Secrets Known Only to the Inner Elites - By Lyndon LaRouche Jr.

was the period of initial efforts to replace the La Malfa pr prefer eferre red d Moro Moro gove govern rnm ment ent with with an Andr Andreo eottti gove govern rnme ment nt.. In the the cour course se of most most of the the post postwa war r political crises in Italy, tiny, now-aging Ugo La Malfa, spokesman for the relatively tiny Republican Party of Italy taly,, appe appear ared ed to play play the tunes unes to which hich Italy taly subsequently danced. By Lyndon H LaRouche, Jr. The answer to that particular question is essentially: Ugo La Malfa has been a key Italian agent-of-influence Through three millenia of recorded history to date, centered around the Mediterranean, the civilized world has been run by two, bitterly for British intelligence services all of his adult life. opposed elites, the one associated with the faction of Socrates and This This is not not to sugg sugges estt that that Brit Britis ish h inte intell llig igen ence ce Plato, the other with the faction of Aristotle. During these thousands serv servic ices es'' opera operati tive vess indiv individ idua uall lly y are are super superme men. n. In of years, until the developments of approximately 1784-1818 in general, general, such agents, including leading operatives, operatives, are a Europe, both factions' inner elites maintained in some fashion an unbroken continuity of organization and knowledge through all of poor lot; short attention-s attention-spans, pans, scatterbrai scatterbrained, ned, without without the political catastrophes which afflicted afflicted each of them In various moral mooring worth mention, easily provoked into loss times and locales. of personal self-control, the majority downright louts, boo boors rs.. So, So, Ugo Ugo La Malf Malfaa himse himself lf.. It is not not Brit Britis ish h FOREWORD intelligence services viewed in the terms the presumably inform informed ed layman layman ordina ordinaril rily y thinks thinks of an intell intellige igence nce The cleverest way wa y, psychologically, psychologically, in which to hide service which are relevant to the indicated problem of La a secret is to divert the investigator down a tiring trail Malfa. Although British networks do have, inclusively, toward a false discovery. His own efforts convince him the sort of characteristics the misinformed layman would either that he has found a secret through great energy and expect — more or less, it is not such incidentals which cleverness on his own part, or, if the secret he seeks account for La Malta's past successes. appears still but to barely elude his grasp, he values all The relevant key point can be abstracted fairly thus. the more his continued course of misdirection. That is Since Since the the Engli English sh trai traito tors rs Rober Robertt Ceci Cecill and Fran Franci ciss the lesson which can be learned from Edgar Allan Poe's Bacon around the onset of the seventeenth century, and fictional case of The Purloined Letter. later, more notably, from the 1660 Stuart Restoration to Exempla Exemplary ry of the follie folliess into into which which presum presumabl ably y the present day, within and behind British intelligence educated and informed people are misled in the pursuit regular regular and irregul irregular ar servic services es there there is an inner inner circle circle of the the snip snipe, e, are are the the doctr doctrin ines es of the the "int "inter ernat natio ional nal representing the ranks of the Black Guelph families of Jewi Jewish sh cons conspi pira racy cy"" and and the the recen recentl tly y more more popul popular ar all Europe, an oligarchy gathered around the privileges "int "inter erna nati tiona onall comm communi unist st consp conspir iracy acy." ." Duri During ng the the and powers of the British and Dutch monarchies. (7) twentieth century, more people have been turned into Attached Attached to and overlapping overlapping these oligarchical oligarchical families, families, dupes dupes alon along g thos thosee two two fals falsee-tr trai aill purs pursuit uitss than than any there there is a specia speciall collec collectiv tivity ity,, tradit tradition ionall ally y centere centered d competing obsessions. notably in Oxford, Cambridge, and Sussex universities, The effect of that sort of misdirected search for the an inner intelligentsia of that faction, which studies the ultimate, ultimate, global master-conspir master-conspiracy acy is principally principally twoclassics, thereby to gain the knowledge through which fold. The dupes themselves are misled away from the the forces associated with the British monarchy may rule secr secret etss bein being g hidd hidden en in this this manne mannerr. Seco Secondl ndly y, the the the world. discredit which is directed to fall upon the lured turns Through three millennia of recorded history to date, most others, foolishly, away from all searches for the centered around the Mediterranean, the civilized world secrets secrets of those "inner elites" elites" which have in fact run the has been run by two, bitterly opposed elites, the one world' world'ss affai affairs rs during during approxi approximat mately ely three three thousa thousand nd associated with the faction of Socrates and Plato, the years of known history. othe otherr with with the the fact factio ion n of Aris Aristo totl tle. e. Duri During ng thes thesee To illustrate the corollary aspect of the problem; thousa usands of year ears, unti ntil the deve evelopments of durin during g a meet meetin ing g betw between een this this writ writer er and and a lead leadin ing g approximately 1784-1818 in Europe, both factions inner politi political cal figure figure of Italy Italy,, which which occurr occurred ed during during early early elites maintained in some fashion an unbroken continuity 1976, the latter asked: "Why is it that Ugo La Malfa of orga organi niza zati tion on and and know knowle ledg dgee thro throug ugh h all all of the the always comes out on top?" The context of his question

THE SECRETS KNOWN ONLY TO THE INNER ELITES

Trusted by over 1 million members

Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions! Start Free Trial Cancel Anytime.













2 political catastrophes which afflicted each of them in Such a transformation of the mass of plebeians is various times and locales. the work of years, even under favorable circumstances. At this moment of writing, it would be criminal folly to It was the elite elite associ associate ated d with with the Platonic Platonic (or, (or, propos posee to wait wait year yearss befo before re brin bringi ging ng the the Plat Platoni onicc Neo-p Neo-plat latoni onicc factio faction n which which organi organized zed the Americ American an pro faction back into a leading position in the government of Revo Revolu luti tion on and and esta establ blis ishe hed d the the Unit United ed Stat States es as a society. If the neo-Aristotelian faction prevails through democra democratic tic constit constituti utional onal republi republic. c. During During the early early the present period of crises, it is more than conceivable eightee eighteenth nth century century,, in circum circumsta stance ncess associ associate ated d with with that the human race might not survive, or, at best, that Marlborough's campaign and the Mississippi and Souththe new beginn beginning ingss of civili civilizat zation ion would have to be Sea bubbles plots, the continuity of the Platonic faction assembled from the shards of o f general thermonuclear war. war. was first administered a broad, temporary defeat with some lasting effects, and was shattered later as a world The Platonic elite in the fullness of its knowledge force through the events of 1784-1818. must be reconstituted now. That cannot occur unless the "secret knowledge" of that faction is reestablished with In the aftermath of the 1815 Treaty of Vienna, the aid aid of refe refere rence nce to clas classi sica call know knowle ledge dge,, class classic ical al shattering of the power of the Platonic elite in Europe knowledge resurrected in appropriately modern terms of meant in large measure both a scattering of the main reference. That indispensable articulation is the function forces of that faction, faction, and an associated, associated, increasing increasing loss of this report. of the "secret knowledge" through which the Platonic inner inner elite elite had former formerly ly develop developed ed and exercis exercised ed its factional power. From that time to the present period, the THE CONSPIRATORS inner circles of the Aristotelia Aristotelian n (or, (or, more exactly, exactly, "neoAristotelian") faction have been hegemonic increasingly Yes, Adela elaide, the world has been run by in ordering world affairs. Although humanist (Platonic) conspiratorial elites employing secret knowledge. In its faction factional al forces forces have have continu continued ed in existe existence nce and are lesser lesser aspects, aspects, that conspiracy, conspiracy, has subsumed subsumed features features represented among political and related elites today, the which coincide at first impression with what you might Plat Platon onic ic elit elitee has has lost lost conn connec ecti tion on to the the body body of imagine a conspiracy to be. However, if you pursue the knowledge upon which its former power depended. inve invest stig igat atio ion n from from the the stan standp dpoi oint nt of your your usua usual, l, The The per person son who pose posed d the ques questtion ion cite cited d is misguided preconceptions of a "global conspiracy," you exemplary of this problem. He is not only a Christian will will only only misl mislea ead d your yourse self lf into into anot anothe herr path pathet etic ic humanist and a member of the ruling political elite, but a concoction of mixed facts, half-truths and fantasies, like man of unusual personal character as well as political the concoctions associated with the "international Jewish skills and power. Yet, with the considerable knowledge conspiracy" or "international communist conspiracy." available to him, he did not know the answer to the Global Global conspir conspiraci acies es which which functi function on succee succeed d by question. question. Any member of the Platonic elite in command command establishing "controlled environments" around the minds of the "secret knowledge" of that tradition would have of the credulous masses of the world. Such a controlled known the answer immediately. immediately. environment is summed up efficiently by stating that the The pri principal function of this repor port is to credulous masses are ruled by mythologies, and that the summ summari arily ly,, but but syst systema emati tical cally ly ident identif ify y the the "sec "secre rett elit elites es rule rule such such mass masses es by crea creati ting ng,, shap shapin ing, g, and and knowledge" of the Platonic inner elite. That includes the manipulating the mythologies. The methods employed Plat Platoni onic' c'ss knowl knowledg edgee of the the secr secret etss of the the enemy enemy,, by Jose Joseph ph Goeb Goebbel belss and and carr carrie ied d furt further her by Brit Britis ish h Aristotelian elite. intelligence networks for creating and manipulating the Alth Althou ough gh the the obje object ctiv ivee of this this writ writer er and and his his mythologies of credulous masses through control of all associates is to end the ages-long division between elites or at leas leastt key portio portions ns of the the pres presss and and radi radio o and and and the credulous, myth-ridden masses, this can not be television, are the center of modern techniques to this















3 special knowledge, which makes it efficiently secret, is that the elite not only know that the mythologies are mythologies, but also know that they themselves create and use those mythologies to manipulate the credulous masses. Beyond that first broad level of division between the the know knowle ledg dgea eabl blee and and the the cred credul ulou ous, s, the the secr secret et knowledge is distinguished by the division of elites into two irreconcilable factions. Beyond the sheep-pens of the beli elievers in mytholo ologies, es, there exist two fundamentally opposed views of what to do with the worl world, d, of what what dire direct ctio ion n to adop adoptt in stee steeri ring ng the the historical movement of the human, species. One elite, the humanists, the Platonic or Neoplatonic faction, is dedicated to steering the course of history away from rule through through mythologie mythologies. s. The other, other, the Aristotelia Aristotelians ns and their heirs, is committed to strengthening the rule by mythology, for the purpose of establishing a permanent, "feudal "feudal-li -like" ke" Utopia Utopia of obedien obedient, t, simple simple-mi -minded nded folk folk ruled by a tenured neo-Aristotelian oligarchy. The secret secret knowle knowledge dge is, at first first distin distincti ction, on, as secret as the purloined letter of the Poe tale. Once the mythologies are known to be mythologies, the primitive aspe aspect ct of trut truth h lies lies fact factua uall lly y in plai plain n sigh sight. t. Once Once myth mythol olog ogy y is cast cast asid aside, e, the the deve develo lopm pmen entt of real real knowledge out of such primitive truth, the development properly termed scientific progress, begins. In the case of La Malta, the point to be made is this. Ugo Ugo La Mal Malfa, fa, like ike Cucc Cuccia ia of Medi Mediob oban anca ca,, Riccardo Lombard! of the Socialist Party of Italy, and Amendo Amendola la and and Napol Napolit itan ano o of the the lead leader ersh ship ip of the the Communist Party of Italy, began his career as a British intell intellige igence nce service services' s' agent agent under under the tutela tutelage ge of the same same evil evil Bened Benedet etto to Croce Croce who who menta mentall lly y crip crippl pled ed Antonio Gramsci and many others. Together with the Britis British h intell intellige igence nce servic services' es' Italia Italian' n' Mafia, Mafia, and the Britis British-a h-alli llied ed "black "black nobilit nobility" y" of Italy Italy,, the networ networks ks radiating from Croce's original base at Naples University are among the principal forces that presently govern Italy from within for London. In the end, it is the Black Guelph oligarchy of Italy which is the local branch of the real rulers. The Mafia, together with such persons as La Malf Malfa, a, Lom Lombar bardi and and Amen Amendo dolla are are mer merely ely the the

