Criminal Law Digest People vs Bonaagua Crim Digest
Full description
People people v crim crim
digest
PEOPLE VS PASUDAG, PEOPLE VS ZUELA, PEOPLE VS ABE VALDEZ PEOPLE VS PASUDAG, PEOPLE VS ZUELA, PEOPLE VS ABE VALDEZ CasesFull description
Crim I, Accomplices
Crim case digest
crim digestFull description
Full description
case digestFull description
criminal lawFull description
Harry Go vs PeopleFull description
Case Digest - Criminal Case 1Full description
Trial Memorandum
people vs rafanan digest
People vs Go case digest
lawFull description
G.R. No. 187044 September 14, 2011Full description
case digestFull description
PEOPLE vs Chavez
Criminal Law II
Admin Law
PEOPLE VS DECENA Aug 4, 1994 | REGALADO, REGALADO, J. Plaintif: People of the PH Accus!: George Decena "OP#C$DOC"R#NE: J%S"#&'#NG C#RC%(S"ANCES: DE&ENSE O& SEL& SEL &, RELA"#VES, AND S"RANGERS &AC"S: George Decena was convicted with murder for allegedly stabbing to death Jaime Ballesteros in San Fabian Pangasinan on Dc)*+ -, 199 !"f all dates#$ Says S% & He 'led a petition for review claiming the lower court erred in disregarding his claim of sl/0!/ns and in not appreciating the mitigating circumstance of voluntary surrender(
"sti)n2 / t3 P+scutin *2 L256i)in!a 7allst+s, 14 2$ !aug3t+ / t3 6icti)8 "n Dec 25, 1990, 4pm, )u*viminda was as+ed by her mother to fetch her father Jamie Ballesteros Ballesteros who was watching watching a bas+etball bas+etball game( "n her way to the hardcourt hardcourt she met her father wal+ing home in an into,icated state( Suddenly she saw Decena rushing towards her father with a long bladed weapon( Jamie was stabbed on the right chest -ust below the nipple( Decena then .ed from the crime scene( )u*viminda called her mother for help and they rushed Jamie to the hospital hospital but he was D"/( D"/( "sti)n2 / t3 !/ns "n Dec 25, 1990, 4pm, Decena was watching a bas+etball game( 0he victim Jaime Ballesteros went around the bas+etball court wal+ing in a wobbly manner due to drun+enness( Jaime stopped near the place where Decena was sitting and for no apparent reason 3l! 3i) *2 t3 nc with one arm and at the same time ing against it with the other arm( a /+ against / Barangay 0anod who was also watching the bas+etball bas+etball game intervened( He too+ the for+ from Jaime and advised Decena to go home( Decena left and was followed later by Jaime( Decena1s 2ncle adds that he saw Jaime attac+ing Decena with a balisong( He claims
Decena was able to bloc+ the stabbing blow and a struggle ensued between them( Decena overpowered Jaime and succeeded in twisting his and thrusting the +nife into his body(
#SS%E: 345 Decena acted in complete self6defense self6defense in +illing Jamie Ballesteros thus absolving him from criminal liability 7 NO ;ELD$RA"#O 1. Dcna Dcna
•
R>ui+)nt /+ sl/0!/ns: 0hat there is an unlawful aggression against the person defending himself t must be positively shown that there was a previous unla=/ul an! that placed the un+6! attac that life of the accused in danger and forced him to in.ict more or less severe wounds upon his assailant employing therefor reasonable means to resist said attac+ •
0he burden burden of proof proof is usually usually with the prosecution but *2 in6ing sl/0!/ns, t3 *u+!n / +/ s3i/ts t t3 accus! ( f he fails to su;ciently prove this he shall be convicted from his admission of +illing the victim( /ccused must rely on the st+ngt3 / 3is =n 6i!nc and not on the wea+ness of that of the prosecution for even if that was wea+ it cannot be disbelieved after t3 accus! 3i)sl/ a!)itt! t3 illing ( <( 0here 0here were were grave inconsis inconsistenci tencies es in the the testimonies of the defense Decena in his direct e,amination testi'ed that a for+ was po+ed at his nec+ but on cross6e,amination cross6e,amination he said it was a +nife instead •
•
•
•
Decena insisted that he never went out of his house after the stabbing incident and until his surrender early ne,t morning which is contradicted by the police blotter Decena said he did not immediately confess he +illed Jamie because he was afraid to do so( a righteous individual will not cower but would readily admit the +illing at the earliest opportunity if he were legally and morally -usti'ed in doing so( Decena1s uncle appears to be an imaginative or coached witness
Prosecution1s testimony was more credible because )u*viminda had no opportunity to concoct a story given the time from when the incident too+ place to when she shouted for help(
=( 7ut t3+ =as n t+ac3+2, s t3 c+i) =as si)l 3)ici!. 5o proof that the accused committed the crime by employing means methods or forms in the e,ecution thereof which tended directly and especially to insure its e,ecution without ris+ to himself arising from the defense which the o>ended party might ma+e( ?( @itigating circumstance of voluntary surrender may be awarded to Decena( He was evidently with his concurrence accompanied and surrendered by his father to a person in authority early in the morning after the incident and before he could actually be arrested( J2DG@950 @"DF9D 0 Decena is guilty of homicide 6 A years prison mayor to ? years A months reclusion temporal