Chief Superintendent Examination
2
R&DCell
3
HOD
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
AccreditationCoordinator MentoringCell Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC ) Entrepreneurship Development cell ( EDC) AlumniAssociation Internship and in plant Training TrainingandPlacement
N am e
Dr. V. R. Sampath Dr. G. Sankaranarayanan Research Dean Dr. G. Sankaranarayanan – AUTO Dr. S. Thenmozhi –Civil Mr. J. N. Rajesh kumar –CSE Dr. P. Sivachandran -EEE Dr. T. Sasilatha-ECE Dr. A. Shanmuga Sundaram -MECH Mr. R. Premkumar-IT Dr. C. Mathan Periyasamy-BT Dr.R.Priyadharsini AP/MBA Dr.SuganyaDeviAP/EEE Mr. S. Hariharan-AP/IT Mr. S. Dhachanamoorthy AP/MBA Mr.R.PremkumarAP/IT Dr. S. Arun AP/ECE Mr.S.Venkatesh
Grievance Redressal Mechanism Anti Ragging Committee:
Factors enlisted by the committee: ∑
Primary responsibility for curbing ragging rests with academic institutions themselves.
∑
Ragging adversely impacts the standards of higher education.
∑
Incentives should be available to institutions for curbing the menace and there should be disincentives for failure to do so.
∑
Enrollment in academic pursuits or a campus life should not immunize any adult citizen from penal provisions of the laws of the land.
∑
Ragging needs to be perceived as failure to inculcate human values from the schooling stage.
∑
Behavioral patterns among students, particularly potential ‘raggers’, need to be Measures against ragging must deter its recurrence. 206
Concerted action is required at the level of the school, higher educational institution, district
∑
administration, university, State and Central Governments to make any curb effective. Media and the Civil Society should be involved in this exercise.
∑
Committee and Squad Mem bers Details: SN . o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
FacultyName Dr.A.ShanmugaSundaram Dr.P.Sivachandran Dr.S.Thenmozhi Dr.R.Ganesan Mr.A.Thirumal
Designation AP/Mech AP/EEE AP/CIVIL AP/AUTOMOBILE PhysicalDirector
Mr.S.Hariharan Mr.A.Mahadevan Mr.R.Alaexander Ms.M.Amutha Dr.R.ArunKumar
AP/IT AP/ECE AP/CSE AP/MECHANICAL AP/CHEMISTRY
Position CommitteeMember CommitteeMember CommitteeMember CommitteeMember SquadMember
SquadMember SquadMember SquadMember SquadMember SquadMember
Sexual Harassment commitee:
In pursuance of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act 2013 and the Rules framed there under, the Institute hereby adopts the following procedure for determining complaints filed to the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) constituted under the Act. The procedure complies with the basic principles of natural justice and fair play and has to be adhered to in all complaints, though, in individual complaints, for reasons to be stated in writing, the ICC reserves the right to make exceptions to the procedure stated hereunder. Working Rules:
1. Any aggrieved woman may make, in writing, a complaint of sexual harassment at work place to the ICC, within a period of three months from the date of incident and in case of a series of incidents, within a period of three months from the date of last incident. 6 copies of a written complaint should be submitted to the Committee or any of its members along with list of witnesses and supporting documents. Additional documents and list of witnesses can be submitted to ICC at a later stage during the proceeding . Provided that where such complaint cannot be made in writing, the Presiding Officer or any other member of the ICC shall rend er all reasonable assistance to the woman for making the complaint in writing.
207
Provided further that the ICC for the reasons to be recorded in writing, can extend the time limit not exceeding three months, if it is satisfied that the circumstances were such which prevented the woman from filing a complaint within the said period. 2.1.1.
Any complaint received by the members should be immediately forwarded to the
Presiding Officer, and this must be notified to other committee members at the earliest and not later than 3 days and a meeting should be called for discussing the matter. 2.1.2.
The Committee shall discuss and decide on its jurisdiction to deal with the case or
reject the complaint prima facie and recommend to the Institute that no action is required to be taken in the matter. 2.1.3. Notice shall be issued to the respondent within 7 working days of receipt of the complaint and 10 working days shall be given for submission of reply (along with the list of witnesses and documents.) 2.1.4.
The Committee will provide assistance to the aggrieved woman, if she so chooses,
to file a police complaint in relation to an offence under Indian Penal Code. 2.1.5.
The Committee may, before initiating an inquiry, at the request of the aggrieved
woman, take steps to settle the matter between her and the respondent through conciliation. 2.1.6.
No monetary settlement shall be made as the basis of conciliation. Where a
settlement has been arrived at, the ICC shall record the settlement so arrived and forward the same to the employer for necessary compliance. 2.1.7.
The Committee shall provide the copies of the settlement as recorded under (7) to
the aggrieved woman and the respondent. Where a settlement is arrived at, no further inquiry shall be conducted by the ICC. 2.1.8.
If conciliation is found to be n ot feasible, notice will be issued to both parties for
hearing. 2.1.9.
The Committee may direct the Registrar to ensure the safety and protection of the
aggrieved woman if and when required. 2.1.10.
As an interim measure, ICC may recommend
a. The transfer of the aggrieved woman or the respondent to another section or Department as deemed fit by the Committee. b. Grant leave to the aggrieved woman upto a period of three months or : 208
c. Restrain the respondent from exercising any administrative authority or supervision or academic evaluation of the aggrieved woman. d. Grant such other relief to the aggrieved woman as the case may require. 2.2.5.
The Committee shall proceed to make inquiry into the complaint in accordance
with the provisions of the service rules applicable to the respondent considering sexual harassment as misconduct. 2.2.6.
The Presiding Officer shall convene the first hearing of the enquiry. The
respondent, the aggrieved woman, and the witnesses shall be intimated at least 7 working days in advance in writing of the date, time and venue of the enquiry proceedings. The subsequent proceedings may be on a day to day basis, to be decided by ICC. 2.2.7.
The Committee shall provide reasonable opportunity to the aggrieved woman and
the respondent for presenting and defending her/his case. 2.2.8.
The Committee may at any time during the enquiry proceedings, preclude the face-
to-face examination of the respondent and the aggrieved woman and/or their witnesses keeping in view the need to protect the aggrieved woman or the witnesses from facing any serious health and/or safety problems. 2.2.9.
The Committee may call any person to appear as a witness if it is of the opinion
that it shall be in the interest of justice. The aggrieved woman/respondent has to submit the written reply before the committee within the specified time given. 2.2.10.
