Final Evaluation System.docxfinal

Manila Business College

Manila Business College Sta. Cruz, Manila

Computerized Teacher’s Evaluation System

A thesis presented to the Information System Department

In partial Fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Information System

Presented by

Bustamante, Ryan Regie T. Eco, Angelica A. Santos, Aira Ael !e"reel #. Ramos, Sher$in %. De""a &. Dequi'a

Presented to

#r. %hristoper (. Romasanta Ad)iser

!anuary *+-


!dviser’s "ecommendation Sheet

This designed proposal entitled %omputeri"ed Teacher/s Teacher/s E)aluation System0 for #anila Business %ollege has 1een prepared and designed 1y2


Su1mitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements in System Analysis and Design has 1een eamined and recommended for acceptance and appro)al.

#r. %hristoper (. Romasanta SAD3Ad)iser4


!dviser’s "ecommendation Sheet

This designed proposal entitled %omputeri"ed Teacher/s Teacher/s E)aluation System0 for #anila Business %ollege has 1een prepared and designed 1y2


Su1mitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements in System Analysis and Design has 1een eamined and recommended for acceptance and appro)al.

#r. %hristoper (. Romasanta SAD3Ad)iser4


Panel’s !pproval Sheet

Appro)ed 1y the 5anel of Eaminees for an 6ral Eamination and 5ro7ect Design 5resentation.

8888888888888888888888 88888888888888888888888888 8888 #r. !efferson #. 5rado IT 5rofessor

8888888888888888888888 88888888888888888888888888 8888 #r. !ordan #. Angelo IT 5rofessor


!c#no$ledgement

9e $ould li:e to epress our gratitude and appreciation to the follo$ing2

To each of oursel)es, $hom together $e made the ela1oration of much peer re)ie$ to help each other on different aspects such as grammar, thesis statement, and many other things that $e discussed in class. As a team2 Aira, Angelica, Ryan, Sher$in; $e ha)e no $ords to than:ed each for the magnificent mutual respect that $e sho$ to each other on the different meeting that $e had. 9ith the com1ination of the four of us, $e made possi1le the ela1oration of high quality pro7ect, $e learn to $or: together, not only hear others idea 1ut also to accept them, and specially to understand each other/s strengths in order to distri1ute the amount of $or: in an efficient $ay.

To our family and relati)es for 1eing an inspiration and also a moti)ator that $e can do this pro7ect successfully, for all the unconditional lo)e and moral support that they ga)e. And, for pro)iding us $hat $e need especially in financial terms.

To #r. %hristopher Romasanta, our SAD ad)iser
To #r. Roden, the Academic assistant of our school, #anila Business %ollege for pro)iding us all the information that $e need e)en though it=s someho$ confidential, and for letting us :no$ $hat they $ant and $hat they need on the system that $e are going to 1uilt.

To the #anagement of our school, for the participation and for gi)ing us an opportunity to de)eloped and to present our system.

Manila Business College %edication

This pro7ect is sincerely and heartedly dedicates to the follo$ing2

To my entire group mates $ho ne)er fail to cheer me up and support me through this pro7ect.

I $ould 1e honor to dedicate this pro7ect to my 5rofessor for guiding us, supporting us and for ans$ering all the questions regarding to this pro7ect.

I dedicate this 5ro7ect to my parents, $ho epect my effort on e)erything I do, and I thin: that this 5ro7ect is the perfect image and reflection of all my effort and hard $or:.

&Bustamante, "yan "egie T.

I $ould li:e to dedicate this pro7ect $hole heartedly and $ith all the honor to as follo$s2

To my lo)e ones, $ho support, entrust me and ga)e their time, effort and guidance throughout this pro7ect.

To my friends and group mates, $ho gi)e courage and for 1elie)ing of the success of this pro7ect.

To my SAD ad)iser
And of course,

To our Almighty >od, $ho ga)e me my lo)e ones, friends and group mates and professors to ma:e all this successful.

&Santos, !ira !'el (ezreel M.


I dedicate this pro7ect to my family, my friends, and my lo)e ones.

To my family, $ho al$ays there to gi)e all the things that I need, and for supporting me.

To my friends, $ho ne)er left me and al$ays there to guide me.

To my lo)e ones, $ho is there to lo)e me and :eep me up to ha)e a lot of confidence.

&"amos, Sher$in C.

