Game Dynamics Quick Start

Captain Jack’s Game Dynamics

Captain Jack’s Game Dynamics! A Quick Start Guide to Understanding the Dynamics http://www.getabeautifulgirlfriend.com/shop/game-dynamics-mastery/

Page 1 of 12


How to Get Women More Attracted to You Since I’m going out to meet and seduce women more and actually working on Sticking Points I’ve done a bit more experimentation and then, OUTSIDE THE FIELD, analysis of what I’ve noticed versus what I expected versus what I want. I noticed the other day I was only marginally interesting to the hot bartenders and wait staff until I started talking to cougar and the milf. Normally, I explain this as Social Proof. It’s one of the communities favorite theories. And, it seems to explain a lot. Cialdini popularized it and the definition is people will be more likely to do what they see other people doing. What about in the case of a normal bootcamp when guys are opening but getting blown out or failing to get attraction? They still get more Approach Invitations from women after opening that when they don’t open. And, in this case you’d expect them to get blown out so much the first few times that they’d be done for the night due to all the negative social proof. But, that doesn’t happen. So, what’s REALLY going on? Is it possible that other women seeing you talk to other women and getting REJECTED could actually do more GOOD than harm? Let’s examine this a bit further… Have you ever looked at a woman and thought it looked “hard” to approach her and you weren’t sure if you wanted to risk it. Then, some chode went and opened her and she was extremely nice to him and everything went fine. Then, you said to yourself, “Holy shit, I could do better than that dork” and you walked over and started a conversation? Have you ever seen a hot girl with a dork and thought, “Damn, how did he get her? I’m 10x cooler than that guy!” and you if you had an easy chance you’d have attempted to flirt? Both of the above have happened to me and others many, many times. Here’s another related question: Did you know that guys have been blown out after approaching women, gone back in later, and had it bust wide open? What I’m going to say is that Social Proof doesn’t explain the warm responses you get from approaching women when you’ve been seen in set OR you merge sets with pawns. I think it has to do with how she categorizes YOU in relation to the Game being played. She’s not keying off of the ACTUAL responses of the other women (that’d be pre-selection) as much as she’s keying off the realization that you are playing the Game.

Page 2 of 12

Captain Jack’s Game Dynamics See, women know that this is a Game. The Game is find an attractive mate to have sex with! In any game there are Players and Spectators. If you are not talking to women, approaching women or already with women then you are a Spectator until proven otherwise. (She may HOPE that you are a Player and give you AIs to find out.) Why do AIs increase when women see you open? Simply because they realize you are a Player and so are they… so, it’s an invitation from one Player to another Player to engage in the Game. What about opening sets with a woman with you? First, it demonstrates you’re a Player in two ways, the fact that you OPENED and you are already with a girl (another Player). Second, much like you look at a dude and think you could do better than that guy, the girl looks at the girl and thinks the same thing except girls seem to be much more aggressive in this area than the average dude. An HB3 WILL try to unseat an HB9 or 10 whereas most dudes who feel outclassed will shy away and ask if she has any friends or something. You are most likely missing a lot of Approach Invitations. Assume any eye contact is an AI for the time being and you’ll get a lot of real world experience around the subject. Also, many afc/ PUAs have trouble with making or keeping eye contact so practice holding eye contact if you haven’t done those types of drills. Especially if this is a weak point because it just won’t be tolerated in set. If this is a weak point for you literally stare girls down until you don’t feel any pressure to look away. A few days/nights of this is usually all you need. You can make the assumption that if you see one AI you’ve probably missed 2 or 3. Now, this snowballs. You open a set, girls notice, they start changing their body language and giving you AIs. They look in your direction more. Other girls pick up on this… you open more, new girls pick up on it plus the old girls. Snowball. (If you’ve ever been in a club with a celebrity or sports star you’ll notice this on steroids magnified by one hundred. You can hardly keep a woman’s attention when there’s a big celeb in proximity.) As you move around girls will shift body language towards you. You’ll get Proximity AIs from all girl sets, etc. Can’t this be described by Pre-Selection? Again, only partially. See, pre-selection means the women were visibly and intensely attracted to you and the other women noticed it. We have PLENTY of examples of guys who have a lot of hot female FRIENDS who couldn’t get laid if their life depended on it. What is going on here? Well, though they are surrounded by hot girls they never show new girls they meet that they are in the game. They never show her that they know her Goals and move her across the barriers/ obstacles to the win.

