Descripción: Pretty cool supplement to a Vampire RPG.
Fabrizio Paterlini - Fragments Found
Descrição completa
Julius-Caesar
Jurnal JuliusFull description
Julius Evola - Pagan Imperialism
Quadern de repàs Grec Selectiu València 2014Full description
Description complète
Julius Evola - Pagan Imperialism
an obscure elizabethan play
Julius Evola, A királyság, Lázadás a modern világ ellen
Julius Evola - Pagan ImperialismDescrição completa
Descripción completa
Hermetička TradicijaFull description
Descrição completa
B e r l i n - B r a n d e n b u r g i s c h e A k a d e m i e der
Wissenschaften
Die Griechischen Christlichen Schriftsteller
Iulius Africanus Chronographiae The E x t a n t Fragments
d e r ersten J a h r h u n d e r t e (GCS) Neue Folge • Band 15
Edited by M a r t i n Wallraff w i t h U m b e r t o Roberto a n d , f o r the O r i e n t a l Sources, K a r l Pinggera Translated b y W i l l i a m Adler
W a l t e r de G r u y t e r • B e r l i n • N e w Y o r k
PREFACE
H e r a u s g e g e b e n i m A u f t r a g der B e r l i n - B r a n d e n b u r g i s c h e n A k a d e m i e der
Wissenschaften
v o n C h r i s t o p h Markschies
M o d e r n research o n C h r i s t i a n c h r o n o g r a p h y was inaugurated 400 years a g o b y
G u t a c h t e r dieses Bandes:
Joseph Justus Scaliger w i t h his magisterial Thesaurus
Jiirgen H a m m e r s t a e d t u n d C h r i s t o p h R i e d w e g
temporum
(1606). T h e
w o r k drew scholars' a t t e n t i o n to the author o f the first C h r i s t i a n c h r o n i c l e , I u l i u s Africanus ( 3
r d
cent.), a w r i t e r w h o effectively t r a n s f o r m e d the h e r i t a g e
of
Hellenistic u n i v e r s a l h i s t o r i o g r a p h y b y a d a p t i n g i t t o a C h r i s t i a n f r a m e w o r k . A l t h o u g h A f r i c a n u s ' w o r k is lost i n its entirety, the preserved
fragments—
i n c l u d i n g those o f t h e Cesti, his second m a i n w o r k — r e v e a l a m u l t i f a c e t e d a n d broad-based i n t e l l e c t u a l , w r i t i n g i n an era r i c h i n culture a n d change. G i v e n the i m p o r t a n c e o f Africanus, i t was o b v i o u s that his works be i n s e r t e d i n t o the e d i t o r i a l p r o g r a m o f the GCS series w h i c h was i n i t i a l l y p l a n n e d as " D i e Griechischen C h r i s t l i c h e n Schriftsteller der ersten drei Jahrhunderte."
Although
the idea o f l i m i t i n g t h e series to the first t h r e e centuries was later a b a n d o n e d , A f r i c a n u s was s t i l l r e t a i n e d . The editions were entrusted t o Karl K o n r a d M i i l l e r for the Cesti a n d t o H e i n r i c h Gelzer for the Chronographiae.
Unfortunately, f o r a
v a r i e t y o f reasons, n e i t h e r project was ever c o m p l e t e d , a l t h o u g h Gelzer's w o r k was already at a n a d v a n c e d stage w h e n he d i e d 100 years ago ( t l 9 0 6 ) . After m o r e t h a n a century, the c h r o n i c l e is about the o n l y significant w o r k 1
o f the o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h still n o m o d e r n e d i t i o n exists. T h u s , i t is w i t h ® Gedruckt auf saurefreiem Papier, das die U S - A N S I - N o r m fiber Haltbarkeit erfullt.
p a r t i c u l a r g r a t i t u d e t h a t t h e m a i n editor o f t h i s v o l u m e has taken the o p p o r t u n i t y o f p u b l i s h i n g the present e d i t i o n i n the distinguished GCS series. T h i s i n v i t a t i o n was first e x t e n d e d b y Prof. A l b r e c h t D i h l e , i n 1999, o n b e h a l f o f t h e c o m m i s s i o n w o r k i n g u n d e r the aegis o f the B e r l i n - B r a n d e n b u r g academy, a n i n v i t a t i o n that was later repeated b y Prof. C h r i s t o p h Markschies. H o w e v e r , t h i s
I S S N 0232-2900
p u b l i c a t i o n is m o r e t h a n j u s t a sign o f i n t e l l e c t u a l c o n t i n u i t y d u r i n g a c e n t u r y ,
I S B N 978-3-11-019493-7 Library of Congress
m a r k e d o t h e r w i s e b y t u r m o i l a n d ruptures. I t also heralds an i m p o r t a n t i n n o
Cataloging-in-Publication
Data
A C I P catalogue record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. Bibliografische
Information
der Deutschen
v a t i o n . This is i n fact the first e d i t i o n i n t h e series i n w h i c h the o r i g i n a l t e x t is accompanied b y a t r a n s l a t i o n i n t o a m o d e r n language a n d i n w h i c h t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n a n d t r a n s l a t i o n are i n English. Such an u n d e r t a k i n g was made possible t h a n k s to a felicitous t r a n s a t l a n t i c
Nationalbibliothek
Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet iiber http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar.
c o l l a b o r a t i o n b e t w e e n W i l l i a m A d l e r ( N o r t h C a r o l i n a State U n i v e r s i t y ) a n d a European equipe. T h e f o r m e r , referred t o o n the f r o n t cover as the translator o f the fragments, was also able to offer a great d e a l o f invaluable advice c o n c e r n i n g
m a n y other aspects o f t h e e d i t i o n . T h e texts were discussed between h i m a n d the European equipe
i n n u m e r o u s details d u r i n g three intensive meetings i n
three successive phases o f the project i n B o n n , Jena a n d Basel. O n the E u r o p e a n side, the project was generously funded b y t h e Deutsche as part o f the
1
Gerhard-Hess-Programm.
Forschungsgemeinschaft
I n a d d i t i o n to the editors
already
See Stefan Rebenich, Theodor Mommsen und Adolf Harnack. Wissenschaft und Politik im Berlin des ausgehenden 19. Jahrhunderts, Berlin 1997,175f.
VI
Preface
The Extant Fragments
m e n t i o n e d o n t h e front cover, the t e a m consisted o f G r e g o r Staab, Sebastian
VII
Last b u t n o t least, the t w o referees f o r the G C S series ought to be m e n t i o n e d
Kaas a n d C h r i s t o f Kraus, a l l o f w h o m gave i m p o r t a n t assistance i n different
w i t h gratitude: Prof. C h r i s t o p h Riedweg ( R o m e ) a n d Prof. Jurgen
phases o f the p r o j e c t . I n d e e d , m a n y o f the p r o b l e m s i n the t e x t c o u l d o n l y be
(Cologne). T h e f o r m e r saved us f r o m a few f a t a l errors i n the final phase, t h e
Hammerstaedt
r e s o l v e d c o l l e c t i v e l y a n d o n l y after m a n y h o u r s o f discussion. A s a consequence,
latter also gave p r e c i o u s advice i n intensive discussions o n the text at the U n i
t h e s i n g l e c o n t r i b u t i o n s are n o l o n g e r distinguishable. T h e i n t r o d u c t i o n has
versity o f Jena i n t h e s u m m e r o f 2003.
b e e n w r i t t e n b y the m a i n e d i t o r t o g e t h e r w i t h U m b e r t o R o b e r t o (except for 4.4.,
Iulius A f r i c a n u s c o u l d never have foreseen, n o r c o u l d the editors t h e m s e l v e s
w r i t t e n b y W i l l i a m Adler, a n d 4.6., w r i t t e n b y K a r l Pinggera). I n t h e notes to the
ever have a n t i c i p a t e d , t h a t after nearly 1800 years, exactly 100 fragments o f t h e
E n g l i s h t r a n s l a t i o n , the c o n t r i b u t i o n s o f a l l f o u r scholars are c o n f l a t e d .
Chronographiae
S o m e o f t h e results o f the p r o j e c t w e r e discussed at a conference i n Eisenach i n M a y 2005. T h e conference p r o c e e d i n g s were p u b l i s h e d i n t h e series "Texte
have survived. Surely t h e c h r o n i c l e r , w h o was fascinated a l m o s t
to the p o i n t o f obsession b y the s y m b o l i s m o f n u m b e r s , w o u l d have l i k e d t h e thought.
u n d U n t e r s u c h u n g e n " , parts o f w h i c h c a n be consulted as a u s e f u l s u p p l e m e n t to t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n o f this e d i t i o n .
2
Basel, December 2 0 0 6
O v e r the years m a n y colleagues f r o m all over the w o r l d have h e l p e d i n the p r o d u c t i o n o f t h i s w o r k w i t h i n n u m e r a b l e suggestions a n d a d v i c e . O n l y some o f t h e m c a n b e m e n t i o n e d here. D u r i n g h i s w o r k o n the e d i t i o n o f the Symeon Logofhete
c h r o n i c l e , Prof. Staffan W a h l g r e n ( U n i v e r s i t y o f L u n d , Sweden)
shared s o m e o f his results w i t h us. I n particular, he p u t a m i c r o f i l m o f cod. Vat. 3
gr. 163 at o u r disposal. U n f o r t u n a t e l y , his e d i t i o n a p p e a r e d w h e n o u r e d i t i o n was already n e a r c o m p l e t i o n . T h e r e f o r e , i t was o n l y possible t o refer to his chapter n u m b e r s
i n the index
locorum
(p. 325). W i t h the h e l p o f this list,
h o w e v e r , i t s h o u l d be easy f o r readers t o locate o u r texts i n Wahlgren's e d i t i o n a n d v i c e v e r s a . A p a r t f r o m a few v e r y m i n o r details, the n e w t e x t n e i t h e r alters t h e q u a n t i t y o f relevant m a t e r i a l , n o r changes the shape o f the texts themselves. Special t h a n k s are also due t o t h e m a n u s c r i p t d e p a r t m e n t o f t h e U n i v e r s i t y l i b r a r y i n Jena a n d its d i r e c t o r D r . J o a c h i m O t t , w h o , f o r m o r e t h a n five years a l l o w e d us t o use the m a n u s c r i p t o f H e i n r i c h Gelzer f o r his p l a n n e d e d i t i o n i n o u r office. C l o s e c o l l a b o r a t i o n w i t h the l i b r a r y also l e d to t h e c r e a t i o n o f a c o m m o n p r o j e c t and a s m a l l p u b l i c a t i o n o n C h r i s t i a n w o r l d c h r o n i c l e s .
4
T h e p r e p a r a t i o n o f a b i l i n g u a l e d i t i o n o f this sort is a c o m p l e x u n d e r t a k i n g , n o t o n l y p h i l o l o g i c a l l y , b u t also f o r t h e m a n y technical d i f f i c u l t i e s
encountered
a l o n g t h e w a y . I t w o u l d n o t , f o r example, have been possible t o p r o v i d e a came r a - r e a d y c o p y f o r p u b l i c a t i o n w i t h o u t the use o f a specific k i n d o f software. T h i s e d i t i o n has b e e n executed u s i n g "Classical Text Editor", w h o s e a u t h o r , D r . Stefan Hagel ( A u s t r i a n A c a d e m y o f Sciences, V i e n n a ) , was o n h a n d t o g i v e p r a c t i c a l ad v i c e a n d i n s o m e cases even m o d i f y the p r o g r a m for o u r o w n specific purposes. D r . P h i l i p D i t c h f i e l d ( R o m e ) a s s u m e d the tedious task o f c o r r e c t i n g a n d i m p r o v i n g the E n g l i s h text. O v e r the years, m a n y student assistants spent m a n y h o u r s w i t h v a r i o u s t e c h n i c a l tasks. T h e y can be referred t o o n l y c o l l e c t i v e l y here.
2
Julius Africanus und die christliche Weltchronistik, ed. Martin Wallraff ( T U 157), Berlin 2006.
3
Symeonis Magistri et Logothetae Chronicon, ed. Staffan Wahlgren ( C S H B 44,1), Berlin 2006.
4
Welt-Zeit. Christliche Weltchronistik aus zwei Jahrtausenden in Bestanden der Thiiringer Universitats- u n d Landesbibliothek Jena, ed. Martin Wallraff, Berlin 2005.
Martin Wallraff
CONTENTS Preface
V
Introduction
XIII
1. I u l i u s A f r i c a n u s : T h e M a n a n d h i s W o r k 2. T h e Chronographiae:
XIII
Date a n d Place o f W r i t i n g , L i t e r a r y
Character
XVII
3. T h e C h r o n o l o g i c a l System
XXIII
4. T h e Text a n d its Transmission
XXIX
4.1.
Eusebius
XXXI
4.2.
Chronicles f r o m the A l e x a n d r i a n T r a d i t i o n
XXXIV
4 . 2 . 1 . P a n o d o r u s and A n n i a n u s 4.2.2. T h e Excerpta 4.3.
XXXV
Barbari
XXXVI
Chronicles f r o m the A n t i o c h e n e T r a d i t i o n
4.3.1. lohnMalalas
XXXVIII XXXVIII
4.3.2. John o f A n t i o c h 4.3.3. A n o n y m o u s M a t e r i a l i n t h e Excerpta
XXXIX Salmasiana
(Ps. John o f A n t i o c h ) 4.4.
Georgius Syncellus
4.5.
T h e Logothete C h r o n i c l e a n d Related Texts
XL XLII XLIV
4 . 5 . 1 . S y m e o n Logothete
XLIV
4.5.2. Ps. Symeon and C e d r e n u s 4.6.
Oriental Authors
4.7.
XLVI XLVII
M i n o r A u t h o r s and Texts
XLIX
4 . 7 . 1 . Ps. Eustathius o f A n t i o c h
XLIX
4.7.2. T h e Chronicon
Paschale
XLIX
4.7.3. T h e Anonymus
Matritensis
L
5. E a r l i e r E d i t i o n s
L
6. P r i n c i p l e s o f the E d i t i o n
LV
7. B i b l i o g r a p h y
LIX
Conspectus Siglorum
LXLX
Abbreviations
LXXIX
1. O p e r a i n apparatu adhibita
LXXIX
2. E d i t o r e s et Emendatores
LXXXVII
3. C e t e r a
LXXXVIII
I u l i u s A f r i c a n u s , Chronographiae
1
Testimonia o n the Life o f I u l i u s A f r i c a n u s Tl A f r i c a n u s u n d e r Pertinax a n d Septimius Severus ( A D 193) . . . .
2 2
T2
Africanus' Mission on behalf o f Nicopolis
4
T3
A f r i c a n u s u n d e r G o r d i a n I I I ( A D 238-244)
8
Contents
Contents
X
XI
T4
Africanus under Decius ( A D 249-251)
10
T 4 2 T h e Date o f the B u i l d i n g o f the Temple
T5
A f r i c a n u s as a C o n t e m p o r a r y o f O r i g e n
10
F43 T h e P r e - H i s t o r y o f Egypt
94
F44 M e s t r e m , the Eponymous Father o f the Egyptians
96
Testimonia
o n G e n e r a l Aspects o f the Chronographiae
12
T6
Chronological Overview
12
T7
Jerome
14
T8
C h u r c h Historians i n Constantinople
16
T9
I s i d o r e o f Seville
16
T 1 0 John M a l a l a s Til
Photius
T 4 5 T h e Date o f the F l o o d a n d the D a t e o f A b r a h a m
18
92
98
F46 D y n a s t i e s o f Egypt
100
T 4 7 K i n g A m o s i s a n d Moses
124
T 4 8 M o s e s a n d Inachus
128
T 4 9 C h r o n o l o g y o f the Assyrian K i n g d o m
130
F 5 0 T h e K i n g s o f the Argives
132 138
18
F 5 1 T h e Rulers o f the Sicyonians
T 1 2 Suda
20
T 5 2 F r o m Aeneas to the F o u n d a t i o n o f Rome
146
T 1 3 M i c h a e l Syrus
20
F53 T h e K i n g s o f Rome
146
M a t e r i a l f r o m B o o k s 1/2: F r o m A d a m to Moses
22
F54 T h e Rulers o f the Athenians
148
F14 The C r e a t i o n
22
T 5 5 T h e C h r o n o l o g y of the Floods a m o n g the Greeks
164
F l 5 T h e F a b r i c a t e d C h r o n o l o g y o f the Egyptians a n d the Chaldeans.
24
F56 A t l a s a n d Prometheus
168
F16 The Generations f r o m A d a m to Abraham
26
T 5 7 T h e Years f r o m Inachus to C e c r o p s
170
T17 Adam's Tomb
42
F58 T h e K i n g s o f the Lacedaemonians
170
F18 Seth, t h e I n v e n t o r o f the H e b r e w A l p h a b e t
42
F59 T h e K i n g s o f the C o r i n t h i a n s
174
F19 E n o s h , called b y the name of G o d
44
F60 T h e First Festival o f O l y m p i a n Zeus
178
F20 G o d ' s I m m a n e n c e
44
T 6 1 T h e K i n g s o f Thebes
178
F 2 1 Q u o t a t i o n f r o m the B o o k of Enoch
44
F62 T h e K i n g s o f the Medes
180
F 2 2 T h e Years o f M e t h u s e l a h and the Names o f t h e Sons o f C a i n . . .
46
F63 T h e K i n g s o f the Lydians
182
F23 T h e C i r c u m s t a n c e s o f the F l o o d
48
F64 T h e D a t e o f the First O l y m p i a d
186
F24 T h e Pagan G o d s
52
F25 F r o m t h e D i v i s i o n o f the E a r t h t o Abraham's M i g r a t i o n
58
F 2 6 A b r a h a m i n E g y p t , Lot's L a n d a n d the D e a d Sea
58
T 2 7 The T o p o n y m Gerar
60
T 2 8 T h e C h r o n o l o g y o f Jacob's Life
62
F 2 9 Jacob's T e n t
64
F 3 0 T h e T e r e b i n t h Tree i n Shechem
66
F 3 1 Job, t h e D e s c e n d a n t o f Esau
68
T 3 2 T h e C h r o n o l o g y o f Joseph's Life
68
F 3 3 T h e D a t e o f Joseph's D e a t h
70
M a t e r i a l f r o m B o o k 3: F r o m Moses to the First O l y m p i a d
72
F 3 4 S y n c h r o n i s m o f t h e Exodus a n d Ogygus
72
M a t e r i a l f r o m B o o k s 4/5: F r o m the First O l y m p i a d to the E n d o f the Chronographiae
\
192
F65 V i c t o r s i n the O l y m p i c Games
192
F66 T h e P r o p h e t Jonah
218
T 6 7 P e k a h i a h , K i n g o f Israel
218
T 6 8 Pekah, K i n g o f Israel
220
T 6 9 T h e E n d o f the N o r t h e r n K i n g d o m
220
F70 Manasseh's Supplication a n d L i b e r a t i o n
220
T 7 1 T h e H i g h Priest H i l k i a h
222
F72 K i n g Jehoahaz and the F i r s t T r i b u t e
222
F73 T h e K i n g s o f the Persians
224
F74 C y r u s a n d the Samians
228 230
F 3 5 T h e C h r o n o l o g y f r o m A d a m to Samuel
82
T 7 5 T h e I d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f Cambyses a n d Nebuchadnezzar I I
T 3 6 S y n c h r o n i s m o f E h u d a n d the F l o o d o f D e u c a l i o n
84
F76 T h e C h r o n o l o g y f r o m A d a m t o the Babylonian C a p t i v i t y
232
T 3 7 The FamUy o f Abimelech
84
T 7 7 D a n i e l a n d the C a p t i v i t y
232
T 3 8 A b d o n the Judge
84
F78 T h e Seventy Weeks o f D a n i e l
236
T 3 9 T h e C h r o n o l o g y after Joshua
86
F79 Ezra the Priest
238
T 4 0 T h e C h r o n o l o g y o f the Judges and the O n e - y e a r Rule o f Shamgar
88
T 8 0 A f r i c a n u s as a Source for p o s t - b i b l i c a l Jewish H i s t o r y
240
T 4 1 T h e C h r o n o l o g y f r o m the Exodus t o the B u i l d i n g o f the Temple
90
F 8 1 T h e B e g i n n i n g o f the P e l o p o n n e s i a n W a r
242
XII
Contents
INTRODUCTION
F82 T h e K i n g s o f t h e Macedonians
244
T 8 3 F r o m A d a m to Seleucus I
250
F84 T h e J e w s u n d e r Greek D o m i n a t i o n
252
F85 J o n a t h a n , S i m o n s son, the H i g h Priest
252
F86 T h e P t o l e m i e s
254
F87 T h e F a t h e r o f H e r o d
258
E v e n b y the standards of t h e versatile social elite of the 3
T 8 8 A f r i c a n u s a n d the A r c h i v e o f Edessa
260
A f r i c a n u s was n o t o n l y a v e r y intelligent m a n , h e was also a remarkably w e l l -
F89 H e r o d a n d Cleopatra
262
c o n n e c t e d figure. A C h r i s t i a n w i t h g o o d k n o w l e d g e o f Jewish culture, he was
F90 O m i s s i o n s i n Jesus' Genealogy
270
f l u e n t (at least) i n b o t h G r e e k a n d Latin, h a d interests i n v i r t u a l l y all fields o f
T91
T h e A r r i v a l o f the M a g i
274
h u m a n knowledge a n d possessed g o o d contacts w i t h various p o l i t i c a l leaders a l l
T92
The D a t e o f the Incarnation
1. Iulius Africanus: The Man and his Work rd
century, I u l i u s
274
over the w o r l d . F r o m t h e v i e w p o i n t o f the extant sources, Iulius Africanus is so
F93 T h e P a s s i o n a n d Resurrection o f t h e Savior
276
m u l t i f a c e t e d that m o d e r n h i s t o r i o g r a p h y has even gone as far as to h y p o t h e s i z e
F94 T h e M i l l e n n i a l i s t F r a m e w o r k o f H i s t o r y
290
t h a t there were a c t u a l l y t w o authors n a m e d A f r i c a n u s , one pagan, the o t h e r
F95 John t h e A p o s t l e i n Ephesus
290
C h r i s t i a n . A l t h o u g h t h i s hypothesis has n o w b e e n abandoned for over a c e n
F96 A b g a r V I I I , K i n g o f Edessa
290
t u r y , the m a n still r e m a i n s a n enigma.
F97 C l e m e n t o f A l e x a n d r i a
292
1
F98 A f r i c a n u s ' J o u r n e y to A l e x a n d r i a T99
T h e E n d o f t h e Chronographiae
I n the t r a n s m i s s i o n o f his w o r k s , he is usually referred to quite s i m p l y b y h i s
292
cognomen
292
attested i n the t r a d i t i o n of h i s t w o m a i n w o r k s , viz. the Chronographiae
AcppiKCtvoc,. T h a t b e i n g said, the nomen
gentilicium
'IouAtoc, is also 2
3
and the
294
Cesti ,
297 297
praenomen
297
Sextus,
299
A f r i c a n u s " was once w i d e l y adopted (by the i n f l u e n t i a l Gelzer, amongst others,
2. I n d e x n o m i n u m p r o p r i o r u m
328
i n t h e title o f his b o o k ) , a n d i n d e e d i t is s o m e t i m e s still used, although recent
3. C o m p a r a t i o n u m e r o r u m
348
scholarship does t e n d to a v o i d i t — a n d r i g h d y so. T h e basis of just one reference
348 350
m a t i c ) is p e r i l o u s l y w e a k .
F10O F i n a l D o x o l o g y
a fact w h i c h w o u l d c e r t a i n l y be h a r d t o e x p l a i n i f we really were d e a l i n g
w i t h t w o different authors. Less c o n v i n c i n g is t h e evidence for the c o n v e n t i o n a l Indices 1. I n d e x t e x t u u m a d h i b i t o r u m et l o c o r u m c i t a t o r u m 1.1.
B i b l i a sacra
1.2. T e x t u s antiquitatis et m e d i i a e v i
2
3.1. R o u t h 1 8 4 6 3.2. G a l l a n d i 1766 ( = PG 1 0 , 6 3 - 9 4 ) A p p e n d i x : T h e C h r o n o l o g i c a l System
Sextus. A t one p o i n t , the Suda refers t o h i m as AcppiKctvoc,, 6
ZEKTOC,
XpnuaTiaac. ( T 1 2 ) . Since t h e w o r d ZEKTOC, is n o t t h e n o r m a l transliteration o f 4
scholars have e m e n d e d i t i n t o Eec/roc,. T h e f u l l n a m e "Sextus I u l i u s
i n a late and n o t o r i o u s l y imprecise source ( a n d even here the reading is p r o b l e 5
D u e t o the character o f h i s w o r k , other h o n o r a r y
351 1
See the opinions quoted by Gelzer l,2f. O n Africanus' biography and profile, see Sickenberger 1918; Bardenhewer 1913-32, 2,263-271; Vieillefond 1970; Crehan 1977; Rampoldi 1981 and 1997; Winkelmann 2002; Adler 2004.
2 3
T 2 (Eusebius); T75b (Suda). In the explicit of two books: cestus 7 and 18 (cest. 1,20,66; 5,55); the second case is particularly interesting, because it is preserved on a papyrus dated to around 265 (cest. 5 = Pap. Oxy. 412), thus only one generation after the date of the writing of the Cesti.
4
E.g. Gelzer 1,1. This is apparently also the way in which the lexicographer himself understood the epithet (which he probably found in his source), see the variant ZetcToc. in Suda £ 856 (given in the third app. to T12). Cf. also Adler 2004,523, n. 18, who gives a few examples of papyri where SEKTOC, actually stands for Sextus.
5
A n alternative interpretation would be the transliteration of Latin sectus; Crehan 1977,635 translates "Africanus der Eunuch". Some scholars also suggest an emendation into KEOTOC, an analogy to Clement of Alexandria, author of the Stromata, who is sometimes called Zrpu)pateuq, see Vieillefond 1970,15.
XV
1. Iulius Africanus: The Man and his Work
Introduction
XIV
6
epithets c r o p u p i n the sources t o describe h i m , especially taTopioYp&cpoc a n d 7
Xpovcypdcpoc, . I t is interesting t o note t h a t t h e a t t r i b u t i o n oo90c;/ao(parra-roc; is 8
a near c o n s t a n t i n J o h n Malalas' C h r o n i c l e , b u t i t also occurs i n o t h e r w r i t e r s .
t h e same occasion, h e was able to acquire a c o p y o f the ancient b o o k w r i t t e n b y t h e p h a r a o h Suphis i n E g y p t — " a colossal possession" (F46.54). I t w o u l d a p p e a r t h a t the r e - f o u n d a t i o n o f E m m a u s i n Palestine as a polis w i t h the name " N i c o -
9
T h e C h u r c h h i s t o r i a n Socrates o f C o n s t a n t i n o p l e cites C l e m e n t o f A l e
p o l i s " was achieved t h a n k s to an initiative at the c o u r t o f the R o m a n e m p e r o r i n
x a n d r i a , A f r i c a n u s a n d O r i g e n i n this o r d e r ( T 8 a ) as i m p o r t a n t "ancient" C h r i s
t h e early 220's p r e s i d e d over b y Africanus h i m s e l f ( T 2 ) . T h i s m a y o r m a y n o t
t i a n w r i t e r s ( i . e . p r e - C o n s t a n t i n i a n ) . T h i s l i s t i n g n o t o n l y expresses the h i g h
m e a n that A f r i c a n u s was a resident o f N i c o p o l i s ( o r Palestine i n general) at t h a t
esteem f o r A f r i c a n u s , b u t one m i g h t p r e s u m e also, the c o r r e c t c h r o n o l o g i c a l
t i m e . Nevertheless, his l i n k s to the t o w n were c e r t a i n l y p r o f o u n d a n d w e n t w e l l
sequence. I n f a c t , C l e m e n t was b o r n i n c. 1 4 0 - 1 5 0 , O r i g e n was b o r n a r o u n d 185,
b e y o n d that o f any n o r m a l sightseer. A little later, we f i n d h i m i n R o m e at t h e
a n d A f r i c a n u s m u s t have c o m e s o m e w h e r e i n between, perhaps a r o u n d 170.
c o u r t o f A l e x a n d e r Severus, where he was e n t r u s t e d w i t h the task o f i n s t i t u t i n g 15
U n f o r t u n a t e l y , t h i s is all that can be s a i d w i t h any degree o f certainty. T h e
(ctpxiTEKTOVEiv) the l i b r a r y o f the Pantheon.
l i t e r a r y a c t i v i t y o f A f r i c a n u s is attested f r o m the early 220s u p t o the 240's (see
m u s t have been q u i t e a prestigious post i n the society o f the capital.
b e l o w ) , w h i c h i m p l i e s that he was y o u n g e r t h a n C l e m e n t ; however, since h e calls O r i g e n i n a l e t t e r KUpiE uou Kai u i e ,
10
W h a t e v e r that m i g h t m e a n , i t
G i v e n such a h i g h p r o f i l e p o s i t i o n , i t is h i g h l y plausible that A f r i c a n u s w a s
h e m u s t have been o l d e r t h a n the f a m o u s
w e l l - a c q u a i n t e d w i t h L a t i n . M o s t likely, his m o t h e r tongue was Greek, t h e
A l e x a n d r i a n t h e o l o g i a n . T h i s letter is p r e s u m a b l y his last w o r k , b u t u n f o r t u
language i n w h i c h his w o r k s are w r i t t e n . M o r e o v e r , he c e r t a i n l y k n e w s o m e
nately i t c a n o n l y be loosely dated to t h e 2 4 0 s nus post
quem
11
a n d i t represents t h e o n l y
termi
w e have f o r A f r i c a n u s ' d e a t h . I t m a y be t h a t he was s t i l l alive
H e b r e w , and p r o b a b l y q u i t e well, since he m e n t i o n s t h e measure K&(3OC, ( f r o m t h e H e b r e w 2p) as a n equivalent o f the Greek K o y y i o v , a d d i n g that i t was u s e d
u n d e r D e c i u s ( 2 4 9 - 2 5 1 ) , a l t h o u g h a n o t e o f Symeon L o g o t h e t e t o t h i s effect
b y "us."
( T 4 ) is o f d u b i o u s credibility.
likely, however, is t h a t he spoke a f o r m o f Greek w h i c h was c u r r e n t i n Palestine
16
This c o u l d be t a k e n t o i m p l y that H e b r e w was his first language. M o r e
T h e l i f e s t o r y o f A f r i c a n u s was c e r t a i n l y b o t h interesting a n d eventful,
a n d w h i c h was o p e n t o Semitic influences. H e also used his k n o w l e d g e o f
a l t h o u g h w e a r e o n l y able t o glean s n i p p e t s o f it f r o m his o w n w r i t i n g s . W e first
Hebrew's l i n g u i s t i c structures for his exegetical a r g u m e n t a t i o n i n the l e t t e r t o
f i n d h i m i n Edessa, at t h e c o u r t o f k i n g A b g a r V I I I o f Osrhoene, for w h o m he
Origen.
a p p a r e n t l y h a d m u c h a d m i r a t i o n ( F 9 6 ) a n d w h o s e son he h e l p e d t o educate. I t
s o m e Syriac as w e l l , a l t h o u g h this cannot be p r o v e d .
1 7
G i v e n h i s role at the c o u r t o f Edessa, i t is n o t impossible that he k n e w 18
was h e r e t h a t h e came i n t o c o n t a c t w i t h t h e fascinating i n t e l l e c t u a l Bardesanes
Africanus was c e r t a i n l y b o t h a p o l y g l o t a n d a p o l y m a t h a n d the m a n m a y
(cest. 1,20), i n w h o m he m a y have f o u n d a congenial t h i n k e r a n d source o f
w e l l have been as e q u a l l y m u l t i f a c e t e d i n his d a i l y life; even his religious beliefs
i n s p i r a t i o n . A l l t h i s m u s t have o c c u r r e d s o m e t i m e before 2 1 6 .
12
I t was here also
are d i f f i c u l t to p i n d o w n . T h e r e are g o o d reasons for b e l i e v i n g that he was a
that h e m i g h t have seen w h a t was alleged to have been the t e n t o f Jacob,
R o m a n citizen a n d t h a t h e h a d some sort o f Palestinian b a c k g r o u n d . O f t h e
v e n e r a t e d i n Edessa a n d later d e s t r o y e d ( F 2 9 ) . O n his travels h e saw m o u n t
places already m e n t i o n e d , Palestine is clearly p r o m i n e n t . I n a d d i t i o n , the D e a d
A r a r a t i n A r m e n i a (referred t o as P a r t h i a , F23) a n d also v i s i t e d A p a m e i a i n
Sea a n d N i c o p o l i s ( E m m a u s ) crop u p a n d he m a y also have seen the t e r e b i n t h
S o u t h e r n P h r y g i a , f o r m e r l y Celaenae ( F 2 3 ) . H e was acquainted w i t h t h e D e a d
tree at Shechem ( F 3 0 ) . M o r e interestingly, o n one occasion he speaks o f A e l i a
13
C a p i t o l i n a , the R o m a n n a m e o f Jerusalem, as "the o l d h o m e (f| dpxctia Ttatptc;)"
Sea ( F 2 6 ) a n d was also f a m i l i a r w i t h t h e l i b r a r y o f Nysa i n C a r i a (cest. 5,52). 14
Later, h e m a d e a t r i p to A l e x a n d r i a , w h e r e h e m e t Heraclas ( F 9 8 ) . Possibly o n
(cest. 5,51). T h i s c e r t a i n l y expresses a p a r t i c u l a r e m o t i o n a l l i n k t o Palestine a n d Jerusalem, a l t h o u g h i t is d i f f i c u l t to establish exactly w h a t the author m e a n t b y t h i s phrase. It m i g h t m e a n a general i d e n t i f i c a t i o n w i t h Jerusalem as a " s p i r i t u a l h o m e " for all Jews ( a n d perhaps even C h r i s t i a n s ) .
however, that A f r i c a n u s was actually r e f e r r i n g t o his o w n h o m e t o w n , w h i c h
8
F51b;F54f; F58b; T61; F74; F95.
9
T i b (app.); F 2 4 (app.); F53; F97; all belong to the Logothete tradition.
10
ep. Orig. (78,2 Reichardt).
11
See below note 22.
15
12
Vieillefond 1970,18.
16
cest. 4,55 (if the text is considered genuine).
13
T h e edifice has been recently excavated by Prof. Dr. Volker Michael Strocka (University of
17
ep.Orig. (79,13-15 Reichardt); see also the Hebrew etymology in F16d.
Freiburg, G e r m a n y ) .
18
14
T h i s is n o r m a l l y dated to a phase in which Heraclas replaced Origen as the head of the famous
A text in the Cesti points in that direction: the Syriac name of a serpent is given as (3a9avr)pa8d (cest. 1,2,119).
19
Vieillefond 1970,41f argued that Africanus must have been a Jew.
catechetical school (i.e. after 215); see Winkelmann 2002,510. However, it may also have been
much earlier, even before Heraclas' conversion to Christianity, since Eusebius in his text does not give any specific Christian motivation for the trip. cest. 5,53f; see Harnack 1921.
2. T h e Chronographiae; Date and Place of Writing, Literary Character
Introduction
XVI
s t r o n g l y suggests that he c o u l d n o t have been a Jew, since, f r o m the t i m e o f H a d r i a n , the Jews h a d b e e n b a n n e d f r o m A e l i a C a p i t o l i n a .
chronicle. O c c a s i o n a l l y texts have been falsely attributed to A f r i c a n u s .
X V I I
These
i n c l u d e a Syriac f r a g m e n t dealing w i t h t h e appearance o f Moses a n d E l i j a h
20
W h a t e v e r t h e case m a y be, i t is i n t e r e s t i n g t o note t h a t A f r i c a n u s actually
( C P G 1695), p a r t s o f the account o f an "inter-religious dialogue" at the P e r s i a n 23
court,
w h e n q u o t i n g H e r o d o t u s b y h e a r t he a u t o m a t i c a l l y replaces A p d f h o i
a large n u m b e r o f quotations f r o m a c o l l e c t i o n o f Byzantine a g r i c u l t u r a l t e x t s —
(here
u n d e r s t o o d i n a b r o a d sense o f "Easterners") w i t h "those near us ( o i Ttap' r)uiv)"
a t e x t r e f e r r e d to as the Passio Symphorosae
the Geoponica—the
i n certain m a n u s c r i p t s
24
refers t o H e b r e w w o r d s as " o u r " w a y o f speaking (K&|3OC;, see above). Indeed,
analysis o f w h i c h is s t i l l o n g o i n g .
and
25
(cest. 7,5) a n d he speaks o f Jerusalem as the " o l d home". O n the other hand, his R o m a n a f f i l i a t i o n s are i m p o s s i b l e t o i g n o r e : he uses t h e L a t i n n a m e o f the city, he publishes u n d e r a L a t i n n a m e a n d i n c e r t a i n c i r c u m s t a n c e s he identifies h i m
2. The
Chronographiae:
Date and Place ofWriting, Literary Character
self w i t h the R o m a n s , u s i n g "us" t o d i s t i n g u i s h h i m s e l f f r o m the Persians (cest. l , l , 4 f ) . W h a t m i g h t seem at f i r s t sight to be a c o n t r a d i c t i o n o u g h t perhaps to be seen as an e x p r e s s i o n o f a m u l t i p l e c u l t u r a l a n d r e l i g i o u s i d e n t i t y w h i c h was
Iulius A f r i c a n u s w r o t e his chronicle i n the early 220's, most p r o b a b l y i n t h e
possible a n d e v e n desirable i n t h e u p p e r echelons o f s o c i e t y i n the Severan age.
s u m m e r o r e a r l y a u t u m n o f the year 2 2 1 . T h i s date, w h i c h represents the e n d o f
A s regards his alleged C h r i s t i a n i t y , it has always p u z z l e d scholars h o w his
his h i s t o r i c a l a c c o u n t , is c o n f i r m e d b y v a r i o u s independent texts a n d b y v a r i o u s
Cesti s h o w s n o p r o - C h r i s t i a n l e a n i n g s whatsoever. H o w e v e r , since o n l y 10% o r
forms o f d a t i n g . P h o t i u s for example says that the entire c h r o n o l o g y c o v e r e d a
less o f a l e n g t h y w o r k o f 24 b o o k s has c o m e d o w n t o us, i t is clear that a l l
p e r i o d o f 5723 years ( T l l , 7 ) , w h i c h w o u l d correspond to A D 2 2 1 / 2 2 .
a r g u m e n t s o n t h i s issue are e x t r e m e l y d i f f i c u l t to substantiate. Even o n the basis
a d d i t i o n , t h e c o m p l e x s y n c h r o n i s m f o u n d w i t h i n F54d provides us w i t h t h e
o f the few s u r v i v i n g segments, i t is clear that the w o r k , w h i c h was dedicated to
f o l l o w i n g dates:
A l e x a n d e r Severus ( T 2 d ) , d i d n o t have any a i m i n s u p p o r t i n g one religious
•
0 1 . 250, w h i c h was h e l d i n the s u m m e r o f 221
t r a d i t i o n or a n o t h e r , o r i n d e e d o f a t t a c k i n g one faith t o ingratiate the other. Even
•
the n a m e s o f t h e consuls for the year 2 2 1
i f i t is t r u e t h a t the s u r v i v i n g f r a g m e n t s o f the Cesti d o n o t reveal any hints o f
•
J e w i s h o r C h r i s t i a n f a i t h , i t is also t r u e that t h e y attest n o anti-Jewish o r a n t i C h r i s t i a n s e n t i m e n t s . O f course, a reader steeped i n a n y p r o f o u n d o r t h o d o x creed m i g h t f i n d o t h e r w i s e .
26
In
the t h i r d year o f Elagabalus, w h i c h runs either f r o m M a y 220 to M a y 2 2 1 , or, c o u n t i n g i n c o m p l e t e Roman years, t h e w h o l e o f 221.
The last piece o f evidence comes f r o m t h e text w h i c h deals w i t h the d a t i n g o f C h r i s t ( F 9 3 ) . A c c o r d i n g to Africanus, his parousia
occured i n A M 5 5 3 1 , effecti
th
is usually d a t e d t o b e t w e e n 227 a n d 2 3 1 , t h a t is to say after t h e
vely 192 years b e f o r e t h e 2 5 0 O l y m p i a d (F93.109). This w o u l d again lead t o the
c o n s t r u c t i o n o f the baths o f A l e x a n d e r Severus i n R o m e a n d before the latter s
year g i v e n b y P h o t i u s : A M 5723 = A D 221/22. A l l t r a n s m i t t e d dates, therefore,
T h e Cesti
v i c t o r y over t h e Persians i n 2 3 1 ;
2 1
a l o n g w i t h the Chronographiae
it forms the
coincide w i t h t h e year 221 and p r o b a b l y s o m e t i m e d u r i n g the second h a l f o f it.
m a i n w o r k o f A f r i c a n u s . I n a d d i t i o n , t w o letters have b e e n preserved, b o t h o f
T e c h n i c a l l y s p e a k i n g , the e n d o f the h i s t o r i c a l account w o u l d o n l y be a
w h i c h are v e r y learned a n d b o t h o f w h i c h c o n t a i n exegetical m a t e r i a l . O n e is
terminus
addressed t o a c e r t a i n A r i s t i d e s a n d discusses t h e genealogies o f Christ; i t
w h y i t seems u n l i k e l y that m u c h t i m e elapsed between that date a n d t h e e n d o f
post quern f o r the t i m e o f w r i t i n g . However, there are several reasons
c a n n o t be d a t e d ( C P G 1693). T h e o t h e r is a letter t o O r i g e n , d e a l i n g w i t h t h e s t o r y o f Susanna, p r e s e r v e d i n t h e b o o k o f D a n i e l ( C P G 1692). Origen's answer has also c o m e d o w n to us, a l t h o u g h the correspondence can o n l y vaguely be d a t e d to t h e 2 4 0 s .
22
T h e r e m a y also have been a w o r k c a l l e d n s p i £(38oud5a)v
( F 9 3 , 1 0 2 f ) d e a l i n g w i t h the i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f the s e v e n t y weeks i n the b o o k o f
23
B H L 7971; see Ruinart 1859,70.
25
It is clear that the work contains both genuine and spurious material. The brief remarks of Vieillefond 1970,69f are not all that can be said on the issue. However, whatever is genuine most likely comes from the Cesfi.
26
Calculated with the standard equation, according to which Africanus' years "from Adam" begin in 5502/01 B C (established since Petau 1627, shared by many others, inter alia Finegan 1998, 154-160, see Mosshammer 2006,84). This consensus is challenged by Mosshammer 2006, who suggests a beginning in 5501/00 BC and thus comes to the equation A M 5723 = A D 222/23. His reconstruction, which is based on a new interpretation of the intricate text F93, creates more problems than it solves, especially in conjunction with the evidence of F54d (see above in the main text). T h e information given by Photius, that A M 5723 was in the reign of Macrinus (217218), is in any case faulty.
D a n i e l a n d t h u s perhaps s o m e sort o f precursor t o c e r t a i n elements o f the
20
This is the communis opinio of most recent authors, see Crehan 1977,635; Rampoldi 1981,74; Winkelmann 2002,509; Adler 2004,521f.
21
Vieillefond 1970,60-64.
22
It used to be dated to 240 (Reichardt 1909,65), but de Lange 1983,498-501 rightly pointed out that there is not much evidence to support this dating. He suggests 248, but his arguments are also weak.
Degestis in Perside, C P G 6968; see Bratke 1899,51.
24
2. The Chronographiae: Date and Place of Writing, Literary Character
Introduction
XVIII
its r e d a c t i o n a n d p u b l i c a t i o n . I n F 9 3 , 8 4 f A f r i c a n u s says that after the
Passion
a n d R e s u r r e c t i o n o f C h r i s t "nearly 200 years have elapsed up t o o u r time". These
XIX
e l a b o r a t i n g the m a t e r i a l . T h e e n d o f T 6 c o u l d also be t a k e n as a sign o f an earlier r e d a c t i o n , a l t h o u g h t h e evidence remains w e a k . T h e oldest sources call t h e w o r k xpovoypaqncu,
years w o u l d s e e m t o c o i n c i d e m o r e o r less w i t h t h e a b o v e - m e n t i o n e d 192 years,
30
29
that is t o say a " d e s c r i p t i o n 31
a n d i n any c a s e t h e y leave v e r y few years f o r t h e r e d a c t i o n o f the w o r k after A D
o f time", as Syriac a n d A r m e n i a n authors r i g h t l y translate.
2 2 1 . M o r e e v i d e n c e comes f r o m the O l y m p i c v i c t o r list. T h e list ends w i t h t h e
c o u l d thus be c o n s i d e r e d t h e m o s t likely f o r m o f the o r i g i n a l title, a l t h o u g h
The
expression
w i n n e r o f O l . 2 4 9 , t h a t is to say w i t h t h e games h e l d i n the s u m m e r o f 217
occasionally o t h e r titles are also attested, such as icrtopiKOV (Photius: T i l ) ,
(F65.399). I f t h e w o r k h a d b e e n f i n i s h e d m u c h after 2 2 1 , A f r i c a n u s w o u l d
ioTopiKd (Syncellus: T 6 4 e ) , i o t o p i a (anonymous: F14a), T 6 xpovoYpcupelov ( A n -
xd
p r o b a b l y h a v e a d d e d t h e name o f the w i n n e r o f 0 1 . 250, h e l d i n t h e s u m m e r o f
n i a n u s : T 3 9 b ) o r td xpoviKd (Eusebius: T2a; John C h r y s o s t o m : F90a). T h e fact
that year. I t m a y be t h a t he finished his w o r k d u r i n g the s u m m e r / a u t u m n o f 2 2 1 ,
t h a t Basil o f Caesarea speaks o f t h e ETtiTour)
before he w a s a b l e t o l e a r n the n a m e o f its w i n n e r .
t h e Chronographiae
Finally, i f 2 2 1 was n o t i n fact the t i m e o f w r i t i n g , i t w o u l d be v e r y d i f f i c u l t t o
TV
x p o v w v (F100) suggests t h a t
also existed i n an e p i t o m i z e d f o r m . T h i s t h e o r y appears t o
b e e n d o r s e d b y Syncellus, w h o at one p o i n t actually quotes A f r i c a n u s E V ertiT6(ia)
e x p l a i n w h y t h e h i s t o r i c a l account stops i n t h a t year. There is n o t the slightest
(F89,2) a n d furnishes a h e a v i l y - a b r i d g e d text w h i c h is barely u n d e r s t a n d a b l e .
h i n t t h a t A f r i c a n u s c o n s i d e r e d t h i s p a r t i c u l a r year i n any w a y i m p o r t a n t f o r t h e
Nevertheless, the e v i d e n c e for the existence o f an e p i t o m i z e d v e r s i o n o f t h e
general c o u r s e
w h o l e w o r k is i n s u f f i c i e n t . I t m i g h t be m o r e p r u d e n t t o assume that c e r t a i n
o f h i s t o r y . It is n o t a n e p o c h a l year a n d " n o t h i n g o u t o f the i n i t (nor, for t h a t m a t t e r , i n the w h o l e o f t h e p e r i o d
passages were detached f o r c i r c u l a t i o n and were q u o t e d i n a b r i d g e d versions. A s
f o l l o w i n g t h e d e a t h o f C h r i s t , F 9 3 . 8 5 ) . T h e m o s t l o g i c a l hypothesis, t h e r e f o r e , is
u s e d b y Syncellus, the w o r d £7UTouri m i g h t also s i m p l y refer t o a style o f h i s t o
ordinary" happened
t h a t A f r i c a n u s finished a n d p u b l i s h e d h i s w o r k i n 2 2 1 .
r i o g r a p h y whose b r o a d c h r o n o l o g i c a l scope p r e c l u d e d i n - d e p t h analysis.
2 7
W h i l e t h e t i m e o f w r i t i n g can be d e t e r m i n e d w i t h a relatively h i g h degree o f
T h e sources g e n e r a l l y agree o n the fact that t h e w h o l e c h r o n i c l e consisted o f
certainty, n o t h i n g is k n o w n a b o u t t h e place o f w r i t i n g . As has b e e n s a i d i n the
five books, w h i c h leads us t o believe that the w o r k i n its e n t i r e t y was o f q u i t e a
32
p r e v i o u s s e c t i o n , A f r i c a n u s was a c o s m o p o l i t e , w h o was able t o v i s i t a n d reside
considerable size. J u d g i n g b y the b o o k lengths o f later C h u r c h histories (Euse
i n n u m e r o u s places. W e k n o w t h a t he " i n s t i t u t e d " the l i b r a r y near the P a n t h e o n
b i u s a n d his successors), i t can be s u r m i s e d that t h e s u r v i v i n g parts o f the c h r o
i n Rome (cest. 5,53f), although this w i l l
n i c l e represent o n l y a s m a l l p a r t o f the w h o l e w o r k . A l t h o u g h this is d i f f i c u l t t o
have b e e n after 2 2 1 . T h e
Chrono
m u s t have b e e n w r i t t e n i n a p l a c e w h e r e the author h a d access t o a
estimate, i t is reasonable t o suppose that no m o r e t h a n 10—20% o f the entire t e x t
g o o d l i b r a r y ; t h i s c o u l d have b e e n R o m e , b u t t h e r e is n o w a y o f k n o w i n g f o r
has b e e n preserved. I n a l l l i k e l i h o o d , the o v e r a l l s t r u c t u r e o f the w o r k w a s
certain.
c h r o n o l o g i c a l , i.e. t h e five b o o k s corresponded t o five consecutive p e r i o d s o f
graphiae
I t has b e e n "editions".
28
h y p o t h e s i z e d t h a t t h e Chronographiae
was p u b l i s h e d i n t w o
T h e t h e o r y is based o n a passage i n w h i c h Syncellus speaks o f a
h i s t o r y . T h e s u b d i v i s i o n w a s n o t according t o sections
i n different l i t e r a r y
characters (section o f prose, s e c t i o n o f tables, o r the l i k e ) , a l t h o u g h there m a y 33
SEUTepa SKSOCUC, AcppixavoO ( F 4 6 . 3 3 ) . H o w e v e r , t o surmise the existence o f t w o
have been some s o r t o f a p p e n d i x w i t h one o r m o r e tables.
e d i t i o n s o n t h i s basis alone w o u l d be i m p r u d e n t t o say the least. T h e r e are i n
seems u n l i k e l y that t h e m a t e r i a l was organized i n such a w a y t h a t the n a r r a t i v e
T h a t b e i n g said, i t
fact m o r e l o g i c a l ways o f u n d e r s t a n d i n g t h i s phrase (see note a d l o c ) . T h a t
r e m a i n e d d i s t i n c t f r o m t h e n u m b e r s and the tables, or t h a t there was a d i v i s i o n
b e i n g said, i t is also t r u e that t h e p r e s e r v e d m a t e r i a l contains traces o f earlier
i n t o a h i s t o r i c a l a c c o u n t a n d a s y n o p t i c "canon-table" as f o u n d i n Eusebius.
strata t h a n t h a t o f the final v e r s i o n o f 2 2 1 . T h e h e a d i n g o f the O l y m p i c v i c t o r l i s t sets o u t a catalogue o f names e x t e n d i n g as far as 0 1 . 247 ( = A D 2 0 9 - 1 3 , i.e. t h e r e i g n o f C a r a c a l l a , whose n a m e is also g i v e n , F65,42f.397). B u t the a c t u a l list
29
The text speaks of 184 years after the Resurrection (T6.21). This would lead to the year A M 5716 = A D 214/15 ( A M 5532 + 184 = A M 5716), under Caracalla. However, the names given
goes f u r t h e r , u p t o O l . 249 i n fact. T h i s s h o u l d n o t be i n t e r p r e t e d as a t r a c e o f a
immediately before are totally confused and in any case do not coincide with the reign of
first ( p u b l i s h e d ) v e r s i o n , b u t r a t h e r t h e r e s u l t o f a l o n g process o f c o l l e c t i n g a n d
Caracalla. Moricaviti
probably comes from Marcus Avitus, which would be Elagabalus.
Alexandri could be Alexander Severus. 30
Eusebius: T3,5; T41.6; introductory formulations (fourth app.) to F34.1; F93.22; John of Scythopolis: F20;T93a. See also Gelzer l,26f.
31 32 27
See discussion in Gelzer l,29f.
Eusebius: T3a; Jerome: T2b; Paschale Campanum: T92; Photius: T i l , see also the references to books 1-5 below.
T h i s dating is shared and accepted by most scholars; see inter alia Gelzer l,50f; Winkelmann 2002,511; Burgess 2006,40.
T 6 might reflect such an appendix; see below, pp. X X V I f. T39a,7f could imply that at the end of the fifth book controversial issues were discussed.
2. The Chronographiae: Date and Place of Writing, Literary Character
Introduction
XX
A s f o r i t s l i t e r a r y character, t h e preserved m a t e r i a l reveals a v a r i e t y o f styles,
XXI
apologetic contexts, t h e t r u t h o f the C h r i s t i a n message depended above a l l o n 3 6
i n c l u d i n g s t r a i g h t f o r w a r d lists (e.g. t h e lists o f k i n g s , see b e l o w p p . X X X V I f ) ,
the age o f its d o c t r i n e .
a n n o t a t e d l i s t s (e.g. F89, see 11.18.38.58.66) a n d discourse o r n a r r a t i v e prose (e.g.
existed between M o s e s a n d Plato, or o f t h a t b e t w e e n Moses a n d H o m e r , a l r e a d y
F34, F 9 3 ) . I t is reasonable t o s u p p o s e that t h e m a t e r i a l t h a t has b e e n lost was
attracted a c e r t a i n l e v e l o f interest. T h e o p h i l u s o f A n t i o c h a n d C l e m e n t o f
also p r e s e n t e d
i n the same way. T h e perusal o f such i n t e r m i n a b l e tables a n d
A s a consequence, the c h r o n o l o g i c a l relationship t h a t
A l e x a n d r i a p u s h e d t h e argument even f u r t h e r , a f f i r m i n g the existence o f a 37
texts m u s t h a v e been tedious i n t h e e x t r e m e . Nevertheless, t h e y offered reliable
historical c o n t i n u u m t h a t went f r o m c r e a t i o n r i g h t up to the present d a y .
i n f o r m a t i o n w h i c h w o u l d have b e e n o t h e r w i s e d i f f i c u l t to f i n d i n one place—
such a way, C h r i s t i a n roots were traced b a c k to the remotest possible p o i n t ,
In
m a y b e t h i s is another reason w h y t h e w o r k was so w i d e l y u s e d a n d w h y i t has
b e y o n d w h i c h n o h i s t o r y c o u l d be conceived. T h e apologetic t r a d i t i o n i n general, a n d T h e o p h i l u s a n d C l e m e n t i n p a r t i
n o t s u r v i v e d as a whole. I f t h e f i v e books c o r r e s p o n d t o five consecutive p e r i o d s o f history, the q u e s t i o n arises as to where the d e m a r c a t i o n p o i n t s a c t u a l l y were. U n f o r t u n a t e l y , t h e s t r u c t u r e c a n n o t be e n t i r e l y r e c o n s t r u c t e d a n d therefore t h e a t t r i b u t i o n o f
cular, represent t h e m o s t i m p o r t a n t C h r i s t i a n antecedents to the
Chronographiae
o f Africanus. T h a t b e i n g said, his w o r k is m u c h m o r e than just a s i m p l e c o n t i n u a t i o n o f this t r a d i t i o n . To w r i t e five tomes o f historical miscellanea w o u l d
For
have been far t o o m u c h o f an u n d e r t a k i n g , i f i t was meant just to m a k e a p o i n t
b o o k 3, o u r k n o w l e d g e is r e l a t i v e l y g o o d , b o t h for the q u a n t i t y o f material a n d
that i n p r i n c i p l e h a d already been m a d e b y p r e v i o u s authors w i t h a great d e a l
i n d i v i d u a l f r a g m e n t s t o p a r t i c u l a r b o o k s remains i n m a n y cases u n c e r t a i n .
34
for t h e c h r o n o l o g i c a l l i m i t s . T h e l o n g discussion o f the s y n c h r o n i s m between
less effort. I n fact, a l m o s t n o trace o f any c o n t r o v e r s i a l theological t h i n k i n g c a n
t h e E x o d u s a n d Ogygus o f A t h e n s ( F 3 4 ) m u s t have been p l a c e d at the b e g i n n i n g
be f o u n d i n any o f t h e preserved f r a g m e n t s ,
38
a n d i t is clear that a w o r k o f s u c h
T h e s y n c h r o n i s m b e t w e e n the first O l y m p i a d a n d t h e first year o f
dimensions c o u l d o n l y have been w r i t t e n b y someone w i t h a genuine s c h o l a r l y
A h a z is also m e n t i o n e d i n t h i s b o o k , a l t h o u g h i t is t a k e n u p a g a i n i n b o o k 4
interest i n h i s t o r i o g r a p h y . I n this sense, the a p p r o a c h o f Africanus m i g h t best b e
of this b o o k .
3 5
( T 6 4 e ) . I t s e e m s plausible to assume, therefore, t h a t b o o k 3 e x t e n d e d f r o m the
t e r m e d as scientific, t h e i m p l i c a t i o n b e i n g t h a t h i s interest i n precise h i s t o r i c a l
E x o d u s t o t h e first O l y m p i a d . B o o k 4 w o u l d t h e n o p e n w i t h t h e p e r i o d i n w h i c h
k n o w l e d g e was m a i n l y for the sake o f k n o w l e d g e .
G r e e k c h r o n o l o g y becomes firmly established o n the basis o f O l y m p i a d s . B o o k
The C h r i s t i a n character o f his w o r k is clear, especially given the i m p o r t a n c e
5 m u s t h a v e started at the latest w i t h the I n c a r n a t i o n : t h e genealogy o f Jesus
a t t r i b u t e d to the date o f the I n c a r n a t i o n i n A M 5500 and the detailed d i s c u s s i o n
( F 9 0 a , l f ) , h i s Passion a n d R e s u r r e c t i o n (F93, app. to 1. 2 2 ; T 9 3 a ) , and a
final
c o n c e r n i n g the date o f the C r u c i f i x i o n a n d Resurrection o f C h r i s t ( F 9 3 ) . N e v e r
d o x o l o g y ( F 1 0 0 ) are all attested f o r t h i s b o o k . U n f o r t u n a t e l y , t h e l i m i t s between
theless, i t w o u l d b e a mistake to t r y a n d reduce t h e Chronographiae
b o o k 4 a n d 5 cannot be d e f i n e d a n y m o r e precisely t h a n t h i s . T h e same applies
apologetic w o r k . I n t h e same way, there is n o trace o f any interest i n c h i l i a s t i c o r
to a purely
f o r t h e h i s t o r y dealing w i t h t h e p e r i o d f r o m A d a m to M o s e s , i.e. b o o k s 1 a n d 2.
anti-chiliastic t h o u g h t , a l t h o u g h A f r i c a n u s m u s t have been aware o f these
B o o k 1 m i g h t have finished w i t h t h e d i v i s i o n o f t h e earth i n A M 2661 or w i t h
currents a n d o f t h e possible impact his system h a d for this sort o f debate (see
t h e d e a t h o f Peleg i n A M 3000, b u t t h i s is n o m o r e t h a n a s u p p o s i t i o n .
also below p. X X V I I I ) . H e i n r i c h G e l z e r was i n d u b i t a b l y r i g h t i n c a l l i n g Africanus the "father o f
T h e l i t e r a r y character o f A f r i c a n u s ' c h r o n o l o g y is e q u a l l y d i f f i c u l t t o deter m i n e , p a r t i c u l a r l y since the a u t h o r d i d n o t adhere to a n y established
genre.
I n d e e d , h i s w o r k is h i g h l y i n n o v a t i v e i n a n u m b e r o f ways, possessing varied a n d
Christian chronography".
39
T h e Chronographiae
was a b e n c h m a r k a n d as such i t
w e n t o n to b e c o m e a m o d e l for the n e w genre o f C h r i s t i a n chronicles. H e n c e
f a r - f l u n g r o o t s . T h e c h r o n i c l e m i g h t be considered a r e n d i t i o n a n d re-adapta
f o r t h , all later c h r o n i c l e r s i m p l i c i t l y or e x p l i c i t l y had to take account o f t h i s
t i o n o f H e l l e n i s t i c universal h i s t o r i o g r a p h y , f o u n d e d i n a C h r i s t i a n theological
work.
f r a m e w o r k , w i t h a p a r t i c u l a r bias f o r Jewish history. A s e a r l y as the second
to a m u c h h i g h e r degree t h a n one m i g h t i n i t i a l l y suppose.
4 0
T h i s is e s p e c i a l l y t r u e o f Eusebius w h o s e w o r k is based u p o n A f r i c a n u s
c e n t u r y , h i s t o r i c a l debates w e r e b e c o m i n g increasingly i m p o r t a n t w i t h i n learned C h r i s t i a n circles. Such a r g u m e n t s n o t o n l y c o n c e r n e d the h i s t o r y o f C h r i s t i a n i t y i t s e l f ( w h i c h was d i s a p p o i n t i n g l y n e w anyway) b u t also its o l d e r Jewish roots. I n
36
See Droge 1989 and Pilhofer 1990 on early Christian construction of the beginnings of history
37
Theoph. A n t , Autol. 3,16-28; Clem. Alex., str. 1,21,101-147. O n the origins of Christian
and its theological value. 34
the Chronographiae 35
universal history, see Croke 1983 and Wallraff 2004 and 2005. For Africanus' Christian
T h e discussion that follows takes account of whatever is known about Africanus' subdivision of
predecessors, see Gelzer 1,19-24.
into five books and the original placement of individual excerpts in them
(for T 3 9 a see previous note); see also Gelzer 1,27-29.
