A N N O TA TIO N THE HEJUDI CI ALAFFI DAVI TRUL ULEI N RELATI ON TO AFFI DAVI TSTAKE KEN EXPARTE b y MAUR URI CI O C.ULEP* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ §1.Rati onal ef ort herul e,p.578 §2.Scopeandappl i cat i onoft heRu Rul e,p.579 §3.Judi ci alAffidavi t s are us ed i nl i eu ofdi r ectt es t i mony.Ti me t o submi t ,p.579 §4.Cont ent sofaJudi ci alAffidavi t ,p.580 §5.Taskandl i abi l i t yoft hel awy wyer ,p.581 §6.An affia ffiant wi l l be cr os s exami mi ned on t he bas i s of hi s Judi ci al Affidavi t ,p.581 §7.Oralofferofandobj ect i onst oexhi bi t s, p.582 §8.Therul ei sappl i cabl et ocri mi nalact i ons, p.582 §9.Effect sofnoncomp mpl i ancewi wi t ht heJudi ci alAffidavi tRul e,p.582 §10.Publ i cPr os ecut orswer egi ven an ext ended per i od ofoneyeart o comp mpl ywi wi t ht heJudi ci alAffidavi tRul e,p.583 §11.TheJudi ci alAffidavi tRul ei sappl i cabl et oal lcourt s, p.583 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ * For merAs s oc i at e Dean,UE Col l eg e ofLaw;Pr of es s orofLaw;Aut hor ofLaw Boo ks;f or mer Pr e s i d e nt ,I BPMa ni l aCha pt e rI I I . 577
VOL. 747, JANUARY 21, 2015
577
THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS AFFIDAVITS TAKEN TAKEN EX PA PARTE
§12.Benefitandadvant ageoft heJudi ci alAffidavi tRul e,p.584 §13. Affidavi tdefined,p.584 §14.Nat ur eofanAffidavi t ,p.584
§15.Thefil i ngofAffidavi tofcompl ai nantand wi t nes s esi smandat ory undert heRul esonSummaryPr oce dur e, p.586 §16.AnAffidavi ti sani nfirm s peci eofevi dence,p.586 §17.I fan affidavi ti si ncons i s t entwi t h at es t i mony,t he l at t er s hal l pr e vai l .Re as o ns ,p.5 86 §18.I ncons i s t enci esbet ween t he affidavi tand a t es t i mony does not ne ce s s ar i l ydi s c r e di tawi t ne s si fi tr e l at e st omi normat t e r s ,p.5 87 §19. Affidavi t s ar e s ubor di nat ed i n i mpor t anc e t o open cour t decl ar at i ons .
Gener al
rul e
and
except i ons ,
p.5 88 §20.An affidavi tmaybes cant yi n det ai l sbuti tmayadmi t t ed i fi twi l l bet es t i fiedonbyt heaffiant ,p.590 §21 .Affidavi t si n ques t i on and ans werf orm prepared bypol i ceoffice r s areusual l ynotcompl et e,p.590 §22.Affidavi t sar enotcons i der ed t hebes tevi dencei ft heaffiant sar e avai l abl e,p.591 §23.I ft heaffianti snotpres ent ed,t heaffidavi ti scl ass i fiedashearsay. Reasons, p.591 §24.Therul et hatanAffidavi ti scons i deredhears ayi snotappl i cabl ei n l aborcases. Reason,p.592 §25.Effecti fan acc us ed i sconvi ct ed bas ed onl y on an Affidavi tofa wi t ne s s ,p.5 92 §26.Mer eaffidavi t sar enots uffici entt ograntbai l ,p.592 §27.Affidavi tofdi s i nt eres t ed pers onsi n ordert oprovebi rt hi snotan adequat eproof ,p.593 578
578
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS TAKEN EX PARTE
§28.An ext raj udi ci als t at ementoraffidavi ti si nfirm and unre l i abl e,p. 593 §29.Affidavi t sc annotbe r el i ed upon t o annula wi nni ng candi dat e’ s procl amat i oni nel ect i oncases, p.593 §30.AnAffidavi ti snotamodeofacqui r i ngowner s hi pofal and,p.594
§31. Mer eAffidavi ti snots uffici entf ort hei s s uanceofase arc hwarr ant , p.5 94 §32.An affidavi tofacoaccus ed whowass ubsequent l yacqui t t ed may beabas i sf orne wt r i al ,p.5 94 §33.Anaffidavi ti snotsuffici entt oprovefil i at i on,p.595 §34.An affidavi tofpardon i snotcr edi bl ei fi ti snotunders t oodbyt he compl ai nant ,p.595 §35.Omi s s i on ofc er t ai n part i cul arsi n an affidavi twi l lnotes t op an affiantf r om maki nganel aborat i on,p.595 §36.Proceduralaspect ,p.595 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ §1.Rat i onal ef ort herul e The r ea r ef o urma i nr e a s o nsf o rt hee na c t me nto ft heJ ud i c i a lAffida v i tRul e .Thi s i sf o undi ni t swhe r e asc l aus e s ,t owi t : 1 .Ca s ec o ng e s t i o na nd d e l a y spl a g uemo s tc o ur t si nc i t i e sa nd t hes l o wa nd c umb e r s o mea dv e r s a r i a ls y s t e m; 2 .Fo r t ype r c e nt( 4 0%)o fc r i mi na lc a s e sa r ed i s mi s s e dannua l l yo wi ngt ot hef a c t t ha tc o mpl a i na nt ss i mpl ygi v eupc o mi ngt oc o ur ta f t e rr e p e at e dpo s t po ne me nt s ; 579
VOL. 747, JANUARY 21, 2015
579
THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS TAKEN EX PARTE
3 .Fe wf o r e i g nb us i ne s s me n ma k el o n g t e r m i n v e s t me n t si nt he Phi l i p pi ne s b e c a us ei t sc o ur t sa r euna bl et op r o v i d ea mp l ea nd s p e e d yp r o t e c t i o nt ot he i r i nv e s t me nt s ,ke e pi ngi t sp eo pl epo o r ; and 4 .Tor e d uc et het i mene e de df o rc o mpl e t i ngt h et e s t i mo ni e so fwi t ne s s e si nc a s e s unde rl i t i g at i o n A .( . M.No .1288SCdat e dSe pt e mbe r4,2012) §2.Scopeandappl i cat i onoft heRul e The r u l es h al la ppl yt oa l la c t i o ns ,p r o c e e d i ng sa nd i nc i de ntr e q ui r i ng t he r e c e pt i o no fe v i de nc ebe f o r e :
