Marriage of Josephine Bracken and Jose Rizal was Valid Valid Wedding and the Last Hours with Rizal It is Rizal’s desire to get married with Josephine according to the Roman Catholic rite. However, the authorities of the Catholic make a condition. Rizal should retract some earlier, as heretic classified statements. They send the Jesuit Frater alaguer to him in the cell. He should try to !ring him in the conversation again on the line o" the Catholic Church. #ow "or Rizal hours o" moral con"licts and conscience e$amination are starting. In the end, he agrees. The document whose original was rediscovered in %&'( in the archives o" the archdiocese )anila has the "ollowing te$t* "I declare mself mself a Catholic and in this religion in. I retract with all m heart whate!er whate!er in m words, writings, pulications and conduct has een contrar to m #ualit as a son of the Catholic Church. I elie!e and profess whate!er she teaches and I sumit mself to whate!er she commands. I aominate Masonr, as the enem that it is of the Church, and as a $ociet prohiited the Church. %he &iocesan 'relate can, as the $uperior (cclesiastical authorit, make pulic this spontaneous manifestation of mine in order to repair the scandals that m acts ha!e caused and so that )od and the people ma pardon me." The retraction is "or the +rinces o" the Church a great success. However, there are also church critical historians, who deny the e$istence o" a cancellation !ecause it would not have "itted to Rizal’s Rizal’s character character.. They point point out that the retraction retraction was "ormula "ormulated ted in a very di""icult di""icult and e$ceptional situation and that even Rizal’s last poem - )y last Farewell implicate a church critical statement* /. I0ll go where there are no slaves, tyrants or hangmen 1here "aith does not 2ill and where 3od alone does reign. Farewell, parents, !rothers, !eloved !y me, Friends o" my childhood, in the home distressed4 3ive than2s that now I rest "rom the wearisome day4 Farewell, sweet stranger, my "riend, who !rightened my way4 Farewell, to all I love. To die is to rest. 1ith the "ormulation - sweet strangers, my "riend, who !rightened my way 5, Rizal appreciates Josephine rac2en according to the analysts. %he oth get married after the Catholic rite on the *+-*/01, at fi!e o2clock in the earl morning, two hours efore Rizal gets e3ecuted. e3ecuted . 6 certi"icate o" marriage is not handed over to Josephine. In the moment o" parting Rizal should weeps on the shoulder shoulder o" Frater alaguer, alaguer, while Josephine e$claims in the door o" the prison chapel* 51retched7 8adists7 9&:. 6n e$ecution !y heart shot is re"used, !ecause Rizal is considered as 5traitor. He is shot !y the !ac2 9%;:. The "amily circle is not present at the e$ecution. THERE’S NO EVIDENCE OF THEIR !RRI!"E #EFORE HIS E$EC%TION &Retrie'ed (ro)* htt+*,,www-insights.+hili++ines-de,/ra01enengl-ht) 2 htt+*,,www-insights.+hili++ines-de,/ra01enengl-ht) 2
6side "rom the
In this document, whose authenticity has !een =uestioned, she signed hersel" 5Josephine Bracken de Rizal, a widow.8
9Read more* http*>>newsin"o.in=uirer.net>?(@?A'>unhappywi"eo"Boserizali$zzDi@)E8 :
Marriage of Josephine Bracken and Jose Rizal was In!alid arr3ing 4ose+hine 8ome re"erences claim that even !e"ore Tau"er and Josephine le"t "or )anila, Rizal had already proposed to her and applied "or their marriage. &apitan parish priest 9ntonio :ach howe!er wanted Rizal7s retraction of his anti;clerical !iews as a prere#uisite and would only grant the church ceremony i" Rizal could get permission "rom the ishop o" Ce!u. 5Gither the ishop did not write him !ac2 or Rizal was not a!le to mail the letter !ecause o" the sudden departure o" )r. Tau"er 91i2ipedia:. 1hen Josephine returned to apitan, the church wedding she hoped for could not happen. Rizal would not retract and so :ach denied them the permission to marr and 5the Bishop of Ceu confirmed the priest7s decision8 9antug, p. %%?:. 1ith Josephine’s consent, Rizal nonetheless took her as his wife e!en without the Catholic lessings. The couple married themselves !e"ore the eyes o" 3od !y 5holding hands in the presence o" two witnesses 96l!uro:. 6ware o" the circumstances, &o
Though some accounts state that Josephine was "or!idden "rom seeing her hus!and on the "ate"ul day o" his martyrdom, the historian 3regorio Kaide wrote that at (*'; a.m., she and Jose"a 9Rizal’s sister: came. The couple was said to have em!raced "or the last time and Rizal gave to Josephine the !oo2 MImitation o" Christ’ 9!y Thomas a ecem!er ';th, %?&> Jose Rizal. There’s an allegation that either the evening !e"ore or in the early morning o" Rizal’s day o" e$ecution, the couple was married in a ceremony o""iciated !y the priest Nicente alanguer. =onetheless, the memers of Rizal famil themsel!es seriousl dout the claim as no records were found as regards the wedding. &e5e/og6 4- &789: !ugust 8;2- 4ose+hine #ra01en* 4ose Rizal’s Dear and %nha++3 Wi(eRetrie'ed (ro)* htt+*,,ourha++3s0hool-0o),histor3, that she had heard from a $paniard that if the would marr, she would e separate from her husand (5)- The historian Craig assumes that married themselves in presence o" two witnesses. &&=2 One Hundred Letters o( 4ose Rizal to his >arents6 #rother6 Sisters6 Relati'es &anila* >hili++ine National Histori0al So0iet36 9?=?26 ==?.=;: in* htt+*,,)e)/ers-aol-0o),
immoral.8 This verse draws a clear distinction !etween that which is pure and honora!leQ marriageQand that which is se$ually immoralQanything outside o" marriage. 6s living together outside o" marriage "alls into this category, it is de"initely sin. 9none li!ing together outside of lawful marriage in!ites the displeasure and @udgment of )od.
A($%I:=$? • •
6re you a ChristianP I" yes, then recite He!rews %'*D. I" you were oa Teodora 9or a mother:, would you accept your child’s coha!itation or living in with his>her loved one !e"ore getting marriedP
