Logging While Drilling Essentials
Training Curriculum
T R AI N & E T. 200 I N S 0
ER
O
O
W
YE
EMP
ES
E
G
PD
CRCM_170_revE_0605
ING EMP
L
This page intentionally left blank.
LWD I Essentials Course #170
Course Description: This 4-day introductory level course concentrates on the essential background knowledge and theory that the field engineer must possess in order to effectively analyze, interpret, and troubleshoot LWD data. The course provides classroom instruction in petroleum geology, directional drilling basics, data acquisition methods, basic LWD sensor theory, application, and interpretation, LWD system specifics, and surveying theory and quality control. The Lithium Battery Safety course (#080) is also included within the structure of this training. A written assessment designed to measure the student’s understanding of the subject matter will be administered upon completion of the course material.
Course Outline: Day One Introduction Registration and Introductions
0.5 hour
Petroleum Geology Primer Rocks and Minerals Transport and Deposition Sedimentary Rock Classifications Origin of Hydrocarbons Hydrocarbon Migration Hydrocarbon Accumulation
2 hours
Directional Drilling Basics Introduction to Directional Drilling Applications of Directional Drilling Directional Drilling Limitations
1.5 hours
1
CROL_170_revE_0605
Methods of Deflecting a Wellbore o Whipstock o Jetting Assemblies o Rotary Bottomhole Assemblies Building Assemblies Dropping Assemblies Holding Assemblies Mud Motors o Motor Selection o Components o Operational Limitations & Constraints Rotary Steerable Assemblies
Data Acquisition Methods Recorded Data Measurement Process o Recorded Data Advantages / Disadvantages Real-time Data Measurement Process Real-time Telemetry Methods o Mud Pulse Telemetry Theory of Operations Positive Pulse Telemetry Negative Pulse Telemetry Mud Pulse Telemetry Advantages / Disadvantages o Electromagnetic Telemetry Theory of Operations Electromagnetic Telemetry Advantages / Disadvantages
1 hour
The Borehole Environment Drilling Fluid Properties o Drilling Fluid Advantages o Drilling Fluid Disadvantages Formation Properties o Formation Porosity o Formation Permeability o Pore Fluid Saturation and Density o Lithology o Formation Thickness o Shale Content Pressure Differential o Overbalanced o Underbalanced
1 hour
2
CROL_170_revE_0605
Day Two LWD Sensor Theory, Application, and Interpretation 4 hours Directional Data o Importance of Directional Surveying o Directional Surveying Measurements o Directional Sensor Hardware o Sensor Axes and Orientation o Magnetic Field Strength, Dip Angle, Horizontal and Vertical Components o Magnetic Declination o Grid Convergence o Factors Affecting Inclination and Hole Direction o Survey Quality Control - Gtotal, Btotal, Magnetic Dip Angle o Well Plan Parameters (Horizontal & Vertical Projections)
Formation Evaluation Data o Gamma Ray Theory Applications Interpretation
1 hour
o Resistivity Theory Applications Interpretation
2 hours
Drilling Mechanics Data o Pressure While Drilling Theory Applications Interpretation
1 hour
Day Three LWD Sensor Theory, Application, and Interpretation (continued) Formation Evaluation Data o Neutron Theory Applications Interpretation o Density Theory Applications Interpretation
3
1.5 hours
1.5 hours
CROL_170_revE_0605
Drilling Mechanics Data o Vibration Theory Applications Interpretation
1.5 hours
LWD System and Sensor Specifics LWD System Specifications o HEL (Hostile Environment Logging) o PrecisionLWD LWD Sensor Specifications o BAP o HAGR o IDS o ESM o MFR o TNP o AZD LWD Sensor Measure Points LWD Tool Configurations
2 hours
1 hour
Review for Written Exam
Day Four Written Exam
4 hours
Lithium Battery Safety (Course #080)
4 hours
4
CROL_170_revE_0605
Shale Gas Oil Salt Water Shale
Salt
LWD I Essentials Course 170
CRCM_170_revE_0605 © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
1
Registration • Legibly complete the information requested on Course Enrollment Sheet (see below) • Print your name exactly as you wish it to appear on your course certificate • Obtain a copy of the course curriculum from the front of the room • Obtain a pad of paper and writing materials if needed
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
1
Course Outline • Days 1 - 3 – Introduction – Petroleum Geology Primer – Directional Drilling Basics – Data Acquisition Methods – The Borehole Environment – Basic LWD Sensor Theory, Application, and Interpretation – LWD System and Sensor Specifics • Day 4 – Comprehensive Written Assessment – Lithium Battery Safety Course © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Daily Activities • Class starts at 8:00 AM daily • Class ends approximately 5:00 PM daily • Breaks – one in morning, one in afternoon • Quizzes possible at any time • Written Assessment on final day of course
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2
Petroleum Geology Primer Rocks & Minerals
CRCM_170_revE_0605 © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
1
Minerals • A mineral is a naturally occurring inorganic crystalline element or compound • Minerals have definite chemical composition and characteristic physical properties such as crystal shape, melting point, color, and hardness • Most minerals found in rocks are not pure • Examples are quartz and feldspar
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
1
Rock Classifications • A rock is a hardened aggregate composed of different minerals • Rocks are divided into three classifications on the basis of their mode of origin – Igneous – Metamorphic – Sedimentary
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Igneous Rock • Rock mass formed by the solidification of magma within the earth’s crust or on its surface • Two principal types of igneous rock – Intrusive (plutonic), those that have solidified below the surface Granite
– Extrusive (volcanic), those that have formed on the surface Lava (Basalt)
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
2
Metamorphic Rock
• Rock derived from preexisting rocks by mineralogical, chemical, and structural alterations caused by heat and pressure within the earth’s crust – Limestone
Æ
Marble
– Shale
Æ
Slate
• Metamorphism results in a crystalline texture which has little or no porosity
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Sedimentary Rock • Rock composed of materials that were transported to their present position by wind or water • Sandstone, limestone, shale sometimes referred to as clastic rocks, which are distinguished primarily by grain size – Weathering breaks down the structure – Erosion is the removal of weathered rock – Transportation mechanisms move the eroded sediments to a basin where deposition occurs – Compaction forces from the weight of overburden sediments and cementation hardens the sediments into sedimentary rock
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
3
Sedimentary Rock • Sedimentary rocks cover 75% of the land surface of the earth’s crust • Because most sedimentary rocks are capable of containing fluids (reservoir rock) they are of prime interest to the petroleum geologists • Shale is a sedimentary rock that is not typically a reservoir rock, but it is a “source rock” for the production of hydrocarbons Sandstone
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
The Rock Cycle • The possible sequence of events, all interrelated, by which rocks may be formed, changed, destroyed, or transformed into other types of rock
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
4
Rock Texture • Clastic Texture (Sedimentary) – Rock texture in which individual rock, mineral, or organic fragments are cemented together by a crystalline mineral such as calcite
• Crystalline Texture (Metamorphic & Igneous) – Rock texture that is the result of progressive and simultaneous interlocking growth of mineral crystals © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Sedimentary Transport & Depositional Environments
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
5
Sedimentary Transport • Tectonic forces raise lowlands above sea level, ensuring a continuing supply of exposed rock for producing sediments • Gravity causes sediments to move from high places to low • Gravity also works through water, wind, or ice to transport particles from one location to another • Gravity ultimately pulls sediments to sea level
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Sedimentary Transport Mechanisms • Mass Movement • Water Transport • Wind Transport • Glacial Transport
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
6
Mass Movement • In high elevations – Severe weathering – Instability of steep slopes • A large block of bedrock may separate along deep fractures or bedding planes – Rockslide or avalanche
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Water Transport • Primary means of sediment transport • The distance a sedimentary particle can be carried by water depends on: – Available water energy – Size – Shape – Density • The higher the water energy the larger the volume and size of sediments carried • Lighter particles become part of the suspended load, whereas heavier ones settle into the bed load • Spherical particles are more difficult to carry than randomly shaped ones • The more dense a particle is, the faster it will settle out © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
7
Wind Transport • Wind moves only minor amounts of sediment compared to water transport • High winds carry clay, silt, and sand much as a river does • In arid (desert) climates wind may act as the primary weathering and transport agent • Wind-driven sediments are often reworked and redeposited by flowing water
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Glacial Transport • Glaciers move slowly but with great weight, grinding rocks into various sized particles • Glacial sediments are often reworked and redeposited by flowing water • Can move boulder-sized sediments that water and wind cannot
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
8
Depositional Environments • A place where sedimentary particles arriving at a location outnumber those being carried away • Common depositional environments: – Fluvial – Lacustrine – Glacial – Aeolian – Marine
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Fluvial Deposits • Sediments deposited by flowing water • Sediments accumulate where the energy is reduced (inside of bend) – Sandbars – Floods – Deltas
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
9
Lacustrine Deposits • A collection of sediment in a lake at the point at which a river or stream enters • When flowing water enters the lake, the encounter with still water absorbs most or all of the stream’s energy, causing its sediment load to be deposited • Eventually the lake will fill with sediments and ceases to exist, leaving behind a deposit from which hydrocarbons may be born
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Glacial Deposits • Sediments deposited by moving ice sheets are rare because they are subject to erosion and rework by other agents • Retreating glaciers leave behind accumulations of unsorted sediments called till, which is a chaotic jumble of mud, gravel, and large rocks
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
10
Aeolian Deposits • Sediments deposited by wind, typically in arid climates • Sand dunes • Loess (thick beds of silt carried by winds from the outwash plains of glaciers
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Marine Deposits • Marine deposits are far enough seaward not to be affected by wave action or fluvial deposition • Generally associated with finer grained sediments – Reef – Turbidites
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
11
Sedimentary Rock Classifications
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Clastics • Rocks composed mostly of fragments of other rocks which are distinguished by grain size
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
12
Conglomerates • A sedimentary rock composed of pebbles of various size held together by a cementing material such as clay • Similar to sandstone but are composed mostly of grains more than 2 mm in diameter • Usually found in isolated layers; not very abundant
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Sandstones • A sedimentary rock with more than half of its grains between 1/16 mm and 2 mm • Generally composed of quartz and feldspar • Commonly porous and permeable making it a likely type of rock to find a petroleum reservoir • One fourth of all sedimentary rocks are sandstones
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
13
Shales • Distinctive, fine-grained, evenly bedded sedimentary rock composed mostly of consolidated silt or clay • Formed from fine sediments that settled out of suspension in still waters, shale occurs in thick deposits over broad areas, interbedded with sandstone or limestone • Silt grains – 1/256 mm to 1/16 mm • Clay grains – flat, plate-like crystals less than 1/256 mm across • Organic shale is thought to be the source of most of the world’s petroleum • Shales also make excellent barriers to the migration of fluid and tend to trap petroleum in adjacent porous rock • One-half to three-fourths of the world’s sedimentary rock is shale
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Evaporites • A sedimentary rock formed by precipitation of dissolved solids from water evaporating in a closed basin
Anhydrite
• Indicators of former dry climates or enclosed drainage basins • Only a small fraction of all sedimentary rocks but play a significant part in the formation of petroleum reservoirs associated with salt domes
Halite
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
14
Carbonates • A sedimentary rock composed primarily of calcium carbonate (limestone) or calcium magnesium carbonate (dolomite)
Limestone
• Make up about one-fourth of all sedimentary rocks • Most carbonates are formed as a direct result of biological activity • Limestone forms in warm, shallow water
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Origin of Hydrocarbons
putalog
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
15
Hydrocarbons • Originally oil seemed to come from solid rock deep beneath the surface (“inorganic theory”) • Scientists showed oil-rocks were once loose sediment piling up in shallow coastal waters • Advances in microscopy revealed fossilized creatures • Chemists discovered certain complex molecules in petroleum known to occur only in living cells • That source rocks were shown to originate in an environment rich with life clinched the “organic theory”
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Chemical Factors • A hydrocarbon molecule is a chain of one or more carbon atoms with hydrogen atoms chemically bound to them • Variations are due to differences in molecular weight • Despite those differences the proportions of carbon and hydrogen do not vary appreciably • Carbon comprises 82-87% and hydrogen 12-15%
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
16
Chemical Composition of Average Crude Oil & Natural Gas
Element
Crude Oil
Natural Gas
Carbon
82 – 87%
65 – 80%
Hydrogen
12 – 15%
1 – 25%
Sulphur
0.1 – 5.5%
0 – 0.2%
Nitrogen
0.1 – 1.5%
1 – 15%
Oxygen
0.1 – 4.5%
0%
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Chemical Factors • Methane, the simplest hydrocarbon, has the chemical formula CH4 – Four is the maximum number of hydrogen atoms that can attach to a single carbon atom • Petroleum is only slightly soluble in salt water – Molecules with up to four carbon atoms occur as gases – Molecules having five to fifteen carbon atoms are liquids – Heavier molecules occur as solids • Petroleum occurs in such diverse forms as – Thick black asphalt or pitch, – Oily black heavy crude, – Clear yellow light crude, – And petroleum gas
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
17
Biological Factors • Each level of the food chain contributes to the accumulation of organic material, particularly at the microscopic level (protozoa and algae) • Bacteria plays an important role in recycling this decaying organic material – Aerobic (oxygenated) - requires free oxygen for their life processes (i.e., forms slime or scum) – Anaerobic (reducing) - do not require free oxygen to live and are not destroyed by its absence; takes oxygen from dissolved sulfates and organic fatty acids producing sulfides and hydrocarbons • Although aerobic decay liberates certain hydrocarbons that some small organisms accumulate within their bodies, the anaerobics are more important in oil formation
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Formation • For an accumulation of petroleum to form, the supply of oxygen must be cut off • Examples of where anaerobic environments exist: – Deep offshore – Salt marshes – River deltas – Tidal lagoons • In this environment organic waste materials and dead organisms sink to the bottom and are preserved in an anaerobic environment instead of being decomposed by oxidizing bacteria • Accumulation and compaction of impermeable clay along with the organic material help seal it off from dissolved oxygen • Transformation into petroleum is accomplished by the heat and pressure of deeper burial
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
18
Physical Factors • Certain chemical reactions occur quickly at 120°-150°F, changing the organic material trapped within the rock – Long-chain molecules are broken into shorter chains – Other molecules are reformed, gaining or losing hydrogen – Some short-chain hydrocarbons are combined into longer chains and rings • The net result is that solid hydrocarbons are converted into liquid and gas hydrocarbons • Thus the energy of the sun, converted to chemical energy by plants, redistributed among all the creatures of the food chain, and preserved by burial, is transformed into petroleum © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
The Petroleum Window • The set of conditions under which petroleum will form • Temperatures between 100°F-350°F • The higher the temperature, the greater the gas proportion • Above 350°F almost all of the hydrocarbon is changed into methane and graphite (pure carbon) • Source beds (or reservoirs) deeper than about 20,000 feet usually produce only gas
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
19
Source Rocks • Source Rock – Rock in which organic material that has been converted into petroleum • Reservoir Rock – Rock in which petroleum accumulates • Generally, the best source rocks are shales rich in organic matter deposited in an anaerobic marine environment • Limestone, evaporites, and rocks formed from freshwater sedimentary deposition also become source beds • Time is the final ingredient in the formation and accumulation of petroleum • Little petroleum has been found in reservoir rocks with source beds less than one million years old
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Hydrocarbon Migration
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
20
Migration • The movement of hydrocarbons from the area in which it was formed to a reservoir rock where it can accumulate • Primary migration – Movement of hydrocarbons out of the source rock • Secondary migration – Subsequent movement through porous, permeable reservoir rock by which oil and gas become concentrated in one locality
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Primary Migration • Petroleum leaves its source rock by forces of compaction and water flow • As shale gets compressed into less space, it is not the solid mineral grains that are compressed but the pore spaces • Interstitial water is squeezed out, carrying droplets of oil in suspension and other hydrocarbons in solution • Fluids squeezed out of the more readily compressible shale source rocks will collect in the adjacent sandstone, which retains more of its original porosity
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
21
Secondary Migration • Hydrocarbons are moved through permeable rock by gravity – Compressing pore spaces containing fluid – Causing water containing hydrocarbons to flow – Causing water to push less dense petroleum fluids upward • Effective porosity and permeability of the reservoir rocks are more important than total porosity • These factors control how easily the reservoir can accumulate fluids as well as how much it can hold
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Hydrocarbon Accumulation
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
22
Traps • Like water in a puddle, hydrocarbons collect in places it cannot readily flow out of such as: – structural high points – zones of reduced permeability • Traps are a geologic combination of impermeability and structure that stops any further migration
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Traps • The basic requirements for a petroleum reservoir are – A source of hydrocarbons – Porous and permeable rock enabling migration – Something to arrest the migration and cause accumulation • Two major groups of hydrocarbon traps – structural, the result of deformation of the rock strata – stratigraphic, a direct consequence of depositional variations • Most reservoirs have characteristics of multiple types • Timing is critical; the formation of the trap must occur before the arrival of the petroleum
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
23
Structural Traps Anticline Structure
• Anticlines – Created by tectonic deformation of flat and parallel rock strata – A short anticline plunging in both directions along its strike is classified as a dome • Faults – Occur when deformational forces exceed the breaking strength of rock
Impermeable Bed Sealing Fault
– Most faults trap oil and gas by interrupting the lateral continuity of a permeable formation
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Stratigraphic Traps • Result of lateral discontinuity or changes in permeability and are difficult to detect – Stratigraphic traps were not studied until after most of the world's structural oil fields were discovered – They still account for only a minor part of the world's known petroleum reserves • Stratigraphic traps are usually unrelated to surface features • Many stratigraphic traps have been discovered accidentally while drilling structural traps
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
24
Stratigraphic Traps Shoestring Sands • A sinuous string of sandstone winding through impermeable shales • Form complex branching networks • Create isolated “compartments” • Clues such as direction of greatest permeability and general slope of the buried land surface help find the next productive location © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Stratigraphic Traps • Lens – Isolated body of permeable rock enclosed within less permeable rock – Edges taper out in all directions • Formed by turbidity currents and underwater slides • Isolated beach or stream sand deposits • Alluvial fans – Not extended in length
Lens Lens Traps Traps
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
25
Stratigraphic Traps • Pinchout – Occurs where a porous and permeable sand body is isolated above, below, and at its updip edge – Oil or gas migrates updip to the low-permeability zone where the reservoir "pinches out"
Pinchout Traps
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Combination Traps • Many petroleum traps have both structural and stratigraphic features • Typically found near salt domes
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Petroleum Geology Primer ©2006 Weatherford International Ltd. Confidential – Not To Be Distributed Or Copied. All Rights Reserved.
26
Directional Drilling Basics
CRCM_170_revE_0605 © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
1
Introduction to Directional Drilling • Directional drilling is defined as the practice of controlling the direction and deviation of a well bore to a predetermined underground target or location.
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
1
Types of Directional Wells • Slant • Build and Hold • S-Curve • Extended Reach • Horizontal
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Tools • Drilling Tools • Surveying/Orientation Services • Steering Tools • Conventional Rotary Drilling Assemblies • Steerable Motors • Instrumented Motors for geosteering applications • Rotary Steerable Systems • At-Bit Inclination Sensor
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
2
Applications of Directional Drilling • Multiple wells from offshore structure • Relief wells • Controlling vertical wells
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Applications of Directional Drilling • Sidetracking • Inaccessible locations
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
3
Applications of Directional Drilling
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Applications of Directional Drilling • Extended-Reach Drilling – Replace subsea wells and tap offshore reservoirs from fewer platforms – Develop near shore fields from onshore, and – Reduce environmental impact by developing fields from pads
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
4
Applications of Directional Drilling • Drilling underbalanced – Minimizes skin damage, – Reduces lost circulation and stuck pipe incidents, – Increases ROP while extending bit life, and – Reduces or eliminates the need for costly stimulation programs.
