Blanchard Importing & Distributing Co

Ê


  
  
Blanchard Importing and Distributing Co. Inc. (HBS Case 9 - 673 - 033) Submitted by: Tushar Kothavale (130)

NMIMS, FT MBA 2009-2011

c ‘    
 
   
 


  
       


   èe first predict the annual demand for the year 1972 based on trend for 4 months of 1972 based on corresponding months of 1971. Calculations for Annual demand (R): The assumption made here is that the same trend for sales as that for the four months of 1972 would be followed for the rest of the months of the 1972.

î
    
    ‘

‘

 r
               

‘

     

           

‘

    

  

            

  

‘

  

      

           

            

       




î


    

 
  















 

 

 











 

 

  

 







 





 

  









 





 



 







 













Calculations for Setup cost (S):

c

Size changeover cost = (cost of resetting all machinery for change in bottle size/ avg. no. of different items of given size processed between size changeover) = 23000 / (52X7X10) = $6.3186 per changeover Label changeover cost = Labour cost incurred while label changeover process = (23000X0.5X8*)/(52X7) + 5X2.5X0.5 = $10.2 per labour changeover *Assumption each working day is of 8 hrs. Order Processing cost = 18000/ 350 = $51.43 per order.



    !
 '()  *+  !
 '()  ,   -  (.  î   
(.  !
 /+ !
 '()  0  0

!
   î" î       

#  $ 
              %î&

 

 



 



 

 



 

 

 

 



 





 



 

 





 



 

 

Calculations for Unit cost (C): Fixed overhead allocation = total company fixed overhead for the year/ no. of cases sold per yr. èe calculate total fixed overhead as per data given for 1969. Total fixed overhead = 1.31X(2455+1421+800+3096+449) = $ 10769.51 Since fixed overhead remains constant from year to year

Now for year 1972, Fixed overhead allocation = 10769.51 / 11461 0

= $ 0.9396 !
 ' !
  () '() 

      *+ 

  -  

(.   ,  î  


 (.

!
  '()

   0  !
   /+ 0    

 
1 

 

 

 

 
1 +  












 
   !


 


 



 

  

 

 

2 

  

 

 

 

 

 

*  
 

 

 

 

 

 

  














 

 

2

 

 





 


     2











4566

65.6


3   %&

456

4.5

465.

EOQ & ROP Calculations:

a

‘

 

   89  
   î  3   :$;   
  %î&  %&    Ô %0& %7& ‘

!
 ' ()  *+  !
 ' () ,   -  (.  î   
(.   !
  /+ !
 ' () 0  0

‘

89 0$





Ô


:$; 0$   . .

‘

 



 

 



 



 

 

 

 

 



 

 







 

 









 

 



 

 

 



 



 



 

 



 



0 ‘ è    
  
      
    
 !è    ! EOQ/ ROP system: Advantage1)‘ The system achieves the balance between two costs ordering cost and the carrying cost. 2)‘ The system keeps track of removals from inventory on a continuous basis, so the system can provide information on the current level of inventory for each item 3)‘ The system helps meet the anticipated customer demand. 4)‘ The system keeps buffers between successive operations to maintain continuity of production (reducing the variability in demand at various stages).

Disadvantage1)‘ EOQ/ROP system is essentially a reactive approach; this approach gives only an order quantity, it does not suggest ways to reduce the inventory. ÿ

2)‘ For implementation of EOQ a perpetual inventory counting system needs to be in place, this implies substantial investments which might not be feasible for some. 3)‘ Even if EOQ system is in place there is necessity to physically count the inventory periodically in order to ascertain the accuracy of the system. 4)‘ EOQ/ ROP is a static system that is, it does not change automatically with the change in demand. For every period a new EOQ/ ROP needs to be established. 5)‘ It is valid for a single product and not a basket of products. (Assumption made while deriving the EOQ/ ROP.) 6)‘ It does not take into account the other production factors such as times required for production run (as in this case, all one size items are produced in one go rather than changing the sizes and hence a sufficient quantity of other sizes need to be at hand in order to reduce the stock out situations.) System used at Blanchard: Advantages1)‘ At Blanchard finished case inventory storage area is not a constraint (as actual finished goods inventory had never occupied more than 50% of the reserved space) hence carrying cost is fixed (i.e. security, heating, cooling etc.) regardless of the volume of the finished goods inventory. Hence Blanchard importing & distributing co. can focus on reduction of other costs. 2)‘ The substantial cost incurred at Blanchard is that of setting up cost in which the size changeover takes one complete day. Hence it is necessary to reduce this time by reducing the size changeover. Bob and Hank are exactly doing the same. 3)‘ Bob and Hank are not following the EOQ/ ROP set as per 1969 as it is now obsolete, the basis on which these values were based was with the certain pattern of demand for items as per 1969 data. Also it did not account for the pattern of production (i.e. all items of same size in one batch). Usage of latest data for predicting demand and accounting for the pattern of production ensures that the setting up costs are low and service level is high.

Disadvantages1)‘ Due to the patter of production of batch wise production based on size as well as to maintain high level of service a higher level of finished goods inventory is being produced, this is tying down the capital in form of inventory. 2)‘ Since substantial amount of funds are locked in the form of the inventory the company¶s growth is hindered in terms of expanding business by means of wine merchandising.

·

èe prefer the EOQ/ ROP system as gains from reducing the order/ production size (gains in terms of less value of inventory being produced) which though lead to increase in setup cost far outweigh the gains from Blanchard¶s current system (gains in terms of reduction of setup cost) while, costs are that of the value of inventory being produced. a ‘ è  "
#"  
 $ % $%!  1)‘ The company should install perpetual systems (on-line systems) so that the transactions such as stacked cartons list is updated immediately which can aid in transfer of control stock on real time basis. The advantage of on-line systems is that they are always up-to-date. 2)‘ The company can explore the possibilities of reducing the product range in terms of sizes based on profitability of each item as per size. 3)‘ The company should explore the possibility of installing RFID systems that scan the bottle tags and link it to central databases for size and label, blended whiskey combination, ratio of ingredients. This will reduce the need for manual scanning. 4)‘ Exploring the possibility of implementing JIT (Just in Time) system that can reduce the finished goods inventory at substantial level. 5)‘ Follow EOQ/ ROP system and discontinue the practice of production in batches based on item size. 6)‘ The EOQ/ ROP system should be fed the point of sale (here point of dispatch) data in order to make the system more dynamic, the system should be able to forecast the sales and then determine the EOQ/ ROP values automatically.

3