Clarifying the Error of ash-Shaykh Rabee in weakening the Athar of Abdullah Ibn Umar Concerning Bid'ah

"#$%%&' ()* +,-)., /(0 1--%$2 30405 6(' /78‘Eed /78 ‘Eed Ibn Saalih Al8 Al 8‘Ann ‘Ann--(&& --(&& /789-:--$#&&

;#-'47-%&< ()* "# !"%# &'()*(+ &'()*(+ ,(--(+ (-./0*(122 345) 5)2  )216 70* !"#$% '"()% *+ *,-."/))





 

 

   

   

 

  

      

       

 

  

  





 .  .  



0/%))% 0 123456 78 "22)/2$9/ $/29 2.) 3)1)"35. 9, :."86. ;"<))’ ;"<)) ’  (.$5. 5"7) <8 2.) 2$2+) “The <&5&'=& >5 %,& ?$@,%7) A0$<&< B,-7&&5-,C D%,2--'” D%,2--'”E =."2 (.$5. ("1 7)/2$9/)% $/ $2 ,397 2.) %)5+"3$/- 9, 2.) /"33"2$9/ 9, 07"3 "1 <)$/- ()"6 ,3$-.2)/)% 7) "/% "+19 (."2 ("1 59/2"$/)% $/ $2 9, $21 %$12"/2/)11 ,397 2.) ("8 9, 2.) 07"71 9, ."%))2. "/% ‘Ilal ‘Ilal   $/ ()"6)/$/- "/% %),)52$/-? ($2. 2."2 (.$5. %)+$-.21 2.) )"31 9, 2.) @)9@+) 9, %)1$3)1 29 )/%)"A93 $/ %)5+"3$/- 2.) /"33"2$9/1 9, 23412(932.8 /"33"2931 "1 <)$/- ()"6 ($2.942 "/8 @399,B =.$1 $1 " @"2. 2."2 :."86. ;"<))’ ;"<)) ’ 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

0 1"8 (.$+12 1))6$/- 3),4-) ($2. *++".B

F,-$' 4%0<) >5 %,& '-##-%$>' >5 6(' ‘D2-# GH-) /77-, (& I7&-4&< J$%, (>%, >5 %,&2KE *1 ,93 2.) /"33"2$9/ 9, 2.) -3)"2 597@"/$9/ *<%4++". 07"3 2.)/ $2 ."1 <))/ /"33"2)% <8H Al Imaam Wakee’ (May Allah have mercy on him) in his book as in ‘AlIJ"2. ‘Al IJ"2.’’ of  0
Wakee’  $1H =.) 19/ 9, 07"3 C!"8 *++". <) @+)"1)% ($2. <92. 9, 2.)7DB :9 2.$1 5."$/ $1 "42.)/2$5 "/% $21 7)/ "3) 23412.(932. 23412.(932.8B 8B 02 $1 4/$,937+8I59//)52)% <8 ("8 9, 7"6$/5+)"3 2.) ,937 $/ (.$5. $2 ("1 /"33"2)%? "/% 2.$1 $1 ,397 2.) .$-.)12 $2 5"/ <) $/ "42.)/2$5$28 ($2.$/ 2.) 5."$/1B E"6))’  –   ."1 "+19  –   "/% :."<""<". /"33"2)% 2.$1 /"33"2$9/ ,397 P$1.""7 07"3? "<942 the first Athaan on the day of Jumu’ah? So he said: Ibn Umar said: (It’s) a ' $''>L-%$>'”B 01.""F 0'< ,-75  from Wakee’. The 07"7 !4."77"% 07"3 1"$%H ML&#) $''>L-%$>' $4 2$4@0$<-'=& &L&' $5 %,& I&>I7& I&#=&$L& $% %> (& @>>7"3 2."2 .) 1"$%H =he = he first Athaan on the day of Jumu’ah $1 Jumu’ah $1 -' $''>L-%$>'”.

;,& 4&=>'< ,-75   <8 ("8 9, :."<""<". ."1 <))/ 3)@932)% <8 *+I Laalakaee in “Sharh Usool AlI Al I I’tiqaad” (1/134) and by Al IBayhaqee in his “AlI “Al IMadkhal” (139), both of them from the path of

Muhammad Ibn ‘Ubaydillah AlI Al IMunaadee that he said: “Shabaabah narrated to us that he sai%H sai %H P$1.""7 0L-%$>' $4 2$4@0$<-'=& &L&' $5 %,& I&>I7& I&#=&$L& $% %> (& @>><.” 02 <)597)1 5+)"3 $/ 3)-"3%1 29 (."2 ."1 <))/ @3)5)%)% ,397 2.)1) "42.)/2$5 3942)1 2.) "153$@2$9/ 9, 2.) 34+$/- 9, 2.$1 *2.""/ 29  being “an innovation and every innovation is misguidance even if the people see it to be good” to being from the saying of Ibn ‘Umar (May Allah be pleased with both of 2.)7D and that it isn’t in any way from the saying of Naafi’.

=.$1 /"33"2$9/ ."1 <))/ ",,$37)% <8H

NE /7862--2 /78H0O-<<$< H0P($7 6(' 1--<&& /78"--<$’ /78"--<$ ’&& $/ “]433"24+ ‘*8/ ,)) *#($<"2 Qaa’id AlI AlI‘Alaabee ‘Alaabee E"  E" :"".$<$+ *%))/” *%))/ ” C[YD  –  "/%   "/% $/ 92.)3 2."/ $2 –  $2  –  .)   .) 1"$%H “… “…*/% */% ‘*<%4++". 07"3 41)% 29 3)#)52 $2 "/% 1"8H “It is an innovation” as in the Musannaf of Ibn Abee :."8<"..” :."8<". .” QE /78‘ /78‘/77--2-, H0,-22-< /7&& /78M%,$>>I&&  (.)3)<8 .) 59/,$37)% 2.$1 "thar "thar in “Thakheerah *+I‘Uqbaa” *+I ‘Uqbaa” (16/186I^Y[D (16/186 I^Y[D (.)3)<8 .) 1"$%H "/% $2 ."1 <))/ ",,$37)% $/ 2."2 (.$5. ."1 @3)5))%)% 2."2 (."2 >2.7""/ C!"8 *++". <) @+)"1)% ($2. .$7D "%%)% ,397 2.) *2.""/ $1 /92 " @+"5) 9, 59/1)/141? ,93 $21 3)#)52$9/ ."1 <))/ ",,$37)% ,397 07""3 "/% 92.)3 2."/ .$7? .)/5) 2."2 (.$5. 2.) 1@))5. 9, 02.7"/ C!"8 *++". <) @+)"1)% ($2. .$7DB 02 C"+19D 1@"3)1 41 2.) %)<"2) ($2. 2.) 9/) "3-4$/- $/ 3)-"3%1 29 %$3)52$/- 2.) (93% <$% ’". 29 $21 +$/-4$12$5 7)"/$/- by 7)"/$/- by the explanation explanation of Ibn ‘U7"3 ‘U7"3 .$71)+, "/% "++ @3"$1) $1 29 *++".B

S&(-%$'@ %,& =7-$2 >5 /4,8+,-)., ?-(&&’ ?-(&& ’ GH-) /77-, @#-'% ,$2 40=&44K :."86. ;"<))’ ;"<))’ 1"$% $/ .$1 @3)A$941+8 7)/2$9/)% "32$5+) (.$+) 53$2$F4$/- 2.) 1@))5. 9, 943 <392.)3 *+$ *+I‘A *+I‘A,"3)) ,"3)) $/ (.$5. .) "42.)/2$5"2)% 2.) /"33"2$9/ 9, 07"3 C!"8 *++". <) @+)"1)% ($2.  <92. 9, 2.)7D "/% .) 1"$% "5593%$/"5593%$/- 29 2."2 (.$5. $2 1.9()%B

“;,& =>22&'%-#)* T$#4%7)* 6'<&&< %,& 4%-%&2&'%4 $' #&@-#<4 %> %,& 5$#4% /%,--' %,-% $% $4 -' $''>L-%$>' #&L>7L& -#>0'< 1$4,--2 6(' /7 A,--: -'< ,& $4* NE

U>% <&4=#$(&< J$%, 2&2>#) -'< I#&=$4$>'

