Balanced Scorecards for Law Firms JOHN STERLING
PUBLISHED BY
IN ASSOCIATION WITH
Balanced Scorecards for Law Firms is published by Ark Group
UK/EUROPE OFFICE
NORTH AMERICA OFFICE
ASIA/PACIFIC OFFICE
Ark Group Ltd Paulton House 8 Shepherdess Walk, London N1 7LB United Kingdom Tel +44 (0)20 7490 0049 Fax +44 (0)20 7324 2373
[email protected]
Ark Group USA 4408 N. Rockwood Suite 150 Peoria IL 61615 Tel +1 773 529 5750 Fax +1 773 529 5760
[email protected]
Ark Group Australia Pty Ltd Main Level, 83 Walker Street North Sydney NSW Australia 2060 Tel +61 1300 550 662 Fax +61 1300 550 663
[email protected]
Commissioning editor Anna Shaw
[email protected]
Publishing director Lucy Brazier
[email protected]
US marketing enquiries Daniel Smallwood
[email protected]
Head of editorial Kate Clifton
[email protected]
Asia/Pacific marketing enquiries Steve Oesterreich
[email protected]
ISBN: 978-1-906355-55-5
Head of production Danielle Filardi
[email protected]
UK/Europe marketing enquiries Adam Scrimshire
[email protected]
Copyright The copyright of all material appearing within this publication is reserved by the author and Ark Conferences 2009. It may not be reproduced, duplicated or copied by any means without the prior written consent of the publisher publisher..
Balanced Scorecards for Law Firms JOHN STERLING
PUBLISHED BY
IN ASSOCIATION WITH
Contents Executive summary............................ ........................................... .............................. .............................. ............................. ............................. .....................VI ......VIII A bout the author................... author.................................. .............................. ............................. ............................. .............................. .............................. ...................IX ....IX Acknowledgements Acknowledgem ents .............................. ............................................ ............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. ...................XI ....XI Part One: Theory and practice of implementing balanced scorecards in law firms Chapter 1: The balanced scorecard – an overview of Kaplan and Norton’s Norton’s system .............. .............. 3 The balanced scorecard in its most basic form ................................. ................................................. ................................. ....................... ...... 4 The balanced scorecard as a management tool ................................. .................................................. .................................. .................... ... 5 Rationale and arguments for the balanced sc orecard .......................... .......................................... ................................. .................... ... 8 Looking forward towards law firm adoption................................ ................................................. .................................. ............................ ........... 9 Chapter 2: Applying the balanced scorecard in a law firm environment – opportunities and challenges............... challenges.............................. .............................. ............................. ............................. .............................. .................. ... 11 Nature of the opportunity ............................. ............................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ..................... ..... 12 Linkages to profit per partner ................................ ................................................. .................................. ................................. ............................. ............. 12 Effective implementation.......................................... ........................................................... ................................. ................................. ........................... .......... 13 Practice group performance .................... ..................................... .................................. ................................. ................................. ........................... .......... 15 Challenges to adopting balanced scorecards in law firms ...................... ....................................... ................................ ............... 15 Chapter 3: Financial measures – applying the financial element............................. ....................................... .......... 21 High-level objectives ................................. .................................................. ................................. ................................. .................................. ........................ ....... 21 Profit drivers .................................. .................................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ................................... ................... 22 The constricting denominator – equity partnership .............................. ............................................... .................................. ................... 25 Conclusions .................................. .................................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ................................... ................... 26 Chapter 4: Client relationship measures – applying the client satisfaction element ........... 27 High-level objectives ................................. .................................................. ................................. ................................. .................................. ........................ ....... 27 Strategies and action plans driving client relationships ................................. ................................................. .......................... .......... 29 Conclusions .................................. .................................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ................................... ................... 30 Chapter 5: Business process measures measures – applying the business process element element .............. .............. 31 High-level objectives ................................. .................................................. ................................. ................................. .................................. ........................ ....... 31 Strategies and action plans for internal process improvement ............................... ................................................ ................... 33
III
Contents
