QMS for Laboratories Testing and Calibration ISO 17025

GUIDANCE ON

QUALITY MANAGEMENT

SYSTEMS FOR LABORATORIES TESTING AND CALIBRATION (ISO/IEC 17025)

Prepared by the Caribbean Accreditation Services (CLAS) AnLaboratory European Union Funded Project

“Obstacles are what you see when you take your eyes off the goal” November 2010 Edition 1

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE

PREAMBLE This document is a consolidation of information and resources on the process of Developing a Quality Management System for Testing Laboratories. Many resources were consulted in preparation of the guide, and therefore contributed to its completion. Laboratories should understand that there are many ways of accomplishing the goal of Accreditation and producing a reliable output and therefore do not restrict themselves or their staff only to what pertains herein. The development of this manual on “Quality Management systems for Laboratories” was supported by the European Union through the 9th EDF Funded Caribbean Laboratory Accreditation Services Project implemented by the CARICOM Regional Organisation for Standards and Quality (CROSQ). This guidance manual is not used for commercial purposes.

For further information, please contact :

CARICOM Regional Organisation for Standards and Quality (CROSQ) 2nd Floor Nicholas House 29-30 Broad Street Bridgetown Barbados, W.I. www.crosq.org crosq.caricom@crosq.org

Authors Giselle Guevara, BSc., MPhil, MBA Project Coordinator 9th EDF Funded Caribbean Laboratory Accreditation Services Project (CLAS) CROSQ Bridgetown Barbados Ing. Manfred Kindler Accreditation Expert and Consultant Kindler International Division Berlin, Germany manfred@manfredkindler.de Page 2 of 85


This Manual is dedicated to my colleague and dear friend Bertha Munguia

Acknowledgements The Authors are most grateful to the several persons who provided support, very useful input, feedback and gave generously of their time in the development and production of this document. We especially wish to thank those colleagues who reviewed the Manual and paused in their busy schedule to provide incisive comments, helpful tips and stimulat ing input. Thank you for everyone who provide d examples and ideas for the content of this manual, sometimes without even knowing you were helping. We are truly thankful and wish to recognise the contributions of Valerie Wilson and Wendy Kitson-Piggott as Technical Editors, Michael Seepersaud, CROSQ-IDB Project Manager for assisting with the manual publication. Thanks to Manfred Kindler who provided useful technical information, invaluable feedback and assistance, in the preparation and compilation of this material. We wish to thank theofCARICOM andand the Editing European Union fundedwas CISP Project their contribution to theCROSQ, production this guide.Secretariat Preparation of this manual a long andfor precise task and we therefore wish to extend our special gratitude to all who assisted and facilitated the process.

Produced and Printed with support from the European Union under the 9 th EDF Fund

Page 3 of 85


Table of Contents FOREWORD.................................................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 1 LABORATORY QUALITY FUNDAMENTALS .................................................. 7 1.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 7 1.2 QUALITY TERMS AND DEFINITIONS ..................................................................... 8 1.3 ACCREDITATION vs . CERTIFICATION ................................................................. 11 1.4 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ...................................................................... 13 1.5 DOCUMENT HIERARCHY .................................................................................... 14 1.6 A STEPWISE APPROACH TO DEVELOPING A QMS ............................................ 17 1.7 ACTION PLANNING USING THE MILESTONES .................................................... 20 1.8 CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ............................................................. 22 1.9 DOCUMENTATION PLA N ..................................................................................... 29 CHAPTER 2 ELEMENTS OF THE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM .............................. 35 2.1 THE QUALITY PLAN ............................................................................................ 35 2.2 STRUCTURING YOUR QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ................................... 37 2.3 THE QUALITY POLICY STATEMENT .................................................................... 38 2.4 THE QUALITY MANUAL ....................................................................................... 39 2.5 DOCUMENT CONTROL ........................................................................................ 42 2.6 RECORDS ........................................................................................................... 46 CHAPTER 3 PROCEDURES ............................................................................................ 47 3.1 PROCEDURE MANUAL ........................................................................................ 47 3.2 OVERVIEW OF PROCEDURE WRITING ................................................................ 47 3.3 ADVICE FOR WRITING PROCEDURES ................................................................ 48 3.4 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE OUTLINE ........................................................... 49 3.5 OVERVIEW OF TECHNICAL PROCEDURES (SOPs) ............................................. 53 3.6 DOCUMENTATION CHECKLIST ........................................................................... 57 3.7 USE OF FLOW DIAGRAMS .................................................................................. 58 CHAPTER 4 FAQs in LABORATORY QUALITY ............................................................... 61 CHAPTER 5 APPENDICES .............................................................................................. 67 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ............................................................................................ 85

Page 4 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE List of Figures Figure 1 Summary of th e Applic ation Pro cess tow ards Ac creditati on ....................................12 Figure 2 Process Appr oach to Laborato ry Quality Management...... ........................................13 Figu re 3 Docu ment Hierarc hy ......................................................................................................15 Figu re 4 Impl ement ing a Quali ty Management System .............................................................16 Figu re 5 The Twent y Miles ton es su mm aris ed ............................................................................18 Figu re 6 Milest one 1: Qu alit y Pol ici es ........................................................................................20 Figu re 7 Milest one 2: Managemen t............... ..............................................................................21 Figu re 8 Examp le of Respon sib ili ty Matrix for train ing .............................................................21 Figu re 9 Hou se of Acc redit atio n ..................................................................................................17 Figu re 10 The PDCA Mod el fo r QMS Impr ovem ent ....................................................................24 Figu re 11 Examp le of a Quali ty Plan ...........................................................................................25 Figu re 12 Diag ram of QMS Proces s Ac tiv iti es............. ...............................................................28 Figu re 13 Docu ment atio n plan .....................................................................................................29 Figu re 14 Qu alit y Plan Outl ine .....................................................................................................36 Figu re 15 Doc um entat ion Statu s .................................................................................................38 Figu re 16 Examp le of Table of Cont ents f or Manu al .................................................................41 Figure 17 Example of Quality Manual Amendment table...........................................................42 Figu re 18 Examp le of Master list (Docu ment c ont rol lo g) .........................................................43 Figure 19 Example of Header/Footer combination.....................................................................44 Figu re 20 Examp le of a Header ....................................................................................................44 Figu re 21 Ex amp le of a Foot er .....................................................................................................44 Figu re 22 Examp le Header/Footer of Docu ment c ont n ot es ..........................................................................45 Figure 23 Example withrolDocument cont rol note ...............................................45 Figu re 24 Exampl e of Recor d Managem ent Datab ase ...............................................................46 Figu re 25. Th e P’s of Proced ur e wr iti ng ......................................................................................48 Figu re 26. Docu ment atio n Checkli st for th e QMS Prog ram ......................................................57 Figu re 27 Flo wc hart in g Log ic ......................................................................................................59 Figu re 28 Flow ch art sym bol s .......................................................................................................60 List of Appendices Appen di x 1 Su mm ary of Clau ses in ISO/IEC 17025............................................................. 67 Appen di x 2 L ist o f Poli cies i n ISO/IEC 17025 ...................................................................... 70 Appen di x 3 L ist o f Proc edu res in ISO/IEC 17025 ................................................................ 71 Appen di x 4 L ist o f “ SHALLs ” in ISO/IEC 17025 .................................................................. 73 Appen di x 5 Do cu ment Co ntrol Ch eck lis t ............................................................................ 78 Appen di x 6 Ex amp le of a Fl ow chart ................................................................................... 79 Appen di x 7 Ch eck list fo r revi ewi ng Qual ity Man agem ent Sys tem Imp lem ent ation ............. 80

Page 5 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE FOREWORD

L

aboratory accreditation is a formal process that recognizes the technical competence of a laboratory to perform specific tests or calibrations. Accreditation requires laboratories to maintain a documented quality management system (QMS) and personnel who are qualified and authorized to perform tasks related to the scope of accreditation. The added value of accreditation far outweighs the necessary investment in human resources, finances and time, since it is an independent method of monitoring laboratory competence and performance, and assures the validity of results disseminated to users. One very critical benefit of laboratory accreditation is that it provides assurance to trading partners that an exporting country is competent to test or inspect to the trading partners’ requirements, while at the same time addressing and assuring compliance with the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Agreement. The CLAS PROJECT (2008-2010) has sought to develop a framework that would facilitate co-ordination of regional laboratory accreditation in a manner that would leverage regional capacity and harmonize accreditation processes and procedures used across the Caribbean region while also addressing the need for regional accreditation services to be cost-effective and internationally accepted. It was envisioned that CLAS would create a platform for: •

• • •

Strengthening regional communication through providing a mechanism for negotiation and consensus building Building the relevant human resource capacity Forging strong linkages and relationships among regional stakeholders Enabling the smaller countries of the region to participate in and more easily access expertise and services to support their accreditation efforts.

Overall it strengthened and improved regional capacity for the continued functioning of the Laboratory Accreditation infrastructure. More specifically, CLAS provided: • Assistance and support for the coordination of activities of the national accreditation bodies in the region, aimed at avoidin g duplication and promoting tran sfer of knowledge; and ensur ing an internationally recognized accreditation infrastructure in the Caribbean; • Interaction among the National Accreditation Focal points (NAFPs) for multiplication of benefits; • Access to international expertise by the NAFPs; • Access to proficiency testing programs by the NAFPs; • Access to training programs for Labs and Assessors; •A structure to uphold the principles of Cross frontier Accreditation (ILAC G21) and ensure that confidence in the Caribbean Accreditation infrastructure is not eroded by extra-regional Accreditation Bodies. This manual has been developed to support the development of laboratory quality management systems in regional laboratories and to build regional capacity to meet accreditation requirements.

Page 6 of 85


CHAPTER 1 LABORATORY QUALITY FUNDAMEN TALS 1.1

INTRODUCTION

The International Standards ‘ISO/IEC 17025 - General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories’ and ‘ISO 15189 – Medical Laboratories – Particular Requirements for Quality and Competence’ both respectively state that a laboratory shall establish, implement and maintain a quality system appropriate to the scope of its activities including the type, range and volume of testing and/or calibration activities it undertakes Laboratory Accreditation is the formal recognition of a laboratory’s technical competency to perform specific tests, types of tests or calibrations. ISO/IEC 17025 and ISO 151891 requirements are recognised internationally as defining and incorporating essential elements of a quality management system for laboratories (ref: Appendix 1). The requirements for each stage of the quality improvement process are described in the various clauses of the ISO/IEC 17025 and ISO 15189 2. Achieving compliance with the ISO/IEC 17025 and/or ISO 15189 Standard can be achieved in a stepwise manner that ensures efficient use of resources. Essential components of these standards include the following: •

A laboratory that operates within a Quality Management System (QMS) will have a single QUALITY MANUAL (ref: Section 2.4) hereafter referred to as ‘the Manual’, that contains the documented policies for the laboratory and either includes or refers to the processes, procedures and forms used by laboratory staff to implement the QMS throughout all the disciplines in the laboratory.

•

A laboratory shall periodically and in accordance with a predetermined schedule and procedure, conduct internal audits of its activities to verify that its operations continue to comply with the requirements of the quality system and the Standard (ISO 17025/15189 clause 4.14).

Some laboratories have significant gaps in the required QMS documentation and as such implementation of the QMS can at first appear to be a daunting task. However, if everyone in the laboratory can be motivated and involved the task usually becomes easier. The Manual not only serves as a guide for laboratory quality improvement but can also serve as a training manual for new and existing staff because it outlines all the processes and procedures that must be executed in the laboratory. Additionally, by describing all of the laboratory’s processes and procedures, the Manual allows laboratory staff to accurately identify the resources required for the laboratory’s operations.

1

This document references the ISO/IEC 17025:2005 –General Requirements for the competence of Testing

2 and

Calibration Please note thatLaboratories wherever “Clause” is mentioned in this document, it refers to a Clause of the ISO/IEC 17025 Standard

Page 7 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE In designing a quality plan (Figures 11 & 14), the laboratory establishes clear quality objectives that ensure compliance with requirements of relevant regulatory authorities, clients and/or accreditation bodies. The quality plan is intended to ensure that implementation of the QMS is efficient and costeffective. The guidelines given in this publication are of a general nature. The complexity of a QMS depends on the size, scope and organizational structure of the laboratory and many of the processes and procedures described in this publication can be implemented in a simplified manner. In order to master the process of Quali ty Management Sys tem implementation you must first understand some related key concep ts and definitio ns. These are describ ed in the following section. Note Essential areas of focus in your QMS include: org anisation, personne l, equipment, purchasing and inventory, process control, documents and records, information management, occurrence management, internal and externa l assessment, process improvement, facilities and safe ty, customer service

1.2

QUALITY TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

a. Quality M anagemen t Sy stem A program developed to support efficient and effective, high quality and appropriate laboratory services (e.g. accurate and precise results, appropriate test selection, timely reporting, and correct interpretation of results, clinical usefulness, and recommendations for further tests). Comprehensive and coordinated efforts (policies, processes and procedures) designed to meet quality objectives, to direct and control an organization with regard to quality. The system is comprised of the Quality Manual (Quality Policy, General policies, Organisational Chart, etc), Administrative Procedures, Technical Procedures and Technical and Quality Records. b. Policy Statement describing what is done and why. c. Process Series of inter-related steps involved in an activity or examination that uses resources and is managed to transform inputs into outputs. Processes may often be linked since the output of one process is often the input to the next. Rarely is there a process that is not linked to some other.

Page 8 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE d. Proc edu re Written work instructions that specify the way to carry out a step in the process, an activity or examination. Procedures describe in detail exa ctly how one individ ual should perform an activity. e. Record Any information that produces evidence (e.g. requisitions, examination results and reports, instrument printouts, laboratory workbooks and worksheets, accession records, calibration records, quality control records, records of audits, complaints and action taken, external quality assessment records, instrument maintenance records, incident/accident reports, staff training and competency records, personnel records). f.Document Any information that provides information (e.g. instructions including policy statements, textbooks, reference intervals and their srcins, procedures, specifications, calibration tables, charts, posters, notices, memoranda, plans, software, drawings, regulations and standards). g. Doc um ent C on trol Is a system to regulate the handling and management (including archiving, storing and destruction) of documents containing information that communicates policies, processes, procedures as well as records. Usually pertains to documents that are part of the quality management system h. Audit Systematic and independent examination to determine whether quality activities and related results comply with planned arrangements and whether these arrangements are implemented effectively and are suitable to achieve the objectives. Note: In this document the term “Internal Audit” is used to emphasize that the audit is done by the organization itself i. Audit sc ope The extent and boundaries of an audit. Usually established before the audit process begins j. Audi t p lan Description of the activities and arrangements for an audit k. Management r eview A formal evaluation by top management of the status and adequacy of the quality system in relation to quality policy and objectives l. Quality ma nageme nt That aspect of the overall management function that determines and implements the quality policy

Page 9 of 85


m. Quality manag er The staff member (by whatever title) who has responsibility for the laboratory’s quality system, its development, maintenance and ens uing implementation and who, in this capacity, reports directly to top management. n. Quali ty a ud itor Person qualified to perform quality audits o. Obs ervati on A statement of fact made during an audit and substantiated by objective evidence. p. Obje cti ve evid ence Qualitative or quantitative information, records or statements of fact pertaining to the quality of an item or service or to the existence and implementation of a quality system element, which is based on observation, measurement or test and which can be verified. q. Audi t fi ndings Results of the evaluation of the collected audit evidence against specified audit criteria. r.Nonconformity The non fulfillment of specified requirements. s. Corr ecti ve Actio n An action taken to eliminate the causes of an existing nonconformity, defect or other undesirable situation, to prevent recurrence t.Preventive Action An action taken to eliminate the cause of a potentially undesirable result u. Contin uous Q ual ity I mprov ement The use of incremental and breakthrough quality management techniques to constantly improve processes, products, or services provided to internal and external customers and thus achieve higher levels of customer satisfaction v. Quality Imp rove ment Plan A written description of the organization’s quality improvement program that has been approved by the management and is then periodically reviewed and updated, as necessary.