38
An exception would be the polemic against the Marcionites in F93,104-106.
Attested by Syncellus, text in the fourth app. to F34,71; see also the more general formulations
39
Gelzer 1,1.
i n the app. to U. 1.38.104.
40
See Croke 1990,32f., Wallraff 2004,161-166.
XXIII
3. The Chronological System
Introduction
XXII
Nevertheless, t h e H e l l e n i s t i c roots o f A f r i c a n u s ' h i s t o r i o g r a p h y s h o u l d a l
based o n a sort o f c r i t i c i s m o f m y t h , r e c a l l i n g b o t h the euhemeristic t r a d i t i o n 46
A t the b e g i n n i n g o f F 3 4 , w h i c h was p r o b a b l y t h e p r e
a n d t h e i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f Palaephatus. A c c o r d i n g to the t r a d i t i o n a l c r i t e r i o n o f
face t o b o o k 3, he gives a fascinating i n s i g h t i n t o h i s role as an i n t e r m e d i a r y o f
autopsy, A f r i c a n u s occasionally refers i n his narrative to his o w n personal e x p e
the Jewish a n d H e l l e n i s t i c t r a d i t i o n s . For A f r i c a n u s , j u s t as i t was for his H e l l e
riences (e.g. F23,18-20; F29). F r o m these texts i t can be i n f e r r e d that at least
ways b e b o r n e i n m i n d .
4 1
nistic predecessors, t h e d e s c r i p t i o n o f p r i m o r d i a l h i s t o r y was a t h o r n y issue.
some parts o f the Chronographiae
W h e n i t c a m e t o t h e o r i g i n s o f m a n k i n d , t h e G r e e k t r a d i t i o n r e n o u n c e d t h e use
l o g i c a l account, b u t also as a h i s t o r y w h i c h was designed t o i n c l u d e d e s c r i p t i o n s
o f t h e t e r m " h i s t o r y " r e s o r t i n g instead to t h e w o r d "myth". U p u n t i l that p o i n t , a l l
o f n a t u r a l p h e n o m e n a and exotic places. T h e Chronographiae
historians h a d agreed o n c o n s i d e r i n g O l . 1,1 as t h e b e g i n n i n g o f h i s t o r i c a l
t h a n j u s t a m o n o t o n o u s b o o k o f tables a n d lists, i n s o m e parts t h e a u t h o r
time.
4 2
H e r e , A f r i c a n u s overcomes the i n c e r t i t u d e o f Greek historians c o n c e r
actually t r i e d to e n t e r t a i n his readers.
mythical
and Greek
47
t r a d i t i o n . Even t h o u g h he m a y o n l y have k n o w n some o f t h e m second h a n d , h i s q u o t a t i o n s s t i l l s h o w a g o o d k n o w l e d g e o f such authors.
history.
F o r such a l o n g t i m e p e r i o d (4727 years a c c o r d i n g to A f r i c a n u s ) o n l y t h e
was m u c h m o r e
A f r i c a n u s ' use a n d q u o t a t i o n o f v a r i o u s sources also h a r k back to the G r e e k
n i n g t h e i r a r c h a i c p a s t — t h a t is to say for t h e p e r i o d o f t i m e f r o m the b e g i n n i n g o f t h e w o r l d t o O l . 1,1—by d i s t i n g u i s h i n g b e t w e e n Jewish history
were c o m p o s e d not o n l y as a strict c h r o n o
48
The most important
e x a m p l e is the i n s e r t i o n o f an e p i t o m i z e d Jewish v e r s i o n o f the list o f t h e
Jewish c h r o n o l o g y was able to p r o v i d e a secure basis u p o n w h i c h to r e c o n s t r u c t
Egyptian kings o f Manetho (F46). I n the 9
a viable s e q u e n c e o f h i s t o r i c a l events. T h a t does n o t m e a n to say that A f r i c a n u s
t h e best preserved version o f the list ( T 4 6 a ) .
t h
century, Syncellus considered t h i s
e n t i r e l y r e j e c t e d t h e G r e e k t r a d i t i o n . By means o f s y n c h r o n i z a t i o n , he a t t e m p t e d t o l i n k the c o m p a r a t i v e l y fragile m y t h i c a l G r e e k h i s t o r y to the m u c h f i r m e r
3. The Chronological System
Jewish one. T h a n k s t o A f r i c a n u s , s y n c h r o n i s m t h u s became a means o f m e d i a t i n g b e t w e e n t w o d i f f e r e n t c h r o n o l o g i c a l a n d h i s t o r i c a l systems.'
13
Despite t h e p r e d o m i n a n c e o f Jewish h i s t o r y as a general base, A f r i c a n u s s t i l l
A f r i c a n u s ' p r e s i d i n g idea was to i n s e r t the w h o l e o f the h i s t o r y o f m a n k i n d i n t o
m a n a g e d t o r e t a i n s o m e t r a d i t i o n a l topics o f H e l l e n i s t i c universal h i s t o r y . A
one great c h r o n o l o g i c a l system. N o t o n l y was such a system i n t e n d e d to be
g o o d e x a m p l e is his interest i n the h i s t o r y o f h u m a n k n o w l e d g e a n d progress. I n
a r i t h m e t i c a l l y coherent, i t was c o n c e i v e d i n such a w a y as t o encompass a l l
t h e p r e s e r v e d f r a g m e n t s , he m e n t i o n s m a n y o f t h e m o s t i m p o r t a n t discoveries
branches o f history, i n c l u d i n g the S e m i t i c a n d Hellenistic t r a d i t i o n s . E v e r y t h i n g
Another
was s u b o r d i n a t e d to this idea, s o m e t i m e s to an almost obsessive extent a n d
imperii,
a concept w h i c h was p a r t
o c c a s i o n a l l y even at the cost o f f a c t u a l t r u t h . Large parts o f t h e w o r k served little
a n d parcel o f H e l l e n i s t i c h i s t o r i o g r a p h y . T h e translatio
imperii crops u p i n m a n y
o t h e r t h a n t o s u p p o r t the impressive n u m e r i c a l f r a m e w o r k t h a t he re-calculated
passages i n t h e list o f k i n g s a n d elsewhere (see i n p a r t i c u l a r F89.53-57, F 9 3 . 5 0 -
i n o r d e r to f i t v a r i o u s h i s t o r i c a l perspectives. U n d e r p i n n i n g t h e entire system
44
o f m a n k i n d , i n accordance w i t h the Greek t r a d i t i o n o f t h e heuremata. g o o d e x a m p l e is h i s a d o p t i o n o f the translatio
53, also T 6 , 1 4 - 2 1 ) . T h e series o f k i n g d o m s c u l m i n a t e s i n the R o m a n e m p i r e , w h i c h is p r e s e n t e d as t h e h i s t o r i c scene for t h e a d v e n t o f C h r i s t .
45
T h e m e t h o d o l o g y o f A f r i c a n u s was also i n f l u e n c e d by a n u m b e r o f o t h e r t r a d i t i o n a l H e l l e n i s t i c m o d e l s . For example, h i s a p p r o a c h to Greek m y t h o l o g y is
was t h e o l d C h r i s t i a n (and Jewish) c o n v i c t i o n that the d u r a t i o n o f h i s t o r y as a w h o l e a m o u n t e d t o 6000 years, i n accordance w i t h the six days o f creation, w h e r e b y each day equaled 1000 years.
49
I n t h i s f r a m e w o r k , t h e m o s t decisive
dates are the death o f Peleg ( i n w h o s e t i m e the earth was d i v i d e d ) , w h i c h w o u l d be t h e " m i d - p o i n t " o f h i s t o r y o c c u r r i n g i n the year 3000, a n d the I n c a r n a t i o n o f Jesus C h r i s t i n 5 5 0 0 .
41
T h e article of Burgess 2006 gives an excellent overview of the antecedents of Iulius Africanus—
50
E v e r y t h i n g else, a n d i n p a r t i c u l a r t h e t r a d i t i o n a l elements
o f H e l l e n i s t i c historiography, is w o v e n i n t o this f r a m e w o r k .
primarily, but not only, in the Hellenistic sphere. For the Hellenistic roots of Africanus, see also Schwartz 1895,23; for his methodology, see Roberto 2006. 42
T h i s view is also referred to by Africanus, F34.1-5. O n the problem of primordial history in the Greek tradition, see Momigliano 1966,14-22 and Adler 1989, in particular 15-18.
46
F24. O n this question, see Sirinelli 1961,180-189; Roberto 2006,11-13.
43
See F34.4-11 and F15.9-14 for a comparison between Jewish chronology and other Oriental
47
See, e.g., F26.13-23; F30.
systems. O n the synchronism in the Chronographiae, see Sirinelh 1961,509-515 and Roberto
48
See, e.g., F34.26-36.75-87.96-102; F56,4f; F65,30-37; F81a,3-5; F93.14-17.
2006,8-15. For the synchronisation between Jewish and Greek history in preceding universal
49
Ps 89[90],4 ("For a thousand years in your sight are like yesterday when it is past, or like a watch in the night"); II Petr 3,8 ("with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand
historiography see Wacholder 1968 (esp. 463-477). 44
for cultural history, as shown for example by F81b. 45
years are like one day"); see also Barn 15,4; Iren., haer. 5,28,3; 5,23,2; Hipp., Dan. 4,23,5 f.
F18; F24.34-37; F54a,17f; F56,7-9. The interest in heuremata is connected to a general interest F15.9-14, see also T6.17.
50
Here and in the following pages, references to the Africanus material can be found in the "reference" section of the fold-out table in the appendix.
3. The Chronological System
Introduction
XXIV
XXV
O b v i o u s l y , i t is no longer possible t o reconstruct the w h o l e system i n its
relevance nor i n d e e d t h e same level o f certainty. P a r t i c u l a r l y i m p o r t a n t events,
o r i g i n a l f o r m as Africanus w o u l d have presented i t . N o t o n l y are large parts o f
w h o s e dates are b o t h well-attested and f u n d a m e n t a l to t h e entire c h r o n o l o g i c a l
t h e w o r k l o s t , b u t the n u m e r a l s themselves are p a r t i c u l a r l y p r o n e to e r r o r i n
system, are p r i n t e d i n bold-face. I n the second a n d t h i r d c o l u m n s ( f r o m A d a m
t r a n s m i s s i o n , b o t h i n t e n t i o n a l a n d u n i n t e n t i o n a l . Indeed, g i v e n a l l t h e p r o b l e m s
a n d the O l y m p i a d s ) t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g figures are p r i n t e d i n b o l d o n l y w h e n
a n d p i t f a l l s , i t is actually quite s u r p r i s i n g h o w coherent all the e x t a n t m a t e r i a l is.
t h e y are actually attested explicitly i n the sources. A l t h o u g h some dates are n o t
Even the Excerpta
attested directly, t h e y can s t i l l be deduced w i t h a h i g h degree o f certainty (e.g.
Barbari,
w h i c h t e x t u a l l y speaking, represents a n e x t r e m e l y
d i s t o r t e d b r a n c h o f the t r a n s m i s s i o n , preserves numerals w h i c h , i n m a n y cases,
t h e Exodus i n A M 3707 a n d the first O l y m p i a d i n A M 4727). Braces { } h a v e
d o v e t a i l p e r f e c t l y w i t h the system as we k n o w i t f r o m other sources.
been used to i n d i c a t e cases where well-attested dates fail to concur w i t h t h e
T h e p r e s e n t e d i t i o n is based o n t h e hypothesis that A f r i c a n u s ' c h r o n o l o g i c a l
overall c h r o n o l o g i c a l system and where w e have been unable t o offer a l o g i c a l
s y s t e m was i n t e r n a l l y coherent, a l t h o u g h t h i s does not exclude t h e presence o f
e m e n d a t i o n . A r e c u r r i n g p r o b l e m is the n u m b e r i n g o f the first year o f each
d i s c r e p a n c i e s a n d inconsistencies i n a f e w m i n o r places. Hence, i n m a n y p r o b l e
k i n g / e m p e r o r . For example, " 1 Saul" s h o u l d actually be read as "0 Saul", i.e. t h e
m a t i c passages i t is better to assume a n e r r o r i n t r a n s m i s s i o n r a t h e r t h a n a n
b e g i n n i n g o f his r e i g n . Therefore the p e r i o d o f t i m e f r o m " 1 Saul = A M 4 3 8 2 " t o
o v e r s i g h t i n t h e o r i g i n a l . O f course, t h i s c o u l d lead t o an a t t i t u d e o f o v e r - c o n
"20 Saul = A M 4402" is 20 years, n o t 19.
f i d e n t c o n j e c t u r e a n d o f p a p e r i n g over all the c h r o n o l o g i c a l cracks i n t h e text.
It s h o u l d be n o t e d that, although A f r i c a n u s ' c h r o n i c l e included the M o s a i c
T h e r e f o r e , t h e present e d i t i o n a d o p t s a rather cautious m e t h o d . T h e c h r o n o
c o s m o g o n y (F14, see also Photius i n T i l ) , he t y p i c a l l y n u m b e r s years f r o m t h e
l o g i c a l d i s c r e p a n c i e s that r e m a i n are t o o m a n y and t o o grave t o be resolved
c r e a t i o n o f A d a m (arc 6 A S & u ) .
c o n v i n c i n g l y b y means o f s i m p l e e m e n d a t i o n s .
a b b r e v i a t i o n A M (annus
Several inconsistencies
and
53
mundi)
A s a consequence, t h e use o f the c o n v e n t i o n a l is, strictly speaking, n o t appropriate. H o w e v e r ,
c o n t r a d i c t i o n s can be f o u n d i n t h e t e x t , a n d as a rule the notes t o t h e E n g l i s h
for the sake o f clarity a n d brevity, i t has been a d o p t e d i n the translation a n d i n
t r a n s l a t i o n d r a w the readers a t t e n t i o n t o these points. H o w e v e r , w h e r e v e r the
t h e notes to the e d i t i o n .
t e x t w o u l d a p p e a r to be c o r r u p t a n d w h e r e a n obvious s o l u t i o n w a s at h a n d , the
I n m o s t cases, t h e t e x t u a l basis for the m a t e r i a l f o u n d w i t h i n the f o l d - o u t
t e x t has b e e n e m e n d e d ( w i t h t h e o r i g i n a l r e a d i n g i n the c r i t i c a l apparatus). T h a t
table is sufficiently d o c u m e n t e d i n the "reference" section accompanying i t . T h e
b e i n g said, i t has to be a d m i t t e d t h a t i n m a n y cases, the b o r d e r l i n e b e t w e e n the
discussion that f o l l o w s refers only to f u n d a m e n t a l questions a n d a few p a r t i c u
o b v i o u s a n d t h e hypothetical is n o t always completely clear-cut.
51
l a r l y complex details.
T h e d e b a t e over the c o r r e c t r e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f A f r i c a n u s ' c h r o n o l o g i c a l
First and f o r e m o s t , i t is i m p o r t a n t t o d i s t i n g u i s h b e t w e e n A f r i c a n u s ' o w n
s y s t e m has b e e n o n g o i n g for s o m e 4 0 0 years (since Scaliger 1606) a n d some
m e t h o d o f dating a n d t h a t o f m o d e r n h i s t o r i o g r a p h y (i.e. B C / A D ) . Since t h e
quaestiones
ready
latter is o f secondary i m p o r t a n c e for the r e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f Africanus' c h r o n o l o
answers. A s a result, the present e d i t i o n a i m s neither to p r o l o n g t h i s debate n o r
gical system, i t appears i n the table merely as an a d d i t i o n a l a i d . Africanus basi
resolve a n y o f the questions d e f i n i t i v e l y . T h e a i m o f this e d i t i o n is s i m p l y to
cally uses t w o systems o f d a t i n g and part o f his great h i s t o r i o g r a p h i c a l achieve
vexatae
have e m e r g e d , f o r w h i c h we a d m i t to h a v i n g n o
54
place at t h e d i s p o s a l o f scholars a b e t t e r w o r k i n g basis f r o m w h i c h t o analyze all
m e n t consists i n t h e c o o r d i n a t i o n o f the t w o . B y c o m b i n i n g the years f r o m
o f t h e a v a i l a b l e material. A s a consequence, the table i l l u s t r a t i n g t h e c h r o n o
A d a m w i t h the G r e e k system of d a t i n g a c c o r d i n g t o O l y m p i a d s , he was able t o
l o g i c a l s y s t e m i n the a p p e n d i x is i n t e n d e d p r i m a r i l y as an a i d t o h e l p g u i d e the
graft the Hellenistic t r a d i t i o n onto a Jewish h i s t o r i c a l f r a m e w o r k (see above p p .
r e a d e r t h r o u g h the material, n o t a n e w a n d innovative h y p o t h e t i c a l recon
X X I I f).
s t r u c t i o n . I n large parts, i t reflects a b r o a d scholarly consensus, a l t h o u g h parts have b e e n c h a l l e n g e d i n recent p u b l i c a t i o n s .
52
T h e t a b l e can be folded o u t a n d o p e n e d i n order to p e r m i t a b e t t e r synoptic use i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h the texts. N o t a l l the dates have t h e same degree o f
Unfortunately, o n l y t h r e e texts have been preserved
containing a direct
e q u a t i o n between the years f r o m A d a m a n d the O l y m p i a d s : F54d, F89 a n d F93. I n the case o f the s e c o n d text (F89.57), the i n t e r p r e t a t i o n is problematic; a l l scholars agree o n t h e fact that the text is c o r r u p t i n its t r a n s m i t t e d f o r m .
5 5
It
p r o b a b l y ought to be e m e n d e d to give the e q u a t i o n A M 5472 = 01.187,2. I n t h e l o n g fragment F93, d e a l i n g w i t h the Passion a n d R e s u r r e c t i o n o f C h r i s t , the 51
I n F89.57, for example, we did correct 11 to 14, but not 01. 187,4 to 187,2; the notes to the
O l y m p i a d date 202,2 (1. 58) is not i m m e d i a t e l y equated w i t h a year f r o m A d a m .
English translation explain the differing degrees of certainty. 52
T h e most important contributions are Routh 507-509, Trieber 1880, Schwartz 1895, Gelzer 1,26-52, Finegan 1998,154-160, Burgess 2006, Mosshammer 2006 (where more bibliography
53
O n the theological distinction between 'Adam-years' and 'world-years', see Gelzer l,35f.
c a n be found). Our reconstruction of the system owes a great deal to Schwartz, who in many
54
According to the standard equation A M 1 = 5502/01 B C ; see above n. 26.
cases (but not in all) still seems to be the most convincing.
55
See notes 5 and 6 to the translation of the fragment.
Introduction
XXVI
XXVII
3. The Chronological System
I t m i g h t be 5 5 3 1 , w h i c h is q u o t e d b y Syncellus f u r t h e r d o w n , b u t f r o m a s l i g h t l y
slight i m p r e c i s i o n lies i n the time-span a t t r i b u t e d to the R o m a n e m p i r e ( 7 4
d i f f e r e n t c o n t e x t i n A f r i c a n u s (1. 109), o r i t c o u l d be 5532, as f o u n d i n M i c h a e l
years). Instead o f g i v i n g the p e r i o d b e g i n n i n g w i t h the death o f C l e o p a t r a ( e n d
t h e S y r i a n ( T 9 3 d ) . M o s t scholars prefer the second o p t i o n ,
5 6
since the e q u a t i o n
o f the P t o l e m a i c dynasty) r u n n i n g u p t o t h e C r u c i f i x i o n a n d the R e s u r r e c t i o n
O l . 202,2 = A M 5532 is c o h e r e n t w i t h the t h i r d a n d best piece o f evidence. I n
(60 years, F 9 3 . 5 3 ) , t h e text calculates t h e p e r i o d starting f r o m t h e d e a t h o f
F 5 4 d , the y e a r O l . 250,1 is equated w i t h A M 5723, w h i c h is presumably t h e date
Caesar a n d A u g u s t u s ' o w n accession to t h e t h r o n e . T h i s is n o t w r o n g i n itself,
o f the end o f the
but i t does n o t c o n c u r w i t h the precept o f the translatio
Chronographiae.
imperii,
since i t c o u l d
A l l these i n d i c a t i o n s l e a d us t o the f u n d a m e n t a l date o f A M 4727, w h i c h
lead to the p e r i o d o f 14 years between 1 Augustus and the death o f C l e o p a t r a
represents t h e year o f the first O l y m p i a d , a h y p o t h e s i s c o n f i r m e d b y v a r i o u s
b e i n g c o u n t e d t w i c e . T h i s is effectively w h a t happens at the e n d o f t h e t e x t w h e n
57
c a l c u l a t i o n s w i t h i n t h e Chronographiae.
I n s u m , A f r i c a n u s ' entire c h r o n o l o
the c a l c u l a t i o n o f t h e t o t a l n u m b e r o f years f r o m A d a m t o the R e s u r r e c t i o n is given. T h i s n u m b e r has been calculated independently o n the basis o f t h e
g i c a l system is f o u n d e d u p o n t h e f o l l o w i n g three c o h e r e n t equations: A M 4727 = 01.1,1
n u m b e r s m e n t i o n e d before. T w o errors o c c u r r e d i n the process. O n e is a s i m p l e
A M 5532 = 01.202,2
error o f c a l c u l a t i o n (or, m o r e likely, a s c r i b a l e r r o r ) ; the text reads 5726, whereas the correct s u m s h o u l d be 5526. T h e o t h e r is the double c o u n t i n g o f t h e first 14
A M 5723 =01.250,1
years o f A u g u s t u s ; t h e total should therefore a m o u n t to 5512. M o r e o v e r , one has G i v e n the c o m p l e x i t y o f t h e system as a w h o l e , i t is q u i t e possible that A f r i c a n u s
to consider t h a t t h e o n l y n u m b e r that a c t u a l l y managed to creep i n f r o m
c o m p o s e d a s h o r t s u m m a r y i n tabular f o r m at t h e b e g i n n i n g o r at the e n d o f his
Eusebian t r a d i t i o n , w h i c h is definitely n o t f r o m Africanus, is the date o f t h e
the
w o r k . T h i s w o u l d c e r t a i n l y n o t have h a d the f o r m o f a "second b o o k " as i n the
F l o o d (2242 i n t h e text, opposed t o 2262 w h i c h is quite d e f i n i t e l y t h a t o f A f r i c a
c a n o n s o f E u s e b i u s , b u t r a t h e r a b r i e f one o r t w o page o v e r v i e w (see above p.
nus). Therefore, t h e correct sum for A f r i c a n u s ' system can be r e c t i f i e d t o 5532,
X V I I I ) . I t i s t e m p t i n g t o t h i n k that the e n i g m a t i c t e x t (T6)—attested o n l y i n
w h i c h s u p p o r t s once again the dating o f the C r u c i f i x i o n a n d R e s u r r e c t i o n g i v e n
L a t i n f r o m the 9* century onwards—might u l t i m a t e l y derive from Africanus'
above.
own
s u m m a r y , a l t h o u g h t h i s c a n n o t be p r o v e n .
58
T h e table includes a s t r i k i n g
Syncellus a l r e a d y considered the date o f the F l o o d i n A M 2262 a characte
n u m b e r o f dates w h i c h are a l l well-attested i n o t h e r authentic fragments o f
ristic feature o f A f r i c a n u s ' (and o n l y A f r i c a n u s ' ) system ( T 1 6 g w i t h note 2; T 2 2 a ;
A f r i c a n u s . E v e n i f t h e t e x t is t h e w o r k o f a l e a r n e d reader o f later times, t h i s
T45). T h i s is n o t o n l y 20 years later t h a n t h e date given b y Eusebius, i t is also 20
59
reader m u s t have b e e n v e r y w e l l acquainted w i t h t h e Chronographiae.
Since
years later t h a n the date that c o u l d have b e e n calculated o n the basis o f t h e B i b l e
references t o k n o w n fragments are given i n t h e apparatus o f the e d i t i o n , o n l y a
as i t was k n o w n t o Syncellus, i.e. the Septuagint ( i n its Byzantine textus
few p o i n t s n e e d f u r t h e r e x p l a n a t i o n here. T h e w h o l e c h r o n o l o g i c a l scheme is
B e h i n d a l l t h i s lies an o l d p r o b l e m o f b i b l i c a l c h r o n o l o g y : i f one takes t h e
b a s e d o n t h e H e l l e n i s t i c idea o f the translatio
n u m b e r s g i v e n i n t h e Greek Bible seriously, Methuselah s h o u l d have s u r v i v e d
imperii:
i.e. a h i s t o r y o f the Jews
f o l l o w e d b y a h i s t o r y o f t h e Persians, M a c e d o n i a n s a n d R o m a n s .
60
The only
receptus).
the F l o o d . A c c o r d i n g to the figures, M e t h u s e l a h lived 969 years, 167 u p t o t h e b i r t h o f h i s s o n L a m e c h , 188 up t o the b i r t h o f N o a h (Gen 5 , 2 5 - 3 2 ) ; f r o m there
T h e most prominent confirmation comes from F34.41, according to which the period from the
the F l o o d . I n t h e H e b r e w Bible, this p r o b l e m is avoided b y the a s s u m p t i o n t h a t
Exodus to O l . 1,1 is 1020 years, i.e. A M 3707 + 1020 = A M 4727. The information on the
L a m e c h was b o r n 20 years later ( a n d N o a h 6 years earlier), therefore p u t t i n g
Sicyonian kingdom (F51a) also points in the same direction: the kingdom begins 114 years
Methuselah's d e a t h exactly i n the year o f t h e F l o o d itself. A f r i c a n u s f o l l o w e d
after the migration of Abraham ( A M 3277, F16d,6), from there to the first Olympiad, 1336
this t r a d i t i o n , a l t h o u g h he n o r m a l l y u s e d the Septuagint a n d i t is q u i t e possible
years have elapsed: A M 3277 + 114 + 1336 = A M 4727. Similarly with the Lacedaemonians (F58a): their kingdom began in the 20 58
600 years elapsed u p to the F l o o d ( G e n 7,6), thus placing his death 14 years after
th
year of Saul, which is 325 years before O l . 1,1.
61
that he s t u d i e d a l i t t l e textual c r i t i c i s m f o r t h e purpose. I n d e e d , f o r m u l a t i o n s o f
According to F35, Saul began his reign in A M 4382, and A M 4382 + 20 + 325 = A M 4727.
the Chronicon
T h e text was first published in 1688 by Henry Dodwell (1641-1711), on whom see Quantin
Syncellus ("on t h e basis o f a few copies", T 1 6 h ) b o t h suggest t h i s .
2006. 59
("the accurate copies o f the b o o k o f Genesis", T 1 6 g ) a n d
A s i m i l a r case is the p r o b l e m o f the "second" Kenan, that is to say t h e son o f
T h i s becomes immediately plausible from the high number of cross references to other frag ments i n the apparatus.
60
Paschale
It should be remarked that Africanus seems to adopt an Egyptian perspective. The Persian
A r p a c h s h a d after t h e F l o o d ("second" because there is another p e r s o n o f that n a m e before the F l o o d ) . A l t h o u g h K e n a n is m e n t i o n e d b o t h i n t h e Septuagint
kingdom ends with the conquest of Egypt by Alexander. In the same year ( A M 5172) the Macedonian Augustus.
(Ptolemaic)
hegemony begins, which lasts until the conquest of Egypt by 61
O n the chronology of the various versions of the Hebrew Bible, see Rosel 1994,129-144.
XXVIII
Introduction
XXIX
4. T h e Text and its Transmission
a n d t h e G o s p e l o f L u k e ( G e n 10,24; 11,13; L c 3,36), he does n o t appear i n the
b a c k t o t h e o r i g i n a l v e r s i o n o f the Chronographiae.
H e b r e w B i b l e . A f r i c a n u s follows the H e b r e w t e x t a n d o m i t s the 130 years u p t o
t h e Persian k i n g d o m i n O l . 55,1 and t h e r e b u i l d i n g o f Jerusalem i n O l . 83,4.
t h e g e n e r a t i o n o f Kenans son Shelah ( F 1 6 c w i t h note 1; T 1 6 i - o ) . T h e r e f o r e , i n
B o t h dates are well-attested a n d b o t h dates fail t o c o r r e s p o n d w i t h A f r i c a n u s '
These are the b e g i n n i n g o f
c o m p a r i s o n w i t h the Byzantine t r a d i t i o n ( i n c l u d i n g Syncellus), t h e c h r o n o l o g y
system. A l t h o u g h i n b o t h cases n o A M date is given, there is sufficient evidence
o f A f r i c a n u s i s l a c k i n g 110 years ( K e n a n s 130 years - Methuselah's 20 years =
to calculate w i t h a h i g h degree o f certainty w h a t m u s t have been A f r i c a n u s '
110 years, T 1 6 q ) .
dates: A M 4942 and A M 5057 ( c o r r e s p o n d i n g to O l . 54,4 a n d O l . 83,3). H o w e v e r ,
T h e d e a t h o f Peleg i n A M 3000 is a n o t h e r i m p o r t a n t feature o f A f r i c a n u s ' s y s t e m . A s s t a t e d i n F94 (see also F 1 6 c , 7 - 1 2 , 3
r d
i n t w o i m p o r t a n t a n d well-attested fragments, A f r i c a n u s ' calculations are c l e a r l y
app.), this date falls precisely
b a s e d o n t h e A M dates a n d n o t o n those o f the O l y m p i a d s . Curiously, however,
m i d w a y t h r o u g h the 6000 year p e r i o d , a span o f t i m e w h i c h A f r i c a n u s equates
he o m i t s the A M dates, even w h i l e c i t i n g those o f the O l y m p i a d s (F34, see n o t e
w i t h the e n t i r e p e r i o d f r o m the c r e a t i o n t o t h e e n d o f the w o r l d . how
6 2
W h e t h e r and
6, a n d F93, see note 6).
A f r i c a n u s actually dealt w i t h eschatological issues is a m o o t p o i n t . A l
t h o u g h n o p r e s e r v e d text addresses questions o f this s o r t ,
63
i t is o b v i o u s l y i n the
4. The Text and its Transmission
l o g i c o f h i s c h r o n o l o g i c a l system to a t t e m p t calculations c o n c e r n i n g the e n d o f t h e w o r l d . I n d e e d , since he w r o t e i n A M 5723, there w o u l d be 277 years left u n t i l the e n d o f t h e s i x t h m i l l e n n i u m a n d t h e b e g i n n i n g o f the "great Sabbath", the
T h e Chronographiae
seventh m i l l e n n i u m b e l o n g i n g t o G o d . 277 years were almost c e r t a i n l y e n o u g h
t h e Cesti,
to q u i e t t h e e s c h a t o l o g i c a l fervor o f his o w n g e n e r a t i o n a n d several succeeding
rynchus,
ones. A f r i c a n u s p r o b a b l y d i d n o t reflect o n t h e p o s s i b i l i t y that his system w o u l d
consequence, all attempts at r e c o n s t r u c t i n g the w o r k d e p e n d totally o n later
stir u p a g i t a t i o n i n A D 500, a l t h o u g h this is precisely w h a t h a p p e n e d .
64
o f A f r i c a n u s is lost. N o complete c o p y o f it survives. U n l i k e
where an i n t e r e s t i n g fragment o n papyrus was discovered i n O x y 66
n o fragments o f its direct transmission have ever been f o u n d . A s a
Since n o
a u t h o r s u s i n g or q u o t i n g A f r i c a n u s . W i t h the exception o f a few excerpts ( T 6 ,
t h i n g is k n o w n a b o u t A f r i c a n u s ' v i e w o f t h e future, the " C h r o n o l o g i c a l System"
F14), t h e nature o f the source m a t e r i a l consists a l m o s t e n t i r e l y o f q u o t a t i o n s
i n t h e a p p e n d i x ends i n A M 5723 a n d n o t i n A M 6000.
( w h e r e the t e r m is u n d e r s t o o d as an i n s e r t i o n o f text i n an i n d e p e n d e n t c o n t e x t
I n " h i s t o r i c a l " times, i.e. after O l . 1,1, t h e c h r o n o l o g y becomes i n c r e a s i n g l y
w i t h its o w n l i t e r a r y aspirations). Put succinctly, a l m o s t e v e r y t h i n g we possess
c o m p l e x . A t t h e b e g i n n i n g o f b o o k 3, A f r i c a n u s inserts a f u n d a m e n t a l dis
f r o m A f r i c a n u s has c o m e d o w n to us i n the context o f i n d e p e n d e n t w o r k s ,
cussion o f t h e s y n c h r o n i z a t i o n o f the Jewish c h r o n o l o g i c a l system w i t h t h e
m o s t l y chronicles, w i t h t h e i r o w n inclinations, agendas a n d interests. T h o s e w h o
G r e e k one ( F 3 4 ) . A c c o r d i n g to t h i s text, t h e t w o p r i n c i p a l dates are the E x o d u s
q u o t e d A f r i c a n u s usually d i d so because they either w a n t e d t o c o n f i r m t h e i r
o f Moses ( A M 3707) a n d the first O l y m p i a d , w h i c h , i n H e l l e n i s t i c h i s t o r i o
o w n v i e w o f w o r l d h i s t o r y o r falsify s o m e b o d y else's—as a result some criticize
graphy, r e p r e s e n t s t h e b e g i n n i n g o f a c o n t i n u o u s c h r o n o l o g i c a l n a r r a t i v e . T h e
h i m , others praise h i m . E v e n w h e n A f r i c a n u s is used p u r e l y as a h i s t o r i c a l
t i m e - s p a n f r o m the Exodus to O l . 1,1 is 1020 years, the first O l y m p i a d ( A M
source, those c i t i n g h i m have a p a r t i c u l a r interest i n q u o t i n g a precise piece o f
4727) o c c u r r i n g i n the first year o f the r e i g n o f k i n g A h a z i n Israel.
65
data. A n y textual c r i t i c i s m has t o take all o f these elements i n t o account. T h e
F r o m t h i s p o i n t onwards, the t w o d a t i n g systems r u n parallel. H o w e v e r , it can b e d e m o n s t r a t e d t h a t A f r i c a n u s a c t u a l l y c o n t i n u e s c a l c u l a t i n g o n t h e basis o f years " f r o m A d a m " . T h i s corresponds w i t h his c h r o n o l o g i c a l m e t h o d f o r m u
66
cest. 5 = Pap. Oxy. 412. In the case of the chronicle also, there might be an interesting case of fragmentary direct transmission. Berendts 1904,75-79 (hence Bardenhewer 1913-32, 2,266)
lated i n F 3 4 , a c c o r d i n g to w h i c h the p r i n c i p a l h i s t o r i c a l t h r e a d is t h e Jewish one.
analyzes the scarce information on a Meteora manuscript given by the Russian bishop Porfirij
It also e x p l a i n s t w o i m p o r t a n t inconsistencies i n the system w h i c h p r o b a b l y go
Uspenski (tl885). He saw the manuscript in 1859 and his notes were published posthumously i n 1896 (Richard 1995, nr. 1676). A l l he says on the "ms. 34" of the monastery of the trans figuration (Metamorphosis) is the following: "'IoropcKdv cmo Tfjc 07rraoiac. TOU AavinA mc, rfjc
62 63
T h e birth o f Peleg in A M 2661 corresponds to the division of the earth after the Flood (F25).
(5aoiXeiac. TO0 AVTCDVLVOU KapaK&XAa... Anfang und
Gelzer 1,29 suggests that this date was the point of division between books 1 and 2.
of the w o r l d . However, there is no real reason to think that this still derives from Africanus
1904,75). Berendts rightly infers that there is a certain likelihood that the text is linked to
(hence p r i n t e d i n small letters).
Africanus. Unfortunately, it was not possible to find the manuscript, nor does the detailed
64
Brandes 1997. O n the history of millenarianism, see Landes 1988.
catalogue by Bees 1967 show any trace of it. The manuscript may be irretrievably lost. The only
65
F o r the f a l l of Troy, which was the earliest possible historical event in the Hellenistic tradition,
remaining possibility is that Uspenskij actually took the manuscript with him, in which case it
A f r i c a n u s follows the widely accepted chronology of Eratosthenes and assumes that this took
might ultimately have ended up in an ecclesiastical library in Russia. Cf. also Richard 1995, nr.
place 407 years before Ol. 1,1, i.e. A M 4727 - 407 = A M 4320 (F50.28), 1183/82 B C .
1676 on Uspenskij: "De nombreux mss des bibliotheques signalees ont depuis disparu."
XXX
XXXI
4. The Text and its Transmission
Introduction
70
f o l l o w i n g p a r a g r a p h s , t h e r e f o r e , are i n t e n d e d to assist t h e reader i n assessing the
i n editions g o i n g b a c k t o Renaissance o r B a r o q u e t i m e s .
p r i n c i p a l a u t h o r s w h o are t h o u g h t t o constitute the A f r i c a n u s t r a d i t i o n .
a great deal o f s c h o l a r l y debate is still needed t o clarify m a n y aspects o f t h i s l i t e
E x p l a i n i n g w h y t h e Chronographiae
has n o t s u r v i v e d is a difficult
task.
W h a t e v e r t h e reasons, A f r i c a n u s is n o t alone i n this l i t e r a r y category. O f H i p p o -
Even w i t h b e t t e r t e x t s ,
rature. Hence, w h a t follows is only a snapshot o f the present state o f research, a b r i e f synopsis o f t h e sources u n d e r p i n n i n g t h i s e d i t i o n .
l y t u s ' v v o r k w e have n o t h i n g b u t a few w o e f u l fragments. A s for Eusebius, large
T h e first a u t h o r assumed to have used a n d c r i t i c i z e d Africanus is H i p p o l y -
p a r t s o f h i s w o r k are k n o w n o n l y i n ancient translations ( L a t i n a n d A r m e n i a n ) ,
tus. However, t o o l i t t l e o f his w o r k has b e e n preserved to take any m a t e r i a l f r o m
w h i l e o f a c e r t a i n c h r o n i c l e r n a m e d Judas ( 3 t h a n that h e actually existed.
67
rd
cent.) w e k n o w n o t m u c h m o r e
T h e loss o f such w o r k s is p e r h a p s due to the fact
t h a t c h r o n i c l e s , despite t h e h i g h esteem i n w h i c h t h e a u t h o r s were often h e l d , w e r e l a r g e l y c o n s i d e r e d Gebrauchsliteratur.
l o n g e r u s e d a n d copied. O c c a s i o n a l l y q u o t e d a n d c o n s u l t e d , the m o r e ancient w o r k s w e r e a l l eventually s u p e r s e d e d b y newer versions. R o m a n a n d B y z a n t i n e E m p i r e , a n s w e r i n g t o a b r o a d s p e c t r u m o f interests a n d needs. I t w o u l d be a m i s t a k e h o w e v e r to g r o u p such w o r k s u n d e r the title o f Tri68
Therefore, o u r first r e l e v a n t
author is Eusebius o f Caesarea, w h o also happens to be one o f the m o s t i m p o r tant.
4 . 1 . Eusebius Eusebius a l m o s t c e r t a i n l y k n e w Africanus r i g h t at the b e g i n n i n g o f his s c h o l a r l y
A s a g e n r e , chronicles w e r e v e r y p o p u l a r i n the G r e e k literature o f the Later
o r Monchschroniken.
71
T h a t is to say, as s o o n as a m o r e u p -
t o - d a t e a n d (allegedly) m o r e c o r r e c t c h r o n i c l e existed, t h e o l d e r ones were n o
vialliteratur
i t and collate i t w i t h o u r collection o f f r a g m e n t s .
W h i l e i t is t r u e t h a t s o m e chronicles were
m i n o r w o r k s w r i t t e n b y m o n k s , i t is also t r u e t h a t o t h e r w o r k s were c o m p o s e d b y a u t h o r s f o r m i n g p a r t o f a n i n t e l l e c t u a l elite, possessing h i g h l i t e r a r y a n d s c h o l a r l y a m b i t i o n s . I t was m e n b e l o n g i n g to such l o f t y g r o u p s , m e n such as Eusebius, Syncellus a n d M i c h e l t h e Syrian that i n v a r i a b l y h a d recourse to A f r i canus' c h r o n o l o g y . A l t h o u g h i n a f e w cases the ( d i r e c t o r i n d i r e c t ) use o f his c h r o n o l o g y also "sank d o w n " i n t o t h e l o w e r strata o f t h e genre, we are m o s t l y d e a l i n g w i t h s c h o l a r l y p r o d u c t s , w r i t t e n for an i n t e l l e c t u a l elite audience.
career. I f the m a n h a d n ' t inspired a n d fascinated h i m to some extent, i t w o u l d b e h a r d to e x p l a i n w h y , i n the wake o f A f r i c a n u s ' Chronographiae,
he b e g a n h i s
activity w i t h a s i m i l a r m o n u m e n t a l h i s t o r i c a l w o r k . A l r e a d y i n the first f e w l i n e s , Eusebius associates h i m s e l f w i t h the C h r i s t i a n chroniclers, m e n t i o n i n g b y n a m e C l e m e n t o f A l e x a n d r i a , Africanus, a n d T a t i a n ,
72
o f w h o m the second is d o u b t
lessly the m o s t i m p o r t a n t . The l i t e r a r y genre chosen b y Eusebius is t h a t o f Africanus. Eusebius also copied his basic c h r o n o l o g i c a l structure, a t t e m p t i n g t o b i n d together t h e v a r i o u s h i s t o r i o g r a p h i c a l t r a d i t i o n s o f the H e l l e n i s t i c a n d Semitic w o r l d a n d place t h e m i n a C h r i s t i a n perspective. I n m a n y p o i n t s , h o w ever, Eusebius succeeds i n m a i n t a i n i n g a c e r t a i n critical distance f r o m predecessor. T h i s applies b o t h to some h i s t o r i c a l details
73
his
and to the m o r e gene
G i v e n t h e p o p u l a r i t y o f t h e genre a n d the i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e o f the w o r k s
ral issue o f his w h o l e h i s t o r i o g r a p h i c a l c o n c e p t i o n : his most i m p o r t a n t i n n o v a
a m o n g t h e m s e l v e s , i t is v i r t u a l l y impossible to establish a n y k i n d o f stemma
t i o n is the p r e s e n t a t i o n o f the material i n t h e f o r m o f a series o f c h r o n o l o g i c a l
e x p l a i n i n g w h o c o p i e d w h a t a n d f r o m w h o m . T h e task becomes even harder
tables
because o f t h e h i g h l y f r a g m e n t e d state o f p r e s e r v a t i o n o f t h e w o r k s and, i n m a n y cases, t h e lack o f c r i t i c a l editions. A l t h o u g h a v i a b l e "stemmatization" w i l l always r e m a i n a n i l l u s i o n , t h e n u m b e r o f available e d i t i o n s has increased some
(Canones).
G i v e n t h e l i t e r a r y i m p a c t o f the Chronographiae
as a genre a n d a l l t h e c r i t i
c i s m i t received, i t is h a r d t o conceive t h a t Eusebius k n e w the w o r k o f A f r i c a n u s
w h a t i n t h e last decades. A h u n d r e d years ago, w h e n G e l z e r first attempted to e d i t the f r a g m e n t s , the s i t u a t i o n was d i r e . A l t h o u g h s o m e g o o d editions have appeared i n t h e m e a n t i m e ,
69
70
This applies, for instance, to ps. Sym. Log. (unpublished); Cedr.; ps. Eust, in hex.; Ioh. Scyth.,
71
O n Hippolytus'use of Africanus, see Bauer 1905,150-152 and Bauer 1955.XXVII.
72
T48a = Eus., c a n .
scholia in epp. Dion. Areop.
t h e s i t u a t i o n is still far f r o m satisfactory. Some o f
t h e w o r k s i n q u e s t i o n have n e v e r been edited, w h i l e o t h e r s are still o n l y available
HlCT
7,10-17. O n Eusebius' chronicle, see Schwartz 1907,1376-1384; Sirinelli
Eusebius considers, for example, his dating of Moses to the period of Cecrops as an important
According to Eus„ h.e. 6,7 his chronicle was inspired by the seventy weeks of Daniel; the author
chronological achievement. This is completely different from Africanus' system (Moses under
thought the coming of the Antichrist was near.
Ogygus, therefore c. 200 years earlier). Opinion also diverges concerning the duration of the
O n Byzantine chronicles in general, see Gelzer 2,129-410; Hunger 1978,1,257-278 (fundamen
period from the exodus to the building of the temple (T41) and the interpretation of the
tal, despite his classification under Trivialliteratur); Adler 1989; Rochow 1990; Croke 1990.
passage in the book of Daniel (9,24-27), also known as the "apocalypse of 70 weeks" (F78,
Already i n 1965 Hans-Georg Beck has shown that the so-called Monchschroniken
were not
T78a). O n both problems, cf. Adler 1992,471f and Adler 2006,148-150. In general, Africanus
necessarily written or primarily read by monks (Beck 1965).
seems much more confident about the possibility of establishing a coherent chronology on the
Since Gelzer, good critical editions have appeared for Eus., can."'"; Eus., h.e.; Io. Mai.; (ps.) Io.
basis of the Bible. H e tries to make everything fit into his system. This is why Adler 1992,479
A n t ; S y n c ; Sym. Log. and others.
speaks of "Africanus' dogmatism" as opposed to "Eusebius' reserve".
4. The Text and its Transmission
Introduction
XXXII
i n excerpts o r fragments
A s e c o n d obstacle i n e v a l u a t i n g t h e m a t e r i a l i n Eusebius' c h r o n i c l e is t h e
only. I n d e e d , i n a later w o r k he actually refers t o a
complete c o p y o f the c h r o n i c l e w h i c h h a d c o m e i n t o his possession,
74
a n d i t is
h i g h l y l i k e l y t h a t he h a d i t at his d i s p o s a l already w h e n he was w r i t i n g
the
XXXIII
heterogeneous w a y i n w h i c h he exploits his predecessor. I n some cases, he quotes h i m directly, m o s t l y i n o r d e r t o criticize h i m .
7 8
I n a f e w cases, the c r i t i q u e
recon
is n o t e x p l i c i t i n that he quotes i n a n affirmative way, b u t t h e n goes o n to a d d
s t r u c t i o n o f A f r i c a n u s ' w o r k , b u t for v a r i o u s reasons this treasure is n o t easy t o
i m p l i c i t c o r r e c t i o n s , w h i c h has a h a b i t o f r e n d e r i n g his quotes rather m i s l e a d i n g
rescue. T h e m o s t serious i m p e d i m e n t is t h e u n f o r t u n a t e t r a n s m i s s i o n o f Euse-
to say the least.
bius' text i t s e l f a n d t h e l a c k o f a s a t i s f a c t o r y m o d e r n e d i t i o n . T h i s
complex
those i n w h i c h Eusebius s i m p l y cites the h i s t o r i c a l m a t e r i a l o f his predecessor
essentially
w i t h o u t q u e s t i o n i n g h i m o r even m e n t i o n i n g his name. Such cases are d i f f i c u l t
consisted o f t w o p a r t s — t w o v o l u m e s as i t w e r e — w h i c h for the sake o f s i m p l i c i t y
to i d e n t i f y . Parallels d r a w n b e t w e e n the m a t e r i a l o f Syncellus, w h i c h are a t t r i
c h r o n i c l e . I t is f o r t h i s reason that h i s t e s t i m o n y is so precious f o r t h e
s i t u a t i o n r e q u i r e s s o m e e x p l a n a t i o n . T h e o r i g i n a l w o r k (Chronica) are here r e f e r r e d t o as Chronographia
75
a n d Canones.
The literary character o f
79
B u t b y far the biggest a n d m o s t d i f f i c u l t g r o u p o f citations are
butable t o A f r i c a n u s a n d passages i n Eusebius' chronicle are i n s o m e cases c o n 80
the f o r m e r w a s p r o b a b l y q u i t e s i m i l a r t o t h a t o f A f r i c a n u s ' o w n w o r k . A prose
clusive.
text w i t h m a n y i n s e r t e d tables, it c o n t a i n e d v a r i o u s historical t h e m e s w h i c h
w h i c h c o n t a i n r a t i o n a l i z i n g e x p l i c a t i o n s o f myths, are a l l p r o b a b l y taken f r o m
T h e series o f texts i n the Excerpta
were c o l l a t e d a n d p l a c e d i n t o d i r e c t r e l a t i o n s h i p w i t h one another b y m e a n s o f
A f r i c a n u s a n d s o m e t i m e s reveal s t r i k i n g parallels w i t h Eusebius. 82
Salmasiana
(ps. I o h . A n t . , fr. 2 * - 2 1 * ) , 81
A s for the v a
t h e o r e t i c a l d i s c u s s i o n s a n d s y n c h r o n i s m s . T h i s p a r t o f Eusebius' w o r k is o n l y
rious kings' lists,
preserved i n its e n t i r e t y i n an early A r m e n i a n t r a n s l a t i o n and i n a n u m b e r o f
to say w h e t h e r Eusebius c o p i e d t h e m f r o m h i m directly, o r w h e t h e r he t o o k
Greek f r a g m e n t s .
7 6
T h e latter p a r t / v o l u m e
constitutes
Eusebius' m a i n
inno
these a l l basically go b a c k to Castor, b u t often i t is i m p o s s i b l e
t h e m s t r a i g h t f r o m A f r i c a n u s . T h i s is w h y the Eusebian n u m e r a l s have b e e n 83
v a t i o n : a j u x t a p o s i t i o n o f the w h o l e h i s t o r y o f m a n k i n d f r o m A b r a h a m t o t h e
n o t e d i n the apparatus for each o f t h e relevant fragments.
present d a y i n a large table, c o n t a i n i n g several c o l u m n s for the v a r i o u s h i s t o r i c a l
o f A f r i c a n u s ' m a t e r i a l has b e e n i d e n t i f i e d i n Eusebius' c h r o n i c l e so far.
themes. U n d e r s t a n d a b l y ,
such a w o r k fascinated
Jerome,
apart
and,
fragments version.
77
therefore,
from
the
later authors, i n p a r t i c u l a r
Armenian
translation
and
some
o f t h e Greek o r i g i n a l , this p a r t is also preserved i n Jerome's L a t i n
I t is u n l i k e l y that a l l
I n o n l y o n e spectacular case has i t been possible to f i r m l y a t t r i b u t e m a t e r i a l o f t h i s category t o A f r i c a n u s . T h e latter concerns the l o n g list o f O l y m p i c v i c t o r s stretching
from
the b e g i n n i n g o f the
games to 0 1 . 249, w h i c h effectively
I t b e c a m e one o f t h e s t a n d a r d h i s t o r y b o o k s o f the L a t i n m i d d l e ages.
constitutes t h e o n l y s u r v i v i n g a n t i q u e list o f its k i n d (F65). T h e a t t r i b u t i o n to
F o r the p u r p o s e s o f the present e d i t i o n , i t has b e e n necessary, o n o c c a s i o n , t o
A f r i c a n u s was i n i t i a l l y s u r m i s e d b y Scaliger and a l t h o u g h some d o u b t s were
anticipate t h e w o r k o f a f u t u r e e d i t o r o f Eusebius, i.e. r e c o n s t i t u t i n g a t e x t o n t h e
recently cast over i t , a d e t a i l e d analysis demonstrates that the hypothesis
basis o f t h e G r e e k , L a t i n a n d A r m e n i a n witnesses.
carries a h i g h degree o f p l a u s i b i l i t y .
74
T3a = h.e. 6,31,2.
78
75
This terminology follows Fotheringham 1923,111—V, who has collected all relevant material and comes to the conclusion that this is closest to the sources, without claiming that Eusebius
76
T48a; T78a; mention without critique: T80a.b.c; F85. For Eusebius' critique of Africanus in general, see Adler 2006.
79
This is the case in F64d, where a verbatim quotation from Africanus is given (U. 1 I f = F64c).
actually used these titles. Schwartz 1907,1376 d i d not see the two parts as "two volumes", rather
The quotation is given with the intention of confirming, with his predecessor's authority, Euse
he considered the first part only an introduction to the main work which would be the YDOVIKO'I
bius' main point, namely the dating of the first Olympiad. Closer analysis, however, reveals that
Kdvovec,. T h i s was due to an exaggerated tendency to exalt Eusebius' originality.
the quoted text has nothing to do with this problem and that Eusebius actually disagrees with Africanus' dating (as Syncellus rightly pointed out, T64e).
The A r m e n i a n text is easily accessible in a G e r m a n translation in the GCS edition by Karst 1911; this does not, however, replace the useful edition of Aucher 1818, which is a sound work
80
F56;F81.
of scholarship, where the Armenian text is provided along with a literal Latin translation and
81
See Roberto 2005b and below, pp. X L ff.
with the corresponding Greek fragments. O n the Armenian text, see also Drost-Abgarjan 2006.
82
Africanus' material is partly preserved in the Excerpta Barbari; see below, pp. X X X V I f.
The G r e e k material still awaits a comprehensive modern analysis and edition. At present, the
83
A n additional problem is presented by the lists transmitted both in Armenian and in Latin in
best version can be found in Schoene 1875-76, 1,1-286 (especially the texts preserved in the
the context of the chronicle, although apparently neither of them belong to it ("regum series",
ms. Paris, gr. 2600, the so called Excerpta Eusebiana, collated by Paul de Lagarde, see p. X I I ) . The
not in Helm's edition, but in Schoene 1875-76, 1,19-40 [Appendix I B ] and Karst 1911,144-
value o f this edition is often underestimated; it is by no means superseded by Helm 1956 and
155).
Karst 1911. Although it is less reliable, the older Cramer edition also remains useful for the Ex
material.
cerpta Eusebiana, because it gives the whole relevant section o f the ms. Paris, gr. 2600 (ff. 193'77
still
84
84
They might derive from Eusebius' preparatory work in the form of a collection of
Scaliger's hypothesis won general acceptance until Mosshammer 1979,138-146 argued that if
219') i n its context. O n the codex see Christesen/Martirosova-Torlone 2006,41-43.
Eusebius had really had the list from him, he would have mentioned Africanus in the record of
Helm's G C S edition of Jerome's chronicle can be considered a masterpiece. Apart from the
sources that follows shortly after (Eus., chron. 125,8-25). However, this argumentum ex silentio
edition itself, the appendix should also be used, where Helm gives references in condensed form
remains weak. A n analysis of the historical notices contained within the list and a study of the
to many useful parallels (including the preserved Greek fragments).
transmission of the text suggest otherwise, see Wallraff 2006,50-53. The most recent study of
XXXIV
I n a s i m i l a r fashion, i t has also b e e n h y p o t h e s i z e d t h a t Eusebius used a list o f b i s h o p s , r e l a t i n g to the m o s t i m p o r t a n t sees, w h i c h was itself o r i g i n a l l y c o m piled by Africanus.
8 5
H o w e v e r , the a r g u m e n t a t i o n here is m u c h m o r e c o m p l e x
a n d a l t h o u g h the hypothesis c a n n o t be t o t a l l y r u l e d o u t , t h e evidence is m u c h t o o s c a n t y "to j u s t i f y its i n c l u s i o n i n t h e present e d i t i o n .
XXXV
4. The Text and its Transmission
Introduction
i n the A l e x a n d r i a n i n t e l l e c t u a l m i l i e u b y a reference to h i m i n the c h r o n i c l e o f A n n i a n u s ( T 3 9 b ) . A r o u n d the same t i m e , a G r e e k chronicle, c o m p o s e d i n A l e x a n d r i a d u r i n g the r e i g n o f Zeno or Anastasius a n d preserved i n a L a t i n e p i tome, referred to as t h e Excerpta
Barbari
t h
( 8 c e n t u r y ) , contains yet m o r e o f h i s
quotations.
86
E v e n i n Eusebius' later w o r k s , A f r i c a n u s always r e m a i n e d a n i m p o r t a n t i n t e l l e c t u a l m o d e l . However, a l t h o u g h h e c o n t i n u e d to use a n d q u o t e h i m , the t o n e b e c o m e s somewhat m o r e i r e n i c . I t w o u l d have b e e n pointless f o r Eusebius to stress differences i n c h r o n o l o g i c a l d e t a i l i n l i t e r a r y w o r k s t h a t n o longer per t a i n to t h e g e n r e o f a c h r o n i c l e . A l t h o u g h Eusebius still tends n o t t o agree w i t h e v e r y t h i n g A f r i c a n u s says, he n o w seems prepared to a d m i t at least that A f r i canus b e l o n g e d to the " m e n o f l e a r n i n g , second t o n o n e i n t h e c u l t i v a t e d class" (p. e. 1 0 , 9 , 2 6 ) , a n d that he was "no o r d i n a r y h i s t o r i a n " ( h . e. 1,6,2). M o r e o v e r , i n s o m e i n s t a n c e s he cites A f r i c a n u s i n l o n g e r passages w i t h o u t i n t e r r u p t i o n or c o r r e c t i o n . I n his theological w o r k s , t h e Eclogae propheticae, the Demonstratio
evangelica,
t h e Praeparatio
and
we have a s m a l l n u m b e r o f l e n g t h y quotations
b e l o n g i n g t o the most i m p o r t a n t a n d well-attested s u r v i v i n g texts. These are F34, w h i c h p r e s u m a b l y f o r m e d p a r t o f A f r i c a n u s ' prooemium
t o b o o k 3, a n d F93,
the i n t r i c a t e discussion o f t h e date o f t h e Passion a n d t h e R e s u r r e c t i o n o f C h r i s t . T h e q u a l i t y o f the text i n these cases is v e r y h i g h as can be i n f e r r e d f r o m parallels i n Syncellus.
87
4.2.1. Panodorus
and
Annianus
T h e m o n k s P a n o d o r u s a n d A n n i a n u s were b o t h w r i t i n g at the b e g i n n i n g o f t h e f i f t h century. A l t h o u g h t h e i r w o r k s d o n o t s u r v i v e , some general features
and
excerpts are k n o w n , m a n y o f t h e m c o m i n g t h r o u g h the quotations o f Syncellus. A p p a r e n t l y b o t h a u t h o r s attempted a n e w c h r o n o l o g i c a l system, c o n t i n u i n g a n d c o m m e n t i n g o n t h e w o r k o f their predecessors, A f r i c a n u s a n d Eusebius. Syncellus tells us t h a t Panodorus c o m p o s e d a universal c h r o n i c l e far s u r passing A n n i a n u s i n b o t h length a n d a s t r o n o m i c a l l e a r n i n g .
88
Establishing h i s
o w n r e c k o n i n g system, k n o w n as the A l e x a n d r i a n era, Panodorus c a l c u l a t e d 5493 years f r o m A d a m t o the I n c a r n a t i o n .
89
A n o t h e r i m p o r t a n t feature o f h i s
w o r k was the r e c o n c i l i n g o f pagan sources a n d scholarship w i t h b i b l i c a l c h r o nology. Syncellus c r i t i c i z e s h i m for some c h r o n o l o g i c a l errors (e.g. c a l c u l a t i n g 90
the b i r t h a n d t h e d e a t h o f Jesus) a n d he questions his o r t h o d o x y . I n his a t t e m p t to f o r m a n e w C h r i s t i a n c h r o n o l o g i c a l system, i t is h i g h l y probable that P a n o dorus t o o k an interest i n A f r i c a n u s ' Chronographiae
a n d that he k n e w his w o r k .
Unfortunately, this c a n n o t b e proved o n the basis o f the preserved m a t e r i a l .
91
A l t h o u g h A n n i a n u s m a y have been less i n n o v a t i v e than Panodorus, S y n
4.2. C h r o n i c l e s f r o m the A l e x a n d r i a n T r a d i t i o n
cellus v i e w e d his c h r o n i c l e far m o r e favorably. W h i l e c o n t a i n i n g m u c h o f t h e T h e c h r o n i c l e o f Eusebius s o o n b e c a m e a s t a n d a r d w o r k , a n d t o a large extent i t
same m a t e r i a l as P a n o d o r u s , it was less p r o l i x , s t r u c t u r e d , a c c o r d i n g to S y n
s u p e r s e d e d t h a t o f his predecessor A f r i c a n u s . However, interest i n t h e father o f
cellus, i n the f o r m o f tables o f 532-year Easter cycles. U n l i k e Panodorus, A n n i a
C h r i s t i a n c h r o n o g r a p h y s t i l l l i n g e r e d . I n t h e f i f t h century, t h i s interest is attested
nus also adhered t o t h e t r a d i t i o n a l d a t i n g o f t h e I n c a r n a t i o n i n A M 5500. A s a consequence, his w o r k exerted m o r e i n f l u e n c e t h a n that o f Panodorus, espe
the list (Christesen/Martirosova-Torlone 2006, appeared after our edition was finished) does
2
I n one preserved f r a g m e n t ( T 3 9 b ) , A f r i c a n u s is directly m e n t i o n e d . H e r e ,
useful information on the transmission of the text. Further studies of the list are by Moretti
A n n i a n u s criticizes Eusebius for forgetting to m e n t i o n the 40 years o f anarchy
1957 a n d Wacker 1998. 85
cially a m o n g Syriac c h r o n o g r a p h e r s . '
not discuss the question of authorship (see only p. 38f, quoting Mosshammer). However, it gives
The argument was developed with acumen and in detail by Harnack 1897,70-230 and Schwartz 88
Sync. 35,20-36,5.
struction of Africanus' list.
89
See Serruys 1907,251-260.
86
For a detailed analysis, see Wallraff 2006,53-56.
90
Sync. 378,5-10, see also 17,26f and 42,20-24.