1 .The Me t r o p o l i t a n Tr i a lCo ur t s ,t he Muni c i p alTr i a lCo ur t si n Ci t i e s ,t he Muni c i pa lTr i a lCo ur t s ,t heMuni c i palCi r c ui tTr i a lCo ur t sa ndt heSha r i ’ aCi r c ui t Co ur t sb uts h al lno ta ppl yt os ma l lc l a i msc a s e sunde rA. M.0 88 7 SC; 2 .TheRe g i o na lTr i a lCo ur t sa ndt heSha r i ’ aDi s t r i c tCo ur t s ; 3 .TheSa nd i g a nb a y an,t heCo ur to fTa xAp pe a l s ,t heCo ur to fAp pe a l s ,a ndt he Shar i ’ aAppe l l a t eCo ur t s ; 4 .Thei n v e s t i g a t i ng o ffic e r sand b o d i e sa ut ho r i z e db yt he Sup r e meCo u r tt o r e c e i v ee v i de nc e , i nc l udi ngt heI nt e gr a t e dBaro ft hePhi l i ppi ne s( I BP) ;and 5 .Thes p e c i a lc o ur t sa nd q ua s i j udi c i a lb o di e s ,who s er u l e so fp r o c e d ur ea r e s u bj e c tt o di s a ppr o v a lo ft he Supr e me Co ur t ,i ns o f a ra st he i re x i s t i ng r u l e so f Se c .1 ,A. M.No .1288SC) pr o c e dur ec o nt r a v e net hepr o v i s i o nso ft her ul e .( §3.Judi ci alAffidavi t s are us ed i nl i eu ofdi r ectt es t i mony.Ti me t o s ubmi t A j udi c i alaffida v i t mus t be s ubmi t t e d fiv e( 5)da y s be f o r et he pr e t r i alo r pr e l i mi nar yc o nf e r e nc eo rt hes c he dul e dhe a r i nge i t he rt hr o u ghpe r s o na ls e r v i c eo r b yl i c e ns e dc o ur i e r . 580
580
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS TAKEN EX PARTE
I ti s us e di nl i e uo fa d i r e c tt e s t i mo n ya nd t he p ar t i e ss h o ul ds u bmi tt he f o l l o wi ng : ( 1 )Thej udi c i a la ffida v i t soft he i rwi t ne s s e s ,whi c hs ha l lt aket hepl a c eo fs uc h wi t ne s s e s ’ di r e c tt e s t i mo ni e s ;and ( 2)Thepar t i e s ’ do c ume nt ar yo ro bj e c te v i de nc e , i fany ,whi c hs hal lbeat t ac he dt o t hej udi c i alaffida vi t s .( Se c .2 ,A. M.No .1 288 SC) §4.Cont ent sofaJudi ci alAffidavi t Aj udi c i alaffida v i ts hal lbepr e par e di nt hel anguag ekno wnt ot hewi t ne s sand,i f no ti nEng l i s ho rFi l i pi no ,ac c o mpani e db yat r a ns l at i o ni nEng l i s ho rFi l i pi no ,and s hal lc o nt ai nt hef o l l o wi ng: ( a )Thena me ,a ge ,r e s i de nc eo rb us i ne s sa ddr e s s , a ndo c c upa t i o no ft hewi t ne s s ; ( b)The name and addr es so ft he l awye r who c onduc t so rs uper vi s e st he e x a mi na t i o no ft hewi t ne s sa ndt hepl a c ewhe r et hee x a mi na t i o ni sb e i nghe l d;
( c )A s t a t e me ntt ha tt hewi t ne s si sa ns we r i ngt heque s t i o nsa s ke do fhi m,f ul l y c o ns c i o ust ha thedo e ss ounde ro a t h,a ndt ha thema yf a c ec r i mi na ll i a bi l i t yf o r f al s et e s t i mo nyo rpe r j ur y ; ( d)Que s t i o na s k e do ft hewi t ne s sa ndi sc o r r e s p o ndi nga ns we r s ,c o ns e c ut i v e l y number edt hat : ( 1 )S ho wt hec i r c ums t a nc e sund e rwhi c ht hewi t ne s sa c q ui r e dt hef a c t sup o n whi c hhet e s t i fie s ; ( 2 )El i c i tf r o m hi mt ho s ef a c t swhi c ha r er e l e v a ntt ot hei s s ue st ha tt hec a s e pr e s e nt s ; and ( 3 )I de nt i f yt hea t t a c he ddo c ume nt a r ya nd o b j e c te v i d e nc ea nd e s t a bl i s ht he i r a ut he nt i c i t yi nac c o r da nc ewi t ht heRul e so fCo ur t ; 581
VOL. 747, JANUARY 21, 2015
581
THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS TAKEN EX PARTE
( e )Thes i g na t ur eo ft hewi t ne s so v e rh i sp r i nt e dna me ;a nd ( f )A j ur at wi t ht hes i g na t ur eo ft heno t ar ypub l i cwhoadmi ni s t e r st heo at ho fa n o ffic e rwhoi sa ut ho r i z e db yl a wt oa dmi ni s t e rt hes a me . (Se c .3 ,A. M.No .1 28 8 SC) §5.Taskandl i abi l i t yoft hel awyer Thej udi c i a la ffida v i ts hal lc o n t a i nas wo r na t t e s t a t i o na tt hee nd,e x e c ut e db yt he l a wy e rwhoc o nduc t e do rs upe r v i s e dt hee x ami na t i o no fwi t ne s s e s , t ot hee ffe c tt ha t : ( 1 )Hef a i t hf ul l yr e c o r de do rc a us e dt ober e c o r d e dt heque s t i o nsheas k e da ndt he c o r r e s p o ndi ngans we r st ha tt hewi t ne s sg a v e ;a nd ( 2 )Ne i t he rheno ra nyo t he rp e r s o nt he np r e s e nto ra s s i s t i nghi mc o a c he dt he wi t ne s sr e g ar d i ngt hel at t e r ’ sa ns we r s . A f al s eat t e s t at i o ns hal ls ubj e c tt hel a wy e rme nt i o ne dt odi s c i pl i nar y ac t i o n, i nc l udi ngdi s b a r me nt .( Se c .4 A ,. M.No .1288SC) §6.An affiant wi l l be cr os s exami ned on t he bas i s of hi s Judi ci al Affidavi t The a dv e r s ep ar t ys h a l lha v et he r i g htt oc r o s s e x a mi ne t he wi t ne s so n hi s j udi c i alaffida v i tando nt hee xhi bi t sat t ac he dt ot hes ame .Thepar t ywhopr e s e nt s t hewi t ne s sma yal s oe x a mi nehi ma so nr e d i r e c t .I ne v e r yc a s e ,t hec o u r ts ha l lt a ke ac t i v epar ti ne x ami ni ngt hewi t ne s st ode t e r mi nehi sc r e di bi l i t yaswe l last het r ut h o fhi st e s t i mo nyandt oel i c i tt heans we r st hati tne e dsf o rr e s o l v i ngt hei s s ue s .(Se c . 7, A. M.No .1 28 8 SC)
582
582
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS TAKEN EX PARTE
