UNIVERSITY OF SAN JOSE-RECOLETOS SCHOOL OF LAW COURSE SYLLABUS
Course Title:
No. of Units:
Injunction, Provisional Remedies, Special Civil Actions 2
Instructor:
Atty. Abraham Montecillo Acosta
Rey
Semester/ SY: First / 2017-2018 Department/Track: Pre-requisites: I.
COURSE DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES
The course is divided between the Provisional Remedies and Special Civil Actions chapters of the Rules of Court. Learning Outcomes Upon completion of this course, students will be able to: Understand and apply the basic concepts c oncepts of provisional remedies and special civil actions Recall the contents of and write the basic legal forms required for each e ach provisional remedy and special civil action Outline the rules and digest the jurisprudence Methodology
1. Socratic Method will be the primary form of teaching. A student will be required to discuss the rules and cases, guided by questions from the professor. 2. Powerpoint presentations will supplement certain sections of the Rules. 3. Students, by groups, will present legal forms for each particular rule. II. COURSE OUTLINE Week/Session Topic Week 1 I. Introduction to Provisional Provisional Remedies A. The different provisional remedies 1. Purpose of Provisional Remedies 2. When provisional Remedies Cannot Be Availed Of B. Outlining The Rules Week 2 II. Attachment
A. Nature 1. Stages of Attachment 2. Contemporaneous Service of Summons B. Persons Entitled (§1) 1. Plaintiff 2. Other Proper Party !!!"
Week 3
Week 4
C. Grounds (§1) 1. What may be attached? 2. Officer of a corporation 3. Fraud Incurring the obligation 4. Disposal in fraud of creditors 5. Residing out of the Philippines D. Issuance and Contents of Order (§2) 1. Ex parte 2. Upon motion with notice and hearing 3. Contents E. Affidavit and bond (§§3, 4) 1. The affidavit, and the bond required by the next succeeding section, must be duly filed with the court before the order issues. 2. Affidavit of: a. Applicant b. or of some other person who personally knows the facts 3. Contents of Affidavit. 4. Bond F. Manner of Attaching Property (§5) G. Sheriff’s Return (§6) H. Examination of Party (§10) I. Sale of attached property J. Discharge of attachment 1. Upon counterbond (§12) 2. On other grounds (§13) K. Third party claim (§14) L. Balance collected upon execution (§16) M. Disposition N. Claim for damages (§20) III. Preliminary Injunction
A. Definitions 1. Temporary Restraining Order 2. Preliminary Injunction 3. Final Injunction 4. Preventive Injunction 5. Mandatory Injunction B. Classes C. Origin D. Purpose E. Scope F. Distinguished from Mandamus G. Distinguished from Prohibition H. Kinds I. When Issued (§3) J. Irreparable Injury K. Status Quo L. Who grants injunction (§2) Week 5
M. Against Whom Issued N. Injunction on Government Projects or Contracts #!!"
Week 6
O. Time to Grant Injunction P. Jurisdiction of courts Q. Sufficiency of Complaint, Application and other Requisites (§§4,5) R. Bond (§§4,7) S. Objections to Issuance (§9) T. Other laws/rules on injunctions IV. Receivership
Week 7
A. Definition (§1) B. Distinguished from Replevin C. Distinguished from Sheriff D. Purpose E. Effect of Dismissal of Case F. Granted only in extreme situations G. Where rights yet to be determined; propriety H. Exhaustion of Local Remedies I. Jurisdiction J. Appointment (§1) K. Grounds for Appointment (§1) L. Oath, Bond (§2, 4, 5) M. Discharge (§3) N. Powers (§6) O. Actions against receiver (§6) P. Liability for refusal or neglect to deliver (§7) Q. Termination and Compensation (§8) R. Judgment against Sureties (§9) S. Other laws/rules V. Replevin A. Definition (§1) B. Nature C. Application (§1) D. Affidavit and Bond (§2) E. Order (§3) F. Duty of Sheriff (§§4, 8) G. Enforcement H. Return of Property (§5) I. Disposition of Property by Sheriff (§6) J. Claim by Third Persons (§7) K. Judgment (§§9, 10) VI. Support Pendente Lite
Week 8
A. Definition B. Application (§1) C. Comment (§2) D. Hearing (§3) E. Order (§4) F. Enforcement of Order G. Support in Criminal Cases H. Restitution (§7) VII. Special Civil Actions $!!"
A. Nature VIII. Interpleader
A. Definition B. Distinguished from Intervention C. When Proper (§1) D. Order (§2) E. Summons (§3) F. Motion to Dismiss (§4) G. Answer and other pleadings (§5) H. Determination (§6) I. Fees (§7) IX. Declaratory Relief and Similar Remedies
A. Definition B. Who may file (§1) C. Where to file (§1) D. Requisites E. Parties (§2) F. Notice (§§3,4) G. Court Action (§5) H. Conversion into Ordinary Action (§6) X. Review of Judgments of COMELEC and COA
Week 9
A. Scope (§1) B. Mode of Review (§2) C. Time to file Petition (§3) D. Fees (§4) E. Form and Contents of Petition (§5) F. Order to Comment (§6) G. Comments of Respondents (§7) H. Effect of Filing (§8) I. Submission for Decision (§9) XI. Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus A. Definition and Purpose 1. Certiorari 2. Prohibition 3. Mandamus B. Distinguished from each other C. Certiorari and appeal; distinguished D. Certiorari under Rule 45 and 65; distinguished E. Prohibition distinguished from injunction F. Prohibition vis-à-vis quo warranto G. Mandamus distinguished from injunction H. Mandamus distinguished from quo warranto I. Drastic character of mandamus J. Rules and principles of jurisdiction K. Jurisdiction and exercise of jurisdiction distinguished L. Error of jurisdiction and error of judgment distinguished %!!"