The Committee shall have the right to summon, as many times as required, the
respondent, aggrieved woman and/or any witnesses for the purpose of supplementary testimony and/or clarifications. 2.2.11.
The Committee shall have the power to summon any official papers or documents
pertaining to the aggrieved woman as well as the respondent. 2.2.12.
The past sexual history of the aggrieved woman shall not be probed into as such
information shall be deemed irrelevant to a complaint of sexual harassment. 2.2.13.
The Committee shall have the right to terminate the enquiry proceedings and to
give an ex party decision on the complaint, should the respondent fail, without valid ground, to be present for three consecutive hearings convened by the Presiding Officer. 2.2.14.
The aggrieved woman and the respondent, or any one person on her/his behalf,
shall have the right to examine written transcripts of the recordings with the exclusion of witnesses’ names and identities. Any person nominated by the aggrieved woman and/or 209
the respondent on her/his behalf shall be (only) either a student, or a member of the academic or non-teaching staff. No person who has been found guilty of sexual harassment shall be accepted as a nomineee. The aggrieved woman/respondent should inform the Presiding Officer specifically if they wish to exercise this right. The Presiding Officer shall allow access to such documents on a specific date to be intimated at least two days in advance to each of the parties concerned. At no point in time, however, can the concerned parties take these documents outside the office. 2.2.15.
The aggrieved woman and the respondent shall be responsible for presenting their
witnesses before the Committee. However, if the Committee is convinced that the absence of either of the parties to the disputes is on valid grounds, the Committee shall adjourn that particular meeting of the Committee for a period not exceeding five days. The meeting so adjourned shall be conducted thereafter, even if the person concerned fails to appear for the said adjourned meeting without prior intimation/valid ground. 2.2.16.
All proceedings of the ICC shall be recorded in writing. The record of the
proceedings and the statement of witnesses shall be endorsed by the persons concerned as well as the committee members present in token of authenticity thereof. In case the minutes cannot be reduced in writing the same day, as audio recording of the proceedings may be made, and the written proceedings will be authenticated on a next available opportunity. 2.2.17.
If the aggrieved woman desires to tender any documents by way of evidence, the
Committee can supply true copies of such documents to the respondent. Similarly, if the respondent desires to tender any documents in evidence, the Committee shall supply true copies of such documents to the aggrieved wom an. 2.2.18.
In the event the Committee thinks that supplementary testimony is required, the
Presiding Officer shall forward to the persons concerned a summary of the proceedings and allow for a time period of seven days to submit such testimony, in person or in writing, to the Committee. 2.2.19.
The aggrieved woman and the respondent shall have the right of cross-examination
of all witnesses. However such cross-examination shall be conducted in the form of written questions and responses via the Committee only. The respondent shall have no right to directly cross-examine the aggrieved woman or her witnesses. 210
2.2.20.
The respondent/aggrieved woman may submit to the Committee, a written list of
questions that he/she desires to pose to the aggrieved woman/witness. The Committee (ICC) shall retain the right to disallow any questions that it has reason to believe to be irrelevant, mischievous, slanderous, derogatory or gender-insensitive. 2.2.21.
Amicus Curie can be called for helping the committee if and when required.
2.2.22.
After concluding its investigation, the Committee shall submit a detailed reasoned
report to the Institute. 2.2.23.
If the Committee finds no merit in the allegations, it shall report to the Institute.
2.2.24. In the event the Committee finds that the allegation(s) against the respondent have been proved, it shall recommend the nature of action to be taken by the Institute. Committee Members: S .N o 1 2 3 4 5
FacultyName Ms.J,Parimala Dr.S.Thenmozhi Ms.R.Paneerselvi Ms.T.Sarnita Dr.Bhuvana Devi
Designation AP/ECE AP/Civil AP/CSE AP/Maths AP/MBA
Position PresidingMember Member Member Member SocialMember
The Institution has a Grievance Redressal Cell and the functions are:
i.
To receive Grievances from the students orally or in writing other than the grievances
ii.
submitted to each department and examine the nature of the grievances. All the discussions related to academic pursuit such as attendance, awarding internal assessment marks, practical, submission of records and assignment or project work will be referred to the department concerned and the remarks of the HOD will be obtained. The grievances in question will be redressed in such a way that the studies of the student are not affected.
iii.
Grievance related to infrastructural facilities such as Lab , Library, Bus and o ther basic amenities like drinking water, sanitary provisions will be immediately redressed in consultation with the management and the concerned authorized persons.
iv.
Grievances from the students regarding the violent behavior of co-students will be sent to the Disciplinary committee for appropriate action and redressal. The major grievances redressed during the last two years are a)
Increasing the Internet Bandwidth 211
b)
Additional Vehicle parking facility
c)
Introduction of value added courses.
d)
Providing Internet facility in Hostels
e)
Ambulance Services
f)
Additional Bus services
Grievance Redressal Cell composition SNo.
N am e
Category
Present Telephone Designation/ numbers Occupation
1
Dr.V.R.S ampath
Chairman
Principal
72999 05145
2
Dr.S.Thenmozhi
Member
HOD(Civil)
94443 16915
3
Dr.T.Sasilatha
Member
VicePrincipal
72999 05153
4
Dr.G.Sankaranaray anan
Member
Dean (Research)
94443 66717
5
Mr.J.N.Rajesh Kumar
Member
HODi/c (CSE)
98405 36505
E-mail
Address
Sree Sastha Institut ssiet@ of Engineering & eth.net Technology, Chennai Sree Sastha Institut ssiet@ of Engineering & eth.net Technology, Chennai Sree Sastha Institut ssiet@ of Engineering & eth.net Technology, Chennai Sree Sastha Institut ssiet@ of Engineering & eth.net Technology, Chennai Sree Sastha Institut ssiet@ of Engineering & eth.net Technology, Chennai
Action taken report S .N o
ComplaintReceived
1
Increasing the Internet Bandwidth
2
Additional Vehicle parking facility
3
Introduction of value added courses
4
Providing Internet facility in Hostels
ActionTaken
Internet Bandwidth Increased Additional Vehicle parking created Audit course introduced Internet facility provided in hostel
10.1.4. Delegation of financial powers (10) Financial powers delegated to the Principal, Heads of Departments and relevant in-charges The Delegated financial power as follows
212
S.No
Financial fund allotted for
Amount allotted
Mode of transfer
1
Principal
25000
Cash
2
HeadoftheDepartment
3
AdministrativeOfficer
15000
Cash
4
ExaminationCell
5000
Cash
5
TPO
6
TrainingDivision
7
IQAC
10000
Cash
10000
R em a rk s
Every Individual maintain the separate imprest Cash register The allotted amount is revived after submitting the imprest cash Register
Cash Cash
10000
Cash
2500
Utilization of financial powers for each of the assessment years ∑
All the above mention delegated financial power authorities maintain the separate imprest accounts register, The allotted amount is revived after submitting the imprest cash Register
10.1.5 Transparency & availability of correct/unambiguous information in public domain (5) Information on the policies, rules, processes is to be made available on web site ∑
The College ensures transparency in the admission process by strictly adhering to the guidelines issued by the AICTE, Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Directorate of Technical Education and Anna University.
