5G RAN RFI Clarification
Agenda
ZTE Introduction ZTE 5G Solution Highlight and Roadmap RAN RFI Topic Discussion and Q&A
Leading 5G Standardization As Tier 1 Player Vice chairman of RAN3 Rapporteurs of 3 study items Editors of 3 NR specifications
Co-chair Co-cha ir of 802.1 802.11 1 Tgax PHY adhoc adhoc Member of SA New Standard Committee Funding member of ZSMISG
Vice chairman of SG17 and WP3 Chairman of ITU-T SG15 WP3
Board member Vice chairman of international corporation group Vice chairman of radio access working group
Board member
Vice chairman of TC5 Vice chairmen of WG3/WG9/WG8/WG12
Initiate Member of NFV-ITI
Chairman of TC8 WG1 Vice chairman of TC8 WG2
4700+ 5G NR / NGC Proposals
2000 5G Patents, 1000 SEP NO.4
ZTE 5G E2E Roadmap 2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
5G Trials (NSA / SA)
2020
5G Commercial Service
Access Technical Research
Trial
Commercial
Enhancement
Transport 4G & Pre5G
5G NSA
5G SA
Common Core
Flexible Network Slicing (support mMTC & uRLLC)
Core IMS/VOLTE
VoWIFI
5G Voice 1st Drop
5G Voice to full VoNR
Voice MANO
Orchestration
Service Orchestration
5G Slice Orchestration
E2E Slice Orchestration & OSS Homogenisation
SA - Quick Quickly ly Underta Undertake ke 5G 5G Busine Business ss Need Needs s 5GC Architecture in one step; Function Functi on introduced introduced step by step step
3-6 months
With Frozen Standard Terminal is coming soonand Rapid Development of Industr y, Commercially available in 19H2Scale Commercialization in 2019 SA will be Ready Ready for Large
Optimal performance of SA scheme MM+terminal MM+te rminal dual emissio emission; n; Performance of Uplink and downlink far fa r exceeds that of NSA
Agenda
ZTE Introduction ZTE 5G Solution Highlight and Roadmap RAN RFI Topic Discussion and Q&A
Spain Mobile Frequencies
5G Spectrum Spectrum Strate Strategy gy - Stand Standalon alone e
3.4-3.8 GHz (eMBB, VoNR)
700 MHz (URLLC, VoNR)
mmWave (eMBB)
•
Continuous coverage
•
eMBB eM BB se servic rvice e
•
VoNR
•
URLLC
•
VoNR (supplemen (supplementary) tary)
•
Hotspot coverage
•
eMBB eM BB se servic rvice e
5G BBU Product Roadmap 2018
BBU
2019
- 15x 100MHz 64T64R 64T64R @ N78 - 60x 20M 2T4R 2T4R @ N28
2020 -30x 100MHz 64T64R @ N78 -120x 20M 2T4R @ N28
- ZTE ZXRAN ZXRAN Server Server
CU
- COTS Server Server
6 Modes
15 NR Cells
250 Gbps
GSM, UMTS, NB-IoT, LTE FDD, LTE TDD, 5G NR
World Leading Capacity in 2U with Own Baseband Chipset
2*25Gbps + 2*100Gbps Interface Capability
Virtualized IT BBU - ZXRAN V9200 Specification 1
2
3
4
Capacity
GSM: 540 TRXs UMTS: 135 CSs LTE: 90 * 20MHz 4T4R/8T8R ; MM: 15 * 20MHz 64T64; 5G NR: 15 * 100M 64T64R
S1 Ban Bandwid dwidth th
100 Gbps
Power Consumption
Less than 1700W
Volume (H*W*D)
88.4 88. 4 mm mm*48 *482.6 2.6 mm mm*37 *370 0 mm
Weight
18 kg (with full configuration configuration))
5
1. Baseband Processing Processing Board Board (VBP)/Gener (VBP)/General al Computing Board (VGC) 2. Power Distribution Distribution Board Board (VPD) 3. Power Distribution Distribution Board (VPD)/Envi (VPD)/Environment ronment Monitoring Monitoring Board (VEM) 4. Switching Switching Board (VSW) 5. Fan Array Module (VF)
Series Radio Units for Diversified Scenarios Main Stream 64T64R
Cost Effective 16T16R
200MHz 200W
@Macro Coverage
Sub1GHz
@Hotspot, FWA
Small Cell Outdoor
@Wide Coverage, URLLC
800MHz 4T4R
200MHz 200W
@Macro Coverage
20MHz 2T4R 2*80W
mmWave
200MHz 4T4R
@Outdoor Hotspot
Indoor 800MHz 4T4R
400MHz 4T4R
LTE 20M + NR 100M 2T2R + 4T4R
@Indoor Coverage
5G Macro Cell Product Roadmap 2019
2018 2017&Before
Sub 1G (2T4R)
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q2
Q3
A9631* A9631* 200M 64T64R 200W
A9611 200M 64T64R 200W
A9621 400M 64T64R 200W
(64T64R/16T16R) A9603 200M 16T16R 200W
N78
(4T4R)
Q1
R9212E 35M 2T4R 2x80W
N8
Sub6G
26/28G
Q4
R9212E 45M 2T4R 2x80W
N28
N78
Q4
2020
N257 /N258
A9815 A9815 800M 4T4R 62dBm
A9623 400M 16T16R 200W
Q4
ZTE 5G Small Cell Product Roadmap 2019
Outdoor Pad RRU / Micro BTS
Indoor Pico BTS
Indoor Qcell
2020
2021&later
R9105 200M 4T4R 4x5W
R9115 200M
N78 N258
BS9315 800M 4T4R 53dBm(EIRP)
BS9325 800M
N257 /N258
BS9305 400M 4T4R
LTE + NR
R8139 LTE 20M + NR 100M 2T2R + 4T4R 2x125mw + 4x250mw
pBrige pRRU Connection & Power Supply
PB1120B 8*10GE Port
R8139 NR LAA
ZTE 5G RAN Feature Roadmap NR18.2
NR18.1 •
•
•
•
•
3GPP R15 NSA Architecture & Networking --NSA Networking (Opt 3x) --CU/DU Split (F1 interface) Radio Performance --DL SU-MIMO & MU-MIMO (24 Layers) --UL SU-MIMO & MU-MIMO (12 Layers) --MU-MIMO ZF for PDCCH --Coverage Enhancement Phase1 --Beam Management --UL MMSE-IRC --Scheduling based on BWP DC&CA --DC (LTE CA+ NR Intra-band CA) --Intra-band CA Phase1 Service --Low latency service@n78 --Voice for NSA (Opt 3x)
2018Q2
•
•
•
•
•
3GPP R15 NSA&SA Architecture & Networking --SA Networking (Opt 2) --NR-LTE Interworking --Network Slicing Radio Performance --Coverage Enhancement Phase2 --Beam Cooperation --Mini-slot --Grant-free Transmission --DL 256QAM --UL 256QAM(Trial) 256QAM(Trial) DC&CA --Inter-band CA Phase1
Service --URLLC Phase1 --Voice for SA (Trial) --EPS Fallback
2018Q4
NR19.1 •
•
3GPP R15 NSA&SA Architecture & Networking --Het NET
•
•
•
•
•
•
Radio Performance --Coverage Enhancement Phase3 --Interference Management Phase1 --Beam Management and Cooperation @mmWave --Mixed Numerology --UL 256QAM DC&CA --Intra-band CA Phase2 --Inter-band CA Phase2 Service --URLLC Phase2 --Voice for SA --FWA
2019Q2
NR20
NR19.2
•
•
3GPP R15 NSA&SA Architecture & Networking --NSA Networking (Option 7x/7a) Radio Performance --Coverage Enhancement Phase4 --Interference Management Phase2 --Beam Cooperation Enhancement @mmWave DC&CA --DC(NR FR1+FR2) --Intra-band CA Phase3*
• •
•
•
Service --URLLC Phase3 •
3GPP R16 NSA&SA Architecture & Networking --NSA Networking (Other Opt.)