87
I n the case of F93, there is also a double transmission within Eusebius' oeuvre. He quotes the
91
1903-09, 3 , C C X X V I I I - C C X L I I I . Harnack 1897,124-127 even gave a hypothetical
recon
O n Panodorus, see Unger 1867,40f, Gelzer 2,189-204 (in particular 190f on the originality of
same passage both in his Eclogae propheticae, dating to around 305 and his Demonstratio
his work), Seel 1949, and, more recently, Adler 1983, Adler 1989,97-101. Expanding an hypo
evangelica ca. ten years later (for the dating, see Winkelmann 1991,188-191). However, this
thesis of Unger, Gelzer asserts that the main sources of Panodorus were Africanus, Eusebius
doublet is no check on the quality of the transmission, because it is quite possible that in the
and Dexippus. Furthermore, he presumes that the excerpts of these authors came to Annianus
second case Eusebius took the quotation from his older work (rather than looking it up again in
and to Syncellus mainly through Panodorus, see, e.g., his hypothesis on the transmission of
the original). Another fragment is transmitted in the Church history (F87, The Father of Herod,
Africanus' list of Egyptian kings to Syncellus via Panodorus, 196-198. This view is basically
again w i t h a doublet in the Eclogae), a rather short text, where the positive judgment on the
shared by Mosshammer 1979.77f.81.147; cf., however, Seel 1949,633f and Adler 1989,101-105, who are much more cautious (see also below, pp. X L I I ff).
quality o f the transmission has to be attenuated: considerable differences between Eusebius and Syncellus appear and it is impossible to know which author modified the original wording.
92
See Adler 1989,102f. For Annianus' chronological system, see Serruys 1907,260-262.
XXXVI
XXXVII
4. The Text and its Transmission
Introduction
after the d e a t h o f S a m s o n the judge. O n the o t h e r h a n d , he affirms that A f r i
goes back t o h i m t h a n w h a t is d i r e c t l y a t t r i b u t e d b y means o f e x p l i c i t q u o t a t i o n .
canus was r i g h t i n i n s e r t i n g these years i n the t o t a l s u m o f his chronography.
As a result, each list has been discussed separately, the specific reasons for each
T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n is i n t e r e s t i n g for t w o reasons. F i r s t l y , i t shows that A n n i a n u s ,
a t t r i b u t i o n b e i n g p r o v i d e d i n the notes t o the translation to the text. I n w h a t
who
follows s o m e general c r i t e r i a are g i v e n :
was w r i t i n g i n A l e x a n d r i a at the t i m e o f b i s h o p T h e o p h i l u s ( 3 8 8 - 4 1 6 ) , for his o w n c h r o n o l o g i c a l calculations.
1) T h e l i s t o f the Sicyonians (F51a) is explicitly attributed to A f r i c a n u s . T h i s
Secondly, i t is m e t h o d o l o g i c a l l y remarkable t h a t A n n i a n u s used A f r i c a n u s t o
list w i t h its specific features can serve as a m o d e l for s i m i l a r m a t e r i a l i n the
k n e w and u s e d the Chronographiae
p r o v e the i n c o n s i s t e n c y o f Eusebius' c h r o n o l o g i c a l system. T h e same approach is
Chronographiae.
also f r e q u e n t i n Syncellus' c r i t i c i s m o f Eusebius.
s y n c h r o n i s m w i t h m a j o r events i n J e w i s h history. B o t h at the b e g i n n i n g a n d at
I t contains the n a m e s a n d dates o f kings w h o are r e c o r d e d i n
Regrettably, due t o t h e i r p o o r state o f p r e s e r v a t i o n , b o t h Panodorus a n d
the e n d o f the list there is an accurate c a l c u l a t i o n o f the years o f t h e k i n g d o m
A n n i a n u s a r e o f l i t t l e use f o r the concrete r e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f A f r i c a n u s ' c h r o n i c l e .
u n t i l the b e g i n n i n g o f O l . 1,1. W h e r e s i m i l a r features occur i n o t h e r lists w i t h i n the Excerpta
Barbari,
there is a s t r o n g l i k e l i h o o d that the i n f o r m a t i o n derives
from Africanus.
4.2.2. The E x c e r p t a B a r b a r i
2) Parallel texts i n o t h e r witnesses w h i c h explicitly m e n t i o n A f r i c a n u s a i d i n T h e Excerpta
Latina
Barbari
constitutes an 8* c e n t u r y L a t i n translation o f a n
earlier G r e e k c h r o n i c l e , w h i c h was c o m p o s e d i n A l e x a n d r i a d u r i n g the r e i g n o f Z e n o ( 4 7 4 - 4 9 1 ) o r Anastasius ( 4 9 1 - 5 1 8 ) . I t b e g i n s w i t h A d a m a n d breaks o f f a b r u p d y i n A D 387. T h e t r a n s l a t i o n was m a d e i n M e r o v i n g i a n France b y a n anonymous
author, w h o shows scarce k n o w l e d g e o f b o t h Greek a n d L a t i n .
Scaliger refers to h i m as a homo barbarus ritissimus,
ineptus
Hellenismi
h e n c e the c o n v e n t i o n a l name Excerpta
barbari,
et Latinitatis o r Barbarus
T h e text w a s first p u b l i s h e d b y Scaliger i n 1606, i n h i s Thesaurus
impeScaligeri.
Paris. Lat. 4 8 8 4 ) . T w o centuries later, the Excerpta
Barbari
had already s u r m i s e d that there was a c o m m o n A l e x a n d r i a n source for b o t h authors, p r o p o s i n g the lost chronicle o f A n n i a n u s as the i n t e r m e d i a r y . i n the Excerpta
Barbari
97
(where t h e y actually c a r r y the n a m e A f r i c a n u s ) are those dedicated to the A t h e n i a n s (F54) a n d the L a c e d a e m o n i a n s (F58). I n other cases, Syncellus can be
was e d i t e d once again, first b y
p a r t i c u l a r l y useful w h e n i t comes t o a t t r i b u t i n g list material o f the Barbari
the Excerpta
clearly belongs to a v e r s i o n o f Manetho's list. T h e t o t a l n u m b e r o f
years a t t r i b u t e d t o the d u r a t i o n o f each dynasty i n the Excerpta
was a n i m p o r t a n t text for t h e u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f the C h r i s t i
comes f r o m the t r a d i t i o n o f the Chronographiae
Barbari
96
A l t h o u g h t h e section does n o t derive f r o m A f r i c a n u s i n its entirety, m u c h m o r e
3) S o m e o t h e r lists can be a t t r i b u t e d t o A f r i c a n u s o n the basis o f a close pa rallel w i t h h i s c h r o n o l o g i c a l system. O n e decisive c r i t e r i o n is the e q u a t i o n O l . 1,1 = 1 A h a z . F u r t h e r reasons are e x p l a i n e d i n the notes to the t r a n s l a t i o n o f each list. It is also w o r t h r e m i n d i n g the r e a d e r that n o t all lists o f the Excerpta
nd
2
pagination, p. 44-70 (= 16S8,58-85); the quoted epithets are to be found in
the title. 94
95
O n the central value of the Excerpta Barbari in Scaliger's study of Christian chronology, see
the P t o l e m i e s ,
f o r example, are a l l i n c o n s i s t e n t w i t h the c h r o n o l o g i c a l system
pagination, p. 239 (reprinted and translated in Grafton 1983-93, 2,560f; the
280,14-330,3 Frick. This section has the form of an excursus; it is inserted between the historical account from Adam to Cleopatra (first part) and from Caesar to A D 387 (third part);
o f the
Excerpta
was u s i n g A f r i c a n u s i n d i r e c t i y , d r a w i n g f r o m an i n t e r m e d i a r y w o r k
w h i c h m i x e d A f r i c a n u s w i t h other sources.
text is missing in the second edition of 1658); Frick 1880,7f; Gelzer 1,137; Jacoby 1909,1570. 96
98
of A f r i c a n u s . T h i s observation suggests that the Grundschrift
lh
belong
to the t r a d i t i o n o f A f r i c a n u s . The L a t i n k i n g s , the list o f Seleucids a n d the list o f
Grafton 1983-93,2,560-569. For a general view of the text and its problems, see the preface in Scaliger 1606, 4
actually
(F46, see app. 3).
95
T h i s applies chiefly, t h o u g h n o t exclusively, to t h e s e c o n d part, w h i c h contains various l i s t s o f k i n g s , w h o s e a t t r i b u t i o n to A f r i c a n u s seems h i g h l y p r o b a b l e .
agrees
version o f t h e list o r i g i n a l l y c o m p o s e d b y M a n e f h o . A s a result, i t is n o t u n reasonable t o suppose that the E g y p t i a n list i n the Excerpta
g o o d k n o w l e d g e o f t h e A f r i c a n u s material, w h e t h e r i t be d i r e c t or i n d i r e c t .
Barbari
w i t h t h a t g i v e n i n the list w h i c h Syncellus explicitly identifies as A f r i c a n u s '
general a g r e e m e n t o n t h e fact that the a n o n y m o u s A l e x a n d r i a n c h r o n i c l e r h a d
Scaliger 1606, 2
Excerpta
t o A f r i c a n u s . Even i f h i g h l y a b r i d g e d , the list o f E g y p t i a n dynasties i n
an c h r o n o g r a p h i c t r a d i t i o n after A f r i c a n u s a n d Eusebius. I n d e e d , there is n o w
93
T h e lists
w h i c h show a s t r i k i n g affinity w i t h the t h o s e o f M a l a l a s
94
D e s p i t e t h e i g n o r a n c e o f the translator, Scaliger was q u i c k to p o i n t o u t t h a t the Excerpta
to h i m . It is i n t e r e s t i n g to n o t e
that such p a r a l l e l texts often come f r o m the chronicle o f John Malalas. Gelzer
93
Temporum,
u s i n g a c o p y ( n o w H a m b u r g M s . hist. 269) o f t h e o r i g i n a l m a n u s c r i p t ( n o w A . Schoene i n 1875 a n d t h e n b y C. F r i c k i n 1892.
the a t t r i b u t i o n o f some o f the lists i n t h e Excerpta
T h e relevant m a t e r i a l is not l i m i t e d , however, to just b a r r e n lists o f kings. The Excerpta
Barbari
also plays a n i m p o r t a n t role i n the r e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f A f r i -
300,13-302,29,316,19-320,2 and 320,3-21 Frick respectively.
XXXIX
Introduction
4. The Text and its Transmission
canus' u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f Greek h i s t o r y before a n d after 0 1 . 1,1. O c c a s i o n a l l y
O l y m p i a n Zeus, r e c o r d e d after a b r i e f reference t o the L a c e d a e m o n i a n a n d C o
h i s t o r i c a l n o t e s are i n s e r t e d into t h e lists o f k i n g s . A n o t h e r f r a g m e n t , w h i c h ex
r i n t h i a n kings.
XXXVIII
p l i c i t l y q u o t e s A f r i c a n u s as a source, gives a list o f famous G r e e k w r i t e r s , p h i l o sophers a n d (F81b).
artists w h o allegedly l i v e d u n d e r t h e Persian k i n g A r t a x e r x e s
A s i n other sources, t h e fact that Malalas quotes A f r i c a n u s does n o t necessa r i l y m e a n that he h a d d i r e c t k n o w l e d g e o f his w o r k . B y c o m p a r i n g d i f f e r e n t t r a d i t i o n s , such as M a l a l a s a n d the Excerpta
99
E v e n i f t h e a u t h o r o f t h e Excerpta
o n l y k n e w Africanus i n d i r e c t l y a n d even
i f t h e u n d e r l y i n g c h r o n i c l e is preserved o n l y i n a p o o r L a t i n t r a n s l a t i o n , the
Barbari,
las usually reduces the t e x t o f the Chronographiae
i t becomes clear that M a l a
t o scant a n d inaccurate i n f o r
m a t i o n . I n some o f his m o r e developed discourses, i t is n o t always clear w h a t
q u a l i t y o f t h e t r a n s m i s s i o n is s u r p r i s i n g l y h i g h . T h i s can be s h o w n i n F78 w h i c h
data Malalas is actually a t t r i b u t i n g t o Africanus as a source. T h e record o f t h e
deals w i t h t h e 70 weeks o f D a n i e l a n d w h e r e t h e w o r d i n g o f t h e Excerpta
f l o o d u n d e r Ogygus i n M a l a l a s 3,11 ( = T54c) reveals, for example, a c o n f u s i n g
seems
t h a n to t h e o n e i n Eusebius
c o n t a m i n a t i o n o f at least t w o sources. Even i f t h e w o r d s resemble those o f
(see n . 1 t o t h e t e x t ) . T h i s is a sign o f t h e h i g h q u a l i t y o f the f o r m e r t w o sources
A f r i c a n u s (see F54b f o r Syncellus' version), the q u o t a t i o n o f A f r i c a n u s o u g h t t o
w h i c h w e r e o t h e r w i s e c o m p i l e d i n d e p e n d e n t l y o f each other.
be s t r i c t l y c o n f i n e d to t h e r e c k o n i n g o f the n u m b e r o f years f r o m the f l o o d t o 1
to b e closer t o a parallel i n the Chronicon
Paschale
Cecrops. T h e statement t h a t Ogygus perished i n t h e f l o o d does n o t come f r o m A f r i c a n u s h i m s e l f (see F 3 4 , 3 8 f ) . E i t h e r i t comes f r o m another source or i t is t h e 4.3. C h r o n i c l e s f r o m the A n t i o c h e n e T r a d i t i o n
result o f confusion i n M a l a l a s ' r e a s o n i n g .
102
T h e general o p i n i o n is that Malalas o n l y k n e w A f r i c a n u s 4.3.1. John
Malalas
second-hand,
t h r o u g h an i n t e r m e d i a r y . H e does n o t adhere t o t h e c h r o n o l o g i c a l f r a m e w o r k o f
John M a l a l a s w r o t e a chronicle i n A n t i o c h d u r i n g the first h a l f o f t h e 6
t h
century.
the Chronographiae.
A f a m i l i a r i t y that was o n l y i n d i r e c t m i g h t also explain w h y
A second e d i t i o n ( o r version) o f h i s w o r k was c o m p o s e d i n C o n s t a n t i n o p l e after
Malalas seems to use i n f o r m a t i o n w h i c h o n l y deals w i t h t h e lists o f kings, f a i l i n g
the d e a t h o f Justinian i n 565. T h e c h r o n i c l e is eighteen b o o k s l o n g a n d deals
to quote A f r i c a n u s o n o t h e r matters. Gelzer p r e s u m e d t h a t t h e lost w o r k o f t h e
w i t h the p e r i o d reaching f r o m A d a m d o w n t o A D 565. A s e x p l a i n e d i n the
A l e x a n d r i a n A n n i a n u s was an i m p o r t a n t source f o r t h e first p a r t o f Malalas'
preface o f h i s w o r k , the Chronographia
chronicle.
o f M a l a l a s was d i v i d e d i n t o t w o parts.
103
T h i s t h e o r y c o u l d e x p l a i n the h i g h level o f concordance b e t w e e n
The first p a r t deals w i t h universal h i s t o r y f r o m t h e creation o f A d a m d o w n t o
Malalas a n d the Excerpta
the e m p e r o r Z e n o ( A D 4 7 4 ) . I n t h e s e c o n d p a r t , Malalas records t h e events f r o m
this is o n l y a hypothesis.
Barbari,
i n p a r t i c u l a r f o r t h e lists o f kings; however,
Z e n o d o w n t o his o w n d a y ( b o o k s 1 5 - 1 8 ) . T h e m a i n sources f o r t h e first p a r t were i n d i c a t e d i n the preface. A m o n g these authors, Malalas i n c l u d e d I u l i u s A f r i c a n u s t h e c h r o n o g r a p h e r ( T 1 0 ) . I n v a r i o u s passages i n b o o k s 2 - 8 , Malalas actually c i t e s h i m as a source.
100
M o s t o f t h e references to A f r i c a n u s c o n c e r n the lists o f k i n g s , i n p a r t i c u l a r those o f a r c h a i c Greece.
101
The l i s t o f t h e P t o l e m a i c dynasty f o u n d i n M a l a l a s
o u g h t also t o be considered as a n o t h e r A f r i c a n u s fragment ( F 8 6 ) . S o m e o t h e r texts a t t r i b u t e d to A f r i c a n u s p r o v i d e us w i t h different k i n d s o f i n f o r m a t i o n , b u t they are a l w a y s used i n a context w h i c h is l i n k e d t o the k i n g lists. E x a m p l e s are
4.3.2. John of
Antioch
John o f A n t i o c h w r o t e h i s Historia
chronica
i n C o n s t a n t i n o p l e at the b e g i n n i n g
o f t h e r e i g n o f H e r a c l i u s ( 6 1 0 - 6 4 1 ) . H i s k n o w l e d g e o f A f r i c a n u s is clearly second-hand; it d e p e n d s w h o l l y o n John Malalas t o w h o m he was closely rela ted. I t has also been o b s e r v e d that i n his first t w o b o o k s , J o h n o f A n t i o c h supple m e n t s Malalas' scant i n f o r m a t i o n o n biblical h i s t o r y w i t h another u n k n o w n C h r i s t i a n chronicle (e.g. t h e histories o f k i n g D a v i d a n d k i n g S o l o m o n ) . H o w ever, there is no evidence t h a t this second source p e r t a i n s to A f r i c a n u s o r to t h a t
F74 w h i c h r e c o r d s the Samian thalassocracy, together w i t h t h e conquests o f C y r u s , t h e first k i n g o f Persia, or F60 w h i c h deals w i t h the first festival o f the 102 Another significant example could be mentioned. Malalas relates that Africanus wrote on the kingdom of Thebes (see T61). However, this information follows a long excursus on the 99
For the Excerpta
Barbari as evidence for Greek history in Africanus, see Gelzer 1,118-137.
mythical history of Boetia and Thebes, which cannot automatically be attributed to Africanus
100 O n the relationship between Africanus and Malalas, see Jeffreys 1990,172f. For the importance
(see Io. Mai. 2,14-17). We know from other passages in the work (e.g. F34,90f) that Africanus
of Malalas' framework of the ancient past (from the creation to the Trojan war) and Byzantine
included some of these themes in his description of Greek history after Moses; but we have very
chronography in general, see Jeffreys 1979. A n excellent general introduction with recent
little evidence of them in the surviving fragments (F50,17f; F54a,17f). It seems, therefore, safer
bibliography on Malalas is Jeffreys 2003.
to include only the section of this long excursus, where Africanus is quoted by Malalas. For a
101 Sicyonians (F51b), Athenians (F54c), Lacedaemonians (F58b), Corinthians (F59b) and Thebans (T61). T h e same applies to the list of Lydian kings (F63b).
different perspective, see Gelzer 1,140. 103 Gelzer 2,137f.
Introduction
4. The Text and its Transmission
o f a c l o s e l y related c h r o n i c l e . I n d e e d , this source does n o t f o l l o w the c h r o n o
author o f t h e c o l l e c t i o n was, nor d o w e k n o w h o w these excerpts w e r e t r a n s
XL
logical system of Africanus.
1 0 4
Nevertheless, the t e x t o f J o h n o f A n t i o c h is s t i l l
u s e f u l , since i t occasionally offers a b e t t e r v e r s i o n o f M a l a l a s ' t e x t t h a n the c o d e x Baroccianus
182, w h i c h is t h e o n l y m a n u s c r i p t t o have c o m e d o w n t o us
XLI
m i t t e d , o r w h y t h e y w e r e connected t o t h e s e c o n d part o f the Excerpta siana, d e r i v i n g f r o m J o h n o f A n t i o c h .
Salma
1 0 7
Such p r o b l e m s d o n o t d i m i n i s h i n a n y w a y the i m p o r t a n c e o f these texts i n
b e l o n g i n g t o the d i r e c t t r a n s m i s s i o n i n Greek. A g o o d e x a m p l e is t h e c a l c u l a t i o n
the t r a n s m i s s i o n o f t h e Chronographiae.
o f t h e years f r o m t h e E x o d u s o f Moses u p t o the first year o f Cecrops i n A t h e n s .
identical t o s o m e w e l l - a t t r i b u t e d fragments o f A f r i c a n u s , q u o t e d b y Eusebius o r
W h i l e the c o d e x Baroccianus 182 attributes 270 years t o t h i s t i m e - s p a n , John o f
Syncellus. H o w e v e r , t h e transmission o f these texts is n o t d i r e c d y r e l a t e d t o
A n t i o c h , u s i n g his c o p y o f M a l a l a s , gives i t o n l y 206 years. T h i s n u m b e r
either Eusebius o r Syncellus, since p a r t o f the m a t e r i a l has parallels o n l y i n o n e
c o r r e s p o n d s exactly w i t h t h e c h r o n o l o g y o f A f r i c a n u s ( T 5 4 c ) a n d allows us t o
o f the authors a n d n o t the other.
c o r r e c t t h e reference t o 208 years i n the Excerpta
Barbari
(F54a,4).
A s M i i l l e r p o i n t e d o u t , the excerpts are
108
T h e m a t e r i a l c a n be d i v i d e d i n t o t h e f o l l o w i n g groups: . fr. 1*: t h i s e x c e r p t i n c l u d e s three d i f f e r e n t texts, each o f w h i c h deals w i t h t h e
4.3.3. Anonymous T h e Excerpta
Material
Salmasiana
in the Excerpta Salmasiana (Ps. John of
c o n s t i t u t e s a c o l l e c t i o n o f texts c o p i e d b y C l a u d i u s
Salmasius at the b e g i n n i n g o f t h e 1 7 Vat.
Pal. 9 3 , 1 2
th
th
century f r o m a codex i n Heidelberg ( n o w
cent.). I t consists o f t w o groups o f excerpts, the first o f w h i c h
was p u b l i s h e d b y K a r l M i i l l e r , i n 1851 i n his Fragmenta rum,
Antioch)
Historicorum
Graeco-
v o l . 4 , as fr. 1, u n d e r t h e n a m e o f John o f A n t i o c h . I n a note o n the same
page, h o w e v e r , he e x p l a i n s t h a t these fragments d o n o t b e l o n g to John o f A n t i o c h , c o n t r a r y t o t h e s e c o n d p a r t , w h i c h does. F u r t h e r m o r e , he indicates t h a t t h e y d e m o n s t r a t e a clear c o n n e c t i o n w i t h the c h r o n o g r a p h i c t r a d i t i o n o f A f r i canus, Eusebius and Syncellus.
105
Gelzer considered t h e m as o r i g i n a l excerpts
f r o m b o o k s 3 a n d 4 o f t h e Chronographiae.
U n f o r t u n a t e l y , he neglected to c o n
sult the f o o t n o t e i n M u l l e r ' s e d i t i o n a n d assumed—falsely—that these excerpts c a m e f r o m J o h n o f A n t i o c h . A f t e r Gelzer, the Excerpta
Salmasiana
was generally
c h r o n o l o g i c a l r e l a t i o n s h i p between t h e E x o d u s o f Moses f r o m E g y p t a n d t h e first (F34)
year o f C y r u s i n O l . 55,1. C o m p a r i s o n w i t h the v e r s i o n o f Syncellus c l e a r l y s h o w s that the texts are t a k e n f r o m the Chronographiae
of
Africanus. • fr. 2*-22*: these texts deal w i t h Greek m y t h o l o g y a n d ancient h i s t o r y u p t o t h e first O l y m p i a d . A t first sight, there does n o t seem to be any evidence o f s o m e sort o f t e x t u a l c o n n e c t i o n w i t h any o f the s u r v i v i n g fragments o f A f r i c a n u s . H o w e v e r , several elements reveal a c e r t a i n a f f i n i t y w i t h the
Chronographiae.
These e l e m e n t s i n c l u d e the s t r u c t u r e , s o m e lexical features, the t o p i c s , s u c h as the r a t i o n a l i z i n g i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f m y t h s (e.g. the i n t e r p r e t a t i o n a c c o r d i n g to Palaephatus), a n d the attempt to create s y n c h r o n i s m s b e t w e e n G r e e k a n d Jewish h i s t o r y . • fr. 23*-30*: these texts c o m e f r o m the l i s t o f E g y p t i a n kings o f M a n e t h o i n t h e
was there
v e r s i o n o f A f r i c a n u s (F46). A s t r i k i n g c o n f i r m a t i o n o f this a t t r i b u t i o n comes
f o r e i n c o r r e c t l y seen as a k e y w o r k i n the t r a n s m i s s i o n o f A f r i c a n u s . T h e n e w
f r o m a n i n s e r t i o n w i t h i n the E g y p t i a n excerpts o f a t e x t a b o u t S e m i r a m i s ,
e d i t i o n o f J o h n o f A n t i o c h ( R o b e r t o 2005a) p u t them—faute de
queen o f A s s y r i a . T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n is attested i n the Chronographiae
c o n s i d e r e d t o derive f r o m J o h n o f A n t i o c h , whose Historia
t h e n a m e o f an a n o n y m o u s ps. J o h n o f A n t i o c h .
1 0 6
chronica
mieux—under
W e d o not k n o w w h o the
(in a
different s e c t i o n : F 3 4 . 5 1 - 5 3 ) . • fr. 3 1 * : t h i s s m a l l f r a g m e n t , dealing w i t h t h e late Seleucid dynasty, shows n o evidence o f a n y relationship w i t h A f r i c a n u s ; i n a d d i t i o n , A f r i c a n u s ' list o f
104
O n the problem, see Roberto 2005a,CXXX. For a different interpretation, cf. Sotiroudis
1989,145f. Quae hucusque depriscis Graecorum barbarorumque temporibus legimus optime conveniunt cum melioris notae chronicis Africani, Eusebii, Syncelli. Exspectaveris excerptorum istorum seriem iisdem ducibus iam ad certiorem historiam nos deducturam esse. At non ita se res habet. Nam quae deinceps in Salmasii codice leguntur, denuo redeunt ad antiquissimam Assyriorum, Aegyptiorum, Graecorum memoriam, eamque eodem plane modo explicant, quern ex deterioris farinae chronologis, ex Malala, Cedreno, similibus, bene novimus. Ad posteriorem hanc antiquae historiae expositionem pertinent, quae ex Ioanne excerpta praebent Tituli Constant. Tlepi ApeTfjc. et Uipi imjSov\Qv, nec non codex Paris. 1630. Quae quum ita sint, haud temere contendere mini videor Ex cerpta ista Salmasiana ex duobus chronicis fluxisse eorumque partem priorem, quam modo apposui, ab Ioanne nostro alienam esse. Miiller 1851,538, referring to his fr. 1. 106 First ed. in Miiller 1851, 538-540 as fr. 1, new edition: Roberto 2005a,556-575, which is followed here. See also Sotiroudis 1989,139-141, Roberto 2 0 0 5 a , L X X I V - L X X V I I , Roberto 2005b.
105
Seleucid k i n g s is lost. • fr. 32*: t h i s e x c e r p t , c o n c e r n i n g Aegialeus, k i n g o f Sicyon, is c o m p l e t e l y i n k e e p i n g w i t h A f r i c a n u s ' interest i n t h e archaic kings o f Greece ( F 5 1 ) . • fr. 33*-36*: t h i s g r o u p o f short texts derives f r o m Africanus' list o f v i c t o r s i n the O l y m p i c games (F65). • fr. 37*: t h i s e x c e r p t , d e a l i n g w i t h H o l o p h e r n e s a n d i d e n t i f y i n g Cambyses
as
N e b u c h a d n e z z a r I I , also comes f r o m A f r i c a n u s ( T 7 5 ) .
107 For a general discussion of the Excerpta Salmasiana, see Roberto 2005b. The whole collection has a 12 century terminus ante quern, when the manuscript Vat. gr. 96—the first codex con taining both groups of excerpts—was written. 108 A detailed analysis can be found in Roberto 2005b,271-288. th
XLII As
Introduction
regards the e d i t i o n o f A f r i c a n u s , the f o l l o w i n g c o n c l u s i o n s are p e r t i n e n t :
m o s t o f t h e first p a r t o f t h e Excerpta t r a d i t i o n o f the Chronographiae.
Salmasiana
XLIII
4. The Text and its Transmission
are d i r e c t l y c o n n e c t e d to t h e
em AEteux;) a n d t e x t u a l lacunae (e.g., Kal uex' oAtya, rat ue9' erepa). A n o r i ginally c o n t i n u o u s narrative o f the F l o o d ( F 2 3 ) survives i n Syncellus' c h r o n i c l e
Hence, t h e y are u s u a l l y q u o t e d i n apparatus 3
as t w o separate excerpts. The fact t h a t Syncellus describes a l e n g t h y passage o f
o f t h e e d i t i o n . T w o excerpts, w h i c h come f r o m the first p a r t o f Manetho's list i n
Africanus' c h r o n i c l e (F89) as an "epitome" i m p l i e s that i t was either a precis o f a
the
a n d w h i c h are absent i n Syncellus, are presented as a n
longer passage, o r a collection o f m a t e r i a l c u l l e d f r o m various places i n h i s
o r i g i n a l t e x t f r o m A f r i c a n u s (F43b a n d F44). A p a r t f r o m fr. 31*, w h i c h does n o t
Chronographiae
chronicle. Tables a n d lists o r i g i n a t i n g i n A f r i c a n u s ' chronicle m a y also have b e e n
b e l o n g t o A f r i c a n u s , t h e g r o u p o f excerpts d e a l i n g w i t h t h e m y t h i c a l h i s t o r y o f
condensed. A f r i c a n u s ' list o f the b i b l i c a l patriarchs f r o m A d a m t o A b r a h a m
Greece ( f r . 2*-22*)
probably c o n t a i n e d expository n a r r a t i v e t h a t Syncellus chose to exclude
s t i l l r e m a i n s dubious. Gelzer notes that m a n y
excerpts
(see
c o n c u r w i t h the a r g u m e n t s e x p o u n d e d b y A f r i c a n u s i n b o o k 3 as p a r t o f his
F16a, n . 1). A l t h o u g h Africanus' v e r s i o n o f Manetho's list o f E g y p t i a n k i n g s
discourse o n Greek m y t h i c a l h i s t o r y after Moses (see F 3 4 . 8 9 - 9 2 ) . F u r t h e r m o r e ,
probably i n c l u d e d the dynastic successions o f the d i v i n e a n d s e m i - d i v i n e r u l e r s
s o m e o f t h e excerpts r e v e a l v a r i o u s synchronisms b e t w e e n Greek a n d Jewish
before t h e F l o o d (cf. F43, n . 1), Syncellus o n l y transcribes the 30 dynasties o f t h e
h i s t o r y . A s a result, Gelzer was i n c l i n e d t o consider a l l these texts as fragments
h u m a n k i n g s o f E g y p t (F46).
of Africanus.
1 0 9
B u t since this c a n n o t be p r o v e n b e y o n d a l l reasonable d o u b t , t h e
A m b i g u i t i e s i n Syncellus' m e t h o d o f q u o t i n g sometimes m a k e i t d i f f i c u l t t o
t e x t s have n o t been i n c l u d e d here. Nevertheless, i t seems plausible, even likely,
ascertain t h e e x t e n t a n d literalness o f t h e source material taken f r o m A f r i c a n u s '
t h a t they d o i n d e e d s t e m f r o m A f r i c a n u s . O n e hopes t h a t m o r e evidence w i l l b e
chronicle. Use o f phrases such as K O T & 6e A 9 p i r a v 6 v or wc, cpr|criv 6 Acppncavoc,
f o r t h c o m i n g i n the f u t u r e , a l l o w i n g a m o r e secure a t t r i b u t i o n .
do not necessarily m e a n that Syncellus is q u o t i n g directly. C o m p a r i s o n w i t h other sources shows, for example, t h a t Syncellus' references to A f r i c a n u s ' a c c o u n t o f the m i r a c u l o u s t e r e b i n t h tree (F30a) a n d the ancestry o f H e r o d t h e G r e a t
4.4. G e o r g i u s Syncellus T h e Ecloga
Chronographica,
(F87b) were paraphrases. A n u n a t t r i b u t e d passage dealing w i t h the r u l e r s o f c o m p o s e d b y Georgius Syncellus i n C o n s t a n t i n o p l e
b e t w e e n t h e years 8 0 8 - 8 1 0 , is a c h r o n i c l e o f w o r l d h i s t o r y , b e g i n n i n g w i t h t h e creation.
110
W h e n Syncellus' d e a t h prevented h i m f r o m c o m p l e t i n g the w o r k , i t
was left t o a f e l l o w m o n k T h e o p h a n e s to c o n t i n u e t h e c h r o n i c l e f r o m the r e i g n o f D i o c l e t i a n d o w n t o h i s o w n day.
111
Because m u c h o f w h a t is k n o w n o f A f r i c a
the scope o f t h e c i t a t i o n can be a m b i g u o u s (cf. F19, F84). C o r r u p t i o n s o f A f r i c a n u s w i t h i n t h e w o r k o f Syncellus are m o s t c o m m o n i n the t r a n s c r i p t i o n o f n u m e r i c a l data. T h e o r i g i n a l numbers o f A f r i c a n u s ' i n t r i c a t e e x p o s i t i o n o f t h e calendar u n d e r l y i n g Daniel's apocalypse o f 70 weeks ( D a n i e l
contents, s t r u c t u r e a n d c h r o n o l o g i c a l f o u n d a t i o n depends to a large
9,24-27) are n o w a l m o s t irrecoverable f r o m Syncellus' faulty t r a n s c r i p t i o n o f t h e m ( F 9 3 , 7 0 - 7 7 ) . Emendations b y a later e d i t o r are p a r t i c u l a r l y noticeable i n
e x t e n t o n t h i s source. T h e a s s o r t e d m a t e r i a l t a k e n f r o m Africanus reveals v a r y i n g degrees o f e d i t o r i a l i n t e r v e n t i o n , r a n g i n g f r o m excerpts to epitomes, paraphrases a n d nia.
w i t h c h r o n o l o g i c a l i n f o r m a t i o n f r o m o t h e r sources. Even i n a t t r i b u t e d excerpts,
Chrono
n u s ' c h r o n i c l e survives o n l y i n Syncellus, the r e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f the graphiae'?,
Athens ( F 5 4 d ) conflates Africanus' c h r o n o l o g y o f the annual A t h e n i a n archons
testimo-
The h e a d i n g s o f several o f his excerpts i n c l u d e d e s c r i p t i v e s u m m a r i e s o f t h e
passage c o n t e n t s (F15, F 2 3 , F79, F 9 3 ) . I n t w o places, Syncellus ascribes A f r i canus' analysis o f c o m p a r a t i v e Greco-Jewish c h r o n o l o g y t o the t h i r d b o o k o f t h e Chronographiae
(see app. t o F34.38.104). D i r e c t q u o t a t i o n s f r o m A f r i c a n u s are
c o m m o n l y d i s t i n g u i s h e d w i t h f o r m u l a i c phrases, i n d i c a t i n g l i t e r a l c i t a t i o n (e.g.,
Syncellus' s u m m a r y o f Africanus' a c c o u n t o f t h e dissolution o f t h e P t o l e m a i c k i n g d o m ( F 8 9 ) . I n this passage, a c o r r e c t i o n o f Africanus' 300-year c h r o n o l o g y o f the Persian e m p i r e to "300 less t w o " (1. 54) harmonizes his r e c k o n i n g w i t h th
Syncellus' o w n system (see n . 4 ad l o c ) . A reference to the " 2 4 year a c c o r d i n g to the A n t i o c h e n e s " i n the same passage m a y be a later a d d i t i o n b y an e d i t o r o f Syrian p r o v e n a n c e (see 11. 66f and n . 7 a d l o c ) . I n his paraphrase o f A f r i c a n u s ' account o f t h e m i r a c u l o u s t e r e b i n t h tree, a t e r m for prayers u s e d
i n the
Byzantine l i t u r g y (rac, EicrsvdcJ has r e p l a c e d a reference t o b u r n t offerings (rac. eKcn:6u(3ac), w h i c h , a c c o r d i n g to A f r i c a n u s , w e r e p o s i t i o n e d o n the altar before
109
Gelzer"" and Gelzer 1,118-137.
the tree (F30a,10, cf. F30b,10). C o n f u s i o n a b o u t Africanus' use o f t h e w o r d
110
Critical edition by Mosshammer 1984. For an English translation, see Adler/Tuffin 2002. T h e
parousia
older C S H B edition of Dindorf 1829 is still useful. For discussion of Syncellus' use of and
words K a i tfjc avctaT&aswc. into a sentence d e a l i n g w i t h the b e g i n n i n g o f the
dependence on earlier authorities, including Africanus, see most recently Adler/Tuffin 2002,lxlxix. F o r the more important previous studies, see Mosshammer 1984,xxvi-xxx; Huxley 1981; Laqueur 1932; Gelzer 2,176-189; G . G . Bredow, Dissertatio de Georgii Syncelli Chronographia, in D i n d o r f 1829, 2,3-49; J. Goar, Praefatio, in Dindorf 1829,2,53-73. 111
Ed.de B o o r 1883-85. For an English translation of Theophanes, see Mango/Scott 1997.
p r o b a b l y accounts for the later a n d u n g r a m m a t i c a l i n s e r t i o n o f the
m i n i s t r y o f Jesus i n A M 5531 (F93,109f a n d n . 18 ad l o c ) . As he does w i t h his other sources, Syncellus frequently volunteers his o w n j u d g m e n t s o n A f r i c a n u s ' abilities as a c h r o n o g r a p h e r and a h i s t o r i a n . A f r i c a n u s '
XLIV
Introduction
4. The Text and its Transmission
XLV
date o f A b r a h a m ' s m i g r a t i o n t o C a n a a n ( T 1 6 p ) , the age that he assigns t o Jacob
n e w critical e d i t i o n b y Staffan W a h l g r e n is a w a i t e d .
w h e n he a r r i v e s i n M e s o p o t a m i a ( T 2 8 a ) , his c h r o n o l o g y o f the A r g i v e k i n g d o m
manuscripts are available, t h e t w o m o s t i m p o r t a n t b e i n g "Leo G r a m m a t i c u s "
( T 4 9 ) a n d h i s i d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f C a m b y s e s as Nebuchadnezzar
( T 7 5 a ) , a l l elicit
f r o m S y n c e l l u s the same o n e - w o r d r e a c t i o n : d6uvcn:ov. I n t e r e s t i n g l y , a few o f Syncellus' c o m m e n t s are e m b e d d e d i n t h e actual excerpt.
112
The w o r d dmcrrov
( " n o t c r e d i b l e " ) is added at the e n d o f A f r i c a n u s ' discussion o f h o w t e r m s such
a n d "Theodosius M e l i t e n u s "
117
115
O l d e r editions o f c e r t a i n 116
, a l t h o u g h the n a m e s are m o r e o r less a r b i t r a r y
a n d c a r r y n o h i s t o r i c a l w e i g h t . I n a few cases, t h e m a n u s c r i p t Vat. gr. 163 has also b e e n c o n s u l t e d .
118
A c c o r d i n g to s o m e earlier studies o n the q u e s t i o n , a text published u n d e r
as t h e "sons o f G o d " a n d the "daughters o f m e n " i n Genesis ( 6 , 2 - 4 ) m i g h t best be
the n a m e o f "Iulius P o l l u x " o r "ps. Polydeuces"
i n t e r p r e t e d ( F 2 3 , l l ) . I n addition, a refutation o f Africanus' dating o f the Exodus
S y m e o n Logothete t r a d i t i o n . However, Staffan W a h l g r e n has s h o w n that this t e x t
d u r i n g t h e r e i g n o f the E g y p t i a n k i n g A m o s i s appears t w i c e a n d i n i d e n t i c a l
is an independent p a r a l l e l source, w h i c h , i n the early parts—up to Julius Caesar
w o r d i n g i n A f r i c a n u s ' list o f E g y p t i a n k i n g s (F46,134f and n . 6 a d l o c ) .
—coincides w i t h S y m e o n . I t seems plausible, therefore, t h a t t h e text goes b a c k t o
T h e r o u g h a n d u n f i n i s h e d character o f the e d i t i n g o f some o f these excerpts supports
R . Laqueur's conjecture t h a t Syncellus' death p r e v e n t e d
him
from
119
was also considered part o f t h e
a c o m m o n source, c h r o n i c l i n g the p e r i o d f r o m c r e a t i o n u p t o the first c e n t u r y B C ; t h i s Grundschrift
c a n be h y p o t h e t i c a l l y d a t e d t o t h e 6
th
century.
120
For t h e
N o r should we
p u r p o s e o f o u r e d i t i o n , o n l y this text is relevant ( w i t h t h e one exception o f F 9 7 ) .
assume t h a t Syncellus o r the later m a n u s c r i p t t r a d i t i o n was solely responsible
A s an independent t e s t i m o n y for the chronicle o f S y m e o n Logothete, therefore,
c o m p l e t i n g t h e revisions to w h a t was r e a l l y o n l y a first d r a f t .
113
for t h e glosses, corrections, c o r r u p t i o n s a n d r e w o r k i n g s o f t h e t e x t o f A f r i c a n u s .
the text o f "Iulius P o l l u x " deserves particular a t t e n t i o n . Purely for the sake o f
A l t h o u g h a n e n t r y i n Photius i m p l i e s t h a t a complete copy o f t h e
Chronogra
simplicity, the latter has b e e n i n c l u d e d i n the siglum "Sym. Log". I n dealing w i t h
e x i s t e d i n C o n s t a n t i n o p l e ( T i l ) , i t is e n t i r e l y possible t h a t Syncellus'
these t w o sources, i t m u s t always be r e m e m b e r e d t h a t t h e consensus o f S y m e o n
phiae
k n o w l e d g e o f A f r i c a n u s depended o n a p r e v i o u s l y edited c o r p u s o f c i t a t i o n s , t r a n s m i t t e d t o h i m by intermediaries.
p r o p e r l y speaking a n d I u l . Pol. goes f u r t h e r back t h a n t h e 10* century. Gelzer has l o n g since u n d e r l i n e d the i m p o r t a n c e o f the Logothete c h r o n i c l e 121
for the r e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f the Chronographiae. 4.5. T h e L o g o t h e t e C h r o n i c l e a n d Related Texts T h i s t i t l e c o v e r s a n u m b e r o f B y z a n t i n e chronicles i n w h i c h i t is unclear w h e t h e r we are d e a l i n g w i t h a single m a n u s c r i p t , a n
A l t h o u g h the author
draws
heavily u p o n A f r i c a n u s , v e r y little o f the m a t e r i a l concerns e x p l i c i t l y a t t r i b u t e d quotations ( o n l y F24, F53, F97). I n the m a j o r i t y o f cases, the o r i g i n can b e sometimes independent
r e d a c t i o n o f a n existing w o r k , or an a u t o n o m o u s chronicle. Research o n these texts is s t i l l a t a p r e l i m i n a r y stage a n d therefore o n l y p r o v i s i o n a l s t a t e m e n t s are possible h e r e . A f u r t h e r p r o b l e m lies i n t h e fact that c u r r e n t research s t i l l tends to focus o n t h e latter p a r t o f these c h r o n i c l e s , at the expense o f t h e less o r i g i n a l earlier s e c t i o n s . B u t because the earlier parts are largely d e r i v a t i v e , t h e y are h i g h l y r e l e v a n t for the r e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f o l d e r w o r k s , i n c l u d i n g A f r i c a n u s ' .
ascertained
o n l y o n t h e basis o f parallel texts preserved elsewhere
(mosdy
Syncellus). I n such cases, the text o f Symeon L o g o t h e t e is placed i n the t h i r d apparatus o f the m a i n ( a t t r i b u t e d ) text. Obviously, w i t h such extensive, b u t u n a t t r i b u t e d use o f A f r i c a n u s , one c a n n o t help b u t conjecture that m u c h m o r e m a t e r i a l exists t h a n has actually b e e n identified t h r o u g h parallels w i t h external sources. T h i s is p r o b a b l y t r u e and m o r e fragments m i g h t be f o r t h c o m i n g i n t h e future, especially for t h e early parts, dealing w i t h the p e r i o d f r o m A d a m t o Abraham.
122
Nevertheless,
for m e t h o d o l o g i c a l reasons the present e d i t i o n
115 Wahlgren's edition appeared after completion of the work on our edition, see above p. V I .
4.5.1. Symeon
Logothete
th
116 Paris, gr. 1711,11 cent., ed. Bekker 1842.
The c h r o n i c l e b e a r i n g the n a m e S y m e o n Logothete runs f r o m t h e c r e a t i o n o f the w o r l d u p to the year 948 a n d was w r i t t e n presumably s h o r t l y after its e n d date i n t h e s e c o n d h a l f o f the 1 0
th
c e n t u r y . Previous versions c a n b e h y p o t h e -
tically r e c o n s t r u c t e d back to the t i m e o f Justinian I I ( t 7 1 1 ) a n d t h e year 8 4 2 .
114
T h e text h a s c o m e d o w n t o us i n o v e r t h i r t y different Greek m a n u s c r i p t s a n d a
117 Monac. gr. 218,11
th
cent., ed. Tafel 1859; for the name, see Rresten 1976,208-212.
118 Staffan Wahlgren kindly put a microfilm of this manuscript at our disposal. 119 Ironically, for this text there is a reliable edition on the basis of a late manuscript (Monac. gr. 181, 16* cent., used by Hardt 1792) and a flawed edition on the basis of the best manuscript (Ambr. D34 sup., 11
th
cent., used by Bianconi 1795). Because of the important Milan
manuscript, this text has also been called Chronicum Ambrosianum—ceftzmbf
a better name
than the ones used i n the two editions. O n names, transmission and editions, see Kresten 1969. 120 Wahlgren 2003. These findings were partially anticipated by Gelzer (unpublished), who at the beginning of his manuscript gave the reconstruction of an "Epitome der jiidischen Geschichte" 112 For further discussion, see Laqueur 1932,1389.
5
(Gelzer™ , file 1, section A ) .
113 Laqueur 1932,1407.
121 Gelzer 1,57-72.
114 See K a z h d a n 1991; Wahlgren 2006.
122 See Wallraff 2006,56-58.
XLVI
Introduction
4. The Text and its Transmission
XLVII
r e m a i n s c a u t i o u s . W h e r e there is neither a n e x p l i c i t a t t r i b u t i o n , n o r a d i r e c t
F24, w h e r e ps. Symeon a n d Cedrenus b o t h p r o v i d e us w i t h a m o r e elaborate
p a r a l l e l i n Syncellus o r elsewhere, cases i n w h i c h w e have actually been able t o
v e r s i o n , i n c o m p a r i s o n to that f o u n d i n Leo G r a m m a t i c u s a n d
a s c r i b e m a t e r i a l to A f r i c a n u s w i t h a sufficient degree o f c e r t a i n t y r e m a i n v e r y
Melitenus.
few(F25,F35,F76).
I n ps. Symeon-Cedrenus, the interest i n Africanus is p a r t i c u l a r l y f o c u s e d o n
I t is v i r t u a l l y i m p o s s i b l e to establish w h e r e S y m e o n Logothete (or r a t h e r h i s Grundschrift
Theodosius
125
f o r t h e early parts) t o o k the A f r i c a n u s m a t e r i a l f r o m . I t w o u l d
his a c c o u n t o f Jewish h i s t o r y d o w n u n t i l t h e B a b y l o n i a n captivity. H e b r e w ety m o l o g i e s also s e e m t o attract b o t h a u t h o r s ( F 1 6 d and, o n l y i n ps. S y m e o n , F 6 6 ) .
p e r h a p s b e p r u d e n t t o assume that he h a d s o m e s o r t o f i n d i r e c t k n o w l e d g e , working
with
other
chronicles
or handbooks.
Whatever
the
channel
of
t r a n s m i s s i o n , i t seems t o have been i n d e p e n d e n t o f o u r t w o other m a i n sources —Eusebius a n d S y n c e l l u s — m a k i n g it all the m o r e p r e c i o u s for the e d i t i o n o f Africanus.
ibn Qustantin),
B i s h o p o f M a b b u g , is the a u t h o r o f a u n i v e r s a l
and
al-'Unvdn
("book o f the title").
126
T h e b o o k chronicles the b e g i n n i n g o f the h i s t o r y o f m a n k i n d a n d extends as far
Cedrenus
th
as the author's o w n times ( 1 0 cent.). W h i l e the preserved m a n u s c r i p t s break o f f
A m o n g t h e B y z a n t i n e c h r o n i c l e r s , the s o - c a l l e d ps. S y m e o n a n d graphiae,
Agapius (Mahbub
history, w h i c h is k n o w n under the n a m e Kitab
4.5.2. Ps. Symeon
Cedrenus
4.6. O r i e n t a l A u t h o r s
also seem t o have h a d a g o o d k n o w l e d g e o f Africanus'
Georgius Chrono
i n 776/77, a r e m a r k o f the author shows t h a t he m u s t have at least g o n e as far as 941/42. L i k e Eusebius, Agapius associates t h e floruit
of Africanus ( T 3 b ) w i t h the
a l b e i t i n d i r e c t l y . Since Cedrenus w o u l d appear t o have taken n e a r l y a l l
e m p e r o r G o r d i a n I I I (238-244), a l t h o u g h his i n f o r m a t i o n seems i n d e p e n d e n t .
his m a t e r i a l f r o m ps. S y m e o n , the t w o authors c a n be treated together. I n o n l y
T h e fragments d e a l i n g w i t h the i n v e n t i o n o f t h e Hebrew alphabet b y Seth ( F 1 8 )
one case d o e s C e d r e n u s actually quote a text f r o m A f r i c a n u s that is n o t p r e
and t h e a r r i v a l o f the M a g i (T91) are unattested elsewhere. H o w e v e r , t h e e v i
served i n p s . S y m e o n ( F 9 3 , app. to 11. 3 - 1 9 ) . U n f o r t u n a t e l y , due to the l a c k o f a
dence is t o o scanty t o allow us to decide w h e t h e r or not A g a p i u s was a c q u a i n t e d
c o m p l e t e e d i t i o n o f ps. S y m e o n , establishing t h e exact relationship b e t w e e n t h e
w i t h t h e e n t i r e w o r k o f Africanus ( i n G r e e k ? ) .
t w o c h r o n i c l e r s is h a z a r d o u s .
bably e r r o n e o u s l y — a list o f the C h a l d e a n k i n g s to A f r i c a n u s .
127
Agapius also a t t r i b u t e s — p r o 128
T h e n a m e ps. S y m e o n refers t o a B y z a n t i n e c h r o n i c l e , w h i c h is preserved i n v
r
the m a n u s c r i p t Paris, gr. 1712, ff. 1 8 - 2 7 2 a n d deals w i t h the p e r i o d r u n n i n g f r o m A d a m d o w n t o t h e year 963. T h e text was p r o b a b l y w r i t t e n i n the last t h i r d o f t h e t e n t h c e n t u r y a n d represents a r e w o r k e d a n d e n r i c h e d version o f t h e chronicle o f Symeon Logothete.
123
I n o n l y one case does ps. Symeon p r o v i d e a
q u o t a t i o n f r o m A f r i c a n u s w h i c h is n o t taken u p b y C e d r e n u s (F66, d e a l i n g w i t h the i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f t h e t o p o n y m Tarshish). 124
stabulum
i n w h i c h he uses a l m o s t e v e r y t h i n g useful ( o r
useless) t h a t was available t o h i m i n the p r e c e d i n g B y z a n t i n e t r a d i t i o n . L i k e ps. S y m e o n , C e d r e n u s seems t o be acquainted w i t h A f r i c a n u s t h r o u g h t w o d i f f e r e n t channels. I n m o s t cases, he clearly relies o n Syncellus. I n t r a n s c r i b i n g Syncellus, he u s u a l l y changes h i s w o r d i n g , a b r i d g i n g t h e t e x t a n d often o m i t t i n g
126 See Graf 1947,39f; Breydy 1989; Pancenko 2000. The title derives from a scribal error in a late manuscript. T h e oldest preserved witness (ms. Sinai arab. 580, late 10
th
cent.) shows that the
original title was Kitab al-Tartkh ("book of history"). There are two editions of the work: C S C O
G e o r g i u s C e d r e n u s c o m p o s e d a w o r l d c h r o n i c l e f r o m A d a m to t h e y e a r 1057, a quisquiliarum
125 Along with F86 (the list of Ptolemies) this text could lead to the assumption that one possible channel of transmission of the Africanus material in ps. Symeon was somehow related to John Malalas.
65 arab. 10 (Cheikho) and PO 5,4-11,1 (Vasiliev, see below Conspectus, p. L X I X ) . For the first part (up to the birth of Christ) the manuscripts of both editions derive from Sinai arab. 580, for the second part both editions use the same manuscript. In the present edition Vasiliev was preferred, since he directly uses the Sinai manuscript (as opposed to Cheikho) and since he gives a critical apparatus. The quoted texts can be found in Cheikho in the following places: T3b at p. 269,15f, F18 at p. 13,16f,T 91 at p. 138,8-13.
to
127 A comprehensive analysis of Agapius' sources is lacking. The existing case studies show that
m e n t i o n t h a t A f r i c a n u s is the o r i g i n a l source (see, e.g., F23, F26, T 3 6 etc.).
Agapius often used Syriac sources or Syriac translations of Greek authors (e.g. Eusebius); see
A n o t h e r g r o u p o f q u o t a t i o n s is taken f r o m t h e c h r o n i c l e o f Symeon L o g o t h e t e or r a t h e r f r o m S y m e o n Logothete's source. A n i n t e r e s t i n g case is p r e s e r v e d i n
Baumstark 1912 and Lindner 1916. 128 P O 7,553,9 - 554,9 (Vasiliev); C S C O 284,12 - 285,3 (Cheikho). A similar list is also transmitted in Eusebius (chron. 5,24-33) as a quotation from Alexander Polyhistor (FGrHist 680 F4), and anonymously in Syncellus (18,11-20). I n Agapius, the list is inserted into a biblical framework, beginning with Adam and ending with the Flood. The beginning is in contrast with Africanus'
123 O n ps. Symeon, see Gelzer 2,357-384, Markopoulos 1978, and Kazhdan 1991c. Markopoulos has announced an edition of the chronicle, which is still awaited. 2
124 Scaliger 1658, 3 Kazhdan 1991a.
r i
pagination, p. 402. O n Cedrenus see Schweinburg 1929/30; Maisano 1983;
dismissal of the Chaldean tradition (F15,9f; see note ad loc), while the end is compatible with Eusebius' system, not with Africanus' (2242 years from the creation to the Flood). Therefore, it seems likely that Agapius took the text from a chronicle in the Eusebian tradition and erroneously attributed it to Africanus; see also the arguments in Wallraff 2006,48f, n. 17.
XLVIII
Introduction
4. The Text and its Transmission
M i c h a e l t h e Syrian, Patriarch o f t h e W e s t Syrian C h u r c h f r o m 1166 to 1199, was t h e a u t h o r o f a universal h i s t o r y e x t e n d i n g to 1 1 9 4 / 9 5 .
129
I n t h e preface, he
m e n t i o n s A f r i c a n u s as one o f his sources (T13a). H e considers t h e graphiae history.
Chrono
contact w i t h the t r a n s m i s s i o n o f the Chronographiae,
XLIX b u t at present this r e m a i n s
t o t a l l y u n c e r t a i n a n d n o concrete fragment can b e ascribed ( b e y o n d t h e monium
in T88).
testi
137
n o t a " C h u r c h history", b u t a "description o f time", i.e. a u n i v e r s a l 1 3 0
A m o n g Greek w o r l d c h r o n i c l e s , h e makes extensive use o f Eusebius,
b u t i n a f e w places he also refers to t h e c h r o n o l o g i c a l calculations o f A f r i c a n u s
4.7. M i n o r authors a n d texts
( T 1 6 f , T 7 7 b , T 8 3 ) . I n T 7 1 , he gives a v a g u e a n d otherwise unattested reference to A f r i c a n u s ' a c c o u n t o f the h i g h priest H i l k i a h . I t is u n c e r t a i n w h e t h e r M i c h a e l
4.7.1. Ps. Eustathius
of
Antioch
h a d d i r e c t k n o w l e d g e o f the w o r k o f A f r i c a n u s . His k n o w l e d g e m a y have been
T h e w o r k c o m m o n l y r e f e r r e d to as the " c o m m e n t a r y o n the hexaemeron", a n d
m e d i a t e d b y l o s t Syriac sources.
t r a n s m i t t e d u n d e r the n a m e o f Eustathius o f A n t i o c h , is actually p a r t exegesis
A l l r e f e r e n c e s t o A f r i c a n u s i n t h e w o r l d chronicle o f G r e g o r
Barhebraeus,
a n d p a r t chronicle. T h e u n k n o w n author was w r i t i n g s o m e t i m e between 370
m a p h r i a n o f t h e West Syrian C h u r c h ( 1 2 6 4 - 1 2 8 6 ) , can be t r a c e d b a c k t o M i c h a
a n d the end o f the 5* c e n t u r y . T h e fact that he was f a m i l i a r w i t h the h o m i l i e s o n
el t h e S y r i a n . I n his biblical c o m m e n t a r y Horreum
t h e hexaemeron of Basilius of Caesarea gives us a terminus
ten
around
1271/72,
131
Mysteriorum,
probably writ
there are t w o f r a g m e n t s o n the genealogy o f C h r i s t
( F 9 0 b . c ) w h i c h m a y derive f r o m the Chronographiae
of Africanus.
132
Since Bar
h e b r a e u s p r o b a b l y k n e w little Greek, i t is l i k e l y that he read the texts i n a Syriac translation.
1 3 3
terminus
c o m e s from an A n t i o c h e n e m i l i e u .
of Armenia,
Moses o f C h o r e n e
134
1 3 8
T h e author w o u l d appear to have k n o w n a n d consulted Africanus' graphiae,
I n his History
post quern, w h i l e a
ante quern is g i v e n i m p l i c i t l y i n the text i n F94. T h e w o r k p r o b a b l y Chrono
either d i r e c t i y o r t h r o u g h a t r a d i t i o n closely related to h i m .
1 3 9
Two
claims t o use A f r i c a n u s as a
quotations are i m p o r t a n t . I n the first instance ( F 3 0 b ) , his text can be j u x t a p o s e d
s o u r c e for a p o t e n t i a l l y l o n g text, b u t t h e v a l u e o f this a t t r i b u t i o n is d u b i o u s . I n
w i t h that of Syncellus, a l l o w i n g us to check his account o f the t e r e b i n t h tree i n
his s e c o n d b o o k , Moses refers t o the f i f t h b o o k o f the Chronographiae
as the
Shechem—taken f r o m A f r i c a n u s — b u t slightly e m e n d e d i n b o t h cases. A n o t h e r
m a i n s o u r c e f o r t h e h i s t o r y o f t h e A r m e n i a n kings. A f r i c a n u s is s u p p o s e d to
t e x t (F94), w h i c h gives precise i n f o r m a t i o n o n the c h r o n o l o g i c a l f r a m e w o r k of
have b a s e d h i s k n o w l e d g e o f A r m e n i a n h i s t o r y o n the archives o f Edessa, b u t c r i t i c a l r e s e a r c h n o w m o s t l y rejects t h i s .
1 3 5
A t t e m p t s at a s c r i b i n g at least p a r t o f
the m a t e r i a l t o A f r i c a n u s v i a t h e use o f G r e e k parallel texts r e m a i n u n c o n v i n cing.
1 3 6
Africanus, is o n l y p r e s e r v e d b y ps. Eustathius. T h e w o r d s K C U ctv&OTctaiv are p r o b a b l y a later gloss a n d s h o w that ps. Eustathius m a y have shared a s i m i l a r source w i t h Syncellus ( F 9 3 , 1 0 9 ) .
T h i s does n o t exclude t h e p o s s i b i l i t y that Moses m i g h t have h a d some 4.7.2. The C h r o n i c o n Paschale
129 See Weltecke 2003. 130 T h e preface does not survive in the Syriac original; it is known only in two Armenian trans lations, o n e written shortly after the other (between 1246 and 1248). The translations are based
T h e anonymous a u t h o r of the Chronicon
Paschale
(of ca. 630) uses some q u o
t a t i o n s f r o m A f r i c a n u s a n d exploits his c h r o n o l o g i c a l system for the p e r i o d
o n the S y r i a c autograph, but in both cases there are alterations, presumably intended to stress
before the F l o o d (see e.g., app. to F16b, F33). T h e m a t e r i a l f r o m the
the identity of the Armenian Church. T h e translation of the monk Vardan i n many cases
phiae w o u l d appear to c o m e d o w n to h i m v i a at least three different channels.
expands a n d elaborates the text (versio longior). T h e shorter version could be a correction and revision o n the basis of the original text, see Schmidt 1996 and 1998. Therefore, i n T13 the versio brevior
is given along with the additions of the other version in the apparatus.
His m a i n source is t h e chronicle o f Eusebius. I n some cases, the Paschale
transcribes
Eusebius
Chronogra 140
Chronicon
almost v e r b a t i m (see, e.g., F64c a n d T 6 4 d ) ,
131 See T a k a h a s h i 2005,92f.
a l l o w i n g us to restore t h e o r i g i n a l w o r d i n g . A n o t h e r c h a n n e l o f t r a n s m i s s i o n is
132 See below F 9 0 a , n . 1.
John Malalas. W h i l e u l t i m a t e l y derived f r o m A f r i c a n u s , the i n f o r m a t i o n about
133 T a k a h a s h i 2005,31-35.
t h e pagan gods preserved i n the Chronicon
134 T h e discussion on the date of the author and his work is still open. The work purports to be
through Malalas (see app. t o F 2 4 ) .