Dissemination of the information about student, faculty and staff ∑
Faculty and students achievements are made available in college website
213
10.2. Budget Allocation, Utilization, and Public Accounting at Institute level (30) Table 1 - CFY 2015-2016 Actual expenditure (till…): 2531.14
Total Income :
Total Number of Students :2388
Fee
Govt
Grants
Other Sources (Specify)
Recurring including salaries
Non recurring
Special projects /Any other, specify
Expenditure per student
2626.8
0
0
0
2428.38
102.76
0
1.06
Note: Similar tables are to be prepared for CFYm1, CFYm2 & CFYm3. Table 2 – CFYm1 2014-2015 Actual expenditure (till…): 2616.76
Total Income :2622.32
Fee
Govt
Grants
2622.32
0
0
Other Sources (Specify) 0
Total Number of Students : 2710
Recurring including salaries
Non recurring
Special projects / Any other, specify
Expenditure per student
2446.87
169.89
0
0.965
Table 3 – CFYm2 2013-2014 Actual expenditure (till…): 2555.17
Total Income :2561.93
Fee 2561.93
Govt Grants 0
0
Total Number of Students :
Other Sources (Specify)
Recurring including salaries
Non recurring
Special projects /Any other, specify
3018 Expenditure per student
0
2418.23
136.94
0
0.847
214
Institute Budget Allocation, Utilization (Amount in Lakhs)
Items
Infra-structure and Built-up Library Laboratory equipment Laboratory consumable Teaching and non Teaching Staff Salary Maintenance and spare R&D Training and Travel Miscellaneous Expenses others Total
Budgeted Actual Budgeted Actual Actual Budgeted Budgeted Actual in Expenses in Expenses Expenses in in 2012- Expenses 2015in 2015- 2014- in 2014in 20132013-2014 2013 in 20122016 2016 till 2015 2015 till 2014 till 2013 till
45
45.72
53
36.96
65
89
277.5
309.38
5.00
3.13
2.00
1.61
5.00
4.52
7.50
6.31
74.25
57.04
36.75
18.04
25.50
18.45
57.50
54.92
15.00
9.33
15.25
13.16
10.25
7.45
9.25
8.70
1375.00
1346.25
5.75
4.33
13.75
11.56
9.00
8.38
3.25
2.83
6.00
5.00
43.75
22.75
33.25
30.04
30.25
27.70
26.75
27.06
22.5
14.98
21.25
19.81
12.25
11.18
18.25
18.05
1000.00 2600.00
1016.05 2531.14
1350.00 1328.14 4.50
4.03
1150.00 1156.59 2675.00 2616.76
1,300.00 1,289.46 1,250.00 1,205.10 8.50
1140.00 2600.00
8.65
7.25
6.83
1095.93 1200.00 1194.31 2555.17 2860.00 2835.66
10.2.1 Adequacy of budget allocation (10)
Budget requirements under ‘recurring’ and ‘non-recurring’ heads are collected from every departments and sections before the commencement of the financial year. Allocations are made as per the availability of funds. Spending is monitored by the accounts section. Supplementary allocations are made in special cases. The institution carefully monitors the expenses so that the necessities are met without affecting the smooth working of the institution. The management has been very efficiently doing this over the past several years that the institution never had any serious budget crunch that affected the functioning of the college.
215
Adequacy of budget allocation S .N o
1
2
3
4 5 6 7
8
9
10
Justification
Items
The funds allotted for the Infrastructure was lesser than 2014-2015, since majority of the constructions required for academics is over. The library books are updated continuously. Based on the Library requirements of various departments, necessary amount is allotted for library. The required laboratory equipments are already provided as per the requirement of the Curriculum. The amount Laboratory equipment allotted in the budget is for additional facilities only. The amount is allotted as per the requirements of the department. The laboratory consumables are allocated based on the Laboratory consumable student strength. As the institute aims at high quality education, a major Teaching and non Teaching part of the budget about 50% is allocated for salary of Staff Salary teaching and non-teaching staff. The maintenance expenses are allotted based on the Maintenance and spare annual maintenance requirements of all the departments. The institute aims at improving the Research and R&D Development activities. Hence a gradual increase in the amount allotted for Research can be found. 1.5% of the total budget is allotted for training and travel which includes the expenses to be incurred towards training students for placement and also faculty Training and Travel development. The Institute motto is to make the students employable. Hence a considerable amount is allotted for the training. The miscellaneous expenses head includes expenses towards academic and professional activities of the Miscellaneous Expenses departments. It is allotted as per the academic plans proposed by the department. The Institution had allotted funds for general expenses under this head. It also includes establishment expenses, accreditation expenses and overall administrative Others expenses. The institution is offering many courses and is big in terms of its size. Hence a huge amount of fund is allotted for this head. Infrastructure and Built-up
216
10.2.2. Utilization of allocated funds (15)
Funds are allocated by the Management of the College. Department Heads / Section-incharges are intimated of the extent of funds allocated against their budget proposals. Major works like construction, up-gradation of existing infrastructure, procurement and maintenance of common utilities, house-keeping, procurement of furniture etc. are controlled directly by the Management. Actions for procurement of lab equipment, up-gradation of existing lab facilities, purchase of consumables etc. are initiated from the respective departments and the funds are released on a case by case basis from the accounts office of the college on approval by the Management. During the last three years, the budget was utilized to meet expenses such as staff salary, infrastructure development, purchase of equipment, expenses towards consumables and contingencies, travel etc. Every year almost 50% of the budget is spent on staff salary, 10% on infrastructure development, about 8% on purchase of equipment, about 5 % on library development and the rest on other expenses. This has been the general pattern of utilization of budget for the last 5 years
Utilization of budget allocation S .N o
Items
1
Infrastructure and Built-up
2
Library
3
Laboratoryequipment
4 5 6
Laboratory consumable Teaching and non Teaching Staff Salary Maintenance and spare
7
R&D
8
TrainingandTravel
Budgeted in 2015-2016
Utilized in 2015-2016
45
45.72
5.00
3.13
74.25
57.04
15.00
9.33
1375.00
1346.25
5.75
4.33
13.75
11.56
43.75
22.75 217
Justification
The amount was spent for upgrading the AV hall and Mini Conference Room The amount was spent for purchasing books as per requirement. The fund was allotted for New lab setting as per 2013 regulations for ECE, Civil and EEE. The amount was spent by the respective departments. The budgeted amount was spent towards payment of salary. The amount was spent by the respective departments. The department of EEE, ECE and Bio Tech spent the money for establishing research center. The amount was spent through the Training and Placement Department and respective departments.