ML&' $5 4>2& >5 %,& I&>I7& >5 1-<&&%, ,-L& 0'#&4%#$=%&<7) 4-$< %,-% ,& $4 - ;,$P-, G%#04%J>#%,)KE ;,&) -#& 3-,)- 6(' H- ’een, ’een, S0,-)2 and Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdi77-, ‘Abdi77-, 6(' ‘Ammar; J,-% ‘Ammar;  J,-% $4 =>##&=% $4 %,-% ,& $4 +--7$, -4 62--2 /,2-< 4-$%,&# 4%-%&2&'% $' #&@-#<4 %> ,$2 0'%$7 ,& 4-$< about him: laa Ba’4Ba’ 4- ($,&& G%,&#& $4 '> I#>(7&2 J$%, ,$2K -'< 5#>2 ,&#& /%,8;,-,-(&& 4-$< $' #&@-#<4 # &@-#<4 %> ,$2 %,-% ,& $4 +-<00PE G/4 5>#K %,& 4%-%&2&'% >5 /781--5$%, 6(' 1-O# $' #&@-#<4 %> ,$2 %,-% ,& $4 ;#04%J>#%,)C %,&' $% #&P0$#&4 G50#%,&#K $'L&4%$@-%$>'E ;,& 7$.&4 >5 ,$2 $5 ,& 4%-'<4 -7>'& G$' '-##-%$'@ - '-##-%$>'K then his narration isn’t said to be Saheeh or Hasan.” =."2 (.$5. *1.I:."86. ;"<))’ ;"<)) ’ (May Allah grant him success) ."1 success)  ."1 -9/) 29("3%1 ,397 #4%-$/- 2.) /"33"2$9/ 9, 07"3 29 <)$/- !4/6"3 (.$+) 59/5)/23"2$/- 9/ ()"6)/$/- P$1.""7 0
;,& T$#4% VI&=%$L& =."2 2.91) (.9 ."A) %)5+"3)% 02 ,&#& /%,8Thahabee /%,8Thahabee said in regards to him that he is Saduuq.” *1.I:."86. ;"<))’ ;"<))’  C!"8 *++". -3"/2 .$7 1455)11D 5"7) 29 2.) 59/5+41$9/ 9, 2."2 (.$5. *+I P"",$2. 0#K %,& 4%-%&2&'% >5 /781--5$%, 6(' 1-O# $' #&@-#<4 %> ,$2 %,-% ,& $4 ;#04%J>#%,)C %,&' it requires (further) investigation.” investigation.” =.)3) $1 /9 %94<2 $/ 2.) %$12"/2/)11 9, 2.$1 12"2)7)/2 ,397 2.) 5933)52 @"2.? "1 2.) /4++$,8$/- 9, $2 ($++ 597) $/ %)2"$+B C=.$1 $1D 2.) 7"22)3 (.$5. 5"41)1 2.) #4%-7)/2 4@9/ " /"33"293 $/ 59/23"%$52$9/ 29 .$1 "524"+ 59/%$2$9/? .)/5) " 5+)"3 7$12"6) ($++ 3)14+2 ,397 $2 $/ 3)-"3%1 29 #4%-$/- 2.) /"33"2$9/ C$21)+,D? "1 ."1 occurred with Shaykh Rabee’ and Allah’s "$% $1 194-.2B E) ($++ <3$/- ,932. ,93 2.) 3)"%)3 2."2 (.$5. ($++ @+)"1) .$1 )8)1 "/% 1)22+) .$1 .)"32 2.)3)$/ ,397 2.) %)5+"3"2$9/ 9, 2.) 07""71 2."2 P$1.""7 0
3)-"3%1 29 ()"6)/$/- .$7 "/% 92.)3 2."/ 2."2 (.$5. .) 7)/2$9/)%? 29 (.$5. /9 %94<2 ($++ <) +),2 $/ .$1 3),42"2$9/B

;,& 4%-%&2&'%4 >5 %,& 62--24 >5 1-<&&%, $' <&=7-#$'@ 1$4,--2 6(' /7 A,--: %#04%J>#%,) NE /78 /78Imaam Imaam Ya’qoub Ibn Sufyaan Al8T-4-J&&* Al 8T-4-J&&* P) 1"$% $/ *+I!"’rifa *+I!"’rifa watI2 watI2a’reekh a’reekh C@-BM[MDH “0
QE /7862--2 /(0 1--%$2 /#8?--:$* P$1 19/ *+I07""7 07"3 02<". P"%))2. .) $1 ,397 2.) %#04%J>#%,) >'&4 5#>2 1$24ee’s ‘ >2<". 0
RE /7862-2 6(' H- ’&&'* ^B 01.""F 0
WE /7862--2 /(<0##-,2-' 6(' 6(#-,&&2 S0,-)2* >2.7"/ 0
J93 2.$1 3)"19/ 894 ,$/% *2.IThahabee *2.IThahabee in ‘AlI ‘Al IMeezaan’ and ‘=""3))6. ‘ =""3))6. *+I01+""7’ *+I01+""7’? 2.) 597@"/$9/ of ‘AlI ‘AlIWaafi bil Wafayaat’ C[LXMND Wafayaat’  C[LXMND "/% 92.)3 2."/ 2.)7 3)+"8$/- ,397 U4."87 .$1 %)5+"3$/- 9, 0
XE /7862--2 6(' +- ’ad* ’ad* Ibn Sa’"% Sa’"% 1"$%H “*/% .) 41)% 29 <) 23412(932.8” 23412(932.8” (AtI="<"F""2 (AtI="<"F""2 *+IKubraa *+IKubraa of Ibn Sa’ad C[LXKYDD

YE /7862 /7862aam aam Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdillah Ibn ‘/22-# ‘ /22-# /78H>J4$7&&* P) 1"$% $/ 3)-"3%1 29 P$1.""7 0
ZE ;,& %#04%J>#%,) -'< #&7$-(7& +-<-P-, 6(' B,--7$<* Ya’qoob said in ‘*+I ‘*+IMa’rifa Ma’rifa WatI2 WatI2a’reekh’ a’reekh’ CMLZ\X  CMLZ\X): ): “P$1.""7 0
[E /781--5$% /781--5$%, , /(<0##-,2-' 6(' 30405 6(' B,-#--4,* He said: “P) “P) 41)% 29 <) ,397 2.) <)12 9, @)9@+)” @)9@+) ” as in Ta3))6. Ta 3))6. V"-.%""% C^XLXXD =.$1 $1 ,397 2.) 2)371 41)% $/ %)5+"3$/- 9/) " =.$F". "/% 0
\E /781--5$% /781--5$%, , 6(' 1-O# /78 /78‘‘/4P-7--'$* *+IP"",$2. 0
N]E /7862--2 /%,8;,-,-(&&* Where he said in his book ‘AlI ‘Al I‘0<"3 ,)) R."<3$/ 7$/ ‘0<"3 ’H “Hishaam Ibn AlIW.""S AlIW.""S *+I'43"1.)) *%IU$7"1.F)) ("1 "@@9$/2)% 9/ 2.) V"824+7""+ ,93 !"/1993B P) /"33"2)% ,397 !"6.99+ "/% C2.91) 9,D .$1 +)A)+B P) ("1 ,397 2.) 23412(932.8 9/)1 9, :.""7 "/% ,397 2.)3) 15.9+"31.” 15.9+"31.” He also said in his biography from ‘Siyar A’laam An INubalaa’ (7/60): “=.) “ =.) 07""7? 2.) ;)5$293 "/% 2.) Muhaddith” :9 2.$1 $1 (."2 $1 59/1$%)3)%  –   /9 %94<2  –  ,397   ,397 .$1 12"2)7)/2 $/ "-3))7)/2 ($2. 2.) 07""71 9, ."%))2. "/% $2 $1 793) 5933)52 2."/ .$1 12"2)7)/2 $/ .$1 <996 ‘*+ R""1.$, ’: ’: “* 2342.,4+ worshipper” worshipper”BB

NNE /7862--2 /,2-< 6(' /(<$77-, /78B,-:#-O&&* E.)3)<8 .) 1"$% $/ his ‘R.4+""1" ‘R.4+""1"h’ h’   C@-BX^ND $/ 2.) <$9-3"@.8 9, P$1.""7 0
NQE /7862--2 /78/7(--'$* 0/ /47)3941 @+"5)1 ,397 .$1 <9961 ,397 2.)7H ^B 07"am 07"am Al Albaani said in his book ‘AtI ‘At ITa’leeqatul Hisaan ‘*+"" ‘ *+"" :".eeh :".eeh Ibn Hibbaan’ CZL^X\ZDD $/ 3)-"3%1 29 " 5."$/ ($2. 9/) $21 7)/ <)$/- P$1.""7 0<""%". $
; abee’ah abee’ah 2."2 .) 1"$%H 0 .)"3% 2.) !)11)/-)3 C D 1"8: 1"8: “b"32.F4"6)1? 2.39($/- "/% mutilation will occur in the end of my nation” s9 s 9 2.)8 1"$% ,93 (."2 C3)"19/D 9. !)11)/-)3 9, *++".a P) 1"$%H “By “By 2.)7  2.)7 2"6$/- ,)7"+) 1$/-)31 "/% %3$/6$/- "+59.9+” "+59.9+ ”B *.7"% 0
NRE /78 /78‘‘/77--2-, ‘Abdulmuhsin Al8 Al8‘/((--<* E.)3)<8 .) %)5+"3)% .$7 23412(932.8 $/ .$1 )_@+"/"2$9/ 9, :4/"/ *<)) U"(99% $/ 2.3)) @+"5)1H *+I‘*++ *+I‘ *++aamah aamah ‘Abdulmuhsin AlI AlI‘*<<""% 1"$% $/ "++ 9, 2.)7H “P$1.""7 0
F7-#$5)$'@ %,& 2$4%-.& >5 /4,8+,-)., ?-(&&’ ?-(&& ’ $' #&@-#<4 %> %,-% J,$=, ,& @#-((&< >'%> 5#>2 %,& 4%-%&2&'%4 >5 %,& 62--24 $' J&-.&'$'@ 1$4,--2 1$4,--2 6(' /78A,--:* J$312+8H G4++$,8$/- .$1 41) 9, 07""7 *.7"%’s *.7"% ’s expression as evidenceH evidenceH *1.I:."86. ;"<))’ ;"<))’ said: “…:9 “…:9 2."2 (.$5. $1 5933)52 $1 2."2 .) $1 :""+$. "1 07""7 *.7)% 1"$%B” 1"$%B ” 0/%))% .$1 19/ *<%4++". 3)+"8)% ,397 .$7 in ‘AlI ‘AlI‘Ilaal Wa Ma’rifatur Rijaal’ CMLON[? Rijaal’  CMLON[? /9BZZX^): /9BZZX^ ): “0 “0 "16)% .$7 "<942 P$1.""7 0
0, 2.) (93% +--7$,  ,397 2.) 07""71 9, ."%))2. $1 4/3)123$52)%+8 7)/2$9/)%? 2.)/ 2.) $/2)/2 ,397 $2 $1 4@3$-.2/)11 $/ 2.) 3)+$-$9/T 7)"/$/- .) $1 3$-.2)941 $/ .$1 3)+$-$9/B *+IP"",$2. 0
CP9()A)3D $, 2.)8 4/3)123$52)%+8 7)/2$9/)% /48+-7-, G0I#$@,%'&44K 2.)/ (."2 2.)8 $/2)/% ,93 .$7 $1 $/ 3)-"3%1 29 .$1 3)+$-$9/.” 3)+$-$9/.” :9 <"1)% 9/ 2.$1 2.)3) $1 /9 59/23"%$52$9/ <)2())/ 2.$1 )_@3)11$9/ "/% 2.) %)5+"3"2$9/ 9, 23412(932.$/)11 C2"(2.))FD 9, 2.) 07""71 9, ."%))2.? 1$/5) 2.) 12"2)7)/2 9, 07""7 *.7)% $1 $/ 3)-"3%1 29 2.) 4@3$-.2/)11 $/ 2)371 9, .$1 3)+$-$9/ "/% 2.) 07""71 9, ."%))2. ."A) 9@)/+8 %)5+"3)% .$7 23412(932.8 (.$5. 59A)31 2.) 1$%) 9, 4@3$-.2/)11 "/% 597@+)2) @3)5$1$9/B P9(ever if the narrator becomes void of being declared trustworthy in one side and we don’t find P9(ever $/ .$1 "3)" )_5)@2 2.) (93% +--7$,C Then this won’t elevate him to the level of being used as )A$%)/5)? %4) 29 $2 <)$/- %$3)52)% 29("3%1 2.) 4@3$-.2/)11 1$%) C9, 2.) /"33"293D 9/+8 "/% %4) 29 $2 "+19 <)$/- A9$% 9, 2."2 (.$5. -$A)1 " ,))+$/- 9, "@@3"$1"+ $/ 2.) @3)5$1$9/ 1$%)B E."2 $1 ()++ 6/9(/ $1 2."2 2.) 7)"/$/- 9, 4@3$-.2/)11 (‘Adaalah) (‘Adaalah)   %43$/- $21 4/3)123$52)% 7)/2$9/ <8 2.) 07""71 9, ."%))2. $1 that it’s %$3)52)% <92. 29("3%1 2.) 4@3$-.2/)11 $/ 2)371 9, 2.) 3)+$-$9/ "/% 2.) 597@+)2) @3)5$1$9/ 29-)2.)3B 

