(revised) STOP Any Action By Holding Corporate Employees “PERSONALLY” Liable

International Registered Mail Number:

Power of Attorney-In-Fact ATTORNEY IN FACT defined: A person to whom the authority of another, who is called the constituent, is by him lawfully delegated. This term is employed to designate persons who act under a special agency, or a special letter of attorney, so that they are appointed in factum, for the deed, or special act to be performed; but in a more extended sense it includes all other agents employed in any business, or to do any act or acts in pais for another. Bac. Ab. Attorney; Story, Ag. Sec. 25. A Law Dictionary Adapted To The Constitution and Laws of the United States of America and of the Several States of the American Union by John Bouvier Revised Sixth Edition, 1856

To: "Private and Confidential" c/o Richard Roe d/b/a/ Secretary of State (Trustee) Office of Secretary of State 123 State Avenue Non-Domestic Tucson Arizona united States of America (U.S.A.) zip not required [DMM 602 1.3e (2)] “without the U.S.” on the back flap "Priority"

Return to: Sui Juris known as John of the genealogy of Doe General Delivery c/o Main Post Office Non-Domestic Tucson Arizona united States of America (U.S.A.) “without the U.S.” ACKNOWLEDGMENT: Grant of Exclusive Power of Attorney-In-Fact to conduct all matters including but not limited to: Protect My un-a-lien-able Rights in your Fiduciary Capacity against any and all claims, legal actions, orders, warrants, judgments, demands, liabilities, losses, foreclosure, depositions, summonses, lawsuits, costs, fines, liens, levies, penalties, taxes, damages, interests, and expenses whatsoever, both absolute and contingent, as are due and as might become due, now existing and as might hereafter arise, and as might be suffered by, imposed on, and incurred by Debtor for any and every reason, purpose, and cause whatsoever. I accept your Oath, Oath of Office Security Agreement, Constitutions as By-Laws, and Malfeasance (Fidelity) Bond and place you in the Private commencing this self-executing binding contract between you and I. Further, I appoint you Trustee “Fully Personally Liable Now” on your honor and solemn Oath to perform your obligations and duties. Please honor Obligation of Good Faith in Performance of your Duties. Quid Pro Quos, an equal exchange or substitution. FILING OFFICER defined: The person in charge of the office responsible for receiving legal papers and documents that are required to be publicly filed (e.g., office or department of Secretary of State in which a financing statement must be filed to perfect a security interest under the Uniform Commercial Code. U.C.C. § 9-401). Black’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 628) FILE defined: v. To lay away and arrange in order, pleadings, motions, instruments, and other papers for preservation and reference. To

1


deposit in the custody or among the records of a court. To deliver an instrument or other paper to the proper officer or official for the purpose of being kept on file by him as a matter of record and reference in the proper place. It carries the idea of permanent preservation as a public record. City of Overland Park v. Nikias, 209 Kan. 643, 643, 498 498 P.2d 56, 56, 59. See See also also Record. Record. Constr Constructi uctive ve filing. filing. See that title. Black’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 628) LEGAL defined:. That which is according to law. It is used in opposition to equitable, as the legal estate is, in the trustee, the equitable estate in the cestui que trust. Vide Powell on Mortg. Index, h.t. 2. The party who has the legal title has alone the right to seek a remedy for a wrong to his estate, in a court of law, though he may have no beneficial interest in it. The equitable owner is he who has not the legal estate, but is entitled to the beneficial interest. 3. The person who holds the legal estate for the benefit of another is called a trustee; he, who has the beneficiary interest and does not hold the legal title, is called the beneficiary, or more technically, the cestui que trust. 4. When the trustee has a claim, he must enforce his right in a court of equity, for he cannot sue any one at law, in his own name; 1 East, 497; 8 T. R. 332; 1 Saund. 158, n. 1; 2 Bing. 20; still less can he in such court sue his own trustee. 1 East, 497. A Law Dictionary Adapted To The Constitution and Laws of the United States of America and of the Several States of the American Union by John Bouvier Revised Sixth Edition, 1856 Notice to Agents is notice to Principles; Notice to Principles is Notice to Agents. All are without excuse. Including but not limited to; successors and or assigns, d/b/a/ the U.S., all Enclaves, Insular Possessions, Territories, together with all Cities, Municipalities, Counties, Townships, etc., all sundry employees, agents, officers, officials, independent contractors, and all a/k/a: PUBLIC SERVANTs commencing this binding contract. Any adverse action(s) taken without prior written consent (authorization) of Beneficiary strictly prohibited, thus rendered null and void.

2


BREACH OF TRUST AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION (FEE SCHEDULE) Trustee(s), agent(s) Fee Schedule and Invoice (Billing) Statement; Including but not limited to this schedule: (1) Trespass on Cestui Que Trust matter(s) and trust property, including any trust property impaired as a result of any action taken without consent. $10,000,000.00 in silver dollar coin convertible at the legal and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars per trespass per person.

(2) Trustee(s), agent(s) Correspondence not signed in affidavit form (under penalties of perjury, commercial liability). $1,000,000.00 in silver dollar coin convertible at the legal and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars per communication not in compliance.

