The Beginning of the Iron Age in Macedonia Dragi Mitrevski There are various chronologies chronologies for the Iron Age in Macedonia. Macedonia. It is possible to indicate the beginning of the period as a Transitiona Transitionall Period from Bronze to Iron Age, since at that time Bronze Аge development was interrupted and new criteria were established. In the Vardar valley the local Ulanci culture f rom the Late Bronze Age was researched. It is well presented presented in the settlement of Vardarski Rid and Stolot–Ulanci. In the latter site a necropolis has been excavated and dated 14th to 12th century BC. In 12th century BC up to the beginning of the 11th 11th century this culture was interrupted, and the main reason were several successive waves of migrations moving from North to South. New necropolises and new burial methods with urn cremation appeared as well as many new elements from the Northern and Central Balkan’s origin. The new necropoleis are concentrated along the main routes. These events caused the f inal interruption of the Bronze Age cu ltura lturall development. However t hey did not cause signi fica ficant nt demogr aphic changes ch anges in Macedonia Ma cedonia and with w ith t he establishment of the new Iron Age culture the old burial customs with inhumation in cist g raves again emerged. The situation in the regions outside of the Vardar Valley is somewhat different and many of the Late Bronze Age elements still developed during the Transitional period and in the Early Iron Age. Towards the end of the 11th century BC, the outside inf luences introduce introduce a new cultural eleme elements nts from the Ha llstatt culture. We might expect that the bearers of the customs of buria l under the tumuli car ried these elements to Macedonia. Thus, at the genesis of the Iron Age culture in Macedonia at the end of the 11th century BC, these are the decisive elements.
Началото на Желязната Епоха в Македония Драги Митревски За периода на Желязната епоха на Македония са в у потреба разл ични хронологически схеми. Възможно е началото на периода да се обозначи като своеобразен преходен период (от бронзовата към желязната епоха), тъй като по това време развитието на местната култура, тази на бронзовата епоха, е прекъснато и на тяхно място са се образува ни нови. В долината на Вардар от края на бронзовата епоха ни е известна култура Уланци, добре представена в селищата Вардарски Рид и Столот-Уланци. Към последния обект е проучен и некропол, датиран в рамките на 14–12 в. пр. Хр. През 12 в. пр. Хр. и началото на 11 в. пр. Хр. развитието на тази култура е прекъснато, като главната причина за това са били ня колкото последователни миграционни въ лни, движещи се от север на юг. Тагава се появяват и нови некрополи с нов начин на погребване (кремация в урни), както и много други елементи със северен и централ нобалкански пр оизход. Те Те са концентрирани по главните маршрути. Тези събития са причини ли финалното прекъсване на ра звитието на културите през късната бронзова епоха. Въпреки това те не са донесли значителни демографски промени в Македония, и с установяването на новата желязна епоха стария начин на погребване с инхумация в цистови гробове от ново се завръща. Ситуацията в районите извън долината на Вардар е доста различна, и много от елементите от късната бронзова епоха продължават и през преходния период и през желязната епохи. Към края на 11 в. пр. Хр. външни влияния въвеждат нови културни елементи от халщатските култури. Може да се очаква, че носите лите на обичая оби чая на погре бване под могилен насип нас ип донася т тези елементи в Македония. Маке дония. Така, в създава съз даването нето на културата на желязната епоха в Македония към края на 11 в.пр.Хр., в.пр.Хр., тези елементи са решава щи.