ignorant, superstitious Italian will tend to swallow. In this his way way, Croc Crocee and and his his cir circle cle made ade them themsselve elvess craftmasters of the manipulation of Italy's characteristic mythologie mythologies. s. They are the qualified qualified sheepherders sheepherders of the sheep of Italy, the sheep who have made up the majority of Italy's myth-ridden population. On this account it should be readily understood that the notable folly of La Malta's opponents is that they este esteem em thems themsel elve vess "pra "pract ctic ical al polit politic icia ians ns." ." In othe other r words, they are at their best and their worst Machiavellians. As with Machiavelli in his fatal worst feature, they define the art of ruling as one of bending with with the the wind windss of prev prevai aili ling ng myth mythol olog ogie iess — the the mythologies employed by their adversaries. They seek to bend the levers of such prevailing mythology, intending so to move move politi political cal proces processes ses into into direct direction ionss which which correspond in actuality with the real interests of Italy and its people. By committing such a blunder of "practical politics"— sometimes termed "ductility" — they commit themselves to leading within the limits of the sheep-pen that La Malfa and his British masters control, the sheep pen of the British-controlled Italian mythologies. A popularized mythology is like a goldfish bowl. No matter how cleverly the fish chooses his direction within the bowl, he can never escape it in such a fashion. No matter how cleverly he adapts to the environment environment of the bowl's medium (e.g., popular mythologies), whoever moves the bowl moves him in a corresponding direction. The The misg misgui uide ded d ""re ""real alis ists ts," ," the the self self-e -est stee eeme med d "practical politicians" of Italy's humanist forces, regard it as wisdom to maintain influence and credibility in terms of popular political mythologies, to attempt to bend the internal features of enemy-controlled mythologies in the direction agreeable to the interests of the nation and its people. Those for whom La Malta speaks control the mediu edium m with withiin whic which h the the hum humani anists sts so situ situat atee themselves. Thus, and not by any advantage of personal prowess. La Malta has often appeared to win in most of the political crises of Italy to date. The same political arrangement prevails in North America and throughout Western Europe to the present day. It prevails in most of the developing sector, and in a somewh somewhat at differ different ent form form in Easter Eastern n Europe. Europe. Only Only a















4 The instit instituti utions ons of ballot ballot-de -democ mocracy racy — massiv massivee between France and Holland had enabled the corrupted House of Orange to oust De Witt's humanists. vote-frauds vote-frauds momentarily momentarily overlooked — have done little little The late late sevent seventeen eenth th centur century y House House of Orange Orange,, allied allied by to improve this on principle. What does it mean to have marri marriage age to the ruling ruling.. Black Black Guelph Guelph House House of Hanove Hanoverr and the power to vote, if massive vote-frauds determine the otherwise thoroughly committed to Black Guelph policies in its own official tallies, or, if the knowledge given to the voter is right, right, undertook undertook to neutraliz neutralizee the republican republican ferment ferment within the pred predomi ominan nantl tly y a myth myth,, and and if the the voter voter's 's crit criter eria ia of larger portion of the English population by instituting the form of theater known variously as British "constitutional monarchy" and judgment are chiefly mythological? If you, Adelaide, are a typical plebeian, you are still today largely a puppet of British "liberalism." By giving the credulous British plebeians the thoroughly corrupted (to this day) British parliament with which to those elites which control the shaping shaping and manipulation manipulation amuse themselves, the Black Guelph (Orange-Hanover) monarchy of your adopted mythologies preserved to itself all it considered essential respecting the actual THE ARISTOTELIAN ENEMIES OF MANKIND

For reasons better understood on the basis of the body of this this repo report rt,, the the only only effe effect ctiv ivel ely y ruli ruling ng elit elitee in the the capitalist sector of the world today has been the neoAristotelia Aristotelian n faction's faction's inner circles, circles, the inner circles of a force centered in Britain. Britain. The humanist humanist elite exists, but, with with handf handful ulss of excep excepti tions ons rela relati tivel vely y spea speaki king ng — chie chiefl fly y scat scatte tere red d exce except ptio ions ns — lack lackss the the "sec "secre rett knowledge" upon which its global effectiveness depends. For reasons we shall identify in due course, the present cen center of the power of the neoeo-Aristotel oteliian or oligarchical faction, the "Persian model" faction, is the Black Guelph monarchies of Britain and Holland, the ...power of both monarchies consolidated under the British. So, as we account for the Black Guelph faction as a whole, we focus here upon its center, the British monarchy. One of the most notable frauds afoot in today's credulo credulous us world world is the myth myth of Britis British h "democr "democracy acy," ," British "constitutional government." Britain has in fact two governments, the first a parliamentary charade for the the edif edific icat atio ion n of the the cred credul ulou ous, s, the the othe otherr the the real real,, monarchical government. With notabl notablee aid from from corrup corruptt Presbyt Presbyteri erians ans,, the Hous Housee of Oran Orange ge and its its Amst Amster erdam dam banki banking ng alli allies es overthrew the British Commonwealth in 1660, installing the Dutch puppets, the House of Stuart, upon the British throne. Those Stuarts proved to have several important defects as Dutch puppets. More narrowly, this being typical of the immorality and venality of the Scottish aristocracy generally, the Stuarts sold their favors wherever the market prices suited them, including circles around the French monarchy. monarchy. More significantly, significantly, under James II the

government of the United Kingdom. By cultivated popular reputation, the British monarchy is a quaint enclave of ceremonial functions, plugging along quaintly on an annual household budget of a few millions. It, like its associates among the Black Guelph aristocratic families of continental Europe, is reputed by the credulous to exist principally to provide editorial copy for the society pages of certain news media, and for those quaint quaint littl littlee women' women'ss magazi magazines nes so popula popularr among among the most most brutalized portions of the European population. In reality, the British monarchy defines a domain of special powers powers and privilege privilege outside outside the reach of existing existing practices practices of parliamentary control. It is screened from inquiry by the doctrine of lese majeste and by an arrangement known as the Official Secrets Act. Through the monarchy's own privileged financial activities, and through interface with and discretion of both the Bank of England and a select group of private merchant-banking families, it is the centerpiece of one of the most powerful financial institutions of the world. world. It is otherwis otherwisee armed with extraparl extraparliame iamentary ntary control of Britain's combined official and unofficial intelligence services, and has de facto facto as well well as some some nomina nominall contro controll over over the the Britis British h military. This power is nominally located in the powers and privilege of the incumbent monarch. That aspect of the matter has a certain impor importan tance, ce, but repres represent entss far too narrow narrow a focus. focus. The Britis British h monarchy is best viewed as the rallying point for an assemblage of oligarchical families, both British and Commonwealth nations, and also also strata strata of the allied allied oligar oligarchi chical cal famil families ies of Europe Europe.. These These oligarchic oligarchical al families families,, together together with with their their most trusted political political servants, gather around and behind the screen of the powers and privilege of the British monarchy. Through such and related means, and through the vast networks of influence they have developed among many nations over recent centuries, these combined forces control and deploy one of the most powerful forces on earth, and the most efficiently evil force existing today. The neo-Aristotelian "secret knowledge" of these oligarchical forces is transmitted to each generation within the privileged strata in principally a threefold way. First, First, the the famili families es themse themselve lvess transm transmit it their their oligar oligarchi chical cal tradition, a certain way of viewing the world and its matters of















5 broadly broadly,, implicit implicitly ly,, the tradition tradition is transmit transmitted ted through through a kind of "drill" governing the rearing of the young. Second, Second, the British British oligarchi oligarchical cal traditio tradition n and attitudes attitudes are shaped into forms of knowledgea knowledgeable ble world; world; outlook, outlook, in varying varying degr degree eess of dept depth h and and brea breadt dth h from from case case to case case,, by Oxfo Oxford rd,, Cambri Cambridge, dge, and Sussex Sussex univer universit sities ies.. (The (The Londo London n School School of Economics is chiefly the center for recruiting foreigners to British intelligence service.) Together with these universities there are the publi publicc school schools, s, which which feed feed into into the former former.. These These insti institut tution ionss provide provide a center center and model for the "gentlemen's "gentlemen's education" education" of the oligarchies' young throughout the world. Third, the articulation of policies and strategies agreeable to that tradition is accomplished through aid of various "think-tanks." Oxford, Oxford, Cambridg Cambridge, e, and Sussex Sussex universit universities ies include include privilege privileged d domains which are the core of such arrangements. These are the institutions which coordinate the British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS or MI-6), MI-6), MI-5, MI-5, and the London London Tavistoc Tavistock k Institut Institute. e. Other Briti British sh instit instituti utions ons contro controlli lling ng Briti British sh Policy Policy,, includ including ing its its intelligence services' policies, include the Round Table, the Royal Instit Institute ute of Intern Internati ationa onall Affai Affairs rs (RIIA (RIIA), ), and the Inter Internat nation ional al Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). The British intelligence services operate branches of IISS in many nations, including a part of the New York Council on Foreign Relations and the Aspen Institute in the United States. The Trilateral Trilateral Commis Commissio sion n is predom predomina inantl ntly y an arm of Briti British sh intell intellige igence nce services. The London Tavistock Institute controls the United Nations Organization's World Federation of Mental Health, is the "mother" and continuing influence of the RAND Corporation, runs the Fabian operation against the United States' United Mine Workers Union, and many many other other instit instituti utions ons,, includ including ing intern internati ationa onall terror terroris istt networks, in many nations. It is notable that many persons in high positions in the United States and other nations are both nominally and efficiently British intelligence services' agents-of-influence. The U.S. Labor Party has publicly documented the case of Henry A. Kissinger. The cases of Vice-Presi ice-President dent Walter alter A. Mondale, Mondale, Senator Senator Edward Edward Kennedy Kennedy,, Zbigni Zbigniew ew Brzez Brzezins inski, ki, Werner erner Micha Michael el Blumen Blumentha thal, l, James James R. Schlesinge Schlesinger, r, and many others could be added. added. The "W "Water atergate" gate" against President Richard M. Nixon was a monstrous hoax, set up from from both both inside inside and outsid outsidee the the admin administ istrat ration ion by Kissi Kissinger nger,, General Alexander Haig, and other British agents-of-influence, run on the outside largely by the networks of the Institute for Policy Studies and corrupt, complicit elements of the press, themselves either British agents outright or British agents-of-influence. agents-of-influence. The United States is only the most important of the nations massively subverted by British intelligence services in this way. THE “SECRET KNOWLEDGE”