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Limitations • Doglegs • Reactive Torque • Drag • Hydraulics • Hole Cleaning • Weight on Bit • Wellbore Stability
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
5
Methods of Deflecting a Wellbore • Whipstock operations – Still used • Jetting – Rarely used today, still valid and inexpensive • Downhole motors – Most commonly used, fast and accurate
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Whipstock Operations
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
6
Jetting
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Control with Rotary Assemblies • Design principles
• BHA types
• Side force
• Building assembly
• Bit tilt
• Dropping assembly
• Hydraulics
• Holding assembly
• Combination
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
7
Weight On Bit
• Increasing Weight on Bit, increases Deviation Tendency …. and vice-versa
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Stabilization Principle • Stabilizers are placed at specified points to control the drillstring and to minimize downhole deviation • The increased stiffness on the BHA from the added stabilizers keep the drillstring from bending or bowing and force the bit to drill straight ahead • The packed hole assembly is used to maintain angle
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
8
Reasons for Using Stabilizers • Placement / Gauge of stabilizers control direction • Stabilizers help concentrate weight on bit • Stabilizers minimize bending and vibrations • Stabilizers reduce drilling torque less collar contact • Stabilizers help prevent differential sticking and key seating
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Stabilizer Forces
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
9
Building Assemblies (Fulcrum) • Two stabilizer assemblies increase control of side force and alleviate other problems
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Building Assemblies (Fulcrum)
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
10
Dropping Assemblies (Pendulum) • To increase drop rate: – increase tangency length – increase stiffness – increase drill collar weight – decrease weight on bit – increase rotary speed – Common TL: • 30 ft • 45 ft • 60 ft • 90 ft © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Dropping Assemblies (Pendulum)
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
11
Holding Assemblies (Packed) • Designed to minimize side force and decrease sensitivity to axial load
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Application of Steerable Assemblies • Straight-Hole • Directional Drilling / Sidetracking • Horizontal Drilling • Re-entry Wells • Underbalanced Wells / Air Drilling • River Crossings
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
12
Steerable Assemblies
• Build • Drop • Hold © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Mud Motors
Turbine Motor
Positive Displacement Motor
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
13
Commander
TM
PDM Motors
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Motor Selection • These are the three common motor configurations which provide a broad range of bit speeds and torque outputs required satisfying a multitude of drilling applications – High Speed / Low Torque - 1:2 Lobe – Medium Speed / Medium Torque – 4:5 Lobe – Low Speed / High Torque – 7:8 Lobe
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
14
Motor Selection • High Speed / Low Torque (1:2) motor typically used when: – Drilling with diamond bits – Drilling with tri-cone bits in soft formations – Directional drilling using single shot orientations
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Motor Selection • Medium Speed/Medium Torque (4:5) motor typically used for: – Conventional and directional drilling – Diamond bit and coring applications – Sidetracking wells
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
15
Motor Selection • Low Speed / High Torque (7:8) motor typically used for: – Most directional and horizontal wells – Medium to hard formation drilling – PDC bit drilling applications
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Components of PDM Motors • Dump Sub Assembly • Power Section • Drive Assembly • Adjustable Assembly • Sealed Bearing Section
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
16
Dump Sub Assembly • Hydraulically actuated valve located at the top of the drilling motor • Allows the drill string to fill when running in hole • Drain when tripping out of hole • When the pumps are engaged, the valve automatically closes and directs all drilling fluid flow through the motor
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Dump Sub • Allows Drill String Filling and Draining • Operation - Pump Off - Open - Pump On - Closed • Discharge Plugs • Connections
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
17
Power Section • Converts hydraulic power from the drilling fluid into mechanical power to drive the bit – Stator – steel tube containing a bonded elastomer insert with a lobed, helical pattern bore through the center – Rotor – lobed, helical steel rod • When drilling fluid is forced through the power section, the pressure drop across the cavities will cause the rotor to turn inside the stator
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Power Section • Pattern of the lobes and the length of the helix dictate the output characteristics • Stator always has one more lobe than the rotor • Stage – one full helical rotation of the lobed stator • With more stages, the power section is capable of greater differential pressure, which in turn provides more torque to the rotor
Performance Characteristics
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
18
Drive Assembly • Converts Eccentric Rotor Rotation into Concentric Rotation
Flex Rod
Universal Joint
Constant Velocity Joint -© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Adjustable Assembly • Can be set from zero to three degrees • Field adjustable in varying increments to the maximum bend angle • Provides a wide range of potential build rates in directional and horizontal wells
H = 1.962
o
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
19
Sealed Bearing Section • Transmits axial and radial loads from the bit to the drillstring • Thrust Bearing • Radial Bearing • Oil Reservoir • Balanced Piston • High Pressure Seal • Bit Box Connection
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Motor Handbook • Every possible motor configuration is represented in the Motor Handbook – Dimensional Data – Specifications – Adjustable Housing Settings – Performance Charts
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
20
Motor Dimensional Data
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Motor Specifications
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
21
Estimated Build Rates
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Performance Charts
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
22
Using the Performance Charts • Differential Pressure –Difference between the system pressure when the drilling motor is on-bottom (loaded) and off-bottom (not loaded) • Full Load –Indicates the maximum recommended operating differential pressures of the drilling motor • RPM –Motor RPM is determined by entering at the differential pressure and projecting vertically to intersect the appropriate flow rate line • Torque –Motor torque is determined by entering at the differential pressure and projecting vertically to intersect the torque line
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Operational Constraints • Temperature – 219 °F / 105 °C –Stator can be customized for temperatures up to 300 °F / 150 °C –Special materials and sizes of components used • Excessive Weight on Bit –Excessive weight on bit stops the bit from rotating, and the power section of the motor is not capable of providing enough torque to power through (Motor Stalling) –Rotor cannot rotate inside of the stator, forming a seal –Continued circulation will erode and “chunk” the stator
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
23
Operational Constraints • Motor Rotation – Rotating at bend angle greater than 1.83 degrees is not recommended (housing damage and fatigue) – Speed of rotation should not exceed 60 RPM (excessive cyclic load on housing) • Drilling Fluids – Designed to operate with practically all types of drilling fluids such as fresh and salt water, oil based fluids, mud with additives for viscosity control or lost circulation, and with nitrogen gas – Hydrogen based fluids can be harmful to elastomers – High chlorine content can cause damage to internal components – Keep solids content below 5% – Keep sand content below 0.5% © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Operational Constraints • Differential Pressure – Difference between the system pressure when the drilling motor is on-bottom (loaded) and off-bottom (not loaded) – Excessive pressure drop across the rotor and stator will cause premature pressure wash (chunking), and impair performance – Maximum differential is flow rate dependent; higher the flow rate the lower the allowable differential pressure • Underbalanced Drilling – Proper gas/liquid ratio must be used to avoid motor damage – Under high pressure operation conditions, nitrogen gas may permeate into the stator and expand when tripping out of the hole causing blistering or chunking of the stator
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
24
Directional Drilling Problems • Pressure increases • Pressure decreases • Loss of rate of penetration
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure Increases • Motor Stalled or stalling • Motor or Bit Plugged • Undergauge (tight) Hole
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
25
Pressure Decreases • Dump Sub valve stuck open • Worn or damaged stator • String Washout / Twist-off • Lost Circulation • Gas Kick
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Loss of Rate of Penetration • Bit Worn or balling • Worn Stator (Weak Motor) • Motor Stalled • Change of Formation • Drill String / Stabilizer Hang Up
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
26
Rotary Steerable • Revolution RSS – Smart Stabilizer
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Benefits of Rotary Steerable • No Sliding reduces risk of buckling pipe • Continuous rotation of drillstring reduces chance of differential sticking • Reduces torque & drag due to smoother well bore curvature • Longer reach wells • Longer horizontal / lateral sections • Improved formation evaluation due to pad contact of wireline tools • Improved formation evaluation with LWD tools • Deviation control in Vertical Wells © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
27
“Push the Bit” versus “Point the Bit”
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Planning a Directional Well • Geology • Completion and Production • Drilling Constraints
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
28
Geology • Lithology being drilled through • Geological structures that will be drilled • Type of target the geologist is expecting • Location of water or gas top • Type of Well
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Completion and Production • Type of completion required (“frac job”, pumps and rods, etc.) • Enhanced recovery completion requirements • Wellbore positioning requirements for future drainage/production plans • Downhole temperature and pressure
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
29
Drilling Constraints • Selection of surface location and well layout • Previous area drilling knowledge and identifies particular problematic areas
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Drilling Constraints • Casing size and depths • Hole size • Required drilling fluid • Drilling rig equipment and capability • Length of time directional services are utilized • Influences the type of survey equipment and well path
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
30
Planning • Build rates • Build and hold profiles should be at least 50m • Drop rate for S-curve wells is preferably planned at 1.5o/30m • Kickoff Point as deep as possible to reduce costs and rod/casing wear • In build sections of horizontal wells, plan a soft landing section
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Planning • Avoid high inclinations through severely faulted, dipping or sloughing formations • On horizontal wells clearly identify gas / water contact points • Turn rates in lateral sections of horizontal • Verify motor build rates
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
31
Planning • Where possible start a sidetrack at least 20m out of casing • Dogleg severity could approach 14o/30m coming off a whipstock • Identify all wells within 30m of proposed well path and conduct anti-collision check
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional Drilling Basics
32
Data Acquisition Methods
CRCM_170_revE_0605 © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
1
Data Acquisition Methods • There are two methods in which LWD data can be acquired: – Recorded – Real-time • We will discuss the following about each: – Measurement Process – Advantages and Disadvantages
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Data Acquisition Methods
1
Recorded Data Measurement Process • LWD recorded data is obtained by sampling the downhole sensors, storing each data point in downhole memory, and retrieving the data when the toolstring is tripped out of the hole • Each data point is associated with a time from the master (or sensor) downhole clock • Depth monitoring versus time is performed on the surface during drilling • Synchronization of the surface and downhole clocks at the start of the bit run is critical • During post-run processing, the time component from the depth and data files are matched to create sensor data versus depth information that is used to create logs © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Recorded Data Advantages • High data resolution – data resolution is at least as good and usually much better than real-time – real-time resolution is generally no better than 8-bit (except for survey data) – recorded resolution at least 8-bit, does go up to 16-bit – Typically replaced real-time data once it is extracted from tool memory • Independent of Transmission Problems – no missed data due to poor detection or surface sensor problems • Fast Sample Rates – more data points per depth interval – can store data at a much faster rate than transmission – can log the hole faster than real-time and achieve the same data quality
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Data Acquisition Methods
2
Recorded Data Disadvantages • No real-time feedback – recorded data is not as useful for drilling mechanics data such as pressure and vibration (historical only) – difficult to use for pore pressure prediction and casing and coring point selection – impractical and very expensive to use recorded data for directional drilling and geosteering applications
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Real-time Data Measurement Process • LWD real-time data is obtained by sampling the downhole sensors, encoding the data into a binary format, and transmitting the data through some medium to the surface • The transmission is decoded at the surface, processed into a sensor data value and associated with depth to create real-time logs • The process sounds simple, but it is extremely complex and requires a combination of events to happen perfectly for a data point to be processed
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Data Acquisition Methods
3
Real-time Telemetry Methods • In LWD real-time applications there are 3 types of telemetry methods: – Positive Mud Pulse – Negative Mud Pulse – Electromagnetic • “Telemetry” basically amounts to accessing and transmitting data to and from remote locations • The LWD industry did not create telemetry, but adapted it from other disciplines
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Mud Pulse Telemetry • Mud pulse telemetry utilizes an incompressible transmission path (mud column in drillpipe) to carry pressure waves created by a downhole pulser • Sensor data can be encoded in many different ways (manchester, pulse position modulation, etc.), but all of these methods require the pressure pulses to be detected at the surface in order for the data to be decoded © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Data Acquisition Methods
4
Positive Mud Pulse Telemetry • Positive mud pulse telemetry uses a hydraulic poppet valve to momentarily restrict the flow of mud through an orifice in the pulser • This generates an increase in pressure in the form of a positive pulse or pressure wave which travels back to the surface and is detected by a transducer on the standpipe and/or pumps • Precision’s main LWD telemetry method is Positive Pulse
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Negative Mud Pulse Telemetry • Negative mud pulse telemetry uses a controlled valve to vent mud momentarily from the interior of the tool into the borehole annulus • This generates a decrease in pressure in the form of a negative pulse or pressure wave which travels back to the surface and is detected at the standpipe and/or pumps
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Data Acquisition Methods
5
Mud Pulse Telemetry Advantages • Simple mechanical operation • Reliable if maintained properly • Original telemetry method; 20+ years of development and improvement history
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Mud Pulse Telemetry Disadvantages • Transmission medium must be incompressible (no air in mud column) • Slow data transmission rates (1 to 3 bits/sec) • Advanced signal processing techniques are required to reduce the effects of distortion and noise within the telemetry band • Limited two-way downlink capability (series of pump cycles to switch between 2 fixed modes) • Negative pulse systems require ample pressure drop below the valve to generate sufficient pulse amplitude • Positive pulse systems require the use of drillpipe screens
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Data Acquisition Methods
6
Electromagnetic Telemetry • EM emitting antenna injects an electric current into the formation around the hole
TransmitterReceiver
Earth Antenna
• An electromagnetic wave is created, which propagates in the formation while being “channeled” along the drillstring • Data is transmitted by current modulation and decoded at the surface • Propagation of EM waves along the drillstring is strongly enhanced by the guiding effect of the electrically conductive drillstring
Bi-directional Transmission
Emitting Antenna Drill Bit
Injected Current
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Electromagnetic Telemetry • Signal attenuation is affected by the frequency of transmission, strength of signal received, and the level of parasitic electrical interference upon the carrier signal • Works on Ohm’s Law principle (V = IR) • Precision’s LWD system is able to utilize EM telemetry
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Data Acquisition Methods
7
Electromagnetic Telemetry Advantages • No restriction on drilling fluid characteristics; drilling fluid can be incompressible or compressible (allows for use in Underbalanced Drilling applications) • Reduced survey/connection time (tool is always on; no need to cycle pumps to turn tool on and off) • Unlimited two-way communication with the downhole tool • No moving parts
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Electromagnetic Telemetry Disadvantages • Slow data transmission rate (1-3 bits/sec) • Suffers higher vibration in underbalanced applications • Standard EM setup suffers extreme signal attenuation at excessive depths or if high resistivity “barrier” formations are present at the emitting antenna • “Extended Range” EM setup can be used to relocate the point of telemetry nearer to the surface receiver; this requires hanging off a wireline in the hole
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Data Acquisition Methods
8
The Borehole Environment
CRCM_revE_0605 © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
1
The Borehole Environment • We will consider the borehole environment to be the borehole annulus and the formation affected by invasion of the drilling fluid • Any physical barrier between the sensor detector and the uninvaded formation rock must be accounted for prior to log interpretation • Key aspects to discuss: – Drilling Fluid Properties – Formation Properties – Formation/Borehole Pressure Differential
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
The Borehole Environment
1
Radial Borehole Profile • KEY POINT: –LWD sensors do not preferentially measure the virgin formation alone; their response is affected by whatever is between the sensor and the uninvaded formation
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Drilling Fluid Properties • Drilling Fluid provides many critical functions during the drilling of a well: • Hole cleaning (transport of cuttings) • Solids suspension (gel strength, PV/YP) • Bit hydraulics (aid the bit in rock failure and chip removal) • Lubricity (reduce torque and drag) • Control formation damage (oil-based mud, fluid loss) • Hole stability (control formation pressure, prevent hole collapse, inhibit shale swelling) • Cooling the BHA
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
The Borehole Environment
2
Drilling Fluid Properties Drilling fluid can also create some unfortunate “side effects”: • Decreases drilling rate as mud density increases • Causes real-time data detection problems if mud viscosity is too high • Can cause irreversible formation damage • Expensive – oil-based mud requires careful containment and cutting recycling processes • Percolates into permeable formation pore spaces (in overbalanced situations) making log interpretation more difficult and complex • Renders some logging tools unusable or ineffective (oilbased mud, salt saturated mud) and can severely alter sensor response (mud additives) © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Formation Properties • The physical makeup of the formation will affect sensor response. Some of the properties that we must consider are: • Formation Porosity • Formation Permeability • Pore Fluid Saturation and Density • Lithology • Formation Thickness • Shale Content
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
The Borehole Environment
3
Formation Porosity • Total porosity is the ratio of the total pore space volume to the bulk formation volume • For example, a total porosity of 25% means that per cubic foot of formation, there is ¼ cubic foot of void space dispersed throughout (a sponge is a good analogy) • Maximum theoretical porosity is 48% if the grains are same size perfect spheres stacked on end (perfect sorting, cubic packing) • Porosity is the ultimate storage space for formation fluids (gas/oil/water)
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Formation Porosity • Effective porosity is the ratio of the volume of all the interconnected pores to the total volume of a rock unit • Only the pores that are connected with other pores are capable of accumulating petroleum • Effective porosity depends upon how the rock particles were deposited and cemented as well as upon later diagenetic changes
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
The Borehole Environment
4
Formation Permeability • Formation Permeability is a measure of how easily fluid flows through interconnected formation pore spaces • Permeability is a function of the size of the pore openings, the viscosity of the fluid, and the pressure acting on the fluid • By definition, one darcy of permeability is equal to 1 cc/sec of flow of 1 cp viscosity fluid from a core sample with an area of 1 cm2 at a differential pressure of 1 atm • Permeability indicates the potential mobility of the fluids from the formation during production
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Formation Permeability
• The basic unit is the Darcy; 1/1000 of a Darcy is a millidarcy (md) • The permeability of sandstones commonly ranges between 0.01 and 10,000 md • For comparison a piece of writing chalk has a permeability of about 1 md <1 md 1-10 md
Poor Fair
10-100 md
Good
100-1000 md
Very Good
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
The Borehole Environment
5
Formation Permeability • Although closely related, permeability and effective porosity are not the same • Differences in capillarity, the ability of a fluid to cling to the rock grains, may make the permeability of a given rock relatively high for gas, lower for water, and near zero for viscous oils • Permeability can vary with direction of flow • Pore connections may be less numerous, narrower, or less well aligned in one direction than another
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Fluid Accumulation • Most petroleum reservoirs are “water-wet”, meaning that the rock grains were originally filled with water (deposited in marine environments) • All reservoirs will contain some irreducible water component due to the strong attractive forces between the connate, or original water and the rock grain surfaces (bound water) • Any hydrocarbons present are a result of displacement of any movable water • Most oil fields have 50-80% maximum oil saturation • Above 80%, the oil can be produced with very little water mixed in • Below 10%, the oil is not recoverable © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
The Borehole Environment
6
Pore Fluid Saturation and Density • All available pore space will be filled with fluid • There will always be water present within the pore space • The sum of the fluid saturations of gas, oil, and water is 100% (Sg + So + Sw = 100%)
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pore Fluid Saturation and Density • If gas, oil, and water are present in a formation they will be distributed by density • Gas will be on top, followed by oil, then water • The type of fluid filling the formation pore space will affect LWD sensor response in very distinct ways
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
The Borehole Environment
7
Lithology • Lithology corrections are required for some sensor data when logging formations different from the calibration standard which is typically limestone
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Formation Thickness • When formations beds are thinner than the vertical resolution of the sensor, the response of that sensor will not be able to yield a “true” formation value due to the effect of the surrounding “shoulder beds”
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
The Borehole Environment
8
Shale Content • Clays can be distributed in sand formations in three different ways: dispersed, laminated, and structural • Regardless of the distribution, different clay types have properties that affect all LWD sensor responses • Shale content calculations are key to correcting LWD data
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure Differential • The pressure differential between the borehole and the formation can have a large effect on LWD sensor response • There are 2 scenarios to consider: – Overbalanced – Underbalanced
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
The Borehole Environment
9
Overbalanced Condition • An overbalanced condition exists when the bottomhole circulating pressure is greater than the formation pressure • Although this condition is considered the safest method to drill under it can cause the following undesirable effects: – Drilling Fluid Invasion – Terminal fluid loss – Differential sticking of drillpipe – Low drilling penetration rates – Expensive drilling fluid systems – Expensive and ineffective stimulations © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Conventional Overbalanced Drilling • Overbalance for well control • Filtercake for fluid loss • Fluid designed for rock compatibility • Post drilling treatment • Casing and cement • Perforation and stimulation
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
The Borehole Environment
10
Conventional OBD Wellbore Wellbore Crossection
Filter Cake
Wellbore
Shallow Matrix Damage
FLUID
FLUID
INVASIO N
INVASIO N
RESERVOIR
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
OBD In Horizontal Wells • Extended wellbore exposure • Mechanical filtercake erosion • Significant fluid loss • Poor post drilling cleanup • Ineffective completion stimulation • Permanent permeability impairment • Limited reservoir deliverability
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
The Borehole Environment
11
OBD Horizontal Wellbore
RESERVOIR
INVASION
INVASION
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
OBD Damage
Drilling Damage Wellbore Crushing
Fracture Plugging
Filter Cake
Pore Plugging
Shallow Matrix Damage
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
The Borehole Environment
12
Underbalanced Condition • Underbalanced drilling can reduce or eliminate some of the problems associated with overbalanced drilling by reducing the bottomhole circulating pressure to pressures below or equivalent to the formation pressure • Underbalanced drilling has the following benefits: – Controlled inflow of reservoir fluid or gases during drilling operations – Controlled drilling condition while accurately separating and measuring recovered drilling fluids as well as produced liquids and gases – Higher rates of penetration – Eliminates differential sticking – Uses simplified drilling fluid systems – Allows formation evaluation to be conducted during drilling* • *A major disadvantage is that conventional LWD mud pulse telemetry systems cannot be used in compressible drilling fluids; only electromagnetic telemetry can be used
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
The Borehole Environment
13
This page intentionally left blank.
LWD Sensor Theory Application & Interpretation
Directional CRCM_170_revE_0605 © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
1
Importance of Directional Data
“Delivery of high quality, accurate directional data is your highest priority on my wellsite” - the customer © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
2
1
Importance of Directional Data • Things to remember: – You only have one chance to put the hole in the right spot – You can’t assume that because the computer comes up with an answer that it’s always correct (GIGO) – It costs the company lots of money (profit) to correct a directional data screw up
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
3
Implications of Bad Directional Data • Well is drilled at wrong inclination or in wrong direction • Well collides with another well • Well crosses a lease line • We lose credibility with the customer • You potentially lose your job
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
4
2
What is Survey Data? • A survey, or more appropriately a survey station, consists of the following components: – Inclination – Hole Direction (Azimuth) • • • •
– Measured Depth The highest quality survey data is best achieved as a static measurement Survey data tells the directional driller where the hole has been Inclination and hole direction are downhole directional sensor measurements Measured depth is a surface derived depth monitoring system measurement
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
5
Inclination • Inclination is the angle, measured in degrees, by which the wellbore or survey instrument axis varies from a true vertical line • An inclination of 0° would be true vertical • An inclination of 90° would be horizontal.
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
6
3
Hole Direction • Hole direction is the angle, measured in degrees, of the horizontal component of the borehole or survey instrument axis from a known north reference • This reference is true north or grid north, and is measured clockwise by convention • Hole direction is measured in degrees and expressed in either azimuth form (0° to 360°) or quadrant form (NE, SE, NW, SW)
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
7
Measured Depth • Measured depth refers to the actual length of hole drilled from the surface location (drill floor) to any point along the wellbore
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
8
4
What is Steering Data? • Steering, or toolface data, is dynamic data and tells the directional driller the position of the bend of the mud motor • Orienting the bend to the desired position allows him to control where the hole will be going • There are two types of toolface data – Magnetic – Highside (Gravity)
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
9
Magnetic Toolface • Magnetic toolface is the direction, in the horizontal plane, that the mud motor bend is pointing relative to the north reference • Magnetic Toolface = Dir Probe Mag Toolface + Total Correction + Toolface Offset • Magnetic toolface is typically used when the inclination of the wellbore is less than 5° • The magnetic toolface reading is whatever magnetic direction the toolface is pointed to © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
10
5
Gravity Toolface • Gravity toolface is the angular distance the mud motor scribeline is turned, about the tool axis, relative to the high side of the hole • Gravity toolface = Dir Probe Gravity Toolface + Toolface Offset • If the inclination of the wellbore is above 5°, then gravity toolface can be used • The toolface will be referenced to the highside of the survey instrument, no matter what the hole direction of the survey instrument is at the time • The toolface will be presented in a number of degrees either right or left of the highside
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
11
Gravity Toolface • For example, a toolface pointed to the highside of the survey instrument would have a gravity toolface of 0° • A toolface pointed to the low side of the survey instrument would have a gravity toolface of 180° • If the probe highside point was rotated to the right of highside, the gravity toolface would be 70° to the right.
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
12
6
Electronic Accelerometer & Magnetometer Axes • “Z” axis is along the length of the probe (axial plane) • “X” and “Y” are in the cross-axial plane and are perpendicular to each other and to the “Z” axis • “Highside” is aligned with the “X” axis • All three axes are “orthogonal” to each other
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
13
Quartz-Hinge Accelerometers • Respond to the effect of the earth’s gravitational field in each plane • An alternating current (AC) is used to keep the quartz proof mass in the reference position as the accelerometer is moved relative to gravity • The intensity of the “bucking” current is related to the gravitational force felt by the accelerometer © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
14
7
Fluxgate Magnetometers • Respond to the effect of the earth’s magnetic field in each plane • The magnetometer contains two oppositely wound coils around two highly magnetically permeable rods • As AC current is applied to the coils, an alternating magnetic field is created, which magnetizes the rods • Any external magnetic field parallel with the coil will cause one of the coils to become saturated quicker than the other • The difference in saturation time represents the external field strength.
