Project Management and ISO 9001— An Integrative Approach Through Process Management Yvess Pszenica, Yve Pszenica, PMP PMP,, Business Process Reengineering Manager, Manager, Dürr Environmental, Environmental, Inc., Wixom, Wixom,Michigan Michigan
Introduction
The Approach
The issue of Quality of Quality in Project Management , reco recognized gnized as one one of th thee PMBOK® Guide nine areas of knowledge, knowledge,has has been widely Guide nine areas written about. about. Most of what has been published published on the subject subject refers to the the application, application, in a project context context,, of quality concepts concepts used essentially in manufacturing environments. Project Management in Quality has Quality has become become the topic of various publications as the methodology was found to be an effective and efficient way to implement a quality management system per ISO 9001 or other quality related standards. On the other other hand, the issue issue of Quality of Quality and Project Management has Management has received very little attention as judged by the quasi absenc absencee of refe referenc rencee material material on the subject. subject. In other words, how can proper project management methodology (per the PMBOK® Guide guidelines) Guide guidelines) be implemented at the enterprise level, that complies with the ISO 9001 (revision 2000) requirerequirements in order to obtain third party registration? As ISO 9001 is gaining popularity in the U.S. and is now a basic requirement to do business in Europe, more and more companies enjoying the benefits of good project management will be faced with ISO 9001 registration mandates. This paper offers a generic method for implementing ISO 9001 in a project management environment, environment, using process management as a tool.The tool. The methodology exposed has been developed, developed,implemented implemented and validated in a capital equipment environment but could easily be applied to any organization involved with project management.
The Context The Organization Dürr Environmental, Environmental,Inc. Inc.(DE) (DE) is the world’s world’s largest supplier ofVOC of VOC and hazardous air emission emission control systems systems to a wide variety of industries including automotive, automotive,wood, wood, cement and semiconductor. semiconductor. The company relies heavily on project management to effectively and efficiently execute 50 to 60 unique projects per year, year, with contract values ranging from $250,000 to $10,000,000 per project.
The Issue As a result result of a worldwide worldwide corporate corporate mandate, mandate, custome customerr requirements and an internal quest for for improved operations, DE management decided to embark on the ISO 9001 journey.
At first, first, the 1994 1994 revision revision of the ISO 9001 9001 standard standard (ISO (ISO 9001:1994) was used. Heavily tailored to manufacturing operations,it tions, it was found to be very “unfriendly”for “unfriendly”for a business environenvironment such as DE’s.Wide DE’s. Wide interpretations were required to attempt the most basic basic level of compl compliance iance with the the requirements, requirements, thus making the task even more challenging and uncertain. In light of this fact, a back-to-basics back-to-basics approach approach focusing on core activities activiti es was considered. ISO 9001’s 9001’s purpose is to define generic guidelines to set up a quality management system system (QMS); as such the standard cannot dictate how companies are set up or even operate. As far as core processes processes are concerned, concerned, a careful analysis of the company’s company’s operations lead to the conclusion that the only commonality between betwee n the 50 to 60 projects per year was the way they were being executed. executed. This established project management activities as DE’s core processes. The approach taken can be summarized as follows: 1. Identify the business processes that constitute DE’s operations. 2. Establ Establish ish and develop core core activities activities first, i.e. proje project ct management. 3. Extend the effort to the other activities as they relate to project management. 4. Ensure compliance with ISO 9001. 5. Hope for for the best! With the recent publication of ISO 9001:2000, 9001:2000, this approach is not only officially recognized but promoted by the international standard, making compliance compliance easier to achieve, especially for service type businesses. As stated in the March 2001 2001 issue of Quality magazine “ This is good news for those who attempted to implement reality-based quality management systems that reflect and build on actual business configurations and resources.”
Key Concepts Following is a short introduction to the key concepts referred to throughout this paper.
Quality ISO 9001:2000 defines the requirements for a Quality Management System System (QMS) that demonstrates the ability ability of an organization to consistently meet customer and applicable regulatory requirements , as well as to enhance customer satisfaction.