The core of the knowledge guiding the overall direction of work of British intelligence services is "secret knowledge" based

personality in the Poe story. Most relevant to this point is evidence proving the distinction between what Oxford and Cambridge know and what they profess publicly to believe. The point point is illust illustrat rated ed by the case case of Thales Thales's 's associ associate ate Anaximenes. "Everyone knows" that Anaximenes specified "air" to be one of the primary constituents of all substance. Yet, the Greek term which Oxford and Cambridge, in particular, have certified to signify "air" has approximately the same meaning as the modern German Geist, "mind" or "spirit," more precisely defined by context of usage. The fraud is so blatant that the translator who perpetrates it shows that he is engaged in a witting hoax. Yet, the credulous Ph.D.'s and others who piously recite the fraud, and interpret Anaximenes from this standpoint, have not yet had their their degree degreess revoke revoked d — least least of all, all, not by Oxford Oxford and Cambridge. Most Most of the the wide widely ly accr accred edit ited ed text textbo book okss on clas classi sica call philosophical and related topics are riddled with, indeed based upon blatant hoaxes to the same effect. To get at the real issues of the fourth century BC and earlier, and to trace the consequences of those continuing issues over subsequent centuries into the recent eighteenth century, one is obliged to discard the largest portion of the accredited "secondary sources" as either witting frauds or as a learned fool's glosses on the frauds he pathetically repeats. Focusi Focusing ng for the moment moment only only on the expli explicit citly ly Briti British sh cond conduc uctt of such such frau frauds ds,, inst instan ance cess such such as thos thosee we cite cited d in connectio connection n with with Anaximenes Anaximenes prove conclusively conclusively that the inner inner circles centered around Oxford and Cambridge are engaged in an effort to conceal the most vital issues of historical scholarship to their own advantage. By these means, they convert the most vital categories of historical knowledge into the "secret knowledge" of the inner elites, the elites not duped by the mythologies of the popular universities' classics and political science departments. Once one knows that this fraud exists, sufficient primary and other suitable source-documentation exists to reconstruct the core of the truth in these matters — even acknowledging the masses of ancien ancientt docume documents nts which which may be buried buried away away from from the honest honest scholar's scholar's view in one fashion fashion or another another.. Consequent Consequently ly,, the bare facts of the "secret knowledge" do indeed r epresent a likeness to the case of The Purloine Purloined d Letter Letter.. The knowledge, knowledge, admitted admittedly ly widely widely scattered, exists in large measure, on condition one knows what one is seeking and in what sort of place it is located in which fashion. That That is the princi principal pal "secre "secret" t" of the Briti British sh intell intellige igence nce services, the core of the body of "secret knowledge" through which the British and their accomplices have largely ruled the world during recent centuries. We are not to be accuse accused d of singl singling ing out arbitr arbitrari arily ly the seventh-through-fourth centuries BC in this connection. Once one has understood the crucial issues of that period of civilization, and knows how those issues shaped the course of all subsequent history, history, there exist with certainty no more important secrets to be discovered respecting past or present. That fact will be made clear in the course















6 Egyptian propaganda), with odd pieces of actual Babylonian and other other histor history y added added to the mixtu mixture. re. The latter latter infus infusion ion gave a credib credible le calend calendar ar to the otherw otherwise ise fraudu fraudulen lentt concoc concoctio tion. n. This This original Mesopotamian hoax was reworked repeatedly, repeatedly, always under the supervision of non-Jews, with the basic structure of the Old 1'estament hoax completed during the Persian Empire period. This hoax was first introduced into European languages about 230 230 BC, BC, on the the reco recomm mmen enda dati tion on of the the same same Aris Aristo tote teli lian an Peripatetics who contrived the exotic cults of Ptolemaic Egypt, and on orders from the Ptolemies. That edition, of the "Seventy," is otherwise notable for the fact that it was produced in a variety of demotic Greek peculiar to such locations as the waterfront brothels of Egypt. (4) Later Later,, when when Philo Philo of Alexan Alexandri driaa attemp attempted ted to develo develop p a Platon Platonic ic versio version n of Judais Judaism m (the (the roots roots of the later later Sephar Sephardic dic tradition of Maimonides and Avencibrol), Avencibrol), Philo avoided, for obvious political political reasons, reasons, simply simply throwing out the mess before before him. He attempted to circumvent the problem by the rabbinical, Pharasaical ruse of the "commentary," tolerating the text while fundamentally altering the reading to be attributed to it. The Christian Apostles, confronted with the same general problem, rid Christianity of the worst worst impli implicat cation ionss of the Old Testame estament nt by empha emphasiz sizing ing the the "Dispensation of Christ," and warning against the dangers of the "concision." Christ had freed man from such barbarisms as the Old Testament. Only those sections of the Old Testament which pointed toward toward the coming coming ,of the Messia Messiah h or otherw otherwise ise happened happened to coincide withChristianity were to be treated seriously. It does not follow from this that the Apostles were in any fashion hoaxsters of the Aristotelian Aristotelian varieties. Apostolic Christianity always, and rightly so, regardedmAristotelianism as an organized force for evil, as did the greate greatest st religi religious ous thinke thinkers rs of the Europe European an Renais Renaissan sance. ce. Even Even Thomas Aquinas belatedly associated himself among such thinkers by acknowledging, during the period before his death, that all his preceding preceding writings writings / had been fundamentally fundamentally in error. error. Apostolic Apostolic Christianity and its leading continuations were always Platonic or Neoplatonic in respect of philosophical method. Aristotelian sync syncre reti ticc meth method odss and and Aris Aristo tote teli lian anis ism m were were intr introd oduc uced ed to Christianity initially by way of the vestiges of the cult of Apollo, in the effort of the collapsing Roman Empire to develop an episcopal form of Christianity in conformity with pagan (Aristotelian) policies for design and use of state religious cults. Alth Althoug ough h that that view view is not not usua usuall lly y supp suppor orte ted d with with such such frankness by published church histories, many leading theologians, notably including Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa, are explicit on the problem of Aristotelianism. However, However, those theologians who concur with with our judgme judgment nt have have genera generally lly regarded regarded it as impru impruden dentt to disturb the naive faith of the ignorant with historical problems of this sort. This policy policy within within Church Church circles circles intersects intersects the fact that both the Platonics and Aristotelians adhered, for opposite reasons, to

prejudic prejudices, es, and on the state of ignorance ignorance concerning concerning individua individuall experience otherwise known as "common sense." The second, next-hig next-higher her level of knowledge knowledge is equivalent equivalent to the condition of understanding defined b y Immanuel Kant, the mere understanding. Persons at this level have consistent knowledge of the ostens ostensibl ibly y lawful lawful featur features es of practi practice ce in certai certain, n, variou variouss catego categorie riess of human human practi practice ce in genera general. l. This This is a condit condition ion corresponding to the lowest level of what may be termed scientific knowledge. Such persons do not know why such categories exist, or how or why the ostensibly lawful principles appropriate to such categories are determined. They have merely practical knowledge of consistent cause-and-effect cause-and-effect features of practice in those categories of experience in which they have been educated. ; The third third,, highes highestt level level of human human knowle knowledge dge is reason reason,, otherwise termed Plato's Socratic reason. It is only on this level that truth can be efficiently comprehended comprehended . The The know knowle ledg dgee of the the two two lowe lowerr leve levels ls is nece necess ssar arily ily mythological, false, or, as Spinoza specifies, "fictitious." For such reasons, the Platonics judged mythologies twofoldly twofoldly.. All mythologies they knew to be inherently false (fictitious), but no person could rise above mythologies except by attaining reason. Therefore, in dealing with masses living at the inferior levels of mental life, it was deemed necessary to deal with them on the terms of mythological beliefs. The issue of practical politics therefore took the task-orien task-oriented ted form of distinguish distinguishing ing among destructive destructive and usef useful ul myth mythol olog ogie ies. s. Thos Thosee form formss of simp simple le beli belief efss or mere mere understanding which tended to allow society to move in directions otherwise required by reason were deemed the tolerable class of mythologies. Those other mythologies, which tended toward evil consequences, were evil beliefs, which must be fought accordingly. It is imposs impossibl iblee to unders understan tand d the centra centrall doctri doctrinal nal issue issuess among leading Christian theologians, from the apostolic period to present times, without taking that 'Platonic view inclusively into account. These theologians have been concerned for themselves and for determination of policy with the issues of truth according to reason. They have been, at the same time, otherwise concerned with popular mythologies, respecting chiefly the issue whether this or that popular belief lee away from or toward the realization of the dictates of reason. Although the objective has been to bring all of manki mankind nd into into the state state of reason reason (atone (atonemen ment), t), for immedi immediate ate purposes the rule has been that this effort must be situated within terms of the problem defined by the simple beliefs of the ignorant. The Aristotelians Aristotelians and their heirs, notably including Bernard of Clairvaux Clairvaux,, Martin Martin Luther Luther and the Presbyterian Presbyterian leaders, leaders, had and continue an opposite policy concerning mythologies. The original Aristotelians were the intelligence-services arm of the oligarchies joi joint ntly ly cont contro roll llin ing g the the cour courtt of Phil Philip ip of Mace Macedo don n and and the the contemporary Persian court of that time. Their objectives were to stop technological and scientific progress, and to create zero-growth synthetic mythologies as the simple beliefs of the ignorant masses. These efforts they regarded as the means to establish permanent

















7 man's existence according to reason to be the helper of God in the continuing continuing work of creation. creation. Abelard Abelard located located lawfulnes lawfulnesss in the lawfulness governing the ordering of continued creation. The exact opposite opposite position position was classically classically argued by the twelfth-c twelfth-centu entury ry Bernard of Clairvaux, a point of importance we shall cover in the course of this report. THE OUTER LIMITS OF O F "MARXISM"

Althoug Although h Karl Karl Marx Marx made made some some genuin genuinee and impor importan tantt additions to human knowledge in general, Marx never succeeded in becoming part of the knowledgeable "inner elite." His doctrine has a collateral but no fundamental place within the "secret knowledge" of the elites. Marx wrote that all history is the history of class struggles. To the extent extent this this is partia partially lly true as a matter matter of descri descripti ption, on, it is otherwise so misleading as to be false as a guide for practice. Marx also also wrote wrote that that the princi principal pal achiev achieveme ement nt of the emerge emergence nce of industrial, urban-centered capitalist capitalist development was to end the rule of societ society y by "the "the idiocy idiocy of rural rural life." life." The latter latter observ observati ation on touche touchess upon upon the "secre "secrett knowle knowledge dge"" of the elite, elite, wherea whereass the the maxim cited before does not. Marx also bent, unfortunately, toward the view that the essential positive struggle of the human intellect was toward "materialism." by way of but away from "idealism. " That latter view of Marx's is not only nonsensical, but prevented Marx Marx from from turnin turning g into into the directio directions ns in which which he might might have have discovered the "secret knowledge" he sought. The true, primary determinants of the course of human history are expressed in the most concentrated form in the factional issue between the factions of Plato and Aristotle during the fourth century BC. All preceding and subsequent history is properly understood from that standpoint of conceptual reference, as we have already indicated and as we shall show in this report. The partial truth buried under Marx's misunderstanding of the class struggle, a partial truth to which Marx himself was happily close for his practice, is that the progress of humanity has been accomplis accomplished hed through through the instrume instrumentali ntality ty of those social forces forces which, as social classes, have been oriented toward urban-centered technological, scientific and related cultural progress. So far, Marx, like Lenin's Chernyshevskii, was correct.

