FACULTY OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF STRUCTURE AND MATERIAL ENGINEERING LAB MATERIAL
REPORT Subject Code Code & Experiment Title Course Code Date Section / Group Name Members of Group
Lecturer/Instructor/Tutor Received Date
Comment by examiner
BFC 31901 U5 – SPACE FRAME 2 BFF 21/03/2012 SECTION 9 / GROUP 7 MUHAMMAD IKHWAN BIN ZAINUDDIN 1.NUR EZRYNNA BINTI MOHD ZAINAL 2.MUHAMMAD NUH BIN AHMAD ZAIRI 3.NUR EEZRA ATHIRLIA BINTI GHAZALI 4.MUHAMMAD HUZAIR BIN ZULKIFLI 5.ZIRWATUL FAUZANA BINTI CHE JEMANI EN. MOHD KHAIRY BIN BURHANUDIN 4/04/2012
Received
(DF100018) (DF100118) (DF100093) (DF100147) (DF100040) (DF100027)
STUDENT CODE OF ETHIC (SCE) DEPARTMENT OF STRUCTURE AND MATERIAL ENGINEERING FACULTY OF CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
We, hereby confess that we have prepared this report on our effort. We also admit not to receive or give any help during the preparation of this report and pledge that everything mentioned in the report is true.
Name
___________________________
___________________________
Student Signature
Student Signature
: MUHAMMAD IKHWAN BIN ZAINUDDIN
Name
: NUR EZRYNNA BINTI MOHD ZAINAL
Matric No. : DF100018
Matric No. : DF100118
Date
Date
Name
: 04/04/2012
: 04/04/2012
___________________________
___________________________
Student Signature
Student Signature
: NUR EEZRA ATHIRLIA BINTI GHAZALI
Name
: MUHAMMAD HUZAIR BIN ZULKIFLI
Matric No. : DF100147
Matric No. : DF100040
Date
Date
Name
: 04/04/2012
: 04/04/2011
_______________________
_______________________
Student Signature
Student Signature
: MUHAMMAD NUH BIN AHMAD ZAIRI
Name
: ZIRWATUL FAUZANA BINTI CHE JEMANI
Matric No. : DF100093
Matric No. : DF100027
Date
Date
: 04/04/2012
: 04/04/2012
1.0
INTRODUCTION In architecture and structural engineering, a space frame or space structure is a truss-like,
lightweight rigid structure constructed from interlocking struts in a geometric pattern. Space frames can be used to span large areas with few interior supports. Like the truss, a space frame is strong because of the inherent rigidity of the triangle; flexing loads (bending moments) are transmitted as tension and compression loads along the length of each structure.
Figure 1.0 - The roof of this industrial building is supported by a space frame structure
Space frames were independently developed by Alexander Graham Bell around 1900 and Buckminster Fuller in the 1950s. Bell's interest was primarily in using them to make rigid frames for nautical and aeronautical engineering. Few of his designs were realized. Buckminster Fuller's focus was architectural structures; his work had greater influence.
Figure 2.0 - Simplified space frame roof with the half-octahedron highlighted in blue
2.0
OBJECTIVE To verify member forces obtain from experiment with tension coefficient method
3.0
LEARNING OUTCOME 2.1
Application of theoretical engineering knowledge through practical application
2.2
To enhance the technical competency in structural engineering through laboratory application.
2.3
Communicate effectively in group.
2.4
To identify problem, solving and finding out appropriate solution through laboratory application.
4.0
THEORY If the members of a truss system is situated not in a two dimensional plane, then the truss is
defined as a space frame truss. In other words, space truss has components in three axis i.e. x, y and z. Consider a member with nodeA (xA,yA) and B (xB,yB).
Figure 3.0 – Space truss component Assume the force in the member is TAB (+ve tension) and length LAB Definition of tension coefficient (t), tAB = TAB LAB At A, the horizontal component TAB is: TABcosӨ = tABLABcosӨ = tABLAB (xB-XA) LAB = tAB (xB-xA)
Used the same method , the vertical component at A is = tAB(yB – yA) At B, the horizontal component TAB = tAB(xA-xB) Vertical component TAB=tAB(yA-yB) Using statics, write the equation for each joint using the coordinate value and solve for t. Convert it into force using:
5.0
PROCEDURES Part 1: 1. Select any weight between 10 to 50 N. 2. Ensure distance a = 500mm and place load hanger on D. 3. Measure the distance b,c dan d and record it in Table 1. 4. Record the dynamometer readings for members S1, S2 dan S3. 5. Put the selected load on the hanger at D and record the 6. Repeat step (2) to (4) with different value of a. 7. Calculate the theoretical member forces and record it in Table 1. Part 2: 1. For part 2, use a distance of 350 mm for a. 2. Place the hanger on D. 3. Measure the distance b, c and d. Record the dynamometer readings for member S1, S2 and S3 in Table 2. 4. Put a load of 5N on the hanger and record the dynamometer readings.. 5. Repeat step 2 to 4 using different load. 6. Complete Table 2 by calculating the theoretical member value. 7. Plot the graph of force against load for the theoretical and experimental results.
