Fil iltr tra aFiltration tion ti on Traini Training ng Semi Seminar nar Innotek Training Seminar Hyd ydrauli raulic c Flu luid id Serv rvic ice e Se Semi minar nar
Con onta tami mina nati tion on Fun Funda damenta mentals ls
Con onta tami mina nati tion on Fun Funda damenta mentals ls
Cost Savin vings gs thr throug ough h Flui luid d Servi rvice ce!! • Effective filtration practices and in-depth monitoring and evaluation of fluid attribute changes in hydraulic and lubrication systems, provides alerts that lead to corrective actions that will prevent breakdowns and increase the life expectancy of important and expensive hydraulic and lube lub e system compon co mpone ents . • The high hig h costs cost s of component comp onent repair repair and syste syst em downtime can be kept to a minimum through a fluid service program that includes using and maintaining the proper proper system system filtr ation and monitor ing equipment. equipment.
Fluid Contamination is Expensive for ALL Industries!
Contamination
THE ENEMY TO MODERN HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS
Fluid Analysis Terminology • Forms of Contamination • Particulates/water/gases
• Sources of Contamination • Effects of Contamination • ISO/NAS Codes • Fluid analysis/measurement • Particle counter • Method & Location of sampling • Measurement error
Types of Contamination
SOLIDS
LIQUIDS
GASES
Particle Size Diameter Comparison 1 m = 0.001 mm = 0.000039” The human eye can only see particles sized d own to 40 micr ons .
How do we measure fluid contamination?
ISO / NAS codes: Are a measure of particles/particulate per a specific volume of fluid
Structure of ISO-Code ISO Code: 22/18/13 ISO 4406: 1999 (E) - ISO Contamination Code Number of Particles per 100 ml Up To and Inclu din g
max. amount of dirt particles in 100 ml > given size Chart cont… Scale Number
More Than
Up To and Inclu din g
14
8,000
16,000
Scale Number
More Than
28
130,000,000
250,000,000
13
4,000
8,000
27
64,000,000
130,000,000
12
2,000
4,000
26
32,000,000
64,000,000
11
1,000
2,000
25
16,000,000
32,000,000
10
500
1,000
24
8,000,000
16,000,000
9
250
500
23
4,000,000
8,000,000
8
130
250
22
2,000,000
4,000,000
7
64
130
21
1,000,000
2,000,000
6
32
64
20
500,000
1,000,000
5
16
32
19
250,000
500,000
4
8
16
18
130,000
250,000
3
4
8
17
64,000
130,000
2
2
4
How do we measure fluid contamination?
Structure of ISO-Code: amount of dirt particles in a 100 ml sample larger than these specified sizes: 4µm / 6µm / 14µm
Example: larger than 4µm = 2,234,000 larger than 6µm = 195,000 larger than 14µm = 4,250
22
18
13
How do we measure fluid contamination?
Structure of ISO-Code: amount of dirt particles in a 100 ml sample larger than these specified sizes: 4µm / 6µm / 14µm
Example: larger than 4µm = 2,234,000
22
How do we measure fluid contamination?
Structure of ISO-Code: amount of dirt particles in a 100 ml sample larger than these specified sizes: 4µm / 6µm / 14µm
Example: larger than 4µm = 2,234,000 larger than 6µm = 195,000
22
18
How do we measure fluid contamination?
Structure of ISO-Code: amount of dirt particles in a 100 ml sample larger than these specified sizes: 4µm / 6µm / 14µm
Example: larger than 4µm = 2,234,000 larger than 6µm = 195,000 larger than 14µm = 4,250
22
18
13
How do we measure fluid contamination?