9
Miscellaneous Expenses
10
Others
Total
22.5
14.98
1000.00
1016.05
2600.00
2531.14
Conferences, Symposiums and Workshops were conducted by the respective departments. The amount was also spent for student awards granted for best innovative ideas. Guest lecture sessions regularly organized by all departments are funded under this head. The amount was spent towards general expense, administration expenses and accreditation expenses, transport, power, stationery, travel expenses for experts and annual events. -
10.2.3 Availability of the audited statements on the institute’s website (5) ∑
Every year the accounts are audited by an external agency and the audited statements are made available in the web sites.
10.3 Program Specific Budget Allocation, Utilization (30)
Total Income at Institute level: For CFY, CFYm1, CFYm2 & CFYm3 CFY: (Current Financial Year), CFYm1: (Current Financial Year minus 1), CFYm2: (Current Financial Year minus 2) and CFYm3: (Current Financial Year minus 3) Table 1: CFY 2015-2016
Total Budget: 13.5
Actual expenditure (till 2015-2016…): 10.54
Total No of Students
:493
Expenditure Non Recurring
Recurring
Non Recurring
Recurring per student
1. 5
1 2 .0
1 .3 8
9 .1 6
0 .0 2
Table 2 :: CFYm1 2014-2015
Total No of Total Budget: 12.53
Actual expenditure (till 2014-2015…):10.45 Students
: 624
Expenditure Non Recurring 0 .2 8
Recurring 1 2 .2 5
Non Recurring 0 .0 4
Recurring 1 0 .4 1
218
per student 0 .0 1 7
Table 3: CFYm2 2013-2014
Total No of Total Budget: 13.5
Actual expenditure (till 2013-2014…): 9.58 Students
: 561
Expenditure Non Recurring
Recurring
NonRecurring
Recurring per student
2.00
1 1 .5 0
0 .1 0
9. 48
0 .0 1 7
Table 3: CFYm3 2012-2013
Total No of Total Budget: 24.25
Actual expenditure (till 2012-2013…): Students
: 614
Expenditure Non Recurring
Recurring
Non Recurring
Recurring per student
1 5 .0 0
9 .2 5
1 4 .6 5
0.04
8 .0 5
Program Budget Allocation, Utilization
Items
Laboratory equipment Software Laboratory consumable Maintenance and spare R&D Training and Travel Miscellaneous Expenses T ot al
Budgeted in 20152016
Actual Expenses in 2015-2016 till
Budgeted in 20142015
Actual Expenses in 20142015 till
Budgeted in 20132014
150000
138162
28000
3550
200000
0
0
0
0
100000
26602
100000
Actual Expense s in 2013-
Budgeted in 20122013
Actual Expenses in 20122013 till
9970
1500000
1465189
0
0
0
0
23439
50000
32656
25000
19503
2014 till
100000
53445
25000
11450
125000
43000
50000
25900
150000
100000
125000
100000
100000
75000
0.00
0.00
450000
373000
450000
386000
450000
382000
450000
382000
400000
363000
525000
521000
425000
1350 000
1 05420 9
12 53000
1045 439
13500 00
219
415000 9 57626
400000 2 42500 0
378000 2 27059 2
10.3.1. Adequacy of budget allocation (10)
Yes. There is adequate budget to cover the day-to-day expenses. v
Principal sent a circular seeking budget proposals for the civil engineering department
v
All the faculties and the lab in charges discussed in the review meeting regarding the civil
engineering department budget. v
A written intent is required from the faculty relating department plans and proposed
expenditure. v
Civil HOD will review the request and finalize the budget then the budget request is
forwarded to the principal. v
The budget will be approved by the principal and send to the management for sanction. Adequacy of budget allocation
Sl.No
Items
1
Laboratoryequipment
2
Software
3
Laboratoryconsumable
4
Maintenanceandspare
5
R&D
6
TrainingandTravel
7
MiscellaneousExpenses
Budgeted in 2015-2016
150000
0
100000
100000
150000
450000
Justification
The department already has major equipments. The budgeted amount is required for Surveying laboratory, Concrete laboratory & soil mechanics laboratory. The amount is budgeted as per the requirements of the civil department laboratories. The existing Software satisfies the curriculum requirement of the university. Hence not budgeted for the Software. The laboratory consumables are budgeted for Environmental Engineering laboratory, soil mechanics laboratory and concrete laboratory. Annual maintenance for all civil Engineering laboratory budgeted .such as survey lab, Environmental lab, soil mechanics lab, concrete lab, highway lab & structural lab etc The Civil Engineering department students research activities for project work required financial assistance. The Amount budgeted for training and travel which includes the expenses to be incurred towards training students for placement and also faculty development programmes, conference, workshop, guest lecture.
400000
220
The miscellaneous expenses Civil department budgeted for student’s activities and faculty
activities of the civil Engineering department. For Example conducting Workshop, conference, symposium, industrial visit, seminar, FDPT, Publications etc. Total
135000 0
10.3.2. Utilization of Allocated funds (20)
From the Tables, it can be seen that every year 90 % of the budgeted amount is effectively utilized. ÿ
Budget will be utilized as per the requirement of the department
Utilization of budget allocation Sl.No
Items
Budgeted in 2015-2016
Utilized in 2015-2016
1
Laboratory equipment
150000
2
Software
0
0
3
Laboratory consumable
100000
26602
138162
Maintenance and 4
spares
100000
53445
5
R&D
150000
100000
6
Training and Travel
450000
373000
7
Miscellaneous Expenses
400000
363000
Total
1350000
1054209
221
Justification
The programme had purchased equipments for Vane shear apparatus, Test Sieve 8” dia bars, Systronics Dissolved Oxygen Meter, Vicat Needle Apparatus, The existing Soft ware satisfies the curriculum requirement of the university. The programme had purchased Consumables utilized for conducting the experiments for Environmental laboratory and soil mechanics laboratory. The maintenance expenses the programme had utilized for based on the annual maintenance requirements Concrete of the CivilandEngineering laboratories.( laboratory structural laboratory. The programme had utilized the amount for research and developing student’s research project. The programme had utilized for training and travel which includes the expenses to be incurred towards training students for placement and also faculty development programmes, conference, workshop, guest lecture. The miscellaneous expenses the programme had utilized for students activities and faculty activities of the civil Engineering department. For Example conducting Workshop, conference, symposium, industrial visit, seminar, FDPT, Publications etc.