Figure 4.0 - Space Frame Equipment
Figure 5.0 – Space Frame Dimension
6.0
RESULT TABLE 1
Dimension (mm)
Dynamometer Reading S1
a
b
c
Force (N)
S2
S3
Experiment
Theory
d Unloaded
Loaded
Unloaded
Loaded
Unloaded
Loaded
S1
S2
S3
S1
S2
S3
500 460 295 360
0.3
0.53
0.3
0.57
5
13
0.23
0.27
8
5.35
5.35
-10.93
400 490 247 360
0.6
7
0.7
6.8
6
17
6.4
6.1
11
5.44
5.44
-16.46
300 515 186 360
1.4
10
1.4
9.7
6
22
0.4
8.3
16
11.15
11.15
-16.73
200 540
2.5
16
2.7
16.1
8
31
13.5
13.4
23
17.55
17.55
-27.20
LX=b, LY=b/2 LZ=a-c F=L x t
65
360
TABLE 2 Dimension (mm)
LOAD
a
b
c
Dynamometer Reading S1
d
Force (N)
S2
S3
Unloaded Loaded Unloaded Loaded Unloaded
(N)
Experiment
Theory
Loaded
S1
S2
S3
S1
S2
S3
5
350 495 257
360
1
4.4
1.2
4.7
6
12
3.4
3.5
6
5.35
5.35
-5.56
10
350 505 221
360
1
8
1.2
8.4
6
19
7
7.2
13
5.51
5.51
-5.51
15
350 513 187
360
1
12
1.2
12.3
6
25
11
11.1
19
11.26
11.26
-21.42
20
350 518 160
360
1
16
1.2
16.5
6
31
15
15.3
25
17.41
17.41
-32.53
25
350 523 115
360
1
20.5
1.2
20.8
6
37
19.5
19.6
31
24.04
24.04
-37.48
LX=b, LY=b/2 LZ=a-c F=L x t
7.0
DATA ANALYSIS
7.1
PART 1
Force (N) = Theory
Load = 10 N
Dimension a = 500 mm
Dimension b = 460 mm
Dimension c = 295 mm
Dimension d = 360 mm
Member
Lx (mm)
Ly (mm)
Lz (mm)
S1
460
-180
205
S2
460
180
S3
460 0
Load L=
t
F
534.81
0.01
5.35
205
534.81
0.01
5.35
0
-295
546.47
- 0.02
-10.93
0
-10
Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
L=
L (mm)
Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
= 4602 + (-180)2 + 2052
= 4602 + (-295)2
= 534.81 mm
= 546.47mm
FOR F : t * L ∑ Fx = 0 460 ts1 + 460 ts2 + 460 ts3 = 0
(1)
∑ Fy = 0 -180 ts1 + 180 ts2 + 0 + 0 = 0 180 ts2 = 180 ts1 ts2 = ts1
(2)
∑ Fz = 0 205ts1 + 205 ts2 - 295 ts3 = 10
(3)
Substitute ts2= ts1 into (1) and (3) 460 ts1 + 460 ts2 + 460 ts3 = 0
(1)
920 ts2 + 460 ts3 = 0
(4)
205ts1 + 205 ts2 - 295 ts3 = 10
(3)
410 ts2 - 295 ts3 = 10
(5)
From equation ( 4 ) 920 ts2 + 460 ts3
=0
ts3
= - 920 ts2 460 = -2 ts2
ts3 Substitute into ( 5)
410 ts2 - 295 ts3 = 10 410 ts2 -295 ( -2 ts2 ) = 10 410 ts2 + 590 ts2 = 10 1000 ts2 = 10 ts2 =
10 1000
ts2 = ts1 = 0.01 Substitute into ( 4 ) ts3 = -2 ts2 = - 2 (0.01) = - 0.02
*Do the same step for other calculation
Load = 10 N
Dimension a = 400 mm
Dimension b = 490 mm
Dimension c = 247 mm
Dimension d = 360 mm
Member
Lx (mm)
Ly (mm)
Lz (mm)
L (mm)
t
F
S1
490
-180
153
543.98
0.01
5.44
S2
490
180
153
543.98
0.01
5.44
S3
490
0
-247
548.73
-0.03
-16.46
0
0
-10
Load
L=
Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
L=
Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
= 4902 + (-180)2 +1532
= 4902 +(-247)2
= 543.98 mm
= 548.73mm
FOR F : t * L ∑ Fx = 0 490 ts1 + 490 ts2 + 490 ts3 = 0
(1)
∑ Fy = 0 -180 ts1 + 180 ts2 + 0 + 0 = 0 180 ts2 = 180 ts1 ts2 = ts1
(2)
∑ Fz = 0 153ts1 + 153 ts2 - 247 ts3 = 10
(3)
Load = 10 N
Dimension a = 300 mm
Dimension b = 515 mm