I $ould li:e to dedicate this mind31lo$ing study and one of the hardest pro7ects that $e=)e encountered to the follo$ing;

To my parents $ho al$ays there $hen I needed them, for gi)ing me their trust to go on an o)ernight $ith my classmates 7ust to finish this pro7ect, for supporting me financially and emotionally $hen I almost thin: of gi)ing up. For 1eing a moti)ator that I can do e)erything 7ust has faith on him ?>od@.

To my friends $ho al$ays supporting and moti)ating me that I can do this. For al$ays 1eing there $hen I needed a shoulder to lean on and for listening for all the rants that I=m saying $hen something $ent messed up and for 1eing so stressed $ith e)erything.

To my group mates $ho al$ays ha)e the courage and ha)ing a mindset that, 9E %A D6 TCIS, e)en though $e $ere almost ga)e up 1ecause $e thought that $e can=t do this pro7ect anymore. For ha)ing the guts and for 1eing positi)e thin:er. I dedicate this pro7ect to us group mates

&Eco, !ngelica !.


I $ould li:e to dedicate this pro7ect to my family $ho supported me especially in financial. In doing this matter they are al$ays right there to help me and support me morally. E)erything I do I dedicated to them and also the person $ho al$ays stay 1eside me, helping me and gi)ing my needs in school. &%e)ui*a, %ezza +.


Chapter 

I.

Introduction * A. Bac:ground of Study  B. 6rgani"ational %hart ............G %. Statement of 5ro1lem .......H D. 617ecti)e of the Study ......H E. Significance of the Study ......F. Scope and imitation of the System .J >. Definition of Terms .......K

Chapter 

I. II. III.

Re)ie$ of Related iterature L Studies  +3 %onceptual Frame$or: . G Theoretical Frame$or: . H

Chapter 

I. II. III. I&. &. &I. &II. &III. IN. N.

Technical Feasi1ility ... J 6perational Feasi1ility .... K Economic Feasi1ility ....... M %ost LBenefits Analysis ......M %ost Reduction ?Eisting L 5roposed@ .... *+ a1or %ost Reduction . .*+3* Error Reduction .. * Brea: Do$n of Recurring %ost .. ** %ost L Benefit Analysis . * Brea: E)en Analysis .. *G


%hapter I

Page


. ntroduction o$adays, technology has 1ecome rapidly changed and it :eeps on impro)ing 1ecause of the needs and demands of the people. Due of the eistence of technology, computeri"ed system $as de)eloped. By no$, there are t$o $ays to e)aluate2 the manual and computeri"ed. Teacher e)aluation system is used to :no$ and monitor the teacher/s performance for the $hole semester. There are many school requires to ha)e an e)aluation process, 1ecause it helps to ma:e impro)ement for the teachers teaching s:ills and to :no$ if the students are satisfied $ith their performance. Also, 1y this process the teachers $ere a1le to :no$ on $hat field of their teaching a1ilities they need to enhance. In their eisting system, they are using a >oogle Form that helps the admin to easily manipulate the system, 1ut it doesn/t really help 1ecause it is prone to human error. Their eisting system is not efficient and requires a lot of time, effort and man po$er to arrange the record and to calculate the a)erage score gi)en 1y the students. As day passes 1y, the school needed a fast and relia1le e)aluation system 1ecause of the pro1lems in the eisting system that $as stated earlier. The Academic Assistant of #anila Business %ollege $ho processes the system struggle a lot in using the eisting system. They find it hard to encode, record and calculate the a)erage score that the teacher got in the e)aluation process. It causes them a huge num1er of $or:load. So there is a need to design a computeri"ed system that $ill arrange the record and calculate the a)erage score of each professor. The proponents aim to find a 1etter $ay to accelerate the process of the eisting e)aluation record system that $ill produce a relia1le data. This pro7ect $ill pro)ide an efficient and effecti)e $a y to speed the time of filling out result of the e)aluation to achie)e a more producti)e output.

