International Human Resource ManagementFull description
Case Study No. 8
BUENAVISTA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.: Masquerade
John Felix M. Limbo
May 15, 2015
I.
SMM!"# $n%inee& 's(a& )as(ua is an $le(t&i(al $n%inee&in% %&aduate o* F$!+I nie&sity on yea& yea& 1-85. 1-85. e /as /as hi&e hi&ed d as an eml emloy oyee ee o* the the Nati Nationa onall $le( $le(t& t&i* i*i( i(ati ation on !dminist&ation N$!. e /as assi%ned to handle di**e&ent 3obs in di**e&ent unit until he /as &omoted to Chie* )lannin% '**i(e& in yea& 1--4. $n%inee& )as(ua also attend di**e&ent t&ainin% in(ludin% those *o& mana%ement. e *inished his M! (ou&se in 1--5. 6hen the osition *o& 7ene&al Mana%e& *o& uenaista $le(t&i( Cooe&atie, In(. $CI be(ame a(ant in Janua&y 1--, he /as nominated and in Ma&(h 1-- he /as noted to sta&t the /o&9 and *ill the a(an(y. !s he assum assumes es the the osi ositi tion on,, he be(am be(amee a/a& a/a&ee o* the the situ situat atio ions ns /hi(h /hi(h a&e a&e a&aised by his o**i(e&s. +hese a&e as *ollo/s: the &i(e o* ele(t&i(ity o* $CI is 5 th hi%hest in the (ount&y, 25; o* ele(t&i(ity %ene&ated is lost /ithout any a((ounts, delays on sulies in mate&ials, some emloyees do not &eo&t &e%ula&ly *o& /o&9 and lastly the in(&easin% amount o* un(olle(ted a((ounts. y this, he made some &e(ommendations *&om the boa&d to sole these &oblems and he&e as *ollo/s: the dismissal o* emloyees that not &eo&t &e%ula&ly, sala&y in(&ease, hi&in% additional emloyee and *o&mation o* team to inesti%ate the system loss. !ll o* these /e&e a&oed by the boa&d and in Ma&(h 1--<, a*te& a yea&, they ealuated that the &oblems /e&e not sole thus it %ets /o&se. $n%inee& )as(ua (on(luded that in site o* the %&antin% o* sala&y in(&ease, no subse=uent im&oement /as seen. e is no/ (onside&in% mo&e d&asti( measu&es but he is not su&e i* it is the &i%ht thin% to do. In addition, he is also a/a&e that the&e a&e
II.
some emloyees /ho a&e =uali*ied and dedi(ated to thei& 3obs. S+!+$M$N+ 'F +$ )"'L$M
6hat /ill be the best leadin% a&oa(h $n%inee& )as(ua should use to (ounte& a(t the ee& %&o/in% &oblems his unit is dealin% /ith> Se(i*i(ally, /hat tye o* o/e&s he is /illin% to imlement to *u&the& st&en%then his leade&shi> III. III.
!L+ !L+$"N! $"N!+ +I?$ I?$ C'" C'"S$ S$S S 'F !C+ !C+II'N a. "edist&ibut "edist&ibutee the emloyees emloyees to to othe& unit unit to see see (han%es o& o& &emoal &emoal *&om o**i(e o**i(e to othe& emloyees /hi(h a&e not bein% &odu(tie to the unit. b. se the a&oa(h o* ositie leade&shi to those /ho a&e dedi(ated emloyees and a ne%atie leade&shi to those /ho a&e not ta9in% thei& 3obs /ell. (. Sue&i Sue&ise se all all the 3obs 3obs in di* di**e& *e&ent ent unit unit d. "eo&%an "eo&%ani@e i@e the o&%ani o&%ani@at @ation ional al o**i(e& o**i(e& then dele%ate dele%ate eole /ith &elatie &elatie o/e& and de(ision ma9in% o/e&.
F&om the *ou& alte&naties, alte&natie a su%%est &edist&ibution o* /o&9e&s /hi(h may lead not only to &eali@ation o* /o&9 syn(h&oni@ation but also it (an also ma9e the system sus(etible to mo&e &oblems sin(e &otational /o&9s needs t&ainin% to be made *o& the /o&9e&s to assume some 3ob o& /o&9 and this is also t&ue in alte&natie d. !lte&natie ( su%%est sue&ision to all /o&9 /hi(h may be time (onsumin% and ti&in% *o& $n%inee& )as(ua.
+he best alte&natie to be (hosen is alte&natie b. +his su%%est that *o& the dedi dedi(a (ate ted d /o&9 /o&9s, s, they they /ill /ill be &e/a &e/a&d &ded ed and and &ai &aise sed d /hil /hilee *o& *o& thos thosee /ho /ho a&e a&e un&odu(tie /ill be imlemented /ith (oe&(ie (onse=uen(es su(h as demotion o& &emoal *&om o**i(e.
y this method, the dedi(ated emloyee /ill a((et the leade&shi o* $n%inee& )as(ua and they /ill be mo&e motiated to do the /o&9. Fo& the un&odu(tie ones,
they they /ill /ill be moti motia ate ted d to (han (han%e %e thei thei&& habi habits ts and and be &od &odu( u(ti tie e o& they they /ill /ill e&se(uted (oe&(iely.