§7.Oralofferofandobj ect i onst oexhi bi t s Upo nt e r mi na t i o no ft het e s t i mo nyo fhi sl a s twi t ne s s ,apa r t ys ha l li mme di a t e l y ma keano r a lo ffe ro fe v i de nc eo fhi sdo c u me nt ar yo ro bj e c te x hi b i t s ,pi e c eb ypi e c e , i nt he i rc hr o no l o gi c a lo r d er ,s t at i ngt hepur p os eo rp ur p os e sf o rwhi c hheo ffe r st he par t i c ul are xhi bi t( Se c .8 ,A. M.No .1 28 8 SC) . AnAffidavi thasnopr obat i veval ue i fi ti sno tp r es e nt e df o r mal l yi ne vi de nc e . P (e o pl ev .Amo r e s ,58SCRA505[ 1974] ) §8.Therul ei sappl i cabl et ocri mi nalacti ons Ther ul es hal lappl yt oal lc r i mi nalac t i o ns : ( 1 )Whe r et hema x i mum o ft hei mp o s a b l ep e na l t ydo e sno te x c e e ds i xy e a r s ; ( 2)Whe r et heac c us e dagr e e st ot heus eo fj udi c i alaffida vi t s ,i r r e s pe c t i v eoft he pe nal t yi nv o l v e d;o r ( 3)Wi t hr e s pe c tt ot hec i v i las pe c to ft heac t i o ns ,what e v e rt hepe nal t i e si nv o l v e d ar e .( Se c .9,A. M.No .1288SC) §9.Effect sofnoncompl i ancewi t ht heJudi ci alAffidavi tRul e The r ea r et hr e ee ffe c t so fno nc o mp l i a nc ewi t ht heJ ud i c i a lAffid a vi tr ul e .The y ar easf o l l o ws : ( a )A p ar t ywhof a i l st os u bmi tt her e q ui r e dj ud i c i a la ffid av i t sande x hi b i t so n t i mes ha l lb ed e e me dt oha v ewa i v e dt he i rs u b mi s s i o n .Thec o u r t ,ma y ,ho we v e r , a l l o wo nl yo nc et hel at es ub mi s s i o no ft hes a me ,pr o v i de d,t hede l a yi sf o rav al i d r e a s o n,wo ul d no tundul ypr e j ud i c et heo p po s i ngpa r t y ,a nd t hede f a ul t i ngp ar t y pa y safineo fno tl e s st ha nP1 , 0 00 . 0 0no rmo r et ha nP5 , 0 00 . 0 0,a tt hedi s c r e t i o no f t hec o ur t . ( b )Thec o ur ts ha l lno tc o n s i de rt heaffida v i to fa nywi t ne s swhof a i l st oappe a rat t hes c he d ul e dhe a r 583
VOL. 747, JANUARY 21, 2015
583
THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS TAKEN EX PARTE
i ng o ft hec a s ea sr e q ui r e d .Co uns e lwhof a i l st oa pp e arwi t ho utv a l i dc a us e de s pi t eno t i c es hal lbede e me dt oha v ewai v e dhi sc l i e nt ’ sr i g htt oc o nf r o ntb yc r o s s e x a mi na t i o nt hewi t ne s s e st he r epr e s e n t .
( c )Thec o ur ts ha l lno ta dmi ta se vi de nc ej udi c i a laffida v i t st ha td ono tc o nf o r mt o t hec o nt e ntr e q ui r e me nt so fSe c t i o n3a ndt heat t e s t a t i o nr e q ui r e me nto fSe c t i o n4 a bo v e .Thec o ur t ,ma y ,ho we v e r ,a l l o wo nl yo nc et hes ub s e q ue nts u bmi s s i o no ft he c o mpl a i ntr e p l a c e me nta ffida v i t sbe f o r et hehe a r i ngo rt r i a lpr o v i de dt hede l a yi sf o r av a l i dr e a s o na nd wo u l d no tund ul yp r e j ud i c et heo p p o s i ngp ar t ya nd pr o v i de d f ur t he r ,t ha t pub l i co r pr i v a t ec o uns e lr e s p o ns i b l ef o rt he i r pr e p ar a t i o na nd s u bmi s s i o np a y safineo fno tl e s st ha nP1 , 0 00 . 0 0no rmo r et ha nP5 , 0 00 . 0 0,a tt he di s c r e t i o no ft hec our t . ( Se c .10 ,A. M.No .1 28 8 SC) §10.Publ i cPr os ecut orswer egi ven an ext ended per i od ofoneyeart o compl ywi t ht heJudi ci alAffidavi tRul e OnJanuar y8,2013,t heSupr emeCour E t nBanc i s s ue daRe s o l ut i o nmo d i f y i ng t hepubl i cpr o s e c u t o r s ’ c o mpl i a nc ewi t ht hepr o v i s i o nso ft heJudi c i a lAffida v i tRul e f ora per i od ofone ye ar ,f r om 1 Januar yt o31 Dec ember2013.Thi shasbee n c ompl i ed wi t h( Se eOCA Ci r c ul arNo.052013 dat ed Januar y 10,2013) .I twas f ur t he re x t e nde df o ra no t he ro n eye a r( OCACi r c ul arNo.012014dat e dJanuary2, 2014) .To da y ,pub l i cp r o s e c ut o r sa r eno wb oundt of o l l o wt heJudi c i a lAffida v i tRul e . §11.TheJudi ci alAffidavi tRul ei sappl i cabl et oal lcourt s The J ud i c i a l Affid a v i t Rul ei sa pp l i c a b l et oa l lc o u r t sl i k et he Co u r t of Appe al s ,Sandi ganbay an,Co ur to fTa xAp pe a l s , 584
584
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS TAKEN EX PARTE
Re g i o na lTr i a lCo ur t s ,Me t r o p o l i t a n Tr i a lc o ur t s ,Muni c i pa lTr i a lCo ur t si n Ci t i e s ,Muni c i pa lCi r c ui tTr i a lCo ur t sa ndShar i ’ aCi r c ui tCo ur t s .(OCA Ci r c ul ar No .1062012dat e dOc t o be r15,2012) §12.Benefitandadvant ageoft heJudi ci alAffidavi tRul e Ther ul ei shi g hl yb e ne fic i a la nda dv ant a ge o ust oal i t i g ant .Thi swr i t e ro nc eha d ac l i e nti nape t i t i o nf o ra do pt i o nwhoi sac i t i z e no ft heUni t e dKi ng do m.Be f o r et he he a r i ng ,t hi swr i t e rp r e p a r e da nds u bmi t t e dhi sJud i c i a lAffid a vi ti na dv a nc e .He a r r i v e df r o m Lo ndo na t2 : 0 0o ’ c l o c ki nt hee ar l ymo r n i ng ,hewa sab l et oge to uto f t hea i r p o r ta t3: 0 0o ’ c l o c k,hewa i t e da ta b ur g e rr e s t a ur a ntwhi c hi so p e nf o r t we nt y f o urho ur sne art heHa l lo fJ us t i c e ,t he nhet e s t i fie da t9: 0 0o ’ c l o c ka ndhi s