(3) Trustee(s), agent(s) against Cestui Que Trust convertible at the legal Federal reserve notes to

Foreclosure, Repossession, Court Matters $1,000,000.00 in silver dollar coin and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of silver dollars.

(4) Trustee(s), agent(s) Taking of any Cestui Que Trust property thru force, duress, coercion, conversion (including but not limited to arrest/kidnapping) $10,000,000.00 in silver dollar coin convertible at the legal and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars per occurrence.

(5) Self-Executing Lease Agreement (contract) created upon the taking thru force, duress, coercion, conversion of any Cestui Que Trust property $10,000 in silver dollar coin convertible at the legal and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars lease/per day out of possession of beneficiary.

(6) Trustee(s), agent(s) Harassment after notice $1,000,000.00 in silver dollar coin convertible at the legal and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars per occurrence.

(7) Trustee(s), agent(s) Violation(s); Breach of Trust, Breach of Contract, Breach of the Peace, Perjury) of oath(s)/oath(s) of office of Trustee(s) False Swearing and acting “Without Authority.” $10,000,000.00 in silver dollar coin convertible at the legal and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars per person per violation.

3


(8) Trustee(s), agents False Statements $1,000,000.00 in silver dollar coin convertible at the legal and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars per person, per false statement. (9) Trustee(s), agent(s) Impairment of Contracts $10,000.000.00 in silver dollar coin convertible at the legal and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars user fee, per person, per impairment.

(10) Trustee(s), agent(s) Violation of any un-a-lien-able rights including but not limited to all rights protected by Trusts, Trust Law, Law, Common-Law, International Law, Constitutions, Law of Nations, etc. $10,000.00 in silver dollar coin convertible at the legal and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars user fee, per violation, per person.

NOTARY or NOTARY PUBLIC defined: An officer appointed by the executive, or other appointing power, under the laws of different states. 2. Their duties are generally prescribed by such laws. The most usual of which are, l. To attest deeds, agreements and other instruments, in order to give them authenticity. 2. To protest notes, bills of exchange, and the like. 3. To certify copies of agreements and other instruments. 3. By act of congress, Sept. 16, 1850, Minot's Statutes at Large. U. S. 458, it is enacted, That, in all cases in which, under the laws of the United States, oaths, or affirmations, or acknowledgments may now be taken or made before any justice or justices of the peace of any state or territory, such oaths, affirmations, or acknowledgments may be hereafter also taken or made by or before any notary public duly appointed in any state or territory, and, when certified under, the hand and official seal of such notary, shall have the same force and effect as if taken or made by or before such justice or justices of the peace. And all laws and parts of laws for punishing perjury, or subornation of perjury, committed in any such oaths or affirmations, when taken or made before any such justice of the peace, shall apply to any such offence committed in any oaths or affirmations which may be taken under this act before a notary public, or commissioner, as hereinafter named: Provided always, That on any trial for either of these offences, the seal and signature of the notary shall not be deemed sufficient in themselves to establish the official character of such notary, but the same shall be shown by other and proper evidence. 4. Notaries, are of very ancient origin they were well known among the Romans, and exist in every state of Europe, and particularly on the continent. 5. Their acts have long been respected by the custom of merchants and by the courts of all nations. 6 Toull. n. 211, note. Vide, generally, Chit. Bills, Index, h. t.; Chit. Pr. Index,, h. t.; Burn's Eccl. Law, h. t.; Bro. Off. of a Not. passim; 2 Har. & John. 396; 7 Verm. 22; 8 Wheat. 326; 6 S. & R. 484; 1 Mis. R. 434. By act of Aug. 15, 1876, c. 304, notaries are authorized to take depositions and do all other acts in relation to taking testimony to be used in the courts of the United States, and to take acknowledgments and affidavits with the same effect as commissioners of the United States circuit courts may do. R. S. §1778. They may protest national bank circulating notes; R. S. §5226; take acknowledgment of assignment of claims upon the United States; id. §3477; and administer oaths of allegiance to