Page 10 of 85


1.3

ACCREDITATION vs. CERTIFICATION

Laboratory accreditation requires the use of criteria specifically developed to determine technical competence . These criteria are based on the international standards ISO/IEC 17025 and ISO 15189, for Testing/Calibration and Medical Laboratories respectively. Accreditation bodies, through specialist technical assessors, use these standards to conduct a thorough evaluation of all factors relevant to the laboratory’s competence and aim to ensure the laboratory’s test data are accurate and reliable. The ISO 9001 standard is widely used in manufacturing and service organizations to evaluate their system for managing the quality of their product or service. The ISO 9001, however, does NOT assess the technical competence of the organisation’s operations. This standard is thus used for certification and cannot be used for accreditation of laboratories. Note While laboratories may be certified to ISO 9001, such certification does not make any statement about the technical competence of a laboratory as this standard does not contain technical requirements for laboratory personnel and operations 3

Why Is a Laboratory’s Technical Competence Critical?

Because it is important for laboratories to: Minimise Risk In the world today, customers seek reassurance that the products, materials or services they produce or purchase meet their expectations or conform to specific requirements. This often means the product is sent to a laboratory to determine its characteristics against a standard or a specification. For the manufacturer or supplier, choosing a competent laboratory minimizes the risk of producing or supplying a faulty product. Avoi d Ex pensi ve Ret esting Testing of products and materials can be expensive and time consuming, even when they are done correctly the first time. If not done correctly, then the cost and time involved can be even higher if the product has failed to meet specifications or expectations and re-testing is required. This can negatively impact the reputation of a supplier or manufacturer. Additionally, the supplier can also be held liable for any failure of the product, particularly if it involves public safety or financial loss to a client. Choosing a competent laboratory thus minimises the chance of retesting being required, increase in operational costs and/or exposure to legal action.

3

See ISO CASCO Communiqué on Accreditation vs. Certification and ILAC Publication on Laboratory Accreditation or ISO 9001 Certification (www.ilac.org.tt)

Page 11 of 85


How does a Laboratory Apply for Accreditation?

Figure 1 summarises the steps in the accreditation process from the pre-audit visit to the final award of the accreditation certificate.

Figure 1 Summary of the Application Proce

ss towards Accreditation

Accreditation Body Pre-Audit External Audit by pre-Assessment Visit with Experts from Accreditation Body Corrective actions completed

Application to Accreditation Body Complete Application process for Accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025

Accreditation Body Document Review – On-site Visit Review of Documents forwarded by laboratory previously On site Assessment by Assessor team

Laboratory Corrective Actions Cause Analysis – identify the source of Non conformances and Confirm Corrective Actions

Accreditation Accreditation Body -Vote on Accreditation Decision Lab - Receipt of Accreditation Certificate

Page 12 of 85


1.4

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Laboratory management, tasked with the responsibility for developing the QMS, must define the policies under which the laboratory will operate. These policies are operationalised by defining the processes and procedures (specific actions) that describe what must be done to implement the policies (Appendix 2). Many laboratories may already be adhering to the best technical and management practices and may only need to now document these practices. Some laboratories may already have all or most of the documentation they need and all that is required is collation, rationalization, and organization of the existing documentation with possibly some additional documentation of the general administrative procedures (e.g. document control, purchasing of supplies, retention of records, etc). What is a Quality Management System (QMS)?

The procedures (activities, mechanisms, actions) that a laboratory uses to achieve and demonstrate control over its system constitute the Quality Management System (QMS). Every QMS is driven by an overarching quality policy (philosophy) from which a series of connected processes and procedures are derived. These define the resources needed to provide the desired laboratory outputs. The QMS outlines the inputs needed to produce the desired laboratory outputs as well as the processes and procedures that transform these inputs into outputs. The laboratory’s input-output relationships are thus connected through the laboratory’s processes and procedures and collectively shape the laboratory’s quality system (Figure 2). The decision to implement a QMS has to be made by top management since management’s commitment is essential for the implementation and successful maintenance of the system. The design and implementation of a QMS will vary depending on the type, size and output of the laboratory with each one having its own objective. The QMS is often designed to align with the requirements of an international standard. For laboratories, the standard commonly used is either the ISO 17025 or ISO 15189. Figure 2 Process Approach to Laboratory Quality Manag

INPUT

Personnel Environment Methods Equipment Materials

PROCESS

Critical process necessary to provide reliable output

OUTPUT

Product or Service

Internal or External Customer

Satisfied or Dissatisfied

Measures of performance (Time, quantity, quality)

Page 13 of 85

ement


What are Quality Objectives?

In order for a QMS to be effective, its quality objectives must be clearly defined and must reflect the laboratory’s overall service objectives. Objectives must also be practical, able to be regularly reviewed and measured for effectiveness. All laboratory staff must be familiarized with these quality objectives. Ongoing adjustments must be made to reflect major changes to the laboratory and its practices. What are Quality Documents?

A QMS consists of documented policies, processes and procedures for establishment and effective implementation of the system, as well as records to provide evidence that the system is in compliance. Key documents include the Quality Manual (which includes the quality policy or philosophy of the laboratory and general policies); administrative and technical procedures (specific work instructions), Test Methods (SOP’s), and technical and quality records (proof).

1.5 DOCUMENT HIERARCHY

Figure 3 illustrates a typical document hierarchy. It shows that the laboratory must first establish the Quality Policy (philosophy) for the organization, followed by the development of the more general policies that reflect the overarching goals for every area of the laboratory’s operations (a list of policies from ISO/IEC 17025 are referenced at Appendix 2). Although very important, these policies can be stated in a relatively simple way. Administrative or operational processes and procedures that your organization performs to achieve the goals or objectives expressed in the quality policies are then developed in addition to the documentation of technical procedures that describe the specific analytical work performed in your laboratory. These documents outline “how” you do things in your laboratory. Finally the document hierarchy includes all the forms and records that are used to document the results and activities of day-to-day operations. Records can be classified as either Quality or Technical records, and as such the retention times and instructions for archiving both categories should be documented. It is these records that are used as documented evidence of the work and represent the proof of compliance with the standard’s requirements. All of these documents collectively comprise the laboratory’s QMS documentation. The laboratory’s safety management system, which will include policies, procedures and records, can also be integrated into the Quality Management system.

Page 14 of 85


Figure 3 Document H ierarchy

What are the Benefits of a QMS? • • • • • •

• • •

Increases operational efficiency and productivity Provides a system to enable control of all processes Reduces costs and risks/errors Provides ability to identify improvement opportunities Provides employee participation and motivation of human resources Increases customer satisfaction Allows effective and efficient use of resources Provides flexibility and ability to respond to market opportunities Increases competitiveness and industry reputation

Implementing a Quality Management System –who does what?

Successfully implementing a laboratory QMS needs careful planning, detailed identification of tasks and clear guidance on the roles and responsibilities of the key stakeholders. Figure 4 details the critical roles and responsibilities of management, the quality manager and the quality team.

Page 15 of 85


Figure 4 Impleme nting a Quality Mana gement System Responsibility • •

Management

• •

• • •

Management/QM/QT

• •

• •

QM/QT

• •

• •

QM/QT/Management

•

•

Management

• • • •

QM/QT •

• •

Management

• • • • •

QM/QT/Management

• •

Tasks Set objectives and goals of the QMS App oint a Qualit y Manager (QM) or Quali ty Team (QT) to develop and maintain the QMS Set tim elines and project scope All ocat e reso urc es requi red fo r t he d evelo pment, i mpl ementatio n and o n-go ing management of the system Inform all staff and seek participation from all l evels Decide if a consultant is required for the project Prepare a project plan an allocate resources Develop a budget based on equipment, tr aining, time and personnel required Seek approval from manage ment to procure required resources a nd execute training Ass ess m etho d fo r do cum enti ng t he QMS Design templates and documentation Set tim elines for the various tasks Schedule individual depa rtments and positions for development of policies and procedures Develop QMS policies to reflect laboratory objectives Start to develop procedures and work instructions (SOPs) with each department Report to management any risks and improvement opportunities that have been found Document any Quality Corrective Action Requests that might be identified (identified risk areas that r equire manage ment attention and impro vements) App rov e and issu e the QMS Operate the QMS for a minimum period of 3 months Carry out initial audits to ensure docume ntation matches processes Ensure that “you do what you say you do”. If any deficiencies are found change processes or QMS to r eflect what is actually done Ass ess t he eff ecti venes s of the QMS and im plem ent any c hang es that m igh t b e required. Undertake management review of the QMS Adj ust reso urc e requirement s Decide if accreditation assessment is required Set accreditation assessment timelines App oint Accredi tati on B ody Continue to audit, review and assess the QMS at the agreed time intervals Continue to assess risk areas a nd identify improvement opportunit ies Continue to review policies and p rocedures and make amendme nts as required Continue to measure effectiveness of QMS to the overall laboratory performance

The ISO standards mention “shall ” where it requires the laboratory to perform an activity without question (i.e. all requirements that begin with shall are mandatory) . Additionally, it mentions Policy and Procedure wherever one of these documents is required. Where it does not require a documented procedure, the standard may ask that the laboratory implement an activity. Page 16 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE Naturally, if an activity is performed, records of its performance will be produced in a number of different ways. Probably you will find that the most difficult task in implementing your QMS is ensuring that all these activities are documented in one form or another and the records can be retrieved when necessary. Note As stated in the standard, the establis hm ent and effectiv e im plemen tation of the QMS Procedur es requires them to be documented. Quality Management System documents may be kept in various forms, such as written on paper, in electronic format, photographic, or in any other media

1.6

A STEPWISE APPROACH TO DEVELOPING A QMS

HOUSE OF ACCREDITATION

(Model developed by Manfred Kindler, Berlin, Germany)

The following diagram illustrates how the 20 milestone s can be put together in a systemati c pathway to achieve the desired endpoint, i.e. Accreditation for your laboratory. Let us picture a house in which the policies are the foundation of the house, and the walls are comprised of the documents and activities which make up the Management and Technical requirements of the standard. The roof is the final pinnacle in the effort towards the achievement of accreditation. The house is complete only after each brick has been laid. Figure 5 House of Accre ditation

Page 17 of 85


THE 20 MILESTONES FOR TESTING LAB ORATORIES

(Model developed by Manfred Kindler, Berlin, Germany 4)

Successful implementation of a QMS requires a structured and strategic approach. One such approach entitled ‘The Twenty Milestones to Accreditation” is outlined in Figure 6. These milestones present a stepwise approach that can be used to develop and implement a Quality Management System and represent the actions you would undertake prior to applying for Accreditation. The achievement of each milestone should signal the development and completion of that particular aspect of the QMS. A timeline chart can be drawn using the milestones agains t the estimated time allocated to conducting the activities. As each is completed it can be ticked off (see example below). Figure 6 The Twenty Milestones summarize d 1.

Policies • • • • • •

2.

Management • • • •

3.

Legal status established Quality policy develope d and documented Quality goals agreed and documented Quality Indicators determined and documented General Policies developed and documented Quality Plan developed and documented

Conflict of Interest Analysis conducted Commitments fr om Top Management Technica l (testing s taff) responsibiliti es developed and documented Technica l and Quality Responsibilities/Job Descriptions develope d and doc umented

Scope Descriptio n of Scope of tests for Accreditation Procedure s/Equipment/P ersonnel identifi ed for test scope Inventory of all Requirements for testing do cumented • • •

4.

Qualit y System Quality Manual Structure develope d Continuous Quality Improvement plan developed • •

5.

Pro cedures Adm inist rati ve Work Proc edures dev elop ed and d ocu mented Process for Control of Documents deve loped Records identif ied and filed • • •

6.

Test Methods Instructions f or Equipment operation documented Examinations documented • •

4

Kindler International Division – manfred@manfredkindler.de

Page 18 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE 7.

Sampli ng Instructions for Pre-Ana lysis pr ocesses a nd procedures documented Sampling procedures developed, a nd Sampling pl an and processes documented • •

8.

Review Reques ts, Tenders and Contrac ts Review Quality Manual Review Requests and Contracts Identify Process and procedures for Advisors • • • •

Evaluation of Subcontracting laboratories 9.

QualityC ontrol Reference Methods developed and documented Internal and External Qua lity Control pro cesses esta blished • •

10. Valid atio n Verification Procedure s developed and documented Validation o f new or modified Test Procedures documented • •

11. Work Conditio ns Accomm odat ion con dit ion s doc umented and mo nit ored Faciliti es evaluated for suitabilit y Work Environment monitored • • •

12. Lit eratur e Review of current Standards Research current Scientific Literature • •

13. Traceability Check of Test Equipment Calibration of Equipment Reference Materials purchased and used • • •

14. Uncertainty Training in Estimation of Measurement Uncerta inty Calculation of Uncertainties • •

15. Trainin g Job Descriptions documented Plan and Impleme nt Staff conti nuing education • •

16. Monit ori ng Monitoring System deve loped Internal Audit plan and Schedule developed • •

17. Internal Audi t Training of Auditors Internal Audit conducted Aud it Report prepared and evaluated • • •

Page 19 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE 18. Comp laint s Complaint Manage ment syst em implemented Root Cause Analysis procedure impl emented Corrective Action pro cedure implemented Preventive Acti on pro cedure implemented • • • •

19. Review Docum ents Internal Revie w of Quality Documentation (Final review) Review Manual, Procedures, Forms, Lists, Technical and Quality Records • •

20. Management Review Management Review conducted, Corrective Action pl an implemented Implementa tion and Control of Plan for Effectiveness • • •

END OF THE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

1.7

ACTION PLANNING USING THE MILESTONES

Each of the twenty milestones can be broken down into the steps of an action plan, where each action must end in a tangible res ult. In Figures 7 and 8 that follow, Milestone 1 and 2, for example , are broken down into a series of 10 achievable steps with related laboratory and management staff responsibilities. Each step yields a distinct result and responsibilities for achieving the result at each step can be assigned to different persons. The responsibility matrix (Figure 9) can be used to determine what each person’s role is at each step.

Figure 7 Milestone 1: Quality Policies

Step 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Ac ti on

HL

Legal Status E DecideaboutPolicy E DefineObjectives D DetermineIndicators D Createmonitoringlists D General management D Policies GeneralTechnicalPolicies E DesignQualityPlan E IssueQualityRecords C QualityReport C

QM

TM

EP

SEC

P P E E P E

P P P P P P P P E P P P

P P P P P P

C C E E

D P P P

P P P I

P P P P

Page 20 of 85

Resu lts (Company) Registration Quality Policy List of Objectives List of Indictors Monitoring Procedure Management policies Technical Policies Quality Plan Quality Records Report


Figure 8 Milestone 2: Manage ment

Step

Ac ti on

HL

IntroductionWorkshop ConflictAnalysis

34 5

Organisational Structure D E ManagementCommitment D E Clinical interpretation D P Responsibility TechnicalResponsibility D P QualityResponsibility D E JobDescriptions D E Final Check C E FinalReport C E

6 7 8 9 10

D D

QM

1 2

E E

TM

EP

SEC

Resu lts

P P

P P

P P

Agend a and Minutes Structure, Process, Outcome Analysis, Risk Matrix

P P E

P P P

P P P

Organisation CommitmentsChart in writing List of Responsibilities

E P P P P

P P P P P

P P P P I

List of Responsibilities List of Responsibilities CVs, Job Descriptions Checklist MilestonesReport

Responsibili ty Matrix The following matrix is very useful for highlighting the responsible persons and the necessary activities which must be performed in the normal conduct of daily operations for the laboratory. The matrix can be used on its own or integrated into a procedure to illustrate the responsibilities needed for effective implementation

Figure 9 Example of Responsibility Matrix for training Activity Asses sm ent of training needs Creation of a training plan Interview of employee s about training Appr ov ing the t raini ng pl an Orienta tion o f new s taff Technical training and exchange of experiences (seminar, staff experiences) Control of training activities

Key –HLHead Lab of QM– QualityManager TM– TechnicalManager EP – Employee Sec – Secretary

HL D D P D/E D D

P E P I E P

QM

TM EC I EC C PP EP

D/E

P

C

E - Execute P - Perform/Developactivities C – Cooperate/Assist D - Decide I - Informed

Page 21 of 85

EP P

Secr C

I I P C


Staff competency is key to the quality of laboratory operations and thus the laboratory must also ensure that the personnel they employ are: Trained Experienced and Evaluated (to competently perform the tests which the laboratory offers.) • • •

To ensure that well-trained and competent personnel are recruited the laboratory must develop procedures which aim to: Establish criteria for recruitment of staff Develop appropriate job descriptions Ensure that relevant qualifications are included in job descriptions Develop orientation and continuing education programmes • • • •

Additionally, new and re-assigned staff must be properly supervised and trained before they are allowed to perform tests on client samples. Competency evaluations should be performed and documented. These records now serve as proof of the laboratory’s confidence in the staff’s ability to perform testing independently. The laboratory can use several different techniques for evaluating competence. These can include but are not limited to: Testing of unknown samples Testing using reference materials, and Testing of replicate samples • • •

Up to date training records must also be kept to prove that ALL staff have undergone initial orientation, competency evaluation and participate regularly in continuing education. This can easily be kept in a separate training file developed for each staff member (ISO/IEC 17025 Clause 5.2 Personnel). Repeat the acti on plan format for each of the mile stones (Figure 6 The Twenty Milestones ) above and share it with staff. This can comprise the majority of the Lab’s quality plan, clearly outlining what is to be done and by whom.