:."86. ;"<))’ ;"<))’ didn’t C597@+)2)+8D ,4+,$++ 2."2 (.$5. ("1 3)+"8)% ,397 07""7 *.7"% $/ 3)-"3%1 29 P$1.""7 0
=.) 12"2)7)/2 9, *+I07""7 *.7"% “Saalih “Saalih   *+IP"%))2.” *+IP"%))2.”  $1 .$-.)3 $/ 2)371 9, 2.) narrator’s 59/%$2$9/ 2."/ 2.)$3 statement “Saalih”B “Saalih”B C*+19D 2.) 12"2)7)/2 9, 07""7 *.7"% “:""+$. *+IP"%))2.” *+IP"%))2.” %9)1 /92 59/23"%$52 2.) 2)371 9, 2.91) (.9’ve (.9 ’ve %)5+"3)%  %)5+"3)% .$7 23412(932.8 ,397 2.) 07""71 <8 2."2 (.$5. $1 .$-.)3 2."/ $2? "1 2.)8 "++ ."A) 9@)/+8 %)5+"3)% .$7 23412(932.8B =."2 (.$5. 5+"3$,$)1 2.$1 793) $1 7"/8 $114)1 ,397 2.)7H

T$#4%7)* =."2 2.) 15.9+"31 9, ."%))2. ."A) 59/1$%)3)% 2.) 2)37 +--7$, /781-<&&%,   29 <)$/- ,397 2.) 2)371 41)% "1 2.) +9()12 + 9()12 ,9371 9, "@@3"$1"+ "/% 2."2 $2 5"//92 )+)A"2) 29 2.) 159@) 9, <)$/- 41)% "1 )A$%)/5) 4>7&7)C /92 <)5"41) $2 ("1 @+"5)% ,93 $21 41) $/ %$1@"3"-$/- "/% ()"6)/$/- C" /"33"293DB /"33"293DB 07""7 *1ISan’aani *1ISan’aani 2)_24"++8 $/%$5"2)% 2.$1 (.)3) .) 1"$%H “:9 2.) 12"2)7)/2 9, 2.) "42.93 : ‘0/%))% ‘0/%))% 2.) ()"6 "5593%$/- 29 2.)7 $1 :""+$. *+IHadeeth’; *+I Hadeeth’; i1 i1 /92 5933)52 "1 C2.) /"33"293 %)153$<)% "1D :""+$. *+IP"%))2. $1 ,397 2.91) 2."2 ."A) <))/ "@@3"$1)% "/% $1 ,397 2.) @)9@+) ,94/% $/ 2.) +)A)+1 9, "@@3"$1"+ (.$5. $1 $/ 9@@91$2$9/ 29 ()"6 4@9/ "++ $21 2.3)) 28@)1B” 28@)1B”

*2.IThahabee said In ‘AlI!4F$2.". *2.IThahabee ‘Al I!4F$2.".’’H “…So and so Is Saalih *+IP"%))2.? Saalih  *+IP"%))2.? :9 "/% 19 $1 :"%44F $, *++". ($++1B :9 "++ 9, 2.)1) 2)371 "3) -99%? -'< %,&) -#& '>% %,>4& %,-% J&-.&' %,& =>'<$%$>' >5 %,& +,-).,T 8)1? "/% they don’2 don’2 3"$1) .$1 /"33"2$9/1 29 2.) +)A)+ 9, 597@+)2) "42.)/2$5$28 2."2 $1 "-3))% 4@9/B” 4@9/B” P) "+19 1"$% $/ ‘!4F"%%$7". *+I!))S""n’ *+I!))S""n’ (1/ZIX (1/ZIX): ): “…*/% “…*/% 0 %$% /92 14<#)52 781)+, $/ 7)/2$9/$/2.91) (.9 $2 ("1 1"$% "<942 2.)7 “His position is .9/)128 .9/)128” ”? “No problem with him” and the one /78Hadeeth” Hadeeth” for indeed this is (.97 $2 ("1 1"$% "<942 him “He is a Shaykh” or “He is Saalih /78 5#>2 %,& 4&=%$>'4 >5 -II#-$4-7E ” 02 $1n’t $1n’t   +$6)($1) 2.) 5"1) $, $2 $1 597<$/)% ($2. " 2"(2.))F 2."2 $1 59/1$%)3)%? 1$/5) 2.)3) $1 " %$,,)3)/5) "5593%$/- 29 2.) @)9@+) 9, ."%))2. $/ 7"6$/- 41) 9, " 2)37 (.)/ $2 $1 4/3)123$52)%+8 7)/2$9/)% "/% (.)/ $2 $1 597<$/)% ($2. 92.)3 2)371B

