Geotechnical logging techniques From MineDesignWiki - Collaborating to create mining best practice Jump to: navigation navigation,, search Warren Originating Newcomen Author:
Contents [hide hide]]
1 Core logging procedure 1.1 Core photographs and preparation o 1.2 Intervals o 1.3 Core description o 1.3.1 Colour and rock description 1.3.2 Total core recovery length 1.3.3 Rock quality designation (RQD) length 1.3.4 Number of discontinuities 1.3.5 Number of sets 1.3.6 Strength grade 1.3.7 Weathering/alteration grade 1.4 Discontinuity description o 2 Discontinuity orientation o 2.1 Methods for determining orientation 3 See also
Core logging procedure The following steps are suggested during the core logging process:
1. Clean the core of drilling fluids or mud. 2. Mark major structures, proposed point load testing locations, and depths (every 1-2 metres) on undisturbed core in splits. 3. Photograph the core in the splits (if using triple tube method) with a scale placed in the picture and a whiteboard indicating what depth the core has been obtained from. 4. Complete the Discontinuity and core description logs. 5. Transfer the core from the splits to a labelled core box. 6. Once a core box is full, take a single photograph of the core box wit h a scale.
The steps are detailed in the following sections.
Core photographs and preparation One of the most important things to do at the drill rig is photograph the undisturbed core in the splits. These photos may be used later to confirm televiewer images and will be an invaluable resource on the rock mass and for review of the design work. Proper core photos require that the core be cleaned prior to photographing. When core is covered in drilling mud, structural information can be obscured making it difficult to determine lithologies. Take the time to properly clean the core. The core should be wet if possible as some structural features do not show up on dry core so make sure to wet it down with a spray bottle or paint brush. The following are also required in all core photographs:
A scale - make sure the measuring tape you use is in focus and readable in the photos A white board with the project name, project number, hole ID, date, interval number(s), and depth from and to written out The depths with 1 meter increments marked on the core using a paint pen or grease pencil Labels of major structures, including type and depth. Examples of colours and symbols are outlined in Table 1.
Table 1: Examples of core symbols Item
Whole meter depth
Major structures
PLT samples
Mechanical breaks
Notes:
Colour
White
Red
Yellow
Blue
Symbol
1. Major structures should be identified using their corresponding logging code. In the example above the symbol is for a Fault; if the structure was a Shear the “F” would be substituted for an “S”. 2. The numbers in the Whole meter depth and Major structures symbols indicate the depth in meters.
Intervals The properties used in the core description are recorded by intervals for each run of core. An interval represents a change in lithology, alteration, and/or rock mass quality. The benefit of logging on an interval basis is that it allows for distinctly different units within one run of core to be assigned their own properties. This prevents the need for averaging different units over the length of a run, which can lead to overestimating / underestimating material properties. Photograph 1 below provides an example of a change in rock mass quality. Intervals should be at least 30 cm in length and will be at most the length of the core run. Intervals are also numbered sequentially. For example if you have 100 runs you should have between 100 and 500 intervals, assuming a maximum run length of 1.5 m (5 feet). The start depth (i.e. depth from) and the end depth (i.e. depth to) for each interval should be recorded as measured from the top of the hole. This is strictly a function of where the drill bit started and ended during the run, and may be less than the length of the maximum run if blocking of the core barrel occurs, the bit requires replacement, etc.
Figure 1: Example of rock core broken into intervals
Depths of zones of substantial core loss may have to be estimated. For example, if a 1.5 m run of core is completed and only 1.0 m of core is returned with 0.4 m of crushed rock at the start (first interval) and 0.6 m of competent rock following (second interval), it is likely that the core loss occurred in the crushed zone. Consequently, the end depth of the first interval and the start depth of the second interval should be adjusted to account for the 0.5 m loss of core in the crushed zone. If a downhole survey (e.g. with a televiewer) has been completed, the zone of core loss may be more accurately defined by the images from the survey, requiring modification of the logs during the matching process with the televiewer and core logging data.