Dimension c = 186 mm
Dimension d = 360 mm
Member
Lx (mm)
Ly (mm)
Lz (mm)
L (mm)
t
F
S1
515
-180
114
557.33
0.02
11.15
S2
515
180
114
557.33
0.02
11.15
S3
515
0
-186
557.56
-0.03
-16.73
-10
Load L=
Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
L=
Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
= 5152 + (-180)2 +1142
= 5152 + (-186)2
= 557.33 mm
= 557.56mm
FOR F : t * L ∑ Fx = 0 515 ts1 + 515 ts2 + 515 ts3 = 0
(1)
∑ Fy = 0 -180 ts1 + 180 ts2 + 0 + 0 = 0 180 ts2 = 180 ts1 ts2 = ts1
(2)
∑ Fz = 0 114ts1 +114 ts2 - 186 ts3 = 10
(3)
Load = 10 N
Dimension a = 200 mm
Dimension b = 540mm
Dimension c = 65 mm
Dimension d = 360 mm
Member
Lx (mm)
Ly (mm)
Lz (mm)
L (mm)
t
F
S1
540
-180
135
585.00
0.03
17.55
S2
540
180
135
585.00
0.03
17.55
S3
540
0
-65
543.90
-0.05
-27.20
0
0
-10
0
0
0
Load L=
Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
L=
Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
= 5402 + (-1802) +1352
= 5402 + (-652)
= 585.00 mm
= 543.90mm
FOR F : t * L ∑ Fx = 0 540 ts1 + 540 ts2 + 540 ts3 = 0
(1)
∑ Fy = 0 -180 ts1 + 180 ts2 + 0 + 0 = 0 180 ts2 = 180 ts1 ts2 = ts1
(2)
∑ Fz = 0 135ts1 +135 ts2 - 65 ts3 = 10
(3)
7.2
PART 2
Force (N) = Theory
LOAD = 5 N
Dimension a = 350 mm
Dimension b = 495 mm
Dimension c = 257 mm
Dimension d = 360 mm
Member
Lx (mm)
Ly (mm)
Lz (mm)
L (mm)
t
F
S1
495
-180
93
534.86
0.01
5.35
S2
495
180
93
534.86
0.01
5.35
S3
495
0
-257
557.74
-0.01
-5.56
-5
Load L=
Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
L=
Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
= 4952 + 1802 + 932
= 4952 + (-257)2
= 534.86mm
= 557.74mm
FOR F : t * L ∑ Fx = 0 495 ts1 + 495 ts2 + 495 ts3 = 0
(1)
∑ Fy = 0 -180 ts1 + 180 ts2 + 0 + 0 = 0 180 ts2 = 180 ts1 ts2 = ts1
(2)
∑ Fz = 0 93 ts1 + 93 ts2 -257 ts3 = 5
(3)
LOAD = 10 KN
Dimension a = 350 mm
Dimension b = 505 mm
Dimension c = 221 mm
Dimension d = 360 mm
Member
Lx (mm)
Ly (mm)
Lz (mm)
L (mm)
t
F
S1
505
-180
129
551.42
0.01
5.51
S2
505
180
129
551.42
0.01
5.51
S3
505
0
-221
551.24
-0.03
-5.51
-10
Load L=
Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
L=
Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
= 5052 + 1802 + 1292
= 5052 + (-221) 2
= 551.42 mm
= 551.24 mm
FOR F : t * L ∑ Fx = 0 505 ts1 + 505ts2 + 505 ts3 = 0
(1)
∑ Fy = 0 -180 ts1 + 180 ts2 + 0 + 0 = 0 180 ts2 = 180 ts1 ts2 = ts1
(2)
∑ Fz = 0 129 ts1 +129 ts2 - 221 ts3 = 10
(3)
LOAD = 15 KN
Dimension a = 350 mm
Dimension b = 513 mm
Dimension c = 187 mm
Dimension d = 360 mm
Member
Lx (mm)
Ly (mm)
Lz (mm)
L (mm)
t
F
S1
513
-180
172
563.04
0.02
11.26
S2
513
180
172
563.04
0.02
11.26
S3
513
0
-187
535.45
-0.04
-21.42
-15
Load L=
Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
L=
Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
= 5132 + 1802 + 1722
= 5132 + (-187)2
= 563.04 mm
= 535.45mm
FOR F: t * L ∑ Fx = 0 513 ts1 + 513 ts2 + 513 ts3 = 0