4


persons prosecuting such claims; id. §3479. By act of June 22, 1874, c. 390, notaries may take proof of debts against the estate of a bankrupt. The acts of notaries are respected by the custom of merchants and the law of nations. Their protest of a bill is received as evidence in the courts of all civilized countries. A Law Dictionary Adapted To The Constitution And Laws Of The United States Of America And Of The Several States Of The American Union by: John Bouvier Revised Sixth Edition, 1856 Sui Juris, known as: John, of the genealogy of Doe, freeborn spiritual being on the land state the facts contained herein are true, correct, complete, and not misleading, to the best of my personal first hand knowledge and belief. Being of sound mind, competent, over the age of 18. This my free will, voluntary act and deed to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver under my hand and seal with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights and my specific common law right not to be bound by any contract or obligation which I have not entered into knowingly, willingly, voluntarily, and without misrepresentation, duress, or coercion, whereby I did not sign nor consent. I am not now nor have ever been a CITIZEN nor a U.S. Citizen nor a Fourteenth Amendment Federal Citizen nor Employee, I am not bound by sworn oath or oath of office. Whereas I hereby disclaim Clauses One and Two of Section One to the Fourteenth Amendment, together with Article Four Section Three Clause Two. I do hereby certify, verify, state, claim and declare forever without abandonment; Real Property (on Earth); Personal Property (body); and Ecclesiastical Property (soul) together with all trusts, probate, rights, titles, interests droit, droit both absolute and contingent, “Without the U.S.” Should this not be true then let the record be corrected or it will stand as truth. Time is of the essence. Veracity; In my Private Capacity as General Executor/Eecutrix of said Cestui Que Trust account Droit, Droit, This serves Notice that your offer has been Accepted as Valuable Consideration and Returned for Value. This property is Exempt from Levy. Please Adjust this Account for the Proceeds, Products, Accounts and Fixtures and Release The Order(s) of The Court to Me Immediately. Make adjustment and close this account immediately, with prejudice. I accept your Oath, Oath of Office Security Agreement, Constitutions as by-laws, and Malfeasance Bond and place you in the Private commencing this self-executing binding contract between you and I. Further, I appoint you trustee “Fully Personally Liable Now” on your honor and solemn Oath to perform your obligations and duties to Protect My un-a-lien-able Rights in your Fiduciary Capacity against any and all claims, legal actions, orders, warrants, judgments, demands, liabilities, losses, foreclosure, depositions, summonses, lawsuits, costs, fines, liens, levies, penalties, taxes, damages, interests, and expenses whatsoever, both absolute and contingent, as are due and as might become due, now existing and as might hereafter arise, and as might be suffered by, imposed on, and incurred by Debtor for any and every reason, purpose, and cause whatsoever. Please honor Obligation of Good Faith in Performance of your Duties. Quid Pro Quos, an equal exchange or substitution.

5


This my free will, voluntary act and deed true and lawful attorney-infact to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver under my hand and seal, explicitly reserving all rights without prejudice; By:__________________________________________ Sui Juris known as; John of the genealogy of Doe Bailor for JOHN DOE Bailee

________________________ ___________________ Ran, Roe Third Party Witness "Sealed and delivered in the presence of us."

________________________ ___________________ James, Roe Third Party Witness "Sealed and delivered in the presence of us."

STATE OF IINOIS ! ! SS: "O#NT$ OF "OO% ! "ERTIFI"ATE OF A"%NO&E'(MENT On t)is date t)e indi*idual named abo*e+ in )is,)er stated -a.a-it/+ .ersonall/ a..eared be0ore me to ee-ute t)is a-noledgement t)at t)is instrument as signed+ sealed+ and deli*ered as t)eir 0ree ill+ *oluntar/ a-t and deed to mae+ ee-ute+ seal+ a-noledge and deli*er under t)eir )and and seal *eri0ied and aut)enti-ated 0or t)e uses and .ur.oses t)erein mentioned  'ATE AFFI8 NOTAR$ SEA IF RE9#IRE'

 Signature o0 NOTAR$ 6#7I"

'ate "ommission E.ires 

NOTI"E: NOTI"E: 6ubli- a-ts de0ined: de0ined: are t)ose )i-) )a*e a .ubli.ubli- aut)orit/+ aut)orit/+ and )i-) )a*e been been made be0ore .ubli- o00i-ers+ o00i-ers+ are aut)oried b/ b/ a .ubli- seal+ seal+ )a*e been made .ubli- b/ t)e aut)orit/ aut)orit/ o0 a magistrate+ magistrate+ or )i-) )a*e been etra-ted and been .ro.erl/ aut)enti-ated 0rom .ubli- re-ords 7la-;s a 'i-tionar/ 'i-tionar/ Sit) Edition <.age 2=!

=


Notice c/o Richard Roe d/b/a/ Secretary of State (Trustee) Office of Secretary of State: Please kindly correct your records to reflect return location: Return to: Sui Juris known as John of the genealogy of Doe General Delivery c/o Main Post Office Non-Domestic Tucson Arizona united States of America (U.S.A.) “without the U.S.” Since the use of ZIP is not required (see zip not required [DMM 602 1.3e (2)] Domestic Mail Manual Service Regulations, the U.S. Postal Service cannot discriminate against the non-use of ZIP codes, pursuant to the Postal Reorganization Act, Section 403 (Public Law 91-375) The U.S. attempts to assert jurisdiction by sending letters with ZIP codes, when jurisdiction would otherwise be lacking. The receipt and "acceptance" of mail with ZIP codes is one of the presumptions for the Internal Revenue Service, in particular, to presume jurisdiction to send notices. In fact, the IRS has adopted ZIP code areas as "Internal Revenue Districts." See the Federal Register, Volume 51, Number 53, for Wednesday, March 19, 1986. The U.S. Corp. cannot bill a non-U.S. Citizen because such a non-U.S. Citizen is not within the purview of the District of Columbia, its Jurisdiction, territories, possessions or enclaves. As a group, these areas are now uniquely and collectively identified as "the federal zone," as explained in the book entitled The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue, San Rafael, Account for Better Citizenship, 1992. Your immediate cooperation in this matter will be most appreciated. Thank you in advance for your cooperation and understanding. This my free will, voluntary act and deed true and lawful attorney-infact to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver under my hand and seal, explicitly reserving all rights without prejudice;

By:__________________________________________ Sui Juris known as; John of the genealogy of Doe Bailor