Core description
The Core description portion of the log covers the lithology, interval determination data, and the rock mass classification. Below is a description of each logging parameter. Both the top and the bottom of the interval are to be recorded. Colour and rock description
Colour and rock descriptions should be logged as part of the core logging procedure to indentify the lithologies and alteration sequences encountered. Logging should be based on easy to identify attributes that will in most cases allow rock type to be determined quickly and easily. Such attributes include: Pattern Colour Grain size Texture Fabric Lithology Alteration
Logging these parameters separately and on an interval basis will allow for recognition of subtle variations that would normally be smoothed over in the summary log, and will ensure that the descriptions produced for final reporting are clear, concise, and repeatable. Codes describing the above should be decided upon in advance, and kept as simple as possible for ease of data entry and for consistency. An example of possible codes for a geotechnical core logging scheme is included in Table 2 below.
Table 2: Examples of rock core desciption codes Color Modifier Code
Pattern
Code
Primary/secondary color
Code
Light
L
Banded
BA
Pinkish
PK
Dark
D
Streaked
SK
Reddish
RD
Blotched
BL
Yellowish
YW
Mottled
MT
Brownish
BR
Speckled
SP
Olive
OL
Stained
ST
Greenish
GR
None
NO
Blueish
BL
Greyish
GY
Grain size Code
Term
Particle Size
VC
Very course
> 60 mm
Examples
Porphyries-w measureable grains
C
Coarse
M
Medium 0.06- 2 mm
F VF
2 -60 mm
Fine
0.002 0.06 mm
Congromerate,Breccia,Gneiss-w/measureable grains Sandstone, Gabbro, Granite, Schist - having clearly visible grains Tuff, Siltstone, Claystone, Mudstone, Basalt
Very fine <0.002 mm
Texture Code
Texture
AP
Aphanitic
Description
Grains cannot be seen with naked eye
EQ Equigranular All grains are the same size BM
Bimodal
Two sizes of crystal exist in rock
TR
Trachytic
AC
Acicular
Crystals are needle shaped
DM
Diamitic
Gap graded, matrix supported clasts (sedimentary)
Alignment of grains in a volcanic rock parallel to flow direction
Fabric Code
Fabric
GN
Gneissic
BX
Brecciated
BD
Bedded
IB
Description
Alternating layers of different colour or texture Angular fragments that have been healed Deposited in layers, can be in sedimentary or volcaniclastic rocks
Interbedded Beds alternating with others of a different character
MA
Massive
PR
Porphyritic
TU
Tuff
LT
Lapilli tuff
No crystal or grain fabric (homogeneous) Intrusive texture where large phenocrysts are present in a much finer grained groundmass Lithified pyroclasic sediments Lithified pyroclastic sediments with large clast inclusions
VC Volcaniclastic Clastic rock containing volcanic material FO
Foliated
Mineral are aligned due to shearing or metamorphism
Lithology Code
MZ
Lithology
Description
Monzonite
Intrusive rock with a low quartz content and equal amount of plagioclase and alkali feldspar (k-spar), mafic minerals may or may not be present
GR Granitic intrusion Intrusive rock, approx. equivalent content of
quartz, plagioclase and alkali feldspar, mafic minerals may or may not be present MD
Mafic dyke
DT
Diorite
FP
Feldspar porphyry
SC
VB
Schist
Dyke containing mostly mafic minerals. Typically have bleached contacts at KSM Intrusive rock, mainly plagioclase feldspar Lath shaped feldspar crystals make up a significant percentage of the rock mass (>=20%) Foliated metamorphic rock, mica typical on foliation separation planes, foliation usually undulating, sometimes poorly defined
Cemented angular fragments. Cause of brecciation Volcanic breccia is volcanic, either by injection of melt or the breccia is composed of pyroclastic debris
TU
Tuff
LT
Lapilli tuff
VC
Volcanic
SH
Shale
SS
Sandstone
AR
Argillite
General term for all consolidated pyroclastic/volcaniclastic material, flow lines / bedding may be visible Large clasts (2-64 mm) are visible in the tuff beds Fine grained, flow lines may be visible, mafic Fine grained sedimentary rock, laminated, fissile Clastic sedimentary rock, grains are sand sized and may be cemented with clay / silt sized particles Very fine grained sedimentary rock, indurated, lacks the fissility of shale
