Conditioned Emotional Reactions by John B Watson

Journal of Experimental Psychology VOL. Il l, No.

i.

FEBRUARY,

1920

CONDITIONED EMOTIONAL REACTIONS BY JOHN B. WATSON AND ROSALIE RAYNER

In recent literature various speculations have been entered into concerning the possibility of conditioning various types of emotional response, but direct experimental evidence in supp su pp ort or t f such a view view has been lacking. If the theo ry advanced by Watson and Morgan to the effect that in infancy the original emotional reaction patterns are few, consisting so far as observed of fear, rage and love, then there must be some simple method by means of which the range of stimuli which can call out these emotions and their compounds s gre atly increased. Otherw ise, complexi com plexity ty in ad ult response response cou d no t be accounted for. for. These autho rs ithou t ade qu ate experimental evidence advanced the view that this range was increased y eans f conditi cond itioned oned ef ex factors. fac tors. t was suggested there that the early home life of the child furnishes a laboratory situation for establishing conditioned emotional responses. responses. he presen t authors have recentl recentlyy t the whol matter to an experimental test. Experimental work has been done so far on only one child, lbert B. Th is infant was reared reared almost om birth in hosp ital env ironm ent; his his other was was a et nurse nurse n the arr iet Lan e Ho e or Invalid Children. Children. lbert's e was normal: he was healthy from birth and one of the best developed youngsters ever brought to the hospital, weighing twenty-one pounds at nine nine onths f age. age. e was on the the whole whole stolid stolid and unem otional. His stability was one f the principal reasons reasons for for using using him him as a subject in in this this tes t. We 'Emotional Reactions and Psychological Experimentation,' American Journal of P sychology April, 1917, Vol. 28, pp. 163-174.

JOHN B. WATSON AND ROSALIE RAYNER

felt that could do him relatively little harm by carrying out such experiments those outlined below. At approximately nine months age we ra him through the emotional tests that have become part of our regular routine determining whether fear reactions can be called out by other stimuli than sharp noises and the sudden removal f supp ort. Tes ts this type have been described by the senior author another place. In brief, the infant confronted suddenly and for the first time successively with a white rat, a rabbit, a dog, a monkey, with masks with and without hair, cotton wool, burning newspapers, etc. A permanent record Albert's reactions to these objects situations been preserved n motion picture study. Manipulation was the most usual reaction called out. no time did this infant ever show fear in any situation. These experimental records were confirmed by the casual observations of the mother an hospital attendants. No one had ever seen him in a state fear rage. Th infant practically never cried. to approximately nine months age we had no t tested him with loud sounds. Th test to determine whether fear reaction could called out by a loud sound made when he was eight months, twenty-six days of age. The sound was that made by striking hammer upon suspended steel ba four feet length three-fourths of an inch diameter. he laboratory notes are as follows: ne of the two experimenters caused the child to turn its head nd fixate moving hand; the other, stationed back of the child, struck the steel bar a sharp blow. The child started violently, breathing checked and the arms were raised n characteristic n th second stimulation the same thing manner. curred, and in addition the lips began to pucker nd n the third stimulation the child broke into tremble. a sudden crying fit. This is the first ti emotional situation the labo ratory has produced a ny fea or even crying Albert. 'Psycholog y ro

the Standpoint of

Behaviorist,' p. 202.

CONDITIONAL EMOTIONAL REACTIONS

We had expected just these results on account of our work ith othe r infants brou ght up und er similar conditions. is worth while to call attention to the fact that removal of support (dropping and jerking the blanket upon which the infant was lying) was tried exhaustively upon this infant on th e sa e occasion. t was no t ef ect ve n producing the fear response. his stimulus s effective in younger children At what age such stimuli lose their potency in producing fear is no t know n. or is it known wh ether less placid children ever ose their fear f the . Th is pro ba bly depend s upon the train ing the child ge ts. It is well known th t children eagerl run to be tossed into the air and cau ght. On the other hand it is equally well known that in the adult fear responses are called out quite clearly by the sudden removal of support, if the individual is walking across a bridge, walking out upon a beam , etc. he re is a wide eld of stu dy here which i aside from our present point. The sound stimulus, thus, at nine months of age, gives us the means f testing several im po rtan t factors. I. Can we condition fear of an animal, e.g., a white rat, by visually presen ting it and simultaneously striking a steel bar? II . If such a conditioned emotional response can be established, will there be a transfer to other animals or other objects? I I I . What is the effect of time upon such conditioned emotional responses IV. If after a reasonable period such emotional responses have not died out, what laboratory methods can be devised for their removal I. The establishment of conditioned emotional responses. At first there was considerable hesitation upon our part in making the attempt to set up fear reactions experimentally. A certain responsibility attach es to such a procedu re. We decided finally to make the attempt, comforting ourselves by the reflection that such attachments would arise anyway as soon as the child left th e sheltered env ironm ent f th nurse ry for the rough and tum ble f the hom e. We did no begin this work until Albert was eleven months, three days f age. Before atte ptin g to set up a conditioned respons e, as before, put him through all of the regular emotional


tests. No t the slightest sign of a fear response wa s obtained in any situation.