Radio Performance --NOMA --DL 1024 QAM --Interference Management Phase3 --Mobility Enhancement
DC&CA --DC (LTE CA+ NR Inter-band CA) --Inter-band CA Phase3
Service --URLLC Phase4 --mMTC
* Based on std std development
2019Q4
2020Q2
Agenda
ZTE Introduction ZTE 5G Solution Highlight and Roadmap RAN RFI Topic Discussion and Q&A
Coverage Enhancements by 5G NR – physical aspects
Terminal Enhancement
Multiple antenna Technology
Bandwidth Advantage
~20MHz
4G terminal
5G terminal
4G LTE 5G NR
23dBm Single TX antenna
~100MHz
26dBm Dual TX antenna
Multiple antenna enables flexible beam forming, decreases inter- user interference and increases BS receiving sensitivity
Bandwidth advantage can be transformed to coverage advantage via allocating more resource for edge UEs and lowering inter-BS inter-BS interference
Coverage Enhancements by 5G NR – system aspects Hybrid MU/SU Beamforming •
CRS free Design
NSA
…
16 steams needs 16 UEs
•
There is no always on CRS signal in 5G NR, which saves RE resource and eliminates the inter cell interference
2 stream SU-MIMO × 12 UEs =24 streams
•
More easy for MU pairing
•
Less resource consumption on control channel
SA … 24 streams needs only 12 UEs
Beamed BC and CC Channel
CSI-RS Enhancement CDM8 (FD2, TD4),32 port,Density=1 [RE/RB/port] • •
Beamed CRS-RS for beam
management;
searching, tracking and recovery; • •
Maximum 32 ports;
•
Enhanced codebook;
•
Feedback on amplitude and phase;
Initial access, Handoff, SIB, paging can all be based on beam
l
0
l
6
l
13
Power is more focused, leading less inter-channel interference;
Multi-user Simulation Results – Uplink NR 3.5GHz provides a much better UL edge data rate due to its advantage in multi-user scheduling and interference
reduction; throughput of NR 3.5G is also much better than FDD 1.8G , which mainly comes from the frequency The average throughput efficiency increase via MU-MIMO in cell center area; anti-interference in NR 3.5GHz can easily be transformed to coverage coverage advantage The advantage of capacity and anti-interference Uplink Cell Edge User Throughput (Mbps) (Mbps) —20UE
Uplink Cell Average Throughput (Mbps)—20UE 0,942
1
70
63,52
0,9 60
0,8
0,7
50
0,6
40
0,471
0,5 0,4
0,307
0,3
0,2
20
0,150
31,76
31,66
30
0,101
17,20 8,31
10
0,1 0
0 F DD DD 1 .8 .8G ( 2R 2R )
F DD DD 1 .8 .8 G ( 4R 4R )
T DD DD 1 .9 .9 G ( 8R 8R )
N R 3 .5 .5G ( 16 16 R) R) 20%
NR 3.5G (16R) 40%
F DD DD 1 .8 .8 G ( 2R 2R )
F DD DD 1 .8 .8 G ( 4R 4R )
T DD DD 1. 1. 9G 9G ( 8R 8R )
N R 3 .5 .5 G ( 16 16 R) R) 20%
NR 3.5G (16R) 40%
Multi-user Simulation Results – Downlink DL edge data rate of NR 3.5GHz (64TR) is almost 10X compared with FDD 1.8G(2TR);
throughput of NR 3.5G is i s almost 20X compared with FDD 1.8G(2TR); The average throughput Regarding ing both capacity and cover coverage, age, NR 3.5GHz is far better than FDD 1.8GHz; Regard
Downlink Cell Edge User Throughput (Mbps)-20UE (Mbps)-20UE
NR Cell Average Throughput (Mbps)-20UE (Mbps)-20UE 13,14
14,00
1000,0
911,7
900,0
12,00
800,0
10,00
682,5
700,0
8,12
600,0
8,00
499,8
500,0
6,00
400,0
4,51
300,0
4,00 2,00
1,12
1,40
FDD 2TR
FDD 4TR
200,0
100,0
0,00
46,9
53,8
FDD 2TR
FDD 4TR
0,0
NR 16TR
NR 32TR
NR 64TR
NR 16TR
NR 32TR
NR 64TR
3.5GHz NR vs FDD 1.8GHz Test Test in Shenzhen Shenzhen - China Indoor/Outdoor Coverage Test 4G/5G Collocated Sites
Outdoor Coverage Test Dive Route
Site AAU&Antenna
3.5GHz 5G AAU
1.8G Antenna
On One e 4G 4G/5 /5G G co coll lloc ocat ated ed si site te for in indo door or co cove verrag age e te test st an and d an anot othe herr 4G 4G/5 /5G G co coll lloc ocat ated ed si site te for ou outd tdoo oorr co cove verrag age e dr driv ive e
test te st 3. 3.5G 5GHz Hz NR AA AAU U an and d 1. 1.8G 8GHz Hz FD FDDD-LLTE an ante tenn nna a mo moun unte ted d on th the e sa same me po pole le
Indoor Coverage Comparison NR 3.5G vs. FDD 1.8G loca cati tion onss on Fl Floo oorr 2 an and d Fl Floo oorr 6 of th the e tar arge gett bui uild ldin ing g wer ere e se sele lect cted ed for UL th thrrou ough ghpu putt tes est; t; 17 lo Ro Roug ughl hly y 10 100% 0%-1 -150 50% % ave vera rage ge th thro roug ughp hput ut gai ain n fr from om 5G NR to 1. 1.8G 8G FD FDDD-LLTE TE.. UL Throughput (Mbps)
Location
UL Throughput (Mbps)
Location
Outdoor Coverage Comparison NR 3.5G vs. FDD1.8G UL Throughput
FDD
NR
Distance to BS 与基站距离（米）
100,00
900
90,00
800
80,00
700
）
s p b M ( t u p h g u o r h T
70,00
600
60,00
500
50,00
400
40,00
300
30,00 20,00
200
10,00
100
0,00
0
Time
5G RSRP
5G UL Throughput
4G RSRP
4G UL Throughput
) m ( e c n a t s i D
Mobility Mobili ty - ZTE Support Support NSA/SA HO defined defined in 3GPP Rel15 Mobility with SA Option 2 Operation PS Handover Cell Selection and Reselection Redirection
NR<->NR
NR->LTE
LTE->NR
Intra Frequency
√
√
√
Inter Frequency
√
√
√
Intra Frequency
√
√
√
Inter Frequency
√
√
√
Intra Frequency
N/A
√
N/A
Inter Frequency
N/A
√
N/A
Secondary Node Change
Secondary Node Add
Secondary Node Release
Intra Frequency
√
√
√
Inter Frequency
√
√
√
Intra Frequency
√
√
√
Mobility with NSA Option 3x NR
Operation
LTE Intra-Master Intra-Master Node Handover Inter-Master Node Handover
SA vs NSA: Overview Service
5GC introduced by SA mode will enable operators more power for service innovation in vertical industry NSA (Option 3 series) mode can only provide eMBB service