Alternative fee arrangements................................. ................................................. ................................. .................................. .............................. ............. 33 Conclusions ................................. .................................................. .................................. ................................. ................................. ................................... .................... 34 Chapter 6: Learning and growth measures – applying the people/capability dimension... 37 High-level objectives ................................. ................................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ........................ ........ 37 Strategies and action plans ................................ ................................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. ................ 40 Organisational capability assessments – an alternative approach for aligning capabilities with strategy ................................. .................................................. .................................. ................................. ................................. ................................... .................... 40 Conclusions ................................. .................................................. .................................. ................................. ................................. ................................... .................... 42 Chapter 7: Implementing the balanced scorecard at the firm level – a ‘how to’ primer ....................... ..................................... ............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. ........................... ............ 43 Information gathering and background analysis ...................................... ....................................................... .............................. ............. 43 Vision and strategic plan development................................. .................................................. ................................. ................................ ................ 44 High-level objectives ................................. ................................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ........................ ........ 45 Engage the practice groups ............................ ............................................. ................................. ................................. .................................. ................... .. 46 Dialogue, evaluation and adjustment ............................... ................................................ ................................. ................................. ................... .. 48 Chapter 8: Implementing the balanced scorecard at the practice group level – a secondary ‘how to’ primer............................ primer........................................... .............................. .............................. ............................. .................... ...... 49 Information gathering and background analysis ...................................... ....................................................... .............................. ............. 49 Vision and strategic plan development................................. .................................................. ................................. ................................ ................ 50 High-level objectives ................................. ................................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ........................ ........ 51 Action planning and balanced scorecard development ............................ ............................................. .............................. ............. 51 Dialogue, evaluation and adjustment ............................... ................................................ ................................. ................................. ................... .. 51 Part Two: Applying the balanced scorecard: case studies Case study 1: Client relationship drive at Mallesons Stephen Jaques ............................. ................................ ... 55 Background............................... ................................................ .................................. ................................. ................................. .................................. ...................... ..... 55 Vision, strategy and high-level objectives ........................................... ............................................................ ................................. .................. .. 56 Integrated implementation and metrics ............................. .............................................. ................................. ................................. ................... .. 56 The results ................................. .................................................. .................................. ................................. ................................. .................................... ...................... ... 57 Case studies 2-4: Using client feedback to inform relation strategies ............................ ................................ .... 59 Background and strategic context................................ ................................................ ................................. ................................. ........................ ........ 59 Overview of firm experiences with client feedback ...................... ...................................... ................................. ........................... .......... 60 Differentiation............................... ................................................ .................................. ................................. ................................. ................................... .................... 63 Case study: moving from pilot to purposeful programme ............................... ................................................ ........................ ....... 64 Case study: client feedback and strategic planning................................ ................................................ ................................ ................ 65
IV
Balanced Scorecards for Law Firms
Case study 5: Bryan Cave – An integrated, balanced approach to strategy implementation.............................. ............................................ ............................. .............................. .............................. ......................... .......... 69 Background and introduction................................ ................................................. .................................. ................................. ............................. ............. 69 Strategy development ................................ ................................................. ................................. ................................. .................................. ........................ ....... 69 Integrated approach to implementation .................... ..................................... .................................. ................................. .......................... .......... 70 Results .................................. .................................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. .................................. ........................... .......... 72 Index ............................. ............................................ .............................. .............................. .............................. ............................. ............................. ........................ ......... 75
