Altounian
1
Altounian, Elizabeth Professor Vana DerOhanessian English 114A 29 October 2014 Ebola: Is it Socially Accepted? Social media is a compilation of websites and app lications that enable users to create and share content or to participate in social networking. Using social media on a daily basis has become the status quo in the lives of average Americans. Many consider the nature of social media users as people who ignorantly pass jud gment. When traditional values in our culture clash with social media, new norms evolve based on opinions stated in comment sections and status updates. Based on trending subjects and personalities, the public adapts to what is considered most popular or appealing. Although many may disagree, social media is a large factor in evaluating societal norms because of the constant sharing and spreading of opinion and judgment. Since the discovery of Ebola-infected people in America, many popular social networking sites, such as Twitter, have been mocking the actual severity of this illness without taking into consideration that these outbursts may lead to criminal charges or even the exposure ex posure of this deadly virus. When it comes to Ebola, the younger generation believes that making jokes about it is acceptable. In other words, social media has made Ebola the laughing stock of our generation. Moreover, the main reason people ridicule and mock a disease new to the American public is because of the lack of information provided to the public about this deadly illness. Therefore our ignorance drives our judgment. The symptoms s ymptoms of this disease are so severe, they can lead to death; it has put many people in confinement and has killed many who have been exposed to the
Altounian
2
disease. An example that demonstrates someone t aking this too lightly would be a tweet that states, “If I get Ebola I know who I‟m sneezing on first” (@Girlfession). When the person tweeting states “If I get Ebola”, it implies that the person running this account is not thinking about what this disease will do to them but thinking about what they can do to people they don‟t approve of. Threatening to spread the Ebola virus reveals the blatant ignorance of certain people in our society who are so quick to stoop to ridiculous insults just to crack a joke. Another example would be the post on Twitter using the very famous film Mean Girls as a joke implying that the main character Lindsey Lohan plays is the person who actually brought Ebola to the states. A picture posted with Lindsey Lohan‟s character captioned, “We all know who really brought Ebola from Africa and into the USA...” implies her character is the one who brought the disease because she is from Africa (@TedOfficialPage). Using Mean Girls as the source of this joke appeals to a much broader audience because everyone, regardless if they have seen the movie or not, can relate to this pop-culture reference due to the popularity of this film. The more popular a film is, the quicker these jokes (or memes) spread. The more common a joke becomes, the more socially acceptable it seems to make fun of a deadly disease. Younger generations who grew up on social media sites might not understand the severity of their actions regarding the constant ridiculing of Ebola. There have been a few cases of criminal threats charged against people who thought it would be a good idea to joke about th
having the Ebola disease. NBC news reported on October 14 that a passenger on a metro bus in the Lincoln Heights area claimed he had Ebola and authorities opened a criminal threat investigation against him. Apparently, “a man in a surgical mask told a bus driver, „You better not mess with me because I have Ebola,” before getting off the bus” (NBC). What if the many off-color jokes about this disease inspired this particular man to take the jok e even further? This
Altounian
3
man‟s outburst spurned authorities to open an inve stigation into the matter merely because he made a joke he thought was socially accepted by society. This minor joke he thought was okay caused the whole bus to be put under lockdown until they were sure no one was infected. Another similar incident occurred on an airline involving a man who made a joke about having Ebola before he was escorted off the plane. “Four officials in blue plastic hazmat suits boarded U.S. Airways Flight 845 to retrieve him after it lan ded in Punta Cana in the Dominican R epublic” (KTLA5). This man making the joke on an airplane caused a panic because the disease was originally carried over by a man visiting his family in Texas from Africa. The jokes that were being made were probably meant to be harmless but because of the dangers of this particular disease, serious actions were taken against the people who made the jokes. Humor is a way for people to communicate their fears to each other in order to avoid a heavy heart. But there comes a point where these jokes can be abused. There are those people who might disagree with the points being made in this paper, claiming that citizens have freedom of speech. Freedom of speech does give people right to say what they wish but there are people who abuse this right. “Freedom of Speech, Right, as stated in the 1st and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, to express information, ideas, and opinions free of government restrictions based on content” (Britannica). People will argue that they can say what they wish without receiving any consequences just how people on social media websites do, like Twitter. Although this may be true, the hypothetical “fine print” of the amendment is limited due to the fact that it is based on content. People have the wrong understanding of the amendment, therefore using this amendment as a safety net to fall back on as an excuse. Social media can alter the way most people view certain things in society. The way we are influenced by what we see should not change the way we act in public. Jokes such as the
Altounian
4
Ebola disease being made on Twitter and in public have two completely different consequences. Society does have the right to freedom of speech, yes, but it all depends on how one puts it to use. With a disease so deadly, the government has the society‟s safety in mind. This is why such severe actions are being taken to make sure it does not spread and infect more people than it already has.
Altounian
5
Works Cited Girlfessions (Girlfessions). “if I get Ebola I know who I‟m sneezing on first.” Tweet. TED (TedOfficialPage). “we all know who really brought Ebola from Africa and into the USA…” 04 October 2014, 2:00 p.m. Tweet. Knight, Nerissa, and CNN WIRE. "Man Escorted Off Plane b y Men in Hazmat Suits After Ebola Scare on US Airways Flight." KTLA 5. N.p., 9 Oct. 2014. Web. 28 Oct. 2014. Kandel, Jason, and Gadi Schwartz. "Ebola Scare Prompts Criminal Threat Investigation." NBC Southern California. N.p., 14 Oct. 2014. Web. 28 Oct. 2014. "Freedom of Speech." Encyclopedia Britannica. CSUN Library, 9 Oct. 2013. Web. 28 Oct. 2014.
Figure 1
Figure 2