The steps taken to condition emotional responses are shown in our laboratory notes. II

onths 3 Days

1. White rat suddenly taken from the basket and presented to lbert. He began to reach or ra t with lef han d. Ju st as his hand touched the animal the bar was struck imm ediately behind his head. he infant jum ped violently and fell forward, burying his face in the mattress. e did no t cry, however. 2. Ju st as the right hand touched the rat the bar was again struck. Again the infant jum ped violently, fel forward and began to whimper. In order not to disturb the child too seriously no further tests were given for one week. II Months IO Days

t presented suddenly ithout sound. Th ere 1. was steady fixation but no tendency at first to reach for it. he ra t was then placed nearer, whereupon ten tativ reaching movem ents began with the right ha nd . hen the rat nosed the infant's left hand, the hand was immediately withdrawn . e started to reach for the hea of the animal with the forefinger of the left hand, but ithdrew it suddenly before conta ct. t is thus seen that the two joint stimulations given the previous week were no t itho ut e ec . e was tested w ith his blocks immediately afterwards to see if they shared in the process f conditioning. He began i ediately to pick them up, dropping them , pounding them, etc. In the remainder of the tests the blocks were given frequently to quiet him and to test his general emotional state. They were always removed from sight when the process of conditioning was under way. 2. Jo int sti ulation with ra t and sound. Started, then f l over imm ediately to right side. o crying.


Joint stimulation. Fell to right side and rested upon hands, with head turned away from ra . No cry-

ing. Joint stimulation. Sa e reaction. 5. at suddenly presented alone. Puckered whimpered and withdrew body sharply to the left. 6. Joint stimulation. Fell over immediately to right side and began to whimper. Joint stimulation. Started violently and cried but did not fall over. 8. Rat alone. Th instant the rat was shown th baby began to cry. Almost instantly he turned sharply to th left, fell ove on left side, raised himself on all fours and began to crawl away so rapidly that he was caught with difficulty before reach ing th edge of the table. This was as convincing a case of a completely conditioned fear response as could have been theoretically pictured. In all seven joint stimulations were given to bring about the complete reaction. t is not unlikely had the sound been f greater intensity or f a ore co plex clang character that the number of joint stimulations might have been materially reduced. Experiments designed to d fi e th nature of the sounds that will serve best as emotional stimuli are under way. When a conditioned emotional response has been established for one object, is there a transfer? Five days later Albert was again brought back into the laboratory and tested as follows: 11 Months

Days

1. Tested first with blocks.

He reached readily f them, playing with them as usual. This s s tha there has been no general transfer to the room, table, blocks, etc. Rat alone. Whimpered immediately, withdrew right hand and turned head and trunk away. Blocks again offered. Played readily with them, smiling and gurgling.

JOHN B. WATSON AND ROSALIE kAYNER

t alone. Leaned over to the left side as far away from the rat as possible, then fell over, getting up on all fours and scurrying away as rapidly as possible. 5. Blocks again offered. Reached imm ediately for them, smiling and laughing as before. The above preliminary test shows that the conditioned response to the rat had carried over completely or the five days in which no tests were given. question as to whether or not there is a transfer was next taken up. 6. abb it alone. Th e rab bit was suddenly p ace on the m attress in front of him. e reaction was pro nounced. egative responses began once. He leaned as far away from the animal as possible, whimpered, then bu rst into tears . hen the rabb it was placed i contact with him he buried his face in the mattress, then got up on all fours and crawled away, crying as he wen t. Th is was a most convincing test. The blocks were next given him, after an interval. He played with them as before. t was observed by four people that he played far more energetically with them th an ever before. he blocks were raised high over his head and slammed down with a great deal of force. 8. Dog alone. he dog did not produc e as violent reaction as the rabb it. he m om ent fixation occurre the child shrank back and as the animal came nearer he attempted to get on all fours but did not cry at first. As soon as the dog passed out of his range of vision he became quiet. Th e dog was then made to approach th infant's head (he was lying down at the moment). Albert straightened up immediately, fell over to the opposite side and turne d his head away . e then bega to cry. 9. Th e blocks were again prese nted. He began immediately to play with them. ithdrew imm ediately to the 10. Fu r coat (seal). eft side and began to fret. oat t c ose to him on th


