Huawei Microwave Radio Product RTN 380V1R1 Field Test Report for DU V5.0-Finially

Huawei Microwave Radio Product RTN 900 V100R003 Test Proposal V1.0

RTN380 Microwave Products Field Test Proposal

Reference:

{Reference}

Version:

V3.0

Date:

3th Feb 2013

................................................... /................. Signature / Date:

................................................... /................. ................................................... /.................

13 August 2013

Commercial in Confidential

Page 1 of 68


Contents 1 OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................4 1.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................4 1.2 Reference Documents.......................................................................................................................4

2 EQUIPMENT LIST..........................................................................................5 2.1 Equipments under test.....................................................................................................................5 2.2 Instruments for testing....................................................................................................................5

3 FIELD TRIAL DESCRIPTION........................................................................6 3.1 Maps of field trial.............................................................................................................................6

4 FIELD TEST SUMMARY................................................................................7 4.1 Radio link .........................................................................................................................................7

5 FIELD TEST CASE........................................................................................8 5.1 PM testing ........................................................................................................................................8 5.1.1 PM testing of Eth service with difference frames size................................................................8 5.2 Configuration Test in field............................................................................................................10 5.2.1 IF Configuration........................................................................................................................10 5.2.2 Radio configuration...................................................................................................................13 5.3 Service Test in Field.......................................................................................................................16 5.3.1 E-Line Services..........................................................................................................................16 5.3.1.1 Point-to-Point Transparently Transmitted E-Line Services...............................................16 5.3.1.2 VLAN-Based E-Line Service.............................................................................................20 5.3.2 Transmission Delay Measurement in Field...............................................................................24 5.3.2.1 Ethernet service round-trip delay.......................................................................................24 5.3.3 Transmission Capacity Measurement in Field..........................................................................25 5.3.3.1 Ethernet service throughput（2.5Gbps（.............................................................................25 5.3.3.2 Ethernet service throughput................................................................................................27 5.3.4 Quality of Service (Qos)............................................................................................................30 5.3.4.1 Eth Traffic schedule according to VLAN priority.............................................................30 5.3.5 Service Stability.........................................................................................................................35 5.3.5.1 Ethernet service transmission stability test........................................................................35 5.4 Operation and Maintenance Test in Field by LCT.....................................................................37 5.4.1 Maintenance..............................................................................................................................37 5.4.1.1 Checking the NE status......................................................................................................37 5.4.1.2 Browsing the Current Alarms.............................................................................................40 5.4.1.3 Browsing the History Alarms.............................................................................................43 5.4.1.4 Browsing the Transmit Power and Receive Power............................................................46 5.4.2 Emergency Maintenance...........................................................................................................48 5.4.2.1 IEEE 802.1ag ETH OAM test............................................................................................48 5.4.3 Y1731 Test.................................................................................................................................57 5.4.3.1 LM Test..............................................................................................................................57

13 August 2013


Page 2 of 68


5.4.3.2 DM Test..............................................................................................................................59 5.4.3.3 FDV Test............................................................................................................................62 5.5 1+1 HSB and 2+0 Scenario Test....................................................................................................63 5.5.1 1+1 HSB Scenario Test.............................................................................................................63 5.5.2 2+0 Scenario Test......................................................................................................................66

13 August 2013


Page 3 of 68


1

OVERVIEW

1.1

Introduction

This document describes the field test proposal used by Huawei® microwave radio transmission platform RTN 300 series. The field trial information and microwave planning parameters are descripting in this document, and most contents of them should be completed after meeting with costumers. Every test case in this document can be applied to one or more field trial, and every field trial may implement with one or more test case. Chapter 4 descript the combination of radio link and test case.

1.2

Reference Documents  < RTN 380 V100R001 Feature Description >  < RTN 380 V100R001 Configuration Guide >  < RTN 380 V100R001 Maintenance Guide >

13 August 2013


Page 4 of 68


2

EQUIPMENT LIST

2.1

Equipments under test Version

Quantity

V1R1

2

U2000

V1R8C00

1

U2000WebLCT

V1R8C00

1

RTN900 series

V1R3/R5

2

Products RTN380

2.2

Instruments for testing

Type Ethernet analyzer

13 August 2013

Manufacturer

Model and Serial number

Test center

Quantity

Valid of Calibration

1


Page 5 of 68


3

FIELD TRIAL DESCRIPTION

3.1

Maps of field trial

According to the real site information Site A

13 August 2013

Radio link

Site C


Page 6 of 68


4

FIELD TEST SUMMARY

4.1

Radio link

No

Test Items

1

1+0

2

1+1

13 August 2013


Notice

Page 7 of 68


5

FIELD TEST CASE

5.1

PM testing 5.1.1

Test Consideration

PM testing of Eth service with difference frames size This case to verify the radio transmission stability of Ethernet service with difference frames size.