c r o s s e x a mi na t i o nwa sc o nc l ude daf t e ra nho ur .Heha pp i l yr e t ur n e dt oEng l a ndt he f o l l o wi ngda y . §13 .Affidavi tdefined Affida v i ti s a wr i t t e no r pr i nt e d de c l ar at i o no rs t at e me nt o ff ac t s ,made v o l unt a r i l yandc o nfir me db yt heo a t ho ra ffir ma t i o no ft hepa r t yma ki ngi t ,t a ke n b e f o r eap e r s o nha v i nga ut ho r i t yt oad mi ni s t e rs uc ho a t ho ra ffir ma t i o n.(St at ev . Kni g ht ,2 1 9Ka n.8 6 3) §14 .Nat ur eofanAffidavi t x par t e Affida v i t s ,be i ng t ake ne ,us u al l ya r ei nc o mpl e t ea nd o f t e ni na c c ur a t e , c a us e ds o me t i me sf r o m pa r t i a ls u gg e s t i o ns ,s o me t i me sf o rwa nto fs u gg e s t i o nsa nd i nq ui r i e s ,wi t ho utt he a i do fwhi c h,t he wi t ne s s ma yb e una bl et or e c a l lt he c o nne c t e dc o l l a t e r a lc i r c ums t a nc e s ne c e s s a r yf o rt he c o r r e c t i o n o ft he fir s t s ug ge s t i o no fhi sme mo r y ,andf o rhi sac c ur a t er e c o l l e c t i o no fal lt hatb e l o ng st ot he s ubj e c t . P (e o pl ev .Pac al a,58 SCRA 370[ 197 4 P ] ;e o pl ev .Mur o s,423 SCRA 69 [ 2 0 0 4 ] P ;e o pl ev .De l mi ndo,4 2 9SCRA5 4 6[ 2 0 04 ] Ma ; r t ur i l l as 585
VOL. 747, JANUARY 21, 2015
585
THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS TAKEN EX PARTE
v .Pe o pl e ,487SCRA 273[ 2006] ;Tat i ngv .Mar c e l l a,519SCRA 79[ 2007] P ;e o pl e v . Co r p uz ,701SCRA493[ 2013] ) Mo r e o v e r ,a ffid a v i t sa r ef r e q u e nt l y no tc o mp l e t er e p r o d uc t i o n so fwha tt he de c l a r a nt sha di nmi nd,c o ns i de r i ngt ha ta ffida v i t sa r ef r e q ue nt l ypr e p ar e db yt he a dmi ni s t e r i ngo ffic e ra ndc a s ti nt hel a t t e r ’ sl a ng uag eo rt hel a t t e r ’ sunde r s t a ndi ng o fwha tt heaffia ntha ds a i d ,whi l et hea ffia ntf r e q u e nt l ys i mp l ys i g nst heaffid a v i t a f t e rt hes a meha sb e e nr e a dt ohi m. P (e o pl ev .Vi l l anue v a,215SCRA22[ 1992] .Se e a l s E o ug e ni ov .Co ur to fAppe al s,239 SCRA 207 [ 1994 P ] ;e o pl ev .Sanc he z ,313 SCRA 25 4[ 19 99 P ] ;e o pl ev .Cue t o,395 SCRA 344 [ 2003 ] ;Pe o p l ev .Bal l e n o,4 08 SCRA 513[ 200 3] ; Pe o p l ev .Ri v e r a,412SCRA 224[ 2003] ;Pe o p l ev .Do mi ng o,556 SCRA788[ 2008] ; Pe o p l ev .Al k o dha,561SCRA696[ 2008] ) I nd e e d ,a ffid a vi t sa r eu s ua l l yno tp r e p a r e db yt hea ffia nthi ms e l fb utb yano t he r whous eshi sown l anguagei nt aki ngdown t heaffiant ’ sst at ementand t her ef or e, t he ymus tb eunde r s t o o dwi t hs o mede g r e eo fl a t i t ude . P (e o pl ev .Pane l a,346SCRA 3 08[ 20 00 L ] ; uc asv .Co ur to fAppe al s,389SCRA 749[ 2002 E ] ; ag l eRi dg eGo l f& Co unt r yCl ubv . Co ur to fAp pe a l s,616SCRA116[ 2010] )
Omi s s i o na ndmi s u nd e r s t a nd i ngb yt hewr i t e ra r ef r e q ue nt ,p ar t i c ul a r l ywhe n t he d i c t a t i o ni sd o nei n ha s t ea nd i mp at i e nc e .The i ri nfir mi t ya se v i d e nc ei sa mat t e ro fj udi c i ale xpe r i e nc e . P (e o pl ev .Mar c e l i no,316SCRA 104[ 1999] P ;e o pl ev . Gar al de ,348SCRA38[ 2000] ) La s t l y , affid a v i t sa r e no te n t i r e l yr e l i a b l ee v i d e nc ei n c o u r td ue t ot he i na c c ur a c i e st ha tma y ha v eo c c ur r e di nt he f o r mul a t i o no ft hes a me P (e o pl ev . Ge g ui r a,328SCRA 11[ 2000] P ;e o pl ev .De l mo,390SCRA 395[ 2002]andt hatt he y ar es e l do mc o ns i de r e da st her e po s i t o r i e so ft r ut h. P (e o pl ev .Nubl a,35 8SCRA 73 5 [ 2 0 0 1 ] ) 586
586
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS TAKEN EX PARTE
§15.Thefil i ngofAffidavi tofcompl ai nantand wi t nes s esi smandat ory undert heRul esonSummar yPr oc edure Thefil i ngo fAffid a v i to ft hec o mp l a i na nta ndwi t ne s s e si sma nd at o r yund e rt he Rul eson Summar y Pr oc edur e.Thepur pos ei st oenabl et hec our tt odet er mi ne whe t he rt odi s mi s st hec a s eo ut r i g hto rt or e q ui r ef ur t he rpr o c e e di ng s . P (l ac e rv . Vi l l anue v a,126SCRA463[ 1983] ) §16.AnAffidavi ti sani nfirm s peci eofevi dence Ge ne r a l l y ,a na ffid a vi ti sno tp r e p a r e db yt hea ffia nthi ms e l f ,b utb yano t he rwho use s hi so wn l anguage i n wr i t i ng t he affiant ’ ss t at ement s . Omi s s i ons and mi s under s t andi ngs by t he wr i t er ar e not i nf r equent par t i c ul ar l y under c i r c ums t a nc e so fhur r yandi mpat i e nc e . Fo rt hi sr e a s o n,t hei nfir mi t yo fa ffida v i t sa s as pe c i eo fe v i de nc ei smuc hamat t e ro fj udi c i ale x pe r i e nc e . P (e o pl ev .Re s a y ag a,54 SCRA 350[ 197 3] ;Pe o p l ev .Mo r i ,55SCRA 382[ 1974] ;Pe o p l ev .Sag un,Jr . ,1 85 SCRA405[ 1990 P ] ;e o pl ev .Pat i l an,197SCRA354[ 1991] ) §17.I fan affidavi ti si ncons i s t entwi t h at es t i mony,t he l at t er s hal l prevai l .Reasons I ft he r ei sa ni nc o ns i s t e nc ybe t we e nt hea ffida v i to fa na ffia nta ndhi st e s t i mo n y , t hel a t t e ri st obegi v e nmo r ewe i g hts i nc e : ( 1 )Affid av i t s ,b e i ngt a ke ne xpar t e ,a r eal mo s ta l wa y si nc o mpl e t eandi na c c ur a t e . P o pl ev . Lo v e r i a, 18 P o pl ev . Car r i ag a, 411 SCRA 40 (e 7 SCRA 47 [ 19 90 ] ;e [ 2 0 0 3 ] F ; uk uz umev .Pe o pl e,474SCRA 570[ 2005] P ;e o pl ev .Se r e nas,62 2SCRA48 5 [ 2 0 1 0 ] ;Ongv .Pe o p l e ,661SCRA104[ 2011] )
