Administrative Law Case Digests Eugenio vs Civil Service Commission, 242 SCRA 196 Case Digest G.R. No. 115863 March 31, 1995
Full description
civil law 2 digest
For Torts and Damages
Civil Case Digest
LAW
digested case
3 Loadmasters vs Glodel FINAL CASE DIGEST
Civil Service Form for GovernmentFull description
pesons case
Full description
Admin (4-6)
Public Offcr & AdminFull description
DigestFull description
Borja vs Comelec Case DigestFull description
Constitutional Law II - A , Atty. Tagarda-Mabilen
Case
law, obligations, oblicon, case digestFull description
MEDENILLA v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION FACTS:
Petitioner was a contractual employee of the DPWH occupying theposition of Public Relations Ocer II. A reorganization reorganization ensue within th eDPWH an all the positions therein were abolishe. A re!ise stang patterntogether patterntogether with the guielines on the selection an placement of personnel wasissue. "his inclue the conteste position of #uper!ising Human ResourceDe!elopment ResourceDe!elopment Ocer to which position petitioner was appointe. Responentsloge Responentsloge a protest before the DPWH tas$ force on reorganization contesting theappointment theappointment of the petitioner to the position. %#% re!o$e re!o$e appointment. ISSUE/S:
Whether there is merit in the protest. HELD:
&o. While the appointing authority is gi!en the wie latitue of iscretion' to sustain the appointment of (eenilla may gi!e the appointingpower unnecessary opportunities to act capriciously an th us thwart thenatural an reasonable e)pectation of the ocer ne)t*in* ran$ to any !acantposition' to be promote to it.We it.We ha!e alreay rule on se!eral occasions that when the appointee is+uali,e' the %i!il #er!ice %ommission has no choice but to attest to theappointment. It is not within its prerogati!e to re!o$e re!o$e an appointee on thegroun that substituting its -ugment for that of the appointing power' another person has better +uali,cations for the -ob.Once the function is ischarge' ischarge' the participation of the %i!il %i!il #er!ice% ommission in the appointment process ceases. "he only purpose of attest ation is to etermine etermine whether the appointee possesses the re+uisiteci!il ser!ice eligibility' no more than that is left for the %i!il #er!ic e%ommission to o. "he rationale of this octrine is that the power of app ointment is essentially iscretionary. "he iscretion to be grante to theappointing authority' if not plenary must at least be sucient