Test Bench

1. Create radio link with required parameters. 2. Configure E-LINE services over radio link. Test Procedure

3. Loopback relevant Ethernet ports on remote site. 4. Configure the test analyzer with difference frames:96,101,512,1024,1518,1522. 5. Check the results.

Test Results

Radio link information: link 1 Radio Channel Spacing: 500MHz Packet length

Modulation Scheme: 64QAM Rate measured value

96 Bytes

13 August 2013


Page 8 of 68


101 Bytes

512 Byte

1024 Bytes

1518 Bytes

13 August 2013


Page 9 of 68


1522 Bytes

The long test should be no packets loss. Expected Results

Remarks: signature

5.2

Configuration Test in field 5.2.1

IF Configuration When a new radio link to be installing, the MW engineer should go to the site and configure radio parameters according to the network planning profile.

Test Consideration

This case to verify that same basic parameters can be query and configurable by LCT in field. Be careful, some operations in this case may interrupt the radio link.

Test Bench

Test Procedure

13 August 2013

1. Establish a radio link with required parameters.


Page 10 of 68


2. Query the Radio configuration on LCT and check parameters list below are correct: a. Channel space b. Manually specified modulation c.

Link ID

d. Received link id 3. Apply a new channel space and query the channel space should be update. ( before do this, you must ensure the adjacent channel is free) 4. Check the radio link is broken, then configure the channel space to initial value and check the radio link should restore. 5. Apply a new modulation scheme and query the modulation should be update. 6. Check the radio link is broken, then configure the modulation to initial and check the radio link should restore. 7. Apply a new Link ID and check the received link id on remote site should equal to this new ID. 8. Configure the Link ID to initial value and check the received link id on remote site should change back.

Radio link information: link 1 Radio Channel Spacing: 500MHz Actions Query the channel space Test Results

Modulation Scheme: 16QAM Results OK

Query the modulation scheme

OK

Query the Link ID

OK

Query the received Link ID

OK

Modify the channel space

OK

Modify the modulation scheme

OK

Modify the Link ID

OK

Reason for Failure: Remarks: Radio link ID（

13 August 2013


Page 11 of 68


IF Channel:

13 August 2013


Page 12 of 68


Modulation mode:

signature

5.2.2

Radio configuration When a new radio link to be installing, the MW engineer should go to the site and configure radio parameters according to the network planning profile.

Test Consideration

This case to verify that same basic radio parameters can be query and configurable by LCT in field. Be careful, some operations in this case may interrupt the radio link.

Test Bench

Test

13 August 2013

1. Establish a radio link with required parameters.


Page 13 of 68


2. Query the raido configuration on LCT and check parameters below are correct: a. Actual transmit frequency b. Actual receive frequency c.

Actual transmit power

d. Actual receive power e. Actual transmit status 3. Configure a new transmit frequency and query the actual value should be update to the new frequency. ( before do this, you must ensure this new frequency is free and no any other radio using this frequency on the same path) Procedure

4. Check the radio link is broken, then configure the transmit frequency to the initial value and check the radio link should restore. 5. Configure a new transmit power and query the actual value should be update to the new level 6. Check the receive power on remote site is changed, then configure the transmit power to the initial level and check the receive power on remote site is change back to the initial level. 7. Mute the radio and query the actual transmit status is mute, check the radio link will interrupt. 8. Unmute the radio and query the actual transmit status is mute, check the radio link will restore.

