Fundamental rights in constitution of PakistanFull description
Causes of Delay in Constitution Making of Pakistan
Full description
Full description
Compare and Contrast the Foreign Policy Sri Lanka Between 1948 - 1956 and 1956 - 1965
chemistry
by Shaykh-ul-Islam Dr Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri
The Canon of Judo is a book was originally published in 1956, and written by Kodokan 10th dan, Kyuzo Mifune (1883-1965). The book covers almost all of the Kodokan recognized techniques, adds…Descrição completa
Strategic Marketing ProjectFull description
Rizall Bill
The present study intended to focus upon the issue of amending the constitution and the doctrine of basic structure with the help of a doctrinal method, the proposed exercise attempted to know that, Every provision of the constitution can be amended
Land ReformsFull description
Full description
Full description
74th Amendment ActFull description
Philippine ConstitutionFull description
Constitution of India, Helping Good People Do Good Thing
mmFull description
Compare the salient features of the constitution 1956 and 1962. (2003-A)
1. Introduction: The constitution of 1956 as !enerall" #ased on $o%ernment of &ndia act 1935 and constitution con stitution of 1962 introduced presidential from of the !o%t.
2. Points of dierences between the constitution of 1956 and 1962: 'oints of dierence #eteen the constitution of 1956 and 1962 are as under
(i) Form of Goernment: Constitution of 1962 introduced presidential form of $o%t. $o%t . Constitution of 1956 introduced parliamentar" form of $o%t.
(ii) !eferendum: Constitution of 1962 introduced an institution *non as referendum in the countr". Constitution of 1956 introduced no institution.
(iii) "ethod of #$ection: Constitution of 1962 introduced indirect election. Constitution of 1956 introduced direct election.
(i) Is$amic Institutions: Constitution of 1962 introduced to &slamic institution There as no such institute in the constitution of 1956.
() %u&reme 'udicia$ counci$:
Constitutions of 1962 introduced a ne institution supreme +udicial council. There as no such institution in the constitution of 1956.
(i) #ecutie Powers: ,ost of the eecuti%e poers %ested in the president under the 1962 constitution. ,ost of the eecuti%e poers ere eercised #" the prime minister under the constitution of 1962.
(ii) ist of %ub'ects: Constitution of 1962 pro%ided onl" to list of su#+ects i. e central and pro%incial. Constitution of 1956 contains three lists of su#+ect i. e federal pro%incial and concurrent matter.
(iii) Presidentia$ Powers: /nder the constitution of 1962 president had !reat poer. &n the constitution of 1956 the poers ere reasona#le.
*. +onc$usion: To conclude & can sa" that #oth of the constitution ere dierent in nature. the constitution of 1956 introduced parliamentar" from of $o%t. hile constitution of 1962 introduced presidential form of $o%t. oe%er there ere some similarities #eteen these constitutions too.
