Material control & Receving inspection flow chartDeskripsi lengkap
FIDIC Flow ChartFull description
management teknik sipil
Full description
Descrição completa
Full description
Is the court sitting in diversity and is the matter clearly substantive?
YES
Is there a direct conflict between state P and federal law, rule or practice? Note: Silence on issue can = conflict.
State law/ practice applies. Erie.
NO
YES Is the federal law/ practice expressed in a statute or FRCP, or is it a matter of judicial practice/custom? Where no federal law on point, always apply Hanna I.
Federal statute or FRCP: Rules Enabling Act Analysis (A) Federal Constitutional: If federal constitution provision applies, it will control regardless of the state law or practice. (B) Federal Statute: If statute is valid (reasonably classified as procedural) and on point, it applies. (C) Federal Rule: FRCP considered “presumptively valid.” Federal rule will control (supremacy clause) unless it is invalid (because Congress lacked power to enact): (1) Rule is unconstitutional (not properly adopted). a. Rule is not within the scope of REA, i.e. procedural, not clearly substantive. Procedural if deals with the process of litigation; not rights outside of court. b. If rule is “arguably procedural” may apply federal rule, unless conflict with 28 USC 2072(b). (2) Rule abridges, enlarges or modifies a state substantive right. 28 USC 2072(b). a. Does the process change the plaintiff’s legal right to recover; does it make it substantially easier for one party to prevail? b. Ex: Damages, elements of a claim; right to recovery (SoL).
Fed. CL (informal) practice or custom : Rules of Decision Act Analysis
If rule invalid, move to RODA analysis.
(1) Does applying the federal rule contravene the aims of Erie of Erie? ? Hanna I (a) Would the litigant forum shop on the basis of this rule? (b) Would applying the federal law over state law lead to inequitable administration of the law? Yes to either: Apply state law. No: Move to step 2.
(2) Would applying state law determine the outcome? (Forum (Forum selection which is not outcome determinative is fine.) Yes: Is it a “close call”? (Byrd) YES: Go to step 3. NO: Apply federal law. Guaranty Trust. No: Apply federal law. Guaranty Trust.
(3) Byrd Balancing Test: On balance, are the federal interests more compelling than the state interests? (i.e., right to jury tr ial, uniformity and efficient admin. of law, federal independence, etc.) Yes: Apply FEDERAL law. No: Apply state law.