Signature Without Liability Primer Liability Primer by Michael H. Keehn November 22, 2006
Without a little foundation, Signature Without Liability may be a little confusing. This primer is intended to provide some basic foundational knowledge which may make what follows more understandable. If you have no previous knowledge of these matters, the ride is going to be a bit bumpy at first. This is always the case when you encounter new truths that do not coincide with "knowledge" you already hold. At least you think its knowledge that we are holding, but as you learn more you may well think differently. In much of the emerging teachings of law and contractual obligations there is a mention of a strawman. The more appropriate term is Trade Name. You will need to know how the Strawman or Trade Name came into existence. Simply, a government issued birth certificate certificate is issued with consent of one parent at the time of birth. The birth certificate is sent s ent to a government agency, generally the Bureau of Vital Statistics. Here, another another ‘birth certificate’ is issued, this one spelling the name of the baby in ALL CAPITAL letters, creating a fictional entity (strawman ( strawman or TRADE NAME). If the name on the birth certificate were to represent the baby as a natural individual, it would be spelled with the appropriate upper and lower case lettering. For example, John Quincy Adams, not JOHN QUINCY ADAMS. The all capitals spelling of the name creates a corporate fiction (a strawman, a TRADE NAME), which the government can regulate and control. With the issuance of a birth certificate on this fictional "person", this strawman or TRADE NAME is placed into international commerce. The government issues a bond on the birth certificate in perhaps the amount of $630,000 (today’s value), and the bond i s sold on a securities exchange. It is always purchased by the th e same corporation, the Federal Reserve Bank. Through trickery and deception, the baby becomes surety, which guarantees the payback of the bond. The trick is to get the baby to volunteer to pay... all of his (or her) life. And that is what all of us need to know: how to avoid becoming liable for a fictional strawman or TRADE NAME that was a creation of government for the purpose of defrauding the individual (the baby). More Details... When a child is born, the hospital generally sends the original, not a copy, of this record of live birth to the State Bureau of Vital Statistics, sometimes called, Department of Health Page 1 of 5
and Rehabilitative Services (HRS). Each STATE is required to supply the corporate UNITED STATES with birth, death, and health statistics. The STATE agency that receives the original record of live birth (Certificate of Live Birth) keeps it and then issues another Birth Certificate in a different form where the name of the baby is spelled in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. This creates a legal person as opposed to a man or woman. ‘
’
The Birth Certificate issued by the State is then registered with the U.S. Department of Commerce -- the Executive Office - specifically through their own sub-agency, the U.S. Census Bureau, which is responsible to register vital statistics from all the states. Thus, the birth certificate is registered in international commerce. The word registered , as it is used in commercial law, does not mean that the ALL CAPITAL version of the name was "merely" noted or recorded in a book for future reference purposes. When a birth certificate is registered with the U.S. Department of Commerce, the Treasury will issue a bond on the value of the birth certification. That bond is then made available for purchase on a securities exchange and is bought by the Federal Reserve Bank. This purchase then become the authority or collateral to issue Federal Reserve Notes , which we use as a medium of exchange. The value of the bond in today’s world is perhaps $630,000. The bond is then held in trust for the Federal Reserve at the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation at 55 Water Street in New York City , about two blocks down the street from the Federal Reserve. It is a high-rise office building and the sign in front reads: "The Tower of Power ." They also handle hedges for the short selling of stocks and cannot be audited by the US "government" because of their special organization as a Trust. This process creates a burden in that the ALL-CAPITAL legal person named on the birth certificate has become a surety , or guarantor , a condition and obligation that is automatically and unwittingly assumed unless you rebut the presumption by effectively noticing government. "Guarantor. Person who becomes secondarily liable for another’s debt or performance...One who promises to answer for the debt, default or miscarriage of another." - Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed. From this it is easy to conclude that the baby is to assume the liability for any burden created or associated with the strawman or TRADE NAME listed on the birth certificate. Let's make this really simple: If you sign as the authorized representative of the Strawman's TRADE NAME, then you become the accommodation party, which makes you liable for all payments and specific performance as though You are the STRAWMAN. You take on the STRAWMAN'S debts and liabilities. All you need to do is make it totally clear to Page 2 of 5
