Students are going to make an original game using Scratch and they are going to assess each other using this rubric guide
non verbal reading comprehension assessmentFull description
Grading rubric for assessment 1
An Internal Assessment for IB Environmental Systems and Societies is an student-chosen lab, where all lab design, data collection, analysis, and conclusions must be done by the student.
Full description
History IB Internal Assessment about the Marshall Aid Plan of 1948.Full description
A quick and concise guide to help students pick an IA topic and research questionFull description
Internal Assessment to investigate the impact of Social Networking Sites on the students' academic performance. This study was carried out at the Antigua State College.Full description
Descripción: Internal Audit Risk Assessment
Chem IA. IBFull description
A quick and concise guide to help students pick an IA topic and research questionFull description
Bio Reaction Internal Assessment Nerve ImpulsesFull description
Full description
IB Geography SL
Full description
Full description
Descripción completa
dance rubric for pe
CAPE Sociology IAFull description
November 2013 graduate. Biology HL-6 Practical Work-5Full description
Psychology SL Internal Assessment/Experimental Assessment/Experimental Study Rubric Total of 20 points Checklist Marks Criterion A: Introduction (2 marks)
The aim of the study is clearly stated.
0.
There There is no no introd introduct uction ion or or it is irr irrele elevan vantt
The study replicated is clearly identified and explained.
1.
The aim of of the student’ student’ss study study I impre imprecise cise,, or the the study study being replicated replicated is identified identified but not explained explained
The significance of the study to be replicated is explained.
2.
The aim of of the student’ student’ss study study is clearly clearly stated stated and the the study being replicated is clearly identified and explained
Criterion B: Design (2 marks) 0.
IV and DV are accurately identified.
The design is appropriate and justified.
Ethical guidelines are followed.
Operational definitions are provided as necessary.
1.
2.
The inde indepen penden dentt and depen dependen dentt variab variables les are are not identified or they are irrelevant. The psychology course ethical guidelines are not followed. The independen independentt and dependent dependent variable variabless are accurate accurately ly identified. The design is appropriate appropriate but unjustified. There is evidence that the psychology course ethical guidelines are followed The independen independentt and dependent dependent variable variabless are accurate accurately ly identified. The design is appropriate appropriate and justified. There is evidence that the psychology course ethical guidelines are followed.
Criterion C: Participants (2 marks)
The characteristics of the target population are identified (number, age, gender, ESL?)
The sample is selected using an appropriate method.
If necessary, explain how they were allocated into groups.
The method is justified.
0.
No releva relevant nt characte characterist ristics ics of the targe targett populati population on are are identified and no relevant sampling technique is identified or justified. 1. Some character characteristi istics cs of of the the targe targett popula population tion are identified but not all all are relevant. The sample is selected selected using an appropriate method but the method is not justified 2. The character characteristic isticss of the target target popula population tion are identified. The sample is selected selected using an appropriate method and the method is justified
Criterion D: Procedure (2 marks)
Include materials that were used to carry out the experiment
0.
No releva relevant nt proc procedu edure re is is prese presente nted. d.
(reference appendix)
1.
The procedure procedure is is releva relevant nt but but is not clear clearly ly descri described bed and is not easily replicable
2.
The procedure procedure is is relevant relevant,, clearly clearly describe described d and is is easily easily replicable
Standardized Standardized directions should appear in an appendix.
The procedure is relevant and clearly described.
It is easily replicable.
Debriefing procedure is mentioned.
Criterion E: Results (4 marks) )
0.
There There are no results results,, or they they are are irrelev irrelevant ant to the aims. aims.
1.
Results Results are fairly fairly stated stated and accurate accurate.. Graphs Graphs are not sufficiently accurate or clear. Result Resultss are are state stated d and and accur accurate ate.. Graphs Graphs are are not not sufficiently accurate or clear. Results Results are clearly clearly stated stated and accurate accurate.. Graphs Graphs are generally accurate and clear. Results Results are clearly clearly stated stated and accurate accurate.. Graphs Graphs are completely accurate and clear.
Results are clearly stated and accurate.
Raw data is presented in an appendix.
Descriptive statistics are applied.
Graphs are accurate and clearly presented (labelled)
Text makes direct reference to the graphs as presented.
2. 3. 4.
Criterion F: Discussion (6 marks)
Comment on your results with regard to the original study.
0. 1.
No new studies are introduced.
The strengths and limitations of the study are clearly 2. 3.
identified.
The conclusion is appropriate and well balanced.
Modifications and/or improvements are suggested for further 4. 5.
research.
6.
There is no discussion or it is irrelevant The discussion of the results, in light of the study being replicated, is very superficial. The strengths and limitations are not always accurately identified. There is no conclusion drawn and no modifications are suggested. The discussion of the results, in light of the study being replicated, is not fully developed. Not all the strengths and limitations have been accurately identified. The conclusion is appropriate drawn and some modifications are suggested .same as above . The discussion of the results, in light of the study being replicated, is fully developed. The strengths and limitations are clearly identified. The conclusion is appropriate and well balanced and modifications and/or improvements are suggested.
Criterion G: Presentation (2 marks)
The report is in the correct format. Spelling and grammar is checked. The report is between 1000 and 1500 words. References are provided using standardized method. All references listed in the bibliography are cited in the paper.
0. 1.
2.
The Report is not within the word limit of 1,000 – 1.500 words and/or no references are provided. The report is within the word limit of 1000-1500 words. However, the report is not in the required format or the references are incomplete, or one standard method of listing references is not used. The report is in the correct format and within the word limit of 1000-1500 words. References are provided using one standard method listing references consistently
You must add the following: 1. An abstract (see below) 2. A cover page (which includes your word count) 3. Page numbers 4. A Table of Contents The abstract: A summary of the entire investigation. About 150 words. It should begin with a one-sentence summary of your paper and then include: Aim of the research The Research Hypothesis Type of design Variables studied Participants Results with reference to statistical analysis Conclusions Mention implications of findings