Structure of ISO-Code: amount of dirt particles in a 100 ml sample larger than these specified sizes: 4µm / 6µm / 14µm
Example: larger than 4µm = 2,234,000 larger than 6µm = 195,000 larger than 14µm = 4,250
22
18
13
How do we measure fluid contamination? Structure of SAE AS 4059 (previously NAS Codes) Class
4-6 µm
6-14 µm
14-21 µm
>21 µm
00
125
22
4
1
0
250
44
8
2
1
500
89
16
3
2
1000
178
32
6
3
2000
356
63
11
4
4000
712
126
22
5
8000
1425
253
45
6
16000
2850
506
90
7
32000
5700
1012
180
8
64000
11400
2025
360
9
128000
22800
4050
720
10
256000
45600
8100
1440
Cleanliness Code Con versio n: SAE AS 4059 – Equivalent ISO 4406 Class Based o n ISO 4406: 1999 and SAE AS 4059 Revised 2005-05: Rev E 8/29/07 Cumulative Particles per 100 ml
Differential Particles per 100 ml
Code Designatio n
> 1 um
> 5 um
> 15 um
5 to 15 um
15 to 25 um
25 to 50 um
50 to 100 um
> 100 um
>4 um(c)
>6 um(c)
>14 um(c)
6 to 14 um(c)
14 to 21 um(c)
21 to 38 um(c)
38 to 70 um(c)
> 70 um(c)
Size Code A
Size Code B
Size Code C
---
---
---
---
---
Code Designation
SAE AS 4059
Equivalent ISO 4406 Class
195
76
14
---
---
---
---
---
000
8/7/4
390
152
27
125
22
4
1
0
00
9/8/5
780
304
54
250
44
8
2
0
0
10/9/6
1,560
609
109
500
89
16
3
1
1
11/10/7
3,120
1,217
217
1,000
178
32
6
1
2
12/11/8
6,250
2,432
432
2,000
356
63
11
2
3
13/12/9
12,500
4,864
864
4,000
712
126
22
4
4
14/13/10
25,000
9,731
1,731
8,000
1,425
256
45
8
5
15/14/11
50,000
19,462
3,462
16,000
2,850
506
90
16
6
16/14/12
100,000
38,924
6,924
32,000
5,700
1,012
180
32
7
17/16/13
200,000
77,849
13,849
64,000
11,400
2,025
360
64
8
18/17/14
400,000
155,698
27,698
128,000
22,800
4,050
720
128
9
19/18/15
800,000
311,396
55,396
256,000
45,600
8,100
1,440
256
10
20/19/16
Hydraulic Component Clearances Are Critical and therefore require strategic f iltration designs t o remove the sized particles that will attack the most critical components of the hydraulic system
gear pump J1: 0.5 - 5µm J2: 0.5 - 5µm vane pump J1: 0.5 - 5µm J2: 5 - 20µm J3: 30 - 40µm servo valve J1: 1 4µm
piston pump J1: 5 - 40µm J2: 0.5 - 1µm J3: 20 - 40µm J4: 1 - 25µm
Guidelines Data Sheet Provides ISO target cleanlin ess levels for various crit ical hydraulic /Lube oil co mponents and th e filt er selectio n that will achieve that cleanliness level target.
Hydraulic Component Clearances Are Critical and therefore require strategic f iltration designs t o remove the sized particles that will attack the most critical components of the hydraulic system
8
5µ
Sources of Contamination
New Oil - Photomicrographs
ISO 16/14/11 Demanded by Modern Hydraulic Systems
ISO 20/18/15 New Oil as Delivered in Tanker
ISO 17/15/13 New Oil as Delivered in Mini-container
ISO 23/21/18 New Oil as Delivered in Barrels
Effects of Contamination CAN EFFECTS OF CONTAMINATION BE STOPPED?
Basics of Fluid Contamination
Type of Contami nation Gaseous
Liquid
Solid
Effects
Air
Water
Gases
Chemicals
Emery Metal Scale Rust Particles
Extremely Damaging
Iron, Steel Brass, Bronze Aluminum Laminated Fabric Fibers Seal Abrasion Rubber Hose Particles
Damaging Minimal Damage
Basics of Fluid Contamination
Measuring procedures for solid particle contamination Weighing Gravimetric Analysis
Non-Homogeneous fluids
Counting Microscopic Analysis Manual Counting Automatic Counting
Electronic Analysis Automatic Particle Counters (APCs) In The Field
How do we measure fluid contamination? Weighing: Gravimetric Concentration 20 18
l / g m D T M O S I
16 14 12 10 8 6 4
How do we measure fluid contamination?