everybody that You are not the STRAWMAN, even though the names look similar. ALL CAPS is not a very natural way to write your name, right? ALL CAPS is not natural, just like the STRAWMAN. The STRAWMAN might be considered a person in court but not outside the court. It can't eat, breathe, make choices, make plans or work for a living. But You don't have to be responsible for the STRAWMAN'S bills. Not your job. The simplest way to sign your name to clearly avoid being mistaken for the STRAWMAN is to simple write "Agent" after your name. (Without the " ... " that is.) That's it. That's all it needs to be. By: John Henry Doe, Agent . You could do it several other ways but this is the easiest to remember. They've had to disguise this "authorized representative" relationship so that you wouldn't catch on to the difference between John Henry Doe and JOHN HENRY DOE. They could write INC after the STRAWMAN'S NAME but that would really give it all away. This is the tool by which the banksters can legally make you a slave. No whips. No chains. No massah or watchers. No fences. No gates. That's not necessary for you to be a slave. You can be driving a Hummer and you'd still be a slave. You might have a big bank account or 401K or a big house on the top of a hill or by the shore. No difference. You're just a richer than usual slave. But you're a slave nevertheless. You can see the evidence of this deception on "your" check blanks. Look at the name at the top left that indicates the holder of that account... is that your name? .... really? Do you really write your name in ALL CAPS? What's that word again? ..... Unnatural? The name is the CORPORATE designation of your STRAWMAN. You've been doing all the work getting the money to put into that account. Now you've been told that it doesn't really belong to you but to a fictitious entity created by a fictitious entity that calls itself "GOVERNMENT". Yes, government's a corporation, too. A fiction. It's in business to make money and control people. Your money and you and me, the people. Try getting some new checks at the bank, but ask to have them printed with the first letters in CAPS and the rest in lower case. You know...the way you were taught to print your name in elementary school. They'll usually smile and assure you that they would be happy to accommodate your wishes. They'll try for a while, often getting a bit frustrated until they have to admit that the machine won't let them do it. They'll usu ally just shake their head and shrug their shoulders as they apologize. Bank personnel don't usually have a clue what that's about, and I rarely try to 'splain it to them. People have to be really ready to face the implications of this deception. It can get a little spooky at first.
Page 3 of 5
But the clincher for me was the microprint of the signature line. The check company makes a claim that this is done to provide a tiny print that cannot be clearly copied by copy machines. They call it a security measure. But why replace the signature line with microscopic words? Why not anywhere else on the face of the check? Signatures are very important. They are the difference between slavery and freedom. You haven't been signing your name on a line. You've been signing on a hidden designation that permits the banksters plausible deniability. "We print the truth right on the face of the check! Waddya want?" It will take a very powerful microscope to be able to see what that line says. It usually says in much smaller print than this, AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE Now imagine the line above micro-printed so small that after magnification at more than 20 X it starts to look like the tiny print above. I had to ask myself why they had to disguise the fact that I, the real living man, had to put my money in a bank account of so me corporation that has a name similar to mine and then sign the check as though I'm just the accountant who's got the permission to sign checks for the Corporation. And it's very simple to get control of your TRADE NAME and become its First Creditor. You just have to take control of learn how to write a Financial Statement for the Secretary of State in your state and get the forms and provide the evidence that they need. Sign your name properly to release you from hidden liability.
The first time I tried this was with a telephone bill. The bill was $172. So I wrote a check to the phone company drawn on an account with only $.78 in it. Normally the bank would send the check back to me NSF but this time (because I signed properly) the bank sent the Page 4 of 5
check back to the phone company! The phone company then came after me. NOT the bank on an NSF. The next opportunity I had to use this technique was when I was arrested on June 2 8, 2007 and had to sign a $1000 Sig Bond the next day after being held against my will for 24 hours. I was charged with "obstruction of justice" and "resisting arrest". Pretty serious charges. I was facing up to 9 months in jail and a $10,000 fine. When the D.A. discovered that I'd signed the bond "conditionally" (for MY advantage) he (realizing that he had a worthless bond) offered (in writing) to reduce the charges down to (get this) a $5 Ordinance Violation, court costs of $125.30 and an apology letter to the sheriff for making him come on site and talk to me.
I accepted that offer at the pre-trial meeting but when I went to court I told the judge that (yes, as Sovereign I knew I was the court and she knew it too) I was calling the 24 hours I was kidnapped and held against my will without a phone call or an offer of counsel as "time served" and I am dismissing all charges and here's your apology letter. All she could (and did) say was: "OK." She knew she had to accept my offer to remain in honor or I could have arrested her. It's magick!!! And here's the beauty part: The case, being that it was dismissed and all charges dropped, provides me with prima-facie proof that the foreclosure (which is what all of this was spawned from), arrest and (false) imprisonment opens the door for me to file charges/lawsuits against EVERYONE who had a hand in the seizure of my castle which I had paid for three times over. Over 50 people in toto. This includes ALL 7 of the bank agents who wouldn't answer my questions about my fraudulent mortgage, assorted county agents including the recorder and corporate counsel (who denied my right to record 2 vital affidavits), the sheriff, the armed gunmen who stormed my castle on June 28, 2007, the bank's attorney (and that entire law firm) and even the purchaser of my home and the judge. All in their personal capacities! Please post this prominently so that others can reap the benefits of signing without liability. This is right out of the UCC (Uniform Commercial Code ). Their rules!
Page 5 of 5