+&=>'<7) C"/% $2 $1 793) $7@932"/2DH =."2 2.) 9/) (.9 @3"52$5)1 2.$1 6/9(+)%-) $/ 2)371 9, $7@+)7)/2$/- $2  –   <8 )/-"-$/- ($2.$/ 2.) 5."$/1? 3)1)"35.$/- 2.) 12"2)7)/21 9, 2.) 07""71 $/ 3)-"3%1 29 2.) 7)/ C9, ."%))2.D? 2.) ("8 $/ (.$5. 2.)8 -"2.)3 "/% ."379/$S) <)2())/ C2.)1) 12"2)7)/21D "/% 2."2 2.) @3$7"38 5"1) 9, 2.)$3 12"2)7)/21 C$/ 3)-"3%1 29 2.) 7)/ 9, ."%))2.D <92. $/ "@@3"$1"+ "/% %$1@"3"-)7)/2 $1 $/ "-3))7)/2 3"2.)3 2."/ %$1"-3))7)/2 –  %$1"-3))7)/2 –  ($++  ($++ 3)"+$S) 2."2 2.)8 9,2)/ mention such terms in regards to a narrator that is Thiqah in order to bring awareness that he isn’t "2 2.) +)A)+ 9, 2.) ."%))2. $/2)++$-)/5)1 145. "1 *2.IThawree, *2.I Thawree, Shu’bah, Maalik, Ibn AlI]."%%""/? Al I]."%%""/? *.7"% "/% 92.)3 2."/ 2.)7B =.$1 $1 (."2 793) 2."/ 9/) 9, 2.) 07""71 ."A) 2)_24"++8 $/%$5"2)%H 07""7 *%.IDhahabee *%.IDhahabee said in ‘Ar I;4(""2 I;4(""2 *2.I=.$F""2 *+IMutakallam *+I Mutakallam Feehim’ (pg.10) while clearly indicating this: “Abaan Ibn Yazeed Al I‘Addaar is one of the Th$F""2B Th $F""2B *<4 P""2$7 1"$% Al8Hadeeth”, and this term shows that other than him from his 3)-"3%$/- .$7 “Saalih Al8 =>2I-'$>'4 -#& 20=, 5$#2&# %,-' ,$2 40=, -4 1-22--2 -'< ^-4,--# .” .” C:$7$+"3+8D 0'7) 2&-'4 %,-% >%,&# %,-' ,$2 -#& ,$@,&# -'< J$%,>0% <>0(% %,& ;,$P--% -#& $' 7&L&74E ;,$4 $4 %,& =-4& $5 ,$4 saying “he isn’t firm” was for left him undisputedly. However the man is a Thiqah without doubt.” 0, 2.) 07""7 0
3)-"3%1 29 9/) (.97 2.) 07""71 3)"5.$/- 2.) /47<)3 9, 2.) @)9@+) 9, ."%))2. ."A) %)5+"3)% 23412(932.8B =.$1 <8 $21)+, $1 )/94-. $/ "<9+$1.$/- the path of Shaykh Rabee’ (May Allah grant him 1455)11D $/ 3)-"3%1 29 2.$1 "2."3B E) <)/),$2 ,397 2.$1 (.)/ 942()$-.$/- <)2())/ 2.) /"33"2$9/ 9, 9/) (.9 ."1 145. " 59/%$2$9/ "/% 2."2 9, 2.) 9/) (.91) 59/%$2$9/ ."1 <))/ @3)5)%)%. @3)5)%)%. This doesn’t negate from him the title of memory and precision as Shaykh Rabee’ (May Allah grant him success) 5+"$71? success)  5+"$71? 1$/5) 2.) 7)"/$/of the term “Thiqah” during its unrestricted mention by the Imaams is the one who is Honest in his 3)+$-$9/ "/% @3)5$1) $/ .$1 ."%))2.1B =.) =.$F""2 "3) $/ %$,,)3)/2 +)A)+1 $/ 3)-"3%1 29 7)7938 "/% @3)5$1$9/ 9, 2.) ."%))2. "1 0
ZB ‘*<%4++". 0<"8%$++". 19 .) 1"$%H “+--7$, /781-<&&%, ”B ‘Al ‘AlII‘0+"+ 0+"+’’ CMZY^D ‘*<%4++". 1"$%H !8 ,"2.)3 1"$% !"’qal !" ’qal Ibn Ubaydillah AlI Al IJazari “ ;,$P-,” ‘AlI ‘AlI‘0+"+ 0+"+’’ CZ^YY "/% Z\YYD *+I!$3("2.$ 1"$%H 0 "16)% .$7 –  .$7  –  7)"/$/  7)"/$/- 07"7 *.7"% –  *.7"%  –  "<942   "<942 !"’qal !" ’qal I <"8%$++". 19 .) said “;,$P-,” ‘Sua"+""2$.$ ‘Sua"+""2$.$’’ C[MD OB *+I!$3("2.$ 1"$%H 0 "16)% .$7 "<942 !41" 0F<". "/% 0<3".))7 0F<". "/% !4."77"% 0F<". 19 .) 1"$% “H04- $4 - ;,$P-,C - ;,$P-, ” and he said “There is no @39<+)7 ($2. 2.)7”. 2.)7”. ‘Suaalaatihi’ (193) *.7"% 1"$% $/ 2.) /"33"2$9/ 9, 0
‘*<%4++". 1"$%H !8 ,"2.)3 1"$%H “Zakariyya ibn Abee Zaaidah is a ;,$P-, ? 1())2 $/ 3)-"3%1 29 hadeeth, a Shaykh and a Thiqah”. ‘AlI ‘Al I‘Ilal’ (2495) ‘*<%4++". 1"$%H !8 ,"2.)3 ("1 "16)% "<942 c"6"3$88" 0
[B ‘*<%4++". 0
/781-<&&%, %, ”. ‘AlI ^MB ‘Abdullah s"$% s"$% <8 ("8 9, .$1 ,"2.)3H “*22", 0
^ZB *+I!"8799/)) 1"$% 0 .)"3% .$7 1"8 C!)"/$/- *.7"% 0F"8+)) >F"8+))’’ (M[YD (M[YD P"3< 02 %,& 5$#2 >'&4”. ‘Tahtheeb AtI=".2.))< AtI=".2.))<’’ C[LKX[D ^OB ‘*<%4++". 04& >5 -' $'%&77$@&'% 2-' )_5)@2 2."2 .) ,"++1 $/29 Shi’asm”. ‘Al ‘AlII‘Ilal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 –  14@@91)  –  $/   $/ 12)@@$/- %9(/ –  %9(/  –  2."2   2."2 2.) 2)371 C:""+$.D "/% C:""+$. *+IP"%))2.D ()3) 59/1$%)3)% 29 ()"6)/ 2.) 59/%$2$9/ 9, 2.) /"33"293 )A)/ 2.94-. "<942 2)/ ,397 2.) 07""71 9, ."%))2. "/% 7)7938 ."A) %)5+"3)% .$7 23412(932.8  –  and this is something that isn’t known by 2.) @)9@+) 9, ."%))2. $/ "/8 ("8Q  –  "1   "1 $1 2.) 5"1) 9, P$1.""7 0
=.$1 ."1 <))/ $/%$5"2)% <8 07""7 *%.IU."."<)) C7"8 *++"". ."A) 7)358 9/ .$7D $/ .$1 <996 ‘Dhi6  ‘Dhi 6 ru ru Man Yu'tamad’ C@-B^OYD Yu'tamad’ C@-B^OYD (.)3) .) 1"$%H “It is not enough 5># 6(' H-_&&' %> 4-) -(>0% ,$2 G5># &`-2I7&): &`-2I7&): “H& “H& $4 S-_&&5 GJ&-.K” GJ&-.K ”C J$%,>0% =7-#$5)$'@ %,& #&-4>' 5># ,$4 J&-.'&44C J,$7& >%, ,-L& -55$#2&< ,$4 %#04%J>#%,$'&44E 6' 40=, =-4&4 >'& 4,>07< J$%,,>7< 5#>2 O0<@$'@ O 0<@$'@ ,$4 ,-<&&%, as Saheeh, and it is more close to being Hasan.” =.$1 ."1 <))/ "@@39A)% <8 07""7 *+IE"%$g)) C7"8 *++"". ."A) 7)358 9/ .$7D "/% .) 7)/2$9/)% 2."2 2.$1 ("1 12"2)% <8 *+IHaafidh *+IHaafidh in ‘Taqhreeb AtI At ITahdheeb’ Tahdheeb’ C1))  C1)) @-B^[DB =.)3)",2)3 +996 –  +996  –  !"8   !"8 *++". -4"3% 894 –  894  –  .9(   .9( 07""7 *%.IU."."<)) C7"8 *++"". ."A) 7)358 9/ .$7D %$%n’t %$%n’t consider the consider the statement of Ibn Ma'een: “Da'eef” 29 2"6$/- 2.) /"33"293 9421$%) 2.) ,9+% 9,  <)$/- 41)% "1 )A$%)/5)? %4) 29 2.) 2.) ,9++9($/- 3)"19/1H 3)"19/1H ^B =.) 2)37 C%"g)),D $1 " %$1@"3"-)7)/2 2."2 $1 /92 %)2"$+)% "/% 2.) 3)"19/ $1 /92 5+"3$,$)%B MB 02 ("1 1"$% "+9/-1$%) " 59/1$%)3)% %)5+"3"2$9/ 9, 23412(932.$/)11B 0, 2.$1 $1 2.) 5"1) $/ 3)-"3%1 29 " 2)37 2."2 $1 5+)"3 $/ 2.) ,"52 2."2 $2 $1 " %$1@"3"-)7)/2  –  (.$5.   (.$5. $1 (the term) Da’eef –  2.)/  2.)/ (."2 %9 894 2.$/6 "<942 2.) 2)371 C:""+$.D 93 C:""+$. *+IP"%))2.D (.$5. :."8kh :."8 kh Rabee’ 5+$/-1 9/29 $/ 93%)3 29 ()"6)/ 0
J397 2.$1 $1H 02 %)123981 2.) @3$/5$@+)T 7"6$/- 2.) )_@+"/"2$9/ 9, 2.) %$1@"3"-)7)/2 " 59/%$2$9/ (.)/ $2 59/23"%$521 " 2"(2.))F 2."2 $1 59/1$%)3)% 59/1$%)3)% –   –  P9(  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

U077$5)$'@ ,$4 04& >5 4>2& >5 %,& '-##-%$>'4 >5 6(' H- ’&&' -4 &L$<&'=& *1 ,93 2.) 12"2)7)/2 9, ‘/((--4 /<8S-J#$  –   "/% .) $1 ,397 2.) 7912 )12"<+$1.)% 9, @)9@+) $/ 3)-"3%1 29 0 E"2I="’%))+ C\LMO[2.  <$9BDT 2.)/ 2.)3) $1 /9  I#>(7&2 J$%, ,$2 ,$2” ”  "/% 1$7$+"3+8 $/ *+I'"3. E"2I="’ 59/23"%$52$9/ <)2())/ $2 "/% 2.) 2(9 /"33"2$9/1 (.$5. $21 7)/2$9/$/- @3)5)%)% 1.932+8 %4) 29 2.) ,9++9($/- 7"22)31H 

=."2 (.$5. 2.) 124%)/2 9, 0 I#>(7&2 J$%, ,$2   "/% 19 "/% 19 .) $1 ()"6 ”. ”. So  So  .) 1"$%: 1"$%: “I “I,, 0 1"8 29 894 %,&#& $4 '> I#>(7&2 J$%, ,$2C %,&' ,& $4 - ;,$P-, .” ‘Lisaan *+I!))S""/ ‘Lisaan  *+I!))S""/’’ C^LKD

:9 9,2)/ 2.) 7$12"6)1 9, 7"/8 @)9@+) "3$1) ,397 2.) +"56 9, 9<1)3A"2$9/ -$A)/ 29 2.) 2)37$/9+9-8 9, the Imaams, as has occurred here with Shaykh Rabee’. Imaam As ISan’aani has pointed out in ‘Tawdeeh AlI AlIAfkaar’ (1/190) that that the one who doesn’t observe this and understand it will err upon 2.) 15.9+"31 "/% ($2. .$7 6/9($/- 2.)3) 2)37$/9+9-$)1 (.$5. 2.)8 @+"5)% $/ 2.) 15$)/5)1 9, ."%))2. 2.)/ 2.) 7$12"6) ($++ /92 95543 "/% *++".g1 "$% $1 194-.2B 