V
Executive summary IT HAS been over ten years since Robert Kaplan and David Norton published their landmark strategy book, The Balanced Scorecard1. The book and the concept of a balanced scorecard (BSC) are now so entrenched in the field of strategic management that application of balanced scorecards is literally ‘old news’ to strategists. Yet the concept is only beginning to take hold within law firm management circles. In commercial, manufacturing and other service industries, balanced scorecards have proven to be an extremely useful tool in translating strategy into meaningful action and understandable, measurable outcomes. Naturally, Naturally, that includes tracking financial outcomes, but in a law firm environment it reaches well beyond revenue per lawyer and profit per equity partner. partner. It calls on management to identify meaningful measures and actions related to the development of top quality people, highly satisfied clientele and superior business practices and processes. The balanced scorecard is not a ‘silver bullet’ solution or an off-theshelf prescription for effective strategy implementation. On the contrary, it requires creative thinking that connects firm and practice level strategies to action plans and measures that answer a critical question for lawyers and staff. Namely, an effective balanced scorecard answers the question, “what does this strategy mean for me?” Beyond the qualitative benefit of answering this critical question for people
throughout the law firm, adoption of balanced scorecards yields superior performance. Naturally, Kaplan and Norton’s Norton’s own research underscores this performance improvement, but independent researchers have found similar advantages. Most recently, recently, a study published in Advances in Accounting found that “firms who adopt the BSC significantly outperform firms that do not adopt the BSC over a three year period”2. Simply, shareholder returns are better at firms that employ balanced scorecards to drive strategy implementation. In an era in which law firm performance is increasingly public – and a determining factor for where the best lawyers decide to practise – it seems axiomatic that firm management would want to adopt tools that are proven to improve performance. This report provides the necessary introduction for firms wanting to adopt the balanced scorecard to improve their own performance. The report includes:
An overview of the balanced scorecard concept and tool – from Kaplan and Norton’s Norton’s original conception to its practical application around the world and the results achieved from its adoption; A discussion of how the balanced scorecard applies in a law firm environment – including a discussion of the central opportunities created by balanced scorecard adoption, as well as the central challenges the tool presents for law firm management; and
VII
Executive summary
An in-depth discussion of each of the major elements of a balanced scorecard – with an emphasis on their meaning in a law firm environment:
Financial measures – the most straight forward and easily understood element; Client measures – client satisfaction is generally understood and highly valued in most law firms; Learning and growth – a set of measures focused on the firm’s people, their knowledge and their capabilities; and Business processes – the most difficult element for most firms to conceptualise and measure, and an area that requires creative thinking and strong linkages to firm strategy.
This report is not about dogmatic application of the balanced scorecard. On the contrary, contrary, a rote and dogmatic application of the tool is almost certain to fail in a law firm context. Yet, there are many examples where all or parts of the balanced scorecard have been used quite successfully – within and outside the legal sector. For firms that have struggled with implementation in the past (i.e., that have agreed on a compelling strategy but fallen well short in implementation), this is a tool that can dramatically improve focus, accountability and execution. However, However, the balanced scorecard should be coupled with other factors that are equally important in driving successful implementation (for example, communication, involvement in the strategy development process, resource allocation and budgeting, organisational and technology alignment, etc.). This report provides insights into how the balanced scorecard can be adapted for application in a law firm management
VIII
context. It includes pragmatic advice for tailoring the core elements of the balanced scorecard to law firms’ unique structural constraints. Finally, it includes real world case studies that illuminate how other firms are using financial and non-financial non-financial measures to drive effective strategy implementation. implementation. References
1. Kaplan, R., and Norton, D., The Balanced Scorecard, Scorecard, Harvard Business Press, 1996 2. Crabtree, A., and DeBusk, G., ‘The effects of adopting the Balanced Scorecard on Accounting , shareholder returns’, Advances returns’, Advances in Accounting, Volume 24, Issue 1, June 2008
About the author JOHN STERLING is a founding partner with SmockSterling Strategic Management Consultants with 25 years’ experience in strategic management and market research. Mr. Sterling has worked extensively with law and other professional service firms, as well as with industrial and consumer product companies and not-for-profit not-for-profit organisations. His work with TimeLine Theatre Company in Chicago led to their winning the Richard Goodman Award for excellence in strategic planning from the Association for Strategic Planning in February of this year. year. Mr. Sterling is president of the Strategic Management Association in Chicago and is a contributing editor to Strategy & Leadership. Prior to co-founding SmockSterling in 1989, Mr. Sterling was a senior consultant with Ernst & Young and a senior policy analyst at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
IX
Acknowledgements THE AUTHOR wishes wishe s to acknowledge and a nd recognise the t he work of Robert S. Kaplan and David P. P. Norton – originators of the balanced scorecard. It is on their considerable shoulders that works like this stand. The author also thanks the contributors of case study materials – indispensible and greatly appreciated – and the firms profiled in those case studies. Finally, Finally, the author thanks his partners, John Smock and Peter Giuliani, for their continuing support throughout the development of this report.
XI