( 2 )The c o n t r a di c t i o n ma yb ee x p l a i ne db yt he f a c tt ha ta na ffid a v i tc a nno t di s c l o s et hewho l ef ac t s ,ando f 587
VOL. 747, JANUARY 21, 2015
587
THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS TAKEN EX PARTE
t e n t i me sa nd wi t ho u td e s i g n, i nc o r r e c t l yd e s c r i b e , wi t ho u tt he d e p o ne n t de t e c t i ng i t ,s o meo ft heo c c ur r e nc e snar r at e d. J ( ac o bov .Co ur to fAppe al s,27 0 SCRA270[ 1997 P ] ;e o pl ev .Be r ana,311SCRA664[ 1999] ) ( 3 )Affid av i t sar eno tc o mp l e t er e p r o d uc t i o nso fwha tt hede c l a r a nth asi nmi nd bec aus et he yar egener al l ypr epar edbyt he admi ni s t er i ngoffic erand t heaffiant s i mp l ys i g nst he ma f t e rt hes a meha v eb e e nr e a dt ohe r . P (e o pl ev .Go ndo r a,265 SCRA408[ 1996] ) P o pl ev .Bani e g a,37 ( 4)The yar et ake nasi nf e r i o rt oc o ur tt e s t i mo ny . (e 7SCRA 1 70[ 2 00 2] ) I nf a c t ,a na ffida v i ti sno tc o n s i de r e dt heb e s te v i de nc ei ft hea ffianti sav ai l a bl e asawi t ne s s P . (e o pl ev .Ma t i l do,230SCRA635[ 1994] ) Ther u l et ha ta na ffid a v i to rs wo r ns t a t e me nti si nf e r i o rt ot e s t i mo n yi no p e n c o ur ta pp l i e so nl ywhe nt he r ea r edi s c r e p anc i e sand i nc o ns i s t e nc i e sbe t we e nt he a l l e g a t i o nsi nt hes wo r ns t a t e me nta ndt ho s ema dei no p e nc o ur t . P (e o pl ev .Rat a, 418SCRA237[ 2003] P ;e o pl ev .Pa j ar o,554SCRA572[ 2008] ) Thet e s t i mo n yo fawi t ne s si no p e nc o u r ta n d hi ss wo r ns t a t e me n tb e f o r et he i nv e s t i g at o r sar eno tf at alde f e c t st hatwo ul dj us t i f yt her e v e r s alo faj udg me nto f Ta r a pa nv . Pe o p l e c o nv i c t i o n.( ,563SCRA577[ 2008] ) §18.I ncons i s t enci esbet ween t he affidavi tand a t es t i mony does not ne ce s s ar i l ydi s c r e di tawi t ne s si fi tr e l at e st omi normat t e r s I nc o n s i s t e n c i e sb e t we e nt he a ffid a v i ta nd a t e s t i mo n yd o e s no tne c e s s a r i l y di s c r e di tawi t ne s si fi tr e l at e st omi no rorc o l l at e r almat t e r s E . xPar t e affid a v i t sa r e g e ne r a l l yi nc o mpl e t e ,he nc e , i nc o ns i s t e nc i e sb e t we e nde c l ar a t i o nso ft heaffi588
588
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS TAKEN EX PARTE
a nt si nt he i rs wo r ns t a t e me nt sandt ho s ei nc o u r t ,dono tne c e s s a r i l ydi s c r e d i t t hem and t he i nfir mi t yofaffidavi t sasan e vi dencei smuc h amat t erofj udi c i al e xpe r i e nc e P .(e o pl ev .Dac o,568SCRA 348[ 2008] ; Pe o p l ev .Ba j ada,57 1SCRA 45 5
o p l ev .Sal l y,633 SCRA 293 [ P o pl ev .Al f r e do,638 SCRA 749 [ 2 0 0 8 ] ;Pe 2010 ] ;e [ 2 0 1 0 ] ; Pe o p l ev .Ang e l i o,667SCRA 102[ 2012] ; Kumme rv .Pe o pl e,70 5SCRA 49 0 [ 2 0 1 3 ] ) Li k e wi s e , t hedi s c r e p anc i e sb e t we e nas wo r ns t a t e me nta ndt e s t i mo n yi nc o ur tdo no to ut r i g ht l yj us t i f yt heac q ui t t alo fan ac c us e d,a st e s t i mo ni ale v i de nc ec a r r i e s mo r e we i g ht t han an affida v i t . P (e o pl ev . De l a Cr uz, 546 SCRA 703 [ 2 0 0 8 ] ; Lumanogv .Pe opl e,630SCRA42[ 2010] ) The r ei sn or ul et ha two u l de s t o pa na ffia ntf r o m ma ki ngane l a b o r a t i o no fa n affida vi tdur i ngt het r i al P .( e o pl ev .Vi l l anue v a,265SCRA216[ 1996] ) Be s i de s ,t he r ei snope r f e c to ro mni s c i e ntwi t ne s sb e c aus et he r ei snope r s o nwi t h p e r f e c tf a c u l t i e so rs e ns e s .An a dr o i tc r o s s e x a mi ne r ma yt r a p a wi t ne s si nt o ma ki ngs t a t e me nt sc o nt r a di c t i nghi st e s t i mo nyo ndi r e c te x ami na t i o n.Byi nt e ns i v e c r o s s e x ami na t i o no npo i nt sno ta nt i c i pa t e dbyawi t ne s sa ndhi sl a wy e r ,awi t ne s s ma yb ei nv e i g l e di nt oma ki ngs t a t e me nt st ha td ono tdo v e t a i lwi t ht het e s t i mo ni e s o fo t he rwi t ne s s e so nt hes a mepo i nt s . P (e o pl ev .Co r fin,380SCRA504[ 2002] ) §19. Affidavi t s ar e s ubor di nat ed i n i mpor t anc e t o open cour t decl arat i ons. Generalrul eandexcept i ons Affida v i t sar eg e ne r al l ys ubo r di nat e di ni mpo r t anc et oo pe nc o ur tde c l ar at i o ns b e c aus et he yar eo f t e nt i me sno ti ns uc has t a t ea st oa ffo r dhi m af a i ro ppo r t uni t yo f P o pl ev .Le ang s i r i nar r at i ngi nf ul lt hei nc i de ntwhi c hhast r a ns pi r e d . (e ,252SCRA 2 13[ 19 96 P ] ;e o pl ev .Gut i e r r e z ,Jr. ,3 0 2 SCRA 6 4 3[ 1 9 99 ] P ;e o pl ev .Me r c ado,30 4 SCRA 504[ 199 9] ; Pe o p l ev .Nul l an,305SCRA 679[ 1999] ; Pe o pl ev.At r e j e ni o,310 SCRA 589