Week 10
Week 11 Week 12 Week 13
M. Conclusiveness of court’s finding as to its jurisdiction N. When certiorari will lie (§5) O. Without jurisdiction; lack of jurisdiction; excess of jurisdiction; grave abuse of discretion defined P. Excess of jurisdiction distinguished from lack of jurisdiction Q. Threatened excess of jurisdiction R. Erroneous exercise of jurisdiction S. Interlocutory orders T. Plain, speedy, adequate remedy 1. Definition a. When appeal is not adequate remedy b. Lost right of appeal c. Exceptions U. Prohibition against accomplished acts V. Judicial functions W. Ministerial Acts X. Mandamus to direct exercise of judgment in a particular way Y. Mandamus to enforce contractual obligations Z. Continuing Mandamus AA. Clear and Defined Right AB. When and Where filed (§4, A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC) AC. Material Dates Rule AD. Form of Petition AE. Contents of Petition AF. Parties 1. Person aggrieved 2. Private Respondents (§5) 3. Public Respondents (§5) 4. Indispensable Party AG. Order to Comment (§6) AH. Expediting Proceedings; injunctive relief (§7, A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC) AI. Proceedings after comment is filed (§8, A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC) AJ. Service and Enforcement of order or judgment (§9) AK. DOJ and Ombudsman rulings XII. Quo Warranto XIII. Expropriation XIV. Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage A. Judicial v. Extrajudicial B. Types of Encumbrancers C. Equity and Right of Redemption D. Disposition of Proceeds E. Equitable Mortgage F. Alternative actions against mortgage debtor
Week 14
XV. Partition XVI. Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer
A. Forcible Entry distinguished from Unlawful Detainer B. Issue of Ownership C. Kinds of action for recovery of possession of real property D. Action by co-owners E. Action by squatters &!!"
F. Effect of Prior Possession G. Judgment in ejectment no bar to action respecting title to the property H. Summary Procedure XVII. Contempt
Week 15
III. REFERENCES AND OTHER MATERIALS Principal References:
The Rules of Court Section on Provisional Remedies and Special Civil Actions shall be the primary source of information. The student may consult any remedial law book. The professor has no preferred author. Topical Reference I.A II.A
II.A.1 II.A.2 II.B.2 II.C.1 II.C.2 II.C.3
Required Readings/Assignments Calo v. Roldan , 76 Phil. 445 Lim v. Lazaro , G.R. No. 185734, July 3, 2013 People v. Velasco , 700 SCRA 784 Ligon v. RTC , 717 SCRA 373 Torres v. Satsatin , G.R. No. 166759, November 25, 2009 Torres v. Satsatin, id. Borja v. Platon , 73 Phil. 659 Professional Video, Inc. v. TESDA , G.R. No. 155504, June 26, 2009 Olsen v. Olsen , 48 Phil 238 Ng Wee v. Tankiansee , G.R. No. 171124, February 13, 2008 Liberty Insurance Corporation v. Court of Appeals , G.R. No. 104405, 222 SCRA 37, 45 [1993] FCY Construction Group, Inc. v. Court of Appeals , G.R. No. 123358, 381 Phil. 282 (2000). Metro, Inc. v. Lara’s Gifts , G.R. No. 171741, November 27, 2009 Republic v. Estate of Lim , G.R. No. 164800, July 22, 2009 Foundation Specialist, Inc. v. Betonval , G.R. No. 170674, 24 August 2009 Aboitiz v. Cotabato, 105 SCRA 88 Mialilhe v. De Lencquesaing , 142 SCRA 694 Toledo v. Burgos , 168 SCRA 513 Torres v. Satsatin , id. Philippine Bank of Communications v. Court of Appeals , G.R. No. 115678. February 23, 2001 Ng Wee, id. Republic v. Garcia , G.R. No. 167741, 12 July 2007 Spouses Tiu v. Villar , A.M. No. P-11-2986, 13 June 2012 Saberon v. Ventanilla, 722 SCRA 287 G.B. Inc., v. Sanchez , 98 Phil. 886 (1956) Insular Savings Bank v. Court of Appeals , G.R. No. 123638, June 15, 2005 United Pulp and Paper Co., Inc. v. Acropolis , G.R. No. 171750, 25 January 2012 • •
•
• • •
II.C.4 II.C.5 II.D.1 II.D.2 II.E.2
•
•
II.E.3 II.E.5 II.I II.J.1
•
•
•
'!!"
