Dirav Dolatbhai Patel, A201 183 819 (BIA Sept. 15, 2017).pdf

U.S Department of Justice

Exectie Oce fr Imgo Revew

Board ofImmigation ofImmigation Appeals Oce othe othe Cerk 5107 leesburg Pike, Pike, SJe 000 Fa Chc Vgn 204

Rios Artur Rafel Law Oice of turo R. Rios, PA 2929 Fifh Avenue Norh Saint Petersburg F 33713

DS /CE Oice of Chef Chef ouse ouse - ELP 11541 Montan e Sute 0 El Paso TX 7936

ame: PATEL DIRAV DOLATBHAI

A 21183819

Date of thi otice: 9/15/217

nclosed s  copy o he Bod's ecso d ode n he above-eeced cse. Sncerely,

Cyn L Crosby Duy Ce Clek

Enclosure Panel Members:

Grant, Edwrd R.

Userte Dock

Cite as: Dirav Dolatbhai Patel, A201 183 819 (BIA Sept. 15, 2017)

U.S Department of Jusice Jusice

Executive Oce r Immgation Review Board oImmigraton oImmigraton Appeals Oce of he Clerk 5107 Leesburg Pik, Suite 000 Fal Chc Chc Vgna 204 I

PATEL, DIRAV DOLATBHAI A201183-819 c/o IRWIN COUNY DETENTION CENTE 132 COTTON DRIVE OCILLA GA 3174

ICE Oice of Chief Counsel Counsel  ELP DHS ICE 11541 Montana Ave Suite  E Paso TX 9936

Name: PATL DAV DOLABAI

A 20118819

Date of this notice 9 15 201

decso n te above-eenced abo ve-eenced case. Ths copy copy is beig ncosed is a copy of the Boad's decso povided povided to you as a coesy You atoey o epeseave as bee seved wt s deciso pusuant pusuant to 8 CFR § 1292S(a) 1292S(a)  e ataced deciso odes at at you be emoved om e Unted tates or as a gao Judges eciso odeg at you be emoved, ay peto  revew of e aaced decso u be ed wh and eceved b the appropriate ou of appeals wthi 30 days of the date o e ecisio ec isio ceely ,'

/l

J     �  u  .

Cyntha L Cosby Depu Ce Clek cosue Panel Members:

Grant, Edwar R.

Useream:

Cite as: Dirav Dolatbhai Patel, A201 183 819 (BIA Sept. 15, 2017)

·u.s Deparent of Justice : . ·u.s ' Exutive Oce r Imiation Reiew

Decson of e e Bod of io Apeal

Fa Chu, Vgin 22041  File: 201 183 819  El Paso, X

Date

SEP 1 5 207

 In re:  olatbh PATL N MVL PRCEEDGS PEAL ON BHF OF ESPDEN: o Rael ios, Esqire ON BHALF OF DHS: di F Boilla  Assist Chief Cosel  APLCAION:  APLCAION: Couce

 Ps to or ori at at 8 CF.R § 10032(a) (207), proviig at the Board may at y  tme reon reon or reconsider on its o moon moon y cse  ch it h rendered a decisio, e ll  reopen s mer sa sponte d remd e record to e mgron Judge r e lted  pose of deteg if termnon of proceedngs out out prejudce is te. Ths mer w t bere e Bod on Noveber 23, 205, wen we dsmsse  appe of  mirion ge's order, dated May 9, 2014, deng e responents motion r a coue Subseqent to at order, e respondent le a otion to reopen  e on Jde. The oton ws coecly chcterzed chcterzed as a moon to reopen  in bsenta order ssed by an Immiion udge. e iion Jdge, i a decsion decsio n dated May 4, 207 207  poin ot  a oote oote  e otion  not a moon to reopen   absentia order, but rer a moon to s oe reopen poceedgs der 8 C.FR. § 100323(b)(1). See mmiron Judge Decison, May 4, 207, at 2, n. 1. The aton Jde deed e oon on e bs  e assered act that e respondent had a penng U sa applicaton  USCS di not o to  exceptonal or copellng crcstce at ould sti sti  reopening reop ening hs reov reov  proceedgs See  Ion Judge Decsion, May 4, 2017 at 2, citg Mr of G-D, 2 I&N Dec 132, 3334 (BA 999) The respondent led a mely mely appea. Subseqent Subseqent o e  e g of o f e appe, e respondent e  Emerency oon to Rem," asserng t on y 26, 2017, e USCS oed m t e ad met al e requements to e grd U-1 non sts. 1 he on eer" submed subm ed s Ex B dcates at  e soe reason e  e responent was not red e sts sts n qeson qe son eately is e  e sca e lits." Leer om USCS, St As, Veont, e Juy ,   7 e esponent note  that e on Jde ha sed at e te of evidence e respondent now preses  essenty,  approved  vsa vsa - wod reect a compelli reason r sua sponte reopeg  Iio Jdge ecsio May 4, 2017 at 2 

To te eent  e respondent has no led a moon t e Bo, e qeon o o  wher  e on dge h jsicon jsicon over the moton to reopen sa sponte, led  te  Iion Co is i s now oot 8 CFR. § 003.2(a); 8 .F. § 100323(b)() (mmon dge acks jscon to s sponte reopen a case where e jscon is vested i e Bo. Cite as: Dirav Dolatbhai Patel, A201 183 819 (BIA Sept. 15, 2017)