Radio link information: link 1 Radio Channel Spacing: 500MHz Actions Query the actual transmit frequency

Modulation Scheme: 64QAM Results Ok

Test

Query the actual receive frequency

Ok

Results

Query the actual transmit power

Ok

Query the actual receive power

Ok

Modify the transmit frequency

Ok

Modify the transmit power

Ok

Mute the radio

Ok

Unmute the radio

Ok

Reason for Failure: Remarks:

13 August 2013

TX frequency:


Page 14 of 68


TX power:

RX power:

TX mute:

signature

13 August 2013


Page 15 of 68


5.3

Service Test in Field

5.3.1 5.3.1.1

E-Line Services Point-to-Point Transparently Transmitted E-Line Services

Test Consideration

The point-to-point transparently transmitted E-Line services are the basic E-Line model. Point-to-point transmission does not involve service bandwidth sharing, service isolation, or service distinguishing; instead, Ethernet services are transparently transmitted between two service access points. in this manner, the transmission link is private This case to verify the transparently transmitted E-line services can be done on RTN equipment.

Test Bench

1. Establish a radio link with required parameters. 2. Configure an E-Line service with null source VLAN and sink VLAN. Test Procedure

3. Create an IP streams on Ethernet analyzer with or without VLAN. 4. Configure the transmit rate less than the throughput in current radio mode. 5. Start transmit, check received packets without any loss.

Radio link information: link 1 Test Results

Radio Channel Spacing: 500MHz

Modulation Scheme: 16QAM

Ethernet Services

Result

IP Stream without VLAN

Pass through

IP Stream with VLAN

Pass through


13 August 2013


Page 16 of 68


Configuration:

13 August 2013


Page 17 of 68


Traffic with Vlan:

13 August 2013


Page 18 of 68


Traffic without Vlan:

Result :

13 August 2013


Page 19 of 68


signature

5.3.1.2

VLAN-Based E-Line Service

Test Consideration

VLANs can be used to separate E-Line services. With the VLAN technology, multiple E-Line services can share one physical channel. These services are VLAN-based ELine services This case to verify the VLAN-Based E-line services can be done on RTN equipment.

Test Bench

Test Procedure

13 August 2013

1. Establish a radio link with required parameters. 2. Loopback relevant ports on remote site.


Page 20 of 68


3. Configure an E-Line service from port 1 of local site to port 1 of remote site through radio link with Vlan ID equal to 100. 4. Create an IP streams on the analyzer’s port which connect to port 1 of local site with VLAN id equal to 100（200. 5. Start transmits with appropriate rate, check received packets on port 1.

Service Model:

Service 1 can pass through the radio link. And service 2 should be blocked.

Radio link information: link 1 Test Results



Ethernet Services

Result

IP service 1 (Vlan id: 100)

Pass

IP service 2 (Vlan id: 200)

block


13 August 2013

Configuration:


Page 21 of 68


Traffic with vlan 100:

13 August 2013


Page 22 of 68


Traffic with vlan 200

13 August 2013


Page 23 of 68


signature

5.3.2 5.3.2.1

Transmission Delay Measurement in Field Ethernet service round-trip delay

Test Consideration

The Ethernet service transmission on the radio link. This case to measure the round-trop delay of Ethernet service.

Test Bench

1. Create radio link with required parameters. Test Procedure

2. Configure E-LINE services over radio link. 3. Loopback relevant Ethernet ports on remote site. 4. Measure the latency with required packet length.

Radio link information: link 1 Radio Channel Spacing: 500MHz Test Results

13 August 2013


Packet length

Round-trip delay

64 Bytes

Notes in remarks

128 Bytes

Notes in remarks

…

Notes in remarks


Page 24 of 68


The value is the one direction trip latency in the talbe.

Expected Results

Result :

Remarks:

signature

5.3.3 5.3.3.1

Transmission Capacity Measurement in Field Ethernet service throughput（2.5Gbps（

Test Consideration

13 August 2013

This case to verify the maximum radio transmission capacity of Ethernet service can reach 2.5Gbps.


Page 25 of 68


Test Bench


2. Configure E-LINE services over radio link. 3. Loopback relevant Ethernet ports on remote site. 4. Measure the throughput with 64bits packet length on the highest modulation.

Test

The maximum radio transmission capacity can reach 2.490Gbps

Results Reason for Failure: Throughput :

Remarks:

signature

13 August 2013


Page 26 of 68


5.3.3.2

Ethernet service throughput

Test Consideration

This case to verify the radio transmission capacity of Ethernet service can reach to the guaranteed value in the products specification.

Test Bench


7. Configure E-LINE services over radio link. 8. Loopback relevant Ethernet ports on remote site. 9. Measure the throughput with required packet length.