Page 3 of 12


Don’t get me wrong Pre-Selection DOES help. But, what I’m talking about is something even before and more basic. I’m talking about girls giving AIs and becoming warm just based on her/ their analysis that you are playing the same Game they are. Pre-selection comes later… it is “He’s in the same Game AND he’s obviously good at it. (Parading a woman around activates Pre-Selected by Women, especially when multiple girls are paraded together or close together in the same night.) EVERYBODY in the game hates wasting time. Females don’t want an opportunistic Spectator to suck up their time so they usually reserve their AIs for proven Players. Girls also intuitively know that if she can get one guy to open her then a few others will get more courage and open. Thus, more Players and more opportunity for her to win. What about Celebrities? Why do women like Celebrities? Let’s go through the standard list of reasons someone might give. 1. Money? Money doesn’t hurt BUT, it can’t ONLY be money. Pro dating coaches have many, many super rich guys come to us for help. Many super rich end up as sugar daddies for hotties and those situations aren’t usually exclusive. 2. Looks? Well, women don’t have the same physiological responses to looks as men do. Their acceptable range of looks is MUCH wider and is weak enough that we can totally ignore it. (Provided your grooming and style is good). Plus, many Celebrities are dog ugly. 3. Status? A strong contributor. Society has conditioned us to treat celebs better. Even dudes want to meet other celebrity dudes. 4. An Assumed Player in the Game. This conditioning of status begins the SNOWBALL we talked about earlier. When you get the multiple girls visibly interested, the society conditioning of treating celebs as special plus the idea of bragging rights and money, then you have a lot of factors working together. It is deduced, assumed, that they are prime Players in the Game so the females play all out. The Case of the Man with Social Proof but Not a Player in the Game. Take the example of a guy out with three women. One of them is his wife, the other two are her sexy girlfriends. Does he get massive AIs? No. He might get a few at first. Some women are screwy and like to try to get a married man’s attention and others may not have noticed the ring but after an hour or two in the venue he is essentially invisible to the other Players. I noticed this when I was out with FBs/Girlfriends. I’d get a LOT of AIs at first and after a bit I was essentially invisible again. Sure I was with a hot girl (social proof idea) BUT it was preempted because the girls realized I wasn’t in the Game. So, I put the idea of Social Proof on the backburner as something that, while valid, only partially described what was happening and opt instead for the fuller idea of Player in the Game. It better describes what actually occurs in the field. Spectators, Players, Winners, Obstacles and Goals.

Page 4 of 12

Captain Jack’s Game Dynamics This also helps to mesh Sexual Framing with some of the more standard Mystery Method structured approach theory. Though, I usually avoid the standard Peacocking, Pawning, Social Proof/DHV routines (ex. the routine where you show you with pics with hot girls, doing cool shit, hanging with cool people), with this idea they start to make sense together. When I open and start Sexual Framing, I’m demonstrating that I’m a Player in the Game, that we are both playing the same Game, that I value her Game Goal and I’m willing to carry it home (so to speak! haa). Since I’ve gotten good at opening one or two sets, hooking and staying in conversations for the long haul, the other girls notice if the set busts or unravels. Many girls in the vicinity have noticed the deep sexual attraction between me and the other girl and have me pegged as a Player. Opening any girl who witnessed that makes it go that much easier. She isn’t looking for Value or Social Proof, she’s looking for the man in her near vicinity who is the best Player in the Game. If you understand this it will lessen your worry about people seeing a set go bad. It won’t matter, by opening you’ll show everyone else you’re in the game. Captain Jack P.S. You should also feel less pressure from others watching you open because Spectators don’t count! And, Male Players are too busy playing to notice or care! In fact, if anything they’re probably thinking of allying with you to give both of you better chances to win. The Game Dynamics Mastery Course provides a deep understanding of your interactions with women. You'll know WHY things that were going well suddenly take a turn for the worst. The Four Individual Game Dynamics provide THE KEY to getting incredibly good in a very short period of time. It puts the fun, excitement and adventure back into playing Dating Games.