left side, he turned immediately, began to cry and tried to crawl away on all fours. . Co ttonw ool. The wo l was presented n a paper package. t the end the cotton was no t covered by the paper. t was placed first on his feet. e kicked it away but did not touch it with his ha nd s. hen hi hand was laid on the wool he immediately withdrew it but did not show the shock that the animals or fur coat produced in him. e then began to play with the pape r, avoiding contact with th e wool itself. He finally, under the impulse of the manipulative instinct, lost some of his negativism to the wool. 12. Just in play W. put his head down to see if lbert would play with his hair. Albert was completely negative. Tw o other observers d d the same thing He began imm ediately to play with their hair. then brought the Santa Claus mask and presented it to lbert. e was again pronouncedly negative. II

onths 20 Days

1. Blocks alone. Played with them as usual. 2. at alone. ithdraw al f the who e body, bending over to left side, no crying. Fixa tion and fo owing with eyes. Th e response was much less marked tha n o first prese ntation the previous week. wa thought best to freshen up the reaction by another joint stimulation. Just as the rat was placed on his hand the rod was struck. Rea ction violent t alone. Fell over t once to eft side. eaction practically as strong as on former occasion but no crying. 5. t alone. Fell over to eft side, got up on all fours and started to crawl awa y. On this occasion there was no crying, but strange to say, as he started away he began to gurgle and coo, even while leaning far over to the left side to avoid the rat. 6. it alone. Leaned over to left side as fa as possible. id no t fa l over. Began to whimper bu reaction not so violent as on former occasions.


Blocks again offered. e reached or them imm ediately and began to play. All of the tests so far discussed were carried out upon a table supplied with a mattress, located in a small, well-lighted dark-room . We wished to test next hether conditioned fear responses so set up would appear if the situation we e markedly altered. e thou gh t it best before making this test to freshen the reaction both to the rabbit and to the dog by showing them at the oment the steel bar was struck . t wi l be recalle that this was the first time any effort had been made to directly condition response to the dog and rab bit. he experimental notes are as follows: 8. he rab bit at first was given alone. he reaction was exactly as given n tes t (6) above. hen the rab bit was left on Albert's knees for a long time he began tentatively to reach out and manipulate its fur with forefingers. hile doing this the steel od was struck . violent fear reaction resulted. 9. abb it alone. Reaction wholly similar to t on trial (6) above. 10. abb it alone. Started imm ediately to whim per, holding hands far up, t did no t cry. Conflicting tendency to manipulate very evident. 11 Dog alone. Began to whimper, shaking head from side to side, holding hands as far away from the animal as possible. 12. Dog and sound. Th e rod was struck ju st as the animal touched him. A violent negative reaction appeared. He began to whimper, turn ed to one side, fell over and started to get up on all fours. 13 Blocks. Played with them immediately and readily. On this same day and immediately after the above experiment Albert was taken into the large well-lighted lecture room belonging to the labo rator y. e was placed on a tal?le in the center of the room immediately under the skylight. Four people were pres ent. he situation


was thus very different from that which obtained in the small dark room. t alone. o sudden fear reaction appeared at 1. first. he hand s, however, were held up and away from the animal. o positive anipu latory reactions ap peared. ab bit alone. Fear reaction slight. Tu rned to left and kept face away from the animal but the reaction was never pronounced. Do g alone. urne d away t did not all over. Cried. an ds moved as far away om the animal a possible. himpered as long as the dog was prese nt. t alone. Slight negative reaction. 5. t and sound. t was tho ug ht best to freshe th e reaction to the rat . he sound was given ju st as the ra t was presented. Albert jump ed violently b ut did not cry. 6. R t alone. t first he did not how any negative reactio n. hen ra t was placed nearer he began to show negative reaction by drawing back his body, raising his hands, whimpering, etc. Blocks. Played with them imm ediately. 8. t alone. Pronounced ithdrawal f body and whimpering. 9. Blocks. Played ith them as before. 10. ab bit alone. Pronounced reaction. himpered with arms held high, fell over backward and had to be caught. t first the dog did no t produce 11 Dog alone. th e pronounced reaction. Th e hands were held high over the head, breathing was checked, but there was no crying. Ju st a t this mom ent the dog, which had no barked before, barked three times loudly when only ab ou t s x inches om th e baby 's face. lbert imm ediately fell over and broke into a wail that continued until the dog was removed. he sudden barking f the hitherto quiet dog produced a marked fear response in the adult observers!