Performance
NSA terminals can only transmitted with single antenna at NR
SA has better uplink coverage and downlink performance than NSA
SA has better user experience for DL/UL data rate
NR 3.5GHz can be colocated with FDD 1.8G 2R to form a continuous SA coverage
Flexibility
NSA needs much more effort in existing network upgrade, Under SA NR and LTE can evolved independently while under NSA NR and LTE are tightly coupled
Under NSA operator has no flexibility for vendor selection
Inter system system IoT can guarantee service continuity in SA early deployment
Cost
SA is the final target while NSA is a transient architecture
With similar scale, NSA needs less CAPEX for initial deployment, but needs additional CAPEX for 2nd upgrade to SA in the future. So the ultimate TCO with NSA is bigger than SA
Service: 5GC enables more opportunities
With the 5GC, operator operatorss can provide 5G end to end services experience.
5GC new features, including SBA, network slicing, fi ner flow based QOS, flexible networking, open API offer operator with more opportunities on 5G new services.
Service Ba Based Ar Architecture
Network Sl Slicing
Refined QoS
Flexible UP
EPC support new service
Although EPC can support support
Bearer is minimum minimum size size Bearer is
EPC gateway is is hard hard to to be be
and function through patch, relatively difficult and slow extension 5GC, service based architecture like IT, loose coupling among functions. Comply with 3GPP, customize function and open interface, easier for inter-vendor integration
multiple multiple data data communication communication network (DCN), anetwork single user (DCN), a single user cantoonly can only be connected one be connected DCN at a time.to one DCN at time. a 5GC virtualizes multiple 5GC multiple logical virtualizes network slicing within logical network slicingand a one physical network, within one physical network, single user can connect to and a single user can different network slicing connect to usly different network simultaneously simultaneo for different slicing simutaneousltfor scenarios. different scenarios.
grading grading of of EPC QoS control, control, too coarse to to meet meet the the increasing finer QoS QoS increasing finer requirement.
deployed deployed down down to to the the edge, edge, and also with with related related billing billing and routing issues. routing issues. 5GC’s user plane plane gateway gateway can be deployed deployed anywhere anywhere flexibly to provide provide most most flexibly to appropriate routing routing for forusers. users.
5GC provide aa refined refinedQos Qos
control with minimum minimumsize size control with grading of Qos Qos flow. flow. grading of Operators can offer offer more more precise, content based basedvaluevalue-added services. added services.
Performance: SA outperforms NSA Comparing to dual layer l ayer transmission for SA UE, only single layer UL transmitting for NSA UE at 3.5GHz band, so that for NSA: NSA:
UL coverage decays by 3dB: With only 23dBm transmitting power, UL coverage of 3.5GHz will be severely impaired. Single user UL throughput reduces by 50%: Dual layer transmission of SU-MIMO is lost at UL. Cell DL throughput drops by 10%: simultaneous MU-MIMO and SU-MIMO are not designed for NSA
NR UL LTE UL
Avg. DL Cell Throughput (Mbps)
NSA
SA
SA Gain
16TR
458 . 3
5 36 . 6
+17%
64TR
883 . 8
9 81 . 2
+11%
In NSA mode, only single layer UL transmitting, with power of 1*23dBm for UE UL cell coverage radius (m)
NSA
SA
SA Gain
2Mbps UL edge throughput @ 16TR
153
21 9
+43%
2Mbps UL edge throughput @ 64TR
172
24 7
+43%
512Kbps UL edge throughput @ 16TR
221
313
+42%
512Kbps UL edge throughput @ 64TR
249
353
+42%
DL Beamforming DL forged Beamforming
In NSA mode, with only single layer UL transmitting for UE, performance of DL beam forming is severely impacted, especially the overall performance of MU-MIMO plus SU-MIMO
Performance: Requirements for typical 5G services Service ty type
Bandwidth
Latency
NSA Feasibility
SA Feasibility
Remark
HD video(4K)
18Mbps
10ms
4K will be the dominant video format in 5G era
VR/AR(4K)
45Mbps
16ms
These requirements are only based on 4K, more stringent requirements may be needed for higher resolution
V2X(including autonomous driving)
100Mbps
3ms
Requirements for IoV are very complicated, here only refers to L5 level autonomous driving
Remote control
100M~1G
20ms
Includes mechanic engineering, drone, remote surgery
Intelligent manufacture
<1Mbps
5ms
Intelligent manufacture has wide coverage, here mainly refers to robot in unmanned factories
Smart Grid
*Kbps
5ms
Here mainly refers to control requirements in smart Grid, not including video surveillance
For initial 5G launch service may limited to eMBB type such as HD video or VR/AR, VR/AR, experienced data data rate of 50Mbps per user is a reasonable requirement, requirement, which is a important guide for 5G network planning
Deployment: SA makes deployment easier
In NSA mode, LTE eNB requires a large modification. Complex interoperability interoperability between 5G NR and LTE. Tight coupling for 5G and 4G leads to inflexible 5G vendor selection, complex operation and evolution.