Page 5 of 12

Captain Jack’s Game Dynamics Become More Attractive to Women with Captain Jack’s Game Dynamics A comment from a reader on the previous Game Dynamics post: Hmm I think this is boiling down to a bit of semantics and how you exactly define it. If I go to a bar with my hot female friends I get tons more AIs that if I go with my male buddies. Sure, if I don’t do anything about it then the AIs will die down over time (except for new girls entering the venue). But either way simply having hot girls with you gets you more interest than not, therefore scientifically proving that social proof is a contributory factor! It won’t get you laid (you’ll still have to open… duh!) but is sure as dandy helps! comment by charliereay on “Opening and Social Proof Versus Player in the Game” post I am surprised I didn’t get more of these types of comments. When I published the post I expected to get a lot more of these types than the all out positive ones. Let me start by saying this… I’m not saying Social Proof isn’t “right or “is wrong.” What I’m saying is that it is INCOMPLETE. I’m pointing out that it leaves A LOT more unexplained than explained. I discussed quite a few things that it left unexplained in the last post. There is a higher level dynamic at work when attracting, approaching and seducing women that better explains what is going on and that is The Player in the Game concept of Game Dynamics. One GREAT way to know if you have found a better organizing principle is if you experience a surge in motivation to act or a desire to do things differently. Two or 3 commenters noted they felt more pumped to approach women. The reason is because when they adopted this idea it caused a spontaneous release of competing and inefficient ideas leaving more energy and attention available for action. And/or it stabilized a lot of floating thoughts thus lessening confusion (and confusion causes fear and apprehension.) I’ll show you how it better explains common field phenomena and then I’ll show you how it ALSO explainsSexual Framing. Social Proof Covered in previous post.

Peacocking Someone who is peacocking (wearing outlandish clothes to draw attention) but not opening is a tool. Why? Socially we know, and women know, that Peacocking is something you do when you are Playing the Game. A dude who is Peacocked and not opening is socially weird. Likewise, people with low game awareness call scantily clad women in the club “sluts” not realizing this is what women do to invite the real Players to open. Saying that women open guys who are peacocked because they realize the men are Players in the Game is a leap but it is a very small leap in comparison to the prevailing theory.

Page 6 of 12


It might be better explained by saying that women can use it to show everyone THEY are playing the Game thus, getting her opened more without making it too obvious.

Pre-Selection I covered this a bit in the last post. Pre-Selection is a VERY valid and observable phenom. But, againthis only applies to Players in the Game. When they realize you aren’t in the Game their awareness is no longer on you and all invitations and attention shift to find Players.

Jealousy Threads ( attempting to get a girl attracted to you to make another girl jealous) Again, you have to be a Player in the Game and have her attracted for a Jealousy Thread to exist. J-Threads are incredibly powerful. They are so powerful BECAUSE the Game has a limited time span (a Game Obstacle) and a limited number of Players (another Game Obstacle). Her desire to win compels her to focus more energy on a proven quantity as does her desire to IMPROVE against competition. (The competition is other females, not the males.) Add to that the fact that she WAS on her way to Winning and you’ve got a deep sense of loss and selfdoubt creeping in. The idea that other females could be BETTER was theoretical, now it is all too real. She will do ALMOST anything to beat the competitor.

Disqualifiers There are two valid players. It looks like they are headed to winning but now one of them seems to be questioning whether or not the other is a Player so the chances of winning drop causing fear and increasing desire to get back in the Game.

DHVs (Demonstration of Higher Value – showing that you are a high value, desirable man) I’m skeptical about the real use of DHVs EXCEPT when you are talking to a girl to whom that shit is important AND her logical mind is engaged. She can use that stuff to talk herself into liking you or giving you more time/chances. Ok, “Player in the Game” refines those a bit without colliding and give us a better understanding. We KNOW Mystery Method works AND it works well for what it was designed to do. Those items listed above are given as the reason MM works. But, what then explains the massive success of Sexual Framing, which isn’t built on any of those? Sexual Framing doesn’t use Jealousy-Threads, Pre-Selection, Demonstrations of Higher Value (DHVs), Merging, Pawning or Social Proof except as a consequence when a set unravels and you have to open a new one. In fact, Sexual Framing VIOLATES many common MM principles.