II.K
Rural Bank of Sta. Barbara v. Manila Mission of Church of Jesus Christ , G.R. No. 130223, August 19, 2009 II.N Stronghold Insurance Company, Inc. v. Cuenca , G.R. No. 173297, 6 March 2013 Equitable Banking Corporation v. Special Steel Products, Inc ., G.R. No. 175350, 13 June 2012 OPTIONAL Ligon v. Regional Trial Court, Branch 56, Makati City, 717 SCRA 373 READINGS Saberon v. Ventanilla, Jr., 722 SCRA 287 People v. Velasco, 700 SCRA 784 Lim, Jr. V. Lazaro, 700 SCRA 547 Limitless Potentials v. CA, G.R. No. 164459, April 24, 2007 III.A.2 National Artist for Literature Virgilio Almario v. Executive Secretary, 701 SCRA 269 III.A.4 III.A.5 Lukang v. Pagbilao, 718 SCRA 297 Vinuya v. Romulo, 732 SCRA 595 Sangguniang Lungsod ng Baguio v Jadewell, 723 SCRA 350 Semirara Coal Corporation v. HGL Development, G.R. No. 166854, December 6, 2006 China Banking Corporation v. Co, G.R. No. 174569, September 17, 2008 Bank of the Philippine Islands v Hong, 666 SCRA 71 III.C Devesa v. Arbes, 13 Phil. 273 III.D Preysler v. CA, G.R. No. 158141, July 11, 2006 Limitless Potentials (supra) Arevalo v. Planters Development Bank, 670 SCRA 252 III.E Mantile v. Cajucom, 19 Phil. 563 Feliciano v. Alipio, G.R. No. L-5656, March 24, 1954 III.G III.I Semirara Coal, supra. Barayuga v. Adventist University, G.R. No. 168008, 17 August 2011 Australian Professional Realty, Inc. v. Municipality of Padre Garcia Batangas, G.R. No. 183367, March 14 2012 Delos Santos v. Metropolitan Bank, 684 SCRA 410 TML Gasket v. BPI Family, 688 SCRA 50 Republic v. Caguioa, 691 SCRA 306 III.J Solid Builders v. China Banking, 695 SCRA 101 Philippine National Bank v. RJ Ventures, G.R. No. 164548, September 27, 2006 Australian Professional Realty, Inc. (id) Ermita v. Aldecoa-Delorino, G.R. No. 177130, 7 June 2011 Optional: Heirs of Yu v. CA, 705 SCRA 84 o UCPB v. Lumbo, 712 SCRA 217 o III.K Overseas Workers Welfare Administration v. Chavez, G.R. No. 169802, June 8, 2007 Dungog v. CA, G.R. No. 139767. August 5, 2003 III.L Lahm v. Mayor, 666 SCRA 1 III.M Executive Secretary v. CA, G.R. No. 131719, 25 May 1994 Garcia v. Drilon, 699 SCRA 352 Mabayo Farm v. CA, G.R. No. 140058, August 1, 2002 Senate Blue Ribbon Committee v. Majuducon, G.R. No. 13378, July 29, 2003 • •
• • • •
• • • •
•
• •
• • •
• • • • •
• • •
•
• • • • • •
(!!"
Southern Cross Cement v. Philippine Cement Manufacturers, G.R. No. 158540, July 8, 2004 Delta Ventures v. Cabato, G.R. No. 118216, March 9, 2000 Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Monetary Board and Chuci Fonancier Vs. Hon. Nina G. Antonio-Valenzuela, etc., et al., G.R. No. 184778, October 2, 2009 Traders Royal Bank v. IAC, G.R. No. L-66321, October 31, 1984 Heirs of Yadno v Heirs of Anchales, 684 SCRA 106 RCBC Capital Corporation v. Banco de Oro Unibank, Inc., G.R. No. 196171, 10 December 2012 City of Lapu-Lapu v. PEZA, 742 SCRA 524 III.N Hermano Oil v. Toll Regulatory Board, 742 SCRA 395 Medina v. Canoy, 666 SCRA 424 Supreme Court Administrative Circular No. 11 - 2000 Republic v. Nolasco, G.R. No. 155108, April 27, 2005 Hernandez v. National Power Corp., G.R. No. 145328, March 23, 2006 Department of Foreign Affairs v. Falcon, G.R. No. 176657, 1 September 2010 Nerwin Industries Corp. v. PNOC-Energy Development Corporation, G.R. No. 167057, April 11, 2012 Baguio Regreening Movement, Inc. v. Masweng, G.R. No. 180882, 27 February 2013 III.Q Republic v. Evangelista, G.R. No. 156015, August 11, 2005 Landbank of the Philippines v. Continental Watchman, G.R. No. 136114, January 22, 2004 Limitless Potentials (supra) III.R Spouses Yap v. International Exchange Bank, G.R. No. 175145, March 28, 2008 III.S III.T Interim Rules on Intra-Corporate Controversies, section on provisional remedies A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC, Special Rules of Court on Alternative Dispute Resolution (Read and understand Rule 5, Interim Measures of Protection). R.A. 8975 SC Cir. 68-94 (November 3, 1994) SC Resolution of February 17, 1998 (supra, Part VI, F, 10) SC Cir. 13-93 SC Admin. Cir. 20-95 (February 12 ,1995) OPTIONAL Plaza v. Lustiva, 718 SCRA 19 READINGS Lukang v. Pagbilao Development Corporation, 718 SCRA 297 Vinuya v. Romulo, 732 SCRA 595 Sangguniang Panlungsod ng Baguio City v. Jadewell Parking Systems Corporation, 723 SCRA 350 Hermano Oil Manufacturing & Sugar Corporation v. Toll Regulatory Board, 7 42 SCRA 395 City of Lapu-Lapu v. Philippine Economic Zone Authority, 742 SCRA 524 Lukang v. Pagbilao Development Corporation, 718 SCRA 297 Garcia v. Drilon, 699 SCRA 352 Office of the Ombudsman v. De Chavez, 700 SCRA 399 National Artist for Literature Virgilio Almario, et. al. vs. The Executive Secretary, 701 SCRA 269 TML Gasket Industries Inc. v. BPI Family Savings Bank, Inc., 688 SCRA 50 Executive Secretary v. Forerunner Multi- Resources, Inc. , 688 SCRA 73 •
• •
• • •
• • • • • • • •
•
• •
• •
• • • • • • • • •
•
• • • • •
• •
"!!"