From the above results it would seem that emotional transfers do take place. Fu rther ore it would seem th the number of transfers resulting from an experimentallyproduced conditioned emotional reaction may be very large. In our observations we had no means of testing the complete number of transfers which may have resulted. III. The effect of time upon conditioned emotional responses. We have already shown th t the conditioned em otional response wi l continue for a period of one week . was desired to make the time tes t longer. In view f th imminence of Albert's departure from the hospital we could not make the interval onger tha n one on th. Accordingly no further emotional experimentation was entered into for thirty-one days after the above test. uring the mo nth, however, Albert was brought weekly to the laboratory for tests upon right and left-handedness, imitation, general development, etc. No emotional tests hatev er were give and during the whole month his regular nursery routine was maintained in the arriet Lane Hom e. Th e notes on the test given at the end of this period are as follows: I Year 21 Days

ask. ithdraw al, gurgling, then 1. Santa Claus slapped at it ithout touching . hen his hand was orced to touch it, he whim pered and cried. His hand was orced to touch it two ore times. He whimpered and cried on bo th tes ts. e finally cr ed at the mere visual stimulus of the mask. Fu r coat. rinkled his nose and withdrew bo th hands, drew back his whole body and began to whimper as the coat was t nearer. Again there was th e strif between withdrawal and the tendency to manipulate. Reached tentatively with left hand but drew back before con tact had been ade. In moving his body to one side his hand accidentally touched the coat. e began to cry at once, nodding his head in a very peculiar manner (this reaction was an entirely new one). Both han ds were ithdrawn as far as possible om th e coa t. he co at


head and whimpering, withdrawing his body as far as possible, pushing the while at the coat with his feet but Fu r coat. Th e coat was taken o ut of his sight and presented again t the end f a inu te. He began immediately to fret, withdrawing his body and nodding his head as before. Blocks. e began to play with them as usual. 5. he ra t. e al owed the ra t to crawl towards hi ithou t ithdraw ing. He sat very still and fixated it inten tly. at then touched his hand . Albert withdrew it immediately, then leaned back as far as possible but did not cry. hen the ra t was placed on his arm he withdrew his body and began to fret, nodding his head. he ra t was then al owed to crawl against his chest. first began to fret and then covered his eyes with both hands. 6. Blocks. Reaction norm al. he rab bit. he animal was placed directly in front f him . t was very qu iet. lbert showed no avoiding reactions at first. After a few seconds he puckered up his face, began to nod his head and to look intently at the experimenter. He next began to push the rabbit away with his feet, withdrawing his body at the same time . Th en as the rabbit came nearer he began pulling his feet away, nodding his head, and wailing a da ." After about a inute he reached out tentatively and slowly and touched the rabbit's ear with his right hand, finally manipulating it. Th e rabbit wa again placed in his lap . Again he began to fret an withdrew his hand s. He reached out tentatively with his left hand and touched the animal, shuddered and withdrew the whole body. Th e experimenter then took hold of his left hand and laid it on the rabbit's back. Albert immediately withdrew his hand and began to suck his th um b. Again the rab bit was laid in his lap . began to cry, covering his face with both hands.

JOHN B. W ATSON AND ROSALIE RAYNER

8. Dog. he dog was very active. lbert fixated it intensely for a w seconds, sittin g ve ry still. e began to cry but did not fall over backwards as on his last con tact with the dog. hen the dog was pushed close to him he at first sat motionless, then began to cry, putting both hands over his face. These experiments would seem to show conclusively that directly conditioned emotional responses as well as those conditioned by transfer persist, although with a certain loss in the intensity of the reaction, for a longer period than one on th. Our view s th t they persist and modi y p ersonality throu gh out l fe. t should be recalled again th t Albert was f an extremely phlegmatic typ e. ad he been emotionally unstable probably both the directly conditioned response and those transferred would have persisted throughout the month unchanged in form. IV. "Detachment" or removal of conditioned emotional responses. nfortun ately Albe rt was tak en om th e hospital the day the above tests were ade. Hence the opp ortu nity of building up an experimental technique by means of which we could remove the conditioned emotional responses was denied us. Our own view, expressed above, which is possibly not very well grounded, is that these responses in the home environment are likely to persist indefinitely, unless an accidental ethod for removing the m is hit upon. he impprtance of establishing some method must be apparent to all. Had the opportunity been at hand we should have tried out several ethods, some f which we ay ention, (i ) Constantly confronting the child with those stimuli which called ou t the responses n the hopes th t hab ituation would come corresponding to "f ti " of ef ex when differential reactions are to be set up . 2) By trying to "r ec on itio " by showing objects calling out fear responses (vsual) and simultaneously stimulating the erogenous zones (ta ctu al). e should tr y first the lips, then the nipples and as a final resort the sex organs. (3) By trying to "recondition" by feeding the subject candy or othe r d ju st as th e animal s shown. Th is ethod calls or the f d control f the sub ject. (4) y building up "constructive" activities around the object by imitation and