1.8 CONTINUOUS QUALITY I MPROVEMENT QUALITY SYSTEM S PLANNING

The ‘Continuous Quality Improvement’ process uses established incremental quality management techniques to constantly improve processes, products and/or services provided to internal and external customers towards achieving higher levels of customer satisfaction. Continual improvement of the laboratory, its staff, and facilities and of course the QMS is vital to the success of a laboratory’s accreditation effort. A strong Quality Plan facilitates effective communication with the parent organization, laboratory staff and clients about the laboratory’s Page 22 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE quality goals and operations. The purpose statement may be generated by using goals or objectives previously defined by the parent organization and/or the laboratory, for example, in Strategic planning. This will give guidance to decision making as the Plan is developed and implemented.

What is a Quality Improvement Plan?

A written description of the organization’s quality improvement program that has been approved by the management and is then periodically reviewed and updated, as necessary.

What is a Purpose Statement?

A purpose statement will give guidance to the development and implementation of a quality plan. Quality principles previously defined by the parent organization and/or the laboratory in, for example, a strategic plan, can provide a foundation for the formulation of a purpose statement.

How will a Quality Plan Benefit the Laboratory? • • •

It provides documentation of your commitment to quality improvement It enables your laboratory to more efficiently use the resources available It assists the staff and management to meet the requirements of accreditation bodies

How is a Quality Plan Developed?

There are several approaches to the development of quality plans, as there are for the development of business pl ans. Figure 10 below illustrates how the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) quality improvement model is applicable to the laboratory’s quality planning and improvement process and Figure 11 goes even further to outli ne an example of a quality plan drawn up by a laboratory that is seeking to achieve accreditation.

Page 23 of 85


Figure 10 The PDCA Model fo r QMS Improv ement

PLAN Act io ns

Actions in

Define Procedures

Theory

Plan/Determine what will be done

Staff responsible

Means of Verification

How frequent? Who is accountable?

DO Initiate Activities in plan

Actions in

Perform processes

Practice

Gather data on performance Execute training or improvement programs

CHECK Review

Monitoring and evaluation of trends

and

Who is responsible for summarizing, reviewing and reporting Report results to the Quality Committee

Evaluation

How will this activity be considered for the purposes of detecting patterns of problems and opportunities for improvement, undertaking quality interventions and corrective actions

ACT Sustainable Actions

Identification of indicators The plan is modified as necessary The process is implemented

A quality plan should clearly identify the laboratory’s overall quality goals and the purpose of the quality improvement effort. The plan should also detail the desired outcomes of the laboratory’s quality initiative and the activities that must be undertaken if these outcomes are to be realized. Figure 11 outlines some of the outcomes and activities that a laboratory preparing for accreditation may want to include in their quality plan.

Page 24 of 85


Figu re 11 Example of a Quality Proje ct Plan Objectives

SuccessMeasures

Verification

Assumptions

Goal Customers have increase d confidence and are satisfied with reliable services

Less Customer complaints

Evaluation Record of customer complaints

More requests for services/products

Client request data

On site visit conducted by Accreditation Assessors Non conformance report prepared with findings of root cause analysis

Assessor report

Customers are willing to continue working with the organization

Services offered meet the customers’ needs

Purpose Laboratory achieve s accreditation

Lab pays Accreditation fees

Non conformance report and supporting records

Root cause analysis finds and eliminates non conformances

Outcomes 1)Accreditation action plan prepared and responsibilities identified 2) Quality Manual written and approved 3) SOPs written and implemented

4) Internal Audit s performed

Staff trained in QMS, 20 Milestones, writing documents

Quality system group trained and staff sensitized

Action plan prepared and approved

Quality Manual written according to ISO Standard requirements Administrative and Technical procedure manuals prepared and implemented Audit program, schedule and reports prepared annually

Approved and Issued Quality Manual

Quality Manager appointed

Approved and Issued Procedure manuals

Consultant provides complete documentation service

Internal Audit plan approved

Internal Auditors trained

Inputs Act iv ities Outcome 1: Accreditation Acti on plan prepared

Determine status of QMS Arrange training of staff Acquire standard and determine scope

How

Who

When

Assumptions

Do lab self Assessment Do training needs Assessment Purchase standard and review testing scope

Quality Manager Executive Management Management

First QMS action plan prepared While preparing action plan Whilepr eparing action plan

Laboratory can get Management commitment to process

Page 25 of 85


Outcome 2: Quality Manual written and

approved

How Perform a GAP analysis Prepare report based on findings Prepare RIPOF Analysis for Qualit y team

Who

When

Assumptions

What do you have? What do you need?

Quality Manager

First month of a ction plan Within two weeks of GAP Analysis

Laboratory can get Management commitment to process

What is missing?

Quality Manager

Within two weeks of GAP Analysis report

How

Who

When

Assumptions

Develop policies, processes and procedures Improve existing policies, processes and procedures Prepare/obtain template for Quality Manual Develop policies required by standard and Organization Write Quality Manual

Quality working group

At working group sessions

Quality Manager has sufficient knowledge to guide team

Quality systems review group

At QMS review meetings

Quality Manager

After GAP Analysis

Quality Manager

At QMS Document writing meetings

Quality Manager

At Document writing meeting

Prepare template for SOPs

Quality Manager

After GAP Analysis

Distribute SOP Template

Quality Manager

At QMS Document writing meetings

Write Administrative procedures as needed Prepare template for Test methods

Persons responsible for executing procedure Quality Manager

One procedure per week at Document writing meeting

Distribute Template

Quality Manager

Write Test Methods as needed

Persons responsible for procedure

One procedure per week at Document writing meeting

Prepare master list of documents

Quality Manager

Updated asare procedures

Quality Manager

Outcome 3: SOP s writ ten and imp lemented

Fill in the GAPS discovered in the Gap analysis

Write Quality Manual

Write QMS Administrative Procedures

Write QMS Test Procedures

Develop record Management system

Page 26 of 85

After GAP Analysis At QMS Document writing meetings

List of policies prepared and available for use

List of Procedures prepared and available for use

Reference documents available

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE written

Outcome 4: Internal Audits performed How

Who

When

Assumptions

Review system for compliance

Perform internal audit

Trainer/Quality Manager

After GAP Analysis

Internal Audit team trained and experienced

Evaluate system routinely

Identify opportunities for continuous quality improvement Prepare Corrective action plan

Management review team

After internal Audit, After Management review

Management team participate in meeting

Auditee and Quality Manager

After the Internal audit

Non conformances are easy to solve

Correct non conformances

A flowchart of the QMS implementation process helps to simplify and clarify the laboratory’s planning and quality improvement process. In Figure 12 below, key activities, functions, duties and responsibilities critical to the QMS planning and implementation process are detailed.

Page 27 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE Figure 12 Diagra m of QMS Proce ss Activiti es

Staff functions/Responsibilities/Duties Clerical/administrative functions Technical functions, Management functions Qualit Mana er functions

Clerical/Administrative Functions Prepare lists of Reference laboratories Quality Control materials Suppliers, Equipment Staff Tests offered

Arrange filing for Package inserts Reagent certificates Reports Other records

Activities: Purchase the standard (ISO 17025) Prepare staff orientation program, Assign computer access Prepare a Safety plan (to include evacuation plan, fire and biological hazards) Prepare an accident report form Set up housekeeping schedule and write procedures

Technical Functions: Compile list of tests done, Collect and compile technical procedures Review technical procedures to ensure that they are appropriate and complete Prepare equipment records using equipment list, maintenance plans

Managerial Functions: Review report format for conformance to standard Prepare waste disposal plans, Arrange laboratory security Decide on the Quality Policy Appoint a Laboratory Director; Appoint a Quality Manager (however named), Set Management review dates

Quality Manager Functions: Prepare audit plan, and audit report forms, train internal auditors Set quality indicators e.g. turnaround times Review technical procedures to ensure they are appropriate and complete Document any missing (outstanding) procedures Set Retention time for - Records, Sample storage

Page 28 of 85


1.9DOCUMENTATIONPLAN

As described above, the ISO/IEC 17025 Standard require that the laboratory develop a comprehensive Quality Management System that controls the daily operations of the laboratory supported by a considerable amount of documentation. Every clause in these standards has specific requirements in terms of the policies, procedures and records required to prove to management, staff and clients that activities have been executed as needed. There are several approaches or tools used to facilitate a laboratory’s development of the QMS in preparation for accreditation. One such tool is entitled ‘The Twenty Milestones to Accreditation”. This can be used to define and track the documentation required for compliance with relevant standards. Figure 13 summarizes the documents needed to meet the requir ements of the ISO/ IEC 17025 standard using the 20 Milestones tracking framework. Figure 1 3 Documenta tion plan Purpose: To facilitate the development of the Quality Management System by the Laboratory in preparation for Accreditation Milestone 1.QualityPolicy

Clause# 4.1,4.2

Legal Entity with Quality policy, Quality Goals and Quality

Conflict of Interest Analysis and Commitments from Top Management, Medical, Technical and Quality Responsibilities/Job Descriptions

Action(Output) required

Policiesand procedures 4.1.5c, 4.1.5d, 4.2.3 Company registration,

Indicators, General Policies

2.Management

Docsrequired

Write policies, prepare procedures

Policy and Procedures

Register company,

Registration certificate,

Develop Quality Policy

Quality Policy statement and Quality statement and Goals Manual (SMART), Develop Quality Team, Quality indicators Host team meeting and

4.2,5.1

4.2.5(Program), 5.1.1 Policy

Job Descriptions QM & Deputies Confidentiality statements, Application for Registration Organization Chart

Page 29 of 85

Records produced

Quality Policy statement, Indicator Monitoring tools

incorporate writing group

List of team members and meeting minutes

Write policy and procedure

Policy and procedure

Develop Job Descriptions, Appoint Quality Manager,

Job Descriptions,

Meeting with Ministry, Develop or review Org Chart

Signed Contracts, Signed Confidentiality Statements Meeting Minutes Organization Chart

Status


3.Scope Description of Scope (Procedures/Equipment/Personnel and Analysis of all specific Requirements)

5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.7

5.2.10,5.3.11, 5.3.12, 5.3.13

Prepare procedures

Procedures

Technical Procedures, List of Equipment, List of authorized personnel,

Revise procedures, decide on scope (selection of tests), Check Equipment and Maintenance records, Authorize personnel and

Updated Technical Procedures

Competency Evaluation Forms

perform competency evaluation

Equipment Maintenanceand records

4.3, Policy and procedures

Prepare policies and procedures

Policies and Procedures

Quality Manual

Develop Quality Manual

Quality Manual,

Develop CQI Plan

Plan for Improvements,

QC Requirements,

4.QualitySystem

4.2,4.3, 4.12

Quality Manual Structure, Continuous Quality Improvement

CQI Plan SOP for SOPs

5.Procedures Work Procedures /Control of Documents and Records

6.TestInstructions Instructions for Equipment and Procedures

4.3.1,4.3.2,4.13.1, 4.3.13 4.3, 4.13, 5.5

5.4, 5.5

Retention policy Document control procedure

Prepare safety program, waste disposal plan

Validation records Training and Competency records

SOP,

Develop technical requirements

Safety Manual

Prepare policy and procedure

Policy and procedures

Develop Document Master log,

Updated Master Document log,

Develop retention policy,

Disposal plan

Document master

Prepare Archive system,

Record management procedure, Retention policy,

Log

Prepare Backup system for data, Develop record management system

Data Backup medium (CDs, etc),

5.4. Equipment Records Technical Procedures Validation procedure

Preparepolicyand Procedures Develop log of Equipment, Document or reference applicable test methods, Prepare Maintenance logs, Perform method validation, Analyze QC data and trends, Prepare reagent lists, Execute training of staff

Page 30 of 85

Policy and Procedures Equipment Records, Technical Procedure manual, Maintenance and calibration logs, Validation procedure, Validation records, QC Data records, Reagent lists, Training records


7. Sampling

5.4,5 .7, 5.8

5.4.5 .7, 5.8, 5.8, 5.8 (Policies)

Prepare Policies and Procedures

Policies and Procedures

Primary sample collection,

Prepare sample collection instructions,

sample collection instructions,

Sample collection procedure,

Prepare sample collection procedure,

Sample collection procedure,

Result reports,

Perform Workflow analysis,

Result reports,

4.4.1, 4.5.1 Policy and Procedure

Prepare Policy and Procedure


Contract review procedure

Perform contract review, Evaluate referral labs,

Contract review procedure,

Requisition forms

Conduct meetings of lab advisors

Contract review records,

5.4, 5.8, 5.8, 5.8. (Procedures) Instructions for collecting samples and related

8. Review Contracts

4.4, 4.5, 4.7

Review Quality Manual, Requests, Advisories, Contracts, Subcontracting labs

Register of Subcontracting labs

Corrective action reports

Client contracts (requisitions) Register of Subcontracting labs, Meeting Minutes

9.QualityControl

5.6

Reference Methods/Internal and External Quality Control

List of Reference materials QC Data, PT reports Corrective action forms

Perform inventory of reference materials,

List of Reference materials,

Perform QC according to requirements of test procedures,

MSDS Sheets, QC Data,

Monitor QC data,

PT Reports,

Participate in PT,

Root cause investigation,

Investigate bad PT results, determine root cause,

Corrective Action reports

Do corrective actions 10.Validation Verification and Validation of Test Procedures

5.5

5.5.1,5.5.2

Preparepolicyand procedure

Validation procedures

Perform validation analysis Verify calibrated equipment

Page 31 of 85

Policy and procedure Validation procedure Validation records (X, SD, CV, TE, etc)


11.WorkConditions

5.2

Accommodation, Facilities and Work Environment

5.2.4,5.2.10 Environmental logs, Housekeeping procedures, Preventive maintenance procedures, Disaster mitigation procedure

Preparepolicyand procedure Perform environmental monitoring, Perform preventive maintenance, Safety audit, Facility plan, improvement Ensure proper arrangements for possible disasters

Policy and procedure Environmental logs, Housekeeping procedures, Preventive maintenance procedures, Preventive maintenance records, Plan for facility improvement, Disaster mitigation procedure

12.Literature

4.3,5.4,5.5, 5.8

Check of current Standards and up to date Scientific Literature

4.3.1, 5.4.1, 5.5.1,5.5.2 Reference books (e.g. Journals, kits inserts, instruction manuals)