10.4. Library and Internet (20) Library Details ∑
Carpet area of library (in m 2) - 408
∑
Reading Space (in m2) - 200
∑
Number of seats in reading space - 100
∑
Number of users (issue book) per day - 95
∑
Number of users (reading space) per day - 227
∑
Number of library staff - 3
∑
Number of library staff with a degree in library - 3
∑
Management Computerization for search, indexing, issue/ return - Yes
∑
Records bar coding used - Yes
∑
Library services on internet/ intranet INDEST -Yes, Delnet
∑
Titles and volumes per title
∑
Number of titles - 12228 Number of volumes – 41000 Library Services -2015-2016
Text Books Reference Books e-Books Journals e-Journals Digital Database CD Video & Others (specify)
Text Books Reference Books e-Books Journals e-Journals Digital Database
Existing No 39997
Newlyadded No 1003
Total No 41000
Value
1010
----
1010
82,97,392
100 75 9985
4538 15 295
4638 90 10280
-14,70,663 23,79,967
100
---
100
--
853
818 1671 Library Membership: CSIR- SERC, IAS- AU Library Services -2014-2015
Existing No 39737
Newlyadded No 260
Total No 39997
Value
80,06,522
1010
-
1010
100 75
-
75
100 14,25,278
9985
-
9985
22,89,980
100
-
100
222
Video CD & Others (specify)
542
311 853 Library Membership: CSIR- SERC, IAS- AU
-
Library Services -2013-2014 Existing No 39319
Text Books Reference Books e-Books Journals e-Journals Digital Database Video & CD Others (specify)
Newlyadded No 418
Total No 39737
Value
79,67,522
1000
10
1010
100 21 9984
54 01
75 9985
100 14,25,278 22,89,980
100
-
100
-
542
542 Library Membership: CSIR-S ERC, IAS- AU
-
10.4.1. Quality of learning resources (hard/soft) (10)
Digital Library Availability of Digital Library content
: yes
If available, Mention number of courses, number of e-books etc.:18 Courses, 4638 e-books Availability of an exclusive server
:2
Availability over Intranet/ Internet : yes Availability of exclusive space/ room
: yes
Number of users per day Accessibility to students
: 50 to 60
Timings: (during working day) - 8.00am to 6.00pm Weekend - 8.00am to 6.00pm Vacation -- 8.00am to 6.00pm 10.4.2. Internet (10)
Name of the Internet provider Availablebandwidth
: Aircel :45Mbps
Available band width
: Yes
Internet access in labs, classrooms, library
: Yes
And offices of all Departments Securityarrangements
:Yes
223
ANNEXURE 1
224
Program Outcomes (PO)
On completion of B.E (Civil) Degree Programme, the Engineering graduates will be able to: PO1:
Apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering in their specialization
involving complex engineering problems. PO2:
Analyze a problem, identify, formulate and solve engineering problems using basic
fundamental principles of mathematics and science. PO3:
Design a system component or process to meet the desired needs and standards
within realistic constraints such as public health and safety, social and environmental considerations. PO4:
Design and conduct experiments, as well as do research, analyze and interpret data
and give clear solutions. PO5:
Use and learn the limitations involved in recent techniques, skills and modern
engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. PO6:
Assess the local and global impact of engineering solutions on individuals,
organization and society and the consequent responsibilities relevant to their professional engineering practice. PO7:
Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and
environmental contexts and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development. PO8:
Understand the professional and ethical responsibilities and norms of engineering
practice. PO9:
Work with multi-disciplinary teams, involve in team activities and accomplish a
common goal. PO10:
Communicate
effectively
with
engineering
community
for
presentation,
documentation of reports adopting the design standards. PO11:
Understand engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own
work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multi-disciplinary environments. PO12:
Meet contemporary issues and create advance technologies and will be engaged to
life long learning in the broadest scale. 225
PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES: PSO 1: Attain proficiency in mathematics, physical science and also excel in problem solving,
design and interpretation of experiments by operating as a team to find solution of various issues in the core areas of civil engineering. PSO 2: Operate effectively in a professional environment by executing quality construction work
applying modern tools and techniques. PSO 3: Achieve excellence, managerial expertise, outstanding leadership to succeed in position in
civil engineering profession and passion for lifelong learning and research in advanced areas & related field.