Proceedings of the Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symposium Novem No vember ber 1–10,2001 1–10,2001 • Nas Nashv hvil ille le,Ten ,Tenn.,USA n.,USA
Exhibit 1. Proc Process ess Management Model Project (Business) Model
Process Definition
Process Classification
Process Mapping
Internal Audit
Process Integration
Feedback Loop
Continuous Improvement Loop Processes Refinement
Performance Improvement
Organizational Evolution
Change Management Loop
The 2000 revision explicitly recognizes that the QMS design should be influenced by the needs, objectives and products provided, processes vided, and structure structure of the organization. organization. processes employed , size and Process management is promoted as the preferred method for QMS implementation.
processes as well as ensuring their continued excellence. Maintenancee is required to keep up with ongoing changes in the Maintenanc organization or its business environment and process improvement seeks to keep them effective and achieve ever-higher efficiency levels.
Project Management
Quality and Project Management
The PMBOK® Guide (as well as ISO 10006:1997 “ Quality Management—Guidelines to Quality in Project Management” ) provides a basic reference reference for project management, the practice of which is describe described d in terms of processes organized processes organized into nine areas of knowl knowledge: edge: integ integration ration manage management, ment, scope manag manageement, time manage management, ment, cost manage management, ment, quali quality ty manag manageement, human resourc resourcee management, management, comm communica unications tions management, managem ent, risk management,and management, and procurement management. management. The practice practice of project manageme management nt seeks to meet or exceed requirements) s) and expectations stakeholder needs (identified requirement (unidentified requirements) from a project within the limits of scope,, time, cost and quality scope quality.. Project management is now also being recognized by ISO 9001:2000 as a “unique process “unique process , con consist sisting ing of a set of coor coordina dinated ted and controlled activities with start and finish dates, undertaken to achieve an objective conforming to specific requirements , including the constraints of time, cost and resources.”
Considering that our ultimate ultimate goal is the integration integration of project management and and ISO ISO 9001:2000, 9001:2000, it is reassuring to find out that both methodologies share the same goal of addressing customer customer requirements (meeting them at a minimum) and rely on a process approach. approac h. This leads to the conclusi conclusion on that process management is the critical link link in the integration of these two concepts. concepts.
Process Management A process is an activity or group of activi activities ties transforming transforming an input into into an output output of great greater er value value through through the use of resources. Process management cons consists ists of maint maintainin ainingg the
The Process Approach Following is an overview of the various steps that were involved involved in the integration integration of ISO 9001:2000 9001:2000 and project management through the use of process management.
Process Management Model The Process Management Model (see Exhibit 1) is a formalization of of the approac approach h described described above above;; it consists consists of a series series of processes leading to a companywide companywide implementation of process management. The processes composing the model are as follows: Process Definition: Definition : Estab Establishm lishment ent of an inv inventory entory of all company processes •
Proceedings of the Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symposium Novem No vember ber 1–10,2001 1–10,2001 • Nas Nashv hvil ille le,Ten ,Tenn.,USA n.,USA
Exhibit 2. Dürr Environmentals Project Life Cycle Cycle (context of capital equipment projects) Stage Gate # 1 P r e c o n t r a c t
Inquiry Received Received from Customer
Sales & Proposal Functions
Order Acquisition Process
*
Contractual Review Function
Project Booking Process * Stage Gate # 2
Contract awarded
Internal kick-off Meeting
Granting of Authorization to Proceed *
P l a n n i n g
Contract finalized
External Kick-off Meeting Project Planning Process
Project Mgt Functions
Strategy Meeting Engineering Technical Review Meeting
Functions
Engineering Planning Process
Project Review Meeting # 1
P Stage Gate # 3
R
Process Engineering Approved by Customer Customer
O J E C T
E x e c u t i o n
P
Project Review Meeting # 2 Project Project Execution Process
Mgt
Engineering
Functions
Functions
Engineering Execution Project
Project Review Meeting # 3
Stage Gate # 4
Customer has has beneficial Use of the Equipment Equipment
H A S E S
C l o s e
Project Review Meeting # 4
Project Close out Process
Project
Engineering
Mgt Functions
Functions
Engineering Close out Process
Close out Meeting(s)
o u t Stage Gate # 5
W a r r
Project complete
Project Management
Proceedings of the Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symposium Novem No vember ber 1–10,2001 1–10,2001 • Nas Nashv hvil ille le,Ten ,Tenn.,USA n.,USA