Paschale
was mediated to the a u t h o r
141
written at the beginning of the reign of Sahak Bagratuni (482). Scholarly debate has proposed dates w h i c h vary from the late 5
th
to the 9
th
th
century; possibly, a dating in the 7 / 8
Ih
cent, would
be the m o s t plausible, see Mahe 1993,88-91. 135 See e.g. T h o m s o n 1978,12f; Traina 1991,61-63. T h e information in Moses that is allegedly taken f r o m Africanus can mostly be traced back to other sources, Mahe 1993,66-68. 136 Topchyan 2001 has argued that large parts of Moses' book 2 are taken from Africanus. This has
137 See Wallraff 2006,49f, n. 20. 138 SeeZoepfl 1927. 139 SeeZoepfl 1927,22.
been rightly criticized by Terian 2001/02, esp. 113, n. 40. Topchyan has reacted to the criticism
140 O n the Chronicon Paschale and the Chronographiae of Iulius Africanus, see Gelzer 2,138-176.
i n his recent monograph (Topchyan 2006), where he presents the thesis in a moderate form.
141 O n the relationship between the Chronicon Paschale and Malalas, see Scott 1990,38f.
L
Finally, t h e r e is a t h i r d u n k n o w n source o f t h e Chronicon also p r e s e r v e s passages f r o m the Chronographiae.
LI
5. Earlier Editions
Introduction
Paschale
which
S t r i k i n g evidence o f t h i s c a n
legacy i n t h e d o m a i n o f ancient h i s t o r i c a l chronology. T h e research c o n d u c t e d by h i m f o r h i s m o n u m e n t a l Thesaurus
1
temporum "
was a m i l e s t o n e n o t o n l y f o r
be f o u n d i n F78. I n t h i s case, the i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f t h e seventy weeks o f A f r i
h a v i n g b r o u g h t A f r i c a n u s to light, b u t also for b r i n g i n g to t h e fore Eusebius a n d
canus is m e n t i o n e d t w i c e . I n the first instance, t h e source reproduces
Eusebius
various o t h e r m i n o r texts o f the G r e e k chronographic t r a d i t i o n . M a n y o f his
(T78a). I n the second
Chronicon
f i n d i n g s r e m a i n v a l i d a n d f u n d a m e n t a l u p to this day.
Paschale
instance (F78), the t e x t p r e s e r v e d by the
is i n d e p e n d e n t o f Eusebius, using w o r d i n g w h i c h w o u l d appear t o b e
v e r y close t o that o f A f r i c a n u s , as a c o m p a r i s o n w i t h the Excerpta
Barbari
shows. T h i s source is p r o b a b l y a lost c h r o n i c l e . G e l z e r assumed that i t was o f E g y p t i a n p r o v e n a n c e a n d suggested A n n i a n u s o r P a n o d o r u s .
the Excerpta
Barbari,
148
Scaliger also d i s c o v e r e d
whose c o n v e n t i o n a l name (still i n use t o d a y ) reflects h i s
pejorative v i e w o f i t . H e first p u b l i s h e d the O l y m p i c victor list o f c o d . Paris, gr. 2600, i n a s e c t i o n k n o w n as the Excerpta
Eusebiana.
Scaliger c o n t i n u e s t o b e
cited b y m o d e r n scholars, although t h e latter have a regrettable h a b i t o f q u o t i n g
142
h i m s e c o n d h a n d a n d thus not always correctly. Scaliger's significance for o u r u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f A f r i c a n u s c a n h a r d l y be
4.7.3. The A n o n y m u s M a t r i t e n s i s U n d e r t h i s n a m e a n a n o n y m o u s chronicle is k n o w n , w h i c h is t r a n s m i t t e d i n a M a d r i d c o d e x of the 10
th
c e n t u r y (Matritensis gr. 4 7 0 1 ) . T h e codex has b e c o m e
f a m o u s f o r t h e p r e c i o u s m a t e r i a l f r o m H i p p o l y t u s ' c h r o n i c l e preserved i n its s e c o n d p a r t ( f r o m f. 5 1 o n w a r d s ) . T h e i n d e p e n d e n t value o f the first p a r t
1 4 3
passed u n n o t i c e d f o r a l o n g t i m e , since this s m a l l c h r o n o l o g i c a l text g r e a t l y resembles t h e Chronicon
breve o f patriarch N i c e p h o r u s ( 8 0 6 - 1 5 ) . Hence, A d o l f
Bauer i n h i s first s t u d y o f t h e codex considered i t t o be a c o p y o f that w o r k .
1 4 4
W h e n he n o t i c e d h i s e r r o r s h o r t i y afterwards, he d e c i d e d t o prepare a s m a l l i n d e p e n d e n t e d i t i o n o f t h e text, i n w h i c h he t y p o g r a p h i c a l l y d i s t i n g u i s h e d t h e parts t a k e n
f r o m N i c e p h o r u s (italics) a n d t h o s e t a k e n f r o m other sources
T h e a u t h o r o f t h e t e x t m i g h t have been a m o n k o r a cleric i n C o n s t a n t i w a s w r i t i n g p r o b a b l y one o r t w o generations
(between 8 4 8 a n d 8 8 6 ) ,
1 4 5
after
Nicephorus
whose chronicle he u s e d as a basis a n d w h i c h h e
s u p p l e m e n t e d w i t h t h e f r u i t s o f his o w n studies. W h i l e N i c e p h o r u s a p p a r e n t l y d i d n o t k n o w a n d use A f r i c a n u s , his follower m u s t h a v e h a d some contact w i t h h i m — b e i t d i r e c t i y o r i n d i r e c t l y . U n f o r t u n a t e l y he does n o t n o r m a l l y n a m e h i s sources,
146
the r e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f the Chronographiae.
Nevertheless, Scaliger never made a n y
attempt at c o l l e c t i n g a n d editing the e x t a n t fragments o f the lost w o r k . O n t h e contrary, h i s e d i t i o n s o f manuscript m a t e r i a l , hypothetical r e c o n s t r u c t i o n s a n d scholarly considerations are often so m i n g l e d , they have p r o v o k e d m i s u n d e r standings a n d c o n f u s i o n i n later s c h o l a r s .
149
A generation later, the w o r k o f D i o -
nysius Petavius (Petau, 1583-1652) w a s a m a j o r achievement f o r research c h r o n o l o g y (Opus de doctrina
temporum,
w h i c h m a k e s i t d i f f i c u l t to i d e n t i f y t h e m a t e r i a l taken f r o m
Afri
canus.
to w a i t o v e r a c e n t u r y before they c o u l d consult the first c o l l e c t i o n o f fragments of the
Chronographiae. 150
has t h e m e r i t o f
being t h e first scholar t o publish s u c h a c o l l e c t i o n . However, this is about t h e only p o s i t i v e r e m a r k that can be m a d e o f it. H i s Bibliotheca
veterum
patrum
(14
vols., V e n i c e 1765-1781) is one o f a series o f comprehensive collections o f patristic texts, p r o d u c e d d u r i n g the 1 8
th
century. Its differentia
specifica
to other
m o n u m e n t a l enterprises resides i n t h e fact t h a t he devoted p a r t i c u l a r a t t e n t i o n to m i n o r authors, especially those t h a t h a d n o t been p u b l i s h e d p r e v i o u s l y , a m o n g t h e m I u l i u s Africanus. I n h i s second v o l u m e , d a t i n g t o
151
1766, h e
p u b l i s h e d t h e correspondence w i t h O r i g e n , the letter to A r i s t i d e s a n d n i n e t e e n fragments o f the Chronographiae,
m o s t o f w h i c h were d r a w n f r o m Syncellus,
a l t h o u g h s o m e came f r o m Eusebius a n d other sources.
5. Earlier Editions
on
1627). However, scholars w o u l d have
The Venetian Oratorian Andrea Gallandi (1709-1779)
( u p r i g h t ) . O n l y t h e l a t t e r are o f interest here. nople. H e
overestimated. I n his m o n u m e n t a l w o r k , he effectively lays d o w n t h e basis f o r
152
T h e w o r k was o f
course far f r o m complete, even b y t h e standards o f the texts k n o w n at that t i m e , a fact t h e e d i t o r h i m s e l f soon became aware o f w h e n he h a d t o w r i t e the preface
Joseph Justus Scaliger ( 1 5 4 0 - 1 6 0 9 ) was the first m o d e r n h i s t o r i a n to have f u l l y u n d e r s t o o d a n d a p p r e c i a t e d the i m p o r t a n c e o f I u l i u s A f r i c a n u s , b o t h f o r h i s c o n t r i b u t i o n t o the l i t e r a r y genre o f C h r i s t i a n c h r o n i c l e s as a w h o l e a n d f o r h i s
147 Scaliger 1606, a 2
nd
edition appeared posthumously in 1658, enlarged by notes left by the author.
148 O n Scaliger and the study of chronography, see Mosshammer 1979,38-41 and the brilliant book of Grafton 1983-93, especially 2,581-591 on Africanus. 149 Nevertheless Grafton 1983-93,2,591 is right in saying: "Scaliger's failures—if failures they were
142 Gelzer 2,154-156. r
143 f. l -29"; see Bauer 1909,69f for an analysis of the smaller texts between the two main blocks.
—can still teach lessons." 150 See Godet 1920. th
144 Bauer 1905,16.
151 O n the 18 century collections and on Gallandi in particular, see Bardenhewer 1913-32,1,50-52.
145 See Bauer 1909,XIIf and Sartori 1988,415.
152 Gallandi 1766,339-341 (letter to Origen); 341-357 (letter to Africanus); 358-362 (letter to
146 T h e only exception is the small discussion in 3,6-4,4 Bauer (= T16m).
Aristides, from Eus., h.e. 1,7); 363-376 (Chronographiae).
He knew nothing of the Cesti.
LII
Introduction
to t h e h u g e v o l u m e .
1 5 3
5. Earlier Editions
LIII
As a result, h i s i n t r o d u c t i o n to A f r i c a n u s c o m e s a l m o s t i n
w h o was to become o n e o f the greatest poets o f I t a l i a n literature. I n 1815, t h e 17
t h e f o r m o f a s u p p l e m e n t t o t h e e d i t i o n . I t is i n fact here t h a t w e f i n d t h e central
year o l d student, G i a c o m o L e o p a r d i ( 1 7 9 8 - 1 8 3 7 ) collected a l l the available m a
texts o f E u s e b i u s
terial b y and o n A f r i c a n u s . H i s w o r k is preserved i n a m a n u s c r i p t w h i c h is n o w
i n the Eclogae
propheticae
(F93), the L a t i n f r a g m e n t
first
156
p u b l i s h e d b y H e n r y D o d w e l l i n 1688 ( T 6 ) , the excerpt o f P h o t i u s ( T i l ) a n d
conserved i n the N a t i o n a l L i b r a r y o f F l o r e n c e .
various others.
edited i n 1997 b y C l a u d i o M o r e s c h i n i . L e o p a r d i was, o f course, unaware o f
I t is p a r t i c u l a r l y u n f o r t u n a t e t h a t t h e A b b d Jacques-Paul M i g n e decided to
R o u t h s e d i t i o n , w h i c h h a d appeared the year before. B u t i t is a m a z i n g h o w
Patrologia
comprehensive h i s k n o w l e d g e o f the sources was a n d h o w well he u n d e r s t o o d
( v o l . 10, c o l l . 6 3 - 9 4 ) . T h e sad consequence is that i n c e r t a i n cases this
the texts. The m a t e r i a l is rarely p r o v i d e d w i t h t h e f u l l Greek text, b u t carries
r e p r i n t t h i s e d i t i o n (rather t h a n t h e later e d i t i o n o f R o u f h ) i n h i s graeca
T h e m a n u s c r i p t was c r i t i c a l l y
d e f i c i e n t e d i t i o n continues to be u s e d a n d q u o t e d u p to t h i s day. I f the M i g n e
references to the e d i t i o n used; i n m a n y cases, L a t i n t r a n s l a t i o n a n d notes are
t e x t m u s t b e c o n s u l t e d , the i n t r o d u c t o r y remarks o f G a l l a n d i are indispensable
p r o v i d e d . A l t h o u g h h i s t r a n s l a t i o n a n d notes are s t i l l w o r t h y o f c o n s u l t a t i o n , t h e
a n d r e a l l y o u g h t to be read ( r e p r i n t e d o n c o l l . 4 5 - 5 0 ) .
w o r k was basically s u p e r s e d e d by R o u t h and Gelzer. T h e same c o u l d n o t be s a i d
A n e w e r a o f studies f o c u s i n g o n A f r i c a n u s is m a r k e d b y t h e f a m o u s O x f o r d scholar M a r t i n Joseph R o u t h ( 1 7 5 5 - 1 8 5 4 ) .
154
Renowned for his meticulous
p r e c i s i o n , h i s c o l l e c t i o n o f p r e - N i c e n e C h r i s t i a n authors, e n t i t l e d sacrae
Reliquiae
2
(4 v o l s . 1 8 1 4 - 1 8 , 1 8 4 6 - 4 8 ) , was c e r t a i n l y a major a c h i e v e m e n t a n d n o t
j u s t f o r t h e t e x t o f A f r i c a n u s . R o u t h s e d i t i o n o f the Chronographiae
remained
however o f the Cesti.
H e r e , L e o p a r d i has the m e r i t o f h a v i n g been t h e f i r s t
scholar to systematically engage i n an analysis o f t h i s enigmatic w o r k , w h i c h was t o t a l l y missing f r o m R o u t h s c o l l e c t i o n .
157
T h e last i m p o r t a n t c o n t r i b u t i o n to the research o n the Chronographiae
was
c o n d u c t e d b y H e i n r i c h Gelzer (1847-1906). Descendant o f an o l d Basel f a m i l y
the s t a n d a r d e d i t i o n for nearly t w o centuries, whereas i n a l m o s t a l l the other
o f scholars, he was a s t u d e n t o f Jacob B u r c k h a r d t i n Basel a n d later w e n t o n t o
cases his w o r k has been superseded b y better a n d m o r e r e c e n t e d i t i o n s . T h e
b e c o m e professor o f G r e e k at the U n i v e r s i t y o f Jena.
G r e e k t e x t s are a c c o m p a n i e d b y a L a t i n translation w h i c h is s t i l l occasionally
scholar o f classical p h i l o l o g y , his interests were s u r p r i s i n g l y w i d e , f o c u s i n g o n
useful, w h i l e t h e notes to t h e t e x t c o n t a i n m a n y significant c o m m e n t s o n m a n y
relatively late l i t e r a t u r e . Indeed, he is n o w r e g a r d e d as one o f the fathers o f
158
For a nineteenth c e n t u r y
p r o b l e m s o f t e x t u a l c r i t i c i s m a n d c h r o n o l o g y . I n difficult cases, these notes are
Byzantine studies. H i s passion for C h r i s t i a n c h r o n o g r a p h y a n d for I u l i u s A f r i
s t i l l w o r t h c o n s u l t i n g . T h e m a t e r i a l basis o f the e d i t i o n is g o o d a n d t h e m e t h o
canus i n p a r t i c u l a r g r e w i n the 1870's and r e m a i n e d w i t h h i m t h r o u g h o u t h i s
d o l o g y is n o t far r e m o v e d f r o m w h a t w o u l d be expected t o d a y a n d i n d e e d
entire scholarly career, r i g h t up to his death. T h e erudit made his debut i n 1880
a p p l i e d — w e hope—here. T h e m a i n c r i t i q u e w o u l d be that h e fails t o d i s t i n g u i s h
w i t h the first v o l u m e o f t h e magisterial m o n o g r a p h e n t i t l e d "Sextus Julius A f r i
b e t w e e n f r a g m e n t s a n d testimonia
a n d i n the case o f m u l t i p l e attestations (e.g.
canus u n d die b y z a n t i n i s c h e Chronographie." T h e o r i g i n a l idea was r e m a r k a b l y
Sync, a n d E u s . ) , his presentation o f t h e text is n o t always v e r y clear. Obviously,
ambitious: an i n i t i a l f i r s t v o l u m e o n A f r i c a n u s , a second v o l u m e p r o v i d i n g a
R o u t h h a d t o rely o n the best available e d i t i o n s o f his t i m e a n d i n m a n y cases a
general overview o f B y z a n t i n e chronography a n d a t h i r d c r o w n i n g v o l u m e c o n
b e t t e r t e x t u a l basis is n o w available.
t a i n i n g an e d i t i o n o f t h e extant fragments o f t h e "father o f C h r i s t i a n c h r o n o
R o u t h t o o k i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n 56 fragments, most o f w h i c h were i n Greek
graphy". A l t h o u g h the w o r k proceeded well u p t o v o l . 2 (1885), the e d i t i o n o f t h e
w i t h o n l y a v e r y few i n L a t i n . T h e present e d i t i o n contains a l m o s t d o u b l e that
extant fragments s o o n g o t bogged d o w n . Finally, i n 1894 A d o l f H a r n a c k , w h o
n u m b e r . T h i s was m a d e possible t h a n k s t o a c o m p l e t e analysis o f a l l the
was i n search for m a n u s c r i p t s for his n e w l y f o u n d e d series " D i e G r i e c h i s c h e n
a n d t h e O r i e n t a l material,
C h r i s t l i c h e n Schriftsteller", persuaded Gelzer t o a b a n d o n his o r i g i n a l p l a n o f
t o g e t h e r w i t h several texts t h a t w e r e o n l y p u b l i s h e d after R o u t h . O u r corpus also
p u b l i s h i n g the e d i t i o n as a final part o f t h e m o n o g r a p h ( w i t h Teubner i n
c o n t a i n s t h e O l y m p i c v i c t o r l i s t ( F 6 5 ) , a l o n g a n d i m p o r t a n t t e x t w h i c h was
Leipzig) and instead, p u t i t at the disposal o f t h e n e w series ( w i t h t h e p u b l i s h e r
available s o u r c e s , m o s t n o t a b l y t h e Excerpta
inexplicably missing i n Routh.
Barbari
H i n r i c h , also i n L e i p z i g ) .
1 5 5
A t l e a s t i n passing i t o u g h t t o b e m e n t i o n e d that at t h e b e g i n n i n g o f t h e 19
1 5 9
th
c e n t u r y , I u l i u s A f r i c a n u s also a t t r a c t e d the interested o f a g i f t e d y o u n g scholar 156 Banco Rari 342 n. 20; see esp. Moreschini 1997,20-31 and 65-116 for the Chronographiae. 157 See Vieillefond 1970,88-99. 153 G a l l a n d i 1 7 6 6 . X X X V I I - X L I . 154 O n his biography, see Hunt 1897.
158 The most comprehensive biographical account is Reichardt 1907, in particular 17-19 which deals with Africanus. See also the obituaries by Gerland 1907 and Kornemann 1907.
155 The r e a s o n could be that he did not trust the Greek text given by Scaliger. Only after the
159 Rebenich 1997,176. The monograph was concluded with a third volume (vol. 2,2, to be precise,
publication of the Armenian version was he convinced that the transmission was good and that
published at Hinrich's, Leipzig 1898 and much smaller than the two preceding parts) on the
the text actually ought to be attributed to Africanus (Routh 504f).
Oriental authors.
LV
6. Principles of the Edition
Introduction
LIV
Gelzer c o m p l i e d , b u t t h i s d i d n o t accelerate the' work's c o m p l e t i o n . O n
p r o b l e m a n d i t was this that made h i m reluctant to consign the m a t e r i a l to t h e
of the B e r l i n
printer. A s i m i l a r p r o b l e m also characterizes the published m o n o g r a p h . T h e
academy, w h i c h was r e s p o n s i b l e for the series, t o s u b m i t his m a n u s c r i p t a n d o n
latter s t i l l r e m a i n s the best and m o s t exhaustive w o r k o n A f r i c a n u s ' c h r o n i c l e
each o c c a s i o n he i n f o r m e d t h e c o m m i s s i o n t h a t t h e w o r k was near c o m p l e
and therefore c o n t i n u e s to be quoted—also i n the notes o f o u r e d i t i o n — b u t i t is
several occasions, he was i n v i t e d by the Kirchenvaterkommission
I n t h e m e a n t i m e , G e l z e r became r e c t o r o f his university, w h i c h o b v i o u s l y
fraught w i t h h i g h l y speculative suppositions, i n many cases presented i n an
f u r t h e r r e t a r d e d t h e w o r k o n A f r i c a n u s . Finally, i n 1906, he d i e d w i t h o u t h a v i n g
a p o d i c t i c t o n e o f certainty. B o t h the u n p u b l i s h e d m a n u s c r i p t a n d t h e p u b l i s h e d
tion.
1 6 0
c o m p l e t e d t h e e d i t i o n . A t t h e t i m e , n o b o d y h a d a clear idea o f h o w far the w o r k
m o n o g r a p h o u g h t t o be considered as extremely precious d o c u m e n t s , w h i c h
h a d really p r o c e e d e d a n d h o w m u c h still n e e d e d t o be done. The c o m m i s s i o n o f
attest t o a n u n p a r a l l e l e d , almost i n t u i t i v e f a m i l i a r i t y w i t h the m a t e r i a l , b u t also
the a c a d e m y was o f t h e c o n v i c t i o n t h a t t h e task was t o o difficult a n d since
to a l a c k o f m e t h o d o l o g i c a l clarity a n d systematic reflection.
c r i t i c a l e d i t i o n s o f i m p o r t a n t authors such as Eusebius a n d Syncellus w e r e missing, i t abandoned the project.
161
I n the year 2000, d u r i n g the p r e p a r a t o r y w o r k for the present Gelzer's m a n u s c r i p t
finally
6. Principles of the Edition
edition,
resurfaced. I t h a d b e e n k e p t i n the l i b r a r y o f Jena
U n i v e r s i t y a n d because i t h a d b e e n given a m i s l e a d i n g label, i t was t h o u g h t t o b e
Fragments
the m a n u s c r i p t o f t h e p u b l i s h e d m o n o g r a p h a n d therefore o f little interest. I t
illustrates t h e c o m p l e x i t y o f the t r a n s m i s s i o n o f extant m a t e r i a l f r o m the
was G r e g o r Staab w h o d i s c o v e r e d that i t was a c t u a l l y the long-awaited e d i t i o n .
nographiae.
N o t o n l y t h a t , b u t w h a t G e l z e r h a d w r i t t e n to H a r n a c k t u r n e d out to be l a r g e l y
h i g h degree o f c e r t a i n t y ; i n others t h e extent t o w h i c h the m a t e r i a l c o r r e s p o n d s
t r u e — t h a t t h e e d i t i o n was v e r y near c o m p l e t i o n . T h e m a t e r i a l is k e p t i n t e n
to t h e o r i g i n a l is unclear. T h e r e are still o t h e r cases i n w h i c h we k n o w f o r c e r t a i n
files,
162
t h e f i r s t t w o o f w h i c h c o n t a i n e d p r e p a r a t o r y w o r k for the e d i t i o n ; five
files t h e n f o l l o w , c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o the five b o o k s o f the Chronographiae,
suc
and
Testimonies.
T h e p r e c e d i n g discussion (see above, s e c t i o n 4) Chro
I n s o m e cases, we possess t h e o r i g i n a l w o r d i n g o f A f r i c a n u s w i t h a
that t h e t e x t has been altered, a b r i d g e d o r garbled. However, i t w o u l d be futile to s u b d i v i d e t h e m a t e r i a l into t o o m a n y d i f f e r e n t categories: each case needs to be
ceeded finally b y t h r e e files o f miscellaneous notes. W i t h i n t h e m a i n b l o c k (files
analyzed separately. Therefore, the present e d i t i o n has l i m i t e d itself t o the t w o
3 - 8 ) the q u a l i t y o f t h e m a n u s c r i p t deteriorates t o w a r d s the end. T h e first f o u r
m a i n categories o f "fragment" (F) a n d " t e s t i m o n i u m " ( T ) . Those texts t h a t i n c l u
b o o k s are i n reasonable c o n d i t i o n . The w r i t i n g is n o t always legible, b u t as a r u l e
de o r i g i n a l w o r d i n g o f Africanus are classified as "F". A l l others—viz. sources
the text is c l e a r a n d c o m p r e h e n s i b l e . T h e final b o o k c o m e s i n the f o r m o f d i s o r
w h i c h t a l k about
g a n i z e d a n d i n c o m p l e t e notes. I n keeping w i t h h i s r e p u t a t i o n , Gelzer h a d d o n e
Since t h e " F " category encompasses v a r i o u s degrees o f p r o x i m i t y to t h e o r i g i n a l
A f r i c a n u s rather t h a n q u o t i n g h i m — a r e considered as " T " .
an e x c e l l e n t w o r k o n t h e text. Since there was n o reliable e d i t i o n o f Syncellus at
text, readers are advised t o pay careful a t t e n t i o n t o the notes a c c o m p a n y i n g t h e
his t i m e , h e c o l l a t e d t h e t w o m o s t i m p o r t a n t m a n u s c r i p t s ( A and B i n M o s s -
E n g l i s h t r a n s l a t i o n . I n a strict sense, o n l y a p o r t i o n o f the excerpts designated
h a m m e r ) . I n m a n y t e x t u a l l y p r o b l e m a t i c cases, his e d i t i o n is w o r t h y o f c o n s u l
"F" t r a n s m i t A f r i c a n u s ' original w o r d i n g w i t h certainty. T h e highest degree o f
t a t i o n . T h i s has b e e n d o n e f o r the present e d i t i o n a n d wherever Gelzer's rea
confidence c a n be g i v e n to texts i n d e p e n d e n t l y attested i n t w o branches o f the
5
d i n g s seem t o have s o m e w e i g h t , they are registered i n t h e apparatus (Gelzer™ ). T h e m a i n p r o b l e m o f his w o r k , a n d p r o b a b l y t h e u l t i m a t e reason w h y he
t r a n s m i s s i o n ( F 3 4 a n d F93). Stylistic analysis o f the Chronographiae
w o u l d thus
have t o c o n s i d e r p r i m a r i l y these cases.
never c o m p l e t e d t h e e d i t i o n , lies i n his m e t h o d o l o g y . O v e r the years, Gelzer h a d c o c o o n e d h i m s e l f i n a fragile w e b o f theories, w h e r e one h y p o t h e t i c a l a t t r i b u
Columns
t i o n was t h e basis f o r a n o t h e r , w i t h the effect t h a t m a n y texts were a t t r i b u t e d t o
d i n g t o "clusters" o f contents; texts l i s t e d u n d e r the same n u m b e r p r e s u m a b l y go
and subdivisions
within
a fragment.
Fragments are n u m b e r e d accor
A f r i c a n u s , w h e n t h i s was n o m o r e t h a n j u s t a vague possibility. Some t h e o r i e s
back t o t h e same passage i n the o r i g i n a l text. I n a few cases, i t is possible t o
w e r e n o t i m p o s s i b l e , s o m e are even likely, b u t m a n y w e r e n o t sound e n o u g h to
r e c o n s t r u c t t h e w o r d i n g o f A f r i c a n u s o n t h e basis o f t w o or m o r e i n d e p e n d e n t
be p r e s e n t e d to t h e s c h o l a r l y w o r l d as a certainty. G e l z e r was clearly aware o f t h e
witnesses (e.g. F 3 4 ) . I n other cases, t w o o r m o r e texts cannot be u n i t e d i n t o a single h y p o t h e t i c a l o r i g i n a l . W h e r e the degree o f s i m i l a r i t y is sufficient, per t i n e n t texts are p r i n t e d i n parallel c o l u m n s (e.g. F30) and the extent to w h i c h t h e
160 Rebenich 2000,116 and 121; see also Rebenich 1997,186, n. 240. 161 Rebenich 2000,140 and 150. 162 See the more detailed description and reproduction of two sample pages in Kronung 2005. Par ticular thanks are due to Thomas Kronung, who compiled a full index of Gelzer's manuscript to facilitate access to the material in the project.
o r i g i n a l c a n be r e c o g n i z e d is expressed b y means o f italicization (see b e l o w ) . I n other instances the relationship b e t w e e n texts dealing w i t h the same topic cannot b e d e t e r m i n e d (e.g. F14). I n these cases, t h e texts are presented s e r i a t i m
6. Principles of the Edition
Introduction
LVI
LVII
u n d e r t h e s a m e n u m b e r w i t h a d d i t i o n a l l o w e r case letters. T h e same applies to
English. Texts p r e s e r v e d i n languages other t h a n Greek or L a t i n are t h e r e f o r e
all t h o s e t e x t s where the sequence is clear, b u t w h i c h m a y have b e e n d i v i d e d by
p r o v i d e d i n the best available translation i n a W e s t e r n language.
o t h e r l o s t e n t r i e s . Here also l o w e r case letters are assigned t o i n d i c a t e that they
I n m a n y cases, s e c o n d a r y evidence also c o m e s f r o m other
independent
b e l o n g t o g e t h e r (e.g. F16). O n l y w h e r e there is reason to t h i n k t h a t v e r y l i t t l e or
fragments. These texts are referred to w i t h an a r r o w (—>). A s a result, the t h i r d
n o t h i n g i s m i s s i n g b e t w e e n a d j o i n i n g b l o c k s o f text, are the texts l i n e d up under
apparatus provides t h e reader w i t h a n e t w o r k o f i n t e r - t e x t u a l references w i t h i n
the same n u m b e r , separated o n l y b y " [ . . . ] " (e.g. F46). L o w e r case letters are also
the
u s e d w h e n w e have one f r a g m e n t f o l l o w e d b y testimonia,
usually i n the f o r m of
d i s c u s s i o n o r c o m m e n t a r y b y v a r i o u s later authors (e.g. F 9 3 ) .
Chronographiae. 4. T h e apparatus o f attestation ( b e g i n n i n g w i t h "test.:") is e m p l o y e d w h e n
m o r e than one source attests to the same o r i g i n a l text (e.g. F34). I n such cases, the relevant source m a t e r i a l is listed i n the h e a d i n g o f the fragment a l o n g w i t h
Apparatuses.
2
the pertinent sigla u s e d i n the apparatus (e.g. "Eus.", "Sync. "). T h e f o u r t h appa
T h e four apparatuses are as follows, b e g i n n i n g f r o m t h e b o t t o m :
1. T h e c r i t i c a l apparatus is n o r m a l l y based o n the c o n s u l t e d e d i t i o n , b u t has
ratus specifies w h e r e a single source begins ("inc.") o r ends ("des."); w h e n t h e y
a c c o r d i n g t o o u r syntax a n d i n s o m e cases is slighdy
are o f interest, t h e w o r d s i m m e d i a t e l y before o r after the q u o t a t i o n are p r o v i d e d
a b r i d g e d . W h e n o u r r e a d i n g d i f f e r s f r o m the one f o u n d i n t h e e d i t i o n , the
here (rather t h a n i n s m a l l letters i n the m a i n text, as w o u l d be the case w i t h
been
standardized
d e c i s i o n o f t h e o r i g i n a l e d i t o r is d o c u m e n t e d i n the apparatus. T h i s can occur,
fragments that are attested b y one source o n l y ) . I n f o r m a t i o n about all available
for e x a m p l e , w h e n a d d i t i o n a l p a r a l l e l s m a k e i t possible to c o n s t i t u t e a text that is
witnesses is repeated at t h e b e g i n n i n g o f the apparatus o n each page. A f t e r t h e
p r e s u m a b l y closer to the o r i g i n a l t h a n t h e text o f the q u o t e d author. W h e r e
first m e n t i o n o f any g i v e n source, a list o f all manuscripts is given i n square
n e e d e d , a l i s t o f all relevant witnesses ( m a n u s c r i p t s ) is p r o v i d e d at t h e b e g i n n i n g
brackets (rather t h a n at t h e b e g i n n i n g o f the c r i t i c a l apparatus). N o t e that i n
o f t h e a p p a r a t u s i n square brackets (unless a f o u r t h apparatus is needed, see
these cases the c r i t i c a l apparatus indicates the readings o f single m a n u s c r i p t s
b e l o w ) . T h e sigla can be f o u n d i n t h e Conspectus
w i t h i n the t r a n s m i s s i o n o f one of the quoted authors i n the f o r m of "Siglum:ms."
siglorum
(pp. L X I X f f ) . W h e n a
(e.g."Sync.:A").
t e x t is d i v i d e d i n t o t w o c o l u m n s , t w o apparatuses m i g h t be r e q u i r e d . 2. T h e apparatus locorum
similium
d o c u m e n t s q u o t a t i o n s i n t h e text ( b o t h
b i b l i c a l a n d n o n - b i b l i c a l ) . References t o sources, parallels a n d users o f Africanus
Use of small
are also c i t e d , usually p r e c e d e d b y "cf." A b b r e v i a t i o n s f o r t h e q u o t e d w o r k s can
functions. T h e y can i d e n t i f y material w h i c h , a l t h o u g h n o t f r o m Africanus, gives
letters.
S m a l l letters i n the m a i n text o f a fragment serve t w o
be f o u n d b e l o w (pp. L X X I X f f ) . Texts t h a t use A f r i c a n u s are i n c l u d e d o n l y w h e n
helpful i n f o r m a t i o n o n t h e context (such as q u o t i n g formulations o r f u r t h e r
t h e y have l i t t i e or n o value f o r t h e c o n s t i t u t i o n o f the text; o t h e r w i s e they appear
discussion o f a n issue b y t h e q u o t i n g a u t h o r ) . M o r e rarely, they can i d e n t i f y
i n t h e t h i r d apparatus w i t h t h e f u l l t e x t .
parts o f the text w h o s e a t t r i b u t i o n to A f r i c a n u s is ambiguous. The latter case
3. T h e apparatus o f s e c o n d a r y t e x t u a l witnesses gives t h o s e texts w h i c h are
m i g h t occur w h e n i t is d i f f i c u l t to determine the precise e n d i n g o f a q u o t a t i o n
s e c o n d a r y t o the m a i n text, b u t w h i c h are o f some interest t o t h e r e c o n s t r u c t i o n
that begins w i t h a clear a t t r i b u t i o n . I n the case o f testimonia,
o f t h e o r i g i n a l w o r d i n g ( o r i n s o m e cases the c h r o n o l o g i c a l system) o f Iulius
used for those parts o f t h e t e x t bearing n o d i r e c t c o n n e c t i o n to A f r i c a n u s or his
small letters are
A f r i c a n u s . Typically, the m a i n t e x t w o u l d be explicitiy a t t r i b u t e d t o Africanus,
chronicle, b u t o f p o s s i b l e v a l u e to the context.
whereas t h e o r i g i n o f the s e c o n d a r y m a t e r i a l is less c e r t a i n . V e r b a t i m parallels w i t h t h e m a i n text often suggest t h a t t h e y originate f r o m t h e same source.
Use of normal
Because t h e m a i n text m i g h t i n s o m e cases be an e p i t o m e , these secondary
sources attesting t h e s a m e t e x t increases the p r o b a b i l i t y that i t reflects A f r i c a n u s '
print
and
italics.
T h e existence o f t w o o r m o r e
independent
t e s t i m o n i e s also sometimes c o n t a i n f u l l e r texts, possibly o f i n d e p e n d e n t value.
own
M a t e r i a l i n these sources w h i c h overlaps w i t h the m a i n text is i d e n t i f i e d i n up
phrases i n texts a p p e a r i n g i n facing c o l u m n s are p r i n t e d i n n o r m a l type; mate
r i g h t p r i n t ; t h e r e m a i n d e r is i n i t a l i c s (see b e l o w ) . I n t h e case o f testimonia,
r i a l not c o m m o n t o b o t h texts is italicized. W h e r e there are verbal c o r r e s p o n
the
o r i g i n a l w o r d i n g . T o indicate such agreements, overlapping w o r d s a n d
s e c o n d a r y witnesses are those texts w h i c h d r a w u p o n the m a i n text, a l t h o u g h it
dences between t h e m a i n t e x t and a secondary t e s t i m o n y ( i n the t h i r d appara
c a n n o t b e e x c l u d e d that t h e y also h a d i n d e p e n d e n t sources o f i n f o r m a t i o n . I n a
tus, see above), t h e s y s t e m o f italics and u p r i g h t p r i n t is used o n l y for t h e secon
few cases, t h i s apparatus also s u p p l e m e n t s testimonia
d a r y source. Italics are also used i n the first apparatus for variants i n L a t i n o r
the o r i g i n a l t e x t o f A f r i c a n u s , to w h i c h t h e testimonium
w i t h " l i k e l y candidates" for refers (e.g. T 3 6 ) .
other languages t o d i f f e r e n t i a t e f r o m the L a t i n language o f the apparatus itself.
W h i l e s o m e p a r t i c u l a r l y i m p o r t a n t witnesses appear i n t h e notes to the t r a n s l a t i o n , m a t e r i a l c i t e d i n t h i s apparatus is n o t n o r m a l l y r e n d e r e d
into
Introduction
LVIII Oriental
languages.
7. Bibliography
LIX
7. Bibliography
W h e r e t h e y appear i n t h e m a i n text, all texts preserved i n
O r i e n t a l languages (Syriac, A r a b i c , A r m e n i a n ) are r e p r o d u c e d i n the o r i g i n a l language. A s w i t h t h e G r e e k a n d L a t i n texts, t h e y are translated i n t o E n g l i s h o n
B i b l i o g r a p h i c a l abbreviations are a c c o r d i n g t o Schwertner 1992.
the facing page. H o w e v e r , w h e r e a d d i t i o n a l m a t e r i a l i n the apparatus is preser v e d i n o n e o f the O r i e n t a l languages, o n l y a t r a n s l a t i o n i n a Western language is
Adler, W i l l i a m , Berossus, M a n e t h o , a n d 1 E n o c h i n the W o r l d C h r o n i c l e o f Panodorus, H T h R 76,1983,419-442.
g i v e n ( u s u a l l y the m o s t recent available).
Adler, W i l l i a m , T i m e I m m e m o r i a l . A r c h a i c H i s t o r y and its Sources i n C h r i s t i a n Translation
and notes. T h e E n g l i s h t r a n s l a t i o n a i m s to facilitate access t o texts
t h a t are s o m e t i m e s d i f f i c u l t t o u n d e r s t a n d . I t also seeks to clarify h o w t h e editors h a v e u n d e r s t o o d the text a n d w h y t h e y have preferred certain s o l u t i o n s over o t h e r s . I n t h i s sense, the t r a n s l a t i o n is p a r t o f the critical e d i t i o n itself. O c c a s i o n a l l y , the E n g l i s h v e r s i o n m a y m o r e closely approximate to A f r i c a n u s t h a n the " o r i g i n a l text". Some sections o f the Excerpta barely u n d e r s t a n d a b l e
and
at best i m p r e c i s e
barbari,
for example, are
representations
of Africanus'
i n t e n t i o n s . O n t h e basis o f o t h e r Greek sources a n d some speculative c o m b i n a t i o n s , it is p o s s i b l e to p r o v i d e a n English t e x t t h a t is m o r e t h a n just a t r a n s l a t i o n I n t h e r e n d e r i n g o f p r o p e r names, the E n g l i s h t r a n s l a t i o n does not adhere t o s t r i c t rules o f t r a n s l i t e r a t i o n , p r e f e r r i n g i n s t e a d m o r e r e a d i l y recognizable L a t i n i z e d f o r m s . T h e s p e l l i n g o f p r o p e r names f r o m t h e H e b r e w Bible c o n f o r m s t o the p r a c t i c e o f t h e N e w Revised Standard V e r s i o n ( N R S V ) . For the sake o f c o n sistency w i t h usage elsewhere i n the e d i t i o n , t h e t r a n s l a t i o n a n d i n t r o d u c t i o n as "Iulius", even t h o u g h h e is better k n o w n to E n g l i s h
readers b y t h e n a m e "Julius Africanus". W h e r e t h e s p e l l i n g o f proper n a m e s is o b v i o u s l y c o r r u p t , as is o f t e n the case i n the Excerpta
s h i n g t o n D C . 1989. Adler, W i l l i a m , T h e O r i g i n s o f the Proto-Heresies. Fragments f r o m a C h r o n i c l e i n the F i r s t B o o k o f Epiphanius' P a n a r i o n , JThS 4 1 , 1 9 9 0 , 4 7 2 - 5 0 1 . Adler, W i l l i a m , Eusebius' C h r o n i c l e a n d Its Legacy, i n : Eusebius, C h r i s t i a n i t y , a n d J u d a i s m , ed. H . W. A t t r i d g e / G . H a t a , Leiden 1 9 9 2 , 4 6 7 - 4 9 1 . Adler, W i l l i a m , Sextus Julius A f r i c a n u s a n d the Roman Near East i n the T h i r d C e n t u r y , JThS 5 5 , 2 0 0 4 , 5 2 0 - 5 5 0 . Adler, W i l l i a m , Eusebius' C r i t i q u e o f A f r i c a n u s , i n : Julius A f r i c a n u s u n d d i e c h r i s t l i c h e W e l t c h r o n i s t i k , ed. M . W a l l r a f f ( T U 157), B e r l i n 2 0 0 6 , 1 4 7 - 1 5 7 .
o f t h e p r o b l e m a t i c L a t i n "original".
spell A f r i c a n u s ' nomen
C h r o n o g r a p h y f r o m Julius A f r i c a n u s to George Syncellus ( D O S 26), W a
barbari,
the t r a n s l a t i o n has
A d l e r / T u f f i n 2002: see Editores
et
emendatores
Alexakis, A l e x a n d e r , C o d e x Parisinus Graecus 1115 and Its A r c h e t y p e ( D O S 34), W a s h i n g t o n 1996. A u c h e r 1818: see Conspectus
s.v. Eusebius, C h r o n i c a
Bardenhewer, O t t o , Geschichte der a l t k i r c h l i c h e n Literatur, 5 vols., F r e i b u r g H913-1932. Bauer, A d o l f , D i e C h r o n i k des H i p p o l y t o s i m Matritensis Graecus 121 ( T U 14,1), L e i p z i g 1905.
s u p p l i e d t h e m o r e c o n v e n t i o n a l spelling o f these names f o u n d i n o t h e r w i t
Bauer 1909: see Abbreviationes
s.v. A n o n . matr.
nesses (e.g., Syncellus o r Eusebius).
Bauer 1955: see Abbreviationes
s.v. H i p p . , c h r o n .
For easier o r i e n t a t i o n , short E n g l i s h tides h a v e b e e n added to the f r a g m e n t s . These t i d e s have n o c r i t i c a l value a n d d o n o t p u r p o r t t o be fully descriptive o f the f r a g m e n t s ' contents. A n i m p o r t a n t p a r t o f the w o r k c o n d u c t e d b y t h e editors is d o c u m e n t e d i n the notes. T h e s e are n o t c o m m e n t a r i e s , i.e. m a n y i m p o r t a n t problems c o n n e c t e d w i t h the t e x t s are n o t discussed or even m e n t i o n e d . Likewise they d o n o t p r e t e n d t o give a c o m p l e t e r e c o r d o f recent ( o r n o t so recent) b i b l i o g r a p h y o n relevant issues. T h e i r r o l e is l i m i t e d t o g i v i n g f u r t h e r arguments for: a) q u e s t i o n s o f t e x t u a l c r i t i c i s m (especially w h e r e t h e y are t o o l o n g o r t o o c o m p l i c a t e d t o be dealt w i t h i n the apparatus) b) q u e s t i o n s o f a t t r i b u t i o n (especially f o r t h e relatively few cases i n w h i c h texts are n o t e x p l i c i t i y a t t r i b u t e d to A f r i c a n u s ) c) c o m p l e x c a l c u l a t i o n s o f dates etc. O n l y i n a few cases d o they also serve t o g i v e translations o f m a t e r i a l c o n t a i n e d i n t h e apparatus w h i c h w o u l d n o t n o r m a l l y b e translated.
Baumstark, A n t o n , D i e Lehre des romischen Presbyters Florinus, Z N W 13,1912, 306-319. Beck, H a n s - G e o r g , Z u r b y z a n t i n i s c h e n „Monchschronik", i n : S p e c u l u m historiale. Geschichte i m Spiegel v o n Geschichtsschreibung u n d Geschichtsdeut u n g , ed. C . B a u e r / L . B o e h m / M . M i i l l e r , F r e i b u r g 1965,188-197 ( = i d . , Ideen u n d Realitaten i n Byzanz. Gesammelte Aufsatze, L o n d o n 1972, N r . X V I ) . Bees, N i k o s A . , T d XEipoypacpa rtov Metecbpaiv. KardAoyoc, TteptypacptKOC, T W V
XEipoypcKpujv
KCOSIKCOV
T(I)v drTOKEiuevarv Etc, rac. uovdc, r t o v MExecopuiv.
1. T d x E i p o y p a f a Tfjc uovfjc M£Tauopc,, Athens 1967. Berendts, A l e x a n d e r , D i e h a n d s c h r i f t l i c h e Uberlieferung der Zacharias- u n d Joh a n n e s - A p o k r y p h e n . U b e r die B i b l i o t h e k e n der M e t e o r i s c h e n u n d OssaO l y m p i s c h e n Kloster ( T U 9,3), L e i p z i g 1904. Boeckh, A u g u s t , M a n e t h o u n d d i e H u n d s t e r n s p e r i o d e . E i n B e i t r a g zur Ge schichte d e r Pharaonen, B e r l i n 1845. de Boor, C a r l (ed.), T h e o p h a n i s C h r o n o g r a p h i a , 2 vols., Leipzig 1 8 8 3 - 8 5 .
Introduction
7. Bibliography
de B o o r , C a r l , Neue Fragmente des Papias, Hegesippus u n d Pierius i n bisher
Finegan, Jack, H a n d b o o k o f B i b l i c a l C h r o n o l o g y . Principles o f T i m e R e c k o n i n g
LX
unbekannten
Exzerpten aus d e r Kirchengeschichte des P h i l i p p u s Sidetes
( T U 5 / 2 ) , Berlin 1888,165-184. B y z a r i z u r n 500 n.Chr., B y Z 9 0 , 1 9 9 7 , 2 4 - 6 3 .
F o t h e r i n g h a m , John K n i g h t , T h e B o d l e i a n M a n u s c r i p t o f Jeromes Version o f t h e C h r o n i c l e o f Eusebius, r e p r o d u c e d i n c o l l o t y p e , O x f o r d 1905.
B r a t k e , E d u a r d , Das sogenannte Religionsgesprach a m H o f d e r Sasaniden ( T U 1 9 / 4 ) , L e i p z i g 1899.
F o t h e r i n g h a m , John K n i g h t (ed.), Eusebii P a m p h i l i C h r o n i c i canones latine v e r t i t , adauxit, a d sua t e m p o r a p r o d u x i t S. Eusebius H i e r o n y m u s , L o n d o n 1923.
B r e y d y , M i c h a e l , Agapius v o n M a n b i g u n d sein historisches W e r k , O r C h r 73, 1989, 9 0 - 9 6 .
F r i c k 1892: see Conspectus
s.v. Excerpta latina B a r b a r i
Frick, Carl, Beitrage z u r Griechischen C h r o n o l o g i e u n d Literaturgeschichte,
B r o o k e , A l a n E . / N o r m a n M c L e a n , T h e O l d Testament i n G r e e k , v o l . 1.4, C a m b r i d g e 1917.
Jahres-Bericht
i i b e r das K o n i g W i l h e l m s - G y m n a s i u m z u H o x t e r a n
der
W e s e r B , 1880,3-14.
Burgess, R i c h a r d W . ( w i t h the assistance o f W i t o l d W i t a k o w s k i ) , Studies i n Euseand
i n the A n c i e n t W o r l d a n d Problems o f C h r o n o l o g y i n the Bible, R e v i s e d e d i t i o n , Peabody 1998.
Brandes, "Wolfram, Anastasios 6 6iKopoc,. E n d z e i t e r w a r t u n g u n d K a i s e r k r i t i k i n
bian
LXI
Post-Eusebian
Chronography
(Historia. Einzelschriften
135),
S t u t t g a r t 1999.
G a l l a n d i , A n d r e a (ed.), B i b l i o t h e c a v e t e r u m p a t r u m a n t i q u o r u m q u e s c r i p t o r u m ecclesiasticorum, v o l . 2, Venezia 1766. Gelzer: see Editores
Burgess, R i c h a r d W , A p o l o g e t i c a n d C h r o n o g r a p h y . T h e A n t e c e d e n t s o f Julius A f r i c a n u s , i n : Julius A f r i c a n u s u n d d i e christliche W e l t c h r o n i s t i k , ed. M . W a l l r a f f ( T U 157), B e r l i n 2 0 0 6 , 1 7 - 4 2 . C a r r 1 9 2 5 : see Conspectus
Gelzer™: see Editores
gelia
emendatores et
emendatores
Gerland, Ernst, H e i n r i c h Gelzer, B y Z 1 6 , 1 9 0 7 , 4 1 7 - 4 3 0 . Goar
s.v. G r e g o r i u s Barhebraeus, C o m m e n t a r i u m i n Evan-
et
(m)
: see Editores
et
emendatores
Godet, P., Galland, A n d r e , i n : D T h C 6,1, Paris 1920,1095. Graf, Georg, Geschichte d e r c h r i s t l i c h e n arabischen Literatur, v o l . 2. D i e S c h r i f t -
C h r i s t e s e n , Paul/Zara M a r t i r o s o v a - T o r l o n e , T h e O l y m p i c V i c t o r List o f Euse b i u s . B a c k g r o u n d , Text a n d T r a n s l a t i o n , T r a d i t i o 6 1 , 2 0 0 6 , 3 1 - 9 3 . C r e h a n , J o s e p h , Africanus, Julius, i n : T R E 1, B e r l i n 1 9 7 7 , 6 3 5 - 6 4 0 .
steller bis zur M i t t e des 15. Jahrhunderts (StT 133), R o m a 1947. Grafton, A n t h o n y , Joseph Scaliger. A Study i n t h e H i s t o r y o f Classical Scholar ship, 2 vols. ( O x f o r d - W a r b u r g Studies), O x f o r d 1983-93.
Croke, B r i a n , The Origins o f the Christian W o r l d Chronicle, i n : History and H i s t o r i a n s i n Late A n t i q u i t y , ed. B. C r o k e / A . M . E m m e t t , S y d n e y 1983, 1 1 6 t h
131 ( = i d . , C h r i s t i a n C h r o n i c l e s a n d Byzantine H i s t o r y , 5 - 6 * Centuries, A l d e r s h o t 1992, I I I ) .
Harnack, Adolf, G e s c h i c h t e d e r altchristlichen L i t t e r a t u r bis Eusebius, 2. Teil. D i e C h r o n o l o g i e , v o l . 1, L e i p z i g 1897 ( r e p r i n t B e r l i n 1958). v o n Harnack, A d o l f , Julius A f r i k a n u s , der B i b l i o t h e k a r des Kaisers A l e x a n d e r Severus.in: Aufsatze, F r i t z M i l k a u g e w i d m e t , L e i p z i g 1921,142-146.
C r o k e , B r i a n , Byzantine C h r o n i c l e W r i t i n g , i n : Studies i n J o h n Malalas, ed. E. Jeffreys/B. C r o k e / R . Scott, S y d n e y 1 9 9 0 , 2 7 - 5 4 .
Geschichte des P h i l i p p o s v o n Side. M i t e i n e m
k o m m e n t i e r t e n K a t a l o g der Fragmente, i n : Julius Africanus u n d die c h r i s t
D e S a n c t i s , Gaetano, A T 0 I Z . S t o r i a della r e p u b b l i c a ateniese dalle o r i g i n i alia 2
eta d i Pericle. T o r i n o 1 9 1 2 .
liche W e l t c h r o n i s t i k , ed. M . W a l l r a f f ( T U 157), B e r l i n 2 0 0 6 , 2 0 9 - 2 4 3 . Hunger, Herbert, D i e h o c h s p r a c h l i c h e profane L i t e r a t u r der Byzantiner, 2 v o l s .
D i n d o r f , W i l h e l m (ed.), Georgius Syncellus et N i c e p h o r u s C o n s t a n t i n o p o l i t a nus, 2 v o l s . ( C S H B ) , B o n n 1829.
( H A W 12,5), M u n c h e n 1978. H u n t , W i l l i a m , Joseph M a r t i n R o u t h , i n : D N B 17, O x f o r d 1897,324-326.
Dittenberger, W i l h e l m / K a r l Purgold, D i e Inschriften v o n O l y m p i a (Olympia. D i e E r g e b n i s s e der v o n d e m d e u t s c h e n Reich veranstalteten A u s g r a b u n g 5), B e r l i n 1896.
Huxley, George L., O n t h e E r u d i t i o n o f George t h e Synkellos, Proceedings o f t h e Royal I r i s h A c a d e m y 8 1 c / 6 , 1 9 8 1 , 2 0 7 - 2 1 7 . Huxley, George L., A T h e b a n K i n g l i s t i n Malalas, P h i l o l o g u s 1 3 1 , 1 9 8 7 , 1 5 9 - 1 6 1 .
D r o g e , A r t h u r J., H o m e r or Moses? E a r l y C h r i s t i a n I n t e r p r e t a t i o n s o f the H i s t o r y o f C u l t u r e ( H U T h 26), T u b i n g e n 1989.
Inglebert, Herve, A p h r a a t e , le «sage persan». L a p r e m i e r e historiographie s y r i aque, Syria 78, 2 0 0 1 , 1 7 9 - 2 0 8 .
V e r s i o n der
E u s e b i o s - C h r o n i k , i n : Julius A f r i c a n u s u n d die christliche W e l t c h r o n i s t i k , ed. M . W a l l r a f f ( T U 157), B e r l i n 2 0 0 6 , 2 5 5 - 2 6 2 .
s.v. Eusebius, Canones
H e y d e n , Katharina, D i e Christliche
D ' A l f o n s o , Francesca, E u r i p i d e i n G i o v a n n i M a l a l a , T o r i n o 2 0 0 6 .
D r o s t - A b g a r j a n , A r m e n u h i , E i n neuer F u n d zur armenischen
H e l m 1956: see Conspectus
Jacoby, F r i e d r i c h , E x c e r p t a Barbari, i n : PRE 6,2, S t u t t g a r t 1909,1566-1576. Jeanjean, B e n o i t / B e r t r a n d L a n c o n (ed.), Jerome, C h r o n i q u e . C o n t i n u a t i o n de l a C h r o n i q u e d'Eusebe, annees 326-378, suivie de quatre etudes sur les c h r o -
Introduction
LXII
7. Bibliography
e
LXIII
niques et c h r o n o g r a p h i e s dans l ' A n t i q u i t e t a r d i v e ( I V - V P siecles), Rennes
Lepsius, C a r l R i c h a r d , K o n i g s b u c h der a l t e n Aegypter, B e r l i n 1858.
2004.
Lindner, Josef, Papias u n d d i e Perikope v o n der Ehebrecherin (Joh 7,53-8,11)
Jeffreys, E l i z a b e t h , T h e A t t i t u d e s o f B y z a n t i n e C h r o n i c l e r s t o w a r d s A n c i e n t Jeffreys, E l i z a b e t h , M a l a l a s ' Sources, i n : Studies i n J o h n Malalas, ed. E. Jeffreys/B. Jeffreys, E l i z a b e t h , T h e T r a n s m i s s i o n o f M a l a l a s ' C h r o n i c l e , i n : Studies i n J o h n
t i n a , R i v i s t a d i s t u d i b i z a n t i n i e slavi 3 , 1 9 8 3 , 227-248. M a n g o , C y r i l / R o g e r Scott, T h e C h r o n i c l e o f Theophanes Confessor. Byzantine
M a l a l a s , ed. E. Jeffreys/B. Croke/R. Scott, S y d n e y 1 9 9 0 , 2 4 5 - 2 6 8 . Jeffreys, E l i z a b e t h , T h e B e g i n n i n g o f B y z a n t i n e C h r o n o g r a p h y . John M a l a l a s , i n : Greek a n d R o m a n H i s t o r i o g r a p h y i n Late A n t i q u i t y . F o u r t h to S i x t h C e n t u r y
a n d N e a r Eastern H i s t o r y A D 2 8 4 - 8 1 3 , O x f o r d 1997. x
M a r k o p o u l o s , A t h a n a s i o s . ' H Xpovoypcupict T O U Feu6ocrup£(l)v Kcd o i Ttnysc, t q c , I o a n n i n a 1978.
A.D., ed. G. Marasco, Leiden 2003,497-527. Jeffreys, E l i z a b e t h / B r i a n C r o k e / R o g e r Scott (trans, a n d eds.), T h e C h r o n i c l e o f John M a l a l a s . A T r a n s l a t i o n (Byzantina A u s t r a l i e n s i a 4 ) , M e l b o u r n e 1986. Jeremias, J o a c h i m , G o l g o t h a , ed. V. H . K a n u s - C r e d e , A l l e n d o r f a n d e r
Eder
M o m i g l i a n o , A r n a l d o , T i m e i n A n c i e n t Historiography, i n : H i s t o r y a n d
the
C o n c e p t o f T i m e ( H i s t o r y and T h e o r y . Beiheft 6 ) , M i d d l e t o w n 1 9 6 6 , 1 - 2 3 . M o r e s c h i n i , C l a u d i o (ed.), G i a c o m o L e o p a r d i . G i u l i o A f r i c a n o . I n t r o d u z i o n e , e d i z i o n e c r i t i c a e note ( I s t i t u t o I t a l i a n o per g l i Studi Storici. Testi Storici,
2002.
K a r s t 1 9 1 1 : see Conspectus
velle t r a d u c t i o n de l'armenien classique, Paris 1993. Maisano, R i c c a r d o , N o t e su G i o r g i o C e d r e n o e la tradizione storiografica b i z a n -
C r o k e / R . Scott, S y d n e y 1990,167-216.
2
bei A g a p i u s v o n M a m b i g , Z K T h 4 0 , 1 9 1 6 , 1 9 1 - 1 9 9 . Mahe, A n n i e et Jean-Pierre, H i s t o i r e de l ' A r m e n i e par Moi'se de K h o r e n e . N o u -
History, Byzantion 49,1979,199-238.
F i l o s o f i c i e L e t t e r a r i 7), N a p o l i 1997.
s.v. Eusebius, C h r o n i c a
K a z h d a n , A l e x a n d e r P., Kedrenos, George, i n : O x f o r d D i c t i o n a r y o f B y z a n t i u m
M o r e t t i , L u i g i , O l y m p i o n i k a i . I v i n c i t o r i n e g l i a n t i c h i agoni o l i m p i c i , R o m a
2, N e w Y o r k 1 9 9 1 , 1 1 1 8 ( = K a z h d a n 1991a). K a z h d a n , A l e x a n d e r P., S y m e o n Logothete, i n : O x f o r d D i c t i o n a r y o f B y z a n t i u m 3, N e w Y o r k 1 9 9 1 , 1 9 8 2 f ( = K a z h d a n 1991b).
1957. M o s s h a m m e r , A l d e n A . , T h e C h r o n i c l e o f Eusebius and the Greek C h r o n o -
K a z h d a n , A l e x a n d e r P., S y m e o n Magistros, Pseudo-, i n : O x f o r d D i c t i o n a r y o f B y z a n t i u m 3, N e w Y o r k 1991,1983 ( = K a z h d a n 1991c).
graphic T r a d i t i o n , L e w i s b u r g 1979. M o s s h a m m e r 1984: see Conspectus
Kienast, D i e t m a r , R o m i s c h e Kaisertabelle. G r u n d z i i g e einer r o m i s c h e n Kaiserc h r o n o l o g i e , D a r m s t a d t 1990.
s.v. G e o r g i u s Syncellus
M o s s h a m m e r , A l d e n A . , T h e C h r i s t i a n E r a o f Julius Africanus. W i t h a n Excursus o n O l y m p i a d C h r o n o l o g y , i n : Julius A f r i c a n u s u n d die c h r i s t l i c h e W e l t c h r o
K l i j n , A l b e r t u s F r e d e r i c Johannes, Seth i n Jewish, C h r i s t i a n and G n o s t i c L i t e r a ture ( N T . S 4 6 ) , L e i d e n 1977.
n i s t i k , ed. M . W a l l r a f f ( T U 157), B e r l i n 2 0 0 6 , 8 3 - 1 1 2 . M i i l l e r , C a r l ( e d . ) , Fragmenta H i s t o r i c o r u m G r a e c o r u m , vol. 4, Paris 1851. Palmer, A n d r e w / S e b a s t i a n B r o c k / R o b e r t H o y l a n d , The Seventh C e n t u r y i n the
K o r n e m a n n , E r n s t , H e i n r i c h Gelzer, K l i o 7 , 1 9 0 7 , 3 0 2 . Kresten, O t t o , A n d r e a s D a r m a r i o s u n d d i e h a n d s c h r i f t l i c h e U b e r l i e f e r u n g des Kresten, O t t o , P h a n t o m g e s t a l t e n i n der b y z a n t i n i s c h e n Literaturgeschichte. Z u v i e r T i t e l f a l s c h u n g e n des 16. Jahrhunderts, J O B 2 5 , 1 9 7 6 , 2 0 7 - 2 2 2 . K r o n u n g , T h o m a s , D i e W i e d e r e n t d e c k u n g des M a n u s k r i p t s v o n H e i n r i c h Gelzer des Iulius
W e s t - S y r i a n Chronicles. I n t r o d u c e d , translated and annotated b y A n d r e w Palmer. I n c l u d i n g t w o seventh-century Syriac apocalyptic texts i n t r o d u c e d ,
zur k r i t i s c h e n E d i t i o n der Chronographien
M o r e t t i , L u i g i , I s c r i z i o n i agonistiche greche, R o m a 1953
Africanus,
in: Welt-Zeit.