UD Undistinguishable This term should be used as little as possible
Alteration codes
Code
ARG
Alteration type
Argillic
Site specific description from exploration logs
Literature description
-introduces a wide variety of clay minerals, includes kaolinite, smectite, and
Mineral assemblage
clay minerals
Diagnostic features
-feldspar grains have been replaced with clay -slippery feel on discons
illite -can also have kaolinite + quartz + hematite + limonite assemblage
CHL
Chloritic
-darkened groundmass when pervasive -greater than 3% k veins
CAR
Carbonate
HFS
Hornfels
HEM
Hematite/Iron Oxide
PHY
POT
Phyllic
Potassic
chlorite, muscovite, quartz, albite -addition of any carbonate minerals, typically calcite, ankerite, dolomite
calcite, dolomite, malachite
-veins / matrix react with acid
-indurated and -thermal hornblende, strengthened alteration, seems plagioclase, "baked" resulting chlorite, in stronger and biotite more indurated rock mass than parent oxide minerals
red/brown/orange
sericite, quartz, pyrite
-feldspars decomposed to sericite and quartz
-pyrite concentrations 2% and greater -sericite and quartz altered feldspars -sericite typically pale green -greenish pale grey groundmass
-typically formed from decomp of feldspars, sericite and quartz replace large feldspar grains, and feldspar in the groundmass -can be associated with high pyrite concentrations -softens rock, easily scratchable -greasy feel -occurs in acidic conditions
-matrix has been replaced by fine grained hydrothermal k-feldspar -typically dark
-high temperature biotite, k- -potassium alteration, results feldspar, feldspar present from potassium magnetite, in groundmass or enrichment +/- epidote as veining -can occur during specularite -dark grey / crystallization of purplish grey
grey - purplish magma grey
PRO
SIL
-dark green to green -magnetic
-turns rocks green, usually alteration minerals replace Fe-Mg bearing minerals (biotite, amphibolite, pyroxene) but can also replace feldspar -low temperature, distal to other alteration types
chlorite, epidote, pyrite, actinolite +/carbonate
-silica flooded/lots of veins -hardened
-addition of secondary silica (quartz)-most common silica flooding: replacement of the rock with microcrystalline quartz -another style is stockwork: formation of closely spaced fractures in a network filled in with quartz
quartz
Propylitic
Siliceous
-green rock matrix
-strong to v strong -sometimes stockwork of quartz veins
Notes: 1. More than one alteration type may be present in a zone. This should be indicated in the core log. Total core recovery length
The total length of core recovered by the drillers from an interval is measured. In addition to providing a first indication of zones of poor rock mass quality or drilling problems, total recovery can be used to check the run block depths provided by the drillers. Also, it is not uncommon for the recovery length to be greater than the drilled
length; this often happens when the core breaks above the bottom of the hole on the previous run, or as a result of errors in the measurement of the length drilled. Where multiple intervals and core loss (or gain) occur between two run blocks, a judgement must be made for which interval(s) will be recorded as having the difference. Appropriate strategies include:
distribute core loss (or gain) over all intervals between the core blocks record the interval nearest the first core block as having the difference select the interval that contains the most fractured rock as having the difference
A mix of strategies may be appropriate; however, a single strategy is generally recommended for consistency and ease of comparison of data. For programs where corehole televiewer programs are conducted, the downhole images may assist in identifying the major zones of core loss. Rock quality designation (RQD) length
The rock quality designation (RQD) is a modified core recovery measurement (Deere and Deere, 1989). For each interval, the total length of all core pieces longer than 10 cm (4 in) as measured along the core centerline, should be determined and recorded as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Measuring RDQ length from rock core (after Deere and Deere, 1989)