Process Classification: Classification: Class Classifica ification tion of the processes processes using the Project (Business) Model (see below) Detailed led descripti description on of each process process Process Mapping : Detai Process Integration: Integration: Ensuring proper interaction between between the processes. Note: this step is often overlooked overlooked but is actually critical to the overall overa ll performance performance of the organization organization;; prope properly rly interacting interacting processes can prevent prevent many of the mistakes and breakdowns breakdowns in the expected expected flow of business activities activities as a result of existin existingg gaps in the system. Once the above four processes are completed, completed, a baseline model of the organization organization has been establ established ished.. Considering the dynamic condition condition of today’ today’ss business environment, ronm ent, howe however ver,, this is not suffic sufficient ient;; pro provisio visions ns must be made to account for feedback regarding performance, continuous improvement improvement and change management. management. These three conconsiderations are addressed in the model by the following processes: Internal Audit : Verify for for compliance, compliance, effectiveness and effiefficiency using the baseline model established Performance Improvement : Continuous search for increased effectiveness and efficiency (business process reengineering, benchmarking…) account of of on-goi on-going ng changes changes Organizational Evolution: Evolution: Take account in the organization’s organization’s structure or method of operation as a result of mark market et condition conditions, s, merg mergers ers and acquisit acquisitions ions,, div divesti esti-tures,, etc. tures Note: Not e: the impact of organi organization zational al changes changes on a comp company’ any’ss processes often lacks lacks the required in-depth analysis, which explains many of the problems resulting resulting from structural changes. Incorporat rporation ion of the outputs outputs of the above above Process Refinement : Inco three processes in the baseline model. The model described allows us to establish a process view of the organization; organization; once that baseline baseline has been established, established, provisions for process maintenance and management have been made.
Execution phase : Incl Includes udes detailed detailed engineering, engineering, manuf manufacturacturing (manage (management), ment), field activi activities, ties, start-u start-up, p, etc. Includes des system system optimizatio optimization, n, testi testing, ng, etc. Closeout phase : Inclu Warranty phase : Includes all service activities activities addressing contractual warranty requirements. Project management activities were defined above as DE’s core processes that lead lead to the establishment of the project life cyclee just described. cycl described. In the particular particular situation situation of DE, engine engineerering activities are actually conducted in parallel to the project management ones. The project life cycle in in Exhibit 2 displays that ongoing interaction between the project management and engineering processes processes as well as the formal lines of commu communication nication between them. This project structure allows for better integraintegration of the engineering activities with the management management ones. Additionally,, such a schematic representation Additionally representation provides an excellent clear snapshot of how an organization handles projects. This approach is totally in-line with ISO 9001:2000 guidelines as it provides provides for planning and control of the activities of an organization, the management of projects in in the particular particular case of DE. The stage gates can also be considered as checkpoints at key milestones of the project. The Project Life Cycle Cycle concept concept combined with process management transforms the management of a project into a series of well-defined processes. processes.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Project Life Cycle The PMBOK® Guide teaches Guide teaches us that projects are usually divided into phases into phases to to allow for better control and appropriate links to the ongoing operations operations of the performing performing organization. organization. Collectively,, the project phases constitute the Project Life Cycle . Collectively The phases are separated by stage by stage gates representing gates representing intermediate project goals. Exhibit 2 provides provides an example example of application of of the concept at at DE, in a capital equipment context.In context. In this particular example example the natural flow of project activities also corresponds to the contractuall aspects of the project. tractua project. The phases of the DE Project Life Life Cycle include include the following activities: Pre-Contract phase : Includes all sales sales and proposal activities activities as well as order booking, (a critical activity in a business environenvironment as diversified as DE’s). Planning phase : Inclu Includes des activiti activities es such as schedu scheduling, ling, budgeting, getin g, proc process ess engineering, engineering, etc. •
•
•