In SA mode, loose coupling for 5G and LTE makes evolution and deployment easier and simple. ITEM Impact for LTE eNB 5G and LTE interoperability Evolution
NSA
SA
SA advantage
Huge modification(1)
Software configure(2)
intra-vendor only
Inter-vendor or Intra-vendor
Easier deployment, flexible vendor selection by SA
Conjunct evolution for 5G and LTE(3)
Separate evolution for 5G and LTE
SA has flexible networking
SA has less impact for LTE eNB
Note： 1. eNB upgrade, upgrade, expansion, expansion, additional additional X2 interface. DC anchor band selection selection and related related configuration. configuration. 2. Only eNB configuration upgrade for IOT IOT (handover (handover,, reselect, reselect, etc.)with 5G gNB. 3. Evolution from from NSA to SA, LTE LTE eNB need upgrade and and modify configuration configuration (delete X2, add IOT with 5G), 5G NR also al so need upgrade and modify configuration (add NG, XN, IOT with LTE)
has lower lower comulativ comulative e cost. Cost: SA has SA is the final target architecture while NSA is just intermediate. Operators can go directly with SA, or NSA first then evolve to SA. Under the same scale, two step approach may bear higher
Cost category
Cost Item
accumulative investment investment cost than one step approach with the
NR Equipment
following four extra cost:
SW Upgrade (NSA->SA) New 5G NR
NR upgrade
4G eNB modification
EPC upgrade and expansion
Transmission reconfiguration
One step Approach
Engineering (Installation/Optimization)
One step SA √
Two step SA (NSA>SA) Initial NSA √ √
√
√
Engineering (NSA->SA Optimization) 4G eNB Upgrade/mo dification
New 5GC
Two step Approach
new NR
new NR
NR upgrade
4G eNB SW upgrade (Interoperability)
4G modification (NSA)
4G eNB SW upgrade (Interoperability)
new 5GC
new 5GC
EPC upgrade(interoperability) (interoperability)
EPC upgrade and expansion
EPC upgrade(interoperability)
new transmission or expansion
new transmission or expansion
Transmission Re-configurati Re-configuration on
Initial NSA
Evolve to SA
EPC Upgrade/mo dification Transmission expansion/ new
SW upgrade (4/5G interoperability)
Evolve to SA
√ √
SW upgrade/expansion (NSA DC)
√ √
5GC Equipment
√
√
Engineering (Installation/Optimization)
√
√
SW upgrade (4/5G interoperability)
√
√
SW upgrade/expansion (NSA DC) Transmission Transmission expansion/ new (5G) Transmission Transmissio n modification (4/5G DC) Transmission Transmissio n modification (NSA->SA)
√ √
√ √ √
ZTE 5G RAN Split Solution Low layer DU/AAU split
LowPHY
RF
Option8
HighPHY
Option7
LowPHY
RF
Split interface between CU&DU defined by 3GPP LowMAC
Option6
HighPHY
HighMAC Option5
LowMAC
Option4
HighMAC
HighRLC
LowRLC
Option2
Option3
LowRLC
PDCP
HighRLC
RRC
Option1
PDCP
Data
RRC
Data
•
BBU
DU CPRI
RRU
eCPRI AAU
•
eCPRI is born with 5G to solve CPRI bandwidth issue, it’s a part of 5G RAN split and it defines demarcation point point between AAU and DU Comparing with option 8 used in CPRI, Option 7 is a mainstream choice for ZTE eCPRI split in industry.
ZTE 5G RAN Split Solution Low layer DU/AAU split
LowPHY
RF
Option8
RF
HighPHY
Option7
LowPHY
Split interface between CU&DU defined by 3GPP LowMAC
Option6
HighPHY
HighMAC Option5
LowMAC
HighRLC
LowRLC Option4
HighMAC
Option2
Option3
LowRLC
PDCP
HighRLC
RRC
Option1
PDCP
Data
RRC
Data
Cell 5G NR Massive Massiv e MIMO
Split Option
Bandwidth (M (MHz)
Ant. Port
Layers
Fronthaul Re Requirements
Option 8
100
64
16
208 Gbps
Option 7-2 (Layer mapping)
100
64
16
25 Gbps
Multiple Options for Telefonica Flexible Deployment Cloud CU C-RAN
D-RAN
Case 1
Case 2
Case 3
Case 4
Case 5
Integrated Integra ted CU/DU
Integrated CU/DU/AAU
Centralized Centr alized DU/CU
Cloud CU, Centraliz Centralized ed DU
EPC/5GC
EPC/5GC
EPC/5GC
EPC/5GC
EPC/5GC
Cloud CU
Cloud CU
Centralized CU+DU
Centralized DU
AAU
AAU
Cloud CU, Integrated DU/AAU
CU+DU AAU
AAU+CU+DU
AAU+DU
CU/DU Deployment Solution for Different Services
CU Cloud
mMTC： •
• •
huge connections latency sensitive cost sensitive
5G AAU
DU
AAU/CU/DU integrate
CU
CU Cloud
5G AAU+DU
CU
eMBB： •
wide bandwidth
CU/DU integrate low latency 5G AAU
URLLC： • •
low latency high reliability
DU+CU
AAU/CU/DU integrate low latency 5G AAU+DU+CU
Site Room
Edge DC
Regional DC
Synchronization St an d ar d
Fr eq u en c y
Ph as e
FDD LTE
0.05ppm
NA
TD-LTE
0.05ppm
3us
5G
0.05ppm
3us GNSS
Baseb and unit
GPS:
Most common
No extra cable is needed
front haul
RF unit
Remote GPS: option
Synchronization
Grandmaster Back haul
1588
GPS
Baseband unit
front haul
RF unit
|T|<=1.5us,for |T|<=1.5us, for base service |T|<=0.4us |T|<=1.5us |T|<=130ns,for |T|<=130ns ,for intra-band contiguous carrier aggregation of same BBU
BBU
|T|<=10ns,for different board of
|T|<=100ns
|T|<=20ns
Security is present along al ong the whole ZTE Product Lifecycle R&D
Requirement
Secure coding Automatic source code analysis Code review
Security requirement System risk analysis Data protection requirement
Security architecture design Open-source / third-party component
security assessment Software security test design
Vulnerability scanning Product security function testing Protocol robustness testing
Release & Delivery @
System Design
System Testing
Anti-virus scanning Version integrity Security hardening
Typic Typ ical al Th Thre reat ats s in th the e RA RAN N Net Netwo work rk eNB/gNB UU
OMC
EMS
AMF/MME
Threats
Vulnerability
Destruction Corruption Removal Disclosure Interruption Attacks
Access Control Data Integrity Authentication Communication Securiy Data confidential confidentiality ity Availbility Privacy Non-Repudiation
UPF/S-GW/P-GW
LDAP
AUSF/UDM
NG-Core
Internet
Major RAN Security Threats domain communication between UE and and eNB/gNB eNB/gNB from Wireless interface interface ① Sniffing and attecks on communication unauthorized access to eNB/gNB eNB/gNB etc ② Sabotage of and/or unauthorized transmission links between between eNB/gNB to Core Network or between Base Stations ③ Attacks from the transmission
④ Attacks on eNB/gNB
ZTE RAN Security Pillars Transport Security
Wireless Security Air Interface Encryption
VLAN Application Layer Security
802.1X IPSec MACSec
OM Security Account Management Authentication
Transport Layer Security
Site Construction Security
Security Log Security Alarm Clock Synchronization Security Security State Audit and Monitoring SSL/TLS Sensitive Information Protect
Device Security
Device Layer Security
Equipment Physical Security Operating System Security Built-in Firework Software Digital Signature Port Security Management
3GPP R16 Voice & SMS Standard Evolution 3GPP R15
Focusing on 5G SA (Option2) Basic Services
3GPP R16
Focusing on 5G SA (Option2) IMS Enhanc Enhancement ement
Basic Voice Service
IMS Enhance Enhancement ment
Domain selection (MO call, MT call, SMS)
IMS netw network ork slice
Interworking （N26-based interworking, dual- registration registration))
SBA-based SBA-b ased Cx and Sh inter interfaces faces
Voice fallback (EPS Fallback, RAT Fallback)
Npcf interface usage in IMS
IMS APP server deployment in local environment
Scenario: IMS cloudification
SMS
IMS-based SMS (SMS over IP)
Control-plane-based SMS (SMS over NAS)
Interoperability Interoper ability Enhancement
Emergency Call Service
Emergency registration
Emergency call fallback
5G SRVCC -direct interoperation interoperation between 5G and 3G: 5G UE registers in the IMS, the UE falls back to 3G (CS voice) when UE makeing call or accept call and setup a dedicated bearer
Scenario: 3G coverage is better than 4G, and 3G is used as the long-term wireless coverage technology
has satisfied the requirement of commercial deployment deployment of 5G Voice & SMS ( SA ).