Ensure current and effective examination procedures are in use,

Examination procedures, Reporting format

Verify suitability of reporting format, Ensure proper document control, Search scientific literature on internet and library, Research innovations in technology

13. Traceability (Calibration) Check of Test Equipment (Calibration, Reference Materials)

5.6, 5.5

5.6,3, 5.5.1 Calibration procedures Calibration certificates List of Equipment List of Reference materials and standards Reference material procedure



Prepare Calibration logs

Calibration logs

Verify calibration/reference materials

Calibration Certificates

Calibrate measuring devices (test specific) Produce secondary reference materials, Prepare calibration curves

Page 32 of 85

Certificate of Analysis, MSDS Calibration curves Secondary reference materials procedure


14.MeasurementUncertainty

5.4

Training in Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty

5.4.6 Procedure for Measurement uncertainty

Facilitate measurement uncertainty training courses,

Procedure for Measurement uncertainty,

Calculate Measurement uncertainty, where applicable

Measurement uncertainty budget,

Monitor QC data and analyze,

Statistical results and calculations

Perform statistical Analysis on data 15.Training

5.1

Job Descriptions, plan and Implementation of Training programme for the Lab Staff

16.Monitoring

Monitoring System and Internal Audit plan and Schedule

5.1.1,5.1.8 (Policies) Job descriptions

4.14,5.6, 4.9, 4.12, 4.6

Preparepolicies

Policies

Prepare Job Descriptions,

Job descriptions

Training plan Continuing Education plan

Determine criteria for selecting staff

Continuing Education plan

Competency evaluation forms

Perform competency evaluations

Continuing Education materials

Prepare Policy and Procedures

Policy and Procedures

Procedure for identifying non conformities

Evaluate procedures and testing process,

Procedure for identifying non conformities,

Procedure for evaluating suppliers

person for dealinginwith non conformities testing,

4.9.1, 4.9.2, 4.9.3, 4.6.1 Policy and Procedures

Procedure for purchase and verification of supplies and services

Appoint responsible

Design or obtain effective Information Management system (e.g. LIS) Evaluate all suppliers Appoint person to verify purchased items

Page 33 of 85

Training plan

Record of non conformities, Supplier evaluation Procedure, Supplier evaluation register, Procedure for purchase and verification of supplies and services


17. Internal Audit

4.14, 4.10, 4.11

Training of Auditors and Internal Audit, Audit Report

4.14.2, 4.10.1, 4.11.2 Procedures

Prepare procedures

Procedures

Internal Audit procedure

Select and Train internal auditors,

Corrective action procedure

Prepare criteria for Auditors

Internal Audit procedure, Internal Auditor criteria,

Preventive action procedure

Prepare internal Audit schedule

Internal Audit schedule,

Conduct internal audits

Internal Audit report,

Address all non conformances, and determine root cause

Corrective action procedure,

Training certificate,

Investigate opportunities for Preventive action 18.Complaints

4.8

Complaint Management, Cause Analysis, Corrective and Preventive Actions

19. Review Documents

4.8Policyand Procedure Resolution of complaints procedure

Document control procedure, Document Master log Record retention policy

20.ManagementReview

Preventive action procedure and plan



Review complaints, Investigate root cause,

Feedback forms, Complaints forms,

Perform corrective actions

Corrective action reports,

Develop preventive action report

Preventive action report

Perform scheduled reviews of documentation as required,

Updated procedures, Updated document master log

4.3, 4.13

Internal Review of Quality Documentation (Manual, Procedures, Forms, Lists, Technical and Quality Records)

Management Review, Corrective Action plan, Implementation and Control of Effectiveness

Corrective action report,

4.15

Ensure obsolete documents are removed from general use and archived Prepareprocedure

Record retention policy, List of obsolete documents

Procedure

Management review procedure

Determine date for MR and invite attendees,

Management review procedure

Meeting documents (e.g. Agenda, reports, etc)

Prepare reports for Management review,

Meeting documents (e.g. Agenda, reports, etc)

Execute MR, Prepare Action plan coming out of discussions

Page 34 of 85

Management review Schedule Meeting minutes and Action plan


CHAPTER2 ELEMENTSOF THE QUALITY MANAGEME NT SYSTEM

2.1 THE QUALITY PLAN Developing a quality plan is comparable to developing a business plan. This plan will serve as the laboratory’s blueprint for its quality management program and should outline the process and details used to meet youramong objectives. It constitutes a concretestaff statement of purpose facilitates communication the laboratory’s management, and clients and willwhich give guidance to effective decision making. Requirements for effective quality program functionin g: There is a written description of the quality program. The program is reviewed annually and modified as appropriate. A designated senior staff member is responsible for the quality program implementation. Top management has substantial invo lvement and participates in quality improv ement activities. There is an active quality systems committee with a defined role, structure and function. The scope of the quality improvement program is comprehensive. The quality assessment process and improvement are systematic. • • • •

• • •

These requirements dictate that the followi ng elements should be addressed in your quality plan: • •

•

•

• •

•

•

•

The Quality Program’s purpose, scope, goals and objec tives Completion of the quality management system’s structure including a description of roles for each staff member and function Description of the process to be used for gathering feedback and conducting satisfaction surveys Description of the methods to be used for identifying non conformities, finding the root causes and performing corrective and preventive actions Development of a listing of the staff employed, tests performed and equipment used Creation of records for each instrument and a description of how the laboratory will reasonably ensure that its professionals are qualified to provide testing services to customers Identification of a mechanism to ensure that the Quality Systems Committee’s functioning is conducted in a manner that protects the confidentiality and impartiality of the laboratory’s clients Development of a process to be used by the Quality Systems Committee to present, recommend and seek approval from management. Development of a process to be used by the Quality Committee to report to the top management and staff

Figure 14 provides a more detailed breakdown of the components to be considered in the process of developing and implementing your quality plan and program. Page 35 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE A critical initial step is the formation of a laboratory team that involves staff and management in the quality improvement effort. Quantifying resources and devising strategies for mobilizing what’s needed is also critical to the laboratory’s ultimate success. Identifying clear goals and objectives, conducting periodic audits and continually taking corrective action is fundamental to success.

Figure 14 Quality Plan Outline WHAT IS

ThePOLICY

ThePLAN

Document expressing management’s commitment to Quality in the laboratory

ThePROGRAM

The strategy for developing your laboratory Quality Management plan and program

The details and content of your Quality Management system

A. Develo p the Plan

B. Develop the Program

1. Form a team (workers and management) 2. Analyze firm’s compliance with the standard 3. Review laboratory scope 4. Develop Quality objectives goals 5. Obtain senior management commitment 6. Develop a budget

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

7. Obtain necessary resources 8. Develop rules, practices & procedures 9. Get a professional review & evaluation 10.Quality System Committee 11. Decide on Responsibilities 12. Set timelines for the various tasks

for development of policies and procedures 7. Start to develop procedures (SOPs) with each department 8. Report to management any risks and improvement opportunities 9. Document any Quality Corrective Action Requests that might be identified (identified risk areas that require management attention and improvements)

C. Implement t he Program 1. Decide if a consultant is required for the project 2. Prepare a project plan an allocate resources 3. Assess an appropriate budget based on equipment, training, time and personnel required 4. Seek approval from management to procure required resources and attend any training 5. Instruct employees in their responsibilities 6. Provide guidance and follow-up

D. Evaluate the Program 1. Continue to audit, review and assess the QMS at the agreed time intervals 2. Continue to assess risk areas and identify improvement opportunities 3. Continue to review policies and procedures and make amendments as required 4. Continue to measure effectiveness of QMS to laboratory performance, review key elements frequently 5. Identify weakness in the program 6. Ensure deficiencies corrected promptly

Quality Policy Statement Develop Training, Orientation & Communication Assess method for documenting the QMS Design templates and documentation Develop QMS policies to reflect lab objectives Schedule individual departments and positions

Page 36 of 85


2.2 STRUCTURING YOUR QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM The first step in the structuring of your quality management system is achieving consensus among key laboratory stakeholders - management & staff - on what process es and procedures are need ed to support the policies required by the standard (Appendix 2). Responsibilities for the development of these documents should then be assigned. As each of these clauses is addressed, you should assess the extent of your laboratory’s compliance with the standard and seek the resources needed to address the gaps and to fully comply. A periodic audit of progress towards the goal of compliance is helpful to ensure that resources continue to be focused on the most important gaps. Note There are cla uses of the standard not requiring a writ ten policy or pr ocedure, but these must be fully complied with to ensure the e fficiency and effectiveness of your syst em.

What should you incl ude in documentation?

Efficient and effective documentation comprise the foundation of your QMS. The QMS itself must include within its control all of the activities of the laboratory that influence or have the potential to influence the validity of the test results or the satisfaction of clients. Hence some questions that you may ask are: ●

●

If the activity were to be conducted incorrectly or inadequately would it impact the result? Can this problem occur under reasonably foreseeable circumstances if it were not controlled within the QMS?

If the answer to any of the above questions is yes, the activity needs to be controlled within the QMS. All activities within the QMS need to be documente d to ensure effective control over the activity concerned. Staff must be familiar with documentation and all documents must be available when needed, must be complete, effective, easy to use, and consistently used whenever required. Note The name of the organization should at least appear on the first page of all documents developed by the laboratory.

The laboratory’s QMS documentation may include both internally and externally generated documents. For most laboratories, the QMS will include both documentation generated in the laboratory (for example the quality manual, administrative procedures, quality plans, technical procedures, calibration procedures, reports, certificates), documentation used within the laboratory but generated outside (for example contracts, requests, standards, specifications, client correspondence), and records (for example worksheets, log books, environmental control records, training records, test reports). The status of a laboratory document at any point in time must be recorded and easily accessed. Figure 15 below illustrates the possible status of a document within the laboratory’s QMS. Page 37 of 85


Figure 15 Documenta tion Status

2.3 THE QUALITY POLICY STATEMENT The Quality Policy statement defines the laboratory’s overall philosophy with respect to quality and the aim or expected outcomes from the Quality Management System (Clause 4.2.2 of the ISO 17025). The Quality Policy statement is documented in the quality manual. This statement is used to establish and reinforce the Management’s commitment to the quality effort. Quality must enjoy the same high priority as the laboratory’s or parent organization's other major goals. The policy should be Issued under the authority of the Laboratory Director Present in the quality manual Clearly stated in terms that are easily understood Posted in a conspicuous place and distributed and explained to all employees Followed by every employee, including senior management, in all work activities Reviewed annually to keep it up-to-date and in tune with current activities of the laboratory and with the latest legislation.      

Page 38 of 85


The policy statement should be rea dily available to appropriate per concise and shall include the following:

sonnel shall be

1. the sco pe of serv ice the l abora tory inte nds to provi de; 2. the la boratory ma nage ment’ s state ment of the la borat ory’s standa rd of service; 3. the la boratory ma nage ment' s commitment to good profe ssiona l practi ce and to the quality of its testing and calibration in servicing its customers; 4. the obje ctive s and pur pose of the quality mana geme nt syste m rela ted to quality 5. a requi reme nt that al l personne l concerne d with testing a nd calibra tion activities familiariz e themselves with the quality documentation and implement the policies and procedures a t all times in their work; 6. the la boratory ’s commitme nt to good professiona l pract ice, the qua lity of its examinations, a nd co mpliance with th e quality management system; 7. the la boratory mana gement’s commitme nt to compli ance with this International S tandard and to continually imp rove the effe ctiveness of the manageme nt system.

2.4 THE QUALITY MANUAL AN OVERVIEW

The Quality Manual contains the laboratory’s quality policy and objectives. The Quality Manual also includes policies (Appendix 2) and general information about the laboratory including the testing services, lists of major equipment, an illustration of the organisational structure, outline of responsibilities and authority. Additionally, it should include how the elements of the QMS are controlled. (All clauses are not mandated by a policy). The quality manual should be used to inform staff members about the policies, and clients about the laboratory’s operation and structure. Confidential information need not be included. No format is mandatory. QUALITY MANUAL BASICS The following should be considered when creating your quality manual: It is the primary or foundation document of a quality management system and must provide a thorough description of the quality management system and its policies The size usually ranges from 20-50 pages although this may vary depending on the size •

•

and scope of the laboratory and the amount of information included Page 39 of 85


•

•

•

• • •

It may include processes, but does not usually include any administrative and technical procedures. Procedures are referred to in the Quality Manual where appropriate (ref: Chapter 2 Section 2.5 - Document control requirements) It will reference your laboratory’s supporting documentation: administrative and technical procedures, records, forms, charts, etc. Some of the supporting documentation could be included within the manual or as appendices The Quality Manual should indi cate where all docu ments are locate d (eg. Procedure Manual) It can be kept in either electronic or paper format It must be easy for authorized personnel to update and easy for staff to access. It is typically maintained and reviewed by a Quality Manager (however named)

STRUCTUR E AND CONTENT OF THE QUALITY MA NUAL

The exact format, structure and contents of the quality manual are at the discretion of each laboratory. You have the freedom to design your manual in keeping with your laboratory’s size and complexity. The manual must, however, address every clause contained in the standard ISO 17025 or ISO 15189 unless the clause is not relevant to your laboratory (this is rarely the case). If your manual format does not follow the layout/design of the standard then you should provide a matrix that cross references the standard’s clauses to the manual’s layout to facilitate ease of QMS implementation and audits. In developing your quality manual content, remember that your quality management system must encompass all management activities, technical activities and processes relating to quality assurance. Organize the manual as you wish and at minimum include the following:      

Proper identification (title of document, organization name, page numbers) A brief introduction (overview of the manual) A description of the organization (name, address, brief history) A quality policy statement (Clause 4.2.2 ISO 17025) General Policies (as required by ISO/IEC 17025) Policies of the Parent Organisation (e.g. policy on cell phone use)

Figure 16 below illustrates the typical contents page of a Quality Manual.

Page 40 of 85


Figu re 16 Example of Table of C onten ts for Ma nual Section Number

Section Title

ISO Standard Cross Reference

Page number

Introduction Organisational Chart Definitions/glossary of terms Cross table Mission, Vision QualityReference Policy Statement, General Organisational Policies Personnel Equipment Purchasing and inventory Process control, validation of processes, Internal quality control and Proficiency testing Documents and records Information management Investigation of non-conformities Evaluation (includes the use of quality indicators and internal audits) Continual (process) improvement Service and satisfaction Facilities and safety

Note Everyone in the laboratory must prov ide input into t he development of the Quality Manua l, and it is essential that the entire staff is familiar with, and understands the contents of the Quality manual and its related documentation

MAINTAINING THE QUALITY MANUAL

a. The quality manual shall be maintained current under the authority of an individual given

this responsibility by laboratory management, this could be the quality manager (however named) (ISO /IEC 17025, clause 4.1.5) b. All laboratory personnel shall be instructed on the use and application of the quality manual. c. The quality manual should be reviewed, approved and updated regularly, at a minimum annually by the individual given this responsibility by top management. d. All amendments to the manual mus t be authorised by agr eed personnel. Figure 17 that follows outlines an example of a documented amendment table

Page 41 of 85


Figure 17 Example of Qua lity Manual Amendment table REVISION NO.

0 1 2 3

DATE OF CHANGE

4/10/09 25/11/09

AUTHORISED BY

QualityManager QualityManager

PAGE AND TEXT AFFECTED

InitialRelease ListofTestsamendedPage4

Note This type of table reminds personnel to ensure that they are using the most up-to-date version of any document and can be place d at the front of the binder.