to those those blunde blunders rs of obsess obsessive ive misbe misbelie lieff expose exposess the essent essential ial problem of Marx. Marx's Marx's simpl simplist istic ic misco misconce ncepti ption on of the class class strug struggle gle in history and his pathetic view of "materialism"-versus-"idealism" "materialism"-versus-"idealism" are essential essentially ly derivativ derivativee of his acceptance acceptance of the myth certifie certified d as "history" through the broad influence of the Black Guelph, Londoncentered faction. In the wake of the 1815 Treaty of Vienna, the fraudu fraudulen lentt accoun accountt of histor history y was made made rapidl rapidly y author authorit itati ative ve throughout Germany and other parts of Europe. Those were the accredited, prevailing "scholarly" views of Marx's Marx's time. time. Factually Factually,, they were more absurd absurd than they were accredited. Marx's credulous acceptance of the main features of that hoax known as the "Ninth of Thermidor," and his related, crippling hist histor orio iogr grap aphi hica call foll folly y in trac tracin ing g the the prog progre ress ss of Euro Europe pean an intellectual life from Francis Bacon, are exemplary of the key to Marx's failures. For those and related reasons, the useful core of his work on methodology and political economy was situated within a containin containing g belief belief in a prevailin prevailing. g. Black Black Guelph Guelph historiogr historiographic aphical al mythology. Marx's foolish criticisms of the leading American economist, Henry C. Carey, efficiently illustrate the point. Following the 1815 Treaty of Vienna, the American branch of the the Neop Neopla lato toni nicc move moveme ment nt of the the eigh eighte teen enth th cent centur ury y was was significantly contained and subverted increasingly overall, but it did not die out as a force as quickly as the Neoplatonic forces were crus crushe hed d into into obsc obscur urity ity in Euro Europe pe itse itself lf.. Thro Throug ugh h circ circle less of "American Whigs" associated with John Quincy Adams, Henry C. Carey Carey,, and and Henry Henry Clay Clay,, a resi residu duee of the the know knowle ledg dgee of the the Neoplatonic heritage persisted, centering around knowledge of the fact fact that that Brita Britain in contin continued ued to be the deadly deadly enemy enemy of both both the Unit United ed Stat States es and and huma humani nity ty in gene genera ral, l, comb combin ined ed with with the the unders understan tandin ding g that that the Britis British h econom economy y, despit despitee its its inclu included ded industria industrial-cap l-capital italist ist feature, feature, was governed governed by an anticapit anticapitalis alistt oligarchy whose rule characterized the British economy as a whole. Marx, as is generally known, viewed the British model as the classical empirical case of reference for the best approximation of industria industrial-cap l-capital italist ist developmen development. t. That view was nonsensic nonsensical, al, as Carey Carey proved proved in his his own writin writings. gs. Marx, Marx, howeve howeverr, stubbo stubbornl rnly y rejected those abundant facts which refuted his credulous obsession on this point.

















8 situat situated ed within within and update updated d by approp appropria riate te terms terms of modern modern scientific knowledge. The writer and his associates have come to this present state of knowledge fortunately, fortunately, but not by / accident. This writer, writer, powerfully influe influence nced d at the the outset outset of his teens teens by Leibn Leibniz' iz'ss writin writings, gs, has pursued that impulse by various pathways of activity, experience, and study all of his adult life. On the basis of his own initial, distinguishing accomplishments in political economy and method, beginning in the early 1950s, he subsequently, beginning in 1966, init initia iate ted d a new new kind kind of poli politi tica call orga organi niza zati tion on ex novo novo,, an organi organizat zation ion based based on those those concep conceptio tions ns and their their strate strategic gic- programmatic relevance for the developing world crisis. Since Since early early 1968 1968 that that organ organiza izatio tion n has been been in escala escalatin ting g direct conflict with British intelligence networks. In the course of that escalation matters have come to the present point, a point at which we have become, much as was Leibniz himself, one of the primary adversary-targets adversary-targets of the London-centered enemy forces. During the course of this escalating conflict, we developed what became a novel, specialized political-intelligence capability. Partly because of and partly with aid of the capability, we have intersecte intersected d increasin increasingly gly leading leading political political forces, forces, including including other intelligence circles, in many parts of the world. Through this total experi experienc ence, e, with with aid of resour resources ces immed immediat iately ely and otherw otherwise ise available for aid of our work, we have been able to produce the best conceptual overview of the British intelligence problem presently available. Throug Through h the combin combined ed effec effects ts of our work work in advanc advanced ed aspe aspect ctss of the the physi physica call scie scienc nces es and and a deca decade de's 's coor coordi dina nate ted d applicati application on of politica political-int l-intelli elligence gence methods methods to crucial crucial issues issues of history, we have in due course discovered ourselves to be much less a novel institution than we might otherwise have assumed to be the case. We have discovered that into the 1790s, the leading forces of the United States and the leading humanist humanist forces forces of Europe were linked linked by common common partic participa ipatio tion n in intern internati ationa onall Neopla Neoplaton tonic ic netw networ orks ks,, netw networ orks ks reac reachi hing ng back back,, esse essent ntia iall lly y unbr unbrok oken en in continuity, over approximately three thousand years. Through such and related efforts, we have been able to revive, in suitably modem term terms, s, the the esse essent ntia iall parts parts of the the "sec "secre rett know knowle ledg dge" e" of that that Neoplatonic elite. Others Others among among today today's 's humani humanist st elite elite already already comma command nd

mythical image of Aristotle as an original philosophical thinker. In this this chapte chapterr we shall shall trace trace this this matte matterr from from Aristo Aristotle tle's 's time, time, emphasizing the role of his influence in the development of the Black Guelph faction, from the emergence of that faction around the leadership of the Pierleoni during the eleventh century AD, into the neo-Arist neo-Aristoteli otelian an developmen developments ts associat associated ed chiefly chiefly with Francis Francis Bacon and the late seventeenth century successors of Bacon around the British Royal Society. Once the contents of this present chapter and the next, on historiography, historiography, have been presented, the reader will have have access access to the most crucia cruciall of the "secrets "secrets"" employ employed ed by humanity's enemies today. The monstrously false report that Aristotle was the successor of Socrates and Plato, and also an important original thinker in behalf of scientific knowledge, is entirely a hoax without foundation in fact. Politically, philosophically, Aristotle was in all respects the enemy of Socrates and Plato, and also personally a chief enemy of Plato. The chief feature of Aristotle's character, the feature which is determining for everything else to be considered in that connection, is that that like like his his cont contem empo pora rari ries es.. the the trai traito tors rs Isoc Isocra rate tess and and Demosthenes, Aristotle was an agent working for the joint forces of the Persian and Macedonian courts. (1) Although Aristotle Aristotle was an agent of Philip of Macedon, he was — not inconsistently — a bitter enemy of Alexander the Great. Grante Granted, d, Alexa Alexande nderr and Arist Aristotl otlee mainta maintaine ined d an intere interesti sting ng correspondence, and Philip did in fact appoint Aristotle Alexander's tutor. The textbooks which emphasize such selected bare facts for the deception of the credulous omit the additional facts; not only, was Alexander Aristotle's philosophical and political adversary, but it was was Aristo Aristotl tle's e's nephew nephew who was convic convicted ted of attemp attemptin ting g to murder murder Alexander Alexander by poisoning, poisoning, and Aristotl Aristotle's e's agents agents who did, according to authoritative sources of that time, finally assassinate Alexander. The The imme immedi diat atee back backgr grou ound nd to the the case case of Aris Aristo totl tlee is summarily as follows. Philip Philip of Macedo Macedon n was a proteg protegee and ally of the leading leading general and others of the, Persian imperial court. (2) The bankers of Mestopotamia, who centuries earlier had brought in the Persians to replace the Babylonians, had developed the view, by the mid-fourth century BC, that a new arrangement was needed. Their scheme centered about a policy of splitting the existing empire into two

















9 constitutions and intent to the promotion of urban-centered scientific and technological progress, and to the; development of modes of produ producti ction on and of world world trade trade to promot promotee this this cause, cause, throug through h colonies and other means, to promote this cause throughout the world. The opposite faction, centered traditionally in the priests and monetarist monetarist financier financier factions factions of Mesopotami Mesopotamia, a, opposed opposed scientif scientific ic progress, opposed urban-centered cultural progress. They proposed a "zero-grow "zero-growth," th," antitechnology antitechnology policy, policy, and the rule of society society universally by a rural-centered, landlordism-based landlordism-based aristocracy, aristocracy, an oligarchy allied to monetarist financier circles. This This divis division ion was alread already y an old one by the eighth eighth into into seventh century BC. As early as the middle of the third millennium BC, powerful city-states committed to urban-centered technological progress and world-trade promotion existed. Prior to the fall of the Phoe Phoeni nici cian an cent center er of Tyre at the the hand handss of the the Pers Persia ians ns'' Mesopotam Mesopotamian ian predecesso predecessors, rs, Phoenicia Phoenician n culture culture had been over centuries a notable Eastern Mediterranean base for city-builders' policies and culture. After the conquest of Tyre, the Phoenicians' resources had been turned largely into instruments of Babylonian "zero-growth" policies. During this period, the political center of humanism in the Eastern Mediterranean region had shifted to lonia and adjoining Lydia. With the Persian subjugation of Lydia and lonia, the center of humani humanist st comman command d among among Greek Greek's 'spea peakin king g people peopless shifte shifted d to Athens. However, Athens Athens was never homogenously a humanist city. city. The pro-rural pro-rural-aris -aristocra tocracy cy or "zero-grow "zero-growth" th" faction faction of mainland mainland Greece was also represented, and was to one degree or another allied with the Persians against the Ionian faction among the Greeks. The control center for the Persian faction in the Aegean region was the cult cult of Apollo, Apollo, nomina nominally lly center centered ed in the bankin banking g nexus nexus at Delphi. Pericl Pericles es is exemp exemplary lary of Persia Persian n agents agents-of -of-in -influ fluenc encee in Athens. He may not have favored the Persian conquest of mainland Greece, but he did make every effort to ensure Persian subjugation of the Ionian cities, and launched the "WPA pr project" oject" associated with his improvements of the Acropolis, as an antihumanist economic policy. Alcibiades is another case of a Persian agent-of-influence. (3) The zero-growth doctrine of Isocrates, the efforts of Macedonian paid-agent Demosthenes to aid Philip of Macedon in securing the desired war with Athens, and the spying and other black operations

the the cult cult and and its its Diony Dionysi sian an offs offsho hoot ots. s. (5) (5) Not Not only only is Brit Britis ish h intellige intelligence nce today collecti collectively vely a continuati continuation on of that cult, but it is the mastery and replication of the methods and techniques of that cult which represent the innermost secrets of British intelligence services. Before returning to the case of Alexander, we glance forward from the time of Alexander's death toward modem times, to afford the reader some sense of the importance 'of the cult of Apollo in ancient through modern history. The cult of Apollo was not only an established institution in the Roman republic, republic, but that institutio institution n managed managed the history of Rome down to the miserable end of the Empire. (6) It was for this reason that Rome's only contribution to human culture was the military system which Rome perfected in the aftermath of the Punic wars. Roman law was, and is, a hideous, antihumanist concoction explic explicitl itly y follow following ing the specif specifica icatio tions ns of the cult cult of Apollo Apollo as explicated by Aristotle et al. The Roman aristocracy was promoted by the cult cult of Apollo Apollo as an expres expressio sion n of the "Persian "Persian model" model" doctrine of the court of Philip of Macedon. The fall of the Roman republic was the result of the cult of Apollo's placing its chips on the Marian faction (Caesar), and developing a Dionysian cult among the Roma Roman n pleb plebei eian anss in Rome Rome,, to prov provid idee Caes Caesar ar with with the the same same organization of a social base of power as the later Mussolini and Hitler. After the assassination of Alexander by Aristotle's agents, a humanist republic was established in Athens by a general who was otherwise one of Alexander's closest supporters. The Peripatetics were kicked kicked out of Athens at that point, point, and moved their center of operation operations, s, lock, stock and library library,, to the Egypt of Alexander's Alexander's enemy, Ptolemy. There, they created the exotic synthetic cults of Egypt (e.g., the Isis-Osiris cult), translated the Old Testament into waterfront-brothel Greek, and enjoyed management fees as debtcollectors of the cult of Apollo's financial operations. Acting Acting through their branch at Rome, the Ptolemian head-office of the Peripatetic cult secured the movement of the Roman legions into mainland Greece, to destroy the last vestiges of Ionian political rule there. The visits of Julius Caesar and Marc Antony to Cleopatra's Egypt fall under the same category of significance. During During the last last decade decade of the eighte eighteent enth h centur century y, Britis British h intelligence services deployed agents Danton and Marat into Paris,

