Fernandez v. Court of Appeals, 691 SCRA 167 Republic v. Caguioa, 691 SCRA 306 Novateknika Land Corporation v. Philippine National Bank, 693 SCRA 423 Solid Builders, Inc. V. China Banking Corporation, 695 SCRA 101; Heirs of Melencio Yu and Talinanap Matualaga v. Court of Appeals, Special Twenty- First Division, 705 SCRA 84; United Coconut Planters Bank v. Lumbo, 712 SCRA 217 The Special Audit Team, Commission on Audit v. Court of Appeals, 696 SCRA 166 Sime Darby Pilipinas Inc. V. Mendoza, 699 SCRA 290; Aldover v. Court of Appeals, 706 SCRA 188 Office of the Ombudsman v. De Chavez, 700 SCRA 399; Calawag v. University of the Philippines Visayas, 703 SCRA 373 Peralta v. Omelio, 708 SCRA 65 Office of the Ombudsman (Visayas) v. Court of Appeals, 708 SCRA 523 Compania General de Tabacos v. Gauzon, 20 Phil. 261 IV.A Villamor v. Umale , 736 SCRA 325 Belgian Catholic Missionaries v. Magallanes Press, 49 Phil. 647 IV.B Po Pauco v. Siguenza, 52 Phil. 241 IV.C Berg v. Teus, G.R. No. L-2987, February 20, 1951 IV.E IV.F Tantano v. Espina-Caboverde, 702 scra 508 Vivares v. Reyes, G.R. No. 155408, February 13, 2008 Chavez v. CA, G.R. No. 174356, 20 January 2010 IV.G Descallar v. CA, G.R. No. 106473, July 12, 1993, 224 SCRA 566, 569 Making Enterprises, Inc. v. Marfori, G.R. No. 152239, 17 August 2011 Bonaplata v. Amber, 2 Phil. 395 IV.H Harden v. Director of Prisons, G.R. No. L-2349, October 22, 1948 IV.I Commodities Storage and Ice Plant v. CA, G.R. No. 125008, June 19, 1997 IV.J IV.K Calo v. Roldan, 76 Phil. 445 Ylarde v. Enriquez, G.R. No. L-1401, June 25, 1947 Rocha and Co. v. Crossfield, 6 Phil. 355 Paranete v. Tan, G.R. No. L-3791, November 29, 1950 Tantano v. Caboverde, G.R. No. 203585, 29 July 2013 Citibank NA v. CA, G.R. No. 61508. March 17, 1999 IV.L IV.N Vivares, supra. Martinez v. Grano, 49 Phil. 214 Platon v. Sandoval, 74 Phil. 731 Orendain v. BF Homes, G.R. No. 146313, October 31, 2006 IV.O Traders Royal Bank v. IAC, G.R. No. 111357, June 17, 1997 IV.Q IV.S New Central Bank Act, Section 30. Interim Rules of Procedure for Intra-Corporate Controversies, Rule 9. Rules of Procedure for Corporate Rehabilitation Chas Realty & Dev't Corp vs Talavera, G.R. No. 151925, February 6, 2003 Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act OPTIONAL Villamor, Jr. V. Umale, 736 SCRA 325 READINGS Tantano v. Espina- Caboverde, 702 SCRA 508 V.B BA Finance Corporation v. CA, G.R. No. 102998, July 5, 1996 •
• • •
•
•
•
• •
• • • • •
• • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • • •
)!!"
Superlines Transportation v. Philippine National Construction Co., G.R. No. 169596, 28 March 2007 Servicewide Specialists, Inc. v. CA, G.R. No. 110048, November 19, 1999 V.C V.D Agner v. BPI Family Savings, 697 SCRA 89 Citibank v. CA, G.R. No. 61508, March 17, 1999 Factoran v. CA, G.R. No. 93540, December 13, 1999 Advent Capital v. Young, G.R. No. 183018, 3 August 2011 Serg’s Products, Inc. v. PCI Leasing, G.R. No. 137705, August 22, 2000 V.E V.F Rivera v. Vargas, G.R. No. 165895, 5 June 2009 Spouses Bautista v. Sula, A.M. No. P-04-1920, 17 August 2007 V.G Fernandez v. The International Corporate Bank, G.R. No. 131283, October 7, 1999 V.K Visayan Surety and Insurance Corporation v. CA, G. R. No. 127261, September 7, 2001 OPTIONAL Agner v. BPI Family Savings Bank, Inc., 697 SCRA 89 READING Family Code, Title VIII VI.A VI.B Calderon v. Roxas, 688 SCRA 330 Francisco v. Zandueta , 61 Phil. 752 Yangco v. Rhode, 1 Phil. 404 Coquia v. Baltazar, G.R. No. L-2942, December 29, 1949 Villanueva v. Villanueva, 54 Phil. 92 Magoma v. Macadaeg, G.R. No. L-5153, December 10, 1951 Ramos v. CA, L-31897, June 30, 1972 Spouses Lim v. Lim, G.R. No. 163209, 30 October 2009 Gotardo v. Buling, G.R. No. 165166, 15 August 2012 Bayot v. CA, G.R. No. 155635, 7 November 2008 Nepomuceno v. Lopez, G.R. No. 181258, 18 March 2010 VI.E Mangonon v. CA, G.R. No. 125041, June 30, 2006 Roxas v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 139337, 15 August 2001 Calderon v. Roxas, G.R. No. 185595, 9 January 2013 Lua v. Lua, G.R. Nos. 175279-80, 5 June 2013 VI.H Saavedra v. Ybañez Estrada, 56 Phil. 33 Rule on Provisional Orders OPTIONAL READING Calderon v. Roxas, 688 SCRA 330 VIII.C Viuda de Camilo v. Aranio, L-15653, September 29, 1961 Wack-Wack Golf v. Lee Won, L-23851, March 26, 1976 Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation v. Metro Container Corporation, G.R. No. 127913, September 13, 2001 Bank of Commerce v. Planters Development Bank, G.R. No. 154470-71, 24 September 2012 Ocampo v. Tirona, G.R. No. 147812, 6 April 2005 Pasricha v. Don Luis Dison Realty, Inc. G.R. No. 136409, 14 March 2008 Maglente v. Hon. Baltazar-Padilla , G.R. No. 148182, March 7, 2007 VIII.H OPTIONAL ! Lui Enterprises, Inc v. Zuellig Pharma Corporation, 719 SCRA 88 READINGS IX.C Imbong v. Ochoa, G.R. No. 204819, 8 April 2014 •
• • • •
• • •
•
•
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •
•
• •
•
!*!!"