The Project (Business) Model As described described earlier earlier,, once an inve inventory ntory of all the compan company y processes has been completed, completed, the various processes are then classified using the Project Model. Model. The model resulting from the application of process management in a project environment environment can be described as follows: Specific Project Processes (Project Life Cycle): Cycle) : Proj Project ect processes processes that belong to a specific phase of the Project Life Cycle Cycle and directly affect the external customer, customer, such as project planning and engineering execution. Project ect related related processes processes that do Ongoing Project Processes : Proj not belong to a specific phase of the Project Life Cycle Cycle or do not directly affect the external customer, customer, such as buy equipment and project change management. Ongoing Company Processes : Company processes processes that are not related exclusively exclusively to project activities, activities, such as inventory management and training. Processes esses Quality Management System Maintenance Processes : Proc required to to build, maintain and upgrade the QMS, such as document and data control and internal audit. The Project Model Model reflects the project orientation orientation of the company and the centrality centrality of proje project ct management management in its operations.All tions. All processes are classified based on how closely they relate to the management of projects, the company company core processes. •
•
•
•
The Enterprise Model The Enterprise Model is obtained by classifying all the organization’s processes within the four categories constituting the Project Proj ect Model. Model. Exhib Exhibit it 3 provides provides a generic example example of such a model for a capital equipment environment.
Proceedings of the Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symposium Novem No vember ber 1–10,2001 1–10,2001 • Nas Nashv hvil ille le,Ten ,Tenn.,USA n.,USA
Exhibit 3. Enterpr Enterprise ise Model Ongoing Company Activities Service Calibration of Measuring Equipment Qualification of Suppliers Evaluation of Suppliers Handling of Defective Materials Guidelines for Business Development
Inventory Management/Warehousing Servers Back-Up/Restore Training Shipping and Receiving
Specific Project Activities - Project Life Cycle Pre-Contract Phase Order Acquisition Order Booking and Review
Planning Phase Project Planning
Engineering Planning
Execution Phase Project Execution
Eng. Execution
Close-Out Phase Eng. Project Close-out Close-out
Warranty Phase Service
Ongoing Project Activities In-Manufacturing Quality Control Project Change Control Project Budget Establishment Field Operations
Field Safety Equipment Start-up Buy Equipment Hire a Subcontractor
Parts Manual
Quality Management System Maintenance Activities Management Review Corrective and Preventive Action Initiation/Revision of a Quality System Document Internal Auditing
The theory of process management further classifies process process into core processes and processes and supporting processing. processing. Core processing processing are are key processes by which the organization achieves achieves its goals; they usually affect external customers directly and are crucial to the organization’s success. These processes tend to be large and comcomplex and cut across organizational boundaries. Supporting processes typically processes typically are internal processes that do not directly create value to the external customer but help core processes achieve their goals. By applying this classification to the process catecategories of the Project Project Model, Model, we obtain the following: following: Specific Project Processes (Project Life Cycle) can be considered as Core Processes Ongoing Project Processes can be considered as Project Supporting Processes Ongoing Company Processes can be considered as Company Supporting Processes Quality Management System Maintenance Processes can be considered as QMS Supporting Processes. With this additional level level of analysis the Enterprise Model now not only provides provides a macro level level view of the organization, organization,but but also provides additional information as to to how it operates. This can be referred to as a Company ID Card . •
•
•
•
Document and Data Control Document Retention Control of Customer Supplied Products
Applications Dürr AIS, AIS, Inc.(AIS) AIS is a turnkey supplier of industrial paint finishing finishing equipment to non-automotive non-automotive markets, such as heavy trucks, motorcycles, automotive tier-one suppliers and aerospace. In addition to sharing office space space with AIS, DE is also providing administrative services to AIS. These services include the implementa impl ementation tion of a QMS. Despite the fact that AIS’s activities are different from DE’s, they relate to capital equipment and use project management as core processes. processes. This being the case, the methodology presented above has been applied to AIS and was found to fit perfectly. perfectly. At the task level some processes show some variation that reflects the differences differences between the products and services of DE and AIS as well as some methods of operat operation. ion. This 100% 100% applicability applicability of the methodology validates the concept.