Page


!. Bac#ground o- the Study The #anila Business %ollege is one of the many schools that offer a free and cheaper education to all the deser)ing students. The interdependence of #B% helped the indi)iduals, especially the indigent youth to fulfill their dreams to finish their studies. Almost all of the students of #B% are scholars. As part of their agreement the students of #B% has the o1ligations to maintain an a)erage score of .H for the chairman scholar and .JH for the college scholar. This agreement includes the responsi1ilities of each student to study and perform their 1est inside the classroom. The professor of the school $ill help e)ery student to attaintheir maintaining a)erage 1y teaching them and guiding them in different fields of their studies. That/s $hy this e)aluation system $as created to monitor and guide the students specially the teacher of #B%. It has the mission and )ision to correct, impro)ed and analy"ed the teaching s:ills of the professor and also to monitor the satisfaction rate of the student to their teacher. In the current system of #anila Business %ollege they are using a >oogle form system, it ena1le all users to e)aluate their current professors. It $as easy to access and to manipulate. But the pro1lem in this system is that it cannot sum up or compute the scores automatically and it can 1e easily access 1y anyone, e)en not a student of #B%. The proponents conduct this study to impro)e the process of the #B% in terms of e)aluating the teachers. Through this, the information inputted $ill 1e more accurate. It $ill also lessen the time during transaction. The proposed system $ill ha)e a 1etter performance and a user friendly interface.

Page


B. Statement o- the Problem . /eneral Problem Page Co$ to de)elop an e)aluation system that $ill lessen the $or:load

of e)ery user and :eep the data and information pri)ateO 0. Speci-ic Problems • 9hy it is time consumingO • 9hy it is not in pri)ateO • 9hy anyone can accessO • 9hy it is difficult to useO • Co$ they manually computingO

C. 1b2ective o- the Study . /eneral 1b2ective

The purpose of this study is to design and de)elop a computeri"ed e)aluation system for the student and the faculty 0. Speci-ic 1b2ectives Specifically, the study aimed to2 essen the time consumed in the process of e)aluating. • Secure the data and information of the school. • Ena1le all the students and admin of #B% to access the system. • Easily manipulate the system. • Automatically sum up all the scores of the e)aluation.


Page


%. Signi-icance o- the Study This study $ill 1e 1eneficial to the follo$ing2 . To the Administration The system $ill 1e helpful to lessen the $or:load of e)aluation. It $ill also helpful to secure the data and information a1out the school. It $ill also de)elop a gro$th to the school. *. To the Faculty mem1ers The result and feed1ac: of the students $ill only 1e a)aila1le for them.It $ill help them to :no$ on $hat field they need to impro)e and it $ill also help them to :no$ if the students are satisfied $ith their performance. . To the Student or Pser The system $ill help them to decrease their $or:load and easy access for e)ery use. It $ill also gi)e them pri)acy for e)ery e)aluation that they ta:e against the teacher. It also helped them to say $hat they $ant to say a1out their professor that they can/t tell personally. G. To the Future Researchers The system $ill 1e helpful for your study. It $ill gi)e :no$ledge and 1ac:ground a1out it. It may 1e the 1asis for the system that you $ill create and 1uilt.

Page


E. Scope and 3imitation o- the System . Scope o- the System It $ill allo$ the user to )ie$ the system anytime. • It is concerned in e)aluating the professor online. • It $ill allo$ the students to e)aluate their professor. • It $ill automatically sum up or compute all the scores that the students •

gi)en to their professor. 0. 3imitation o- the System It is only a)aila1le during the e)aluation $ee:. It is only accessi1le in premises of #B%. 6nly the students of #B% can actually use the system for e)aluation. 6nly the academic assistant is allo$ed to monitor all the students/

feed1ac:.

4. %e-inition o- Terms

Page

The follo$ing are the terms and definitions that $ere technically and operationally used in the study.

Manila Business College ndigent

suffering from etreme po)ert y,totally lac:ing in something. Evaluation system – a system that e)aluates the teacher/s

•

•

&

performance. 5or#load 6 the amount of $or: that is epected to 1e done. "eliable & a1le to 1e trusted to do or pro)ide $hat is needed and a1le to 1e relied on. "etrieve & to get and 1rin g ? something@ 1ac: from a plac e

•

o r

to find and ge t ? information@ from a computer or dis: .

E--ective

•

&

Ca)ing an intended or epected effect.

5roducing a strong impression or response. E--icient &capa1le of producing desired results $ithout $asting materials, time, or energy. Encode 3 to put information in the form of a code on ?something@.

•

/. !cronyms •

MBC 6 #anila Business %ollege SEE%S 6 S:ills Enhancement and Educational De)elopment for

Students.