• • •
IX.D
• • •
OPTIONAL READINGS
• • •
X.A
• • •
X.B
• • •
Malana v. Tappa, G.R. No. 181303, September 17, 2009 Office of the Ombudsman v. Ibay, G. R. No. 137538, September 3, 2001 Dela Llana v. Alba, L-57883, March 12, 1982 Almeda v. Bathala Marketing, G.R. No. 150806, January 28, 2008 Edades v. Edades, 99 Phil. 675 Tolentino v. Board of Accountancy, 90 Phil. 83 Aquino v. Municipality of Malay, Aklan Social Justice Society Officers v. Lim, 742 SCRA 1 City of Lapu-Lapu v. Philippine Economic Zone Authority, 742 SCRA 524 Macabago v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 152163, 18 November 2002 Cagas v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 194139, 24 January 2012 Reyna v. Commission on Audit, G.R. No. 167219, 8 February 2011 Ibrahim v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 192289, 8 January 2013 Reblora v. Armed Forces of the Philippines, G.R. No. 195842, 18 June 2013 Sahali v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 201796, 15 January 2013 Optional Readings:
Limkaichong v. COMELEC, G.R. Nos. 178831-32/G.R. No. 179120/G.R. Nos. 179132-33/G.R. Nos. 179240-41, April 1, 2009 Limkaichong v. COMELEC, Resolution, G.R. Nos. 178831-32/G.R. No. 179120/G.R. Nos. 179132-33/G.R. Nos. 179240-41, July 30, 2009 X.C Pates v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 184915, 30 June 2009 Osmena v. Commission on Audit, G.R. No. 188818, 31 May 2011 OPTIONAL Technical Education and Skills Development Authority(TESDA) v. Commission on READINGS Audit, 718 SCRA 402 Cusing v. Commission on Election, 734 SCRA 495 Ejercito v. Commission on Election, 742 SCRA 210 XI.A.1 Araullo v. Aquino, G.R No. 209287, 1 July 2014 Triplex Enterprises, Inc v. PNB-Republic Bank, G.R. No. 151007, July 17, 2006 XI.A.2 David v. Rivera, G.R. Nos. 139913 & 140159, January 16, 2004 Esquivel v. Ombudsman, G.R. No. 137237, September 17, 2002 Militante v. CA, G.R. No. 107040, April 12, 2000 XI.A.3 XI.B PAMANA v.CA, G.R. No. 133033, June 15, 2005 Araullo, id. Enriquez v. Macadaeg, G.R. No. L-2422, September 30, 1949 Madrigal Transport v. Lapanday Holdings Corp., G.R. No. 156067, August 11, XI.C 2004 Topacio v. Ong, G.R. No. 179895, December 18, 2008 XI.F Morabe v. Brown, G.R. No. L-6018, May 31, 1954 XI.G Herrera v. Barretto, 25 Phil. 245 XI.K Microsoft Corp. v. Best Deal Computer Center Corp., G.R. No. 148029, September XI.L 24, 2002 Campos v. Wislizenus, 35 Phil. 373 XI.M Abad Santos v. Province of Tarlac, 67 Phil. 480 XI.O XI.P Leung Ben v. O’Brien, 38 Phil 182 Herrera (supra) •
•
• • •
• • • •
• •
• • •
• •
!!!!"
XI.R. XI.T.1
Napa v. Weissenhagen, 29 Phil. 182 San Pedro v. Hon. Aspala, G.R. No. 164560, July 22, 2009 Camutin v. Spouses Potente, G.R. No. 181642, January 29, 2009 Sim v. NLRC, G.R. No. 157376, October 2, 2007 Alcantara et al. v. Ermita, G.R. No. 169813, September 5, 2006 XI.U XI.W The Special Audit Team, Commission on Audit v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 174788, 11 April 2013 Pefianco v. Moral, G.R. No. 132248, January 19, 2000 Pimentel, et al. v. Executive Secretary, et al., G.R. No. 158088, July 6, 2005 Hipos, Sr. v. Judge Bay, G.R. Nos. 174813-15, March 17, 2009 XI.X COMELEC v. Judge Quijano-Padilla, G. R. No. 151992, September 18, 2002 XI.Y XI.Z Metropolitan Manila Development Authority, et al. v. Concerned Residents of Manila Bay, G.R. Nos. 171947-48, December 18, 2008 Dolot v. Paje , 703 SCRA 650 XI.AA Manalo v. PAIC Savings Bank, G.R. No. 146531, March 18, 2005 UP Board of Regents v. CA, G.R. No. 134625, August 31, 1999 XI.AB Laguna Metts Corporation v. Caalam, et al., G.R. No. 185220, July 27, 2009 XI.AC Lapid v. Laurea, G.R. No. 139607, October 28, 2002 XI.AF.1 Concepcion, Jr. v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 178624, June 30, 2009 XI.AF.4 Golangco v. Fung, G.R. No. 157952, September 8, 2009 XI.AK Alcaraz v. Gonzalez, G.R. No. 164715, September 20, 2006 Dagan v. Ombudsman , G.R. No. 184083, 19 November 2013 OPTIONAL Heirs of Julito Subremonte vs. Courts of Appeals, 739 SCRA 292 READINGS Villareal vs. Aliga, 713 SCRA 52 INC Shipmanagement, Inc. vs. Moradas, 713 SCRA 475 A.L. Ang Network, Inc. vs. Mondejar, 714 SCRA 514 Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, 722 SCRA 211 Bank of Commerce vs. Radio Philippines Network, Inc., 722 SCRA 520 Sara Lee Philippines, Inc. vs. Macatlang, 724 SCRA 552 Madarang vs. Morales, 725 SCRA 480 Mendez vs. People, 726 SCRA 203 Trajano vs. Uniwide Sales Warehouse Club, 726 SCRA 298 • • •
•
• •
•
• • • • • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • •
• •
•
•
• • •
•
• •
Thenamaris Philippines, Inc. (Formerly Intermare Maritime Agencies, Inc.) vs Court of Appeals, 715 SCRA 153
Philtranco Service Enterprises, Inc. vs. Philtranco Workers Union-Association of Genuine Labor Organizations (PWU-AGLO), 717 SCRA 340 Ayungo vs. Beamko Shipmanagement Corporation, 717 SCRA 538; Omni Hauling Services, Inc. vs. Bon, 734 SCRA 270; Bahia Shipping Services, Inc. vs. Hipe, Jr., 740 SCRA 330; Michelin Asia Pacific Application Support Center, Inc. vs. Ortiz 741 SCRA 121 Crisologo vs. JEWM Agro-Industrial Corporation, 717 SCRA 644 Tesoro vs. Metro Manila Retreaders Inc. (Bandag), 718 SCRA 538 Lanier vs. People, 719 SCRA 477 Saint Louis University, Inc. vs. Olairez, 720 SCRA 74; Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation vs. Thunderbird Pilipinas Hotels and Resorts, Inc., 720 SCRA 178; Causing vs. Commission on Elections, 734 SCRA 495 ; Republic vs. Lazo, 737 SCRA 1 Pascual vs. Daquioag, 720 SCRA 230 People vs. Espinosa, 721 SCRA 53 !#!!"