When measuring the RQD, the following should be taken into consideration:
The total length of core must include all lost core sections When summing up the lengths, the breaks created by the driller during removal from the core barrel (often referred to as “mechanical” breaks) must be ignored Before measuring the RQD, apply slight pressure with your hands along the length of the core to check that all the discontinuities have opened. This will help ensure that “tight” joints are properly accounted for A “soundness check” should be carried out for weathering / alteration and hardness (R) grades; if W/A >4 or R≤1, then that length of core does not get counted in the RQD length The RQD length is measured along the axis of the core If RQD can be measured in the split tubes (if triple tube drilling has been carried out) before the core is put into the box this will result in a more accurate estimate of RQD
Number of discontinuities
The number of geological discontinuities (fractures, joints, shears, bedding, etc.) within each interval is counted and recorded. Breaks in the core from the process of drilling or boxing the drill core (mechanical breaks) are not included in this count. Mechanical breaks are identified by sharp core edges at the break and will often have clean breakage surfaces with no infilling and no discolouration. If the cause of the break in the core is in doubt, treat the break as a natural feature and include it in the discontinuity count. The core shown in Figure 3 has this kind of clear breakage.
Figure 3: Example of when the number of discontinuities can be counted directly from the core
Where discontinuities with thick infillings, faults, or zones of soil-like material are encountered count 1 discontinuity per 1 cm of infilling, fault zone, or soil zone thickness along the core centre line. Figure 4 shows a sample where discontinuities must be estimated.
Figure 4: Example of when the discontinuity number must be estimated
For intervals that have closely spaced discontinuities too numerous to count (possible in bedded, laminated, or foliated rocks), resulting in “discs” of core, the number of discontinuities can be estimated. This is done by measuring the average size of the core pieces and dividing the interval length by the average piece size. For example, a 30 cm zone of broken rock where the average particle size is 3 cm in diameter would count as 10 discontinuities. “Default” numbers for highly fractured rock should not be used Number of sets
The number of discontinuity sets present in the rock mass is used to determine the joint set number (Jn), a parameter used in Barton’s Q rock mass classification system. The most accurate way to determine the number of joint sets is to process core orientation data and determine the number of sets from stereographic projection of the discontinuity data. In the absence of core orientation data it may take several drill core runs to see all of the sets present, particularly if there are widely spaced sets present. This parameter can be extrapolated forwards and backwards in the drill core from zones where the set numbers are obvious; however, make sure that if there are changes occurring in the structural fabric they aren’t missed by averaging the sets over long sections of hole. Use whole numbers only, so if you have 2 sets and no other distinct features, use 2, if there are other features use 3. This is a slightly conservative approach that is acceptable because it is difficult to determine at the core scale whether widely spaced discontinuities form sets. It is important not to include mechanical breaks in this number. Strength grade
The strength grade (Table 4), sometimes referred to as hardness grade, is a field estimate of the strength of the intact material. It is important to use your hands, knife and rock hammer when estimating the strength of a sample. When using the hammer remember that only a firm blow need be applied. Also, make sure that the induced break does not occur along a discontinuity, otherwise the strength test is invalid.