>


NOTICE The Certifying Notary Public is a commissioned officer not a party to the claim. In fact the Certifying Notary Public is a Federal Witness defined pursuant to: Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant. (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation or physical force, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to -(1) -(1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to -(A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object's integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or (3) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation, parole, or release pending judicial proceedings; shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. The Certifying Notary also performs the functions of a quasi-Postal Inspector defined pursuant to Homeland Security Act by being compelled to report any violations of the U.S. Postal regulations as an Officer of The Executive Department. *Intimidating a Notary Public under color of law is a violation of "Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law," which primarily governs police misconduct investigations. This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under the color of law to willfully deprive any individual residing in the United States those rights protected by the Constitution and U.S. laws. Other related federal statutes include "Conspiracy Against Rights"; "Obstruction of Justice;" "False Statements." “Department of Housing and Urban Development and Federal Housing Administration transactions” Federal statutes generally restrict color of law investigations to official actions taken by police officers, federal agents, sheriff’s deputies, correctional officers, and other public safety officials. However, offduty officers who assert their official status also may face prosecution. In rare cases, the actions of security guards, private citizens, judges, defense attorneys, and prosecutors who willfully participate with federal, state, or local law enforcement officials in the commission of color of law violations fall within the purview of the federal statutes. 6ubli- Noti-e,6ubli- Re-ord .ursuant to .rin-i.les o0 "ommon?a does not re-ognie+ -onsent or grant an/ @urisdi-tion to an/



Facts: All "charges" are against the "Cestui Que Trust" The people are the “Beneficiaries” of said Cestui Que Trust/Estate. Legal Title is in the Secretary Of State as Trustee holding legal title for beneficiary (you) of Cestui Que Trust/Estate All "legal titles" of real and personal property are "held" in “Trust” by “Trustee” the Secretary of State (in his Fiduciary Capacity). In respect to the trust and confidence involved in it and the scrupulous good faith and candor which it requires. A person having duty, created by his undertaking, to act primarily for another's benefit in matters connected with such undertaking. LEGAL defined:. That which is according to law. It is used in opposition to equitable, as the legal estate is, in the trustee, the equitable estate in the cestui que trust. Vide Powell on Mortg. Index, h.t. 2. The party who has the legal title has alone the right to seek a remedy for a wrong to his estate, in a court of law, though he may have no beneficial interest in it. The equitable owner is he who has not the legal estate, but is entitled to the beneficial interest. 3. The person who holds the legal estate for the benefit of another is called a trustee; he, who has the beneficiary interest and does not hold the legal title, is called the beneficiary, or more technically, the cestui que trust. 4. When the trustee has a claim, he must enforce his right in a court of equity, for he cannot sue any one at law, in his own name; 1 East, 497; 8 T. R. 332; 1 Saund. 158, n. 1; 2 Bing. 20; still less can he in such court sue his own trustee. 1 East, 497. A Law Dictionary by John Bouvier Revised Sixth Edition, 1856 LEGAL ESTATE defined: One, the right to which may be enforced in a court of law. It is distinguished from an equitable estate, the rights to which can be established only in a court of equity. 2 Bouv. Inst. n. 1688. A Law Dictionary by John Bouvier Revised Sixth Edition, 1856 BREACH OF DUTY defined: In a general sense, any violation or omission of a legal or moral duty. More particularly, the neglect or failure to fulfill in a just and proper manner the duties of an office or fiduciary employment. Every violation by a trustee of a duty which equity lays upon him, whether willful and fraudulent, or done through negligence or arising through mere oversight or forgetfulness, is a breach of duty. See Non-support. Black’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 189) BREACH OF COVENANT defined: The nonperformance of any covenant agreed to be performed, or the doing of any act covenanted not to be done. Black’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 189)

G


BREACH OF TRUST defined: Any act done by a trustee contrary to the terms of his trust, or in excess of his authority and to the detriment of the trust; or the wrongful omission by a trustee of any act required of him by the terms of the trust. Also the wrongful misappropriation by a trustee of any fund or property, which had been lawfully committed to him in a fiduciary character. Every violation by a trustee of a duty which equity lays upon him, whether willful and fraudulent, or done through negligence, or arising through mere oversight and forgetfulness, is a "breach of trust." The term, therefore, includes every omission and commission in carrying out the trust according to its terms, of care and diligence in protecting and investing the trust property, and of using perfect good faith. A violation by the trustee of any duty, which he owes to the beneficiary. Bruun v. Han son, C.C.A.ldaho, 103 F.2d 685, 699. Black’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 189) BREACH OF TRUST WITH FRAUDULENT INTENT defined: Larceny after trust. State v. Owings, 205 S.C. 314, 31 S.E.2d 906, 907. Black’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 189) Conventio vincit legem. The agreement of the parties overcomes or prevails against the law. Story, Ag. Sec. See Dig. 16, 3, 1, 6. Contractus ex turpi causa, vel contra bonos mores nullus est. A contract founded on a base and unlawful consideration, or against good morals, is null. Hob. 167; Dig. 2, 14, 27, 4. Therefore, the “court” of the monopoly corporation d/b/a/ the Govt. of the U.S. has no legitimate jurisdiction or authority over freeborn spiritual beings without our consent to transfer that authority to them. The mere fact that we might have a token on the Elite’s Monopoly board does not mean that we have to set aside our humanity. We have every un-a-lien-able Right to call a “time out,” from the game while we go get refreshed! Under Federal law, which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is “without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers.” Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828) Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution states: “No State shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts.” The individual’s right to contract is unlimited and no State may interfere with that right. The mere fact that a police officer, magistrate, judge, sheriff, real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent, etc., all employees acting under color of law or even upon probable cause, might attempt to serve a notice on a living man or woman in no way diminishes that man’s or woman’s authority and un-a-lien-able Right to contract and to receive compensation for these takings of his time and liberty in the event that the man or woman did not consent to the transaction.