Page


%hapter II

!. "elated 3iterature and Studies

3ocal

Page


The re)ie$ of the literature for this study focuses on procedures used to identify teaching and learning styles and $hat effect a match 1et$een the t$o has on student learning outcomes and e)aluation of instructors. The re)ie$ focuses on a num1er of different instruments used to identify teaching and learning styles. The chapter 1egins $ith a definition of learning styles, teaching styles, and matching, follo$ed 1y the findings of researchers using )arious instruments to measure learning and teaching styles. The research outcomes germane to learning styles, teaching styles, and a match 1et$een the t$o in relation to course grades, final eam scores, and instructor e)aluations are discussed. Bradsha$ L!oyner ; Identified criteria that can 1e used to de)elop more effecti)e e)aluation systems. These criteria included things li:e lin:ing e)aluation to school goals, gathering and using data on teacher performance, esta1lishing feed1ac: mechanisms, and including $ays to meaningfully in)ol)e teachers in the process. Efforts to impro)e the technical quality of e)aluation systems o)er the past t$o decades ha)e not produced e)idence of impro)ed teaching and increased student achie)ement. Thus, ne$er thin:ing treats teacher e)aluation as an organi"ational pro1lem that includes impro)ing school climate, ha)ing the principal 1ecome an instructional leader, and 1uilding lin:s 1et$een school impro)ement, professional de)elopment, teacher e)aluation and student learning. According to %hester Barry ?6ur ady of Fatima Pni)ersity, *+H@ E)aluation is the process of interpreting a measurement or aggregate of measurements, 1y means of a specific su17ecti)e )alue or set of )alues to determine the degree to $hich the measurement represents a desira1le condition. The positi)e ?>ood@ E)aluation of 7udgement that the measurement on forms to our )alues and thus represents an undesira1le condition. Thus the e)aluation process implies the eistence and use of a contetual system or structure of )alues associated $ith the characteristics 1eing measured. A comprehensi)e Page Student Faculty E)aluation in)ol)es the systematic o1ser)ation ?measurement@.


According to iET ?*+H@; The %FES or the %omputeri"ed Faculty E)aluation System $ill gi)e $ay to easy collection and more accurate data analysis of faculty e)aluation in lesser time. The %omputeri"ed Faculty E)aluation System is a paperless process in $hich the e)aluator ?students, co3 teacher, and super)isor@ $ill use the computer and the system to e)aluate the teacher.Teaching performance e)aluation is a necessary step in ensuring good instruction. Traditionally teaching performance e)aluation is used as a tool to apprise teachers on ho$ they are doing their 7o1. 5erformance is defined as a set of outcomes produce during a certain period of time, and does not refer to the traits, personal characteristics or competencies of the performer. It is designed to identify teaching strength and $ea:nesses.

#onitoring and e)aluation is central to school management and impro)ement. According to Basil ?*+@, the t$ofold3o17ecti)e underpinning monitoring, e)aluation, and reflecti)e interactions 1et$een e)aluators and those 1eing e)aluated are2 firstly, to ensure that quality teaching and learning is ta:ing place, and secondly, to promote an urge for professional gro$th in the faculty. There are four 1asic factors in the $hole e)aluation process that need considera1le discussion2 the criterion, the method, the frequency of e)aluation, and $hat ma:es up a good e)aluator. In a more ad)anced and purposeful educational setting, teachers ta:e acti)e role through self3reflection and self3 assessment. It is the teachers that ma:e inferences as to $hat $ent $ell and $hat $ent $rong and $hy. They reflect on ho$ they can ma:e 1etter ser)ices if they are to teach the same lessons again. #onitoring and e)aluation is the 1ac:1one of any dynamic and for$ard3loo:ing institute, and it is only through the greater in)ol)ement of all the sta:eholders that effecti)e learning for teaching can 1e ensured.