Microscopic analysis NAS 9 Photomicrograph
ISO 20/18/15
How do we measure fluid contamination?
Basic principle light obscuration
Light sour ce is an LED light • Durability • Holds calibration • Does not saturate quickly with high contamination levels
How do we measure fluid contamination?
14 micron
Size of Partic les 6 micron 4 micron
Number of Particles = Number of Pulses
How do we measure water content?
• Karl-Fisch er Analysis (chemical) Laboratory •
(optical) Laboratory
• Turbid ity Measurement (optical) Field • Crackle Test (acoustic) Field • Hydrog en Gas Metho d (chemical) Field (WTK) Water test kit • Aqua Sensor - AS-2330 (electronic) Field Installation
What errors can be made during fluid sampling and analysis?
Sources of Error Does the sample represent the system cleanliness? Foreign media: (air partic ulate, O2, water, oil or chemicals on hands, etc.) Type of extract ion (static, dynamic) Point of extraction
- Test Connecti on Penetration type and type of t est sample fitting - Best location to t ake sample
Sources of Error Possible Sample Locations
VACUUM BOTTLE SYRINGE
THROTTLE VALVE
RESERVOIRS
Taking a sample from
Taking a sample
Sources of Error-Reservoir sampling
Example:
Example: Reservoir Extraction w ith auxiliary pump Reservoir Extraction with Auxiliary Pump Point at which suction hose was lowered slowly to the bottom of the tank.
suction hose near surface
suction hose near bottom ISO CLASS INCREASE FROM 15 TO 20
Sources of Error Point of Extraction - Test Connection Arrangement
Sources of Error Point of Extraction - Where in the System is the best representation of system fluid cleanliness?
Sources of Error Disadvantages of Oil Sampling A Snapshot in ti me - does it represent the system cleanliness? Is it a peak or minimum point?
Sources of Error Advantages of Continuous real time on line Measurement Sample taken every 100 millil iter-real-time
Sources of Error
Major actuation
Point of maximum contamination
Filtration is removing particles
Filtration has reached equilibrium
Hydraulic Power Unit Cylinder actuator
SERVO Pressure f ilter
Return filter
Main Hydraulic Pump
Kidney loop filter
Reservoir
Sources of Error Sampling Error • Leaving sample bottles open too long • Using previously contaminated bottles • Unaware of system operation immediately before sampling resulting in inaccurate analysis and conclusions. • Improper handling causing contamination from hands • Failure to flush sampling ports and lines before sampling
Eleme lement nt Tech chno nolo logy gy
What Can Can Be Done? Don e? To assure maximum component life, fluid life and superior system and equipment operation?
CONTAMINANT LEVEL POPULATIONS MUST BE REDUCED TO LEVELS REQUIRED REQU IRED BY B Y CRITIC CRITICA A L SYSTEM COMPONENTS
HOW ? Through Proper Filtering, Monitoring,
Cont onta amin mina atio tion n Cont ontrol rol Loss of component Cost of efficiency du e to wear wear standa standard rd filtration (non-effi (non-efficient cient operation)System perform performance ance degradation degradation
System System downtim dow ntime e costs resulting from comp onent failures-
Equipment & component repair and Repl Replacement acement – labor & component costs
Decrea Decrease se in pr oduc t quality resulting
Contamination Control Loss of component Efficiency du e to wear (non-efficient operation)
System downtime Costs resulting from Component failures
Cost of a superior balanced filtratio n system up front Equip ment & comp onent repair and replacement
Decrease in produ ct Quality resulting fr om Poor co ntrol and