VOL. 747, JANUARY 21, 2015
589
THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS TAKEN EX PARTE
229[ 1999] ;Ca r i a g av .Co ur to fAp pe a l s,358SCRA 583[ 2001] P ;e o pl ev .Pa j ar o, 554SCRA572[ 2008] ) Be s i d e s ,a ffid a vi t sar eo f t e ne x e c ut e dwhe na na ffia nt ’ sme nt a lf a c u l t i e sa r eno t i ns uc has t a t ea st oaffo r dhi m af a i ro ppo r t uni t yo fna r r a t i ngi nf ul lt hei nc i de nt whi c hha st r a ns p i r e d . P (e o pl ev .Sanc he z,302SCRA21[ 1999] ; Pe o p l ev .Aq ui no,329 P o pl ev .Gabi ana,338SCRA 562[ P o pl ev .Mo r at a,354 SCRA 247[ 2000 ] ;e 2000] ;e SCRA259[ 2001] ; Sar ab i av . Pe o p l e ,361SCRA652[ 2001] ) Thee x c e pt i o nst ot hi sr ul ear e :
( 1 )whe r et heo mi s s i o ni nt heaffida v i tr e f e r st oav e r yi mpo r t antde t a i ls uc ht ha t t heaffia ntwo ul dno tha v ef a i l e dt ome nt i o ni t ,a ndwhi c ho mi s s i o nc o ul da ffe c tt he affiant ’ sc r e di bi l i t y . P (e o pl ev .Po nf e r ada,220SCRA 46[ 1993 P ] ;e o pl ev .Do i no g,332 o pl ev .Ma ndao,393SCRA292[ SCRA366[ 2000 P ] ;e 2002] ) ( 2 )Whe nt hewi t ne s s ’ na r r a t i o ni nt hes wo r ns t at e me nts ubs t a nt i a l l yc o nt r a di c t s her t es t i mony i n c our t . P (e o pl ev . Or t i z, 26 6 SCRA 64 1 [ 19 97 P ] ;e o pl ev . Av e r g o nz ado,397SCRA295[ 2003] ) ( 3 )Whe r et hepur p o r t e di nc o ns i s t e nc yc o n c e r nspo i nt so fs u c hi mpo r t a nc e .The s a me c a nno ts i mp l yb ea s c r i b e dt of a i l ur et or e me mb e r ,f o rwhi c hr e a s o n ,t he wi t ne s s ’c r e d i b i l i t y b e c o me ss u s pe c t . P (e o pl ev . Re bo l t i ado, 279 SCRA 79 P o pl ev .Se r v ano,406SCRA508[ [ 1 9 9 7 ] ;e 2003] ) ( 4 )Whe r ea s e r i o u sd i s c r e p a nc yo rva r i a nc eha sa b e a r i ng o n a ma t e r i a lo r s ubs t ant i alf ac to ri s s ue . P (e o pl ev .Se s e ,1 1 1SCRA5 5 2[ 1 9 82 ] P ;e o pl ev .Wi l s o n,321 A c ac ov .Pe o pl e,378SCRA 297[ P o pl ev .Oc o me n,382 SCRA 409[ 1999 ] ; ng 2002] ;e SCRA310[ 2002] ) 590
590
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS TAKEN EX PARTE
§20.An affidavi tmaybes cant yi n det ai l sbuti tmayadmi t t ed i fi twi l l bet es t i fiedonbyt heaffiant As wo r ns t at e me nto ranaffida v i tdo e sno tpur po r tt obeac o mpl e t ec o mpe ndi um o ft hede t a i l so fa ne v e n tna r r a t e db yt heaffia nt .Whi l ehe rs wo r ns t a t e me n tma y ha v eb e e ns c a nt yo n de t a i l si fhet e s t i fie ss uffic i e nt l yo nr e l e v a ntma t t e r so nt he s t and,i twi l lbeadmi t t e dase v i de nc e . P (e o pl ev .DeCas t r o,403SCRA543[ 2003] ) §21 .Affidavi t si n ques t i on and ans werf orm prepared bypol i ceoffice r s areus ual l ynotcompl et e Affida v i t s ,o r di nar i l yi naque s t i o nandans we rf o r m,ar eus ual l yandr o ut i ne l y pr e p ar e d i n p o l i c e pr e c i nc t sb y po l i c e i n v e s t i g at o r s . No ti nf r e q ue nt l y ,t he i nv e s t i g at o r / i nt e r r o g at o rpr o po undque s t i o nsme r e l yt oe l i c i tag ene r alpi c t ur eo ft he s ub j e c tmat t e runde ri nv e s t i g at i o n P (e o pl ev .Sabi o,1 0 2SCRA 2 1 8[ 1 9 81 ] P ;e o pl ev . Gab as ,233SCRA 77[ 199 4] ; Pe o p l ev .Gar c i a,373SCRA 134[ 2002 ] ;Angc ac ov . Pe o pl e ,3 78SCRA2 97[ 2 00 2]a ndi ti sn o tp r e p a r e db yt hea ffia nthi ms e l f . P (e o pl ev . Pe r e z ,417SCRA449[ 2003] ) Tr ue ,s wo r ns t a t e me nt se x e c ut e db ef o r epo l i c eaut ho r i t i e sar eus ual l yi nc o mpl e t e a ndc o n t a i nda t awhi c ha r ei nc o n s i s t e ntwi t ht hef a c t snar r a t e dbywi t ne s s e st os a i d o ffic e r s .Fo rt ha tr e a s o n,c o ur t sha v eg e ne r a l l yb r us he da s i de ,a si nc o n s e que nt i al ,
c o n t r adi c t i o nst he r e o ns ol o ngast he s ea r eo nmi no ra ndr e c o nc i l ab l ema t t e r s .The r ul ei so t he r wi s e ,whe r et hedi s c r e p anc i e st o uc ho ns ub s t ant i a la ndi r r e c o n c i l ab l e f a c t ss uc ha st ho s eo mi s s i o nsi nt hea ffida v i tc o n c e r ni ngi mpo r t antde t a i l swhi c ht he a ffia ntwo ul dno tha v ef a i l e dt ome nt i o n,a ndwhi c ho mi s s i o nc o ul dwe l la ffe c tt he c r e di bi l i t yoft hataffiant P .( e o pl ev .Pe r e z,263SCRA206[ 1996] ) 591
VOL. 747, JANUARY 21, 2015
591
THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS TAKEN EX PARTE
