Special Proceeding Case of Republic v. CA 458 SCRA 200
Lonzanida v. Comelec GR 135150Full description
digest
consti 2016
Regulacion realizada por el CONELEC
Gr No. 163338 Luzon DB v Conquilla Et Al.doc
natres
Palana v. PeopleFull description
Mecano v. COA case digest
Constitutional Law 2 Case digest
Treas v. Pp.
.
law
NPC v Provincial Treasurer of Benguet GR No 209303Full description
Legal Profession UP Diliman - Atty Banez Case DigestFull description
digestFull description
caseFull description
case digestFull description
GR No. 173082 (2014) - Palm Avenue v. SandiganbayanFull description
Kilosbayan v Morato GR No. 118910 11/16/1995 Facts of the case: his is a !etition see"in# to $eclare the %&' invali$ on the #ro(n$ that it is s(bstantially the sa)e as the *ontract of &ease n(llifie$ in G. R. No. 11++,+- + *R' 110. etitioners conten$e$ that the a)en$e$ %&' is inconsistent ith an$ violative of *23s charter an$ the $ecision of the (!re)e *o(rt of 5 May 1995- that it violate$ the la on !(blic bi$$in# of contracts as ell as ection 4- 'rticle 7 of the 198, *onstit(tion in relation to the *2' *irc(lar No. 8555'. Res!on$ents (estione$ the !etitioners3 stan$in# to brin# this s(it. ss(e: ;hether or not the !etitioners have le#al stan$in#. t a!!ly to *ontracts of &ease of e(i!)ent. %2 No. +01 only a!!lies to contracts con tracts for !(rchase of s(!!lies- )aterials an$ e(i!)ent.