226
ANNEXURE II FACULTY INFORMATION List of Faculty: Exclusively for the program/Shared with other Programs CAY (2015-16) Qualification
S.N o
Degree Name of faculty startin Member g from Highes t degree
1
Dr.S.Thenmozhi
PhD
2
Dr.S.J.Mohan
PhD
University
Anna university Chennai Anna university
3
Dr.Ilayaraja
PhD
Chennai Univrsity of Madras
4
Dr.Hariprasad
PhD
JNTU
5
Dr.S.R.Suresh
PhD
6
Dr.S.Nandakuma r
PhD
7
Dr.Saravanan
PhD
8
Dr.B.Hemalatha
PhD
R.Gnanasekran
M.Tec h
9 10
Ms.Vidhya.M
11
Mr.Kannadasan. B
ME ME
Bharath University Univrsity of Madras Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai IIT Anna university Chennai Anna university
Year of grad u ation
Designation(a Date of ll the joining designation the since joining institutio the n institution)
Academic Research
Distribution of teaching load (%) UG st
Faculty Receiving Ph.D. Ph.D. during Guidanc the e assessmen t years
Sponsore d Research Research (Funding Paper Research Publication ) s
1 yr
In progra m
Other progra m
P G
0
NO
NO
3
0
NO
NO
0
NO
NO
0
NO
NO
2012
HOD
12.06.13
0
100
0
2006
Professor
10.5.15
0
100
0
10 0 10 0
Consu ltancy & Produ ct Devel opme nt
Specialization
1
Geo Technical Engineering Structural Engineering
2011
Professor
10.6.15
0
0
0
2008
Professor
15.6.15
0
0
0
2010
Professor
20.6.14
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
2011
Professor
10.7.14
0
0
0
10 0
NO
NO
0
Environmental
2010
Professor
15.02.11
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Civil engineering
2008
Professor
09.06.08
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Environmental Engineering
1991
Assistant Professor
02.02.15
0
100
0
0
No
No
0
Environmental Engineering
2012
Assistant Professor
09.07.12
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Environmental Engineering
2008
Assistant Professor
28.08.09
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
240
GIS Structural Engineering Structural Engineering
1
Geo informatics
12
Mr.M.Chinnasam y
ME
13
Mr. M.Murugan
ME
14
Mrs. B.Lavanya
ME
15
Mr.S.Vinoth kumar
ME
16
Ms.S.Sangeetha
M.E
17
Mr.M.S.Kutti marks
ME
18
Mr.R.Lenin
ME
19
Mr.E.S.Dinesh babu
ME
20
Mr.M.Krishna kumar
M.Tec h
21
Mr.Sastha Arumugapandi
M.E
22
Mr.S.Aravindan
M.E
23
Mr.S.Natarajan
M.E
24
Mr.Gopinath
M.Tec h
25
Mr.Ajith
M.E
26
Mr.Nallaiyan
M.E
27
Mr.Gokulraj
M.E
28
Ms.Subbulakshm i
29
Mrs.Seethalaksh mi
Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai
2008
Assistant Professor
3.06.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
0
Construction Engineering& Management
2011
Assistant Professor
12.06.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Structural Engineering
Pondicherr y university
2007
Assistant Professor
12..06.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
0
Anna university Chennai
2013
Assistant Professor
1.07.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
0
2013
Asst. Professor
3.6.15
0
50
0
50
No
No
0
2013
Assistant Professor
3.07.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
0
Structural Engineering
2013
Assistant Professor
08.07.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Transportation Engineering
2013
Assistant Professor
11.07.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Transportation Engineering
2012
Assistant Professor
30.07.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Remote Sensing
22.6.15
0
50
0
50
No
No
0
28.12.15
0
50
0
50
No
No
0
08.07.15
0
50
0
50
No
No
1
31`7`15
0
100
0
0
No
No
0
26`6.15
0
100
0
0
No
No
0
Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Sathyabam a university Anna university Annamalai university Alagappa university Mepco schlek engg college Anna university Anna university
2011 2010 2011 2015 2013 2015 2014
Asst. Professor Asst. Professor Asst. Professor Asst. Professor Asst. Professor Asst. Professor Asst. Professor
M.E
Anna unsityiver
2014
Asst. Professor
M.E
Popnjesly college of
2015
Asst. Professor
08.06.15
0
100
0
0
No
No
0
8.7.15
0
100
0
0
No
No
0
8.6.15
0
100
0
0
No
No
0
22.7.15
0
100
0
0
No
No
0
241
Advanced Construction Technology Construction Engineering& Management Structural Engineering
Structural Engineering Structural Engineering Structural Engineering Remote sensing Structural Engineering Soil Mechanics And Foundations Environmental Engineering Hydrology And Water resources Engg Structural Engineering
engineering 30
Mrs.Arunthathi
M.E
31
Mr.Silambarasan
M.E
32
Mrs.Uma Magheswari
M.E
33
Mr.Mekala
M.E
34
,Mr..D.S.Shamla
M.Tec h
35
Mr.Rajesh.S
ME
36 37 38 39
Mr.K.Baskaran Mr.N.Thiyagaraj an Ms.S.JeyaBharat hi Mr.Sivaprakasan. S
ME ME ME ME
Mr.S.C.Jayakum 40
ar
ME
41
Ms.Kayalvizhi.I
ME
42
Mr.Dasarathy.K
ME
43
Ms.N.S.Divia
M.Tec h
44
Mrs.T.Diana joslin
ME
45
Mr.T.Kannan
ME
46
Mr.D.Karthik
47
Ms.Aishwarya Devi.S
ME ME
48
Mrs.Sathya
M.E
2014 Anna university Annamalai university CEG,Guind y NIT Anna university Chennai Kumaragur u engg coll Vel Tech University SSIET Anna university Chennai BS Abdur
2008 2004 2009
Asst. Professor Asst. Professor Asst. Professor Asst. Professor
12.1.15
0
100
0
0
No
No
0
1.6.15
0
100
0
0
No
No
0
01.06.15
0
100
0
0
No
No
0
04.06.15
0
100
0
0
No
No
Structural Engineering Irrigation water management Structural Engineering
0
Urban Engineering
2011
Asst. Professor
15.6.15
0
100
0
0
No
No
0
Environmental Geo Technical Engineering
2008
Assistant Professor
4.6.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Irrigation and water management
2006
Asst.prof
2015 2015 2010
Assistant Professor Assistant Professor Assistant Professor
4.7.15
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
4.7.15
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
4.7.15
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
16.6.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Assistant
Structral Engineering Structral Engineering Structral Engineering Construction engineering and management Structural
Rahmn Anna university Trichy Anna university
2013
Professor
3.07.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Engineering
2011
Assistant Professor
04.06.12
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Structural Engineering
07.04.11
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIT
2012
02.07.12
0
100
0
0
0
NO
0
Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Anna university Chennai
2000
Assistant Professor Assistant Professor
Transportation eng ineering Transportation Engineering
2013
Assistant Professor
10.07.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Geotechnical
2013
Assistant Professor
16.7.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Geo informatics
2008
Assistant Professor
04.09.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Structural Engineering
2012
Assistant Professor
02.07.12
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Engineering Environmental
2013
Assistant Professor
29.07.201 3
10 0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Environmental Management
242
49
Ms.Vaidevi.C
ME
50
Mr.Y.C.Thilakar
ME
51
Mr.Prakash.M
ME
Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai
2011
Assistant Professor
01.02.12
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Construction Engineering& Management