1H


In the event that a man or woman does not consent to a particular action and calls a “time out,” the liability clock starts ticking for the police officer, magistrate, judge, sheriff, real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent. Volunti non fit injuria. He who consents cannot receive an injury. 2 Bouv. Inst. n. 2279, 2327; 4 T. R. 657; Shelf. on mar. & Div. 449. The corollary is thus: he who does not consent can receive an injury. “It is the responsibility of those who exercise power to show that it is legitimate.” Noam Chomsky In “Economic Analysis of Property Rights”, Cambridge University Press, 2nd Edition, Barzel observed that, what really matters for an individual is his ability to “use” a given commodity. Under these considerations, it can be seen that the extent to which an individual can enjoy the attributes of his or her property actually defines his rights over that good. To make his point, Barzel stated that “anyone who expects to benefit from an asset, be it a legal owner or a thief, is (at least) a partial owner”. To include this real but informal dimension, Barzel defines property rights to include legal (formal) property rights and economic (informal) property rights. In the case of human bodies – ideas, labor, tissues, etc. – one can observe that the owners of these “commodities,” have exclusive prerogatives over the benefits that they can provide: • They can derive income from them in the form of capture at transaction time. • They can exclude others from using them. • They can also grant similar advantages to selected others. Therefore, until such time as a statute-enforcing police officer, magistrate, attorney, judge, sheriff, real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent and other so-called public officers all employees actually legitimize their actions by proving their case in a court of law that a man or woman is guilty of an alleged crime, that man or woman has every Right to “keep the meter running,” so to speak, by putting these people on notice that they have liability pursuant to a Fee Schedule. If the man or woman has put impersonating govt. on notice to the effect that a Fee Schedule is Schedule is in place, and the people acting in their capacities as police, attorneys, etc., fail to challenge this notice within a specified time, then the man or woman is entitled to recovery of remedy for damages in spite of the outcome of any criminal proceeding that the public officers may initiate as a separate action. Most fundamentally, these rights to own our bodies as “property” and to engage in voluntary exchange are also basic common-law rights, and the two basic principles of voluntary capitalism. These principles are in accordance with the U.S. Constitution as intended by our Founding Fathers. The 5th Amendment states that no one may be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. “Where rights as secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which will abrogate them.” Miranda v. Ariz., 384 U.S. 436 at 491 (1966).

11


The spirit of voluntary capitalism was expressed in this famous Supreme Court case, which reads: “The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.” Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1906). Very few Americans (including lawyers) know that federal legislative and territorial jurisdiction is very limited. It is limited to the ten square miles of Washington District of Columbia, certain military bases where States have ceded jurisdiction, certain territories such as Puerto Rico and Guam, and certain Guano islands. Therefore, as soon as a man or woman can show that a police officer, magistrate, judge, sheriff, real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent, magistrate, etc., is working for the corporation d/b/a/ the Govt. of the .S. U.S. incorporated in 1871, they have shown that those people do not have jurisdiction over the man or woman on the land in the various states of the union. “It is axiomatic that the prosecution must always prove territorial jurisdiction over a crime in order to sustain a conviction therefor.” U.S. v. Benson, 495 F.2d, at 481 (5th Cir., 1974). This information comes from a 29-page paper by Attorney Lowell H. Becraft, Jr. The Supreme Court has stated: “The laws of Congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government.” Caha v. U.S., 142 U.S., at 215 (1894). Becraft cites twenty court cases confirming the territorial limitation of federal jurisdiction, including: · U.S. v. Cotroni, 527 F.2d 708, 711 (2nd Cir., 1975) – holding federal wiretap laws as territorial. · Reyes v. Secretary of H.E.W., 476 F.2d 910, 915 (D.C. Cir., 1973) – holding administration of Social Security Act as territorial. · Schoenbaum v. Firstbrook, 268 F. Supp. 385, 392 (S.D.N.Y., 1967) – holding securities act as territorial Property Rights