• • • • • •
• •
• •
• •
• •
• •
• • •
• • • • •
• • • •
• • • • • • • • •
•
•
• •
Tenazas vs. R. Villegas Taxi Transport, 720 SCRA 467 Macapagal vs. People, 717 SCRA 425 Naval vs. Commission on Election, 729 SCRA 299 Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company vs. Ocampo, 729 SCRA 335 Aboitiz Equity Ventures, Inc. vs. Chiongbian, 729 SCRA 580 Candelaria vs. Regional Trial Court, Branch 42, City of San Fernando, (Pampanga), 730 SCRA 1 Silvero, Sr vs. Silvero, Jr., 730 SCRA 152. Absolute Management Corporation vs. Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company, 730 SCRA 539. Villarosa vs. Festin, 732 SCRA 110. Olongapo City vs. Subic Water and Sewerage Co., Inc., SCRA 132. OSG Ship Management Manila, Inc. vs. Pellazar, 732 SCRA 280 Vinuya vs. Romulo, 732 SCRA 595 Fernandez vs. Botica Claudio, 733 SCRA 133 Jardeleza vs. Sereno, 733 SCRA 279 Jimenez , Jr. vs. People, 735 SCRA 596 Moran, Jr. vs. Office of the President of the Philippines Republic vs. Lazo, 737 SCRA 1. 680 Home Appliances, Inc., v. The Honorable Court of Appeals, 737 SCRA 127 Tze Sun Wong vs Wong, 743 SCRA 567 Philippine Electric Corporation vs. Court of Appeals, 744 SCRA 361 Crisologo v. Jewn Agro-Industrial Corporation, 717 SCRA 644 Macapagal vs. People, 717 SCRA 425 Ayungo vs. Beamko Shipmanagement Corporation, 717 SCRA 538 Technical Education and Skills Development Authority vs Commission on Audit, 718 SCRA 402 Tesoro vs. Metro Manila Retreaders, Inc. (BANDAG), 718 SCRA 538 Lui Enterprises, Inc. Vs. Zuelling Pharma Corporation, 719 SCRA 88 Lanier vs. People, 719 SCRA 477 Saint Lui University, Inc. Vs. Olairez, 720 Scra 74; Philippine Amusement ANS Gaming Corporation vs. Thunderbird Pilipinas Hotel and Resorts, Inc., 720 SCRA 178; Olores vs. Manila Doctors College, 720 Scra 277; Causing vs. Commission on Elections, 734 SCRA 495; Repubic vs Lazo, 737 SCRA 1 Pascual vs. Daquioag, 720 SCRA 230 Enaza vs. R. Villegas Taxi Transport, 720 SCRA 467 People vs. Espinosa, 721 SCRA 53 Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, 722 SCRA 211 Mendez vs. People, 726 SCRA 203 Trajano vs. Uniwide Sales Warehouse Club, 726 SCRA 298 Aruallo vs. Aquino III, 728 SCRA 1 Naval vs. Commission on Elections, 729 SCRA 299 Aboitiz Equity Ventures, Inc. Chiongbian, 729 SCRA 580 Candelaria vs. Regional Trial Court, Branch 42, City of San Fernando, (Pampanga), 730 Scra 1 Silverio Sr. Vs. Silverio, Jr., 730 SCRA 152 Kalipunan ng Damayang Mahihirap, Inc. Vs. Robredo, 730 SCRA 322 Absolute Management Corporation vs Metropolitann and Trust Company, 730 SCRA 39 "
!$!!"