07""7 0
=.) @3$7"38 5"1) $/ 3)-"3%1 29 2.) 12"2)7)/21 9, 2.) 15.9+"31 9, *+I'"3. E"2I="’ E"2I=" ’%))+ $1 2."2 it’s in "-3))7)/2 "/% /9 %$,,)3$/-? 19 2.) 12"2)7)/2 9, 0
.$7h $1 5"33$)% 4@9/ 2."2 (.$5. "-3))1 ($2. 92.)3 2."/ $2 ,397 2.) ="(2.))F? )1@)5$"++8 (.)/ $2 $1 2.) 12"2)7)/2 9, 2.) /47<)3 9, 2.) @)9@+) 9, ."%))2.B :$/5) 2.) ="(2.))F $/ 2.) 12"2)7)/2 9, 0#%,) () 6(' H- ’&&'aB

;,& +&=>'< VI&=%$L&* !"# %&'() &* +"# ),"&-.') &* "./##+" 01 '#2.'/) +& .3+"#1+0,.+012 +"# "./##+" &* 451 6-78"..9:

^B /7862--2 /78S,$)-- /78H-P<$4&&  C!"8 *++". ."A) 7)358 9/ .$7D $/ *+I*.""%))2. *+I !46.2""3".H !46.2""3".H P) ."1 "42.)/2$5"2)% " ."%))2. 9, .$1 CZL^X\D <8 2.) /47<)3 CMKKOD MB /7862--2 /781--.$2  C!"8 *++". ."A) 7)358 9/ .$7D $/ *+IMustadrak *+I Mustadrak ‘Alaa AsI As I :".))."8/H ^B P"%))2. G9B C^NX[DC^LXMND MB P"%))2. G9B CZM[KDCMLZK^D ZB P"%))2. G9B CXON^DCZL\ZD XB P"%))2. G9B C[KNZDCXLMKYD ZB /7862--2 /<,8S,-,-(&&  C!"8 *++". ."A) 7)358 9/ .$7D $/ ="+6.))1 *+I!412"%3"6H ^B P"%))2. G9B CZM[KDCMLZK^D MB P"%))2. G9B CXON^DCZL\ZD ZB P"%))2. G9B C[KNZDCXLMKYD XB /7862--2 /78H0O-<<$< /78/7(--'&&  C!"8 *++". ."A) 7)358 9/ .$7DH 0 5"7) "53911 –  "53911  –  <42  <42 /92 +$7$2)% 29 –  29 –  .$1  .$1 "42.)/2$5"2$/- 9, )$-.2 )$-.2 ."%))2.1 ,397 2.) @"2. 9, P$1.""7 "/% " <396)/ /"33"2$9/H From that which he has corrected in Saheeh Wa Dha’eef AsI:4/"/H AsI:4/"/H ^B A hadeeth in Sunan Abee Dawood (708) from the hadeeth of ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Amr (May *++". <) @+)"1)% ($2. <92. 9, 2.)7DH 07"7 *+I*+<"/)) 1"$% C3)-"3%$/- $2DH !"#"$ &"'((' MB * ."%))2. $/ :4/"/ *<)) U"(99% C^\XOD ,397 2.) @"2. 9, P$1.""7 7)"/$/- 0
ZB * ."%))2. $/ :4/"/ *<)) U"(99% CXNKKD "/% 0?@AB4 "$= )<$ ‘Asaakir wrote a biography of him with the narration of three (nar -"*/-#4 (nar -"*/-#4 .-/0 '+0 –  #/   #/ '+# :+C( 3'"#4 !"#"$ '"=((*'D \B 0/ *2ITa’leeqaat *2ITa’leeqaat AlIP$1""/ AlIP$1""/ C^MM\D ,397 " @"2. 2.394-. P$1.""7 0
/78 Wadi’ee C!"8 *++". ."A) 7)358 9/ .$7D $/ OB /7862-2 /78H0O-<<$< H0P($7 6(' 1--<$ /78Wadi’ee .$1 @3)5$941 <996H *1I:".)). *+I!41/"% !$77"" f"81" J)) *1I:".))."8/ CG9B[XND (.)3)<8 .) %)5+"3)% "42.)/2$5 2(9 ."%$2.1 ,397 .$1 3942)H ^B * ."%))2. CG9B[XND ($2. *<)) U"(99% C!"8 *++". ."A) 7)358 9/ .$7D $/ .$1 :4/"/ COLXMND MB * ."%))2. (No.1197) with Ibn Hibbaan (May Allah have mercy on him) as in “Al I Ihsaan”. /78‘Allaamah ‘Abdul8H0,4$' ‘Abdul 8H0,4$' /78‘Abbaad /78‘Abbaad C!"8 *++". -3"/2 .$7 1455)11D (.)3)<8 .) KB /78‘Allaamah %)5+"3)% "42.)/2$5 P$1.""7 0
/78‘Allaamah Muhammad ‘Alee Al86%,)>>(&& Al 86%,)>>(&&   (.)3)<8 .) 59/,$37)% 2.$1 /"33"2$9/ $/ [B /78‘Allaamah “Dhakheerah AlI AlI‘Uqbaa” (16/186I^Y[D (16/186 I^Y[D "/% 2.) 7)/2$9/$/- 9, .$1 2)_24"+ 12"2)7)/2 ."1  <))/ @3)5)%)%B @3)5)%)%B YB */% 92.)3 2.)/ 2.)7B *++ 9, 2.91) (.91) 7)/2$9/$/- ."1 <))/ @3)5)%)% ,397 2.) 07""71 2."2 %)5+"3)% P$1.""7 0
;,& ;,$#< VI&=%$L&*  ;.,( &* .5)+01#1,# *'&< +"# =&<>.10&1) = &<>.10&1) &* +"# ?31.1@ <.1A *'&< +"# =&<>.10&1) &* +"# 6)7?0".." .1/ &+"#' +"#< 01 5'012012 *&'+" "0) "./##+":

J93 A)3$+8 .$1 ."%))2. ."1 <))/ <394-.2 942 <8 2.) d97@"/$9/1 9, 2.) J943 :4/"/H ^B MB ZB XB OB KB [B

*/IG"1"")) *<4 U"(99% *2I=$37$%.)) 0
J397 2.) 597@"/$9/1 9, 2.) :$."". C@+B :".)).D (.9 <394-.2 942 ,93 .$7 C.$1 ."%))2.DH YB f$6) 0
“AtITaqreeb” and other than it. As for Imaam Muslim, then he hasn’t brought out from his hadith “AtI anything, and this isn’t what dishonors this narrator after the Imaams declared him to be a Thiqah. *1 ,93 Shaykh Rabee’s statement (May Allah grant him success): “For this reason, the two Imaams  Bukhaaree and Muslim didn’t narrate for him any continuous (chained) hadeeth through Naafi’ except that  Bukhaaree narrated one hadeeth from him as Mu’allaq as a follow ;F,D ;F,D G//C "* *'( '"=((*' 3HIB@4D  9$= $/$( /. *'( )0""0# -(,/-*(= *'+# $"--"*+/$ (78(,* )<$ 9<(( &'"1<"' –  and he hasn’t restricted "F*'($*+8+*1 */ J'"* '( -(:"*(# –   .-/0 *'"* J'+8' (0,'"#+K(# *'"* *'+# $"--"*+/$ J'+8' +# "**-+
The fact that the two companions of the two Saheehs didn’t bring out for him through Naafi’ doesn’t show his weakness in narrating from him since there is no evidence upon that. Also it isn’t from the condition of Bukhaaree or Muslim to bring out C."%))2.D ,93 )A)38 =.$F".? /93 29 <3$/- 942 C."%))2.D ,93 )A)38 =.$F". 2.394-. "++ of his shaykhs. So much so that this doesn’t absolutely prove that he isn’t from the firm Thiqaat (pl.Thiqah) in regards to that particular Shaykh "/% 2."2 92.)3 2."/ .$7 ,397 2.91) (.97 2.)8 ."A) <394-.2 942 ,93 2.394-. .$1 :."86. $1 745. ,$37)3 2."/ .$7B b_"7@+)1 9, 2."2 "3) 7"/8? "/% $2 14,,$5)1 41 .)3) 2."2 () 7)/2$9/ 2(9 )_"7@+)1 9, 2(9 07""71 2."2 "3) =.$F".H

NE /7862--2 1-22--< 6(' +-7-2-,* P) C!"8 *++". ."A) 7)358 9/ .$7D $1 2.) 7912 ,$37 9, @)9@+) $/ 3)-"3%1 29 C/"33"2$/- ,397D =.""<$2 *+IV4/""/$ ($2.942 )_5)@2$9/? <8 2.) 2)_24"+ $/%$5"2$9/ 9, 7"/8 ,397 2.) P4,,""2.? .) $1 likewise the firmest of people in regards to Ayyub. In spite of that, Bukhaaree didn’t base anyth $/4@9/ .$7 ,397 =.""<$2 /93 ,397 "/89/) )+1)B G)A)32.)+)11 /9 9/) (.91) 12"2)7)/2 $1 59/1$%)3)% 1"$%  –   "5593%$/- 29 78 6/9(+)%-)  –  “Indeed that is evident of his weakness in regards to his narrating from Thaabit and Ayyub!”