Required New Machine Cleanliness Fluid Cleanliness / Service Life Current Cleanliness
Target
Target
Target
Target
24/22/19
21/19/16
20/18/15
19/17/14
18/16/13
23/21/18
20/18/15
19/17/14
18/16/13
17/15/12
22/20/17
19/17/14
18/16/13
17/15/12
16/14/11
21/19/16
18/16/13
17/15/12
16/14/11
15/13/10
20/18/15
17/15/12
16/14/11
15/13/10
14/12/9
19/17/14
16/14/11
15/13/10
14/12/9
14/12/8
Lif e Ext. Factor
2X
3X
4X
5X
Machinery Life Extension Factor
New Cleanliness Level (ISO Code) ) e d o C O S I (
s s e n i l n a e l C e n i h c a M t n e r r u C
Hydraulics and Diesel Engines JournalBearing and Turbo
Roling Element Bearing Gear Boxes and Other
Common Filter Terms Micron => 1 µm = 0.001 mm = 0.000039” Pressu re Drop acro ss t he element Beta Ratio Beta Stability DHC => Dirt hol din g capacity Multi-Pass Testi ng Filter Indicator Element co llapse Pressure Filter By-Pass Absolute vs. Nominal Rated Filtrat ion
Features of a High Quality Element
High efficiency absolute element Features optimization of all element performance characteristics • High ßx-values (efficiency) • High ßx-value stability • High dirt holding capacity • Low long term pressure drop • High collapse stability • High flow fatigue stability • Wide fluid compatibility
Multi-Pass Testing ISO 16889: 1999 What Data is Obtained? Best performance comparison regarding below parameters • Beta Ratios • Beta Stability • Dirt Holding Capacity
How is test completed? • • • • • •
ISO Medium Test Dust (ISO MTD) Mil-5606 Hydraulic Fluid Constant Viscosity Constant Temperature at 40 degrees Centigrade Constant Flow rate through filter Constant rate of dirt injection
What is Dynamic Filter Performance? Filters that Perform in REAL LIFE!
The Test Lab
• • • • • •
Steady Flow No Fatigue Cycles Constant Dirt “Ingression Rate” to Filter Single Fluid Used Temperature 100°F
Real Life
• Continuous Variations • Millions of Fatigue Cycles • Always Changing • Wide Variety • -40°F to 210°F
Multi-Pass Testing ISO 16889: 1999 (ISO Standard for Performing Mult i-Pass Test)
Beta Values Versus Efficiency Beta Value
Effic iency
Particles ≥ Beta() Micron Upstream
Particles Downstream
Beta X
2
50.0000%
100,000
50,000
Beta X
4
75.0000%
100,000
25,000
Beta X
10
90.0000%
100,000
10,000
Beta X
20
95.0000%
100,000
5,000
Beta X
40
97.5000%
100,000
2,500
Beta X
60
98.3333%
100,000
1,667
Beta X
75
98.6667%
100,000
1,333
Beta X
100
99.0000%
100,000
1,000
Beta X
125
99.2000%
100,000
800
Beta X
150
99.3333%
100,000
667
Beta X
200
99.5000%
100,000
500
Beta X
300
99.6667%
100,000
333
Beta X
500
99.8000%
100,000
200
Beta X
1,000
99.9000%
100,000
100
Beta X
2,000
99.9500%
100,000
50
Beta X
4,000
99.9750%
100,000
25
Beta X
5,000
99.9800%
100,000
20
Beta Values Versus Efficiency Beta Value
Effic iency
Particles ≥ Beta() Micron Upstream
Particles Downstream
Beta X
2
50.0000%
100,000
50,000
Beta X
4
75.0000%
100,000
25,000
Beta X
10
90.0000%
100,000
10,000
Beta X
20
95.0000%
100,000
5,000
Beta X
40
97.5000%
100,000
2,500
Beta X
60
98.3333%
100,000
1,667
Beta X
75
98.6667%
100,000
1,333
Beta X
100
99.0000%
100,000
1,000
Beta X
125
99.2000%
100,000
800
Beta X
150
99.3333%
100,000
667
Beta X
200
99.5000%
100,000
500
Beta X
300
99.6667%
100,000
333
Beta X
500
99.8000%
100,000
200
Beta X
1,000
99.9000%
100,000
100
Beta X
2,000
99.9500%
100,000
50
Beta X
4,000
99.9750%
100,000
25
Beta X
5,000
99.9800%
100,000
20
Beta Stability
ISO 16889: 1999
High ßx -Values / High ß x -Value Stabili ty Beta Ratio r emains at a relatively co nstant level at high pressure drop s beyond normal element operating ranges wi th hig h b eta stability.