Reeco (Bridgewater, (Bridgewater,NJ) NJ) In 1999, 1999, DE acquired acquired Reeco Reeco,, a direct direct competit competitor. or. At first first the company was considered a fully owned subsidiary operating
Proceedings of the Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symposium Novem No vember ber 1–10,2001 1–10,2001 • Nas Nashv hvil ille le,Ten ,Tenn.,USA n.,USA
quite independently from DE. At the time, there were few concerns regarding regarding integratio integration n of the two operations operations or even of QMS implementati implementation. on. In January January 2000, 2000, Reeco became the Standard Product Division Division of DE and its product had become centrall to DE’s centra DE’s market offering. offering. The issues issues of integ integration ration and QMS implementation became critical. critical. By applying the methodology described above, Reeco’ Reeco’ss processes were first identified, and then categorized between Reeco specific processes that would need to be mapped separately and common processes between Reeco and DE (such as purchasing) that would require joint development and harmonization between both offices.
Project Management Management Institute. Institute. 2000. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Kn Management Knowledge owledge . Ne Newto wton n Squ Square are,, PA: Pr Proje oject ct Management Institute. Tenner,Arthur, enner,Arthur,and and DeT DeTorro, Irving. 1997. 1997.Process Process Redesign. Redesign. Rea Reading, ding, MA: Addison Wesley. Wesley.
Conclusions Project Management and ISO 9001:2000 can be easily integrated through the use of process management. management. The methodology and models described above should be transferable to all project project environments environments (construction, pharmaceutical maceu tical,, inform information ation techn technology ology,, defen defense se contr contracting acting,, etc.) etc.).. The Company ID Card provides Card provides an excellent synoptic rendering of the organization organization and and how it operates, operates, and constitut constitutes es a good starting point for continuous improvement and reengineering efforts as well as an a n excellent baseline for change management endeavors. The process approach is universal as it allows for a representation of a company through its “building “building blocks.” blocks.” The implementation implementation of project management with an additional focus on ISO 9001:2000 and the use of process management further reinforces the methodology, methodology, enhances the quality and use of the management system developed, developed, and provides additional dition al benefits benefits in terms of reduc reduced ed mistakes mistakes and customer satisfaction. •
•
•
•
References American America n Society for Quality. Quality. 2000. ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q9000-2000 Quality Management Systems—Fundamentals and vocabulary . Milwaukee,WI: Milwaukee, WI: American Society Society for Quality. American America n Society for Quality. Quality. 2000. ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q9001-2000 Quality Management Systems—Requirements . Mil Milwauke waukee, e,WI: WI: Americ American an Society for Quality. American Society for Quality. Quality. 1997. ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q10006-1997 Quality Management Systems—Guidelines to Quality in Project Milwauke aukee, e, WI: Ameri American can Society for Quality. Quality. Management . Milw Antoni, Marc, and Forsberg Torbjörn. 2000. Process Management in a Project Environment—The Relation Between Different Roles. Proceedings of the Project Management Management Institute Annual Annual Seminars & Newtown own Square, PA: Proje Project ct Management Management Insti Institute tute.. Symposium.. Newt Symposium Halczyn, William. William.2000. 2000. Process Management and Process Ownership at Boeing Airlift & Tanker Programs. Journal Programs. Journal of Innovativ Innovativee Management 5, 3 (Sprin (Spring): g): 57–74. Hammer Hamm er,, Mich Michael. ael. 1996. Beyond Reengineering . New York ork:: Har Harper per Collins. McAtee, McAt ee, Mary. Mary.2001. 2001. Capitalize on ISO Changes. Quality Management (March): (Mar ch): 48–52.
Proceedings of the Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symposium Novem No vember ber 1–10,2001 1–10,2001 • Nas Nashv hvil ille le,Ten ,Tenn.,USA n.,USA
Previous Menu