12


See: http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2013/07/corporations-acting-asgovernments-dont.html When American colonists declared independence from England in 1776, they also freed themselves from control by English corporations that extracted their wealth and dominated trade. After fighting a revolution to end this exploitation, our country's founders retained a healthy fear of corporate power and wisely limited corporations exclusively to a business role. Corporations were forbidden from attempting to influence elections, public policy, and other realms of civic society. Initially, the privilege of incorporation was granted selectively to enable activities that benefited the public, such as construction of roads or canals. Enabling shareholders to profit was seen as a means to that end. The states also imposed conditions (some of which remain on the books, though unused) like these: * Corporate charters (licenses to exist) were granted for a limited time and could be revoked promptly for violating laws. * Corporations were often terminated if they caused public harm. * Owners and managers were responsible for criminal acts committed on the job. * Corporations could not make any political or charitable contributions nor spend money to influence law-making. Most COUNTRIES are CORPORATIONS (except Iran, North Korea and Cuba) Most CITIES and AGENCIES, acting as GOVERNMENTS are CORPORATIONS. Most EXECUTIVE, LEGISLATIVE and JUDICIAL OFFICES are CORPORATIONS. Every NAME in the U.S. is a corporate entity, filed at the time of your birth and acceptance of a social security number. This has been true since 1933 and the " fake bankruptcy" of the U.S. At that time every NAME collectively became the collateral for the bankrupt nation, in their NAME capacity as a corporation with a lifetime of equity and value. These implications are STUNNING because: ALL OF THESE "CORPORATIONS ARE PRIVATE AND FOR PROFIT! How is it that private bankers can profit from your lifetime of value and equity but you as an individual cannot? How can a corporation elect a President of the corporate United States since all corporate heads are appointed. (Who appoints our President?) How can a corporation tell us we have to pay taxes? How can a private, for profit corporation make laws that are "legal" for people? They can only make "rules" applicable to other corporations. Oh, yes our NAMES ARE corporations. But how can NAMES as people be corporations if we never knowingly gave our consent, since consent is required? This means that a private government is run through the U.C.C. and Depart of Commerce, and the Federal Reserve, but WITHIN the sham appearance of a democracy. Now some of the insane decisions by our politicians and wall street make sense. They were making decisions for their CORPORATE HEADS (certainly not for the peons) and in that regard their decisions made perfect sense. The information and lists below came from www.removingtheshackles.blogspot.ca

13


Dunn & Bradstreet (D&B) DUNS code number are assigned to corporations in America to track their credit ratings. Below you will find the DUNS numbers for the aggregate US government and each of its major agencies, those of the aggregate governments of each US state along with that of its largest city, and those of the aggregate United Nations and some of its major agencies. These corporate code numbers can be verified by using the following link to the D&B website and typing in the required information: http://mycredit.dnb.com/search-for-duns-number/ In checking DUNS code numbers for governments, you will find that they have many subsidiaries and shell corporations to lessen financial accountability. You will find that some of them are listed as being in a geographical location other than in their territorial authority, making their operations even more suspicious. The City of Chicago corporation, for example, is located in Washington, DC, the State of Montana Corporation is located in Chicago, Illinois and the State of Maine corporation – listed with seemingly sardonic humor as “State-OMaine Inc.” – is located in New York City, New York. You will often also see executive, legislative and judicial offices themselves listed as corporations. Manta.com is a website for obtaining data on corporations. If the names of any of these government entities are entered, you will find that virtually all of them are listed as private, for–profit corporations. You will also see in the aggregate valuations of their assets that Manta.com provides is vastly greater than what is listed in these private government corporations fraudulent but well-publicized budget documents that seek to justify draconian but fraudulent budget cuts and their related tax-based extortion rackets. This confirms that many hundred trillions of dollars of the people's money listed in the semi-secret government comprehensive annual financial reports (CAFRs) as government institutional investments are being siphoned off by the global banking cartel and those sinister forces behind it. They are doing this via that obscure subsidiary of the private, forprofit Federal Reserve System known as the Depository Trust Clearing Center (DTCC), dba Cede Inc. (Again, note the sardonic humor.) This semi-secret entity fraudulently confiscates these investment funds as an executor after they have been registered by brokers, relegating investors to mere beneficiaries whose funds can then be lawfully – at least according to presently and commonly used Universal Commercial Code (UCC)-based statutory law, not constitutional or common law -confiscated at the will of said executor. The implications of this are staggering: not only has this corporate subversion of government happened in America and with the United Nations headquartered here, but it has happened in almost all of the nations of the world by means of similar corporate subversion enacted under different names. This definitely explains why governments at all levels in almost all nations no longer protect the public interest, but only special interests – specifically, the interests of their fellow predatory for-profit corporations whose actions are now destroying this planet and all life upon it.