The Iron Age in Macedonia has special features, which are not possible to put under neither the Aegean nor the Balkan criteria. Depending on the point of view – if it is from the southern or northern side, side, there are still stil l various chronologies, or different divisions of the stages in the Iron Age development. However, during the last 20 years the quantity of archaeological finds has rapidly increased, which already makes it possible to give g ive a much clearer picture about Iron Age. In that way, the evidence for the last two centuries of the II Millennia BC is The Struma/Strymon River Valley in Prehistory
also increased. It is of special significance for answering many questions about the beginning of the Iron Age in this part of the Balkans. Now it is completely possible to separate this period as a Transitional Period, from Bronze to Iron Age in which the Bronze Age develop development ment was interrupted and the new Iron Age criteria were established (MITREVSKI 1997, 26–70). In any case, to make more complete evaluation about the beginnings of the Iron Age we must go a step back and answer many questions connected to the end of the Bronze Age and
Dragi Mitrevski Mitrevsk i 1 Kastanas; 2 Vardaroftsa; 3 Vardino; 4 Chautchitsa; Chautchi tsa; 5 Kilindir; Kilindi r; 6 Kofilak; 7 Vard arski Rid; Rid ; 8 Vardarski Rid; 9 Demir Kapija; 10 Tremnik Negotino; 11 Tremnik-NegotiTremnik-Negoti no; 12 Vodovrati Vodovrati;; 13 Ulanci; 14 Stolot-Ulanci; 15 Stobi; 16 Caska; 17 Krivi Dol; 18 Fortuna-Stip; 19 Beli-Kocani; 20 Strnovac-Kumano Strnov ac-Kumanovo; vo; 21 Govrlevo; 22 Dolno Sonje; 23 Gradiste-Dolno Sonje; 24 Varos-Prile Varos-Prilep; p; 25 Visoi Beranci Fig.1 Sites disposition Fig.1 dis position of the „Ulanci Cultural Group of the Late Bronze Age“.
Transitional period. What was the local culture cu lture of the Late Bronze Age? When and how it was interrupted? What was the character of the events and their bearers, which provoke provoke the interruption i nterruption of the Late Bronze Age culture? What elements from the Bronze Age and Transitional period took part in the genesis of the new Iron Age culture and when it was completely established and stabilized? We will try to answer these questions, based on the archaeological finds from the R. of Macedonia, mainly from the sites along the Vardar Valley. The Late Bronze Age in Macedonia is marked by the breakthrough and spreading of Mycenaean elements. Along the Vardar valley, this is the period when all the characteristic values of a local and very strong culture of the Late Bronze Age were formed. It is called the „Vardar or Ulanci Group of the Late Bronze Age“,, according to the main site, Age“ site, necropolis and settlement in the village of Ulanci near Gradsko in the Middle Vardar Valley (MITREVSKI 2003, 46–52, T.V, T.VI). There are many sites of this culture, disposed mostly along the Vardar River and its tributaries, up to the Skopje-Kumanovo region at north, Pelagonia region to the west and in the Struma Valley to the East (Fig.1). (Fig.1). In the Steps of James Harvey Gaul, volume 2
The settlement life is known mostly on the basis of the Late Bronze Age layers in the famous Lower Vardar multilayer settlements on the Greek territory, which belong to this group (HEURTLEY 1939; HOCHSTETTER 1982; H ÄNSEL 1989; P APAEFTIMIU-PILALI 1997). Also, some more northern, in the so far excavated settlements such as Vardarski Rid–Gevgelia (MITREVSKI 2001) and Stolot–Ulanci (MITREVSKI 1997:44–45), corresponding layers have been discovered. However, most of the new excavated sites in this group are necropolises, mainly from the territory of R. Macedonia. As the best illustration we could take the necropolis in Ulanci. There, an extensive and well-organized necropolis have been excavated, with material which does not get out of the frame of 14th to 12th century BC. Up to now, 90 graves have been explored. The other similar necropolises only prove the manifestations discovered in Ulanci (MITREVSKI 2003, 46–52, T.V). The T he main marks of these necropolises are the crouched inhumations in cysts graves and very unified burial customs and grave goods. Important role have the elements of the Aegean Late Bronze Age, incorporated i ncorporated and adopted to the local criteria’s and needs. These elements are most visible on the t he pottery, where where beside the local monochrome vases; the significant significa nt place is occupied by the high quality matt painted pot-
The Begining of the Iron Age In Macedonia
Fig. 2 Necropolis in Ul anci. Local Loc al matt painted p ainted potteryy and a piece potter pi ece of Mycenaean Mycenae an imported impor ted vessel.