C h r i s t l i c h e W e l t c h r o n i s t i k aus zwei J a h r t a u s e n d e n i n Bestanden der T h u -
translated a n d annotated b y Sebastian B r o c k w i t h added a n n o t a t i o n a n d a n h i s t o r i c a l i n t r o d u c t i o n b y R o b e r t H o y l a n d (Translated Texts f o r H i s t o r i a n s 15), L i v e r p o o l 1993. Pancenko, K . A . , A r a n w i i MaH6nfl)KCKHM, i n : npaBoaiaBHafl 3Hi(MioioneflMH 1, Moskva 2000,221.
r i n g e r U n i v e r s i t a t s - u n d L a n d e s b i b l i o t h e k Jena, ed. M . Wallraff, B e r l i n 2005,
Petau, D e n i s , O p u s de d o c t r i n a t e m p o r u m , 2 vols., Paris 1627 ( m a n y r e p r i n t s ) .
20-31.
Pilhofer, Peter, Presbyteron K r e i t t o n . D e r Altersbeweis der j t i d i s c h e n u n d christ-
Landes, R i c h a r d , Lest t h e M i l l e n n i u m Be F u l f i l l e d , i n : T h e Use a n d A b u s e o f E s c h a t o l o g y i n the M i d d l e Ages, ed. W . Verbeke, L e u v e n 1 9 8 8 , 1 3 7 - 2 1 1 . de Lange, N i c h o l a s , O r i g e n e , L a lettre a A f r i c a n u s sur l'histoire de Suzanne, i n : O r i g e n e . . . , e d . M . H a r l / N . de Lange (SC 3 0 2 ) , Paris 1 9 8 3 , 4 6 9 - 5 7 8 . Laqueur, R i c h a r d , Synkellos ( 1 ) , i n : PRE 4 A 2 , S t u t t g a r t 1 9 3 2 , 1 3 8 8 - 1 4 1 0 . L e o p a r d i : see M o r e s c h i n i 1997
l i c h e n A p o l o g e t e n u n d seine Vorgeschichte ( W U N T 2,39), T u b i n g e n 1990. Q u a n t i n , Jean-Louis, A n g l i c a n Scholarship G o n e Mad? H e n r y D o d w e l l ( 1 6 4 1 1711) a n d C h r i s t i a n A n t i q u i t y , i n : H i s t o r y o f Scholarship, ed. C h . Ligota/J.-L. Q u a n t i n , O x f o r d 2006,305-356. R a m p o l d i , T i z i a n a , G i u l i o A f r i c a n o e A l e s s a n d r o Severo, R I L 1 1 5 , 1 9 8 1 , 7 3 - 8 4 .
LXIV
LXV
7. Bibliography
Introduction
R a m p o l d i , T i z i a n a , I Kestoi d i G i u l i o A f r i c a n o e l'imperatore A l e s s a n d r o Severo,
Sartori, Franco, M a r i o e i C i m b r i n e U ' A n o n y m u s M a t r i t e n s i s , i n : A l t e Geschichte u n d Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Festschrift f u r K a r l C h r i s t z u m 65. G e b u r t s t a g ,
i n : A N R W I I 34,3, B e r l i n 1 9 9 7 , 2 4 5 1 - 2 4 7 0 . R e b e n i c h , Stefan, T h e o d o r M o m r a s e n u n d A d o l f Harnack. Wissenschaft
und
P o l i t i k i m B e r l i n des ausgehenden 19. Jahrhunderts. M i t e i n e m A n h a n g :
laestinae episcopi, C h r o n i c o r u m c a n o n u m o m n i m o d a e historiae l i b r i d u o ,
E d i t i o n u n d K o m m e n t i e r u n g des Briefwechsels, B e r l i n 1997. R e b e n i c h , Stefan (ed.), A d o l f v o n H a r n a c k . P r o t o k o l l b u c h d e r K i r c h e n v a t e r K o m m i s s i o n der Preufiischen A k a d e m i e der Wissenschaften
ed. P. Kneissl/V. L o s e m a n n , D a r m s t a d t 1 9 8 8 , 4 1 1 - 4 3 0 . Scaliger, Joseph Justus, Thesaurus t e m p o r u m , E u s e b i i P a m p h i l i Caesareae Pa-
1897-1928,
interprete H i e r o n y m o , ex fide v e t u s t i s s i m o r u m c o d i c u m castigati..., L e i d e n 1606 ( r e p r i n t O s n a b r i i c k 1 9 6 8 , 2
nd
e d i t i o n L e i d e n 1658, q u o t e d hereafter).
Schamp, Jacques, P h o t i o s h i s t o r i e n des lettres. L a Bibliotheque
Berlin 2000. R e i c h a r d t , W a l t h e r , H e i n r i c h Gelzer. Geb. a m 1. Juli 1847, gest. a m 1 1 . Juli 1906, in: Biographisches
Jahrbuch
f u r d i e Altertumswissenschaft, f o u n d e d
by
S c h m i d t , A n d r e a Barbara, D i e zweifache armenische Rezension der syrischen C h r o n i k M i c h a e l s des Grofien, Le M u s e o n 1 0 9 , 1 9 9 6 , 2 9 9 - 3 1 9 .
C o n r a d B u r s i a n , ed. W . K r o l l , 3 0 , 1 9 0 7 , 1 - 4 8 . R e i c h a r d t 1909: see Abbreviationes
et ses notices b i o -
graphiques, Paris 1987.
S c h m i d t , A n d r e a Barbara, Syrische T r a d i t i o n i n a r m e n i s c h e r A d a p t i o n . D i e ar
s.v. I u l . A f r . , ep. A r i s t .
Reuss, J o s e p h , Matthaus-, M a r k u s - u n d Johannes-Katenen n a c h d e n
hand-
menische Rezeption des Geschichtswerkes v o n M i c h a e l Syrus u n d der a n t i -
s c h r i f t l i c h e n Q u e l l e n u n t e r s u c h t ( N e u t e s t a m e n d i c h e A b h a n d l u n g e n 18,4-5),
chalcedonensische
M i n i s t e r 1941.
c u m V I I , ed. Rene L a v e n a n t ( O C A 256), R o m a 1 9 9 8 , 3 5 9 - 3 7 1 .
J u d e n b r i e f an Kaiser M a r k i a n o s , i n : S y m p o s i u m Syria-
R i c h a r d , M a r c e l , Florileges D a m a s c e n i e n s , i n : DSp 5, Paris 1964, c o l . 4 7 6 - 4 8 6 .
Schoene, A l f r e d , Eusebi c h r o n i c o r u m l i b r i duo, 2 vols., B e r l i n 1875-76.
R i c h a r d , M a r c e l , Repertoire des b i b l i o t h e q u e s et des catalogues de m a n u s c r i t s
Schwartz, Eduard, D i e K o n i g s l i s t e n des Eratosthenes u n d Kastor. M i t E x c u r s e n
grecs,
Troisieme edition entierement
refondue
par
Jean-Marie
Olivier,
R i e d w e g , C h r i s t o p h , Ps.-Justin ( M a r k e l l v o n A n k y r a ? ) , A d G r a e c o s de vera religione
(bisher „Cohortatio
a d Graecos"). E i n l e i t u n g u n d
Kommentar
(AGWG.PH 40),
et
emendatores
R o b e r t o 2 0 0 5 a : see Conspectus
Schwartz 1903-09: see Conspectus
s.v. Eus., h . e.
Schwartz, E d u a r d , Eusebios, i n : PRE 6,1, Stuttgart 1907, 1370-1439 ( = i d . , G r i e chische Geschichtschreiber, Leipzig 1 9 5 7 , 4 9 5 - 5 9 8 ) .
( S B A 2 5 ) , Basel 1994. R o u t h : see Editores
iiber die I n t e r p o l a t i o n e n bei A f r i c a n u s u n d Eusebios G o t t i n g e n 1895.
B r e p o l s 1995.
s.v. I o a n n e s A n t i o c h e n u s
R o b e r t o , U m b e r t o , G l i Excerpta Salmasiana d i storia greca e o r i e n t a l e dello Ps.
Schweinburg, K u r t , D i e u r s p r i i n g l i c h e F o r m d e r
K e d r e n c h r o n i k , B y Z 30,
1929/30,68-77. Schwertner, Siegfried, Internationales A b k i i r z u n g s v e r z e i c h n i s fur Theologie u n d 2
2
G i o v a n n i A n t i o c h e n o e le C h r o n o g r a p h i a e d i G i u l i o A f r i c a n o , Selecta c o l l i -
Grenzgebiete ( I A T G ) , B e r l i n 1992 ( r e p r i n t i n : Theologische Realenzyklo-
gere I I , Beitrage z u r T e c h n i k des S a m m e l n s u n d K o m p i l i e r e n s griechischer
padie. A b k i i r z u n g s v e r z e i c h n i s , B e r l i n 1 9 9 4 , 1 - 4 8 8 ) .
Texte v o n der A n t i k e bis z u m H u m a n i s m u s , ed. R. M . P i c c i o n e / M . Perkams ( H e l l e n i c a 18), Alessandria 2 0 0 5 , 2 5 3 - 2 9 3 ( = R o b e r t o 2 0 0 5 b ) . R o b e r t o , U m b e r t o , Julius A f r i c a n u s u n d d i e T r a d i t i o n der h e l l e n i s t i s c h e n U n i versalgeschichte, i n : Julius A f r i c a n u s u n d die christliche W e l t c h r o n i s t i k , ed. M . W a l l r a f f ( T U 157), B e r l i n 2 0 0 6 , 3 - 1 6 . R o c h o w , Use, C h r o n o g r a p h i e , i n : Q u e l l e n z u r Geschichte des f r u h e n Byzanz ( 4 . 9. J a h r h u n d e r t ) , ed. F. W i n k e l m a n n / W . Brandes, B e r l i n 1990, 1 9 0 - 2 0 1 a n d 364f. Rosel, M a r t i n , Ubersetzung als V o l l e n d u n g der Auslegung. S t u d i e n z u r GenesisS e p t u a g i n t a ( B Z A W 223), B e r l i n 1994. R u i n a r t , T h e o d o r i c u s (ed.), A c t a m a r t y r u m , Regensburg 1859. Rutgers, I o s e p h u s , Sexti Julii A f r i c a n i O l y m p i a d o n anagraphs, adiectis ceteris q u a e e x O l y m p i o n i c a r u m Fastis s u p e r s u n t , L e i d e n 1862.
2
Scott, Roger, T h e B y z a n t i n e C h r o n i c l e after M a l a l a s , i n : Studies i n John Malalas, ed. E. Jeffreys/B. C r o k e / R . Scott, Sydney 1 9 9 0 , 3 8 - 5 4 . Seel, O t t o , Panodoros, i n : P R E 18 A 2 , Stuttgart 1 9 4 9 , 6 3 2 - 6 3 5 . Serruys, D . , Les t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s de l'aera a l e x a n d r i n a m i n o r , Revue de P h i l o logie 3 1 , 1 9 0 7 , 2 5 1 - 2 6 4 . Sickenberger, Joseph, S. I u l i u s Africanus, i n : PRE 10, Stuttgart 1918,116-125. Sirinelli, Jean, Les vues h i s t o r i q u e s d'Eusebe de Cesaree d u r a n t la p e r i o d e p r e n i ceenne, D a k a r 1 9 6 1 . Sotiroudis, Panagiotis, U n t e r s u c h u n g e n z u m G e s c h i c h t s w e r k des Ioannes v o n A n t i o c h e i a , T h e s s a l o n i k i 1989. Staab, Gregor, C h r o n o g r a p h i e als Philosophie. D i e U r w a h r h e i t der mosaischen U b e r l i e f e r u n g n a c h d e m B e g r u n d u n g s m o d e l l des M i t t e l p l a t o n i s m u s b e i Julius A f r i c a n u s ( E d i t i o n u n d K o m m e n t i e r u n g v o n A f r i c a n u s Chron.
fr. 1),
i n : Julius A f r i c a n u s u n d die christliche W e l t c h r o n i s t i k , ed. M . W a l l r a f f ( T U 157), B e r l i n 2 0 0 6 , 6 1 - 8 1 .
LXVI
Introduction
7. Bibliography
T a k a h a s h l , H i d e m i , Barhebraeus. A B i o - B i b l i o g r a p h y , Piscataway 2005. T e r i a n , A b r a h a m , X o r e n a c ' i a n d Eastern
H i s t o r i o g r a p h y o f the Hellenistic
Period, R E A r m 28,2001/02,101-141.
Julius A f r i c a n u s u n d d i e christliche W e l t c h r o n i s t i k , ed. M . W a l l r a f f ( T U 1 5 7 ) , Berlin 2006,45-59. Weltecke, D o r o t h e a , D i e „Beschreibung der Zeiten" v o n M o r M i c h a e l d e m
T h o m s o n , R o b e r t W., M o s e s K h o r e n a t s ' i . H i s t o r y o f t h e A r m e n i a n s . T r a n s l a t i o n a n d C o m m e n t a r y o n t h e L i t e r a r y Sources, L o n d o n 1978.
Grofien ( 1 1 2 6 - 1 1 9 9 ) . Eine Studie z u i h r e m historischen u n d h i s t o r i o g r a phischen K o n t e x t ( C S C O 594, Sub. 110), L o u v a i n 2003.
T o p c h y a n , A r a m , Julius A f r i c a n u s ' C h r o n i c l e a n d M o v s e s X o r e n a c ' i , Le M u s e o n 114,2001,153-185.
Wevers, J o h n W i l l i a m (ed.), Genesis (Septuaginta. Vetus T e s t a m e n t u m G r a e c u m 1), G o t t i n g e n 1974.
T o p c h y a n , A r a m , T h e P r o b l e m o f the Greek Sources o f Movses
Chorenac'i's
H i s t o r y o f A r m e n i a ( H e b r e w U n i v e r s i t y A r m e n i a n Studies 7 ) , L e u v e n 2006. T r a i n a , G i u s t o , I I c o m p l e s s o d i T r i m a l c i o n e . Movses X o r e n a c ' i e le o r i g i n i d e l p e n s i e r o storico a r m e n o (Eurasiatica. Q u a d e r n i d e l D i p a r t i m e n t o d i S t u d i E u r a s i a t i c i d e l l ' U n i v e r s i t a degli S t u d i d i Venezia 2 7 ) , Venezia 1991. T r a p p , E r i c h et al. (eds.), L e x i k o n z u r b y z a n t i n i s c h e n G r a z i t a t besonders des 9 . 12.Jahrhunderts,vol. l . W i e n 2001. k o n i g l i c h e n Gesellschaft der Wissenschaft, G o t t i n g e n 1 8 8 0 , 4 9 - 7 5 . T r i e b e r , C o n r a d , D i e Idee d e r v i e r Weltreiche, H e r m e s 2 7 , 1 8 9 2 , 3 2 1 - 3 4 4 . U n g e r , G e o r g F r i e d r i c h , C h r o n o l o g i e des M a n e t h o , B e r l i n 1867. V i e i l l e f o n d 1970: see Abbreviationes
s.v. I u l . Afr., cest.
W a c h o l d e r , B e n Z i o n , B i b l i c a l C h r o n o l o g y i n the H e l l e n i s t i c W o r l d Chronicles, 'HThR 61,1968,451-481. Wacker, C h r i s t i a n , T h e R e c o r d o f t h e O l y m p i c V i c t o r y List, N i k e p h o r o s 1 1 , 1998,39-50. W a d d e l l , W i l l i a m G , M a n e t h o ( L C L 3 5 0 ) , L o n d o n 1940 ( v a r i o u s r e p r i n t s ) . W a h l g r e n , Staffan, O r i g i n a l u n d A r c h e t y p u s . Z u Z u s t a n d e k o m m e n u n d Trans f o r m a t i o n einer b y z a n t i n i s c h e n W e l t c h r o n i k
W i n i a r c z y k , M a r e k , Euhemeros v o n Messene. Leben, W e r k u n d N a c h w i r k u n g (Beitrage z u r A l t e r t u m s k u n d e 157), M i i n c h e n 2002. W i n k e l m a n n , F r i e d h e l m , Euseb v o n Kaisareia. D e r Vater der K i r c h e n g e s c h i c h t e , Berlin 1991. W i n k e l m a n n , F r i e d h e l m , Iulius A f r i c a n u s , i n : R A C 19, Stuttgart 2 0 0 2 , 5 0 8 - 5 1 8 . Xeres, Saverio, L b s c u r a m e n t o del sole d u r a n t e la Passione d i C r i s t o nelle f o n t i cristiane e pagane d e i p r i m i due secoli, i n : F e n o m e n i n a t u r a l i e a w e n i m e n t i
T r i e b e r , C o n r a d , D i e C h r o n o l o g i e des Julius A f r i c a n u s , N a c h r i c h t e n v o n der
(Pseudo-Polydeukes/Symeon
Logothetes), ByZ 96,2003,269-277. W a h l g r e n , Staffan, D i e L o g o t h e t e n - C h r o n i k . F o r m - I n h a l t - Ideologic, i n : Julius A f r i c a n u s u n d d i e c h r i s t i i c h e W e l t c h r o n i s t i k , e d . M . W a l l r a f f ( T U 157), Berlin 2006,245-251. W a l l r a f f , M a r t i n , P r o t o l o g i e u n d Eschatologie als H o r i z o n t e der K i r c h e n g e schichte? Das Erbe c h r i s t l i c h e r Universalgeschichte, i n : H i s t o r i o g r a p h i e u n d T h e o l o g i e . K i r c h e n - u n d Theologiegeschichte i m Spannungsfeld v o n geschichtswissenschafdicher
LXVII
M e t h o d e u n d f h e o l o g i s c h e m A n s p r u c h , ed. W .
K i n z i g / V . L e p p i n / G . W a r t e n b e r g ( A r b e i t e n z u r K i r c h e n - u n d Theologiege s c h i c h t e 15), L e i p z i g 2 0 0 4 , 1 5 3 - 1 6 7 . W a l l r a f f , M a r t i n , V o n d e r a n t i k e n H i s t o r i e zur m i t t e l a l t e r l i c h e n C h r o n i k . D i e E n t s t e h u n g c h r i s t i i c h e r Universalgeschichtsschreibung, i n : W e l t - Z e i t . C h r i s t liche W e l t c h r o n i s t i k aus zwei Jahrtausenden i n B e s t a n d e n der T h i i r i n g e r U n i v e r s i t a t s - u n d L a n d e s b i b l i o t h e k Jena, ed. M . W a l l r a f f , B e r l i n 2 0 0 5 , 1 - 1 9 . W a l l r a f f , M a r t i n , D i e n e u e F r a g m e n t e n s a m m l u n g d e r C h r o n o g r a p h i e des Julius A f r i c a n u s . B e m e r k u n g e n z u r M e t h o d i k a n h a n d e i n i g e r D u b i a v e l Spuria, i n :
storici n e U ' a n t i c h i t a , ed. M a r t a S o r d i ( C o n t r i b u t i deU'Istituto s t o r i c o 1 5 ) , Milano 1989,219-226. Zoepfl, F r i e d r i c h , D e r K o m m e n t a r des Pseudo-Eustathios z u m M i i n s t e r 1927.
Hexaemeron,
CONSPECTVS S I G L O R V M c o n t i n e n s omnes textus e quibus fragmenta vel t e s t i m o n i a hausta sunt (* = codices q u i i n praeparanda editione c o n s u l t a t i sunt) A g a p i u s Mabbugensis, H i s t o r i a universalis, ed. A . Vasiliev, 4 v o l . ( P O 5,4 [ = pars 1,1], 11,1 [ = 1,2],7,4 [ = 11,1],8,3 [ = 11,2]),Paris 1909-15. A n o n y m u s Matritensis, ed. A . Bauer, L e i p z i g 1909. M a t r i t e n s i s gr. 4 7 0 1 ( o l i m 121), saec. X ps. A t h a n a s i u s , Fragmenta varia, P G 28,1252-1257. Barhebraeus —> Gregorius Barhebraeus bls
2
BasiliusA Caesariensis, Parisinus D e s p i r i t ugr. sancto, ed. B. 506, saec. XPruche (SC 1 7 ) , Paris 1968. C
Parisinus gr. 966, saec. X I
F
Parisinus gr. 969, saec. X I V
G
Oxoniensis B o d l e i a n u s X X X V I I , saec. X I
K
Mosquensis Sancti S y n o d i 23, saec. X I
M
V i n d o b o n e n s i s theologicus gr. 18, saec. X I V
Catena i n I o a n n e m , e x c e r p t u m
i n : C o l l e c t i o N o v a P a t r u m et S c r i p t o r u m
G r a e c o r u m , ed. B. M o n t f a u c o n , v o l . 2, Paris 1707, p. 105 ( = P G 26,1321B). * Parisinus gr. 209, saec. X I / X I I C a t e n a i n M a t t h a e u m , ed. J. A . Cramer, i n : Catenae g r a e c o r u m p a t r u m i n N o v u m Testamentum, v o l . 1, I n evangelia S. M a t t h a e i et S. M a r c i , O x f o r d 1840 (ed. anast. H i l d e s h e i m 1967), 1 - 2 5 7 , 4 4 9 - 4 9 6 . C
C o i s l i n i a n u s gr. 23, saec. X I
B
Oxoniensis B o d l e i a n u s gr. auct. T 1 4 , saec. X / X I
C e d r e n u s —> Georgius Cedrenus C h r o n i c o n E p i t o m o n , ed. A . Pusch, Jena 1908. T
V i n d o b o n e n s i s theologicus gr. 40, saec. X I I I
H
V i n d o b o n e n s i s historicus gr. 99, saec. X I V
C h r o n i c o n Paschale, ed. L . D i n d o r f , v o l . 1 ( C S H B ) , B o n n 1832. V
Vaticanus gr. 1 9 4 1 , saec. X
LXX
Conspectus Siglorum
Didymus
Conspectus Siglorum
C a e c u s ( A l e x a n d r i n u s ) , C o m m e n t a r i u s i n G e n e s i m , ed. P. N a u t i n ,
2 v o l . (SC 2 3 3 , 2 4 4 ) , Paris 1 9 7 6 - 1 9 7 8 .
LXXI
Eusebius Caesariensis, Eclogae propheticae, ed. T h . Gaisford, O x f o r d 1842 ( = P G 22,1021-1262). * V i n d o b o n e n s i s gr. 55, saec. X I I
D i o n y s i u s b a r Salibi, C o m m e n t a r i i i n Evangelia 1,1, trans. I . Sedlacek ( C S C O 16, Syr. 16), L o u v a i n 1906.
Eusebius Caesariensis, H i s t o r i a ecclesiastica, e d . E. Schwartz (accedit v e r s i o latina R u f i n i , ed. T h . M o m m s e n ) , 3 v o l . ( G C S 9, Eusebius W e r k e 2 ) , L e i p z i g
E c l o g a H i s t o r i a r u m , i n : A n e c d o t a graeca e codicibus m a n u s c r i p t i s Bibliothecae
1903-1909 (ed. anast. B e r l i n 1999). B
Parisinus gr. 1431, saec. X I / X I I
b
M a r c i a n u s gr. 339, saec. X I V
P D
Parisinus gr. 1432, saec. X I I I / X I V
Parisinus syr. 9, p . 165, saec. X I I I , ed. F. N a u , i n : R O C 20
M
M a r c i a n u s gr. 338, saec. X I I
(1915-1917)101-104
A
Parisinus gr. 1430, saec. X I
a
Vaticanus gr. 399, saec. X I
T
Laurentianus 70,7, saec. X / X I
V e r s i o armeniaca
E
Laurentianus 70,20, saec. X
E
E r e w a n , M a t e n a d a r a n 1904, saec. X I I I / X I V
R
Mosquensis Sancti S y n o d i 50, saec. X I I
Aucher
ed. J. B. A u c h e r , 2 vol., Venezia 1818
E
v e r s i o syriaca
Karst
trans. J. K a r s t ( G C S 20, Eusebius W e r k e 5 ) , L e i p z i g 1911
E
Regiae Parisiensis, ed. J. A . C r a m e r , O x f o r d 1839,2,165 - 2 3 0 . P
P a r i s i n u s g r . 8 5 4 , f. 7 1 - 1 4 6 , saec.X
Elenchus a n o n y m u s h i s t o r i o g r a p h o r u m
Eusebius Caesariensis, C h r o n i c a ( C h r o n o g r a p h i a et Canones)
Parisinus gr. 1433, saec. X I / X I I
a
v e r s i o syriaca, a n n o 462
b
v e r s i o syriaca, saec. V I
E x c e r p t a Eusebiana (e t e x t u graeco), ed. J. C r a m e r , A n e c d o t a graeca e
E £arm
c o d d . m a n u s c r i p t i s b i b l i o t h e c e a e regiae Parisiensis, v o l . 2 , O x f o r d 1839,
A
v e r s i o latina R u f i n i
1 1 8 - 1 6 3 (ed. anast. H i l d e s h e i m 1967) ( = ed. A . Schoene, Eusebi c h r o n i -
n
textus m a n u s c r i p t o r u m g r a e c o r u m
c o r u m l i b r i d u o , v o l . 1, B e r l i n 1 8 7 5 , 1 - 2 8 6 ) .
i c
p r i m a manus
r
c o r r e c t i o recentior
r
P
r
* Parisinus gr. 2 6 0 0 , f. 1 9 3 - 2 1 9 , saec. X V
v e r s i o armenica, translata e versione syriaca
c o r r e c t i o antiqua alterius m a n u s
C a n o n e s , V e r s i o l a t i n a H i e r o n y m i , ed. R. H e l m ( G C S 4 7 , Eusebius Werke 2
7), B e r l i n 1 9 5 6 ( e d . anast. c u m praefatione U . T r e u 1984), codices ad
Eusebius Caesariensis, Praeparatio evangelica, e d . K . M r a s / E . Des Places ( G C S
t e x t u m T 6 pertinentes
43, Eusebius W e r k e 8 ) , 2 v o l . , Berlin 1 9 8 2 - 1 9 8 3 .
v i d e apud "Excerptorem a n o n y m u m i n cake
A
Parisinus gr. 4 5 1 , anno 9 1 4
O x o n i e n s i s B o d l e i a n u s lat. auct. T I I 26, saec. V
B
Parisinus gr. 465, saec. X I I I
F r a g m e n t a Floriacensia, i n diversis b i b l i o t h e c i s , saec. V (ed.
D
Parisinus gr. 467, saec. X V I
p h o t o g r a p h i c a , L . Traube, L e i d e n 1902)
G
Laurentianus pluteus 6,9, a n n o 1344
H
M a r c i a n u s gr. 343, saec. X I
chronici". O S
2
Eusebius Caesariensis, D e m o n s t r a t i o evangelica, ed. I . H e i k e l ( G C S 23, Eusebius
I
W e r k e 6 ) , L e i p z i g 1913.
N
M a r c i a n u s gr. 3 4 1 , saec. X V .
Neapolitanus I I A A 16, saec. X V
P
Parisinus gr. 4 6 9 , saec. X I I
O
B o n o n i e n s i s 3643, saec. X I I I
O
B o n o n i e n s i s gr. 3644, saec. X I I I
V
Vatopedinus 180, saec. X I V
S
O x o n i e n s i s C o l l e g i i S. Ioannis Baptistae 4 1 , saec. X V
V
Vaticanus gr. 1153/1154, saec. X I I
LXXII
Conspectus Siglorum
ps. E u s t a t h i u s A n t i o c h e n u s , C o m m e n t a r i u s
i n hexaemeron,
Conspectus Siglorum
ed. L . A l l a t i u s ,
Leiden 1 6 2 9 , 1 - 9 4 ( = P G 18,708-793). E x c e r p t a E u s e b i a n a —> Eusebius Caesariensis, C h r o n i c a Excerpta l a t i n a B a r b a r i , i n : C h r o n i c a M i n o r a , ed. C . Frick, v o l . 1, L e i p z i g 1892,
M
LXXIII
Monacensis gr. 3 9 1 , saec. X V I
P
Palatinus gr. 395, saec. X V I
Q
Vaticanus gr. 9 7 9 , anno 1571
R
Vallicellianus 92, saec. X V I
S
Basiliensis 82, saec. X V I
Par. 1336
Parisinus gr. 1336 f. 143-160 excerpta c h r o n o g r a p h i c a v a
183-371.
r i o r u m a u c t o r i b u s (Syncelli et a l i o r u m ) , saec. X I P a r i s i n u s lat. 4884, saec. V I W i l l
z
archetypus f a m i l i a e c o d i c u m M , P, Q, R, et S sed a n i m a d u e r t e n d u m est R ex M et M , Q, S ex P descriptos esse
Excerptor anonymus i n cake chronici H i e r o n y m i a n i T
* O x o n i e n s i s M e r t o n C o l l e g e 315, saec. I X
U
* V a t i c a n u s O t t o b o n i a n u s l a t . 743, saec. X V
V
* V a t i c a n u s lat. 244, a n n o 1467
t
archetypus f a m i l i a e z et a n t i q u i o r u m c o d i c u m quos siglo x Moss, c o m p r e h e n d i t
G r e g o r i u s Barhebraeus, C h r o n o g r a p h i a , trans. E. A . Wallis Budge, vol. 1, L o n d o n 1932 ( e d . anast. A m s t e r d a m 1976).
Florilegium anonymum P
* P a r i s i n u s gr. 1115, saec. X I I I (cf. A l e x a k i s 1996, i n p r i m i s
G r e g o r i u s Barhebraeus, C o m m e n t a r i u m i n Evangelia ex H o r r e o M y s t e r i o r u m ,
p. 8 6 et p. 3 0 7 ) .
ed. et t r a n s . W . E. W . Carr, L o n d o n 1925.
G e o r g i u s C e d r e n u s , C o m p e n d i u m h i s t o r i a r u m , e d . I . Bekker, v o l . 1 ( C S H B ) , B o n n 1838. •
R
P a r i s i n u s gr. 1713/1713 A , saec. X I I
C
C o i s l i n i a n u s gr. 135, saec. X I I I / X I V
G r e g o r i u s Barhebraeus, Historiae d y n a s t a r u m (arabice), ed. et trans. E. Pococke, O x f o r d 1663. H i e r o n y m u s , C h r o n i c o n —» Eusebius Caesariensis, C h r o n i c a
2
G e o r g i u s M o n a c h u s , C h r o n i c o n , ed. C. de B o o r / P . W i r t h , 2 vol., Stuttgart 1 9 7 8 .
H i e r o n y m u s , C o m m e n t a r i i i n D a n i e l e m , ed. F. G l o r i e ( C C h r . S L 7 5 A ) , T u r n h o u t 1964.
G e o r g i u s M o n a c h u s [ c o n t i n u a t u s ] , C h r o n i c o n ab o r b e c o n d i t o ad a n n u m p. C h r . n . 8 4 2 et a d i v e r s i s s c r i p t o r i b u s a d a. 1143 c o n t i n u a t u m , ed. E. de M u r a l t , Sanktpeterburg 1859 ( = P G 110,41-1286).
H i e r o n y m u s , C o m m e n t a r i i i n M a t t h a e u m , ed. D . Hurst ( C C h r . S L 7 7 ) , T u r n h o u t 1969. R
Karlsruhe, A u g i e n s i s Pergamentum C C L I I I , saec. V I I I
G e o r g i u s S y n c e l l u s , E c l o g a c h r o n o g r a p h i c a , ed. A . M o s s h a m m e r (BiTeu), L e i p z i g
G
Sangallensis 126, saec. V I I I
1984.
O
Salispurgenis S a n c t i P e t r i a. V I I . 2, saec. V I I I
C
Karlsruhe, A u g i e n s i s Pergamentum C C L X I , saec. V I I I / I X
l e c t i o c o d i c i s A post c o r r e c t i o n e m
K
Karlsruhe, A u g i e n s i s Pergamentum C X C I V , saec. I X
scriptura marginis cod. A
E
Parisinus lat. 9 5 2 9 , saec. I X
( e a d e m r a t i o n e Moss, i n ceteris usus est)
B
Bononiensis 4 2 , saec. V I I I / I X
B
P a r i s i n u s gr. 1764, saec. X I
P
Palatinus lat. 177, saec. V I I I / I X
E
E x c e r p t a codicis V a t o p e d i n i 6 4 5 , saec. X V
C
C o i s l i n i a n u s gr. 133, saec. X I I
0
O x o n i e n s i s C h r i s t C h u r c h W a k e 5, saec. I X
a
Bambergensis B . I V . 2 1 , saec. V I
T
V a t i c a n u s gr. 154, saec. X I I
(3
Londinensis C o t t o n i a n u s Calig. A.XV, saec. V I I I
V
V a t i c a n u s gr. 155, saec. I X / X
y
Leidensis Vossianus lat. 0 . 6 9 , saec. I X
X
consensus c o d i c u m C , O , T, V
8
Herfordiensis Bibliothecae Cathedralis O . 3 . 2 , saec. X
A
P a r i s i n u s gr. 1711, saec. X I c
A m A
H i e r o n y m u s , D e u i r i s illustribus, ed. A . Ceresa-Gastaldo, Firenze 1988.
LXXIV
Conspectus Siglorum
H i e r o n y m u s , Epistula 70, i n : E p i s t u l a r u m pars p r i m a , ed. I . H i l b e r g (CSEL 54), 2
W i e n 1 9 9 6 , 700-708. K
LXXV
Conspectus Siglorum
SI
editiones I s t r i n i translationis slavicae
Soph.
G o s . P u l i c n . Biblioteka, Sofijsk sobr. Nr. 1454
Spinaliensis 68, saec. V I I I
L
C o l o n i e n s i s 35, saec. I X
Ioannes Niciensis, T h e chronicle o f John, b i s h o p o f N i k i u , translated
M"
C o l o n i e n s i s 6 0 , saec. I X / X
Zotenberg's E t h i o p i c t e x t b y R. H . Charles, O x f o r d 1916.
<[>
Guelferbytanus 4156, saec. I X / X
from
1
Vaticanus lat. 3 4 1 , saec. X / X I
Ioannes S c y t h o p o l i t a n u s (ps. M a x i m u s Confessor), Scholia i n D i o n y s i i A r e o -
m
Vaticanus lat. 354, saec. X I
pagitae epistulas, i n : D i o n y s i u s Areopagita, O p e r a , ed. B. Cordier, v o l . 2, A n t w e r -
B
Berolinensis lat. 18, saec. X I I
pen 1 6 3 4 , 6 1 - 1 8 4 ( = P G 4,527-576).
I o a n n e s A n t i o c h e n u s , F r a g m e n t a ex H i s t o r i a chronica, ed. U . R o b e r t o ( T U 154),
Iordanes, D e s u m m a t e m p o r u m v e l o r i g i n e actibusque gentis R o m a n o r u m , e d .
B e r l i n 20O5.
T h . M o m m s e n ( M G H A A 5,1), B e r l i n 1882.
ps. I o a n n e s A n t i o c h e n u s , A n o n y m i excerpta chronographica, i n : I o a n n e s A n t i o
Isidorus Hispalensis, C h r o n i c a maiora, i n : C h r o n i c a m i n o r a saec. I V . V . V I . V I L ,
c h e n u s , F r a g m e n t a ex H i s t o r i a c h r o n i c a , ed. U . Roberto ( T U 154), B e r l i n 2005,
v o l . 2 , e d . T h . M o m m s e n ( M G H A A 11,2), B e r l i n 1 8 9 4 , 3 9 1 - 4 8 8 .
556-575. V
* Vaticanus gr. 96, saec. X I I
Isodad Mervensis, C o m m e n t a r i u s i n vetus t e s t a m e n t u m , ed. C. v a n d e n E y n d e
D
* Parisinus gr. 1763, a n n o 1606
(CSCO 229/230, Syr. 9 6 / 9 7 ) , 2 vol., L o u v a i n 1 9 6 2 - 1 9 6 3 .
I o a n n e s C h r y s o s t o m u s —• Catena i n M a t t h a e u m
Iulius Pollux ( = ps. Polydeuces), H i s t o r i a physica seu C h r o n i c o n , ed. I . H a r d t , M u n c h e n 1792.
I o a n n e s D a m a s c e n u s , Sacra parallela, i n : O p e r a O m n i a , ed. M . L e q u i e n , v o l . 2, Paris 1 7 1 2 , 2 7 4 - 7 3 0 ( = P G 9 5 , 1 0 3 3 - 1 5 8 8 ; 96,9-442).
Ioannes
* M o n a c e n i s gr.181, saec. X V I (quern secutus est H a r d t ) Bianconi
e d . J. B. Bianconi, B o l o g n a 1795
* Vaticanus gr. 1236, saec. X V
A m b r o s i a n u s D 34 sup. ( 2 2 7 ) , saec. X I (quern secutus est
* Vaticanus O t t o b o n i a n u s gr. 79, saec. X V
Bianconi)
L y d u s , D e magistratibus
populi
Romani ( A m e r i c a n Philosophical
ps. Iustinus, C o h o r t a t i o a d Graecos, ed. M . M a r c o v i c h (PTS 32), B e r l i n 1990.
Society, M e m o i r s 149), ed. et trans. A . C. Bandy, Philadelphia 1983. Leo G r a m m a t i c u s —» S y m e o n Logothetes I o a n n e s M a l a l a s , C h r o n o g r a p h i a , ed. J. T h u r n ( C F H B 35), B e r l i n 2000. p
Parisinus s u p p l . 682, saec. X
V
Vatopedinus
290 ( m e m b r u m
M i c h a e l Psellus, H i s t o r i a Syntomos, ed.W. J. A e r t s ( C F H B 30), B e r l i n 1990. discissum
codicis
prae-
cedentis saec. X )
M i c h a e l Syrus, D e s c r i p t i o t e m p o r u m
B
Parisinus gr. 1630, saec. X I V
Syriace, ed. et trans. I . B. C h a b o t , C h r o n i q u e de M i c h e l le
Tusc.
C r y p t o f e r r a t e n s i s Z . a . X X I I , saec. V I
S y r i e n , 4 vol., Paris 1899-1910.
O
O x o n i e n s i s Baroccianus 182, saec. X I I
P r o o e m i u m armeniace, recensio brevior, ed. [ T . Sawala-
A
Parisinus gr. 1336, saec. X I
n e a n c ' ] , Jerusalem 1871; recensio longior, ed. [T. Sawala-
EI
C o n s t a n t i n u s V I I Porphyrogenetus, E x c e r p t a de insidiis,
n e a n c ' ] , Jerusalem 1870 ( v i d e S c h m i d t
ed. C. de B o o r , B e r l i n 1905
p. 299, n . 8 n e c n o n p . 3 0 1 , n . 13).
EV
1996, i n p r i m i s
C o n s t a n t i n u s V I I Porphyrogenetus, E x c e r p t a de v i r t u t i b u s et v i t i i s , ed. T h . B i i t t n e r - W o b s t , 2 v o l . , B e r l i n 1906
Moses Chorenensis, H i s t o r i a A r m e n i o r u m , e d . M . Abelean/S. Y a r o u t ' i w n e a n , Tiflis 1913 (ed. anast. c u m praefatione R. W. T h o m s o n , D e l m a r N Y 1981).
LXXVI
Conspectus Siglorum
Conspectus Siglorum
N i c e p h o r u s C a l l i s t u s X a n t h o p u l u s , E x c e r p t a ex historia ecclesiastica ( v i d e de
LXXVII
Sulpicius Severus, C h r o n i c a , ed. G. de Senneville-Grave (SC 441), Paris 1999.
Boor 1888). Symeon Logothetes, C h r o n i c o n
* O x o n i e n s i s B a r o c c i a n u s 142, saec. X I V
V
* V a t . g r . 163, saec. X I I
Paschale C a m p a n u m a n n o 4 6 4 - 5 9 9 . E p i t o m a t e m p o r u m et i n d i c u l u m pascae,
Leo G r a m m a t i c u s , C h r o n o g r a p h i a , ed. I . B e k k e r ( C S H B ) , B o n n 1842.
i n : C h r o n i c a m i n o r a saec. I V . V . V I . V I I . , v o l . 1, ed. T h . M o m m s e n ( M G H . A A 1),
P
Berlin 1892, 744-750.
Theodosius M e l i t e n u s , Chronographia, ed. T h . L . F. Tafel ( M o n u m e n t a
V
* Vaticanus Reginae S u e d i c o r u m 2077, saec. V I
W
Guelferbytanus Helmstadiensis 597, a n n o 8 2 0
Parisinus gr. 1711, anno 1013
Saecularia A c a d e m i a e S c i e n t i a r u m Monacensis 3,1), M t i n c h e n 1859. * Monacensis gr. 218, saec. X I vide etiam: C e d r e n u s et Iulius Pollux
P e t r u s A l e x a n d r i n u s , Ekthesis
c h r o n o n , ed. S. G . S a m o d u r o v a ,
Vizantijskij ps. Symeon, C h r o n i c o n a n o n y m u m i n e d i t u m
V r e m e n n i k 18,1961,150-197.
* Parisinus gr. 1712, f. 1 8 - 2 7 1 , saec. X I I I P h o t i u s P a t r i a r c h a , Bibliotheca, ed. R. H e n r y , v o l . 1-8 (CBy), Paris 1 9 5 9 - 1 9 7 7 . A
M a r c i a n u s gr. 4 5 0 , saec. X / X V
M
M a r c i a n u s gr. 4 5 1 , saec. X I I / X V
Theodosius M e l i t e n u s —» S y m e o n Logothetes
Socrates C o n s t a n t i n o p o l i t a n u s , H i s t o r i a ecclesiastica, ed. G . C h . H a n s e n ( G C S N.F. 1), B e r l i n 1995. M
Laurentianus 70,7, saec. X
F
Laurentianus 69,5, saec. X I
A
X e r o p o t a m u 2 2 6 ( A t h o u s 2559), saec. X I V
T
T h e o d o r u s L e c t o r i n M a r c i a n o gr. 344, saec. X I I I
Cassiod.
Cassiodorus, H i s t o r i a t r i p a r t i t a
Sozomenus,
H i s t o r i a ecclesiastica, e d . J. B i d e z / G . C h . H a n s e n
(GCS N.F. 4),
2
Berlin 1995. B
Oxoniensis B a r o c c i a n u s 142, saec. X I V
B-
folia n o v a i n B, saec. X V
C
A l e x a n d r i n u s 6 0 , saec. X I I I
T
T h e o d o r u s L e c t o r i n M a r c i a n o gr. 344, saec. X I I I
Cassiod.
Cassiodorus, H i s t o r i a t r i p a r t i t a
Suidae l e x i c o n , ed. A . A d l e r ( L e x i c o g r a p h i G r a e c i 1), 5 vol., L e i p z i g 1 9 2 8 - 1 9 3 8 . A
2
Parisinus gr. 2625 pars recentior, saec. X I V
G
Parisinus gr. 2 6 2 3 , saec. X V
I
A n g e l i c a n u s 75, saec. X V
F
L a u r e n t i a n u s 5 5 , 1 , a n n o 1422
V
L u g d u n e n s i s Vossianus 2 fol., saec. X I I
M
M a r c i a n u s 448, saec. X I I I
ABBREVIATIONES 1. Opera in apparatu adhibita
A l d h e l m u s Malmesbiriensis de m e t r i s
D e m e t r i s et e n i g m a t i b u s ac p e d u m regulis, ed. R. E h w a l d , A l d h e l m i opera ( M G H . A A 15), B e r l i n 1 9 1 9 , 5 9 - 2 0 4 .
Aelian.
Claudius Aelianus nat. a n i m a l .
D e n a t u r a a n i m a l i u m , ed. A . F. Scholfield, 3 v o l . , L o n d o n
v a r i a hist.
V a r i a H i s t o r i a , ed. M . R. Dilts, L e i p z i g 1974.
1958-59. Alex. Polyh.
A l e x a n d e r Polyhistor, F G r H i s t 273
A n o n . Matr.
A n o n y m u s M a t r i t e n s i s , ed. A . Bauer, L e i p z i g 1909.
A n t h . Graec.
2
A n t h o l o g i a Graeca, ed. H . Beckby, 4 v o l . , M i i n c h e n 1 9 6 5 68.
App.
Appianus b e l l . civ.
B e l l u m civile, ed. L. Mendelssohn/P. V i e r e c k , L e i p z i g 1905.
Ach.
Acharnenses, ed. V. C o u l o n , v o l . 1, Paris 1 9 5 2 , 1 2 - 6 6 .
Ar.
Aristophanes
Arist.
Aristoteles Pol.
ps. A t h .
Politica, ed. J. A u b o n n e t , 5 v o l . , Paris 1 9 8 6 - 1 9 9 1 . ps. A t h a n a s i u s A l e x a n d r i n u s
fr. pass. Aug.
Fragmenta v a r i a , P G 28,1252-1257. H o m i l i a i n p a s s i o n e m et c r u c e m d o m i n i , P G 28,185-250. Aurelius Augustinus
retract.
Retractationes, ed. A . M u t z e n b e c h e r ( C C h r . S L 57), T u r n h o u t 1984.
Aur. Vict. Caes.
Sextus A u r e l i u s V i c t o r L i b e r de Caesaribus, ed. F. Pichlmayr, L e i p z i g 1911 (ed. anast. Stuttgart 1993).
Barhebr.
G r e g o r i u s Barhebraeus C h r o n o g r a p h i a , ed. et trans. E. A . W a l l i s Budge, v o l . 1, L o n d o n 1932.
hist. d y n .
H i s t o r i a e d y n a s t a r u m (arabice), ed. et trans. E. Pococke, O x f o r d 1663.
hor. m y s t .
C o m m e n t a r i u m i n Evangelia ex H o r r e o M y s t e r i o r u m , ed. et trans. W. E. W . Carr, L o n d o n 1925.
Bas.
Basilius Caesariensis hex.
H o m i l i a e i n hexaemeron, ed. E. A m a n d de Mendieta/St. Y. R u d b e r g (GCS N.F. 2 ) , B e r l i n 1997.
Abbreviationes
LXXX ps. Bas.
1. Opera in apparatu adhibita
Didym.
ps. Basilius Caesariensis
D i d y m u s Caecus ( A l e x a n d r i n u s )
in Gen.
Enarratio i n proph. Isaiam Enarratio i n prophetam
I s a i a m , ed. P. Trevisan, 2 v o l .
Cassiod.
2 4 4 ) , Paris 1976-1978. D i o d . Sic.
D i o d o r u s Siculus, B i b l i o t h e c a historica, ed. F. V o g e l et a l . ,
F r a g m e n t a , ed. R. Pfeiffer, O x f o r d 1949.
D i o g . Laert.
Diogenes Laertius, V i t a e p h i l o s o p h o r u m , ed. H . S. L o n g ,
Dionys. Sal.
D i o n y s i u s bar Salibi
6 v o l . , Leipzig 1 8 8 8 - 1 9 0 6 . C a s s i o d o r u s , H i s t o r i c a ecclesiastica t r i p a r t i t a , ed. R. Hanslik(CSEL71),Wienl952.
Cass. D i o
2 vol., Oxford 1964-66.
Cassius D i o , H i s t o r i a r u m R o m a n o r u m quae supersunt, ed.
c o m m . Ev.
U . Ph. Boissevain, 5 v o l . , B e r l i n 1 8 9 5 - 1 9 3 1 . Cat. G e n . Cat. M t .
C a t e n a i n G e n e s i m , ed. F. Petit, 4 v o l . ( T r a d i t i o exegetica
Dion. Hal.
D i o n y s i u s Halicarnassensis, A n t i q u i t a t e s Romanae, ed. V . F r o m e n t i n ( C o l l e c t i o n des Universites de France,
C a t e n a i n M a t t h a e u m , ed. J. A . C r a m e r , i n : Catenae grae
grecque 386), Paris 1998.
c o r u m p a t r u m i n N o v u m T e s t a m e n t u m , v o l . 1, I n evange-
Eel. C h r o n .
c o d i c i b u s manuscriptis Bibliothecae Regiae Parisiensis, v o l .
G e o r g i u s Cedrenus, C o m p e n d i u m h i s t o r i a r u m , ed. I . Bek-
2, O x f o r d 1839 (ed. anast. H i l d e s h e i m 1967), 2 3 1 - 2 4 2 . Eel. Hist.
Chron. Epit.
C h r o n i c o n E p i t o m o n , ed. A . Pusch, Jena 1908.
C h r o n . Pasch.
C h r o n i c o n Paschale, ed. L. D i n d o r f , v o l . 1 ( C S H B ) , B o n n 1832.
c o d i c i b u s manuscriptis Bibliothecae Regiae Parisiensis, v o l . 2, O x f o r d 1839 (ed. anast. H i l d e s h e i m 1967), 1 6 5 - 2 3 0 . Elias N i s i b .
Elias Nisibenus, O p u s c h r o n o l o g i c u m I , trans. E. W . B r o o k s
Epiph.
Epiphanius Constantiensis
( C S C O 63*, Syr. 2 3 ) , R o m a 1910.
M a r c u s Tullius Cicero
Cic div.
paed. strom.
anc.
A n c o r a t u s , ed. K . H o l l ( G C S 25, Epiphanius 1), L e i p z i g
haer.
P a n a r i o n seu adversus l x x x haereses, 1-33, ed. K . H o l l
D e d i v i n a t i o n e , ed. R. G i o m i n i ( B i T e u ) , L e i p z i g 1975, 1 -
1915,1-149.
148. Clem. Alex,
Ecloga H i s t o r i a r u m , ed. J. A . Cramer, A n e c d o t a graeca e
C h r o n o g r a p h e i o n S y n t o m o n , ed. A . Schoene, Eusebii c h r o n i c u m l i b r i d u o , v o l . 1, B e r l i n 1875, A p p e n d i x 4 , 5 9 - 1 0 2 .
Clemens Alexandrinus
( G C S 25, Epiphanius 1), L e i p z i g 1915.
Paedagogus, ed. M . M a r c o v i c h / J . C . v a n W i n d e n ( S V i g C h r
P a n a r i o n seu adversus l x x x haereses, 3 4 - 6 4 , ed. K . H o l l / J . 2
6 1 ) , L e i d e n 2002.
D u m m e r (GCS 3 1 , E p i p h a n i u s 2), Berlin 1980.
S t r o m a t a I - V I , ed. O . S t a h l i n / L . F r u c h t e l / U . T r e u (GCS 52,
P a n a r i o n seu adversus l x x x haereses, 6 5 - 8 0 , ed. K . H o l l / J . 2
D u m m e r (GCS 37, E p i p h a n i u s 3), B e r l i n 1 9 8 5 .
4
C l e m e n s A l e x a n d r i n u s 2), B o n n 1 9 8 5 . S t r o m a t a V I I - V I I I , ed. O. S t a h l i n / L . F r u c h t e l (GCS 17, Cle
Eus.
Eusebius Caesariensis chron.
2
m e n s A l e x a n d r i n u s 3), B e r l i n 1 9 7 0 . C o n s t a n t i n u s Manasses chron. clul. Os.-Mal. fr. M t .
C h r o n o g r a p h i a ( p r i m a pars c h r o n i c o r u m ) , versio
arme-
niaca, trans. J. K a r s t ( G C S 20, Eusebius W e r k e 5 ) , L e i p z i g 1911,1-143.
C h r o n i c o n , ed. I . B e k k e r ( C S H B 1 5 ) , B o n n 1837. Exc. Eus.
Cyrillus Alexandrinus
Cyr.
Serie
Ecloga C h r o n i c a r u m , ed. J. A . Cramer, A n e c d o t a graeca e
1844,1-257,449-496.
ker, v o l . 1 ( C S H B ) , B o n n 1838.
Chron. Synt.
C o m m e n t a r i i i n Evangelia 1,1, trans. J. Sedlacek ( C S C O 16, Syr. 16), Roma 1906.
graeca l - 4 ) , L o u v a i n 1991-1996.
l i a S. M a t t h a e i et S. M a r c i , O x f o r d Cedr.
C o m m e n t a r i u s i n G e n e s i m , ed. P. N a u t i n , 2 v o l . (SC 2 3 3 ,
( C P S . G 4 - 5 ) , T o r i n o 1939. Callimachus fr.
LXXXI
Excerpta Eusebiana,
ed. J. Cramer, A n e c d o t a
graeca
e
C o n t r a I u l i a n u m imperatorem, PG 76,504-1064.
c o d i c i b u s m a n u s c r i p t i s Bibliotheceae Regiae
C o m m e n t a r i u s i n X I I prophetas m i n o r e s , ed. P. E. Pusey, 2
v o l . 2, O x f o r d 1839 (ed. anast. H i l d e s h e i m 1967), 1 1 5 - 1 6 3
v o l . , O x f o r d 1868 (ed. anast. B r u x e l l e s 1965).
( = ed. A . Schoene, Eusebi c h r o n i c o r u m l i b r i d u o , v o l . 1,
Commentarii
i n Matthaeum,
fragmenta,
ed. J. Reuss,
M a t t h a u s - K o m m e n t a r e aus d e r g r i e c h i s c h e n K i r c h e ( T U 61), B e r l i n 1957,153-269.
Parisiensis,
Berlin 1875,1-286). can.
Canones (secunda pars c h r o n i c o r u m ) = c a n . can.™"
H e r
et c a n .
a r m e n
Canones, versio l a t i n a H i e r o n y m i , ed. R. H e l m (GCS 47, 2
3
Eusebius Werke 7), B e r l i n 1 9 5 6 ( = 1984).
LXXXII
1. Opera in apparatu adhibita
Abbreviationes
can.
a r m e n
Canones, versio a r m e n i a c a , trans. J. Karst ( G C S 20, Euse
ps. Gr. Nyss. h o r n . 1 cr.
bius Werke 5), L e i p z i g 1 9 1 1 , 1 5 6 - 2 2 7 . reg.
R e g u m series s e c u n d u m
sen'
versionem armeniacam,
R e g u m series s e c u n d u m v e r s i o n e m l a t i n a m H i e r o n y m i , ed.
Hdt.
A . Schoene, Eusebi c h r o n i c o r u m l i b r i duo, v o l . 1, B e r l i n
Hier.
1875, A p p e n d i x I B , 2 5 - 4 0 . d e m . ev.
Hieronymus ep. in Dan.
D e m o n s t r a t i o evangelica, ed. I . H e i k e l (GCS 2 3 , Eusebius
Hilarian. curs. temp.
fr. L c .
Fragmenta i n L u c a m , P G 24,529-606.
h.e.
H i s t o r i a ecclesiastica, ed. E. Schwartz (accedit v e r s i o l a t i n a R u f i n i , ed. T h . M o m m s e n ) , 3 v o l . (GCS 9, Eusebius W e r k e
Dan.
S. T i m m ( T U 152), B e r l i n 2005.
haer.
2
v i d e supra sub can. V i t a C o n s t a n t i n i , ed. F. W i n k e l r n a n n (GCS Eusebius W e r k e
Horn.
Homerus
1,1), B e r l i n 1 9 9 1 .
II.
Ilias, ed. T. W. A l l e n , O x f o r d 1931.
ps. Eustathius
Od.
Odyssea, ed. P. v o n der M u h l l ( E d i t i o n e s helveticae. Series 3
graeca 4 ) , Basel 1 9 6 2 .
C o m m e n t a r i u s i n h e x a e m e r o n , ed. L. A l l a t i u s , L e i d e n 1629 Iambi.
Iamblichus D e v i t a Pythagorica, ed. L . D e u b n e r / U . K l e i n , Stuttgart
Excerpta latina B a r b a r i , i n : C h r o n i c a M i n o r a , e d . C. Frick, v i t . Pythag.
v o l . 1, L e i p z i g 1 8 9 2 , 1 8 3 - 3 7 1 . Exc. Eus. Exp. off.
A n o n y m i auctoris E x p o s i t i o o f f l c i o r u m ecclesiae, G e o r g i o
Io. A n a g .
( C S C O 7 1 , Syr. 2 8 ) , Paris 1913. der
griechischen
H i s t o r i k e r , ed.
F.
v
inedita in
ps. I o . A n t .
Anonymi
U . R o b e r t o ( T U 154), B e r l i n 2005. excerpta
c h r o n o g r a p h i c a , ed. U . Roberto, i n :
I o a n n e s A n t i o c h e n u s (vide supra), 5 5 6 - 5 7 5 . Io. C h r y s .
Georgius M o n a c h u s , C h r o n i c o n , ed. C. de B o o r / P . W i r t h , 2
h o r n , i n Gen, H o m i l i a e i n G e n e s i m , PG 53,21 - 54,580. h o m . i n M t . H o m i l i a e i n M a t t h a e u m , PG 57,13 - 58,794. h o r n , i n Io. H o m i l i a e i n I o a n n e m , PG 5 9 , 2 3 - 4 8 2 . Io. Lyd. Ioannes Lydus
2
Georgius M o n a c h u s c o n t i n u a t u s , ed. E. de M u r a l t , Sanktp e t e r b u r g 1859 ( = P G 110,41-1286).
G r e g o r i u s B a r h e b r a e u s , v i d e Barhebr.
codice
r
Paris 1841-1873. vol., S t u t t g a r t 1 9 7 8 . cont.
Chronographia
Ioannes A n t i o c h e n u s , Fragmenta ex H i s t o r i a chronica, ed.
Fragmenta h i s t o r i c o r u m G r a e c o r u m , ed. C. M u e l l e r , 5 v o l . ,
Georg. M o n .
Anagnostes,
A t h e n i e n s i B i b l . Nat. 2492, f. 1 0 8 - 1 1 6 ( s e c u n d u m M o s s -
Io.Ant. Jacoby,
B e r l i n / L e i p z i g 1923ss. FHG
1975.
h a m m e r i n e d i t i o n e Syncelli).
A r b e l e n s i v u l g o a d s c r i p t a , v o l . 1, trans. R. H . C o n n o l l y Fragmente
2
Ioannes
v i d e Eus.
FGrHist
B e r l i n 1986. v i d e Barhebr.
( = P G 18,708-793). Exc. Barb.
2
c h a r d ( G C S N.F. 7), B e r l i n 2 0 0 0 .
Hist. Dynast.
2
hex.
2
W e r k e 4 ) , B e r l i n 1955.
R e f u t a t i o o m n i u m haeresium, ed. M . M a r c o v i c h (PTS 2 5 ) ,
evangelica, ed. K . M r a s / E . desPlaces, 2 v o l .
(GCS 43, Eusebius W e r k e 8), B e r l i n 1 9 8 2 - 1 9 8 3 .
ps. Eust.
D e c u r s u t e m p o r u m , ed. C. F r i c k , C h r o n i c a M i n o r a , v o l . 1,
C o m m e n t a r i i i n D a n i e l e m , ed. G . N . B o n w e t s c h / M . R i
W e r k e 3,1), L e i p z i g 1904, v i d e e t i a m t e x t u m s y r i a c u m , ed.
ser.
Hilarianus
C h r o n i c o n , ed. A . Bauer/R. H e l m (GCS 46, H i p p o l y t u s chron.
o n o m a s t i c o n O n o m a s t i c o n , ed. E . K l o s t e r m a n n (GCS 1 1 , 1 , Eusebius
reg.
D e v i r i s illustribus, ed. A . Ceresa-Gastaldo, Firenze 1988.
Hippolytus
2
v.C.
C o m m e n t a r i i i n D a n i e l e m , ed. F. G l o r i e ( C C h r . S L 7 5 A ) ,
Leipzig 1892,155-174. Hipp.
2), Leipzig 1 9 0 3 - 1 9 0 9 ( = 1 9 9 9 ) .
Praeparatio
2
Epistulae, 4 vol., ed. I . H i l b e r g ( C S E L 5 4 - 5 6 ) , W i e n 1 9 9 6 . T u r n h o u t 1964.
vir. i l l .
Eclogae propheticae, ed. T h . Gaisford, O x f o r d 1842 ( = P G 22,1021-1262).
p r a e p . ev.
Q u i d sit, ad i m a g i n e m dei, P G 4 4 , 1 3 2 7 - 1 3 4 6 . H e r o d o t u s , ed. H . B. Rosen, 2 vol., L e i p z i g 1987-1997.
W e r k e 6), L e i p z i g 1913. eel. p r o p h .
H o m i l i a 1 de creatione h o m i n i s , ed. H . H o r n e r ( G r e g o r i i 30,9-37; 44,257-277).
imag.
155. r
ps. G r e g o r i u s Nyssenus N y s s e n i opera. S u p p l e m e n t u m ) , L e i d e n 1972, 2 - 4 0 ( = P G
trans.
J. Karst (GCS 20, Eusebius W e r k e 5), L e i p z i g 1 9 1 1 , 1 4 5 -
reg. s e r .
LXXXIII
mens.
Ioannes Chrysostomus
D e m e n s i b u s , ed. R. W u n s c h , L e i p z i g 1898.
LXXXIV Io.Mal.
Abbreviationes
1. Opera in apparatu adhibita
I o a n n e s Malalas, C h r o n o g r a p h i a , e d J. T h u r n ( C F H B 3 5 ) ,
Liber Genealogus
B e r l i n 2000. t r a n s l a t e d f r o m Zotenberg's E t h i o p i c text b y R. H . C h a r l e s ,
Berlin 1892,160-196. Lucian.
O x f o r d 1916. Iordanes Rom
Lucianus
verae h i s t .
Iordanes Gothus
F l a v i u s Iosephus ant. I u d .
M i c h . Syr.
M i c h a e l Syrus, C h r o n i c o n , ed. et trans. J. B. C h a b o t , 4 v o l . ,
M i c h . Psellus
M i c h a e l Psellus
Paris 1899-1910.
A n t i q u i t a t e s Iudaicae, ed. B. Niese, 4 v o l . , B e r l i n 1885—
h i s t . synt.
1896. bell. I u d .
Iren.
