perbandingan acrylic, kaca dengan polycarbonat, keuntungan dan kerugian serta aplikasinya
kumpulan bahan
OBDeleven PRO vs VCDS ( VAG COM ) vs VCP ( Vag Can Pro) vs Carista vs Carly for VAG vs Launch EasyDiag supported functions CompareFull description
Sandingan Sistem Manajemen Keamanan Informasi vs Sistem Manajemen Anti Penyuapan vs Sistem Manajemen Mutu vs Sistem Manajemen LayananFull description
PEOPLE VS PASUDAG, PEOPLE VS ZUELA, PEOPLE VS ABE VALDEZ PEOPLE VS PASUDAG, PEOPLE VS ZUELA, PEOPLE VS ABE VALDEZ CasesFull description
digestedFull description
Comparison of Petrol diesel,lpg & CNG run vehicle cars
VS Aristóteles - EnsayosDescripción completa
Descripción: P
difference between guilty and plead guilty under indian evidence act and inherent powers of the high courtFull description
vdb
cabague
kk
Full description
PAGCOR vs. PEJI, Zamboanga City Special Economic Zone Authority, et al. G.R. No. 177333. April 24, 2009 Facts: RA
7903 was enacted into law creating the Zamboanga City Special Economic Zone (ZAMBOECOZONE) and the ZAMBOECOZONE Authority which is granted the power “to operate on its own, either directly or through subsidiary entity, or license to others, tourism-related activities, including games, amusements and recreational and sports facilities” under Sec. 7 of said law. In the exercise of its power, ZAMBOECOZONE Authority passed Resolution No. 2006-08-03 approving the application of Philippine E-Gaming Jurisdiction, Inc. (PEJI) to be a Master Licensor/ Regulator of online/internet/electronic gaming/games of chance. PEJI then undertook extensive advertising campaigns representing itself as such licensor/regulator to the international business and gaming community causing the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR) to file a petition for prohibition assailing the authority of the ZAMBOECOZONE to operate, license, or regulate the operation of “games of chance” in the ZAMBOECOZONE on ground that it encroaches PAGCOR’s authority under PD 1869 to centralize and regulate all games of chance. Whether or not the ZAMBOECOZONE should be authorized to enter into “any gaming activity” by itself when the law only specifically allows the “operation of tourismrelated activities including games, amusements and recreational and sports facilities”.
Issue:
Held: No.
RA 7903 does not authorize the ZAMBOECOZONE Authority to operate and/ or license games of chance/gambling. Where the words of a statute are clear, plain and free from ambiguity, it must be given its literal meaning and applied without attempted interpretation. The plain meaning rule or verba legis rests on the valid presumption that the words employed by the legislature in a stature correctly express its intention or will and preclude the court from construing it differently for the legislature is presumed to know the meaning of the words, to have used them advisedly, and to have expressed the intent by use of such words as are found in the statute. Verbal egis non est recedendum . From the words of a stature there should be no departure.