§22.Affidavi t sar enotcons i der ed t hebes tevi dencei ft heaffiant sar e a vai l abl e We l l s e t t l e di st her ul et hata ffida vi t sar eno tc o ns i de r e dt hebe s te v i de nc ei ft he a ffia nt sa r ea va i l a bl easwi t ne s s e s . Thepr e s e nt at i o no fawi t ne s swi l la ffo r dt het r i a l c o ur tt heo ppo r t uni t yt oo bs e r v ehi so v e r a l lde me a no ra ndf o rt hede f e ns et oc r o s s e x a mi nehi ma ndi mpe a c hhi sc r e d i b i l i t y .(Val l ar t av .Co ur to fAppe a l s,16 3SCRA 5 87[ 1 98 8] ; Ay c ov . Fe r nande z,1 9 5SCRA3 2 8[ 1 9 91 P ] ;e o pl ev .Mo r e s ,31 1SCRA34 2 [ 1 9 9 9 ] ) Co r o l l a r i l y ,a n yo r a lo rd o c u me nt a r ye v i d e nc ei s he a r s a yb y na t ur ei ft he pr o b at i v ev al uei sno tb as e do nt hepe r s o n alkno wl e dg eo ft hewi t ne s s e sb uto nt he knowl edgeofs omeot herper s on whowasne ve rpr es ent edon t hewi t nes ss t and, b e c a us ei ti st heo p po r t uni t yt oc r o s s e x a mi newhi c h ne g a t e st hec l a i mt ha tt he ma t t e r st e s t i fie dt ob yawi t ne s sa r ehe a r s a y . P (e o pl ev .De l aCr uz,58 0SCRA 21 2 [ 2 0 0 9 ] ) §23.I ft heaffianti snotpres ent ed,t heaffidavi ti scl ass i fiedashearsay. Reas ons I fape r s o ne x e c ut e sa nda ffida v i ti nac a s e , buthei sno tpr e s e nt e dt ot hewi t ne s s s t a nd ,i tr e nd e r s hi sa ffid a v i ti na dmi s s i b l ef o rb e i ng he a r s a ya nd i tmus tbe e x c l ude da sa ne v i de nc e .Affida v i t sa r ec l a s s i fie da she a r s a ye v i de nc es i nc et he yar e no tg e n e r a l l ypr e p a r e db yt hea ffia ntb utb yano t he rwhous e sh i so wnl a ng ua g ei n wr i t i ngt hea ffia nt ’ ss t a t e me nt s , whi c hma yt husb ee i t he ro mi t t e do rmi s u nde r s t o o d b yt heo newr i t i ngt he m.Mo r e o v e r ,t headv e r s epa r t yi sd e pr i v e do ft heo ppo r t uni t y t oc r o s s e x a mi net hea ffia nt s . P (e o pl ev .Pe r ue l o,105SCRA 226 [ 1981] P ;e o pl ev . Ramo s ,122SCRA 312[ 1983 I ] ; mbatv .So l i v e n,519SCRA 121[ 2007 E ] ;s t r e l l av . Ro bl e s ,Jr t r o n Co r po r at i o nv .Co mmi s s i o ne ro fI nt e r na l . ,538SCRA 60[ 2007] ;Pe Re v e nue ,626SCRA100[ 2010] ) 592
592
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED
THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS TAKEN EX PARTE
At e s t i mo nypr e l i mi nar yi nv e s t i g at i o nwhi c hi sbas e do nt heaffida v i t so fo t he r si s pr i maf ac i e Sa l o n g av .Cr uz Pa ño, he a r s a ya ndc a n ha r d l yq ua l i f ya sa e v i de nc e .( 134SCRA438[ 1985] ) §24.Therul et hatanAffidavi ti scons i deredhears ayi snotappl i cabl ei n l aborcases .Reason Ho we v e r ,t her ul et h ata nAffida vi ti sc o ns i de r e dhe a r s a yi sl i b er a l l ya ppl i e di n l abo rc as e s .( Se eGr e atPac i ficLi f eEmpl o y e e sUni o nv .Gr e a tp ac i ficLi f eAs s ur anc e Co r po r a t i o n,303SCRA113[ 1999] ) Ther e a s o ni s ,i ti sno tne c e s s a r yf o rt heaffia nt st oap pe a randt e s t i f ya ndb e c r o s s e x a mi ne db yc o uns e lf o rt hea dv e r s epa r t y .Tor e q ui r eo t he r wi s ewo ul db et o negat et he r at i onal e and pur pos e oft he s ummary nat ur e oft he pr oc ee di ngs mandat edbyt he Rul esand t omakemandat or yt heappl i c at i on oft het ec hni c al r ul e so fe v i de nc e . L (e pant oCo ns o l i dat e dMi ni ngCo mpanyv .Dumapi s,56 2SCRA 1 03[ 2 00 8] ) §25.Effecti fan acc us ed i sconvi ct ed bas ed onl y on an Affidavi tofa wi t nes s The a c c us e d wi l lbe a c q ui t t e d .The a dmi s s i o no fa he a r s a ye v i d e nc el i k ea n a ffid a v i ta nd t he c o n v i c t i o no ft he a c c us e do nt he b a s i st he r e o fv i o l a t e s hi s c o ns t i t ut i o nalr i g htt ome e twi t ne s s e sf ac et of ac eandt os ub j e c tt he mt ot her i g i d t e s to fc r o s s e x ami nat i o n.The c o n s t i t ut i o nalr i g ht t oc o nf r o n t a t i o n pr e c l ude s r e l i a nc eo ns u c ha ffid a vi t s .Suc h ac o ns t i t ut i o na ls a f e g ua r dc a nno tb es a t i s fi e d unl e s st heo ppo r t uni t yi sg i v e nt heac c us e dt ot e s tt hec r e di b i l i t yo fa nype r s o n, who ,b ya ffid a v i to rd e p os i t i o nwo u l di mp ut et hec o mmi s s i o no ft heo ffe n s et ohi m. P (e o pl ev .Mo nt e ne gr o,436SCRA33[ 2004] ) §26.Mer eaffidavi t sarenots uffici entt ograntbai l Me r ea ffida v i t so rr e c i t a l so ft he i rc o n t e nt sar eno ts uffic i e nts i nc et he ya r ee r e he a r s a ye v i de nc e ,he nc et he yc a nno t 593
VOL. 747, JANUARY 21, 2015 THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS TAKEN EX PARTE
593
l e g a l l yf o r mt heb as i so fa no r de rg r a nt i ngba i l .Thus , a nRTCj ud gewhog r a nt e d b ai lb as e do name r ea ffid a vi twa sf o undg ui l t yo fg r o s si g no r a nc eo ft hel a wa ndwa s o r de r e dt opa yafineo fP2 0, 0 00 . 