Mos. C h o r e n .
Niceph.
A d v e r s u s haereses, ed. A . Rousseau/L. Doutreleau, 2 v o l .
c h r o n . syn.
2
I s o d a d Mervensis, C o m m e n t a r i u s i n vetus
135.
ed. C. v a n d e n Eynde ( C S C O 229, 230 = SS 96, 97), 2 v o l . ,
OrMan
L o u v a i n 1962-1963.
Or.
O r a t i o Manassis Origenes Cels.
( C C h r . S L 175), T u r n h o u t 1 9 6 5 , 1 - 2 6 . Iul. Afr.
227), Paris 1 9 6 7 - 7 6 . c o m m . i n Gen. C o m m e n t a r i i i n G e n e s i m (fragmenta), P G 12,45-145.
Iulius Africanus
c o m m . i n M t . C o m m e n t a r i i i n M a t t h a e u m , 2 vol., ed. E. K l o s t e r m a n n / E .
C e s t i , ed. J.-R. V i e i l l e f o n d ( P I F F . H 2 0 ) , Firenze 1970.
ep. A r i s t .
E p i s t u l a ad A r i s t i d e m , ed. W . R e i c h a r d t , D i e Briefe des Sextus Julius Africanus an A r i s t i d e s u n d Origenes ( T U 3 4 , 3 ) ,
Benz (GCS 38.40, Origenes Werke 10), L e i p z i g 1 9 3 5 - 3 7 . sel. i n ps.
Selecta i n Psalmos (fragmenta), PG 12,1053-1686.
hist.
Historiae adversus
Oros.
Leipzig 1909,53-62.
Paulus Orosius
E p i s t u l a ad O r i g i n e m , ed. W . R e i c h a r d t , Die Briefe des Sextus Julius Africanus a n A r i s t i d e s u n d Origenes ( T U 3 4 , 3 ) ,
I u l . Pol.
Paus.
Pausanias, Graeciae descriptio, ed. M . Casevitz, v o l . 1-4, Paris 1998-2002 ( l i b r i 1,2,7,8); ed. M . H . Rocha-Pereira,
I u l i u s P o l l u x ( = ps. P o l y d e u k e s ) , H i s t o r i a physica, ed. J.
v o l . 1-3, L e i p z i g 1 9 8 9 - 1 9 9 0 . Petr. A l e x .
Iustinus Martyr dial.
ps. l u s t . coh. Gr.
paganos, ed. M . - P . A r n a u d - L i n d e t ,
3 vol., Paris 1 9 9 0 - 1 9 9 1 .
L e i p z i g 1909, 7 8 - 8 0 . H a r d t , M i i n c h e n 1792. lust.
C o n t r a C e l s u m , ed. H . B o r r e t , 5 v o l . (SC 132.136.147.150.
Liber Iubilaeorum cest.
ep. O r i g .
Nicephorus p a t r i a r c h a C o n s t a n t i n o p o l i t a n u s C h r o n i c o n breve, ed. C. de Boor, N i c e p h o r i a r c h i e p i s c o p i C o n s t a n t i n o p o l i t a n i opuscula historica, L e i p z i g 1880, 7 9 -
testamentum,
I t i n e r a r i u m B u r d i g a l e n s e , ed. P. Geyer/O. C u n t z , i n : I t i n e r a r i a et alia g e o g r a p h i c a Iub.
prae-
fatione R. W. T h o m s o n , N e w York 1981).
(SC 2 1 1 ) , Paris 20 02. IsodadMerv.
Moses Chorenensis, H i s t o r i a A r m e n i o r u m , ed. M . A b e lean/S. Y a r o u t ' i w n e a n , T i f l i s 1913 (ed. anast. c u m
2
C o n t r a A p i o n e m , ed. T h . R e i n a c h , Paris 1972. I r e n a e u s Lugdunensis
haer.
M i c h a e l i Pselli H i s t o r i a Syntomos, ed. W . J. A e r t s ( C F H B 30), B e r l i n 1990.
B e l l u m I u d a i c u m , ed. O . M i c h e l / O . Bauernfeind, 3 v o l . , D a r m s t a d t 1959-1969.
c. A p .
Verae historiae, ed. M . D . Macleod, i n : L u c i a n i opera, v o l . 1, Oxford 1972,82-125.
D e s u m m a t e m p o r u m v e l o r i g i n e actibusque gentis R o m a n o r u m , ed. T h . M o m m s e n ( M G H A A 5,1), B e r l i n 1882.
Ios.
anni CCCXVII, in: Chronica m i n o r a
saec. I V . V . V I . V I L , v o l . 1, ed. T h . M o m m s e n ( M G H . A A 9 ) ,
I o a n n e s Niciensis, T h e c h r o n i c l e o f John, bishop o f N i k i u ,
Io. N i c .
Liber Genealogus
LXXXV
D i a l o g u s c u m T r y p h o n e Iudaeo, ed. M . M a r c o v i c h ( P T S
Phil. Sid.
47), B e r l i n 1997.
Philo
ps. I u s t i n u s
Iustin.
M . I u n i a n i Iustini Epitoma h i s t o r i a r u m Philippicarum
L e o Gr.
vide Sym. Log.
P o m p e i T r o g i , ed. O. Seel, L e i p z i g 1935 (ed. anast. 1985).
Philippus Sidensis, C h r i s t i a n a historia, cf. H e y d e n 2006. Philo A l e x a n d r i n u s
migr. Abr.
C o h o r t a t i o a d Graecos, ed. M . M a r c o v i c h (PTS 3 2 ) , B e r l i n 1990.
Petrus A l e x a n d r i n u s , Ekthesis c h r o n o n , ed. S. G . Samodurova, Vizantijskij V r e m e n n i k 1 8 , 1 9 6 1 , 1 5 0 - 1 9 7 .
D e m i g r a t i o n e A b r a h a m i , ed. P. W e n d l a n d , i n : P h i l o n i s A l e x a n d r i n i opera, v o l . 2, B e r l i n 1897,268-314.
op.
D e opificio m u n d i , ed. L . C o h n , i n : P h i l o n i s A l e x a n d r i n i opera, v o l . 1, B e r l i n 1 8 9 6 , 1 - 6 0 .
post.
D e posteritate C a i n i , ed. P. Wendland, i n : P h i l o n i s A l e x a n d r i n i opera, v o l . 2, B e r l i n 1 8 9 7 , 1 - 4 1 .
LXXXVI Philostr.
2. Editores et emendatores
Abbreviationes
C a i u s Suetonius T r a n q u i l l u s
Suet.
L. F l a v i u s P h i l o s t r a t u s
Nero
gym.
D e g y m n a s t i c a , ed. J. Jiithner, L e i p z i g / B e r l i n 1909.
VA
V i t a A p o l l o n i i , ed. J. Keyser, Flavii P h i l o s t r a t i opera, Leipzig
D e v i t a Caesarum, l i b . V I . N e r o , ed. M . I h m , L e i p z i g 1908, 222-259. S u l p i c i u s Severus
Sulp. Sev.
1870,1-344.
chron.
Phleg. Trail.
P h l e g o n T r a l l i a n u s , F G r H i s t 257
Photius
P h o t i u s P a t r i a r c h a , Bibliotheca, 8 v o l . , ed. R. H e n r y ( C B y ) ,
C h r o n i c a , ed. G . d e Senneville-Grave (SC 441), Paris 1999.
ps. Sym.
ps. Symeon, A n o n y m i opus i n e d i t u m i n codice Parisino gr.
Sym.
S y m e o n Logothetes
1712, f. 18-271; vide et Gelzer 2 , 2 7 6 - 2 9 7 ; 3 5 7 - 3 8 4 .
Paris 1 9 5 9 - 1 9 7 7 . Pindarus
Pind. olymp.
Log. Leo Gr.
4
C a r m i n a O l y m p i a c a , ed. A . Puech ( C U F r ) , Paris 1958.
Ti. Plinius nat. hist.
Th. Mel.
T i m a e u s , e d . J. B u r n e t , i n : Platonis O p e r a , v o l . 4, O x f o r d
( M o n u m e n t a Saecularia A c a d e m i a e S c i e n t i a r u m M o n a censis 3 , l ) , M i i n c h e n 1859. vide e t i a m Cedr., I u l . Pol.
N a t u r a l i s h i s t o r i a , ed. L. I a n / K . M a y h o f f , 5 v o l . , Leipzig Sync.
G e o r g i u s Syncellus, Ecloga c h r o n o g r a p h i c a , ed. A . A . M o s s h a m m e r (BiTeu), L e i p z i g 1984.
de D a e d . Plat D e D a e d a l i s Plataeensibus, i n : M o r a l i a , v o l . 7, ed. F. H . S a n d b a c h ( B i T e u ) , Leipzig 1 9 6 7 , 9 4 - 9 9 . P l a t , quaest.
Platonicae quaestiones, ed. C. H u b e r t , i n : P l u t a r c h i M o
Numa
V i t a N u m a e , ed. R. Flaceliere et al., i n : Plutarque, Vies,
Tac.
C o r n e l i u s Tacitus dial.
D i a l o g u s de Oratoribus, ed. R. Mayer, C a m b r i d g e 2 0 0 1 .
Tat.
ralia, V I / I , L e i p z i g 1 9 5 4 , 1 1 3 - 1 4 2 .
Tatianus orat.
O r a t i o ad Graecos , ed. M . W h i t t a k e r , O x f o r d 1982.
TGFr
T r a g i c o r u m g r a e c o r u m f r a g m e n t a , ed. A . N a u c k , L e i p z i g 2
vol. 1 ( C U F r ) , Paris'1993,256-318. in Gen.
P r o c o p i u s Gazaeus
Th. Mel.
C o m m e n t a r i u s i n G e n e s i m usque a d cap. X V I I I , ed. A . M a i
Theodorus Lector
chron.
E p i t o m a c h r o n i c o r u m , i n : C h r o n i c a m i n o r a saec. I V V V I .
Theoph. A n t .
V I I . , v o l . 1, ed. T h . M o m m s e n ( M G H . A A 9 ) , B e r l i n 1892,
Autol.
385-485. Quintil. i n s t i t . orat. SIG
3
1995.
Theophilus Antiochenus A d A u t o l y c u m , ed. et trans. R. M . Grant, O x f o r d 1970. T h u c y d i d e s , Historiae, ed. H . S. Jones/J. E. Powell, 2 v o l .
Thuc.
M a r c u s Fabius Q u i n t i l i a n u s Sylloge I n s c r i p t i o n u m G r a e c a r u m , 4 v o l . , ed. G. D i t t e n -
Vard.
berger, L e i p z i g 1 9 1 5 - 1 9 2 4 . Socrates, H i s t o r i a ecdesiastica, ed. G. C h . H a n s e n
( S C B O ) , Oxford 1942. V a r d a n Arawelc'i, O p u s h i s t o r i c u m , trans. R. W . T h o m s o n ,
7 v o l . , ed. J. C o u s i n ( C U F r ) , Paris 1 9 7 5 - 8 0 . 3
Socr.
H i s t o r i a ecdesiastica, ed. G . C . Hansen (GCS N . F . 3), B e r l i n 2
Prosper T i r o (Aquensis)
1889.
v i d e S y m . Log.
epitome
( C A V C 6 ) , R o m 1834 ( = P G 8 7 / 1 , 2 1 - 5 1 2 ) . Prosp.
T h e o d o s i u s Melitenus, C h r o n o g r a p h i a , ed. T h . L . F. Tafel
C. P l i n i u s S e c u n d u s
Plutarchus
Proc. G.
Grammaticus, C h r o n o g r a p h i a , ed. I . Bekker, B o n n
1902, p . I l l , 1 7 a - 9 2 c St.
1892-1909. Plut.
Leo
1842.
Plato
PL
LXXXVII
DOP
43,1989,125-226.
I o a n n e s Zonaras, E p i t o m e h i s t o r i a r u m , lib. 1-12, 3 vol., ed. (GCS
Zon.
L . D i n d o r f , Leipzig 1 8 6 8 - 1 8 7 5 .
N.F. 1), B e r l i n 1995. Sol.
Gaius I u l i u s S o l i n u s , Collectanea r e r u m m e m o r a b i l i u m , ed.
2. Editores et emendatores
2
T h . M o m m s e n , B e r l i n 1895. Soz.
S o z o m e n u s , H i s t o r i a ecdesiastica, ed. J. B i d e z / G . C h . H a n 2
sen ( G C S N . F . 4 ) , B e r l i n 1995. Strabo
Strabo, G e o g r a p h i c a , 5 vol., ed. S. Radt, G o t t i n g e n 2003-06.
Suda
Suidae l e x i c o n , 5 v o l . , ed. A . A d l e r ( L e x i c o g r a p h i Graeci 1), Leipzig 1928-1938.
Adler/Tuffin
T h e C h r o n o g r a p h y o f George Synkellos. A Byzantine C h r o n i c l e o f U n i v e r s a l H i s t o r y f r o m the C r e a t i o n , translated w i t h i n t r o d u c t i o n a n d n o t e s b y W . Adler/P. T u f f i n , O x f o r d 2002.
Chilm.
E. C h i l m e a d , Johannis Malalae H i s t o r i a chronica, O x f o r d 1691.
LXXXVIII
Abbreviationes
3. Cetera
Cr.
J. A . C r a m e r
cf.
confer
Di.
L. Dindorf
cod.
codex
Gelzer
H . Gelzer, Sextus I u l i u s A f r i c a n u s u n d die byzantinische C h r o n o
codd.
codices
g r a p h i e , 2 v o l . et add., L e i p z i g 1 8 8 0 - 1 8 9 8 (ed. anast. 1 v o l . N e w
corr.
correxit/correxerunt
Y o r k 1967).
del.
delevit/deleverunt
Sextus I u l i u s A f r i c a n u s , C h r o n o g r a p h i a , e d i t i o m a n u s c r i p t a , ed. H .
des.
desinit/desinunt
Gelzer, a p u d B i b l i o t h e c a m U n i v e r s i t a t i s Jenensis (Nachlass H e i n -
ed.
edidit/editio
rich Gelzer).
f.
folium/folia
G e o r g i i m o n a c h i q u o n d a m S y n c e l l i c h r o n o g r a p h i a et N i c e p h o r i
fort.
fortasse
p a t r i a r c h a e b r e v i a r i u m c h r o n o g r a p h i c u m , ed. I . Goar ( C o r p u s b y -
fr.
fragmentum
Gelzer
ms
Goar
Goar
m
Gutschmid Kamb. Moss.
z a n t i n a e historiae 15), R o m a 1652.
ibd.
ibidem
i n m a r g i n e e d i t i o n i s , R o m a 1652.
inc.
incipit/incipiunt
A . v o n G u t s c h m i d , i n : Eusebi c h r o n i c o r u m l i b r i duo, ed. A . Schoe
in ms.
in manuscripto
ne, v o l . 1, B e r l i n 1875.
1.
linea/lineae
A . K a m b y l i s , i n : Ioannes M a l a l a s , C h r o n o g r a p h i a , ed. J. T h u r n
marg.
in margine
( C F H B 3 5 ) , B e r l i n 2000.
man. p r i m .
manus prima
Georgius
Syncellus, Ecloga
c h r o n o g r a p h i c a , ed. A . A . M o s s
h a m m e r ( B i T e u ) , L e i p z i g 1984. Routh
Julius A f r i c a n u s , L i b r i q u i n q u e de t e m p o r i b u s seu c h r o n i c o n , ed.
Olympias
Pprop.
pagina/paginae
r
proposuit/proposuerunt recto
3 5 7 - 5 0 9 (ed. anast. H i l d e s h e i m / N e w Y o r k 1974).
sc.
scilicet
I . Rutgers, Sexti Julii A f r i c a n i
scrips.
scripsit/scripserunt
suppl.
supplevit/suppleverunt verso
2
M . J. R o u t h , i n : Reliquiae Sacrae, v o l . 2, O x f o r d 1846, 2 3 8 - 3 0 9 , Rutgers
Ol.
O l y m p i a d o n anagraphe, L e i d e n
1862. 2
Seal.
J. J. Scaliger, Thesaurus T e m p o r u m , L e i d e n 1606 ( 1658).
Vig.
R Vigerius
3. Cetera A b b r e v i a t i o n e s b i b l i o g r a p h i c a e s e c u n d u m S c h w e r t n e r 1992. l i t t e r a e i n c o d i c i b u s deperditae c o n i e c t u r a suppletae < >
l i t t e r a e additae
{}
l i t t e r a e deletae
<
omisit/omiserunt
[...]
lacuna
+
addidit/addiderunt transposuit/transposuerunt
=
similiter etiam
—*
v i d e e t i a m ( i n hac e d i t i o n e )
ad loc.
ad l o c u m
AM
annus m u n d i
app.
apparatus/apparatu/apparatum
V
LXXXIX
IULIUS AFRICANUS CHRONOGRAPHIAE
Iulius Africanus
2
T l Africanus under Pertinax and Septimius Severus ( A D 193)
3
Tl Testimonia Tla
on the Life of Iulius Africanus
G e o r g i u s Syncellus ( 4 3 4 , 1 1 - 2 1 M o s s h a m m e r )
Leonides, the father of Origen, was martyred when persecution broke out in Alexandria. Musianus, an ecclesiastical author, was becoming known. 1 cf. Cass. D i o 7 4 , U s ; Aur. Vict., Caes. 20,1 7 cf. Eus., c a n . ™ " 212« 8 cf. Eus., c a n .
Hier
2 - 4 cf. Eus.,
can.
H i t t
211
a
H I
6 cf. Eus., c a n . " 212
c
212'
Through the use of Greek doctrines, the feeble-minded Origen formulated in Alexandria mean ingless and radical ideas. As one who had the same beliefs and treated Origen like a god, Euse
[At = x (= C O T V ) + z (= M P Q R S ) ] 1 OEuppoq A x P M R S oePqpoc Q S Itdv-TEVOC, t | 5lE7ip£7tEV t SlETtpClTTEV A 9 6p6(ppCl)V At OUOqJpOVO. C
Tib
C
bius, [pupil] of Pamphilus, should be classed with him.
c
4 Ttdvtaivoc, P TIEVTCUVOC. A
c
G e o r g i u s C e d r e n u s ( 4 4 1 , 1 7 - 2 1 B e k k e r ) , cf. e t i a m Symeon Logothetes ( L e o
Tib
G r a m m a t i c u s [ 7 1 , 1 6 - 1 8 Bekker] = T h e o d o s i u s M e l i t e n u s [ 5 4 , 1 8 - 2 0 Tafel]) 'Em TOUTOU ( s c . Pertinax), cue, cpnolv Euoefhoc,, f|v 6 ZupuaYOc., elq Tciv eppnvEurcov Tfjc TU>v'E(Jpakov
Symmachus lived during his [sc. Pertinax'] reign, as Eusebius states. He was one of the translators
Ypa
of the Scripture of the Hebrews, a member of the Ebionite heresy. There was also Porphyry the phi
AcppiKav6c; 6 xpovoypdepoe,.
losopher, who wrote against Christians, and A f r i c a n u s the c h r o n o g r a p h e r .
'Eni TOUTOU AecoviSpc 6 TOU KCticocppovoc. '0.piy£vouc, mrrrip E u a p r u p n e r E v .
During his reign, Leonides, the father of the evil-minded Origen, was martyred.
r
1 - 4 cf. Iul. P o l . 228,23 - 230,3; ps. Sym. f. 80 ; Mich. Psellus, hist. synt. 34 1 cf. Eus., h.e. 6,16,4-17 1 'Eni IlEpTivaKoc, Sym. Log. | d>c,-..£uuuaxoc. < Sym. Log. alpeoiv + f\v S y m . Log. | 6 < Sym. Log.
marg. Leo G r . < T h . Mel. 4Tm...£u.apTupr|0£v < Sym. Log.
1
Although the two notices that follow have overlapping material (see the sentence immediately following the note about Africanus), they disagree about the floruit of Africanus and the death of Origen's father Leonides. The first one dates them to the reign of Septimius Severus, the second to his predecessor Pertinax.
Iulius Africanus
4
T 2 Africanus' Mission on behalf of Nicopolis
T2
T 2 Africanus'
T 2 a E u s e b i u s , Canones ( C h r o n i c o n Paschale [ 4 9 9 , 5 - 7 D i n d o r f ] =
armeniace
Mission
on behalf of
5
Nicopolis
T2a
h
[224 Karst] = Hieronymus [214 Helm]) Nicopolis o f Palestine, f o r m e r l y E m m a u s , was f o u n d e d as a polis, w h e n I u l i u s naXaiarivric vnkp
aOTfjc, Kai npoi'crrauevou ' I o u M o u AcppiKavou xoO xcx x p o v i K a auyypa\|ra-
Africanus, the a u t h o r o f the Chronica, presided over the u n d e r t a k i n g .
acted as ambassador o n its b e h a l f a n d
1
uevou.
1-3
Iordanes, Rom. 279 (36 Mommsen) Emmaus in Iudaea constructa et Nicopolim nominata.
tunc et Africanus egregius temporum scriptor pro ipsa legationem suscepit ad principem. Mich. Syr. 6,7 (187,29s Chabot, unde etiam Barhebr. [59 Wallis-Budge]) De son temps (sc. Helagabalus) fut batie Nicopolis de Palestine, qui est Emmaus; le chroniquer Iulius Africanus presidait a sa construction. 1 - 3 cf. S o z . , h . e. 5,21,5
T2b
T 2 b H i e r o n y m u s , De u i r i s i l l u s t r i b u s 63 ( 1 6 6 - 1 6 8 C e r e s a - G a s t a l d o ) I u l i u s A f r i c a n u s , cuius q u i n q u e de t e m p o r i b u s e x t a n t u o l u m i n a , sub I m p e r a -
D u r i n g the r e i g n o f t h e e m p e r o r M a r c u s A u r e l i u s A n t o n i n u s , w h o was t h e
t o f e M a r c o A u r e l i o A n t o n i n o , q u i M a c r i n o successerat, l e g a t i o n e m p r o instau-
successor to M a c r i n u s , I u l i u s Africanus, w h o s e five books o n c h r o n o l o g y are
r a t i o n e u r b i s E m m a u s suscepit, quae postea N i c o p o l i s a p p e l l a t a est.
still i n c i r c u l a t i o n , u n d e r t o o k an embassy o n b e h a l f o f the restoration o f the
H u i u s est epistula a d O r i g e n e m super quaestione Susannae: eo q u o d dicat i n 5
H e b r a i c o h a n c f a b u l a m n o n h a b e r i nec c o n u e n i r e c u m H e b r a i c a e t y m o l o g i a d7to T O O
n p i v o u Tipiocu Kai
a n d T O O crxivou a x i c o u , c o n t r a
quem
t o w n o f E m m a u s , w h i c h was subsequently n a m e d N i c o p o l i s . There is a l e t t e r b y h i m t o O r i g e n c o n c e r n i n g the question o f Susanna:
doctam
namely, he asserts t h a t this story is n o t f o u n d i n the Hebrew, n o r is the
e p i s t u l a m scripsit Origenes. E x t a t eius ad A r i s t i d e m a l t e r a epistula, i n qua super
w o r d - p l a y i n 'euro xoO n p i v o u npioat Kai arto T O U rjxivou a x i o m ' consistent w i t h
6ia
Hebrew e t y m o l o g y . A g a i n s t h i m , O r i g e n w r o t e a n erudite letter. There is i n cir
p l e n i s s i m e disputat.
culation another l e t t e r b y h i m to A r i s t i d e s , i n w h i c h he discusses at v e r y great length the d i s a g r e e m e n t t h a t appears t o exist i n t h e genealogy o f the Savior i n
4 - 9 -»T3;T11,8-11
M a t t h e w and L u k e .
6s->T12,3s
8 M t 1,1-17; L c 3,23-38 [a(3y6] 2 legationem] legatione y relegationem S Nocopolisfi
4
Huius < Gebhardt cuius y
2s instauratione] instaurationem o(3
| est] extant epistulae y
|
3 Nicopolis]
quaestione] questionem (3y
6 doctam] dogma y 7 eius < 5 | altera epistula] alteram epistulam p 9 disputat] disputauit y
Although the three witnesses to Eusebius' report of Africanus' mission to Rome on behalf of Emmaus textually agree, they date the event differendy. According to the Latin and the Arme nian version of the chronicle, the embassy occurred during the reign of Elagabalus, in A D 221. The Chronicon Paschale dates the embassy two years later, during the reign of his successor Alexander Severus.
Iulius Africanus
6 T2c
Nicephorus
T2 Africanus' Mission on behalf of Nicopolis
Callistus X a n t h o p u l u s , E x c e r p t a
ex h i s t o r i a
ecdesiastica
T2c
7
2
r
(Eusebius Caesariensis et Philippus Sidensis?) i n codice Barocciano 142, f. 2 1 2 , In a letter to Aristides, A f r i c a n u s has w r i t t e n m o s t a d m i r a b l y about the appa
A f r i c a n u s was f r o m E m m a u s , t h e village i n Palestine to w h i c h those w i t h 3
Cleopas were t r a v e l i n g . T h r o u g h A f r i c a n u s ' embassy, i t later received t h e legal
MarSaicp T E Kai A O U K C L
6e 6 AcppiKavoc; dTto'Euuaouc, Tfjc; Kcbunc; Tfjc, E V n a A a t a d v n , E V fj o i rapi
KXEortav eTtopEuovro, f\
gelists M a t t h e w and Luke.
iIc,
TE
WTEpov S i K a i a
TTOXEOJC,
s t a n d i n g o f a city and was r e n a m e d N i c o p o l i s .
AaftoOaa K a r a Ttp£a(3£iav
AcppiKavoO N I K O T C O X I C ; u£Tcuvouda9n.
l - 3 E u s . , h . e . 1,7,1
T2d
4 - 6 Phil. Sid,frg.4.1 Heyden
T2d
G e o r g i u s Syncellus (439,15-20 M o s s h a m m e r )
Ep-uaouc; r)
n a X a i a T i v j ] K(i)ur|, n e p i rjc, cpspETai
ispou; suayyEXioic,,
E m m a u s , the village i n Palestine m e n t i o n e d i n the h o l y gospels, was h o n o r e d
NiKonoXtc; £Tipr)9r| KaXsTaGai (mo AXe^dv5pou TOO auTOKpdTopoc,, AcppiKavoO
w i t h t h e n a m e N i c o p o l i s b y t h e e m p e r o r Alexander, w h e n A f r i c a n u s , the author
np£a(3EuaauEvou tdc, iaTopiac. E V Tt£VTaj3i(3Xa) cnjyypa\)/auEvou.
of a h i s t o r y i n five books, acted as its ambassador.
EV
AcppiKavoc; r p v EWEdpifiXov
TCOV K E O T C U V
TpiKwv K a l cpuoiKcliv Kai YEtopYiKcov Kai c;dv6pco
TOUTU)
E V TOIC,
A f r i c a n u s addressed to t h i s A l e x a n d e r a treatise i n n i n e books entitled t h e
£my£Ypauu£vr|v TtpaYpcrtEiav ia-
XUUEUTIKCOV
n£pi£xouoav SuvdpEic;
AAE-
4
Cesti,
w h i c h deals w i t h the p r o p e r t i e s o f m e d i c a l , n a t u r a l , a g r i c u l t u r a l a n d
a l c h e m i c a l agents.
TtpoacpwvEi.
4 - 6 — T 3 , l s ; T i l , I s ; T12.2-4 l c f . Lc 24,13 [At = x ( = C O T V ) + z ( = M P Q R S ) ] 1 role < t
4
EW£dj3i|5Xov Goar evvd|3i|}Xov At
| KEcrrtivA
Kaiarilv t
2
The collection of excerpts from various historians found in codex Baroccianus 142 was pro th
bably compiled by the 14 cent, historian Nicephorus Callistus Xanthopulus; for discussion of this codex, see most recently Pouderon 1994. The first paragraph of the text originates in Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History. For Philip of Side as the possible source of the second part of the notice, see Heyden 2006,223-225. 3
O n the problematic identification of Emmaus, see Gelzer l,6f; Adler/Tuffin 2002,517, n. 7.
4
Cf. above T2a, which dates the mission of Africanus during either the reign of Elagabalus or of Alexander Severus. Syncellus' report that Alexander Severus was the emperor who conferred the name Nicopolis on the city does not state under which emperor the actual mission occurred.
Iulius Africanus
8
T3 Africanus under Gordian III (AD 238-244)
T3
T 3 Africanus
T3a 'Ev
Eusebius, H i s t o r i a ecclesiastica 6,31,1-3 (584,21 - 586,13 Schwartz) TOUTCp (sc. sub Gordiano Augusto) Kai A9piKav6c, 6 ttbv EmysypauuEvcuv
KEOTWV
or>7Ypa
TOUTOU
cntopoOvroc, (be, v 6 0 o u K a i TtenXaauEvnc.
'QpryEVEt ypcupeiaa cpepetai,
oucmc, xf\c,
EV
T AavirjX Kara
Eouadvvav iatopiac,- npoc, f|v 'QpiyEvnc. dvTiypd9£i TtXn prorata. T o u 5 ' aurou AcppiKavotJ Kai aXXa xov dpiGuov T I S V T E Xpovoypa
0Tcou8a0uaTa-
under Gordian
III (AD
9
238-244)
T3a At this t i m e [i.e. d u r i n g the reign o f G o r d i a n A u g u s t u s ] , Africanus, the a u t h o r of the w o r k e n t i t l e d the Cesti, was b e c o m i n g k n o w n . A letter b y h i m , w r i t t e n t o Origen, is i n c i r c u l a t i o n ; there he raises the q u e s t i o n as to w h e t h e r the s t o r y o f Susanna i n t h e b o o k o f D a n i e l was a s p u r i o u s fabrication.
I n his response t o
this letter, O r i g e n w r i t e s at very great l e n g t h .
ev ole,
F r o m t h e same A f r i c a n u s , there has also c o m e to us the
Chronographiae,
CTEiAaaScu em xf\v AAeij&vSpeiav Sia Tco\Xf]v ToCHpaicXa iprjunv, OV £7ti XoyotC, (piXoaocpoiC,
five books i n n u m b e r , a project that was p u r s u e d w i t h p a i n s t a k i n g accuracy. I n
Kai Toic, aAXoic.'EXXiivtov ua0r)uaaiv eu udXa 6ia7tpe\|/avTa, xrjv E7tiaK07tf|v rfjc;
this work, he States t h a t he himself set out on a journey to Alexandria because of the great
auxoGt sKKXr|0iac, i y x
£ l
P
l ( !
Kai £Tepa Se tot) aurou
^
y a l
eSr|A.cbcFct[i.£v.
A9piKavou
9£perai EmoToXq rtpoc, ApioTEion v, Ttepl
rfic; voui£ou£vr|c, 6ia9a>v[ac, xd>v Ttapd MaxBaiq) T E Kai AouKa T O U Xpiarou
fame of Heraclas. A s w e stated, Heraclas, v e r y w e l l - k n o w n for his discourses i n philosophy a n d o t h e r branches o f Greek l e a r n i n g , was entrusted w i t h
the
oversight o f t h e c h u r c h there.
yEVEaXoyicuv- E V fj a a 9 £ a T a t a rf]v o u p 9 u ) v i a v T W V EuayyEXiaTtiJv 7tapiaTnaiv it,
A n o t h e r letter, f r o m the same Africanus, is i n c i r c u l a t i o n , w r i t t e n t o A r i s t i -
ioTopiac, E L C aurov KaTEXBouanc., i\v K a r a Kaipov E V TO) n p u r a p rfjc uEra yApac,
des. I t concerns t h e supposed c o n t r a d i c t i o n b e t w e e n the genealogies o f C h r i s t
U7to9£aeojc, 7tpoXa(3a>v £^e9£ur|v.
in M a t t h e w a n d L u k e . I n this letter, he establishes m o s t clearly the agreement between the evangelists o n the basis o f i n f o r m a t i o n that came d o w n t o h i m ,
1 Sym. Log. (Leo Gr. [75,17s Bekker] = Th. Mel. [56,14 Tafel] = Iul. Pol. [236,3s Hardt] » Georg. Mo'n. cont. [ P G 110.545B] » Zon. [12,17 Dindorf])'Era Ma^iuou KO'I rop5iavou ( K a r a TOUTOUC. TOUC. Xpovouc. Iul. Pol. TOTE 6E Kai Zon.) Acppu T 2 b , 3 - 6 ; T l 1,6-9; T12.3-5 6s = F98 10-13 - • T i l , 12-14; T2b,6s
w h i c h I have a l r e a d y set out at the a p p r o p r i a t e place i n the first b o o k o f t h e present w o r k .
Is Iul. Afr., cest. 2 - 4 Iul. Afr., ep. Orig.; cf. Mich. Syr. 6,7 8s cf. Eus., h.e. 6,26; 6,29,4; 6,35; Eus., c a n . " 215 (sub anno 231 p. Chr. n.) 10-12 Iul. Afr., ep. Arist. Hi
h
a r m
[ A T E R B D M X A ] 1 K C U I S E K C U M I S 6...e-yvupiCero A T E R B D M warein bekannterSchriftsteller £""" erat... vir inter scriptores ecclesiasticos nobilis A 3 tlx;TERBDM cba dv A 6 Ttenoinueva M 8 eUr|vu>v A T E R M Tffiv eXAr|vcov T E R Graecorum A < X"™ 11 TOU E rasura BD TayYE\iaTv auucpcoviav A T E R
T3b
A g a p i u s Mabbugensis, H i s t o r i a universalis ( P O 7/4, 526,1s Vasiliev)
T3b At this t i m e [i.e. d u r i n g the reign o f G o r d i a n A u g u s t u s ] , there was k n o w n Africanus, t h e a u t h o r o f chronicles, w h o c o m p o s e d m a n y books o n the t i m e s and the b i o g r a p h i e s o f t h e kings and others.
1
marg. codd. (recte)
1
Note that the information in Agapius, which appears to be independent of that in Eusebius, confirms his dating of Africanus' floruit.
10
T 4 Africanus
T4 T 4 a S y m e o n Logothetes (Leo G r a m m a t i c u s [76,14 - 77,1 Bekker] = T h e o d o s i u s Melitenus
11
T4 Africanus under Decius (AD 249-251)
Iulius Africanus
under Decius
(AD
249-251)
T4a
[ 5 6 , 2 5 - 57,2 Tafel]) ~ G e o r g i u s M o n a c h u s c o n t i n u a t u s ( 3 6 0 , 4 - 6
M u r a l t = P G 110, 5 5 2 C ) AEKIOC, epaaiAeuaev
err) 8vo,
AcppiKavoc, K a i rprryopioc; 6
[...]
ETC! T O U T O U
rjv KAr|ur|c; 6 aTpojuateuc; Kai
and Africanus a n d Gregory Thaumaturgus.
T4b
T 4 b M i c h a e l Psellus, H i s t o r i a syntomos 4 4 (28,94s A e r t s ) 'ETTL T O U T O U
D e c i u s r e i g n e d for t w o years; . . . l i v i n g d u r i n g his r u l e were C l e m e n t , author o f the Stromata,
QaupaToupyoc.
( S C . D e c i u s ) KAf|unc; 6 0Tpu>uaT£i)c; EyvcupitETO AcppiKavoc, T E 6
D u r i n g h i s [ D e c i u s ] reign, C l e m e n t , author o f t h e Stromata,
was b e c o m i n g
1
k n o w n as w e l l as A f r i c a n u s t h e p h i l o s o p h e r a n d Navatus a presbyter.
cpiAoaocpoc; K a i N a u d t o c ; •ripEap'vJTEpoc,.
T 5 Africanus
T 5 G e o r g i u s Syncellus (445,27 - 446,7 M o s s h a m m e r ) X)c, (sc. Eusebius) U E I ^ U TtdvTiov d y u u v K a i oiSacncdXcov a u t o v (sc. Origenem) cmoSeiEjca aTtou5d(cov
as a Contemporary
of
Origen
In the sixth book of his Ecclesiastical History, he [Eusebius] strives to prove that he [Origen] was greater than all the other saints and teachers. As one holding the same views that Origen did, he
ev EKTO) Tfjc; e K K X r i a i a o T i K f j c OUTOO iaTopiac. X6ya> o u o c p p o v w v COITO 7toXXotc, EYKCOUIOIC; cuVr6v E V -
uppiCei, uf| eiSwc, a Xe-yei r\ TtEpi (I)v SiaPePaioutai. Ttdvu yap oXiyOV TCEpi TCOV Kara TOUO5E TOUC;
xpovouc; [sptov Kai uaKapitov Tcarepcov ETtiuvriaGEic,, K\f]UEVTOc; AEyco
TOO
5 cTpcouaTetoc;, 'iTCTtoAutou T O U lEpopaprupoc,, AcppiKavoC xov taropiKou, AiovufflOU TOIJ p.eydX0V AXEC;av5p£iac; Kai aXXcOV, |j6vou v
XOV uaraioeppovoc,
naiSoc, d v a Y C f Y r | eK6eidc>i U£xpi Tfjc EV T(|) uapTupiti) XEirtoTaKTrjcrEOK;.
actually insults him with his lavish words of praise, since he knows neither whereof he speaks nor
what he affirms. For he makes o n l y t h e briefest remarks about t h e h o l y a n d blessed fathers o f t h e t i m e , I m e a n C l e m e n t , author o f the Stromata,
a n d the h o l y
m a r t y r H i p p o l y t u s , a n d A f r i c a n u s the h i s t o r i a n , a n d D i o n y s i u s t h e Great o f
'npivsvouc xr\v EK
A l e x a n d r i a , a n d Others. The conduct of only the feeble-minded Origen from his childhood up to his desertion in the face of martyrdom does he exalt to the status of divinity.
[At] 3 oXiyov A 6Xiywv t 4 \iyio xov t XEYOUEVOU A
1
Psellus' description of Africanus as a 'philosopher' may have been inspired by his wide-ranging learning, especially apparent in the Cesti. Cf. T12, where the Sudas reference to Africanus the 'philosopher' precedes a summary of the contents of the Cesfi.
T6
13
T6 Chronological Overview
Iulius Africanus
12
E x c e r p t o r anonymus i n cake chronici H i e r o n y m i a n i Testimonia
on General Aspects of the
Chronographiae
I t e m s e c u n d u m A f r i c a n u m , q u i de t e m p o r i b u s et h i s t o r i i s H e b r a e o r u m et Graec o r u m et Persarum et M a c e d o n u m c u m A l e x a n d r i n o r u m , i t e m q u e R o m a T 6 Chronological
n o r u m V libris o m n i a c o m p l e x u s est. IICCXLII.
Also a c c o r d i n g t o A f r i c a n u s , w h o has i n five b o o k s i n c l u d e d e v e r y t h i n g p e r
I t e m a c a t a c l y s m o usque a d A b r a h a m et t r a n s m i g r a t i o n e m i n t e r r a m Chanaan anni M X V .
t a i n i n g t o t h e c h r o n o l o g y and h i s t o r y o f t h e Hebrews, Greeks, Persians a n d
A b A d a m u s q u e ad c a t a c l y s m u m N o e 5
anni
H a b i t a t i o o m n i s generis I s r a h e l i n terra Chanaan et i n t e r r a A e g y p t i anni C C C C X X X . 10
F r o m A d a m t o t h e F l o o d o f Noah:
2242 years.
2
A n d f r o m the F l o o d u p to A b r a h a m a n d t h e m i g r a t i o n to the l a n d o f Canaan:
anni X L .
1015 years.
H i e s u s N a u e et q u i post i p s u m presbyteri
a n n i LV.
The s o j o u r n o f a l l t h e offspring o f Israel i n t h e l a n d o f Canaan a n d t h e l a n d o f
anni CCCCXC.
S a c e r d o t u m et I u d i c u m
anni X C .
Regum Hebraeorum
anni CCCCXC.
C a p t i u i t a t i s et d e s t r u c t i o n i s H i e r u s a l e m
anni L X X .
Persarum regnum
anni C C X X X .
M a c e d o n u m p r i n c i p a t u s c u m A l e x a n d r i n i s et Ptolemaeis
anni CCC.
Et i m p e r i u m R o m a n o r u m usque ad Saluatorem et r e s u r r e c t i o n e m eius I n se o m n e s a n n i i n t e m p u s supra s c r i p t u m
anni
Egypt:
anni
40 years.
Joshua son o f N u n a n d the elders succeeding h i m :
55 years.
For the judges a n d p e r i o d w i t h o u t rulers a n d t h e t i m e o f peace:
490 years.
For the priests a n d judges:
90 years.
For the k i n g s o f t h e Hebrews:
490 years.
VDCCXXVI. CLXXXIIII.
70 years.
The k i n g d o m o f t h e Persians:
230 years.
The d o m i n i o n o f t h e Macedonians, t o g e t h e r w i t h the A l e x a n d r i a n s a n d P t o
E x i n d e a d i m p e r i u m A l e x a n d r i , hoc est M o r i c a u i t i , q u i A n t o n i n u s c o g n o m i n a tus est,
430 years.
Moses i n the w i l d e r n e s s :
For the c a p t i v i t y a n d d e s t r u c t i o n o f Jerusalem:
anni L X X I I I I . 20
M a c e d o n i a n s , together w i t h the A l e x a n d r i a n s , as well as the R o m a n s .
Moyses i n heremo I u d i c u m e t sine p r i n c i p i b u s et pacis t e m p o r e
15
1
Overview
lemies:
300 years. 74 years.
3
5726 years.
4
A n d the R o m a n empire u p to the time o f the Savior a n d his resurrection: I n s u m all t h e years f o r the p e r i o d o f t i m e r e c o r d e d above:
F r o m that p o i n t t o t h e principate o f A l e x a n d e r , that is M a r c u s A v i t u s , surn a m e d A n t o n i n u s [sc. Elagabalus]: 1
184 years.
Although this summary of Africanus' chronology appears in some manuscripts as an appendix to Jerome's version of Eusebius' Canons, it does not belong to the original work. Absent from the earliest witnesses to Jerome's version (O and S i n Helm, 5 dex Merton 315, Oxford (T, 9
th
th
cent), it is first attested in C o
cent.). Two of the several later witnesses to the text ( U and V )
have also been collated for the present edition. While it is conceivable that the passage, which is mostly an accurate representation of Africanus' chronology, originated in his chronicle (cf. Theoph. Ant., Autol. 3,28 and Jerome, both of whom added chronological summaries to their own works), it is safer to classify it as a later testimonium from a learned reader (in or before the 9
th
cent). A better dating and understanding would require further analysis of the manu
script tradition of Jerome's chronicle (the best analysis so far is Fotheringham 1923,1-7). Much 6 - » F16d,4s 1450 anni)
7s
9-14
F89,53s; F93.52
of the information in the text can be confirmed by other fragments (see the parallels in the app.
R o u t h | qui + et U V | Antoninus T Antonius U V
and introduction, pp. X X V I f; "incorrect" numbers are printed in italics in the text).
16 - » F86.22;
17s - * F89.56; F93,52s
2
Africanus reckoned 2262 years from Adam to the Flood (F16b,2). 2242 is Eusebius' chronology.
3
The number 74 represents the total years from 1 Augustus. Africanus counted 60 years from
4
The total years add up to 5526. The addition of 20 years to the date of the Flood (1.4) and the sub
the end of the Ptolemaic dynasty (= 14 Augustus) to the Resurrection (F93,53f).
Iul. Afr. (F16b,2
15 regnum T regum
20 Moricauiti] Marci Auiti
traction of the overlapping 14 years of Macedonian and Roman rule (11.171) would produce the re quired 5532 years, see introduction, p. X X V I I (and p. X I X , n. 29 for the confused data in U. 20f).
Iulius Africanus
14
5
T7 Jerome
T7
T7
T 7 a H i e r o n y m u s , E p i s t u l a 70,4 (706,6 - 707,3 H i l b e r g )
T7a
15
Jerome
E x t a n t et I u l i i A f r i c a n i l i b r i , q u i t e m p o r u m s c r i p s i t historias, et Theodori, qui postea
T h e r e are also i n c i r c u l a t i o n t h e b o o k s o f I u l i u s A f r i c a n u s , w h o w r o t e h i s t o r i c a l
Gregorius appellatus est, u i r i a p o s t o l i c o r u m s i g n o r u m atque u i r t u t u m [ . . . ] : q u i o m -
W o r k s o n c h r o n o l o g y , and of Theodore, who was subsequently called Gregory, m e n
nes i n t a n t u m p h i l o s o p h o r u m d o c t r i n i s a t q u e sententiis suos r e f e r s e r u n t l i b r o s ,
d o w e d w i t h the miracles a n d v i r t u e s o f t h e apostles. . . . A l l o f t h e m
u t nescias, q u i d i n i l l i s p r i m u m a d m i r a r i debeas, e r u d i t i o n e m saeculi a n s c i e n -
t h e t e a c h i n g s and sayings o f the p h i l o s o p h e r s t o such a n e x t e n t i n t h e i r b o o k s
tiam scripturarum.
t h a t y o u m i g h t be at a loss as
en
interweave
to w h i c h t o a d m i r e i n t h e m first, t h e i r secular
l e a r n i n g o r t h e i r k n o w l e d g e o f the Scriptures. [KLM
K ystoriam B storiam j Theodori] teodori ex eodori K theodorii
runt] referunt L l m refferunt M ante correctionem manus secundae resarciunt c
3 referse
4 nescias quid] ne-
scisquod®
T7b
5
H i e r o n y m u s , Commentaria i n M a t h e u m (9,46-56 Hurst)
T7b
«Iacob autem genuit Ioseph.» hunc locum obicit nobis Iulianus Augustus dissonantiae euangeli-
'Now Jacob begot Joseph.' With this passage Iulianus Augustus presents us with a disagreement of
starum, cur euangelista Matheus Ioseph filium dixerit Iacob, et Lucas filium eum appellauerit Heli,
the evangelists: why did the evangelist Matthew state that Joseph was the son of Jacob, whereas Luke
non ^ntellegens consuetudinem scripturarum quod alter secundum naturam, alter secundum legem
called him the son of Heli? He does not understand the scriptural usage, according to which one is
ei pater sit. s c i m u s enim hoc per Moysen Deo iubente praeceptum ut, si frater aut propinquus
his father according to nature, the other according to law. For we know that this has been ordained
absque liberis mortuus fuerit, alius eius accipiat uxorem ad suscitandum semen fratris vel propinqui
through Moses by the command of God: i f a brother or relative dies childless, another is to take his
sui. s u p e r h o c
wife in order to raise up offspring for his brother or relative. C o n c e r n i n g
et A f r i c a n u s t e m p o r u m s c r i p t o r et Eusebius Caesariensis i n l i b r i s
d i a p h o n i a s e u a n g e l i o r u m plenius d i s p u t a r u n t .
A f r i c a n u s the c h r o n o g r a p h e r
1
this, b o t h
a n d Eusebius o f Caesarea have e x a m i n e d
more
f u l l y t h e disagreements o f t h e gospels i n t h e i r books. 6 ^ F90 1 Mt 1,16 1 - 6 cf. Iul. Afr., ep. Arist. « Eus., h.e. 1,7; Aug., retract. 2,7,2 C 0
[ B P G O C K M E L R ] 1 obicit] obiecitur R G " | Iulianus] lucianus C | Augustus] agustus O C | disso nantiae] dissonantia
R dissonantium BP
secundum l e g e m < C (lacuna)
4
2 filium eum < C
3
propinquus] propinquos O B
corr
consuetudinem] consuetudine K -
7
diaphonias] 5ia(p
diafonias O B P < K | disputarunt] disputabunt K
1
Although Africanus does treat the genealogies of Jesus in his chronicle (F90), Jerome's descrip tion of Africanus as temporum scriptor does not necessarily mean that he is referring here to his chronicle. The explanation of the gospel genealogies that he provides summarizes the portion of Africanus' Epistle to Aristides cited in the Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius.
T8 Church Historians in Constantinople
Iulius Africanus
16
T8
T8
T 8 a S o c r a t e s , H i s t o r i a e c d e s i a s t i c a 2,34,10s ( 1 5 1 , 3 - 1 0
5
Hansen)
Church
Historians
in
17
Constantinople
T8a
OUTO) Se rjv 6\iYoua6f|c, 6 AETIOC, K a i TCOV iepuiv y p a u u d T u v duuntoc., TO EpiartKov Si KaTcop8u)KEi
Aetius was a man of so little knowledge, so unfamiliar with the sacred Scriptures, and successful
uovov, 6n£p d v K a i dypoucoc, TIC, 7toiqa£i£v, cbc, ur|5e roue, dpxatouc, TOUC, T d X p i c m a v i K d Xdyia epun-
only in disputation—something that any boor could do—that he had not been carefully trained i n
veuoavTac, d a K n e f i v a i . TtoXXa y a p v a i p e i v eppdaac, tolc, rcepi K X r | u e v x a K a i AcppiKa-
those ancient writers who interpreted the Christian oracles. For w h i l e
v6v
renounced
K a i ' Q p i y e v n v , d v S p d a t ndor|c, cptXoaocpiac; s m o x r i u o a i ,
EmoToXdc, ouvEKdTTusv
Clement,
Africanus
and
Origen,
men
he
knowledgeable
completely in
every
npoc. T E T6V fiaoiXEa K c u v o T d v T t o v K a i rcpoc, ETEpouc, Tivdc, EpEOxeXiac, avujtXeKuiv K a i aocpiauaTa
b r a n c h o f p h i l o s o p h y , he would cobble together letters both to the emperor Constantius, a n d
UEXEXU>V.
to some other persons, entwining them with idle argumentation and making displays of sophistry.
1
[ M F A T C a s s i o d ] 1 Si ] Si] M vov] d(ppiKiav6v A
r
2 fix; [ir\Sk] UIJTE M ' F A | r d < T
3 yap < M F A Cassiod.
3s A f p i K a -
4 d v 8 p d a i . ..ETtiarf|UOOL] dvSpac,... Emorfjuovac, M F A | ipiXoao9iac] 009(01;
M F A sapientiae Cassiod. 5 T E < M F A | xtvdc, < M
5
T 8 b S o z o m e n u s , H i s t o r i a e c d e s i a s t i c a 1,1,12 ( 8 , 2 3 - 3 1 B i d e z / H a n s e n )
T8b
'Qpur|8r|V Si. T O : UEV TtpuYra d n ' apxpc, TauTnv avyypayca xt\v u p a y u a T e i a v . X o y t a d u e v o c , S E cbc.
I was initially inclined to compose this treatise from the very beginning. B u t after I c o n s i d e r e d
K a i . d X X o i x a u x n c , £ T t e i p d 9 r | o a v p e x p i TCOV Kax' a u x o u c , x p o v c o v , KArjunc TE Kai ' H y f j -
that o t h e r s h a d a l r e a d y u n d e r t a k e n t h i s t a s k u p t o t h e i r o w n times—both Clement
and Hegesippus, extremely wise men and closely following in the succession of the apostles, a n d
cruyvpacpeuc; K a i EuoePioc, 6 E7tiKXr|v riap9iXou, dvf|p Tiiv 9E(COV ypa9U>v K a i TUIV n a p ' "EXXpoi
A f r i c a n u s t h e h i s t o r i a n , and Eusebius surnamed [pupil] of Pamphilus, a learned man highly
rtoinxarv K a i ovyypaqiwv
n o X u u a S E O T a T o c . ToTiop, o a a UEV T i i v EIC, f|uac, EX96VTWV rate, EKKXnaiaic,
knowledgeable in the sacred Scriptures and the writings of the Greek poets and authors—I drew up
o u v e p n UETCI x f ] v eic, oupavouc, &vo8ov TOO XpioroO uexpt Tfjc, Auavlou Ka9atpE0£u>c,, E7TITEU6UEVOC
an epitome in two books of all that we have received about events in the churches, after the
£7tpayu.aT£ucrdur|V EV p\(3Xioic, Suo.
ascension of Christ up to the overthrow of Licinius.
5 - 7 cf. T h e o d o r u s Lector, epitome 1 2
2
2
[B C T C a s s i o d ] 1 cbc. < T 3 5ia6oxfj T Cassiod. SiSaxp B C 4 6] & T 5 UEV + ouv B C
6 oupavoiic,
2
B caelos C a s s i o d . oi>pav6v C T
T 9 Isidore
of
Seville
1
D u r i n g the r e i g n o f the emperor M a r c u s A u r e l i u s A n t o n i n u s , Iulius A f r i c a n u s T9
I s i d o r u s Hispalensis, C h r o n i c a maiora 1 (424,1-4 M o m m s e n )
was t h e f i r s t a m o n g u s t o establish a b r i e f [ c h r o n o l o g y ] a r r a n g e d a c c o r d i n g t o generations a n d k i n g d o m s a n d u s i n g a s i m p l e h i s t o r i c a l style. Thereafter, Eusebius
B r e v e m t e m p o r u m p e r g e n e r a t i o n e s et regna p r i m u s ex n o s t r i s I u l i u s A f r i c a n u s
of Caesarea and Jerome of hallowed memory published the multifaceted history of the Chronici
sub
Canones, arranged both by kingdoms and in chronological order. After them were various others.
i m p e r a t o r e M a r c o A u r e l i o A n t o n i n o s i m p l i c i h i s t o r i a e s t i l o e l i c u i t . deinde
Eusebius Caesariensis atque sanctae memoriae Hieronymus chronicorum canonum multiplicem ediderunt historiam regnis simul ac temporibus ordinatam, post hos alii atque alii.
1
O n the composition of the Chronographiae during the reign of Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (Elagabalus), see introduction, p. X V I I .
attention, by which I mean from Adam up to the emperor Zeno and those who ruled in succession
chronographers Africanus,
Eusebius, [pupil] of Pamphilus,
Pausanias,
Didymus, chronogra
after h i m . r
1-4
Inscriptio cod. Parisini gr. 1630, f. 234 (= B in app. infra) ex Historia chronica loannis Antio-
And rfjq EKdiasax; 'Iwavvov A V T / O ^ & J C rtjc mpl xpdvaiv tcai KTIOTOJC K.6o~)iov Tiovn9tioy]c„ (oq cprjcriv, and fitpiwv Mcocecoc, Aippucavou, Euoepiou, JJanniov Kai AiSuuou Kai iripwv.
cheni (app. ad fr. 1 Ro.)
[PB(abbrev.) S1EIJ I s Kai T(I>v Kama. < P 4
2 AiSuuou BS1 Zioiviou P
3 EuaTa8iou Si K a d 9 P < B
K a i aotpdiv post eK6eaeai P transposuit Kamb. E K G e a a i 001 Kamb. SKOSOEOI P fort. EK8ea9ai SI < B
5 CA86VTO)V SI eA66ru)v P < B 6 ASdu £a>c P < BS1
Tl
e a x i v 6 Kai roue. Aeyousvouc,
KEO-TOUC, EV
H e is t h e one w h o also c o m p o s e d i n 14 volumes the w o r k called the Cesti.
Xoyoic; crovxd^ac; 16'.
A l t h o u g h he is concise, he o v e r l o o k s n o t h i n g i n need o f historical r e c o r d .
"Ecrxi 8k cnjvxopoc; uev, dAAa unSsv xaiv dvayKaicov iaxopr|9fjvai n a p a X i u n d 5
Photius
T h e h i s t o r y o f A f r i c a n u s was read.
AvsyvcuaOn AtppiKavoO iaxopiKov. OUTOC,
2
T i l
1 P h o t i u s , B i b l i o t h e c a 34,7a7-24 (1,19s H e n r y )
V O J V . d p x s x a i 5e d n o xfjc, MtouaaiKfjc, Koauoyevetac, K a i Kdxeiaiv zwc, xfjc X p i -
H e b e g i n s w i t h the M o s a i c c o s m o g o n y a n d continues d o w n to the parousia
a x o u Ttapouaiac;. eTtixpoxd6r|v 5e 5iaAauf3dvei Kai x d dno X p i a x o u p e x p t Tfjc;
C h r i s t . H e also gives a c u r s o r y account o f events f r o m C h r i s t up to the reign o f
M a K p i v o u T O U 'Pcouaicov paaiAicoc. fiaaiXeiac;, oxe auxtp, cue cpnoi, Kai fj6e f| ovy-
t h e R o m a n e m p e r o r M a c r i n u s , at w h i c h date, as he tells us, t h e w o r k concludes,
ypacpfi a u v e x e A e i x o ,
c o n s i s t i n g o f 5723 years. T h e b o o k is c o m p r i s e d o f five v o l u m e s .
EXCOV
o u a a ,£\\iK.y'. tevjr\
5e xo (3i(3Aiov
of
3
TTEVXE.
He
O U T O C K a i n p o c 'Opiy£vr|v ypdcpsi Ttepl xou K a x d I c o a d v v a v Smyfjuaxoc, (be
also w r o t e a letter t o O r i g e n c o n c e r n i n g the s t o r y o f Susanna, stating
O U K ei't] auxcp ev xolc E|3pai'K0ic dvEyvcoopevov, Kai tbc, oi>8' dKoXouGov xfj
t h a t i t was n o t i n the H e b r e w books k n o w n to h i m , a n d that neither the
10 expand) E T u u o A o y i a otixe xo d n o xou n p i v o u n p l a a i oiixe xo a n d xou o x i v o u
w o r d - p l a y ' d n o T O U n p i v o u Ttptoxu' n o r ' d n o xou o x i v o u crxioai' is consistent w i t h H e b r e w etymology. O r i g e n answered and refuted these objections.
axio"at- a K a i £niA.af36uEvoc'npiyevr|c dvx£ypa\|/£.
A f r i c a n u s also w r o t e a letter t o Aristides, i n w h i c h he a b l y demonstrated n o
T p d 9 E i 6 e AcppiKavoc, K a i npoc A p i a x e i 5 r | v , ev ok, iKavax; xtjv v o u i ( o u e v r | v Siacptoviav T i a p d M a x S a i w Kai A o u K a Ttepi xfjc xoO au>xfjpoc rjutov yeveaXoyiac;
s u p p o s e d discrepancy i n t h e genealogy o f o u r Savior i n M a t t h e w a n d L u k e .
oTjpxpojvov e5eii;£v.
2 - » T2d,4-6; T 3 a , l s 6s -* F54d,9-11
4s - » T 6 ; T13a,3s; F14; T92,3s; F93.108-110
8 - 1 1 - * T2b,4-7; T3a,2-4; Ti2,3s
5s - » T80a.b.d; F93,84s; T99
1 2 - 1 4 - * T2b,7-9; T3a,10-14; F90 1
2 Iul. Afr., cest. [AM]
8 - 1 1 Iul. Afr., ep. Orig.
2 6 Kai M 6 A
6 cpncri A
12-14 Iul. Afr., ep. Arist. 7 TO |3i(3Xiov A TOU pi(3Aiou M
O n the problems of the transmission of this text, see Jeffreys 1990,25 If; Roberto 2005a,XXIV, n. 25.
10 TOO oxivou A axivou M
2
O n the fragment, see Schamp 1987,301-306.
3
Cf. F54d,9f, which puts the year 5723 in the third year of the emperor Elagabalus. See intro
2
11 emAapop-Evoc. A erciAubuevoc A M
duction, pp. X V I I and X X V f.
20
T12
Africanus, the one called Sectus, a p h i l o s o p h e r a n d Libyan, and the a u t h o r o f
ev pipXJoLc; K S ' . eiai 8e o i o v e l 9 u a i K d , e Y p v r a S K Xoycov t e K a i erraoiotov Kai
the Cesti i n 24 b o o k s . I t is a k i n d o f Physica, c o n t a i n i n g cures f r o m w o r d s ,
SEKTOC
xptipaxiaac,
Suda
Ai(3uc, 6 rove, Keo~rouc, yeypa9d)c,
Yparrrtov 5
T12
S u d a A 9 p i K a v o c A 4647,1-5 (1,433,30 - 434,3 A d l e r )
AcppiKavoc, 6
21
T12 Suda
Iulius Africanus
91A60O9OC,
vapaKTiipcov idaetc, re Kai dXXoiu>v evepveicov. K a r a
TOUTOU
charms, w r i t t e n figures o f some k i n d , a n d operations o f various sorts. O r i g e n
£ypon|/ev 'f2piy£vr|<; e'varaatv 7toir|adaevoc; nepl T O U Tfjc; Zwadvvnc, (3i(3Xiou, T O U
wrote against h i m , t a k i n g a n opposing p o s i t i o n o n the subject o f the b o o k o f
etc; T 6 V A a v i r j X .
Susanna, w h i c h b e l o n g s t o the book o f D a n i e l .
1-3
TIVCOV
1
— > T 2 c , 4 - 6 (sedlibri 9); T 3 a , l s ; T l 1,2 (sedlibri 14)
3-5
- > T 2 b , 5 s ; T l l . 8 - 1 1 ; SudaZcoodwa
Z 856 (4,408,8s Adler; id i p s e l e x i c o g r a p h u s d e s u m p s i t ex Suda A 4647,3s) Zu>cravva- o n K a r a TOU AcppiKavoO SeEjorou EypayEv 'flpryEvn,c,, EVCTTCCCIV TtomaduEvoc, itepi TOU Tfjc, Ecuadvvric p\|3\tov>, TOU sic. T O V AavirjX. I s cf. Suda KEO-T6C K 1428
1 - 3 Iul. Afr., cest.
T13 T13a
3 - 5 cf. Iul. Afr., ep. Orig.
Michael
Syrus
2
But first i t is necessary t o give the names o f those historians f r o m w h o m w e shall collect the m a t e r i a l f o r our edifice.
