!"#$"%&
Mapa ng Loob •
Began as a project in a graduate class on Personality Scale Construction at UP Diliman in 2010
•
Measures the broad traits that make up the Five-Factor model
Masaklaw na Panukat ng Loob (Mapa ng Loob) Development and Validation: Excerpts
Gregorio E. H. del Pilar, PhD PAP Tatlong Panukat De La Salle University May 23, 2015
Mnemonic device for the domains of the Five-Factor Model
Openness to Experience Conscientiousness Extraversion A greeableness greeableness Neuroticism
Facet scales of the Mapa ng Loob Neuroticism (Hina ng Loob, Pagkamaramdamin, Neuroticism (Hina Pagkamapag-alala, Pagkasumpungin) Extraversion (Pagkamasayahin, Pagkapalakaibigan, Pagkamasigla, Pagkamadaldal) Openness to Experience (Kakaibang Experience (Kakaibang pag-iisip, Hilig sa Bagong Kaalaman, Pagkamakasining, Pagkamaharaya) Agreeableness (Pagkadimayabang, Agreeableness (Pagkadimayabang, Pagkamapagtiwala, Pagkamaunawain, Pagkamapagparaya) Conscientiousness (Pagkamasikap, Conscientiousness (Pagkamasikap,
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Mapa ng Loob •
Completed in May 2013, after six item testing studies over five successive semesters
•
Initially meant to be a revision of the Panukat ng Pagkataong Pilipino (PPP)
2002, Vol. 82, No. 1, 89–101
%
!"#$"%&
Conclusion: Katigbak, Church, Lapena, Carlota & del Pilar (2002)
"...most of the dimensions measured by Philippine personality inventories overlap considerably with, and are adequately encompassed by, dimensions of the five-factor model..." p. 97
Factor Analysis •
Construction of the scales of the Mapa ng Loob
• •
Construct definition Item-writing
•
•
Item review (to improve phrasing, to eliminate highly similar items, and assignment of prototypicality ratings) Item testing
• •
Reliability analysis Factor analysis
Principal Component Analysis of Mapa Preliminary Version 6 (Final Version)
Since the Mapa aims to measure the five factors, it has to demonstrate that the five facets group as expected.
Scale
N1 Hina ng Loob
Scale name in English
Vulnerability to Stress
Cronbach’s Alpha
Number of positively-keyed items
.67
3
N2 Pagkamaramdamin
Oversensitiveness
.77
5
N3 Pagkamapag-alala
Worrying anxiety
.75
3
N4 Pagkasumpungin
Temperamentalness
.75
5
E1 Pagkamasayahin
Cheerfulness
.79
4
E2 Pagkapalakaibigan
Friendliness
.81
3
E3 Pagkamasigla
Energy
.73
2
E4 Pagkamadaldal
Loquaciousness
.67
5
O1 Kakaibang Pag-iisip
Original Thinking
.66
2
Intellectual Curiosity
.67
5
Aesthetic Sensitivity
.65
4
Imaginativeness
.70
6
Modesty
.69
5
O2 Hilig sa Bagong Kaalaman O3 Pagkamakasining O4 Pagkamaharaya A1 Pagkadimayabang
Locating people and constructs in a "map" of 5 dimensions Factor 2
Emotional Intelligence
Factor 1
Factor 1
Resilience
Forgivingness
Factor 2
#
!"#$"%&
English version of the Mapa • •
Began in 2013 and currently being revised First version facet reliabilities, UP Diliman: Sem 1 13-14: .62-.85, mean = .72 Sem 2 13-14: .65-.87, mean = .74 * Excellent factor structure
Validation Studies on the scales of the Mapa ng Loob
International Personality Item Pool (IPIP, L. Goldberg, 2008)
English version of the Mapa: correlations with Filipino version, UP Diliman
Semester I 13-14 (N= 202)
Semester II 13-14 (N=202)
Neuroticism
.81
.84
Extraversion
.87
.92
Openness to Experience
.67
.75
.79
.85
.74
.86
Scale
Agreeableness Conscientiousnes s
Borlasa, Magayanes, Menorca & Syjueco, 2014
• •
Participants: 120 UP Diliman college students Correlated the English Mapa domain scale scores with the International Personality Item Pool Big Five scales (20 items per domain scale)
•
•
collection of personality items in the public domain, available on the Internet, established by Lewis Goldberg in the 1990's aims to promote personality and individual differences research by making available, for free, measures that are highly correlated with well-known but copyrighted measures such as the NEO PI-R, the MMPI, the 16 PF, the CPI, etc.