10 altered in a single essential feature. The objectives, the policies, the methods remain essentially the same. During the middle fourth century BC the influence of the Ionian faction in Athens centered around the work of Socrates and Plato. The Academy of Athens Athens was no mere teaching institution. Nor was Plato Plato's 's decade decade of occupa occupatio tion n with with the republ republicic-pro projec jectt for Syracuse exceptional in principle (the Republic). The participants in the the Acad Academ emy y at Athe Athens ns were were draw drawn n from from all all area areass of Gree Greek k influence in the Mediterranean. The regular work of the Academy included the development of constitutional forms of government for the nations of that culture. (8) One of Aristotle's chief assignments as a Macedonian-Persian spy in Athens Athens was his his partic participa ipatio tion n in the destru destructi ction on of the Academy. The earlier judicial minder of Socrates was no eccentric autochthonous affair of Athenian internal life. Aristotle's other duties there there were were princi principal pally ly those those of a spy for Phili Philip p of Macedo Macedon’ n’ss interest, a duty which he and other Peripatetic agents of the cult of Apollo performed in various places. On the basis of Aristotle' Aristotle'ss demonstra demonstrated ted deep — one should say, abysmal — commitments and skills as an enemy of the human species, his patrons assigned him to various locations. In addition to his services as a spy and assassin, he played a leading role in the literary activities for which the Peripatetics are ordinarily reputed, However, contrary to what is believed by the credulous, and taught by both both hoaxst hoaxsters ers and fools, fools, Aristo Aristotle tle was not engage engaged d in the progress of knowledge. The literary activities of the Peripatetics were chiefly dedicated to a scheme for eliminating the influence of scientific method from civilization. The technique employed to that malignant purpose was one which post-1670 post-1670 Europe Europe would would justly justly term "encyclopedic "encyclopedic." ." The doctrines of all existing branches of knowledge were rewritten, with the additional distinction of being recodified in such a fashion as to eliminate as far as possible all trace of the scientific method, and to mystify the origins of existing knowledge in this and related ways. Aristotle, like other members of the Peripatetics, was assigned to various locations. In each location he or others would take down a sectio section n of the existi existing ng body body of knowl knowledg edgee from from some some releva relevant nt sour source ce-a -aut utho hori rity ty,, and and woul would d then then proc procee eed d to reco recodi dify fy that that information according to the doctrine of the cult of Apollo. This was exactly the technique employed, initially under the

another significance. Like Aristotle's Aristotle's Peripatetics, the purpose of the Royal Royal Society' Society'ss circulati circulation on of scientifi scientificc works works was to eliminate eliminate scient scientifi ificc progre progress, ss, by outlaw outlawing ing the princi principle ple of rigoro rigorousl usly y form formul ulat ated ed cruc crucia iall hyp hypothe othesi siss (rit (ritua uall llly ly deno denoun unce ced d as "metaphysics") in favor of that banalizing doctrine known as "the principle of the inductive sciences." Such antiscientific literary undertakings aside, the principal empirical pursuit of the Peripatetics in matters of knowledge was the subject of botany. This is the one aspect of Aristotle's writings which stands stands out as having having some some explic explicit it conten contentt of intere interest st in the development of knowledge. Why the exception in this case? The interest in botany was essentially political, in a manner of speaking. The specialty of the Peripatetic assassins was poisoning. ARISOTELIAN RELIGIOUS CULTS CULTS

Apar Apartt from from the the work work of spy spying, ing, "enc "ency yclop cloped edis ism, m,"" and and poisoning, the principal production of the Peripatetics included the producti production on of new religious religious and quasi-reli quasi-religious gious cults. (It is not entire entirely ly withou withoutt signif significa icance nce that that that that portio portion n of the Thames Thames suffering the misfortune to lie near Oxford is named the "Isis.") We have already referred to the synthetic cults of Egypt (e.g., the IsisOsiris cult, and others) produced by the Dionysian cults, yesterday and today: throughout the centuries a basic item of antihumanist social control technique. Peripatetics under the Ptolemies. The same meth method odss used used to this this purp purpos osee by the the Peri Peripa pate teti tics cs have have been been continued by their emulators down to the present day. Such British intelligence-service intelligence-service creations as the Hare Krishna cult, the "Children of God," and the so-called "Moonies" are only the most obvious and notorious notorious such concoctio concoctions. ns. The Maoist Maoist organiza organizations tions of North North America and Western Europe are based on the same methods and techniques of cult design, as is the British intelligence-created rockdrug countercul counterculture, ture, the "environm "environmental entalist" ist" movement, movement, and the overlapping organization of international terrorism. The The meth method odss of crea creati ting ng synt synthe heti ticc reli religi giou ouss cult cultss as instruments of state domestic and foreign policies is known in some significant detail since Babylon. The original synthesis of what later becom becomes es the Jewish Jewish religi religion on repres represent entss only only one form form of such such Babylonian synthetic religious cults. It is not the details of these cult cultss that that ough oughtt to occu occupy py our our atte attent ntio ion n here here,, but but rath rather er the the

















11 It is known that the Israel and adjoining nations of the period of Saul, David, and Solomon — especially Solomon's Israel, were buffer-states of the Phoenicians (e.g.. Tyre). In a manner consistent with city-builders' policies, the backward people of Israel had been broug brought ht up, largel largely y, to a civil civilize ized d state state throug through h a citycity-bui builde lder r program. (Hence, the Freemason legend of the early Freemasons as Phoenician-trained builders of the temple of Solomon.) It is also known that there was no trace of "Judaism" as later defined, but rather a strong influence of the cult of Baal otherwise widespread throughout the region, together with Phoenician cults. We also know, from the standpoint of epistemology, that the characteristic philosophical outlook of Thales, Heraclitus, et al. is an expres expressio sion n of the worldworld-out outloo look k upon upon which which the citycity-bui builde lders' rs' culture converges. Hence, philosophical beliefs converging upon the views of the lonians, Socrates, and Plato were in fact influential among the leading leading strata strata of eastern eastern Mediterran Mediterranean ean city-bui city-builders lders prior prior to the Ionian Ionian period, period, including therefore therefore leading strata in Israel. The The func functi tion on of the the Baby Babylo loni nian an crea creati tion on of the the Jewi Jewish sh religious cult was to transform the people of Israel into an advanced postpost-Bab Babyl yloni onian an puppet puppet-st -state ate for Babyl Babylon' on'ss war agains againstt Tyre. yre. Consequently, the Babylonians were constrained by the kinds of religious belief which already existed in an area strongly influenced by Phoenician culture. Hence, the ordinary sort of polymorphous image-cults might not have succeeded in that region. We know also that the city-builders and their anti-humanist advers adversari aries es often often did did not attemp attemptt to direct directly ly uproot uproot existi existing ng mythologies, but rather to recodify existing mythologies in such a way as to serve the policy of the state. The mythology was adjusted to embody, as a mythology, the impulses appropriate either to a city builders or antihumanist policy. policy. The thrust, on the humanist, or city builders side, throughout the known sources, is toward the deified human hero or heroine, for which the Herakles-Prometheus Herakles-Prometheus model is typical: the giver of knowledge (reason) to a whole people. The antihumanist policy emphasizes the opposite policy: it proposes the irrationality of the deities, it insists upon . the unfathomable mystery of the order of the universe. On this basis, we can not confidently assume that the existence of image-worship in itself meant one thing or the other. Only the features of image-worship or other forms of worship which are characteristically Platonic or anti-Platonic are

In general, the main course of development of religious and philosoph philosophical ical belief belief among among humanist humanist and humanisthumanist-infl influence uenced d curren currents ts has been been away away from from the polyt polythei heisti stic, c, imageimage-cen center tered ed doctri doctrines nes toward toward the the Logos Logos-pr -princ incipl iple, e, and toward toward the trinit trinity y doctrines as exemplified by the internal determinations of the Platonic dialogue. The survival of Judaism coincides with the effect of such circumstances. It is merely, in itself, a plastic form of belief, which can be made either humanistic or antihumanistic, and serves the latter purpose with the advantage of being ancient, and also largely free of the incredible, hated polytheistic forms which were discarded in the wake of the Mediterranean worldwide hatred of Roman Latin imperial order. Another decisive feature of Judaism is the ancient association of nominal Jews with banking. Throughout the period from Babylon into the persecution of the Jews during the thirteenth century and afterw afterward ardss in Europ Europe, e, one factio faction n of Jews Jews was was conti continuo nuously usly associ associate ated d with with moneta monetaris ristt polici policies es of financ financee throug throughou houtt the Mediterra Mediterranean nean littorals littorals,, whereas whereas the other faction, the medieval medieval Seph Sephar ardi dicc fact factio ion, n, espe especi cial ally ly duri during ng the the Chri Christ stia ian n era, era, was was associated with Ismaili humanist policies of opposition to monetarist financial policies. Despite the inevitable, large-scale assimilation of Jews Jews into into the mainstre mainstream am of the culture culturess in which which they they were were situated, a kernel of Jewry remained defined and otherwise selfdefined as "outsiders" to the mainstream of the cultures in which they resided. (And, so forth and so on. The relevant points should be clear.) This fact we shall encounter below, in connection with the Pierleoni. On thei theirr side side of the the matt matter er of reli religi gion on,, the the work work of the the Peripatetics was directed to the same objectives as their frauds in knowledge knowledge generally generally.. In philosophy philosophy,, the Peripatet Peripatetics ics sought sought to poi poiso son n the the seco second nd leve levell of Plato latoni nicc know knowle ledg dge, e, the the mere mere understanding, against knowledge of the scientific method (reason). In religi religion, on, they they treate treated d the lowest lowest state state of human human knowl knowledg edge, e, simple beliefs of the ignorant masses, to the same purpose. The object was to promote irrationalist beliefs agreeable to state policies of zero-growth and monetarist-oligarchical monetarist-oligarchical rule. The same sort of project was launched by British intelligence services during the 1920s, with the evil Bertrand Russell the central figure in this operation. During the 1920s, Russell, as a principal spokesman for the effort, laid out a spectrum of projects, all aimed



