Point of element failure
Poor Beta Stability Causes a loss of adequate protection from the point that Beta drops below manufacturer ’s published beta specification before the end of element life. • Signi ficant loss of filter efficiency before the end of element life • Loss of equipment through loss of protection • Increased wear and component failures • Increased downtime • Decrease in Customer Satisfaction
High Dirt Holding Capacity ISO 16889: 1999 • Decrease in downtime when indicator is utilized for change-out indication (Less Element Changes) • Decrease in replacement element costs (longer lasting-util izing full element capacity) • Decrease in maintenance/labor costs
DHC - Dirt Holding Capacity DHC Measured at Terminal Pressure / Indicator Setting
INDICATOR TRIP POINT Element Terminal Pressure
72
Superior Element Life Pressure Drop Over Element Life Comparison High efficiency element h as high er D/P than a low efficiency element HYDAC designs elements t o incr ease D/P at a slow er rate than others
Element technology Compatibility with all modern fluids
Features of a High Quality Element with high flow fatigue stability ISO 3724
Element Construction for High Efficiency & Performance Element Recipe Layers
Superior elements are designed for max. Surface Area Section Of Supported Element Pleat spring movement
resilience
Upstream Support Downstream Support Media & Suppo rt Layers Filter Element Suppo rt Core
HYDAC optimizes the number of pleats to maximize surface area of the media.
HYDAC Elements Designed for Max. Surface Area Section Of Unsupported Element Lost Effective Area
FLOW
Collapsed Pleat Caused by Lack of Support in recipe struct ure Typi cal Location of Fatig ue Failures Core suppor t tu be
FLOW
FORCE
Compressed Pleat Caused b y Lack of Adequate Support and hi gh flo w
Filter Element Material Options Caking oc curs on surface of media under Non-violent non-turbulent flow condit ions
Surface Filtration With surface media (paper, metals, polyester) there is
Parti cles enter fibers and becom e entr ained
Depth Filtration With depth media as show n above, the particles enter
Filter Terms Absolute vs. Nominal ISO 16889: 1999 CONFORMANCE REQUIRED FOR AB SOLUTE FILTERS Absolute Rated Filter ß x 75 • Beta ratio, efficiency and Dirt holding capacity determined by conducting a multipass test per ISO 16889: 1999 (filtration) • Most are in fact Fiberglass media.
NO INDUSTRY STANDARD EXISTS FOR NOMINAL FILTERS Nominal Rated Filter • No indust ry st andard exists to determine nominal element ratings. • Surface filtration (nominal) applied in actual systems can not achieve dirt holding capacities derived through multipass testing. • Most are paper, cellulose, polyester, or metals • Beta effic iency and dirt hol ding are not valid data for nominal media per the multi pass test specification – Depth media only is specified on th e ISO
Multi-Pass Test Report ID: MPT990105 Test Component: FILPRO 160D010BN
Test Date: 01/21/99 Tested By: HLM
TEST CONDITIONS Fluid: Viscosity: Test Dust: Test Flow : Specific Test Flow: Base Upstream Gravimetric Level: Termin al Pressur e: Filtration Area: Bubbl e Point:
MIL-H-5606 +ASA 15.0 cSt SAE 5-80 60.0 L/min 12.8 mm/s 5.0 mg/L 72.0 psi 782.0 cm2 N/A mmWC (5)
TEST RESULTS Clean Element Press ure: Collapse Pressure: Bets 2/20/75: TWA Beta 10: Efficiency:
2.8 psi N/A psi <2.0 / 8.5/12.3 µm per ANSI / (NFPA) 32.7 T3.10.8.8 R1-1990 96.94%
Multi-Pass Test Report ID: MPT981202 Test Component: 0160D010BN3HC
Test Date: 01/21/98 Tested By: HLM
TEST CONDITIONS Fluid: Viscosity: Test Dust: Test Flow : Specific Test Flow: Base Upstream Gravimetric Level: Termin al Pressur e: Filtration Area: Bubbl e Point:
MIL-H-5606 +ASA 15.0 cSt SAE 5-80 60.0 L/min 8.4 mm/s 5.0 mg/L 72.0 psi 1194.0 cm2 N/A mmWC (5)
TEST RESULTS Clean Element Press ure: Collapse Pressure: Bets 2/20/75: TWA Beta 10: Efficiency:
3.5 psi N/A psi <2.0 / 2.6/4.8 µm per ANSI / (NFPA) 2251 T3.10.8.8 R1-1990 99.94%
Typical Filter Configurations
Pressure Line Filtration
• Removes contaminants after hydraulic pump
Lube System Filtration
Altern ative A In-Line Filtr ation
Alter native B Off-Line Filtration
Alternative A
Alternative B
Return Line Filtration
• Cost effective for relatively dirt-tolerant systems
