Without numerical techniques, it would be almost impossible to solve- practical engineering problems analytically with a reasonable degree of accuracy. Most numerical techniques in continu…Full description
Without numerical techniques, it would be almost impossible to solve- practical engineering problems analytically with a reasonable degree of accuracy. Most numerical techniques in continuum mech...
Without numerical techniques, it would be almost impossible to solve- practical engineering problems analytically with a reasonable degree of accuracy. Most numerical techniques in continuum mech...Full description
Finite element method
Applied Element Method for the simulation of structures.Descripción completa
The finite element method
Full description
Elementary Finite Element Method by Chandrakant Desai
Elementary Finite Element Method by Chandrakant DesaiFull description
Finite Element MethodDescripción completa
Elementary Finite Element Method by Chandrakant DesaiDescripción completa
Finite Element Method
Full description
Descripción: Finite Element Method Using Matlab
Vince Adams and Abraham Askenazi OnWord Press 1999 156690-160-X Building Better Products with FEA offers a practical yet comprehensive study of finite element analysis by reviewing the…Full description
Descrição: Vince Adams and Abraham Askenazi OnWord Press 1999 156690-160-X Building Better Products with FEA offers a practical yet comprehensive study of finite element analysis by reviewing the basics...
The constructive numerical implementation of the two dimensional dual boundary element method. This paper present to solve nonlinear 2 D wave equation defined over a rectangular spatial domain the boundary conditions. Two dimension wave equation is a
cara membuat laporan boundary ray
Full description
FINITE ELEMENT METHODS FOR ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
IEM
BOUNDARY EL EMENT EMENT METHOD (BEM) The basic idea of the BEM is to discretize the integral equation using boundary elements. The well-known moment method is equivalent equivalent to BEM when using subsectional bases and the delta function as weighting functions. Thus, BEM can be regarded as a combination of the classical boundary integral equation method and the discretization concepts originated from FEM. Consider the case of the Laplace’s equation, i.e.
∇ 2u =0 in Ω u =u in Γ1
∂u =q in Γ2 ∂n Γ = Γ1 + Γ2 q=
By application of the weighted residual method we obtain:
∫ ∇ u ⋅W ⋅ d Ω = 0 2
Ω
Using the following identities:
∇(∇uW ) = ∇ 2uW + ∇u∇W ∇(u∇W ) = u∇ 2W + ∇u∇W And applying the Gauss theorem, theorem, we can write:
∫ Ω
∫
W ⋅ ∇ u ⋅ d Ω = W ⋅ 2
Γ
∂u ∂W ⋅ d Γ − ∫ u ⋅ ⋅ d Γ + ∫ u ⋅ ∇ 2W ⋅ d Ω = 0 ∂n ∂n Γ Ω
The weighting function W is chosen to be the fundamental solution, determined earlier:
∇ 2W = δ (r − r ' ) Thus the domain integral in the above equation can be written as:
∫ u ⋅ ∇ W ⋅ d Ω = −∫ u ⋅ δ (r − r ' ) ⋅ d Ω = −u 2
Ω
i
Ω
For any point inside the domain. Combining the above equations, the following integral relation is obtained:
∫
ui = W ⋅ Γ
∂u ∂W ⋅ d Γ − ∫ u ⋅ ⋅ d Γ ∂n ∂ n Γ
FINITE ELEMENT METHODS FOR ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
IEM
Performing similar mathematical manipulations we can obtain the following integral relation for the Poisson equation (∇ 2u = − f ) :
∫
ui = W ⋅ Γ
∂u ∂W ⋅ d Γ − ∫ u ⋅ ⋅ d Γ − ∫ f ⋅W ⋅ d Ω ∂n ∂ n Γ Ω
Notes:
∂u ) are taken into account by the first integral ∂n
•
Neumann boundary conditions (
• •
Dirichlet boundary conditions ( u ) are taken into account by the second integral. Any source point ( f ) inside the domain Ω is taken into account by the domain integral in the above equation.