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
15
Earth’s Magnetic Field • The outer core of the earth contains iron, nickel and cobalt and is ferromagnetic • The Earth can be imagined as having a large bar magnet at its center, lying (almost) along the northsouth spin axis • Although the direction of the field is magnetic north, the magnitude will be parallel to the surface of the Earth at the equator and point steeply into the Earth closer to the north pole © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
16
8
Earth’s Magnetic Components • M = Magnetic North direction • N = True North direction • Btotal = Total field strength of the local magnetic field • Bv = Vertical component of the local magnetic field • Bh = Horizontal component of the local magnetic field • Dip = Dip angle of the local magnetic field in relationship to horizontal • Dec = Variation between the local magnetic field’s horizontal component and true north • Gtotal = Total field strength of the Earth’s gravitational field © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
17
Dip Angle vs. Latitude • Lines of magnetic flux lie perpendicular (90°) to the earth’s surface at the magnetic poles • Lines of magnetic flux lie parallel (0°) to the earth’s surface at the magnetic equator • Dip Angle increases as Latitude increases • As dip angle increases the intensity of the horizontal component of the earth’s magnetic field decreases © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
18
9
Dip Angle vs. Latitude • At the magnetic equator, Bh = Btotal, Bv = 0 Bh = Btotal
• At the magnetic poles, Bh = 0, Bv = Btotal
Bv = Btotal Bh = 0
• Bh is the projection (using the dip angle) of Btotal into the horizontal plane
Bh = Btotal(cos Dip)
Btotal Bv = Btotal(sin Dip)
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
19
Magnetic Declination • Complex fluid motion in the outer core causes the earth’s magnetic field to change slowly and unpredictably with time (secular variation) • The position of the magnetic poles also change with time • However, we are able to compensate for this variability by applying a correction (declination) to a magnetic survey which references it to true north
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
20
10
Magnetic Pole Movement (1945 – 2000) North Pole
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
South Pole
21
True North • True north, or geographic north, is aligned with the spin axis of the Earth • True north does not move making it a perfect reference • A survey referenced to true north will be valid today and at any time in the future • The correction we apply to change a magnetic north direction to a true north direction is called declination. © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
22
11
Applying Declination • To convert from Magnetic North to True North, Declination must be added: • True Direction = Magnetic Direction + Declination • Important Note: –East Declination is Positive & West Declination is Negative in both the northern and southern hemispheres
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
23
Applying an East Declination • An east declination means that magnetic north is east of true north • For example, if magnetic north hole direction is 75° and the declination is 5° east, the true north direction would be calculated as follows: True Direction = Magnetic Direction + Declination 80° = 75° + (+5°)
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
24
12
Applying a West Declination • A west declination means that magnetic north is west of true north • For example, if magnetic north hole direction is 120° and the declination is 5° west, the true north direction would be calculated as follows: True Direction = Magnetic Direction + Declination 115° = 120° + (-5°)
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
25
Implications of an Incorrect Declination • Since declination is a addition of degrees of correction to the magnetic hole direction, any mistakes made to the declination have serious consequences. • For example, if you intend to apply a +18° declination but instead input a -18 ° declination, your reported hole direction will be wrong by 36°! • This mistake may not be detected until the data is compared against independent survey data
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
26
13
Grid Convergence • Corrects for the distortion caused by projecting the curved surface of the earth onto a flat plane • Correction becomes more severe moving from the equator towards the poles • Two common projection methods are Transverse Mercator and Lambert
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
27
UTM Grid Projection • In the Universal Transverse Mercator Grid, the earth is divided into sixty, 6° grid zones
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
28
14
Grid Zones • A central meridian bisects each 6° grid zone • Each central meridian is along true north • If directly on the central meridian or on the equator, the grid correction is ZERO Convergence is zero here
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
29
Grid Zones • Convergence correction increases as location moves away from the equator and central meridian
Maximum Grid Correction
• Convergence should not be more than ±3º, otherwise the incorrect central meridian has been chosen
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
30
15
Grid Zones • For rectangular coordinates, arbitrary values have been established within each grid
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
31
Comparing Grid Projections • Different projections yield varying views in terms of distance, shape, scale, and area
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
32
16
Applying Convergence • To convert from Grid North to True North, Convergence must be subtracted: • Grid Direction = True Direction – Convergence • Important Note: –East Convergence is Positive & West Convergence is Negative in the Northern Hemisphere –East Convergence is Negative & West Convergence is Positive in the Southern Hemisphere
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
33
Applying an East Convergence • An east convergence means that grid north is east of true north • For example, if true north hole direction is 70° and the convergence is 3° east, the grid north direction would be calculated as follows: Grid Direction = True Direction Convergence 67° = 70° - (+3°)
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
34
17
Applying a West Convergence • A west convergence means that grid north is west of true north • For example, if true north hole direction is 120° and the convergence is 3° west, the grid north direction would be calculated as follows: Grid Direction = True Direction Convergence 123° = 120° - (-3°)
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
35
Applying Declination and Convergence Simultaneously • Replacing the formula for a true north direction in the grid north direction equation gives us the following formula: Grid Direction = Magnetic Direction + Declination – Convergence (Declination – Convergence) is called the Total Correction • If magnetic declination is 5° east and the grid convergence is 3° west, and the magnetic direction is 130°, the grid direction is calculated as: 138° = 130° + (+5°) - (-3°) © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
36
18
Static Survey Procedure • Drill down to the end of the joint or stand and stop rotating • Work the pipe up and down to release any built up torque in the drillstring • Lower the bit to the survey point and shut down the pumps • Wait 30 – 40 seconds • Turn on the pumps and transmit the survey to the surface (pipe may be moved slowly while sending up the survey)
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
37
Sources of Real-time Inclination Errors These factors can introduce error into the inclination value presented to the directional driller: • Movement during a survey (axial or rotational) • Accelerometer or associated electronics failure • Calibration out of specifications • Sensor measurement accuracy • Real-time Data resolution
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
38
19
Inclination Quality Checks • Does the inclination value match the actions of the directional driller? • Is Gtotal within ± 0.003 g of the Local Gravitational Field Strength?
Gtotal = Gx 2 + Gy 2 + Gz 2
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
39
Sources of Real-time Azimuth Errors These factors can introduce error into the hole direction value presented to the directional driller: • Magnetic Interference (axial or cross-axial) • Magnetometer or associated hardware failure • Calibration out of specification • “Bad” accelerometer input (inclination and highside toolface are part of the calculation!) • Mathematical Error (at 0° and 90° inclination) • Sensor measurement accuracy • Real-time Data resolution • Latitude, Inclination, Hole direction • Wrong Declination and/or Convergence
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
40
20
Azimuth Quality Checks
• Does the azimuth value match the actions of the directional driller? • Is Btotal within ± 350 nT of the Local Magnetic Field Strength?
Btotal = Bx 2 + By 2 + Bz 2 • Is Gtotal within ± 0.003 g of the Local Gravitational Field Strength?
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
41
Additional Survey Quality Checks
• Is the calculated Magnetic Dip value within ± 0.3º of the Local Magnetic Dip value? • MDIP utilizes inputs from the accelerometers and magnetometers but is not as sensitive of a quality check as Gtotal and Btotal • It is possible for the MDIP to be out of specification even if the Gtotal and Btotal are not • NOTE: MDIP should not be used as sole criteria to disqualify a survey if Gtotal and Btotal are within specification
Mdip = ASIN ( © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
( Bx∗Gx )+ ( By∗Gy )+ ( Bz∗Gz ) Gtotal ∗ Btotal
) 42
21
Survey Quality Checks
Gtotal = Gx 2 + Gy 2 + Gz 2
Btotal = Bx 2 + By 2 + Bz 2
Mdip = ASIN (
( Bx∗Gx )+ ( By∗Gy )+ ( Bz∗Gz ) Gtotal ∗ Btotal
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
) 43
Survey Quality Check Limits • Gtotal = Local Gravity ± 0.003 g • Btotal = Local Field ± 350 nT • MDIP = Local Dip ± 0.3°
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
44
22
Survey Quality Example #1 • Given the following survey data, decide if each quality check is within limits • Local References:
Gtotal = 1.000 g
Btotal = 58355 nT Mdip = 75.20°
INC
AZ
Gtotal
Btotal
MDip
3.72
125.01
1.0012
58236
75.25
• Based on your observations, are the inclination and azimuth values acceptable?
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
45
Survey Quality Example #1 • Given the following survey data, decide whether each quality check is within limits • Local References:
Gtotal = 1.000 g
Btotal = 58355 nT Mdip = 75.20°
INC
AZ
Gtotal
Btotal
MDip
3.72
125.01
1.0012
58236
75.25
+0.0012
-119
-0.05
• Based on your observations, are the inclination and azimuth values acceptable? YES / YES
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
46
23
Survey Quality Example #2 • Given the following survey data, decide if each quality check is within limits • Local References:
Gtotal = 1.000 g
Btotal = 58355 nT
INC
AZ
Gtotal
Btotal
MDip
5.01
127.33
1.0009
58001
74.84
Mdip = 75.20°
• Based on your observations, are the inclination and azimuth values acceptable?
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
47
Survey Quality Example #2 • Given the following survey data, decide if each quality check is within limits • Local References:
Gtotal = 1.000 g
Btotal = 58355 nT
INC
AZ
Gtotal
Btotal
MDip
5.01
127.33
1.0009 +0.0009
58001 -354
74.84 -0.36
Mdip = 75.20°
• Based on your observations, are the inclination and azimuth values acceptable? YES / NO
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
48
24
Survey Quality Example #3 • Given the following survey data, decide if each quality check is within limits • Local References:
Gtotal = 1.000 g
Btotal = 58355 nT
INC
AZ
Gtotal
Btotal
MDip
8.52
125.34
0.9953
58150
74.28
Mdip = 75.20°
• Based on your observations, are the inclination and azimuth values acceptable?
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
49
Survey Quality Example #3 • Given the following survey data, decide if each quality check is within limits • Local References:
Gtotal = 1.000 g
Btotal = 58355 nT
INC
AZ
Gtotal
Btotal
MDip
8.52
125.34
0.9953 -0.0047
58150 -205
74.28 -0.92
Mdip = 75.20°
• Based on your observations, are the inclination and azimuth values acceptable? NO / NO
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
50
25
Survey Quality Example #4 • Given the following survey data, decide if each quality check is within limits • Local References: INC 17.13
AZ
Gtotal = 1.000 g Gtotal
129.88 1.0120
Btotal = 58355 nT
Btotal
MDip
57623
73.44
Mdip = 75.20°
• Based on your observations, are the inclination and azimuth values acceptable?
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
51
Survey Quality Example #4 • Given the following survey data, decide if each quality check is within limits • Local References: INC 17.13
AZ
Gtotal = 1.000 g Gtotal
129.88 1.0120 +0.0120
Btotal
Btotal = 58355 nT
Mdip = 75.20°
MDip
57623 73.44 -732 -1.76
• Based on your observations, are the inclination and azimuth values acceptable? NO / NO
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
52
26
Survey Calculation Methods • Once we have verified the quality of the inclination, hole direction, and measured depth values at the survey station the data is then passed to the directional driller • Survey calculations are performed between survey stations to provide the directional driller with a picture of the wellbore in both the vertical and horizontal planes • If the input parameters are identical the calculated survey values on your survey report should match the directional drillers’
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
53
Survey Calculation Methods • Survey calculations are more easily understood by applying basic trigonometric principles
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
54
27
Tangential Calculation Method • Assumes that the borehole is a straight line from the first survey to the last
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
55
Average Angle Calculation Method • Assumes distances from survey to survey are straight lines • Fairly accurate and conducive to hand calculations
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
56
28
Radius of Curvature Calculation Method • Applies a “best fit” curve (fixed radius) between survey stations • More accurately reflects the shape of the borehole than Average Angle
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
57
Minimum Curvature Calculations • Uses multiple points between survey stations to better reflect the shape of the borehole • Slightly more accurate than the Radius of Curvature method
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
58
29
Comparison of Calculation Methods • Total Survey Depth @ 5,985 feet • Maximum Angle @ 26° • Vertical hole to 4,064 feet, then build to 26° at 5,985 feet • Survey Intervals approximately 62 feet
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
59
Survey Terminology
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
60
30
Survey Terminology • Survey Station – Position along the borehole where directional measurements are taken • True Vertical Depth (TVD) – The projection of the borehole into the vertical plane • Measured Depth (MD) – The actual distance traveled along the borehole • Course Length (CL) – The measured distance traveled between survey stations
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
61
Survey Terminology • Horizontal Displacement (HD) – Projection of the wellbore into the horizontal plane – Horizontal distance from the wellhead to the last survey station – Also called Closure • Latitude (Northing) – The distance traveled in the northsouth direction in the horizontal plane – North is positive, South is negative • Departure (Easting) – The distance traveled in the eastwest direction in the horizontal plane – East is positive, West is negative
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
62
31
Survey Terminology • Target Direction – The proposed direction of wellbore • Vertical Section (VS) – The projection of the horizontal displacement along the target direction – The horizontal distance traveled from the wellhead to the target along the target direction • Dogleg Severity (DLS) – A normalized estimate (e.g., degrees/ 100 feet) of the overall curvature of an actual well path between two consecutive survey stations
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
63
Vertical Section Calculation • To calculate vertical section the closure (horizontal displacement), closure direction, and target direction must be known • The vertical section is the product of the horizontal displacement and the difference between the closure direction and target direction
VS = HD *cos (Target Direction – Closure Direction)
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
64
32
Vertical Projection • In the vertical projection the directional driller plots True Vertical Depth versus Vertical Section
Build Section True Vertical Depth
• The wellbore must pass through the vertical target thickness along the vertical section direction in order to hit the target in this plane
Kickoff Point
Lock ed
in Se ction
Ta ng en t
Vertical Section
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
65
Horizontal Projection • In the horizontal projection the directional driller plots Latitude versus Departure • The wellbore must pass through the horizontal target radius along the proposed target direction in order to hit the target in this plane
N
Closure
Proposal Direction
Latitude
Departure
E
Vertical Section
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Directional
66
33
This page intentionally left blank.
Shale Gas Oil Salt Water Shale
Salt
LWD Sensor Theory Application & Interpretation
Gamma Ray CRCM_170_revE_0605 Gamma Ray © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
1
Gamma Ray Sensor Theory • Natural Gamma Ray devices are “passive” detectors of radioactive gamma ray decay occurring within formations • The three most common gamma emitting isotopes found in the earth’s crust are Potassium-40, Thorium-232, and Uranium-238 • High gamma counts measured by the sensor indicate a high concentration of radioactive material • Natural gamma devices cannot distinguish the origin of the gamma radiation because of the type of detector they employ (GeigerMueller tubes) Gamma Ray © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Gamma Ray
2
1
Gamma Ray Sensor Theory • Potassium and Thorium are typically associated with clay minerals which are a large component in SHALE • Log analysts generally infer that high gamma count formations are shale and low gamma count formations are “non-shales” (sandstone, limestone, halite, gypsum, coal, etc.) • Gamma count values higher than the shale baseline are uncommon and are typically seen in rock of volcanic origin or in permeable reservoir rock where uranium has precipitated out in the pore space • Gamma Ray sensors indicate matrix clay content, but DO NOT directly reveal fluid contents (i.e., gas, oil, water) • Can be run in any environment – air, any salinity fluid, oil-based fluids, open hole or cased hole wells
Gamma Ray © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
3
Gamma Ray Sensor Theory • Spectral Gamma Ray devices are also “passive” detectors of radioactive gamma ray decay occurring within formations • Unlike natural gamma devices, however, the spectral device uses a detector which can distinguish the origin of each gamma ray it detects • This can be done because potassium, thorium, and uranium each have unique decay spectrums
Decay Spectrums of Potassium, Thorium, & Uranium
1.46
0.23
0.61
Gamma Ray © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Gamma Ray
4
2
Gamma Ray Sensor Theory • Azimuthal Gamma Ray devices are also “passive” detectors of radioactive gamma ray decay occurring within formations • The azimuthal gamma detector is partially shielded to attenuate gamma radiation on one side of the tool and uses an accelerometer to give information about the up or down position of the unshielded “window” during the measurement • Used in “geosteering” applications
Gamma Ray © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
5
Gamma Ray Sensor Applications • Lithology Identification • Formation Thickness • Stratigraphic Correlation • Geosteering • Shale Volume Estimation
Gamma Ray © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Gamma Ray
6
3
Gamma Ray Sensor Applications Lithology Identification • Shale versus “non-shale” indicator • Low gamma response can indicate potential reservoir rock Formation Thickness • Differences in the radioactivity level between formations allows log analysts to use gamma data to determine formation thickness • The thick sandstone interval in the example is well defined on the gamma curve Gamma Ray © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
7
Gamma Ray Sensor Applications Stratigraphic Correlation • Gamma data can be used to correlate formation tops and “marker beds” between nearby wells to help determine geologic structure and the areal extent of the reservoir • Marker beds generally show responses that are very different from the surrounding beds
Gamma Ray © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Gamma Ray
8
4
Gamma Ray Sensor Applications Geosteering • The intentional directional control of a well based on the results of downhole geological logging measurements rather than threedimensional targets in space, usually to keep a directional wellbore within a pay zone • In mature areas, geosteering may be used to keep a near horizontal wellbore in a particular section of a reservoir • Azimuthal Gamma Ray sensors were designed specifically for geosteering applications
Gamma Ray © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
9
Gamma Ray Sensor Applications Clean Line (25 api)
• Shale Volume Estimation – Shale Volume is the ratio between the zone value and the spread between the clean and shale lines – Used to correct other formation evaluation sensor data for the effect the shale has on the data
Shale Baseline (75 api)
Zone of Interest (50 api)
– Example calculation: VSH (%) = GRlog – GRclean
X 100
GRSH – GRclean VSH (%) = 50 – 25
X 100
75 – 25 VSH (%) = 50% Gamma Ray © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Gamma Ray
10
5
Gamma Ray Data Interpretation • Lithology response is different between shale and sandstone due to the varying amounts of radioactivity within the matrix of each • No change in gamma response in the sandstone despite the change in fluid type through the formation • Gamma data can NOT be used to identify the presence or type of hydrocarbon in the formation
Shale Gas Oil
Sandstone
Salt H2O Shale
Gamma Ray © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
11
Gamma Ray Data Interpretation • Shale is fairly consistent over short intervals allowing the analyst to determine the “shale baseline” • Halite (NaCl), which is not a reservoir rock, has an extremely low gamma response because it is pure and has no radioactive components • Gypsum, anhydrite, coal are other formation types that will generate very low gamma counts
Shale Gas Oil Salt Water Shale
Halite
Gamma Ray © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Gamma Ray
12
6
Gamma Ray Data Interpretation • Log analysts can make qualitative inferences based on the shape and trend of the gamma curve • This is an example of a sandstone “cleaning up” (decreasing in shale content) from top to bottom
Gamma Ray © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
13
Gamma Ray Data Interpretation
• The Spectral Gamma Ray’s ability to determine the potassium, thorium, and uranium components of a formation may allow the log analyst to identify specific clay mineralogy
Natural GR
Spectral GR
• Spectral analysis can also be used to reveal situations that could cause the analyst to misinterpret some log responses • In the isolated zone in the example, the natural gamma curve shows higher radiation than the zones above and below it, indicating shale; the zone is actually a sandstone with a high concentration of uranium
Gamma Ray © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Gamma Ray
14
7
This page intentionally left blank.
LWD Sensor Theory Application & Interpretation
Pressure CRCM_170_revE_0605 Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
1
Pressure Sensor Theory • Downhole pressure sensors are drilling performance tools that provide continuous and direct downhole measurement of absolute bore and annular pressure
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure
1
Pressure Sensor Theory • Bore pressure communicates with the transducer through a hole on the inside of the insert
Bore Pressure Port
Annulus Pressure Port
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure Sensor Theory • Annulus pressure communicates with the transducer through a hole on the outside of the collar
Annulus Port
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure
2
Pressure Sensor Theory • Real-time LWD pressure measurements provide information on downhole hydraulics and fluid performance that help the driller avoid drilling problems and optimize the drilling process • Safe Operating Envelope – For safe drilling the equivalent mud density must remain between • Minimum Fracture Pressure • Maximum Pore Pressure
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure Sensor Theory • Annulus Pressure – Hydrostatic density of the mud column plus frictional losses in the annulus from the pressure sensor to surface • Bore Pressure – Hydrostatic density of the mud column plus frictional losses through the BHA below the pressure sensor, pressure drop through the bit and frictional pressure losses in the annulus from the bit to the surface • Differential Pressure – Difference in pressure between the bore and annulus pressure gauges – Provides the pressure across the BHA and through the bit – Used to monitor motor performance, blockage at the bit, washout in the lower BHA, and evaluating where packoff is occurring
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure
3
Pressure Sensor Theory • Equivalent Mud Weight (EMW) – Static (pumps off) EMW is equal to the average density of the static mud column – Dynamic (pumps on) EMW is equal to the average density of the static mud column plus annular frictional pressure losses; commonly called Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD)
EMW =
pressure TVD∗K
K=.052 (Pressure in psi, TVD in feet, EMW in lb/gal) K=.00981 (Pressure in Pa, TVD in meters, EMW in g/cc)
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure Sensor Theory • Factors Affecting EMW – Mud Weight – Breaking a Gel – Cuttings Load – Flow Rate – Formation Fluid Influx – Restrictions in the Annulus – Swab and Surge Pressures – Sliding versus Rotary Drilling
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure
4
Pressure Sensor Theory • Mud Weight – The measured surface mud weight is the primary factor controlling downhole pressure – The mud weight sets the baseline around which all other factors vary
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure Sensor Theory • Breaking a Gel – The gel strength of a drilling mud determines its ability to hold solids in suspension during non-flowing conditions – The force needed to break the gel and return the mud to a fluid state adds to the annulus pressure losses until the mud is fluid again
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure
5
Pressure Sensor Theory • Cuttings Load – Suspended solids in the mud increase the mud weight, which increases the pressure of the mud column
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure Sensor Theory • Flow Rate – The pressure necessary at the bit to push the mud up the annulus increases with increasing flow rate
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure
6
Pressure Sensor Theory • Formation Fluid Influx – When formation fluid flows into the annulus, it changes the mud properties, which changes the hydrostatic pressure exerted by the mud – During a gas kick, the gas bubble displaces mud and expands as it rises in the annulus, drastically reducing the annular pressure
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure Sensor Theory • Restrictions in the Annulus (Packoff) – Restrictions to circulation increase the pressure necessary to move the fluid at a specific flow rate – Restrictions can be caused by swelling formations, poor hole cleaning, hole collapse, fractured formations, or any other formation factor that causes the walls of the borehole to come loose and enter the annulus
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure
7
Pressure Sensor Theory • Swab and Surge Pressures – Moving the drillstring axially in the hole displaces the drilling fluid like a piston in a cylinder – Swabbing the hole decreases the annulus pressure and surging the hole increases the annulus pressure
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure Sensor Theory • Sliding versus Rotary Drilling – The annular fluid flow path when sliding is different from the flow path when rotating the drillpipe – This changes the resistance to the flow, the type of flow regime, and the path length of the flow
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure
8
Pressure Sensor Data Interpretation
• Leak Off Test Data – Tests the integrity of the casing shoe and formation – Gives an indication of formation strength as an upper limit for the ECD to prevent lost circulation
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure Sensor Data Interpretation • Formation Integrity Test Data – A predetermined pressure (less than the LOT value) is applied to the formation – Pressure is then observed for a period of time (10 -20 minutes) to see if the formation can hold that pressure
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure
9
Pressure Sensor Data Interpretation • Circulation & Rotation – During circulation (pumps on) the EMW increases because cuttings are suspended; the EMW will drop as the cuttings are circulated out – During pumps off, the EMW decreases to hydrostatic – Rotation of the drillpipe increases the EMW (see next slide) Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure Sensor Data Interpretation • How Rotation increases EMW – Rotation changes the eccentricity of the drillpipe which adds turbulence that requires more pressure to move the fluid; this effect is increased with increasing hole inclination and rotation speed – Rotation keeps solids suspended which increases mud weight; how much of an increase is determined by the rate of rotation, mud properties, and the well geometry
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure
10
Pressure Sensor Data Interpretation • Surge and Swab – Surge pressures force the fluid up the annulus with increased velocity, resulting in an increase in EMW – Swab pressures force the fluid down the annulus; this subtracts from the pressures felt at the sensor and lowers the EMW – Running speed and “tightness” of the hole will dictate the severity of the change in EMW
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure Sensor Data Interpretation • Rig Heave – When the bit is off bottom and there is no active rig heave compensation, rig heave causes low frequency reciprocal surge-swab variations in the EMW – In this North Sea example, rig heave during high seas in winter caused enough swab to collapse the hole and induce packoff, lost circulation, and hole fill
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure
11
Pressure Sensor Data Interpretation • Poor Hole Cleaning – Uneven EMW during drilling is an indication of poor hole conditions and varying restrictions to circulation
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure Sensor Data Interpretation • Gas Influx – Gas influx into the annulus appears as a rapid and sometimes dramatic decrease in the EMW
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure
12
Pressure Sensor Data Interpretation • Salt Water and Sand Influx during Riserless Drilling – A salt water kick from an unconsolidated formation can carry sand into the annulus resulting in an increase in EMW
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure Sensor Data Interpretation • Gel Strength Pressure Spikes – Gellation produces an initial resistance to circulation which may require significant pressure to overcome
Fracture Pressure
– In this example, the gel pressure spikes initiated fractures in the formation which caused lost circulation
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure
13
Pressure Sensor Data Interpretation
• Packoff Pressure Spikes – Packoff occurs when enough settled cuttings are present to create a restriction in the annulus which causes a sudden increase in EMW – Packoff usually is a result of hole collapse or poor hole cleaning – Packoff spikes can be large enough to cause formation fracture Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure Sensor Data Interpretation • Lost Circulation – The pressure sensor does not provide a direct indication of lost circulation unless the loss is severe enough to cause a loss of hydrostatic head – Pressure data is often useful in determining how the lost circulation occurred and what the EMW was when it occurred – In this instance a large reaming down surge immediately preceded a lost circulation incident
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure
14
Pressure Sensor Applications Applications
Pressure Response
Comments
Formation Integrity Test Lack of pressure bleed off after shutting in the well indicates the formation will withstand the tested pressure
The data from the test is transmitted to the surface when the pumps come on
Leak Off Test
The data from the test is transmitted to the surface when the pumps come on
Measuring Pumps-Off Swab and Surge Pressures and Gel Strength of the mud
Detecting Packoff
The pressure at which there is a break in the slope of the LOT pressure curve indicates the fracture pressure of the formation The pumps-off maximum pressure captures the largest surge or gel pressure experienced during the pumps off cycle The appearance of a series of positive spikes in the EMW indicates packoff
Pressure
The pumps-off minimum captures the lowest swab pressure
This results in a pressure spike only when the packoff is above the pressure sensor
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure Sensor Applications
Applications Monitoring Hole Cleaning
Pressure Response
Comments
A gradual decrease in EMW while steering indicates poor hole cleaning
This results from cuttings settling out in high angle wellbores
A steady increase in EMW while rotating indicates poor hole cleaning
This results from settled cuttings being lifted back into suspension
Short term variations in EMW can indicate poor hole cleaning
This results from restrictions in the wellbore while circulating
A decrease of EMW to the input mud weight while circulating indicates the hole is clean
EMW is the same as the calculated ECD
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure
15
Pressure Sensor Applications
Applications Measuring Pressures from Rotation or Flow
Pressure Response
Comments
EMW shifts with a change in rotary speed or flow
Detecting Formation A decrease in EMW Fluid Influx when drilling that does not correlate with mud to rig operations
The size of the decrease is relative to the mud densities and the volume of influx
Detecting Gas Influx
A sudden large decrease in EMW that does not correlate to rig operations
This is usually a dramatic change and not seen at the surface for several minutes
Mud Weight Optimization
A stable EMW between the fracture pressure and pore pressure
Detecting Hole Instability
Hole collapse causes a sudden increase in EMW as solids load up in the annulus
Often correlates with high rotary torque
Pressure © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Pressure
16
LWD Curriculum LWD
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Geology
Directional
Neutron Porosity
Directional Drilling
Gamma Ray
Density
Data Acquisition
Pressure
Vibration
Bore Hole Environment
Resistivity
LWD Tool Specs
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
1
MWD Curriculum MWD
Day 1
Day 2
Geology
Directional
Neutron Porosity
Directional Drilling
Gamma Ray
Density
Data Acquisition
Pressure
Vibration
Bore Hole Environment
Resistivity
MWD Tool Specs
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2
1
This page intentionally left blank.