3GPP Standard 5G Voice Solution
voice
Idle/Data,Registration/SMS
5G NSA Option3
5G SA Option2
VoLTE/CSFB
EPS Fallback
EPC
CS
Sv/SGs
2/3G
IMS
IMS
IMS
CS
VoNR
LTE
5G NR
2/3G
EPC Sv/SGs
LTE
VoLTE&SRVCC or
VoLTE&SRVCC or
CSFB
CSFB
Core uses IMS + 4G EPC, supports CSFB to 2/3G
5GC
CS
EPC Sv/SGs
N26
5G NR
EPS Fallback
Core uses IMS + 5GC, supports EPS Fallback to 4G.
2/3G
LTE
SRVCC
5G NR
VoNR &Handover
continuity Core uses IMS + 5GC+ 4G EPC, voice continuity guaranteed by PS domain.
Note: In NSA Option3 voice user plane bearer can be established on LTE or NR (decide by RAN). It has the same requirement for CN and VoLTE.
5GC N26
Voice and SMS Solution for Option3 CSFB
VoLTE + SRVCC IMS IP-SM-GW
Internet
CS
SCC AS
EPC MSCS
SGs
MME
EPC MSCS
SAE-GW
MME
CS
SAE-GW
Sv/SGs
SGs MGW
MGW RAN/GERAN
Internet
CSCF
eNodeB
NR
RAN/GERAN
eNodeB
handover
Not Deploy VoLTE
Already Deploy VoLTE
CSFB to 2G/3G for Voice service;
VoLTE under LTE coverage;
SMS over SGs.
HO to 2G/3G with SRVCC when move out of LTE coverage; SMS over SGs, or SMS over IP.
NR
Voice and SMS Solution for Option2 (5GC SA) EPS Fallback
VoNR
Voice Idle/Data
Voice Idle/Data
Registration/SMS
Registration/SMS
IMS
CS
IMS
E PC Sv/SGs
2/3G VoLTE&SRVCC
5GC
CS
N26
LTE
NR
EPC
Sv/SGs
2/3G
LTE
SRVCC
EPS Fallback
5GC N26
NR VoNR & Handover
or CSFB •
• •
NR hotspot Coverage: VoLTE for voice solution to avoid frequent handover between 5G VoLTE and 4G; Voice will fall back to EPS( a little more call establishment time) SMS over NAS, or SMS over IP
and EPS Fallback Fallback use the s
•
Smooth evolution to VoNR, handover to VoLTE in 5G cell edge Both data and voice served by NR, better user experience
•
SMS over NAS, or SMS over IP
•
chitec
NR large-scale coverage
/NR or EPC/L
act as voice be
5G Emergency Call Solution UDM
AUSF
I/S-CSCF AMF
A NR
EATF
SMF+ UPF
PSAP
P-CSCF
P
E-CSCF
PCF
AMF Func Function tionss
SMF & UPF Functio Functions: ns:
PCF Functions
IMS Func Function tion
1. Supports local emergency service data data configure 2. Supports emergency registration and emergency PDU session setup 3. Supports issue emergency service indication and emergency fallback indication 4. Supports issue emergency call number list 5. Supports emergency fallback
1. Supports emergency service data configure 2. Supports emergency PDU session setup 3. Provides special QoS guarantee and policy control for emergency service 4. UPF guarantee only emergency emergency service data transferred on the emergency PDU.
1. PCF provides SMF with QoS parameters and policies for emergency service PDU session 2. Supports to guarantee only emergency service data transferred on the emergency PDU.
Supports identifying 5G location information and delivering to PSAP.
UE Function Supports emergency fallback
NR Fun Functio ction n Supports emergency fallback
Two Solutions of 5G SMS SMS over IP
SMS over NAS
IMS SMS over IP IP-SM-GW SMSC
IP-SM-GW
Nx
5GC
SMSF
SMSC
EPC
5GC
EPC SMS over NAS
LTE
NR
SMS over NAS ( new SMSF) UE registers to SMSF when when registering in 5G. MO path: UE->AMF->SMSF->SM UE->AMF->SMSF->SMSC SC MT path: SMSC->SMSF->AMF->U SMSC->SMSF->AMF->UE E Currently the SMSF protocol protocol is only a draft. It is recommended to adopt adopt MAP for the SMSF-SMSC interface. SMSF shall report its GT to UDM via the N21/Nudm interface for MT SMS routing.
LTE
•
SMS over IP When a UE registers in IMS through 4G/5G network, S-CSCF executes a 3rd party registration to IP-SM-GW. MO call: UE->P/S-CSCF->IP-SM-GW->SMSC MT call: SMSC->IP-SM-GW->P/S-CSCF->UE This solution is the same as 4G SMS over IMS. •
• •
NR
• •
Due to co-existence co-existence of diff erent types of UEs and APPs, APPs, two solut ions may bot h exist. For voice-centric UEs, SMS over IP is the best choice, which implements both voice and SMS services.
ZTE ElasticNet UME R18 Architecture NMS / 3rd Party System
Unified Portal Provisioning
Z T E E l a s t i c N e t U M E R 1 8
TOPO Management
RAN Configuration Management
Monitoring Fault Management
Security
System
UME 3A Center
UME Health Check
Northbound Adapter Function
Performance Management
Log Management UME Setting Center
Inventory and Hardware Management Service Provisioning and Upgrading
...