0 0. B ( ay l o nv .Si s o n,243SCRA284[ 1995] ) §27.Affidavi tofdi s i nt eres t ed pers onsi n ordert oprovebi rt hi snotan adequat eproof Thes u bmi s s i o no fa na ffid a vi to fd i s i nt e r e s t e dp e r s o na t t e s t i ng t ot hea c t ua l bi r t ho fape r s o ndo e sno tc o ns t i t ut eade quat epr o o fast ot heac t ualdat e / y e aro fhi s bi r t hs i nc et heaffida vi ti she ar s a yands e l f s e r v i ng . R (e :Samano di nL.Ampas o,256 SCRA679[ 1996] ) §28.Anext raj udi ci als t at ementoraffidavi ti si nfirm andunrel i abl e A e x t r a j udi c i als t at e me nto raffida v i ti sg e ne r al l y no tpr e par e d byt heaffiant hi ms e l fbut by anot her who us es hi so wn l anguage i n wr i t i ng t he affiant ’ s s t at e me nt . He nc e ,o mi s s i o ns and mi s under s t andi ng by t he affiant ar e not i nf r e q ue nt .The i nfir mi t yo fa ne x t r a j udi c i a ls t a t e me nti s a ma t t e ro fj udi c i a l e x pe r i e nc e . Be s i de s , a na ffida v i te x e c ut e da f t e rc o n vi c t i o no ft hea c c us e dandwhi l et hea ffia nt i si nde t e nt i o n,i sunr e l i abl e .Theal l e gat i o nst he r e i n,no tb ei ngt e s t i fie dt oi nc o ur t , a r eme r ehe a r s a ya ndha v enos ub s t a nt i a le v i de nt i a r yva l ue . P (e o pl ev .Pat al i nj ug, 318SCRA116[ 1999] ) §29.Affidavi t sc annotbe r el i ed upon t o annula wi nni ng candi dat e’ s procl amat i oni nel ect i oncases Affida v i t sc anno tber e l i e d upo nt oannulawi nni ngc andi dat e ’ spr o c l amat i o n. Thi si sb e c aus ei ti ss e l f s e r v i ngandi tc a nno to v e r t ur nt hepr e s ump t i o nt hato ffic i al dut yha sbe e nr e g ul a r l ype r f o r me d .( Ve l a y ov .Co mmi s s i o no nEl e c t i o ns,327 594
594
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS TAKEN EX PARTE
Luc manv. Di mapo r o,33SCRA387[ SCRA715[ 2000] .Se eal s o 1970] ) Li ke wi s e ,t hef a c tt ha tt heaffida v i t so ffe r e db yapa r t yi na ne l e c t i o npr o t e s tc a s e ar eo fo nes t y l eo rwo r d i ng ,i sno t hi ngunus ual .(Si ns uatv .Pe ndat un,33SCRA 63 0 [ 1 9 7 0 ] ) §30.AnAffidavi ti snotamodeofacqui r i ngowner s hi pofal and
No ta l lno t a r i z e ddo c ume nt sa r ee x e mp t e df r o mt her u l eo na ut he nt i c a t i o n.Thus , an affidavi tdoe s no taut omat i c al l y bec ome a publ i c doc umentj us tbec aus ei t c o nt a i ns a no t a r i a j lur at . Mor eo ve r , an affidavi ti s not a mode of ac qui r i ng Ce queña v .Bol ant e,33 l i c i ano v . o wner s hi p ofa l and.( 0 SCRA 21 6[ 200 0] ;Fe Zal di v ar ,503SCRA182[ 2006] ) §31. Mer eAffidavi ti snots uffici entf ort hei s s uanceofase arc hwarr ant Me r ea ffid a v i to ft he c o mp l a i na nta nd hi swi t ne s s e si sno ts u ffic i e n tf o rt he i s s ua nc eo fa s e a r c h wa r r a nt .The e x a mi ni ng j ud g e ha st ot a k ed e p o s i t i o n si n wr i t i ngo ft hec o mp l a i na nta ndt hewi t ne s s e sh ema ypr o d uc ea ndt oa t t a c ht he mt o t her e c o r d.Suc hwr i t t e nde po s i t i o ni sne c e s s a r yi no r d e rt ha tt heJudg ema ybeab l e t op r o p e r l yd e t e r mi net hee x i s t e nc eo rno ne x i s t e nc eo fpr o b ab l ec a us eandt oho l d l i abl ef o rpe r j ur yt hepe r s o ng i v i ngi ti fi twi l lbef o undl at e rt hathi sde c l ar a t i o ns ar ef al s e P .(e o pl ev .Mamar i l ,420SCRA662[ 2004] ) §32.An affidavi tofacoaccus ed whowass ubsequent l yacqui t t ed may beabasi sf ornew t ri al Whi l eaa ffida v i to fac o a c c us e dwhowa ss ub s e q ue nt l yac q ui t t e d ,e x e c ut e da f t e r t r i a lha s no p r o b at i v ev a l ue a st ot he c o n vi c t i o no nc i r c u ms t a nt i a le v i de nc e ,o f pe t i t i o ne r ,t heSupr e meCo ur tma ybr us ha s i det e c hni c a l i t i e sa ndc o n s i de rt he 595
VOL. 747, JANUARY 21, 2015
595
THE JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE IN RELATIONTO AFFIDAVITS TAKEN EX PARTE
He mut h,Jr .v .Pe o pl e,112 e x i s t e nc eo fs a i daffida v i ta sab as i sf o rne wt r i a l . ( l SCRA573[ 1982] ) No t eho we v e rt ha taf o r g o t t e na ffida v i ti sno tab as i sf o rane wt r i a l . P (e o pl ev . Re g at o,127SCRA287[ 1984] ) §33.Anaffidavi ti snots uffici entt opr ovefil i at i on Affida v i t s and pi c t ur e s ar ei ns uffic i e ntt os ho w fil i at i o ns i nc et he y ar es e l f s e r v i ng ,i ns i g ni fic a ntand i ns u ffic i e nt . B (e r c i l e sv .Go v e r nme ntSe r v i c eI ns ur anc e Sy s t e m,128SCRA53[ 1984] ) §34.An affidavi tofpardon i snotcr edi bl ei fi ti snotunders t oodbyt he compl ai nant
An al l e g e daffida v i to fpar do nb yt heo ffe nde dhus bandt ohi swi f e ’ spar amo ur whi c hwa swr i t t e ni nEng l i s hi nal a ng ua g eno tund e r s t o o db yc o mp l a i na ntwhoi s i l l i t e r a t eand appe ar st obehas t i l y pr e p ar e di sno tc r e di b l e . L (i gt asv .Co ur to f Appe al s ,149SCRA514[ 1987] ) §35.Omi s s i on ofc er t ai n part i cul arsi n an affidavi twi l lnotes t op an affiantf r om maki nganel aborat i on The r ei snor ul eo fe v i de nc et ot hee ffe c tt hato mi s s i o no fc e r t ai npar t i c ul ar si na s wo r ns t a t e me ntwo ul de s t o pana ffia ntf r o m ma ki nga ne l a bo r a t i o nt he r e o fo rf r o m c o r r e c t i ng i nac c ur a c i e s dur i ng t he t r i al . P (e o pl ev .To r r e c ampo,423 SCRA 433 [ 2 0 0 4 ] ) §36.Pr ocedur alas pect A j udg ema yc r o s s e x ami net hepar t i e si nahe ar i ngo famo t i o ni ft he ys ubmi t c o nt r a di c t o r yaffida vi t s P . (e o pl ev .Mo nt e i r o,192SCRA548[ 1990] )