4oreign

Page


According to 6ford Bi1liography 1y !ames C. Stronge, eslie 9. >rant, Nian uanNu ?*+@; Teacher e)aluation has e)ol)ed o)er time from focusing on the moral )alues of a teacher in the early M++s to standards31ased e)aluation models of today that see: to include measures of student academic progress. 6ften, teacher e)aluation systems see: to ser)e t$o needs2 accounta1ility and impro)ement. %hanges in teacher e)aluation ha)e 1een influenced 1y political $inds as $ell as a desire to create systems that are fair and 1alanced. According to #easures of Effecti)e Teaching ?#ET@ that t$o3thirds of American teachers feel that traditional e)aluations don/t accurately capture the full picture of $hat they do in the classroom. They $ant information that they can trust from measures that are fair and relia1le. The #easures of Effecti)e Teaching ?#ET@ pro7ect $as designed to find out ho$ e)aluation methods could 1est 1e used to tell teachers more a1out the s:ills that ma:e them most effecti)e and to help districts identify and de)elop great teaching. 9hen it came to identifying $hat great teaching loo:s li:e, $e :ne$ that it $as imperati)e to go straight to the source2 teachers. #ost uni)ersities as: students to complete course e)aluations as part of the institution3$ide assessment process. Cas:ell states that student e)aluations of faculty mem1ers $ere first used at the Pni)ersity of 9isconsin in the early M*+s primarily for informational feed1ac: so that faculty might 1e more a$are of student needs.0 Co$e)er, in the M-+s as more uni)ersities 1egan to use these instruments in their curricula, the purpose clearly changed to a decision3ma:ing tool regarding salary, promotion, and tenure. 5resently, these types of sur)eys pro1a1ly constitute the most $idely used form of teaching e)aluation in higher education. According to %ol1y, Susan A.; Bradsha$, ynn Q.; !oyner, Randy  , The teacher e)aluation literature $as re)ie$ed to disco)er insights to further the understanding of teacher e)aluation. Information $as gathered from a re)ie$ of the empirical research and theoretical literature related to teacher e)aluation through more than + ERI% searches. A matri $as de)eloped to summari"e the findings from each research study and theoretical article or 1oo:. Findings $ere


coded 1y topic, and the topics $ere grouped 1y general theme. Findings $ere categori"ed into fi)e criteria that can 1e used to determine the effecti)eness of a teacher e)aluation system. These criteria are2 ?@ purposes for e)aluation match the methods or procedures; ?*@ district commitment is e)ident in sound policies

Page

and practices and appropriate allocation of time and resources; ?@ teacher e)aluation is tightly connected to district priorities and school functions; ?G@ educational leaders play a strong, positi)e role in e)aluation; and ?H@ the e)aluation en)ironment is supporti)e of ongoing professional learning. These criteria ser)ed as a foundation for effecti)e teacher e)aluation 1eginning in the MK+s and can ser)e as a frame$or: for guiding research and educator efforts to strengthen teacher e)aluation. An appendi compares research31ased criteria $ith epert guidelines. According to Ben7y a)in; Teacher e)aluation can ser)e one or 1oth of t$o purposes. The first is to guide decisions a1out hiring, retention, and promotion. The second is to help impro)e teaching. In each case the purpose suggest certain important questions. The first purpose, personal decisions, requires comparison among teachers so techniques used for e)aluation must 1e fair. In research 7argon this is a question of relia1ility

the etent to $hich an e)aluation produces

consistent results at different times and for different people

and )alidity, that

an e)aluation measures $hat it is supposed to measure. The situation is different for the impro)ement of teaching. Cere the crucial question is the etent to $hich e)aluation influences the su1sequent 1eha)ior and attitudes of teachers and students.

B. Conceptual 4rame$or#

Page


Process

nput

STPDET E&APATI6

#B% %6#5PTERIED TEA%CERS E&APATI6 SSTE#

1utput

TEA%CER E&APATI6 RE56RT

Figure 1.1 Conceptual Framework

C. Theoretical 4rame$or#

Page


The Input35rocess36utput $as used 1y the proponents as an organi"ational guide in the accomplishment of the research o17ecti)es. The first 1loc: $hich is the input 1loc:, it includes all of the materials and information required for the process; the personal information of the students and details a1out the students schedule, su17ect and their professor. The second 1loc: $hich is the process 1loc: represents the methods used 1y the proponents to design and de)elop the system. It in)ol)es the coding and designing of the system to ma:e a computeri"ed system. In order to functionally use the proposed system it needs to process the input data of the user o gi)e a desired output. After 1eing processed it led to the third 1loc: $hich is the output 1loc: represents the de)elop system entitled E)aluation System0 that $ill produce impro)ement in the current process of e)aluation of teachers.

Page


%CA5TER III

Page

Manila Business College !. Technical 4easibility

This phase in)ol)es the allocation of technical resources need to implement in desired system. 9e $ould consider the resources needed. %omputer is the main tool that the proponents used in creating the system. For the hard$are and soft$are consideration, computer contains hard$are and soft$are that are used in inputting, manipulating, and processing data to store in the memory.

7ard$are 

System Pnit %5P  5rocessorK- Family - #odel * Stepping + >enuineIntel U*MM* #h" #E#6R 3 Total &irtual #emory*.++ >B Total 5hysical #emory G,++.++ #B ST6RA>E 3 Si"e

GM.+G >B ?-+,+,+G,M* 1ytes@

So-t$are M8S93 +isual Studio 0:0

Page


B.