...
RAN Supervision Dashboard
Signaling Trace Analytics
...
NR
Northbound and Openness
Application data Backup Recovery
Document
...
DocLite
...
...
LTE
Open API Service
...
ZTE ElasticNet UME Main Functions & Solutions •
Fault Management
•
Configuration Management
•
Topology Management M anagement
•
Performance Management
•
RAN Supervision Dashboar Dashboard d
•
Inventory Management
•
Software Management
•
Security Management
•
Signaling Trace Management
•
VNF Management
Main Functions
Main Solutions
•
Security Solution
•
High Availability Solutions (HA, BR, GR)
•
NBI Solution
•
Integration solution with MANO
gNB Comm Commissio issioning ning Workflow Workflow – Plug & Play
gNB Po Power wer on
IP Connection Setup
TLS Channel Setup to UME
Self Commissioning
gNB Self Test Test
gNB Com Commis missio sionin ning g Too Tooll - LMT Site (gNB) Debug
EMS Server (UME)
ETH5
Router/Switch
Ethernet Port
Ethernet Port
NE Test Computer （OS: Windows ）
Site-Commissioning Mode
Scenario Description
Mode 1（Use WebLMT to commission a site at local end ）
Data file, version packet, commissioning regulation file in near end( laptop); The transmision between EMS(UME) and the gNB.
Mode 2（Use WebLMT to commission a site at remote end ）
Data file, version packet, commissioning regulation file in remote end(UME FTP server); No DHCP service.
ZTE’s Device Roadmap 2018H2
Hand set
SmartPhone Engineer Sample Sub6G NSA 8150+X50 201812
MBB
Indoor CPE Engineer Sample Sub6G NSA 8150+X50 201812
2019H1
2019H2
SmartPhone Engineer Sample Sub6G NSA/SA 8150+X55 201909
Outdoor CPE Engineer Sample NSA Sub6G/mmW 8150+X50 201906
ZTE’s RAN Io IoDT DT Pl Plan an 2018
2019 NSA CS
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
SA TQ
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Lab
Lab
Lab
Field
May
Jun
Energy Consumption Spec Item
BBU
AAU
RRU
V9200
A9611
A9603
A9815
R9212E
Power Supply
-48V DC
-48V DC
-48V DC
-48V DC
-48V DC
Voltage Range
-40V DC ~ -57V DC
-37V DC ~ -57V DC
-37V DC ~ -57V DC
-37V DC ~ -57V DC
-37V DC ~ -57V DC
Typical Power Consumption W (25℃)
325W
980 W
500W
450 W
228 W
Peak Power Consumption W (35℃)
650W
1,150W
630W
455 W
490 W
Heat dissipation for indoor equipment
325W
980 W
500W
450 W
228 W
Temperature Range( ℃)
-10~+55
-40~+70
-40~+55
-40~+55
-40~+55
Power Saving Features
Baseband processors automatical shut down based on traffic load Automatic shut down of 5G NR layers for multi-layer 5G NR sites
Automatic shut down of Cell In a SRAN node with NR and 4G deployed
4G Site Evolution to 4G/5G add V9200 for 5G
V9200 in full mode
5G uses new spectrum Add 5G RU/AAU
…
5G uses new spectrum Add 5G RU/AAU
…
2G/3G/4G RRU B8200
2G/3G/4G RRU V9200
V9200
V9200 supports 4G and 5G Phase I: GULN+NR
B8200
+
+
+ 2G/3G/4G RRU
Phase III: All 5G
Phase II: GULN+NR
5G AAU
2G/3G/4G RRU
Existing RRUs upgrade SW to support 5G
5G AAU
V9200
V9200
5G AAU
V9200
B8200
• •
Legacy B8200 supports GULN Introducing V9200 and 5G RRU to support 5G
•
•
Connect existing RRUs to V9200 to support GULN + 5G NR Legacy B8200 can be reused in other places
•
Existing ZTE 6x/7x RRU’s, and beyond, can support NR through SW upgrade.
Panama
R8862A/R8872A
Ecuador
R8862A/R8872A
Use Cases and Deployment Strategy (1/ 2) Use Case
Deployment Strategy
Rationale & Comment
mmWave FWA
Option 3 or DC with NR in low bands
Low coverage, low mobility requirements.
AR/VR
eMBB slice in 3.5 GHZ, local CDN (MEC)
Late Latenc ncy y less less than than 5ms 5ms to to miti mitiga gate te the the “vertigo” vertigo” effect -> CDN introduction. introduction.
URLLC
NR FDD in sub1GHz band (7 (700 MHz)
FDD NR as coverage la l ayer, providing UR U RLLC & voice as primar primary y services. services. Laten Latency cy requir requireme ement nt may may be as low low as 0.5 ms ms E2E (tactile (tactile interactio interaction). n).
Massive Io IoT
NR FDD in sub1GHz band (700 MHz), although although casuistic casuisticss can be large large
Introduc Introduction tion of a new RRC RRC mode, mode, RRC connected connected inactive inactive situation. situation.
In gener general, al, NW NW slicing slicing is re rega gard rded ed as a basic basic ena enable blerr fo forr mul multip tiple le use case casess re-inf re-infor orcin cing g the op optio tion n 2 as prima primary ry architect arch itecture ure opti option. on.
Use Cases and Deployment Strategy (2/ 2)
CU Cloud
mMTC： •
• •
huge connections latency sensitive cost sensitive
5G AAU
DU
AAU/CU/DU integrate
CU
CU Cloud
5G AAU+DU
CU
eMBB： •
wide bandwidth
CU/DU integrate low latency 5G AAU
URLLC： • •
low latency high reliability
DU+CU
AAU/CU/DU integrate low latency 5G AAU+DU+CU
Site Room
Edge DC
Regional DC
Ultra-Reliable and Low Latency L atency Requirement for URLLC Use case attribute
V2N for mid/ long-term environment modelling
V2X for short term environment modelling (sensor sharing)
V2X for cooperation (coordinated control)
Latency
Not critical (100 ms end-toend seems to be tolerable)
<20 ms end-to-end
<3 ms end-to-end for platooning, <10 ms end-to-end for cooperative manoeuvres.
