Descripción: Cuestionario Sobre Rayos x y Rayos Gamma
Descripción completa
........................Descripción completa
Ensayo sobre rayos XDescripción completa
Descripción: Los Rayos Cósmicos
nnnDescripción completa
Descripción completa
Bienvenidos a Qué Rayos Sabemos Nosotros!? Guía De Estudio. Felicitaciones por su decisión de continuar la aventura que usted comenzó mirando la película.Descripción completa
Descripción: Cristalografia Cristaloquímica Difraccion de rayos X Estructuras Cristalinas
rxDescripción completa
Informe de laboratorio sobre rayos gamma
Ensayo sobre rayos XFull description
Monografia rayos xDescripción completa
Descripción: Osciloscopio de Rayos Catódicos
Descripción: Es un importante tema de la fisica, imprescidible para todo estudiante de las ciencias de la salud e investigadores de la rama de la radiologia
RAYOS-OMBAC v RAYOS Facts:
Mrs. Irene Rayos-Ombac (lola) is the petitioner in this case. The respondent is • Atty. Orlando Orlando Rayos Rayos (lawyer), (lawyer), her nephew. nephew. Jan. 1985: lawyer induced lola, who was then 85 years old, to withdraw all her • bank deposits and entrust it to him for safekeeping. Lawyer made lola believe that if she would do so, all the money will be excluded • from the estate of her deceased husband and therefore exclude the other heirs from inheriting. Lola then withdrew all her money (P588K) and deposited it in the account of • lawyer in Union Bank. Upon demands that the amount be returned, lawyer informed lola that he can • only return P400K on installment. Pumayag na lang si lola kasi kelangan niya talaga ng pera. They signed a MOA regarding this transaction. However, the check given by lawyer to lola was dishonored due to insufficient • funds. Lola then filed an estafa case against lawyer. Lawyer offered as settlement 2 • second-hand cars and cash amounting to P40K. Lola refused the offer. Lawyer also filed cases against Lola. Estafa - because lola allegedly reneged on • her promise to sell a certain parcel of land. Another accusing lola of making false statements in the testate proceedings of her deceased husband. Lola then filed a case for disbarment on 2 grounds. (1) defrauding lola and (2) • filing frivolous cases against her. •
IBP recommended that lawyer be suspended for 2 years.
Lawyer then filed this motion to lift the suspension stating that lola has already • withdrawn her complaint for disbarment Issue:
•
W/N lawyer should be suspended for 2 years
Held:
Yes. In fact the SC raised the penalty to disbarment. (pinabayaan na lang sana • niya yung suspension, baka di pa siya disbarred)
The withdrawal of lola of her complaint has no effect on the disbarment • proceedings. Lawyer violated the CPR as well as his oath when he deceived his 85 year old • aunt. • Lawyer’s wicked deed was aggravated by the series of unfounded suits he filed against lola. • Lawyer’s deceitful conduct makes him unworthy of membership in the legal profession.