Packet length

Throughput measured value

64 Bytes

More than 1G

128 Bytes

More than 1G

…

More than 1G

Expected Results

13 August 2013


Page 27 of 68


Remarks:

13 August 2013


Page 28 of 68


13 August 2013


Page 29 of 68


signature

5.3.4 5.3.4.1

Quality of Service (Qos) Eth Traffic schedule according to VLAN priority In some situations, the 3G base site using different VLAN priority to identify different services (e.g. voice, HSDPA etc) with same VLAN ID. In this manner, the transmit equipment should schedule different services according to VLAN priority.

Test Consideration

13 August 2013

This case to verify schedule the Ethernet services according to VLAN priority in RTN equipment. In this test case, we are considering three kinds of condition to verify this feature, the first one is a basic scenario that without congestion, the second one is got congestion and restore in case of the transmission rate change of one or more services changing, the last one is got congestion and restore in case of radio transmission capacity change (e.g. AM down shift and up shift).


Page 30 of 68


Test Bench

Service Model:

Test Procedure

1. Establish a radio link with required parameters. 2. Connecting the GE port of Ethernet analyzer to NE. 3. Configure an E-Line service with VLAN ID 100 between local and remote sites. 4. Loopback the service port on remote site. 5. Create a new port policy with required schedule policy (e.g. ALL queues are SP). 6. Configure traffic classification according to the VLAN priority and map them to different queues. 7. Apply the policy to relevant ports. 8. Create 4 IP streams on the test port of Ethernet analyzer with same VLAN ID and with different VLAN priority. Condition 1 : 1. Setting the transmit rate for every stream and keep the amount transmit rate is less than radio transmission capacity. 2. Start transmit all services, check the actual received rate of every stream is equal to the transmit rate, that means all services are transmit through the radio link correctly. Condition 2: 1. Increase the transmit rate of stream1till the radio getting congestion. 2. The low priority should be lost. 3. Restore the transmit rate of stream 1. 4. Start transmit all services, check the actual received rate of every test port is

13 August 2013


Page 31 of 68


equal to the transmit rate, that means all services are transmit through the radio link correctly.

Radio link information: link 1 Radio Channel Spacing: 500MHz

Modulation Scheme: QPSKS

IP streams configuration: Stream1: 128byte, Vlan ID 100, VLAN Pri 7, Stream2: 128byte, Vlan ID 100, VLAN Pri 5, Stream3: 128byte, Vlan ID 100, VLAN Pri 3, Stream4: 128byte, Vlan ID 100, VLAN Pri 1, Condition 1: Non-Congestion

Test Results

Ethernet Services

Actual Transmitting Rate

Actual Receiving Rate

Stream1

100M

100M

Stream2

100M

100M

Stream3

100M

100M

Stream4

100M

100M

AMOUNT

400M

400M

Condition 2: Congestion by transmission rate of streams increased Ethernet Services

Actual Transmitting Rate (Congestion / Restore)

Actual Receiving Rate (Congestion / Restore)

Stream1

250/350/424

250/350/424

Stream2

100

100/74/0

Stream3

100

74/0/0

Stream4

100

0/0/0

AMOUNT Expected

The packet losing of each service is correct by different VLAN priority.

Results Remarks:

13 August 2013

Configuration :


Page 32 of 68


13 August 2013


Page 33 of 68


13 August 2013


Page 34 of 68


signature signature

5.3.5 5.3.5.1

Service Stability Ethernet service transmission stability test

Test Consideration

13 August 2013

This case to verify the reliability of Ethernet service that transmits through radio link for a long test period.


Page 35 of 68


Test Bench

1. Establish a radio link with required parameters. Test Procedure

2. Configure Ethernet service. 3. Make PER measurement for a period of more than 24 hrs.


Service Type Ethernet Stream1

Service Description Packets length: 101

Modulation Scheme: 16QAM Start Date/Time

Stop Date/Time

Results

2013-02-07

2013-02-09

OK

Throughput: 2G Vlan-ID: 100 Priority: 0


13 August 2013


Page 36 of 68


signature

5.4

Operation and Maintenance Test in Field by LCT

5.4.1 5.4.1.1

Maintenance Checking the NE status

Test Consideration

This case to verify checking the NE status in field by LCT.