A single value should be used for the strength grade. If the grade within the interval ranges from one hardness grade to another (e.g. is between 3 and 4), use half values (e.g. 3.5). If the hardness is extremely variable, consider splitting the run into two or more intervals to accurately capture the variability. Table 4: Field strength grades (ISRM 1978)
Grade
Field identification
Description
UCS (MPa)
R6
Specimen can only be chipped with flat end of geological hammer
Extremely strong
R5
Specimen requires many blows of flat end of geological hammer to fracture
Very strong
100-250
R4
Specimen requires more than one blow of flat end of geological hammer to fracture
Strong
50-100
R3
Cannot be scraped or peeled with pocket knife; can be fractured with single firm blow of flat end of the geologic hammer
Medium strong
25-50
R2
Can be peeled by a pocket knife with difficulty; shallow indentation made by firm blow with point of geological hammer
Weak
5-25
R1
Crumbles under firm blow with point of geological hammer; can be peeled by a pocket knife
Very weak
1-5
R0
Indented by thumbnail
Extremely weak
< 0.2 – 1
S6
Indented with difficulty by thumbnail
Hard
S5
Readily indented by thumbnail
Very stiff
S4
Readily indented by thumb but penetrated only with great effort
Stiff
0.050 0.1
S3
With moderate effort, penetrates several centimeters by thumb
Firm
0.025 0.05
S2
Easily penetrated several centimeters by thumb
Soft
0.012 0.025
S1
Easily penetrated several centimeters by fist
Very soft
< 0.012
> 250
>0.2 0.1 – 0.2
Weathering/alteration grade
The weathering/alteration grade is a measure of how the core properties (i.e. strength, mineralogy, etc.) have been changed from their original form. Although these two characteristics are often paired together, it is important to make a distinction between weathering and alteration. Weathering is the result of exposure to and infiltration by surface agents (i.e. surface water, ice, air, freeze-thaw cycles, organic activity, etc.) and is limited by proximity to the ground surface. Weathering is a relatively recent geologic process affecting the rock mass. Alteration is a result of the geological formation of the rock mass itself, resulting in physical or chemical changes. The effects of alteration generally pre-date weathering effects; however, it may be very difficult to distinguish the two. In addition, alteration, in the context of geotechnical logging, is generally used to downgrade the strength of the rock mass (e.g. sericitization, chloritization, argillization, etc.). However, there are alteration types that can increase the strength of the rock mass (e.g. silicification, phyllic, etc.). More sophisticated systems to define alteration type and intensity are often employed by geologists when characterizing the ore deposit, and should be evaluated to determine their relationship to the geomechanical properties of the rock mass.
Table 5 provides suggested weathering/ alteration grades and their associated descriptions. As for hardness values, a single weathering/alteration value should be used. If the weathering/alteration is extremely variable, consider splitting the run into two or more intervals to accurately capture the variability. Table 5: Weathering/alteration grades Grade
A1/W1
Description
Fresh and Unweathered
Field identification
Parent rock showing no discoloration, loss of strength or any other weathering effects. Strength may be increased by some alteration types.
A2/W2
Slightly Weathered or Altered
Rock may be slightly discoloured, particularly adjacent to discontinuities, which may be open and will have slightly discoloured surfaces; the intact rock is may be weaker than the fresh rock.
A3/W3
Moderately Weathered or Altered
Rock is discoloured; discontinuities may be open and have discoloured surfaces with alteration starting to penetrate inwards; intact rock is noticeably weaker than W1/A1 rock of
the same unit.
A4/W4
Highly Weathered or Altered
Rock is discoloured; discontinuities may be open and have discoloured surfaces, and the original fabric of the rock near the discontinuities may be altered; alteration penetrates deeply inwards. The ratio of original rock to weathered rock should be estimated where possible.
A5/W5
Completely Weathered or Altered
Rock is discoloured and decomposed/ friable or changed completely to a soil, but original fabric is visible. The properties of the soil depend in part on the nature of the parent rock.
A5/W6
Residual Soil
Original rock fabric is completely destroyed.