Reliability
Not critical
99% – 99.999%
Critical (99.999%)
Smart Sma rt gri grid d <5ms E2E for transmission/ grid backbone, <50ms <50ms for distribution distribution and <1s for access 99.9% – 99.9% – 99.999% for the different domains/ applications
Source: NGMN “Perspectives “Perspectives on Vertical Industries and Implications for 5G” 5G ” Use case attribute
Discrete automation – motion control
Electricity distribution – high voltage
Tactile interaction
Remote control
E2E Latency
1ms
5ms
0.5ms
5ms
Reliability
99.9999%
99.9999%
99.999%
99.999%
Source: 3GPP TS22.261 “ Service requirements for the 5G system” system ”
E2E Latency Requirement for URLLC and eMBB gNB
5G AAU
UE
CU for URLLC DU
New CPRI
CU for eMBB/mMTC Backhaul
URLLC UPF
500 μs(URLLC)
UE PDCP – PDCP – gN gNB B PD PDCP CP
URLLC UPF
4 ms (eMBB)
T0
T1
T2
T3
Interface
Fronthaul
Process
Midhaul
• •
Core
<20~50 μs(eMBB) <10~30 μs(URLLC)
T4
T5
Backhaul
Process •
Several ms(eMBB)
Processing Time
BBU
CPRI
RRU
Mini-slot Length
UE
Downlink
<180μs
30μs
<20μs
142μs/71μs
<120μs
Uplink
<200μs
30μs
<20μs
142μs/71μs
<100μs
URLLC in 3.5G is difficult di fficult for commercial deployment With self-contained self-contained subframe configur configuration ation PDSCH
3.5G TDD with 30Khz SCS
S
S
U
ACK:N+0
S
S
S
S
S •
•
U
S
Due to cross-slot interference, interfe rence, difficult to deploy in network; Limited uplink slots lead to uplink service bottleneck.
Some information about Maturity on URLLC •
According to our knowledge, commercial 5G chips are still focused on eMBB service. Many URLLC related related features features are are optional and not supported.
•
Enhanced URLLC features are still still being standardized in R16 framework
•
We are closely cooperating with top tier chipset vendor in commercializing commer cializing 5G eMBB networks and would would also like like to work with Telefónica to push commercialization of URLLC as market matures
ZTE URLLC Implementation Summary Target
Payload (32Bytes) Low latency (0.5ms) High Reliability (1e-5 with 1ms) Multiplexing URRLC and eMBB
ZTE URLLC Implementation
Description
Frequency
700MHz
Antenna Configurations ons
gNB gNB 2T4R, UE 2T4R
Numerology
eMBB: 15KHz +NCP, URLLC: 15KHz + NCP
Features
# Mini-slot Based Scheduling & Transmission: 2 OS (Q4 2018) # Type 1 UL Grant-free Transmission with periodicity = 14 OS (Q4 2018) # UL TB repetition in grant-free transmission within period (Q2 2019) # BLER-target and CQI table for URLLC (Q2 2019) # DL Preemption Indication (Q4 2018) # DL Semi-Persistent Semi-Persistent Scheduling with 1ms periodicity
OSS Integration, UNICA •
•
We’r e’re e willing to integrate integrate our 5G system with TEF’s TEF’s NMS, as we did for 3/4G We understand we’re in the process of VRAN RFI and are waiting for next steps for the instruction from TEF
AAU
Large-capacity, wide-bandwidth, compact 64T64R 64T 64R 5G 5G NR AAU - A96 A9611 11 Advantages
A9611 A9603 A9815
•
Smooth Evolution
•
Large Capacity, High Output Power
Volume
57 L
Weight
40 kg
Output Power
•
Smart Antenna Array, Counter Interference
Application scenarios
S45: 100 W 200 MHz
OBW
100 MHz S35: 3400-3700 MHz S37: 3600-3800 MHz S45: 4400-4800 MHz
Antenna Gain
Compact Design
S35/S37: 200 W
IBW
Operating Band
•
•
The A9611 can be deployed in various scenarios, such as sector coverage, hotspot, and high rise building coverage.
AAU
Large-capacity, wide-bandwidth, compact 16T16 16T 16R R 5G NR AAU - A96 A9603 03 Advantages
A9611
•
Smooth Evolution
•
Large Capacity, High Output Power
A9603 A9815
•
Compact Design
•
Smart Antenna Array, Counter Interference
Volume
40 L
Weight
30 kg
Output Power
200 W
IBW
200 MHz
OBW
100 MHz
Operating Band
S35: 3400-3600 MHz
Antenna Gain
23.5 dBi
Application scenarios •
The A9603 can be deployed in large capacity macro scenarios.
AAU
Large-capacity, wide-bandwidth, compact 4T4R 4T4 R 5G NR NR AAU - A98 A9815 15 Advantages
A9611 A9603
•
Smooth Evolution
•
Large Capacity, High Output Power
A9815
•
Compact Design
•
Smart Antenna Array, Counter Interference
Volume
20 L
Weight
18 kg
Output Power
EIRP = 62 dBm
IBW
800 MHz
OBW
800 MHz
Operating Band
S28: 26500-29500 MHz S26: 24250-27500 MHz
Application scenarios •
The A9815 can be deployed in various scenarios, such as sector coverage, hotspot, and high rise building coverage.
Outdoor Small Cell (5G Pad RRU/BS) Fiber Fiber
R9105
Remote/Local Macro BBU
BS9315
Indices
R9105
BS9315
Band
n78
n258
Carrier Width
100MHz
800MHz
Output Po Power
20W(4*5W)
53dBm(EIRP)
TXRX
4T4R
4T4R
Pad RRU Wall mounting mounting
CBD •
DU integrated into mmWave mmWave AAU, with 2*400MHz Carriers
•
One fiber is enough for each Pad-site
•
Micro-Micro/Macro-Micro coordination, UDN
Pad RRU On pole
Community
Shopping Street
Airport
Indoor Small Cell – QCell Solution Cat6A & Above
QCell
Fiber
Multi bands
pBridge
700
1800
2100
2600
3500
2T2R
2T2R
2T2R
2T2R
4T4R
Any combination of 3.5G NR and one LTE Band Multi mode
Ethernet pBridge
100m pBridge
pBridge
4G
5G
2G
3G