Test Bench

Test Procedure

1. In NE List, query communication status of an NE, communication status needs to be Normal. 2. Check Login Status of an NE. If the Login Status column of an NE is Not Logged In, log in to the NE. a)

13 August 2013

Select an NE, and then click NE Login, the NE Login dialog box is


Page 37 of 68


displayed. b)

c)

Enter a user name in User Name and a password in Password. 

The user name is ‘lct’ by default.



The password for the user lct is ‘Changeme_123’ by default.

Click OK. 

After you log in to the NE successfully, Login Status in NE List changes to Logged In.

Radio link information: Radio link 1 Test

Actions

Results

NE login

OK

Login status after login

OK

Results


13 August 2013


Page 38 of 68


13 August 2013


Page 39 of 68


signature

5.4.1.2

Browsing the Current Alarms

Test Consideration

13 August 2013

This case to verify browsing the current alarms and saving them to a field by LCT.


Page 40 of 68


Test Bench

1. In the NE Explorer, select the required NE from the Object Tree, and then click the

icon on the toolbar. You can also click an alarm indicator on the toolbar to display the alarms of the specific severity. From left to right, the alarm indicators and corresponding alarm severities are as follows: Red: critical alarm

Test Procedure

Orange: major alarm Yellow: minor alarm Purple: warning Light blue: abnormal event 2. Browse the displayed alarms. 3. If there are newly generated alarms after the last maintenance, select the newly generated alarms, record the details of these newly generated alarms, and then notify the troubleshooting personnel to clear these alarms in time. 4. Click Save As, a text file that lists the current alarms is displayed in Internet Explorer.

Radio link information: Radio link 1 Radio Channel Spacing: 500MHz Test Results


Actions

Results

Browsing the Current alarms

Ok

Save the Current alarms to a file

Ok

Plaster the current alarms file in here. Reason for Failure:

13 August 2013


Page 41 of 68


Remarks:

signature

13 August 2013


Page 42 of 68


5.4.1.3

Browsing the History Alarms

Test Consideration

This case to verify browsing the history alarms and saving them to a field by LCT.

Test Bench

1. In the NE Explorer, select the required NE from the Object Tree, and then click the

icon on the toolbar.

2. Click the Browse History Alarms tab. 3. Click Filter, The Filter dialog box is displayed. Test Procedure

4. Specify Rising Time and Cleared Time, and then click Filter. 5. The time span starts from the time when the last history alarm browsing operation was performed to the current time. 6. Browse the filtered history alarms. 7. Click Save As, a text file that lists the history alarms is displayed in Internet Explorer.

Radio link information: Radio link 1 Test Results



Actions

Results

Browsing the History alarms

OK

Save the History alarms to a file

OK


13 August 2013


Page 43 of 68


13 August 2013


Page 44 of 68


13 August 2013


Page 45 of 68


signature

5.4.1.4

Browsing the Transmit Power and Receive Power

Test Consideration

This case to verify browsing the history transmits power and receives power and then draws the power curve by LCT.

Test Bench

1. GO to the main topology, press the radio link and select the radio link monitor. Test Procedure

2. Choose the 15min or 24h performance, and query valve. 3. Check the curve of the TX power and RX power.




Actions

Results

Browsing the transmit power

OK

Browsing the receive power

OK


13 August 2013


Page 46 of 68


13 August 2013


Page 47 of 68


signature

5.4.2 5.4.2.1

Emergency Maintenance IEEE 802.1ag ETH OAM test

Test Consideration

The IEEE 802.1ag OAM focuses on the maintenance of end-to-end Ethernet links. It realizes the sectional and segmental management over the service flow by specifying the maintenance domain, maintenance association, and maintenance point.

Test Bench

Test Procedure

1. Create radio link with required parameters. 2. Creating a maintenance domain (MD). 3. Creating a maintenance association (MA). 4. Creating an MEP point. 5. Creating remote MEPs in an MA. 6. Creating MIP. 7. Performing LB and LT testing on local site.

13 August 2013


Page 48 of 68





Actions

Results

LB test for a good radio link

pass

LT test for a good radio link

pass


13 August 2013


Page 49 of 68


13 August 2013


Page 50 of 68


13 August 2013


Page 51 of 68


13 August 2013


Page 52 of 68


13 August 2013


Page 53 of 68


13 August 2013


Page 54 of 68


13 August 2013


Page 55 of 68


signature

13 August 2013


Page 56 of 68


5.4.3 5.4.3.1

Y1731 Test

LM Test

Test Purpose

Test the Ethernet OAM function.