2.5 DOCUMENT CONTROL OVERVIEW

Your quality manual and ALL do cumen ts in your QMS will be considered controlled documents (ref: Appendix 10–document control checklist). Changes to documents must be controlled to prevent irrelevant and unauthorised changes being introduced. The standard requires that documents shall be reviewed and approved by the srcinal reviewer(s) or by other authorized staff thoroughly conversant with the background information on which the srcinal documents were based. In order to ensure that documents can be issued and withdrawn efficiently and accurately, a control mechanism - suchstatus as a and MASTER LIST - location. should beRequirements developed tofor record and identify documents, their revision the document document control are as follows (ref: ISO 17025 Clause 4.3): 1. Laboratory management shall define, document and maintain procedures to control documents and records. Documents and records may be maintained and stored on any appropriate medium that maintains its integrity (Paper or electronic). 2. Authorized documents shall be available at all locations where operations essential to the effective functioning of the laboratory are performed (e.g. within easy reach of the work areas in the laboratory). 3. All documents issued to laboratory personnel as part of the quality management system shall be reviewed and approved for use by authorized personnel prior to us e. 4. A MASTER LIST , also referred to as a DOCUMENT CONTROL LOG, that identifies the current valid revisions and their distribution, must be maintained. An example of a master list is provided in Figure 18 below.

Page 42 of 85


Figure 18 Example of Maste r list (Document control log Document number

Document name

Issue Date

ACME – P001

Document control procedure

1/4/09

Edition no .

Prepared by

Approv ed by

) Revision status

Revision date

31/3/10

Retention time

Issued to

JohnSmith, Senior Technologist

5. Invalid or obsolete documents shall be promptly removed from all points of use, or otherwise assured against inadvertent use. 6. A retention period for out of date documents shall be identified (this is defined by the country’s regulations or laboratory policy) 7. Retained or archived out of date doc uments shall be appropriately identified to prevent their inadvertent use (for example by labelling as obsolete) 8. Only currently authorized versions of appropriate documents must be ava ilable for active use at relevant locations.

ELECTRONICDOCUME NTS

Electronic files comprise Quality System documents, data from tests, staff records, inventory files and client information among others. These must be protected from unauthorised changes and deletions. Password protection, administrator privileges and limited access to confidential information are techniques that can be employed to ensure the protection of important electronic files. DOCUME NT IDENTIFICATI ON

Unique identification numbers on documents should be easy to use, with a simple format followed throughout the QMS and communicated to everyone involved in their use. An example of a numbering system follows: All documents relevant to the quality management system shall have a unique identification, including: a. Title (simple and relevant to the procedure) b. Edition and/or cur rent revision date or revision number (e.g. Edn 1 Revision 2) c. Number of pages (e.g. Page 1 of 6) d. Authority for issue (not necessarily a signature, e.g. Authorised by…) e. Location of documents (including electronic documents) EXAMPLE OF A DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATI ON SYSTEM

The following is an example of a numbering system used by the GGMLab: GGMLAB–X-000 P –- Standard Operating Procedures (GGMLAB-P-001 series) R Records (GGMLAB-R-001 series)

Page 43 of 85


T – Test method Documents (GGMLAB-T-001 series) E – Equipment instructions (E-001 serie s) L – Lists (L-001 series) F – Forms (F-001 series)

EXAMPLES OF HEA DERS AND FOOTERS

Figures 19-23 that follow present a variety of document identification examples including examples of headers and footers that meet the standard’s requirements for document identification. Any of these can be adapted for your quality manual and related documentation in your Quality Management System. Note that pagination can either be continuous or sectioned. Additionally, you should include a revision history for each individual policy and/or procedure as part of a standard header or footer. The revision history indicates the date when the document was last reviewed and what the current version is. This ensures that all persons have the same version and obsolete versions of documents are not used in the laboratory.

Figure 19 Example of Heade r/Footer comb ination Header:

Quality Manual

Good Test Laboratories Section 0.0 Page 1 of 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Revision date: Jan 31 2009

Footer:

Prepared by

Senior Technician

Issue Number

2

Approved by

Lab Manager

Issue Date

Jan 31, 2005

Figure 20 Example of a Header Section1.0Q ualityManual Table of Contents Revision2

DateIssued:21/01/09 Authorized by: Lab Manager Approvedby:QualityManager

Page1of1

Figure 21 Example of a Foote r Prep Date: 05/11/10, Revision Date: 09/01/21 Authority for Issue: Quality Manager

Page 44 of 85

Quality manual

Pg 1 of 42


CONTRO LLED AND UNCONTROLL ED DOCUMENTS

All documents in the QMS should have some label or mark indicating whether they are controlled under the Document control system. Figures 22 and 23 below provide examples of acceptable control labelling. If the document is no longer under the control of the person responsible for Quality or the document has left the supervision of that person it is considered to be uncontrolled. For example, a document sent to a person outside of the lab for review, for information, as a resource document, etc. This is applicable whether the QMS documents are in electronic or paper format. If your quality manual and procedures are primarily electronic documents where uncontrolled printed paper copies may exist, you can consider adding footers either electronically or you may use a coloured rubber stamp on the bottom of the printed pages to identify these documents Figure 2 2 Example of Document control notes

NOTE: This is a CONTROLLED Document, as are all management system files on this server. Any documents appearing in paper form are not controlled and should be checked against the server file version prior to use.

Notice:The hard copy of this Document may be used for reference purposes only. The on-line copy must be considered the current document

Figure 23 Example Hea der/Footer with Document

control note

Header: Good Test Laboratory Status: Approved

QualityManualSection5.1 Title: Document and Record Management Policy

Footer: Prepared by: Senior Technician

Approv ed b y: Lab Manager

Page

1 of 2

Version 2.0 Rev. Date: 2006/08/26 Effective Date: 2005/08/26

NOTE: This is a CONTROLLED document for internal use only.Any documents appearing in paper form are not controlled and should be checked against the document (titled as above) on the file server prior to use.

Page 45 of 85


2.6 RECORDS The Standard requires that the Laboratory keep detailed records of all the activities it performs as proof that the activity has been completed, the data is correct or corrective actions have been performed to improve the process. Examples of laboratory records required by the QMS are data sheets, purchasing documents, training records, raw data from testing, sampling records and equipment maintenance records. All records must be kept in a safe location that allows them to remain legible and easily accessible and able to be disposed of in a manner that maintains confidentiality. A reasonable retention time, taking into account lab operations and storage options, should be established for each record. An example of an appropriate record management database is illustrated in Figure 24 below

Figure 24 Example of Re cord Management Database Record Management Database

Name of Record

Type of Record

Date created

Retention time

Date deleted

Back up

Created by

Page 46 of 85

Entered by

Storage Location

Reference no

Comments

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE CHAPTER3 PROCED URES

3.1 PROCEDURE MANUAL It is suggested that the quality system procedures be compiled into a manual to instruct those involved in managing the process of transforming laboratory policies into laboratory outcomes i.e. who, what, when, where, why and how the policies and objectives expressed in the quality manual are to be addressed and achieved. Your procedure manual outlines one or more procedures arising from the relevant policies laid out in the quality manual. These define how individuals or groups of people in the same or different departments will work to meet management’s stated objectives for quality. The quality system procedures must address each requirement of the relevant clause of the standard and collectively they will define the organisation’s administrative operation, from receiving an enquiry to delivering a completed product or service. Note It should be noted that the procedures do not have to be a ssembled into a manual, but it is qui master set will be in th e form of a manual, to facilitate control.

te likely that one

3.2 OVERVIEW OF PROCEDURE WRITING Several procedures may be required in the conduct of any of the processes conducted in the lab that arise from the laboratory’s stated policies. If you do not have a written procedure, you may start by simply writing down how you actually carry out the activity and then verify it works as you have described. This outline may be prepared as a flow chart. Flow charting is a powerful technique for generating a description of processes and is usually a good way to start (ref: Section 3.8). In documenting your administrative and technical procedures you may use the following steps: Step 1 Produce an outline of the procedure which should simply list: I. What is done? II. When it is done? III. Who does it? IV. How is it done? All other parts of the procedure can be included at a later time. This outline may be prepared as a flow chart. Step 2 When the procedure outline has been prepared it must be reviewed by several persons who have to use it. The reviewers must check to make sure that the outline adequately describes what is being done.

Page 47 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE Step 3 Once the details of the procedure are listed, then the document should be reviewed following the questioning technique to evaluate the efficiency of the procedure outlined in Figure 25 below. Figure 2 5 The P’s of Procedure writing Purpose

Place

Progression

Person

What is done?

Where is it done?

When is it done?

Who does it?

How is it done?

What shoul d be done? Why is it done?

Where should it be done? Why is it done there?

When should it be done? Why is it done then?

Who should do it?

What else might be done?

Where else might it be done?

When might it be done?

How should it be done? Why is it done that way? How else might it be done?

Why does that person do it? Who else might do it?

Process/Method

Step 4 When the procedure has been reviewed and is found to be adequate, the team should produce a draft procedure that is circulated for comment and, as well, should set and enforce a deadline for responses. Step 5 Comments are reviewed, suggested changes made and the procedure can then be issued for use.

3.3 ADVICE FOR WRITING PROCEDURES •

•

•

•

•

•

Procedures are short documents and should not exceed three pages if possible. If the procedure is too long it should be split into two separate procedures In each stage of a procedure each action should have a person responsible, e.g. Clerk completes the request form Procedures should be written with an eye to auditing. At every point the question should be asked. How do you prove this has been done? Procedures should be written in simple direct language, long sentences or unfamiliar words cause misunderstandings and misinterpretations The language used should be precise, there is no room for interpretation of the meaning of a word in a procedure Use verbs (active words) in the procedure description

Page 48 of 85


3.4 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE OUTLINE For Admi ni strat ive Qual ity Sy stem Proc edu res, the following headings are applicable. 3.4.1 Title

All procedures should have a title that clearly states the intent of the document. The title should be concise and descriptive. E.g. “Procedure for Purchasing Supplies and Services.” Because a procedure describes how to do something, the title should use direct language to declare what is being done to what. A procedure titled "Laboratory Equipment" is not descriptive of the procedure's content; a more appropriate title would be, "Procedure for Purchasing of Laboratory Equipment." 3.4.2 Purpose

This section would outline the intention of the document. If a procedure were being written for procedure writing the section would read as follows: The purpose of this procedure is to define the steps to be taken in writing a procedure, to ensure that all procedures written have been adequately reviewed and are consistent. 3.4.3 Scope

This section would outline the limits of applicability of the procedure. This section would indicate the function, department or group to which the procedure is applicable. This procedure is applicable to all staff of the stores department and is to be applied to all new equipment delivered to the laboratory. 3.4.4 References

This section would list all the other documents referred to in the procedure or which have a bearing on the activity. These could be legislation, standards or associated procedures. 3.4.5 Definitions

This section would list definitions of all acronyms, initials and abbreviations. It would also list definitions of all words which have specific meaning in the context of the document. 3.4.6 Responsibility

This section would list persons with specific responsibilities under the procedure, Example: “The superintendent is responsible for reviewing all test data before incorporation into the test report.” 3.4.7 Process/Methods (Actions)

This section would describe the details of the activity as laid out during the review steps above (Section 3.2 Procedure Writing). 3.4.8 Documents Generated (Records)

This section would list the documents generated by the procedure.

End of Outline

Page 49 of 85


Example of an Adminis trative Proce dure PreparedBy:

LaboratoryTechnician

Date:

2009.05.01

ReviewedBy: Approved By: Title:

SeniorLaboratoryTechnician Quality Manager ProcedureforcontrollingDocuments

Date: Date

2009.05.30 2009.06.01

Purpose To control all quality system documents (internally generated and from external sources). To identify changes made to documents including amendments by hand and electronically. To control documents maintained in computerized systems. To dispose of documents which are obsolete or irrelevant • • • •

Scope This procedure applies to the Quality Manual, all Test Methods, Forms, Standards, Specifications, Work Instructions, Registers and Standard Operating Procedures (SOP’s). The procedure ensures that:  authorized editions of appropriate documents are available at all locations where operations essential to the effective functioning of the laboratory are performed  documents are periodically reviewed and where necessary revised to ensure continuing suitability and compliance with applicable requirements  invalid or obsolete documents are promptly removed from all points of issue or use to assure against unintended use  obsolete documents retained for either legal or knowledge preservation purposes are suitably marked  documents are uniquely identified  documents are approved and issued by authorized laboratory personnel Definitions and Acron yms Quality manual – a document stating the quality policy, quality system, and quality practices of an organization Standard operating procedure (SOP) – a document that specifies or describes how an activity is to be performed. It may include methods to be used and sequence of operations. Test Methods – a document that specifies activities performed in the determination of analyze(s) in a specific test sample (s) Responsibilities Laboratory management ensures that this document control procedure is established, implemented and maintained. The Quality Manager/Laboratory supervisor/Senior Laboratory technician oversees the operations responsible for day-to-day following this procedureofin document its entirety. control. Laboratory technical personnel are Page 50 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE Laboratory technical personnel include Quality Manager, Technical Manager, Laboratory Manager Laboratory Supervisor, Senior Laboratory technician and Laboratory technician. Procedure Note – Documents in the QMS may consist of signs, flowcharts, pictures, drawings, sketches, forms, and numbered lists. Regardless of the format, all quality system documents must be controlled through this procedure The Quality Manager develops and reviews a master list of all controlled documents (LAB-P001) and circulates for comments to all staff. Quality Manual: 1. The Quality Manual is approved by the ACME Lab Director, who signs the master copy. 2. Controlled hard copies are indicated by the “Controlled Copy” Number on the Title page of the Manual. Operating Procedures: 1. Test methods and standard operating procedures are controlled documents with limited distribution, and working copies are kept in three-ring binders. The Table of Contents includes all current procedures assigned to a given work area and the following information:  the code and title of each procedure  the revision number of each procedure  the effective date of each procedure  the issue date of each procedure  review date – the date each procedure was last reviewed  total number of pages 2. Test Unique codes are forthe each procedure. 3. methods are assigned written with following headings (as applicable):  Scope  Description of Test Items, Sample Identification, Holding Times  Quantities to be Tested  Materials and Equipment Required  Physical Environmental Conditions Required  Procedure  Safety Measures  Method for Data Analysis and Presentation  Sensitivity, Quality Control Plan  Reference Procedures  Documents Generated  Revision History  Appendix 4. SOPs are written with the following headings (as applicable):  Purpose  Scope  Definitions and Acronyms Page 51 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE       

Responsibility Materials Required Procedure References Documents Generated Revision History Appendix

5. Procedures and Testcopies Methods prepared, reviewed Laboratory staff authorized by Quality Manager; areare uniquely identified, andbydistributed to technical users, with a “Controlled Copy” Number on the title page. Note – the issue date is the date the document was issued to the user for review. The effective date is the date the document is effectively in place and followed. 6. Obsolete master copies are archived for at least five (5) years. All other draft copies and obsolete versions are kept in LAB-OBS-07 –Obsolete Document Folder. 7. The Quality Manager maintains the master copies of the current procedures. 8. The master list of procedures includes:  Code, copy number  title  revision number  review date  status (current, obsolete) Document Review: 1. Quality is of reviewed on an annual bas is bymade. the Quality Manager/Technical Manager. Recordsmanual are kept this review and any changes 2. Written Administrative procedures and Test Methods are reviewed on a biennial basis. The reviewer makes a record of this review, any required changes, and forwards to the Quality Manager. Document Changes: If any changes are required for any Controlled Documents these are documented on the Change Request Form outlining the description of the change and forwarded to the Quality Manager. This form is held as a record. 1. Changes to the Quality Manual, Test Method or a procedure require the same review and approval by technical laboratory personnel who performed the srcinal review and approval. 2. Changes are indicated by typewritten bold italic font to the revised area. The master list is updated to reflect the changes in revision status and revision release date. 3. Personnel affected by the issue of a revised procedure are informed in writing. Holders of obsolete copies return them to the Quality Manager who ensures the updated version is placed in the manual. A list of obsolete quality manual sections and procedures is maintained.