LWD Sensor Theory Application & Interpretation
Resistivity CRCM_170_revE_0605 Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
1
Resistivity Sensor Theory • Physical Principles • Electromagnetic wave resistivity sensors respond to the way radio frequency (RF) waves propagate (move) through the formation • The propagation of an RF wave is controlled by the following physical properties of the material through which the wave is moving: – Electrical Conductivity, which is the ability of a material to conduct an electrical current – Dielectric Permittivity, which is the ability of a material to store electrical charge – Magnetic Permeability, which is the ability of a material to become magnetized • At transmission frequencies below 10 MHz, the formation conductivity is the dominant factor • If reasonable assumptions are made for the dielectric permittivity and magnetic permeability, measured wave parameters can be related to the formation resistivity
Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity
1
Resistivity Sensor Theory What does the Electromagnetic Resistivity sensor measure? • Phase Shift - the time difference of arrival of the RF wave between the two receivers • Attenuation - the difference in intensity of the RF wave signal at each of the receivers • Both the phase shift and attenuation data can be used to compute a formation resistivity value
Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity Sensor Theory
Resistivity
Conductivity
Phase Shift
Attenuation
High
Low
Small
Low
Low
High
Large
High
• Electromagnetic waves can propagate through any medium, however, low resistivity (high conductivity) mediums cause the most signal reduction • Electromagnetic sensors can be used in any type of drilling fluid (they actually perform better in high resistivity mud) • Salinity of the drilling mud and the formation water, along with the formation temperature and porosity, have the greatest effect on the “apparent” measured resistivity Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity
2
Resistivity Sensor Theory Why two measurements? • The physics behind the measurements dictate that the attenuation has a deeper depth of investigation than the phase
Phase DOI
Attenuation DOI
• However, the dynamic range of the phase is much better than the attenuation • Typically the phase data is used quantitatively whereas the attenuation data is used qualitatively
Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity Sensor Theory • The dynamic range of the phase measurement is between 0.1 and 1000 ohm-m
Phase Shift (°)
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.1
1
10
100
1000
Resistivity (ohm-m)
Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity
3
Resistivity Sensor Theory • The dynamic range of the attenuation measurement is between 0.1 and 100 ohm-m
Attenuation (-dB)
10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1
1
10
100
1000
Resistivity (ohm-m)
Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity Sensor Theory • Breaking down the formation components • Hydrocarbons, rock matrix, and dry clay are infinitely resistive • Since formation water is the only conductive component in the formation, the amount of water present in the formation volume, its salinity, and the formation temperature drives the resistivity response Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity
4
Resistivity Sensor Theory • Why Multiple Transmission Frequencies? • The choice of transmission frequency is dictated by two physical phenomena: • The measured phase shift and attenuation values are more dependent on the formations dielectric permittivity than its resistivity at frequencies greater than 10 MHz • At frequencies below 100 KHz electrical eddy currents are induced in the steel drill collar, essentially “short circuiting” the measurement between the transmitters and receivers • Lower frequencies allow for creating higher amplitude signals, which allows for development of sensors with longer transmitter to receiver spacing, which provides deeper depths of investigation • The more frequencies, the more measurements that can be made Resistivity
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity Sensor Theory • Why Longer and Multiple Transmitter to Receiver Spacings? • The depth of investigation of the sensor increases with increasing transmitter to receiver spacing • Having multiple spacings allows the sensor to “see” at different distances into the formation • Typical sensor design allows for determination of the flushed zone, invaded zone, and virgin zone resistivities • The virgin zone resistivity (true formation resistivity) is the most challenging to obtain because the measurement is affected by all the zones in between the sensor and the formation
Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity
5
Resistivity Sensor Theory • Shallow, Medium, and Deep spacings provide 2 MHz and 400 KHz transmission frequencies and yield phase and attenuation data (12 curves total) – Shallow - 16”/ 24” – Medium – 26”/ 34” – Deep – 42”/ 50” • Digital technology provides very accurate values, even at high resistivities • Opposing transmitters compensate for thermal and borehole effects Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity Sensor Applications • Qualitative Hydrocarbon Zone Indentification • Determine Rt in Invaded Zones • Quantitative Petrophysical Evaluation (fluid saturations, formation porosity) • Identify Movable Fluids (permeability indicator) • Determine Casing and Coring points • Predict Abnormal Formation Pore Pressure • Geosteering
Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity
6
Resistivity Sensor Applications Qualitative Hydrocarbon Zone Identification
Increasing Resistivity
• In general, when the resistivity response is higher than the shale baseline it is an indication of the presence of hydrocarbons • In general, when the resistivity response is lower than the shale baseline it is an indication of the presence of salt water
Shale Baseline
Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity Sensor Applications Determine Rt in Invaded Zones • MWD data is less affected by mud invasion than wireline data • Typical MWD exposure time is less than one hour, whereas wireline exposure time is generally from one to seven days
Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity
7
Resistivity Sensor Applications • Quantitative Petrophysical Evaluation to calculate formation porosity, water saturation, and insitu reserves • Archie’s equations provide a quicklook estimation • Other calculation methods are much more rigorous and take into account many more parameters
Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity Sensor Applications • Time-Lapse Logging aids in identifying movable fluids • Re-logging a potential pay zone and comparing the resistivity values from each pass can qualitatively indicate formation permeability • Multiple spacing resistivity sensors can provide similar information in a single pass Resistivity
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity
8
Resistivity Sensor Applications • Casing Point Selection
Set casing here…
• Resistivity data can be used to determine acceptable casing points • Casing is set in non-permeable formations like shale • Trying to set casing in a permeable sandstone may cause the formation to fracture or even collapse the casing
… or here
Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity Sensor Applications • Coring Point Selection • Resistivity data can be used to determine coring intervals on subsequent wells drilled after the pilot hole • Coring is very time consuming and expensive, therefore we would only want to core the hydrocarbon zone and not the salt water zone
Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity
9
Resistivity Sensor Applications • Predict Abnormal Formation Pore Pressure • By monitoring shale resistivity values, the presence of an overpressure transition zone can be seen • Drilling into formation pressure that is higher than borehole pressure can cause a “kick” and if uncontrolled can result in a “blowout”
Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity Sensor Applications Geosteering • Objective: Keep wellbore in oil zone (avoid shale, gas, and water)
SHALE
• Sensors Required for Geosteering: • Gamma Ray - to differentiate between shale and sandstone • Resistivity - to differentiate between oil and water zones • Neutron porosity and Formation Density – to differentiate between oil and gas zones
GAS SAND
OIL SAND
WATER SAND
Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity
10
Resistivity Sensor Applications
Water EWR® CNφ® Saturation Resistivity Neutron Porosity SW (Ohm-m) 200 42 (LS pu) -18 1 % 0
• The deeper the depth of investigation of the resistivity sensor allows ample anticipation time to prevent drilling into the water leg Wate Oilr Water Saturation
Neutron Porosity
DGR™ Gamma Ray (AAPI) 100 ROP (ft/hr) 02
Resistivity
Rate of Penetration
Well Path 0 TVD X50 (ft) X00 500
Gamma Ray Zone A
Well Path
Zone B Measured Depth (Ft)
X000
X500
Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity Sensor Data Interpretation General Resistivity Response Shale
Gas Oil Salt Water
• Shale response is typically low due to the high amount of associated water with clays • The hydrocarbon response (gas and oil) is generally high, and very different from the salt water zone (low) • Salt has no fluid associated with it therefore its’ response is infinite (off scale high)
Shale
Salt Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity
11
Resistivity Sensor Data Interpretation Invasion Profiles • Data logged in a high salinity water sand with fresh mud • No appreciable invasion seen on the MWD data (1 hour) • Significant invasion seen on the MAD data (7.5 days, 23”)
Deep
Shallow
• Wireline data shows even more invasion effect (12 days, 63”) • Shallowest MWD spacing equivalent to wireline shallow guard measurement • Notice the superior vertical resolution of the MWD data versus the wireline
Resistivity © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Resistivity
12
FAR DETECTOR CRYSTAL
4.
NEAR DETECTOR CRYSTAL
Cl
H
H
3. 2.
H NEUTRON SOURCE
1.
LWD Sensor Theory Application & Interpretation
Neutron CRCM_170_revE_0605 Neutron © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
1
Neutron Porosity Sensor Theory • The Life of a Neutron • A chemical source (Am241Be) generates neutrons which scatter into the formation (free neutrons do not occur naturally) “1” • These epithermal, or “fast” neutrons are slowed by collisions with nuclei in the formation • Hydrogen nuclei are the most efficient at slowing down neutrons because their atomic masses are very similar (20 to 30 collisions) “2” • When the neutron is slowed to the point where it is no longer moving and is at a very low energy state it is called a “thermal” neutron • In this state thermal neutrons are susceptible to being absorbed or “captured” by other nuclei, particularly chlorine “3”
FAR DETECTOR CRYSTAL
4.
NEAR DETECTOR CRYSTAL
Cl
H
H
3. 2.
H NEUTRON SOURCE
1.
• As thermal neutrons are captured, gamma rays of capture are emitted “4” • Neutron Porosity tools generally either detect thermal neutrons (3) or gamma rays of capture (4)
Neutron © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Neutron
1
Neutron Porosity Sensor Theory • The objective of the neutron porosity measurement is to infer the total porosity of the formation by measuring the effect that the matrix and pore fluids have on emitted neutrons (hydrogen content indicator) • Since neutrons and hydrogen have the same atomic mass (1), when they collide a large amount of energy is transferred from the neutron to the hydrogen atom (billiard balls) • Typically the only hydrogen in the formation is in water and hydrocarbons • When neutrons collide with high atomic mass atoms such as Barium (137), little energy is imparted and the neutron bounces off, retaining most of its energy (ping-pong ball and bowling ball) • When a neutron loses energy, it slows down • This process is called “moderation”
Neutron © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Neutron Porosity Sensor Theory • If there is high hydrogen content in the formation in the vicinity of the source, the emitted neutrons will be slowed rapidly, resulting in a short travel distance from the source and low count rates at the detectors • If there is low hydrogen content in the formation in the vicinity of the source, the emitted neutrons will be not be slowed rapidly, resulting in a long travel distance from the source and high count rates at the detectors • The measurement relationship is as follows: – High Hydrogen Content = High Porosity = Low Counts – Low Hydrogen Content = Low Porosity = High Counts Average Detector Count Rate (c/s)
10000 Near Detector Far Detector 1000
100
10
1
Neutron
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Porosity (pu)
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Neutron
2
Neutron Porosity Sensor Theory • Most LWD Neutron tools are thermal neutron devices • Thermal Neutron devices utilize He3 tubes as detectors • The He3 gas in the tube is very efficient in capturing thermal neutrons • Despite the apparent simple nature of the measurement and counts to porosity relationship, the initial derived porosity value is typically far from correct • Neutron data requires significant environmental correction because of the limited depth of investigation of the sensor (9 – 14”)
Neutron © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Neutron Porosity Data Interpretation • The neutron porosity measurement is so sensitive to hydrogen content that there are some conditions where the sensor will give an erroneous porosity value – “Bound” water in shales (clay) – Gaseous hydrocarbon zones – Environmental corrections not representative of the environment during logging – “Off-matrix” lithology
Neutron © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Neutron
3
Neutron Porosity Data Interpretation “Bound” Water • The overall negative charge of clays combined with their large surface area means that a relatively high volume of water can be associated with each clay grain • This “bound water” is not free to move; it is tightly held to the grain by strong adsorption forces
Neutron © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Neutron Porosity Data Interpretation Why is bound water an issue? • For the neutron sensor, bound water (i.e., hydrogen) will artificially increase the calculated porosity • In shale zones (which have very little actual porosity) the neutron sensor will be fooled by the bound water and typically generate porosities in excess of 40% • If clays are present within a reservoir zone matrix, the bound water will affect the response of the sensor as mentioned above, indicating a higher than actual porosity • How intense the effect will be depends on the amount and type of clay present • This phenomenon is known as the “Shale Effect” and is much easier to recognize when analyzing neutron and density data together Neutron © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Neutron
4
Neutron Porosity Data Interpretation
Neutron “Gas Effect” • Neutron collisions with nuclei in gaseous hydrocarbons occur much less frequently than collisions in liquid hydrocarbons because the molecules are spread out much farther • This apparent lack of hydrogen causes the sensor to give an erroneously low value of porosity • The sensor typically does not distinguish between oil and water since the hydrogen content of each is very similar • This phenomenon is known as the “Gas Effect” and is much easier to recognize when analyzing neutron and density data together because the two curves display a distinctive “crossover” effect Neutron © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Neutron Porosity Sensor Theory • Improper Environmental Corrections • Neutron sensor environmental corrections needed: Hole Diameter Mud Density Mud Salinity Formation Salinity Temperature Pressure Lithology • Most of the environmental corrections compensate for the change in hydrogen content seen by the sensor as it logs in conditions different than the calibration standard (Lithology is the exception) • In other words, if the sensor is not logging in conditions identical to calibration, environmental correction of the data is required Neutron © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Neutron
5
Neutron Porosity Data Interpretation • The corrections which can have the greatest effect on neutron porosity are the mud and formation water salinity values
Formation Salinity @ 150 kppm 6 6" Borehole - Centralized 7.25" Borehole - Centralized
Correction (pu)
4
8.5" Borehole - Centralized
2
0 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
• Salinity, a measure of the amount of free chlorine ions present in the mud and formation water, must be compensated for because chlorine is a very efficient absorber of thermal neutrons • If there is high chlorine content, the overall count rates will be reduced, generating a porosity value which is erroneously high
-2
-4
-6 Porosity (pu)
• 150,000 ppm formation water in a 20 percent porosity formation will require a -3 p.u. correction
Neutron © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Neutron Porosity Data Interpretation “Off-matrix” lithology • The lithology correction is typically applied after all other environmental corrections have been applied • Limestone is the standard (zero correction) • It compensates for the different neutron thermalizing properties of sandstone and dolomite • The correction is a direct addition or subtraction of porosity units (PU) • Sandstone and dolomite corrections will be positive and negative respectively and the amount of correction depends upon the formation porosity • If the lithology correction is different from the lithology logged, the neutron porosity value will be incorrect • Salt, which has zero porosity, reads approximately +4 PU in this example because the data has been processed assuming a sandstone matrix Neutron © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Neutron
6
Neutron Porosity Data Interpretation • Obvious “Shale Effect” separation between the neutron and density curves • Dramatic decrease in neutron porosity in gas zone (“Gas Effect”)
Shale Gas Oil Salt Water
• “Crossover Effect” apparent in gas zones when analyzed with density curve • Since oil and water have similar hydrogen content, it is difficult to see the oil/water contact (must use in combination with the resistivity curve) • Since salt (not salt water) has no porosity, and thus no fluid, the neutron curve reads close to zero
Shale
Salt Neutron © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Neutron Porosity Sensor Applications • Indicates the presence of gaseous hydrocarbon alone, or in combination with the Formation Density sensor • Hydrocarbon Typing - normalized count rates from the near and far detectors can be used to distinguish gas from oil • Used with formation density data to determine rock type using crossplots
Neutron © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Neutron
7
Neutron Porosity Sensor Applications
Gas Crossover
• The characteristic crossover of the neutron and density curves is an indication of the presence of gas
Neutron Porosity
Bulk Density
Neutron © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Neutron Porosity Sensor Applications
Hydrocarbon Typing
Near Counts (dash)
Far Counts (dot)
GAS
• Near and Far count rates are forced to overlay by choosing appropriate plotting scales in a water (or oil) zone • When gas is encountered, the deeper depth of investigation of the far detector makes it more sensitive to the gas, creating a separation between the two curves • This method can be used to distinguishing gas from oil with only neutron sensor data
SS Porosity
Neutron © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Neutron
8
Neutron Porosity Sensor Applications Neutron-Density Crossplot
• Crossplots allow for lithology and porosity determination from neutron and density data
Neutron © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Neutron Porosity Sensor Applications
Neutron-Density Crossplot • Crossplots allow for lithology and porosity determination from neutron and density data
Neutron © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Neutron
9
This page intentionally left blank.
LWD Sensor Theory Application & Interpretation
Density CRCM_170_revE_0605 Density © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
1
Density Porosity Sensor Theory The Life of a Gamma Ray • A Cs-137 source emits gamma radiation that is focused into the formation at an energy of 0.662 MeV • Gamma rays collide with electrons in the formation and are scattered, losing energy, not speed, in the process (Compton Scattering) • Eventually, when the gamma ray is at very low energy (< 100 keV) it is absorbed by an electron-atom system (Photoelectric Effect) and completely disappears • The sensor measures the number of gamma rays that are scattered back to the detectors
Density © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Density
1
Density Porosity Sensor Theory • The objective of the density porosity measurement is to infer the bulk density of the formation by measuring the attenuating effect that the matrix and pore fluids have on emitted gamma rays (function of bulk electron density) • As gamma radiation interacts with materials of high electron density, it loses energy more rapidly • For example, a 5-cm thick piece of lead would attenuate a gamma ray more efficiently than the human body • Another by-product of the measurement is the Photoelectric Effect (Pe) which allows the log analyst to determine mineralogy
Density © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Density Porosity Sensor Theory • The matrix will attenuate gamma radiation more than the pore fluid since it is denser • If the matrix is sandstone, a 10 p.u., water-filled zone will read higher density than a 30 p.u., water-filled zone • The measurement relationship is as follows: – High Bulk Density = Low Porosity = Low Counts – Low Bulk Density = High Porosity = High Counts
Matrix
Bulk Density (g/cc)
Sandstone
2.65
Limestone
2.71
Dolomite
2.87
Anhydrite
2.98
Halite
2.03
Shale
2.30 – 2.70
Pure Water
1.00
Oil
0.80
Gas
0.20
Density © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Density
2
Density Porosity Sensor Theory • LWD density sensors are “contact” devices, meaning that the detector blade and source are in contact with the borehole wall • Density data is considered more accurate than neutron and sonic data because the measurement is more direct • Density sensor data requires some environmental correction because of the limited depth of investigation of the sensor
Density © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Density Porosity Sensor Theory • The LWD density sensor detectors measure gamma counts through low density windows in a blade on the drill collar • The “detector blade” is forced against the borehole wall by the rotating action of the drillstring • The blade will generally not remain in contact 100% of the time creating a condition called “standoff”
Density © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Density
3
Density Porosity Sensor Theory
• In order to compensate for standoff, LWD density tools take many samples per revolution to insure that some samples are taken while in contact with the borehole wall • These fast samples are then processed using special mathematical techniques and algorithms to calculate an apparent density value at each detector spacing
Density © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Density Porosity Sensor Theory • If the near and far density values fall on the “spine” (45° line) it indicates that there is no standoff correction needed
“Spine & Ribs” Plot
• Depending on which side of the spine the point falls will indicate a positive or negative correction • How severe the correction will be depends on how far from the spine the point falls on a “rib”
Density © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Density
4
Density Porosity Sensor Theory • If standoff exists, the apparent density will typically be too low because of the ratio of the formation density and mud density • The difference between the near and far density values is used to determine the appropriate standoff correction, which compensates for mud density and blade distance from the formation Correction Required (True - Far Density)
Standoff Correction
Density
0.25
Company A 6-3/4" Tool Company B 6-3/4" Tool AES 4-3/4" Tool
0.2
0-0.5" Standoff, 1-2 gm/cc Mud
0.15
0.1
0.05
0 -0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
-0.05
Correction Available (Far - Near Density)
© 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Density Porosity Data Interpretation • The density porosity measurement is much less susceptible to environmental effects than the neutron sensor • It is more or less a “what you see is what you get” type of measurement • As discussed previously, the problem of standoff during rotation is compensated for with mathematics and the “spine and ribs” correction • Bulk density data can be converted to density porosity data by making an assumption of matrix type and fluid type and applying the following formula: φ = (ρma - ρb) / (ρma - ρfl)
Density © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Density
5
Density Porosity Data Interpretation • For example, if the assumed matrix is sandstone and the assumed fluid is water, a bulk density value of 2.25 g/cc will yield a porosity of:
Matrix
φ = (ρma - ρb) / (ρma - ρfl)
Bulk Density (g/cc)
Sandstone
2.65
φ = (2.65 – 2.25) / (2.65 – 1.00)
Limestone
2.71
Dolomite
2.87
Anhydrite
2.98
Halite
2.03
Shale
2.30 – 2.70
Pure Water
1.00
Oil
0.80
Gas
0.20
φ = 24.2% • Problems can arise if the density porosity value is calculated using the wrong matrix or fluid assumption • For the example above let’s say we assumed the matrix was limestone when it really was sandstone • The calculate density porosity would then become: φ = (2.71 – 2.25) / (2.71 – 1.00) φ = 26.9%, which is erroneously high Density © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Density Porosity Data Interpretation
• Density (as well as neutron) sensor response is calibrated such that the “true” density (or porosity) value is computed in water-filled zones • Therefore, the two curves should overlay, if all environmental corrections and assumptions have been properly applied
Density © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Density
6
Density Porosity Data Interpretation
Shale Gas Oil Salt Water Shale
Salt
• The “Shale Effect” curve separation and “Gas Crossover” is easily recognized when analyzing the Density and Neutron curves together • Since oil and water have similar densities, it is difficult to see the oil/water contact (must use in combination with the resistivity curve) • Since salt (not salt water) has no porosity the density tool should read 2.03 g/cc, which is the density of salt
Density © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Density Porosity Sensor Applications • Determine formation bulk density • Determine lithology and specific minerology (Photoelectric Effect) • Indicates the presence of gaseous hydrocarbon in combination with the Neutron Porosity sensor
Density © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Density
7
This page intentionally left blank.