T13
Africanus a n d 'Yesov' a n d Hegesippus a n d Josephus, the Jews, w r o t e u n t i l the
T 1 3 a M i c h a e l Syrus, p r o o e m i u m ( 2 , 4 - 1 5 Sawalaneanc' 1 8 7 1 , cf. e t i a m 1870)
A n n i a n u s , the A l e x a n d r i a n monk, w r o t e f r o m A d a m to the emperor
advent o f C h r i s t .
fi.uy'g
tgiupin
ohinnijb^
t fulfil
gufitpj
II QkunL
\\ifipplfuhinu q hi/hi iiiu'ii 5 \yhufhnu
ni innji Cufhq.hp£ibug_ bt{j>
Jbpnj:
U. ^kgupignu
li. QnUjibu/nu
Cpkiujgli
if-pbg/fu JJfb^hL
^ujiTippihiuj,
\^ribj2uuhii}-pujgp,
if-ripbuig
fi
j\^q.uiJuy
Jp%^kL
p
Jdwtj-uiLnp'b: jnpng
Eusebius [ p u p i l ] o f P a m p h i l u s composed a b o o k f r o m these, and he called it the Ecclesiastical
[History].
T13b Even so [ t h e i r ] c h r o n i c l e s are not called Ecclesiastical
'I pug
d-ntpiijbwg
l}"-pli
h-
uiunLuhikwg
\ybbqbgujlfu/uu:
Con-
stantine.
p
%Qppuuinup:
l/poliwuip
\\nuinuiUi^.puihnu \ymbpp
ijnilnti niliit iguJinJuiq punfu
^jiunmiMgu
3
Chronographies,
[Histories],
but rather
t h a t is a description o f t i m e s , l i k e those that Josephus, A n d r o 4
nicus, A f r i c a n u s , A n n i a n u s , Georg[ius] rgty',
John o f A n t i o c h , a n d
finally
Eusebius [ p u p i l ] o f P a m p h i l u s have p r o d u c e d . 3s —> T6; T l 1,4s; T92,3s; F 9 3 , 1 0 8 - l 10; Elenchus anonymus historiographorum (103 Nau) Combien d'ecri-vains ecrivirent I'histoire ecclesiastique depuis Adam jusqu'au Christ: Africanos, Hegesippos,
1
Josephos et Jude (Yhouda) qui ecrivit sur les semaines de Daniel.
SEKTOC. in the main text, IE^OTOC, in the resume X 856 (text in the third app.). Scholars mostly interpreted this as an equivalent of the Latin 'Sextus', hence the name 'Sextus Iulius Africanus', see introduction, p. X I I I . However, the information given here is generally not very reliable. The
following epithet 'Libyan' is probably just a faulty inference, based on the name Africanus'. For the'philosopher', see above T 4 , n. 1. 2
The text of Michael's preface is preserved only in two Armenian translations (ed. by T. Sawa laneanc' 1870 and 1871, see Schmidt 1996, 299, n. 8 and 301, n. 13). The shorter version (1871,
T 1 3 b M i c h a e l Syrus 10,20 (4, 3 7 8 , 2 3 - 2 6 Chabot)
whose text is given here) is considered closer to the Syriac original. This section is part of the preface of the lost history of Dionysius of Tel-Mahre (Syrian Orthodox Patriarch A D 818-845).
rdXre*
_gnr,A>n\-iA\ ^ ~-n ^Jjzart&lSl
q p Q r u ^ n n r ^ i m p o r t * CAA r ^ W
3
cal historians in the Elenchus
^ l u d i O . r d i C r O ^ i » ^ i < X ^ Q . t p O j r d v l K ' Q C p c q r t ' i n . i a r ^ O QpcuUjCli.TJre'O a
-
c p q \ i » ' 7 a A . i cpoi-icncinr r^chi»»-iQ
.vy^Wx
It is not clear to which of the named authors the epithet 'Jews' applies. O n Hegesippus' Jewish origins, see Eus., h.e. 4,22,8. The identity of Yesov is uncertain. Cf. the parallel list of ecclesiasti
qpOjauaoQ - iuaa, l ^ A c n v r y r * ' .rdJLst c r \ c i i = c K i - i o oSi'Scirt'. q a & r V ' i ^ C L l o i A
anonymus historiographorum
(in app.): "Africanus, Hegesippus,
Josephus and Judas, who wrote on the weeks of Daniel." For the identity of Judas, see Eus., h. e. 6,7. 4
George of Raggath (?); this could be George Syncellus, see Palmer 1993,95, n. 230: he was from Palestine and we know of the existence of a place called Raggath/Rakkat.
Iulius Africanus
22
F14 The Creation
23
F14 Material from Book 1/2: From Adam to Moses v
F 1 4 a F l o r i l e g i u m a n o n y m u m i n c o d i c e P a r i s i n o gr. 1115, f. 2 2 4 - 2 2 5
r
AcppiKavoO icjTopLctc*
5
F14
£7roiri08v
xov o u p a v o v KCU xf\\ y f j v , X O U T E O T I T O rtav K a x ' r\ a i t o uepouc, TUVV aKpwv, ei T I e t e p o v S i d T O U T O J V crnpaivETat. a' 7Tpd)Tr| usv r|uepa T O fax;, 5 EKdAeaev qpspav. (3' SevjTepa. 5e OTepetoua Ttpoc. Swucpiaiv uSaToc,, oupavov ETtovoudaac..
'Ev apxfj
6 9E6C,
The
1
Creation
i6eav F14a From the history of Africanus: I n t h e b e g i n n i n g , G o d created the heaven a n d t h e earth, t h a t is e v e r y t h i n g ac
•y'
Tphn 5k f\v yf\q cpavEpwoTc; K d i 9 a \ d a a n c , c n j v o 6 o i .
6'
TftdpTr] cpcoaTfjpec;.
c o r d i n g t o its f o r m , o r f r o m a p a r t o f the extremes,
E'
rtEprcTri £t; u S d x o j v yw)(a\ vnKxcbv X E Kai d e p i a i v .
signified by this.
c/
gKTn
10
d r t o yr)c,
1.
r t \ a a 9 e i c , , K a 9 ' 6uoia>aiv S E £p\|/uxa>u£voc,, r] o x i x o psv Kax' e k o v a Ttpoa-
2.
xe
8K
xfjc yf^c; £ci>a. dvOpamoc, K a x '
sbcova
9EO0
XO XOIK6V
2-11 — T l l , 4 s ; T 9 2 , 3 s 3 cf. Plato, Ti. 35C2-36A6
O n t h e t h i r d , the appearance o f l a n d a n d the g a t h e r i n g t o g e t h e r o f the sea. O n t h e f o u r t h , the l u m i n a r i e s .
3 el] fort. f\ vel f) ei 8 vnKT&v Alexakis I)/UKTU)V cod.
10 euvi/ux^uevoc cod.
O n t h e fifth, f r o m t h e waters, l i v i n g creatures o f t h i n g s t h a t s w i m a n d t h i n g s o f t h e air.
6.
Nyss., imag. 1 3 2 8 B C ; ps. Gr. Nyss., horn. 1 de creatione hominis 28,13-31,5
1,25)
O n t h e second, [ G o d created] t h e f i r m a m e n t f o r the s e p a r a t i o n o f the water,
3.
9 - 1 1 cf. G e n 1,26s; 2,7; I Cor 15,47; Clem. Alex.,
strom. 2,22,131,6; Clem. Alex., paed. 1,12,98,2s; D i d y m . , in Gen. 1,26-28 (59,2-5 Nautin); ps. Gr.
2 ei8iav cod.
O n t h e first day, [ G o d created] t h e l i g h t , w h i c h he called 'Day.'
4. 5.
cf. Gen 1,1-23
i f s o m e t h i n g d i f f e r e n t is
g i v i n g i t the n a m e 'Heaven.'
qwsc, x o 5e K a 9 ' o p o i o j a i v T t p o a 5 o K d x a i .
2-8
2
A n d o n t h e s i x t h , a n i m a l s f r o m t h e earth. M a n was created ' a c c o r d i n g to t h e i m a g e ' o f G o d , a t h i n g o f d u s t f r o m the earth, b u t e n d o w e d w i t h a soul 'accor d i n g t o his likeness'; o r else t h a t w h i c h ' a c c o r d i n g t o his i m a g e ' belongs t o
9 re] re cod., fort. T& (cf. G e n
h i m b y nature, whereas t h a t w h i c h is 'according to his likeness' is a w a i t e d .
F14b F 1 4 b G e o r g i u s Syncellus ( 3 , 1 - 1 8 M o s s h a m m e r ) Tpy
Ttpd)xnv f|U£pav 6 Acppixavoc, v o n x r | v Xiyei
XO rrpcOXOKTlOXOV Cpd)C, K a i
KEVTJUEVOV.
5id
xo
d6iopydvtaxov
Elvat
ev rii> rcpcoTOKTLcrrco vuxSnpepci), Tfj npcbrn
T h e first day A f r i c a n u s calls ' i n t e l l i g i b l e ' , because t h e
AiyuJtxtoic. K 9 '
TOU
aueva>9, ev f|pipa KupiaKfj, fjroi pia
TIIIV
aa|3(3dTiuv, ETToinaev 6
TOO
9E6C, T 6 V
l i g h t was y e t
4
nap'
'E|5paioi<; npuiTou pqvoc, Niodv, toe, npoSetSEiKTai, napa de'Pcouaioic, K E ' tou Mapriou ur|v6c, Kal Jtap'
5
first-created
XEOJC,
oupa-
u n f o r m e d a n d diffuse. O n the first-created full day, the first day of the first Hebrew month of Nisan, as has been shown above, the 2 5
th
th
of the Roman month of March, and the 29 of the Egypti
an month of Phamenoth, on the Lord's day, that is on the first of the week, God created the heaven
v6v icai rfjv yfjv, T 6 OK6TOC, Kai td M a r a , nvEOua Kai cptoc, Kal vuxSpuepov, 6pou epya ertTd. ev Tip 1
F14a was originally published by Alexakis 1996,86, along with photographs of the relevant manuscript pages. For a new edition and analysis of the Platonic background of the fragment, see Staab 2006. Staab suggests that F14a is an epitome of what was in Africanus' chronicle a list and commentary on the works of creation. In his opinion, F14b, which made up part of this commentary, originally followed the word quEpav in 1.4 of the preceding fragment.
2
For discussion of the meaning of the phrase dno pEpouc, TCOV dKpcov and its relationship to Plato, T i . 35C2-36A6, see Staab 2006,75 (and 74fon T6 ndv KOT' ISEOV).
3
Although Gen 1,26 states that G o d intended to create man "according to our image and like ness," the following verse from Genesis states only that he created man according to "the image of God." Africanus offers here two explanations as to why God did not actually create man "according his likeness".
4
Because the first-formed light was diffused throughout the atmosphere before the sun was created as a receptacle for it, Africanus calls the first day 'intelligible'. O n the 'intelligible light (
r
1-5 ps. S y m . f. 19 = Cedr. (7,2-21 Bekker) ..."H npwTr] ion TOV nap' 'Efipaioiq\eyopevov Nteav mv irpwTov ptjvoc,, dKoorf] Si ntfinTf] TOV napa 'Pa>p.aioiq Mapriov unvoq, napa Si Aiyvmioiq C
2 Kai < ps. Sym. | KexupEvov ps. Sym. Kexup-
UEVOV A 3 Nicrdv D i . viaadv A 4 uia Tciiv aappdrtuv ps. Sym. uidc oappdtou A pia Z a Io. Anag.
F14 The Creation
Iulius Africanus
24 t
8eux£pq) v u x Q n u e p u j EYEVETO ° o X E p E u i u a , Epyov a', ev TCI; Tpixqj vux9rip.£pu) EyevETO Jpya 5', 9 a v £ -
p0"u; yfjc, K a i a v a c x l p a v a i c , r t a p d S e i a o c , , 5ev5pa TtavToIa, Pordvai K a i O T t E p u a r a . Tfj &' npspg e n o i q 6 BEOC, T O V fjXiov K a i Tf|v OEXfjvnv K a i roue, dcTEpac,. Tfj t' f|UEpg E r c o i n a E V 6 6e6<; t d EprtEtd K a i
OEV xd 10
v r j K x d T t d v x a , KrJTr| K a i ix9uac. K a i 8aa
iv
t o i q u S a a i , Sxi T E i t E T E i v d , 6 p o u e p y a y'. Tf| cj f|U£pa
E T t o i n a e v 6 9E6C, xd T E T p d i t o S a K a i xd s p r c E t a xfjc, yfjc,, t d 9ppia K a i T 6 V Sv9pai7tov, E p y a 6'. d u o u Ttdvxa S p y a K ( ? ' iadpi8ua TOCC, KP"Eppa'LKoic, y p d u u a a i
ASdu. Eaic,'IaKd)P
EiKoai 6uo
VEC, d n o K d X u \ | / i v . amr\
td
K a i T a t ? K p " E p p a i ' K a i c pipXoic. K a i TOIC, drro
y E v a p x i a i c , , c EV XETfTfj (pEpeTai TEVEOEI, fjv K a i M u O O E a i q e l v a i
9001 T I -
rdc, o u p a v t o u c , 8uvdu£ic, xfj r t p u n n i"|u£pg XEyEt E K T i a 9 a i .
25 5
and the earth, the darkness and the waters, wind and light and a full day: altogether seven works. On the second full day, the firmament came into being: one work. On the third full day, there were four works; the manifestation and drying of the land, Paradise, all kinds of trees, and plants and se eds. On the fourth day, God created the sun and the moon and the stars. On the fifth day, God crea ted all reptiles and swimming things (sea monsters and fish and whatever is in the waters), as well as birds: altogether three works. On the sixth day, God created four-footed animals, land reptiles, wild beasts, and man: four works. Altogether there are 22 works, equal in number with the 22 letters of the Hebrew alphabet, and the 22 books of the Hebrew Bible, and the 22 generations of patriarchs from Adam up to Jacob, as it is reported in the Little Genesis, which some say is also a revelation of Moses. This work says that the heavenly powers were created on the first day. 6
6-10
s i m i l i t e r e t i a m i n ps. S y m . et C e d r e n o , n o n n u l l i s a d d i t i s
7 TtapdSEicroc. D i . napd5£iaaoc, A Io. A n a g . r t a p d S n o o c , ps.
Sym.
F15
The Fabricated
Chronology
of the Egyptians
and the
7
Chaldeans
From Africanus, concerning the mythical chronology of the Egyptians and the Chaldaeans:
F15
G e o r g i u s Syncellus (17,28 - 18,10 M o s s h a m m e r )
A9piKavou rtepl Tfjc
Tiiv
AlyuTrricov Kai XaXSaiuiv pu9u)6oi)c, xpovoXoylac,-
AiyuTmoi U E V ouv ETCI T O K O U T T C O S E O T E P O V xpovcov TtEprrrdc; TtEptoSouc; Kai uuptdSac; excov Kara 0 E O I V xtva xcov reap' auxolc; daxpoXoyouuEvcov E C ; E 9 E V T O , dc; T L V E C , Ttbv xauxa dKpi(5ouv 5oc;dvTCi)v O U C T T E A A O V T E C ; a£\r|vtaiou<; E I T I O V Evtau5 T O U C ; , o u 6 e v < 6 E > E X O T T O V eni T O UU9CU6EC, dTiovEVEUKOTEc, cruUTiiTiTouai rate, 6 K T C U Kai EWEa xiXtdaiv E T C U V , at; AiyuitTicov oi rtapa IIXdTcovi iepetc; Etc; ZoXcuva KaTapi9(ioCvT£c; O U K dXr|9Euouatv. Kai pET* oXiya* T d yap OoivtKcov xptopupta £Tr| f\ T O V TCOV XaXSaicov Xfjpov, T O TCDV ur)' pu10 ptdScov, T I 6 E T Kai XfiyEiv; E K T O U T C D V yap 'IouSaloi T O dv^Ka9sv yfiyovoTEC. and A(3padu dpc;dp£voi dmcpoTEpov T E Kai dv9pco7Ttvcc>c; uETd T O U dXr|9ouc; 6td T O U M C O U O E C O C ; TtvEupiaToc; 6i6ax9£VT£c;, E K T E T C O V Xotncov'E(3pai'K(I)v ioToptcov, dpi9pov E T C O V nevTaKiaxiXtiov rtEVTaKooicov Etc; rr)v EiticpdvEiav T O U acoTr)piou Xoyou Tqv ertl Tfjc; uovapxtac; TCOV Kaiadpcov Kr|puooopEvr|v Ttapa5E5coKaaiv.
The Egyptians, t h e n , i n order to m a k e s o m e t h i n g o f an impression, have set forth outlandish c h r o n o l o g i c a l cycles a n d m y r i a d s o f years according t o s o m e sort o f system based o n a s t r o n o m i c a l calculations m a d e b y t h e m ; w h i c h s o m e o f them, reputed f o r t h e i r accuracy i n these m a t t e r s , compress, saying that they are lunar years. B u t i n c l i n i n g n o less than the others to the mythical, they m a n a g e to reconcile these years w i t h the eight a n d nine thousand years t h a t the Egyptians priests i n Plato falsely enumerate t o Solon. And after some other words: O f the 30,000 years o f the Phoenicians o r o f the absurdity o f the Chaldaeans, w i t h their 480,000 years, w h y should one e v e n speak? For although i t is f r o m the Chaldaeans t h a t the Jews as descendants o f A b r a h a m derive their o r i g i n s , they have received t h r o u g h the spirit o f M o s e s m o r e modest and m o d e r a t e teaching, together w i t h the t r u t h . A n d f r o m t h e i r r e m a i n i n g Hebrew histories, they have h a n d e d d o w n a p e r i o d o f 5500 years u p to the advent o f the W o r d o f salvation that was a n n o u n c e d d u r i n g the sovereignty o f the Caesars. 8
5 6
2s -»F43a,l-4; F43b,7-9 12-14 -»T92,3s;T93c,8s;Sym. Log. (Leo Gr. [57,8-12 Bekker] = Th. Mel. [46,31-34 Tafel] • Iul. Pol. [164,6-21 HardtJ) T(i 6E ,£9' ETEI d u o KTICJEUJC, K o o p o u KCCI -xiaaa.paKocnu) Sevrepw ETEI Auyotioroo i^ijXde Soyfia nap' avrov anoypafEodcu ndaav rfjv oiKovfievrjv, iv £> ITEI Kai 6 Kvpioq rfttwv iyewrjdrj, 'HpwSovfiaoiXevovmc,TtjclovSaiaq, ov 6 Kalaap Avyovcnoc npoe^tipiaaro.
The description of the 22 works of creation that follows the excerpt from Africanus forms a single block of material and is thus cited in full. Syncellus' enumeration is based on Iub 2,2-23. 'Little Genesis' is a commonly used Greek title for the Book of Jubilees. In conformity with the text of the Hebrew Bible, Iub 2,23 counts 22 patriarchs from Adam to Jacob. This is also Afri canus' numbering. Syncellus' own list of the patriarchs from Adam up to Jacob, which includes the second Kenan found in the Septuagint version of Genesis, comes to a total of 23. Resemblances to the prooemium to the third book (F34,1-11) suggest that Africanus' discus sion of the chronology of the Egyptians, Chaldaeans, Phoenicians and Hebrews may have ser ved as a programmatic introduction either to book one of his chronicle or to the entire work. This is the only reference to Chaldaean chronology in the surviving fragments of the Chronogra phiae. Africanus, who seems to have known the Babylonian historian Berossus (3 cent. BC) in some form (F34,14), may have based the 480,000 years of Chaldean history on Berossus' Babyloniaca; but cf. Alexander Polyhistor's version of Berossus, which assigns 215,000 years to Babyloni an history (in Eus., chron. 6,19f). The list of Chaldaean kings that follows this excerpt in Syncellus (18,11-20) does not originate in Africanus' chronicle, see Gelzer l,208f and Wallraff 2006,48, n. 17. rd
Iulius Africanus
26
F16 The Generations from Adam to Abraham
F16 PI6a
F16
to
ETCOV
a\'
y e w a T O V Zfj6-
Kai T O U T O I C
Eiucrjaac
£rr| \|/'
ct7t£0a-
A d a m , w h e n he was 230, begot Seth. A n d after l i v i n g a n o t h e r 700 years, he d i e d
ysvEOECoc
Seth, w h e n he was 205, begot E n o s h : f r o m A d a m , t h e n , u p t o the b i r t h o f
( t h a t is a s e c o n d death).
v£v, f j x o i SeuTEpov O d v a r o v .
£y£vvr|a£ T O V ' E V U J C , -
'EVCOC, £ T T | TCt o r i u T i a v T a 'Evcbc, u r r d p x w v ETCOV p p '
cmb A S d u T O I V U V uExpt
E n o s h , t h e r e is a t o t a l o f 435 years.
v\e'.
yEwa T O V
2
E n o s h , b e i n g 190, begot K e n a n .
Kaivav.
K e n a n , at age 170, begot M a h a l a l e l .
K a i v d v SE E T C O V p o ' y e v v a T O V MaAEAsfjX. Ma\£A.£fiA. 8k ETCOV pee'
y£vva
M a h a l a l e l , at age 165, begot Jared.
Tdv'IdpES.
Jared, at age 162, begot E n o c h .
' I d p e S SE E T C O V p^[3' y e v v a Tov'Evcbx 10 'Evcox 8k uTtdpxcov ETCOV pc£' yewa.
TOV
MaQouadXa-
Kai suapeaTriaac,
TCO BECO
E n o c h , b e i n g 165, begot M e t h u s e l a h . A s o n e pleasing t o G o d , he l i v e d a n o t h e r 2 0 0 y e a r s a n d was n o t f o u n d .
feTO^fjaac, err) a' o u x EuptOKETO.
3
M a 9 o u a d X a Y E V O U E V O C ETCOV pn(J EyEvvnaE T O V A d u e x -
M e t h u s e l a h , w h e n he was 187, b e g o t L a m e c h .
Adu_£Y_ o n a p x c o v ETCOV p r m ' y s w a T O V N C O E .
L a m e c h , b e i n g 188, begot N o a h .
2-13
1
Abraham
From Africanus:
yEvopEvoc
2f]G yevouevoc, ETCOV a s ' 5
from Adam
F16a
G e o r g i u s Syncellus (91,23 - 92,4 M o s s h a m m e r )
AcppiKavcvOASdu
The Generations
27
S y m . Log. (Leo Gr. [8,22 - 10,20 Bekker] = T h . Mel. [14,2 - 15,7 Tafel] = Iul. Pol. [58,2 -
60,18 Hardt]) 0 Se AS&u yevouevoc, etcov aX' iyivvnoe rdv Zr\0- Kai TOUTOIC. y {enric T h . Mel.) emtflaac, err] 9vr)oKEI
...
2f]8 A(ovpav ayduevoq rr)v aSeXtpfjv (A(ovpav ... ccSeXcpfjv < Iul. Pol.), at' vnapyoiv ( y e v o u e v o c ; ae' Iul. Pol.) etcov, e y e v v n a e TOV'Evcbc..... 'Evcbc, eyr\uaro 'Eppav rfjv aSeX(pi\v avrov (< T h . Mel. | iyrjuaro
... avrov < Iul. Pol.)- po' (sic codd.)
yevdfievoq ETCSV ( + Kai Leo Gr. T h . Mel.) y e w a T6V Kaivav. 1
Kaivav po' etcov inap^iov iyivvrjoe TOV MaXeXerjX.
The material that appears in the following cluster of texts consists mainly of lists of the names
MaXeXef)X etcov p!;e' ( f c ' T h . Mel.) yevouevoc. tyivvrfoe tov'IdpeS.
and dates of biblical patriarchs from Adam to Abraham, along with chronological information
about significant events (e.g., the Flood and Abrahams entrance into Canaan). Because Africa nus used a biblical text whose chronology sometimes departed from the version of the Greek Bible known to later chroniclers, much of the criticism found in later testimonia faults him for
'Evcbx yevdfcevoc pi;e' eriov iyevvnoe tov MaSouadXav (MaOouadXa T h . Mel.), Kai a' npoc. rovroic, tmSuioaq
deviating from the chronology of the Septuagint (see T16e-q). It is possible that Syncellus' own
ett|,...
MaOoucdXa prcC (pfe' Iul. Pol. E K a t d v dydorJKOvTa Leo Gr.) etcbv y£v6uevoc eyevvr|ae tov Aduex-
version of Africanus' list of the biblical patriarchs represents only a chronological summary of
Aduex etcbv p r m ' urcdpxcov eyivvnoe tdv Ncoe.
an originally more developed exposition. Some of the more ample notices about the patriarchs
Ntie ircbv
found i n the Logothete group may also have originated in the chronicle of Africanus. Only a few of these notices are attributed to him, however (e.g. F16d, F22); for discussion, see Wallraff
avrov rdv 7a
T 1 6 f 12
2006,56-58.
T16o; T16q,2-4; F22 2
2-13
two authors give his age as p f and pn' respectively.
6 po' Sym. Log. Mich. Syr. ( T 1 6 0 G o a r Gelzer 1,52 (cf. Gen 5,9) ppe' A B
7s LcctAeXeijX B paXaXef]X A 12 ptcf B p7tn' A
I n the apparatus, Enoch's age according to the text of Sym. Log. (190, as in the Septuagint) is based on Leo Gr. and the Munich mss. of T h . Mel. and Iul. Pol. The printed editions of these
cf. G e n 5,3-29; Hipp., chron. 23-32; Eus., chron. 38,7 - 39,21; 40,21 - 41,4 = Sync. 92,8-26;
Cf. the textus receptus of the Septuagint, which gives 167 years as Methuselah's age when he begot Methuselah. 187 is the number found i n the Masoretic text and some Septuagint mss. (Wevers 1974 ad l o c ) . See further T16g, n. 2 and introduction, p. X X V I I .
Iulius Africanus
28
F16b
F16 The Generations from Adam to Abraham
G e o r g i u s Syncellus ( 9 4 , 1 5 - 1 7 M o s s h a m m e r )
F16b From Africanus:
AcppLKavou' Nd>e
29
rjv E X O J V
x',
ore
6
KaxaicAuapoc, eyevExo.
N o a h was 600 years w h e n t h e F l o o d o c c u r r e d .
rivexai xaivuv drto A 5 d p | i s x p i NUJE Kai xou KaxaKAuauoO Exn ,pat;f3'.
F r o m A d a m t o N o a h a n d t h e F l o o d , there are, t h e r e f o r e , 2262 years.
2s Sym. Log. ( L e o Gr. [12,3-5 Bekker] = T h . Mel. [16,11s Tafel] = Iul. Pol. [64,18 - 66,1 Hardt]) 'Eyeveto ( + ovv Iul. Pol.) 6 KaxaKXu0u6c, rai \' erei TOV N(I>E. yivovrat (+ oiiv Iul. Pol.) drro Aodu p£Xpi Nd)e K a l (Ncoe K a i < Iul. Pol.) TOU KaraicXuapoO ETn ,^0fi/3' djiofin' T h . Mel. + yeveai (' Iul. Pol.). 3 ->• F 1 6 d , 4 - 6 ; T16g,ls; T16h,2-4; T16q,3; T22a; T45.9-12 2 cf. G e n 7,6
2s cf. Hipp., chron. 34s
3 cf. Chron. Pasch. 403,13; 526,7; Epiph., haer. 1,173,16s s
ps. S y m . f. 2 6 = Cedr. 27,21-23; Eel. Hist. 170,17s; Anon. Matr. 2,12s; Cat. Gen. 699; 865 (2242 anni); Io. M a i . 1,4; Io. Ant. fr. 2,18s (2552 anni) [AB]
3 lvr\ ,(5cf^(5' B ~ A
F16c F 1 6 c G e o r g i u s Syncellus ( 9 7 , 4 - 1 5 M o s s h a m m e r ) From Africanus: AcppiKavouM E T O Se x 6 v
After the Flood, Shem begot Arpachshad.
KaxaKAuapov
Z r ] u £yiv\r\ae
ApcpacdS 5 e yevopevoc, E X O J V pXe' yevvq S a \ d y e v o p e v o c , E X O J V pX'
1
A r p a c h s h a d , w h e n h e w a s 135, begot Shelah, i n 2 3 9 7 .
x 6 v ApcpacdS.
Shelah, w h e n he was 130, b e g o t Eber, i n 2527.
x o v S a A d , ,(5xo('.
yEvva x o v "EBep, ,fiq>K.C.
Eber, w h e n he was 1 3 4 , b e g o t Peleg, i n 2 6 6 1 ; he r e c e i v e d t h i s n a m e
2
because o f
the d i v i s i o n o f t h e e a r t h d u r i n g h i s life.
a
5 "Eftep y e v o u e v o c , E X O J V pX5' y e v v a x o v O O A E K , , P x ^ > OOXOJC, £ 7 t t K \ r | 9 £ v x a S i d xo ev r)p£paic, auxoO usptaGfjvai xr]v y f ] v .
2-6
S y m . Log. (Leo Gr. [12,6 - 14,12 Bekker] = T h . Mel. [16,13 - 17,31 Tafel] = Iul. Pol. [66,1 -
80,6 Hardt]) E v Si TW Sevripa
ITU UETCI T6V Karaic\uop6v I r ) u yevouevoc, p' (pp" Iul. Pol.) iTtiv
e y E v v n o E TOV Ap
cpacdS (Kctivav Leo Gr., + cup' ov npdnrj fiaaiXtia XaXSaliov Iul. Pol.). ApcpacdS (Kctivav
Leo Gr.) 6E (< Leo Gr.) yev6pEvoc, p \ s ' (pX' Leo Gr. pXC Iul. Pol.) ETOIV eyevvtjoe
T6V Z d X a (EaXau Leo Gr. Iul. P o l . ) . . . . ZdAa (ZaXap. L e o . Gr. Iul. Pol.) yev6uevoc, pX' ETUJV iyivvr\oe T6V "EfJsp "E|3Ep yEvopevoc, p\8' ETWV iyivvnoe T6V OaXEK. EV apxfi rCiv fjfiepcbv OaXeK (iv...
noiovvTai
< Iul. Pol.)
1
At Gen 10,24; 11,13 (hence L c 3,36), most manuscripts of the Septuagint mention a second, post-diluvian Kenan between Arpachshad and Shelah, see Wevers 1974 ad loc. Lacking in the
TIJV Staviprjoiv.
3s de secundo Cainan deficiente ->• T16i; T16k; T161; T16m; T16n; T16o; T16q,ls; T45.13-15
Masoretic text and, according to Sync. (T16i), in some Septuagint manuscripts, this second
2-6
critique of their omission of the second Kenan, see T16i-o and Gelzer 1,89.
Kenan is also missing i n Africanus' and Eusebius' lists of the biblical patriarchs. For Syncellus' cf. H i p p . , chron. 36-41
2 - 1 2 cf. G e n 11,10-26; Eus., chron. 41,33 - 42,28; 43,4-22; 43,29-
44,13 = S y n c . 97,20 - 98,13; 98,20 - 99,6; 99,12-30; Chron. Pasch. 43,3-13; 86,18 - 87,5; Niceph., chron. syn. 83,21-84,15 Barb. 1 9 1 , 1 3 - 1 5
5s
cf. Gen 10,25; Niceph., chron. syn. 84,5-7; C h r o n . Epit. 11,1-4; Exc.
2
According to Gen 10,25 ("To Eber were born two sons: the name of the one was Peleg, for in his days the earth was divided and his brother's name was Joktan"), the name Peleg derives from the verb ??V ("divide"), see also the following note.
30
F16 The Generations from Adam to Abraham
Iulius Africanus
O a A e K excbv pX'
e-yEwnae
TOv'Payau,
Kai
Peleg, at age 130, b e g o t Reu, and after l i v i n g a n o t h e r 209 years, he d i e d .
£ 7 u ( f | 0 a c , exn oQ' ExeXeuxnoev.
F r o m A d a m u p t o the d e a t h o f Peleg, t h e r e are
A n o A 5 d p em X E X E U X T I V O O X E K EXT] , Y , KOTO S E EUOE|3IOV ,(3^TC'
Reu, w h e n he was 132, begot Serug.
Z e p o u x pX' xov Naxtop. N a ^ w p 0 8 ' xov 0 d p a .
For Africanus, the name Peleg refers both to the division of the earth during his lifetime and the completion of the first half of universal history at the time of his death. Cf. Sym. Log. (in the app.): "The years from Adam to the death of Peleg come to a total of 3000. Fittingly, then, Peleg
VEVETat < C e d r . ) .
received this name, for it means 'division', anticipating each of the two divisions. T h e sons of 7-12
cf. H i p p . , chron. 616-619
8 cf. Cat. Gen. 860,1; Proc. G., in G e n . 11 (PG 87/1.315C); Cedr.
Noah made the allotment of the earth during his time, and the division of the supposed period of 6000 years occurred at the end of his life; the one division was at the beginning, the other at
22,4
the end of his life." Some of the material in the ample geographical excursus that follows may 7 - 9 [AB] 7 et 9 payed) B p a y d u A 10aepoi>xA oepoiiyB
11 e t l 2 8 d p a A 8dppaB
originate from Africanus.
Iulius Africanus
32
F16 T h e Generations from Adam to Abraham
F16d
33
F16d From Africanus, concerning Abraham:
S y n c . ' i G e o r g i u s Syncellus ( 1 1 2 , 1 6 - 2 1 M o s s h a m m e r )
F r o m this originates t h e a p p e l l a t i o n o f the Hebrews. F o r 'Hebrews' i n t e r p r e
2
Sync. : i b d . ( 9 7 , 1 6 - 1 8 M o s s h a m m e r )
1
t e d m e a n s 'crossers', f r o m Abraham's crossing o f t h e Euphrates, a n d not, as s o m e believe, f r o m the p r e v i o u s l y m e n t i o n e d Eber. T h e r e f o r e ,
A9piKavoO rcepi Appadu-
" E v 0 s v a p t e r a l Td)v'Eppaicov f\ npoawvuuia. 'E|3paioi yap 01 nepdxai EpunVEUovxai, Sian£pdaavxo<; Eucppaxriy A P p a d u , Kai oux, obc, oi'ovxai xtvsc,, d n o "Eftep
TOU
TtpoeipnuEvou. auvdyETai
TOIVUV
sic, xf|v £7ii(5aaiv Tfjc, KaTnyyEApEvnc,
2
f r o m the F l o o d
a n d N o a h u p to Abraham's entrance i n t o the p r o m i s e d l a n d , there is a total o f 1015 years i n 10 generations, b u t f r o m A d a m there are 3277 years i n 20 genera tions.
5 yfjc; A ( 3 p a a u and U E V T O O KaraKAuauou K a i Nd)£ yEVEtov 1' ixr\ ,ai£', d n o 5 E A S a u ysvediv K ' £xr| ,YOX>C-
1
test.: 1 - 6 S y n c . [AB]
2
4 inc. Sync. [AB] (—• F16c)
. . . Kai Appdv. ouvdyerai roivuv ...
2-4 ps. S y m . f. 30" = Cedr. (49,11-13 Bekker) Aianspdoaq Si xdv Eixppdrnv n;v npoowvvuiav iXa/?£v'EfJpaToi yap T t E p d r a i Xiyovxai. oi Si dno'Eftep Xiyovmv amove KaAsfofloj'Eppaiouc,. 4 - 6 Sym. Log. (Leo G r . [20,18-20 Bekker] = Th. Mel. [22,1-3 Tafel]) ... and Si rov Siafiepiaftov Tfjc. yfjc. ixn ,Hic_' f,ac' L e o Gr.), dmb Si TOU KataicAuouou ern. ,aie\ d i t d 6e A5du Srn ,ycroC 4-6 —» F16b; T16g,2-4; T I 6 0 ; T16p; T16q,2-4; T45.9-10.15-18 5s - + T6,6; F51a,10s 2s
cf.Philo, migr. Abr. 20; Or., comm. in Gen. P G 12,113,9s; Io.Anag. f. 115
v
3s
cf. Gen 10,21;
14,13; Ios., a n t . I u d . 1,146; Io. Mai. 1,5 (8,19 T h u r n in apparatu); Exc. Barb. 205,24; Sym. Log. (Leo Gr. 13,4-7 = T h . Mel. 17,5-7 = Iul. Pol. 68,7-11)
4-6
cf. Eus., chron. 45,20-28 = Sync. 100,32 -
101,3 5s cf. H i p p . , chron. 621; Io. Mai. 3,3; Io. Ant. fr. 18,8s; Iul. Pol. 86,9-11 5 6e < Sync.
2
6 ,yooC Sync. Leo Gr. ,yoC Sync. 2
T16e
3
Now
t h a t I have thus d e m o n s t r a t e d the date at w h i c h Eber begot Peleg, the 1 6
descendant
4
th
f r o m A d a m , I t h i n k i t f i t t i n g to juxtapose o u r calculations w i t h
A f r i c a n u s ' n u m b e r i n g o f years u p to this p o i n t , a n d f r o m there up to A b r a h a m . A f r i c a n u s ' version is i n a s e c o n d table (because after a l l he predates Eusebius b y s o m e years). A n d t h e n i n t h e same w a y I shall f u r n i s h as w e l l Eusebius' n u m b e r i n g o f years, set o u t i n t h r e e tables a n d based, so he says, o n the sages w h o
1
t r a n s l a t e d the Septuagint, t h e t e x t u a l version used b y t h e Hebrews, i n a d d i t i o n t o t h e one used b y the Samaritans. O n c e the years have b e e n arranged a c c o r d i n g l y i n five tables f r o m A d a m u p to Peleg a n d f r o m Peleg u p t o A b r a h a m , the genealogy o f t h e patriarchs a n d the c h r o n o l o g y that coincides w i t h the w r i t i n g o f Moses a n d t h e gospels w i l l be rea
T 1 6 e G e o r g i u s Syncellus ( 9 1 , 1 - 1 1 M o s s h a m m e r ) OuTcuc, drcoSeSeiyuEvou
TOU
d i l y evident.
xpovou, K a 8 ' 6 V 6 "Eftep
TOV OOXEK
EyEvvnaE tc,' 6 v -
r a dno A 5 & u , a^iov olpai E K TtapaXXrjAou T W V f)plv ETtiXoyioGevTuJv E V SeuTEpoj Kavovioj TTapaGsoGai Kai xd 7tapd xd) A 9 p i K a v c p sxn
EOJC, X O U S E
xpovou, Kai dno
X O 0 6 E uEXpt ABpadp (Kai yap itpoyEVEaxepoc, 6 dvr|p unapxEt xoij Eua£(3iou 5
at
TTOU),
e I 9 ' oi5xu) Kai xd rtapd
EUOEJMOU
1
The Septuagint translates "Abraham, the Hebrew (nasn)" (Gen 14,13) as A(3pdu Til) TtepaTn ("Abraham the crosser," deriving from the verb 13V). For ancient discussion of the two opposing etymologies of the word "Hebrew," see Adler/Tuffin 2002,140, n. 4.
2
Syncellus quotes the following sentence twice with identical wording, although in both cases the preceding text is different. I n F16c he probably gave an abridged list. In this particular case we can be sure that the original of Africanus had more information than the list (see n. 1 to F16a); it certainly contained the etymology of "Hebrews," although it is hard to reconstruct the precise structure of the text.
3
This passage precedes Syncellus' chronological tables of the biblical patriarchs up to Abraham, as calculated by Africanus, Eusebius and Syncellus himself.
4
T h e number '10' found in the manuscripts is corrupt. Syncellus counted 16 patriarchs from Adam to Peleg (cf. Sync. 90,22; 101,16 and T16i,4). Goar and Gelzer emend it to '15', which represents Africanus' numbering of the patriarchs.
EXE-
xpixwc, £ K X E 0 £ v x a , cbc, £K£iv6c cpnat, Ka
r a xe xouc, o' aocpouc, EppnvEac; Kai Kaxa xd nap"Eppaioic, Kai E T I Kaxd xo napd Zauapetxaic, dvxiypacpov. Ovxd)
yap
EV KEVXE
Kavovtotc, KEipsvuiv xcov dno A 5 d p
EOJC, X O U
aX£K Kai
dno xou
a(
IO uoai'Kfj K a i euayY£^ li YP Pfi Y
[AB]
£ V £ a
PX'
a
T
8
K
a
l
XP
o v 0
XE M B -
a
^°7' -
5
1 ic,' s c r i p s i m u s SEKOTOV AB ie' Goar Gelzer"" 5 rcou + p' Gelzer™
34
Iulius Africanus
T16f
35
F16 T h e Generations from Adam to Abraham
M i c h a e l Syrus 1,3 (4, 2 a , 1 7 - 2 0 C h a b o t )
T16f
But
Enosh according to the
chroniclers A n n i a n u s a n d A f r i c a n u s f a t h e r e d
c h i l d at the age o f 190, a c c o r d i n g t o the Syrians 90 y e a r s .
a
1
-»F16a,10s cf. G e n 5,9; E l i a s Nisib. 7,35 (Annianus?)
T16g T16g
2
C h r o n i c o n Paschale ( 3 6 , 1 7 - 2 1 D i n d o r f ) I n the 100
'EV
T(I) EKCtTOOTll) £ T £ L TOU E f j t l , EC^aKOOTOaTtp S i TOU N(I)£ K a i ^ C T C ^ ' ETEl y £ V £ 0 E -
coc, K O O U O U Kai
KaTaKAuauoc, im rfjc, yfjc,' roaauTa auvijyayEv, ETteiSr) K a i T O . dKpi|3f| TTJC M a 9 o u c d X a £ T n , K a i OUTCOC. O O T O V yEwfjaai T O V eyEVETO 6
6 A9pixav6c;
9aivei TOU
1-4 - » T16q; T45.6-18
th
year o f S h e m , t h e 6 0
t h
year o f N o a h , a n d t h e 2 2 6 2
n d
year f r o m
the
c r e a t i o n o f t h e u n i v e r s e , t h e F l o o d came u p o n t h e e a r t h . T h i s is t h e s u m o f
S E p i ^ p i T O V £VTaiJ0a
years t h a t A f r i c a n u s also c a l c u l a t e d u p t o t h i s t i m e , f o r t h e accurate copies o f
pnC
the b o o k o f Genesis m a k e i t clear that M e t h u s e l a h w a s 187 years o l d w h e n h e
FEVEOEOJC, (3i(5Aia
Adpsx-
begot L a m e c h .
I s - > T22a; F16b,3s; T 1 6 h 2 - 4 -+ F16a,12; F16d,4-6; T16o; F22,2s; T22b T16h
I s cf. Chron. Pasch. 403,13; 526,7 From Adam to the Flood, there are 2242 years. This is what Eusebius and the true tradition and the
3 £7iriYaYev d u Cange
large majority of the manuscripts of Mosaic writings report, in accordance with the Septuagint version. N o t w i t h s t a n d i n g , A f r i c a n u s r e c k o n e d 2 2 6 2 years, o n t h e basis o f a f e w copies that r e p o r t t h i s t r a d i t i o n . B u t n o c r e d e n c e s h o u l d be p u t i n these copies. Up to the Flood, therefore, as the preceding has shown, the copies of Hebrew Scriptures disagree by T16h
G e o r g i u s Syncellus ( 9 4 , 4 - 1 4 M o s s h a m m e r )
349 years with the most ancient Samaritan text, which is composed in a different Hebrew script, and
An6 ta
ASdu ecoc, too KaraKAuouoO E t n ,(5au8'. OUTCD S E K a i EiioeSioq K a i 6 dAn8f|c \6yoc, K a i r a Tt\elaTCOV
Miouaa'iKcJv dvTiypdcpaiv 7tEpiexouoi K a r a rf]v rdiv o' SKSOOIV.
,Pai;|3' ETteXoyioaTO
EK TIVIOV
anaviojv
'O
dvTiypdcpcov O U T O J
AcppiKavoc,
pEVTOl
rapiExovTcov,
olc: ou
Xpr) Tt£i0EO"Sai. Mexpi t o i v u v TOO KataKAuau.ou KaOtbq n p d K e i t a i Siacp
yp
a c
P
a
F r o m A d a m t o t h e F l o o d , A f r i c a n u s differs f r o m E u s e b i u s b y 20 years.
1
'tpoc, t o ZauapeiTwv apxaidrarov K a i TOIC xapaKTfjpm SiaAAdrrov, o K a i dAr|9EC d v a i Kai
AcppiKavoc.
6E
ixpoc, EUOE(3IOV drto
ASdu
Scoc.
TOU K a T a -
The divergence reflects the variations in the biblical versions. Unlike Annianus and Africanus, both of whom followed the chronology of the Septuagint, the Syriac text reflects a variant
7tp
which the Hebrews acknowledge is both true and original. Compared with the Septuagint
version, the Hebrew version differs by 586 years; the Samaritan version differs from it by 935 years.
chronology also found in the Masoretic text and the Samaritan Pentateuch. 2
In the following two texts, Syncellus criticizes Africanus' treatment of two related issues: the age of Methuselah when he begot Lamech and the date of the Flood. Because chronographers
K X U O U O U 5ia9u>v£l£Tr| K ' .
established biblical chronology by adding up the ages of the patriarchs when each of them fathered a successor, Africanus' addition of 20 years to the age of Methuselah (187 instead of 1-8 -^T16g;T16p;T22a;T45,13-15
2-4
F16b,3s; T16g,ls
7s - » T16o; T16q,2-4; T22b
167, see above F16a,12) put the date of the Flood in A M 2262 instead of 2242. 187 is the age of Methuselah found in the Hebrew text, and, as Syncellus notes, in some manuscripts of the
Is Eus.,
r
cf. H i p p . , chron. 35; Eus., chron. 45,20-28 = Sync. 100,32 - 101,3; ps. Sym. f. 26 = Cedr. 27,21; can.
H i e r
15,4s; 70,15s; 174,5; 250,23 4 - 7 cf. Eus.,
chron. 39,28; 41,10
Septuagint (see Wevers 1974 ad loc; Adler/Tuffin 2002,27, n. 3). Although this reading is already reflected in the biblical chronology of Demetrius the Jewish chronographer ( 2 BC),
[AB]
7 ?)Ae' A ? ) \ ' B 935 Eus., chron. 36,3
n d
cent.
it is probably a correction of 167, designed to avoid a discrepancy created by the latter
number. If Methuselah was only 167 years when he begot Lamech, then his death i n 2256 would have been 14 years after the Flood in A M 2242, see below T22a.
Iulius Africanus
36
Tl 6i
F16 The Generations from Adam to Abraham
G e o r g i u s Syncellus (132,15-22 M o s s h a m m e r )
T16i
T i v d 5E TCtrv avTiypdcpcov, cbc, Kai Ei>a£(3iou, uy' exouai TOU ApcpacdS psrd TO yEvvfjaac aur6v TOV ZdX.a, olc o o S ' 6Xcoc, E7t6pe9a, 7tdvTr| Tfjc; d\n6Eiaq TCOV X P °
5
V C 0 V
K
a
l
v
!
According to some of the manuscripts, as well as Eusebius, Arpachshad lived another 403 years
ysvEcov 5tr|papTr|K6o[v.
after begetting Shelah. But these manuscripts we utterly disregard, since they have gone quite astray
d v T i y a p - T O U K a ' i v a v T O V Z d X a cpaol y E w n G f j v a i T « Apcpa!;d5 AcppiKavoc, T e K a i
from a truthful account of the chronology and the generations. B o t h A f r i c a n u s a n d Eusebius
EUOE|3IOC„
say t h a t S h e l a h was b o r n t o A r p a c h s h a d i n s t e a d o f K e n a n , a n d t h e y p u t Shelah
K a i xr\\
i S ' ysvEav T O U X d A a
™
37
iy' Tdrrouai,
pvf]ur|v xov
SsuTspou
ispai
(3C(3AOI K a i
K a ' i v a v o t > 5 ' oXcoc, 7toir|adp£voi, 6 v a i r t a v T a v o u Tf|c, FEVEOECOC; TO
K a x d A o u K d v E u a y y e X t o v xov ApcpacdS u i d v £K5£<5
itaTEpa 8k T O U 2 d \ a
16'
A5dp,
t h
i n the 1 3 , n o t the 1 4
t h
g e n e r a t i o n . A n d t h e y e n t i r e l y neglect t o m e n t i o n t h e se
c o n d K e n a n , w h o m t h e sacred b o o k s at e v e r y p o i n t i n Genesis, as w e l l as t h e G o s p e l a c c o r d i n g t o L u k e , have d e c l a r e d to have been A r p a c h s h a d ' s
d u o ASdp OVTOC,.
13
th
d e s c e n d a n t f r o m A d a m , a n d t h e f a t h e r o f Shelah, the 1 4
Arpachshad. Arpachshad, when he was 135, begot Kenan, in 2377. Kenan, when he was 130, begot
Z a X d ,p
Shelah, in 2507. E u s e b i u s a n d A f r i c a n u s d i d n o t c o u n t t h i s K e n a n . T h e r e f o r e , t h e y
T O . pX' ETrj auTou acpdXXovTai.
are i n e r r o r b y o m i t t i n g h i s 130 years.
chronography:
In the second year after the Flood, Shem
begot
3s - > F16c,3s; T16i; T16k; T161; T 1 6 m ; T16o; T16p; T16q,ls; T45.13-15 1 - 4 cf. G e n 11,10-13 3s cf. Eus., c h r o n . 42,1; 43,6; 43,31 = Sync. 97,22; 98,22; 99,14 1
[AB]
1 vpovoypacpelov g xpovoypcupiov A 2 ETUJV B < A 3 EOTOixEicooav B EOTOIXEICDOEV A
T16m
T16m
A n o n y m u s M a t r i t e n s i s (3,6 - 4,4 B a u e r )
Ka'ivdv y £ v 6 u £ v o c ETUIV p \ ' EyEvvnaE TOV EdXa Kai ETTECJIOEV ixr\ T X ' - EyevovTo Si rcdaai ai f | p i p a i Ka'ivdv ixr\ ut;' • ioTEOv 6 T I T O V Ka'ivdv TtapaXeXoinaaiv AcppiKavoc, T E K a i EUOE(3IOC, EV
Toic, xpovoic;- ou yap £ u p r | K a a i v auTov E V TTOXXOIC; TCOV dvTiypdcpcov. 6 Si dyioc,
When Kenan was 130 years of age, he begot Shelah and lived an additional 330 years. A l l the days of Kenan totaled 460 years. I t s h o u l d be r e c o g n i z e d t h a t b o t h A f r i c a n u s a n d omitted h i m i n t h e i r chronology. For t h e y d i d n o t find
Eusebius
h i m i n many o f the
m a n u s c r i p t s . However, Saint Luke mentions him in his genealogy of the Savior. AouKdc, yevEaXoycOv TOV acoTfjpa pEpvnrai ai>Tou.
cf. E u s . , chron. 42,1; 43,6; 43,31 = Sync. 97,22; 98,22; 99,14
3 cf. Niceph., chron. syn. 83,25-28
3s cf. Lc 3,36
T16n T16n
C h r o n i c o n E p i t o m o n ( 1 0 , 1 6 - 2 6 Pusch) When Arpachshad was 135 years of age, he begot Kenan. There is no reference at all to this Kenan
Apc, eupioKETai £p.cpEpdu£voc,, dXX' dno TOU Ap
5
xpovoypdcpcov o i k s
auTov O U T S TOUC; vpovouc; auTou dpiSuouaiv. 6 UEVTOI
d7t6aToXoc, K a i EuayyEXioTf|c, AouKdc aa
found in the Hebrew version; moreover, according to the Septuagint translation, Shelah was begot ten from Arpachshad, and then the others were begotten in succession. I t seems l i k e l y t h a t , at the v e r y outset, t h e r e was a n e r r o r i n the m a n u s c r i p t s , as a result o f w h i c h s o m e o f the c h r o n o g r a p h e r s
1
n u m b e r n e i t h e r h i m n o r h i s years. However, the apostle and
evangelist Luke clearly also mentions this Kenan as both son of Arpachshad and father of Shelah in the reverse genealogy set out by him, which is in his gospel. We also follow it, since it is more deserving of consideration. A n d we accept both this Kenan and his years.
auTou S £ x 6 u e 9 a .
3s - » F16c,3s; T16i; T16k; T161; T 1 6 m ; T16n; T16q,ls l c f . G e n 11,12 4 - 7 cf. Lc 3,35s [TH]
2 eucpepouevoc, T EKcpEpduEvoc. H | yevvr|9f|vai T Y£y£vvn9rjvai H
X o v r a i Kai H
3 Sk < H
4 OUTOO + Si-
| UEVTOI + 9EIOC, H 5 AouKdc, < H 6 uvnpovEiki T u.vr|p.ov£uu>v H | Kara T ev H
1
The reference to "some chronographers" would include Africanus and Eusebius, both of whom omitted the second Kenan.
T16o
41
F16 T h e Generations from Adam to Abraham
Iulius Africanus
40
TI60
G e o r g i u s Syncellus (104,16-23 M o s s h a m m e r )
EucrePioc. rip , y p n S ' e r a TOU x6apou cpnai TOV A(3padu yEwr]6fjvai. a9dXXeTai 6 EUCE|3IOC; ev role,
Eusebius states that Abraham was born in A M 3184. But Eusebius errs in his dating from Adam to
dno A&au e'cuc, A|3paau ypovoic, Td pX' etn TOU Seurepou Kdivdv up OTOixEiuoac. utoO Ap
Abraham, since he did not count the 130 years of the second Kenan, the son of Arpachshad, w h o m
olo' dpi8poucn K a i T 6 K a r a AOUKOV Eiiayy^Xiov iy' dno A6du.
the Septuagint and the Gospel according to Luke number as the 13
th
from Adam.
AppiKcxvoc, euro A 5 d u im T 6 n p a j r o v eroc, A(3paau err] ,yo$' eTteXoyiaaro.
A f r i c a n u s reckoned 3202 years f r o m A d a m up to the first year o f A b r a h a m .
a
But h e t o o is mistaken b y o m i t t i n g t h e same 130 years o f the second K e n a n s o n
ucpaipoupevajv
o f A r p a c h s h a d . For i f one subtracts the 20 a d d i t i o n a l years t h a t he assigns t o
OUTOC, TU)
4s
TU>V K '
etdiv
,YpTt6' 8T8I T O U
TOU
M a G o u a d X a , a n v a 7Tpooouoicoc, T O ; EuaefSiq) Kai
M e t h u s e l a h , he also dates i t , m u c h l i k e Eusebius, i n A M 3184.
T 1 6 h , 7 s ; T 1 6 k ; F22;T45,9-11 1 cf. Eus., c h r o n . 45,20-22 = Sync. 100,32-34 2s cf. L c 3,36 [AB]
2 uiou B oi uiou A
6s cf. Eus., chron. 42,33 = Sync. 98,17
6 Ttpooouoiuic. Di. np6c, 6uoioc. A B
7 OUTOC B OUTOJCA | TU>...K6OUOU
delere m a l u e r u n t Goar et D i .
T16p T16p
G e o r g i u s Syncellus (105,3-5 M o s s h a m m e r )
A c c o r d i n g to Africanus, i n A M 3277, A b r a h a m w e n t u p t o the p r o m i s e d l a n d o f C a n a a n . T h i s d a t i n g c a n n o t possibly be correct.
K a x d A < p p i K a v 6 v ra>
,yaoC
STEI T O U K O O U O U
£7te(3r| A(3padu Tfjc, ETtnyYEXuEvnc,
X a v a v i r i S o c , yfjc, ortep d S u v a r o v 7teq)UK8.
T 6 . 5 - 8 ; F 1 6 d , 4 - 6 ; T16h; T161; T16o; T45.6-18
T16q C o m p a r e d w i t h the accurate c h r o n o l o g y presented here, A f r i c a n u s ' c h r o n o l o g y is l a c k i n g 110 o f the 130 years o f t h e second Kenan. T h e r e m a i n i n g 20 o f these T16q
130 years were p r e v i o u s l y offset b y the lengthened p e r i o d o f t i m e represented
G e o r g i u s Syncellus (112,22 - 113,2 M o s s h a m m e r )
b y t h e 2262 years f r o m A d a m up t o the F l o o d ; these 20 years were added o n t o AeiTtetai n p o c , xr\v TtpoKEtpivnv dKpipfj xpovoXoyiav r\ rtapd voic, p i ' ex Tcov p X ' eribv pX'
x] anb A S d u im
TOV
TOU
TUJ
SeuTEpou Kaivav. r d y a p d X X a
KaraKAuauov
TUJV
A9piKavu> xpo-
K ' S K TUJV
the years o f M e t h u s e l a h .
aururv
,|3CT^(3' ET(I>V rcapau^naic. Ttpoa9r|p7ia-
ae, itpoaTeGevTcov aotujv roic, T O U MaGouadXa xpovoic,.
1-4
-»F16b;T16g;T16o;T22b
Is
F16c,3s; T16i; T16k; T161; T16m; T16n
2-4
->F16a,12;
T16d,4-6; T 1 6 h , 7 s ; F22; T45.9-11; 1 [AB]
2 pX' B pXe' A
3 napau^noic. B napd^naic, A
Since 3202 - 20 = 3182, Goar and Dindorf favor the deletion of the number. However, Syncel lus states only that Africanus' date was "nearly the same (npooopoiux;)" as Eusebius' (= 3184).
42 T17
Iulius Africanus
T17 Adam's Tomb v
C a t e n a i n I o a n n e m i n codice Parisino gr. 209, f. 2 9 8 (2,105 M o n t f a u c o n
T 1 7 Adam's
43
1
Tomb
= P G 26,132IB) OvJTOi 5e £i0iv o i n e p i Tfjc, Tacpfjc tov A S d u sipr|K6T£c;, AcppiKavoc; Kai 6 iryioc,
These are t h e a u t h o r s w h o write about Adam's t o m b : A f r i c a n u s a n d
ASavdoioc,.
Athanasius.
1
Saint
Sym. L o g . (Leo Gr. [9,4-7 Bekker] = T h . Mel. [14,5-7 Tafel] = Iul. Pol. [58,6-9 Hardt); cf. Cedr.
[18,11-13 Bekker]) = Georg. Mon. (43,16s de Boor/Wirth) TOOTOV (6c, Georg. Mon.; sc. Adam —• F IA32,2s) Xeyetat npui-rov (npcotoc, Georg. Mon.) eic, rf|V yfjv, ££, f\c e\r|
F 1 8 A g a p i u s M a b b u g e n s i s , H i s t o r i a universalis ( P O 5 / 4 , 587,8s Vasiliev)
F 1 8 Seth, the Inventor
of the Hebrew
Africanus the sage claims that Seth, the son
2
Alphabet
o f A d a m , was
the first t o b r i n g t o l i g h t
letters a n d t a u g h t w r i t i n g a n d the H e b r e w language.
- * F16a,2-4; Sym. Log. (Leo Gr. [9,22 - 10,1 Bekker] = Th. Mel. [14,20s Tafel]) OUTOC 6 Zf|6 rcptoToc, ta'EPpdi'Kd ypdpuato e^eupibv cruveypd\]/aTo. Io. Mai. 1,1 (4,18 T h u m ) K a i ypduuara "EBpaiKd ecpeupev 7tpd)Toc, Kai OUTOC dveypd\)/aTO. 1 cf. Gen 4,25; 5,3 Syr. 1,4
v
Is cf. Io. Ant. fr. 1,13s; Georg. Mon. 10,5; ps. Sym. f. 21 ,36 = Cedr. 16,16; Mich. 1
On this type of catena on John, see Reuss 1941,210-215 ("Typus F"), in particular pp. 210f on the Paris ms. Although this short notice is late and unspecific, the information found i n Sym. Log. may provide a fuller understanding of Africanus' version of the tradition (on which, see Gelzer l,60f): "It is said that Adam was the first to be buried in the ground (cf. Iub 4,29), from which he was taken. A n d his tomb was in the ground of Jerusalem, according to what is reported in a Hebrew tradition." See also Georg. Mon. cont, who attributes the tradition to "Josephus." Christian writers from the time of Origen situated the burial site of Adam on Mount Golgotha, cf. the loci similes and Jeremias 2002,35-43.
2
About Seth and the discovery of the letters see Klijn 1977,48-51. Other passages in the Chrono graphiae attest Africanus' strong interest in the history of culture. For his account of the disco very of arts and crafts and of cultural heroes (npuVroi euperai) see F24.35-37; F54a,17f; F56.7-9 and Roberto 2006,13f. His specific interest in the Hebrew language also appears in the various etymologies and aetiologies found elsewhere (T2b,4-7; T l 1,8-11; F16d,l-4; F19,3f; F44.2, see also Wallraff 2006,57f). Furthermore, there is a tradition, found in Sym. Log. (Leo Gr. 10,6f and parallels), according to which Enoch first learned and tought letters, see also Iub 4,17.
44
F19 Enosh, called by the name of God
Iulius Africanus
F19
F19
G e o r g i u s Syncellus ( 1 0 , 7 - 1 1 M o s s h a m m e r )
Enosh,
called by the name of
45
God
And A 5 d u EUJC, YEvvfjoecoc'EvcJc, Err) TEtpaKocia tpidKovra n£VT£, 6r|XouoT|C, rfjc, ypacpfjc,-'Evuic, «fjX-
From Adam until the birth of Enosh were 435 years, Scripture revealing that Enosh was the first 'to
maEv EniKaXeiaGai r 6 ovopa icupiou TOO 9EOU» 7tpu)Toc, TOUX' EOTI rtpooayopEUEaSai ovopaxi 9EO0.
hope to make use of the name of the lord God', that is to be called by the name of G o d .
