FRANKLIN BAKER COMPANY OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. HONORABLE CRESENCIO B. TRAJANO, DIRECTOR OF BUREAU OF LABOR RELATIONS, FRANKLIN BAKER BROTHERHOOD ASSOCIATION (TECHNICAL AND OFFICE EMPLOYEES)-ASSOCIAT...
Alliance of Govt Workers v. Minister of Labor and EmploymentFull description
Labor Laws
ReferenceFull description
case digestFull description
Full description
statcon case
Cirtek Employees Labor Union – Federation of Free Workers v. Cirtek Electronics, Inc. G.R. No. 190515
June 6, 2011
FACTS: A memorandum of agreement between the petitioner and respondent was signed. Despite the ratification of this memorandum of agreement however, a labor dispute regarding the matters covered by the memorandum of agreement arose between petitioner and respondent. When the case reached the Secretary of Labor, the Secretary found that the MOA came about as a result of the constitution, at respondent’s behest, of the Labor-Management Council (LMC) which, he reminded the parties, should not be used as an avenue for bargaining but for the purpose of affording workers to participate in policy and decision-making. Hence, the agreements embodied in the MOA were not the proper subject of the LMC deliberation or procedure but of CBA negotiations and, therefore, deserving little weight. The Secretary of Labor rendered a decision in favor of the petitioner-union beyond what was stated in the compromise agreement entered into by the parties. On appeal, the Court of Appeals ruled that the Secretary did not have the authority to give an arbitral award higher than what was stated in the MOA. The Court of Appeals relied on the parol evidence rule to support its decision.