LWD Sensor Theory Application & Interpretation
Vibration CRCM_170_revE_0605 Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
1
Vibration Sensor Theory • Vibration sensors utilize three mutually orthogonal, DC-coupled accelerometers to measure changes in acceleration along three axes • The X-axis measures lateral and radial acceleration of the drillstring • The Y-axis measures lateral and tangential acceleration of the drillstring • The Z-axis measures the longitudinal (axial) acceleration of the drillstring
Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration
1
Vibration Sensor Theory • Vibration Mechanisms – Torsional – Axial – Lateral
Torsional
Lateral Axial
Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration Sensor Theory • Sensor Measurements – Average Represents the average acceleration over a specified time period – Peak Represents the highest acceleration which has occurred over a specified time period – Instantaneous Data sampled at very high rate (up to 2000 Hz) used mainly for frequency analysis
Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration
2
Vibration Sensor Applications • Vertical or near-vertical wells • High-cost drilling environments where tripping costs are prohibitive (deepwater drilling) • Harsh drilling environments • Intermediate sections of holes with large diameters • Large formation washouts • Underbalanced drilling • Areas of hard drilling (low ROP) • Areas of drillstring damage or MWD failures
Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration Sensor Data Interpretation • Factors Affecting Downhole Vibration – Rotary Speed – Weight on Bit – Hole Inclination – Bottomhole Assembly Configuration – PDC Bits – Lithology – Hole Size
Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration
3
Vibration Sensor Data Interpretation • Rotary Speed –Rotation of the drillstring is the main source of drillstring excitation –High RPM creates high the imbalance force to the bit and drillstring, generating more energy to create lateral vibrations or BHA/bit whirl –Low RPM is also undesirable because it creates higher frictional torque –If rotary speed matches one of the natural frequencies of the drillstring, resonance can create large scale oscillations in the drillstring –When a change of RPM is required, a 10 – 15% change in the RPM is usually recommended if it is within constraints of the operator
Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration Sensor Data Interpretation • Weight on Bit – High WOB generally will increase the stability of a PDC bit but aggravate the roller cone bit vibrations – High WOB can cause the BHA to buckle, resulting in contact between the collars and borehole wall which can cause BHA whirl and lateral shocks – When a change of WOB is required, a 10 – 15% change in the WOB is usually recommended if it is within constraints of the operator
Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration
4
Vibration Sensor Data Interpretation
• Vibration generally increases as WOB and RPM increase
30 25 30
WOB
15
25
20
20
10
15 10
5
g RMS
5
15
0
120
130
140
0
150
RPM Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration Sensor Data Interpretation • Hole Inclination – Severe drillstring lateral vibrations are more likely to occur in vertical or near vertical wells rather than in highly deviated wells because gravity tends to reduce the amount of lateral displacement – Torsional vibration (stick-slip) is more likely to occur in deviated holes due to the higher frictional torque involved
Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration
5
Vibration Sensor Data Interpretation • Bottomhole Assembly Configuration – Drilling motors can reduce the energy of interactions between the rotating BHA and the wellbore, eliminating the chance of BHA whirl and lateral shocks – Packed hole conventional assemblies are subjected to less vibration than pendulum assemblies – Long unstabilized spans, such as those found in pendulum assemblies used in vertical drilling, encourage bending and help induce collar and bit whirl – Use full gauge stabilizers if possible – especially in vertical or near-vertical wells – In extended reach and high angle wells, spiral stabilizers can be used to reduce drag – Tool joints should be inspected at regular intervals if high levels of vibration have been seen. Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration Sensor Data Interpretation • PDC Bits – Anti-whirl PDC bits are more stable than conventional PDC bits – PDC bits tend to whirl at high RPM’s and in hard formations – Dull or undergauge PDC bits can induce torsional vibration of the drillstring (stick-slip)
PDC
Tri-Cone
Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration
6
Vibration Sensor Data Interpretation • Lithology – Drillstring vibration will always increase as the formation strength (hardness) increases – Crossing a bed boundary at an angle can also intensify vibration
Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration Sensor Data Interpretation • Hole Size – An oversized hole can increase the instability of the drill bit and drillstring, increasing the likelihood of lateral shocks, BHA whirl, and bit whirl
Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration
7
Vibration Sensor Data Interpretation • Torsional Vibration (Stick-slip) – Non-uniform bit rotation in which the bit stops rotating momentarily at regular intervals causing the string to periodically torque up and then spin free – Prevalent in high angle and deep (3000’ or more) wells or aggressive PDC bits with high WOB – Surface torque fluctuation > 15%, PDC bit damage, lower ROP, connection over-torque, and drillstring twistoffs – Average X – Average Y > 1g – Increase RPM and/or decrease WOB, use less aggressive PDC bit, reduce stabilizer drag Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration Sensor Data Interpretation • Axial Vibration (Bit Bounce) – Large WOB fluctuations causing the bit to repeatedly lift off and impact the formation – Prevalent in vertical wells, roller cone bits in hard rock – Impact loading can damage the bit, drillstring, or hoisting equipment – High Peak Z acceleration – Decrease WOB and/or decrease RPM, use shock sub, less aggressive roller cone bit
Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration
8
Vibration Sensor Data Interpretation • Lateral Vibration (Backward Bit Whirl) – Eccentric rotation of the bit about a point other than its geometric center caused by bit/wellbore gearing (analogous to a “Spirograph”) – Extremely difficult to recognize on the surface – Prevalent with aggressive side-cutting PDC bits in hard rock, vertical wells – Bit cutter impact damage, overgauge hole, BHA connection failures, and MWD component failure – High Peak X and Y accelerations, medium to high Average X and Y accelerations (equal to each other), frequency analysis shows a large magnitude primary whirl frequency – Reduce RPM Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration Sensor Data Interpretation Backward Whirl Pattern
PDC Bit Whirl
Path of the Bits center Bit Gauge
–Both backward and forward whirl take place with PDC bits –Backward whirl is destructive for PDC bits –Backward motion is responsible for the “looped” path of the intermediate cutter trace –The innermost circle corresponds to the path of the center of the bit
Center of Hole Hole Gauge
Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration
9
Vibration Sensor Data Interpretation • The mold of a cored bottom hole (right) shows a typical whirl pattern resulting from backward whirl. • With bit whirl, the bit’s cutting pattern is larger, causing the bit to rotate over more surface area producing an irregular shaped and enlarged hole. This causes more bit wear and slows down the penetration rate.
Anti-Whirl Core Bit Bottom Hole Pattern
Conventional Core Bit with Typical Whirl Pattern
Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration Sensor Data Interpretation • Lateral Vibration (Backward BHA Whirl) – Similar to bit whirl, the BHA gears around the borehole and results in severe lateral shocks between the BHA and wellbore – Extremely difficult to recognize on the surface – Prevalent in vertical or near vertical wells, pendulum or unstabilized BHA’s – MWD component failure, localized tool joint and/or stabilizer wear, washouts or twistoffs, increased average torque – Same sensor response and recommended action as bit whirl Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration
10
Vibration Sensor Data Interpretation • Lateral Vibration (Side Shocks) – BHA moves sideways or sometimes whirls forward and backwards randomly – Difficult to recognize at the surface – Prevalent in hard rock and unbalanced or long unstabilized BHA’s – MWD component failure, localized tool joint and/or stabilizer wear, washouts or twistoffs, increased average torque – Medium to high Peak X and Y accelerations (equal), low Average X and Y, no dominant peaks in the frequency analysis – Reduce RPM Vibration © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Vibration
11
This page intentionally left blank.
LWD System & Sensor Specifications
CRCM_170_revE_0605 Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
1
MWD Versus LWD Systems • Measurement-While-Drilling (MWD) systems generally include directional and gamma ray sensors, and may include downhole pressure, vibration/shock and temperature sensors • The system becomes a Logging-While-Drilling (LWD) system when a resistivity, neutron, density or other logging sensor is added to the toolstring
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
1
PES LWD Systems (Advantage R&D) • PrecisionLWD™ system – NOTE: there is no space between Precision and LWD • Hostile Environment Logging (HEL™) MWD system
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
HEL™ System • The HEL™ system is made up of these individual tools and sensors: – IDS (Integrated Directional Sonde) sensor – ESM (Environmental Severity Measurement) sensor – BAP (Bore/Annular Pressure) sensor – RAT (Rapid Annulus Temperature) sensor * – HGAM (High Temperature Gamma Ray) sensor or – HAGR (High Temperature Azimuthal Gamma Ray) sensor or – SAGR (Spectral Azimuthal Gamma Ray) sensor – * RAT must be run in conjunction with BAP (for now) Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
2
PrecisionLWD™ System • The PrecisionLWD system is made up of the components of the HEL™ system, but adds these tools: – MFR (Multi-Frequency Resistivity) sensor – TNP (Thermal Neutron Porosity) sensor – AZD (Azimuthal Density) sensor
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Common System Components • Both systems employ: – PMT (Pressure Modulated Telemetry) pulser assembly for data transmission – DBM (Dual Battery Module) assembly for power – Spectrum surface acquisition software for data acquisition and processing
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
3
EMpulse™ System • The official name of the EM tool is the EMpulse™ electromagnetic MWD system. • This system utilizes the same components as the HEL system except for the pulser
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Revolution™ System • Benefits over conventional and mud motor drilling – Rotation of drill pipe all the time – Smooth borehole (no corkscrewing) – Less time to complete well
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
4
HEL™ System Configuration • PMT is on top of the toolstring because: – It is not a sensor – It must be connected to the driver controller insert (between PMT and DBM) – Most likely component to be modified in the field (orifice) • ESM is a component on the driver controller insert • DBM is used to extend the power capacity of the toolstring • IDS sensor is on bottom to allow for quicker decisions concerning the directional aspects of the hole Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
HEL™ System Highlights • “Industry Best” Features and Benefits: – 30,000 psi pressure rating – Reliable operation at temperatures of up to 356°F (180ºC), with survival to 392°F (200ºC) – High flow rates for all size tools: • 4 3/4” up to 400 gpm • 6 3/4” and 8” up to 1000 gpm • 8 ¼” and 9 ½” up to 1800 gpm
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
5
HEL™ System Mechanical Specifications
HEL Specification
4 3/4” Tool
6 3/4” Tool
8” Tool
8 ¼” Tool
9 ½” Tool
Nominal Tool O.D.
4 3/4”
6 3/4”
8”
8 ¼”
9 ½”
Maximum Tool O.D.
5 1/4”
7 3/8”
8 5/8”
8 7/8”
10 1/8”
Length HEL System
25.2 ft
25.3 ft
25.2 ft
25.6 ft
25.8 ft
Weight
1400 lbs
2850 lbs
4100 lbs
4000 lbs
5500 lbs
Top Connection
3 1/2” IF box
4 1/2” IF box
6 5/8” Reg box
5 ½” IF box
7 5/8” Reg box
Bottom Connection
3 1/2” IF pin
4 1/2” IF pin
6 5/8” Reg pin
5 ½” IF pin
7 5/8” Reg Pin
Makeup Torque
9,900 - 10,900 28,000 - 32,000 52,000 - 56,000 53,000-56,000 75,000-78,000 ft-lb ft-lb ft-lb ft-lb ft-lb
Maximum Torque
16,700 ft-lb
44,700 ft-lb
77,300 ft-lb
80,100 ft-lb
112,000 ft-lb
Maximum Tension
528,000 lbs
978,000 lbs
1,480,000 lbs
1,450,000 lbs
1,870,000 lbs
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
HEL™ System Mechanical Specifications HEL Specification Bending Strength Ratio Dogleg Severity Rotating
4 3/4” Tool
6 3/4” Tool
8” Tool
8 ¼” Tool
2:10
2:53
2:70
2:47
3:10
20° / 100’
11° / 100’
10° / 100’
9° / 100’
8° / 100’
9 ½” Tool
36° / 100’
19° / 100’
16° / 100’
15° / 100’
14° / 100’
Equivalent Bending Stiffness (O.D. x I.D.)
4.75” x 3.22”
6.75” x 4.20”
8.0” x 4.18”
8.25” x 5.17”
9.5” x 5.16”
Maximum Operating Temperature
356°F
356°F
356°F
356°F
356°F
(180°C)
(180°C)
(180°C)
(180°C)
(180°C)
392°F
392°F
392°F
392°F
392°F
(200°C)
(200°C)
(200°C)
(200°C)
(200°C)
Maximum Operating Pressure
30,000 psi
30,000 psi
30,000 psi
30,000 psi
30,000 psi
Maximum Flow Rate
1800 gpm
Dogleg Severity – Sliding
Maximum Survival Temperature
400 gpm
1000 gpm
1000 gpm
1800 gpm
Maximum Sand Content
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
Lost Circulation Material
80 lb/bbl
80 lb/bbl
80 lb/bbl
80 lb/bbl
80 lb/bbl
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
6
BAP Sensor Specifications
BAP Specifications
4 3/4” Tool
6 3/4” Tool
8” Tool
8 ¼” Tool
9 ½” Tool
Transducer Type
Quartz Crystal
Quartz Crystal
Quartz Crystal
Quartz Crystal
Quartz Crystal
Maximum Working Pressure
30,000 psi
30,000 psi
30,000 psi
30,000 psi
30,000 psi
1 psi
1 psi
1 psi
1 psi
1 psi
± 7.5 psi
± 7.5 psi
± 7.5 psi
± 7.5 psi
± 7.5 psi
Repeatability
± 3 psi
± 3 psi
± 3 psi
± 3 psi
± 3 psi
Measurement Range
0 – 30,000 psi
0 – 30,000 psi
0 – 30,000 psi
0 – 30,000 psi
0 – 30,000 psi
Resolution Accuracy
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
HGAM Sensor Specifications
4 3/4” Tool
6 3/4” Tool
8 ” Tool
8 1/4” Tool
9 1/2” Tool
Detector Type
GeigerMueller
GeigerMueller
GeigerMueller
GeigerMueller
GeigerMueller
Measurement Range
0 – 250 AAPI
0 – 250 AAPI
0 – 250 AAPI
0 – 250 AAPI
0 – 250 AAPI
± 2 AAPI
± 2 AAPI
± 2 AAPI
± 2 AAPI
± 2 AAPI
18”
18”
18”
18”
18”
± 5 AAPI @ 1000 ft/hr
± 5 AAPI @ 1000 ft/hr
± 5 AAPI @ 1000 ft/hr
± 5 AAPI @ 1000 ft/hr
± 5 AAPI @ 1000 ft/hr
HGAM Specifications
Accuracy Vertical Resolution Statistical Repeatability
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
7
IDS Sensor Specifications
IDS Specifications
4 3/4” Tool
6 3/4” Tool
8” Tool
8 1/4” Tool
9 1/2” Tool
Toolface Update Period
3 seconds
3 seconds
3 seconds
3 seconds
3 seconds
Toolface Accuracy
± 1.5°
± 1.5°
± 1.5°
± 1.5°
± 1.5°
Inclination Accuracy
± 0.1°
± 0.1°
± 0.1°
± 0.1°
± 0.1°
Azimuth Accuracy
± 0.5°
± 0.5°
± 0.5°
± 0.5°
± 0.5°
30 seconds
30 seconds
30 seconds
30 seconds
30 seconds
Survey Update
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
ESM Sensor Specifications
ESM Specifications
4 3/4” Tool
6 3/4” Tool
8” Tool
8 1/4” Tool
9 1/2” Tool
Sensor Type
Single Axis Accelerometer
Single Axis Acceleromete r
Single Axis Acceleromete r
Single Axis Acceleromete r
Single Axis Acceleromete r
Measurement
Lateral Shock and Vibration
Lateral Shock and Vibration
Lateral Shock and Vibration
Lateral Shock and Vibration
Lateral Shock and Vibration
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
8
MFR Configuration
• Symmetrical antenna design minimizes borehole effects and cancels impedance changes in antennas caused by pressure and temperature variations while drilling • Can be run in standalone configuration (powered by two battery inserts) • Typical configuration also includes HGAM sensor
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
MFR Highlights • Features and Benefits: – Fully compensated antenna arrays integrated into the drill collar for increased reliability – Fully digital electronics measure phase and attenuation at each transmitter-receiver pair, resulting in highly accurate measurements – Three transmitter-receiver spacings measure 12 fully compensated phase and attenuation measurements at unique radial distances from the borehole – Diameter of investigation of 197” at 20 ohm-m is the industry’s deepest reading LWD resistivity measurement Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
9
MFR Highlights • Features and Benefits: – The MFR may be run in any mud system – Three independent transmitter-receiver antenna spacings and two operating frequencies provide accurate measurements over a wide range of drilling conditions – Deeper reading 400 kHz measurements are unaffected by eccentering and hole rugosity, providing stable measurements in highly conductive formations drilled with oil based mud (OBM)
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
MFR Highlights • Features and Benefits: – Any three compensated measurements can be combined to radially invert diameter of invasion (DOI), resistivity of the flushed zone (Rxo), and true resistivity (Rt) over a wide range of borehole conditions and resistivity contrasts – Deep reading resistivity measurements and log inversion capabilities enhance geosteering applications and horizontal log interpretation
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
10
MFR™ System Mechanical Specifications
MFR Specification
4 3/4” Tool
6 3/4” Tool
8” Tool
8 ¼” Tool
9 ½” Tool
Nominal Tool O.D.
4 3/4”
6 3/4”
8”
8 ¼”
9 ½”
Maximum Tool O.D.
5 1/4”
7 3/8”
8 5/8”
8 7/8”
10 1/8”
20.8 ft
20.8 ft
20.8 ft
20.8 ft
20.8 ft
1225 lbs
2425 lbs
3500 lbs
4500 lbs
6200 lbs
Top Connection
3 1/2” IF box
4 1/2” IF box
6 5/8” Reg box
5 ½” IF box
7 5/8” Reg box
Bottom Connection
3 1/2” IF box
4 1/2” IF box
6 5/8” Reg box
5 ½” IF box
7 5/8” Reg box
Length (HEL System) Weight
Makeup Torque
9,900 - 10,900 28,000 - 32,000 52,000 - 56,000 53,000-56,000 75,000-78,000 ft-lb ft-lb ft-lb ft-lb ft-lb
Maximum Torque
16,700 ft-lb
44,700 ft-lb
77,300 ft-lb
80,100 ft-lb
112,000 ft-lb
Maximum Tension
528,000 lbs
978,000 lbs
1,480,000 lbs
1,450,000 lbs
1,870,000 lbs
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
MFR™ System Mechanical Specifications 4 3/4” Tool
6 3/4” Tool
8” Tool
8 ¼” Tool
9 ½” Tool
2:10
2:53
2:70
2:47
3:10
Dogleg Severity Rotating
20° / 100’
11° / 100’
10° / 100’
9° / 100’
8° / 100’
Dogleg Severity – Sliding
36° / 100’
19° / 100’
16° / 100’
15° / 100’
14° / 100’
4.75” x 3.22”
6.75” x 4.20”
8.0” x 4.18”
8.25” x 5.17”
9.5” x 5.16”
HEL Specification Bending Strength Ratio
Equivalent Bending Stiffness (O.D. x I.D.) Maximum Operating Temperature
302°F
302°F
302°F
302°F
302°F
(150°C)
(150°C)
(150°C)
(150°C)
(150°C)
329°F
329°F
329°F
329°F
329°F
(165°C)
(165°C)
(165°C)
(165°C)
(165°C)
Maximum Operating Pressure
30,000 psi
30,000 psi
30,000 psi
30,000 psi
30,000 psi
Maximum Flow Rate
Maximum Survival Temperature
400 gpm
1000 gpm
1000 gpm
1800 gpm
1800 gpm
Maximum Sand Content
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
Lost Circulation Material
80 lb/bbl
80 lb/bbl
80 lb/bbl
80 lb/bbl
80 lb/bbl
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
11
MFR Sensor Specifications
MFR Specifications
4 3/4”, 6 ¾”, 8”, 8 ¼”, 9 ½” Tools
Measurement Range (phase)
0.1 – 3000 Ω-m
Accuracy (phase, all spacings)
± 0.25 mmhos
Measurement Range (attenuation)
0.1 –200 Ω-m
Accuracy (attenuation, all spacings)
± 0.25 mmhos
Depth of Investigation
Varies with type of measurement, frequency, spacing, and formation resistivity
Vertical Resolution
Varies with type of measurement, frequency, spacing, and formation resistivity
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
AZD / TNP Configuration • AZD and TNP sensors offer density and neutron porosity LWD measurements at penetration rates of up to 400 ft/hr – with both the precision and accuracy of equivalent wireline tools • AZD and TNP are run together in the same collar • Can be run in standalone configuration (powered by two battery inserts) • Combinable with the MFR tool and the HEL system
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
12
AZD Highlights • Features and Benefits: – Optimized design results in measurements less affected by standoff and improved spine and ribs correction – Digital electronics allow 50 msec sampling for accurate standoff correction of both density and neutron measurements – Patented self-binning technique accurately corrects measurement for tool standoff while rotating – 2 curie, Cs-137 gamma emitting source Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
TNP Highlights • Features and Benefits: – Multi-detector design combined with stronger source provides exceptional statistical precision – Optimized He3 detector spacings result in a high precision measurement with reduced environmental effects – Multiple detectors at each spacing provide redundancy for increased log quality and deliverability – 18 curie, Am241Be neutron emitting source Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
13
AZD™/ TNP™ System Mechanical Specifications AZD/TNP Specification
4 3/4” Tool
6 3/4” Tool
8 ¼” Tool
Maximum Colar O.D.
5 1/4”
7 3/8”
8 7/8”
Stabilizer Blade O.D.