Borlasa, Magayanes, Menorca & Syjueco, 2014
IPIP ES
IPIP E IPIP O IPIP A IPIP C
Mapa N
-.73
-.27
.01
-.24
-.28
Mapa E
.18
.78
.12
.42
.21
Mapa O
-.14
.10
.56
.23
.04
Mapa A
.32
-.10
-.23
.38
.17
Mapa C
.13
.35
.28
.43
.65
$
!"#$"%&
Del Pilar, 2014: Ratings from current best friends and childhood best friends
•
•
Mapa score
STUDENTS (N = 49)
Rating
BEST FRIENDS (N=49) Mapa Score
Participants: two undergraduate classes in Psychological Measurement in UP Diliman, who recruited current and chilhood best friends Current best friend pairs N=98, childhood best friend pairs N= 80
Participants with current best friends
Participants with childhood best friends
•
70 females and 28 males
•
61 females and 19 males
• •
98 % were aged 17-22 (max age was 26) Mean Age = 19.4, SD = 1.34
• •
Mean Age = 19.3, SD = .92 (17-21)
•
56 Psychology Majors; 42 nonPsychology Majors
First five items on the rating instrument
39 Psychology Majors; 41 nonPsychology Majors
Del Pilar, 2014 •
•
•
The score on a rating scale for a facet was the rating on the facet, eg, Hina ng Loob. Domain rating score = rating on facet 1 + rating on facet 2 + rating on facet 3 + rating on facet 4 Example: Rating score on Neuroticism = rating on Hina ng Loob + rating on Pagkamaramdamin + rating on Pagkamapag-alala + rating on Pagkasumpungin
(
!"#$"%&
Convergent and discriminant validity matrix: Mapa facet scales vs facet rating scales: 20 cv's, 380 dv's
Convergent Validity Coefficients (Spearman's Rho) for Current and Childhood Best Friends
Facet
Current Childhoo d .26 .38
N1 Hina ng Loob
R1 M1
N2 Pagkamaramdamin
.30
.07
N3 Pagkamapag-alala
.18
.05
!
N4 Pagkasumpungin
.26
.15
!
E1 Pagkamasayahin
.57
.17
M5
E2 Pagkapalakaibigan
.59
.34
M6
E3 Pagkamasigla
.52
.18
E4 Pagkamadaldal
.61
.34
O1 Kakaibang Pag-iisip
.32
.16
O2 Hilig sa Bagong Kaalaman
.14
.15
...
O3 Pagkamakasining
.10
.04
...
Significant at = .01 = .05
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
...
...
...
R20
CV
M2
CV
M3
CV
M4
CV
!
CV CV
M7
CV
M8
CV
...
... ...
i i
l i
i
Del Pilar, 2014: Significant correlations for current best friends l l
Coe"cient
Rank-order correlation between Mapa domain scores and rating domain scores: Psych raters (N=56)
Total number of Percentage significant coe"cients Numberi
Convergent
15
Discriminan t
Extraversion
Mapa N
.40**
-.20*
-.12
-.03
.08
Mapa E
.06
.72**
.33*
-.01
-.08
Mapa O
.08
.22
.40**
.15
-.13
Mapa A
-.16
.29*
.20
.36**
-.15
Mapa C
.04
.03
-.30*
-.02
.46**
75
20
57
Openness Conscient to Agreeable iousExperienc -ness ness e
Neuroticism
15
380
Comparison of convergent and discriminant correlations between the NEO and the Mapa ng Loob Convergent validity coe"cients
Average discriminant validity coe"cients (absolute value)
NEO PI
Mapa ng Loob
NEO PI
Mapa ng Loob
Neuroticism
.38**
.40**
.07
.12
Extraversion
.40**
.72**
.11
.09
Openness to Experience
.43**
.40**
.09
.10
Agreeableness
.28**
.36**
.06
.22
**
**
Conscientiou
Mapa ng Loob
&
!"#$"%&
College-age Normative Sample N=384 Group
Frequency
16
32
17
85
18
134
19
63
20
39
21
10
22
8
23
8
Missing
5
Mean
19.5
N selected for final sample
Gender percentage in the final sample M
F
Not reporting
Major
UP Diliman (16-23 years old)
(413)
192
29
65
6
varied
College non-UP (16-23 years old)
(330)
192
18
78
4
varied
Metro Manila 1
(83)
48
24
65
11
Metro Manila 2
(191)
115
20
79
1
Psychology
Central Luzon
(56)
29
29
69
2
Agriculturerelated
Total
(743)
384
25
74
1
College-Age Normative Sample N=384 Age
N
Tourism Management
Adult Sample N=190 • • •
Metro Manila sample 62% F, 38% M 75% from call centers and BPO's
• Age: 24-30 - 65% 31-35 - 19% 36 + - 15%
!
!"#$"%&
)