12 technological progress, and also a continuation of Russell's project for destroying the progress of science from within. Russell Russell also proposed the applicati application on of existing existing scientif scientific ic technology technology to the purposes of mass mind-contro mind-control, l, including including the deve develo lopm pmen entt of drug drugss for for mass mass use use for for this this purp purpos ose. e. Aldo Aldous us Huxley's Brave New World and others' leading roles in promoting psychedelic drugs and drug-cultures are part of the implementation of that British Black Guelph project for mass drug-addiction. Russell was more directly active, from that point onward, in the development of what became known as "linguistics." This is the form of "linguistics" most popularly associated with the name of former former Rand Corporati Corporation on associate. associate. Professo Professorr Noam Chomsky Chomsky.. Russell, Russell, working working closely closely with longstandi longstanding ng British British intellige intelligence nce operat operative ive Karl Karl Korsch Korsch,, and with with Carna Carnap p and others others,, launch launched ed linguistics in the United States during the 1930s, also in intersection with the work of the fascist sociologist, social-work "brainwasher" Dr. Kurt Lewin. Noam Chomsky, whose work is used prominently, and direct directly ly,, for the develo developme pment nt of explic explicitly itly brainw brainwash ashing ing techniques, is a direct protege of the apparatus set up under Russell's leadership. Russel Russell-K l-Kors orschch-Ca Carna rnap-C p-Chom homsky sky lingui linguisti stics cs exten extend d the methods of synthetic religious-cult building of the Peripatetics Peripatetics to an extr extrem eme. e. The The cogn cognit itiv ivee feat featur uree of the the use use of lang langua uage ge is systematically systematically outlawed wherever linguistics methods are employed. The philos philosoph ophica icall outloo outlook k of the cult cult of Diony Dionysus sus is centra centrall to ling lingui uist stic ics. s. Ther Theree is no univ univer ersa sall lawf lawful ulne ness ss,, but but only only the the heteronomic impulses and desires of the individual and small group. In other words, the doctrines of Thomas Hobbes, also perceptively adopted by the Nazi regime as appropriate to its character. character.

In this this connec connectio tion, n, we should should reemph reemphasi asize ze what what we have have outlined above in connection with Aristotelian Aristotelian religious cults. The commonplace blunder of professed Marxists and others in assessing British policies is the mistaken assumption that the ruling forces forces of the Britis British h oligar oligarchy chy are motiva motivated ted by specif specifica ically lly capitalist impulses. It is of course the case that the British oligarchy and its global allies live in a world in which the industrial-capitalist forms forms of manufa manufactu cturin ring, g, agricu agricultu lture, re, trade, trade, and cultur culturee are the premise upon which human existence depends. It is also true that world rule to this date in recent modern history has been feasible only only to the the exte extend nd that that repr repres esen enta tati tive vess of the the Blac Black k Guel Guelph ph oligarchy controlled the financial power, and state material power adapted to industrial-capitalist development. However, to conclude from such and related evidence, evidence valid up to a point, that the British oligarchy's motives are subsumed under the rubric of "capitalist" is the grossest of blunders, of incompetencies. The Guelph Guelph (Welf (Welfen) en) were were origin originall ally y a bucoli bucolicc German German arist aristocr ocrati aticc house, house, associ associate ated d with with the rule rule of Franc Franconi onia, a, with with branches in Italy. During the eleventh century, through an alliance among Roman banking banking families families centered centered around around the Pierleon Pierleoni, i, including Matilda of Tuscany and the ruling house of Lotharingen (Lorr (Lorrain aine), e), the oligar oligarchi chical cal factio faction n of the presen presentt mille milleniu nium m acquir acquired ed the name name Guelph Guelph throug through h the marria marriagege-con connec nectio tion n of Matilda Matilda of Tuscany Tuscany's 's House to the Welfen elfen house. house. In the course course of developmen developments ts following following the Guelph Guelph defeat defeat of the Hohenstaufen Hohenstaufen House (Frederick Barbarossa through Frederick II) during the events of 1266-1268 AD, there arose the Guelph-Ghibelline (Ghibelline = Italianized Waibling, as Guelph was Italianized Welf) disputes. In the internal struggles within Italy (and elsewhere) at the onset of the

















13 The Bourbon-Borbon monarchs were a mixed lot, as typified by the case of Louis XIV. The Bourbon tendency expressed by Louis IV's minister Colbert — and by Descartes and Huygens — was one current. The rural aristocratic input into Louis XIV was the Guelphish side. The case of the ill-fated clock-hobbyist, Louis XVI, less interesting interesting than his exception exceptional al contempora contemporary ry,, Joseph Joseph II of Austria's Hapsburgs, illustrates the case of monarchs pulled toward the humanist side of policies, just as the Duke of Orleans was not only a raving Guelph, but an agent of the British monarchy. monarchy. Prior to the hegemony of Godoy in the Spanish court, the Spanish Borbon court of the mid-eighteenth century was a center of influence of the "French faction," to which the painter, Francisco Goya Goya was was attach attached. ed. This facti faction on of the Spanis Spanish h Borbon Borbon court court developed developed a humanist humanist,, city-buil city-building ding project-po project-policy licy for "Greater "Greater Spain, Spain,"" and contribu contributed ted in a vital vital way to the fosterin fostering g of the humanist currents in such later Latin-American nations as Mexico. The English Tudors are another example of the problem. The case of Richard III of England is open to fresh scrutiny. The case of Warwick is of more immediate interest. In any event, the accession of the Tudors involved the influences associated with Louis XI of France, and apart from peculiarities of some of the Tudor monarchs as such, the humanists gathered around the Dudley family are key to everythin everything g decent decent that occurred in England England during during the sixteenth sixteenth century and immediately thereafter. The accurate view of the role of the European aristocracy and monarc monarchic hical al famili families es in genera generall is twofol twofold. d. First First of all, all, these these families were divided overall and internally on fundamental issues of policy. Some representatives were deeply committed to humanist or anti-h anti-huma umanis nistt polici policies. es. Others Others vacill vacillate ated d under under pressu pressure re of

that British British intellige intelligence nce services, services, conduiting conduiting funds through their agent Alexander Alexander Herzen, funded Bakunin and controlled the Russian anarchist movement and its terrorist offshoot. Nor is it astonishing that when Count Witte was embarked on a policy for promoting the industrial deyelopment of Russia in closer relationship to Germany, the Russian 1905 Revolutio Revolution n was organized organized with with a lead-role lead-role of Anglo-Dutch (Samuel) agent Alexander Helphand-Parvus, and with a leading role b y Parvus's protege of that moment, Leon D. Trotsky. Trotsky. (Kari Radek, N. Bukharin, and G. Riazanov were agents of the AngloAnglo-Dut Dutch ch — Royal Royal Dutch Dutch Shell Shell — intell intellige igence nce networ networks ks featur featuring ing Parvus Parvus.. The "docto "doctor's r's plot" plot" agains againstt Stali Stalin's n's life life was probably no exaggeration at all.) As Thomas Paine emphasized, monarchy is an unacceptable form of government in the humanist interest, but sections of the arist aristocr ocracy acy and monar monarchs chs have have been, been, noneth nonethele eless, ss, dedica dedicated ted humanists. Exemplary of the latter point is the case of the Salian Holy Roma Roman n empe empero rors rs,, from from Otto Otto I thro throug ugh h Henr Henry y IV, and and the the Hohens Hohenstau taufen fen empero emperors, rs, from from Frede Frederic rick k Barbar Barbaross ossaa throug through h Frederick II. The thrust of these Holy Roman emperors was earlier expressed by Charlemagne. They were predominantly humanists, city-buil city-builders. ders. The policies policies otherwis otherwisee expressed expressed by Abelard were embedded in the building of urban-centered culture and trade-routes, north-south and east-west by the Salian emperors. The urban culture of Europe did not emerge by some spontaneous principle within "feudalis "feudalism," m," but because because leading leading "dirigist "dirigist"" monarchs monarchs and others others steere steered d the applic applicati ation on of "natio "national nal"" financ financial ial and econom economic ic resources to bring this about, and because those same potentates and others fostered humanist education, including energetic programs

















14 incurred in the effort to prevent continental Europe and England itself from developing an industrial-development-centered industrial-development-centered policy. policy. As Alexan Alexander der Hami Hamilto lton's n's 1791 1791 Repor Reportt on Manufa Manufactu ctures res proves clearly enough, and as Henry C. Carey 'stated the point bluntly bluntly and accurately accurately,, the British British System System was not an industrial industrial capitalist model, but a "mixed economy," in which the interest.and dynam dynamic ic of indu indust stri rial al capi capita tall was was subo subord rdin inat ated ed thro throug ugh h the the monarchy and oligarchy to parasitical landlord interest, an interest which took "primitive accumulation" from rural landholdings as its point of reference for policy. The British physiocratic doctrine, like its French imitators, expressed that point of view exactly. (14) The The same same poin pointt is expo expose sed d most most nake nakedl dly y by the the Ford Ford Founda Foundatio tion's n's 1964 1964 "Trip "Triple le Revolu Revolutio tion" n" report report,, advoca advocatin ting g a "post. "post.ind indust ustria riall societ society y," and the coordi coordinat nated ed launch launching ing of the internatio international nal "environm "environmental entalst" st" ferment ferment by British British intellig intelligence ence services' networks beginning the autumn of 1969. The targets of these British intelligence services' operations have been precisely industrial development, industrialist profits, and so forth. Excepting London's (and its monetarist allies ) perfervid preoccupation with strengthening its control ( of the world's nominal financial wealth, London's policy is perfervidly anticapitalist. anticapitalist. What sort of an idiot is it that would attempt to turn up a capitalist motive for the policies of British Intelligence services and the British government? The ruling, Black Guelph oligarchy of Britain, together with those oligarchi oligarchical cal families families (aristocr (aristocratic atic and quasi-aris quasi-aristocra tocratic) tic) to which it is allied outside Britain, K dedicated essentially, essentially, by its own statement on the matter, to bringing about a "new dark ages," out of which depopulated globe (reduced willfully to the order of as few as

China? It is the antihumanist, "labor-intensive" bucolic obscenity of Maoist Maoist China China which which arouse arousess their their orgas orgasms. ms. It is the "feuda "feudal" l" oligarchy's zeal to restore the cult of Dionysus as the mythology of a mass of plebeians reduced to bucolic moral imbecility of humanmanure manure tossing, tossing, instead instead of modern modern agricultu agricultural ral methods, methods, which arouses their passions. Conver Conversel sely y, whenev whenever er one notes notes this this or that that ostens ostensibl iblee "conservat "conservative" ive" political political spokesman spokesman in Western estern Europe Europe or North North Amer Americ icaa maki making ng an obsc obscen enee publ public ic spec specta tacl clee of hims himsel elff in admiration of Maoist China, the persistence of such episodes is a "litmus test" certifying that conservative to be a British intelligence services' agent, a mercenary of the Black Guelph oligarchy centered in the British monarchy. A similar point is applicable to the case of those who rhapsodize over the memory of N. Bukharin in the Soviet Union. This This connec connectio tion n of the Britis British h monarc monarchy hy,, Black Black Guelph Guelph oligarchy, oligarchy, and British intelligence services to the "Persian model" is not simply simply an imita imitatio tion n resurr resurrect ected ed throug through h aid of Oxfor Oxford d and Cambr Cambridg idgee schola scholars. rs. The The connec connectio tion n of today today's 's Black Black Guelph Guelph oligarchy to the ancient Macedonian court and Ptolemaic Egypt is direct — granting the point that in places, the continuing road winds somewhat. The continuity of the doctrines of Aristotle throughout the the cent centur urie iess into into the the poli polici cies es and and meth method odss of the the "neo "neo-Aristotel Aristotelians" ians" of British British empirici empiricism, sm, of pragmatis pragmatism, m, is a direct direct contin continuit uity y of antihu antihuman manist ist bestia bestialit lity y leadin leading g into into the Britis British h intelligence services of the present date. THE CASE OF O F ALEXANDER THE GREAT

