EppnvEuETCti y a p
E n o s h is
6 'Evobc, cboavei dvOpcorcoc, K a t d T O V 'E(3paiK.6v voOv. O U T O J 6 S
v i o r is the
Kal 6 a u ) T f | p uioc, TOO O V T O C , a v S p o j i t o u , K a x a T O V cpuoiKov A o y o v . Acppucavoo.
Africanus. D i d y m . , in Gen. 4,26 (144,27 - 145,8 Nautin) 'O lf\S ovv avri TOV Sixaiov Texdeiq
1-4
'EVOJC SiKaioq
SIKCCIOV, dq CCVTI TOV Kvpiov
ovopaxoq
Tijq fvxfjq avTov
Ttjv dpertjv
7tou KaTacnaoiv-
'Evwq yap nap' EBpaioiq avdpanoq
npooamet
aiircd-
«oiToq»
avBpcbna evaperw
Srjkovanq, ow^ovonq
iavTov
Is
1-4
G e n 4,26
o f the 'one
who
is man',
a c c o r d i n g t o the
For Sa
n a t u r a l sense. F r o m
2
npoonyopiaq,
TO « K « T 'CIK&VCU Kai rfjvTou OVTCJC, OVTOC, dv8pioicniv. apiXei yovv
npa^iq- iXn'iq Si fj rep OVTI amr\ ioTiv
TTJV deiav ioriv
son
a c c o r d i n g to the H e b r e w sense. T h u s also the
Africanus also says this in the Chronographiae: For G o d
r
cf. Cat. Gen. 574 (= Eusebius Emesenus); ps. Sym. f. 22 = Cedr. 17,9-12; Sym.
is called b y t h e
same n a m e as all t h a t is f r o m h i m , since he is i n
e v e r y t h i n g . B u t i n the d i v i n e economy, he is c a l l e d ' h u m a n ' , since i n his w h o l e
Log. (Leo Gr. 9 , 1 3 - 1 5 = T h . Mel. 14,11-14); Iul. Pol. 58,13-15
b e i n g he is invested w i t h existence, i n accordance w i t h w h a t has been said, ' F o r [AE]
4
T O U SVTOC, A E 3VTCOC, ps. Sym.
|
K a r d TOV UOIK6V Aoyov Africano attribuerunt Routh,
18
Gelzer" K. T .
F20
I o a n n e s S c y t h o p o l i t a n u s (ps.
M a x i m u s Confessor), S c h o l i o n i n D i o n y s i i
i n h i m t h e w h o l e fullness o f d e i t y dwells b o d i l y ' .
F21
Quotation
from
the Book
of
Enoch
A r e o p a g i t a e ep. 4 (76 C o r d i e r = P G 4 . 5 3 2 B ) From Africanus: A b o u t . . . he states . . . an oracle (?) ( o f ?) E n o c h is r e p o r t e d i n a T o 0 r 6 cpnoi K a l A(ppiKav6c, EV talc, Xpovoypacpiaic,A e y e T c u yap
b o o k o f the a p o c r y p h a .
3
opwvuptoc, 6 Qzbc, rtdffi TOLC, el; auTovi, enetSr] E V Tidaiv e a r t v . E V
8E Tfj o i K o v o p i a , cbc; K a T a Tqv o u a i a v 6 X n v ouaioj0Eic, dv6poj7toc, XsyETai, K a x d T 6 E i p n p E v o v - «sv (I) KaToiKEi Ttdv Tfjc, GeoTriToc, T O 7tA.r|pojpa au)paTiKd)p>.
1
To preserve the ambiguity of the word EmKaXeioSai found in the Septuagint text of Gen 4,26, the translation renders the word as 'make use of the name of. EmKoXEio9ai can mean either 'to call upon' (in the middle voice) or 'to be called by the name o f (in the passive voice). Later
4 C o l 2,9
Christian interpreters often preferred the latter, in part because it explained how the descen dants of Seth and Enosh could be identified as 'the sons of God' of Gen 6,2 (see, e.g., Io. Chrys., hom.
22 in Gen. 189,4-35). By this interpretation, Enosh could also be seen as a foreshadowing
of Christ. While the name Enosh means 'man' in Hebrew, he was also called by the name 'God.' 2
Mosshammer's punctuation, which removes the full stop before AcppiKavou, would attribute only the last sentence of this passage to Africanus (beginning with the words "thus also").
F21
N o t a i n m a r g i n e c o d i c i s P a r i s i n i gr. 1 7 1 1 , p. 13 (ad t e x t u m G e o r g i i
Syn-
Because the meaning of the phrase 'the natural sense (Xoyoc,) of Africanus' is doubtful, the punctuation presented here follows Rouths text; cf. also Gelzer l,61f.
celh [20,29s M o s s h a m m e r ] ) 3 AcppiKavoo-| e r t i t . . . t | ep[...] | (pax
'Evd>v_| E V f3[f3X.to | T63V dTtOKp.
Found in the margin of ms. A (= Parisinus gr. 1711), this notice originates in a note to one of Syncellus' lists of the early biblical patriarchs (20,26-29). Because the text is mostly illegible, Mosshammer did not include it in his edition. Gelzer did provide it in his planned edition of Africanus (Gelzer™). While fragmentary, the text suggests Africanus' familiarity with the Book
t . . . t ] Nt;a G e l z e r
m s
| v Gelzer™'
of Enoch.
46
F22 The Years of Methuselah and the Names of the Sons of Cain
Iulius Africanus
F22
F22
G e o r g i u s Syncellus ( 2 1 , 1 - 8 M o s s h a m m e r )
'O yap MaQovoaka
O U T O C , dTtdvrcov i t A e i o v a x p o v o v §101, TI
TCOV T E
or|uaiv£i
of the Sons of Cain
sic,
T h i s m a n l i v e d l o n g e r t h a n anyone else, b o t h those w h o p r e c e d e d h i m a n d
T t o X u x p o v i o v auTou 8 i d r f ] v
those w h o s u c c e e d e d h i m u p to o u r t i m e , 969 years i n all. Perhaps his l o n g e v i t y
rtpo auTou Kai
TO
and the Names
For Methuselah died in the Flood, concerning whom Africanus wrote:
iv TCO KaTaxXucpcp TEGVTJKE, rrepi ou A9pocav6c,-
r ) u a q , EIC, exn Td cruuTtavTa ?)c;0'. r d x a
The Years of Methuselah
47
TCOV ECJJC,
5'
has s o m e m e a n i n g , because o f the s u p r a m u n d a n e eighth day, t h e Lord's day.
uarepEt, xouxo rcpoc; d v a T t X f j p c o a i v Tfjc; xtXid6o<;, npcoxov u n d p x o v TtXfjpcoua, d v -
For he h a p p e n s t o be n u m b e r e d e i g h t f r o m the f i r s t . A n d w h a t he is l a c k i n g ,
ETiXrjpcoasv 6 acoTfjp.
this t h e S a v i o r has c o m p l e t e d i n o r d e r t o f u l f i l t h e m i l l e n n i u m , t h e p r i m a r y a n d
UTtEpKoauiov 6 y 5 o d 8 a K u p t a K i j v f ) u s p a v . 6 y 5 o o c , y a p d n o
TOU
a ' xuyxdvEt.
0
1
5
Etta ipnoiv- s i a i xpsic; o u c o v u u i a t TTCOC; diro K d t v xoic, dno ZfjQ, cbq'Evcbx K a i M a -
the c o m p l e t e p e r i o d o f t i m e .
2
Then he says: T h e r e are three descendants o f C a i n , whose names are i n a c e r
OouodXa K a i AduEX-
t a i n w a y i d e n t i c a l w i t h those o f the descendants o f Seth, n a m e l y E n o c h , M e t h u selah a n d L a m e c h . 2 s - » F 1 6 a , 1 2 ; T 1 6 o ; T16q,2-4 2s cf. Gen 5,27; Eus., chron. 38,22-26; 39,18s; 41,1s = Sync. 92,22s; 93,13s; 93,31s in ps. 118,164; Bas., hex. 2,8 (36,14-16) [A]
1 Ma9ouadXa Di. uaGouodXac. A
T 2 2 a Georgius Syncellus (20,5-13 M o s s h a m m e r )
T22a
Tco ,aooC £ T E I EyEvvnaev 'Evd>x T6V MaSouadXa. Ma8ouodXa yevouEvoc p^C ETOJV iyEvvnaE TOV
In the 1277
Adu.E)(. Tui , a u v 5 ' ETEI TOU K d o p o u , Tivd 5E TCOV dvriypdfcov TCO p7t(' ETEI OUTOU MaflouadAa cpEpouoi
mech. This was in A M 1454, but some of the manuscripts report the birth of Lamech in the 187
Tf|v yEvvnaiv AdpEx- otc. Kai 6 AcppiKavoc, dKo\ou6r|aai; TCO ,PcTcjj3' E T E I T O U KOOpOU T O V ETtl
year of this Methuselah. With them is Africanus also in agreement, who reckoned t h e date o f
N u J E KOTaKXuapOV EOTOlXELCOaev, dnsp ou 5OKEI nplv Uyiux; J x 5
3 - 6 cf.Or.,sel.
7s cf. Gen 4,17-19; Philo, de posteritate Caini 40s
Tcp ,|3ac;P'
ETEI TOU KOCJUOU T O V
vouc, Tfjc, C^Tjc; M a O o u a d X a d p x o p E v o u c , drto yEiv
EIC, T O
,pavc;'
ETOC; T O U
E l v
-
SOKEI
KaTaKXuopov OToixEicoaai 5 i d
Koopou
EVTOC; T U J V
TOU
,aaTt('
,(3ai;(i'
th
year, E n o c h begot Methuselah. When Methuselah was 167 years of age, he begot L a th
3
6E poi d AcppiKavdc,
the F l o o d at t h e t i m e o f N o a h i n A M 2 2 6 2 . But this does not seem to us to be sound. For
xpo-
in my opinion Africanus reckoned the date o f t h e F l o o d i n A M 2262 because t h e
K o a p o u Xrj-
969-year d u r a t i o n o f Methuselah's l i f e b e g a n i n A M 1287 a n d c o n t i n u e d u p t o
T O TOUC;
ETOUC, T O U
^Q'
ETCOV.
AM
2256, w i t h i n t h e p e r i o d o f 2262 y e a r s .
4
3 - 7 — F16b,2s; T16g,ls; T16o; T16q; T45.15-17 1 cf. Gen 5,21 I s cf. Gen 5,25 L X X [A]
6 ,aarcC G o a r
m
,aan^'A
2s cf. Io. Chrys., hom. 21 i n Gen. 5 ( P G 53,181,23-25) 1
7 ETOC, Goar™ ETOUC, A
1
Methuselah, the eighth patriarch from Adam, prefigures not only the Resurrection of Christ on the first day after the Jewish Sabbath, but also the end of the 7000-year millennial week.
2
969 (the age of Methuselah at the time of his death) added to 31 (the age of Jesus at the time of the Crucifixion) equals the perfect millennial number of 1000. For Africanus' dating of the Crucifixion of Jesus at age 31, see T93b.
3 4
For Septuagint mss. reading 187 years, see Wevers 1974 ad loc. See above, T16g, n. 2.
48
Iulius Africanus
T22 T h e Years of Methuselah and the Names of the Sons of Cain
T 2 2 b G e o r g i u s Syncellus ( 1 3 1 , 7 - 1 6 M o s s h a m m e r )
"EOTCU Si KaiTctpEo" paKpoPiiiTEpoc. aurou EXT] ry',
T22b
(fjaac, £Tn, 67i£p OU8EVI auprcEcpcbvnTai. 816-
And Jared, who lived to age 962, will have outlived him by 13 years—an opinion with which no one
rt£p oii xpf\ 5 i d TO cpdvai auvarcoX£a6ai a u r o v TOIC, EV T
agrees. Therefore, to say that he was swept away with the others in the Flood does not necessarily
PiwKEvai.
M \ d
AcppiKavw neiSoueGa npooTiBsvTi r d aura K ' M a G o u a d X a d v x i ?)2;6'. Xom6v oi\ Kpetooov Elvai 5OKEI rale,
O U S E T
Etn Kai
mean that as a result he lived only 949 years. B u t n e i t h e r are we c o n v i n c e d b y A f r i c a n u s ,
world and assign 969 years to his life, even if it means that he survived the Flood by 15 years; for
•^710' A e y o v T l T O U 5
49
ouq OI8E rporcoDC, Kai Tonouc,.
adds o n these 2 0 years, a n d assigns 989 i n s t e a d o f 969 years t o M e t h u s e 1
In my opinion, then, it is better for us to follow the sacred books used throughout the whole
perhaps God kept him alive miraculously, as he did Enoch, through means and locations that only he knows.
3s - » F16a,12; T16f,3-5;T16g,7s;T161; T 1 6 n , 2 - 4 [AB]
1 ry' Goar™ Ky' A B 2 cruva7toX£o8ai B auvartoXX^aSai A 5£7top£vaic,A emupevaic, B
F23
F23
The Circumstances
of the
Flood
1
S y n c . : G e o r g i u s Syncellus ( 1 9 , 2 4 - 2 0 , 4 M o s s h a m m e r ) 2
S y n c . : G e o r g i u s Syncellus (21,27 - 2 2 , 1 0 M o s s h a m m e r )
nXrjGouc, d v 0 p d ) 7 t u ) v y E v o u i v o u E T I I tfjc, yfjc,
dvGpojTtcov
dyyEXoi
TOU
oupavou Guyaxpdaiv
cruvfjXGov. E V E V I O I C , a v r i y p d c p o i c , Eupov- o i u i o i T O U G E O U .
uuGEUErai
6E, die, o l p a i - < o i U E V > a n d T O U 2 r ] G i m o r o u nveupaToc, o i u t o i G E O U Ttpoaayo-
yEVEaXoyoupsvouc, SiKaiouc, T E K a i n a r p i a p x a c , dxp i T O U aojTfjpoc;. T O U C , 8' d n o K d i v d v G p i u r a o v dnoKaXfil cmopdv, tbe, O U S E T I GETOV EaxrjKOTac. S i d n o v n p i a v yEvouc, K a i 8 i d T O Tfjc (puaewc, d v o p o i o v . EntutxGEVTurv p s u o v r a i 5 i d T O U C , an
5
aurou
auTtbv r f ) v ctyavaKTriaiv norqaaaGai T O V GEOV.
W h e n h u m a n k i n d b e c a m e n u m e r o u s u p o n the e a r t h , angels o f heaven h a d i n tercourse w i t h d a u g h t e r s God'.
o f m e n . I n some m a n u s c r i p t s , I f o u n d : 'the sons o f
I n m y o p i n i o n , t h i s is t o be u n d e r s t o o d
2
figuratively:
< t h e descendants>
o f Seth are c a l l e d ' t h e s o n s o f G o d ' by the S p i r i t , since the genealogies o f t h e r i g h t e o u s a n d the p a t r i a r c h s u p u n t i l the Savior are t r a c e d f r o m h i m . B u t t h e descendants o f C a i n i t designates as h u m a n seed, as h a v i n g h a d n o t h i n g d i v i n e because o f the w i c k e d n e s s o f t h e i r l i n e a n d the d i s s i m i l a r i t y o f t h e i r nature, so t h a t w h e n t h e y w e r e m i n g l e d together, G o d g r e w a n g r y .
test.:
1
1 inc. S y n c . [A]: AcppiKavou nepl T
1-10 Sym. Log. (Leo Gr. [10,21 - 11,3 Bekker] = T h . Mel. [15,8-13 Tafel] = Iul. Pol. [60,18-62,4 Hardt]) Ol iyprjyopoi npdc rdc Ouyarspac TU>V dvBpdmujv Empiciav noinoduevoi yevvojoi TOUC, yiyavrac,, uavxeiac, r£ au (ovv Iul. Pol.) Kai yorjTEiac, avOpconoic eianyrfTai yevouevoi, in 8t (Kai Iul. Pol.) aarpovo^iiaq re Kai aorpoXoyiaq Kai redone. vynXfjc, Kai UETEtbpou Kivrjo£(oc,, Kai Talc, yuvaiQ TOVTU)V dndvrwv TcapaScSwHOTEC. Ti|v yvaxjiv, elq aKpov iXOelv novnpiac. TOUC, dv9pu)Tcouc napeoKevaoav. 1 - 2 3 cf. S y m . Log. (Leo Gr. 10,21 - 12,5 = T h . Mel. 15,8 - 16,12 = Iul. Pol. 60,18 - 64,20) Iul. Pol. 62,7-22
I s cf. Gen 6,1s (in traditione manuscripta modo dyyEXoi modo uioi)
1 - 7 cf.
2 - 7 cf. Ios„
1
ant. I u d . 1,73s; Or., Cels. 5,55,1-9; Proc. G . , i n G e n . 6 (86,5 - 87,10 Mai = P G 87/1.265C - 268C)
Syncellus' statement that Africanus lengthened the life of Methuselah from 969 to 989 years is a misunderstanding of Africanus' chronological system. The additional 20 years refer to the date when Methuselah begot L a m e c h (187 instead of 167), not the number of his years.
1 nXr|6ouc, G o a r
m
TtXf|6oc, A 3 oi ptv Seal. 5 dnoKaXEi Goar™ drtoKaXEiv A
2
Lit.: 'this is related mythically.'
10
F23 The Circumstances of the Flood
Iulius Africanus
50
E i SE ETC' dyysXcov v o o r r o E X E I V T O U T O U C ; , T U J V rcepi uaysiac, Kai yor|Teia<;, E T I
B u t l e t us suppose t h e y refer t o 'angels'. T h e n i t was t h e y w h o t r a n s m i t t e d
SE api9ud)v Kivijoecoc; TCOV pETEcbpcov talc; yuvai^i xrjv yvcboiv TrapaSeStuKEvai,
k n o w l e d g e a b o u t m a g i c a n d sorcery, as w e l l as the n u m b e r s o f t h e m o t i o n o f as
t r o n o m i c a l p h e n o m e n a , to t h e i r w i v e s , f r o m w h o m they p r o d u c e d t h e giants as
Ttav acpaviaai (cbcov yevoc; 6 0E6C; E V KaTaKXuoucjj, d7T£tXfJ0ac; pK' Etn oi>x vm£p-
their c h i l d r e n ;
Pfjae00ai T O U C ; dv0pdmouc,. p.n5£ voui(£a9co tjJTr]ua Sid T O nXsiova vpovov Tivdc,
solved t o d e s t r o y e v e r y class o f l i v i n g t h i n g s i n a f l o o d ,
uaTEpov (3icovai- T O yap SidoTnua T O U xpovou ysyovev EKaTov ETn pixpi
T
0
U
K
a
15
Tcp Ncoe Sid SiKaioouvtyv EuapsoTfjoavTi
"
0E6C;- Kai yevou£vr|c, EiofjXBov sic; auTrjv auToc, T E N C O E Kai oi uioi, fj yuvij Kai ai vuutpat, Kai dno itavToc; c^coou cmapjj\
ekr^e
TO
4
after t h r e a t e n i n g t h a t
against t h e s i n n e r s o f t h a t age was 100 years u p t o the F l o o d ( f o r t h e y were 2 0 years o l d ) . T o N o a h , w h o w a s w e l l - p l e a s i n g t o h i m because o f h i s righteousness,
eic, 5iauovf]v T O U yEvouc;. fjv SE ETCOV E C / X -
Koaicov 6 N C O E , 5 T E 6 KaTaKXuapoc; syEVETO. cbc, 8s
a n d w h e n d e p r a v i t y c a m e i n t o b e i n g because o f t h e m , G o d r e
because s o m e later l i v e d m o r e years t h a n that. F o r the i n t e r v a l o f t i m e i n v o k e d
UTTEOETO KaTaaKEudaai
KI^COTOV
3
h u m a n k i n d w o u l d n o t l i v e b e y o n d 120 years. L e t i t n o t be c o n s i d e r e d a p r o b l e m
TaKAuouofj KaTd Tcbv duapTcoXcbv TCTJV T O T E - f j o a v yap EiKoaasTEic;.
20
51
uScop, r) KI(3COT6C;
God
gave o r d e r s t o p r e p a r e a n a r k . A n d w h e n i t was c o m p l e t e d , there e n t e r e d i n t o i t
iSpuOn era Td opn ApapdT, a r i v a i'auEV E V I l a p 9 i g , T I V E C ; SE E V KEAaivalc, Tfjc;
N o a h h i m s e l f a n d h i s sons, his w i f e a n d t h e i r y o u n g wives, t h e f i r s t l i n g s
Opuyiac, s l v a i cpaaiv- E I S O V S E T O V T O T T O V EKdTspov. E7teKpdTr|0E Se 6 KaTaKXua-
every l i v i n g t h i n g , i n o r d e r t o e n s u r e t h e s u r v i v a l o f t h e i r species. A n d N o a h
udc; eviauTov- K a i T O T E ecripdvOn f] yfj. o i 8e ei;fjX9ov
was 600 y e a r s o f age w h e n t h e F l o o d o c c u r r e d . B u t w h e n the w a t e r receded, t h e
Tfjc; KI(3COTOU Kara cruCu-
yiac,, cbc; eaxiv eupetv, Kai oux 6v £iafjX0ov Tponov Kara npoc, T O U
yivr\,
euXoyouvTai T E
ark c a m e t o rest o n the m o u n t a i n s o f A r a r a t , w h i c h we k n o w t o be i n P a r t h i a , but
Beov.
from
s o m e say t h e y are i n Celaenae o f P h r y g i a . I have seen b o t h places.
The
F l o o d p e r s i s t e d f o r a year. A n d t h e n t h e e a r t h became dry. A n d t h e y came o u t o f t h e a r k i n p a i r s , as c a n be d i s c o v e r e d , a n d n o t i n the same m a n n e r i n w h i c h they e n t e r e d , a c c o r d i n g t o species; a n d t h e y were blessed before G o d .
test.: Sync.
1
10
2
eyvco inc. Sync. [A]: A^piKavoO (marg.)
11
1
KaTaKAvoucp des. Sync. : dmcr-rov
2
23 des. Sync. : TOUTUIV |iev ovv EKOOTOV TCOV 8ia
Io. M a i . 1,4 (7,86-92 T h u r n ) Merit TO navoai rdv KaraKXvoudv Kai ra (Soara Acocpfiaai evpe-
9rj aiirn f| Kipcoroc, Kadioaoa
ev roiq opeoiv Apapdr rr)c LJioiSiaq enap%iaq, fjonvoq eonv unrponoXiq
Anaptua (quae olim etiam KeAaivai vocabatur) Kai earn ra IfiXa avrfjq exei ewe rfjq vvv, coc ovveypayaro Ylipyauoq
6 TlajifvXioq. Iwannoq Se Kai Evoefiioq 6 LTau
devro, on ra opn A p a p d r eonv eni rrjv Apueviav Kai uera^v lldpScov Kai 'Apueviwv Kai ASiaflnv&v. v
tcaKEi ZKaQioEv r) Kifiwroq. ps. Sym. f. 20 = Cedr. (20,18s Bekker) "On r a opq Apapdt lauev ev I l a p 8ia T^C Apueviaq elvac rivec, 5e 9aaiv, ev KeAaivalq xf\q ct>puy(a<;.
19
Proc. G., in Gen. 8 (88,3-6
Mai = P G 87/1.285A, cf. Georg. Mon. 47,15-18) Ilepi Se rfjq KIPCOTOO
ovrwq- fjq Kifiarov ra Xeiyava
uexpi vvv npoc anoSei^iv rcov yeyovdrwv
SeiKvvrai ev opei Xeyopievwv A p a p d r , & rvyx&vei ava ueoov rfjq Apueviaq Kai IlapOiKrjc. x&paq Kara
3
Africanus' account of the revelation of forbidden knowledge by the angels is first attested in I H e n 6-8, where the angels are also identified as 'Watchers.' This is also the way they are
rfjv TOJV ASiaplnvwv yfjv.
described in the parallel text from Symeon Logothete: 'The Watchers had intercourse with the 11-14
cf.Gen6,3
15-18 cf.Gen7,6-16
18s c f . G e n 8 , 4
daughters of men and begot the giants, after having introduced to humankind both divination
chron. 11,35 - 12,2; Sync. 31,28 - 32,1 2 0 - 2 3 cf. G e n 8,13-19
1
Sync. appends the word arciOTov ('not credible'). Since it is lacking in the repetition of the 2
same text i n Sync. , it is most likely a gloss either by Syncellus himself or an earlier editor, 8
nayeiac] jiavTeiac Sym. Log.
19 iSpu6r| D i . ij8puv8qA
11
1
dcpavtoai tjciwv yevoc 6 0e6c Sync. - (6 8. d. (. y.) Sync.
2
meant to express disapproval of the notion that heavenly angels actually had intercourse with women, see also introduction p. X L I V .
52
Iulius i
F24 The Pagan Gods
F24
F24
F 2 4 a S y m e o n Logothetes (Leo
Gram-
F 2 4 b ps.
S y m e o n (cod.
Par.
m a t i c u s [ 1 5 , 5 - 16,3 Bekker] = T h e o d o -
f. 2 6
sius M e l i t e n u s [18,15 - 19,2 T a f e l ] )
C e d r e n u s 28,20 - 2 9 , 1 2 )
v
-
27
r
= [inc.
gr.
a 1. 10]
1712,
The Pagan
1
Gods
F24b
F24a
Georgius
AcppiKavoO' E K SE tfjc; cpuXfjc; xov
Z r | | i dvEcpdvr] a v -
GpcoTtoc. yiYavToyevijc;, dvouaadeiq xov 5
Ttcrrpoc, Kpovoc; Etc; ETtcovupov
nXavrJTOu Sei^ev
Kai
fiao-dsvEiv
io
xov
vnb
K a X o u p i v n v , ki,
fjc;
EOXEV
T O U itXavrJTOu
TtpcoToc; ijpfev
Kai'PEU!6V,
vidv
6v6[iaxi
6 E Kpovoc;
'Acppov, &>
npdq AiBvnv
yfjv
oc,
6
Kai
d6£Xcpr|v " H p a v .
rtjv
the
kn-
yu-
ECTYE
ans-
krkpovq
Svo
viovc,-
kyn-
'Acppoi,
Kai
Nivov.
'Acppov kh] ov 6
'Acppov
Kai
yrjftac;
p l a n e t o f that n a m e .
the A s s y r i a n s .
3
4
had 10
a son
who
the
the
father, after
the
n a m e C r o n u s b y his
was
H e f i r s t revealed
He had
was
F r o m the t r i b e o f S h e m arose a m a n
given
He
a w i f e Semira-
mis, also called R h e a , f r o m w h o m
i6iav
5 E Kpovoc; Kat
2
of
h o w to r u l e and exercise k i n g s h i p over
raXou-
IlfJKoc;, yrjuac; xryv
race o f g i a n t s .
n a m e C r o n u s b y his 5
p i v r | v , fit; rjc; gavEv uiov, 6c; ETt£KXrj9r| ZEUC,
KXrjpuaE
5E
vaika ZEpipaLtiv Trjv K a i 'Vkav
6c;
i S i a v d6sXcpr|v " H p a v . Kai irspov
EOYE
F r o m the t r i b e o f S h e m arose a m a n
Sk
daTEpoc;, 6c;
Aaaupicov.
£7i£KXr|9r] Zeuc, 6 Kai niKoc,, yrjuac, xryv ECTYE
wvouacOn
T O U Tiaxpoc; K p o v o c ; EIC; fdkv
cbvuuov
Aaaupicov.
£OXE 8k y u v a t K a lEuipautv r r j v av
9pu)Ttoc; yiyavToyEvric;,
d o t s p o c ; , 6c, Ttpcutoc; KOCTE-
apxeiv
From Africanus:
' E K tfjc cpuXfjc T O U Z f | | i dv£cpdvr| dv-
urtd
53
surnamed
he
Zeus,
race o f giants. H e
was
of
given
the
father, after
the
p l a n e t o f t h a t name. He was the f i r s t r u l e the Assyrians. H e had
a wife
to Se-
m i r a m i s , also called Rhea, f r o m w h o m he h a d a s o n w h o was s u r n a m e d Z e u s , also k n o w n as Picus, w h o m a r r i e d
his
also k n o w n as P i c u s , w h o m a r r i e d his
own
sister H e r a . C r o n u s also h a d
two
o w n sister H e r a . C r o n u s also h a d
o t h e r sons: Afer, after w h o m the
Afri
5
o t h e r son
named Afer,
6
to
whom
an he
are n a m e d , and N i n u s . A f t e r m a r r y i n g
a l l o t t e d the l a n d i n t h e d i r e c t i o n o f L i bya. He m a r r i e d A s t y n o m e ,
7
a n d begot
y
test. F24a: 2 Zf)p + ibc, (pnoiv AcppiKavoc, 6 oocpuYraToc, Vat. gr. 163, f. 5 5 Leo. Gr. marg. die, tpnoiv Acpptxavbc, 6 aotparraToc, test. F24b: 10s inc. Cedr.: d>c 8e A
1
In ps. Symeon, the heading of the entire passage is AcppiKavoO. In Cedrenus, the attribution to Africanus cl>c 6E AcppiKavoc cpnci ('as Africanus says') appears before the account of the birth of Afer. Among the Logothete group, the words uiq cpnaiv AcppiKavoc 6 oocpuiTaroc ('as the most learned Africanus says') appear in a marginal note to 1. 5 in Leo Grammaticus, at the beginning of the text in the codex Vat. gr. 163. John Malalas, who has a version of the story, quotes D i o dorus Siculus as his source in the context of the death of Zeus-Picus (Io. Mai. 1,13 [14,49-52 Thurn] = Diod. Sic. 6, fr. 5).
2
Because the eastern part of the inhabited world, including Assyria and Babylonia, was allocated to Shem (see, for example, Leo Gr. 14,22 - 15,1), Cronus and his descendants belong to the tribe of Shem. The description of Cronus as a 'giant' may be connected with the biblical N i m rod, the legendary giant and founder of Babylon (Gen 10,8f), who is also sometimes identified as a descendant of Shem (against Gen 10,6), see Io. Mai. 1,7.
3
Cf. Io. Mai. 1,8, which identifies Cronus' father as 'Damno'; in the Chron. Pasch. 65,3, he is named 'Damnos.'
(—* vide infra ad
4
Cf. Eus., chron. 30-35; Sync. 109,16, which list 'Belus' as the first king of Babylon and the father of Ninus. For the identification of Belus as Cronus, see Eus., praep. ev. 9,17,9 (quoting Alexan der Polyhistor).
O n the identification of the Roman god Picus with Zeus, see also, for example, Sync. 200,14-16.
6
'Afer' is thus the eponymous father of the Afri (Africans'). Cf. Cleodemus Malchus (in Ios., ant. Iud. 1,239,4-8), who identifies him with Afer, son of Midian and grandson of Abraham and Keturah (Gen 25,1-4).
7
Cf. Gelzer 1,70, who suggests a possible connection between the mentioned Astynome and the Phoenician mother goddess Astronoe.
Io. M a i . 1,8 (9,47- 10,62 Thurn)'EK Si Tfjc amfjq (puXfjq TOO Sqp Tijc KpaTnoaorjc, Tr)vZvpiav
xai Trjv TlepalSa Kai ra Xoind uiprj rfjq avaroXfjq rov a' viov Noi£ iyevvrjdr] Kai dvecpdvr| dv9pu>rcoc YiYavTOYEvrjc ovofiari Kpovoc, imKXnBeiq dno Aauvib TOO iSiov avrov naxpoc eic TI;V inwvvjiiav TOU TtXavfJTou dorepoc. iyivcro
Si <5KV«TOC OVTOC, doric npuitoc KaTeSei^ev TO fiamXcvav fjroi
apxeiv Kai Kpartiv
T
KaXoupevpv napa
Aoovpiotc Sid TO avrrjv zlvou vnepfjepavov Kai
avrfjc cpvXfjq TOV Zrju, viov Naie. icrj(£v Si 6 Kpovoq uidv dvopari LUKOV Soriq and TWV yoviwv iKXfjdr] Zeuc
Svofia Kai amdc TOV nXavrjmv
aaxipoq. eoxev Si xai aAAov vidv d aiirdq Kpovoq
dvofiart Nivov Kai Qvyaripa Si io%ev ovo^ari "Hpav. IXaB-ev Si yvvaiKa LJiKoq 6 Kai Zevq Tf)v iSiav avrov dSeXeppv rf\v"Hpav ovouan.
10-14
Io. Mai. 1,9 (10,71-76 Thurn) Kai epeivev (sc. Kpdvoc)
Kparcvv Kai ficcoiXzvwv rfjq Svoewq ndonq 'irr\ noXXa Kai eoxev £KEI yvvaiKa 'eoxev uiov d v o u a T i 'Acppov, cinvi eSwKe Tf|v A
npdc
Aipunv yfjv Kai tKpdrei
ovopan TWV
0iXvpav, i f fjq
iKei fiaotXevwv 6
Tfiv Aoruvdpnv eK rfjq Aaxepiaq vijoov Kai iyevvnoe GuyaTEpa, fjv EKOXEOEV
Acppo6iTr|V eiq dvoua Kai avrrjv rov nXavryrov doripoq rfjq ovpaviaq AfpoSirrjq... 1. 38-43). 2s cf. G e n 10,21s; Io. Mai. 1,7 6,1-3; Georg. M o n . 11,17- 12,8 Io. Mai.)
5a nAdvnToc T h . Mel. | npdrroc + nota marginalis Leo. Gr. vide supra 7a Zepipdpnv Th. Mel. 11 'Acppov] Acppov Sym. Log. corr. Bekker Tafel TOV 'Acppov Cedr. 12b Kai Nivov < Cedr. | 6 Acppov ps. S y m . oc Cedr.
fie rrjv
A a r u v o p n v , yevvrjaac,
6uyctT£pa, f]v iK&Aecev 15
D ac, Aia
TOO
iSiou u i o u
Kai NTvov, ocvr&v
vlovq
avrfjq
avrov,
0uyaT£pa
xr\v
f r o m her
rfjq
imo
TOU
SUOEI
a d a u g h t e r w h o m he c a l l e d
Aphrodite.
'O S E K p 6 v o c , i^wOsiq xf\q PaaiAdac,
ftaaiAEi-
[lexa
inoinoE
AmpoSiTnv.
Aide, KCXXEXITTE
'Peaq ^aaiXeveiv
AaTuvopnv,
i S i o u u i o u Aioc,
KOTIOJV
EV
15
Tfj
KpctTEi Tfjc, 'iTaAiac,.
'Aaovpi-
When
8
C r o n u s was
aupiarv napeyevexo
TOJV
Aa-
Ttpoc, T O V Ttatepa-
Elra
b ZEVC,
Aaaupicov
OUV
u7Toxa)pf|aac,
napayivErai
npbq
forced out
9
Assyrians w i t h Cronus himself
their
T6V
Kpn-rn-
/iaoiXsvoaq
elra
ETEOI
TeAEUTriaac, KaTaTi-
6sTai EV Kpr]TT|.
the
West a n d
took
and
Zeus, t h e n , w i t h d r e w f r o m the A s
allowed h i m
EV
away to
became k i n g o f a l l Italy.
TCOV
XeuEiv rfjc, 'ITaAiac,, Kal TTOXXOIC,
£T£0"i Kai TeAEuTfjaac, KaxarOETai
of
moved
West, t o o k c o n t r o l ,
onq
TCOAAOIC,
forced out
c o n t r o l o f Italy.
the
syrians a n d c a m e to his father. A n d
Kparrjoaq
C r o n u s was
moved
over
naTEpa' 6 5 E TtapavupEi auTuj paai-
Kai
When
reign
6 SE TtapaxcopeT a u r a ) (3aciA£U£iv mx'iTOAiac;,
of
left b e h i n d h i s sons Zeus a n d N i n u s t o
away to the
v)Ttoxcopr|aac;
a daughter A p h
his k i n g d o m by his o w n son Zeus, h e
mother Rhea.
ouv
A s t y n o m e , Afer h a d
his k i n g d o m b y his o w n son Zeus, he
Kai fSaoiXsvei
ndanqTxaXiaq.
55
rodite.
uv- cxi)Toq Se Katicbv sv xfj SuaEi Kpatet
Zevq
25
ei;
AcppoStrnv.
Se K p o v o c , i^waOeic; xt)c
UTTO
pinrpoq
20
F24 The Pagan Gods
Iulius Africanus
54
25
And
after
to
be
king
controlling
he
o f all Italy.
i t for
several
years, he d i e d a n d was b u r i e d i n Crete.
10
Zeus, t h e n , w i t h d r e w f r o m the A s syrians and came to his father. A n d
he
a l l o w e d h i m to be k i n g o f Italy. A n d after r e i g n i n g for several years, he t h e n d i e d a n d was b u r i e d i n Crete.
1 5 - 2 0 - » F 3 4 . 4 9 - 5 3 ; Io. Mai. 1,9 (10,66-71 Thurn) 'O Si nponarwp Kpovoc, iaaaq rdv iavrov vibv n~mov ivrfj Acxovpia Kal rrjv iavrov yvvaiKa'Peav rrjv Zep.ipap.iv pera IHKOV rod Kai Aide uloO av rov Kai XaBibv noXXfjv BoijSeiav 6%Xov avdpdmwv yevvaicov anfjXdev em xr\v Svaiv aBaoiXevxov oioav, fit) Kpaxovpivnv vnd nvoq KeXevovroq, Kai EKpdrnoE rQv SvriKwv pep&v acpavtjq EK rfjq 'Aaovploc yevbuevoq. 21 - 2 5 Io. Mai. 1,10 (11,89-97 Thurn) Mera Si TO BaoiXevoai rbv TTIKOV TOV Kai Aia rfjq Aooupiac £rn X' iaaaq Kal avrbq rrjv iavrov uirripa Kai rrjv "Hpav rfjv iavrov dSeXffjv Kai yvvaiKa Kai noifjoaq rdv iavrov vidv BfjXov BaoiXia rfjq Aaovpiaq anfjXdev tnl rt)v Siioiv Ttpoc. T6V iavrov T i a T e p a TOV Kpdvov ... d Si Kpdvoq iwpaKwq rdv iSiov avrov vidv Uimv rdv Aia iXBdvra npdq avrdv iv rfj Svoei TtapEx<<)pnoEV aurai rrjv BaoiXeiav rfjq Svoewq ... Kai £(3aoiA£U0E rfjq Svoeaq fjroi x(\q1ra\iaqdTliKoq6 KalZevqaXXaern25s Io.Mal. 1,13 (13,45 - 14,52Thurn) MeXXwv Si TEAEUTOV 6 avrbq TliKoq b Kal Zevq iKiXevoe rb Xeiyavov avrov xayfjvai iv Tfl Kprjtn vfjow. Kal Kriocxvrtq avrw vabv ol avrov naiSeq edr/Kav avrdv iv rfj Kpt)rrj vfj&a) iv pvtjuari, onep pvfjpa fjv ev rfj avrfj Kptjrrj, Keirai S' ecoq rod napdvroq, iv d> imyiypanw evOdSe Keirai davav TliKoq d Kai Zevq, bv Kal Aiav KaXovmv. nepl ov ovveypayaro AibS(opoq d oofdraroq xpomypaipoq, dq Kal iv rfj hcBiaei xov avyypapparoq avrov xov nepl deav elnev, on Zevq, b rov Kpdvov vidq, iv rfj Kpfjrr) Keirai. 15-20 cf. Io. Ant. fr. 4,20-22; Chron. Pasch. 65,19 - 66,3 (omnes ex Io. Mai.); Exc. Barb. 234,25 236,3 21 - 26 cf. Io. Ant. fr. 4,29-32; Chron. Pasch. 66,15 - 67,3 (omnes ex Io. Mai.); Exc. Barb. 236,4-22 24 - 26 cf. Theoph. Ant., Autol. 1,10,12s; Tat., orat. 27,1; Io. Ant. fr. 6.2,4-13; Chron. Pasch. 80,1-10 (ambo ex Io. Mai.) 15b £Su>8etc ps. Sym. e!;u>a6Eic, Cedr. + Tfj Cedr.
16b Kcmtbv ps. Sym. Kcrr£A8drv Cedr. 21b ouv < Cedr. 26b EV
8 9
The passage interprets the meaning of the name Aphrodite as 'born to Afer (= A9P0C,)'. For Africanus' discussion of the Assyrian kingdom after Ninus, see F34.49-53, T49a.b, and 11. 27-31 below. 10 The tradition according to which Zeus was buried in Crete was wide-spread in antiquity; it may originate in Euhemerus, see Winiarczyk 2002,35-43.
dvaaxrjXcoaavTec; OEfSovrat. Mfitd SE Tr)v Aioc, T£X£UTr|V O a u
S e T T | V TOV Aioc, T E X E U T T I V
Oauvoc, uioc; auTou EfSaofXEUosv, 6c; 35
F24 The Pagan Gods
Iulius Africanus
56
voc,
0 vibe,
ai>Tou
efiaoiXEUOEv, Sc.
After
N i n u s , the k i n g o f the Assy
rians was T h u r a s ,
11
whom
57
A f t e r N i n u s , the k i n g o f the A s s y r i
they re
ans was T h u r a s , also k n o w n as A r e s ,
n a m e d Ares, since h e w a s extremely
since he w a s e x t r e m e l y w a r l i k e . T h e
w a r l i k e and brave. T h e Assyrians re
Assyrians r e n a m e d h i m as a g o d w i t h
n a m e d h i m as a g o d w i t h t h e name
the n a m e Baal, o r Bel, a n d after erec
Baal, a n d after e r e c t i n g a m o n u m e n t
ting a m o n u m e n t to h i m , worshipped
to h i m , w o r s h i p p e d h i m .
1 2
him.
A f t e r the death o f Z e u s , Faunus his
A f t e r t h e death o f Zeus, Faunus h i s
pETcovoudaGn 'Eppfjc,- rjv y a p XoytcoTa-
u£Tcovopda0n 'Eppfjc,- rjv y a p Xoyicoxa-
roc, Ttdvi) K a i paBnuariKOC,- banc, K a i
T O C 7tdv\) Kai pa9npaTiKOC,- oc; Kai xf|v 35
son became k i n g , w h o w a s renamed
son b e c a m e k i n g , w h o was r e n a m e d
tr)v
T O U XPUODU TtoiT|0lV ECpEUpEV EK pETaX-
H e r m e s . He was e x c e e d i n g l y eloquent
H e r m e s . H e was exceedingly e l o q u e n t
Xcov dv9pd)Ttoic,.
and f o n d o f l e a r n i n g ; h e also discover
and f o n d o f l e a r n i n g ; he also discover
ed for m a n k i n d the a r t o f m a k i n g g o l d
ed for m a n k i n d the art o f m a k i n g g o l d
f r o m metals.
f r o m metals.
tov
xpvoov
7toir|0iv ecpefjpev E K
pETdXXwv ctvGpcbTiotc,.
"H UEVTOI AcppoSirrj KiXrj Xeyouevn viw
XoyiKt)
Kai noi-
£ y a p f | 9 n T U > A6coviSi rat
T O U K i v u p o u , 9iXoa6cpa) o v t t Kai 40
H o w e v e r , A p h r o d i t e , said t o be i n
aura}- ouc, Kai &xpt 9 a v d T o u cpiXoao-
t e l l e c t u a l a n d sophisticated, was m a r
cpouvxaq auv dXXrjXoic, Picooat
r i e d t o A d o n i s the s o n o f Cinyras; h e
iaro-
pouoi.
t o o was a p h i l o s o p h e r . I t is r e p o r t e d that t h e t w o o f t h e m l i v e d together u p t o the t i m e o f t h e i r deaths p r a c t i c i n g philosophy.
F25 From the Division of the Earth to Abraham's Migration
S y m e o n Logothetes (Leo Grammaticus [20,16-20 Bekker] = Theodosius
F 2 5 From
the Division
of the Earth to Abraham's
59
1
Migration
M e l i t e n u s [ 2 2 , 1 - 3 Tafel]) 'Oporj T o i v u v yfveTcu erii uexpi Tfjc TtapoiKeaiac, ASpadu r o o a u r a . 6 Siauepiauoc, Tfjc yfjc, yeyove rfj tc
ctpxfi TUJV iju-Epcrv aXeK. arco 5k TOU Siauepiopou Tf|<; yfjc, £ T T ] ,X .'> * ° ^ <
Tt
T 0 U
KaraKXuauoO EXt]
XtXia 6£Karc8VT£, dno Se A S d u ETT) x p i a x i X i a 6 i a K o a i a £ ( 3 5 o p f | K o v x a ETCxd.
Is - » F16c,5 (ann. 2661)
Altogether, then, the years up to the migration of Abraham are the following: The division of the earth occurred at the beginning of the days of Peleg. From the division of the earth, there are 6 1 6
years. From the Flood there are 1015 years, from Adam 3277 years.
1 £ T r | . . .Tfi < T h . Mel. 2 dpxfi Leo Gr. dpxf] T h . Mel. | ,xic/ T h . Mel. ,ac' Leo Gr.
F26
G e o r g i u s Syncellus ( 1 1 4 , 1 - 2 4 M o s s h a m m e r )
F26
AcppiKavou-
From Africanus:
A L U O U KaxaoxovToc, xrjv yr)v xr\v X a v a v i x i o a KaxfjX0£v EIC, Ai'yuTtxov A(3pa-
dp,
5£6icbc, 5e pf| 6 i d x o KdXXoc, xfjc y u v a i K o c . dvaipEGji, dSfiXcpoc, Eivai O K E T C X E -
xai.
£7taive6£iaav 5e t i y d y E X o Oapacb (ouxco y a p A i y i m x i o i xoix; fSaaiXfilc, E p p t ] -
5 V E U O U O I ) , K a i 6 p£v 8iKaq E X I O E X OEOJ, 6 6' a p a xoic, iSioic, A(3padp f|8r| trXouxcbv d n n X X d o a E x o .
in Egypt, Lot's Land and the Dead
Sea
2
W h e n a f a m i n e g r i p p e d the l a n d o f C a n a a n , A b r a h a m w e n t d o w n t o E g y p t . Fearing t h a t he m i g h t be k i l l e d o n a c c o u n t o f the beauty o f his w i f e , he m a d e a plan t o p r e t e n d t o be h e r brother. A n d P h a r a o h ( f o r this is the n a m e t h a t E g y p tians use t o m e a n 'kings') t o o k her f o r h i m s e l f w h e n she was c o m m e n d e d
to
h i m . A n d whereas he was punished b y G o d , A b r a h a m , n o w e n r i c h e d , d e p a r t e d
'Ev X a v a d v 8i£TtXr|Kxiaavxo rcoipEVEc; x o u X E A ( 3 p a d p K a i x o u Acox, K a i 56c;-
w i t h his h o u s e h o l d .
a v r o c , auxolc, £xcopio0r|aav, E X O U E V O U Atbx e v EoSopoic, O I K E I V 6 I ' dp£xf|v K a i KdXXoc. xfjc, yfjc, £xouor|c; T I E V X E TtoXeic;, S 6 6 o p a , T o p o p p a , 'ASapa, Z£(3cu£ip, Z r | 10
Abraham
y i u p , K a i x o a o u x o u c , paaiXsic,. xouxoic, o i itXriaioxcopoi XEaaapEC, (3aoiX£lc, Z u p a r v ETtoXEpnoav, (Lv r j v E i x o X o 5 o X X a y o p o p paaiXeuc, A i X d p . auv£J3aXXov 6 E r t a p d xr)v 0 d X a a a a v x f | v dXiKtjv, f) K a X a x a i vuv GdXaxxa VEKpd.
I n C a n a a n , t h e shepherds o f A b r a h a m a n d L o t were i n dispute, a n d b y m u tual consent t h e y separated. L o t chose t o live i n S o d o m because o f the f e r t i l i t y and b e a u t y o f the l a n d ; i t h a d five cities, S o d o m , G o m o r r a h , A d m a h , Z e b o i i m , and Segor, a n d as m a n y kings. The f o u r n e i g h b o r i n g kings o f the Syrians m a d e war
w i t h t h e m , l e d b y C h e d o l a o m e r k i n g o f E l a m . They m e t b y t h e Salt Sea,
w h i c h is n o w c a l l e d the D e a d Sea. r
7-12
ps. S y m . f. 31 = Cedr. (51,5-14 Bekker) AcppiKavou- (< Cedr.) "On 6 Acbr x^piaSeiq TOV AB-
paapi KOCTWKnoev eiq ZoSoua Si' dpeTfjv Kai KdXXoc Tfjc, Yfjc, exouar|c TIEVTE rtoXsic,, SoSoua Tdpoppa A S a u a 2eBor)v (leSdl'v Cedr.) K a i Zriycip, Kai TOOOUTOUC, BaaiXeic,. TOUTOIC, oi 7tXr|ai6xci>poi Tecroapec, BaaiXeic, Zupcov enoXeur|cav, civ rjyEiTO XoSoXXoyouop BaaiXeuc 6 AiXdu (IXdu Cedr.). ouveBaXov SE rcapd rqv GdXaoaav rf|v dXiKijv, f) ( K a i Cedr.) KaXeiTai vuv OdXacaa VEKpd, nXelaTa Oaupdaia ixovca,
& iycb £9eaadu.r|v. (wov TE yap oiiSev EKEIVO cp£p£i TO uScop, K a i v e K p d pEv adiftaTa u7to(3pu-
Xia yivcrai
(yivovrai
ps. Sym.), (div S E riq O U S ' av paSicoc. BarrriaaiTO. ( K a i Cedr.) Xuxvoi 6e
(piv
1
Cedr.) K a i o u E v o i uev (< Cedr.) Emcpepovrai, aSevvuuevoi SE KaraSuouaiv.
The dates provided in large print accurately represent the chronology of Africanus. For his da ting of Abrahams migration i n A M 3777 and the Flood in A M 2262 (3277 - 1015), see F16d, 3-6.
2s cf. Gen 12,10; Iub 13,10 Gen
3-5
cf. Gen 12,11-17; Iub 13,13; Ios., ant. Iud. 1,162-164
13,1-11; Iub 13,14-17; Ios., ant. Iud. 1,170
7 - 2 2 cf. p s . Eust., i n hex. 761B-D
5-10
1 0 - 1 3 cf. G e n
For the division of the earth i n the first year of Peleg's life, A M 2661 (3277 - 616), see
F16c,5f.
cf. 2
Although the endpoint of this excerpt, consisting of several parts, is not clearly demarcated in
14,1-10; Iub 13,22; Ios., ant. I u d . 1,171-175
the text of Syncellus, its contents can be verified from parallel material preserved in the secon
[AB]
personal visit to the vicinity of the Dead Sea is also consistent with Africanus' own documented
dary witnesses to the tradition (Cedrenus, ps. Eustathius and ps. Symeon). T h e recollection of a 3 Se < A
ps. Sym.
5eno"eA a i T i o e B
7 SLETtXnKTioavTO A 8ie7tXr|KTfjaavTo B 9 aeBcoeiu A B rjeBorjv
11 CTUVEBOAXOV A B cruveBaXov ps. Sym.
interest in autopsy and travel, see F23.19-24; F46.52-55.
60 'Ev TauTT| TtAEicnra uScop, K a i veKpoi
TO 15
F26 Abraham in Egypt, Lot's Land and the Dead Sea
Iulius Africanus
aaLVTO.
TCOV
UEV
8k Kai6|i£vot
XUYVOI
cpspei
I n this sea, I have w i t n e s s e d a great m a n y m a r v e l l o u s t h i n g s . For that b o d y
8k oi>8' av paSicoc; (3anTi-
o f w a t e r sustains n o l i v i n g t h i n g . Corpses are c a r r i e d beneath its depths, b u t t h e
Gaupaaicov Te9sauai. (cocov T E -yap ouSsv
uTro|3puxioi 9EpovTai,
(COVTEC;
ETticpspovTai, aftevvVJuEvoi
UEV
SE
SKEIVO
l i v i n g w o u l d not easily even d i p under i t . L i g h t e d torches are b o r n e u p o n i t , b u t
KaTaSuouaiv.
' E v T a O 0 d Eioiv ai Tfjc; docpdXTOu Tmyai- 9£p£i SE OTurrTripiav Kai dXac;, 6Xi-
yov
T I TCOV
EupeGfj
dXXcov SiacpEpovra- rciKpd
K & T C V O U TTXEOV
vouc; auTcp, X f j y a 20
TE
SE
dvaTETpd99ai vnb mv
xpcopi-
somewhat different f r o m o t h e r k i n d s i n that t h e y are b i t t e r a n d translucent.
si SE uf] ' I o p S d v n v
EIXE T O V
A n d wherever y o u c a n f i n d f r u i t , i t turns o u t rather t o consist o f the m o s t f o u l
tiScop IdTai
E T I I TCOXU
dvTExovTa,fiXniJEvdv
nap' aurfj TtdtiTtoXu T O O PaXaduou COUTOV. imovoEirai
E O T I SE
9EOU
5 i a Tf]v
I n that place are t h e springs o f b i t u m e n ; a n d i t produces a l u m a n d salt,
TOUC;
T O SE
r c a v d i5SaTi r t d a x o v Td Evavda.
TioTaudv Tpo9fiv cbc; Ttopcpfjpav SurrpExovTa Kai 9dxTov fj cpaivsTai.
w h e n t h e y are e x t i n g u i s h e d t h e y sink.
yap kaxi Kai 5iauyf|. £ v 9 a 5' dv KapTtoc,
TE
EuptaKETai OoXspcoTdTOV).
TCOV
61
smoke. B u t the water is m e d i c i n a l for those w h o use i t . A n d i t drains i n a w a y different f r o m all o t h e r water. For i f it d i d n o t have the Jordan River as n o u r i s h m e n t f l o w i n g t h r o u g h i t l i k e p u r p l e dye and h o l d i n g o u t for a l o n g t i m e , i t
TtEpioiKoVJ VTCOV daEJkiav.
w o u l d have d r a i n e d m o r e q u i c k l y t h a n i t fills. A n d there is b y i t a v e r y large c r o p o f balsam. It is b e l i e v e d t h a t the sea was made sterile b y G o d because o f the 1 3 - 15
ps. Eust., in hex. (59,26-30 AUatius = P G 18,761C)'P<(0£'vT£CYdp in' avTfj
ava/ikvaravovainorrovYxai.
vExpol Se KaraSvvovm16-22
(CDVTEC
Kai Xdxvoi Sk KCUOUEVOI ETCicp£povTai, a^ecdevTeq
r
av&pwnoi Si
Kara-
i m p i e t y o f the n e i g h b o r i n g peoples.
v
ps. Sym. f. 3 1 - 3 1 = Cedr. (51,14-23 Bekker) 'EvtaOBd eicnv a i tfjc. dacpdXrou
Ttnyai. cpipei Sk cmmTnpiav K a i aXac. dXiyov T I Tciv aXXcov SiacpEpovra- rcucpd TE yap eiai Kai Siauyfj. £ v 0 a 6"' dv KapTtdc. eupESfj, KartvoO nXiov EupiaKETai SoXEpcoTdrou (ovSiv Cedr.). TO Si uScup latai TOUC; xpwpevouc, autcl> (ailrd ps. Sym.), Xnyei TE TCOVT'I uSari rcdaxov r d i v a v r i a . EI 6E p.f| 'IopSdvqv EIXEV d ronoq Tpocpqv cbc. Ttopcpupav 6iaTp£x°vra Kai im noXu d v T E x o v r a , £Xn,cev dv SdTTOv p cpaivErai. imi
8k reap' avrrfl ndpnoXu rd |3aXcjdu.ou cpurdv. OrcovoEiTai Si dvaTETpd90ai urtd TOU 8EOU 8id
Tf|v Tcbv TtepioiKouvTcuv do£(3eiav.
[AB.]
13 ( u x o v AB (cjov ps. Sym.
13s cpspei T6 iidcop B ps. Sym. ~ A
V E K p a UEV 0"cop.aTa UTto(3puxia ytvovrai ps. Sym. a a i v T o A PaTrrfjaaivTO B 16 £ v r a u 9 a + 6E A 7ioTap6v AB
T27
14 VEKpoi...cp£povTai AB
CCBVTEC 6E AB (civ Si TIC ps. Sym.
14s
(5arfrf-
Xuxvoi Sk K a i d p E v o i piv B ps. Sym. Xuxvoi pev K a i o p E v o i 8E A
16s dXiyov A ps. Sym. dXiycov B
6 T6TIOC ps. Sym.
airriqv B | TOO AB
15
|
C
20 SiarpExovra A B
19 auric A Cedr. aiird B ps. Sym. 8iarpEcpovTa ante corr. A
19s Tdv
21 auTfj A ps. Sym.
T 6 ps. Sym.
G e o r g i u s Syncellus (113,25s M o s s h a m m e r )
AfSpadp TtapcpKnaev iv TEpdpoic, fjv
TIVEC;
AoKaXcovd 9aaiv elvai, cbc; K a i A9piKav6c;.
T27
The Toponym
1
Gerar
Abraham settled in Gerar, w h i c h s o m e , i n c l u d i n g A f r i c a n u s , say is A s h k e l o n .
cf. G e n 20,1; ps. Sym. f. 31'= Cedr. 51,1s
1
Portions of the historical narrative in which this small notice about Abraham's settlement of Gerar is inserted (Sync. 112,16 -
113,28) may also have come from Africanus' chronicle.
Routh's edition (415f) provides additional text from Cedrenus (see app.), on the basis of a marginal note mentioning Africanus in a manuscript used by Xylander for his 1566 Cedrenus edition.
62
T28
T 2 8 The Chronology
T 2 8 a G e o r g i u s Syncellus ( 1 2 0 , 1 8 - 2 1 M o s s h a m m e r )
T28a
'O AcppiKavoc, o(' ypctcpfjc;.
ETUJV
Xsyei
TOV
'IaKu>|3
EXGEIV
63
T28 The Chronology of the Life of Jacob
Iulius Africanus
etc, MeaonoTauiav, (be,
EK
Tfjc,
ii 8e vpacpf) oi)6auou T O U T O (paiverai Xtyouoa, dXXtoc, re, EI TOUTO SCOUEV, earai 6Tcoaf]cp
of Jacob's Life
Africanus says t h a t at age 7 7 Jacob came t o M e s o p o t a m i a , as i f he was q u o t i n g from Scripture.
1
But it is clear that Scripture nowhere says this; besides, if we grant this, Joseph
will have been born in the 9 6
K a r a t 6 pc' T O U 'IaKcofS y£vvr|6£tc,, onep aSuvarov.
th
year of Jacob, which is impossible.
l»-*F51,10s e
1 cf. Eus., c a n . ™ " 30 (anno 78); Eus., praep. ev. 9,21,Is (= Demetrius FGrHist 722 F l , l ; Alex. Polyh. F G r H i s t 273 F19a); Georg. Mon. 112,11s; Sym. Log. (Leo Gr. 21,16-18 = Th. Mel. 22,20-22) (omnes anno 75); ps. S y m . f. 32'= Iub 29,13; Cedr. 59,17-19; Sync. 120,22 (omnes anno 73); Chron. Pasch. 106,21 - 107,3 (anno 63) 2s cf. Sync. 133,23 - 134,28 ( - » T28c) [AB]
1 Aeyei B Xeyerai A | Tdv'IaKibB EX6EIV B ~ A
T28b
G e o r g i u s Syncellus ( 1 2 1 , 8 - 1 3 M o s s h a m m e r ) T28b
O O T E KCITCI T O V
AcppiKavov p o t
6OKET S U V O T O V E I V C U T O V
AEVJI
yEvvnGfjvcu
T W JT£'
E T E l T O 0 ' I a K U ) ( 3 OUTE K a r a TOV EUOEPIOV Ttl) a i i r i i itf. ei y a p 6'Icoaf|(p p' ET&V ?|v T
I n m y o p i n i o n , A f r i c a n u s cannot possibly b e r i g h t that Levi was b o r n i n t h e 8 7 2
'IaKcofS, pviKa K a r f | X 6 e npdc, aiirSv eic, Aiyurrrov, a v d y K n r c a a a rdv iaKd>|3 pa' aiiToO I r a y£vvqoai
t h
3
year o f Jacob; nor can Eusebius be right, who dates it in the same year 87. For if Joseph was age th
40 in the 130 year of Jacob, at which time he came down to him in Egypt, it is absolutely necessary
T6VTU>OT|C|> E K Tqc'PaxfjX.
that when Jacob was 91 he begot Joseph from Rachel.
Is
cf. C h r o n . Pasch. 107,14s; Exc. Barb. 222,17-19 (omnes anno 83); Eus., praep. ev. 9,21,1-3 (= De
metrius F G r H i s t 722 F l . 1 - 3 ; Alex. Polyh. FGrHist 273 F19a) (anno 85); Hipp., haer. 285,11; Sym. Log.
(Leo Gr. 23,3s = Th. Mel. 23,20 = Iul. Pol. 92,2s); Niceph., chron. syn. 85,10; Suda Manjofjc, M
1348,15s; G e o r g . Mon. 115,17 (omnes anno 87); Anon. Matr. 9,4 (anno 86); Epiph., anc. 110,5
1
[AB]
2ret/ A B rtc,' Sync, infra (T28c,3)
The Bible does not give a precise chronology of Jacob's life. Africanus may have arrived at the number '77' by the following reasoning: According to Gen 41,46, Joseph was 30 years of age
Hi
(anno 89) 2 cf. Eus., chron. 46,29 (anno 86); c a n . " 31" (anno 87) 2s cf. G e n 41,46; 45,6; 47,8s
when he entered the service of the Pharaoh. Another nine years elapsed before his brothers' arrival in Egypt ( G e n 45,6). If Jacob and his family spent 17 years in Egypt before Jacob died at