5 7/8”
8 1/4”
12”
Target Hole Size
6 1/8”
8 ½”
12 ¼”
Length
18.6 ft
22.5 ft
22.8 ft
Weight
1225 lbs
2425 lbs
5150 lbs
Top Connection
3 1/2” IF box
4 1/2” IF box
5 ½” IF box
Bottom Connection
3 1/2” IF box
4 1/2” IF box
5 ½” IF box
Makeup Torque
9,900 - 10,900 ft-lb 28,000 - 32,000 ft-lb 53,000-56,000 ft-lb
Maximum Torque
16,700 ft-lb
44,700 ft-lb
80,100 ft-lb
Maximum Tension
528,000 lbs
978,000 lbs
1,450,000 lbs
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
AZD™/ TNP™ System Mechanical Specifications AZD / TNP Specification
4 3/4” Tool
6 3/4” Tool
8 1/4” Tool
Bending Strength Ratio
2.10
2.53
2.47
Dogleg Severity - Rotating
20° / 100’
11° / 100’
9° / 100’
Dogleg Severity – Sliding
36° / 100’
19° / 100’
15° / 100’
4.75” x 3.22”
6.75” x 4.29”
8.25” x 4.39”
302°F
302°F
302°F
(150°C)
(150°C)
(150°C)
329°F
329°F
329°F
(165°C)
(165°C)
(165°C)
30,000 psi
30,000 psi
25,000 psi
400 gpm
1000 gpm
1800 gpm
Maximum Sand Content
3%
3%
3%
Lost Circulation Material
80 lb/bbl
80 lb/bbl
80 lb/bbl
Equivalent Bending Stiffness (O.D. x I.D.) Maximum Operating Temperature Maximum Survival Temperature Maximum Operating Pressure Maximum Flow Rate
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
14
AZD / TNP Sensor Specifications
Measurement Density
Neutron Porosity
Photoelectric Effect (Pe)
Accuracy
Repeatability
1.7 – 3.05 g/cc
± 0.0075 g/cc
± 0.015 g/cc
@ 2.4 g/cc
0 -10 pu ± 0.5 pu
± 0.75 pu
10 – 40 pu ± 5%
@ 20 pu
1 – 10 B/e- ± 5%
± 0.25 B/e-
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Revolution RSS Configuration • The Revolution system’s pointthe-bit technology uses a pivot stabilizer between the bit and the rotary steerable tool to orient the drill-bit axis with the axis of the hole • Relative rotation between the center shaft, which carries torque to the bit, and the nonrotating housing drives a hydraulic pump • The pump generates enough motive force to deflect the drill stem as programmed in the well’s steering plan
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
15
Revolution RSS Highlights • Applications and Advantages: – “Point-the-bit” design for improved hole quality and bit life relative to “push-the-bit” design – 4 3/4” system for extended reach, 6 1/8” wellbores – Simple functionality ensures high reliability – Deviation rates set from surface for improved directional control – Build rates of up to 10°/100’ depending on formation type – Short system length – Fully integrated with PrecisionLWD system – Measure point on inclination is 10’ from bit Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Revolution™ System Mechanical Specifications Revolution RSS Specification
4 3/4” Tool
6 3/4” Tool
8 1/4” Tool
Nominal Tool O.D.
4 3/4”
6 3/4”
8 1/4”
Maximum O.D.
6 3/32”
8 3/8”-9 7/8”
12 1/4”
Length (RSS mechanics)
2.8 ft
3.6 ft
N/A
Weight (RSS mechanics)
200 lbs
790 lbs
N/A
3 1/2” IF pin
4 1/2” IF pin
5 1/2” IF pin
3 1/2” Reg pin
4 1/2” Reg pin
5 1/2” Reg pin
Make-up Torque
9,900 – 10,900 ft-lb
24,000 – 25,200 ftlb
53,000-56,000 ft-lb
Maximum Torque
10,000 ft-lb
20,000 ft-lb
N/A
Top Connection Bottom Connection
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
16
Revolution™ System Mechanical Specifications 4 3/4” Tool
6 3/4” Tool
250,000 lb (survival)
350,000 lb (survival)
100,000 lb (reusable)
130,000 lb (reusable)
10°/100 ft
10°/100 ft
N/A
0°
0°
0°
Maximum Operating Temperature
302°F (150°C)
302°F (150°C)
302°F (150°C)
Maximum Survival Temperature
329°F (165°C)
329°F (165°C)
329°F (165°C)
25,000 psi
20,000 psi
N/A
350 gpm
1000 gpm
N/A
2%
2%
N/A
Revolution RSS Specification
Maximum Tension
Maximum Build Rate Minimum Kick-off Angle
Maximum Operating Pressure Maximum Flow Rate Maximum Sand Content
8 1/4” Tool
N/A
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Toolstring Configuration Facts • Sensor electronics are mounted on inserts (mud flows through insert), except for the IDS (mud flows around pressure case) • Various length collars are used for different configurations • Pulser must always be at top of toolstring • Driver is always directly below pulser • HEL tool typically run with two battery inserts, but can be run with three for directional only configuration • IDS is always the bottom sensor in the HEL toolstring
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
17
Toolstring Configuration Facts • HEL tool communicates with any sensors run below it via an adjustable male/female interconnect combination • MFR can be run with or without an on-board HGAM sensor • MFR can be run in stand-alone recorded only mode because of on-board batteries and memory • AZD / TNP share a common collar • AZD / TNP can be run in stand-alone recorded only mode because of on-board batteries and memory
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Toolstring Configurations • HEL – HGAM / BAP • Most common configuration
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
18
Toolstring Configurations • Other configurations of the HEL string: • HEL – DIRECTIONAL ONLY (2 BATTERIES) • HEL – DIRECTIONAL ONLY (3 BATTERIES) • HEL – HGAM • HEL – BAP (2 BATTERIES)
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Toolstring Configurations • HEL – MFR (with HGAM) – Top end of HEL tool • Pulser • Driver • Battery • Battery • BAP Insert • IDS Flow Diverter • IDS • Male Interconnect • Female Interconnect • Battery • Battery • MFR • HGAM Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
19
Toolstring Configurations • TRIPLE COMBO – This is the typical configuration although it is subject to some modification depending upon the customer’s requirements – Top of toolstring: • HEL – BAP • TNP – AZD • MFR – HGAM
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Toolstring Configurations • TRIPLE COMBO with RSS – This is the typical configuration although it is subject to some modification depending upon the customer’s requirements – Top of toolstring: • HEL – BAP • TNP – AZD • MFR – HGAM • IDS • RSS
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
20
Sensor Measure Point and Sensor Distance • Sensor Measure Point – Physical position on a sensor where the measurement is taken – Measure point does not change with configuration in toolstring or BHA • Sensor Distance or Sensor Offset – The distance from the sensor measure point to the bit – Will change with change of position within the toolstring or BHA • Where a sensor appears in the toolstring may depend upon physical restrictions, customer request, and sensitivity to the borehole environment
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Sensor Measure Points • IDS – The midpoint between the center of the accelerometer and magnetometer packages located 1.24’ (0.38 m) from the top of the jam nut
Top of jam nut
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
21
Sensor Measure Points • HGAM – The center of the Geiger-Mueller tube bank located 0.70’ (0.21 m) from the nose-end shoulder of the insert
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Sensor Measure Points
• ESM – The center of the single-axis accelerometer located 1.67’ (0.51 m) from the noseend shoulder of the driver insert
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
22
Sensor Measure Points • MFR – The midpoint between the receivers
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Sensor Measure Points • BAP – The center of the annulus pressure port on the collar
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
23
Sensor Measure Points • TNP –The midpoint between the near and far detectors
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Sensor Measure Points • AZD –The center of the far detector window
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
24
4-3/4” AZD/TNP
Neutron Measurement Point 109.6”
Density Measurement Point 13.6”
BOTTOM
TOP
DENSITY NEUTRON
F
N
S
S
16”
N
EDP
F
16” 29.6”
24” 89.6”
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
6-3/4” AZD/TNP
Neutron Measurement Point 110.2”
Density Measurement Point 14.5”
BOTTOM
TOP
DENSITY NEUTRON
F
N
S
S
16”
N
EDP
F
16” 30.5”
24” 90.2”
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
25
Measure Points
Sensor Specifications © 2005 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
Technical Specifications
26
Directional Drilling
Revolution Rotary Steerable Service ®
81/4 -in. System The Revolution service now offers a new 8 1/4-in. rotary steerable system (RSS) with point-the-bit drilling technology for improved borehole quality and bit life. The Revolution system’s short, compact design reduces the complexity of rotary steerable drilling technology while placing critical LWD measurements close to the bit. The Revolution system’s point-the-bit technology uses a pivot stabilizer between the bit and the rotary steerable tool to orient the drill-bit axis with the of the hole. Relative rotation between the center shaft, which carries torque to the bit, and a non-rotating outer housing drives a hydraulic pump. This pump generates enough motive force to deflect the drill stem as programmed in the well’s steering plan.
Near-bit gamma measure point
Near-bit inclination measure point Interface to MWD and electronics
Applications
Non-rotating RSS housing
• Extended-reach 12 1/4-in. wellbores
Features, Advantages and Benefits
RSS mechanics
• Point-the-bit design for improved hole quality • • • • • •
and bit life. Simple functionality ensures high reliability. Deviation rates set from surface for improved directional control. Build rates of up to 7.5°/100 ft depending on formation type. Compact system. Fully integrated with PrecisionLWD™ system. Measure point on inclination is 14 ft from bit.
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
Near-bit stabilizer Bit
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2957.00
Directional Drilling
Revolution Rotary Steerable Service ®
81/4 -in. System
Specifications Nominal tool OD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 1/4 in. (210 mm) Maximum OD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 1/4 in. (311 mm) Top connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 5/8 in. API IF (box) Bottom connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 5/8 in. API Reg (pin) Make-up torque . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .TBA Maximum torque . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50,000 ft-lb (67,790 N-m) Maximum tension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1,000,000 lb (450,000 kg) survival . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .250,000 lb (112,500 kg) reusable Maximum build rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7.5°/100 ft. Minimum kickoff angle – vertical kickoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0° Maximum operating temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302°F (150°C) Maximum survival temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .329°F (165°C) Maximum operating pressure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20,000 psi (138 MPa) Maximum flow rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1500 gal/min (5,678 L/min) Maximum sand content . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2%
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
Weatherford products and services are subject to the Company’s standard terms and conditions, available on request or at www.weatherford.com. For more information contact an authorized Weatherford representative. Unless noted otherwise, trademarks and service marks herein are the property of Weatherford. Specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2957.00
Directional Drilling
Revolution Rotary Steerable Service ®
63/4 -in. System The Revolution service now includes a new 6 3/4-in. rotary steerable system (RSS) with point-the-bit drilling technology for improved borehole quality and bit life. The Revolution system’s short, compact design reduces the complexity of rotary steerable drilling technology, while placing critical LWD measurements close to the bit.
The Revolution system’s point-the-bit technology uses a pivot stabilizer between the bit and the rotary steerable tool to orient the drillbit axis with the of the hole. Relative rotation between the center shaft, which carries torque to the bit, and a non-rotating outer housing drives a hydraulic pump. This pump generates enough motive force to deflect the drillstring as programmed in the well’s steering plan.
Near-bit gamma measure point
13.0 ft (3.9 m)
Near-bit inclination measure point
11.2 ft (3.4 m)
Interface to MWD and electronics 8.1 ft (2.5 m)
Applications • Extended-reach 8 3/8 to 9 7/8-in. wellbores
RSS mechanics
Non-rotating RSS housing
Features, Advantages and Benefits 4.5 ft (1.4 m)
• Point-the-bit design for improved hole quality • • • • • •
and bit life. Simple functionality ensures high reliability. Deviation rates set from surface for improved directional control. Build rates up to 10°/100 ft depending on formation type. Compact design. Fully integrated with PrecisionLWD™ system. Measure point on inclination is 11.2 ft from bit.
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
3.2 ft (1.0 m) Near-bit stabilizer Bit
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
1.0 ft (0.3 m)
2963.00
Directional Drilling
Revolution Rotary Steerable Service ®
6 3/4 -in. System Specifications
Nominal tool OD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 3/4 in. (171 mm) Maximum OD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 3/8–9 7/8 in. (213-251 mm) Length (RSS mechanics) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3.6 ft (1.1 m) Weight (RSS mechanics) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .790 lb (359 kg) Top connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 1/2 in. API IF (pin) Bottom connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 1/2 in. API Reg (pin) Make-up torque . . . . . . . . . . . .24,000–25,200 ft-lb (32,539-34,166 N-m) Maximum torque . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20,000 ft-lb (27,116 N-m) Maximum tension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .350,000 lb (159,000 kg) survival . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .130,000 lb (59,000 kg) reusable Maximum build rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10°/100 ft. Minimum kickoff angle – vertical kickoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0° Maximum operating temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302°F (150°C) Maximum survival temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .329°F (165°C) Maximum operating pressure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20,000 psi (138 MPa) Maximum flow rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .750 gal/min (2,839 L/min) Maximum sand content . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2%
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
Weatherford products and services are subject to the Company’s standard terms and conditions, available on request or at www.weatherford.com. For more information contact an authorized Weatherford representative. Unless noted otherwise, trademarks and service marks herein are the property of Weatherford. Specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2963.00
Directional Drilling
Revolution Rotary Steerable Service ®
4 3/4 -in. System The Revolution service was the first slimhole rotary steerable system (RSS) to use point-the-bit drilling technology for improved borehole quality and bit life. The Revolution system’s short, compact design reduces the complexity of rotary steerable drilling technology, while placing critical LWD measurements close to the bit. The Revolution system’s point-the-bit technology orients the drill bit axis with the axis of the desired well path, optimizing the directional drilling process and maximizing drilling efficiency. Relative rotation between the center shaft, which carries torque to the bit, and a non-rotating outer housing drives a hydraulic pump. This pump generates enough motive force to deflect the drillstring as programmed in the well’s steering plan.
Near-bit gamma measure point
11.0 ft (3.4 m)
Near-bit inclination measure point
9.0 ft (2.7 m)
Interface to MWD and electronics 6.1 ft (1.9 m)
Non-rotating RSS housing
Applications • Extended-reach 6 1/8-in. wellbores
RSS mechanics
Features, Advantages and Benefits
3.3 ft (1.0 m)
• Point-the-bit design for improved hole quality • • • • •
and bit life. Simple functionality ensures high reliability. Deviation rates set from surface for improved directional control. Build rates of up to 10°/100 ft depending on formation type. Compact design. Fully integrated with PrecisionLWD™ system.
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
2.5 ft (0.8 m) Near-bit stabilizer Bit
0.8 ft (0.3 m)
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2960.00
Directional Drilling
Revolution Rotary Steerable Service ®
4 3/4 -in. System Specifications
Nominal tool OD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 3/4 in. (121 mm) Maximum OD† . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 3/32 in. (155 mm) Length (RSS mechanics) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2.8 ft (0.9 m) Weight (RSS mechanics) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .200 lb (91 kg) Top connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 1/2 in. API IF pin Bottom connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 1/2 in. API Reg box Make-up torque . . . . . . . . . . . . .9900–10,900 ft-lb (13,423–14,778 N-m) Maximum torque . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10,000 ft-lb (13,558 N-m) Maximum tension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .250,000 lb survival (113,398 kg) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .100,000 lb reusable (45,359 kg) Maximum build rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10°/100 ft Minimum kickoff angle – vertical kickoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0° Maximum operating temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .302°F (150°C) Maximum survival temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .329°F (165°C) Maximum operating pressure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20,000 psi (138 MPa) Maximum flow rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .350 gal/min (1325 L/min) Maximum sand content . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2% Distance from bit, near-bit inclination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 ft (3.4 m) Distance from bit, near-bit gam †
Dependent on bit size
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
Weatherford products and services are subject to the Company’s standard terms and conditions, available on request or at www.weatherford.com. For more information contact an authorized Weatherford representative. Unless noted otherwise, trademarks and service marks herein are the property of Weatherford. Specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2960.00
MWD/LWD
HEL MWD System TM
The hostile-environment logging (HEL) MWD system is specifically designed for today’s high-pressure/high-temperature hostile drilling environments. Designed to operate at temperatures up to 356°F (180°C) and to withstand downhole pressures of 30,000 psi (207 MPa), the HEL MWD system meets or exceeds all existing MWD system specifications.
PMT
Applications • The HEL MWD system is qualified using the most stringent testing
ESM 19.2 ft
regime in the industry. Tests include flow-loop erosion, lost circulation, high-pressure tests at elevated temperatures, and aggressive vibration qualification including innovative random-on-random standards during multiple temperature cycles.
DBM
Features, Advantages and Benefits • 30,000-psi (207-MPa) pressure rating—the industry’s highest. • Reliable operation at temperatures of up to 356°F (180°C), with • • • • • • •
•
survival to 392°F (200°C). High flow rates for all size tools: 4 3/4 in. (400 gal/min), 6 3/4 in., 8 in. (1000 gal/min), 8 1/4 in. and 9 1/2 in. (1800 gal/min). System handles lost circulation material (LCM) up to 80 lb/bbl. Pressure Modulated Telemetry (PMT™) system uses mudflow and battery power to generate a positive mud pulse. Environmental Severity Measurement (ESM™) sensor monitors tool shock and drilling vibration. Dual Battery Module (DBM™) assembly provides long-duration, redundant power for extended downhole operation. High-Temperature Azimuthal Gamma Ray (HAGR™) tool for accurate API gamma ray measurements. Bore/Annular Pressure (BAP™) sensor uses quartz transducers to provide highly accurate bore and annular pressure measurements. Integrated Directional Sonde (IDS™) provides directional and toolface measurements.
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
25.2 ft (7.7 m)
HAGR 12.5 ft
BAP 10.8 ft
IDS 5.7 ft
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2966.00
MWD/LWD
HEL MWD System TM
Specifications Mechanical Specifications
Nominal Sensor OD
4 3⁄4 in.
6 3⁄4 in.
Length (HEL system)
25.2 ft
25.3 ft
Maximum OD
5 1⁄ 4 in.
Weight
Maximum tension Maximum dogleg severity, rotating
Maximum dogleg severity, sliding
Equivalent bending stiffness (OD x ID)
Maximum operating temperature Maximum survival temperature
Maximum operating pressure
25.8 ft
4 1⁄ 2 IF pin
6 5⁄ 8 Reg pin
16,700 ft-lb
44,700 ft-lb
77,300 ft-lb
2:10
2:53
528,000 lb
Bending strength ratio
25.6 ft
4100 lb
8 7⁄8 in. 4000 lb
9 1⁄ 2 in. 5500 lb
4 1⁄ 2 IF box 6 5⁄ 8 Reg box 5 1⁄ 2 IF box 7 5⁄ 8 Reg box
9900– 28,000– 10,900 ft-lb 32,000 ft-lb
Maximum torque
25.2 ft
2850 lb
3 1⁄ 2 IF pin
Make-up torque
9 1⁄2 in.
8 5⁄ 8 in.
3 1⁄ 2 IF box
Bottom connection
8 1⁄4 in.
7 3⁄ 8 in.
1400 lb
Top connection
8 in.
978,000 lb
52,000– 56,000 ft-lb
5 1⁄ 2 IF pin 7 5⁄ 8 Reg pin
53,000– 75,000– 56,000 ft-lb 78,000 ft-lb
80,100 ft-lb 112,000 ft-lb
1,480,000 lb 1,450,000 lb 1,870,000 lb 2:70
2:47
3:10
20°/100 ft
11°/100 ft
10°/100 ft
9°/100 ft
8°/100 ft
36°/100 ft
19°/100 ft
16°/100 ft
15°/100 ft
14°/100 ft
4.75 in. x 3.22 in.
6.75 in. x 4.20 in.
8.0 in. x 4.18 in.
8.25 in. x 5.17 in.
9.5 in. x 5.16 in.
356°F (180°C) 356°F (180°C) 356°F (180°C) 356°F (180°C) 356°F (180°C) 392°F (200°C) 392°F (200°C) 392°F (200°C) 392°F (200°C) 392°F (200°C)
Maximum flow rate
Maximum sand content
30,000 psi (207 MPa)
400 gal/min 2%
30,000 psi (207 MPa)
30,000 psi (207 MPa)
30,000 psi (207 MPa)
30,000 psi (207 MPa)
2%
2%
2%
2%
1000 gal/min 1000 gal/min 1800 gal/min 1800 gal/min
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2966.00
MWD/LWD
HEL MWD System TM
Specifications Sensor Specifications Nominal Sensor OD Transducer type Resolution Accuracy
Repeatability
Measurement range Measure point from bottom of sensor
4 3 ⁄4 in.
6 3⁄4 in.
BAP™ Sensor
8 in.
8 1⁄4 in.
9 1⁄2 in.
Quartz crystal Quartz crystal Quartz crystal Quartz crystal Quartz crystal 1 psi
± 7.5 psi ± 3 psi
1 psi
± 7.5 psi ± 3 psi
1 psi
± 7.5 psi ± 3 psi
1 psi
± 7.5 psi ± 3 psi
1 psi
± 7.5 psi ± 3 psi
0–30,000 psi 0–30,000 psi 0–30,000 psi 0–30,000 psi 0–30,000 psi 10.6 ft
10.6 ft
10.6 ft
10.6 ft
10.6 ft
Measurement range
0–250 API
0–250 API
0–250 API
0–250 API
0–250 API
Vertical resolution
18 in.
18 in.
18 in.
18 in.
18 in.
Accuracy
Statistical repeatability Measure point from bottom of sensor
Sensor face update period
HAGR™ Sensor Specifications
± 2 API
± 5 API @ 100 ft/hr 12.5 ft
± 2 API
± 5 API @ 100 ft/hr 12.3 ft
± 2 API
± 5 API @ 100 ft/hr 12.4 ft
IDS™ Sensor Specifications
3 sec
3 sec
3 sec
Sensor face accuracy
± 1.5°
± 1.5°
± 1.5°
Azimuth accuracy
± 0.5°
± 0.5°
± 0.5°
Inclination accuracy Survey update
Measure point from bottom of sensor Sensor type Measurement
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
± 0.1°
30 sec 5.7 ft
± 0.1°
30 sec 5.3 ft
± 2 API
± 5 API @ 100 ft/hr
± 5 API @ 100 ft/hr
3 sec
3 sec
12.4 ft
± 1.5°
± 0.5°
± 0.5°
± 0.1°
30 sec
30 sec
ESM™ Sensor Type - All Sizes
12.4 ft
± 1.5°
± 0.1°
5.6 ft
± 2 API
5.6 ft
± 0.1°
30 sec 5.6 ft
Single-axis accelerometer Lateral shock and vibration
Weatherford products and services are subject to the Company’s standard terms and conditions, available on request or at www.weatherford.com. For more information contact an authorized Weatherford representative. Unless noted otherwise, trademarks and service marks herein are the property of Weatherford. Specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2966.00
This page intentionally left blank.