Page 52 of 85


Am end men ts by Hand : 1. Where permitted, hand written amendments in ink are clearly marked, initialed, approved by Laboratory Supervisor/Senior Laboratory technician and dated on all copies. The relevant changes are made at the next revision of the document. Computerize d Documents: 1. Electronic copies of documents are maintained under the authority of the Quality Manager. 2. Access to electronic copies is password protected and changes are made and controlled by Laboratory manager/Quality Manager/Laboratory Supervisor. 3. Documents that are revised are maintained in a folder identified as current; the obsolete version is moved to a folder identified as obsolete. 4. Relevant personnel are inf ormed of any amen dment(s) Documents Generated Document Change request Form Document Master List Approved master copies of Quality Manual and procedures END OF EXAMPLE PROCEDURE

3.5 OVERVIEW OF TECHNICAL PROCEDURES (SOPs) Technical procedures or Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) describe or reference all activities necessary to conducting tests and describe in detail how specific tests or calibrations are conducted. While it is not necessary to transcribe the contents of a kit insert or manufacturer’s procedure manual once the documented format is appropriate, however, these documents must form part of the controlled documentation of the laboratory and be numbered appropriately. SOPs could be presented as drawings, pictures, kit inserts, analytical methods and models. They may srcinate within the organization, be provided by the customer or from international scientific references.

TECHNICAL PROCEDURE/SOP OUTLINE A technical procedure must normally be supplemented by additional information. It can be written in a very condensed form with considerable cross-referencing. For Technical Procedures , the following headings may be applicable:

Page 53 of 85


3.5.1 Title

All Test Methods should have a title that clearly states the intent of the document. The title should be concise and descriptive. E.g. “Determination of Calcium in drinking water” Because a procedure describes how to do something, the title should use direct language to declare what is being done to what. A procedure titled "Maintenance Chemical Analyser" is not descriptive of the procedure's content; a more appropriate title would be, "Preventive Maintenance Procedure for the Photometer." 3.5.2 Principle of test

The scientific basis behind the reactions which occur in the test 3.5.3 Responsibility

Who is responsible for performing the work described? Who is responsible for reporting the work? Are there special training or certification requirements? i.e., who will be qualified to perform the work described? 3.5.4 Reagents and Media

The Method should include a list of the reagents or media used, which should include:  List of required reagents and/or media, Reagent name or chemical formula  Special safety requirements  Step-by-step instructions for reagent or media preparation  Degree of accuracy and any special handling instructions for measuring device  QC of reagents or media (e.g., pH testing or visual assessment)  Labelling requirements, including expiration, Storage requirements, including containers and stability Note Only provide instructions for preparing reagents when the reagents are to be prepared each time the procedure is performed

3.5.5 Equipment

Only include a list of equipment. Instructions for calibrations and maintenance are written as separate procedures. They are only included in the technical procedure where they are performed each time the procedure is done. 3.5.5.1 Procedure s for equipment calibration sho uld inclu de the followin g:  Schedule for performing the calibration – daily, weekly, monthly, semi-annually  Schedule for performing calibration verifications (Assaying of calibration materials in the same manner as patient samples to confirm that the calibration of the instrument, kit or test system has remained stable throughout the laboratory’s reportable range for patient test results)  Calibration material specifications, preparation and storage  Source of the calibration material  Step-by-step instructions for performing the calibration, including expected readings  Troubleshooting guidelines  Documentation methods and storage requirements for calibration data Page 54 of 85


3.5.5.2 Procedures for equipment maintenance should i nclude the following:  Schedule for performing preventative maintenance – daily, weekly, monthly, semi-annually  Step-by-step instructions for performing preventative maintenance or references to equipment manuals containing instructions  

Troubleshooting guidelines Records for documenting results of maintenance

3.5.6 Supplies

The method should include a list of the supplies (consumables) used in performing the procedure. E.g., disposable pipettes, pipette tips 3.5.7 Sample Information

The analytic procedure should include the following information regarding the sample required:  Sample type and source  Amount of sample required, including minimum requirements  Acceptable collection containers  Sample stability and storage requirements, Preservative/Additive  Criteria for acceptable samples and follow-up action 3.5.8 Special Safety Precautions

This is included when ADDITIONAL safety requirements - beyond the basic handling of hazardous materials are necessary. They should include the following:  Engineering controls (E.g., Use of Fume hood)  Personal protective equipment (E.g., Respirators, gloves, face shields)  Work practice controls (E.g., Beginning a step only after certain conditions have been met or precautions have been taken) 3.5.9 Quality Control

Instructions for QC are usually written as separate procedures. They are only included in the technical procedure where they are performed each time the procedure is done. QC procedures should include the following information:  Type of QC material to be used  Instructions for preparation and handling of control materials  Frequency with which controls must be run, number of controls to use  QC expected values and/or ranges  Explanation of control criteria (E.g., Accept or reject runs or batch criteria)  Corrective action, to be taken if controls do not meet the expected criteria  Instructions for documentation of QC data  Alternate QC measures (E.g. correlation) 3.5.10 Process/Method

Write in a step-wise fashion rather than lengthy paragraphs. Provide a COMPLETE listing of the steps required to accomplish the analysis.

Page 55 of 85


3.5.11 Interpretation of Results

This section should include:  Comparison of the results to the expected values or to determine if the result is normal, abnormal, or indeterminate. Follow-up for indeterminate results  Recognition of results that fall outside the reportable range, and reference back to the Method Limitations section of the srcinal procedure  Recognition and follow-up of results that exceed critical limits

3.5.12 Calculations (Quantitative procedures)

Quantitative analytic procedures should include the equations for calculations when they are applicable to the test. Include:  The full equation  Step-by-step instructions to solve the equation, An example of how to solve the equation Normal Values (Where applicable)

Include a range of expected values for the test result, where necessary or applicable. Method Limitations

The limitations may be due to the method itself or interfering substances. Include the following:  Analytic sensitivity and specificity  Reportable range  Appropriate dilutions or reporting measures if the reporting range is exceeded  Interfering substances such as chemicals (E.g., Preservatives). Procedure Notes (Hints, special precautions, comments)

Insert appropriate comments which could include special hazards in performing the test. If special reporting of results is required it should be noted in this section. 3.5.13 References

Procedures should include the references that were used as the source of the information, when applicable. References may srcinate from any of the following:  Manufacturer’s product literature  Text books  Published standards and guidelines  Laboratory policy manuals  Applicable regulations 3.5.14 Related Documents

Reference (List) other related procedures, e.g. Procedure for cleaning glassware Records such as Forms used or data sheets produced

END OF PROCEDURE OUTLINE

Page 56 of 85


3.6 DOCUMENTATION CHECKLI ST The following checklist may be used to determine if you have developed the documents required for the most crucial portions of the QMS. At minimum these documents will assist your system implementation and ensure effective operation of the laboratory on a daily basis.

Figure 26 Documenta tion Checklist for the QMS Program Do you have documentation to prove that these things have been done? 1.PolicyStatement The written policy statement has been: Distributedtoallemployees

8.QualityControl Yes

No

Properly explained to all employees 2.Responsibilities Quality System responsibilities have been communicated to: Managers Supervisors Workers Subcontractors New managers have received a health and safety orientation 3.Documentcontrol Document control procedures are being followed

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Professional training Newworkerorientation Continuing education First Aid training All training sessions

Yes

No

4. Purcha sing o f Supplies Yes

No

Yes

No

Items are inspected before use Supplier Evaluations are performed 5. Non conformit ies There are written procedures for identifying and controlling NCs There are written procedures for performing corrective actions

10.Reporting& InvestigatingAccidents Reports are kept for: Critical injuries Lost-time injuries Medical aid injuries Property damage Accident investigations Are Standard forms used 11. Internal Audits Standard checklists are used Planned audits are done as scheduled Audit reports are kept Deficiencies are corrected

6. Examination/Test Procedures Yes Examination/Test procedures have been properly documented Are available for use by relevant employees

Procedureshavebeenestablishedand implemented for Quality control Trends aremonitored and discordant results are acted on 9.Training Training records are kept for:

No 12. Management Review Management Reviews are done The recommendations are answered and an action plan effected

Page 57 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE 7. Accommodation and Environmenta

l condit ions Yes

No

13.Personnel

Environment suitable for testing Proper housekeeping is performed

Yes

Worker training records are kept There are staff files/ records

3.7 USE OF FLOW DIAGRAMS Flow charts are used to simplify a process by representing it in a diagrammatic fashion. They help to clarify what outcomes are expected, and what should be done to provide better customer focus and satisfaction. This is accomplished with an illustration of the sequence of steps that are performed to produce an output. The output can be a product, service, information or a combination of all three. Many complex processes or procedures can best be illustrated by the use of flow diagrams. Wherever possible, diagrams can form part of documented procedures and be used to simplify complex text. It provides a simple mechanism for greater understanding of a process and better identification of areas of variability, redundancy and potential waste and is an essential aid to developing effective procedures. You can prepare flowcharts for all processes and they can be used to identify the sequence of activities involved in a process and to identify where documented procedures are needed to describe a given task. The following is a listing of common flow chart symbols:

Page 58 of 85

No


Figure 27 Flowcharting Logic To construct a process flow chart

List t he steps

Sequenc e the steps

Draw appropriate symbols

Sys tem Mod el

Check Completeness

Determine the boundaries

Use a verb to start the task description

Use post-it notes so you can move tasks Do not draw arrows until later

Start with the basic symbols

Draw charts using system (input– process-output) approach Input – use information based upon people, machines, material, method and environment

Ensure document control is Included and complete, using title and date for easy reference

Where does a process begin?

The flowchart can either be less detailed when providing the information to understand the general process flow or be very specific and detail every finite action and decision

Process – use series of processes in steps or parallel Output – use outcomes or desired results

Where does a process end?

Finalise the flowchart

Ask if this process is being run the way it should be

Are people following the process as charted?

Do we have a consensus?

Remove what is redundant, add what is missing

Key to symbols: • • •

•

•

• •

Ovals show input to start the process or output at the end of the process Boxes or rectangles show task or activity performed in the process Diamonds show points in the process, where yes/no questions are asked or a decision is required Arrows show process direction flow, usually there is only one arrow out of an activity box. If there is more than one arrow, a decision diamond is needed If there are feedback arrows, make sure the feedback loop is closed, i.e. it should take you back to an input box. Small circles are connectors from one page to another Flags contain a brief description of records generated while performing an action

Below are examples of the Flow chart symbols used in Quality Management. (See Appendix for example of a flow chart)

Page 59 of 85

for

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE Figure 2 8 Flowcha rt symbols

An oval is used to show the input to start the process or the output at the end of the process

Arrows show direction or the flow taskprocess or activity performed in the of the process

There is usually only one arrow out of an activity. If there is more than one arrow, you may need a decision diamond Make sure every feedback loop is closed i.e. every path takes you back or ahead to another activity

A diamond shows those points in the process where a yes/no question is asked or a decision is required

YES

An oval is used to show the input to start the process or the output at the end of the process

Page 60 of 85

NO


CHAPTER 4 FAQs in LABORATORY QUALITY

What is Calibra tion? Calibration is the process of comparing a measuring instrument against a measurement standard to establish the relationship between the values indicated by the instrument and those of the standard (standard in measurement is considered to be the reference base). The purpose of calibration is to eliminate or reduce bias in your measurement system relative to the reference base. The calibration procedure compares an "unknown" or test item(s) or instrument with reference standards according to a specific algorithm. Do all measuring instruments need to be calibrated? All measuring devices usually need to be calibrated - whether they are simple devices or state-ofthe art systems - because certain characteristics change with time. There are situations where an instrument need not be calibrated, for example where its readings are ‘for information only’ and their accuracy has little or no impact on the test, product or service being provided. How often should an instrument be calibrated? Calibration frequency can be established using manufacturer’s recommendations. In some cases, commercial calibration laboratories can suggest intervals for particular instruments. There are two main considerations when determining the calibration frequency. Firstly, the instrument’s reproducibility should be taken into account - new devices should be calibrated frequently in order to establish their reproducibility. Secondly, the required uncertainty of measurement should be assessed. If the instrument’s reproducibility is shown, by successive calibrations, to be substantially better than the uncertainty required then the interval between calibrations can be extended. At the other extreme, where the instrument’s reproducibility approaches the uncertainty needed, the calibration intervals should be much shorter. To provide confidence in the accuracy of calibration results, the measurement must show traceability. This means that all results associated with a calibration – including those relating to the calibration of the measurement standard used - must be traceable back to standards held at a national measurement institute, through an unbroken chain of comparisons and where each link has stated measurement uncertainties. In addition, it is important that appropriate equipment and procedures are used in the calibration process, in that they are used by trained and authorized personnel operating in an experimental environment. Why perform calibrations? • To improve the measurement accuracy and reliability of the instrument • To reduce the number of end-products rejected because they are outside acceptable tolerances • To provide products with reduced and more competitive tolerances, better reliability, and access to quality-conscious markets • To minimize unnecessary rework and delays, resulting in customer dissatisfaction • To eliminate health and safety, legal and regulatory issues § Page 61 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE What is Traceability? Traceability is the property of the result of a measurement whereby it can be related to appropriate measurement standards, generally international or national standards, through an unbroken chain of comparisons (traceability chain) in which all uncertainties are indicated. It should be noted that the instrument itself is not traceable, but the result produced by the instrument is! Traceability applies to both physical and chemical measurements. The standard referred to is a material measure, measuring instrument, reference material or measuring system that define, realize, conserve or reproduce a unit, or one or more values of a quantity to serve as a reference. What is Tracea bility to in ternational standards? Representatives of seventeen nations signed the Metre Convention treaty which provided the foundation for the establishment of the International System (SI) Units. Since then, national standards laboratories have cooperated in the development of measurement standards that are traceable to the SI. The units of measurement with the highest accuracy are realized by international measurement standards. The value of the international standard is usually determined by comparison of national standards of the highest quality, or in the case of the kilogram by the mass of the International Prototype. National measurement standards, maintained in a National Metrology Institute (NMI) are compared with these international standards before they are used as a reference for calibration of standards of lower precision. Therefore it is possible to demonstrate an unbroken chain of comparisons that ends at a national standards body. What is the tr aceability chain? It is a series of comparisons between the device under test to a reference. The final comparison in the chain is made using the International System (SI) units as a reference. Each comparison is a link in the chain and the uncertainty of each comparison (link) must be known and documented. NMIs provide the ultimate measurement references for their country. The intent of all NMIs is to realize the SI units as closely as possible so that traceability to the SI can be established by comparing to an NMI that in turn compares its references to the SI. SI UNITS

Primary National Standard NMI

Secondary Standards NMI

Working Standards NMI or other

Calibration of instrument

Page 62 of 85


What are the benefits of Traceability? Allows you to be competitive and operate in the global environment thus reducing technical barriers to trade It provides another way of guaranteeing a measurement’s accuracy. •

• • •

It is an essential element of quality control systems It links people, organizations, documents, techniques and measurements within a large and diverse measurement community §

What is Measurement Uncertainty? Test or calibration measurements are subjected to imperfections in each step of the process – from sampling to final measurement. Measurement uncertainty (also referred to as “uncertainty of a measurement”) is the term used to describe this imperfection, and is defined as the parameter associated with the result of a measurement, that defines the range of the values that could reasonably be attributed to the measured quantity. This indicates the interval within which the true value of the quantity being measured is expected to lie with a stated level of confidence. How is mea surement uncertainty evalua ted? Measurement uncertainty is evaluated by quantifying and combining a number of uncertainty components, which can be: Random Effects – e.g., fluctuations in temperature, humidity, air-pressure, variability in performance of the measurement, sampling. Systemic Effects – e.g., offset of measuring instruments, drift in its characteristics between calibrations, personal bias in reading an analogue scale or uncertainty of the value of a reference standard. The components are quantified either by evaluation of the results of several repeated measurements, or by estimation based on data from records, previous measurements, knowledge of the equipment and experience of the measurement. The evaluation from repeated measurements is done by applying a mathematical formula derived from statistical theory. The parameter determined is the standard uncertainty expressed as a standard deviation. Measurement uncertainty is usually written as an expanded uncertainty and provides an interval within which the value of the measurand is believed to lie with a higher level of confidence. It is obtained by multiplying the combined standard uncertainty by a coverage factor (k); where k is based on the level of confidence desired. For a level of confidence of 95%, k is 2. •