QE /7862--2 /4,8Shaafi’ee: /4,8Shaafi’ee: P) C!"8 *++". ."A) 7)358 9/ .$7D ("1 $/%))% ,397 2.) ,$37 =.$F""2 $/ 3)-"3%1 29 !""+$6 C!"8 Allah have mercy on him), Sufyaan ibn ‘Uyaynah and other than them. However neither Bukharee /93 !41+$7 <394-.2 942 ,93 .$7 "/8 ."%))2. %)1@$2) .$1 .$-./)11 "/% 7)7938 C!"8 *++". ."A) 7)358 9/ .$7DB G9 9/) (.91) 12"2)7)/2 $1 59/1$%)3)% 1"$%  –   "5593%$/- 29 78 6/9(+)%-)  –  “Indeed their lack of bringing out his hadeeth is evident of his weakness in regards to his narration from Maalik and other than him!” *1 ,93 .$1 12"2)7)/2 C!"8 *++". -3"/2 .$7 1455)11DH “and $/$( .-/0 *'( )0""0# $"--"*(= *'+# $"--"*+/$ (78(,* Ibn (78(,*  Ibn Abee Shaibah, and he hasn’t restricted authenticity to what he relates” 

So this limitation that Shaykh Rabee’ (May Allah preserve him) affirmed its mentioning is f 397 f 397 2."2 (.$5. 7"/8 9, 2.) 794/2"$/1 9, 7)7938 "/% @3)5$1$9/ 3),3"$/ ,397 $/ 3)-"3%1 29 7"/8 ."%))2.1B =.)8 "3) 2.91) (.9 ."A) 9<1)3A)% 2.) ,94/%"2$9/1? @)3."@1 2.) 7)7938 "/% "("3)/)11 of the smallest from amongst them hasn’t been reached by the most know+)%-)"<+) know+)%-)"<+) "/% 7)793$S)% $/ 3)-"3%1 29 ."%))2. ,397 2.) 59/2)7@93"38 15.9+"31 $/ 2.) -)/)3"2$9/ 9, "+I!$SS))? .$1 124%)/2 *%.IU."."<)) "/% 2.91) ",2)3 .$7 +$6) *+IP"",$2. C0
/78‘Allaamah /78‘Allaamah Al8 Al8Mu’allimee (May Allah have mercy on him) said: “The uprightness of a narrator is affirmed with the Muhaddith by his following up of the narrator’s hadeeth and assessing it (by ("8 9, -"2.)3$/- "++ 9, $21 3942)1DB 021 $/%$5"2$9/ 2."2 "++ 9, $2 $1 4@3$-.2 @39A)1 2."2 2.$1 /"33"293 ("1 ,397 2.) @)9@+) 9, .9/)128 "/% 23412(932.$/)11 and this isn’t possible for the people of our era. P9()A)3 $, 2.91) %),"7$/- 2.) /"33"293 ."A) 2)_24"++8 $/%$5"2)% (."2 C@"32D 2.)8 ."A) 59/%)7/)% ,397 .$1 ."%))2.1 (.)3)<8 $2 <)597)1 5+)"3 2."2 (."219)A)3 ,397 .$1 ."%))2. $/ )_5)@2$9/ 29 2."2 $1 4@3$-.2? 2.)/ $2 $1 +$6)+8 ,93 41 29 9<1)3A) 2.91) ."%))2.1T .)/5) $, $2 <)597)1 5+)"3 2."2 $2 ."1 1239/- 942+)21 2."2 5"/ %),)/% 2.) "5541"2$9/ ,397 2.) /"33"293 2.)/ 2.) 4@3$-.2/)11 9, .$1 /"33"2$9/ has been affirmed.” ‘AtI ‘At ITankeel’ (1/76). He (May Allah have mercy on him) said: “ ;,& 7&L&7 >5 O0<@2&'% %,-% ,-4 (&&' I>$'%&< >0%b '> >'& 5#>2 %,& I&>I7& >5 %,$4 &#- =-' #&-=, $% ? $/ 3)-"3%1 29 2.) )"3+$)3 /"33"2931B b_5)@2 $, 197) 9, 2.) )"3+$)3 15.9+"31 "5541) " /"33"293 $/ 3)-"3%1 29 " ."%))2. 2.)8 14@@91)% .) ."1 <))/ 1$/-+)% 942 ($2.? .)/5) 197) 9, 2.) @)9@+) 9, 2.$1 )3" 9<2"$/ 5933)52 ,9++9(I4@1? 4/+)11 (.)3)<8 2.) )"3+$)3 15.9+"31 %$1"-3))% 2.)3),93) .) 1))61 $/ 942()$-.$/- Cthe C the arguments).” ‘AtI ‘AtITankeel’ (1/37).

/74> %,$4 7$2$%-%$>' $4 '077$5$&<  <8 (."2 *+IP"",$%. 0
02 ."1 <))/ @3)5)%)% $/ 2.) <)-$//$/- 9, 2.$1 23)"2$1) 2.) <3$/-$/- 942 9, 2.$1 /"33"2$9/ <8 07""71 92.)3 2."/ 2.)7H ZB :9 () 7)/2$9/)% 2.) /"33"2$9/ 9, /7862--2 H0,-22-< 6(' U-4# /78H-#J-:&& $/ *1I:4//". CK[D /78c--7-.--&& $/ :."3.4 >144+ *+II’tiqaad XB =.) /"33"2$9/ 9, /7862--2 /78c--7-.--&& *+II’tiqaad (1/134) /78^-),-P&& $/ *+I!"%6."+ 0+"" *1I:4/"/ *+IR4<3""  –  (.$5. OB =.) /"33"2$9/ 9, 62-2 /78^-),-P&&   (.$5.  <)+9/-1 29 .$7 –  .$7 –  C^Z\D  C^Z\D *1 ,93 .$1 1"8$/- C!"8 *++". -3"/2 .$7 1455)11DH “…Ibn Abee Shaibah, and he hasn’t restricted authenticity to what he relates”  Then this isn’t what can stand as a proof over this narration being Munkar, and if only Shaykh Rabee’ (May Allah grant him succes1D succes 1D 5"3),4++8 9<1)3A)%  –  <8   <8 ("8 9, )_"7@+)  – “As  –  “AsI:$+1$+". I:$+1$+". *1I Saheehah” of Imaam AlI Al IAlbaani and “AsI:".)). “AsI:".)). *+I!41/"% !$77"" f"81" J)) *1ISaheehayn” *1I Saheehayn” 9, 07""7 *+IWaadi’ee *+IWaadi’ee (May Allah have mercy on both of them), he would have found what @+)"1)1 .$1 5.)12 –  5.)12 –  <8  <8 +)"A$/- 9,, 2.$1 12"2)7)/2 –  12"2)7)/2  –  ,397  ,397 2.) 7"/8 5."$/1 2."2 "3) :".)). "/% P"1"/ that have been transmitted from the books whose companions haven’t restricted authenticity. From those books (are): “Musannaf” of Ibn Abee Shaybah (May Allah have mercy on him)!! Do )1 .) 2.)3),93) –  2.)3),93) –  0  0 (9/%)3 –  (9/%)3  –  #4%-)   #4%-) $2 C2.)1) 5."$/1D 29 <) !4/6"3 93 ()"6 %4) 29 $2 <)$/- <394-.2 942 <8 one who hasn’t restricted authenticity to it or due to the singling out of the Thiqaat with some or 7912 9, $2aQ =-.'0*A012 +"# /0)+.1+1#)) &* ?".A("  Rabee’s path –  5A  5A %#.(#1012 +"0) 1.''.+0&1 –  *'&<  *'&< +"# .,+0&1) &* +"#  4<..<) 01 /#*#,+012 +"# "./##+": "./##+":

As for Shaykh Rabee’s (May Allah grant him success) statement: “that which is apparent to me is that this narration of his through Naafi’ is considered M F$C"-D M F$C"-D L(8"F#( '( '"# <(8/0( #+$2:(= /F* J+*' +* .-/0 /F* of the many companions of Naafi’, and among them are the eminent ones from his land –   –   M"=(($"' 9$;  Nabawiyyah. From those narrating from him are: His H is sons Abu ‘Umar, ‘Umar, ‘Abdullah and ‘Abdullah ib $   19 .) 7)/2$9/)% " -3)"2 @932$9/ ,397 2.) /"33"2931 2.)/ .) 1"$%  –  &/ !+#'""0 )<$ 9:;  Deenaar…  –  19 Ghaaz has become singled out (in his narration) through Naafi’ from among this large number and from them "-( '+# #/$#N "$= "0/$2 *'(0 "-( *'( (0+$($* /$(# .-/m .-/ m the people of Madeenah, and he hasn’t transmitted  .-/0 *'(0 *'+# #*-"$2( *(7*D 9==+$2 */ *'+# *'"* *'( /$( *-"$#0+**+$2 .-/0 '+0 +# !+#'""0 +<$ 9:;O'""KN 9: ;O'""KN "$= he isn’t from the people of Al ;M"=(($"'D ;M"=(($"'D P"*'(- '( +# " #*-"$2(-N J'/#( /-+2+$ +# .-/0 Q"0"#8F#N "$= *'($ became a settler of Baghdad and was (living) on the funds of Abee Ja’far Al ;M"$#//-D Al ;M"$#//-D &/ *'( :+C( /. *'+# '"=((*' /. '+# –  "$=   "$= *'+# <(+$2 '+# #+*F"*+/$ –  – is is considered Munkar.”  P) 2.)/ 23"/17$22)% " 12"2)7)/2 9, Muslim in “Muqaddimah Saheeh Muslim” (pg.7) and said: “Contemplate upon the saying of Imaam  Muslim:”  “That he has participated along with the Thiqaat from the people of knowledge and 7)7938 $/ 3)-"3%1 29 197) 9, (.$5. 2.)8 ."A) /"33"2)% "/% ."1 5"3),4++8 9<1)3A)% $2 942 9, "-3))7)/2 ($2. 2.em…so 2.em…so the acceptance of a hadeeth of the people of this like isn’t allowed and