MWD/LWD
Slimhole, Retrievable MWD System The slimhole, retrievable MWD system is a positive-pulse, measurement-while-drilling system that provides unique cost-saving features for operators. The system is 100% wireline-retrievable and features a rigid design, a high-speed pulser and mechanical characteristics suggested by directional drillers. The slimhole, retrievable MWD system eliminates the need for roundtrips when drilling operations outlast the battery capacity of the slimhole MWD tool. The slimhole, retrievable MWD system features an OTIS 1 1/2-in. fishing neck so operators can fish the complete tool, as needed. The system’s rigid design reduces the impact of drilling operations on tool reliability. The system’s extended mean time between failures (MTBF) ensures reliable performance throughout drilling operations. The slimhole, retrievable MWD system’s high-speed, positive pulser creates high-speed data transfer rates. Tool-face data is transmitted every six seconds. Full surveys only require 45 seconds of pump down time. Customer input dictated development of the system’s mechanical characteristics. From bottom to top of housing, the downhole probe accommodates a flow switch, optional gamma-ray sensor package, a directional sensor, telemetry electronics, a battery pack and a high-speed pulser. The system is packaged in rugged transport boxes and/or a specially designed MWD container that protects various components during transportation. Both boxes and container are easy to handle. Boxes and container contain running gear, a special modular box for downhole electronics, battery packs, surface unit and all other necessary accessories. The downhole tool is run in standard, non-negotiable drill collars. Collar sizes range from 9 1/2-in. O.D. to 3 3/4-in. O.D. The slimhole, retrievable MWD system also provides build rates of up to 30°/100 ft. For short-radius applications, an upgrade set is available that accommodates build rates of up to 100°/100 ft. The directional sensor package consists of field-proven, solidstate, three-axis accelerometers and magnetometers that are shock-resistant up to 1000 g. A temperature sensor monitors the downhole tool’s temperature. The gained value is used to correct other downhole measurements and provides an indication of local geothermal gradients.
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
Fishing neck Pulser Battery pack Middle centralizer Directional unit Directional measure point Gamma unit Gamma measure point
Flow switch
Extension bar Muleshoe adapter with intergrated locking device
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2973.00
MWD/LWD
Slimhole, Retrievable MWD System The slimhole, retrievable MWD system’s gamma ray sensor produces high-quality logs of natural gamma radiation, calibrated in AAPI units. This facilitates geological interpretation during drilling. Gamma ray smoothing intervals can be user-selected to match the expected rate of penetration.
Specifications
Downhole system Length . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23.86 ft (7.28 m) directional only 29.39 ft (8.96 m) directional plus optional gamma unit Diameter Pulser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2.64 in. (67 mm) Pressure housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2.24 in (57 mm) Weight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .180 lb (81.6 kg) Tool configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .complete MWD tool fits in pulser Sub/NMDC/orienting sub-combination Adjustment to NMDC length . . . . . . . .by means of MWD extension bars
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
Weatherford products and services are subject to the Company’s standard terms and conditions, available on request or at www.weatherford.com. For more information contact an authorized Weatherford representative. Unless noted otherwise, trademarks and service marks herein are the property of Weatherford. Specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2973.00
MWD/LWD
PrecisionPulse MWD System TM
The design of the PrecisionPulse MWD system is based on the proven reliability of the EMpulse™ electromagnetic MWD system but includes modifications specifically for directional drilling with gamma ray services.
Spear point Orientation module
27.0 ft (8.23 m)
Features, Advantages and Benefits • Rated to 15,000 psi operating pressure. • Rated to 300°F (150°C) operating temperature. • Gamma ray probe with scintillation counter for • • • •
accurate AAPI measurements and recorded data in non-volatile memory. Pressure Modulated Telemetry (PMT™) system uses mud flow and battery power to generate a positive mud pulse. A 1 3/4-in. sonde-based tool fits in collars between 3 1/16 in. and 9 in. Retrievable in certain BHA configurations. Battery operated.
MWD electronics
Battery
Gamma ray
13.0 ft (3.9 m)
Control module
Pulser
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2965.00
MWD/LWD
PresicionPulse MWD System TM
Specifications Collars and Muleshoe Collar OD
3 1/8 in.
2 1/4 in. (57.2 mm) N/A 160 gal/min 370 in. (9.30 m)
Collar ID
Max flow w/2 in. pulser Max flow w/1.75in.pulser Collar length (new)
3 1/2 in. 31/2 in. Flex 4 3/4 in. 43/4 in. Flex 6 1/4 in. 2 1/4 in. (57.2 mm) N/A 160 gal/min 370 in. (9.30 m)
Collar connections (Top box, bottom pin)
2 11/16 in.–4 SA
2 7/8 in.–4 S
MS connections (Top box, bottom pin)
41 in. (1.0 m)
41 in. (1.0 m)
2 11/16 in.–4 SA
2 7/8 in.–4 SA
Muleshoe length
DLS—Rotating (°/100 ft) DLS—Sliding (°/100 ft)
38° 116°
EM Orientation Module
27° 66°
Name
Description
AZ
Azimuth
38° 116°
38.128 in. (0.97 m) 3 1/2 in. IF
20° 36°
27° 66°
4.0 in. (102 mm) 1200 gal/min N/A 370 in. (9.30 m)
6 5/8 in. REG 35.375 in. (0.90 m)
37.625 in. (0.96 m)
4 1/2 in. XH (6.25 in., 6.50 in.)– 4 1/2 in. IF (6.75 in., 6.50 in.) 14° 13° 20° 18°
6 5/8 in. REG 10° 15°
Resolution
Accuracy
0-360°
0.250°
1° for incl. >5°
MTF
Magnetic Tool Face
0-360°
Tin
CDS Internal Temperature
0-150°C
Gravity Tool Face
8.0 in.
Range
0-128°
GTF
6 3/4 in.
211/16 in.(68 mm)or 2 13/16 in. 3 1/4 in. (82 mm) 2 13/16 in. (71 mm) 350 to 400 gal/min 400 gal/min 700 gal/min 350 to 400 gal/min N/A 370 in. 370 in. (9.30 m) (9.30 m) 4 1/2 in. XH (6.25 in., 6.50 in.)– 3 1/2 in. IF 4 1/2 in. IF (6.75 in., 6.50 in.)
Inclination
INC
6 1/2 in.
0-360°
0.125°
4.0 in. (102 mm) 1200 gal/min N/A 370 in. (9.30 m) 7H90
41 in. (1.0 m) 7H90 9.5° 14°
0.2°
4°
2° for incl. <5°
1°C
1°C
4°
9.0 in.
2° for incl. >5°
Gamma Ray Probe
External diameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 11/16 in. (43 mm) Length . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37.2 in. (945 mm) Standard operating temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .257°F (125°C) Optional (under development) temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . .302°F (150°C) Collapse pressure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15,000 psi Memory type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Non-volatile Memory capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .200k (data sets) up to 47 days Sampling interval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16 seconds Sensor position . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .700 mm from bottom of probe
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
Weatherford products and services are subject to the Company’s standard terms and conditions, available on request or at www.weatherford.com. For more information contact an authorized Weatherford representative. Unless noted otherwise, trademarks and service marks herein are the property of Weatherford. Specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2965.00
MWD/LWD
EMpulse MWD System TM
EMpulse electromagnetic measurement-while-drilling (EM MWD) system allows operators to drill and survey wells independent of rig hydraulics. Bit pressure drop, flow rates, and drilling fluid and formation loss are irrelevant to EM technology, creating substantial savings in drilling time and project costs. EM MWD saves an average of two to five days per well due to faster survey times and fewer limitations on hydraulics, compared to mud pulse MWD and steering tools. The EMpulse system has no moving parts, deriving power from long-life batteries instead of a mud-driven generator. The tool propagates an electromagnetic wave along the drillstring to surface, where data is detected and decoded by a surface transceiver. This method allows survey information to be transmitted regardless of drilling fluid properties. Electromagnetic surveys do not require extra rig time, unlike mud pulse surveys (which take an average of 3–5 min.) or steering tools (which take an average of 25 min. to complete a transmission cycle). Once a connection is made, drilling resumes immediately.
Antenna
Antenna
MWD
MWD
Battery
Battery
EMpulse system is user friendly to drillers because of the system’s ability to operate independent of the rig’s circulating system. Current generation EM MWD transmits real-time data from downhole to surface:
• • • • • •
Directional surveys Annulus pressure Formation gamma ray Oriented gamma ray (OGR) Formation resistivity Near-bit instrumentation (inclination, gamma ray)
Gamma Ray
Gamma Ray
Applications • The tool is especially applicable for drilling permeable formations since it is unaffected by drilling fluid loss. • EM telemetry also is well suited for underbalanced drilling since it does not require a homogenous fluid column for data transmission. Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2967.00
MWD/LWD
EMpulse MWD System TM
Features, Advantages and Benefits Options • Simple, rapid installation at the wellsite. Surface equipment can be installed in less than one hour without any modifications to rig equipment. • Reduced tool inventory/mobilization. EMpulse system is a sonde-based design configured for use in a full range of non-magnetic drillstring tubulars and hole sizes. • Two-way communication with the MWD tool. The fundamental advantage of EMpulse system is the downlink ability that allows operators to communicate instructions to the downhole instrumentation while drilling proceeds. Uplink and downlink communications are completely independent of rig or drilling activity. • Drillstring optimization. Survey data can be recorded in 15 sec while the drillstring is stationary, which is less than normal connection time. This reduces the possibility of differential sticking or hole sloughing that can result from extended periods without circulation or pipe movement. • Reduced survey/connection times. Due to the system’s independence from drilling hydraulics, there is no lag time or need to cycle the pumps for synchronization purposes when survey data is being transmitted or to re-sync after anomalous drilling hydraulics incidents. This also reduces the risk of a washout when transmitting a survey. • Reduced fishing/lost hole cost. The latest generation of EM-MWD allows, in certain bottomhole assembly (BHA) configurations, the ability to wireline-retrieve the EM MWD electronics. • Improved reliability. EMpulse system is built entirely with solid-state electronics designed to operate in harsh drilling environments, such as air/mist, foam and multiphase underbalanced horizontal drilling applications.
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
• Gamma ray measurement. EMpulse system can be equipped with a real-time gamma ray probe. Data is transmitted in real time and also recorded in downhole memory. • Annulus pressure. EMpulse system also can be equipped with a real-time annular pressure sensor to measure downhole pressure conditions on any rig while drilling, circulating, monitoring lost circulation or during shut-in conditions. • GABIS. This short sub can be mounted directly above the bit to provide real-time inclination and gamma ray near the bit. • Oriented gamma ray. This sensor provides real-time high-side and low-side gamma measurements while rotating, along with real-time total gamma ray. The sondebased EMpulse electromagnetic MWD system is easily tested at the rigsite. Simple installation in the BHA minimizes time required on the rig floor.
Steering tool Mud pulse MWD
Average time savings per type of system used
EM MWD
Average connection time (min) Average survey time (min)
Average drilling time (hr/d)
In low-pressure formations and lost circulation zones, EM MWD saves significant drilling time compared to steering tools and mud pulse MWD systems.
Weatherford products and services are subject to the Company’s standard terms and conditions, available on request or at www.weatherford.com. For more information contact an authorized Weatherford representative. Unless noted otherwise, trademarks and service marks herein are the property of Weatherford. Specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2967.00
MWD/LWD TM
TM
PrecisionLWD System—Azimuthal Density (AZD ) and Thermal Neutron Porosity (TNP ) Sensors TM
The AZD and TNP sensors offer density and neutron porosity logging-while-drilling measurements at penetration rates up to 400 ft/hr with the precision and accuracy of equivalent wireline tools.
Features, Advantages and Benefits
System • Rated up to 30,000 psi (207 MPa) operating pressure. • Wireline accuracy at drilling rates up to 400 ft/hr. • Combinable with the Multi-Frequency Resistivity (MFR™) sensor and the Hostile Environment Logging (HEL™) MWD system. TNP Sensor • Multi-detector design combined with 18-Curie AmBe radioactive source provides exceptional statistical precision equivalent to a wireline measurement at drilling rates up to 400 ft/hr. • Optimized He3 detector spacings result in a high-precision measurement with reduced environmental effects. • Multiple detectors at each spacing provide redundancy for increased log quality and deliverability. AZD Sensor • Optimized design results in measurements less affected by standoff and improved spine and rib corrections. • Digital electronics allow 50-ms sampling for accurate standoff correction of both density and neutron measurements. • Patented rotational correction technique provides accurate measurement for tool standoff while rotating. • Standoff and hole size are calculated while rotating using data acquired with fast sampling and may be displayed on both real-time and recorded logs.
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
He3 detectors TNP 18.6 ft (5.7 m) Source
AZD 10.7 ft (3.3 m)
Source
Near detector Far detector
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2969.00
MWD/LWD
TM
TM
PrecisionLWD —Azimuthal Density (AZD ) and Thermal Neutron Porosity (TNP ) Sensors TM
Specifications AZD/TNP Tool Mechanical Specifications
Nominal Tool OD
Maximum collar OD Length Weight Top connection Bottom connection Stabilizer blade diameter Target hole size Make-up torque Maximum torque Maximum tension Bending strength ratio Dogleg severity, rotating Dogleg severity, sliding Equivalent bending stiffness (OD x ID) Maximum operating temperature Maximum survival temperature Maximum operating pressure Maximum flow rate Maximum sand content
4 3/4 in.
6 3/4 in.
5 1/4 in. 18.6 ft 1225 lb 3 1/2 IF box 3 1/2 IF Pin 5 7/8 in. 6 1/8 in. 9900– 10,900 ft-lb 16,700 ft-lb 528,000 lb 2:10 20°/100 ft 36°/100 ft 4.75 in. x 3.18 in. 302°F (150°C) 329°F (165°C) 30,000 psi (207 MPa) 400 gal/min 2%
7 3/8 in. 22.5 ft 2425 lb 4 1/2 IF box 4 1/2 IF Pin 8 1/4 in. 8 1/2 in. 28,000– 32,000 ft-lbf 44,700 ft-lb 978,000 lb 2:53 11°/100 ft 19°/100 ft 6.75 in. x 4.39 in. 302°F (150°C) 329°F (165°C) 30,000 psi (207 MPa) 1000 gal/min 2%
8 1/4 in.
9 1/2 in. 22.8 ft 5150 lb 5 1/2 IF box 5 1/2 IF Pin 12 in. 12 1/4 in. 53,000– 56,000 ft-lb 80,100 ft-lb 1,450,000 lb 2:47 9°/100 ft 15°/100 ft 8.25 in. x 4.28 in. 302°F (150°C) 329°F (165°C) 25,000 psi (172 MPa) 2000 gal/min 2%
AZD/TNP Sensor Specifications
Measurement
Density
Neutron Porosity Pe
Accuracy
1.7–3.05 g/cm ± .015 g/cm3
3
0–10 p.u. ± 0.5 p.u. 10–40 p.u. ± 5% 1–10 B/e ± 5%
STANDOFF EFFECTS ON LWD DENSITY:
• Patented rotational correction • • • • • •
technique developed to compensate for both neutron and density standoff. Method accounts for simultaneous changes in formation density and standoff while tool is rotating. Data sampled every 50–250 ms. Improved data quality by eliminating samples with excessive standoff. Segments with constant density and constant standoff are determined. Standoff correction is applied to each data segment in real time. Standoff corrected bulk density, azimuthal bulk density and neutron porosity are stored in memory and transmitted real time via positive mud pulse telemetry. Tool rotation causes standoff to vary during a single sample. The patented rotational correction eliminates poor quality data with excessive standoff.
Repeatability
± .0075g/cm3 @ 2.4 g/cm3 ± 0.75 p.u. @ 20 p.u.
± 0.25 @ 3 B/e
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2968.00
MWD/LWD
TM
TM
PrecisionLWD —Azimuthal Density (AZD ) and Thermal Neutron Porosity (TNP ) Sensors TM
Wireline
LWD rb
rb
WL CALI
fN
fN
ROP
GR
LWD and Wireline Comparison—Eocene Shaly-Sands.This well was drilled using a 13.1 lb/gal oil-based mud and a 6 1/8-in. bit. The superior bed resolution of the 2-MHz, 46-in. phase resistivity (LWD_RPD2) compared to the wireline ILD in track two is highlighted by yellow shading. The LWD neutron porosity and bulk density closely correlate with wireline logs in the shale sections, but differ in hydrocarbon zones. LWD nuclear logs are less affected by invasion than wireline logs as shown in the highlighted Eocene shaly-sand gas zone at 6435 ft. The LWD logs were acquired one hour after drilling, and the wireline logs were acquired three days after drilling.
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
Weatherford products and services are subject to the Company’s standard terms and conditions, available on request or at www.weatherford.com. For more information contact an authorized Weatherford representative. Unless noted otherwise, trademarks and service marks herein are the property of Weatherford. Specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2968.00
This page intentionally left blank.
MWD/LWD
HEL MWD System—High-Temperature Azimuthal Gamma Ray (HAGR ) Sensor TM
TM
The HAGR sensor is an integral part of the hostile environment Logging (HEL) MWD system using Geiger Muller tubes to obtain real-time azimuthal gamma ray measurements while drilling. The azimuthal data can be transmitted in quadrant or octant format for geosteering applications. The HAGR sensor provides real-time azimuthal gamma ray measurements while rotating or sliding at temperatures up to 356°F (180°C) [392°F (200°C) survival] and pressures up to 30,000 psi (207 MPa). This extreme operating requirement requires the use of Geiger Muller tubes rather than scintillation detectors. Five banks of two tubes each are implemented in the 4 3/4-in. sensor, while eight banks are implemented in the 6 3/4- and 8-in. sensors. The number, size and symmetric distribution of tubes were chosen to provide the greatest combination of statistical precision and azimuthal sensitivity. All tools are calibrated to API standards using a combination of measurements made at the University of Houston API gamma ray facility, measurements made in secondary standards and computer modeling. Correction algorithms, developed for mud weight, borehole size and potassium concetration, are in agreement with lab measurements. Field data obtained with the HAGR sensor show good correlation with wireline data from the same well.
HEL MWD system
25.2 ft (7.7 m)
HAGR 12.4 ft (3.8 m)
Geiger Muller tubes
Applications • Extreme operating specifications enable accurate, critical formation evaluation data in deepwater drilling environments.
Features, Advantages and Benefits • Geiger Muller tubes measure real-time gamma ray to statistically precise ±5 API at 100 API for 20-s unfiltered samples (±2.5 API with a five-point non-block filter). • Rated to 356°F (180°C) operating and 392°F (200°C) survival temperatures. • Rated to 30,000 psi (207 MPa) operating pressure. • Data transmitted to surface via the HEL MWD system using mud pulse telemetry or EMpulse™ electromagnetic MWD system. Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2970.00
MWD/LWD
TM
HEL MWD System—High-Temperature Azimuthal Gamma Ray (HAGR ) Sensor TM
Specifications HEL MWD System Mechanical Specifications
6 3⁄4 in. 8 in. Nominal Sensor OD 4 3⁄4 in. Maximum OD 5 1⁄4 in. 7 3⁄ 8 in. 8 5⁄ 8 in. Length (HEL system) 25.2 ft 25.3 ft 25.2 ft Weight 1400 lb 2850 lb 4100 lb Top connection 3 1⁄ 2 IF box 4 1⁄ 2 IF box 6 5⁄ 8 Reg box Bottom connection 3 1⁄ 2 IF pin 4 1⁄ 2 IF pin 6 5⁄ 8 Reg pin Make-up 9900– 28,000– 52,000– torque 10,900 ft-lb 32,000 ft-lb 56,000 ft-lb Maximum torque 16,700 ft-lb 44,700 ft-lb 77,300 ft-lb Maximum tension 528,000 lb 978,000 lb 1,480,000 lb Bending strength ratio 2:10 2:53 2:70 Maximum dogleg 20°/100 ft 11°/100 ft 10°/100 ft severity, rotating Maximum dogleg 36°/100 ft 19°/100 ft 16°/100 ft severity, sliding Equivalent bending stiffness (OD x ID) Maximum operating temperature Maximum survival temperature Maximum operating pressure Maximum flow rate
Maximum sand content Measurement range Accuracy Vertical resolution
Statistical repeatability Measure point from bottom of sensor
4.75 in. x 3.22 in.
6.75 in. x 4.20 in.
8.0 in. x 4.18 in.
8 1⁄4 in.
9 1⁄2 in.
8 7⁄ 8 in. 25.6 ft 4000 lb 5 1⁄ 2 IF box 5 1⁄ 2 IF pin 53,000– 56,000 ft-lb 80,100 ft-lb 1,450,000 lb 2:47
9 1⁄ 2 in. 25.8 ft 5500 lb 7 5⁄ 8 Reg box 7 5⁄ 8 Reg pin 75,000– 78,000 ft-lb 112,000 ft-lb 1,870,000 lb 3:10
15°/100 ft
14°/100 ft
9°/100 ft
8.25 in. x 5.17 in.
8°/100 ft
9.5 in. x 5.16 in.
356°F (180°C) 356°F (180°C) 356°F (180°C) 356°F (180°C) 356°F (180°C) 392°F (200°C) 392°F (200°C) 392°F (200°C) 392°F (200°C) 392°F (200°C) 30,000 psi 30,000 psi 30,000 psi 30,000 psi 30,000 psi (207 MPa) (207 MPa) (207 MPa) (207 MPa) (207 MPa) 400 gal/min 2%
1000 gal/min 1000 gal/min 1800 gal/min 1800 gal/min 2%
2%
HAGR Sensor Specifications 0-250 API 0-250 API 0-250 API ± 2 API ± 2 API ± 2 API 18 in. 18 in. 18 in. ± 5 API ± 5 API ± 5 API @ 100 ft/hr @ 100 ft/hr @ 100 ft/hr 12.5 ft
12.3 ft
12.4 ft
2%
2%
0-250 API ± 2 API 18 in. ± 5 API @ 100 ft/hr
0-250 API ± 2 API 18 in. ± 5 API @ 100 ft/hr
12.4 ft
12.4 ft
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2970.00
MWD/LWD
HEL MWD System—High-Temperature Azimuthal Gamma Ray (HAGR ) Sensor
TM
TM
Log Example
Log Example
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
Weatherford products and services are subject to the Company’s standard terms and conditions, available on request or at www.weatherford.com. For more information contact an authorized Weatherford representative. Unless noted otherwise, trademarks and service marks herein are the property of Weatherford. Specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2970.00
This page intentionally left blank.
MWD/LWD
HEL MWD System—Bore/Annular Pressure (BAP ) Sensor TM
TM
The BAP sensor is an integral part of the hostile-environment logging (HEL) MWD system using highly accurate quartz transducers to monitor downhole well conditions for early indication of drilling problems. The BAP sensor measures bore and annular pressure and downhole temperature while drilling, wiping or tripping out of hole. BAP sensor information may be presented in pressure units or equivalent circulating density to optimize hole cleaning, control surge and swab, and minimize lost circulation. This information may be plotted vs. depth or time for flexibility in analyzing drilling and non-drilling events. The BAP sensor may also be run in underbalanced applications or in holes with no mud returns using the EMpulse™ electromagnetic MWD system.
HEL MWD system 25.2 ft (7.7 m)
Applications • Provides critical information in deepwater wells where a narrow window exists between pore pressure and formation fracture pressure.
Features, Advantages and Benefits • Accurate quartz gauges measure pressure ± 7.5 psi at • • • • •
BAP 10.6 ft (3.2 m)
Bore pressure port Annular pressure port
Quartz tranducers
1 psi resolution. Rated to 356°F (180°C) operating and 392°F (200°C) survival temperatures. Rated to 30,000 psi (207 MPa) operating pressure. Data transmitted to surface with either the HEL MWD system using mud pulse telemetry or the EMpulse electromagnetic MWD system. Monitors hole cleaning and cuttings transport. Can improve drilling efficiency by providing accurate leak-off and formation integrity test information.
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2971.00
MWD/LWD
TM
TM
HEL MWD System—Bore/Annular Pressure (BAP ) Sensor Specifications HEL MWD System Mechanical Specifications
Nominal Sensor OD Maximum OD Length (HEL system) Weight Top connection Bottom connection Make-up torque Maximum torque Maximum tension Bending strength ratio Maximum dogleg severity, rotating Maximum dogleg severity, sliding Equivalent bending stiffness (OD x ID) Maximum operating temperature Maximum survival temperature Maximum operating pressure Maximum flow rate Maximum sand content Transducer type Resolution Accuracy Repeatability Measurement range Measure point from bottom of sensor
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
4 3⁄4 in.