Page 7 of 12

Captain Jack’s Game Dynamics Can the “Player in the Game” concept describe it? Yes! Wonderfully! A Game is made up of Spectators, Players, Winners, Obstacles and Goals. I’m not using Obstacles in the MM definition here, which is, any person who is NOT your Target. Although her friends COULD be Obstacles they aren’t by default. They are only Obstacles when they don’t KNOW that you and her friend have AGREED to play the game together. In Game Dynamics an Obstacle is anything which could get in the way of achieving the Game Goal. Approaching, attracting and seducing women is often called The Game. So, I present to you The Game Dynamics. All Games are Based on Agreement. Game Dynamic 1: You and her must agree you are both Players. Naturally, this is you making a smooth open, hooking the set and her entering communication with you. If you can’t get agreement on this you don’t have a Game. Game Dynamic 2: You and her must agree you are both playing the same Game TOGETHER. By opening Sexual Frames you are telling her what Game you are playing. As she continues talking with you and playing along she is AGREEING that this is a male-female conversation with a sexual dynamic. If you can’t get agreement on this you don’t have a Game. Game Dynamic 3: You must show her that you VALUE her Game Goal. By being non judgmental and telling her you LOVE how sexy she is, etc you are showing her this. If you can’t get agreement on this you don’t have a Game. Game Dynamic 4: You must demonstrate that you can carry her through the Obstacles. First, by handling them in her mind, then in the immediate environment, then over time. This can be done explicitly by getting the group to like you, getting her so into you that she handles the group and any obstacles and/or using an Inoculation Routine like I mentioned in “FR: College Girls!” Then, by baby-stepping her along ever so gently she’ll know/feel that she is having all the good feelings and none of the bad (like she usually does), she gets even more comfortable and puts more trust in you. If you can’t get agreement on this you don’t have a Game. Also, you can look for her to show you the same! For example, when I ask her “You’re not the jealous type are you?” and then tell a story about how I was “hanging out” (code for sexual relationship) with a girl and she got jealous and I didn’t approve, I’m beginning to define what Game we are playing and putting in question her agreement on Dynamic 2. She has to alleviate my concerns by agreeing with me that jealousy sucks. The Most Evil of All Evils What about LMR (Last Minute Resistance to Sex)? Can this even shed some light on LMR? Yes!

Page 8 of 12

Captain Jack’s Game Dynamics LMR is primarily an unclear agreement about whether or not you are both playing the same Game (unclear Game Dynamic 2). It can also be that you haven’t shown her that you value her Game Goal (unclear on Game Dynamic 3). (To read more about LMR and how to solve it click the link.) If she is playing “Potential GF Game” and you are playing ONE NIGHT STAND Game and she THINKS you are playing “Potential GF Game” but isn’t exactly sure due to mixed communication signals then BAM! — LMR! You’d have to have told her that your game works like this “Primarily Sexual and then possible grow into GF over time” in order to avoid it. On the flipside, if you WERE playing to get a Girlfriend and she was CONVINCED you were and she WAS playing that Game, too… AND she believed that giving it up wouldn’t destroy that Game (clear on Game Dynamic 3), then she’d have no issue having sex with you the first night. This is why so many of the PUAs trained in “social” forms of Pickup have such a hard time getting laid. They broadcast “social, fun guy – potential fun bf” on Game Dynamic 2 and then wonder why it takes forever to get to sex. Furthermore, they never make it clear that they VALUE sexuality (Game Dynamic 3) so she has to be double certain it won’t fuck up that Game (GF GAME) before having sex. They have methodically built tons of agreement on a DIFFERENT GAME (fun, cool, social BF/GF) and wonder why the Game Goal (sex) of a DIFFERENT GAME isn’t happening. Those silly PUAS… if only they knew about Captain Jack’s Game Dynamics! Captain Jack P.S. Knowing what you know now about The Game Dynamics you should be able to pinpoint on WHICH Dynamic any busted set failed on. All “no-gos” are failure on Game Dynamic 1. All sets that unravel come from failures on Game Dynamic 4, etc. What would you do with said information? Why you’d examine your Game Plan and look for deficiencies in your common routines/stacks/ideas/beliefs in that area, shore it up, set up experiments/solutions and get your ass back in the Field! P.P.S. Disqualifiers work because they threaten agreement on Game Dynamic 1. See that? If there isn’t agreement on all the Game Dynamics, there is NO GAME, thus no chance of winning. Jealousy Thread threatens Game Dynamic 2. The Game Dynamics Mastery Course provides a deep understanding of your interactions with women. You'll know WHY things that were going well suddenly take a turn for the worst. The Four Individual Game Dynamics provide THE KEY to getting incredibly good in a very short period of time. It puts the fun, excitement and adventure back into playing Dating Games.