14


The world could well see sweeping constitutionally-based legal and law enforcement actions in all of the nations of the world against those who have perpetrated crimes against nature and humanity. The new transparent governmental and financial models now being tested in the nation of Iceland. Likewise poorly publicized mass resignations of government, banking and corporate officials now occurring worldwide are both heralds of these imminent transforming events. DUNS Numbers of the US Corporate Government and Most of Its Major Agencies United States Government-052714196 US Department of Defense (DOD)-030421397 US Department of the Treasury-026661067 US Department of Justice (DOJ)-011669674 US Department of State-026276622 US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS)-Office of the Secretary112463521 US Department of Education-944419592 US Department of Energy-932010320 US Department of Homeland Security-932394187 US Department of the Interior-020949010 US Department of Labor-029536183 US Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD)-Office of the Secretary-030945779 US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-931691211 US Transportation Security Administration (TSA)-050297655 US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)-056622429 Bureau of Customs & Border Protection (CBP)-796730922 Federal Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE)-130221646 US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-057944910 National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA)-003259074 National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)-079933920 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)-364281923 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)-037751583 Federal Communications Commission (FCC)-020309969 US Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC)-003475175 US Public Health Service (USPHS)-039294216 National Institutes of Health (NIH)-061232000 US Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC)-927645465 US Food & Drug Administration (FDA)-138182175 US Internal Revenue Service (IRS)-040539587 Federal Reserve Board of Governors (Fed)-001959410 Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)-878865674 National Security Agency (NSA)-617395215 US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)-167247027 Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms & Tobacco (BAFT)-132282310 Federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM)-926038563 Federal Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)-926038407 DUNS Numbers of Each US Corporate State and Its Largest City State of Alabama-004027553 City of Birmingham-074239450 State of Alaska-078198983 City of Fairbanks-079261830 State of Arizona-068300170 City of Phoenix-030002236 State of Arkansas-619312569 City of Little Rock-065303794 State of California-071549000 City of Los Angeles-159166271 State of Colorado-076438621 City of Denver-066985480 State of Connecticut-016167285 City of Bridgeport-156280596 State of Delaware-037802962 City of Wilmington-067393900

15


District of Columbia-949056860 City of Washington-073010550 State of Florida-004078374 City of Miami-965299576 State of Georgia-069230183 City of Atlanta-065372500 State of Hawaii-077676997 City of Honolulu-828979612 State of Idaho-071875734 City of Boise-070017017 State of Illinois-065232498 City of Chicago-556057206 State of Indiana-071789435 City of Indianapolis-964647155 State of Iowa-828089701 City of Davenport-963855494 State of Kansas-827975009 City of Wichita-069862755 State of Kentucky-828008883 City of Louisville-943445093 State of Louisiana-0612389911 City of New Orleans-033692404 State of Maine-061207536 City of Portland, Maine-071747802 State of Maryland-847612442 City of Baltimore-052340973 State of Massachussetts-138090548 City of Boston-007277284 State of Michigan-054698428 City of Detroit-021733631 State of Minnesota-050375465 City of Minneapolis-009901959 State of Mississippi-008210692 City of Jackson-020864955 State of Missouri-616963596 City of Kansas (City)-832496868 State of Montana-945782027 City of Billings-068925759 State of Nebraska-041472307 City of Omaha-926604690 State of Nevada-123259447 City of Las Vegas-019342317 State of New Hampshire-066760232 City of Manchester-045009073 State of New Jersey-067373258 City of Newark-019092531 State of New Mexico-007111818 City of Albuquerque-129962346 State of New York-041002973 City of New York-021741036 State of North Carolina-830979667 City of Charlotte-809275006 State of North Dakota-098564300 City of Bismarck-080245640 State of Ohio-034309166 City of Columbus-010611869 State of Oklahoma-050411726 City of Oklahoma (City)-073131542 State of Oregon-932534998 City of Portland (Oregon)-054971197 State of Pennsylvania-933882784 City of Philadelphia-929068737 State of Rhode Island-008421763 City of Providence-069853752 State of South Carolina-067006072 City of Columbia-878281562 State of Tennessee-04143882 City of Memphis-051386258 State of Texas-002537595 City of Houston-967421590 State of Utah-009094301 City of Salt Lake City-017096780 State of Vermont-066760240 City of Burlington-037442977 State of Virginia-047850373 City of Virginia Beach-074736299 State of Washington-079248936 City of Seattle-009483561 State of West Virginia-828092515 City of Charleston (West Virginia)197931681 State of Wisconsin-001778349 City of Milwaukee-004779133 State of Wyoming-832826015 City of Cheyenne-021917273 DUNS Numbers of the United Nations Corporation and Some of Its Major Corporate Agencies United Nations (UN)-824777304 UN Development Program (UNDP)-793511262 UN Educational, Scientific, & Cultural Organization (UNESCO)-053317819 UN World Food Program (UNWFP)-054023952 UN International Children's Education Fund (UNICEF)-017698452 UN World Health Organization (WHO)-618736326 This is a list of publicly traded companies (corporations) with the SEC. http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=&match=&CIK=... Home | Latest Filings | Previous Page Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System EDGAR Search Results SEC Home » Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System » Company Search »