 A21 183 819

 I opposg e appe  e I Jdges decisin, e DHS cie  Mr of Yauri, 25 &N Dec 103, 10 IA 2009), r e prpositi  e Bo wl o repe roces of respondes responde s under a  reoval re oval rder here reopeng re openg is sgh as a echs  rder f rov while a caer  (over ch he Bd  o jisdicon)   s  a  is bei rsoved We n  in tr oYaur i addiin o deyng e  e reoens reqes  o repe sa spne, e also, n e ts presee, ed a DH DH oon  oon  ermine o  prejce Id a  2 Uner e crcsnces of s ce, we cnclude a tter of Yau is disishabe. disishabe. eore, we e e repenig d redng r e sle ppose of dee if eon of proceedngs hu prejudce is ed  In s,  e presen case, we cnclde a reopenig d red of e record  allow he mo ude o deee d eee if erin of proceedis wu prejice is pprpe is wed by he copelg circces circc es presened ORDER:

Te Bod's order d November 23, 205, 205, is vacaed

Te recr is reded :�e :�e o udge rer proceedngs proceedngs cosise with e abve decision decisio n d the e of a 1  order. FUTHR OER

�R  FOR BO  BO

2

Cite as: Dirav Dolatbhai Patel, A201 183 819 (BIA Sept. 15, 2017)

(

(

(



UNITED STATES DEPARTMNT OF JUSIC EXCUTIVE OIE OR IMMIGRAIO RVW UNITED STATS IMIGRATION COURT L PSO, TXAS

May 9 2014

iles: 201-83819/0/1 In the Matters of  )  )  )   )  )

IRA OLBHA A (ead) SWETA DIR PAEL LKHAN IR PA SONS

I RMOAL R MOAL PROCIGS

CHARGS

 237a)(1 )B)  237a)(1 )B) o te Immigration Immigration and ationali Act  visa oversta; and Section 37a)(C)i) o the Immigraton and Nationalit Act  ailure to comply with conditions o nonimmigan satus.

 PIAIO

None

ON BHAL O SPOS SPO S K LVI LVI O BA BA O S BA HS HS

ORL CISIO AD OR O H IMMIGRATION UG On May 19 2014 al tree respondents appeared bere te Cour r a Master Caedar ering prevosy scedued Peadings ad been taken and e crge o removal had en sustained sustai ned since Augst 9 013 On at date respondents appeared bere this Cou ith counel and admited te actual llegaions in te Noice o pper concedng concedn g removabiity removabiity as carged Exibit 1 ) Base upon upo n e  ,

I

(

(



admission and cncesions this C s satisfied tat revaility ha een lhd n h c  cler a onvincn videnc W v NS, 385 US 276 (1976) Prr t tday's hearin respndents cunel ad filed a mtin r cntinuane Tat motion motion had ben received y te te Court on March 24 204 imply stated, stated, te t e mtn aks tat te Crt continue tis case or anter six mnts eyond tdays date in the the pes tat te Adminitratin Adminitratin would curtail removals rom ti country e mtion allee that th rondnt are in  itin to take advanta of any such curailment curailment of licy by te present Administratin. e ur notes that ruests r cntinuance ar verned y  CFR 00329 he rulation reuires that the mvant estalish gd cause r ny requested continuance. s nted, the case advanced r te extended continuanc continuanc was the xpctatin or hope that te prsnt Administration mit chane thir prsent rmoval olicy h Cu nots that any uc motion s ased alost entirely upn seculati wt resect to wat actin if ay, the present Admnstration migt take regardin its plicy toward toward deratin and remval remval he rpndent in each case conceded conceded tr remvaility remvaility Exibit Exibit  Fe, in en urt, consl ain reiteratd tat he resndnts  not eliile r relief and were were nt reuestng relie In the asenc asenc of a continuane, respondent cunsel requestd an rdr of removal for ach of the resndnts Snc t  mposs to determn what atin if an the executve branh my  t in th future the urt cant cntnu thes cas r a perod perod f sx ont asd upon hoe and seculat that resent resent plcy a chane chane Snc god caus wa n stalsd t rus r a cntinuance a nied 20-8389/820821

2

May 9, 24

(

(

(

(

he Court aso noes h on August 9, he resondens hd reqesed  cnnun unt December 2  enabe hem o expoe relief and dermne wheh he Oce o Ce Counse woud gree o cose he cases based uon er prosecuora discreton Wen dscreon as no graned he Co graned a urher coninuance fo eceber  until May 9 o s year o enabe e respondns o e any and a acons ac ons for reef Conseqeny Conseqeny  a cases ad been been endn bere e Co sce Augus 29 2011· Good cause not havng een esbsed he Cour proceeded o order reoa o da bsed uon e carges connd n e Noce o Apear. ORR OF TH COURT  requs by e resondens r a fuer connance s ereby DENID. he responden's are orderd remoe o da on  arges conned   ther resectve oce o Aear

Please see the next page for elecroi  sgaure

OAS C. ROEPK Imgraon Jude

A201183-819820/821

3

May 19, 214

(

(

(

(

/Isl/ Imigraton Judge THOMAS C. ROEPK oepket on Ags 19, 204  3:  GMT

A201-18389/2082

4

May  214 1