Allah knows best.” “This is absent in regards to Ibn Al ; Al ;Ghaaz as he is limited in narration, and hasn’t  participated along with the companions of Naafi’ in what w hat they have narrat (= (= .-/0 *'( "F*'($*+8 '"=((*'# "$=  4/2$+ .) 1"$% –  1"$% –  9:;!"".+=' didn’t carefully observe their agreement  –  4/2$+  9:;!"".+=' )<$ P"R"< #"+= J'+:( 0"C+$2 $/*( /. *'+#  #,((8' /. )0""0 MF#:+0 E “He has openly clarified that if the Thiqah makes due care in becoming in "-3))$/- ($2. 2.) =.$F""2 $/ 2.)$3 ."%))2. 2.)/ <)597)1 1$/-+)% 942 ,397 2.)7 ($2. " ."%))2.? 2.)/ (."2 .) ."1 <)597) 1$/-+)% 942 ($2. $1 "55)@2)%? "/% .) ."1 7)/2$9/)% $2 ,397 2.) @)9@+) 9, knowledge.” From ‘Sharh ‘Ilal AtI AtITirmidhee’ (1/456IXO[DB (1/456IXO[DB  !+#'""0 +<$ 9:;O'""K +# .-/0 *'( *1,( whose hadeeth isn’t accepted if they become singled out through the likes of Naafi’ and Az ;SF'-(( Az ;SF'-(( J+*' J'"* none from the Thiqaat of their companions have participated in.”  Verily this path wasn’t implemented by the Imams of Al I‘Ilal and  and  P"%))2. 9/ "++ 9, 2.) 1$/-4+"3$2$)1 9, 2.) =.$F""2 ,93 C2.) ,9++9($/-D $114)1H ^B =.) @3$7"38 12"2) $1 2.) "55)@2"/5) 9, 2.) /"33"2$9/ 9, 2.) 23412(932.8 C@)319/D "/% /92 %94<2$/- .$1 /"33"2$9/ 4/+)11 2.) )A$%)/5) $1 1299% 4@ "-"$/12 $21 $/"5543"58H b$2.)3 <8 2.) 2)_24"+ $/%$5"2$9/ 9, 2."2 <8 "/ 07"7 93 <8 7)/2$9/$/- .$1 /"33"2$9/ $/ .$1  <$9-3"@.8 ,397 2.) <9961 C%)%$5"2)%D 29 2.) ()"6 /"33"2931 /"33"2931 $/ 53$2$5$17 53$2$5$17 9, $2B i3 <8 $2 59/23"%$52$/- 9/) (.9 942()$-.1 .$7 $/ 2)371 9, "223$<42)1 "/% /47<)3B 



It doesn’t suff $5) $5) $/ 3)-"3%1 29 2."2 29 1$7@+8 5+"$7 2.) 1$/-4+"3$28 C9, 2.) /"33"293D ",2)3 $2 $1 59/,$37)% 2."2 2.) 1$/-4+"3 C/"33"293D ."1 <))/ 7"%) " =.$F".B I don’t suspect Shaykh Rabee’ would place himself in the level of those well memorized Imaams 2."2 ."A) 9<1)3A)% 2.) ,94/%"2$9/1 "/% ."A) 7)793$S)% 2.) ."%))2.1 9, 2.) /"33"2931 "/% 2.91) 9, 2.)$3 59/2)7@93"3$)1 "/% !"1.""8$6.T (.$5. ($++ )/"<+) .$7 29 #4%-) 2.) 1$/-4+"3$28 9, " =.$F". ($2. "/92.)3 =.$F". "1 <)$/- ()"6 +)2 "+9/) <)$/- !4/6"3QQ =9 (.$5. .) 1"81H “That which is apparent to me is that this narration of his through Naafi’ is Munkar”!!  =9 2.) )_2)/2 2."2 .) 1"81H “Hishaam ibn Al ;Ghaaz is from the type of those whose hadeeth isn’t accepted if they become singled out through the likes of Naafi’ and Az ;SF'-(( ;SF'-(( J+*' J'"* $/$( .-/0 *'( 5'+6""* /. *'(+companions have participated in”!!!  =$++ .) 1"81H “This is missing in regards to Ibn Al ; Al ;Ghaaz as he is limited in narration, and hasn’t participated along with the companions of Naafi’ in what they have narrated from the authentic hadeeths and didn’t carefully observe their agreement”!!  This statement of Shaykh Rabee’ (May Allah grant him success) is recklessness! If only he would  <43%)/ .$71)+, 2.) 2394<+) 9, 3)1)"35.$/-? 3)1)"35.$/-? .) (94+% ."A) ,94/% 2."2 (.$5. $1 $/ 9@@91$2$9/ 29 (."2 .) C4/%94<2)%+8D "15)32"$/)%B :$/5) 2.) /"33"2$9/1 9, P$1.""7 0
through Ibn ‘Umar (May Allah be pleased with both of them) as is the case with our narration. `94 ."A) "56/9(+)%-)% 2."2 .$1 !41"//", C)B-B 0
[B E."2 ."1 <))/ 3)@932)% <8 0
U$134@2$/- 2.) @3$/5$@+)1 9, 2.) 07""71 <8 3)#)52$/- 2.) ."%))2.1 9, $/%$A$%4"+1 ,397 2.) =.$F""2 "/% <8 /92 "55)@2$/- 2.) 1$/-4+"3$28 )_5)@2 ,397 2.) 794/2"$/1 9, @3)5$1$9/ ,397 2.) 7)793$S)31 9, ."%))2. C!"8 *++". ."A) 7)358 9/ 2.)7D d+91$/- %9(/ 2.) %993 ,93 "11)117)/2 C<8 -"2.)3$/- 2.) 3942)1 9, " ."%))2.D "/% ,9++9($/- $2 4@ ($2. ."%))2.1 9, 2.$1 6$/%? 1$/5) #4%-$/- 2.)$3 1$/-4+"3$2$)1  –  "/%   "/% 2.) 5"1) $1 "1 @3)5)%)%  –   "1 <)$/- !4/6"3 2"6)1 2.)$3 /"33"2$9/1 942 9, 2.) ,$)+% 9, )A"+4"2$9/B */% @39<+)71 92.)3 2."/ 2."2 OB An important issue which Shaykh Rabee’ (May Allah grant him success) overlooked in this research, we’ll mention it agai/ agai / %4) 29 $21 $7@932"/5)H =.) 07""71 9, ."%))2. (94+% /92 <) 1)A)3) $/ #4%-$/- 2.) ""*'""-  as is their case with the hadeeth of the Prophet, and they wouldn’t $7@91) "1 " 59/%$2$9/ 2.91) F4"+$2$)1 "/% 59/%$2$9/1 7"%) $/ 3)-"3%1 29 .$1 ."%))2.B =.$1 $1 " 7"2ter 7"2ter that isn’t hidden from the likes of Shaykh Rabee’ (May Allah grant him success), to (.$5. .) (94+% 597) ,932. ($2. )A)382.$/- 2."2 ."1 <))/ @3)5)%)% $/ 93%)3 29 3)#)52 2.) /"33"2$9/ 9, P$1.""7 0




;,& T>0#%, VI&=%$L&*  B0)"..< 451 6-7Ghaaz has been followed up in this narration of his through Naafi’.

=."2 $1 $/ 3)-"3%1 29 (."2 0
om him isn’t Weak. Ibn Hibbaan said: “As for the Majaaheel (pl. ^B ;,-% %,& >'& '-##-%$'@ 5# om Majhool) that only the Weak ones have narrated from, then they are rejected in all cases”. “AlI!"#34.99/ “Al I!"#34.99/ CML^\ZD I say: This isn’t present here as the one narrating from this Mubham is Hushaym  Hushaym   05 %,& =,-$'E 0 1"8H +$6) 2.) 5"1) 9, 2.$1 !4<."7 C*+I].43"1.))D (.9 $1 $/ 2.) +)A)+ 9, P$1.""7 0
/78Waadi’ee (May Allah have mercy on him) in his explanation of “Ikhtisaar MB /7862--2 /78Waadi’ee ‘Uloom AlI AlIHadeeth” at the statement of Ibn Katheer: “and guidance is sought with it in 5)32"$/ @+aces” @+aces” whereby he said: “Meaning it is suitable for assessment or to be used as a Shaahid, however his hadeeth isn’t accepted alone.”

i43 7)/2$9/$/- 9, 2.) ,9++9($/- 4@ 9, 2.$1 !4<."7 $1 " 1239/- @399, 2."2 5"/ <) 41)% "1 " -4$%) $/ ",,$37$/- 2.) /"33"2$9/ 9, 0
02 $1 14,,$5$)/2 ,93 7) .)3) 29 7)/2$9/ 2(9 )_"7@+)1 9, -4$%"/5) <)$/- 194-.2 <8 2.) @)9@+) 9, 2.$1 7"22)3 ($2. 2.) /"33"2$9/ 9, " !4<."7 "/% .)/5) 7"6$/- "11)117)/2 ($2. $2H ^B E."2 ."1 <))/ 7)/2$9/)% <8 /781--5$%, 6(' 1-O-#  C!"8   C!"8 *++". ."A) 7)358 9/ .$7D $/ .$1  book “Fath AlI AlIBaari” (1/161) where he said: “his statement: “Knowledge is merely by learning” it is a raised hadeeth aswell; Ibn Abee ‘Aasim and Ad IU"<"3""/$ 3)@932)% 3)@932)% $2 ,397 2.) ."%))2. of Mu’aawiyah also with the wording: Oh people, Learn! For knowledge is only through learning… its isnaad is Hasan, &`=&I% %,-% %,&#& $4 - H0(,-2 %,-% ,-4 (&&' 40II>#%&< 5#>2 -'>%,&# -'@7&E” MB E."2 ."1 <))/ 7)/2$9/)% <8 /781--5$%, 6(' B-%,&&#  C!"8   C!"8 *++". ."A) 7)358 9/ .$7D $/ “AlIV$%""8". “Al IV$%""8". E" */INihaayah” */I Nihaayah” (5/189) where he said: “…Abu Dawud said that Musaddad narrated to us…and this also contains a H0(,-2? .9()A)3 2.) ."%))2. 9, '""<$3 $1 " +,--,$< 5># $% B”