tery (Fig. 2). This pottery means introduction of hitherto completely unknown techniques inspired by the Late Mycenaean pottery. In our group, the appearing of this matt painted pottery is very evident ev ident as local reaction on the Mycenaean pottery. The vessel shapes are of local origin and they are very popular in the local monochrome production (Fig. 3). Local copies of Mycenaean vessel types are also presented (MITREVSKI 2003, T.V–7, T.VI–1) . In the same way, some of the famous metal objects from the Aegean Bronze Age are fre The Struma/Strymon River Valley in Prehistory
Fig. 3 Necropolis Necropolis in i n Ulanci. Ulanci . Local monochromi mo nochromicc potter y.
quent grave goods. Bronze knifes, razors and especially miniature double axes take special place. Very interesting is the fact that the dou ble axes are in a shape shape of complex complex ritual objects in some special female graves (Fig. 4). It will be one of the main cult object during the Early Iron Age in Macedonia. According this we could easily mark that the „Ulanci group“ had a character of a stable and deeply canonized culture of the Late Bronze Age. It means that the t he local loca l communities from the end of the Bronze Age were not so involved
Dragi Mitrevski Mitrevsk i Gravе 80
Gravе 54
Fig.4 Fig. 4 Necropolis in Ul anci. The Graves G raves 80 (above) and 54 (below), with the belts of double axes and the belt of the Grave 54. In the Steps of James Harvey Gaul, volume 2
The Begining of the Iron Age In Macedonia
Fig. 5. 5. Hipodrom-Skopje. Hipodrom- Skopje. The g raves 3 (left) and 7 (right) in different d ifferent stages of excavation. excava tion.
in the First waves of the so called Great Aegean Migrations. Consequently, after the fall of the Mycenaean civilization civilizat ion in the South, many of its cultural acquisitions went on to exist and maintained and grown at the North, in Macedonia. Some of them will be important i mportant elements elements in the genesis of the new Iron Age culture. However, during the 12th, up to the beginning of the 11th century BC this culture was interrupted. Doubtlessly, the main reason for it was several successive waves of migrations migr ations and destructive process, moving from North to South. The burned layers in the Lower Vardar settlements of Kastanas, Vardaroftsa Vardino and so on record them. The settlement of the Ulanci Necropolis was also burned and no more rebuild. The population of the Late Bronze Age settlement in Vardarski Rid, in Gevgelija, during that period moved to the more safety position at the nearby hill „Kofilak“. The Struma/Strymon River Valley in Prehistory
On the other hand, the burials in all of the mentioned necropolises through the Middle and Northern Vardar Valley has ended, more exactly, it was interrupted. The new necropolises and a new way of burring with urn cremation c remation appeared. Among the archaeological finds connected to these necropolises many elements from the Northern and Central Balkan origin appeared. The best illustration illustrat ion of those time and events we have in Kastanas, and in its 12, 11 layers, but also in the relatively new discovered necropolises with cremation, from f rom Hippodrome, near Skopje Skopje up to the Genykokastro, near Kilkis (MITREVSKI 1994; S AV AVOPOUL OPOULU U 1987; S AV AVOPOULU OPOULU 1988). Many of them are still unpublished (Oresani-Skopje, Caska-Veles, Stobi and so on), and on this occasion we are not able to pay more attention to them. In any case, what is more important, the necropolises of this type ty pe are concentrated along
Dragi Mitrevski Mitrevsk i
Fig.6 HipodromHipodrom-Skopje. Skopje. Some Som e leading types t ypes of pottery (left) and remains of Mycenaean helmet.