•
From the Poisson’s equation, the residual to be minimized can be written as:
∫ (∇ u + f )⋅W ⋅ d Ω = 0 2
Ω
When the observation point “i” is located on the boundary Γ , the boundary integral becomes singular as R approaches zero. To extract the singularity on boundary, we rewrite the equation
∫
ui = W ⋅ Γ
∂u ∂W ⋅ d Γ − ∫ u ⋅ ⋅ d Γ ∂n ∂ n Γ
In the following form: ui =
∫ Γ − ∆Γ
W ⋅
∂u ∂u ∂W ∂W ⋅ d Γ + ∫ W ⋅ ⋅ d Γ − ∫ u ⋅ ⋅ d Γ − ∫ u ⋅ ⋅ d Γ ∂n ∂ ∂ ∂ n n n ∆Γ Γ − ∆Γ ∆Γ
We present in detail the two-dimensional case. In this case: W = −
1 2π
ln r
And:
⎡θ ⎤ 1 1 ∂u ∂u ∂u ln lim ln ε ε θ ⋅ ⋅ Γ = − ⋅ ⋅ Γ = − ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ W d r d d ⎢ ⎥=0 ∫∆Γ ∂n ∫ ∂n ∂n 2π ∆Γ 2π ε →0 ⎢⎣θ ∫ ⎥⎦ 2
1
⎡θ 1 ⎤ θ − θ ∂W 1 1 1 lim ε θ − ∫u ⋅ ⋅ d Γ = − ⋅ ⋅ Γ = − ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ = − 2 1 ⋅ ui u d u d ⎢ ⎥ ∫ ∫ 2π ∆Γ r 2π ε →0 ⎢θ ε 2π ∂n ⎥⎦ ∆Γ ⎣ 2
1
Substituting in the earlier equation we obtain:
the
FINITE ELEMENT METHODS FOR ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
∫
ci ⋅ u i = W ⋅ ∆Γ
IEM
∂u ∂W ⋅ d Γ − ∫ u ⋅ ⋅ d Γ ∂n ∂ n ∆Γ
Where:
⎧ 1 ⎪ θ 2 − θ 1 ci = ⎨1 − 2π ⎪ 0 ⎩
i ∈Ω i∈Γ i ∉Ω
If we consider Poisson’s equation:
∫ f ⋅W ⋅ d Ω = ∫ f ⋅W ⋅ d Ω + ∫ f ⋅W ⋅ d Ω
Ω
Ω − ∆Ω
∆Ω
⎡θ ⎤ ⋅ ⋅ Ω = − ⋅ ⋅ Ω = − ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ln lim ln ε ε θ ε f W d f r d f d d ⎢ ⎥=0 ∫∆Ω ∫ 2π ∆Ω 2π ε →0 ⎢θ ∫ ⎥⎦ ⎣ 1
1
2
1
The final equation is:
∫
ci ⋅ ui = W ⋅ ∆Γ
In general either u or
∂u ∂W ⋅ d Γ − ∫ u ⋅ ⋅ d Γ − ∫ f ⋅ W ⋅ d Ω ∂n ∂ n ∆Γ Ω
∂u on the boundary must be known. Determining all values of ∂n
solution u and its normal derivatives on the boundary the solution at an arbitrary point of the domain can be calculated. The electrostatic and magnetostàtic problems are then defined by the following equations:
∫
ρ ∂Φ ∂W ⋅ d Γ − ∫ Φ ⋅ ⋅ d Γ + ∫ ⋅ W ⋅ d Ω ∂n ∂n ∆Γ Ω ε
∫
∂ A ∂W ⋅ d Γ − ∫ A ⋅ ⋅ d Γ + ∫ µ ⋅ J ⋅ W ⋅ d Ω ∂n ∂ n ∆Γ Ω
ci ⋅ Φ i = W ⋅ ∆Γ
ci ⋅ Ai = W ⋅ ∆Γ
Where Φ denotes the electrostatic potential and A is the magnetic potential vector.
Boundary element discretization The basic idea of the BEM is to discretize the boundary of the domain under consideration into a set of elements. The unknown solution over each element is approximated by an interpolation function, which is associated with the values of the functions at the element nodes, so that the integral equation can be converted into a system of algebraic equations. The boundary geometry can be discretized in a series of elements.