• •
• • • •
•
• • • • •
Villarosa vs. Festi, 732 SCRA 110 OSG Shipmanagement Manila, Inc. Vs. Pellazar, 732 SCRA 280 Araullo vs. Aquino III, 728 SCRA 1 Land Bank of the Philippines vs. Atlanta industries, Inc., 729 SCRA 12 Kalipunan ng Damayang Mahihirap, Inc. vs. Robredo, 730 SCRA 322 Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines Employees' Union (CAAP-EU) Formerly Air Transportation Employees' Union (ATEU) vs. Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines (CAAP), 739 Scra 570 Star Special Watchman and Detective Agency, Inc. vs. Puerto Princesa City, 722 SCRA 66 Kalipunan ng Damayang Mahihirap, Inc. vs. Robredo, 730 SCRA 322 Jardeleza vs. Sereno, 733 SCRA 279 Aquino vs. Municipality of Malay, Aklan, 737 SCRA 145 Buena, Jr. vs. Benito, 738 SCRA 278 Martinez vs. Martin, 743 SCRA 718
•
XII
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
XIII
• •
• • •
• • • • • • • • •
De Castro v. Carlos, G.R. No. 194994, 16 April 2013 Vilando v. HRET, G.R. No. 192147, 23 August 2011 Topacio v. Ong, GR No. 179895, December 18, 2008 Mendoza v. Allas, G.R. No. 131977, February 4, 1999 Damasen v. Tumamao, G.R. No. 173165, February 17, 2010 Calleja v. Panday, G.R. No. 168696, February 28, 2006 Madrigal v. Lecaroz, G.R. No. L-46218, October 23, 1990 Pardo de Tavera v. Phil. Tuberculosis Society, GR. No. L-48928, February 25, 1982 PPSTA v. Apostol, G.R. No. L-36966, February 28, 1974 Liban v. Gordon, G.R. No. 175352 Santiago v. Guingona, G.R. No. 134577, November 18, 1998 Camid v. Office of the President, G.R. No. 161414, January 17, 2005 Yap v. Civil Service Commission, G.R. No. 104226, August 12, 1993 Divinagracia v. Consolidated Broadcasting, G.R. No. 162272, April 7, 2009 Feliciano v. Villasin, G.R. No. 174929, June 27, 2008 NPC v. Co, G.R. No. 166973, February 10, 2009 Philippine Veterans Bank v. Bases Conversion Development Authority, G.R. No. 173085, January 19, 2011 Republic v. Gingoyon, G.R. No. 166429, 19 December 2005 Republic v. Gingoyon, G.R. No. 166429, February 1, 2006 Asia’s Emerging Dragon Corporation v. DOTC, G.R. No. 169914, April 18, 2008 Landbank v. Wycoco, G.R. No. 140160, 13 January 2004, 419 SCRA 67, 80 NPC v. Angas, G.R. Nos. 60225-26, 8 May 1992, 208 SCRA 542 City of Manila v. Serrano, G.R. No. 142304, June 20, 2001 MCWD v. J. King and Sons, G.R. No. 175983, April 16, 2009 Republic v. Tagle, G.R. No. 129079, December 2, 1998 City of Cebu v. Spouses Dedamo, G.R. No. 142971, May 7, 2002 Spouses Ortega v. City of Cebu , G.R. No. 181562-63, October 2, 2009 BPI v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 160890, November 10, 2004 Bardillon v. Barangay Masili, G.R. No. 146886, April 30, 2003 !%!!"
Republic v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 160379, August 14, 2009 Eusebio v. Luis, G.R. No. 162474, October 13, 2009 Landbank v. Santiago, G.R. No. 182209, 3 October 2012 Landbank v. Araneta, G.R. No. 161796, 8 February 2012 Landbank v. Peralta, G.R. No. 182704, 23 April 2014 Monzon v. Relova, G.R. No. 171827, 12 September 2008 Looyuko v. CA, G.R. No. 102696, 12 July 2001 Looyoko, id. Huerta Alba Resort, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 128567, 1 September 2000 Spouses Suico v. Philippine National Bank, G.R. No. 170215, 28 August 2007 Spouses Rosales v. Spouses Suba, G.R. No. 137792, 12 August 2003 Suico Rattan v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 138145, 15 June 2006 LZK Holdings and Development Corporation vs. Planters Development Bank, 714 SCRA 294 Marquez vs. Alindog, 714 SCRA 460 Quintos vs. Department of Agrarian Reform Adjudication Board, 715 SCRA 592 Sombilon vs. Garay, 726 SCRA 397 Cabling vs. Lumapas, 726 SCRA 628 Berot vs. Siapno, 729 SCRA 475 Gopiao vs. Metropolitan Bank and Trust Co., 731 SCRA 131 Okabe vs. Saturnino, 733 SCRA 652 680 Home Appliances, Inc., v. The Honorable Court of Appeals, 737 SCRA 127 Robles vs. Yapcinco 739 SCRA 292 Arambulo v. Gungab, G.R. No. 156581, 30 September 2005 Spouses Barnachea v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 150025, 23 July 2008 Fernando v. Spouses Lim, G.R. No. 176282, 22 August 2008 Spouses Samonte v. Century Savings Bank, G.R. No. 176413, November 25, 2009 Spouses Refugia v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 118284, 5 July 1996 Encarnacion v. Amigo, G.R. No. 169793, 15 September 2006 Spouses Mendoza v. Coronel, G.R. No. 156402, 13 February 2006 Pajuyo v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 146364, 3 June 2004 Spouses Benitez v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 104828, 16 January 1997 Malabanan v. Rural Bank of Cabuyao, G.R. No. 163495, 8 May 2009 Acbang vs. Luczon, Jr., 713 SCRA 346 Alconera vs. Pallanan, 714 SCRA 204 Teodoro vs. Espino, 715 SCRA 435 Mangaser vs. Ugay, 744 SCRA 13 Marcelo vs. Pichay, 718 S CRA 464 Suarez vs. Emboy, Jr., 718 SCRA 677; Dela Cruz vs. Capco, 719 SCRA 291; Zacarias vs. Anacay, 736 SCRA 508 Dela Cruz vs. Capco, 719 SCRA 291 Pro-Guard Security Services Corporation vs. Tormil Realty and Development Corporation, 279 SCRA 206 Manzanilla vs. Waterfields Industries Corporation, 730 SCRA 104. Tagalog vs. Lim Vda. de Gonzalez, 730 SCRA 201. Mauleon vs. Porter, 730 SCRA 229. • • • • •
XIV.A XIV.B XIV.C
• •
XIV.D XIV.E XIV.F OPTIONAL READINGS
• • • •
• • • • • •
• •
•
XVI.A
• • •
XVI.B
•
•
XVI.C XVI.D XVI.E XVI.F XVI.G OPTIONAL READINGS
• • • • • • • • • • •
• •
• • •
!&!!"
• • • • • • • •
•
XVII.