1=


Current Page Companies for SIC 8888 - FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS Click on CIK to view company filings Items 1 - 40 CIK Company State/Country 0000311669 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK R6 0000866710 BANCO NACIONAL DE COMERCIO EXTERIOR SNC O5 0001026725 BANCO NACIONAL DE OBRAS Y SERVICIOS PUBLICOS SNC O5 0001045299 BANQUE CENTRALE DE TUNISIE DC 0000912239 CANADA MORTGAGE & HOUSING CORP DC 0001498597 CARSO INFRAESTRUCTURA Y CONSTRUCCION SAB DE CV O5 0001016472 CITY OF NAPLES DE 0001109609 DEVELOPMENT BANK OF JAPAN INC. formerly: DEVELOPMENT BANK OF JAPAN (filings through 2008-09-29) M0 0000033745 EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK N4 0000276328 EXPORT DEVELOPMENT CANADA/CN formerly: EXPORT DEVELOPMENT CORP (filings through 2002-06-07) DC 0000873463 EXPORT IMPORT BANK OF KOREA NY 0000205317 FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL D5 0000035946 FINLAND REPUBLIC OF DC 0001556421 FMS WERTMANAGEMENT 2M 0001179453 GOVERNMENT OF BELIZE DC 0001163395 GOVERNMENT OF JAMICA NY 0000931106 HELLENIC REPUBLIC NY 0000216105 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND Q2 0000889414 HUNGARY formerly: REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY (filings through 2011-11-25) NY 0000052749 ISRAEL STATE OF NY 0000052782 ITALY REPUBLIC OF L6 0000053078 JAMAICA GOVERNMENT OF L8 0000837056 JAPAN NY 0001551322 Japan Bank for International Cooperation M0 0000053190 JAPAN DEVELOPMENT BANK M0 0001109604 Japan Finance Corp formerly: JAPAN BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION (filings through 2008-09-29) M0 0000837335 JAPAN FINANCE ORGANIZATION FOR MUNICIPALITIES formerly: JAPAN FINANCE CORP FOR MUNICIPAL ENTERPRISES (filings through 2008-09-29) M0 0000821533 KfW formerly: KREDITANSTALT FUER WIEDERAUFBAU (filings through 2004-11-12) KREDITANSTALT FUR WIEDERAUFBAU (filings through 2002-10-11) 2M 0000835615 KFW INTERNATIONAL FINANCE INC DE 0000869318 KOREA DEVELOPMENT BANK NY 0001483135 KOREA FINANCE Corp M5 0000878519 LANDESBANK BADEN WURTTEMBERG DE 0001306843 LANDESKREDITBANK BADEN WURTTEMBERG FORDERBANK 2M 0001144797 LANDWIRTSCHAFTLICHE RENTENBANK I8 0000356049 LONDON FINANCE & INVESTMENT GROUP PLC/ADR/ NY 0001027457 NATIONAL POWER CORP R6 0000357024 NORDIC INVESTMENT BANK H9

1>


0000202811 OESTERREICHISCHE KONTROLLBANK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT C4 0000074615 ONTARIO PROVINCE OF A6 0000076027 PANAMA REPUBLIC OF DC http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar Home | Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System | Previous PageModified 03/14/2012 Home | Latest Filings | Previous Page Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System EDGAR Search Results SEC Home » Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System » Company Search » Current Page Companies for SIC 8888 - FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS Click on CIK to view company filings Items 41 - 60 CIK Company State/Country 0000077694 PERU REPUBLIC OF NY 0000836136 PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA A1 0000862406 PROVINCE OF NEW BRUNSWICK A3 0000842639 PROVINCE OF NOVA SCOTIA NY 0000722803 QUEBEC A8 0000852555 QUEENSLAND TREASURY CORP C3 0001191980 REGION OF LOMBARDY DE 0000914021 REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA DC 0000019957 REPUBLIC OF CHILE formerly: CHILE REPUBLIC OF (filings through 2002-11-01) F3 0000917142 REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA NY 0000873465 REPUBLIC OF KOREA M5 0000911076 REPUBLIC OF PORTUGAL DC 0000932419 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA formerly: SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIC OF (filings through 2002-04-10) DC 0001030717 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES NY 0000869687 REPUBLIC OF TURKEY NY 0000203098 SASKATCHEWAN PROVINCE OF NY 0000225913 SWEDEN KINGDOM OF V7 0000898608 TREASURY CORP OF VICTORIA C3 0000101368 UNITED MEXICAN STATES NY 0000102385 URUGUAY REPUBLIC OF DC http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar For your view, re-view http://youtu.be/Y888wVY5hzw the corporation http://youtu.be/umVj5XQYAi8 What The FUQ? - Frequently Unanswered Questions Whereas defined pursuant to: The Alien Registration Act of 1940, usually called the Smith Act because the anti-sedition section was authored by Representative Howard W. Smith of Virginia, was adopted at 54 Statutes at Large 670-671 (1940). The Act has been amended several times and can now be found at 18 U.S. Code § 2385 (2000). § 2385.

1


Advocating Overthrow of Government; Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof-- Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. As used in this section, the terms "organizes" and "organize", with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons. Whereas defined pursuant to: Officers and employees acting as agents of foreign principal 18 USC § 219 (a) Whoever, being a public official, is or acts as an agent of a foreign principal required to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than two years, or both. (b) Nothing in this section shall apply to the employment of any agent of a foreign principal as a special Government employee in any case in which the head of the employing agency certifies that such employment is required in the national interest. A copy of any certification under this paragraph shall be forwarded by the head of such agency to the Attorney General who shall cause the same to be filed with the registration statement and other documents filed by such agent, and made available for public inspection in accordance with section 6 of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (22 USCS § 616], as amended. (c) For the purpose of this section "public official" means Member of Congress, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, either before or after he has qualified, or an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency, or branch of Government thereof, including the District of Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such department, agency, or branch of Government. Please take the time to un-learn the un-truths that have engulfed your entire life. "People will always have opinions about your decision because they're not courageous enough to take action on their opinion."

1G

(revised) STOP Any Action By Holding Corporate Employees “PERSONALLY” Liable

Recommend Documents