Discontinuity description Engineering in rock provides different challenges than those faced when using soil or concrete as engineering materials because rock is a discontinuous material: the rock mass is made of blocks defined by joints, bedding, faults, etc. (discontinuities). The geological and engineering properties of the discontinuities are important for excavation design. While the detail of observations commonly required for a single discontinuity will be familiar to exploration geologist, the volume of data to be collected over a drilling program can be overwhelming. The level of effort required in discontinuity data collection must be determined with consideration of the detail required for the level of design of the study, and the practical limitations of the site conditions and the field program schedule. For detailed engineering studies is it not uncommon for every individual discontinuity to be logged and described to a level of detail that includes all of the observations outlined in the sections below. However, for a geotechnical data collection program running concurrently with exploration and relying on the site geology staff at, say a
preliminary assessment level, provision of this amount of detail may not be practical. During the early rock engineering investigation phases of projects or properties, the data collected should focus on:
Estimating the “average” or “typical” properties of the materials at the site Determining what / where the materials are that may be at the ends of the spectrum of expected engineering behaviour, i.e. where are the very weak rocks and very strong rocks or the highly plastic soils and very stiff soils? Those materials that differ significantly from the “general” or “average” site conditions need to be quickly identified so that they can be explored, because the weaker materials are most likely the ones that will have the greatest impact on the stability of an excavation. Identifying and describing the major discontinuity features: faults, weak seams or beds, and/or contacts between geological units.
At least one example of the “typical” discontinuities for the interval should be logged. Where oriented core is conducted, it will be useful to log one or two representative discontinuities of each type in each interval. The following sections describe the observations that should be made for logged discontinuities. Discontinuity depth
The discontinuity location should recorded as the total downhole distance along the core from the collar or other zero reference point used for the program (drill deck, top of stick-up , ground surface) to the intersection of the structure with the core axis to the nearest centimetre. The locations of discontinuities should not be recorded with reference to the geotechnical interval from or to. Instead, the depth to the discontinuity along the core centre line is recommended. Where multiple discontinuities occur at the same depth, it is useful to add another digit to the depth measurement to differentiate between the features. For example, two discontinuities at 352.21 m could be recorded as 352.211 and 352.212. Since many databases and 3D geological modelling software tools interpret over lapping depths as errors, this can be avoided with a small modification to the data collection approach recommended.
Discontinuity orientation Methods for determining orientation The orientation of discontinuities encountered in a drillhole can be determined a variety of ways. The general concept is to mark the core with reference to a known direction or location (generally the top or bottom of the core or magnetic north), depending on the method used to survey the core hole, then measure the relative orientation of the discontinuities to the reference line. The most common core orientation methods currently in use include the following methods: 1. Spear 2. Cralieus 3. Ezy-Mark
4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Clay-Imprint Ball-Mark ACT Scribe Acoustic or optical televiewer
Downhole surveys of the drillhole, where optical or acoustic images are taken of the discontinuities in the walls of the core hole (method 8) have more recently become popular as technology has become more advanced and the costs for these methods have decreased. The main advantage of this type of discontinuity orientation method is that because it does not require recovery of the core to get a measurement, it is less labour intensive. The main disadvantage of the televiewer system is that it still requires characterization of the discontinuity so that the orientations calculated can be assigned to the appropriate structure type, thus requiring some post-processing of the images and development of relational databases to match the data from the core logging to the downhole survey data. Alpha and beta angles For drilling programs where more traditional methods of core orientation are undertaken, the orientation of individual discontinuities and geological structures can be calculated by measuring the alpha (α ) and beta (β) angles of the discontinuity and the orientation of the drillhole at the location of the discontinuity, as determined by a downhole survey data for the core hole. The alpha angle (α ) is the angle of intersection of between the discontinuity surface and the core axis (Figure 5). This can be measured with a goniometer, carpenter’s protractor, or even a Douglas-style protractor. The alpha angle is always a positive o o angle between 0 to 90 . The beta angle (β) is measured around the circumference of the core, clock -wise from the reference line provided from the core orientation method (Ball-Mark, Ezy-Mark, ACT, clay-imprint, various scribe systems, etc.) to the tip of the discontinuity farthest down-hole (Figure 1). The beta (β) angle is measured using a linear protractor which has been sized for the diameter of the core.
Figure 1: Oriented core measurements