2013
Assistant Professor
10.07.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Transportation Engineering
2008
Assistant Professor
15.6.11
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Construction engineering and management
CAYm1 (2014-15) Qualification
S.N o
Name of faculty Member
Degree starting from Highest degree
1
Dr.S.Thenmozhi
PhD
2
Dr.Nandhni Devi.G
PhD
3
Dr.Saravanan
PhD
4
Dr.B.Hemalatha
PhD
5
Dr.S.R.Suresh
PhD
6
Dr.S.Nandakumar
PhD
7
Mr.Kannadasan.B
ME
8
Mrs.S.Archana
ME
9
Ms.Aishwarya Devi.S
ME
10
Ms.Vidhya.M
ME
University
Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Bharath University Univrsity of Madras Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Anna
Year of gradu ation
Designation( Date of all the joining designation the since joining institutio the n institution)
Distribution of teaching load (%) UG st
1 yr
In progra m
Other progra m
P G
Academi c Research Faculty Receivin g Ph.D. during the assessme nt years
Ph.D. Guidan ce
Research Paper Publicatio ns
Sponsor ed Researc h (Fundin g Researc h)
Con sult anc y& Pro duct Dev elop men t
Specialization
1
Geo Technical Engineering
2012
HOD
12.06.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
1
NIL
2010
Professor
29.05.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
Structural Engineering
2010
Professor
15.02.11
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
Civil engineering
2008
Professor
09.06.08
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
2010
Professor
20.6.14
0
100
0
0
No
No
0
NIL
Structural Engineering
2011
Professor
10.7.14
0
0
0
10 0
No
No
0
NIL
Environmental
2008
Assistant Professor
28.08.09
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
Geo informatics
2010
Assistant Professor
06.09.10
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
Environmental Management
09.07.12
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
09.07.12
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
2012 2012
Assistant Professor Assistant
243
1
Environmental Engineering
Environmental Engineering Environmental
11
Mr.M.Chinnasamy
ME
12
Mr. M.Murugan
ME
13
Mrs. B.Lavanya
ME
14
Mr.S.Nagaraj
ME
15
Mr.S.Vinoth kumar
ME
16
Mr.S.C.Jayakumar
ME
17
Mr.M.S.Kutti marks
ME
18
Mr.R.Lenin
ME
19
Mrs.T.Diana joslin
ME
20
21
Mr.Y.C.Thilakar
Mr.E.S.Dinesh babu
ME
ME
22
Ms.N.S.Divia
M.Tech
23
Mr.T.Kannan
ME
24
Mr.M.Krishna kumar
M.Tech
25
Mr.S.Ramesh
ME
26
Mr.D.Karthik
ME
university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Pondicherr y university Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai BS Abdur Rahmn Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai NIT Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university
Professor
Engineering
2008
Assistant Professor
3.06.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
2
Construction Engineering& Management
2011
Assistant Professor
12.06.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Structural Engineering
2007
Assistant Professor
12..06.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
0
Advanced Construction Technology
2013
Assistant Professor
01.7.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Water Resource Engineering
2013
Assistant Professor
1.07.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
0
2013
Assistant Professor
3.07.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
0
2013
Assistant Professor
3.07.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
3
Structural Engineering
2013
Assistant Professor
08.07.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Transportation Engineering
2013
Assistant Professor
10.07.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Geotechnical
2013
Assistant Professor
10.07.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
1
Transportation Engineering
2013
Assistant Professor
11.07.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Transportation Engineering
2012
Assistant Professor
02.07.12
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Transportation
2013
Assistant Professor
16.7.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
1
Geo informatics
2012
Assistant Professor
30.07.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Remote Sensing
2008
Assistant Professor
26.08.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
0
2008
Assistant Professor
04.09.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
0
244
NIL
1
Construction Engineering& Management Structural Engineering
Construction Engineering& Management Structural Engineering
27
Mr.K.Karthik
ME
28
Mrs.Sathya
M.E
29
Mr.K.Manikandan
ME
30
Ms.Saranya.R
ME
31
Ms.Devi Priyadarshini.K
ME
32
Mr.Sivakumar.B
ME
33
Ms.Devarajan.V
ME
34
Mr.Meenalakshmi.D
ME
35
Ms.Sudha.V
M.Tech
36
Ms.Kayalvizhi.I
ME
37
Mr.Panchasaram.K
ME
38
Mrs.Banupriya.R
ME
39
Mrs.Lavanya.B
ME
40
Mr.Balasundaram.V
ME
41
Mr.Dasarathy.K
ME
42
Mr.Prakash.M
ME
Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai0 Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Trichy Anna university Chennai Vinayaga mission Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university
2013
Assistant Professor
19.02.14
10 0
0
0
0
NO
NO
0
Environmental Engineering
2013
Assistant Professor
29.07.20 13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Environmental Management
2013
Assistant Professor
26.09.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Irrigation Water Management
2013
Assistant Professor
26.09.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Geo Informatics
2013
Assistant Professor
29.10.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Geo Informatics
2013
Assistant Professor
29.10.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Structural Engineering
2013
Assistant Professor
29.10.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Environmental Engineering
2013
Assistant Professor
12.11.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Integrated Water Resources Management
2013
Assistant Professor
12.11.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Structural Engineering
2011
Assistant Professor
04.06.12
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Structural Engineering
2012
Assistant Professor
30.12.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Transportation Engineering
2010
Assistant Professor
4.07.11
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Structural Engineering
2012
Assistant Professor
5.03.14
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Remote sensing and GIS
2012
Assistant Professor
5.03.14
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Integrated water resources
2000
Assistant Professor
7.4.11
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Transportation eng ineering
2008
Assistant Professor
15.6.11
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Construction engineering and
245
43
Ms.Vaidevi.C
ME
44
Mr.Sivaprakasan.S
ME
45
Mr.Jeya Aarthi.J
ME
46
Mr.Rajesh.S
ME
47 48
Mr.Mathu Latha.O Mr.Premkumar.K
Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Andhra university Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Andhra university Anna university
ME ME
49
Ms.Jenisha.T
ME
50
Mrs.Chandrakantham ma..
