Sereno - Quo Warranto - Motion for ReconsiderationFull description
This is a sample of motion to resolve motion for execution.
Sample - Motion for Production of Documents. Legal FormsFull description
Motion for Early Resolution SampleFull description
sampleFull description
Letter of ReconsiderationFull description
Sample Motion to Dismiss
This is a sample of Motion to Revive
Motion For Bill of ParticularsFull description
For Legal Forms discussionFull description
Motion for Certificate of Finality
Motion for Execution of JudgmentFull description
Full description
Sample Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for ReviewFull description
This sample motion for a new trial for an unlawful detainer (eviction) case in California is made pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 657 and Code of Civil Procedure section 1178. The motio...Full description
This sample motion for a protective order for a deposition in California is filed pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 2025.420(b) on the grounds that the moving party will suffer unwarranted annoya...Full description
criminal case
sample motion to quash service in california due to improper serviceFull description
Motion to Render Judgment- SampleFull description
Republic of the Philippines DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF THE CITY PROSECUTOR Cit of !"s Pin"s
PEOP!E OF THE PHI!IPPINES#
Criminal case No. 12345-A For: $u"lifie% Theft . Article 310 of the Revised Penal Code
Pl"intiff#
&'e(sus&
CHRISTOPHER A)USTIN A*ES# Accuse%+ ,&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
C!"# C!"# N$% N$% the com&lai com&lainant nant '( the )ndersi*n )ndersi*ned ed attorne( attorne( and +ithin +ithin the re*lem re*lemen entar tar( ( &erio &eriod d &rescr &rescri'e i'ed d '( the R)les R)les of Co)rt Co)rt here here'( '( files files this this motio motion n for for reconsideration from the iss)ance of the resol)tion of lac, of &ro'a'le ca)se '( the )d*ement )d*ement rendered rendered '( Prosec)tor Prosec)tor onorio onorio /ali&an /ali&an of ffice ffice of the the Prosec)tor Prosec)tor '( virt)e of ne+ vital +itness +hich +as not o'tained d)rin* the trial of this case and if &rod)ce +ill s)'stantiall( affect the decision of the onora'le Co)rt% to +it:
1. n cto'er cto'er 1% 1% 2012% 2012% )ndersi* )ndersi*ned ned co)nse co)nsell for the Com&la Com&laina inant nt receive received d a co&( of this onora'le Co)rts Resol)tion den(in* the com&laint for )alified theft. /he dis&ositive &ortion of the Resol)tion states: -HEREFORE# -HEREFORE# IN *IE- OF THE FORE)OIN) FORE)OIN)## that an information for the crime of )alified theft filed a*ainst the res&ondent CR#/P"R A"# is lac, of merit. A co&( of of the Resol)tion Resol)tion is attached attached hereto hereto as Anne, .A.
2. /he denial of the &etition on the follo+in* *ro)nds: a. For one to 'e *)ilt( of theft% the acc)sed m)st have an intent to steal 6anim)s f)randi7 &ersonal &ro&ert(% meanin* the intent to de&rive another of his o+nershi&8la+f)l &ossession of &ersonal &ro&ert( +hich intent is a&art from% ')t conc)rrent +ith the *eneral criminal intent +hich is an essential element of a felon( of dolo 6dolos mal)s7. /he animo 'ein* a state of the mind ma( 'e &roved '( direct or circ)mstantial evidence% incl)sive of the manner and cond)ct of the acc)sed 'efore% d)rin* and after the ta,in* of the &ersonal &ro&ert(. 9eneral criminal intent is &res)med or inferred from the ver( fact that the +ron*f)l act is done since one is &res)med to have +illed the nat)ral conse)ences of his o+n acts. ;i,e+ise% anim)s f)randi is &res)med from the ta,in* of &ersonal &ro&ert( +itho)t the consent of the o+ner or la+f)l &ossessor thereof. /he same ma( 'e re')tted '( the acc)sed '( evidence that he too, the &ersonal &ro&ert( )nder a 'ona fide 'elief that he o+ns the &ro&ert(.
'. /he acts of Christo&her and the relevant circ)mstances that led to acc)sed him of stealin* the scra&&ed steel metal &rovide that there is no s)fficient 'asis for the findin* of &ro'a'le ca)se to file information a*ainst him for )alified theft. n fact% it is eas( to infer from the fact)al milie) of the instant case the e
c. !oreover% the element of )alified theft +as lac,in* since 'ased on the res&ondents affidavit. And that the com&lainant did not &)rs)e the said alle*ation 3. /he com&lainant res&ectf)ll( moves for the reconsideration of the a'ove-cited resol)tion 'ased on the follo+in* *ro)nds:
a. $hile discretionar( a)thorit( to determine &ro'a'le ca)se in a &reliminar( investi*ation to ascertain s)fficient *ro)nd for the filin* of information rests +ith the e
dro& the char*es a*ainst Christo&her as the(e /"s 0o(e th"n p(ob"ble c"use to p(ocee% "1"inst hi0 fo( 2u"lifie% theft .
'. n fact% it is o'vio)s from the &int affidavits affidavits that he ,ee& the scra&&ed metal and ma,e &rofis ndeed% as the his o+n testimon(% ahe ,ee& the tool 'o< in the 'arrac,s 'ecomes an evidence of intent to *ain.
c. /a,in* this fact into consideration% it cannot 'e denied that the +heels of the felon( started t)rnin* da(s 'efore of ,ee&in* and sellin* the metals. And the ta,in* and &rofitin* +as a mere c)lmination of the crime that +as commenced in ;imoco Constr)ction.
PRAYER
-HEREFORE% it is most res&ectf)ll( &ra(ed that the instant &etition 'e
considered '( the ono)ra'le Co)rt and f)rther *rant the com&laint other relief 'e *ranted as shall 'e deemed )st and e)ita'le in the &remises Cit( of ;as Pinas% cto'er 05% 2013.
ANDRES T+ CREUS
411 Paloma =)ildin* Pam&lona% ;as Pinas Cit(
Co&( hereof received '( fiice of the Prosec)tor% ;as Pinas Cit( this 5 th da( of cto'er% 2013.
ATTY+ MARY JOY 3+ TA)!E
Co)nsel for the Acc)sed
ASST+ FISCA! 4A!A)TAS 4A!A)TAS
1>>> . ;i+asan% !anila
ANDRES T+ CREUS
Co)nsel for the Acc)sed Notar( P)'lic ?ntil @ecem'er 31% 2013 P/R N. 1>220 ss)ed on Ban)ar( 1>% 2013 at ;as Pinas Cit(