Page 9 of 12

Captain Jack’s Game Dynamics Make Dating Women Easy with Game Dynamics Hola, The Game Dynamics posts have really gotten around. I’ve had DOUBLE the normal traffic and linking as my normal stuff and a lot of guys are resonating with it. It’s gotten to the point where I look at all the words out of her mouth, text messages or emails as attempts to Clarify on the Dynamics. I can HEAR which Dynamic is out of whack by the topics she brings up and stuff she says or questions she asks. Now that I know what she is getting at I can smoothly feed her the info she needs and ONLY the info she needs to get it Clarified. Sexual Framing, while elegant in itself, did a lot of this but did it somewhat sloppily compared to what I expect to create with this new model. MOST of the success you see PUAs from other systems getting comes from a boost in numbers/attempts, a boost in Intention+followup and the fact that women have high sex drives. (There’s also the added effect of having something to say so they are less likely to fuck things up.) Now, shit is getting much, much easier. It changes everything. It changes “Sticking Point Analysis” because now we look at SPs in terms of which Dynamic you are not Clarifying or you are Violating. If you are doing it and notice a pattern you can bust it and get a move forward BUT if you look at it form a higher viewpoint and see which Dynamic you are messing up on then you can handle MULTITUDES of SPs and potential SPs in one shot! Progress will go through the roof! By applying Game Dynamics, I’ve already handled a BIG SP I have with girls that I’m actually, truly interested in — cracked it wide open and dissolved it. Once I saw what it was it was easy, easy, easy to dissolve. Using SP Analysis in the previous fine-grained approach would’ve taken a LOT more time and effort and it would’ve reappeared down the road further in interactions. Texting and Phone Game becomes so much easier. You probably have recent text messages in your phone right now that are attempts by a girl to Clarify on Dynamic 2 (“playing the same game Together.”) Handling it via text CAN be done but it would’ve been so much easier (and more powerful and persuasive) to do it in person. If you do too much texting/phone without setting things up and getting back in front of her then you are creating DOUBT on Dynamic 4 – You must demonstrate that you can carry her through Obstacles first by handling them in her mind, then in the immediate environment, then over time.) Shit that was “ON!” can fizzle really quickly if you create DOUBT here. Also, if original Agreement on Dynamic 2 was on an SNL type or “no strings attached” relationship then the prolonged and repetitive association with her day-to-day life can start undermining the original agreement as that begins to look like a diff. game!

Page 10 of 12


Can you see this? We now have a model and a methodical way to deduce WHERE our gaming attempts are going wrong!!! And, then apply fixes in our communication to make things seem to her like “it just happened!” This WILL create a huge jump just like Sexual Framing has!!! I predict it will have much more far reaching impact as we can begin to really get at the Game Rules. (Each type of Game has different Rules. Ex: GF/BF Game has a Rule: You do not Date other Players.) Game Rules are things that must be met or “not violated” in order for the Game to exist and continue existing. Time frames will shorten and close ratios will go WAY UP. This is Gaming Elegance at it’s finest and there aren’t a bazillion steps to remember or keep track of. Once you have conceptual understanding then a simple question (in your head) to notice what she is attempting to Clarify and then your response to Clarify it makes shit run so smooth it is ridiculous. (Lots of drills and examples given in the Game Dynamics Mastery Course.) In the future, I’ll release even more audios on new techniques and ways to execute this stuff, starting with a reclassification of all the “standard” stuff in the community. Using a tactic or routine at the wrong time can really, really fuck things up! Once you have Clarified you’ll NEVER use certain tactics/communications with her again because it will only make you go backwards. This is why certain sets inexplicably unravel. Anyway, guys this is an awesome new discovery. We ARE on to something that is going to SIMPLIFY and FORWARD gaming for the future. Hope to see you as a member of my group of PUAs going out and benefiting and really jumping to the cutting edge. Captain Jack

Page 11 of 12


Next Steps Thanks for reading this quick start guide to the Game Dynamics. What you’ve read are the original three core posts that originally appeared on my blog and should give you a quick start to understanding all the jargon that appears in the posts and in the course. The next steps are: 1. Read the rest of the ‘Game Dynamics Posts’ at: http://www.getabeautifulgirlfriend.com/ category/game-dynamics/ 2. Take the ‘Game Dynamics Mastery’ course! Guys reported smoother, easier and faster interactions and that they IMPROVED their game so much faster because they finally understood all the mystifying things that would happen (or not happen) in their dating life. Cryptic statements by women suddenly became clear. They wouldn’t waste time building ‘Agreement’ on the wrong things. They wouldn’t unwittingly agree to the wrong Game and more. 3. Apply it to your OWN Game and watch the results!

Captain Jack

Page 12 of 12

Game Dynamics Quick Start

Recommend Documents