the main communications especially through the Vardar Valley and they just prove the impact of the new northern population. Many of the new elements especially in the pottery are new phenomenon not just in the Vardar Valley but also at north, in the frame of the neighbouring, so called Donja Brnjica culture. So these t hese events was surely happened happened in the frame of some general movements. In this occasion the spreading of the Donja Brnjica and other Central Balkan elements in Macedonia has occurred. The penetration of these cultural manifestations can be easily traced, from Danube through the Morava and Vardar Valley until Peloponnese. Peloponn ese. There, over the ruins of a already al ready destroyed Mycenaean settlements and into the new protogeometric necropolis are manifested either as introduction of a new way of burying with cremation or as foreign, so called north or barbarian pottery, terracotta’s and so on (G AR ARAŠA AŠANIN NIN 1953; BOUZEK 1967; STEFANOVICH 1973; DIAMOND 1988). In the Steps of James Harvey Gaul, volume 2
Some of the findings from HippodromSkopje, especially the incrusted goblet and the Mycenaean helmet helmet (Fig. 6), are the best illustrail lustrations for the mobile character of this culture or for the direct contacts either with the Northern or with the Southern parts of the Balkan. However, these events had many consequences for the future development. In addition to everything else, they caused the final interruption of the Bronze Age cultural development, especially in the regions along the main communication ways. In the Vardar Valley, at the expense of the previous contact with the Aegean, the link with the central and northern Balkan cultures was promoted. So, in the establishing of the Iron Age Culture in Macedonia the contacts with the north will have also very important role (MITREVSKI 1994a). However, in spite of all the cultural changes these events did not cause some significant demographic changes in Macedonia. For example, the burial way with cremation as a foreign element without deeper routs on this territory did
The Begining of the Iron Age In Macedonia
not last so long. With the establishment of the new Iron Age culture the old burial customs with inhumation in cist graves again emerged as a unique way of burring. Only, as a consequence of these events, during the Early Iron Age, a cultural decadence decreased economical power and certain certa in depopulation or reduced intensity of living along the valley of Vardar is very evident. Even by the end of 8th century BC, in this region a full cultural stabilization will take place. The situation in the other regions, outside of the Vardar Valley, is different. In the West, in the Ohrid–Prespa and Pelagonija Region, many of the late bronze elements continued to be developed during the Transitional Transitional period per iod and the Early Iron Age. But towards the end of the 11th century, the outside influences introduce new cultural elements from the so-called Hallstatt cultural environments into these regions. These elements, from the eastern Alps or West Balkans Region, started spreading towards south, mainly by the naval route, along Eastern Adriatic cost. It might expect that the same bearers who spread the customs of burr-
ing under the tumuli carried these elements in Macedonia. In any way, this process continued further to the East by the route of the later Roman Via Egnatia. Even in the following centuries of the Iron Age some of these manifestations become more dispersed, accepted and produced in the wider Macedonian area. So, the most popular Hallstatt forms, mainly jewellery: fibulae, torches, faleras, bracelets and so on, become very frequent forms in the local Iron Age culture (V ASIĆ 1987). Thus, at the genesis of the Iron Age culture in Macedonia, these elements elemen ts denote the ultimate constitutional element. Even Even then the new culture of the Iron Age in Macedonia was finally fi nally shaped, somewhere somewhere in the end of the 11 century BC. In conclusion we can say that the Iron Age in Macedonia is a mixture of different di fferent elements elements that were involved on this territory from f rom different cultural surroundings, in different times and selectively accepted by the local population making a unique physiognomy physiognomy of the local Iron Age. Of course, all these elements were based on the heritage from the Local Bronze Age.