•

Why is measureme nt uncertainty i mportant? • It provides laboratories and customers with valuable information about the accuracy and reliability of test or calibration data. • It tells how well the results represent the value of the quantity being measured. • It gives confidence in comparability of results (which help to reduce barriers to trade). • It shows whether the result is within the acceptable limits or outside of it. • It is a requirement of ISO 17025:2005 (5.4.6). §

Page 63 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE What is quality control (QC)? Quality control (QC) is an integral part of a laboratory’s operation. It is defined as the observation techniques and activities used to fulfill requirements for quality. The control can be a substance, sample or procedure intended to verify performance characteristics of a system. QC should not be confused with quality assurance (QA), which encompasses everything a laboratory does to assure high quality services to its customers. Why establish a QC program? Your QC program should be a monitoring system that provides immediate information about the acceptability of results, as well as a method for evaluating data over time. Most control material is accompanied by stated target values for the mean and standard deviations (S.D.). These stated values may be used if they correspond to the methodology and instrumentation employed by the laboratory. If they are not provided, then calculate the parameters after a statistically significant number of control determinations have been completed (repetitions of 20 or more). Develop control charts using the mean and S.D. to record the results of the control. Es tablish criteria for acceptability, e.g. by applying Westgard rules to analyze the data. Also, develop policies and procedures for remedial action for QC failures and apply them as needed to maintain accurate and reliable test results. What to look for on QC charts? 1. Excessive scatter – points are widely scattered above and below the mean. It shows poor reproducibility of results. Common cause is operator variability in pipetting or inattention to critical steps in the procedure. 2. Bias – majority of points fall either above or below the mean. The two most common causes are an error in calibration or an error in reconstituting a control material. 3. Drift or trend – QC results move away from the mean in a particular direction over an extended period of time. Causes are outdated reagents, deterioration in reagents or instrument is losing its calibration. 4. Shift – controls suddenly change from moving above and below the mean to a line that is either always above the mean or always below the mean. Com mon causes are: recalibration was just performed; change in reagent lot; sudden deterioration of reagent (possibly not refrigerated overnight); new analyst; major change instrument performance. What are the benefits of QC? • Demonstrates analytical capability of laboratory personnel. • Monitors the stability of test methods or systems. • Assesses the accuracy and precision of test results and test methods. • Alerts the analyst if there is a problem with the reagent, test method, or instrument. • Allows the laboratory to track the overall performance of a test procedure over time. • Detects random and systemic errors. §

Page 64 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE What is Method Validation? Method validation is defined as the confirmation, through the provision of objective evidence, that the requirements for a specific intended use or application have been fulfilled. The aim is to establish the operational limits and performance characteristics of a new, modified or otherwise inadequately characterised test method. When is Method Validation done? Test methods should be validated when: a new test method is being developed an established test method is modified QC indicates that an established method is changing with time demonstrating the equival ence between two methods, e.g. a new method and a standard method. • • • •

How is Method Validation don e? The experiments used to determine method performance characteristics should be conducted with equipment that is within specification, working correctly and adequately calibrated. The analyst carrying out the experiments must be competent in the field of study and capable of making appropriate decisions from the data produced during the study. The following are common characteristics tested during method validation studies: Specificity/selectivity – ability to accurately measure the analyte in the presence of interferences. Linearity - ability of an analytical method to produce test results which are proportional to the concentration of analyte in samples within a given concentration range. •

•

• •

•

•

•

•

•

Accuracy – closeness of the measured value to the true value for the sample. Range – the concentration interval over which acceptable accuracy, linearity and precision are obtained. Precision (Repeatability & Reproducibility) – the amount of scatter in the results obtained from multiple analyses of a homogeneous sample. Detection Limit – lowest concentration of the analyte that can be confidently detected by the method. Quantization Limit – strictly the lowest concentration that can be determined with an acceptable level of repeatability, precision and trueness. Robustness – ability of the test method to remain unaffected by small but deliberate changes, e.g. temperature. Recovery – assesses the efficiency of the method in detecting all of the analyt e present.

Why is Method Validation necessary? To provide objective evidence that the results are accurate and reliable To demonstrate that a test method is “fit for purpose” Validation data can be used to design QC programs • • •

§ Page 65 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE What is Verification? Test method verification is a simplified validation process employed to check or verify a test method’s performance characteristics. It typically includes a subset of the parameters evaluated when a complete validation is performed, and asks the question “Does this new test method perform to its specification in my laboratory?” When is Verification done? It should be done before a new externally validated test method is employed by the laboratory to report results. How is Verification done? The laboratory should: Develop a clear, detailed verification procedure that defines the parameters to be evaluated. Define and approve the acceptance criteria (e.g., manufacturer’s package insert) to be used in analyzing the results. Compare experimental results to the previously established performance characteristics. Based on the results, accept or reject the test method. Summarize the data collected from the verification study in a final report. •

•

• • •

The following is the most common subset of characteristics used in verification studies:

• • •

•

Characteristics Analyzed Ac curac y Precision

•

Reportable ra nge of test results for the test method Manufacturer’s refere nce intervals (medical laboratories)

• •

•

Types of Experiments Performed Comparison of methods to estimate inaccura cy or bias Replication experime nt to estimate imprecision Linearity type experiment to estimate imprecision and to d etermine reportable ra nge Collecting reference value s to verify the established reference range

Why is Verification n ecessa ry? To provide objective evidence that your laboratory has the ability to achieve acceptable results for a given test method. To prove that an externally validated test method is acceptable for its intended use. •

•

Page 66 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE CHAPTER5 APPENDICE S Appendi x 1 Sum mar y of Claus es in ISO/IEC 17025 General Requirements for Quality and Competence in Testing and Calibration Laboratories.

Following is a summary of its requirements:

MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS 4.1

Organization Laboratory management shall have responsibility for the design, implementation, maintenance and improvement of the quality management system.

4.2

Management syst em (QMS) The QMS shall have all its procedures documented. It shall include internal quality control and participation in interlaboratory comparisons. A quality policy statement and a documented quality manual are needed.

4.3

Doc um ent cont rol Define, document and maintain procedures to control all documents and information. Define retention periods and archive documents for later reference.

4.4

Review of Request, tend ers and contra cts Ensure that all parties understand and abide by the provisions made in contracts. Keep records of all reviews, including significant changes and maintain these records.

4.5

Subcon tractin g of test s and ca libr ations Have procedures for evaluation and selection of subcontracted laboratories and consultants. Maintain a register of all subcontra ctors used.

4.6

Purchasin g External service s and suppl ies Ensure external services, equipment and consumable supplies consistently meet the laboratory’s standards. Have an inventory control system and quality records of external commodities purchased.

4.7

Service to t he cli ent Clients shall be afforded consideration to verify their samples are appropriately handled and analyzed. Confidentiality shall be maintained.

4.8

Com plaints Keep records of any complaints or feedback and of investigations or corrective action taken by the laboratory.

4.9

Identifi cation an d control of non- conf ormi ties When a non-conformity is detected: a) Personnel must be designated for problem resolution; b) Corrective action must be defined and taken immediately; c) The deviation must be documented, and reviewed by staff.

4.10 Improv ement Review all procedures at regular intervals to identify any potential source of non-conformance. Action plans must be developed, documented and implemented as appropriate.

Page 67 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE 4.11 Corr ective Action Carry out investigations to determine the root causes of problems. Document and implement any changes made to procedure. Review all procedures regularly and take action to improve the system. 4.12 Preventi ve Action Identify any necessary improvements and areas of non-conformities, either technical or concerning the management system. Develop action plans and procedures to reduce the likelihood of potential non-conformities. 4.13 Contr ol of rec ords Establish procedures for Identification Collecting, Indexing, Access Maintenance Safe disposal of quality and technical records • • • •

4.14 Internal Audi ts Formally and periodically carry out internal audits to ensure that the QMS is maintained. 4.15Management review Laboratory management must periodically review the QMS to maintain and improve the system. Findings must be recorded and any corrective action needed must be taken immediately.

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS 5.1 5.2

General Personn el Define qualifications and duties for all personnel. Implement the Quality Management System (QMS) and procedures.

5.3

Acco mmod ation an d envir onme ntal conditi ons Ensure the facilities for examination allow for correct performance of tests and reliability of results.

5.4

Test and C alibra tion M ethod s and M ethod valida tion Use only relevant, validated, documented procedures which meet the needs of the users of the laboratory’s services. Record any deviations or changes in procedure.

5.5

Equipment Provide the laboratory with relevant, functioning and calibrated equipment. Ensure authorized personnel operate equipment in a safe working environment.

5.6

Measure ment Tr aceabilit y The laboratory must have documented evidence that measurements made by the laboratory can be traced to the International System of Units (SI). Calibration certificates issued by or to laboratories shall contain the measurement results, including the measurement uncertainty or a statement of compliance with an identified metrological specification.

5.7

Sampli ng Sampling plansisshould based on sound sampling techniques. Theand laboratory must be sure that there a goodbeunderstanding andstatistical agreement between the customer the laboratory as

Page 68 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE to how the sampling process is to be carried out. It must be properly documented and carried out according to an authorized sampling plan and its associated procedures. 5.8

Handling of Test and Calibra tion it ems Authorized personnel must review results and determine reliability before releasing results. Disposal of samples must be in accordance with local standards.

5.9

Assuring the Quality of test and calibr ation results Establish quality control methods to verify attainment of quality results. Document, record and retain records of results. Take action if results are suspected to be incorrect.

5.10 Reporting resu lts Results must be reported legibly, unambiguously and in an identifiable manner. Use an audit log if the present reporting system cannot capture changes or alterations

Page 69 of 85


Appendix 2 List of Polic ies in ISO/IEC 17025 Policy Name(Description)

ISO17025 Clause Number

For ensuring the protection of confidential information

4.1.5c

For avoiding involvement in activities that would

4.1.5 d

diminish c onfidence in its competence, impa rtiality, jud gmen t or o perat ion al in tegr ity Quality Policy Statement

4.2.2

For conducting r eview of requests, tende rs and contracts For the selection and purchasing externa l services and supplies, equipment and consumable supplies that affect the quality of Tests and Ca librations

4.4.1

For the re solution of comp laints

4.8

To identify and control nonconfor mities when they occur To designate a ppropriate authorities for implementing corrective actions For identifying training training

4.6.1

needs and providi ng personnel

Page 70 of 85

4.9.1 4.11.1 5.2.2

Section in Quality Manual

Done

Not Done


Appen dix 3 List of Procedur es in ISO/IEC 17025 ProcedureName(Description)

ISO 17025 Clause Number

For ensuring protection of confidential information

4.1.5c

For avoiding involvement in a ny activities which would dimini sh confidence in its competence , impartiality, judgment, or operational integrity

4.1.5d

To control all documents

4.3.1

Appro val and issu e of d ocu ments

4.3.2.2

For hand a mendments of documents pending re-issue (if allowed) To describe cha nges in documents maintained in the computerized systems are ma de and control led

4.3.3.3 4.3.3.4

For review of requests, tenders and contracts

4.4.1

For the selection and purchasing external services and suppli that affect the quality of t ests and calibrations

es

For the resolution of complaints To identify and control nonconfor

4.6.1 4.8

mities when they arise

4.9.1

To designate a ppropriate authorities fo r impl ementing corrective actions

4.11.1

To identify, document and eliminate the root cause(s) of nonconformities For initiating and monitoring preventive actions

4.11.2 4.12.2

For identification, col lection, indexing, access, storage, maintenance a nd safe disposal of records

4.13.1.1

To protect and back up records stored electronically

4.13.1.4

For internal audits which i nclude the types of audit, frequencies, methodologies and required documentation

4.14.1

For conduct ing Manageme nt reviews

4.15.1

For checking that t he environment does not adversely affect the performance of specimen collection and equipment

5.2.2

To ensure good housekee ping

5.3.5

Test and Calibrations methods

5.4.1

Procedure for validating test methods

5.4.5.2

For estimating uncertainty of measurement for calibration labs

5.4.6.1

For estimating uncertainty of measurement for testing Labs performing calibrations

5.4.6.2

For protecting th e integrity of (electronic/computer) data at all

5.4.7.2b

Page 71 of 85

Section in Quality/Procedure Manual

Done

Not Done

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE times Up to date instructions on the use a nd maintenance of equipment For safe handling, transport, storage and use of

equipment

5.5.3 5.5.6

For performing int ermedia te checks to maintain confid ence in the calibra tion status of equipmen t

5.5.10

For ensuring correction factors are correctly updated

5.5.11

For calibration of equipment

5.6.1

For calibration of reference standards For intermediate checks to maintain confidence in the calibration status of reference, primary, transfer or working standards and reference materials

5.6.3.1 5.6.3.3

For safe handling, transport , storage and use of reference standards For sampling performed by the lab

5.6.3.4

For recording relevant data and operations relating to

sampling

5.7.1 5.7.3

For transportation, receipt, handling, prot ection, storage, retention and/or disposal of test/calibration it ems

5.8.1

For avoiding deterioration, loss or damage to the test or calibration item duri ng storage, handling and prepara tion.

5.8.4

Quality control procedures for monitori and calibrations undertake n

5.9.1

ng the validity of tests

Page 72 of 85


Appendix 4 List of “ SHALLs” in ISO/IEC 17025 Requirement

Met

NotMet N/A

Clause

The labora tory shall b e an entity that can be held legally responsible. The laboratory mana gement system shall co ver all work carried out in p ermane nt and mobile facilities

4.1.1

If personnel do perform other activities th an testing, e. g. consulting, the organiza tion shall be define d in order to identify conflicts of i nterest

4.1.4

The la boratory shall have personnel and resources nee ded to carry out its duties according to its scope of accredita tion

4.1.5.a

The laboratory shall have arrangements to avoid that their personnel are not i nfluenced of in ternal / exte rnal pressure that could in fluence the quality of their work, e.g. paid by the number tests performed The labora tory shall h ave policy and procedures to avoid involvement in anything that could diminish its confidence

4.1.5.b

The la boratory shall define its organization and manage ment structure and the relationships in the in the organization, e. g. by using an organiza tion chart.

4.1.5.e

The labora tory shall s pecify the responsibility, authority and

4.1.5.f

interrela tions of personnel that could influence the test results. The la boratory shall provide supervision of testing staff, including trainees, by competent personnel.

4.1.5.g

4.1.3

4.1.5.d

The laboratory shall have technical ma nageme nt with the competence a nd resources neede d with the overall responsibility for the quality.

4.1.5.h

The laboratory shall appoint a Quality Manager.

4.1.5.i

The la boratory shall appoint deputies for

4.1.5.j

key personnel.

The la boratory shall establish, implement and maintain an appropriate quality system for its activities.

4.2.1

The labora tory’s quality system and policies sh all be defined in a named Quality Manual.

4.2.2

The quality policy statement shall be signed by the management. The Qua lity Manual shall make reference s to supporting document systems and outline the s tructure of the sys tem.

Page 73 of 85

4.2.2.a-e 4.2.3

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE The roles of responsib ilities of the Technical Ma nageme nt and Quality Manager shall be defined.

4.2.4

The laboratory shall include / make references to external and internal documents in the quality system.

4.3.1

All doc ument s issued as part o f th e quali ty s ys tem s hal l be reviewed and approved. A master list (or equivalent) shall outline the documented quality system and be used to control the documents.

4.3.2.1

The procedures adopted shall ensure that:

4.3.2.2

-

Aut hori zed docu ments are available where needed Docume nts a re p eriodi cally re viewed an d if n ecessary Replaced

-

Inva lid/ obso lete docum ents a re r emove d an d ma rked as s uch

Quality system documents generated by the lab shall have id, page numbering, a nd information if they are va lid and be authorized. Change s to documents shall be reviewed and approved by the same function that made the srcinal.

4.3.2.3

Altered t ext in documents shall if poss ible b e ident if ied in the revised docu ment.

4.3.3.2

If the laboratory allows that changes are made by hand in documents, that procedure must be documented.

4.3.3.3

If changes to “ electronic documents” must be documented.