Comprehensive Filtration
Multiple Filters Provid e Maximum protection
Off-Line Filter Provides High efficient filtration
Absolute depth filters have an average pore size of the element rating Initial ISO code results from method of delivery
Fluid Storage Tank
Filled fro m: Mini-tot es – 17/15/13 Tanker tru cks – 20/18/15 Metal drums – 23/21/18
Transfer cart-single filter
Single absol ute depth filter
Hydraulic System Reservoir
Desir ed ISO = 16/14/11 RATINGS UNDER EQUILIBRIUM CONDITIONS ISO Code target
Micron absolute rating
20/18/15
20 micron
19/17/14
10 micron
Filter Element 3 micron Beta=1000
# particles in 100,000
# particles out 100
For every 1000 particles 3 micron or larger that enter the element ---- one goes through when the filter element is in equilibrium – continuous Re-circulating flow.
Filter Element 3 micron Beta=1000
# particles in 100,000
# particles out 100
For every 1000 particles 3 micron or larger that enter the element ---- one goes through when the filter element is in equilibrium – continuous Re-circulating flow.
Effectively performing as a two pass pr ocess
Initial ISO code resul ts from method of delivery
Transfer cart – dual fi lter
Hydraulic System Reservoir
Fluid Storage Tank Dual series absol ute depth filter Filled from: Mini-totes – 17/15/12 Tanker tru cks – 20/18/15 Metal drums – 23/21/18
Desir ed ISO = 16/14/11 RATINGS UNDER EQUILIBRIUM CONDITIONS ISO Code target
Micron absolute rating
20/18/15
20 micron
The design and operation of a Hydraulics System
• Assess system requirements • Recommend optimum components for performance and longevity • Monitor & Maintain fluid characteristics, cleanliness and water content
Assess 1. Determine TCL (target cleanliness level) Based on • system components • system pressure & environmental conditions Use this g uidelines document foun d on our w ebsite In the Broch ures section
Assess 2. Determine Current Conditions • particle contamination levels • water content • fluid health (ageing/effectiveness) • fluid sampling changes over time
Assess 2. Evaluate Current Protection in Place • to account for ALL sources of contamination
Assess 2. Evaluate Current Protection in Place • pressure filters • return line filters • offline filtration loops • breathers-high integrity and desiccant types • new oil protection – treatment, transfer, polishing • monitoring (sampling)/change-out schedule
Recommend Filtration Upgrades
A = B =
Offline Recir culating Loop Pressur e OR Retur n Filter
Recommend Filtration Upgrades 1. Betafit Elements • • • • • • •
High ßx-values High ßx-value stability High dirt holding capacity Low long term pressure drop High collapse stability High flow fatigue stability Wide fluid compatibility
Recommend Filtration Upgrades 2. Addition of Offline Filtration Loops
Off line loop membrane Filtr ation – Used for solid particulate in
Vacuum Dehydr ator
Filter coolers
when high water or gas content is present
when heat is a problem
Recommend Filtration Upgrades 3. Addition and replacement of high performance breathers Breathers Wide variety including: - desiccant for water vapor removal - spin-on - with filler baskets
Monitor & Maintain 1. Contamination Monitoring Devices • Portable & Online • Water Content Sensors
FCU (Portable)
CS (Permanent)
Perfect for plants with many small machines
Perfect for larger, critical systems where constant, monitoring is required
AS (AquaSensor) Water content sensor
Monitor & Maintain 2. Supplemental Monitoring Techniques • Regular Fluid Sampling & Analysis
Fluid Sampling Kit s Provides information about more than contamination: - additive depletion - contamination - water content - viscosity - wear metals - trending from periodic sampling
Leads to predictive maintenance decisions
Monitor & Maintain 3. Portable Offline and Fluid Handling Filtration Loops • Can be used on multiple machines if contamination levels unexpectedly rise
Fluid transfer carts
Hand-held
Vacuum dehydrator
The Science Science of Conditi on Moni Monitor toring ing and Contamin Contamina atio tion n Control Condition Monitorin g Measure and Measure and determin e the status of system co mponent s and fluid health to p revent failure, optimize maintenance practices and fluid processing and/or replacement intervals.