6 3⁄4 in.
8 in.
20°/100 ft
11°/100 ft
36°/100 ft 4.75 in. x 3.22 in.
19°/100 ft 6.75 in. x 4.20 in.
5 1⁄4 in. 7 3⁄8 in. 8 5⁄8 in. 25.2 ft 25.3 ft 25.2 ft 1400 lb 2850 lb 4100 lb 3 1⁄ 2 IF box 4 1⁄ 2 IF box 6 5 ⁄ 8 Reg box 3 1⁄ 2 IF pin 4 1⁄ 2 IF pin 6 5 ⁄ 8 Reg pin 9900– 28,000– 52,000– 10,900 ft-lb 32,000 ft-lb 56,000 ft-lb 16,700 ft-lb 44,700 ft-lb 77,300 ft-lb 528,000 lb 978,000 lb 1,480,000 lb 2:10 2:53 2:70
8 1⁄4 in.
9 1⁄2 in.
8 7⁄8 in. 25.6 ft 4000 lb 5 1⁄ 2 IF box 5 1⁄ 2 IF pin 53,000– 56,000 ft-lb 80,100 ft-lb 1,450,000 lb 2:47
9 1⁄2 in. 25.8 ft 5500 lb 7 5 ⁄ 8 Reg box 7 5 ⁄ 8 Reg pin 75,000– 78,000 ft-lb 112,000 ft-lb 1,870,000 lb 3:10
10°/100 ft
9°/100 ft
8°/100 ft
16°/100 ft 8.0 in. x 4.18 in.
15°/100 ft 8.25 in. x 5.17 in.
14°/100 ft 9.5 in. x 5.16 in.
356°F (180°C) 356°F (180°C) 356°F (180°C) 356°F (180°C) 356°F (180°C) 392°F (200°C) 392°F (200°C) 392°F (200°C) 392°F (200°C) 392°F (200°C) 30,000 psi 30,000 psi 30,000 psi 30,000 psi 30,000 psi (207 MPa) (207 MPa) (207 MPa) (207 MPa) (207 MPa) 400 gal/min 1000 gal/min 1000 gal/min 1800 gal/min 1800 gal/min 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% BAP Sensor Specifications Quartz crystal Quartz crystal Quartz crystal Quartz crystal Quartz crystal 1 psi 1 psi 1 psi 1 psi 1 psi ± 7.5 psi ± 7.5 psi ± 7.5 psi ± 7.5 psi ± 7.5 psi ± 3 psi ± 3 psi ± 3 psi ± 3 psi ± 3 psi 0–30,000 psi 0–30,000 psi 0–30,000 psi 0–30,000 psi 0–30,000 psi 10.6 ft
10.6 ft
10.6 ft
10.6 ft
10.6 ft
Weatherford products and services are subject to the Company’s standard terms and conditions, available on request or at www.weatherford.com. For more information contact an authorized Weatherford representative. Unless noted otherwise, trademarks and service marks herein are the property of Weatherford. Specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2971.00
MWD/LWD
HEL MWD System—Environmental Severity Measurement (ESM ) Sensor TM
TM
The ESM sensor is an integral part of the hostileenvironment logging (HEL) system using a single lateral accelerometer to monitor bottomhole assembly shock and vibration while drilling. An ESM sensor is installed in every HEL system to improve tool reliability. Real-time vibration data is triggered after exceeding pre-set thresholds. Information provided by the ESM sensor alerts the driller that changes in drilling conditions are needed to reduce or eliminate harmful downhole vibration. Also vibration data from the sensor is used to adjust maintenance schedules based on cumulative shock and vibration exposure.
Features, Advantages and Benefits • Provides real-time data that alerts drillers when excessive shock or vibration is occurring. • ESM information allows rig personnel to vary weight-on-bit and/or rotary speed real time to reduce shock and vibration without sacrificing penetration rate.
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
ESM sensor 19.2 ft (5.8 m)
25.2 ft (7.7 m)
HEL MWD system
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2972.00
MWD/LWD
TM
HEL MWD System—Environmental Severity Measurement (ESM ) Sensor TM
Specifications HEL MWD System Mechanical Specifications
Nominal Sensor OD
4 3⁄4 in.
6 3⁄4 in.
Length (HEL system)
25.2 ft
25.3 ft
Maximum OD Weight
Top connection
Bottom connection Make-up torque
Maximum torque
Maximum tension
Bending strength ratio Maximum dogleg severity, rotating
Maximum dogleg severity, sliding
Equivalent bending stiffness (OD x ID)
Maximum operating temperature Maximum survival temperature
Maximum operating pressure Maximum flow rate
Maximum sand content Sensor type
Measurement
5 1⁄4 in.
8 in.
8 1⁄4 in.
9 1⁄2 in.
25.2 ft
25.6 ft
25.8 ft
7 3⁄8 in.
8 5 ⁄8 in.
1400 lb
2850 lb
4100 lb
3 1⁄ 2 IF pin
4 1⁄ 2 IF pin
6 5 ⁄8 Reg pin
16,700 ft-lb
44,700 ft-lb
77,300 ft-lb
8 7⁄8 in. 4000 lb
9 1⁄ 2 in. 5500 lb
3 1⁄ 2 IF box 4 1⁄ 2 IF box 6 5 ⁄8 Reg box 5 1⁄ 2 IF box 7 5 ⁄8 Reg box 9900– 10,900 ft-lb 528,000 lb
28,000– 32,000 ft-lb
52,000– 56,000 ft-lb
5 1⁄ 2 IF pin 7 5 ⁄8 Reg pin 53,000– 56,000 ft-lb
75,000– 78,000 ft-lb
80,100 ft-lb
112,000 ft-lb
2:47
3:10
978,000 lb
1,480,000 lb
20°/100 ft
11°/100 ft
10°/100 ft
9°/100 ft
8°/100 ft
36°/100 ft
19°/100 ft
16°/100 ft
15°/100 ft
14°/100 ft
2:10
4.75 in. x 3.22 in.
2:53
6.75 in. x 4.20 in.
2:70
8.0 in. x 4.18 in.
1,450,000 lb 1,870,000 lb
8.25 in. x 5.17 in.
9.5 in. x 5.16 in.
356°F (180°C) 356°F (180°C) 356°F (180°C) 356°F (180°C) 356°F (180°C) 392°F (200°C) 392°F (200°C) 392°F (200°C) 392°F (200°C) 392°F (200°C) 30,000 psi (207 MPa)
400 gal/min 2%
30,000 psi (207 MPa)
30,000 psi (207 MPa)
30,000 psi (207 MPa)
30,000 psi (207 MPa)
2%
2%
2%
2%
1000 gal/min 1000 gal/min 1800 gal/min 1800 gal/min
ESM Sensor Type–All Sizes
Single-axis accelerometer
Lateral shock and vibration
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2972.00
MWD/LWD
HEL MWD System—Environmental Severity Measurement (ESM ) Sensor
TM
TM
Log Example
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
Weatherford products and services are subject to the Company’s standard terms and conditions, available on request or at www.weatherford.com. For more information contact an authorized Weatherford representative. Unless noted otherwise, trademarks and service marks herein are the property of Weatherford. Specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2972.00
This page intentionally left blank.
MWD/LWD
PrecisionLWD System—Multi-Frequency Resistivity (MFR ) Sensor TM
TM
The MFR sensor is designed to operate at borehole pressures up to 30,000 psi (207 MPa) and flow rates from 400 to 1800 gal/min, depending on tool size. The MFR sensor operates in all mud types at 2 MHz and 400 kHz with transmitter-receiver spacings of 20, 30 and 46 in.
Applications
46 in.
• May be run in any mud system. • Deeper reading 400 kHz measurements
30 in.
are unaffected by eccentering and hole rugosity, providing stable easurements in highly conductive formations drilled with oil-based mud.
• Deep-reading resistivity measurements and log inversion capabilities enhance geosteering applications and horizontal log interpretation.
Transmitters
20 in. Measure point
4 in. 4 in. 20 in. 30 in.
Receivers
Transmitters
46 in.
A compensated antenna design minimizes borehole effects, increases accuracy and provides a symmetrical log response.
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2968.00
MWD/LWD
PrecisionLWD System—Multi-Frequency Resistivity (MFR ) Sensor TM
TM
Features, Advantages and Benefits • Fully-compensated antenna arrays integrated into the drill collar for increased reliability. • Rated to 30,000 psi (207 MPa) operating pressure. • Designed for high flow—4 3/4 in. (400 gal/min), 6 3/4 in., and 8 in. (1000 gal/min), 8 1/4 in. and 91/2 in. (1800 gal/min). • Fully-digital electronics measure phase and attenuation at each transmitter-receiver pair, resulting in highly accurate measurements. • Three transmitter-receiver spacings measure 12 fully compensated phase and attenuation measurements at unique radial distances from the borehole. • Diameter of investigation of 197 in. at 20 ohm-m is the industry’s deepest reading LWD resistivity measurement. • Three independent transmitter-receiver antenna spacings and two operating frequencies provide accurate measurements over a wide range of drilling conditions. • Each compensated measurement has a unique depth of investigation. Any three can be combined to radially invert invasion diameter, flushed resistivity zone (Rxo) and true resistivity (Rt) over a wide range of borehole conditions and resistivity contrasts. • Symmetrical antenna design minimizes borehole effects and cancels impedance changes in antennas caused by pressure and temperature variations while drilling.
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2968.00
MWD/LWD
PrecisionLWD System—Multi-Frequency Resistivity (MFR ) Sensor TM
TM
Specifications Nominal Sensor OD
4 3⁄4 in.
Maximum OD
5 1 ⁄4 in.
Weight
1225 lb
Length (HEL system)
20.8 ft
Mechanical Specifications 6 3⁄4 in.
8 in.
8 1⁄4 in.
20.8 ft
20.8 ft
7 3 ⁄ 8 in.
8 5 ⁄ 8 in.
2425 lb
3500 lb
20.8 ft
9 1⁄2 in.
8 7⁄ 8 in.
10 1⁄ 8 in.
4500 lb
6200 lb
20.8 ft
Top connection
3 1⁄2 IF box
4 1⁄2 IF box
6 5 ⁄ 8 Reg box
5 1⁄2 IF box
7 5 ⁄ 8 Reg box
Make-up torque
9,900– 10,900 ft-lb
28,000– 32,000 ft-lb
52,000– 56,000 ft-lb
53,000– 56,000 ft-lb
75,000– 78,000 ft-lb
Bottom connection
3 1⁄2 IF pin
Maximum torque
16,700 ft-lb
Bending strength ratio
2:10
Maximum tension
4 1⁄2 IF pin
48,200 ft-lb
6 5 ⁄ 8 Reg pin
77,250 ft-lb
5 1⁄2 IF pin
7 5 ⁄ 8 Reg pin
80,100 ft-lb
112,000 ft-lb
2:47
3:10
750,000 lb
1,800,000 lb
2,850,000 lb
1,450,000 lb
20°/100 ft
11°/100 ft
10°/100 ft
9°/100 ft
8°/100 ft
Maximum dogleg severity, sliding
36°/100 ft
19°/100 ft
16°/100 ft
15°/100 ft
14°/100 ft
Maximum operating temperature
302°F (150°C)
302°F (150°C)
302°F (150°C)
302°F (150°C)
302°F (150°C)
Maximum survival temperature
329°F (165°C)
329°F (165°C)
329°F (165°C)
329°F (165°C)
329°F (165°C)
Maximum flow rate
400 gal/min
1000 gal/min
1000 gal/min
1800 gal/min
1800 gal/min
Maximum dogleg severity, rotating
Equivalent bending stiffness (OD x ID)
Maximum operating pressure Maximum sand content
4.75 in. x 2.29 in.
30,000 psi (207 MPa) 2%
2:53
6.75 in. x 3.06 in.
30,000 psi (207 MPa) 2%
2:70
8.0 in. x 4.20 in.
30,000 psi (207 MPa) 2%
8.25 in. x 5.28 in.
30,000 psi (207 MPa) 2%
1,870,000 lb
30,000 psi (207 MPa) 2%
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2968.00
MWD/LWD
PrecisionLWD System—Multi-Frequency Resistivity (MFR ) Sensor TM
TM
Diameter of Investigation
Frequency Spacing
Resistivity, ohm-m 0.2 2 20 200 2000 Frequency Spacing
2 MHz 20 in.
Phase Measurement 2 MHz 2 MHz 30 in. 46 in.
400 kHz. 20 in.
400 kHz 30 in.
400 kHz 46 in.
19.1 28.2 43.1 56.4 64.3
23.1 36.0 55.5 77.5 91.3
26.0 39.4 53.0 61.8 65.1
31.7 49.7 71.4 87.8 95.1
in. in. in. in. in.
39.4 in. 62.9 in. 95.8 in. 126.1 in. 141.9 in.
400 kHz 20 in.
400 kHz 30 in.
400 kHz 46 in.
41.0 in. 72.8 in. 153.2 in. 390.0 in. 1142.0 in.
49.7 in. 85.8 in. 170.8 in. 412.8 in. 1167.0 in.
61.1 in. 104.4 in. 196.6 in. 445.4 in. 1132.0 in.
in. in. in. in. in.
28.2 in. 46.7 in. 88.5 in. 200.3 in. 563.4 in.
34.7 in. 57.7 in. 102.9 in. 219.2 in. 584.3 in.
Performance Specifications
NominalSensorOD(in.)
Measure point from bottom of sensor
4 3/4 , 6 3/4 , 8 , 8 1/4 , 9 1/2
10.4 ft
Phase
Attenuation
±.25 mmhos
±.5 mmhos
Measurement range 0.1–3000 ohm-m 0.1–200 ohm-m
Accuracy (all spacings)
28.2 in. 44.9 in. 71.3 in. 106.2 in. 133.2 in.
Attenuation Measurement 2 MHz 2 MHz 30 in. 46 in.
2 MHz 20 in.
Resistivity, ohm-m 0.2 2 20 200 2000
in. in. in. in. in.
42.3 in. 71.2 in. 123.5 in. 247.1 in. 616.7 in.
in. in. in. in. in.
Vertical Resolution—50% Response
100-ohm-m bed 2-MHz phase
2-MHz attenuation 400-kHz phase
400-kHz attenuation 1-ohm-m bed 2-MHz phase
20-in. spacing 22 in.
56 in.
25 in.
87 in.
20-in. spacing 6 in.
30-in. spacing 46-in. spacing 28 in.
36 in.
35 in.
48 in.
66 in.
79 in.
96 in.
111 in.
6 in.
6 in.
30-in. spacing 46-in. spacing
2-MHz attenuation
16 in.
17 in.
17 in.
400-kHz attenuation
25 in.
29 in.
33 in.
400-kHz phase
12 in.
12 in.
12 in.
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2968.00
MWD/LWD
PrecisionLWD System—Multi-Frequency Resistivity (MFR ) Sensor TM
TM
Limestone—horizontal well with salt-saturated mud
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
Weatherford products and services are subject to the Company’s standard terms and conditions, available on request or at www.weatherford.com. For more information contact an authorized Weatherford representative. Unless noted otherwise, trademarks and service marks herein are the property of Weatherford. Specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2968.00
This page intentionally left blank.
MWD/LWD
PrecisionLWD System—Multi-Frequency Resistivity (MFR ) High-Temperature Sensor TM
TM
The MFR HT sensor is designed to operate at borehole pressures up to 30,000 psi (207 MPa) and flow rates from 400 to 2000 gal/min, depending on tool size. The MFR HT sensor operates in all mud types at 2 MHz and 400 kHz with transmitter-receiver spacings of 20, 30 and 46 in.
Applications
46 in.
• May be run in any mud system. • Deeper reading 400 kHz measurements are unaffected by eccentering and hole rugosity, providing stable measurements in highly conductive formations drilled with oil-based mud. • Deep-reading resistivity measurements and log inversion capabilities enhance geosteering applications and horizontal log interpretation.
30 in.
Transmitters
20 in. Measure point
4 in. 4 in. 20 in. 30 in.
Receivers
Transmitters
46 in.
A compensated antenna design minimizes borehole effects, increases accuracy and provides a symmetrical log response.
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2974.00
MWD/LWD
PrecisionLWD System—Multi-Frequency Resistivity (MFR ) High-Temperature Sensor TM
TM
Features, Advantages and Benefits • Fully-compensated antenna arrays integrated into the drill collar for increased reliability. • Rated to 30,000 psi (207 MPa) operating pressure. • Designed for high flow—4 3/4 in. (400 gal/min) to 9 1/2 in. (2000 gal/min). • Fully digital electronics measure phase and attenuation at each transmitter-receiver pair, resulting in highly accurate measurements. • Three transmitter-receiver spacings measure 12 fully compensated phase and attenuation measurements at unique radial distances from the borehole. • Diameter of investigation of 197 in. at 20 ohm-m is the industry’s deepest reading LWD resistivity measurement. • Three independent transmitter-receiver antenna spacings and two operating frequencies provide accurate measurements over a wide range of drilling conditions. • Each compensated measurement has a unique depth of investigation. Any three can be combined to radially invert invasion diameter, flushed resistivity zone (Rxo) and true resistivity (Rt) over a wide range of borehole conditions and resistivity contrasts. • Symmetrical antenna design minimizes borehole effects and cancels impedance changes in antennas caused by pressure and temperature variations while drilling.
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2974.00
MWD/LWD
PrecisionLWD System—Multi-Frequency Resistivity (MFR ) High-Temperature Sensor TM
TM
Specifications Nominal Sensor OD
4 3⁄4 in.
Maximum OD
5 1 ⁄4 in.
Weight
1225 lb
Length (HEL system)
20.8 ft
Mechanical Specifications 6 3⁄4 in.
8 in.
8 1⁄4 in.
20.8 ft
20.8 ft
7 3 ⁄ 8 in.
8 5 ⁄ 8 in.
2425 lb
3500 lb
20.8 ft
9 1⁄2 in.
8 7⁄ 8 in.
10 1⁄ 8 in.
4500 lb
6200 lb
20.8 ft
Top connection
3 1⁄2 IF box
4 1⁄2 IF box
6 5 ⁄ 8 Reg box
5 1⁄2 IF box
7 5 ⁄ 8 Reg box
Make-up torque
9,900– 10,900 ft-lb
28,000– 32,000 ft-lb
52,000– 56,000 ft-lb
53,000– 56,000 ft-lb
75,000– 78,000 ft-lb
Bottom connection
3 1⁄2 IF pin
Maximum torque
16,700 ft-lb
Bending strength ratio
2:10
Maximum tension
4 1⁄2 IF pin
48,200 ft-lb
6 5 ⁄ 8 Reg pin
77,250 ft-lb
5 1⁄2 IF pin
7 5 ⁄ 8 Reg pin
80,100 ft-lb
112,000 ft-lb
2:47
3:10
750,000 lb
1,800,000 lb
2,850,000 lb
1,450,000 lb
20°/100 ft
11°/100 ft
10°/100 ft
9°/100 ft
8°/100 ft
Maximum dogleg severity, sliding
36°/100 ft
19°/100 ft
16°/100 ft
15°/100 ft
14°/100 ft
Maximum operating temperature
356°F (180°C)
356°F (180°C)
356°F (180°C)
356°F (180°C)
356°F (180°C)
Maximum survival temperature
356°F (180°C)
356°F (180°C)
356°F (180°C)
356°F (180°C)
356°F (180°C)
Maximum flow rate
400 gal/min
1000 gal/min
1000 gal/min
1800 gal/min
1800 gal/min
Maximum dogleg severity, rotating
Equivalent bending stiffness (OD x ID)
Maximum operating pressure Maximum sand content
4.75 in. x 2.29 in.
30,000 psi (207 MPa) 2%
2:53
6.75 in. x 3.06 in.
30,000 psi (207 MPa) 2%
2:70
8.0 in. x 4.20 in.
30,000 psi (207 MPa) 2%
8.25 in. x 5.28 in.
25,000 psi (172 MPa) 2%
1,870,000 lb
25,000 psi (172 MPa) 2%
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2974.00
MWD/LWD
PrecisionLWD System—Multi-Frequency Resistivity (MFR ) High-Temperature Sensor TM
TM
Diameter of Investigation
Frequency Spacing
Resistivity, ohm-m 0.2 2 20 200 2000 Frequency Spacing
2 MHz 20 in.
Phase Measurement 2 MHz 2 MHz 30 in. 46 in.
400 kHz. 20 in.
400 kHz 30 in.
400 kHz 46 in.
19.1 28.2 43.1 56.4 64.3
23.1 36.0 55.5 77.5 91.3
26.0 39.4 53.0 61.8 65.1
31.7 49.7 71.4 87.8 95.1
in. in. in. in. in.
39.4 in. 62.9 in. 95.8 in. 126.1 in. 141.9 in.
400 kHz 20 in.
400 kHz 30 in.
400 kHz 46 in.
41.0 in. 72.8 in. 153.2 in. 390.0 in. 1142.0 in.
49.7 in. 85.8 in. 170.8 in. 412.8 in. 1167.0 in.
61.1 in. 104.4 in. 196.6 in. 445.4 in. 1132.0 in.
in. in. in. in. in.
28.2 in. 46.7 in. 88.5 in. 200.3 in. 563.4 in.
34.7 in. 57.7 in. 102.9 in. 219.2 in. 584.3 in.
Performance Specifications
NominalSensorOD(in.)
Measure point from bottom of sensor
4 3/4 , 6 3/4 , 8 , 8 1/4 , 9 1/2
10.4 ft
Phase
Attenuation
±.25 mmhos
±.5 mmhos
Measurement range 0.1–3000 ohm-m 0.1–200 ohm-m
Accuracy (all spacings)
28.2 in. 44.9 in. 71.3 in. 106.2 in. 133.2 in.
Attenuation Measurement 2 MHz 2 MHz 30 in. 46 in.
2 MHz 20 in.
Resistivity, ohm-m 0.2 2 20 200 2000
in. in. in. in. in.
42.3 in. 71.2 in. 123.5 in. 247.1 in. 616.7 in.
in. in. in. in. in.
Vertical Resolution—50% Response
100-ohm-m bed 2-MHz phase
20-in. spacing 22 in.
30-in. spacing 46-in. spacing 28 in.
36 in.
2-MHz attenuation
56 in.
66 in.
79 in.
400-kHz attenuation
87 in.
96 in.
111 in.
6 in.
6 in.
400-kHz phase 1-ohm-m bed
2-MHz phase
2-MHz attenuation 400-kHz phase
400-kHz attenuation
25 in.
20-in. spacing 6 in.
16 in.
12 in.
25 in.
35 in.
48 in.
30-in. spacing 46-in. spacing 17 in.
12 in.
29 in.
17 in.
12 in.
33 in.
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
© 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2974.00
MWD/LWD
PrecisionLWD System—Multi-Frequency Resistivity (MFR ) High-Temperature Sensor TM
TM
Limestone—horizontal well with salt-saturated mud
Weatherford International Ltd. 515 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77027 USA Tel: 713-693-4000 www.weatherford.com
Weatherford products and services are subject to the Company’s standard terms and conditions, available on request or at www.weatherford.com. For more information contact an authorized Weatherford representative. Unless noted otherwise, trademarks and service marks herein are the property of Weatherford. Specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2006 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
2974.00
This page intentionally left blank.