Test Topology

(1) Setup the configuration according above figure.. (2) Configure Ethernet service from NE1 to NE2. Test Steps

(3) Create MEP1 at port of NE1, and set the MPID (4) Create MEP2 at port of NE2, and set the MPID, (5) Set the frame loss test parameters and check the result.

Expected Results Pass / Fail

Frame loss test work normally and the result is the same with the tester. pass

Remarks

13 August 2013


Page 57 of 68


13 August 2013


Page 58 of 68


Signature

5.4.3.2

DM Test

Test Purpose

13 August 2013



Page 59 of 68


Test Topology


(3) Create MEP1 at port of NE1, and set the MPID (4) Create MEP2 at port of NE2, and set the MPID, (5) Set the frame delay test parameters and check the result.

Expected

Frame delay test work normally and the result is the same with the tester .

Results

Latency: 70us----150us one way

Pass / Fail

pass

Remarks

13 August 2013


Page 60 of 68


Signature

13 August 2013


Page 61 of 68


5.4.3.3

FDV Test

Test Purpose


Test Topology


(8) Create MEP1 at port of NE1, and set the MPID (9) Create MEP2 at port of NE2, and set the MPID, (10)Set the frame delay test parameters and check the result.

Expected Results

Frame delay test work normally and the result is the same with the tester. Less than 10us.

Pass / Fail

pass

Remarks

13 August 2013 68


Page

62 of


5.5

1+1 HSB and 2+0 Scenario Test 5.5.1

Test Purpose

1+1 HSB Scenario Test To verify the HSB switching working normally.

Test Topology

(1) Create the test environment as shown in the diagram above. (2) Configure 1+1 HSB on the RTN 380, RTN380 NE1 is main unite, NE2 is standby. And RTN380 NE3 is main unite,NE4 is standby.

Test Steps

(3) Configure Two Ethernet service between NE1 and NE3 with vlan 100 and the vlan 200. (4) Setting the Ethernet analyzer, send traffic with vlan 100, and vlan 200. (5) Check the service status. (6) Cut off the main radio link, the service should be switch to the standby.


Remarks:

13 August 2013 68

This scenario requires the switch or the upper device support static nonsharing mode. If the switch can support the LAG configuration, the HSB will work normally. But in current test environment, the switch can not support non-sharing mode, so another solution have to be used to instead. Solution 2: Configure ports protection on switch side. This solution switching time is more than 3s. Test topology: Commercial in Confidential

Page

63 of


Before switching

After switching

13 August 2013 68


Page

64 of


So for one link, it can transmit 1Gbps service and for each port is 500Mbps

Signature

13 August 2013 68


Page

65 of


5.5.2 Test Purpose

2+0 Scenario Test To verify the 2+0 configuration can supply lager bandwidth and higher transmission capacity.

Test Topology

(1) Create the test environment as shown in the diagram above; (2) Configure Manual Sharing LAG on switch side;

Test Steps

(3) Configure four Ethernet service between NE1 and NE3 with vlan 100, 200, 300, and 400. (4) Connect the switch and the tester with 10G port and set the Ethernet analyzer, send Eth traffic. (5) Check the service status.


Remarks:

13 August 2013 68

This scenario requires the switch or the upper device support manual sharing mode. If the switch can support the LAG configuration, the 2+0 will work normally. In current test environment, the switch can not support banding one optical and electoral ports in one sharing LAG, so we test another solution. Test topology: Commercial in Confidential

Page

66 of


Link 1 channel bandwidth and modulation is 500MHz—16QAM ,capacity is 1.3Gb. And the RX power is -51dBm and -47dBm. Link 2 channel bandwidth and modulation is 500MHz—16QAM,capacity is 1.3GB. And the Rx power is -58dBm and -56dBm So for 2+0 scenario, 2Gbps service can be transmitted and each port 500Mbps

13 August 2013 68


Page

67 of


Signature

13 August 2013 68


Page

68 of

Huawei Microwave Radio Product RTN 380V1R1 Field Test Report for DU V5.0-Finially

Recommend Documents