Home
Add Document
Sign In
Register
Dacudao v. DOJ Digest G.R. No. 188056
Home
Dacudao v. DOJ Digest G.R. No. 188056
Equal Protection of Law...
Author:
haruhime08
26 downloads
329 Views
29KB Size
Report
DOWNLOAD .PDF
Recommend Documents
Case Digest GR No.196735
people vs jumawan case digest
Digest 1 Filinvest v IAC GR No 65935
natres
Mecano v. COA, GR No. 103982 (Case Digest)
Mecano v. COA case digest
[DIGEST] GR No. 221697 Poe v Comelec - Pres Candidacy Case
.
Quinto v Comelec, Gr No 189698 - Case Digest
Legal Profession UP Diliman - Atty Banez Case DigestFull description
17 DOJ v. Liwag
Case digestFull description
2 Panaguiton vs DOJ Digest
Criminal Procedure
02_sldc v Dswd GR 199669 - Case Digest
Consti Law 2 on Power of TaxationFull description
People v. Canton, GR 148825.Digest
People v. Canton, GR 148825.Digest
Arroyo v. DOJ
ConstiFull description
Aguilar v DOJ
Aguikar v. DOJ digest
GR NO 163101 Digest Benguet vs Denr
csae
Digest for Gr 87434
hilpFull description
Gr 129546 Case Digest
LawFull description
DOH v Phil Pharmawealth GR No. 182358
DOH v Phil Pharmawealth GR No. 182358
203. Aquino v. CA GR No. 91896
Labor 1Full description
People v. Lovedioro GR. No. 112235
caseFull description
004 Kilosbayan v Morato GR No. 118910
asd
GR No. L25532
case digest - Partnership
Chavez v Public Estate Authority, GR 133250, Jul9'02 - digest
People vs Roger Tulin Digest GR NO. 111709
TERRITORIALITYFull description
Corona vs United Harbour Pilot Gr No 127980 Case Digest
Corona vs United Harbour
GR No. L-24193 June 28, 1968 - The Case Digest
this is the case of ...
In Re Camilo Sabio GR No. 174340 Case Digest
In Re Camilo Sabio GR No. 174340 Case DigestFull description
TOPIC CASE CA SE TITLE ITLE G.R. NO. DATE PONENTE
: RIGHT
TO EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS : Sps. Augusto and Ofela !a"udao #. Se"$eta$% of &ust"e Raul '. Gon(ales : )**+,: &anua$% * /+)0 : &ust"e 1e$sa2n
FACTS
He$en spouses 3e$e a2ong t4e n#esto$s 34o2 Celso G. !elos Angeles &$. and 4s asso"ates n t4e Lega"% G$oup of Co2panes 5Lega"% G$oup6 allegedl% def$auded t4$oug4 t4e Lega"% G$oup7s 89u% 9a": ag$ee2ent8 t4at ea$ned t4e2 "4e": pa%2ents t4at 3e$e ds4ono$ed. Afte$ t4e$ 3$tten de2ands fo$ t4e $etu$n of t4e$ n#est2ents 3ent un4eeded t4e% ntated a nu29e$ of "4a$ges fo$ s%nd"ated estafa aganst !elos Angeles Angeles &$. et al. n t4e Off"e of t4e Ct% P$ose"uto$ of !a#ao Ct% on Fe9$ua$% - /++;. On 'a$"4 )* /++; t4e Se"$eta$% of &ust"e ssued !epa$t2ent O$de$ No. )*/ 5!O No. )*/6 d$e"tng all Regonal State P$ose"uto$s P$o#n"al P$ose"uto$s and Ct% P$ose"uto$s to fo$3a$d all "ases al$ead% fled aganst !elos Angeles Angeles &$. et al. to t4e Se"$eta$at of t4e !O& Spe"al Panel n 'anla f o$ app$op$ate a"ton e<"ept t4at of "ases fled n Caga%an de O$o Ct% 34"4 s "o#e$ed 9% anot4e$ !O& 'e2o$andu2 dated 'a$"4 / /++; 5'a$"4 / 'e2o$andu2 'e2o$andu26. 6. Pu$suant Pu$suant to !O No. )*/ t4e "o2plant "o2plantss of t4e spouses spouses 3e$e fo$3a$ded 9% t4e Off"e of t4e Ct% P$ose"uto$ of !a#ao Ct% to t4e Se"$eta$at of t4e Spe"al Panel of t4e !O&. Agg$e#ed 9% su"4 tu$n of e#ents t4e spouses 4a#e d$e"tl% "o2e to t4e Sup$e2e Cou$t #a petton fo$ "e$to$a$ p$o49ton and 2anda2us and $ase as ssue a2ong ot4e$s t4at t4e 'a$"4 / 'e2o$andu2 #olated t4e$ $g4t to e=ual p$ote"ton unde$ t4e Consttuton sn"e t e
W4et4 W4et4e$ e$ t4e =uest =uestone oned d !epa$t !epa$t2e 2ent nt O$de$ O$de$ and 'e2o$a 'e2o$andu ndu2 2 #olat #olatee t4e spous spouses> es> $g4t $g4t to e=ual e=ual p$ote"ton of t4e la3s. la3s. RULING
T4e Sup$e2e Cou$t negates. T4e e=ual p$ote"ton "lause of t4e Consttuton does not $e=u$e t4e un#e$sal appl"aton of t4e la3s to all pe$sons o$ t4ngs 3t4out dstn"ton? 34at t $e=u$es s s2pl% e=ualt% a2ong e=uals as dete$2ned a""o$dng to a #ald "lassf"aton. Hen"e t4e Cou$t 4as aff$2ed t4at f a la3 net4e$ 9u$dens a funda2ental $g4t no$ ta$gets a suspe"t "lass t4e "lassf"aton stands as long as t 9ea$s a $atonal $elatons4p to so2e legt2ate go#e$n2ent end. T4at s t4e stuaton n t4e nstant "ase. In ssung t4e assaled !O& 'e2o$andu2 dated 'a$"4 / /++; t4e Se"$eta$% of &ust"e too: nto a""ount t4e $elat#e dstan"e 9et3een Caga%an de O$o 34e$e 2an% "o2planants aganst t4e Lega"% G$oup $esded and 'anla 34e$e t4e p$el2na$% n#estgatons 3ould 9e "ondu"ted 9% t4e spe"al panel. He also too: nto a""ount t4at t4e "ases 4ad al$ead% 9een fled n t4e Ct% P$ose"uto$>s Off"e of Caga%an de O$o at t4e t2e 4e ssued !O No. )*/. G#en t4e "onsde$a9le nu29e$ of "o2planants $esdng n Caga%an de O$o Ct% t4e Se"$eta$% of &ust"e 3as full% @ustfed n e<"ludng t4e "ases "o22en"ed n Caga%an de O$o f$o2 t4e a29t of !O No. )*/. T4e "lassf"aton ta:en nto "onsde$aton 9% t4e Se"$eta$% of &ust"e 3as $eall% #ald. Resultantl% t4e spouses "ould not n=u$e nto t4e 3sdo2 9e4nd t4e e
petton petton fo$ la": of 2e$t.
×
Report "Dacudao v. DOJ Digest G.R. No. 188056"
Your name
Email
Reason
-Select Reason-
Pornographic
Defamatory
Illegal/Unlawful
Spam
Other Terms Of Service Violation
File a copyright complaint
Description
×
Sign In
Email
Password
Remember me
Forgot password?
Sign In
Our partners will collect data and use cookies for ad personalization and measurement.
Learn how we and our ad partner Google, collect and use data
.
Agree & close