CONDITIONAL EM OTIONAL REACTIONS

i$

by putting the hand through the motions manipulation. At this imitation overt motor activity strong, as our present but unpublished experimentation shown. INCIDENTAL OBSERVATIONS

(a) Thumb sucking s compensatory device blocking fear noxious stimuli. uring th course these experiments, especially in the final test, it was noticed that whenever Albert verge tears emotionally upset generally would continually thrust thumb into mouth. Th moment th hand reached th mouth became impervious to the stimuli produ cing fear. Again again while the motion pictures were being made at the end f the thirty-day rest period, we had to remove th thumb from mouth before th conditioned response could obtained. This method blocking noxious emotional stimuli (fear and rage) through erogenous stimulation seems to persist om bir th onw ard. Very ofte in our experiments upon th work adders with infants under days of age the same reaction app eared . When at work upon th adders both the infants arms under slight res traint. Often rage aplegs pears. They begin to cry, thrashing their arms about. If the finger gets into th mouth crying ceases at once. he organism thus apparently from birth, when under the influence love stimuli blocked to all others. This resort to sex stimulation when under th influence noxious and emotional situations, when th individual is restless adu lt life. lbert, idle, persists throughout adolescent rate, did not resort to thumb sucking except in the presence such stimu li. Th um b sucking cou d imm ediately be checked offering him his blocks. These invariably called ou active manipulation instincts. It is worth while here to call attention to the fact that Freud's conception the stimulation erogenous zones being th expression an original "pleasure" seeking principle may be turned about The stimulus to love in infants according to our view is stroking of the skin, lips, nipples and sex organs, patting nd rocking, picking up, etc. Patting nd rocking (when not conditioned) re probably equivalent to actual stimulation th sex organs. In adults course, every lover knows, vision, audition nd olfaction soon become conditioned by joint stimulation with contact nd kinxsthetic stimuli.


and possibly better described as a compensatory (and often conditioned) device for the blockage of noxious and fear and rage producing stimuli. (b) qual primac y of fear, love and possibl rage. hile in general the results of our experiment of r no pa rticu lar points of conflict with Freudian concepts, one fact out of harmony ith them should be emph asized. According to prope Freudians sex (or in our terminology, love) is the principal emotion in which conditioned responses arise which later limit and distort persona lity. We wish to tak e sharp issue with this view on the basis of the experimental evidence we have gath ered . Fear is as primal a factor as love n influencing personality. Fear does not gather its poten cy in any derived anner om love. t belongs to the original and inherited nature of an. Probab ly the same may be true of rage although at present we are not so sure of this. The Freudians twenty years from now, unless their hypotheses change, when they come to analyze Albert's fear of a seal skin coat—assuming that he comes to analysis at that age—will probably tease from him the recital of a dream which upon their analysis will show that Albert at three years of age attempted to play with the pubic hair of the mother and was scolded violently for it. (We are no means denying th t this ight n some other case condition it) . f th analyst has suff ciently prepared lbert to accept such a dream when found as an explanation of his avoiding tendencies, and if the analyst has the authority and personality to put it over, Albert may be fully convinced that the dream was a true revealer of the factors which brought about the fear. probable th t m any of the phobias in psychop athology are true conditioned emotional reactions either of the direct or the transferred type . One ay possibly have to believe that such persistence of early conditioned responses will be found only n persons who are constitution ally inferior. Ou argum ent s eant to be constructive. Em otional disturbances n adu lts cann ot be traced back to ex alone. he ust be retraced along a t least thre e collateral lines— to conditioned and transferred responses set up in infancy and early youth in all three of the fundamental human emotions.

Conditioned Emotional Reactions by John B Watson

Recommend Documents