15 of the revolting Phoenician fleet decided the issue in the eastern Mediterran Mediterranean ean waters. The priests priests of Amon in Egypt Egypt staged staged an Egyptian revolt against the local Persian satrap, and negotiated what circumsta circumstances nces show to have been a city-buil city-buildingding-poli policy cy alliance alliance with the priests of Amon — certifying this by ordering the opening of the canal from the Nile to the Red Sea. Humanist, city-builder policies were Alexander's policies up to the point of his death at the hands of Aristotle's assassins. His policy was to develop Babylon as a center of world humanist culture and world trade, to dredge the Euphrates to Babylon, to build roads linking linking Babylon Babylon to the Mediterranean Mediterranean,, and to develop develop education education programs modeled on the Academy throughout the empire. There is recorded no policy like it known until the conscious commercial development policy of the Salian emperors of the eleventh century. century. After his death and the division of his empire among the genera generals, ls, (princ (principa ipally lly)) his his enemie enemies, s, humani humanist st polici policies es were were nonetheless reestablished at Athens — until the Ptolemies brought the Roman legions into Greece. With With that event, and with the defeat of the humanist faction of the brothers Gracchi, the Apollo-ridden evil that was Rome degenerated rapidly into the imperial form. It is upon the latter, the protofascist Pax Romana, that the post-1660 Restorati Restoration on British British Black Guelph faction faction modeled modeled its eighteenth eighteenth century-adopted policy of Pax Britannica — or, rightly named, Pox Britannic Britannica. a. Behind Behind mouthing mouthingss of adoration adoration of British British agents-of agents-of-influence Metternich and Bismarck, it is the Pox Britannica to which British agent-of-influence Henry Kissinger is dedicated. The legacy of Plato and Aristotle reemerged in the Hellenic world in and through the influence of the rise of Christianity as the fascist economic order that was imperial Rome underwent its lawful

Histor Historica ically lly the most most import important ant of such such Jewish Jewish bankin banking g families of Rome was the Pierleoni. (18) Emulating another Roman Jewish banking family which had "converted" earlier to Christianity, Christianity, to successfully benefit from the financial advantages of the papacy, the Pierl Pierleon eonii "conve "converte rted" d" with with the same same purpos purposee in view view. One member of the family, styling himself Pope Gregory VI, took the direct route to his goal, buying the papacy from an incumbent pope. That That sordi sordid d arrang arrangeme ement nt was nullif nullified ied by interv intervent ention ion of the German emperor, and ex-Gregory VI and his heir Hildebrand, later Pope Gregory VII, were hustled off into exile. This occurred during the eleventh century, and is no quaint element of church history but the focus of a chain of events which shaped the course of history over the following centuries, until the culminat culmination ion of this policy in the mid-fourt mid-fourteenth eenth century Black Death' Death'ss killin killing g of about about half half the existi existing ng popula populati tion on pf centra centrall Euro Europe pe.. To foll follow ow even events ts from from 1045 1045 AD to 1453 1453 AD in the the Mediterranean one must move one's attention constantly back and forth along the map from Rome to as far eastward as Mongolia. All the principal elements of history over that period are directly linked. From From appr approx oxim imat ately ely 1045 1045 AD, AD, Hild Hildeb ebra rand nd,, late laterr Pope Pope Greg Gregory ory VII, VII, was was shap shapin ing g Euro Europe pean an hist histor ory y for for the the wors worst. t. Hildebrand's immediate principal allies were Lotharingen, Matilda of Tuscany, the Guelphs allied to Maltilda, and the rich, corrupt Cluniac monastic order in France. Hildebrand's adversaries were the empir empiree itsel itself, f, the indepe independe ndent nt bishop bishopss and other other clerg clergy y of the Church, and the humanist forces generally. Three principal principal operations operations of that period were decisive decisive in enabling Hildebrand to seize the Papacy. Papacy. First, the Norman conquest of Saxon Saxon Englan England d and the associ associate ated d projec projectt for the Norman Norman

















16 The eleventh-century levels of per capita wealth and ratios of wealth in trade may appear tiny now, but those quantities in trade repres represent ented ed the sinews sinews of transm transmiss ission ion of techno technolog logica icall and scientific knowledge. They have been the portion of the social tissue in which economic growth and progress have been located over the, ages. Hildeb Hildebran rand d and his his co-con co-conspi spirat rators ors undert undertook ook to begin begin breaking the power of the empire by attacking its ally in the north. With aid of the intelligence-service intelligence-service capabilities of the Cluniacs, they attacked the Saxons on three fronts simultaneously. They rallied trai traito toro rous us forc forces es with within in Saxo Saxon n Engl Englan and. d. They They depl deploy oyed ed the the Scandanviands in an invasion that was to deplete the strength of King King Harald Harald prior prior to the Battle Battle of Hasti Hastings ngs They They launch launched ed the Norman invasion as a crusade — in fact, the first crusade as such — with Church blessings of the banners of the invaders and Church rallying of the invading forces. The murdering of elected popes terrorized other candidates to the point that Hildebrand was able, with aid of other means, to determine the succession to the papacy, papacy, finally installing himself. A faction of Baghdad bankers of that time were allies of the Pierleoni in the joint fight against humanism, against city-builder policies. (19) Through their control of Baghdad and other cities, and through the promotion of Seljuk mercenaries (initially brought from the vicinity of present-day Afghanistan), Afghanistan), they held the native Islamic population essentially in suppression and had reduced Ismaili power in the region from Mesopotamia eastward almost to nonexistence. However, the Ismaili tradition and influence was still powerfully embedded in sections of the population (it was not to be uprooted until after the Mongol conquest).

VII's VII's policy policy was the combined institutio institution n of the Inquisition Inquisition and Crusade, although the latter was not formally put into effect until after his death. By the close of the eleventh century, the Cluniacs were too blatantly corrupt to be credible as religious authorities. They were replaced by the Cistercians, with whom is associated one of the most evil men in European European history, history, Bernard Bernard of Clairvaux Clairvaux,, who developed the model on which Martin Luther's theology was based. The humani humanist st forces forces were were defeat defeated ed but not crushe crushed. d. The continuity continuity of the Neoplatonic Neoplatonic current was fully maintaine maintained. d. In the East, Hassan ben Saba raised a new kind of force able to deal with the brutal brutal method methodss of the Selju Seljuks ks and follow followers ers of al-Gha al-Ghazal zali, i, establis establishing hing a countervai countervailing ling Ismaili power in the Middle Middle East which persisted until the Mongol conquest of the thirteenth century. (27) The Knights Templars and Knights Hospitalers were influenced by the Ismaili Ismailis. s. Despite Despite the monstrous monstrous crimes crimes against against humanity humanity perpetrated by a corrupted papacy in the name of the Crusades, huma humani nist st powe powerr resu resurg rged ed in Euro Europe pe,, espe especi cial ally ly arou around nd the the Hohenstaufen from Frederick Barbarossa to Frederick II. Alfonso the Wise of Toledo was a cousin of Frederick II. In a concerted operation, the Guelph faction and its allies to the East broke the power of the humanists during the seventh decade of the thirteenth century, celebrating this with, the launching of the Inquisition ' against the Jews. The strategic key to the operation in Europe lay in Asia. The Mongol Mongol invasi invasion on was the key. key. Altho Although ugh there there never never exist existed ed a Mongol "horde" — the Mongol male population of that period, boys and men, never exceeded one million by generous estimate — the Byzantine methods of conquest (chiefly by treachery) employed by



















17 representa representative tive of Ibn Sina's Sina's influence influence.. To combat combat the humanist humanist influence associated with Ibn Sina (Avrcenna) the Dominican order was deployed to lead the Inquisition, turning to Aristotle as the Church's then-adopted official philosopher, philosopher, and following the policy adopte adopted d by Thoma Thomass Aquina Aquinass in his irresp irrespons onsibl iblee writi writings ngs in criticizing the anti-Aristotelian Ibn Sina as an erring "commentator" upon Aristotle Aristotle.. The entire Aristoteli Aristotelian an business business was a hoax, hoax, as Thomas Aquinas sadly suspected toward the close of his own life. (23) During the fifteenth century, century, the documents were studied which fully proved the whole Aristotelian business a hoax, as well as the concoction known as "canon law." As a consequence of the triumph of the Guelph faction with aid of Aristot Aristotle, le, the, the, Guelph Guelph banker bankerss enjoy enjoyed ed an orgy orgy of debtdebt pyramiding. The Jews — unwanted competition— were driven off, as in England, as a side-effect of monarch's receipt of loans from the Bardi, Peruzzi and other leading Guelph bankers. The pyramiding of the debts of Europe's monarchs and other potentates led to an early form of Schachtian "fiscal austerity." The labor on the estates was

Roman Roman Empir Empire, e, the Guelph Guelph banker bankerss of Italy Italy and their their client client Ferdinand began to perform a crucial role in the destruction of the culture of the western region of the Mediterranean, including a growing evil role in Italy. Although the Spanish infantry continued to play a potent role in Europe until its decisive defeat of 1653, Ferdinand created those institutions in Spain which lawfully degraded Spain from a major power into an impoverished "Third World" nation of the looted Iberian peninsula. Ferdinand's role was to increase the dominance of the bucolicimbecilic rural aristocracy of the Reconquista at the expense of the urban and cultured strata of Spain, using the Inquisition and the limpiaza de sangre (purity of blood) as the principal instruments of this this social social progra program. m. It was his polici policies es which which shaped shaped the later later Spanish genocide in the Americas. (During approximately half a century during the later, sixteenth century, century, Spanish methods reduced the population of present-day Mexico from over twenty millions to less than two millions.)

