4.3.3.4

are allowed, that procedure

The laboratory shall have procedures for the review of requests, tenders and co ntracts. Records of reviews (including subcontractors) shall be maintained. When the laboratory is goi ng to use a subcon tractor, it shall use a competent one.

4.3.3.1

4.4 4.4.2 / 4.4.3 4.5.1

The labora tory shall inform the cli ent if the laboratory uses subcontractors

4.5.2

The labora tory shall maintain a register with its subcontractors and their competence.

4.5.4

approved

The labora tory shall h ave a policy and pro cedure for the selection of purchasing of services and supplies and a procedure for the approval of bought goods. The laboratory shall offer its

clients service.

4.6.1 / 4.6.2

4.7

Page 74 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE The labora tory shall h ave a policy and procedure for and a list o f received complaints.

complaints

The la boratory shall have a policy and procedure to control conforming work. The labora tory shall m onitor the effect of any

non

corrective action.

When there is a doubt that the la boratory does not follow its own procedures, the labora tory shall p erform an internal audit: If there is the need / opportunity laboratory shall do that.

to perform a preventive action the

4.8 4.9.1

4.10.4 4.10.5 4.11

The la boratory shall have a system for archiving of its documents.

4.12

Each observation etc. shall be documented in such a way making it possibl e to identify the responsible person, and if of importance, the time.

4.12.2.1

Mistake s shall not b e “ tippexed” or erase d, the wrong note shall be over-lined, dat ed and signed together with th e correct result.

4.12.2.3

The laboratory shall have a procedure and a predetermined schedule for interna l audits covering the whole quality system.

4.13

The ma nageme nt shall periodically, according to a schedule, perform management reviews.

4.14

The laboratory shall ensure the competence of i competence shall be documented.

5.2.1

ts personnel. That

The laboratory shall have a policy about training/competence and a procedure to detect the need of training.

5.2.2

The laboratory shall have up-date

5.2.4

d doc umented job d escriptions.

The la boratory shall have documente d authorizations for personnel to perform specific tasks, e. g. signing of test reports.

5.2.5

The labora tory must have facilities and environment that does not affect the test result.

5.3.1

The labora tory shall, if n ecessary monitor, control environmental conditions.

5.3.2

and record

The la boratory shall use appropriate te st methods and laboratory specifi c SOPs wh ere needed.

5.4.1

The labora tory shall i nform the cli ent of the appropriate method to meet the clie nts’ needs; the lab shall choose international, regional or national methods or methods p ublished in reputable organiza tions / technical journals or methods proposed by the manufacturer of the equipment used.

5.4.2

Non standard methods sh all be validated before use.

Page 75 of 85

5.4.4 / 5.4.5.2

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE When calibrating, the uncertainty shall be estimated.

5.4.6.1

Testing laboratories shall have procedures to uncertainty.

estimate its

5.4.6.2

Calculations and data transfers shall be checked periodically.

5.4.7.1

The laboratory shall validate own developed software and have procedures to protect data stored electronically, e. g. log i n / user name and backups. The laboratory shall have the equipment needed to perform the tests. Used equipment shall have the quality needed and shall be appropriate calibrated.

5.4.7.2

The equipment shall be operated by c ompetent persons; instructions shall be available where needed.

5.5.1 5.5.2

5.5.3

Each item of equipment shall be identified and properly documented. Equipment suspected to function in correct shall be prevente d for unintended use.

5.5.4 / 5.5.5 5.5.7

When intermediate checks (verifications) are needed to guarantee the function of a piece of equipment those checks shall be performed according to a defined plan and procedure.

5.5.10

The la boratory shall have a program for calibration of its equipment.

5.6.1

When necessary the testing laboratory shall have traceability to SI units for the physical factors in qu estion.

5.6.2.2

The la boratory shall have a program and procedures for the calibration of its reference standards.

5.6.3.1

Reference material shall be traceable to SI units or to certified reference material if possible.

5.6.3.2

The la boratory shall have procedures to ensure the calibration status of its standards and reference material.

5.6.3.3

The la boratory shall have procedures for the handling of i standards and reference materials.

5.6.3.4

If the laboratory carries out sampling, it sh procedure for that.

ts

all have a plan and

The laboratory shall have procedures for receipt, transport, pre treatme nt labeling / identification etc. of te st items. If any abnormal is detected upon receipt of

a test item that shall

be recorded and noted in the test report.

5.7

5.8.1 / 5.8.2 5.8.3 / 5.10.3.1.a / 5.10.3.2.e

Page 76 of 85

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE The labora tory shall h ave plans and procedures for monitori ng the validity of its results. Syste ms shall be used in o rder to detect trends, e.g. the use of statistical evaluations.

5.9

The result shall be presented in a calibration certificate or test report fulfilling the requirements in ISO 17025.

5.10

If opinions and interpreta tions are includ ed in the report, the basis of that must be explained and clearly sepa rated from the result.

5.10.5

If subcontractors have been used that must be c lear from the report. In the case of e lectronic transmission o f results that must be agreed (in writin g) with the client and the requirements in ISO 17025 mus t be m et.

5.10.6

Additions or cor rec tion s to a tes t report can only be m ade by a new document with an explana tion.

5.10.9

Page 77 of 85

5.10.7


Appendi x 5 Doc um ent Contro l Check list Instructions - If the laboratory has implemented the action, process or procedure referred to, the auditor will tick YES and state in the Proof/Comments column what was seen to verify or prove implementation. If not, then tick NO and include any relevant and useful comments Yes No Proof/Comments 1. Is there an up to d ate SOP for docume nt control? 2. Is the do cume nt curre nt an d within re view date ? 3. Is the re evide nce tha t the docume nt has bee n prepa red, checked and approved by a suitably qualified member of staff? 4. Does the docume nt have the ne cessa ry informa tion such as version number, unique identification, title, review dates, etc.? 5. Is there evide nce of cr oss re ferencing to othe r documents? 6. Is the re evide nce tha t docume nts are a ccessible a nd secure? 7. Is the re evide nce of a ppropria te docume nt distribut ion? 8. Is ther e evide nce that this i s worki ng? 9. Is the re evide nce of a pr ocess for docume nt chan ge? 10. Is there evidence of a backup procedure for the document control system? 11. Is there evidence that pre vious versions of documents have been archived? 12. Are pre vious versions of documents ava ilable for retrieval? 13. Is there evidence that staff a dhere to the document control procedure? 14. Is there evidence that out of date documents are being withdrawn from circulation? 15. Are out of da te documents r eviewe d? 16. Are they in date , appropriate ly formatted etc? 17. Is the re evide nce of regular document review? 18. When was the last document review? 19. Is st aff trained in doc ument control? 20. Do they ha ve documented evidence of the training? 21. Is their a dequate back-up of documents? 22. Is sta ff informed when documents are available?

updated a nd

Page 78 of 85


Appendix 6 Example of a Flowchart

START

Responsibilities

Quality Manager

Documents Generated

Identify persons to train as auditors

List of Trainee Internal Auditors

Quality Manager

Identify facilitator and establish

Trainer

Develop training materials

Training Manual

Human Resources

Schedule and organize training

Training Schedule

Trainer

Conduct training

Attendance Register Evaluation Forms

Quality Manager

Training Proposal

Is the training effective?

No

Conduct investigation & document findings

Competency Evaluation Investigation Report

YES

Quality Manager

Quality Manager

Update training records

Personnel Records

Plan and execute Audits

Audit plan and schedule

END

Page 79 of 85


Appen dix 7 Chec kl ist fo r reviewi ng Qualit y Managem ent Sys tem Implem ent ation This checklist will be used to review the Quality Management Implementation process being conducted by the Lab against ISO/IEC 17025. Items from this checklist are discussed in detail in the standards. If the item is present simply tick the checkbox, otherwise leave it blank if element is not available. Note that all items below must be included in a QMS. If an item is not relevant, an explanation must be provided. Also note that the process may either be described or referenced in the Quality Manual; however, all references should be readily accessible within the organization and provided to the Staff. Lab Name: Lab Address: Country : Tel: Quality Manager:

Fax:

Email:

Yes ORGANIZATION 1.

Is Legal status of Laboratory identified and available (e.g. Company registration certificate, etc)?

2.

Are arrangements for confidentiality and impartiality outlined?

3.

Is there a description of the process for resolving disputes?

4.

Is there a statement of the organization's Quality policy? 4a. Q policy statement includes general objectives/goals? 4b. Q policy statement includes requirements from standard?

5.

Is organizational chart available? 5a. Organizational chart identifi es all important Managerial/Technical positions of the organization? 5b. Organizational Chart identifies position of QA manager and lines of reporting?

6.

Does it include authorities and independence of the QA manager and staff?

7.

Describes procedures to ensure QA staff has access to appropriate levels of management?

Page 80 of 85

Comments/Page(s)

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE Yes 8.

Discusses how management assures understanding and implementation in all programs?

9.

Identifies how internal coordination of QA and QC activities is performed?

QUALITY SYSTEM COMPONENTS 11. Describes principal quality system components (e.g., quality manual, administrative procedures, test procedures, records management system, annual reviews and planning, project-specific quality documentation? (Please identify the components in Comments section.) 12. Description of components includes how they are implemented and responsibilities of management and staff?? 13. Lists responsibilities for implementing each component (e.g., Quality Systems Audits, Training Plans, Management review? 14. Identifies review and approval procedures? QUALIFICATIONS AND TRAINING 15. Is there a policy regarding Quality training for management and staff? 16. Does it describe the process for identifying, maintaining, ensuring, and documenting that personnel have necessary quality-related qualifications? 16a Have records of competency analysis been prepared? 17. Is there a process for identifying the need for quality-related retraining based on changing requirements and the roles, responsibilities, and authorities for these processes? PROCUREMENT OF ITEMS AND SERVICES 18. Is there a process for reviewing and approving all purchase agreements? 18a. The process ensures documents are complete and accurate and agreement clearly describes the item or service needed? 18b. The process ensures agreement describes the associated technical and quality requirements? 18c. The process ensures agreement describes the quality system elements for which the supplier is responsible? 18d. The process ensures that the supplier’s conformance to the customer’s requirements will be verified? 19. Describes process for reviewing and approving applicable requisitions to ensure that they satisfy all technical and quality requirements? 19a. Review process ensures the review of evidence of the supplier’s capability to satisfy quality requirements?

Page 81 of 85

Comments/Page(s)

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE Yes 19b.Review process ensures procured items and services are acceptable? 20. Describes process for review and appro val of suppliers’ quality-related documentation (e.g., QA Project Plans and QMPs)? 21. Describes roles, responsibilities, and authorities for the above processes process to ensure policies are satisfied? DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS 24. Describes process for identifying quality-related documents and records (including electronic) requiring control? 25. Describes procedure for preparing, reviewing, approving, issuing, using and revising documents and records? 26. Describes process for maintaining documents and records including confidentiality, transmittal, distribution, retention, access, preservation, traceability, retrieval, removal of obsolete documentation, and disposal? 26a. Have all test methods been documented? 27. Does it describe the roles, responsibilities, and authorities for the above processes? COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE 28. Describes process for developing, installing, testing, using, maintaining, controlling, and documenting computer hardware and software? 29. Describes process for assessing and documenting the impact of changes to user requirements and/or the hardware and software on performance? 30. Describes process for evaluating purchased hardware and software? 31. Describes process for ensuring that data and information produced from or collected by computers is backed up and secured? 32. Describes the roles, res ponsibilities, and authorities for the abo ve processes? PLANNING 33. Includes a description of the systematic planning process for operations and identification and involvement of all customers and suppliers? 34. Does process include specification of needed QA and QC activities to assess the quality performance criteria? 35. Does process include specification of performance criteria for measuring quality (e.g. Control chart)? 36. Describes the roles, res ponsibilities, and authorities for the abo ve processes?

Page 82 of 85

Comments/Page(s)

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE Yes IMPLEMENTATION OF WORK PROCESSES 37. Describes process for ensuring that work is pe rformed according to planning and technical documents? 38. Describes the roles, responsibilities and authorities for the above process? AUDIT 39. Describes the process for assessing the adequacy of the quality system at least annually? 40. Describes the process for planning, implementing and documenting audits and reporting results to management? 40a. Process includes selecting an audit tool, the expected frequency, and the roles and responsibilities of assessors? 40b.Process includes determining the level of competence, experience and training needed for audit personnel? 40c. Process includes ensuring that personnel have no real or perceived conflict of interest, and have no direct involvement or responsibility for the work being assessed? 40d.Process includes ensuring that personnel conducting audits have sufficient authority, access to programs and managers, access to documents and records? 41. Describes process for management’s review of, and response to findings? 42. Describes process for identifying how and when corrective actions are to be taken in response to the findings of the audit? 42a. Process includes ensuring corrective actions are made promptly and actions documented? 42b.Process includes confirming the implementation and effectiveness of any corrective action? 43. Are past QS management audit findings resolved? (Put date of Final Report in Column 3.) 44. Describes the roles, res ponsibilities, and authorities for the abov e processes? QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 44. Describes process for ensuring that conditions adverse to quality are prevented, identified promptly, corrected promptly and that actions are taken toward prevention, documented and actions tracked to closure? 45. Describes process for encouraging staff to establish communications between customers and suppliers, identify process improvement opportunities, and identify and propose solutions for problems? 46. Describes the roles, res ponsibilities and authorities for the above processes?

Page 83 of 85

Comments/Page(s)

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDANCE Yes

OTHER REVIEW CRITERIA 47. Have all administrative procedures as required by standard been documented and implemented? 48. Has scope of testing been defined and documented?

49. Have staff been trained in use of the QMS documentation? 50. Has a Quality team been designated?

Page 84 of 85

Comments/Page(s)


REFERENCEDOCUMENTS Preparing For Accreditation: Guidance on Implementation of Quality Management Systems (QMS) for Medical Laboratories. A QMS “How To” Guide. Edition 1December 2006 Strengthening Of Medical Laboratory Services In The Caribbean. A CARIFORUM Project Funded by the European Union (CAREC EU Project) Estimation of uncertainty of measurement in Medical Laboratories, 12 th September 2006. European Diagnostic Manufacturers Association Position paper. www.edma-ivd.be M3003 The Expression of Uncertainty and Confidence in Measurement, Edition 2 August 2006 United Kingdom Accreditation Service www.ukas.com Uncertainty of Measurement in Clinical www.ifcc.org/ejifcc/vol13no4/130401006

Microbiology.

Fuentes-Arderiu

X,

eJIFCC

vol

13

International Laboratory Accredi tation Cooperation (ILAC) Documents www.ilac.org

ILAC G2 Traceability of Measurement ILAC G9 Guidelines for the Selection and Use of Certified Reference Materials ILAC G13 Guidelines for the requirements for the Competence of Providers of Proficiency Testing Schemes

Clinical laboratory testing and in vitr o diagnostic test systems

ISO 15189:2003 ISO 15190:2003 ISO/TR 22869:2005

Medical laboratories – Particular requirements for quality and competence Medical laboratories –Re quirements for safety Medical laboratories – Guidance on laboratory implementation of ISO 15189:2003

Quality Management Standards

ISO/IEC 17025:2005

General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories

ISO/IEC 17043

Conformity Assessment – General Requirements for Proficiency testing

ISO/IEC Guide 2:2004

Standardisation and related activities – General Vocabulary

ISO/IEC 17000

Conformity Assessment - General Vocabulary

ISO 19011:2002

Guidelines for quality and/or environmental management system auditing

ISO/TR 10013:2001

Guidelines for Quality Management System documentation

ISO 10002: 2004

Quality Management – Customer Satisfaction – Guidelines for complaints handling in organisations

ISO 10002: 2004

Quality Management – Customer Satisfaction – Guidelines for complaints handling in organizations

ISO 9000

Quality Management Systems – Fundamentals and vocabulary

ISO 9001

Quality Management Systems –R equirements

Page 85 of 85

no.

4.

QMS for Laboratories Testing and Calibration ISO 17025

Recommend Documents