pRRU pR RU R8 R813 139 9
It em Channel
Fi r s t c h an n el 2T2R
Sec o n d c h an n el 4T4R
Band
700/1800/2100/2600MHz Select One LTE band
3.5GHz N78: 3542.5-3700 MHz
Configuration
1 x 20M FDD LTE
5G NR 100M 4T4R
OBW
20 MHz
100 MHZ
Transmitting Power
2 x 125 mW
4 x 250 mW
pBridge
BBU ZTE BBU
5G Ready Product Make Simplified Network Evolution 5G Ready
All Bands & All Modes 800MHz 900MHz
1
Time Investment
1800MHz 2100MHz
Ultra-broadband Multi-mode & Multi-band
2600MHz 3500MHz
Sub-6GHz
2
mmWave
Full
Networks Competitive 4G Network
Range Services
eMBB mMTC
Remote Radio Unit — ZXSDR R9212E Specification
4 1 5 m m
Supporting 2T2R OR 2T4R cells
Small and light, fast deployment
Natural cooling and high reliability
5G Ready R9212E
R9212E
R9212E
Capacity
L: 2*20 MHz LTE 2T4R cells NR: 2* 2T4R cells
Max TOC
2*80W
TxRx
2T4R
Typical Power Consumption
230W in LTE Single Mode
Receiver Recei ver Sensit Sensitivity ivity
L: -112.2dBm@four antennas, band28 -112dBm@four antennas, band8 NR: -112.2dBm@four antennas, band28 -112dBm@four antennas, band8
Power Supply
-48V DC
Interface
2*9.8304Gbps CPRI interfaces
Frequency band
band8/band28
Protection Class
IP65
Temperature Tempera ture Range
-40℃ to +55℃
R 9212 9212E E h as 5 G NR capable hardware an d supports
ZTE SDR Baseband Unit Hardware Roadmap PM
FS
All kinds of BP boards FA M
SA
Indoor BBU ZXSDR B8200
CC Outdoor BBU ZXSDR B8902
2016&Before Available Boards: - GSM BP: UBPG, UBPG, UBPG3 UBPG3 - UMTS BP: BPK_d, BPK_d, BPK_e, BPK_e1 - LTE LTE BP: BPL1, BPN0 - Multi-Mode Multi-Mode BP: BP: BPN2 - CC: CC16B, CC16B, CCE1B CCE1B - FS: FS3A, FS5/FS5A FS5/FS5A,, CR0 Interface: - 16E1(SA+SE), 1GE/FE(CC2/CC16B), 12 CPRI(2*FS) - 2*10GE+2*1 2*10GE+2*1GE GE (CCE1B) (CCE1B)
2017 Boards: - Multi-Mode Multi-Mode BP: BP: - BPQ2: 12 LTE LTE Cells & 6 NB-IOT Carriers, Carriers, or other Multi-mode configurations - BPQ0: 6 LTE Cells & 3 NB-IOT Carriers, Carriers, or other Multi-mode configurations - BPQ3 (MM): 2 MM MM LTE LTE Cells - CC: CCF0 CCF0
2018 B8902: - LTE LTE Mode: Mode: - 12 LTE LTE Cells Cells - Multi-Mode Multi-Mode:: - GSM/UMTS/LTE/NB-IOT GSM/UMTS/LTE/NB-IOT
2019&Later
ZTE BBU BBU - ZXRAN V920 V9200 0 Roadmap Roadmap VBP
Indoor BBU ZXRAN V9200
VBP
VPD VPD/VEM .
VSW/VGC
VF
. . . :
“
”
. .
2018 ZXRAN V9200 Boards : - Control & Switch Board: VSWc VSWc - General Computing Computing Board: VGCc1 - Baseband Processing Processing Board: - VBPc1: LTE, NB-IOT, UMTS, GSM - 18 LTE Cells & 6 NB-IOT Carriers Carriers or other Multi-mode configurations - VBPc5: VBPc5: 5G NR
2019
2020&Later
Boards : - New Switching Boards: Boards: VSWd VSWd
Boards : - Baseband Processing Processing Board: - VBPc0: LTE, NB-IOT, UMTS, GSM - 12 LTE LTE Cells & 6 NB-IOT Carriers Carriers or other Multi-mode configurations
Boards : - Multi-mode BP Boards: - VBPd: 5G NR, LTE, LTE, NB-IoT, UMTS, GSM
Multi-Mode Radio Units HW Roadmap 2017&Before
2018
2019
R9212E 2*80W R8854 4*40W
600M Band28
APT 700M
Band20
RSU82 2x60W
R8862 2x40W
900M
RSU82 2x80W
R8881 1x80W
R8863 3x80W
R8862/A 2x60W
R8852E 2x80W
R8881 1x80W
R8863 3x80W
R8862/A 2x60W
R8852E 2x80W
R8881 1x80W
R8863 3x80W
R8862/A 2x60W
R8852E 2x80W
Band8
1800M
RSU82 2x80W
Band3
2100M Band1
RSU82 2x80W
R8854 4*40W
R9212E 2*80W
R8862A 2x60W
Band28
DD 800M
2020
R8892N 800+900MHz 2x(40+60)W R9212E 2*80W
R8852D 2*80W
R8854/D 4x40W R8892N 1.8+2.1GHz 2x100W
R8854 4x40W
R8854E 4x60W R8892N 1.8+ 1.8+2.1GHz 2x120W
R9214 4*40W
R8894E 1.8~ 1.8~2.1GHz 4x80W R8854D 4x40W
R8854 4*40W
FDD Massive MIMO Products Roadmap ZXSDR MM6612 L1800 Specification Specification
2017&Before Trial: - B3 1.8G 1.8G - 32T32R 32T32R - 10/15/20 10/15/20 Bandwidth Bandwidth - TM9 3D Beam Beam forming forming - TM3 Virtual Virtual Beams Beams
Max TOC
80W
Tx/Rx
32T32R
Antenna Gain
15dBi
Interface
2x25Gbps CPRI interfaces
Dimension
999mm*699mm*145mm
Weight
<47kg
Frequency band
1805MHz-1880MHz(band3)
2018 MM6612 - B3 1.8G, 1.8G, 80W - UL MU-MIMO MU-MIMO - UL 32R MRC/IR MRC/IRC C - DL MU-MIMO MU-MIMO - Intra band 2CC 2CC MM CA - Inter band band MM&NonMM&NonMM 2CC CA
Bandwidth
20MHz, 15MHz, 10MHz
2019
2020&Later
A9212 - B1&B3 B1&B3 1.8G+2 1.8G+2.1G .1G,, 200W
A9212 - B7 2.6G 2.6G
4G Site Evolution to 4G/5G(Backup) V9200 in full mode
V9200 works with B8200 5G uses new spectrum Add 5G RU/AAU
…
5G uses new spectrum Add 5G RU/AAU
…
2G/3G/4G RRU B8200
V9200
2G/3G/4G RRU
V9200
Existing B8200 interworking of 4G and 5G(Backup) Existing network
Evolve to Option7x
Evolve to Option3x
+
+ •
2G/3G/4G RRU
2G/3G/4G RRU
B8200
B8200
B8200 supports GULN Panama
•
CC：CC2/CC16/CC16B/CCE1 BP：BPL1/BPN0/BPN2 •
Ecuador CC：CC2/CC16B/CC17B/CCE1/CCE1B BP：BPL/BPL1/BPL1A/BPN2
•
Nicaragua
• •
2G/3G/4G RRU
5G AAU
B8200
V9200
Add V9200 and 5G AAU to support 5G NR RRU can be reused by SW upgrade BBU Existing BPN0 and BPN2 can be reused Existing CCE1B/CCF0 can be reused
5G AAU
V9200
LTE upgrade to eLTE • •
RRU can be reused by SW upgrade BBU Existing BPN2 can be reused Existing CCE1B/CCF0 can be reused