(1)
∑ Fy = 0 -180 ts1 + 180 ts2 + 0 + 0 = 0 180 ts2 = 180 ts1 ts2 = ts1
(2)
∑ Fz = 0 172ts1 +172 ts2 - 187 ts3 = 15
(3)
LOAD = 20 KN
Dimension a = 350 mm
Dimension b = 518 mm
Dimension c = 160 mm
Dimension d = 360 mm
Member
Lx (mm)
Ly (mm)
Lz (mm)
L (mm)
t
F
S1
518
-180
190
580.37
0.03
17.41
S2
518
180
190
580.37
0.03
17.41
S3
518
0
-160
542.15
-0.06
-32.53
-20
Load L=
Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
L=
= 5182 + (-1802) + 1902
Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
= 5182 + (-1602)
= 580.37 mm
= 542.15 mm
FOR F : t * L ∑ Fx = 0 518 ts1 + 518ts2 + 518 ts3 = 0
(1)
∑ Fy = 0 -180 ts1 + 180 ts2 + 0 + 0 = 0 180 ts2 = 180 ts1 ts2 = ts1
(2)
∑ Fz = 0 190ts1 +190 ts2 - 160 ts3 = 20
(3)
LOAD = 25 KN
Dimension a = 350 mm
Dimension b = 523 mm
Dimension c = 115 mm
Dimension d = 360 mm
Member
Lx (mm)
Ly (mm)
Lz (mm)
L (mm)
t
F
S1
523
-180
235
600.96
0.04
24.04
S2
523
180
235
600.96
0.04
24.04
S3
523
0
-115
535.49
-0.07
-37.48
-25
Load L=
Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
L=
Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
= 5232 +(- 1802) + 2352
= 5232 +(- 1152)
= 600.96 mm
= 535.49 mm
FOR F : t * L ∑ Fx = 0 523 ts1 + 523ts2 + 523 ts3 = 0
(1)
∑ Fy = 0 -180 ts1 + 180 ts2 + 0 + 0 = 0 180 ts2 = 180 ts1 ts2 = ts1
(2)
∑ Fz = 0 235ts1 +235 ts2 - 115 ts3 = 25
(3)
8.0
RESULT
1.
Compare the graph of theoretical and experimental results. Comment on the results. From the graph, the theoretical and experimental result is almost the same. When we compare the both graph, it’s a linear. For the third graph, there are negative gradient. It is because of the some error while doing experiment. There are may be errors in calibrating the scale of the apparatus and all the reading taken consist of errors. Zero error occurs. Where the scale does not start with zero or the zero ends is spoilt
2.
Gives reasons for any discrepancy in the results. Several reading of the value are taken, their values may differ from one another. However these reading and closed to the real value. The errors may be due to the charges in condition of the experiment or surrounding which can be controlled. We should record the average of this value as the best reading for this quantity
9.0
CONCLUSION From the experiment, we had verified member forces obtain from experiment with tension
coefficient method. From this experiment, the value of S1 and S2 was almost the same compared to the value of S3 caused by distance and angle influences. The values of theoretical and experimental graph are just a little bit different. From S1 and S2 graph, it shown the gradient are almost the same while S3 graph had negative gradient
10.0
REFERENCES
1. Structure Analysis ; UTHM 2. Teori Struktur ; Yusuf Ahmad ; UTM 3. Fundamentals of Structural Analysis; Tung Au; Carnegie; Mellon University