References BOUZEK 1967 J. Bouzek. Balkani Balkanische sche elemente in spätmykenischen und geometrischen Griechenland. – Acta Antiqu a Academiae Scienti Sci entiarum arum Hungaricae 15, 1967, 261 ff. DIAMOND 1988 S. Diamond. Mycenaean origins: Infiltration from the North? –In: E.B. French, K.A K.A.. Wardl Wardlee (eds.). Problems in Greek prehist prehistory. ory. Papers presente presentedd at the centenary conference of the British School of Archaeology at Athens, Manchester, April 1986 (Bristol 1988),
153–159
G ARA ŠANIN 1953 M. Garašanin. Banat/Srpsko Podunavlje/Kerameikos. – RVM 2, 1953. H ÄNSEL 1989 B. Hänsel. Kastanas. Die Grabung der Baubefund Prähistorische ische Archäologie Archäolog ie in Südosteuro pa 7.2 (Ber– Prähistor lin 1989). HEURTLEY 1939 W.A. Heurtley. Prehistoric Macedonia (Cambridge 1939). HOCHSTETTER 1982 A. Hochstetter. Spatbronzezeitliches und fruheisenzeitliches formengut in Makedonien und in Balkanraum. –In: Sudosteuropa zwischen 1600/1000 v.Chr. – Prähistor ische Archäologi Archäologiee in Südoste Südosteuropa uropa 1 (Berlin 1982), 99–118. 9 9–118. The Struma/Strymon River Valley in Prehistory
HOCHSTETTER 1984 A. Hochstetter. Die handgemachte Keramik. TextTextund Tafelteil. –In: Kastan as. Ausgrabungen Ausgrabun gen in einem Siedlungshügel der Bronze- und Eisenzeit Makedoniens Siedlungshügel 1975–1979. – Prähistor ische Archäologie Archäolog ie in Südoste uropa, Band 3 (Berlin 1984).
MITREVSKI 1994 D. Mitrevski. A Brnjica type necropolis near Skopje. – Starinar XLIII–XL XLIII–XLIV IV,, 1994. MITREVSKI 1994a D. Mitrevski. Northern elements regarding the Iron Age culture in Macedonia. – Culture et Civili sation au Bas Danube Da nube XIII–XIV (Braila 1994). MITREVSKI 1997 D. Mitrevski. Proto-Historical Communities in Macedonia. – Cultural and Historic Heritage of Re public of Macedonia Mace donia XXVII (Skopje 1997). MITREVSKI 2001 D. Mitrevski. The Ancient Macedonian Town at Vardarski Rid (Skopje 2001 20 01). ). MITREVSKI 1994 D. Mitrevski. Prehistory in Republic of Macedo Recentt Research nia. –In: D. V. Grammenos (ed.). Recen in the Prehistor y of the Balkans. – Publicat Publications ions of the th e Archaeologi cal Institute Institu te of Northern Greece Greec e 3 (Thessaloniki 2003), 13–72.
P APAEFTIMIU /PILALI 1997 A. Papaeftimiu, A. Pilali. Pi lali. Prehistorical Prehis torical Macedonia: An Itinerary Itinerar y (Thessaloniki (Thessalon iki 1997). S AV AVOPOULU OPOULU 1987 T. Savopoulu. Savopoulu. An Early E arly Iron Age cemetery at Pal io Gynaikokastro of Kilkis. – Το Αρχαιολογικό Έργο στη Μακεδονία και Θράκη 1, 1987, 305–312. S AV AVOPOULU OPOULU 1988 T. Savopoulu. New evidence from cemetery of Palio Gynaikokastro. – Το Αρχαιολογικό Έργο στη Μακεδον ία και Θράκη Θρά κη 2, 1988, 21–230.
In the Steps of James Harvey Gaul, volume 2
Dragi Mitrevski Mitrevsk i
STEFANOVICH 1973 M. Stefanovich. Some Balkan Elements in the Aegean Migrations. – Actes du VIII cong res UISPP/Actes III (Beograd (Beograd 1973). V ASIĆ 1987 R. Vasić. Gevgeliska grupa starijeg gvozdenog doba. – Praistor Praistorija ija Jugoslavenski h Ze malja V (Sara jevo 1987).