18 of Bruno' Bruno'ss writi writings, ngs, and the terror terror his impri imprison sonmen mentt and death death effected among so many of his allies — including Galileo — it rema remain inss an open open ques questi tion on whet whethe herr we shal shalll ever ever be able able to reconstruct the full record of his power and influence in Europe during the last decades decades of the sixteenth sixteenth century. century. So feared was Bruno that even the transcript of his trial was suppressed. What is known to date identifies him as one of the greatest intellects and most effective political personalities in European history. history. It is known that Bruno established a network of organizations throughout Europe, and the chief parts of his work in England and France are known, especially his English work. The Dudleys, Sir Philip Sidney, and Christopher Marlowe were among his closest collaborators in England, and the princes of the House of Navarre his closest collaborators in France. It is also known that most extant Shakespear Shakespearee scholarshi scholarship p is absurd, absurd, on the basis of the evidence evidence turned turned up by focusing focusing on Bruno Bruno's 's work in Englan England. d. (28) (28) It is relevant to all these points that Christopher Marlowe wrote "Doctor Faustus" in behalf of an effort to rescue Bruno from the Guelph

Massachus Massachusetts etts Bay Colony Colony,, Penn's Penn's Pennsylva Pennsylvania, nia, Rhode Rhode Island, Island, Conne Connecti cticut cut,, were were leadin leading g elemen elements ts of a genera generall effor effortt by the Commonwealth Party to launch such humanist colonizing projects during the seventeenth century. So, a selection of the best humanist' minds minds of Europe Europe and their their predom predomina inantl ntly y liter literate ate suppor supporter terss established those colonies. (Consequently, (Consequently, during the last half of the eighteenth century the literacy rate and social-productivity of the Americans was more than double that of Britain.) In effect, the American Revolution was a civil war between the humanist and Guelph factions within British culture. It was a direct continuation of the civil war in seventeenth century England; and, was seen rightly as a civil war by those American leaders, typified typified by Paine, Paine, who sought to extend extend the American American Revoluti Revolution on into England itself. By the close of the eighteenth century, century, there was an unbridgable gulf between the leading American humanists and the ruling British empiricists. As is gene genera rall lly y know known, n, the the succ succes esss of the the Amer Americ ican an Revolution was secured, strategically, strategically, through the aid of the League

















19 population population (sansculottes) (sansculottes) as an initial initial wrecking wrecking force (Orleans's (Orleans's staging of the storming of the Bastille, etc.), and then launched their trained agents Danton and Marat to set in motion the Jacobin Terror, Terror, launching launching the latter latter from inside inside the faction of Necker Necker protege protege and dupe Robespierre. The success of the Shelburne gang in reducing continental Europe into a war-ruin until 1814, and the successful establishment of the bucolic imbecility, the Holy Alliance, as an instrument for paying dividends on debts to the City of London, established the Shelburne gang and its tradition as the ruling force in and around the British monarchy to the present date. The poor fools, with a "different perception" of history, are the lawful, helpless prey of that mob attached to the British monarchy. Believing the historical and other mythologies concocted for such credulous fools as themselves, the British can perform the same tired old Aristotelian swindles upon them yet another time, without facing facing an effec effectiv tivee defens defense, e, and witho without ut the victi victims ms even even then then awakening to the" reality of what has been done to them.

Firs First, t, narr narrat ativ ivee hist history ory begi begins ns as we have have note noted, d, with with surviving literary records available to us. This includes not only ordinary literary records, but inscriptions on various monuments and so forth. This source-material as a whole has the obvious defect of not including including documents documents which have not survived, survived, some of which which may be as significant as those prominent in the available collections. It also omits the .literary materials not written, but which would be required if we were to possess testimony concerning all important transactions. There are, similarly, similarly, the monuments which were either destroyed — or not constructed — to the same effect. In all this. in most periods periods the portion of the population population which left a literary literary record was small and selective. Second, in addition to willful falsifications of fact in official and other source-documents, the rulership and internal ordering of soci societ etie iess has has alwa alway ys cent center ered ed to this this time time arou around nd sets sets of mythologies. Only special categories of records, created by special kinds of persons under special circumstances have the authority of candor, and still fewer of that same special class represent efficient

















20 origins. origins. In all major respects, respects, Bismarck Bismarck was a British British agent-ofagent-ofinfluence. He won the war with Austria (1866) because London rigged rigged the treasuries treasuries and the "radical" "radical" movements movements of Europe Europe to procure and secure that result. He won the Franco-Prussian war under London's auspices and pre-arrangements. It was the British oligarchy's preference that Germany be unified (in its main parts) under a Prussian monarchy and oligarchy being molded by London's influence into emulation of the British model. Although one can point meaningfully to prominent, included features of the nineteenth century "concert of Europe" to account for the secondary aspects of London's Prussian preference, the criteria by which those empirics were judged in London are not located in the nineteenth century, but in the millennial history of the "Persian model" policies of the Black Guelph faction. London London's 's Prussi Prussian an policy policy is cleare clearerr when when compar compared ed with with London's policy concerning Napoleon II, its Mexican policy, policy, and its policy for attempting to reconquer the United States. The France of Napoleon III was notably a Saint-Simonian sort

Guelph mobilization of the Norman Conquest of Saxon England created a Norman power in the north of France which, especially after Simon de Montfort's slaughter of the Albigensians, threatened, weakened and repeatedly almost destroyed France, until Louis XI completed the work inaugurated around the figure of Jeanne d'Arc. Although Navarre was allied to the humanist Tudor faction, and Cromwell's England to Mazarin's France, France's English allies had always been the Guelphs'' enemies. The model for British Guelph French policy from 1660 to the present date is the House of Orange's operation against Colbert's Fran France ce.. The The Hous Housee of Oran Orange ge unde underm rmin ined ed both both the the Fren French ch Colbertistes and the Dutch humanists (De Witt, Spinoza, et al.), by strengthening the grip of the rural-aristocratic faction in Louis XIV's court, and launching Louis XIV into his wars against the House of Orange. Orange. In the course of that development development,, the humanist humanist forces forces in both England and France France were then weakened weakened significa significantly ntly,, by Marlbo Marlborou rough' gh'ss campai campaigns gns in behalf behalf of the the DutchDutch-Han Hanove overia rian n interest, and by the simultaneous launching of the two financial

















21 oversight of London's did not take important political form until after the ushering of Bismarck from the Chancellory. Chancellory. The circumstances of 1866-1871 in Europe were determined by preceding developments in North America. The "Frenc "French h factio faction" n" in the eighte eighteent enth h centur century y Spani Spanish sh Borbon Borbon court had transmitt transmitted ed into the cultured cultured circles of Latin Latin Americ Americaa the the echo echo of the "Great "Great Design Design"" policy policy which which was the Greater Spain project. All the Spanish colonies were to be elevated in politi political cal status status to form form a transa transatla tlanti nticc Spani Spanish sh state, state, a state state dedicated dedicated to scientifi scientific, c, technologi technological cal and cultural cultural progress. progress. The defeat of this humanist faction in Spain b y the rise of the BritishBritish-linke linked d Godoy, Godoy, and the British British puppet-st puppet-status atus of Spain and Portugal throughout the nineteenth (into the twentieth) century century,, had left the active kernel of the Spanish humanists humanists in the colonies. Thus Thus,, one one had, had, in the the case case of Mexi Mexico co,, the the iron irony y of an independen independentt monarchy monarchy pushed forward by .the British British rulers rulers of Spain, where the Mexican humanists still aspired to play their role

dropped the project, and also abandoned the Mexican project to the unfortunate Napoleon III and his puppet Maximilian. Much is made/too much, of the prominence of names such as Rothschild. Mendelssohn, Oppenheimer, and so forth in London's evil operations against Germany, Germany, France, the United States. The role of these Jewish financial houses correlates, a bit too quickly and conclusively in the minds of some, with the role of Jewish financial families families in the horrors which have beset civilizati civilization on during during the period since the eighth century BC. A brief summary of the relevant observations should be included at this point, to show the folly of the "international Jewish conspiracy." According to admissions conceded by Winston Churchill at the close of the last world war, there were two points of the Nazi regime at which the British had the option of ridding Germany of the Nazi pest. The first was during 1938, when Admiral Canaris and members of the military general staff had an operation in place for overthrowi overthrowing ng Hitler Hitler.. Winston Winston Churchill Churchill personally personally intervene intervened d to prevent the plot from being carried through. During the war itself,



















22 It is against the background of events so exemplified that one probes the British oligarchical mind to locate the criteria which governed London's decision to sponsor Bismarck as its "man in the Prussian Prussian Chancell Chancellory ory." ." Prince Prince Albert Albert was explicit. explicit. The Prussian Prussian aris aristo tocr crac acy y need needed ed to be led led into into bett better er info inform rmed ed,, Brit Britis ish h oligarchical ways of doing things, to understand the importance of the charades of "liberalism" as a means for strengthening — and

Likewise, only by tracing such policies to their roots in the cult of Apollo, to show how the British mentality has been evolved as a specie species-m s-ment entali ality ty,, can one compre comprehen hend d the criter criteria ia which which govern governed ed London' London'ss choice choice of Bisma Bismarck rck and Pruss Prussia. ia. Withou ithoutt knowing the sweep of history as a process, one can not competently understand any of its parts.

















23 For one brief brief exampl example, e, on the basis of knowin knowing g crucia cruciall features of the history from the eighth century BC, one can project judgments upon the subjective side of sites from the middle of the third millennium BC, and so forth. How this is to be accomplished, and how we may be certain that such methods are valid, we shall demonstrate in due course in this report. For the present instant, it is sufficient to announce that there can be no competent archeological

subj subjec ect, t, huma human n pale paleon onto tolo logy gy,, from from the the subj subjec ectt of anim animal al paleontology. There is a correlated difficulty arising from this distinction. Although paleontological evidence dates hominid existence to the Pleistocene according to prevailing estimates, it cannot be assumed that the present human species dates from the onset of that period. Skeletal fragments and a scattering of some artifacts do not enable

















24 It is to be gran grante ted d that that the the Brit Britis ish h and and thei theirr dupe dupess take take offici officiall ally y a stron strong g public public stand stand agains againstt a princi principle ple of cultur cultural al evolution, proposing instead the dogma of "cultural relativism." It would be nonetheless an insult to Oxford and Cambridge to assume that their inner circles actually believe their own publicized propaganda in behalf of "cultural relativism" as an anthropologicalscientific thesis. Such propaganda is created for the stultification of

countable objects, and derives notions of ordering and other kinds of relati relations onshi hip p throug through h formul formulati ations ons in which which the qualit quality y of the counted objects is external to the process. Only the quality of the socalled dependent variable is ordinarily assumed to be subject, to constructi constructive ve valuation valuation by formulat formulation. ion. “Self-ref “Self-reflexi lexive ve functions” functions” are, considered outlawed by the dogma of "the inductive sciences" (4) Yet. we have admittedly introduced a “self-reflexive function"

















25 European standards. The problem is that the social productivity of populations kept at "labor-intensive" levels at or near barbarism is inadequate to sustain those persons. There is a recurring "resources problem," of course; however, this problem has no resemblance to the hoaxes circulated under that rubric by Ralph Nader, the Club of Rome, or Barry Commoner. From early in the existence of the human species, man has

The British who propose labor-intensive methods know this. They propose labor-intensive "full employment" methods precisely because they intend to reduce the earth's population to the order of between one and two billion persons by the end of the century. century. They create movements for labor-intensive full employment measures, measures, such as the U.S. draft Humphrey Humphrey-Haw -Hawkins kins legislati legislation, on, because they wish to induce populations to willfully mass-murder

















26 The key to scientific method, and thus to the mastery of both science and history, is the method of the Platonic dialogue. This is also properly termed the dialectical method, as such a method is associated with Thales, Heraclitus and Plato. It is not, however, the "dialectical method" represented in most of the available literary productions of the Moscow Institute of Marxism-Leninism — even though the kernel of Karl Mark's method was a distillate from the

Platonic dialogue, the individual examines his own own cons consci ciou ousn sness ess in terms terms of the the way way this this consci conscious ousnes nesss is consci conscious ously ly mirror mirrored ed in the thinking of another person(s). The point of this is not to comp ompare differen rent views if one











































































































































Secrets Known Only to the Inner Elites - By Lyndon LaRouche Jr.

Recommend Documents