1perational 4easibility

The proposed is managea1le enough to 1e used 1y the authori"ed person $hich is the admin and the users ?students@ if they $ant to e)aluate, update and manage the records. The team 1elie)ed that the facilitator of the system can easily adapt this :ind of system that $as made in a )ery user3friendly graphical user interface $herein you 7ust ha)e to clic: enter and )ie$ the data needed. The files or records are more accurate specially the sum of the e)aluation. It is also more secured 1ecause of the student num1er and pass$ord of the students and the faculty management of #anila Business %ollege. This system doesn/t need lot of time to update and add the information needed. It $ill organi"e and control the records. The admin $ill 1e the one $ho add, update, and manage infor mation $hile the students $ill only add for their e)aluation.

Page


C. Economic 4easibility Economic feasi1ility could also 1e referred to as cost<1enefit analysis. It is the

most frequently used method for e)aluating the 1enefits and sa)ing that are epected from a candidate system and compare them $ith costs. It 1enefits out$eigh cost, and then the decision is made to design and implement the system. Relating to this, #anila Business %ollege #anagement System is highly economically feasi1le and $ould 1e definitely suit the 1usiness requirements. The #B% 6ffice doesn/t need to spend much money for the de)elopment of the system. There are some resources that a)aila1le. The only thing that needs to 1e done is the en)ironment for the de)elopment of the said system. If the proponents are doing so, they can attain the maimum usa1ility of the corresponding resources. Therefore the system is economically feasi1le. . Cost and bene-its

Page


EXISTING Amount/Quan

Total

Description Quantity Bond Paper

Unit

tity

(Short) 4 Bond Paper

Reams

12000

480.00

(!on") Bro$n

4

Reams

1#000

520.00

1

Pieces

00

75.00

2

Pieces

400

100.00

(B'ac) 2 Ba'' pen

Bo*

+000

120.00

(Red) ,o'der

1

Bo*

+000

60.00

(!on") ,o'der

#0

Pieces

-00

210.00

(Short) Puncher ,astener Record

#0 1 2

Pieces Pieces Ro''s

00 #000 #000

150.00 350.00 60.00

Boo

#

Pieces

-000

%n&e'op(!o n") Bro$n %n&e'op(sh ort) Ba''

pen

Total

210.00 2,335.0 0

Page


!. Cost "eduction

PROPOSED Amount/Quan

Total

Description Quantity Bond Paper

Unit

tity

(Short) 1 Bond Paper

Reams

12000

120.00

(!on") Ba''

1

Reams

1#000

130.00

(B'ac) Ba'' pen (Red) ,o'der(Short) ,o'der(!on") Punch

1 0 1 1

Bo* Bo* Pieces Pieces

+000 +000 00 -00

er ,astener Record Boo

1 1 1

Pieces Ro''s Pieces

#000 #000 -000 Total

pen

S;PP3ES

60.00 30.00 75.00 105.00 350.00 30.00 70.00 970.00

C1ST ,?@A.::

"E%;CT1<= E'isting&Proposed> B. 3abor Cost "eduction

LABOR COST REDUCTION Existing Total Month Position I.T Sta I.T

Monthly 2000

s 10

Annually 20.00000

Assistant Total

+000

10

+0.00000 310,000.00 Page

Page


proposed Total Month Position I.T Sta Total

Monthly 2000

Labor Cost Redution

Existing Total

s 10

Annually 20.00000 250,000.00

60,000.00

Proposed Total Annual 310,00

Annual

Sala!y Pe!"entage

0.00

Sala!y Pe!"entag

250,000.00

#!!o!

20$ 62,000.

e #!!o!

5$

Total

00

Total

12,500.00

#!!o! an% &ost 'e%u"tion (#)isting * P!o+ose%

60,000.00

Page

C. 3abor Cost "eduction


%. Brea#do$n o- "ecurring 5or#sheet Page


A System aintenance Semi  Annua''y

Annua''y

2.0000

.00000

System aintenance

ota' Annua' System aintenance ,ee

5,000.00

Bncrementa' 3ommunication Semi  Annua''y

Annua''y

1.0000

#.00000

ncrementa' 3ommunication

ota' ncrementa' 3ommunication ,ee

3,000.00

E. Brea# Even !nalysis

Page

Final Evaluation System.docxfinal

Recommend Documents