MAINTENANCE
failure oriented
preventative
time status Condition Monitoring
predicted
Senso nsorr Ar rays for f or a Full Range Range of fluid conditions monitoring
p r e s s u r e
temperature
oil condition
a d c a q t u a i s i t i o n
Remote Monit Remote Monit orin g Capability Capability : Your Hand Hand on the Pulse Pulse of the Systems
Level sensor
Intranet/Internet
Mobile telephone system Pressure sensor
Machines or Equipment
Temperature sensor
Contamination sensor
Aq ua Aqua sensor
t e n r e h t E
Fixed network M S G
m e d o M
Sensor Monitoring Unit
e r a w t f o S r e v i r m D o o r l o r t n o C
Portable Online Particle Counter for Service Suppor t
Features • Measuri ng of sol id con tamination in hydr aulic and lube oils after market service and repair • Calibration to ISO 11943 field measurement equipment • Stores up to 3000 measured values • Inlet pressu re rang e 15 - 5075 psi (1 - 350 bar) • Integrated pump f or tank samplin g • Easy to o perate
Contamination Sensors on each machine
Aqua Sensor for dissolved water on each machine Main features : • Measurement of water content in o ils relative to the saturation level • Simultaneous measurement of flui d temperature • High reliabilit y due to compact and rugged design • Calibr ation independent of different oil types • Unsusceptible to high pressure pulsation • Wide fluid temperature r ange
Aqua Sensor with readout
Features • Measurement of water content in hydraulic and lubrication oi ls relative to the saturation concentration • Simultaneous measurement of the fluid temperature • Designed for station ary installation • Standard output op tions: - 4-20mA analog o utpu ts for percent saturation and temperature - switch /alarm outputs - serial RS485 interface - integrated di splay
Stationary Single Pass Filtration units
Features • Vane pump f or • hydraulic oils • low cost • Gear pump 5 - 19 GPM (18 - 72 l/min) • Visc osity up t o (1000 mm 2/s) • for higher dirt quantity • Integrated pressure relief valve • Filter element type Dimicron ® membrane • high dirt h olding capacity • reduced filtr ation cost s • excellent singl e pass filt ration
Stationary Single Pass Filtration units Membrane type Dimicron ® filter elements nominal flow rate per element 15 l/min dirt holding capacity per element = 500 g (ISOMTD) ß 2 > 1000 @ dp = 2 bar incinerable
Fluid Conditioning – Water Removing Systems Functions:
Dewatering (vacuu m dehydration)
Filtering
Degassing (de-aeration)
Fluid Conditioning System
Appl ic ati on s in Po wer gener ati on: Lube system for steam turbines Hydraulic steam control system
• Mineral oi l b ased • Phosphate ester only wi th rotary vane vacuum pump Gear box cooling water pump Lube system boiler feed pump Oil storage Appl ic ati on s in s teel indus tr y: Hydraulic or Lube system for roller bearing (Morgoil system) Appl ic ati on s in Pu lp and Paper : Main lube system or wet end hydraulic