• • •
• • •
• • •
• • •
•
•
•
Midway Maritime and Technological Foundation vs. Castro, 732 SCRA 192. Fernandez vs. Villegas, 733 SCRA 548 Noynay vs. Citihomes Builder and Development, Inc. 735 SCRA 708 Zacarias vs. Anacay, 736 SCRA 508 Ocampo vs. heirs of Bernardino U. Dionisio, 737 SCRA 381 Quijano vs. Amante, 737 SCRA 552 Abadilla, Jr. vs. Obrero, 740 SCRA 208 Penta Pacific Realty Corporation. vs. Ley Construction and Development Corporation Javier vs. Lumontad, 744 SCRA 1 Marantan vs. Diokno, 716 SCRA 164 City Government of Baguio vs. Masweng, 717 SCRA 95 Capitol Hills Golf & Country Club, Inc. vs. Sanchez, 717 SCRA 294 Cagas vs. Commission on Elections, 717 SCRA 329 Ligon vs Regional Trial Court Branch 56, Makati City, 717 SCRA 373 Re: Verified Complaint for Disbarment of AMA Land, Inc (represented by Joseph B. usita)Against Court of Appeals Associate Justices Hon. Danton Q. Bueser, Hon. Sesinando E. Villon and Hon. Ricardo R. Rosario, 718 SCRA 335 Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, 722 SCRA 211 Silverio vs. Silverio, Jr., 730 SCRA 152 Angeles vs. Court of Appeals, 735 SCRA 82 Marantan vs. Diokno, 716 SCRA 164 Ligon vs. Regional Trial Court, Branch 56, Makati City, 717 SCRA 373 Re: Verified Complaint for Disbarment of AMA Land, Inc (represented by Joseph B. usita)Against Court of Appeals Associate Justices Hon. Danton Q. Bueser, Hon. Sesinando E. Villon and Hon. Ricardo R. Rosario, 718 SCRA 335 Saint Louis University, Inc. vs. Olairez, 720 SCRA 74; Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation vs. Thunderbird Pilipinas Hotels and Resorts, Inc., 720 SCRA 178; Causing vs. Commission on Elections, 734 SCRA 495; Republic vs. Lazo, 737 SCRA 1 Rivulet Agro-Industrial Corporation v. Paruñgao, 688 SCRA 485; Lim- Lua, 697 SCRA 237; Digital Telecommunications Philippines, Inc. V. Cantos, 710 SCRA 514 Fortun v. Quinsayas, 690 SCRA 623 Belen v. Comilang, 692 SCRA 176 Lozada v. Zerrudo, 695 SCRA 374 Digital Telecommunications Philippines, Inc. V. Cantos, 710 SCRA 514 RE: Verified Complaint of Tomas S. Merdegia Against Hon. Vicente S.E. Veloso, Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, Relative to CA G.R. SP NO. 119461, 711 SCRA 705
IV. COURSE REQUIREMENTS AND GRADING SYSTEM To pass the course, a Final Average of 75% must be obtained, broken down as follows. Course Requirements At least 4 short quizzes Presentation
Grade Breakdown
Description
10% 5%
By groups, the students are expected to present a sample legal form for each rule discussed !'!!"
Recitation
10%
Prelims Midterms Finals
15% 25% 35%
Students who are absent when called will get an automatic zero for the orals, unless he is randomly called again and is present and able to recite well.
V. COURSE POLICIES •
During class sessions, only lesson plan notebooks or similar notebooks are allowed. No books (including the Rules of Court) are allowed on the table. The notebook should contain only the student’s handwritten work. He can copy the Rules of Court by hand verbatim. An outline of the Rules and digests of cases, all by hand, though is much more preferred as the contents of the notebook.
•
Electronic gadgets and recording devices are strictly prohibited.
•
No pass policy during orals. All students called must recite to the best of their abilities.
•
•
•
•
•
Questions related to the re-scoring of bluebooks or exams should be raised to the attention of the professor within two days from notice that the bluebooks/exams have been returned to the office. Similarly, questions related to grades should first be addressed to the attention of the professor within the same time as the previous prior to seeking other avenues. Remember, since this is a special civil action class also, a motion for reconsideration is required prior to any petitions for certiorari since the said motion is a more speedy and adequate mode of appeal. An Excel file containing a running total of grades will be posted on Facebook so that the students will know their status anytime. The university policy on absences shall be strictly enforced. If a student has gone beyond the maximum number of absences, he shall take action accordingly (either withdraw or be marked with a final grade of 5.0). Excuse letters will only be accepted for valid reasons, and if duly notarized and in the form of an affidavit with supporting documents. There are times when the professor may come in late. Unless the School of Law gives advice, no student is expected to leave the classroom until the professor arrives. At any rate, the professor will advise the School of Law if he will hold classes on a particular date or not, or whether he will come in late or not. The class president shall also inquire from the professor whether he will come in or not, if the professor is already late for more than an hour with no advice being given. Other university policies on cheating, plagiarism, dress code, hair cuts, discipline, etc. shall be strictly enforced.
VI. CONTACT AND OTHER INFORMATION •
Preferred manner of communication is via Facebook’s Group Chat function. All communications must be coursed through the group chat facility to enable everyone to participate or know the topic being consulted about. Kindly add to the Group Chat the !(!!"
professor’s facebook account: Abe Acosta. Please note that proper English spelling and grammar shall always be maintained on Facebook. No small talks or nonsensical messages please, and no need to post “Thank you’s” or “noted”. Imagine receiving 60 messages from different students all saying “Thank you” or “noted” and/or similar messages. •
For inquiries requiring confidentiality, the professor may be approached anytime when he is in school or at his office address listed below. Kindly note considerations of office etiquette and time constraints when personally consulting with the professor at his office. Please schedule a consultation time prior to visiting the office. A Acosta & Associates Unit 1606 16/F Keppel Center Building Cardinal Rosales Avenue corner Samar Loop Cebu Business Park Ayala Center Cebu City, Philippines 6000 L: +63 32 354 9908 M: +63 928 506 3466 E:
[email protected] W: http://www.AcostaLaw.ph
!"!!"