;,& T$5%, VI&=%$L&* 0/ "%%$2$9/ 29 (."2 ."1 <))/ @3)5)%)% ,397 2.) "15)32"$/)% )A$%)/5)1 $/ 7"6$/- 0
:9 .$1 7)/2$9/$/- "/% 3)7)7<3"/5) 9, 2.) 7"//)3 $/ (.$5. .) 5"33$)% 2.$1 /"33"2$9/ ,397 G"",$’ G"",$’ is a proof of his memory of this narration that has been asked about. ZB J397 2.) @399,1 2."2 "3) 7)/2$9/)% $1 2.) 12"2)7)/2 9, *+IP"",$2. 0##," ,&1,#'1012 +"# 31/#')+.1/012 &* + he ‘Umar (May Allah be pleased with both of them):  Then I have indeed acknowledged that our brother ‘Alee AlI Al I‘Afaree (May Allah grant him success) (392) "/% 5+"3$,$)% ,397 ,"3 2."2 (.$5. $1 $/ 3)-"3%1 29 <"1$/- 2.) 12"2)7)/2 9, 2.) .9/943"<+) companion Ibn ‘Umar (May Allah be pleased with both of them) upon the linguistic meaning of Bid’ah, and other than that which came in the speech of Shaykh Rabee’ (May Allah grant him 1455)11D ,397 $114)1 2."2 3)F4$3) 5+"3$,$5"2$9/ "/% 3)<422"+B :9 0 14,,$5)% ($2. (."2 0 (392) ,397 " 5."$/ 124%8 9, 2.$1 "*'"- B =.)/ $2 <)5"7) "@@"3)/2 29 7) $/ 7)/2$9/$/- " F4$56 9A)3A$)( 9, (."2 ."1 <))/ @3)5)%)%B 0 (392) 2.$1 3"/%97+8 C($2.942 "/8 @3)@"3"2$9/D (.$+) .9@$/- ,93 $21 "11)2 ,39m ,39 m Allah in the day I’ll meet him. :9 0 1"8 (.$+) 1))6$/- .$1 "$%H

The mentioning of the narration of Wakee’ in his book has been preceded; as in “Al IFath” of Ibn Rajab (6/205): “From Hishaam Ibn AlI Al IGhaaz that he said: I asked Naafi’ about the athaan on the day of Jumu’ah? So he replied: Ibn ‘Umar said: 6% $4 -' $''>L-%$>'b -'< &L&#) $''>L-%$>' $4 2$4@0$<-'=& &L&' $5 %,& I&>I7& I&#=&$L& $% %> (& @>>L-%$>' $4 2$4@0$<-'=& &L&' $5 %,& I&>I7& I&#=&$L& $% %> (e ( e good” $1 ,397 2.) 1"8$/- 9, Ibn ‘Umar (May Allah be pleased with both of them). This is what has come clearly noted from the speech of Ibn ‘Umar (May Allah be pleased with both of them) in more than one path whose 7)/2$9/$/- ."1 <))/ @3)5)%)% $/ 2.) <)-$//$/- 9, 2.) 3)1)"35.B This is clear and doesn’t require sinking (into it), and with it the argument ends in regards to directing the word “innovation” to the explanation of Ibn ‘Umar himself by his saying: “every $''>L-%$>' $4 2$4@0$<-'=& &L&' $5 %,& people %,&  people perceive perceive it to be good” C*++ @3"$1) $1 29 *++". ,93 .$1 -3"/2$/- 9, 1455)11 "/% ,93 .$1 <)129($/-D 0, () ()3) .9()A)3 29 14--)12  –  $/   $/ 12)@@$/- %9(/ –  %9(/  – it it being from the speech of Naafi’, then he is from the most established and attached of people to Ibn ‘Umar (May Allah be pleased with both of 2.)7DB P) $1 2.) 9/) /"33"2$/- ,397 .$7 "2 2.$1 @9$/2? "/% 2.) /"33"293 $1 2.) 7912 "56/9(+)%-)% 29 what he narrates so long it doesn’t contradict its apparent (meaning). He (May Allah have mercy on him) explained the speech of his Shaykh, Ibn ‘Umar (May Allah be pleased with both of them) ($2. (."2 59/,9371 ($2. $21 942("3% C7)"/$/-D? "+19 ($2. .$1 597@"3$19/ 9, 2.) "/1()3 .) %$3)52+8 heard from Ibn ‘Umar (May Allah be pleased with both of them) caused him to make that statement and Naafi’ (May Allah have mercy on him) was indeed a Faqeeh. Even if it wasn’t for except that the word “Bid’ah” has been confirmed from Ibn ‘Umar; it would ."A) <))/ 14,,$5$)/2 $/ ",,$37$/- 2.$1B As for considering the saying of Ibn ‘Umar (May Allah be pleased with both of them) “Bid’ah” to  being similar to the saying of his father ‘Umar (M"8 (M"8 *++". <) @+)"1)% ($2. .$7D 3)-"3%$/- 2.) Taraaweeh Prayer: Prayer: “What a good Bid’ah it is!” Then this is distant.

;,& =7-#$5$=-%$>' >5 %,$4 $4* The primary case in unrestrictedly mentioning “Bid’ah” in the sayings of the Salaf is that the +)-$1+"2$A) C7)"/$ng) C7)"/$ng) of Bid’ah is intended, which is the apparent case here as it –  7)"/$/ 7)"/$/- 2.) 2)37 Bid’ah –   ."1 <))/ <394-.2 4@ $/ 1@))5. 59/5)3/$/- 2.) 34+$/- 9, 2.) *2.""/ $/ 2.) +)-$1+"2$9/B :.$,2$/- 2.) 1@))5. ,397 $21 +)-$1+"2$A) 7)"/$/- 29 $21 +$/-4$12$5 7)"/$/- 3)F4$3)1 )A$%)/5) 2."2 ($++ 1.$,2 $2 C"5593%$/-+8DT "/% 2.$1 $1 5+)"3 "/% 6/9(/ <8 2.) @)9@+) 9, 6/9(+)%-) "/% ,94/%"2$9/B

‘Umar AlI AlIFaarooq’s (May Allah be pleased with him) saying has been linked with supporting @399,1 2."2 "3) %$3)52+8 "/% $/%$3)52+8 3)+"2 ed, which aren’t present in Ibn ‘Umar’s (May Allah be @+)"1)% ($2. <92. 9, 2.)7D 1@))5.B

T#>2 %,& <$#&=%7) #&7-%&< GI#>>54K is the saying of ‘Umar (May Allah be pleased with him): “What a good Bid’ah”. He wouldn’t have praised it if it were legislatively d $1.9/93)%? 19 2.$1 1.9()% 2."2 he intended other than the legislative meaning of the term “Bid’ah” T#>2 %,& $'<$#&=%7) #&7-%&< GI#>>54K $1 2.) ,"52 2."2 2.) e39@.)2 +)% 2.) @)9@+) $/ 2.) ="3""()). @3"8)3 197) %"81? "/% 2.)/ .) +),2 2."2 942 9, ,)"3 2."2 $2 ($++ <)597) 597@4+1938 9/ .$1 /"2$9/B :9 (.)/ 2.) @3)A)/2$9/ ("1 5"/5)++)% <8 2.) 129@@"-) 9, 2.) 3)A)+"2$9/? 2.) 3)A$A$/- 9, 2.$1 :4//".  became legislatively praised. For this reason ‘Umar ‘ Umar (May Allah be pleased with him) said: “What a good Bid’ah it is!” "/% 92.)3 2."/ 2."2T *++". 6/9(1 <)12B I ask Allah that it becomes clear to Shaykh Rabee’ (May Allah preserve him) after this point and 92.)3 2."/ .$7? 2.) %$12"/2/)11 9, 2.) 12"2)7)/2 2."2 2.) "*'"-  of Ibn ‘Umar is Munkar either in its 3942) 93 $/ 2.) 4/%)312"/%$/- <).$/% 2.) /"33"2$9/B ;)243/$/- 29 2.) 2342. 3"$1)1 .$7? "/% <)$/@)31$12)/2 4@9/ 2.) 9@@91$2) 9, 2342. ",2)3 $2 <)597)1 5+)"3 +9()31 .$1 597@"/$9/? "/% *++". $1 2.) -4$%)3 29 2.) 123"$-.2 @"2.B  





     

E3$22)/ <8H  653 B..+0< C3)3* 451 6-7‘Eed Ibn Saalih Al 7‘Ann..5## 6-7D.9..0'##

d97@+)2)%H !93/$/- 9, J3$%"8L MZ '47""%"+ *6.$3" ^XZX *P ‘0/""<".L "+I'"S""$3 C7"8 *++"". @392)52 .)3D