ME
51
Ms.Nandhitha Shinde.M
ME
management Construction Engineering& Management Construction engineering and management Construction engineering and management
2011
Assistant Professor
01.02.12
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
2010
Assistant Professor
16.6.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
0
2014
Assistant Professor
16.6.14
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
2008
Assistant Professor
4.6.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
2012
Assistant Professor
23.7.14
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Structural engineering
2014
Assistant Professor
25.6.14
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Environmental magnagement
2014
Assistant Professor
18.6.14
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Structural engineering
2005
Assistant Professor
01.02.12
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
Structural Engineering
2010
Assistant Professor
0
Soil Mechanics & Foundation
27.01.12
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
NIL
Irrigation and water management
Chennai
CAYm2 (2013-14)
Qualification
S.N o
1 2
Name of faculty Member
Dr.S.Thenmozhi Dr.B.Hemalatha
Degree starting from Highest degree
PhD PhD
Universit y
Anna university Chennai Anna university
Year of gradu ation
2012 2008
Designation( Date of all the joining designation the since joining institutio the n institution)
HOD pofessor
12.06.13 09.06.08
Academi Distribution of teaching load c (%) Researc h Faculty UG Receivin s 1 g Ph.D. t PG during In Other y the progra progra r assessme m m nt years 0 0
100 100
246
Ph.D. Guidan ce
Sponsor ed Researc h Research (Fundin g Paper Publicatio Researc h) ns
Consult ancy & Produc t Develo pment
Specialization
0
0
NO
NO
NIL
1
Geo Technical Engineering
0
0.00 -
NO
NO
NIL
1
Environmental Engineering
Chennai
3
Dr.Muralikrishana
PhD
4
Dr.Saravanan
PhD
5
Dr.Elangovan
PhD
6
Dr.Nandhni Devi.G
PhD
7
Mr.Sathishkumar
ME
8
Mr.Mathiyazhagan.R
ME
9
Mr.Kannadasan.B
ME
10
Mr.M.Chinnasamy
ME
11
Mr. M.Murugan
ME
12
Mrs. B.Lavanya
ME
13
Mr.K.Karthik
ME
14
Mr.Rajesh.S
ME
15
Mr.Mathu Latha.O
ME
16
Mrs.Sathya
ME
17
Mr.Sivaprakasan.S
ME
Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university chennai Anna university chennai Pondicher ry university Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Andhra university Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai
2010
Professor
24.06.10
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
NIL
Civil engineering
2010
Professor
15.02.11
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
NIL
Civil engineering
2010
Professor
14.02.11
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
NIL
Civil engineering
2010
Professor
29.05.13
0
0
0
100
NO
NO
NIL
Structural Engineering
2009
Assistant Professor
30.06.10
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
NIL
Structural Engineering
2009
Assistant Professor
22.06.09
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
NIL
Environmental Engineering
2008
Assistant Professor
28.08.09
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
NIL
Geo Informatics
2008
Assistant Professor
03.06.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
NIL
Construction Engineering&
2011
Assistant Professor
12.06.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
NIL
Structural Engineering
2007
Assistant Professor
12.06.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
NIL
Advanced Construction Technology
2013
Assistant Professor
19.06.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
NIL
Environmental Engineering
2008
Assistant Professor
04.06.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
NIL
2012
Assistant Professor
23.07.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
2008
Assistant Professor
29.07.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
2010
Assistant Professor
16.06.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
0
NIL
Management
247
NIL
Irrigation and water management Structural Engineering Irrigation and water management Construction engineering and management
18
Mr.S.Nagaraj
ME
19
Mr.S.Vinoth kumar
ME
20
Mr.S.C.Jayakumar
ME
21
Mr.M.S.Kutti marks
ME
22
Mr.R.Lenin
ME
23
Mrs.T.Diana joslin
ME
24
Mr.Y.C.Thilakar
ME
25
Mr.E.S.Dinesh babu
ME
26
Ms.N.S.Divia
M.Tech
27
Mr.T.Kannan
ME
28
Mr.M.Krishna kumar
M.Tech
29
Mr.S.Ramesh
ME
30
Mr.D.Karthik
ME
31
Ms.Nandhitha Shinde.M
ME
32
Mr.Dasarathy
ME
33
Mrs.S.Archana
ME
Anna university chennai Anna university Chennai BS Abdur Rahmn University Anna university chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai NIT Anna university Chennai Anna university chennai Anna university chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai
2013
Assistant Professor
01.7.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
Water Resource Engineering
2013
Assistant Professor
1.07.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
0
NIL
Construction Engineering& Management
2013
Assistant Professor
3.07.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
0
NIL
Structural Engineering
2013
Assistant Professor
3.07.13
0
50
0
50
NO
NO
0
NIL
Structural Engineering
2013
Assistant Professor
08.07.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
Transportation Engineering
2013
Assistant Professor
10.07.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
Geotechnical
2013
Assistant Professor
10.07.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
Transportation Engineering
2013
Assistant Professor
11.07.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
Transportation Engineering
2012
Assistant
Transportation
02.07.12
0
100
0
0
0
NO
0
NIL
2013
Assistant Professor
16.7.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
Geo informatics
2012
Assistant Professor
30.07.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
Remote Sensing
2008
Assistant Professor
26.08.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
Construction Engineering& Management
2008
Assistant Professor
04.09.13
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
Structural Engineering
2010
Assistant Professor
27.01.12
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
Soil Mechanics & Foundation
2000
Assistant Professor
07.04.11
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
Transportation
2010
Assistant Professor
06.09.10
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
Enviromnmental management
Professor
Engineering
248
34
Mrs.Banupriya.R
35
Ms.Kiruthigaa Aishwarya.J.U
ME M.Tech
36
Ms.Vidhya.M
ME
37
Ms.Kavitha.V
ME
38
Ms.Kayalvizhi.I
ME
39
Ms.Aishwarya Devi.S
ME
40
Ms.Chitra.R
M.Tech
41
Ms.T.A.Latha
ME
42
Mr.Prakash.M
ME
43
Mr.Selvakumar.P
ME
44
Mrs.Chandrakantham ma..
ME
45
Ms.Krishna kumari.B
ME
46
Ms.Vaidevi.C
ME
Anna university Chennai NIT Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Trichy Anna university Bharath university Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai Andhra university Anna university Chennai Anna university Chennai
2010
Assistant Professor
2006
Assistant Professor
16.07.12
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
2012
Assistant Professor
09.07.12
0
100
0
0
NO
2012
Assistant Professor
02.07.12
0
100
0
0
2011
Assistant Professor
04.06.12
0
100
0
02.07.12
0
100
06.01.10
0
100
2012 2005
Assistant Professor Assistant Professor
04.07.11
0
100
NIL
Structural Engineering
0
NIL
Transportation & Management
NO
0
NIL
Environmental Engineering
NO
NO
0
NIL
Environmental Engineering
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
Structural Engineering
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
0
0
NO
NO
0
2010
Assistant Professor
24.06.10
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
2011
Assistant Professor
15.06.11
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
2011
Assistant Professor
01.07.11
1 0 0
0
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
2005
Assistant Professor
01.02.12
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
2008
Assistant Professor
13.02.12
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
2011
Assistant Professor
01.02.12
0
100
0
0
NO
NO
0
NIL
249
Engineering Environmental Structural Engineering Integrated Water Resources Management Construction Engineering& Managemet Integrated Water Resources Management Structural Engineering Construction Engineering& Management Construction Engineering
